The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
683093
Posts in
27755
Topics by
4096
Members - Latest Member:
MrSunshine
July 19, 2025, 04:19:00 AM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band? (Read 8877 times)
Smile4ever
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 196
Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
on:
July 11, 2014, 08:22:14 PM »
It seems the consensus among Beach Boys fans is that Bruce was a positive addition to the group's vocal blend for their crucial mid-60s work. As a result, he is viewed positively. But as the band was working on developing as a serious live act in the early 70s, was his multi-year departure a good thing? It seems from interviews around this time that the Beach Boys thought the group was going different places from Bruce's style. Was it good for the parties to go their separate ways for a while? And what would the band have been like if he stayed?
«
Last Edit: July 11, 2014, 08:24:59 PM by Smile4ever
»
Logged
rogerlancelot
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #1 on:
July 11, 2014, 08:33:52 PM »
I think it was good for Bruce to spend more attention on his major solo album, the craptacular
Going Public
because it just gives us all one more reason to not take him very seriously. Kudos for him coming back into the fold though because I'm okay with the LA album.
Logged
bluesno1fann
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #2 on:
July 11, 2014, 08:35:46 PM »
As much as I like the addition of Chaplin and Fataar, I don't think it was good for Bruce to have left in the long run.
I wonder what the Beach Boys would have been like with all 8 of them?
Logged
bossaroo
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1643
...let's be friends...
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #3 on:
July 11, 2014, 10:23:24 PM »
Bruce is kind of a non-issue. His membership in the band was neither good nor bad in my opinion. He's just kind of there. He holds down his parts, but he is not personally vital to the end result. He's a glorified extra hand.
«
Last Edit: July 11, 2014, 10:25:40 PM by bossaroo
»
Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2594
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #4 on:
July 11, 2014, 11:35:58 PM »
Bruce could've contributed "Brand New Old Friends" to Carl and the Passions. For better or worse...
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3049
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #5 on:
July 11, 2014, 11:39:42 PM »
You know, I'm pretty gonna get major sh*t for this but oh well. Here goes...
First I'll start with the good. Bruce is a fantastic singer. From the first record he's on with The Beach Boys ("California Girls") he fits in perfectly and sounds great. He is an integral part of the fade to "God Only Knows" and plays a major part on
Sunflower
. He produced
L.A. (Light Album)
which I dig.
However, let's be honest about his career. Sure, he worked with Spector and others when he was in his teens. However, he made the "name" for himself with Beach Boys cash-in or rip-off albums, like the albums
Surfin' USA
by The Hot Doggers or
Kustom City U.S.A.
by The Kustom Kings or
Rev-Up
by The Vettes. Not to mention the fact that him and Terry Melcher basically "became" The Rip Chords and got a hit single under the name even though they weren't
really
in that group. And also my personal favorite Bruce Johnston group, Bob Sled & the Toboggans, who released the single "Here We Go (The Surfer Boys Are Going Skiing)" in March 1966. So yeah, around the time Brian was doing
Pet Sounds
apparently Bruce was trying to hop on the trend(?) of skiing? Riiiiiiiiiiight.
Anyways, guess what all these aforementioned "groups" have in common? The fact that they are hardly groups, just Bruce Johnston doing crappy versions of something Brian Wilson did better a few months before (besides the skiing single, which I'm sure woulda been wonderful coming from The Beach Boys, hah). Now to also be fair, sure, his early album, the
Surfer's Pajama Party
is decent innocent early '60s rock 'n roll, and he did a few nice things with Terry in the mid '60s, but besides that, he was kinda just a hack. And him getting a spot in The Beach Boys is to me basically kinda like how the current singer of Journey used to be in a Journey cover band or whatever. Which I guess means that really Bruce was the first "minor league" surf-rock dude to get promoted to the big leagues. Because in the decades that followed, you had all those goofs from Papa Doo Ron Ron and Jan & Dean's band who would pay their dues playing at Disneyland or whatever, and then get promoted up to the big time and play with The Beach Boys (looking at you Chris Farmer, Jeff Foskett and others!!). Bruce was just lucky enough to be the guy who became a formal member. The other guys came along too late, and had to settle for being mere sidemen.
And I've noticed that out of all The Beach Boys, Bruce has always seemed to put on the biggest "Beach Boy act", if you know what I mean. Like to an outsider who knows nothing, he does the happy go lucky act and always gave off a vibe of Eisenhower era squeaky clean boy next door who just wanted to sing about girls, cars, surfin' and school. And he will happily continue that act even to fans that wanna know more sometimes, flicking them away with snarky lines like "you care more about this stuff then I will in one thousand lifetimes" or whatever.
And to the snobs who still don't give The Beach Boys cred, he represents what those people think The Beach Boys are (square as sh*t, about as funky as Mitt Romney, country club, Tommy Bahama douchebags). I also gotta point out that I think it's hilarious that he thinks that Europeans "hate success" yet the only Beach Boys community he is part of is the Beach Boys Britain page, which I'm preeeeeeeetttty sure if based in a place called Britain, which I also believe is in Europe. Maybe I'm wrong though.
So yeah, do I think Bruce is a net positive for the group? No, not really. I don't think he's contributed very much of any worth. And perhaps Billy Hinsche woulda been interesting had he joined. Or if David Marks had stayed. I don't know. But whatever, as vicious as I've been, I'm glad Bruce is still around, a-clappin, and adjustin' his mic. Maybe one day he will write a new song. And I would be happy to listen.
Bruce Johnston
Surf City, USA
July 12, 2014
Logged
bluesno1fann
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #6 on:
July 11, 2014, 11:44:37 PM »
Juice Bronston is rolling around in his grave
Logged
Disney Boy (1985)
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #7 on:
July 11, 2014, 11:48:18 PM »
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 11, 2014, 11:39:42 PM
You know, I'm pretty gonna get major sh*t for this but oh well. Here goes...
First I'll start with the good. Bruce is a fantastic singer. From the first record he's on with The Beach Boys ("California Girls") he fits in perfectly and sounds great. He is an integral part of the fade to "God Only Knows" and plays a major part on
Sunflower
. He produced
L.A. (Light Album)
which I dig.
However, let's be honest about his career. Sure, he worked with Spector and others when he was in his teens. However, he made the "name" for himself with Beach Boys cash-in or rip-off albums, like the albums
Surfin' USA
by The Hot Doggers or
Kustom City U.S.A.
by The Kustom Kings or
Rev-Up
by The Vettes. Not to mention the fact that him and Terry Melcher basically "became" The Rip Chords and got a hit single under the name even though they weren't
really
in that group. And also my personal favorite Bruce Johnston group, Bob Sled & the Toboggans, who released the single "Here We Go (The Surfer Boys Are Going Skiing)" in March 1966. So yeah, around the time Brian was doing
Pet Sounds
apparently Bruce was trying to hop on the trend(?) of skiing? Riiiiiiiiiiight.
Anyways, guess what all these aforementioned "groups" have in common? The fact that they are hardly groups, just Bruce Johnston doing crappy versions of something Brian Wilson did better a few months before (besides the skiing single, which I'm sure woulda been wonderful coming from The Beach Boys, hah). Now to also be fair, sure, his early album, the
Surfer's Pajama Party
is decent innocent early '60s rock 'n roll, and he did a few nice things with Terry in the mid '60s, but besides that, he was kinda just a hack. And him getting a spot in The Beach Boys is to me basically kinda like how the current singer of Journey used to be in a Journey cover band or whatever. Which I guess means that really Bruce was the first "minor league" surf-rock dude to get promoted to the big leagues. Because in the decades that followed, you had all those goofs from Papa Doo Ron Ron and Jan & Dean's band who would pay their dues playing at Disneyland or whatever, and then get promoted up to the big time and play with The Beach Boys (looking at you Chris Farmer, Jeff Foskett and others!!). Bruce was just lucky enough to be the guy who became a formal member. The other guys came along too late, and had to settle for being mere sidemen.
And I've noticed that out of all The Beach Boys, Bruce has always seemed to put on the biggest "Beach Boy act", if you know what I mean. Like to an outsider who knows nothing, he does the happy go lucky act and always gave off a vibe of Eisenhower era squeaky clean boy next door who just wanted to sing about girls, cars, surfin' and school. And he will happily continue that act even to fans that wanna know more sometimes, flicking them away with snarky lines like "you care more about this stuff then I will in one thousand lifetimes" or whatever.
And to the snobs who still don't give The Beach Boys cred, he represents what those people think The Beach Boys are (square as sh*t, about as funky as Mitt Romney, country club, Tommy Bahama douchebags). I also gotta point out that I think it's hilarious that he thinks that Europeans "hate success" yet the only Beach Boys community he is part of is the Beach Boys Britain page, which I'm preeeeeeeetttty sure if based in a place called Britain, which I also believe is in Europe. Maybe I'm wrong though.
So yeah, do I think Bruce is a net positive for the group? No, not really. I don't think he's contributed very much of any worth. And perhaps Billy Hinsche woulda been interesting had he joined. Or if David Marks had stayed. I don't know. But whatever, as vicious as I've been, I'm glad Bruce is still around, a-clappin, and adjustin' his mic. Maybe one day he will write a new song. And I would be happy to listen.
Bruce Johnston
Surf City, USA
July 12, 2014
Got to say I agree with a lot of this. The only thing I'd add is an acknowledgement of Disney Girls - his one truly great BB song - in your opening summary of his positive contributions to the group; certainly I'd namecheck this before I'd mention his Sunflower contributions (personally, I think his contributions are the absolute low points of Sunflower, especially Tears).
«
Last Edit: July 11, 2014, 11:49:12 PM by Disney Boy (1985)
»
Logged
Smilin Ed H
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #8 on:
July 12, 2014, 02:45:51 AM »
As someone who thinks Tears is good, I'd have to say his absence doesn't seem noticeable. When he returns, the slickness he gave the production is often a major negative, but the guy can sing and play.
Logged
Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3744
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #9 on:
July 12, 2014, 03:53:28 AM »
A prominent vocal part on California Girls!! Part of that sacred vocal trio on GOD ONLY KNOWS!!!!!!!!! .... Disney Girls!!!
Bruce wipes his arse with this thread on those credentials alone.
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3049
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #10 on:
July 12, 2014, 06:37:13 AM »
Quote from: Disney Boy (1985) on July 11, 2014, 11:48:18 PM
Got to say I agree with a lot of this. The only thing I'd add is an acknowledgement of Disney Girls - his one truly great BB song - in your opening summary of his positive contributions to the group; certainly I'd namecheck this before I'd mention his Sunflower contributions (personally, I think his contributions are the absolute low points of Sunflower, especially Tears).
Yeah, after I finished writing I realized that it probably was a mistake to make a mention of the successes of Bruce Johnston without mentioning "Disney Girls". I honestly think that the sentiment expressed is kinda buying into a vision of the '50s that never existed, but it's still a great song.
Logged
halblaineisgood
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #11 on:
July 12, 2014, 07:21:18 AM »
.
«
Last Edit: November 21, 2014, 06:43:32 PM by Al Jardine: TheDickup Artist
»
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3049
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #12 on:
July 12, 2014, 07:27:51 AM »
Quote from: RiC whupped my ass on July 12, 2014, 07:21:18 AM
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 06:37:13 AM
Yeah, after I finished writing I realized that it probably was a mistake to make a mention of the successes of Bruce Johnston without mentioning "Disney Girls". I honestly think that the sentiment expressed is kinda buying into a vision of the '50s that never existed, but it's still a great song.
That version of the 50's existed if you were as white as Bruce Johnston was.
The being white part definitely matters, but I think it's the fact that he grew up very, very well off (read: very rich) that also helps color his view.
Logged
DonnyL
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1990
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #13 on:
July 12, 2014, 01:04:43 PM »
I think Bruce's contributions to 'Sunflower' show he was in sync with the band ... everything gels nicely, and I think his vocals and songs are part of what make the album have a unique charm.
On 'Surf's Up', it seems like he was already not quite fitting in with the direction ... so it makes sense that he left when he did, and came back when he did. 'L.A. Light' needed his vibe to come together.
Logged
http://www.trounrecords.com
Dave in KC
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 630
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #14 on:
July 12, 2014, 09:37:32 PM »
Did Jack Reilly really dislike Bruce?
Logged
Kurosawa
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 365
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #15 on:
July 12, 2014, 10:43:51 PM »
They got a lot better after Bruce left and apart from Love You they haven't been nearly as good as they were with Blondie and Ricky. And Love You is more of a Brian album that Carl had to finish because Brian can't finish things. It's all been downhill from 15BO to the present.
Logged
Member of the Anaheim Azusa and Cucamonga sewing circle book review and timing association (the double-ACASSN).
Niko
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1617
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #16 on:
July 12, 2014, 10:57:15 PM »
"They" meaning Bruce's contributions?
«
Last Edit: July 12, 2014, 10:58:45 PM by Mr. Woodmeister
»
Logged
Check out the awesome Beach Boys mixes a few of us made:
Symphony to God:
http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,18190.0.html
Dumb Angels:
http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,18326.0.html
Hawthorne Sunset:
http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,22538.msg530237.html
Kurosawa
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 365
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #17 on:
July 12, 2014, 11:06:39 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Woodmeister on July 12, 2014, 10:57:15 PM
"They" meaning Bruce's contributions?
They meaning the Beach Boys. Bruce is a skilled guy but sort of a non-factor. His greatest moment as a musician was writing a song so cheesy that Barry Manilow recorded it.
Logged
Member of the Anaheim Azusa and Cucamonga sewing circle book review and timing association (the double-ACASSN).
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3049
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #18 on:
July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM »
I think there's also the fallacy out that Bruce was ever anything more than an occasional songwriter. Until recently, it kinda confused me as to why he hasn't made any "new" compositions available in the last 20 years (besides the two or three songs from the recent Doris Day album, which were recorded in the '80s, so they don't count anyways).
Then I figured it out. As I was talking about in an earlier post, he did a lot of work in the early '60s, which coincidentally is the era where he was either recording Beach Boys covers or Beach Boys sound-a-like songs. So it kinda seems that the guy was never terribly inspired, and once he joined The Beach Boys and finally put his sound-a-like career to rest, you will notice that he had, what about 5 songs on Beach Boys albums from '69 to '71? Then he had his solo album after he left the group, which collected new recordings of some of his old Beach Boys cuts, an old Bruce & Terry song, some other stuff he gave to artists, and maybe one or two songs that hadn't been on an album. And then after his solo album tanked, he had like one or two songs that went to Captain and Tennille, and a Beach Boys re-do of a song he did with California Music earlier in the '70s ("Endless Harmony") and then "She Believes In Love Again", "Happy Endings" and maybe a few more co-writes where he might have written a lyric or added a small part (I know he's credited on "Somewhere Near Japan", but I'm also pretty sure that a John Phillips song). And then lastly that "Slow Summer Dancin'" song from
Summer In Paradise
, and besides the Doris Day cuts, that's the latest we've heard from him. So what's that mean? Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
So the point is, despite the fact that he's looked at like a songwriter, I'd truly take somebody like Al Jardine over him as a songwriter. And before people start complaining about Al "ripping off" people, keep in mind he comes from the folk tradition, where somebody like Bob Dylan has been doing the same thing for over 50 years. And that Dylan guy has done quite alright with that.
Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2594
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #19 on:
July 13, 2014, 02:01:57 AM »
Quote from: Kurosawa on July 12, 2014, 10:43:51 PM
They got a lot better after Bruce left and apart from Love You they haven't been nearly as good as they were with Blondie and Ricky. And Love You is more of a Brian album that Carl had to finish because Brian can't finish things. It's all been downhill from 15BO to the present.
They got a lot better with Carl and the Passions you mean? Wow... Or do you mean as a live band?
Logged
filledeplage
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3151
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #20 on:
July 13, 2014, 06:27:37 AM »
Quote from: Dave in KC on July 12, 2014, 09:37:32 PM
Did Jack Reilly really dislike Bruce?
It is interesting. From what I've read, Reilly "inflated his credentials," eventually got let go, and created what appears to be a "hostile work environment."
Karma is a beautiful thing, coming back ( and it also appears Johnston had vocals on the albums, while not touring ) with a Grammy. Manilow's biggest hit, whether you care for his style or not. It was a big deal.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2014, 06:29:20 AM by filledeplage
»
Logged
Sheriff John Stone
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5309
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #21 on:
July 13, 2014, 07:03:04 AM »
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
I think there's also the fallacy out that Bruce was ever anything more than an occasional songwriter. Until recently, it kinda confused me as to why he hasn't made any "new" compositions available in the last 20 years (besides the two or three songs from the recent Doris Day album, which were recorded in the '80s, so they don't count anyways).
Then I figured it out. As I was talking about in an earlier post, he did a lot of work in the early '60s, which coincidentally is the era where he was either recording Beach Boys covers or Beach Boys sound-a-like songs. So it kinda seems that the guy was never terribly inspired, and once he joined The Beach Boys and finally put his sound-a-like career to rest, you will notice that he had, what about 5 songs on Beach Boys albums from '69 to '71? Then he had his solo album after he left the group, which collected new recordings of some of his old Beach Boys cuts, an old Bruce & Terry song, some other stuff he gave to artists, and maybe one or two songs that hadn't been on an album. And then after his solo album tanked, he had like one or two songs that went to Captain and Tennille, and a Beach Boys re-do of a song he did with California Music earlier in the '70s ("Endless Harmony") and then "She Believes In Love Again", "Happy Endings" and maybe a few more co-writes where he might have written a lyric or added a small part (I know he's credited on "Somewhere Near Japan", but I'm also pretty sure that a John Phillips song). And then lastly that "Slow Summer Dancin'" song from
Summer In Paradise
, and besides the Doris Day cuts, that's the latest we've heard from him. So what's that mean? Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
So the point is, despite the fact that he's looked at like a songwriter, I'd truly take somebody like Al Jardine over him as a songwriter. And before people start complaining about Al "ripping off" people, keep in mind he comes from the folk tradition, where somebody like Bob Dylan has been doing the same thing for over 50 years. And that Dylan guy has done quite alright with that.
It's a mystery. The lack of released Bruce compositions AND productions over the last three and a half decades is perplexing. It's not that he didn't have the time. I wonder why he lost the motivation. I used to think he was saving them for some follow-up solo album or special project with another artist. But then in 2012 when the stories were coming out about potential songs for TWGMTR, it was mentioned that Bruce wanted to re-record "She Believes In Love Again". Again, while perplexing, I guess it was typical Bruce Johnston. It makes you say, "What!?"
Logged
Disney Boy (1985)
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #22 on:
July 13, 2014, 08:11:54 AM »
Quote from: Sheriff John Stone on July 13, 2014, 07:03:04 AM
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
I think there's also the fallacy out that Bruce was ever anything more than an occasional songwriter. Until recently, it kinda confused me as to why he hasn't made any "new" compositions available in the last 20 years (besides the two or three songs from the recent Doris Day album, which were recorded in the '80s, so they don't count anyways).
Then I figured it out. As I was talking about in an earlier post, he did a lot of work in the early '60s, which coincidentally is the era where he was either recording Beach Boys covers or Beach Boys sound-a-like songs. So it kinda seems that the guy was never terribly inspired, and once he joined The Beach Boys and finally put his sound-a-like career to rest, you will notice that he had, what about 5 songs on Beach Boys albums from '69 to '71? Then he had his solo album after he left the group, which collected new recordings of some of his old Beach Boys cuts, an old Bruce & Terry song, some other stuff he gave to artists, and maybe one or two songs that hadn't been on an album. And then after his solo album tanked, he had like one or two songs that went to Captain and Tennille, and a Beach Boys re-do of a song he did with California Music earlier in the '70s ("Endless Harmony") and then "She Believes In Love Again", "Happy Endings" and maybe a few more co-writes where he might have written a lyric or added a small part (I know he's credited on "Somewhere Near Japan", but I'm also pretty sure that a John Phillips song). And then lastly that "Slow Summer Dancin'" song from
Summer In Paradise
, and besides the Doris Day cuts, that's the latest we've heard from him. So what's that mean? Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
So the point is, despite the fact that he's looked at like a songwriter, I'd truly take somebody like Al Jardine over him as a songwriter. And before people start complaining about Al "ripping off" people, keep in mind he comes from the folk tradition, where somebody like Bob Dylan has been doing the same thing for over 50 years. And that Dylan guy has done quite alright with that.
It's a mystery. The lack of released Bruce compositions AND productions over the last three and a half decades is perplexing. It's not that he didn't have the time. I wonder why he lost the motivation. I used to think he was saving them for some follow-up solo album or special project with another artist. But then in 2012 when the stories were coming out about potential songs for TWGMTR, it was mentioned that Bruce wanted to re-record "She Believes In Love Again". Again, while perplexing, I guess it was typical Bruce Johnston. It makes you say, "What!?"
It's only perplexing if you think of Bruce as a prolific song-writer. Whereas if you think of him as a rather lazy song-writer, who makes the effort (occasionally successfully) when the need arises - which is rather closer to the truth - than his output is considerably less of a puzzle. Unlike Brian and Dennis, Bruce is clearly someone for whom music is just a hobby - albeit a lucrative one - rather than something he absolutely needs to do and struggles to live without.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2014, 10:17:55 AM by Disney Boy (1985)
»
Logged
clack
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 537
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #23 on:
July 13, 2014, 09:17:21 AM »
Bruce is a good craftsman. Could he have made a strong contribution 1972-78 as a songwriting collaborator, co-writing with Mike, Al, even Carl and Brian? Dunno, but then it's unclear why Bruce has done so little in the way of co-writes even after rejoining in 78.
Anyway, if Bruce had been in the co-writing mix with Mike, Brian, and Ron Altbach, M.I.U. might have been a better album.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2014, 09:18:31 AM by clack
»
Logged
Sheriff John Stone
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5309
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #24 on:
July 13, 2014, 09:48:49 AM »
Quote from: Disney Boy (1985) on July 13, 2014, 08:11:54 AM
Quote from: Sheriff John Stone on July 13, 2014, 07:03:04 AM
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
I think there's also the fallacy out that Bruce was ever anything more than an occasional songwriter. Until recently, it kinda confused me as to why he hasn't made any "new" compositions available in the last 20 years (besides the two or three songs from the recent Doris Day album, which were recorded in the '80s, so they don't count anyways).
Then I figured it out. As I was talking about in an earlier post, he did a lot of work in the early '60s, which coincidentally is the era where he was either recording Beach Boys covers or Beach Boys sound-a-like songs. So it kinda seems that the guy was never terribly inspired, and once he joined The Beach Boys and finally put his sound-a-like career to rest, you will notice that he had, what about 5 songs on Beach Boys albums from '69 to '71? Then he had his solo album after he left the group, which collected new recordings of some of his old Beach Boys cuts, an old Bruce & Terry song, some other stuff he gave to artists, and maybe one or two songs that hadn't been on an album. And then after his solo album tanked, he had like one or two songs that went to Captain and Tennille, and a Beach Boys re-do of a song he did with California Music earlier in the '70s ("Endless Harmony") and then "She Believes In Love Again", "Happy Endings" and maybe a few more co-writes where he might have written a lyric or added a small part (I know he's credited on "Somewhere Near Japan", but I'm also pretty sure that a John Phillips song). And then lastly that "Slow Summer Dancin'" song from
Summer In Paradise
, and besides the Doris Day cuts, that's the latest we've heard from him. So what's that mean? Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
So the point is, despite the fact that he's looked at like a songwriter, I'd truly take somebody like Al Jardine over him as a songwriter. And before people start complaining about Al "ripping off" people, keep in mind he comes from the folk tradition, where somebody like Bob Dylan has been doing the same thing for over 50 years. And that Dylan guy has done quite alright with that.
It's a mystery. The lack of released Bruce compositions AND productions over the last three and a half decades is perplexing. It's not that he didn't have the time. I wonder why he lost the motivation. I used to think he was saving them for some follow-up solo album or special project with another artist. But then in 2012 when the stories were coming out about potential songs for TWGMTR, it was mentioned that Bruce wanted to re-record "She Believes In Love Again". Again, while perplexing, I guess it was typical Bruce Johnston. It makes you say, "What!?"
It's only perplexing if you think of Bruce as a prolific song-writer. Whereas if you think of him as a rather lazy song-writer, who's makes the effort (occasionally successfully) when the need arises - which is rather closer to the truth - than his output is considerably less of a puzzle. Unlike Brian and Dennis, Bruce is clearly someone for whom music is just a hobby - albeit a lucrative one - rather than something he absolutely needs to do and struggles to live without.
I DID think of Bruce as a prolific songwriter. He seemed to be gathering momentum and building a nice catalog - "The Nearest Faraway Place" > "Deidre"/"Tears In The Morning" > "Disney Girls" > "I Write The Songs". A Grammy, hit singles, recordings by Barry Manilow & Francis Albert Sinatra.
I suppose "conflicts" with a band associate, in this case Jack Reiley, could lead to somebody leaving a group, but this was The Beach Boys, not The Rip Chords! However, he went on to do that Equinox Records thing, wrote songs for others, did his own solo album, did some studio singing on others' records, produced The Beach Boys at a very crucial time in their career, and then....about 35 years of very sporadic work other than touring with The Beach Boys. Bruce is a talker and I'm surprised he hasn't addressed his lack of songwriting and/or recording at length in an interview.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.28 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...