The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
681492
Posts in
27639
Topics by
4082
Members - Latest Member:
briansclub
June 08, 2024, 01:50:18 PM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
"Made in California" Box Set
0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
22
23
24
25
26
[
27
]
28
29
30
31
32
...
53
Author
Topic: "Made in California" Box Set (Read 322686 times)
sockittome
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 842
Re: \
«
Reply #650 on:
September 30, 2012, 11:04:01 AM »
Quote from: runnersdialzero on September 30, 2012, 04:04:14 AM
Quote from: runnersdialzero on September 30, 2012, 03:20:24 AM
COME ON, PHIL, SHOW US YOUR DICK SO WE CAN ALL COMPARE
I thought we hadn't determined Phil's gender.
Logged
Jeff
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 545
Re: \
«
Reply #651 on:
September 30, 2012, 12:46:00 PM »
Quote from: Justin on September 30, 2012, 03:03:26 AM
Quote from: Jeff on September 29, 2012, 08:37:43 PM
The attitude seems to be that there should be no moderation of these threads whatsoever - just let everyone say whatever they want
Yeah. And I hope it never changes.
I'm on several messageboards and I quite enjoy how this one isn't as "regime" like as it could be. You don't know how good we have it. It's only until the freedom is taken away from you when you realize how great it was. I'm on boards that are heavily moderated and it's no fun. Threads missing with no explanation, comments removed for no good reason. It makes for a very confusing not to mention
untrusting
environment to share thoughts. You don't like someone's thread? You think something is spam? Ignore it. We're all adults here, yes? We all have developed a sense of rational thinking, haven't we? Don't like a thread? Don't read it. Don't like a poster? Skip their posts. Don't like it here? Don't visit. Work around your "issues" and you should be fine.
A true believer, eh? I understand your position, but I think it's shallow and counterproductive.
Look, I'm not suggesting that a hammer be used when a fly swatter will do, but ignoring the problem altogether is not the answer. There are a number of approaches that could be used. Among other things, all of Phil's posts and those responding to them could be moved to a single thread. That would leave the box set thread to actual discussion of the box set, and people who want to argue with Phil could do so separately.
Logged
Gertie J.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1008
Re: \
«
Reply #652 on:
September 30, 2012, 12:54:53 PM »
There's already a thread about Phil in Sandbox.
Logged
dj, blogger, and hanger-on
alanjames
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Posts: 234
Re: \
«
Reply #653 on:
September 30, 2012, 01:03:50 PM »
Let's make a petition or something like this to request the ban of this paranoid freak
Logged
monicker
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 746
Re: \
«
Reply #654 on:
September 30, 2012, 01:05:37 PM »
So i've been thinking about the boxxx set and the career-spanning aspect of it. Inevitably, there will be a section for Smile stuff, which is really exciting and something i hadn't really considered until recently. Does anyone have any guesses what this part will entail? It's an odd situation because the Smile box just came out so recently. Will they just use stuff that's already on the Smile box, or do you think they will take this (very good) opportunity to use something from all the extra material that had to be cut because there wasn't enough room? If it's the latter, i wonder what they'd use. It would be amazing if something Smile related has recently been discovered since TSS was put out, though i really doubt it.
I was also thinking about how the GV and PS boxes made any attempt to be as faithful to the original recordings/mixes as possible (and was explicitly stated in the liner notes) but that obviously wasn't the approach at all on TSS (with reason). So, i wonder if this new box will take the same approach as GV and PS, thus use "untampered" Smile material, or if they'd stick some revisionist piece on there. Either way, i think it's going to be interesting to see how Smile era stuff gets handled for this new box set.
Logged
Don't be eccentric, this is a BEACH BOYS forum, for God's sake!
SurfRiderHawaii
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2573
Add Some Music to your day!
Re:
«
Reply #655 on:
September 30, 2012, 01:37:44 PM »
Quote from: PhilCohen on September 29, 2012, 07:37:10 AM
What I'm saying is that Capitol's promise to release the box set "Later This Year"(I.E. 2012) and Mr.Doe's promise that it would be released in Nov.2012.........are apparently not to be.
I know it's hard to understand posts in the "land of delusion" but AGD never, ever PROMISED a Nov 2012 release date. He gets inside information and sometimes gives us a little. As to a specific release date, no one is more aware of how in flux these things can be than AGD.
Logged
"Brian is The Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f***ing messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything" - Dennis Wilson
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Posts: 3040
Re: \
«
Reply #656 on:
September 30, 2012, 01:44:41 PM »
Quote from: monicker on September 30, 2012, 01:05:37 PM
So i've been thinking about the boxxx set and the career-spanning aspect of it. Inevitably, there will be a section for Smile stuff, which is really exciting and something i hadn't really considered until recently. Does anyone have any guesses what this part will entail? It's an odd situation because the Smile box just came out so recently. Will they just use stuff that's already on the Smile box, or do you think they will take this (very good) opportunity to use something from all the extra material that had to be cut because there wasn't enough room? If it's the latter, i wonder what they'd use. It would be amazing if something Smile related has recently been discovered since TSS was put out, though i really doubt it.
I was also thinking about how the GV and PS boxes made any attempt to be as faithful to the original recordings/mixes as possible (and was explicitly stated in the liner notes) but that obviously wasn't the approach at all on TSS (with reason). So, i wonder if this new box will take the same approach as GV and PS, thus use "untampered" Smile material, or if they'd stick some revisionist piece on there. Either way, i think it's going to be interesting to see how Smile era stuff gets handled for this new box set.
Well my hope is that, as far as
SMiLE
stuff, we'd at least "Barnyard" with the backing vocals but no pasted over lead, along with that 3 minute plus version of "Child Is Father Of The Man". Beyond that, I really have no idea what they could do, as far as "unreleased" material from that era.
Logged
Chris Brown
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2014
Re: \
«
Reply #657 on:
September 30, 2012, 03:06:03 PM »
Quote from: sweetdudejim on September 30, 2012, 01:44:41 PM
Quote from: monicker on September 30, 2012, 01:05:37 PM
So i've been thinking about the boxxx set and the career-spanning aspect of it. Inevitably, there will be a section for Smile stuff, which is really exciting and something i hadn't really considered until recently. Does anyone have any guesses what this part will entail? It's an odd situation because the Smile box just came out so recently. Will they just use stuff that's already on the Smile box, or do you think they will take this (very good) opportunity to use something from all the extra material that had to be cut because there wasn't enough room? If it's the latter, i wonder what they'd use. It would be amazing if something Smile related has recently been discovered since TSS was put out, though i really doubt it.
I was also thinking about how the GV and PS boxes made any attempt to be as faithful to the original recordings/mixes as possible (and was explicitly stated in the liner notes) but that obviously wasn't the approach at all on TSS (with reason). So, i wonder if this new box will take the same approach as GV and PS, thus use "untampered" Smile material, or if they'd stick some revisionist piece on there. Either way, i think it's going to be interesting to see how Smile era stuff gets handled for this new box set.
Well my hope is that, as far as
SMiLE
stuff, we'd at least "Barnyard" with the backing vocals but no pasted over lead, along with that 3 minute plus version of "Child Is Father Of The Man". Beyond that, I really have no idea what they could do, as far as "unreleased" material from that era.
Yeah I can't imagine them leaving off Brian's vintage "Child" mix - when it was left off the Smile box, the only explanation I could think of was that they were saving it for this box.
Logged
rogerlancelot
Guest
Re: \
«
Reply #658 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:01:41 PM »
To be honest I think that TSS has been covered enough (unless something new has been discovered) and the same goes for Pet Sound Sessions. I am way more interested in hearing material from 1970 - 1983 which either hasn't leaked out on bootleg as of yet or appears here in pristine quality. "Stevie" anybody?
Logged
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2891
Re: \
«
Reply #659 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:22:39 PM »
Quote from: Ass Clown on September 30, 2012, 05:01:41 PM
To be honest I think that TSS has been covered enough (unless something new has been discovered) and the same goes for Pet Sound Sessions. I am way more interested in hearing material from 1970 - 1983 which either hasn't leaked out on bootleg as of yet or appears here in pristine quality. "Stevie" anybody?
Totally. For it to be a career-spanning box, of course those two albums have to be represented - any Beach Boys box should have most of Pet Sounds - but I hope they don't get carried away with too much of the SMiLE stuff. I'd hope for a little less than what's on the GV box. And hell yes, I really hope Stevie is on there in the best quality possible!
Logged
Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2891
Re: \
«
Reply #660 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
Logged
Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8465
Re: \
«
Reply #661 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:39:24 PM »
If this is true, Mike is still as jealous of Brian as ever. I wish Brian would stand up for his legacy more and tell Mike to shove it on matters like this.
«
Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 05:42:52 PM by SMiLE Brian
»
Logged
And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: \
«
Reply #662 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:43:10 PM »
Thanks for sharing.
But I don't particularly believe what that guy's source says. Predictable stuff there with Mike being the villian. Yawn.
Logged
EgoHanger1966
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2891
Re: \
«
Reply #663 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:46:59 PM »
I'm just hoping it isn't true. There's no proof to back it up so don't wanna jump to any conclusions. But really, time is running out for this stuff. I highly doubt there will be demand for unreleased Beach Boys tracks to be released in say, 20 years time. Although many really cool and unique oddities have escaped the archives officially - I bet for every two or three unreleaed tracks that Capitol/EMI/The Beach Boys have let out, there's probably one that lays in the vaults that would be commercially viable in the context of a package and interesting to fans.
Logged
Hal Blaine:"You're gonna get a tomata all over yer puss!"
Brian: "Don't say puss."
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: \
«
Reply #664 on:
September 30, 2012, 05:51:10 PM »
The "reason" for Mike axing the unreleased songs because they're mostly written by Brian is ridiculously petty. So petty that it sounds exactly like something a fan (or Brianista) would make up just to add more gas to the flame especially at this moment when everyone has a word or two to say about Mike.
Logged
ontor pertawst
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2575
L♡VE ALWAYS WINS
Re: \
«
Reply #665 on:
September 30, 2012, 06:21:08 PM »
Petty, but totally in character. Of course he'd want to the career-spanning box set to be favorable to him, it's not outlandish to imagine him having some qualms with "too much" unreleased stuff being a Brian and Dennis-a-thon. He'd have his reasons which would be completely understandable!
And of course, completely aggravating.
«
Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 06:25:38 PM by ontor pertawst
»
Logged
Jim V.
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Posts: 3040
Re: \
«
Reply #666 on:
September 30, 2012, 06:27:18 PM »
Quote from: EgoHanger1966 on September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
I wouldn't think too much of this seeing as the poster on the Hoff board (a guy name fifthbeatle or something) is the guy we all remember from these parts as "vintagemusic". I don't think the guy knows his ass from a hole in the ground, and I highly doubt he has an "inside sources" with information about the box set. So I'd breathe a bit easier if I were all you guys.
Logged
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8465
Re: \
«
Reply #667 on:
September 30, 2012, 06:29:40 PM »
Quote from: sweetdudejim on September 30, 2012, 06:27:18 PM
Quote from: EgoHanger1966 on September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
I wouldn't think too much of this seeing as the poster on the Hoff board (a guy name fifthbeatle or something) is the guy we all remember from these parts as "vintagemusic". I don't think the guy knows his ass from a hole in the ground, and I highly doubt he has an "inside sources" with information about the box set. So I'd breathe a bit easier if I were all you guys.
That is a relief, somebody ask him about the mob.
Logged
And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
Jason
Guest
Re: \
«
Reply #668 on:
October 01, 2012, 12:54:46 AM »
Quote from: Jeff on September 29, 2012, 08:37:43 PM
Quote from: Klingsor on September 29, 2012, 08:10:36 PM
This continues to be the worst thread
This continues to be one of the worst moderated sites on the web. The attitude seems to be that there should be no moderation of these threads whatsoever - just let everyone say whatever they want, even if it derails the topic, threatens other posters, etc. One of the mods did or does have a Noam Chomsky quote in his sig to the effect that any "censorship" is inherently evil.
It really is a shame. All it takes is (1) a persistent troll; (2) some naive posters who don't understand the concept of "don't feed the troll"; and (3) mods who are unwilling to lift a finger to keep the discussion on track. And voila, we have yet another thread that has virtually nothing to do with the intended subject.
For the record, I'm the one who used to have the Chomsky quote.
As far as "no moderation of these threads", we're HERE and reading them, so obviously there IS moderating going on. We just don't think every little thing that the more overly sensitive folks on here lose their sh*t over is really worth the effort. In this respect, we're actually half-decent at "not feeding the trolls". Maybe we should start banning those who DO feed the trolls. But, yeahhhhhh, that's all well and good until we start nitpicking at every little thing and then you guys will be begging for us to go away. The best response to someone like Phil is to just ignore him. Nothing he says or does is worthy of a ban, even if he speaks 99% bollocks and 1% reality. If we banned people simply because they were the odd men out in whatever topic, by the end of the day the mods will probably have banned 99% of the membership as well as ourselves because at one point or another EVERYONE on here has been that guy or girl. I'm sorry, but disagreeing with someone's viewpoint is NOT worthy of a ban.
And as far as keeping the discussions on track, how do you propose we do it? Threatening bans to those who keep derailing the thread? I mean, even that's a bit draconian. I already tried once to suggest to folks here to stop posting new threads about the same old stuff and find older threads to add it to...and, that doesn't seem to work too well, does it? Just like off of the interwebs, discussions on here will derail every so often. That's the way it works. If such diversions are troubling on here, I might suggest avoiding all conversation altogether.
Besides, for what continues to be one of the "worst moderated sites on the web"...I mean, seriously. We mods here aren't THAT unapproachable - yes, even I'm not that unapproachable. If anyone here has a problem they're more than welcome to PM any of us. I've received plenty of PMs from folks with their concerns. Contrary to popular belief we DO take the feedback from you guys seriously. Have we slipped up? Sure. We could have possibly dealt with that alleged "threatening email" thing a little better. I think inviting that one dude with all of his gore pictures back was a mistake. We could have taken care of nobody better and earlier than we did, but hey. We just can't go around banning people unless there's a legitimately GOOD reason for it.
I once suggested the idea of a banhammer challenge. For anyone who thinks such and such member has committed something worthy of a ban on the board, PM one of the mods or report the post. If the mods agree that nothing in the post is worthy of ban, the person who reported the post will be banned. Maybe then people will learn to live and let live and stop sweating the small stuff.
«
Last Edit: October 01, 2012, 12:56:00 AM by The Real Beach Boy
»
Logged
The Shift
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 7427
Biding time
Re:
«
Reply #669 on:
October 01, 2012, 01:07:33 AM »
Several months ago Id have agreed with those calling for a Phil ban but I've grown to appreciate his own brand of twaddle and the team of facts he has at his fingertips. He's hot on facts as he is on fantasy.
Mods have to tread a thin line constantly and be aware that if they ban someone there's an implication that they believe their own behaviour to be better than that of the person they've judged to be worthy of a ban. Ain't easy. On the whole they do a fine job.
Only call I'd make is for folk - mods included - to use their own names instead of monikers, then at least some might think before posting what they post. But hen I went around by the name of Wee Helper for umpteen years, so who am I…
Logged
“We live in divisive times.”
Alan Smith
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2089
I'm still here bitches and I know everything. –A
Re:
«
Reply #670 on:
October 01, 2012, 02:21:08 AM »
Quote from: John Manning on October 01, 2012, 01:07:33 AM
Several months ago Id have agreed with those calling for a Phil ban but I've grown to appreciate his own brand of twaddle and the team of facts he has at his fingertips. He's hot on facts as he is on fantasy.
Mods have to tread a thin line constantly and be aware that if they ban someone there's an implication that they believe their own behaviour to be better than that of the person they've judged to be worthy of a ban. Ain't easy. On the whole they do a fine job.
+ 1.
I think the mods here are awesome and respect that most posters here are intelligent adults, and recognise that there is a high level of self regulation in most threads - with occasional need for intervention.
Their decisions are usually proven long sighted - I would hate to see diversity of opinion and character suffer should people be banned for one-off, occasional or infrequent lapses in judgement (repeat aberrant behaviour is obviously another matter).
Logged
ESQ - Subscribe Now!!!
A new Beach Boys forum is here!
http://beachboys.boards.net/
The Heartical Don
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 4761
Re: \
«
Reply #671 on:
October 01, 2012, 02:31:55 AM »
Suppose the box set has all the major hits, some attention to rarities (as in: three or four of interesting ones), and some time for the PS Sessions and TSS...
...would I chip out 100+ Euros for that? I am not a nerd enough to do that for a few samples of clearer sound quality through better mastering.
Having the 1993 box set, PS Sessions, TSS, and all the original albums (no SIP though), I'd find a little odd to do that.
And knowing that there must be really more interesting rarities would make me pretty irritated, I tells' ya.
PS: there is a very interesting section on the soul of the true collector in Simon Reynolds'
Retromania
(2011). A real eye opener of a book, with many ideas that elicit controversion and heated debate. Read it.
Logged
80% Of Success Is Showing Up
hypehat
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 6311
Re: \
«
Reply #672 on:
October 01, 2012, 02:59:47 AM »
Quote from: SMiLE Brian on September 30, 2012, 06:29:40 PM
Quote from: sweetdudejim on September 30, 2012, 06:27:18 PM
Quote from: EgoHanger1966 on September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
I wouldn't think too much of this seeing as the poster on the Hoff board (a guy name fifthbeatle or something) is the guy we all remember from these parts as "vintagemusic". I don't think the guy knows his ass from a hole in the ground, and I highly doubt he has an "inside sources" with information about the box set. So I'd breathe a bit easier if I were all you guys.
That is a relief, somebody ask him about the mob.
Yeah, thank God it's him. The voices in his head do not count as reliable sources iirc.
Logged
Quote from: ontor pertawst on October 06, 2012, 06:05:25 PM
All roads lead to Kokomo. Exhaustive research in time travel has conclusively proven that there is no alternate universe WITHOUT Kokomo. It would've happened regardless.
Quote from: Andrew G. Doe on May 15, 2012, 12:33:42 PM
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?
Quote from: Al Jardine
Syncopate it? In front of all these people?!
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 17767
The triumph of The Hickey Script !
Re: \
«
Reply #673 on:
October 01, 2012, 03:16:30 AM »
Quote from: EgoHanger1966 on September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was
because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson
. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
I'd question that claim.
Take that for what you will...
Logged
The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
The Heartical Don
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 4761
Re: \
«
Reply #674 on:
October 01, 2012, 03:27:51 AM »
Quote from: Andrew G. Doe on October 01, 2012, 03:16:30 AM
Quote from: EgoHanger1966 on September 30, 2012, 05:37:14 PM
A user posted this on the Steve Hoffman forum in regards to the BB's box:
Quote
A little bird told me the box set has a lot of unreleased material nixed from the final running order per instructions from Mike Love. There was more unreleased stuff going to be released on the box but Love put the kabosh on it. I wonder why? I was told the reason Love vetoed the songs, was
because the songwriting of the unreleased material was too heavily dominated by Brian Wilson
. I heard this from a good source.
Take that for what you will...
I'd question that claim.
Take that for what you will...
If you don't mind, I take that for what I want it to mean...
Logged
80% Of Success Is Showing Up
Pages:
1
...
22
23
24
25
26
[
27
]
28
29
30
31
32
...
53
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.135 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...