The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
683311
Posts in
27766
Topics by
4096
Members - Latest Member:
MrSunshine
August 07, 2025, 04:46:29 PM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time? (Read 4151 times)
harrisonjon
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 423
What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
on:
November 14, 2011, 09:26:26 AM »
Presumably the target was to squeeze it into 45 minutes or so, to preserve sound quality on a single LP. Would a 19 track LP have permitted that?
Logged
Roger Ryan
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1528
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #1 on:
November 14, 2011, 10:17:37 AM »
Quote from: harrisonjon on November 14, 2011, 09:26:26 AM
Presumably the target was to squeeze it into 45 minutes or so, to preserve sound quality on a single LP. Would a 19 track LP have permitted that?
It depends how long those 19 tracks are! Dylan was releasing 50 minute albums in '65, so it would have been possible to put everything included in the TSS "album" construction on two side of vinyl, but not likely. At the same time, I don't understand why some have claimed SMiLE would only have been a 30 minute album or less, especially since PET SOUNDS is 36 minutes in length. If you take off "Holidays", "Look" and, maybe, "I Love To Say Dada", the remainder would fit fine onto a single vinyl album with little compromise of the sound.
Logged
grooveblaster
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 62
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #2 on:
November 14, 2011, 10:41:01 AM »
Last week I did a quick calculation of the 12 songs listed on the original cover and using the versions from TSS, if I remember right, it came to about 38 minutes.
Logged
SBonilla
Guest
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #3 on:
November 14, 2011, 11:14:45 AM »
Quote from: grooveblaster on November 14, 2011, 10:41:01 AM
Last week I did a quick calculation of the 12 songs listed on the original cover and using the versions from TSS, if I remember right, it came to about 38 minutes.
I think Smile would have been under 40 minutes. Recording contracts define an album as having to contain a minimum number of songs/recordings totalling a minimum amount of time (typically around thirty seven and a half minutes; that time requirement may have been less in 1967, but not by much).
I think Capitol would have balked at having more than 12 titles on a single album. Had there been more, Capitol would have had to pay out more mechanical royalties than normal. The way around this could have been to list/combine some songs as medleys (I Wanna Be Around/Workshop, for instance) and others to be grouped into a suite or suites. The combined songs would have had to share in (split) the mechanical royalties (mechanicals go to the publisher). Capitol would have been OK with that. I'm sure it didn't matter how many songs Brian put on the album as long as Capitol only had to pay for twelve.
Logged
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5143
I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 14, 2011, 11:15:57 AM »
40:01
Logged
Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Curtis Leon
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 310
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #5 on:
November 15, 2011, 07:36:24 AM »
No way to know, as Heroes and Villains was never quantified for a Smile release, the Elements was never recorded fully (no other elements besides Fire, Dada is debatable though the main work on it was after any January release was possible. The Water Chant definitely isn't).
Logged
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5214
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #6 on:
November 15, 2011, 08:28:39 AM »
Quote from: SBonilla on November 14, 2011, 11:14:45 AM
Quote from: grooveblaster on November 14, 2011, 10:41:01 AM
Last week I did a quick calculation of the 12 songs listed on the original cover and using the versions from TSS, if I remember right, it came to about 38 minutes.
I think Smile would have been under 40 minutes. Recording contracts define an album as having to contain a minimum number of songs/recordings totalling a minimum amount of time (typically around thirty seven and a half minutes; that time requirement may have been less in 1967, but not by much).
I think Capitol would have balked at having more than 12 titles on a single album. Had there been more, Capitol would have had to pay out more mechanical royalties than normal. The way around this could have been to list/combine some songs as medleys (I Wanna Be Around/Workshop, for instance) and others to be grouped into a suite or suites. The combined songs would have had to share in (split) the mechanical royalties (mechanicals go to the publisher). Capitol would have been OK with that. I'm sure it didn't matter how many songs Brian put on the album as long as Capitol only had to pay for twelve.
Pet Sounds had 13 tracks, so I don't think your theory was etched in stone. I have to agree that under 40 minutes sounds right. 36 to 38 is more likely, since the LP had to track for Duophonic, not just mono.
Logged
The Brianista Prayer
Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen. ---hypehat
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5143
I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #7 on:
November 16, 2011, 03:25:34 PM »
Quote from: Curtis Leon on November 15, 2011, 07:36:24 AM
No way to know, as Heroes and Villains was never quantified for a Smile release, the Elements was never recorded fully (no other elements besides Fire, Dada is debatable though the main work on it was after any January release was possible. The Water Chant definitely isn't).
Definitely isn't what?
Logged
Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2288
I made a game
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #8 on:
November 16, 2011, 03:28:42 PM »
Part of SMiLE
Logged
AFTERNOON NAP CLUB now available!
https://open.spotify.com/album/1mCbgpJKdQ0feHVIzlS34B?si=lIYJ30z1S2GyyrG6R0mNGg&utm_source=copy-link
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5214
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #9 on:
November 16, 2011, 06:03:52 PM »
Amazing what you can include when you release it 45 years late.
Logged
The Brianista Prayer
Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen. ---hypehat
Curtis Leon
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 310
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #10 on:
November 16, 2011, 06:09:36 PM »
Quote from: runnersdialzero on November 16, 2011, 03:25:34 PM
Quote from: Curtis Leon on November 15, 2011, 07:36:24 AM
No way to know, as Heroes and Villains was never quantified for a Smile release, the Elements was never recorded fully (no other elements besides Fire, Dada is debatable though the main work on it was after any January release was possible. The Water Chant definitely isn't).
Definitely isn't what?
Definitely isn't debatable. There's no possible way Smile would've been released in October/November '67.
Logged
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5143
I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #11 on:
November 16, 2011, 06:19:34 PM »
Quote from: FatherOfTheMan on November 16, 2011, 03:28:42 PM
Part of SMiLE
Quote from: runnersdialzero on November 10, 2011, 09:37:02 PM
Just because it was recorded after the supposed "strict" end of the Smile sessions doesn't mean it wasn't written and intended for Smile. It's a friging "water chant" and there was an elements suite in the works for Smile. Coincidence? Doubtful.
imo
Logged
Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2288
I made a game
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #12 on:
November 16, 2011, 07:57:10 PM »
Oh, trust me, I believe it was 100% meant for either SMiLE or CCW, but based solely on fact...
Logged
AFTERNOON NAP CLUB now available!
https://open.spotify.com/album/1mCbgpJKdQ0feHVIzlS34B?si=lIYJ30z1S2GyyrG6R0mNGg&utm_source=copy-link
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5143
I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #13 on:
November 16, 2011, 09:40:32 PM »
Quote from: FatherOfTheMan on November 16, 2011, 07:57:10 PM
Oh, trust me, I believe it was 100% meant for either SMiLE or CCW, but based solely on fact...
I wouldn't say "fact", though. He never abandoned Smile outright, and Smiley Smile is proof enough of that. The idea for "The Elements" etc. were likely not given up on completely then and there. And then there's the Wild Honey take of "Surf's Up", etc...
So I wouldn't say it's a fact that it's not part of Smile. imo. imo. imo.
Logged
Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 17767
The triumph of The Hickey Script !
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #14 on:
November 16, 2011, 09:55:41 PM »
Quote from: runnersdialzero on November 16, 2011, 09:40:32 PM
And then there's the Wild Honey take of "Surf's Up", etc...
Said take was recorded because Brian wanted to hear how his detuned grand piano sounded, no other reason. The truly fascinating question is
why
he chose to do "Surf's Up"...
Logged
The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5143
I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #15 on:
November 16, 2011, 10:06:06 PM »
Quote from: Andrew G. Doe on November 16, 2011, 09:55:41 PM
Quote from: runnersdialzero on November 16, 2011, 09:40:32 PM
And then there's the Wild Honey take of "Surf's Up", etc...
Said take was recorded because Brian wanted to hear how his detuned grand piano sounded, no other reason.
The truly fascinating question is
why
he chose to do "Surf's Up"...
Well yeah, that's more what I was going for. I wasn't aware that it was recorded for that reason, although certainly didn't think it was a basic track or intended to be finished just based on how it sounds. But yerp - why that song?
Logged
Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #16 on:
November 17, 2011, 03:03:04 AM »
Quote from: drbeachboy on November 15, 2011, 08:28:39 AM
Quote from: SBonilla on November 14, 2011, 11:14:45 AM
Quote from: grooveblaster on November 14, 2011, 10:41:01 AM
Last week I did a quick calculation of the 12 songs listed on the original cover and using the versions from TSS, if I remember right, it came to about 38 minutes.
I think Smile would have been under 40 minutes. Recording contracts define an album as having to contain a minimum number of songs/recordings totalling a minimum amount of time (typically around thirty seven and a half minutes; that time requirement may have been less in 1967, but not by much).
I think Capitol would have balked at having more than 12 titles on a single album. Had there been more, Capitol would have had to pay out more mechanical royalties than normal. The way around this could have been to list/combine some songs as medleys (I Wanna Be Around/Workshop, for instance) and others to be grouped into a suite or suites. The combined songs would have had to share in (split) the mechanical royalties (mechanicals go to the publisher). Capitol would have been OK with that. I'm sure it didn't matter how many songs Brian put on the album as long as Capitol only had to pay for twelve.
Pet Sounds had 13 tracks, so I don't think your theory was etched in stone.
If the reason for the 12 track limit is author's royalties, then Pet Sounds isn't outside that limit because "Sloop John B." is credited to "trad." - no royalties there.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5214
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #17 on:
November 17, 2011, 03:37:50 AM »
Good point and most likely in this instance.
Logged
The Brianista Prayer
Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen. ---hypehat
Reverend Rock
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 136
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #18 on:
November 28, 2011, 06:43:17 PM »
38 to 40 minutes in those times. It was 1967. Sgt. Pepper was considered a long album at 39 minutes. Dylan was still considered outside the mainstream, almost in the same league as folk, jazz or classical, so the extended times on his albums were not considered proper for pop releases. I really don't think Brian himself wanted to put out a longer album than Pet Sounds. I really believe he wanted to whittle SMiLE down to what he would consider a "marketable" length. One thing Brian never took his eyes off of was the state of the record-buying public. He wanted his product to sell. That has been consistant throughout his professional life.
Logged
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: What Would Have Been Smile's Total Running Time?
«
Reply #19 on:
November 29, 2011, 10:52:56 PM »
I think we can't completely rule out a running time between 40 and 50 minutes. After all, Brian was doing unprecedented music, so he might have taken it to an unsprecedented length. And, as was mentioned many times, the Rolling Stones' 1966 Aftermath album runs 52 minutes, which even if you take the 11 minute track off is still longer than Sgt. Pepper's.
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
Pages:
[
1
]
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.451 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...