gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683328 Posts in 27766 Topics by 4100 Members - Latest Member: bunny505 August 09, 2025, 12:46:12 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 104 Go Down Print
Author Topic: New Beach Boys 2012 Remasters!  (Read 674345 times)
brother john
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 604



View Profile WWW
« Reply #700 on: July 27, 2012, 01:42:03 AM »

The samples sound great...but I'll wait for an American release. I just don't have $450 to spare!

Correction - Capitol Japan has released them. It's their baby and nothing to do with the parent company in the USA. There are many Japanese only Capitol releases. Maybe Capitol USA will pick up the ball and run with it... maybe they have other plans like, say, a 50th anniversary GH collection and a rebooted career-spanning box set to concern them right now. We'll see.

No reason to expect a U.S. release of these limited-interest discs.

The fact that people here seem to seriously believe there is a profitable U.S. audience for mono/stereo releases of Beach Boys albums (without bonus tracks!) shows how incredibly unrealistic their worldview is.


So what is it about the Japs that makes them bigger (or more deserving?) fans than the Yanks or the Brits (or anyone else for that matter)?

Whoever it was who said that EMI Japan and Capitol USA are of not the exactly same company is right of course, but Capitol must know that US/UK fans will want copies of these releases so you'd think that they'd at least be able to strike some deal where they became available at a more fan-friendly price.

Mind you, I suppose there is only so much publicity that the Capitol machine can grind out in a 12 month period, and I guess Smile, the new album and 50 Big Ones must be approaching saturation point for most regular record buyers.

Logged

Religion is a privilege, not a right.
PaulTMA
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 185



View Profile
« Reply #701 on: July 27, 2012, 04:57:54 AM »

I'm really scared these are going to leak in FLAC soon.  I'd hate that.    Undecided
Logged
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2891



View Profile
« Reply #702 on: July 27, 2012, 05:23:28 AM »



I think they are only remixing when there was no stereo to begin with. I agree with that (in the context of these reissues).



Why do you think that's the best option though? I can perhaps understand why someone may not want to hear anything but a Brian Wilson mono mix, but it's not like Chuck Britz was some mindblowingly awesome stereo mixer who slaved away for months to ensure each of his mixes could not be improved upon. There's wide room for improvement with some of these early stereo mixes, and since the multis are in the hands of those who can do something about it, why not just do it? If we ever want to hear the original stereo mix, we can just put on the original stereo record, there's just no need to pass up this opportunity to have superior sounding versions of some of our favourite songs imo.

Indeed, there are anecdotal reports that Chuck would do some stereo mixes without bothering to monitor in stereo.

While I understand the appeal of the stereo mixes, there is something to be said for the purity of leaving just the original mixes out there. The new mixes always sound great, fresh, exhilarating for a period ... but I always go back to the originals ultimately. There is something quite definitive about them ... emotional punch maybe. Perhaps it's those quirky 'flaws'.

Exactly, Donny. I'm not one of those purist guys, I like a good remix, but it's important to also have the original stereo mix out there too, despite the quality. Now, of course, you could say that the original stereo mix is on the twofer and this is a new way to get a remix. I don't disagree, but it just seems "right" to me that in the context of a mono/stereo issue of an album, they try to present the original mixes as faithfully as they can.
Logged

Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #703 on: July 27, 2012, 05:34:53 AM »

One participant on the Steve Hoffman forums has received a response from CD Japan as to why CD Japan is not offering the 12 Beach Boys CD's: The "content owners" have instructed EMI Japan not to sell them to CD Japan, yet sites owned by multi-national corporations(HMV, Amazon) are permitted to buy these discs. The Beach Boys fans outside Japan are being screwed by the hostile marketing plans of two huge corporations(EMI & Capitol). They deserve to have the discs counterfeited and/or to have fans obtain the new remixes through illegal downloads. First, they release the discs only in Japan(and at an abnormally high price, even by Japanese standards), then they are actively trying to interfere with the ability of non-Japanese consumers to obtain the discs. CD Japan's owner thinks that the content owners don't want the discs exported.

I should explain why many Americans select CD Japan as their source for Japanese CD's: they accept PayPal, sparing us from paying by credit card, and causing our credit card banks to freak out with paranoia and freeze our credit cards when they see a charge in Japan.

Many younger consumers have no interest in buying music(either on CD or official download), but as for those(mostly adult) consumers who are still willing to buy music on CD, this is what we get for supporting the music industry: We get screwed by an arrogant record company.

I've always maintained that the "Wall of Secrecy" policy surrounding Beach Boys archival products is a policy which is very hostile towards fans. Maybe now some of you will belatedly agree. F#@k Capitol Records!!! They have no respect for the consumers who buy Beach Boys music. If Capitol & EMI soon bite the dust(after the takeover by Universal), they'll be getting what they so clearly deserve.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 06:16:19 AM by PhilCohen » Logged
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #704 on: July 27, 2012, 06:03:58 AM »

I'm really scared these are going to leak in FLAC soon.  I'd hate that.    Undecided

Better to leak in FLAC than lossy MP3. Not everyone can afford the $450 price tag of the overpriced Japanese discs. Once even 100 copies of each of the Japanese discs had been sold, there is no way to put the genie back into the bottle. Many thousands of fans around the world are determined(by whatever means necessary) to obtain these recordings. Capitol's uncooperative(even hostile) stance will make fans even more determined to obtain these recordings.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 06:22:43 AM by PhilCohen » Logged
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #705 on: July 27, 2012, 06:46:59 AM »

In January 1968(one and a half years into what has, by now, been a 46 year hobby of collecting recorded music) when I purchased my first Beach Boys L.P.("Wild Honey") for $4 at a local department store, I could never have envisioned what a downer this hobby would turn in to: A situation where there is a $450 price to obtain a dozen music albums, and the record company is turning the consumer's pursuit of the product into a stressful thing. The industry then wonders where it has gone wrong, and why increasing amounts of consumers are turning away. And it leaves me wondering if maybe I should have(back in my childhood days) selected something else as a lifetime hobby.
Logged
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #706 on: July 27, 2012, 06:52:57 AM »



I think they are only remixing when there was no stereo to begin with. I agree with that (in the context of these reissues).



Why do you think that's the best option though? I can perhaps understand why someone may not want to hear anything but a Brian Wilson mono mix, but it's not like Chuck Britz was some mindblowingly awesome stereo mixer who slaved away for months to ensure each of his mixes could not be improved upon. There's wide room for improvement with some of these early stereo mixes, and since the multis are in the hands of those who can do something about it, why not just do it? If we ever want to hear the original stereo mix, we can just put on the original stereo record, there's just no need to pass up this opportunity to have superior sounding versions of some of our favourite songs imo.

Indeed, there are anecdotal reports that Chuck would do some stereo mixes without bothering to monitor in stereo.

While I understand the appeal of the stereo mixes, there is something to be said for the purity of leaving just the original mixes out there.

Yes. Original 60s mono and stereo mixes need to be preserved and available. It's great that finally, the early albums are being release in mono on CD. The original stereo mix of "Don't Worry Baby" isn't my preferred listening experience, but it's official, it's all that existed for years, and it should be preserved. Hopefully, if these are released in the states with bonus tracks, we'll see the 2008 (2009?) stereo mix. Same goes for other newer stereo mixes.

The alternate option would be a two disc set - original mono mix, original stereo mix, with disc two being a brand new stereo mix with bonus tracks. Sounds good to me. Won't happen, though Cry
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
sea of tunes
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 783



View Profile
« Reply #707 on: July 27, 2012, 06:54:57 AM »



I think they are only remixing when there was no stereo to begin with. I agree with that (in the context of these reissues).



Why do you think that's the best option though? I can perhaps understand why someone may not want to hear anything but a Brian Wilson mono mix, but it's not like Chuck Britz was some mindblowingly awesome stereo mixer who slaved away for months to ensure each of his mixes could not be improved upon. There's wide room for improvement with some of these early stereo mixes, and since the multis are in the hands of those who can do something about it, why not just do it? If we ever want to hear the original stereo mix, we can just put on the original stereo record, there's just no need to pass up this opportunity to have superior sounding versions of some of our favourite songs imo.

Quzi, do you have a hi-res (or close) image of that picture of Brian in your avatar?  That is flat out an awesome picture.
Logged

Husband. Father. Quadragenarian.
37!ws
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1511


All baggudo at my man


View Profile WWW
« Reply #708 on: July 27, 2012, 07:31:49 AM »

Totally agree with using the original stereo mixes as opposed to re-mixes, even if it means having to use rechanneled high/lo fake stereo or the echo-delay "Duophonic" in some cases (i.e. "I Get Around") in which while most of the album was stereo, a track or two was stuck in mono...quite simply to not tamper with history.

Same logic that went into the Beatles' The Capitol Albums boxes...yes, there are better mixes of "She's A Woman" and "I Feel Fine" in stereo, but for the stereo version of the album, they still included the original hi/lo fake stereo that was drenched in reverb and sounded like it was being performed in a coffee can...that's the Dave Dexter trademark that fans would miss; it wouldn't sound like they remembered it.

I'd love to see the mono/stereo single-disc CDs perhaps with stereo remixes thrown in -- such as the 2008 Shut Down Volume 2 remixes that came out before...
Logged

Check out my podcasts: Tune X Podcast (tunex.fab4it.com) and Autobiography of a Schnook (SchnookPodcast.com); there are worse things you can do!
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2891



View Profile
« Reply #709 on: July 27, 2012, 07:39:31 AM »

Totally agree with using the original stereo mixes as opposed to re-mixes, even if it means having to use rechanneled high/lo fake stereo or the echo-delay "Duophonic" in some cases (i.e. "I Get Around") in which while most of the album was stereo, a track or two was stuck in mono...quite simply to not tamper with history.

Same logic that went into the Beatles' The Capitol Albums boxes...yes, there are better mixes of "She's A Woman" and "I Feel Fine" in stereo, but for the stereo version of the album, they still included the original hi/lo fake stereo that was drenched in reverb and sounded like it was being performed in a coffee can...that's the Dave Dexter trademark that fans would miss; it wouldn't sound like they remembered it.

I'd love to see the mono/stereo single-disc CDs perhaps with stereo remixes thrown in -- such as the 2008 Shut Down Volume 2 remixes that came out before...

Well, I don't think I'd go that far. In the CD age, rechanneled/duophonic/fake stereo is redundant. I know there are a few people that dig it, but in the scheme of things, it's grating to listen to and provides no improvement over mono. I know the Capitol Beatles boxes did that, and personally I didn't mind it because those aren't the definitive issues of those albums anyway.

I'd be perfectly fine with leaving something mono in the context of a stereo album, and I'm also really happy with a stereo remix inserted in.  Like I said before, I think stereo remixes are fab and gear, and the whole catalog remixed would be cool, but when you're presenting archive releases, at least have the original stereo mix available at the same time as the remix.
Logged

Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #710 on: July 27, 2012, 07:47:33 AM »

Yeaaahhh, duophonic/fake stereo is another thing entirely, to me, too. While it's interesting that a few have made it to CD, I can't say I see the need to go beyond that, as the best purpose of preserving those "mixes" is to serve as a reminder never to do something like that again and that hay, mono really isn't so bad.
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5214



View Profile
« Reply #711 on: July 27, 2012, 07:48:59 AM »

Plus, with these mono/stereo reissues, they cannot put I Get Around or All Summer Long on there twice in mono. So, I can see using this new Stereo Extraction method or the newer remixes being used in those cases.
Logged

The Brianista Prayer

Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen.  ---hypehat
I. Spaceman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2271

Revolution Never Again


View Profile
« Reply #712 on: July 27, 2012, 08:44:59 AM »


Same logic that went into the Beatles' The Capitol Albums boxes...yes, there are better mixes of "She's A Woman" and "I Feel Fine" in stereo, but for the stereo version of the album, they still included the original hi/lo fake stereo that was drenched in reverb and sounded like it was being performed in a coffee can...that's the Dave Dexter trademark that fans would miss; it wouldn't sound like they remembered it.
 

George Martin added the echo to those songs in the UK especially for US release, despite popular belief to the contrary.
Logged

Nobody gives a sh*t about the Record Room
37!ws
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1511


All baggudo at my man


View Profile WWW
« Reply #713 on: July 27, 2012, 09:08:41 AM »

If that's true, then why is there no echo on the mono versions of the US albums? And why did Dave Dexter himself say that he had the echo put in because he felt it would be more sellable to the American public?
Logged

Check out my podcasts: Tune X Podcast (tunex.fab4it.com) and Autobiography of a Schnook (SchnookPodcast.com); there are worse things you can do!
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6063



View Profile
« Reply #714 on: July 27, 2012, 09:45:30 AM »

So what is it about the Japs that makes them bigger (or more deserving?) fans than the Yanks or the Brits (or anyone else for that matter)?

They buy more copies of the discs.

Whoever it was who said that EMI Japan and Capitol USA are of not the exactly same company is right of course, but Capitol must know that US/UK fans will want copies of these releases so you'd think that they'd at least be able to strike some deal where they became available at a more fan-friendly price.

There are not enough fans in the U.S. or Europe to make releasing them profitable. That is, enough fans who will spend real money on albums that have been reissued on CD multiple times before (and more economically, too -- as twofers). Ask yourself this: If U.S. fans can't be bothered to spend money on remastered twofers (as they roundly ignored the 2001 releases), why should Capitol make the investment of releasing more expensive single-disc versions?
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 09:48:50 AM by Wirestone » Logged
Zach95
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 893


View Profile
« Reply #715 on: July 27, 2012, 09:46:41 AM »

Again, I'll ask, does anyone know what to search to find these on amazon.com?
Logged

Ain't nothin' upside your head!
Zach95
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 893


View Profile
« Reply #716 on: July 27, 2012, 09:47:41 AM »


They are $43.99 a pop at Amazon US.


Now they're 50. What a joke. Here I was hoping they would go down.
Logged

Ain't nothin' upside your head!
Jason
Guest
« Reply #717 on: July 27, 2012, 10:10:33 AM »

I saw a bunch of them on eBay for $36, I believe.
Logged
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5214



View Profile
« Reply #718 on: July 27, 2012, 10:11:34 AM »

Wow, just read the response from CDJapan as to why they are not selling the CDs. Since when do record companies choose what stores to sell their merchandise? No wonder the import price is on the rise. Sad

Letter at the Hoff: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showpost.php?p=7928423&postcount=227
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 10:13:38 AM by drbeachboy » Logged

The Brianista Prayer

Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen.  ---hypehat
sea of tunes
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 783



View Profile
« Reply #719 on: July 27, 2012, 10:12:45 AM »

I saw a bunch of them on eBay for $36, I believe.

That is what I purchased mine for.
Logged

Husband. Father. Quadragenarian.
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #720 on: July 27, 2012, 10:12:54 AM »


They are $43.99 a pop at Amazon US.


Now they're 50. What a joke. Here I was hoping they would go down.

Amazon's 3rd party suppliers will charge (at least) slightly less, but Amazon doesn't permit the 3rd party sellers to offer a product until AFTER Amazon offers it. 3rd party sellers on Amazon aren't permitted to offer anything for preorder.
Logged
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2891



View Profile
« Reply #721 on: July 27, 2012, 10:16:25 AM »

At this point, I'm over it, I don't care that they weren't released here, I just want to HEAR them!!!!

It's like you're really hungry and you know there's food somewhere....but you just can't find it.
Logged

Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
I. Spaceman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2271

Revolution Never Again


View Profile
« Reply #722 on: July 27, 2012, 10:32:06 AM »

If that's true, then why is there no echo on the mono versions of the US albums? And why did Dave Dexter himself say that he had the echo put in because he felt it would be more sellable to the American public?

There sure is echo on the mono version of Beatles '65. Have a listen. Dexter did put echo on earlier Beatles releases, such as the stereo version of The Beatles' Second Album. The reason Martin himself did the echo'd versions of I Feel Fine/She's A Woman was to forestall Capitol/Dexter doing it. Amusingly, he did a much, much worse job than Capitol would have.
Logged

Nobody gives a sh*t about the Record Room
Heysaboda
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1054


Son, don't wait till the break of day....


View Profile
« Reply #723 on: July 27, 2012, 10:34:32 AM »

Again, I'll ask, does anyone know what to search to find these on amazon.com?

Zach, just search on Beach Boys, by release date.  They are all there, now OVER $50.

Boy, when I bought 2 of these yesterday I didn't realize I was getting a DEAL for $43.99.  YIKES!

Probably do better on EBay.
Logged

Son, don't wait till the break of day 'cause you know how time fades away......
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2245



View Profile
« Reply #724 on: July 27, 2012, 10:41:06 AM »

All the good remarks about "Smiley Smile" made me pick it up on Ebay for $38, including shipping.  No real rush for the rest of them (right now) so that should tide me over.  But if EMI Japan does eventually release "20/20", "Friends" and "Love You"---then I'm royally screwed!
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 10:43:21 AM by Justin » Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 ... 104 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.463 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!