gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683154 Posts in 27758 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 21, 2025, 06:18:28 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: If Vegetables Was Released As A Single In 1967...  (Read 7700 times)
Amazing Larry
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 552


There's a new daddy in town...


View Profile
« on: July 13, 2009, 09:56:21 PM »

What kind of structure do you think it would have?
Logged

A discipline daddy.
Bicyclerider
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2009, 06:41:15 AM »

I think it would have been basically the same structure as on BWPS, except it would end with "Fade to Vegetables."
Logged
hypehat
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6311



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2009, 07:16:48 AM »

But, that would be a really bad end to a single.... Maybe it would have faded out on 'Eat a lot, sleep a lot', like on the boxset, instead of going into fade to vegetables.
Logged

All roads lead to Kokomo. Exhaustive research in time travel has conclusively proven that there is no alternate universe WITHOUT Kokomo. It would've happened regardless.
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?

Quote from: Al Jardine
Syncopate it? In front of all these people?!
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2666



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2009, 08:23:56 AM »

What's Fade to Vegetables? Is that the "ba ba ba ba ba ba" that comes in after "eat a lot..." fades out?
Logged

"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread"  -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.
Chris Brown
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2014


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2009, 08:51:26 AM »

What's Fade to Vegetables? Is that the "ba ba ba ba ba ba" that comes in after "eat a lot..." fades out?

Yeah I think that's what Bicyclerider was referring to...oddly enough though that section was never recorded for Vegetables in the first place, it was just stuck on there for the box set. 

I think if it had been finished and released as a single, Brian would have either used "eat a lot, sleep a lot" as the fade, or come up with another one.  Or maybe he would have ended it like on Smiley, with that last verse repeating to the fade.  Other than that, the sequencing on the box set seems the most logical to use.
Logged
Jeff
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 545



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2009, 01:45:01 PM »

What's Fade to Vegetables? Is that the "ba ba ba ba ba ba" that comes in after "eat a lot..." fades out?

Yeah I think that's what Bicyclerider was referring to...oddly enough though that section was never recorded for Vegetables in the first place, it was just stuck on there for the box set. 

I think if it had been finished and released as a single, Brian would have either used "eat a lot, sleep a lot" as the fade, or come up with another one.  Or maybe he would have ended it like on Smiley, with that last verse repeating to the fade.  Other than that, the sequencing on the box set seems the most logical to use.


No, Fade to Vegetables was in fact recorded for Vegetables.  Here's a line from Badman's book: "Wednesday [April] 12th [1967]  Recording Smile session 79 Gold Star studio Los Angeles, CA  2:00-5:00pm. Instrumental tracking sessions for the 'Fade to Vegetables' piece of 'Vegetables'."  He goes on to describe some of the backing vocals for that piece.

http://books.google.com/books?id=BeUDXaFrpTUC&pg=PA181&lpg=PA181&dq=%22fade+to+vegetables%22+%22beach+boys%22&source=bl&ots=GeFh01ibgr&sig=TEyRUHXQ39CDF_8qOWWgC7pPVO0&hl=en&ei=mz1eSszGMYuuswOfgLGlCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6
Logged
Chris Brown
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2014


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2009, 02:03:58 PM »

What's Fade to Vegetables? Is that the "ba ba ba ba ba ba" that comes in after "eat a lot..." fades out?

Yeah I think that's what Bicyclerider was referring to...oddly enough though that section was never recorded for Vegetables in the first place, it was just stuck on there for the box set. 

I think if it had been finished and released as a single, Brian would have either used "eat a lot, sleep a lot" as the fade, or come up with another one.  Or maybe he would have ended it like on Smiley, with that last verse repeating to the fade.  Other than that, the sequencing on the box set seems the most logical to use.


No, Fade to Vegetables was in fact recorded for Vegetables.  Here's a line from Badman's book: "Wednesday [April] 12th [1967]  Recording Smile session 79 Gold Star studio Los Angeles, CA  2:00-5:00pm. Instrumental tracking sessions for the 'Fade to Vegetables' piece of 'Vegetables'."  He goes on to describe some of the backing vocals for that piece.

http://books.google.com/books?id=BeUDXaFrpTUC&pg=PA181&lpg=PA181&dq=%22fade+to+vegetables%22+%22beach+boys%22&source=bl&ots=GeFh01ibgr&sig=TEyRUHXQ39CDF_8qOWWgC7pPVO0&hl=en&ei=mz1eSszGMYuuswOfgLGlCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6

My bad...I don't think we're talking about the same thing.  I thought you were referring to the fade on the box set.
Logged
Jeff
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 545



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2009, 03:35:58 PM »

No, we're talking about the same thing.  Fade to Vegetables, recorded 4/12/67, is the fade on the GV box set version of Vegetables.
Logged
Chris Brown
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2014


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2009, 04:00:25 PM »

No, we're talking about the same thing.  Fade to Vegetables, recorded 4/12/67, is the fade on the GV box set version of Vegetables.

The reason I was confused is that there was a thread a few months back where this was discussed, and AGD said that Leaf told him that the fade edited onto the end of Vegatables on the box set was just thrown on there to get more Smile music out to the public (I'm sure you remember the thread, I remember you being a part of it).  I generally tend to trust AGD.  Plus, the Badman book's description of the fade doesn't seem to jive with the tag on the box set.

« Last Edit: July 15, 2009, 04:01:46 PM by Chris Brown » Logged
Jeff
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 545



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »

I remember that thread, but it's not just Badman's book that references  "Fade to Vegetables."  You can google it - it was in fact an actual session.  As far as Badman's description of the recordings, it's not obvious that those sounds are part of Fade to Vegetables until you listen to the sessions on SOT 17.  It's such a layered track that a lot of things come out in the sessions that can't be heard independently when you listen to the whole.  But trust me, if you listen to SOT 17, you can hear it.
Logged
Bicyclerider
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2009, 10:16:08 AM »

And I think that "Fade to Vegetables" would have been an awesome end to the single.  Just like when GV goes into that choral section, a whole different thing from what's precededed it, but amazing in it's own way.   Fade to Vegetables is one of my favorite pieces of Smile music, period.
Logged
A Million Units In Jan!
Guest
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2009, 11:21:47 AM »

And I think that "Fade to Vegetables" would have been an awesome end to the single.  Just like when GV goes into that choral section, a whole different thing from what's precededed it, but amazing in it's own way.   Fade to Vegetables is one of my favorite pieces of Smile music, period.

And that's what makes SMiLE, after all this time and all these years, so great. It's the small pieces of music-some of them only a minute or so long-scattered here and there that makes you wonder just how great it would have been.

Isn't this fade also used as background music on another official compilation, and they put the vegetables argument  over it?
Logged
Mr. Cohen
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1746


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2009, 10:56:56 PM »

Well, one thing I've thought Brian might have done, although I haven't done an edit yet, is use one of those instrumentals he had the group sing the "eat a lot, sleep a lot" part on or that fade with all of those crazy layered vocals on it to put part of the vegetable arguments on, and put it in their at a semi-random point, kind of like how he put the weird bit in the Smiley Smile version of "Wonderful". Listening to that Sagittarius song "My World Fell Down" made me think of that. Also, maybe use the "eat a lot, sleep a lot" chant twice, kind of like a chorus, which he did with the single version of "H&V".
Logged
Amazing Larry
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 552


There's a new daddy in town...


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2009, 11:09:41 PM »

Does anyone thinkthe april version of With Me Tonite would be on there? Huh
Logged

A discipline daddy.
Sheriff John Stone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5309



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2009, 06:32:20 AM »

And I think that "Fade to Vegetables" would have been an awesome end to the single.  Just like when GV goes into that choral section, a whole different thing from what's precededed it, but amazing in it's own way.   Fade to Vegetables is one of my favorite pieces of Smile music, period.

And that's what makes SMiLE, after all this time and all these years, so great. It's the small pieces of music-some of them only a minute or so long-scattered here and there that makes you wonder just how great it would have been.

Isn't this fade also used as background music on another official compilation, and they put the vegetables argument  over it?

Yes, on the Hawthorne CD, with Brian and Hal Blaine "arguing"....

I agree with you about those brilliant "small pieces of music - some of them only a minute long - scattered here and there that makes you wonder just how great it would have been." That was one of my disappointments with BWPS. Darian did a great job, but I miss those little parts interjected here and there. Specifically, on the BWPS "Vegetables", I find the way it ends suddenly to be disappointing, sacrificing some kind of cool fade....   
Logged
Roger Ryan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1528


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2009, 10:32:32 AM »

But then Darian and co. were interested in putting together something that could be performed live (so fade outs weren't going to be included). I understand that it was easier (and less controversial) to simply duplicate the live presentation in the studio for BWPS, but part of me wishes they did rethink it and incorporate some of that lost music (both the H & V  and VEGETABLES fades are among my favorite pieces of SMiLE). On the other hand, BWPS is an album made up of three movements with no breaks which in itself is a departure/progression from what came before, so something had to be sacrificed.
Logged
grillo
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 725



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2009, 05:48:32 PM »

Does anyone thinkthe april version of With Me Tonite would be on there? Huh
That would be great! Maybe after the bop bop doo doo doot part. I think I like the SS fade better than FTV...
Logged

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Richard Buckminster Fuller
SmileySam
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 04, 2009, 05:40:41 PM »

Yeah, all that time I didn't know that 'With Me Tonight' was originally used for Vega-Tables. I always thought it was an original non-SMiLE related piece.
Logged
juggler
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1170


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2009, 09:39:45 PM »

The reason I was confused is that there was a thread a few months back where this was discussed, and AGD said that Leaf told him that the fade edited onto the end of Vegatables on the box set was just thrown on there to get more Smile music out to the public (I'm sure you remember the thread, I remember you being a part of it).  I generally tend to trust AGD.  Plus, the Badman book's description of the fade doesn't seem to jive with the tag on the box set.

I don't know if Mark Linett still reads this forum, but I'm pretty sure that he has addressed this question in the past.  I seem to recall him once indicating that the fade was definitely NOT "just thrown on there" but was, in fact, found that way on an original tape.  Mark, if you're out there, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Logged
Roger Ryan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1528


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2009, 06:34:06 AM »

The reason I was confused is that there was a thread a few months back where this was discussed, and AGD said that Leaf told him that the fade edited onto the end of Vegatables on the box set was just thrown on there to get more Smile music out to the public (I'm sure you remember the thread, I remember you being a part of it).  I generally tend to trust AGD.  Plus, the Badman book's description of the fade doesn't seem to jive with the tag on the box set.

I don't know if Mark Linett still reads this forum, but I'm pretty sure that he has addressed this question in the past.  I seem to recall him once indicating that the fade was definitely NOT "just thrown on there" but was, in fact, found that way on an original tape.  Mark, if you're out there, please correct me if I'm wrong.

It's placement on an original reel of tape may have indicated the music was meant to be a tag to VEGETABLES (along with existing documentation), but the crossfade used on the GV box set version was specifically done for the '93 release. Brian was not using any crossfades (only hard edits) on tracks finished in '66/'67. Given what exists of the sessions, I can't imagine how one could do a successful hard edit into FADE TO VEGETABLES unless it was placed immediately after the acapella "send us your letter" section. Wanting to include as much of the material as possible for the box set release, I'm assuming the crossfade was the best option.
Logged
Bicyclerider
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 05, 2009, 10:01:41 AM »

Yes, you've got the sequence down - after the a capella "I know that you'll feel better" it would go into the "Fade."
Logged
Roger Ryan
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1528


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 05, 2009, 10:18:27 AM »

Yes, you've got the sequence down - after the a capella "I know that you'll feel better" it would go into the "Fade."

Hmm, makes me wish they edited the track that way for the box set release!
Logged
cta
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2009, 06:59:43 PM »

I would guess that it would be much different than any version of Vegetables any of us have ever heard.   A lot more production and either added or different lyrics from Parks...like two different lines of lyrics going in tandem. 
Logged

Feh.
SmileySam
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2009, 08:18:28 PM »

The slowed down version of "I know that you'll feel better when you send us in your letter and...". Was that recorded during the Smiley Smile sessions?
Logged
Nicko1234
Guest
« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2009, 05:05:21 AM »

Personally I`m really glad that it wasn`t released as a single as I think it would have been one of the worst that the band had released up to that point.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.188 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!