I read an excerpt from the link and I want to read more. Putting aside my view as a fan, I have my doubts about Brian's ability to be an accurate historian. I've read of too many instances where he's given two versions for the same event. I wonder how much of this book is truly BW and how much is the writer reconstructing events from articles and interviews.
if it was a reconstruction, the writer did an uncannily accurate reconstruction of Brian's speech patterns and way of saying things. Very uncanny , like cam Mott meets Mike Love uncanny