gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
681028 Posts in 27628 Topics by 4067 Members - Latest Member: Dae Lims May 16, 2024, 09:15:52 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Which has been the best decade for music?  (Read 4831 times)
Spiritinthesky
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« on: February 12, 2009, 06:56:07 AM »

Which has been the best decade for music?
50's
60's
70's
80's
90's
00's

If you fancy having a vote go to
http://www.thisdayinmusic.com
Logged
mikeyj
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1825



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2009, 07:09:53 AM »

Which has been the best decade for music?
50's
60's
70's
80's
90's
00's

If you fancy having a vote go to
http://www.thisdayinmusic.com

What!! The 80's are winning? Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: February 12, 2009, 07:12:07 AM by mikeyj » Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2594



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2009, 08:42:19 AM »

I tend to like present day best, can't help it. Nothing beats 60s and 70s Beach Boys of course, yet other than that if you're willing to look past what's going on in mainstream rock music I think there's never been a music scene as rich and full of possibilities as today's.
Logged
dogear
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 299


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2009, 09:13:41 AM »

Definitely the sixties, but I think that depends on everybody's formative years ( between 13 and 17??, maybe earlier today).
Logged

Watson, did you hear this?
Big Bri
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 210


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2009, 10:17:25 AM »

The 70's!
Genesis
RUSH
ELP
YES
70's Beach Boys(early that is...)
Jethro Tull
Sex Pistols
Clash
Foreigner
the Cars
Gary Numan
Motorhead
Judas Priest
Boston
ELO
This list could go on and on!

Big Bri
Logged
carlydenise
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


Heaven


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2009, 10:59:34 AM »

I am torn between the 60's and 70's

the 70's were my formative years, but the deep love for music was set in my soul with the late 60's  music as a little kid.
Logged

come be my redeemer...awaken me beautiful dreamer
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2660



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2009, 01:20:09 PM »

I like music from all decades, but I've got a soft spot for the 90s (its a childhood nostalgia thing), and can't get "oldies". For some reason, 50s and 60s rock and roll and pop songs get me off like no other music. I went through a "classic rock" phase as a teenager, but eventually got sick of 70s rock. These days I pretty much avoid Zeppelin, Sabbath, post-Syd Barrett Pink Floyd, post-Satanic Majesties Stones, Deep Purple, Yes, Cream, Rush, Steve Miller, Foreigner, and all those other staples of classic rock radio, with a couple of notable exceptions (I still like Boston, Queen, Bon Scott-era AC/DC, Billy Joel, Elton John, to name a few, plus Sunflower thru Holland and Love You/Adult Child/LA Light BBs, of course). In the past couple of years I've been getting into a lot of "alternative", "indie", punk, etc.
Logged

"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread"  -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.

https://givemesomeboots1.blogspot.com/
MBE
Guest
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2009, 04:46:30 PM »

Remember I am 32 so this is not notalgia for me. Since I was a kid I only really liked 50's and 60's music. Today I like some early seventies but that's about it. I am actually very torn between the fifties and sixties. The fifties stuff is pure solid blues, Rock, Country whatever you like. There were some boring MOR music but all the youth oriented stuff was great. The sixties had a lot of new sounds, advancements, maturity, just a lot of wonderful things about it. By the end of the decade there was a lot of pretentious stuff going on, but almost everything had a good feel to it. So I don't know I guess if I had to choose it would be 55-65.
Logged
Rocky
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 125



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2009, 06:50:53 PM »

i'm thinking if i could only save ten years of music from total destruction it would have to be 64-74
Logged
carlydenise
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


Heaven


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2009, 05:26:50 AM »

i'm thinking if i could only save ten years of music from total destruction it would have to be 64-74

Good call, pre-mainstream glitzy disco and punk, not that I don't like punk and disco, I do.  Some creative artists and excellent music from 1964-74. 
Logged

come be my redeemer...awaken me beautiful dreamer
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2009, 08:33:46 AM »

There isn't one.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
lance
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1018


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2009, 01:29:07 PM »

Funny how you can predict everones answers before you read them.

Tough to say, even when being subjective as possible.

I guess for me I would have to say that I think the seventies and eighties were the richest times for me. Instead of dividing it up into decades, I prefer to divide it into five year blocks...in which case...

76==80. And 86--90 were probably my favorite periods. I also like 66--70. Hmmm..



Logged
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2009, 01:44:16 PM »

Maybe my favorite 5-year period is '64-'68. Honestly, though, it's so hard. I doubt there is a single year from 1958 onward without an album that's indispensable to me. And of course what is indispensable to me changes over time, making the exercise harder still. But yeah, probably 64-68 for 5-years. And the 60s almost certainly have the greatest number of albums I really like. But I feel like I'd be giving up other decades if I officially picked, so I just won't do it. I WON'T! I need The Chirpin' Crickets, A Night at the Opera, Graceland, In the Aeroplane Over the Sea and A Satanic Panic in the Attic, to name just a few. Can I give them up for Pet Sounds? Nope. (And yes, I realize nobody ever said we were swearing off all other decades. I'm being dramatic. Cut me some slack.)
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2009, 12:38:56 AM »

The 1230's were quite good, although I predict the 3020's going down as the best of all time.
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
The Heartical Don
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4761



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2009, 01:26:46 AM »

The 1960s, no doubt. Motown, BBs, Beatles, Fahey, Van Dyke Parks, still spontaneous jazz, blues, country to be had... the major drugs explosion at the end of that decade was a nuclear catastrophe. Much of the 70s music has that cold, calculated cocaine sound. Punk was sh*t, really. Totally forgettable.

I never liked Steely Dan, by the way. Terrible.
Logged

80% Of Success Is Showing Up
lance
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1018


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2009, 10:28:53 AM »

Actually, 64-68 is a good choice, when you think about it, the way that Rock was still expanding in leaps and bounds in so many ways.
Sixties is the obvious choice, of course.

I guess the nineties is the one that's most indispensable to me, but that's more about me spending that decade immersed in the past rather than what was hip...in fact, much of hte music of hte time seemed to be obsessed with the past as well. The nineties kind of sucked, creatively in my honest opinion. Creativity went out the window and retro self-referencing irony took over. But maybe I'm just turning into an old man. Actually, I'm only typing this to put off working.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2009, 11:57:06 AM by lance » Logged
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2009, 10:37:15 AM »

The 90s were particularly ironic, but I think most pop music is always obsessed with the past. it's just that they choose different parts of it, and filter it differently.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
The Heartical Don
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4761



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2009, 12:07:15 AM »

For production values, the 80s are unforgettably dire. Think: Trevor Horn, Simple Minds, and, um, Jeff Lynne/Eugene Landy. Perhaps they will become 'cult' again, but preferably after I'll have passed away.
Logged

80% Of Success Is Showing Up
lance
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1018


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2009, 05:20:00 AM »

Yeah, but think REM, Pylon, B-52's early stuff, the Smiths, the Cure, U2, , INXS, Crowded House, My Bloody Valentine, the Replacements, Husker Du...it was not all dire, jagged soulless synth pop.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2009, 05:21:17 AM by lance » Logged
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7255


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2009, 03:59:38 PM »

For production values, the 80s are unforgettably dire. Think: Trevor Horn, Simple Minds, and, um, Jeff Lynne/Eugene Landy. Perhaps they will become 'cult' again, but preferably after I'll have passed away.

And Trevor Horn went on to do a brilliant job on Belle & Sebastian's Dear Catastrophe Waitress a few (half-dozen already, actually ... jeezus, time flies) years ago.
Logged

Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs here.

No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
melissalynn
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 248


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2009, 04:42:36 PM »

60s all the way.

when I was a small child, I listened to 60s.

when I was a teenager, I listened to 60s.

as an adult, I listen to 60s.

notice a trend?

I actually do listen to modern music as well, but I just can't seem to get 'into' it.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.203 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!