The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
683283
Posts in
27766
Topics by
4096
Members - Latest Member:
MrSunshine
August 05, 2025, 02:48:35 AM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental? (Read 9853 times)
jonjameshall
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 18
How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
on:
April 13, 2011, 02:57:28 AM »
HI All,
I'm starting to think that many of the tracks that we think were incomplete were never meant to have vocals. that a good portion of SMiLE 1967 was instrumental.
I know sources are spurious at best and substances can cloud the mind (and that's just us!) but reading the DP 2004 SMilE book I cant help but wonder just how much of the stuff would never have had lyrics. CIFOTM for example was a new lyric for 2004, as was IBH? and they just don't seem to fit in the way that Brian's melody worked back then?
Am I missing something?
J xxx
«
Last Edit: April 13, 2011, 02:59:06 AM by jonjameshall
»
Logged
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 17767
The triumph of The Hickey Script !
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #1 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:48:24 AM »
Quote from: jonjameshall on April 13, 2011, 02:57:28 AM
HI All,
I'm starting to think that many of the tracks that we think were incomplete were never meant to have vocals. that a good portion of SMiLE 1967 was instrumental.
I know sources are spurious at best and substances can cloud the mind (and that's just us!) but reading the DP 2004 SMilE book I cant help but wonder just how much of the stuff would never have had lyrics. CIFOTM for example was a new lyric for 2004, as was IBH? and they just don't seem to fit in the way that Brian's melody worked back then?
Am I missing something?
J xxx
Reasonable question... I'll see that and raise you the fact that DP said "Worms" was complete, yet the 2004 lyrics date from 1966 and fit perfectly.
Logged
The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
The Shift
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7429
Biding time
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #2 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:53:03 AM »
Didn't Al deny that that was Worms for the GVs box set tho'? He was right about
this
box set!
Logged
“We live in divisive times.”
jonjameshall
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 18
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #3 on:
April 13, 2011, 04:48:45 AM »
I didn't say all of it would be instrumental and I dont want to take what DP says verbatim, but some of the stuff just sounds like the vocals were added for the sake of it. Im not convinced by "roll plymouth rock" - it just doesnt sound right to my ears.
I really think we might be chasing ghosts though, perhaps all these years spent with the bootlegs have scuppered my appreciation somewhat...
Logged
Roger Ryan
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1528
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #4 on:
April 13, 2011, 05:56:09 AM »
Quote from: jonjameshall on April 13, 2011, 04:48:45 AM
I didn't say all of it would be instrumental and I dont want to take what DP says verbatim, but some of the stuff just sounds like the vocals were added for the sake of it. Im not convinced by "roll plymouth rock" - it just doesnt sound right to my ears.
I really think we might be chasing ghosts though, perhaps all these years spent with the bootlegs have scuppered my appreciation somewhat...
You can't get anymore accurate than "Roll Plymouth Rock" at recreating what the Beach Boys version may have sounded like (apart from the previously finished tracks). The song structure is identical to the rough mixes (which feature some of the vocals in place), plus you get the "Bicycle Rider" chorus and the verse melody (w/ vintage lyrics) as remembered by Brian. If it doesn't sound right to your ears...well, you're in good company because it apparently didn't sound right to Brian Douglas Wilson either which is why it remained incomplete and/or unreleased for 37 years!
The fact that Brian has gone on record saying that a lot of the stuff he was coming up didn't seem to work for vocals is a pretty compelling reason for SMiLE not to be finished as a Beach Boys album. Of course, he could have simply been talking about "Mrs. O'Leary's Cow" and using that as an excuse. I think you're right that listening to the instrumental tracks for so long can make a "completed" song seem wrong. Personally, I think all the new lyrics fit quite well and am very happy to have a finished song like "In Blue Hawaii" to listen to instead of just "I Love To Say Da Da".
Logged
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Gender:
Posts: 4940
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #5 on:
April 13, 2011, 07:23:56 AM »
Ditto Roger. I haven't heard anything in the SMiLE boots that sounded as though they were instrumentals. They are not like past Brian Instrumentals where the melody was compelling enough on it's own and the arrangement strong enough to live without vocals being added. With everything I have heard from the SMiLE boots, they have an incomplete feel to them (at least to me).
Logged
Bicyclerider
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2132
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #6 on:
April 13, 2011, 07:28:11 AM »
The idea that a lot of Smile tracks were not to have vocals comes from DP's contention that Brian had essentially finished Smile, therefore those instrumental tracks on boot were never destined to have vocals.
The one track (besides the Elements) which I thought might have been just an instrumental but was dropped from the track list, Holidays, I'm not sure about since it got lyrics and vocals on BWPS.
Logged
guitarfool2002
Global Moderator
Offline
Posts: 10118
"Barba non facit aliam historici"
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #7 on:
April 13, 2011, 07:50:32 AM »
Having a fully produced instrumental backing track ready for lyrics and/or melody in some cases was Brian's working method on certain songs since 1964, including California Girls and Good Vibrations. So if he had never finished California Girls, and we had access to one of the early mixdowns from the studio sessions, the song did not have a title as Brian slated it in the control room, yet that backing track could stand alone as an instrumental. But obviously the next part of the process was adding vocals with lyrics, so it is the song we now know as California Girls.
There is simply no way to tell what was to have lyrics and/or lead vocals if there is nothing to confirm or deny either way, and it becomes a debate about whose speculation is more informed than another. With "Worms", it was confirmed that Frank Holmes worked on his imagery from lyrics written for that song, so that's a definite. Holidays? Look? Who knows.
Logged
"All of us have the privilege of making music that helps and heals - to make music that makes people happier, stronger, and kinder. Don't forget: Music is God's voice." - Brian Wilson
jonjameshall
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 18
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #8 on:
April 13, 2011, 08:24:29 AM »
I was going on the lyrics that VDP was asked to write specifically for SMiLE 2004, in DP's book he talks about being asked to write parts in 2004 for tracksthat he didnt in 1967. My thinking was that if he didnt have them by the time the project was aborted in 1967 then there's a strong chance that they were not required. I guess it boils down to how complete you think SMiLE was/is or if Brian was under pressure to fill the 2004 version with lyrics?
Logged
guitarfool2002
Global Moderator
Offline
Posts: 10118
"Barba non facit aliam historici"
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #9 on:
April 13, 2011, 09:03:58 AM »
Quote from: jonjameshall on April 13, 2011, 08:24:29 AM
I was going on the lyrics that VDP was asked to write specifically for SMiLE 2004, in DP's book he talks about being asked to write parts in 2004 for tracksthat he didnt in 1967. My thinking was that if he didnt have them by the time the project was aborted in 1967 then there's a strong chance that they were not required. I guess it boils down to how complete you think SMiLE was/is or if Brian was under pressure to fill the 2004 version with lyrics?
Remember Van Dyke walked away from the project in early 1967, so consider that tracks which he would have worked on, possibly, never got to that stage after he left. And Brian's focus shifted considerably as well, to the point where he was recording a whole grouping of "Heroes And Villains" fragments that were scattered all over at session after session, and he never really patched those together either, so they remain fragments.
I don't think there was "pressure" to add lyrics to anything they didn't want to add lyrics to in 2003-04, but again it goes back to the time Van Dyke walked away from Smile for good, leaving that next step of the process unfinished.
Logged
"All of us have the privilege of making music that helps and heals - to make music that makes people happier, stronger, and kinder. Don't forget: Music is God's voice." - Brian Wilson
onkster
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 882
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #10 on:
April 13, 2011, 09:08:34 AM »
It's a very hard thing to guess with Brian material: many tracks we know with great familiarity as vocal tracks work spectacularly well as instrumentals (case in point: Let Him Run Wild).
And we of course know of a few that ended up as instrumentals despite having had lyrics and melody written for them (case in point: Pet Sounds--or am I thinking of Let's Go Away for Awhile? Did lyrics ever reach the collector's world from those?)
My guess would be: there would have been 2-3 tracks as instrumentals, but no more, as it would throw off the balance. Compare to other BB albums: same deal, eh?
Logged
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 17767
The triumph of The Hickey Script !
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #11 on:
April 13, 2011, 09:20:27 AM »
Quote from: onkster on April 13, 2011, 09:08:34 AM
And we of course know of a few that ended up as instrumentals despite having had lyrics and melody written for them (case in point: Pet Sounds--or am I thinking of Let's Go Away for Awhile? Did lyrics ever reach the collector's world from those?)
Nope, 'cause none were ever written.
Logged
The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Mahalo
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1156
..Stand back, Speak normally
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #12 on:
April 13, 2011, 10:03:18 AM »
What about Summer Means New Love?....
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #13 on:
April 13, 2011, 12:10:02 PM »
Holiday (version 1966) sounds pretty complete to me, but I don't think that it was necessarily considered to be an album track. It seems sort of like the Trombone Dixie of the early tracks. And while I do like the 2004 version with lyrics, I should say that it's a bit unsatisfying that Brian is simply singing over the horn melody that's already in the song. This wasn't really a common trait for Beach Boys songs (at least not off the top of my head).
Of the 12-song Capitol list, only one track (The Elements) looked like it was heading in the "instrumental" category, which is typically on par with a lot of Beach Boys album (save for Surfin' USA).
Logged
A Million Units In Jan!
Guest
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #14 on:
April 13, 2011, 12:43:49 PM »
Quote from: rockandroll on April 13, 2011, 12:10:02 PM
Holiday (version 1966) sounds pretty complete to me, but I don't think that it was necessarily considered to be an album track. It seems sort of like the Trombone Dixie of the early tracks. And while I do like the 2004 version with lyrics, I should say that it's a bit unsatisfying that Brian is simply singing over the horn melody that's already in the song. This wasn't really a common trait for Beach Boys songs (at least not off the top of my head).
Of the 12-song Capitol list, only one track (The Elements) looked like it was heading in the "instrumental" category, which is typically on par with a lot of Beach Boys album (save for Surfin' USA).
Don't forget 'Look/I Ran'. I know there was a vocal session for it, although it's never turned up. I think that it 'may' have been intended for SMiLE very early on, but was quickly cast aside.
Logged
B-Rex
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 92
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #15 on:
April 13, 2011, 01:36:15 PM »
Look, Holidays, Dada and Worms/RPR have a backing track sound to them. They have no melody for long stretches, where a lead vocal would reside, plainly showing they were meant to have lyrics. They do all work extremely well with lead vocals in 2004, and as stated, verses had been written for Worms/RPR or whatever you want to call it. I do hope that Wee Helper is on to something with Al's quote about Worms. Worms sounds like a good working title for an earth element, which apparently morphed into Fall Breaks with a little help from MOC.
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #16 on:
April 13, 2011, 02:41:04 PM »
Quote from: B-Rex on April 13, 2011, 01:36:15 PM
Look, Holidays, Dada and Worms/RPR have a backing track sound to them. They have no melody for long stretches, where a lead vocal would reside, plainly showing they were meant to have lyrics.
Like I said, I hear a pretty strong melodic line throughout Holidays. It's so strong, in fact, that Brian merely replicates it for his vocal line in the 2004 version.
Look too me sounds more unfinished but it also sounds like something left over from Good Vibrations so I'm not sure on the role it would have played on Smile.
Logged
A Million Units In Jan!
Guest
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #17 on:
April 13, 2011, 02:46:57 PM »
Quote from: rockandroll on April 13, 2011, 02:41:04 PM
Look too me sounds more unfinished but it also sounds like something left over from Good Vibrations so I'm not sure on the role it would have played on Smile.
'Look/I Ran' was recorded before 'GV' was completely finished. It sounds to me like Brian took from 'Look' to help him finish 'GV'.
Logged
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5972
"My God. It's full of stars."
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #18 on:
April 13, 2011, 02:59:58 PM »
Quote from: A Million Units In Jan! on April 13, 2011, 02:46:57 PM
Quote from: rockandroll on April 13, 2011, 02:41:04 PM
Look too me sounds more unfinished but it also sounds like something left over from Good Vibrations so I'm not sure on the role it would have played on Smile.
'Look/I Ran' was recorded before 'GV' was completely finished.
It sounds to me like Brian took from 'Look' to help him finish 'GV'.
Anything specific in either track that would support this? Or is it just the overall mood of the track?
I remember hearing that either Look or CIFOTM had parts (or "feels") of GV in them....I have never been able to pinpoint what parts those are - and I have listened for them.
Logged
Bill Tobelman's
SMiLE site
Quote from: mtaber on September 18, 2021, 07:39:15 AM
God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!
"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.
Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
hypehat
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 6311
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #19 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:06:32 PM »
The final harmonies in GV correspond, sorta, with the instrumental chorus in 'Song For Children' The na-na-na-na, na-na-naaa riff?
Logged
Quote from: ontor pertawst on October 06, 2012, 06:05:25 PM
All roads lead to Kokomo. Exhaustive research in time travel has conclusively proven that there is no alternate universe WITHOUT Kokomo. It would've happened regardless.
Quote from: Andrew G. Doe on May 15, 2012, 12:33:42 PM
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?
Quote from: Al Jardine
Syncopate it? In front of all these people?!
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #20 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:12:02 PM »
Quote from: hypehat on April 13, 2011, 03:06:32 PM
The final harmonies in GV correspond, sorta, with the instrumental chorus in 'Song For Children' The na-na-na-na, na-na-naaa riff?
Exactly.
Logged
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5972
"My God. It's full of stars."
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #21 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:18:34 PM »
Quote from: hypehat on April 13, 2011, 03:06:32 PM
The final harmonies in GV correspond, sorta, with the instrumental chorus in 'Song For Children' The na-na-na-na, na-na-naaa riff?
Ha! Thanks! I finally hear it.
Logged
Bill Tobelman's
SMiLE site
Quote from: mtaber on September 18, 2021, 07:39:15 AM
God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!
"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.
Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
Runaways
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2008
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #22 on:
April 13, 2011, 03:36:31 PM »
Quote from: rockandroll on April 13, 2011, 02:41:04 PM
Quote from: B-Rex on April 13, 2011, 01:36:15 PM
Look, Holidays, Dada and Worms/RPR have a backing track sound to them. They have no melody for long stretches, where a lead vocal would reside, plainly showing they were meant to have lyrics.
Like I said, I hear a pretty strong melodic line throughout Holidays. It's so strong, in fact, that Brian merely replicates it for his vocal line in the 2004 version.
Look too me sounds more unfinished but it also sounds like something left over from Good Vibrations so I'm not sure on the role it would have played on Smile.
I think it's odd to think holidays would be an instrumental, yeah there's a melodic line by a clarinet, kinda used in exactly the same way as "I'm waiting for the day". Brian did that a lot.
Logged
Chris Brown
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2014
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #23 on:
April 13, 2011, 05:36:35 PM »
Quote from: Runaways on April 13, 2011, 03:36:31 PM
Quote from: rockandroll on April 13, 2011, 02:41:04 PM
Quote from: B-Rex on April 13, 2011, 01:36:15 PM
Look, Holidays, Dada and Worms/RPR have a backing track sound to them. They have no melody for long stretches, where a lead vocal would reside, plainly showing they were meant to have lyrics.
Like I said, I hear a pretty strong melodic line throughout Holidays. It's so strong, in fact, that Brian merely replicates it for his vocal line in the 2004 version.
Look too me sounds more unfinished but it also sounds like something left over from Good Vibrations so I'm not sure on the role it would have played on Smile.
I think it's odd to think holidays would be an instrumental, yeah there's a melodic line by a clarinet, kinda used in exactly the same way as "I'm waiting for the day". Brian did that a lot.
I wouldn't say he did it a lot, but that track is the biggest (and most recent) precedent that immediately springs to mind. Even on the intro section of "Holidays" (and the repeat of it that was later filled in with the pirate rap), there's a little melody in there too. It's not conclusive evidence that the track was intended to be instrumental, but out of all the tracks, I'd say it's the most likely candidate for that very reason.
I think "Look" works pretty well as an instrumental as well (though not quite as well as "Holidays"), but the vocal session pretty much negates the possibility that it was intended as an instrumental, along with the fact that it doesn't appear on the December track list.
Logged
Runaways
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2008
Re: How much of SMiLE would have been instrumental?
«
Reply #24 on:
April 13, 2011, 07:18:58 PM »
Cabinessence does the same thing with an instrument playing the vocal melody.
Look sounds more like an instrumental to me than Holidays. Holidays sounds so much like a wilson backing track. Musically there's usually more going on in brian's instrumentals. I don't think the melody on holidays works as well as just an instrumental too. I feel like if it was supposed to be one, then i would have been one in 04
«
Last Edit: April 13, 2011, 07:20:30 PM by Runaways
»
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.286 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...