The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
683023
Posts in
27753
Topics by
4096
Members - Latest Member:
MrSunshine
July 16, 2025, 05:35:14 AM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band? (Read 8875 times)
MyDrKnowsItKeepsMeCalm
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Posts: 848
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #25 on:
July 13, 2014, 09:57:17 AM »
Quote from: Sheriff John Stone on July 13, 2014, 09:48:49 AM
I DID think of Bruce as a prolific songwriter. He seemed to be gathering momentum and building a nice catalog - "The Nearest Faraway Place" > "Deidre"/"Tears In The Morning" > "Disney Girls" > "I Write The Songs". A Grammy, hit singles, recordings by Barry Manilow & Francis Albert Sinatra.
Agree 100% ... this is what bugs me too about just saying 'eh, he wasn't that good'. And honestly, I think Disney Girls is one of the BBs best-written 70s songs, with evocative lyrics rich with detail and emotion. It makes me wish for so much more from Bruce, whether in that vein or not.
Logged
clack
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 537
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #26 on:
July 13, 2014, 10:36:47 AM »
Maybe Bruce has problems coming up with songs from scratch, writing by himself. Still, he was the best lyricist in the band, and second only to Brian (and maybe Dennis) as a pop melodist. It's a mystery why those gifts were so seldom tapped by the other writers in the band -- maybe Carl, for instance, might have been more prolific in the 70s if Bruce had still been with the band, and if he had Bruce writing lyrics and coming up with hooks. Al for sure could have used a collaborator to help with the melodies.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2014, 10:45:30 AM by clack
»
Logged
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 17767
The triumph of The Hickey Script !
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #27 on:
July 13, 2014, 01:35:30 PM »
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
I know of at least three more - "Brand New Old Friends", "If There Were Time" and "Let's Visit Heaven Tonight", all from the 70s/80s.
Logged
The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Moon Dawg
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1036
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #28 on:
July 13, 2014, 01:59:21 PM »
If Bruce had remained in the band, "I Write the Songs" might have been a Number One hit for The Beach Boys. Then again, maybe not.
Logged
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 7255
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #29 on:
July 13, 2014, 02:25:46 PM »
Quote from: Disney Boy (1985) on July 13, 2014, 08:11:54 AM
Unlike Brian and Dennis, Bruce is clearly someone for whom music is just a hobby - albeit a lucrative one - rather than something he absolutely needs to do and struggles to live without.
I don't think that's at all fair to say.
Maybe
you have a solid point if you amend the statement to say that
Writing music
is just a hobby..., but the man has been professionally involved in music for more than half a century. I think it's safe to say music is more than a hobby for him. Writing isn't the only valid musical endeavor.
Logged
Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs
here.
No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
donald
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2485
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #30 on:
July 13, 2014, 07:28:25 PM »
a lot of people who were not the "original" Beach Boys have contributed to the band over the decades. IMO Bruce has contributed the most overall. enough said I think.
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3049
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #31 on:
July 13, 2014, 07:37:45 PM »
Quote from: The Legendary AGD on July 13, 2014, 01:35:30 PM
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
Discounting the early '60s sound-a-like material, dude has probably only released somewhere around 20 songs in about 45 years. And I'm gonna assume he didn't write many more besides what's out there, because we know Bruce loves money, and if he coulda gotten some more songs covered back in the day he would have.
I know of at least three more - "Brand New Old Friends", "If There Were Time" and "Let's Visit Heaven Tonight", all from the 70s/80s.
I counted "If There Were Time" and "Let's Visit Heaven Tonight" when I mentioned:
Quote from: sweetdudejim on July 12, 2014, 11:37:20 PM
And then after his solo album tanked, he had like one or two songs that went to Captain and Tennille
"Brand New Old Friends", yeah I didn't remember that one. That was written for California Music right?
I'm pretty sure my point still stands. About 20 songs in 45 years. Hardly a songwriter. Which makes his sidekick role to Mike make a whole lot more sense. Cuz he ain't gonna be doing anything else. Surely not songwriting.
Logged
Disney Boy (1985)
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #32 on:
July 13, 2014, 10:47:19 PM »
Quote from: the captain on July 13, 2014, 02:25:46 PM
Quote from: Disney Boy (1985) on July 13, 2014, 08:11:54 AM
Unlike Brian and Dennis, Bruce is clearly someone for whom music is just a hobby - albeit a lucrative one - rather than something he absolutely needs to do and struggles to live without.
I don't think that's at all fair to say.
Maybe
you have a solid point if you amend the statement to say that
Writing music
is just a hobby..., but the man has been professionally involved in music for more than half a century. I think it's safe to say music is more than a hobby for him. Writing isn't the only valid musical endeavor.
True. There's also grinning, waving and hand claps to take into consideration...
Logged
Joel Goldenberg
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 628
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #33 on:
July 14, 2014, 08:45:42 AM »
BTW, I happen to like Tears in the Morning, the sound is sweet, but the lyrics are quite angry.
Logged
Cabinessenceking
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2164
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #34 on:
July 14, 2014, 10:23:04 AM »
Quote from: bossaroo on July 11, 2014, 10:23:24 PM
Bruce is kind of a non-issue. His membership in the band was neither good nor bad in my opinion. He's just kind of there. He holds down his parts, but he is not personally vital to the end result. He's a glorified extra hand.
word
Logged
Bill Ed
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #35 on:
July 14, 2014, 05:58:50 PM »
Leaving the band for several years was certainly good for Bruce. He wrote a Grammy-winning song and did production/arranging work for far more successful artists than the group he departed. I love his vocal arrangement on Art Garfunkel's version of Disney Girls and his work on the background vocals of Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me.
I also give him a lot of credit for pegging Jack Rielly as a snake oil salesman. And a few years later the Beach Boys reached out to
him
for help.
Logged
bossaroo
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1643
...let's be friends...
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #36 on:
July 14, 2014, 08:34:24 PM »
lotta help he was. Here Comes the Night ('78) is possibly the worst thing in the BBs catalog.
missed the disco boat by a mile and may be the most bloated cliche unmusical thing ever.
one of my favorite Brian tunes too.
«
Last Edit: July 14, 2014, 08:36:51 PM by bossaroo
»
Logged
♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇
Pissing off drunks since 1978
Global Moderator
Offline
Posts: 11870
🍦🍦 Pet Demon for Sale - $5 or best offer ☮☮
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #37 on:
July 14, 2014, 08:50:11 PM »
Quote
I don't think that's at all fair to say. Maybe you have a solid point if you amend the statement to say that Writing music is just a hobby..., but the man has been professionally involved in music for more than half a century. I think it's safe to say music is more than a hobby for him. Writing isn't the only valid musical endeavor.
Bruce has gone on record stating that playing with the Beach Boys is nothing more than a job to him, and has stated so several times (most notably in the Peter Ames Carlin book).
Logged
Need your song mixed/mastered? Contact me at
fear2stop@yahoo.com
. Serious inquiries only, please!
Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 3744
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #38 on:
July 14, 2014, 08:52:42 PM »
Quote from: Starscream on July 14, 2014, 08:50:11 PM
Quote
I don't think that's at all fair to say. Maybe you have a solid point if you amend the statement to say that Writing music is just a hobby..., but the man has been professionally involved in music for more than half a century. I think it's safe to say music is more than a hobby for him. Writing isn't the only valid musical endeavor.
Bruce has gone on record stating that playing with the Beach Boys is nothing more than a job to him, and has stated so several times (most notably in the Peter Ames Carlin book).
I love it, but agree it was unnecessary.
The original is quite great though. What a mean rhythm track. Fat, pounding piano/bass .... Bruce and Brian are the one's credited with playing piano/organ, so whatever Bruce is doing on the track is awesome.
What a great Brian lead vocal too. In fact, I can only really hear him on the backing vocals as well.
«
Last Edit: July 15, 2014, 03:22:19 AM by Pinder Goes To Kokomo
»
Logged
Kurosawa
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 365
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #39 on:
July 15, 2014, 12:09:01 AM »
Quote from: phirnis on July 13, 2014, 02:01:57 AM
Quote from: Kurosawa on July 12, 2014, 10:43:51 PM
They got a lot better after Bruce left and apart from Love You they haven't been nearly as good as they were with Blondie and Ricky. And Love You is more of a Brian album that Carl had to finish because Brian can't finish things. It's all been downhill from 15BO to the present.
They got a lot better with Carl and the Passions you mean? Wow... Or do you mean as a live band?
Discounting Love You, I don't think much of anything they've done since C&TP and Holland. I like about half of LA, and a few tunes here and there. But apart from Love You, they haven't done a whole album that I liked much since Holland. And as a live band they were never better than with Blondie and Ricky. The early days with Brian are close just for pure energy, however.
Logged
Member of the Anaheim Azusa and Cucamonga sewing circle book review and timing association (the double-ACASSN).
Disney Boy (1985)
Guest
Re: Was Bruce's departure in the early 70s good for the band?
«
Reply #40 on:
July 15, 2014, 02:21:37 AM »
Quote from: Pinder Goes To Kokomo on July 14, 2014, 08:52:42 PM
Quote from: Starscream on July 14, 2014, 08:50:11 PM
Quote
I don't think that's at all fair to say. Maybe you have a solid point if you amend the statement to say that Writing music is just a hobby..., but the man has been professionally involved in music for more than half a century. I think it's safe to say music is more than a hobby for him. Writing isn't the only valid musical endeavor.
Bruce has gone on record stating that playing with the Beach Boys is nothing more than a job to him, and has stated so several times (most notably in the Peter Ames Carlin book).
I love it, but agree it was unnecessary.
The original is quite great though. What a mean rhythm track. Fat pounding piano/bass .... Bruce and Brian are one's credited with playing piano/organ, so whatever Bruce is doing on the track is awesome.
What a great Brian lead vocal too. In fact, I can only really hear him on the backing vocals as well.
I've always adored the HCTN '67. Such a great, insanely catchy tune. I remember playing Wild Honey one time in the presence of family and friends; it was just kind of on in the background as people chatted. Then HCTN came on and my mum's fella suddenly announced 'what a great song' and played it again. And again. And again. And again. Pretty much for the remainder of the evening. And thus a new Beach Boys convert was formed
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.398 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...