SMiLE Sessions box set!

[Wrightfan]

Why the hell did I say Hollidays was on the GV box set?

Never post before bed again 

[JohnMill]

Anyone have any idea what this is?


38.   Psycodelic Sounds: Moaning Laughing (11/4/66) (1:09)


Something with the Vosse Posse or no?

whooooooooooooooooooooooooooHAHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahhahhahahahaaaaaaahhhh....

Yeah that is the rising and falling laughter track.  Really creepy if it comes out of nowhere and you aren't expecting it.

[LittleBirdUpInATree]

Just a lo-fi capture but the new vocals sound okay!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OpijJF1d2U

[Aegir]

wonder how long that's gonna stay up. the quality is so crappy though I can't really tell if it's going to be good or not.

[theCOD]

Just a lo-fi capture but the new vocals sound okay!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OpijJF1d2U

Sounds much better than I expected. Excellent!

[hypehat]

So an unknown youtube account posts one video with these two segments alone captured from an 'unknown online stream'?



Decidedly not psyched.....

[theCOD]

What's the problem? You don't need full high quality tracks to hear how the fly-ins sound.

[Chris Brown]

Low quality or not, those fly-ins sound pretty decent to me, better than any fan mix I've heard anyways.

[Wrightfan]

Odd. Why does it sound like it's in stereo (Great Shape especially)?

I guess that confirms the flown in animal sounds too. That one sound at the end I never heard of.

[runnersdialzero]

Low quality or not, those fly-ins sound pretty decent to me, better than any fan mix I've heard anyways.

I guess that's true. "Barnyard" will always sound weird due to the extreme timing/syncopation differences. "Great Shape" works too well, though - I did a mix that sounds similar, and both versions fit together nicely.

[Dunderhead]

 

[Shady]

Just a lo-fi capture but the new vocals sound okay!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OpijJF1d2U

Oh lord, I hope this is not the start of a leak..

Turned it off after 2 seconds, not listening to any more till the 31st

[Wrightfan]

Inquiry aside (I guess it could just be the way it was faded out) it sounds nice.

I concur with Slim though, no more temptation!

[SamMcK]

I'm going to try to resist reading this thread until I get my hands on this!

[guitarfool2002]

I believe that post/audio is a fake, a ruse, a red herring...

I believe that because at the tail end of Barnyard (the wordless vocals) you can tell it came from the same acetate source we've had all along. I think we'll be getting a non-acetate source of that one, if we believe what we've read so far. And they wouldn't "fly in" anything only to join it to the same distorted acetate version if the tracks of that tune exist in higher quality.

Case closed?

[Shady]

I would hope so

The idea of somebody recording a stream they are so privileged to have access to bothers the hell out of me

[The Radiant Radish]

It sounds ok from what little can be made out but I don't understand why such short bursts of each track? If someone was risking putting these tracks up in the first place why not do the source some justice with a little more than 10 to 12 seconds of each track?

[monicker]

I was going to say the same thing about Barnyard being an acetate. That's still the Barnyard acetate we've had all along, and supposedly the master tapes were used for Barnyard for the new set. Also, this isn't in mono, thus a fake. Interestingly, IIGS, to my knowledge, has never sounded as clear as it does here. Also interesting that these fly-ins sound much better than any previous fan mix. Though it still doesn't sound good. There are a lot of weird pitch stretching artifacts in Barnyard, as if the voice is modulating trying to find the right pitch.

This goes to show that some people will buy and like anything that has an official name on it. It would be funny to see what people's reaction would be if someone actually posts a real capture of the stream but claims that it's their own fan mix.

[theCOD]

I was going to say the same thing about Barnyard being an acetate. That's still the Barnyard acetate we've had all along, and supposedly the master tapes were used for Barnyard for the new set. Also, this isn't in mono, thus a fake. Interestingly, IIGS, to my knowledge, has never sounded as clear as it does here. Also interesting that these fly-ins sound much better than any previous fan mix. Though it still doesn't sound good. There are a lot of weird pitch stretching artifacts in Barnyard, as if the voice is modulating trying to find the right pitch.

This goes to show that some people will buy and like anything that has an official name on it. It would be funny to see what people's reaction would be if someone actually posts a real capture of the stream but claims that it's their own fan mix.

How do you figure? You said yourself these fly-ins sound better than any previous fan mix, and this clip being fake wouldn't change that.

[Shady]

Brian's vocals on "barnyard" are some of the best he's ever done..

Such a unique sound he has going on in that song

[Andrew G. Doe]

Just a lo-fi capture but the new vocals sound okay!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OpijJF1d2U

That is not taken from the review stream, according to someone who would most certainly know.

[Iron Horse-Apples]

Wherever it's from, it sounds impressive.

[buddhahat]

Wherever it's from, it sounds impressive.

I was going to say something similar. These fly ins are probably the thing I'm most anxious about, but if they sound as good as this Youtube link then I'll be happy.

[tansen]

There are a lot of weird pitch stretching artifacts in Barnyard, as if the voice is modulating trying to find the right pitch.

Indeed. This just sounds wrong and artificial. Can't believe anyone actually thinks this sounds good.

[Andrew G. Doe]

Wherever it's from, it sounds impressive.

I was going to say something similar. These fly ins are probably the thing I'm most anxious about, but if they sound as good as this Youtube link then I'll be happy.

They sound much, much better.