-->
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 29, 2024, 03:31:31 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
News: peteramescarlin.com
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  The Smiley Smile Message Board
|-+  Non Smiley Smile Stuff
| |-+  The Sandbox
| | |-+  Japan
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Japan  (Read 11307 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jason
Guest
« on: March 11, 2011, 01:00:40 PM »

Personally sending good wishes out to the people of Japan today, and I do believe we have a couple Japanese members on the board as well - best of luck to you all over the next few days.
Logged
stack-o-tracks
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1408


The baker man


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2011, 03:27:11 PM »

I happened to turn on the news about a half hour after the quake struck. Parts of the country are looking pretty bad. Reminded me of seeing the pictures from after Hurricane Katrina. It sounds like most people were trained to deal with tsunamis and were able to get to higher ground, the latest update had the death toll around 200.



Some pictures. http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/03/earthquake-in-japan/100022/

Too early to make jokes about the fairy tale girl somewhere near Japan?
Logged

No mas, por favor.
The Heartical Don
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4761



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2011, 02:58:49 AM »

Good topic. As long as I am a BBs fan, I have been observing that the Japanese have some special relationship with the band. Special editions, excellent remastering and packaging, deluxe editions, bonus tracks, you name it. They must be fond of the Boys.

My very best wishes to all people in Japan, after the three gigantic tragedies that sought to hit the country in a timespan of a couple of days. I wish all folks that got homeless, lack food, clean water, and shelter, got ill and traumatized, lost their occupation, and most of all: lost one or more of their dearest, all the strength they need, and condolences where due. And to the deceased: may all of you rest in peace.

(My God, one tries to phrase some comprehensive set of expressions of commiseration, and at the end one realizes that everything falls short.)
Logged

80% Of Success Is Showing Up
Awesoman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1830


Disagreements? Work 'em out.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2011, 03:30:32 PM »

Considering that Japan is on the brink of nuclear meltdown, it is a little shocking and unnerving at just how silent the rest of the world has been over this crisis.  Where are the benefit concerts?  Where's George Clooney when you need him?  We can gather all of today's top music stars to record a truly dreadful cover of "We Are The World" for Haiti, but *nothing* for Japan?? 
Logged

And if you don't know where you're going
Any road will take you there
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2011, 04:01:46 PM »

Considering that Japan is on the brink of nuclear meltdown, it is a little shocking and unnerving at just how silent the rest of the world has been over this crisis.  Where are the benefit concerts?  Where's George Clooney when you need him?  We can gather all of today's top music stars to record a truly dreadful cover of "We Are The World" for Haiti, but *nothing* for Japan?? 

We're all too busy filling out NCAA brackets, filling out golf score-cards, and booking tickets for Rio de Janeiro.

I am utterly shocked at how calm the Japanese people are. If this had happened in America there would be looting and utter chaos. In Japan, even in the meltdown area, it appears the people are evacuating in an orderly fashion considering the circumstances. So much devastation - It's incredibly sad.

Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
hypehat
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6311



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2011, 04:38:25 PM »

I keep trying to post something here, but it all seems so trite and worthless. It's awful. I had to make myself stop watching the footage of when it hit. So terrifying. And the whole nuclear issue. I mean, good god.
Logged

All roads lead to Kokomo. Exhaustive research in time travel has conclusively proven that there is no alternate universe WITHOUT Kokomo. It would've happened regardless.
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?

Quote from: Al Jardine
Syncopate it? In front of all these people?!
Jason
Guest
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2011, 12:42:11 AM »

It is eternally ironic that the same nation the United States claimed was "uncivilized" in World War II handles a crisis on this kind of scale with that kind of calm restraint. Spit up in the air...?
Logged
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5985



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2011, 08:55:45 PM »

Considering that Japan is on the brink of nuclear meltdown, it is a little shocking and unnerving at just how silent the rest of the world has been over this crisis.  Where are the benefit concerts?  Where's George Clooney when you need him?  We can gather all of today's top music stars to record a truly dreadful cover of "We Are The World" for Haiti, but *nothing* for Japan?? 
One would have thought that Mike would have rerecorded Sumahama by now. And that's not necessarily meant as a joke.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
18thofMay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1463


Goin to the beach


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2011, 09:06:40 PM »

I don't doubt that he has considered it!
Logged

It’s like he hired a fashion consultant and told her to make him look “punchable.”
Some Guy, 2012
"Donald Trump makes Mike Love look like an asshole"
Me ,2015.
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5985



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2011, 09:16:45 PM »

Actually, if done right, it could actually be very tastefully done, and it would definitely be a worthy cause.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
Awesoman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1830


Disagreements? Work 'em out.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2011, 04:43:33 PM »

Considering that Japan is on the brink of nuclear meltdown, it is a little shocking and unnerving at just how silent the rest of the world has been over this crisis.  Where are the benefit concerts?  Where's George Clooney when you need him?  We can gather all of today's top music stars to record a truly dreadful cover of "We Are The World" for Haiti, but *nothing* for Japan?? 
One would have thought that Mike would have rerecorded Sumahama by now. And that's not necessarily meant as a joke.

Hasn't Japan suffered enough? 
Logged

And if you don't know where you're going
Any road will take you there
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2011, 06:05:37 PM »

It really puts things into perspective. Reading about the workers at the Fukushima plant is tear inducing.

Bravo to nuclear energy. We are the most capable/intelligent people of any generation on earth and yet we find the most dangerous ways to create energy.
Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2011, 06:11:19 PM »

Bravo to nuclear energy. We are the most capable/intelligent people of any generation on earth and yet we find the most dangerous ways to create energy.
Couple things there. One, what generation are you talking about? Unless you're in your, what, 70s? 80s? your generation didn't create nuclear energy. Two, who says this (or some other) generation is the most intelligent? Three, as long as we all continue to demand the modern way of life--lots of ready energy at low cost--we don't have a lot of great options knocking at the door. Our options are either running out, filthy, not readily available, dangerous, or expensive. Or some combination thereof.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2011, 06:27:02 PM »

Bravo to nuclear energy. We are the most capable/intelligent people of any generation on earth and yet we find the most dangerous ways to create energy.
Couple things there. One, what generation are you talking about? Unless you're in your, what, 70s? 80s? your generation didn't create nuclear energy. Two, who says this (or some other) generation is the most intelligent? Three, as long as we all continue to demand the modern way of life--lots of ready energy at low cost--we don't have a lot of great options knocking at the door. Our options are either running out, filthy, not readily available, dangerous, or expensive. Or some combination thereof.

1) I shouldn't have said generation, I meant more or less the people in the last century.
2) It is all relative to what humans consider "intelligent" - this could mean spiritually intelligent, or mentally intelligent - who knows. I just meant that we live in the age where man has walked on the moon. We have invented ways to harness solar energy, wind energy, water energy (dams), and yet due to corporate greed we are stuck in this disgusting nuclear age. There are many things that engineers have invented that harness many types of clean energy, but Nuclear Power/Coal companies put a stop to that through lobbying and buyouts. In this case, you're right: who knows....we are probably the least intelligent humans to ever grace the planet.
Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 18, 2011, 06:58:42 PM »

Really I just don't see much difference between us and previous people. Technology has advanced, certainly, but we're otherwise more or less the same as those who came before (in my opinion). And the energy problem is just huge and difficult. I don't see a devil or a savior among the options.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2011, 07:18:10 PM »

It is sadly unfortunate that now 3 very dangerous nuclear disasters have occurred in within the last 40 years and yet very few in the position of power have stepped up to say "hey, this stuff may be dangerous"

Heck, my governor just got on the airwaves and said that nuclear power is very safe. Yet they don't take nature into account....human nature, or nature itself. In a universe ruled by chaos and Murphy's Law it is quite a stupid to keep these plants running...especially when history has proved my point and will continue to prove my point: nuclear energy is unsafe in the hands of human beings.
Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5985



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2011, 07:22:17 PM »

Maybe The Terminator was right? It's in our nature as human beings to self destruct.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
bgas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6372


Oh for the good old days


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2011, 07:24:21 PM »

It is sadly unfortunate that now 3 very dangerous nuclear disasters have occurred in within the last 40 years and yet very few in the position of power have stepped up to say "hey, this stuff may be dangerous"

Heck, my governor just got on the airwaves and said that nuclear power is very safe. Yet they don't take nature into account....human nature, or nature itself. In a universe ruled by chaos and Murphy's Law it is quite a stupid to keep these plants running...especially when history has proved my point and will continue to prove my point: nuclear energy is unsafe in the hands of human beings.

Still, what viable altertnatives do you suggest?  
Take Japan for an example, with their millions of people, constantly needing energy. What will you Dam to produce the same energy. Where will you get enough Wind energy to power everything.
 Possibly, they should have picked locations not on the oceanfront for nuclear? But there's a negative side to almost any energy source, whether that be danger or low output.  
Logged

Nothing I post is my opinion, it's all a message from God
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2011, 07:38:00 PM »

Nobody in power thinks it is a bad idea? I don't know about that: my state, for example, has had a ban on building new nuclear facilities for nearly 20 years. No new nuclear facilities have been ordered in the US since 1978 or completed since 1996. Sure, we've had 3 disasters of varying degrees, and the thought of a significant disaster is terrifying. But how many dozens of oil- or coal-related disasters have we had? A few dozen blown up here in a mine, a bay or gulf polluted for decades there... I'm not defending anything, mind you. It's just that there really is not a good answer for as populated a world as we have and as demanding a population as we have.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2011, 07:46:57 PM »

It is sadly unfortunate that now 3 very dangerous nuclear disasters have occurred in within the last 40 years and yet very few in the position of power have stepped up to say "hey, this stuff may be dangerous"

Heck, my governor just got on the airwaves and said that nuclear power is very safe. Yet they don't take nature into account....human nature, or nature itself. In a universe ruled by chaos and Murphy's Law it is quite a stupid to keep these plants running...especially when history has proved my point and will continue to prove my point: nuclear energy is unsafe in the hands of human beings.

Still, what viable altertnatives do you suggest?  
Take Japan for an example, with their millions of people, constantly needing energy. What will you Dam to produce the same energy. Where will you get enough Wind energy to power everything.
 Possibly, they should have picked locations not on the oceanfront for nuclear? But there's a negative side to almost any energy source, whether that be danger or low output.  

I think that solar panels on roofs can help. Depending on how large your property is, you can have some small windmills. There have been many creative minds that have invented ways that solar energy can really help us (such as putting nearly microscopic bubbles on the surface of solar panels to help refract the sun more to get more energy - somehow this works). And it also means lowering our consumption of energy. I honestly don't need to spend 5 hours at my computer every day. I don't need my porch light on 24/7. I don't need to use a dryer to dry my clothes (as I have space for a clothesline).

There are plenty of ways to get clean energy...but it takes sacrifice and patience. Nuclear energy is only still around because corporations lobby for them to stay open. This is why my governor was just on praising nuclear energy as thousands are now being radiated by this toxic mess.

I was a very idealistic college student a few years ago - some of it hasn't left me lol

Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2011, 07:58:37 PM »

Nobody in power thinks it is a bad idea? I don't know about that: my state, for example, has had a ban on building new nuclear facilities for nearly 20 years. No new nuclear facilities have been ordered in the US since 1978 or completed since 1996. Sure, we've had 3 disasters of varying degrees, and the thought of a significant disaster is terrifying. But how many dozens of oil- or coal-related disasters have we had? A few dozen blown up here in a mine, a bay or gulf polluted for decades there... I'm not defending anything, mind you. It's just that there really is not a good answer for as populated a world as we have and as demanding a population as we have.

I said very few politicians think it is a good idea to rid our world of this nightmare....not none. You are correct that no new plants have been started since 1978 but there hasn't been the need to create new ones. And there also hasn't been a major push to close them either.

If humans decide to change their way of life then population won't matter in terms of energy usage.

« Last Edit: March 18, 2011, 08:00:15 PM by rab2591 » Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2011, 08:06:26 PM »


If humans decide to change their way of life then population won't matter in terms of energy usage.

I don't know if that is true. Note, I am not disagreeing, I am saying I literally don't know. Could the planet support a population of 7 billion living by Iron Age energy usage, burning wood or peat or whatever else we burned? Are you talking just personal usage, or overall consumption--because the latter would require giving up all the things that cost-effective energy allows to happen (transportation of goods, for example). It seems a relatively consistent position of the sorts of people who study such things that population actually is a huge problem (even if the whole world doesnt follow western / developed energy usage habits).
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5865


"My God. It's full of stars."


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 18, 2011, 08:15:47 PM »


If humans decide to change their way of life then population won't matter in terms of energy usage.

I don't know if that is true. Note, I am not disagreeing, I am saying I literally don't know. Could the planet support a population of 7 billion living by Iron Age energy usage, burning wood or peat or whatever else we burned? Are you talking just personal usage, or overall consumption--because the latter would require giving up all the things that cost-effective energy allows to happen (transportation of goods, for example). It seems a relatively consistent position of the sorts of people who study such things that population actually is a huge problem (even if the whole world doesnt follow western / developed energy usage habits).

I think we are basing our theories on the idea that humans need fire to stay warm and need to burn incandescent (or even fluorescent) lightbulbs to see in the dark. Technology has the means to evolve to help accommodate our changing world...we could probably come up with ways to keep warm without harming the atmosphere. There are probably ways we can see in the dark without needing a nuclear plant.

Unfortunately we are adaptive creatures - We will adapt to the problem but we are ignorant to foresee the problem and therefore ignorant to help stop the problem before it occurs....this "problem" being climate change or other ecological disasters that occur because of our ignorance.

Logged

Bill Tobelman's SMiLE site

God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!

"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.

Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 18, 2011, 08:22:17 PM »

Stay warm and see in the dark without building nuclear plants, sure. But without harming the environment? I wonder. I'd love to think so, but we certainly haven't stumbled across anything so far. (Granted, the "and is financially rewarding to provide" is part of the situation.) But even burning wood emits pollution--just less of it. And solar--transmitting it to those areas where it can't be gathered means environmental impact as well. (Impacts on wildlife makes large-scale solar projects an administrative hurdle in California, for example.) I guess I'm just not a very optimistic person, is all. And what I often see is, the latest disaster is the one that people get excited about, so this week was nuclear energy. Our attention spans are short, though. (BP? Gulf of Mexico? What?) Hell, we almost seem to have forgotten revolutions in the Middle East, except for the past day's Libya news pushing it back above the fold. Anyway ... just my pessimism/cynicism about it all, i guess.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
Mahalo
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156

..Stand back, Speak normally


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2011, 08:28:31 PM »

Ronald Reagan gave a speech where he conveyed the reality that when he was a child the air in the town he lived was much more polluted then because everyone was heating their home by burning wood and coal..and not only that but one would have to wake up in the wee hours to replenish the wood or coal...now we have come a long way. I personally think the cost of solar should be cheaper, and the whole lobbying thing that rab was conveying is a harsh reality. HOWEVER, the biggest problem of nuke plants is not the threat of nuclear meltdown, it is the nuclear waste that is left ON SITE at each plant....here in the Hudson Valley that means that there is nuclear waste sitting on the banks of our beloved river. President W. Bush wanted to have that waste transported to the Yucca mountains to be buried well under the desert but the environmental scardy-cats and Obama nixed all that. So instead that nuclear waste will stay on the banks of the Hudson...

As Americans, we should be the LEADERS in solar, wind, and whatever energy in the world. I'm not convinced we are. Install windmills off the coast off Massachusetts? No, Ted Kennedy and his rich-liberal elite didn't want their view of the oceanic horizon ruined. As Luther said, there hasn't been any new nuke plants built in too long of a time..All of our nuke plants are scheduled to be pahsed out over the next 50 years. With 100 plants in this country that means there would have to be at least 2 new plants built each year until 2060- not going to happen because of the enviromentalists. How do we meet our ever growing energy demands?

My point is that IMO we need to drill for domestic oil (instead of giving it to foreign companies...do your research), mine for coal, and build nuke plants WHILE AT THE SAME TIME give EQUAL OR MORE INCENTIVE to create Solar and Wind Farms, and residential solar panels. Imagine not having to pay a damn utilities bill...this technology is here. While the left drives me nuts with their B.S. on energy, the conservatives drive me nuts (and I am one) because of their downright negligence of Solar and Wind energy. After all, THINK about the true definition of CONSERVATIVE..(Conserve...right?)

I think that when people refer to ALTERNATIVE energy they should be referring to OIL and nuclear...as the alternative to Solar and wind...but that is yet to come...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.482 seconds with 21 queries.