gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
680599 Posts in 27601 Topics by 4068 Members - Latest Member: Dae Lims March 29, 2024, 02:04:35 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Why is it so hard to get a decent sounding mix of Heroes and Villains?  (Read 5368 times)
Al Jardine: Pick Up Artist
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 298

I am an asexual walrus


View Profile WWW
« on: August 21, 2012, 07:59:33 PM »

I know a few members have expressed their sentiments on Heroes and Villains and it's many mixes, but tonight, listening though my library, it started annoying me too.

For example, we have:

Good ol' Smiley Smile mix, muddy, full of stuff that shouldn't be their, missing the cantina, contains studio talk, and an (intentionally) piss-poor effort by Brian.

The '67 Exploding Cantina acetate, which is, uh, horrible IMO (bad vocal, too short, mud)

Hawthorne, CA mix, Smiley Mix but in Stereo, and missing a few things here and there

TSS mono mix. Probably my favorite mix in terms of what's their and how it's arranged, but it's so hard to hear things. It can be hard to hear the organ on Children were raised, the Harpsichord in the chorus is drowned out by the tambourine and cello and whatnot.

TSS stereo mix. Same sh*t, two channels.

SS '12 mix, I haven't heard it yet.

But yeah, why is it so hard to get a satisfying mix? Between muddiness and quietness and cacophony and that effin' snare (personally doesn't bother me, but a lot of people have a particular disdain for it), it seems like we're never going to hear H&V as well as we could.
Logged

Which song: Inappropriate relationship with sister-in-law

Which song: Gonna straight up bang you with "the wood".

Which song: Weather conditions make me horny

Which song: Lack of proper shoes leads to potential blood poisoning and death.

Which song: Who needs church? Let's do it on the couch.

Dennis: "Holy sh*t, Al, you're finally showing signs of developing facial hair!!!"
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2284


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2012, 08:04:25 PM »

The SS Stereo mix is amazing
Logged

Magic Transistor Radio
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2974


Bill Cooper Mystery Babylon


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2012, 09:38:18 PM »

To me, the best sounding mix of Heroes is on Brian Wilson Classics (with the added bass)
Logged

"Over the years, I've been accused of not supporting our new music from this era (67-73) and just wanting to play our hits. That's complete b.s......I was also, as the front man, the one promoting these songs onstage and have the scars to show for it."
Mike Love autobiography (pg 242-243)
DonnyL
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1990



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 10:03:40 PM »

I think the original 45/Smiley mix is perfect. captures the mystery, has punch & sounds catchy. bet it sounds better on AM radio than any of the others. the lead vocal is also the best of all of 'em. best arrangement too !
Logged

Dunderhead
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1643



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2012, 10:12:14 PM »

I really wish we had the first session, I imagine it as probably the most straight forward version of the song. Verse-Chorus-Verse-Chorus-Bridge-Fade.

The bridge was probably My Only Sunshine, which is why I think the fade was tacked onto it by Brian, not because it was a stand alone track, but because he always intended MOS as the bridge to Heroes and Villains.

The 1966 recordings of Barnyard and what not were all probably intended for Heroes and Villains. I just think that sometime in September 1966 Brian resolved himself to use the modular method almost exclusively.

By the November 4th Heroes demo, he had recorded a number of sections for possible use, but hadn't decided on any order yet.

Verse -> Great Shape -> ? -> Barnyard? -> ?

He seemed like he was having trouble with transitions between the different parts, in giving the song a sense of overall cohesion.
Logged

TEAM COHEN; OFFICIAL CAPTAIN (2013-)
Jukka
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 739



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2012, 10:54:39 PM »

The early version found among Smiley Smile/Wild Honey -twofer bonus tracks is probably my favorite. It's tight, punchy, cohesive (in it's own way). It could have been the single. Not a hit single, I'm afraid, but such an oddball, chorus-free song would have at least whetted people's appetite for Smile even more, guaranteed to sell million copies.
Logged

"Surfing and cars were okay but there was a war going on."
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2284


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2012, 10:57:21 PM »

The punchy "Cantina" version is the best Mono.

SS is the best stereo, because it's smooth.
Logged

hypehat
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6311



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2012, 03:52:13 AM »

TSS revs my engine. Although the Cantina mix, whilst not the best sounding, still has the best distillation of that freaky sh*t Wilson was trying to grasp. Imagine releasing that in early 1967. They'd burn Beach Boys albums.
Logged

All roads lead to Kokomo. Exhaustive research in time travel has conclusively proven that there is no alternate universe WITHOUT Kokomo. It would've happened regardless.
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?

Quote from: Al Jardine
Syncopate it? In front of all these people?!
Jukka
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 739



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2012, 04:57:39 AM »

TSS revs my engine. Although the Cantina mix, whilst not the best sounding, still has the best distillation of that freaky sh*t Wilson was trying to grasp.

Yeah... Or was he trying that? Was he making a freaky sh*t or a hit?

Listening to all those sections and different mixes, I can't help but wonder if Brian really believed he was making a hit single, a commercial follow-up to GV? Because as great as the song and individual sections are... it didn't have a chorus, for Pete's sake!

And another thing, did his original idea get diluted when he bolted the Bicycle Rider chorus to it? Was adding the chorus a panic reaction (an attempt to make it more commercial), and in the process he watered down his original idea, and subsequently lost the original spark for the whole project? Damn, so many questions still open.
Logged

"Surfing and cars were okay but there was a war going on."
Cabinessenceking
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2164


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2012, 05:19:19 AM »

To me, the best sounding mix of Heroes is on Brian Wilson Classics (with the added bass)

I just checked this out and you are right! the chorus sounds much better, but there is no way i'll buy that package for that song, so imma trying to torrent, but it's such an obscure package that no torrent exist. Oh Help Me Rhonda?
Logged
Matt Bielewicz
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 648


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2012, 05:56:18 AM »

It does seem really hard to get a mix that encompasses all of the elements of H&V in one place. The original mono mix is terrific and is the one that we base all our subsequent expectations on (as it was assembled and mixed with Brian's express agreement, right when he was near the very top of his game), but it does sound pretty thin, tonally speaking, on modern systems. The Hawthorne, California mix from 2001, is in stereo, but it sounds tonally completely different from the mono mix (personally, I quite like this fact, but many others object - whatever, different strokes etc) and also the chorus is differently mixed, with rising spooky bass and no organ.

The SMiLE Sessions mix lacks an organ overdub on the first two verses, and has the 'spooky bass' chorus again. That's cool, though, as the organ overdub heard on the mono mix was definitely a Smiley-era addition, and as this is trying to be a SMiLE-era mix, it's appropriate that the organ isn't there. However, it does mean that the mix is once again different to the original mono. Also, the organ is back on the third verse, which isn't consistent, but is understandable; that verse and its vocals is from a Smiley-era mono mixdown and has the organ 'locked in'.

Now we have the stereo Smiley mix, which you would think would completely mirror the 1967 single mix - but curiously, it sort of does and sort of doesn't. The tonal balance is much closer to the mono mix than the Hawthorne mix, but with an overall more hi-fi sound, which I find pleasing. Tonally, I think this mix hits just the right spot. The Baldwin organ is also back for the choruses, replacing the rising bass which has been mixed out, as it was in 1967. So far so good. But the timing of some of the edits is different, and the organ is missing from the first two verses as it was on the 2011 SMiLE sessions mix. I just don't get that. It was understandable on the SMiLE Sessions box, but I thought the idea of a stereo mix of all the albums was to get the stereo mixes as close as possible to the mono album mixes. Sometimes, parts are missing from multitracks or whatever, which makes this job harder — but the presence of the organ overdub on the first two verses of the 2001 Hawthorne mix show that it must be available somewhere for use by modern mixes, so why isn't it there on the 2012 stereo Smiley mix?

So the quest for the 'perfect' H&V (obviously, a relative description) goes on. For now, I guess it's a 'roll your own' editing job. We have enough non-bootleg, professionally mixed parts to be able to create one now, at least...!
Logged
petsite
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 770



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2012, 07:46:51 AM »

Honestly, having been a fan since 1973, H&V never hit me right. It was muddy and lacked ommph. I liked it better when Warner's released it as a single cuz they tried to clean it up some, re-eq'd it and made it brighter. But still didn't really care for it, although I loved the live version on IN CONCERT.

Then came 1990 and the 2 fers. First time I heard the cantina version. I remember I stopped dead in my tracks at my apartment and listened again and again. THAT is how H&V should have sounded and should have been released. What a great powerful vocal from Brian, the released is too laid back. Since then, H&V is my #1 fav of all of the BB songs. Hands down. Well that and Do It Again. In fact here is my top 5 (not that anyone really cares to know).

1.) H&V / Do It Again (can't choose)
2.) Surf's Up
3.) Vibes
4.) GOK
5.) Don't Worry Baby
Logged
Summer_Days
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 734


...and your dream comes true.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: August 22, 2012, 07:53:28 AM »

Gee, I dunno...I've always like the mono mix and if it's muddy then it more adds to the song than detracts. Though I typically dislike stereo remixes of Brian's '60s classics, I gotta admit the stereo remix sounds pretty fine.
Logged

Wouldn't it be nice if we were older, then we wouldn't have to wait so long
And wouldn't it be nice to live together, in the kind of world where we belong?
http://wildsmiley.weebly.com
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4925



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 22, 2012, 08:01:39 AM »

To me, the best sounding mix of Heroes is on Brian Wilson Classics (with the added bass)

I like that mix the best as well.
Logged
Cabinessenceking
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2164


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 22, 2012, 09:00:35 AM »

H&V on TSS sounded very fine in mono, the stereo mix on the other hand is an utter disgrace and disaster. It seems the only difference was phasing the mono mix to the right channel and then focus the harmonies to the left*. I know very well that the stereo vocals for this song are lost, but as a compromise could they not have used the H&V Verse remake from TTS and added that to the stereo mix thereby creating a stereo effect for the drums at least. It's phunny how often I cite Smile AD, but he got this one correct as well. The only issue is he did it with the 1967 acetate, not the Smiley version (which sounds almost better right?)

My apologies if people think I'm bitching too much about the mixes our FINE engineers have produced (and the fact that they gave us TSS at all!), but there must be more one can do for a H&V stereo in the same format as that released on TSS. Or maybe I should just give up asking others and figure out how to do it myself. Mixing H&V would give a person enough preoccupation to last a lifetime!  Grin

« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 10:10:59 AM by Cabinessenceking » Logged
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8432



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 22, 2012, 09:04:11 AM »

Lets face it, H&V is Brian's white elephant and its hard to get a decent mix. I love the song, but its convoluted.
Logged

And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
Aegir
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4680



View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: August 22, 2012, 12:13:31 PM »

To me, the best sounding mix of Heroes is on Brian Wilson Classics (with the added bass)

I just checked this out and you are right! the chorus sounds much better, but there is no way i'll buy that package for that song, so imma trying to torrent, but it's such an obscure package that no torrent exist. Oh Help Me Rhonda?

Yeah, just checked out this version myself, it's pretty nice. Especially since I'm so used to hearing it in mono.
Logged

Every time you spell Smile as SMiLE, an angel's wings are forcibly torn off its body.
petsite
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 770



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 22, 2012, 12:15:18 PM »

H&V cantina from the SS/WH 1990 is still the best sounding version of the cantina mix. One of the few times Sonic Solutions really helped the sound.
Logged
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8432



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 22, 2012, 12:17:17 PM »

H&V cantina from the SS/WH 1990 is still the best sounding version of the cantina mix. One of the few times Sonic Solutions really helped the sound.
Shame about the sound quality of that cut, if they had the proper master, it would be by far the best version of H&V.
Logged

And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2012, 03:39:19 PM »

Album/single mix sucks, Cantina mix sucks, Hawthorne mix sucks a lot, Smile Sessions mono sucks, Smile Sessions stereo sucks, 2012 mix sucks. All mixes suck. No "mystery" is brought about by muddy mixes with absolutely no punch to them, they just suck and greatly undersell one of Brian's best songs. You can't please everyone with specific structures, but the mixing is a different story.

Mono format is cool, stereo format is cool, these mixes just suck. I'm thinking the post '67 mixes of the song just don't have the resources to make it sound better.

The Cantina version is a brilliant arrangement and was my introduction to the song, possibly the second song I ever heard by them outside a handful of the early surf hits. The Smiley arrangement improves upon the verse, but the vocal performances are so lacking compared to the Cantina version. I love the performance and song structure, but the mix is really not good and the acetate source is less than ideal (constant "buzz" on the vocals, for one), although I understand that it's (unfortunately) all they really have to work with for this version.

The SMiLE Sessions mix lacks an organ overdub on the first two verses, and has the 'spooky bass' chorus again. That's cool, though, as the organ overdub heard on the mono mix was definitely a Smiley-era addition, and as this is trying to be a SMiLE-era mix, it's appropriate that the organ isn't there.

And yet some of the vocals are Smiley-era additions, as are a number of other elements on The Smile Sessions, thus removing the organ from the verse and especially the chorus (where it's sorely missed) doesn't really make sense. Meanwhile, the 2012 Smiley album stereo mix omits the same organ overdub (that was present on the Hawthorne mix) - why?
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Cabinessenceking
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2164


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2012, 03:51:53 PM »

Hang on I just figured what drags this song down: it's the chorus.

For those of you who have heard the live version done right now on the Beach Boys 50th, the moment the chorus comes on it sounds invigorating, fresh and upbeat, but in a different way from the live version from the 70's. It seems almost as if Brian's backing band suceeded in  doing the chorus live than Brian managed to do with the wrecking crew back in 66'.

I figure the studio chorus is just outright boring, the bass sounds sloppy and not firm enough. The percussion is great, but the bass is feable at best. It cries out for remastering in my ears!
Logged
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2012, 03:56:57 PM »

Hang on I just figured what drags this song down: it's the chorus.

For those of you who have heard the live version done right now on the Beach Boys 50th, the moment the chorus comes on it sounds invigorating, fresh and upbeat, but in a different way from the live version from the 70's. It seems almost as if Brian's backing band suceeded in  doing the chorus live than Brian managed to do with the wrecking crew back in 66'.

I figure the studio chorus is just outright boring, the bass sounds sloppy and not firm enough. The percussion is great, but the bass is feable at best. It cries out for remastering in my ears!

It's been remixed and/or remastered over a dozen times at this point, and none of them seem to get it right. Again, I'd guess it's limited resources or something. The chorus is a little jarring when you first hear the song, but that's gonna happen regardless. The shoddy mixing job on all mixes is what drags the song down, to me.

I will say that if Brian was really pushing for a hit and a follow-up to "Good Vibrations", the Bicycle Rider chorus was about the last thing he should have used for "Heroes". It's a great song, I like the shift from the verse to the chorus, but I can see why it was basically the beginning of the end of their commercial success.
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8432



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2012, 03:58:53 PM »

This song is like quicksand when it comes to mixing it. You can tinker with it forever, and still be lost on how the song should go. If Brian Wilson circa 1966-1967 can't get a great mix, why should we be able to?
« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 04:02:31 PM by SMiLE Brian » Logged

And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
DonnyL
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1990



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: August 22, 2012, 04:14:56 PM »

Album/single mix sucks, Cantina mix sucks, Hawthorne mix sucks a lot, Smile Sessions mono sucks, Smile Sessions stereo sucks, 2012 mix sucks. All mixes suck. No "mystery" is brought about by muddy mixes with absolutely no punch to them, they just suck and greatly undersell one of Brian's best songs. You can't please everyone with specific structures, but the mixing is a different story.

ha! that '67 mix is killer man! i was completely blown away by it the first time i heard it on the radio at age 12. i recorded it on cassette and listened over and over. without all of this history, alternate versions, what 'could have been', etc ... the track stands tall. it's totally subtle ... can you pick out any instruments in it? i don't think many people can very well. it was a total blend, a total sound -- even the drums, which don't even sound like drums. some people call it muddy, i call it magic. totally unique, and unlike any track released by anyone EVER. Beach Boys win again -- they followed up 'Good Vibrations' with something weird as hell, and perfect. the reason no one has been able to top it is because it's the closest we will ever come to SMiLE actually being finished and released in '67 -- that's reality.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 04:16:01 PM by DonnyL » Logged

Al Jardine: Pick Up Artist
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 298

I am an asexual walrus


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: August 22, 2012, 04:21:34 PM »

I think the reason a lot of you love the SS mono mix is nostalgia/familiarity.

It's really quite a sh*t mix.

I dig the little organ stings in the verse, but IMO the organ in the chorus is really depressing. Yeah, it is *really* hard to get a good mix of Bicycle Rider, now that I think about it, they're all over or under produced.

The end of the verse drags on too long, the speaking and laughing screams drugged up Smiley Smile, not fresh follow-up to GV.

I like the whoosh before children were raised, but no cantina.

No pretty fade, just that depressing as hell chorus.

The *only* reason I would want to listen to the exploding cantina (BTW, this mix has convinced me that the single version and Smile version of H&V were going to be very different, exploding cantina b/w "part 2" and then something like we got for TSS on the album) is the alternate children were raised/three score and five, but we have half of that on TSS, and it blows that three score and five is in such horrible quality, it'd be nice to have a tape source of it.

TSS is pretty good, it's just that a lot of parts get muddied out, a trait carried over from the earliest mixes. The stereo sounds exactly like the mono, but, uh, wide.

TSS mix would be a lot more satisfying (for me) if they kept the organ stings in the first verse, boosted the harpsichord in the chorus, brought the cello/bass down a bit, reinstated the whoosh before cantina, and boosted the children were raised organ.

Hawthorne sounds like it was involved in some horrible accident.

I know I'm going to like but not like the SS stereo mix. It's gonna sound crisp and high-quality, but I just don't dig the SS mix.
Logged

Which song: Inappropriate relationship with sister-in-law

Which song: Gonna straight up bang you with "the wood".

Which song: Weather conditions make me horny

Which song: Lack of proper shoes leads to potential blood poisoning and death.

Which song: Who needs church? Let's do it on the couch.

Dennis: "Holy sh*t, Al, you're finally showing signs of developing facial hair!!!"
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.929 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!