gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
682797 Posts in 27744 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine June 29, 2025, 12:32:05 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Biggest Debate in Rock N Roll History ?  (Read 10397 times)
I. Spaceman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2271

Revolution Never Again


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: July 14, 2012, 06:40:04 AM »


The stones were great from 1966-1981 Smiley the beach boys at their peak are better than any other group at their peak and that's the truth. The horrible thing about it all was the boys had no longevity once Brian lost it :/ their music started becoming worse as the years went by.

The Rolling Stones were great well before 1966. They did blankety-blank SATISFACTION before that, fer cripes sakes.
I'm speaking as far as albums go Smiley


Albums aren't the be-all and end-all of rock and roll. And even then, The Rolling Stones Now! is one of the greatest rock albums ever.
that's true ...there's too many covers on that album


COVERS? As if that somehow makes a performance inferior to one that is written by the artist? Boy, you must really look down upon Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, The Ronettes, etc. Boy, come back in five years or something.
Logged

Nobody gives a sh*t about the Record Room
Newguy562
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1878


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: July 14, 2012, 07:09:15 AM »


The stones were great from 1966-1981 Smiley the beach boys at their peak are better than any other group at their peak and that's the truth. The horrible thing about it all was the boys had no longevity once Brian lost it :/ their music started becoming worse as the years went by.

The Rolling Stones were great well before 1966. They did blankety-blank SATISFACTION before that, fer cripes sakes.
I'm speaking as far as albums go Smiley


Albums aren't the be-all and end-all of rock and roll. And even then, The Rolling Stones Now! is one of the greatest rock albums ever.
that's true ...there's too many covers on that album


COVERS? As if that somehow makes a performance inferior to one that is written by the artist? Boy, you must really look down upon Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, The Ronettes, etc. Boy, come back in five years or something.
I don't know any of Frank Sinatra's work..My favorite Elvis songs are the ones he did not his earlier cover songs ..
I just can't get into many covers it seems so unofficial to me and most of the blues songs the stones did seemed so inferior to the original it's an absolutely ridiculous way..
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2288


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: July 14, 2012, 07:58:18 AM »

Beatles, no contest.

The stones were a different band, more interested in jamming then innovating.
Logged

sparkydog1725
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 82



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: July 14, 2012, 02:37:14 PM »


And after FTTBA...

Guess I'm dumb: what does FTTBA stand for?
Logged
Ron
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5086


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: July 14, 2012, 04:20:14 PM »

From there to back again.  I would muster more, but I'm still dumbstruck by Newguy saying he doesn't know Frank Sinatra. 

WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU WAITING FOR?

Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.177 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!