The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
682885
Posts in
27747
Topics by
4096
Members - Latest Member:
MrSunshine
July 07, 2025, 02:21:51 PM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General Music Discussion
|
Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Poll
Question:
Who's the better drummer? Ringo Starr or Charlie Watts
Ringo
Charlie
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Author
Topic: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts (Read 26786 times)
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2666
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #25 on:
September 21, 2007, 07:47:12 AM »
Quote from: Heywood Floyd on September 17, 2007, 11:48:44 PM
He sucks.
He more than made up for lack of technique with energy and intensity. He certainly bashed the hell out of the drums. Keith Moon certainly took some cues from Denny.
Plus, he wrote "Forever", "Little Bird", "Cuddle Up", "Only With You", "Fallin' In Love", "A Time To Live In Dreams", POB, etc. etc.
Logged
"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread" -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.
Daniel S.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 897
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #26 on:
September 21, 2007, 10:15:41 PM »
He's a talented songwriter and a great singer. But as a drummer he is really terrible. He had charisma on the stage and energy and all of that, but that doesn't make up for bad drumming. I'm not a girl. I don't care if he's cute. Being cute doens't make up for shitty drumming.
Logged
Let us all stay teenage gamblers listening to the radio.
mikeyj
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1826
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #27 on:
September 22, 2007, 03:51:13 AM »
Quote from: Heywood Floyd on September 21, 2007, 10:15:41 PM
He's a talented songwriter and a great singer. But as a drummer he is really terrible. He had charisma on the stage and energy and all of that, but that doesn't make up for bad drumming. I'm not a girl. I don't care if he's cute. Being cute doens't make up for merdaty drumming.
Still not bad for a guy who never really learnt, he was just thrown the job of drummer and I think he did a fine job considering
Logged
Beach Boy
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 551
I've got tears in the morning
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #28 on:
September 22, 2007, 04:24:56 AM »
In the early days he was quite good and around 1976, 1977. His drumming at the Long Beach show, 1981 surprised me too, but he can't compete with a Charlie Watts. But I'd rather watch Denny because he has so much energy.
Logged
Late at night
When the whole world's sleeping
I dream of you
Close to you I feel your sweet heart beating
I dream of you
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2666
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #29 on:
September 23, 2007, 12:30:05 PM »
Quote from: Heywood Floyd on September 21, 2007, 10:15:41 PM
He's a talented songwriter and a great singer. But as a drummer he is really terrible. He had charisma on the stage and energy and all of that, but that doesn't make up for bad drumming. I'm not a girl. I don't care if he's cute. Being cute doens't make up for merdaty drumming.
I'm not a girl "who think Dennis is cute". I never said I thought he was cute. I'm more like a guy who wished he could be Dennis. Now he may not have been a "great musician", but he did pretty good for someone who was put on the drums because it was the only spot left in the group. Maybe he wasn't as "proficient" as Starr or Watts, but he was definitely a lot more entertaining. I think we could all agree he had a better singing voice than Ringo.
«
Last Edit: August 26, 2012, 09:34:43 PM by Alex
»
Logged
"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread" -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4940
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #30 on:
September 24, 2007, 05:44:24 PM »
Quote from: ascrodin on September 23, 2007, 12:30:05 PM
Quote from: Heywood Floyd on September 21, 2007, 10:15:41 PM
He's a talented songwriter and a great singer. But as a drummer he is really terrible. He had charisma on the stage and energy and all of that, but that doesn't make up for bad drumming. I'm not a girl. I don't care if he's cute. Being cute doens't make up for merdaty drumming.
I'm not a girl "who think Dennis is cute". I never said I thought he was cute. I'm more like a guy who wished he could be Dennis. Now he may not have been a "great musician", but he did pretty good for someone who was put on the drums because it was the only spot left in the group. Maybe he wasn't be as "proficient" as Starr or Watts, but he was definitely a lot more entertaining. I think we could all agree he had a better singing voice than Ringo.
Plus Dennis had charisma in spades. (Ringo was VERY charasmatic, but Dennis even more so.)
Logged
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 7255
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #31 on:
September 24, 2007, 05:59:04 PM »
I don't think anyone was forgetting about Dennis Wilson in this thread: he was just irrelevant to it because it was written in the "General Music Discussion" thread about Charlie Watts and Ringo Starr. So when one is choosing between them, D. Wilson is not an option.
But since we're discussing him, I'd say Dennis was: a great talent whose musical ability seems intuitive; a terrible technician as a singer and drummer; a charismatic rock 'n' roller and romantic; and a sexy enough man to make a bunch of otherwise nerdy or fat guys still worth watching. Hopefully that answers the Watts v. Starr question...
Logged
Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs
here.
No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
jbaker
Smiley Smile Newbie
Offline
Posts: 7
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #32 on:
September 24, 2007, 08:12:50 PM »
Ringo it is.
I've listened to the Beatles all my live and just this week I was blown away by the drum part in Here comes the Sun ( esp. the end and the cymbal tags on Sun, Sun, Sun, here it Comes...then fills until the line comes back).
But on Charlie's side is he always had such a great snare sound. A drummer I knew once pointed out how Charlie would often raise his hi hat stick during the snare notes so that nothing would distract or muddy the snare sound.
Sorta like the punching of Mick Jagger. No idea if its true, but it makes for a good story.
Logged
DoubleVirgo
Smiley Smile Newbie
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 9
Re: Ringo Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #33 on:
November 02, 2007, 09:52:24 PM »
Ringo for me. I've been defending Ringo for many years now (as if he needs me to do so) and eventually I whittled my response to - "He was the Beat in the Beatles. What more do you want?"
He didn't "luck into" anything. They specifically picked him to be in the group. George says in the Anthology that he was the guy for the role but didn't enter the movie until that scene. Or something like that. If anything, Pete Best lucked into the Beatles when they needed somebody
that day
to go to Hamburg. Or whatever the story really is. He was just a warm body. But they really dug Ringo. And he quit Rory in a heartbeat to play with them. It was cosmic, man.
Don't get me wrong, I loves me my Charlie Watts. Never fails to get me dancing. That's a trait you want in a drummer.
Logged
www.myspace.com/doublevirgo
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4940
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #34 on:
November 12, 2007, 11:53:55 AM »
To put it truthfully and simply, The Beatles wanted Ringo
BEFORE
Ringo wanted the Beatles.
Logged
DoubleVirgo
Smiley Smile Newbie
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 9
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #35 on:
November 12, 2007, 12:48:47 PM »
Oh. I actually wasn't there so I don't know for sure. But the story the way I understood it was that it was kinda mutual. I've heard tales told of Ringo hanging out listening to the Beatles' late night Hamburg sets, sitting in when Pete was sick or whatever, plus Ringo saying something along the lines of "I wanted to play with the Beatles because they were the best band in Liverpool". Whomever had the initial desire notwithstanding, Ringo pretty much dropped what he was doing and joined. Not much arm twisting from what I recall. But I guess the point is that they were made for each other, no?
Logged
www.myspace.com/doublevirgo
Daniel S.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 897
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #36 on:
November 13, 2007, 01:18:30 AM »
Here's the question: Would the Beatles have been as successful if they had kept Pete Best as their drummer? Besides the fact that Ringo is a much better drummer than Pete Best, I think Ringo has much more charisma than Pete.
Logged
Let us all stay teenage gamblers listening to the radio.
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2666
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #37 on:
November 19, 2007, 03:42:34 PM »
I've always wondered what the Beatles would have been like if Stu Sutcliffe had stayed in the group and never died.
Logged
"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread" -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.
the captain
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 7255
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #38 on:
November 19, 2007, 03:53:25 PM »
Quote from: ascrodin on November 19, 2007, 03:42:34 PM
I've always wondered what the Beatles would have been like if Stu Sutcliffe had stayed in the group and never died.
Considering he sucked, it's safe to say worse. Unless they made him stand there and play an unplugged bass and just look good, that is. Then about the same.
Logged
Demon-Fighting Genius; Patronizing Twaddler; Argumentative, Sanctimonious Prick; Sensationalist Dullard; and Douche who (occasionally to rarely) puts songs
here.
No interest in your assorted grudges and nonsense.
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4940
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #39 on:
November 21, 2007, 07:41:23 PM »
No doubt. When Stu was in the group, the were weaker for it. He didn't love the music. He loved John and that is the only reason why he joined the Beatles. He would have been a dead weight on the Beatles rise to success.
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #40 on:
August 23, 2012, 08:42:53 AM »
As far as I'm concerned, Ringo's got way more personality in his drumming than Charlie Watts and personality goes a long way.
Logged
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #41 on:
August 23, 2012, 11:56:02 AM »
Ugh this thread is depressing.
And I'm not one bit surprised Ringo gets the win here. Ridiculously predictable. I'm gonna throw a wrench into the mix. Ringo or Charlie? How about: Ringo
and
Charlie? They're both class acts and they BOTH know what they're doing behind the drum kit. Watts is the Stones' secret weapon and the magic potion (along with Richards) for why all those records worked so well. Anyone crapping on Watts simply doesn't get it. And probably never will.
«
Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 11:57:55 AM by Justin
»
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #42 on:
August 23, 2012, 01:13:54 PM »
Hey, why not throw in Keith Moon while we're at it.
Logged
Aum Bop Diddit
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 673
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #43 on:
August 23, 2012, 08:33:58 PM »
Keith and Charlie are both tremendous rock AND roll drummers essential to their groups' sounds -- the two most successful and influential bands ever. Well two of three anyway. Charlie has a little more swing but that is more the Stones' style too.
There is a clip of John Fogerty doing the old CCR song "Ramble Tamble" with Kenny Aranoff on drums. Aranoff is a powerful drummer with amazing chops, but all I could think is "where the hell is Doug Clifford when you need him?" Ringo and Charlie both served the song, sound, and band. To me, the great rock drummers are not the best drummers. I never liked Fusion, ya know?
Logged
Hey! Those are *MY* wind chimes!
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #44 on:
August 23, 2012, 11:45:29 PM »
Quote from: Aum Bop Diddit on August 23, 2012, 08:33:58 PM
Keith and Charlie are both tremendous rock AND roll drummers essential to their groups' sounds -- the two most successful and influential bands ever. Well two of three anyway. Charlie has a little more swing but that is more the Stones' style too.
There is a clip of John Fogerty doing the old CCR song "Ramble Tamble" with Kenny Aranoff on drums. Aranoff is a powerful drummer with amazing chops, but all I could think is "where the hell is Doug Clifford when you need him?" Ringo and Charlie both served the song, sound, and band. To me, the great rock drummers are not the best drummers. I never liked Fusion, ya know?
This thread is looking up! But Keith Moon didn't really have the "roll" like Charlie did.
Ten points for your comments on Doug Clifford. You totally get it dude!
«
Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 11:47:26 PM by Justin
»
Logged
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #45 on:
August 24, 2012, 12:41:56 AM »
Quote from: rockandroll on August 23, 2012, 01:13:54 PM
Hey, why not throw in Keith Moon while we're at it.
Why don't we throw in Buddy Rich or Gene Krupa while we're here also? We could add a boat load of dudes but the thread specifically focused on Ringo and Charlie so why not stick with them?
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2871
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #46 on:
August 24, 2012, 05:59:00 AM »
Quote from: Justin on August 24, 2012, 12:41:56 AM
Quote from: rockandroll on August 23, 2012, 01:13:54 PM
Hey, why not throw in Keith Moon while we're at it.
Why don't we throw in Buddy Rich or Gene Krupa while we're here also? We could add a boat load of dudes but the thread specifically focused on Ringo and Charlie so why not stick with them?
I think you're on a
roll
.
Logged
Aum Bop Diddit
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 673
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #47 on:
August 24, 2012, 08:17:30 AM »
Quote from: Justin on August 23, 2012, 11:45:29 PM
Quote from: Aum Bop Diddit on August 23, 2012, 08:33:58 PM
Keith and Charlie are both tremendous rock AND roll drummers essential to their groups' sounds -- the two most successful and influential bands ever. Well two of three anyway. Charlie has a little more swing but that is more the Stones' style too.
There is a clip of John Fogerty doing the old CCR song "Ramble Tamble" with Kenny Aranoff on drums. Aranoff is a powerful drummer with amazing chops, but all I could think is "where the hell is Doug Clifford when you need him?" Ringo and Charlie both served the song, sound, and band. To me, the great rock drummers are not the best drummers. I never liked Fusion, ya know?
This thread is looking up! But Keith Moon didn't really have the "roll" like Charlie did.
Ten points for your comments on Doug Clifford. You totally get it dude!
I wrote "Keith and Charlie" when I meant "Ringo and Charlie" (t'was late) but the point is relatively the same -- unique "personality" drummers essential to their particular bands. Moonie was definitely not about "roll"! There is a wonderful track off Townshend's and Ronnie Lane's "Rough Mix" -- "My Baby Gives It Away" -- on which Watts plays dums. It is an awesome performance and is so different than what Moon brought to the table -- something Townshend was tiring of actually.
Just for the hell of it I will mention a few of my favorite "band" drummers. Ed Cassidy of Spirit, Albert Bouchard of Blue Oyster Cult, and John Densmore of the Doors. Though there are definitely some chops in there.
«
Last Edit: August 24, 2012, 08:18:25 AM by Aum Bop Diddit
»
Logged
Hey! Those are *MY* wind chimes!
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4940
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #48 on:
August 24, 2012, 09:08:03 AM »
My personal favorite drummer is neither Ringo nor Charlie but Nick Mason.
Logged
Justin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2245
Re: Ringor Starr or Charlie Watts
«
Reply #49 on:
August 24, 2012, 01:01:57 PM »
Quote from: Aum Bop Diddit on August 24, 2012, 08:17:30 AM
....and John Densmore of the Doors.
VERY nice.
The song "LA Woman" is pure perfection.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.111 seconds with 23 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...