gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
682878 Posts in 27747 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 06, 2025, 12:58:23 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Beatles Remasters?  (Read 5454 times)
Daniel S.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 897



View Profile
« on: August 08, 2006, 12:32:39 PM »


Is that still happening? Didn't the guy who runs Apple say something about their catalog being remastered? Any news? Also, if they do remaster the entire catalog, do you think they'll remaster the Past Masters cd's?
Logged

Let us all stay teenage gamblers listening to the radio.
cta
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2006, 06:39:15 PM »

Neil Aspinall said there was going to be some remastering, but usually that means an attempt to "clean up" the sound.  "Remix" is what would be interesting.  Pick up their 1999 re-release of Yellow Submarine with remixed songs.  They sound GREAT.  I wish they'd do that with all the Beatles albums because the stereo on the Beatles catalog is so separated.  I can understand why George Harrison said that The Beatles in stereo sounded "very naked" because I think Martin & Co. were just in a hurry to slap together a stereo version for the albums and work on the more standard mono of the time.
Logged

Feh.
matt-zeus
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1064



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2006, 02:30:22 PM »

Neil Aspinall said there was going to be some remastering, but usually that means an attempt to "clean up" the sound.  "Remix" is what would be interesting.  Pick up their 1999 re-release of Yellow Submarine with remixed songs.  They sound GREAT.  I wish they'd do that with all the Beatles albums because the stereo on the Beatles catalog is so separated.  I can understand why George Harrison said that The Beatles in stereo sounded "very naked" because I think Martin & Co. were just in a hurry to slap together a stereo version for the albums and work on the more standard mono of the time.

I agree, remix the lot of them in proper stereo, i'm no purist so I don't think it really matters how they're mixed as long as they sound good. The Yellow Submarine album was amazing and i really liked the Let it be naked album too, so they've already done the two 'lesser' albums in their catalogue.
It's similar with the BB in a way, I'd much rather listen to the stereo remix of PS than the mono, so decent stereo on Revolver and Rubber Soul would be great.
Even though the Beatles albums are one of the most important back catalogues, they arguably have the crappest reissues - they are all nearly 20 years old, the sound is bad, the packaging is below substandard, no sleevenotes, no bonus tracks etc. The past masters stuff should have been included as bonus stuff on there at least.
In the way of the Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, Queen and Led Zeppelin, their CDs just recreate the original vinyl because they feel they are still 'current' and don't want to be seen in an historical context (Unlike the excellent CD resissues by the Beach Boys, The Who, The Waterboys, Elvis Costello etc), I mean of course they still are relevant, but they do themselves a disservice by not handling their back catalogues with more care, they might think that the music 'speaks for itself' so they wouldn't need sleevenotes and bonus tracks etc, but we are talking about albums which are getting on for forty years old and people sometimes need/want context and information, perhaps its just me. Undecided
Logged

Disco, disco, discotheque mama...

My music: http://www.thebrigadier.co.uk
cta
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2006, 03:28:09 PM »

Well, with those groups you mentioned in your list of folks who have remixed, they are still alive and have the most control over the songs.   I'm sure Macca wouldn't mind giving it a shot...but you know how The Martian is.  Probably she'd send one of her wide eyed oddball space cadets with countless obscure lawyers and stop it ever from happening.  Not just that, Little Boy Blew still owns the songs from what I understand.
Logged

Feh.
Daniel S.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 897



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2006, 08:20:11 PM »

Little Boy Blew still owns the songs from what I understand.

 Huh  Who might that be?
Logged

Let us all stay teenage gamblers listening to the radio.
GoodToMyBaby
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2006, 08:47:02 PM »

Little Boy Blew still owns the songs from what I understand.

 Huh  Who might that be?
LMAO
Logged

Daniel S.
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 897



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2006, 11:18:06 PM »


You mean Michael Jackson? 


Oh, I get it.
Logged

Let us all stay teenage gamblers listening to the radio.
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 2.23 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!