gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
680598 Posts in 27600 Topics by 4068 Members - Latest Member: Dae Lims March 28, 2024, 05:42:22 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: In Concert Album. How and Why?  (Read 4138 times)
Pretty Funky
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 5855


View Profile
« on: May 26, 2022, 03:28:20 PM »

The So Tough/ Holland Boxset Thread has some interesting comments about the possible content of any ‘In Concert’ set, but it got me thinking about how and why did this live album even come about?
Reasons it shouldn’t have even been considered. The group was past its peak, last few albums had not sold well, no Brian Wilson, Dennis Wilson injured, Ricky and Blondie new unknown’s….did I mention no Brian Wilson? Yet the group and management decided to spend a lot of money funding the recording at various shows, winter at that, in the days when doing so was probably extremely costly and involved quite a team.
Did someone just say ‘This band sounds great and we have to record it regardless of any return’?

I and many others are glad they did, it’s my go-to live album of choice. But what is the story behind it. Liner notes below don’t really give a clue.

http://albumlinernotes.com/In_Concert.html

« Last Edit: May 26, 2022, 03:29:28 PM by Pretty Funky » Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2594



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2022, 02:21:13 AM »

I've always felt like In Concert was their first step towards Endless Summer, with the 2nd LP featuring many earlier songs as the set's big finale. Both Concert and In Concert are fantastic live albums as far as I'm concerned. I wish they'd done one more before Dennis died.
Logged
c-man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4941


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2022, 06:25:53 AM »

Replying to some specific points you make here:

"The group was past its peak, last few albums had not sold well," - sure, compared to the sales of their early- to mid-'60s output, but much MUCH better than the sales of their late-'60s output and Sunflower. And, the Beach Boys as a live act were experiencing a renaissance at the time - filling or nearly filling smaller halls, and playing bigger outdoor venues compared to the half-filled or less shows of 1968-1970. Jack Reiley's management, the expansion of the live set from a 45-minute "jukebox" approach to a 90-minute or more presentation that included more of the recent album material, and positive reviews in the rock press made the Beach Boys a vital live act once again. Plus, by late '73, nostalgia was starting to become a factor, hence the slow addition of more and more "oldies" into the set - to rapturous applause.

"Yet the group and management decided to spend a lot of money funding the recording at various shows, winter at that, in the days when doing so was probably extremely costly and involved quite a team." - it was quite possibly the record label, not the group or their management, that came with the idea for a live album (anyone know for sure?)...regardless, it would have been the label who paid for the recordings of the winter '72 shows (by renting the Record Plant mobile recording truck for a couple of shows in the NYC area, which was probably rather economical). For the summer '73 shows, which constitute the bulk of the recordings used on the final live double album, the group used their own Brother Studios recording equipment, likely transported by truck along with their other gear - and therefore not all that expensive to move (in similar fashion, they took the home studio gear on the road with them in the late '60s to use as sound reinforcement at live gigs).

"Did someone just say ‘This band sounds great and we have to record it regardless of any return’?" - to this point, I would say (a) by late '73 the prospects of a new studio album from the band at any point in the near future were not great, so a live album was actually a pretty good "stop gap" idea to keep them in the consciousness of the record-buying public, (b) the returns were comparatively GOOD: the double-live set charted at Number 25 on Billboard and went gold the following year (shortly after Endless Summer did - making it the first gold record for the group on their current label, Warner Bros./Reprise) - compared to highs of Number 29 for Surf's Up, Number 50 for Carl And The Passions, and Number 36 for Holland, and (c) it helped get the group voted "Band Of The Year" by Rolling Stone in 1974 (this honor was based primarily on their live performances, not just the sales of Endless Summer).

All in all, a relative success, and their biggest commercial success of the decade (not counting reissues of '60s recordings) until 15 Big Ones.
Logged
All Summer Long
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 537



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2022, 10:47:17 AM »

I've always felt like In Concert was their first step towards Endless Summer, with the 2nd LP featuring many earlier songs as the set's big finale. Both Concert and In Concert are fantastic live albums as far as I'm concerned. I wish they'd done one more before Dennis died.

Well, technically, they did do one more with Dennis - they just didn’t put it out until 2002 or so. I agree that it’s too bad they didn’t release Knebworth earlier - it’s a great show and the last release that really relies on the core band.
Logged
Pretty Funky
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 5855


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2022, 08:52:53 PM »

Thanks C-Man for the reply. The time period was 5-6 years before I became a fan (1978) but also when I was too young even to attend concerts.
It was a good call no doubt and I wouldn’t mind knowing who deserves the credit most. You allude to Jack Reiley, who comes across as one of those guys who could sell the group very well. The right guy at the right time. No wonder Brian was so upset when learning of his death in the recent documentary (regardless of him hearing it before or not).

More will be revealed if hopefully there is another box release in the next few years.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2022, 08:53:59 PM by Pretty Funky » Logged
B.E.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 760



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2022, 08:14:27 AM »

"Did someone just say ‘This band sounds great and we have to record it regardless of any return’?" - to this point, I would say (a) by late '73 the prospects of a new studio album from the band at any point in the near future were not great, so a live album was actually a pretty good "stop gap" idea to keep them in the consciousness of the record-buying public

Yeah, this was my main thought on the thread. Conceivably, as early as late '72 (when they started the project) the group (if not the label) may have had an inkling that a potential follow-up to the yet-to-be-released Holland was a ways away.

"Yet the group and management decided to spend a lot of money funding the recording at various shows, winter at that, in the days when doing so was probably extremely costly and involved quite a team." - it was quite possibly the record label, not the group or their management, that came with the idea for a live album (anyone know for sure?)...regardless, it would have been the label who paid for the recordings of the winter '72 shows (by renting the Record Plant mobile recording truck for a couple of shows in the NYC area, which was probably rather economical). For the summer '73 shows, which constitute the bulk of the recordings used on the final live double album, the group used their own Brother Studios recording equipment, likely transported by truck along with their other gear - and therefore not all that expensive to move (in similar fashion, they took the home studio gear on the road with them in the late '60s to use as sound reinforcement at live gigs).

Thanks for the interesting info regarding the equipment, c-man. To the extent that the recording process may have been considered costly, this is the same band that had just decided to record Holland in Holland (bringing their own studio with them, no less). They weren't the most fiscally responsible band of all-time, and therefore probably wouldn't have blinked an eye.
Logged

Every wave is new until it breaks.
B.E.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 760



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2022, 08:22:56 AM »

I've always felt like In Concert was their first step towards Endless Summer, with the 2nd LP featuring many earlier songs as the set's big finale. Both Concert and In Concert are fantastic live albums as far as I'm concerned. I wish they'd done one more before Dennis died.

Well, technically, they did do one more with Dennis - they just didn’t put it out until 2002 or so. I agree that it’s too bad they didn’t release Knebworth earlier - it’s a great show and the last release that really relies on the core band.

Releasing Knebworth in the early '80s would have been a useful and worthy stop-gap release. It also would have preserved an autotune-free document of the show.
Logged

Every wave is new until it breaks.
All Summer Long
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 537



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2022, 12:55:25 PM »

I've always felt like In Concert was their first step towards Endless Summer, with the 2nd LP featuring many earlier songs as the set's big finale. Both Concert and In Concert are fantastic live albums as far as I'm concerned. I wish they'd done one more before Dennis died.

Well, technically, they did do one more with Dennis - they just didn’t put it out until 2002 or so. I agree that it’s too bad they didn’t release Knebworth earlier - it’s a great show and the last release that really relies on the core band.

Releasing Knebworth in the early '80s would have been a useful and worthy stop-gap release. It also would have preserved an autotune-free document of the show.

It would definitely be nice to have the show without autotune.
Logged
Pretty Funky
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 5855


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2022, 01:23:06 PM »

I have it (somewhere) and played it regularly before the official release. Sounds fine without autotune…and the sky does not fall down.
It’s the same story as the 50th Celebration CD where apparently, they couldn’t find good enough recordings despite having over 70 performances of most of the songs.
Logged
Ian
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1833


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2022, 06:47:04 PM »

Of course the double release was in place of a single lp concert recorded in late 1972, which apparently was rejected for not including many older songs. so the 73 release was more of a crowd pleaser with many oldies albeit done in 1970s style. I recall that Brian was not that hot on the first attempt at the concert LP or so he said in the 73 Record World interview
Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2594



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2022, 03:21:56 AM »

Here's what Brian said in that interview:

Quote
I heard it and I said, "Don't release that, don't". And they said, "We're gonna!" [...] I just didn't think it was that good. But they really like it.

Brian was asked in the same interview whether he's working together with Carl in the studio, to which he replied that no, Carl wants to work alone - after which Diane interferes, saying that Brian does work together with Carl in the studio. Interesting stuff.
Logged
Awesoman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1830


Disagreements? Work 'em out.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2022, 07:19:58 AM »

It's a worthy live album and it's quite possible that this particular period showcased the Beach Boys at their absolute best as a live band.  The inclusion of Ricky and Blondie was definitely their secret weapon that added some grit and edge to their performances, even including the oldies.
Logged

And if you don't know where you're going
Any road will take you there
Dave in KC
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 630


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2022, 08:36:49 AM »

Highlight of the album is Marcella. And Alan's solo.
Logged
37!ws
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1509


All baggudo at my man


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2022, 08:31:16 AM »

Whatever the reason for this album, I'm glad it exists. It's truly fantastic. It's got everything a die-hard fan would want: some hits, some deep cuts, newer stuff, and an otherwise unreleased (sorta) song. For me, there are three problems with it:

1) No Dennis-composed or Dennis-sung songs.

2) No "God Only Knows." But from what I understand, the band didn't do that song during those tours because instead, after the show was over, LSO's version of GOK was piped in over the PA.

3) There's some noticeable flutter and wow on some of the tracks -- definitely noticeable on "You Still Believe in Me" and "Funky Pretty." I hope that gets fixed at some point.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2022, 06:35:13 PM by 37!ws » Logged

Check out my podcasts: Tune X Podcast (tunex.fab4it.com) and Autobiography of a Schnook (SchnookPodcast.com); there are worse things you can do!
Ian
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1833


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2022, 01:22:01 PM »

Personally I prefer live in London LP but I am of the less is more school-I prefer a more stripped down sound for the BBs just as I do for Elvis
Logged
Rocker
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10622


"Too dumb for New York City, too ugly for L.A."


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2022, 11:57:53 AM »

Personally I prefer live in London LP but I am of the less is more school-I prefer a more stripped down sound for the BBs


You know, there's that orchestra on "Live in London"...  Wink
Logged

a diseased bunch of mo'fos if there ever was one… their beauty is so awesome that listening to them at their best is like being in some vast dream cathedral decorated with a thousand gleaming American pop culture icons.

- Lester Bangs on The Beach Boys


PRO SHOT BEACH BOYS CONCERTS - LIST


To sum it up, they blew it, they blew it consistently, they continue to blow it, it is tragic and this pathological problem caused The Beach Boys' greatest music to be so underrated by the general public.

- Jack Rieley
SonicVolcano
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 279


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2022, 02:44:02 AM »

Whatever the reason for this album, I'm glad it exists. It's truly fantastic. It's got everything a die-hard fan would want: some hits, some deep cuts, newer stuff, and an otherwise unreleased (sorta) song. For me, there are three problems with it:

1) No Dennis-composed or Dennis-sung songs.

2) No "God Only Knows." But from what I understand, the band didn't do that song during those tours because instead, after the show was over, LSO's version of GOK was piped in over the PA.

3) There's some noticeable flutter and wow on some of the tracks -- definitely noticeable on "You Still Believe in Me" and "Funky Pretty." I hope that gets fixed at some point.

They played God Only Knows at the Carnegie Hall 1972 show, if I'm not mistaken.
Logged
Awesoman
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1830


Disagreements? Work 'em out.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2022, 04:49:22 AM »

Perhaps we'll get an expanded version of the In Concert album that covers more ground.  Let's get that live version of "God Only Knows" along with "River Song" (with Blondie on vocals) and whatever else they performed during this time.  Didn't they also perform "Don't Talk" around this time with Carl on vocals? 
Logged

And if you don't know where you're going
Any road will take you there
Tony S
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 780


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2022, 05:35:52 AM »

I heard a live version of Don't Talk, I think on You Tube....it was ok, but it didn't go over too well from the sound of it. It was a little boring for them at that time.....I remember when the song ended, Carl announced "That's It"! I know they did I'm Waiting For the Day a couple of times, with Billy Hinsche on lead vocals. I have that recording somewhere.
Logged
c-man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4941


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2022, 06:10:54 AM »

I heard a live version of Don't Talk, I think on You Tube....it was ok, but it didn't go over too well from the sound of it. It was a little boring for them at that time.....I remember when the song ended, Carl announced "That's It"! I know they did I'm Waiting For the Day a couple of times, with Billy Hinsche on lead vocals. I have that recording somewhere.

They did those two songs in '74, and maybe early '75.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.37 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!