The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
680977
Posts in
27625
Topics by
4067
Members - Latest Member:
Dae Lims
May 11, 2024, 01:05:40 PM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Author
Topic: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II (Read 12394 times)
TMinthePM
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 320
How can I show you Zen if you do not first empty y
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #50 on:
February 11, 2015, 03:21:34 PM »
Nice work, GF.
Two books come to mind as I read your post - Goeff Emerick's (hope I've spelled that correctly) memoir of working with the Beatles at Abbey Road, and Revolution in the Head, by
MacDonald, the last the best I've ever read (repeatedly) concerning the Fabs.
Logged
joshferrell
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1634
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #51 on:
February 11, 2015, 04:32:40 PM »
when it comes to SS I kind of think of it like when Kurt Cobain recorded "In Utero" his intention was to make the worst album he could so that it would fail, of course in doing so it became a masterpiece that was so unique people just thought he was being artistic, I'm thinking maybe Brian was getting back at the other guys for not supporting Smile so he set out to record the worst album he could, and it became an art statement....lol.. like his ex wife Marilyn said in IJWMFTT about Brian and the other members of the group after Smile(and I'm paraphrasing) "Look if you think you can do better than go ahead." Brian gave the producer helms to the other boys, washing his hands of it, hence it being Produced by Beach Boys..
Logged
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #52 on:
February 11, 2015, 08:47:32 PM »
I think it was "If you think it's so easy, you do it." - At least that's what I remember, but it's the same point really.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #53 on:
February 11, 2015, 09:21:10 PM »
Quote from: Fire Wind on February 11, 2015, 02:32:37 AM
the music itself was mostly just Revolver part II.
Interesting, this is not how I feel at all. The only two tracks that retain a little bit of that "Revolver" vibe IMHO are Good Morning and Lovely Rita. But I just don't like the sheer sound of them as much as the overall sound of Revolver. I don't know the reason, guitarfool could probably write a full message board's worth of detail about it, be it the placement of the mikes or the way the reverb is used.
It's really a thing like preferring dark hair over blondes or vice versa. I don't care how much innovation or creativity Pepper contains more than Revolver. Pepper feels to me like watching a rainy English afternoon with a cup of tea in my hand (which can be nice in a way), while Revolver is like watching an exciting football (soccer) match.
I don't believe that Revolver is regarded better by some because the sounds can be recreated more easily. It just has a more natural sound.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
Bean Bag
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1177
Right?
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #54 on:
February 11, 2015, 09:22:06 PM »
Party
Pet Sounds
Smiley Smile
A party sandwich.
Party!
is the top bun. Light, airy, fluffy.
Pet Sounds
the meat & veggies (or tofu for those with a hard-on for the lousy Beatles). And
Smiley
is the bottom bun -- that absorbs all the burger juice.
Logged
409.
joshferrell
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1634
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #55 on:
February 11, 2015, 09:36:34 PM »
as far as Sgt Pepper, I just recently heard the Mono mix, and don't get me wrong the stereo mix sounds excellent but the mono version sounds "Unique" in the same way that Pet sounds sounds great in stereo but has it's own "Unique" sound mixed in mono...I hear more of the pet sounds influence on the mono version.. but yeah I always thought it was overrated, I like Magical Mystery tour better because the songs are better, I also Like Abbey Road mainly because of the production but I like how it has the Beatles from ALL time periods represented on it, it has heavy guitars, it has pianos, it has orchestral music, it has harmonies, it has ballads, it has political statement (maxwell silver hammer) it has earthy Folk music (Her majesty) it has the moog synths, it has all the Beatles actually playing together unlike the White Album, it has psychedelic sounds and lyrics (Come together and Polythene pam), it has a happy kid song, it has a blues type song (Oh darlin) and (with the exception of Her Majesty) it has no fillers. it's the beatles going back to the basics but with great production..I just wish the "Let it be" album was like that, even though I think that "I,Me,Mine" comes closest to that..
Logged
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5749
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #56 on:
February 11, 2015, 11:30:02 PM »
Quote from: Bean Bag on February 11, 2015, 09:22:06 PM
Party
Pet Sounds
Smiley Smile
A party sandwich.
Party!
is the top bun. Light, airy, fluffy.
Pet Sounds
the meat & veggies (or tofu for those with a hard-on for the lousy Beatles). And
Smiley
is the bottom bun -- that absorbs all the burger juice.
that's both hilarious and remarkably accurate. I can't think of many bands who have released an iconic record (which is not the band's 1st or last record), and to have that record bookended on BOTH sides by such unusual, drastically different (from the iconic record's sound) albums, especially all within a short time period. It's quite unique, AFAIK.
Of course, if you put Summer Days and Summer Nights (the last "proper" studio record), and have the Boys finish SMiLE and release it, it seems like a much more logical progression in a Pet Sounds sandwich. The only real reason the actual released album chronology is so bizarre as it is, is because of a stopgap-to-buy-time quickie record (are there any people here who really think Party! was conceived for any other reason?) and the unprecedented amount of unreleased SMiLE recordings (which show the natural, yet huge leap forward, artistic progression that was **supposed** to follow). Can someone please just invent a time machine and find a way to help get SMiLE completed in '67? Let's get on that, people.
«
Last Edit: February 11, 2015, 11:37:16 PM by CenturyDeprived
»
Logged
ppk700
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 170
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #57 on:
February 11, 2015, 11:39:41 PM »
Quote from: joshferrell on February 11, 2015, 04:32:40 PM
when it comes to SS I kind of think of it like when Kurt Cobain recorded "In Utero" his intention was to make the worst album he could so that it would fail, of course in doing so it became a masterpiece that was so unique people just thought he was being artistic, I'm thinking maybe Brian was getting back at the other guys for not supporting Smile so he set out to record the worst album he could, and it became an art statement....lol.. like his ex wife Marilyn said in IJWMFTT about Brian and the other members of the group after Smile(and I'm paraphrasing) "Look if you think you can do better than go ahead." Brian gave the producer helms to the other boys, washing his hands of it, hence it being Produced by Beach Boys..
That's a very interesting theory. "In Utero" is my favorite album, and I very much like the comparison you've drawn with "Smiley Smile." I can see it. Both are masterpieces, to this listener.
Logged
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5749
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #58 on:
February 11, 2015, 11:43:46 PM »
I wonder if Brian would have been able to release an album to "buy time" to help him finish SMiLE, if such an easy option were afforded to him. Not saying time was all he needed to finish it, but it was one of the things he needed. As I stated in an earlier post, I theorize that maybe SS was an attempt at this in and of itself, if he had it in his head to maybe finish recording SMiLE at a later point (which of course, he did - mucccch later).
He was lucky that Party! filled that role when it did, but maybe it was obvious 1.5 years after Party! that the public wasn't gonna accept another record like that, due to the exponentially sped-up rate of change in popular music, and expectation from the public.
Was Lei'd in Hawaii almost another attempt at an album with the Party! mindset too, to get an easy-to-record album done quickly in order to buy time for writing more new songs?
«
Last Edit: February 11, 2015, 11:45:03 PM by CenturyDeprived
»
Logged
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #59 on:
February 12, 2015, 12:06:19 AM »
Quote from: CenturyDeprived on February 11, 2015, 11:30:02 PM
Can someone please just invent a time machine and find a way to help get SMiLE completed in '67?
Sometimes I wonder if it wasn't for the better that we got to choose our favorite bits from the big pool of recordings. I'm certain I would appreciate a 1967 finished SMiLE less than my own I-put-on-it-what-
I
-like SMiLE compilation. If I imagine a 1967 SMiLE without Holidays and Look (SFC) but with the Rock Me Henry Wonderful in place of the harpsichord version...
On the other hand, it would be nice to have a fully orchestrated version of Surf's Up with those Good Vibrations era sonic characteristics in place of the prog-rock-era cobbled together picking over the bones from 1971 which does next to nothing for me.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5749
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #60 on:
February 12, 2015, 12:40:52 AM »
Quote from: Micha on February 12, 2015, 12:06:19 AM
Quote from: CenturyDeprived on February 11, 2015, 11:30:02 PM
Can someone please just invent a time machine and find a way to help get SMiLE completed in '67?
Sometimes I wonder if it wasn't for the better that we got to choose our favorite bits from the big pool of recordings. I'm certain I would appreciate a 1967 finished SMiLE less than my own I-put-on-it-what-
I
-like SMiLE compilation. If I imagine a 1967 SMiLE without Holidays and Look (SFC) but with the Rock Me Henry Wonderful in place of the harpsichord version...
On the other hand, it would be nice to have a fully orchestrated version of Surf's Up with those Good Vibrations era sonic characteristics in place of the prog-rock-era cobbled together picking over the bones from 1971 which does next to nothing for me.
I'll bet ya anything that if SMiLE had in fact come out in '67, that regardless of if immediately became a game-changer in music history or not (debatable by some, though I for one think it would have), that we'd STILL have gotten an official Capitol huge box set of fragments/parts by themselves many years later, as was the case with the completed album Pet Sounds.
Logged
Lee Marshall
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1639
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #61 on:
February 12, 2015, 12:58:29 AM »
Quote from: CenturyDeprived on February 12, 2015, 12:40:52 AM
I'll bet ya anything that if SMiLE had in fact come out in '67, that regardless of if immediately became a game-changer in music history or not (debatable by some, though I for one think it would have), that we'd STILL have gotten an official Capitol huge box set of fragments/parts by themselves many years later, as was the case with the completed album Pet Sounds.
100%. [well as close to 100% as one can come when guessing about something which really didn't and therefore couldn't happen] Still THAT'S how I think it would have gone too Cent Dep. I disagree with Brian D Wilson. I think the general public WAS more than ready...that they were, in fact, primed and pining for something which Smile would have delivered by the hay-wagon load.
So? We got albums like...Sgt Peppers, Their Satanic Magesties Request, Days of Future Past,/On The Treshold of a Dream/In Search of the Lost Chord/Tommy/The Genuine Immitation Life Gazette...for goodness sake...,and 'Prog Rock'.
Yes. We were MORE than ready for Smile.
Logged
"Add Some...Music...To Your Day. I do. It's the only way to fly. Well...what was I gonna put here? An apple a day keeps the doctor away? Hum me a few bars." Lee Marshall [2014]
Donald TRUMP! ... Is TOAST. "What a disaster." "Overrated?"... ... ..."BIG LEAGUE." "Lots of people are saying it" "I will tell you that." Collusion, Money Laundering, Treason. B'Bye Dirty Donnie!!! Adios!!! Bon Voyage!!! Toodles!!! Move yourself...SPANKY!!! Jail awaits. It's NO "Witch Hunt". There IS Collusion...and worse. The Russian Mafia!! Conspiracies!! Fraud!! This racist is goin' down...and soon. Good Riddance. And take the kids.
stack-o-tracks
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1408
The baker man
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #62 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:45:31 AM »
Quote from: joshferrell on February 11, 2015, 04:32:40 PM
when it comes to SS I kind of think of it like when Kurt Cobain recorded "In Utero" his intention was to make the worst album he could so that it would fail, of course in doing so it became a masterpiece that was so unique people just thought he was being artistic, I'm thinking maybe Brian was getting back at the other guys for not supporting Smile so he set out to record the worst album he could, and it became an art statement....lol.. like his ex wife Marilyn said in IJWMFTT about Brian and the other members of the group after Smile(and I'm paraphrasing) "Look if you think you can do better than go ahead." Brian gave the producer helms to the other boys, washing his hands of it, hence it being Produced by Beach Boys..
I dunno about Kurt trying to make the "worst album he could" or Brian doing the same in regards to In Utero and Smiley Smile, because there's some killer songwriting on both those releases.... But I do agree Kurt & Brian had similar intentions with them, trying to relieve pressure from the record company suits to follow up hit albums they wrote/produced.
And in a way, they succeeded. Neither of them were forced into rehashing their old sounds, and neither achieved the lofty commercial heights as their earliest works..... Though it's a goshdarn shame what happened to both of those creative geniuses, because with one we lost decades of great music, and the other we lost a whole lifetime of great music....
Mental illness and drug addiction are some of the worst things. Glad people finally came around and stopped stigmatizing, and started being more accepting of those "eccentricities".
Logged
No mas, por favor.
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #63 on:
February 12, 2015, 05:30:29 AM »
Quote from: CenturyDeprived on February 12, 2015, 12:40:52 AM
I'll bet ya anything that if SMiLE had in fact come out in '67, that regardless of if immediately became a game-changer in music history or not (debatable by some, though I for one think it would have), that we'd STILL have gotten an official Capitol huge box set of fragments/parts by themselves many years later, as was the case with the completed album Pet Sounds.
Good point, could be.
Quote from: Add Some on February 12, 2015, 12:58:29 AM
I disagree with Brian D Wilson. I think the general public WAS more than ready...
I wonder if Brian D. Wilson really disagrees with you or if that's only the official version for interview perposes.
Personally, I think a 1967 finished SMiLE would be regarded as highly as Satanic Majesties and The Who Sell Out. Pet Sounds would still be regarded as "THE" masterpiece.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
Mujan, 8@$+@Rc| of a Blue Wizard
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1565
SMiLE is America: Infinite Potential Never Reached
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #64 on:
February 12, 2015, 12:49:39 PM »
To address some recent points that have been raised:
Until/unless we get more insight, it's unclear if Brian was self-sabotaging or genuinely trying a new direction when the old one didn't work out. I tend to think he took the boys criticisms (it's too complex to play live! / the lyrics are too obtuse and depressing) and tried to rectify that for Smiley. He just didn't do it how the Boys wanted, and intentionally so. You want something more stripped down? Here. Have fun. But I'm still not comfortable writing the album off as intentionally subpar. Maybe a dig at the Boys criticisms, but I still think he wanted to push boundaries in a different way and still wanted people to like it.
The fact that we can mix our own SMiLEs is a definite silver lining, but in no way an ideal scenario to Brian just finishing it properly. I want the complete vocals to Worms, Child, Look and others. I want a complete Surfs Up and Elements. I want to be able to introduce people to this music without showing them BWPS, the unfinished TSS or my fan fiction mixes. I want the public to have acknowledged the true masterwork instead of the lame Pepper as the statement of the decade. I want this new direction of Brian's to have been encouraged so he'd keep going and make more albums of that calibur.
I agree 100% with Add Some. The world was absolutely ready for SMiLE. It was poised to take the public by storm.
Logged
Here are my SMiLE Mixes. All are 2 suite, but still vastly different in several ways. Be on the lookout for another, someday.
Aquarian SMiLE>
HERE
Dumb Angel (Olorin Edition)>
HERE
Dumb Angel [the Romestamo Cut]>
HERE
& This is a new pet project Ive worked on, which combines Fritz Lang's classic film, Metropolis (1927) with The United States of America (1968) as a new soundtrack. More info is in the video description.
The American Metropolitan Circus>
HERE
[
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8433
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #65 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:07:47 PM »
BWPS is smile...
Logged
And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Gender:
Posts: 5900
"My God. It's full of stars."
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #66 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:10:19 PM »
Quote from: SMiLE Brian on February 12, 2015, 01:07:47 PM
BWPS is smile...
No. BWPS is the one that was recorded and released by Brian Wilson...ya know, the artist who created the music. So, uh, that doesn't count as Smile.
Logged
Bill Tobelman's
SMiLE site
Quote from: mtaber on September 18, 2021, 07:39:15 AM
God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!
"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.
Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
Mujan, 8@$+@Rc| of a Blue Wizard
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1565
SMiLE is America: Infinite Potential Never Reached
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #67 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:11:22 PM »
Quote from: SMiLE Brian on February 12, 2015, 01:07:47 PM
BWPS is smile...
I'm not gonna get into that again, not here.
But I vastly prefer the Wrecking Crew instruments and Beach Boy vocals, and I know the majority does too. So if I were to tell someone "check out SMiLE, it's the best" I'd want them to hear, well, the best.
Logged
Here are my SMiLE Mixes. All are 2 suite, but still vastly different in several ways. Be on the lookout for another, someday.
Aquarian SMiLE>
HERE
Dumb Angel (Olorin Edition)>
HERE
Dumb Angel [the Romestamo Cut]>
HERE
& This is a new pet project Ive worked on, which combines Fritz Lang's classic film, Metropolis (1927) with The United States of America (1968) as a new soundtrack. More info is in the video description.
The American Metropolitan Circus>
HERE
[
SMiLE Brian
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 8433
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #68 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:21:17 PM »
BWPS is BW's final word on SMiLE. I like the sessions a damn lot, but it gets annoying since it is unfinished. BWPS is the key to the puzzle.
Logged
And production aside, I’d so much rather hear a 14 year old David Marks shred some guitar on Chug-a-lug than hear a 51 year old Mike Love sing about bangin some chick in a swimming pool.-rab2591
Mujan, 8@$+@Rc| of a Blue Wizard
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1565
SMiLE is America: Infinite Potential Never Reached
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #69 on:
February 12, 2015, 01:26:04 PM »
Quote from: SMiLE Brian on February 12, 2015, 01:21:17 PM
BWPS is BW's final word on SMiLE. I like the sessions a damn lot, but it gets annoying since it is unfinished. BWPS is the key to the puzzle.
I think this is the wrong thread to debate this old point again.
I want people to be able to hear SMiLE the Beach Boys album. The 60s album. The psychedelic album. Without having to just settle for TSS or fan mixes. Is that better? Is that the semantically correct way to express this point, without starting a debate on BWPS' legitimacy?
Logged
Here are my SMiLE Mixes. All are 2 suite, but still vastly different in several ways. Be on the lookout for another, someday.
Aquarian SMiLE>
HERE
Dumb Angel (Olorin Edition)>
HERE
Dumb Angel [the Romestamo Cut]>
HERE
& This is a new pet project Ive worked on, which combines Fritz Lang's classic film, Metropolis (1927) with The United States of America (1968) as a new soundtrack. More info is in the video description.
The American Metropolitan Circus>
HERE
[
TMinthePM
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 320
How can I show you Zen if you do not first empty y
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #70 on:
February 12, 2015, 03:13:39 PM »
Quote: "We were MORE than ready for Smile."
The assertion that we were all waiting for Smile to be released in 1967 has always puzzled me. Granted, I was only a kid in my mid-teens, and rock n roll was certainly central to my existence, but I never knew what was coming next. I'd just be down at the record department of Times Square Store in Babylon, N.Y. scanning the display racks and flipping thru the bins (Beach Boys/Beatles back to back and always my first stop). Never even heard of Smile till, I don't know, maybe the early 70's.
Logged
Mujan, 8@$+@Rc| of a Blue Wizard
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1565
SMiLE is America: Infinite Potential Never Reached
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #71 on:
February 12, 2015, 03:58:26 PM »
Quote from: TMinthePM on February 12, 2015, 03:13:39 PM
Quote: "We were MORE than ready for Smile."
The assertion that we were all waiting for Smile to be released in 1967 has always puzzled me. Granted, I was only a kid in my mid-teens, and rock n roll was certainly central to my existence, but I never knew what was coming next. I'd just be down at the record department of Times Square Store in Babylon, N.Y. scanning the display racks and flipping thru the bins (Beach Boys/Beatles back to back and always my first stop). Never even heard of Smile till, I don't know, maybe the early 70's.
You're taking it too literally. That just means the world was ready for the far out, challenging, psychedelic type of music SMiLE had to offer. The abundance of crazy progressive albums from '66 to '70 ought to be proof of that.
Logged
Here are my SMiLE Mixes. All are 2 suite, but still vastly different in several ways. Be on the lookout for another, someday.
Aquarian SMiLE>
HERE
Dumb Angel (Olorin Edition)>
HERE
Dumb Angel [the Romestamo Cut]>
HERE
& This is a new pet project Ive worked on, which combines Fritz Lang's classic film, Metropolis (1927) with The United States of America (1968) as a new soundtrack. More info is in the video description.
The American Metropolitan Circus>
HERE
[
TMinthePM
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 320
How can I show you Zen if you do not first empty y
Re: Smiley Smile = Party! Part II
«
Reply #72 on:
February 12, 2015, 04:15:36 PM »
Yeah. OK. That is certainly true.
Logged
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.258 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...