gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683268 Posts in 27763 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 31, 2025, 04:04:06 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: SUPER MEGA SPOILER THREAD  (Read 12041 times)
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 2288


I made a game


View Profile
« on: October 24, 2011, 07:17:14 PM »

Wait... So "I Don't Know" is... TUNE X? WHAT?

Also, listen to (Carol?) after the "I wanna Be Around" session "That Can Be Side 2 to the album" "Yeah That's what happens after the fire!" HAHAHA!
« Last Edit: October 24, 2011, 07:23:46 PM by FatherOfTheMan » Logged

Jason
Guest
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2011, 08:45:27 PM »

I Don't Know is I Don't Know. Tune X is Tune X.
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2011, 08:50:14 PM »

Also, listen to (Carol?) after the "I wanna Be Around" session "That Can Be Side 2 to the album" "Yeah That's what happens after the fire!" HAHAHA!

Ha! So she was sort of right. Unfortunately, it's not Brian saying it so there's no real confirmation.
Logged
Aegir
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4680



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2011, 10:00:07 PM »

I Don't Know is I Don't Know. Tune X is Tune X.
At least from the short clips, they sound like different arrangements of the same song.
Logged

Every time you spell Smile as SMiLE, an angel's wings are forcibly torn off its body.
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2011, 10:17:42 PM »

I think they're just similar. Not that I'm Gosh Darn Brian Wilson featuring Gosh Darn Carl Wilson featuring Gosh Darn Dennis Wilson, but the last band I was in, I had written a bunch of material we were going over (only due to me having prior recordings) when we wanted to start attempting some stuff written by the other guys. First thing the other two brought in had the same time signature, same key, same tempo (basically), similar structures etc. Happened in another band I was in, too. Just happens that way sometimes, I guess, especially when dealing with people's earliest compositions when working together (as was the case with Dennis and Carl and all the instances I'm talking about). I think it's just coincidence.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2011, 10:18:50 PM by runnersdialzero » Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Aegir
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4680



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2011, 10:22:55 PM »

I'm in a lot of bands and I've not once seen that. I think that's a really really strange coincidence.
Logged

Every time you spell Smile as SMiLE, an angel's wings are forcibly torn off its body.
The Shift
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7429


Biding time


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2011, 12:41:26 AM »

Cool, Cool Water (Version 1)

Been hitting samples at random. This is… sublime. Exquisite. Sounds like it might even date from the Sunflower era sessions – anyone hazard a guess?

If that's the case, Mark and Alan, my birthday's not until April so you've plenty of time to ready the Sunflower/Add Some Music box for release – just be sure to include an entire CD's worth of Cool Cool Water sessions & outtakes, a-la GVs/H&V on the SMiLE Sessions.


please…
Logged

“We live in divisive times.”
The Shift
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7429


Biding time


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2011, 12:51:20 AM »

50.   Heroes and Villains: Part 2 Revised      1:54
51   Heroes and Villains: Part 2 (Revised) [Master Take]

Jeez… stunning
Logged

“We live in divisive times.”
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2011, 01:07:24 AM »

Cool, Cool Water (Version 1)

Been hitting samples at random. This is… sublime. Exquisite. Sounds like it might even date from the Sunflower era sessions – anyone hazard a guess?

My guess would be June 7th 1967.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Freddie French-Pounce
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1571


A.K.A. mrmoustachioto


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2011, 01:17:28 AM »

Cool, Cool Water (Version 1)

Been hitting samples at random. This is… sublime. Exquisite. Sounds like it might even date from the Sunflower era sessions – anyone hazard a guess?

My guess would be June 7th 1967.

 Grin No accuracy there

Wait, Swedish frog is missing... Swedish frog? NOOOOO!!!
« Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 01:19:28 AM by mrmoustachioto » Logged

Check out the Mono/Stereo Mix Breakdown podcast Mixology here: https://mixology.podbean.com/
Barnshine
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 96


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2011, 01:40:16 AM »

Backing Vocals Montage - DYLW "tape warp vocals" in stereo!  Rock! Sounds fantastic.
Logged
John Stivaktas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 188



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2011, 01:49:18 AM »

The very name of this thread instantly made me go here. And just a friendly reminder to those who find it difficult to resist:

http://www.hmvdigital.com/artist/the-beach-boys/the-smile-sessions

 Evil Evil
Logged

"It's more blessed to give than receive"

“For me, making music has always been a very spiritual thing, and I think anybody who produces records has to feel that, at least a little bit. Producing a record . . . the idea of taking a song, envisioning the overall sound in my head and then bringing the arrangement to life in the studio . . . well, that gives me satisfaction like nothing else.”

"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
TerryWogan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2011, 02:26:45 AM »

Do You Like Worms (Part 3) is getting my attention right now- never heard the piano part before. I can't quite tell if there's a subtle descending left-hand part or if it's just my brain filling in gaps given these sub-par headphones.
Logged
John Stivaktas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 188



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2011, 02:35:57 AM »

Do You Like Worms (Part 3) is getting my attention right now- never heard the piano part before. I can't quite tell if there's a subtle descending left-hand part or if it's just my brain filling in gaps given these sub-par headphones.

Definitely sounds like the familiar rhythm guitar staccato chords played in the right-hand on a piano...the first two counts of the bar play the lower notes of the F and Bb chords and the last two counts play the higher notes of those two chords.
Logged

"It's more blessed to give than receive"

“For me, making music has always been a very spiritual thing, and I think anybody who produces records has to feel that, at least a little bit. Producing a record . . . the idea of taking a song, envisioning the overall sound in my head and then bringing the arrangement to life in the studio . . . well, that gives me satisfaction like nothing else.”

"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
UK_Surf
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 160


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2011, 02:46:37 AM »

There are some sublime tracks on here - I'm blown away by the H&V Verse Edit Experiment - this has always been my favourite version of the verse, and here, in amazing quality, the experience is taken to a whole new level.

The standouts for me are predictably CIFOTM and SU '67. Everyone is going to have a few reservations I s'spect, and mine is the album mix of IIGS. It's a bit awkward, and I was hoping they'd use some of the more extreme echoplex feedback. But the sessions sound incredible. Meh - can't please everyone all the time. But no issues with BY, oddly. SU is incredible, but personally, I think they over-egged the rvb plug in. The power of the vocal can carry it without props, and personally, I'd prefer a more subtle one. But that's nit-picking.

The sheer quality and sensitivity of these mixes...and the Blessed Continuity of Audio Experience! I cannot begin to express the sheer joy of everything being at the SAME LEVEL and EQ Profile! It feels....joined up. Unified in a way I never expect my experience of Smile to be. That is such a huge achievement. '67 Smile is a lost moment in time, but this gives us the most cohesive experience ever, and what ever individual reservations about particular moments exists, they are stampled into insignificance by the sheer reverence shown to this material.
Logged
TerryWogan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2011, 02:54:55 AM »

Definitely too much reverb on the SU vocals. The second section sounds much better dry; more intimate.
Logged
Barnshine
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 96


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2011, 03:07:21 AM »

Definitely too much reverb on the SU vocals. The second section sounds much better dry; more intimate.

I think it gives it a bigger, more "majestic" sound, closer to BWPS. It's definitley less "intimate", but the original intention could have very well be closer to this. We have no way of knowing.
SU '67, on the other hand...
Logged
John Stivaktas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 188



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2011, 03:11:32 AM »

Definitely too much reverb on the SU vocals. The second section sounds much better dry; more intimate.

Perhaps this was Brian's intention for the original track in 1967 and this was relayed to Mark at some point in 2004 because the BWPS version of Surf's Up has prominent reverb in all the vocals (both lead and background).
Logged

"It's more blessed to give than receive"

“For me, making music has always been a very spiritual thing, and I think anybody who produces records has to feel that, at least a little bit. Producing a record . . . the idea of taking a song, envisioning the overall sound in my head and then bringing the arrangement to life in the studio . . . well, that gives me satisfaction like nothing else.”

"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 2288


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2011, 03:24:00 AM »

I must say, after listening to surfs up a bit more,
I like the vocals a LOT, they seem to flow less "blandly" with the new sincopation,
It "rolls" Better.
Logged

TerryWogan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2011, 03:32:49 AM »

Definitely too much reverb on the SU vocals. The second section sounds much better dry; more intimate.

I think it gives it a bigger, more "majestic" sound, closer to BWPS. It's definitley less "intimate", but the original intention could have very well be closer to this. We have no way of knowing.
SU '67, on the other hand...

The intention may have been for a fully orchestrated 'majestic' second section, but since all we have is the piano demo I don't think swathes of reverb really work in this context.
Logged
UK_Surf
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 160


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2011, 03:45:10 AM »

It's going to be a subjective response to SU, as it seems to be the Smile track most people have the closest relationship with, but I reckon there's good historical and aesthetic justifications for the mix, and of course we'll have reserve full judgement til we hear it in its entirety.

Also, you can't really tell from the snippet, but I reckon that the real production/mixing triumph of this set will be one of the first online sneak-peaks: Vega-tables! That mix is utterly transformative in terms of the importance of the tune to Smile as a whole, and it reveals the complexity and variety of the track whilst keeping it a fun, and very cool pop song. It's a bold mix, a real declaration of intent, and I was nearly cartwheeling with joy when I first heard it - can't wait for the full audio experience.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 03:51:39 AM by UK_Surf » Logged
TerryWogan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2011, 03:49:59 AM »

I was trying to work out what Teeter Totter Love reminded me of..a simple chord progression going on in the background with bizarre shouty vocals...and then it hit me: Drip Drop Razz
Logged
Iron Horse-Apples
Guest
« Reply #22 on: October 25, 2011, 04:04:15 AM »

Sorry if this has already come up, but there are H&V sections here I've never heard.

And the bit's I have heard now sound fantastic. That fade remake. Wow
« Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 04:06:43 AM by Iron Horse-Apples » Logged
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: October 25, 2011, 04:17:35 AM »

I was trying to work out what Teeter Totter Love reminded me of..a simple chord progression going on in the background with bizarre shouty vocals...and then it hit me: Drip Drop Razz


Reminds me of a gently steaming pile of sh*t.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Iron Horse-Apples
Guest
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2011, 04:33:31 AM »

And the You're Welcome, where they are walking in is great. They should have gone with that.

And I like Teeter Totter Love. I love that sort of quirky sound, and his voice is supposed to be bad eh? Thta is the charm of it.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.168 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!