I read that review, and it seems clear to me that the guy really didn't like the New Orleans performance.
The critic didn't even ATTEND the BB concert. He simply talked with one person who was negative.
Which begs the question: whose fault was it that the Beach Boys gave a bad performance that day?
Comments here
http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12818.0.html indicate there was no soundcheck that day, so it apparently took some time to get the sound right. Other comments indicated that the crowd was enthusiastic.
Conveniently not mentioned by the "judge"... it was the third show of the tour. And an abbreviated one, at that. "Rough" spots (if any) were quickly smoothed over, although the critic claimed
"the reviews were generally negative at every stop along the way", which we all know is completely bogus. This guy clearly just does not like The Beach Boys or, more specifically, Mike. Why else would he reference a concert that took place more than two months earlier in what was supposed to be a review of the dvd?