gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
680750 Posts in 27614 Topics by 4068 Members - Latest Member: Dae Lims April 19, 2024, 05:35:25 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Time To Get Alone - I want to know everything!  (Read 11321 times)
CarlTheVoice
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 355



View Profile
« on: June 25, 2015, 02:06:39 PM »

Time To Get Alone is BY FAR my favourite Beach Boys song. I never tire of it and it just takes me to places that no other song I've ever heard can. To me it's the Beach Boys at their very best and it disappoints me that this wasn't released as a single. In my opinion it's up there with GOK, but of course the general public have no idea it exists!

I'm always trying to find out more information about the song, how it was produced, it's history, it's reception inside and outside the band and who sings what parts on it. I've got a couple of questions I'd love to get answers to, but in addition to this if anyone has any more information, trivial or career defining, please share!

So, my nagging questions are:

1. The 20/20 version is produced by Carl. We all know Brian wrote it, TDN were going to record it etc, but what exactly did Carl bring to the track that wasn't previously there? More strings, more vocals, more atmosphere, the DEEP AND WIDE revelation?
2. Was this ever considered for a single release?
3. Do we have any quotes from the boys on this song? Did they love it/hate it/consider it to be a gem?
4. Was it ever sung live by the boys?
5. In the Hawthorne version one vocal is really bugging me and I need to find out who it is! After the 3:14 mark, during the absolutely heavenly harmonies there is a voice, I think it may be Carl, who is just above Mike (?) in the mix. It's a really smooth, beautiful voice but it could also be Bruce, it's difficult to work out. Can anyone help? It's not very low but it stands out.

Thanks everyone, I know here is going to be the best place to come for this information!
Logged
NateRuvin
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 924


"I had to prove that I could make it alone"...


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2015, 02:17:01 PM »

As for Carl's production, I believe the sessions during this time (late 60's-mid 70's) where largely collaborative. I think Brian prepared the track, and Carl sweetened it by adding additional instrumentation probably. I'm assuming he and Bruce arranged the vocals, but Mr. Desper could probably give a more definitive answer.
Logged
phirnis
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2594



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2015, 02:18:37 PM »

Can't really answer any of your questions but this was essentially the song that made me a hardcore fan of their music. I first heard the song in An American Band. Would love to learn a bit more about its making too!
Logged
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5749



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2015, 02:26:45 PM »

I find it VERY, VERY strange that this song didn't get released as a single, especially considering how much work went into recording it. Didn't Stephen Desper say this song was reworked or had more time spent on it than any other song in the band's catalog?

I'm not sure if that meant including the endlessly worked-on SMiLE tracks like H&V + GV, but regardless, it's clear the band was hell-bent on getting this song to sound as good as it could possibly have sounded, which must've said they had some faith in the song being a commercially viable option. Plus the band was pretty desperate for any newly-composed commercial-sounding completed Brian material at this point.

The only thing that makes sense to me, is that Brian had lingering emotional issues about the song which weren't going away, regarding how it was taken away from what he originally planned for it, and that it was a real sore spot for him. If the band wanted to not dig deeper into Brian's wound, even if they had planned for it to be a single at some point, maybe they just let that desire go, and chose to not release it as a single.

Other than that idea, the non-release of this song as a single makes zero sense to me.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 02:33:52 PM by CenturyDeprived » Logged
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2015, 02:29:53 PM »

Here's some session info:

1967
October
12 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]
14 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - strings & horns]
15 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - drums & percussion]

1968
October
  2 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone/Be With Me [home studio]
  4 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]

These sessions were filmed and sued in the original "I Can hear Music" promo.

November
21 - 20/20 session: All I Want To Do/Time To Get Alone [home studio]

Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5749



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2015, 02:38:27 PM »

Here's some session info:

1967
October
12 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]
14 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - strings & horns]
15 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - drums & percussion]

1968
October
  2 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone/Be With Me [home studio]
  4 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]

These sessions were filmed and sued in the original "I Can hear Music" promo.

November
21 - 20/20 session: All I Want To Do/Time To Get Alone [home studio]



Would've been weird if the November 21 session with All I Want To Do had inadvertently switched the sex sounds up, and those sounds wound up the outro fade of Time to Get Alone instead. Or what would have happened if those sex sounds had been put at the end of Surf's Up?  Grin
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 02:41:23 PM by CenturyDeprived » Logged
CarlTheVoice
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 355



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2015, 02:39:22 PM »

Andrew - Thanks. Smiley  

Century Deprived - Jack Reilly's quote comes to mind - they always blew it! It could have turned their fortunes around!
Logged
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5749



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2015, 02:41:04 PM »

Andrew - Thanks. Smiley  

Century Deprived - Jack Reilly's quote comes to mind - they always blew it! It could have turned their fortunes around!

They did indeed always blow it! But really, does any other theory other than the one I proposed make an iota of sense? So odd.
Logged
tortapuerco
Smiley Smile Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 9


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2015, 02:44:28 PM »


These sessions were filmed and sued

In true Beach Boys style...
Logged
Sheriff John Stone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5309



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2015, 02:59:38 PM »

I think "Do It Again" and "I Can Hear Music" were the correct choices for singles; "Bluebirds Over The Mountain" not as much. "Time To Get Alone" is a great song, but I think Friends and Sunflower shows that the general listening public just wasn't into mellow Beach Boys at that time. I think "Time To Get Alone might've stiffed as a single.
Logged
Vegetable Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 115



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2015, 03:05:45 PM »

I think "Do It Again" and "I Can Hear Music" were the correct choices for singles; "Bluebirds Over The Mountain" not as much. "Time To Get Alone" is a great song, but I think Friends and Sunflower shows that the general listening public just wasn't into mellow Beach Boys at that time. I think "Time To Get Alone might've stiffed as a single.

I agree. Still, It was released as the B-side to "Cottonfields" in some countries. This is a sleeve from Germany I believe, courtesy of http://www.beachboys45.nl/

Logged

"I've never written one note or word of music simply because I think it will make money"- Brian Wilson (1965)

"I like food"- Brian Wilson (1980)
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2015, 03:09:51 PM »


These sessions were filmed and sued

In true Beach Boys style...


Fat Finger Syndrome strikes again !
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2015, 03:13:35 PM »

Here's some session info:

1967
October
12 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]
14 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - strings & horns]
15 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - drums & percussion]

1968
October
  2 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone/Be With Me [home studio]
  4 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]

These sessions were filmed and sued in the original "I Can hear Music" promo.

November
21 - 20/20 session: All I Want To Do/Time To Get Alone [home studio]



Would've been weird if the November 21 session with All I Want To Do had inadvertently switched the sex sounds up, and those sounds wound up the outro fade of Time to Get Alone instead. Or what would have happened if those sex sounds had been put at the end of Surf's Up?  Grin

Sorry to burst your bubble but the, ah, "effects" on the tag of "AIWD" were recorded at Capitol.  Grin
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5749



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2015, 03:47:59 PM »

Here's some session info:

1967
October
12 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]
14 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - strings & horns]
15 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - drums & percussion]

1968
October
  2 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone/Be With Me [home studio]
  4 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]

These sessions were filmed and sued in the original "I Can hear Music" promo.

November
21 - 20/20 session: All I Want To Do/Time To Get Alone [home studio]



Would've been weird if the November 21 session with All I Want To Do had inadvertently switched the sex sounds up, and those sounds wound up the outro fade of Time to Get Alone instead. Or what would have happened if those sex sounds had been put at the end of Surf's Up?  Grin

Sorry to burst your bubble but the, ah, "effects" on the tag of "AIWD" were recorded at Capitol.  Grin

Too bad the echo chamber wasn't used  LOL
Logged
superunison
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 85



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2015, 04:54:06 PM »

I don't have the book in front of me, but I believe Priore's Smile book had a section on this song. Maybe someone can find the quotes. Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember reading that the distinctive call and response piano/harpsichord(?) production flourish in the verse was the idea of Danny Hutton?? Not saying as a co-writer, talking specifically about the keys sounds. It's truly one of my all time favorite songs as well, and i love it no matter who came up with that idea, such an amazing sound!!!!
Logged
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5749



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 25, 2015, 05:30:39 PM »

The acapella vocal outro from the Hawthorne version is one of my all-time fave BB moments. I have wanted to loop it and keep it playing over, and over again.

Am I crazy, or do I remember reading somewhere that the acapella outro from that Hawthorne version was pieced together from the vocal sessions after the fact, and grafted onto the end of a pre-existing alternate mix to make for a more cohesive alternate version?

In other words, that it was not intended to be an acapella outro, and that it was just vocal sessions from a different part of the song (intended to have backing track music heard underneath it)? Or did I imagine reading that?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 06:15:48 PM by CenturyDeprived » Logged
♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇
Pissing off drunks since 1978
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11846


🍦🍦 Pet Demon for Sale - $5 or best offer ☮☮


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: June 25, 2015, 06:11:32 PM »

The 'deep and wide' part happens to be my favorite BB vocal moment throughout history...
Logged

Need your song mixed/mastered? Contact me at fear2stop@yahoo.com. Serious inquiries only, please!
bgas
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6372


Oh for the good old days


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2015, 06:27:55 PM »

.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 06:29:13 PM by bgas » Logged

Nothing I post is my opinion, it's all a message from God
Emdeeh
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2982



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2015, 06:32:54 PM »

The 'deep and wide' part happens to be my favorite BB vocal moment throughout history...

And one of mine, as well. I always turn that part up when it comes on.
Logged
superunison
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 85



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2015, 07:49:29 PM »

Pages 126-129 of Priore's book feature Danny Huttons recollections about the song. Specifically his contribution of the multiple keyboard production. He also mentions that Brian called in the string section.It also features a quote by VDP who says that Danny "did the layering on that one, and Brian approved." I'm assuming he meant the vocal arrangement. The book paints the song as a true collaboration between Brian and Danny (at least Redwood version, which the BBs version is built on of course). Not trying to diminish Brian's involvement, just adding some more info that is out there.
Logged
wantsomecorn
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 580



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 25, 2015, 09:10:49 PM »

Here's some session info:

1967
October
12 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]
14 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - strings & horns]
15 - Redwood session: Time To Get Alone [Wally Heider - drums & percussion]

1968
October
  2 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone/Be With Me [home studio]
  4 - 20/20 session: Time To Get Alone [home studio]

These sessions were filmed and sued in the original "I Can hear Music" promo.

November
21 - 20/20 session: All I Want To Do/Time To Get Alone [home studio]



Would've been weird if the November 21 session with All I Want To Do had inadvertently switched the sex sounds up, and those sounds wound up the outro fade of Time to Get Alone instead. Or what would have happened if those sex sounds had been put at the end of Surf's Up?  Grin

Sorry to burst your bubble but the, ah, "effects" on the tag of "AIWD" were recorded at Capitol.  Grin

In what, the middle of the studio? Did he at least clean up afterwards?
Logged

On our way through this "backstage" maze, Bruce joined up with the group and said hello, singing "It Never Rains in Southern California" and joking with some of the older ladies. I'm not sure if they knew he was a Beach Boy or simply an enthusiastic elderly gay gentleman.
Hot Rod
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 25, 2015, 09:40:49 PM »

I always thought it was a Friends outtake, because it sounds exactly like the Friends album and has the same mellow feel
Logged
guitarfool2002
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10002


"Barba non facit aliam historici"


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: June 25, 2015, 10:26:47 PM »

I wrote this piece in early 2005 about the song. This is the piece exactly as I had it saved in my files. Chalk up any errors or overlooks to youthful exuberance. I hope you find something of interest in it about a truly great song, Time To Get Alone. From March 2005:


----------



I’d recommend listening to the song itself while reading this information, if possible, so the details pointed out in each section will be more clearly heard. Each section analyzed within the song is marked with the exact time.

Thanks for reading, and thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions!

Craig



The recent discussion about Brian’s post-Smile musical activity, combined with a few mentions of the song Time To Get Alone, was the inspiration for doing something like this. Time To Get Alone has always sounded amazing to me, even comforting in a way, almost sounding like it came from a very inspired place in relation to what was surrounding it at the time of both its creation and its eventual release as a Beach Boys track. The song has characteristics of Brian’s best production work from Pet Sounds and Smile, and would probably have fit perfectly on either one of those projects. However, the song’s history is somewhat mired in controversy, and the role it played during a sad chapter of the Beach Boys’ saga. The song is mostly overlooked as an album track, and I feel it deserves much more recognition than it has received.

In an attempt to answer a few musical questions, and maybe come closer to understanding why this track stands out as it does, I’ve tried to combine a traditional musical analysis with an analysis of the song’s production, including instrumentation, form, rhythm, and other components that created what I consider one of the greatest productions of Brian Wilson’s career. I have purposely not analyzed the lyrical content of the song, except where certain lyrics are closely connected to specific musical concepts.

First Impressions, First Verse (0:00-0:23): Brian has said “All my life I have been fascinated with waltzes.” The most immediate characteristic sound from the opening bars is the ¾ waltz time. That ¾ meter in pop music immediately stands out among the vast majority of songs written in 4/4 time. It instantly sets a mood, establishes a specific groove and feel, and sets certain expectations for the listener. The chord progression is bright and positive, familiar enough to match the warm feeling of the opening lyrics.

Harmonically, the chord progression of the first verse is fairly standard: In the key of D major, the chords are Dmajor (I) - Gmajor(IV) - Eminor(ii) - A7(V7), a very familiar and somewhat ordinary I-IV-ii-V vamp. However, when set in a waltz feel, holding the chords for two measures each, it makes the progression sound anything but ordinary.

Instrumentally, the first verse features some fantastic production ideas. The bass line covers primarily the root notes of the harmonic progression, but is made sonically interesting by the combination of instruments playing the line. There is an electric bass part, played with a pick, that sounds both warm and percussive; then there is a piano part doubling each note played by the electric bass. This piano’s doubling of the electric bass offers both the initial sharper attack on each note, and the more colorful decay of the note after that attack. When combined, the two create almost a new instrument; that combination of sonic textures in the bass is something Brian experimented with on Pet Sounds, and is a technique which has been used extensively in popular music. This bass sound is constant throughout the song.

Vocally, the beautiful melody is double-tracked, with no harmonies or embellishments, and sung in a very friendly and heartfelt tone. This lead vocal is very dry, with no obvious external effects like reverb or delay. The double-tracking here creates a very full sound, and the lack of effects makes the warm delivery of the lyrics seem that much more personal.

The most mind-blowing sound on the track is introduced immediately. What Brian seems to have done is combine four of his most familiar keyboard- and piano-based sounds into a repeating rhythmic and harmonic hook, a part which almost sounds like a loop created with modern digital editing software. Listen closely to the piano part(s): there are four distinct and separate keyboard instruments playing each chord. To my ears, it sounds like the order of instruments is: PIANO, TACK PIANO, HARPSICHORD, and either ACCORDIAN or HARMONIUM. If we’re counting the waltz time as 1-2-3, 1-2-3, the keyboard instruments are assigned one chord each per two-bar harmonic cycle, as follows: 1(bass)-2(piano)-3(tack piano), 1(bass)-2(harpsichord)-3(accordian). The rhythmic and sonic effect created by this arrangement of instruments is incredible, and has to be heard to be fully appreciated. This is a groundbreaking moment of this song’s production which creates an incredible sonic hook, and is a part which a lesser producer or arranger would have assigned to perhaps one keyboard instrument rather than four.

Rhythmically, the drums in the verse are playing simple quarter notes on the hi-hat and hitting the snare on beat 2. The bass and piano double is hitting strong on beat 1, and on the “and” (eighth note) of beat three. That bass pattern, combined with the drums accenting beat 2, and the keyboard “loop” accenting beats 2 and 3, creates a unique rolling feel with no single instrument taking the lead as the rhythmic foundation of the arrangement; rather, each part assumes a vital role in the overall groove. I don’t really hear a kick drum, and it wouldn’t even be necessary with the percussive attack of the electric bass and piano playing their syncopated parts in sequence with the drums. Again, a lesser musical mind may have assigned a standard waltz feel to a full drum kit, and filled in the rest with a traditional waltz feel. Brian instead makes the whole band part of the rhythmic hook, with every instrument playing an essential and multi-faceted role.

The First Chorus (0:23-0:46): The harmonic foundation of the chorus is best analyzed in two parts. The initial measures are built on a descending bass line which could be called a line cliché, still in D major. The harmonic rhythm is altered for this chorus, featuring one chord per bar rather than the two-bar duration of the verse. The chords are: D Major - D/C# - D/B - D/A. This descending line emphasizes how the different bass notes work under the constant D major triad, and also creates yet another strong hook for the chorus, a bass hook which works perfectly with the higher-range melody. The interesting twist is the second part of this phrase (‘just be together, we’ll only be together’), where the chords are: G7 - Dminor7 - G7 - G7. It appears that Brian borrowed the characteristic v minor chord from the G Mixolydian mode, to give that phrase one of his trademark unexpected resolutions. He’s creating yet another hook, a harmonic hook, in the process. In the key of D major, the G chord acts as the IV, and does not have the flatted 7th (F natural) available, and obviously the Dminor7 chord is not diatonic to D major. By “borrowing” this modal progression and using the characteristic Mixolydian minor v chord, Brian adds tremendous interest to this chorus, and adds an unpredictable conclusion to the predictable “line cliché” bass motion.

Instrumentally, the keyboards which were limited to hitting one chord each in the verse are now opened up and split in the chorus. They are somewhat difficult to distinguish in the mix, but it sounds like the harpsichord has become the driving rhythmic and chordal force in the chorus, playing a steady, rolling eighth note pattern that sounds like it could be doubled by the tack piano. It sounds like the standard piano is now playing the chords on the quarter notes, and it also sounds like a fuzz guitar line could be buried in the mix, playing sustained root notes on beat one of each measure. As mentioned, the bass is playing the descending line in the same rhythm as the verse, and the drums have now added a snare beat to hit on both beats 2 and 3, creating more of a traditional waltz pattern. Combining all of these instruments creates a very rhythmically full sound for the chorus, and adds sonic drive and force to make the chorus stand out apart from the verse.

Vocally, the chorus is where the vocal tracks really explode. Both Brian and Carl are sharing the high lead, trading off at various points, and they are backed by at least three separate backing vocal parts. These parts are either doubled or sung in harmony, covering the entire low-to-high vocal range, and creating counter-melodies while introducing additional lyrics. The parts that stand out most are Mike’s double-tracked bass vocal, Brian’s falsetto lead splitting off into Carl’s then coming back in harmony, and a brilliant harmony line that outlines the D major chord in dotted-half notes, singing the wordless notes: A-D-F#-A, switching to G, and ending by singing what sounds like “baby it’s time” with those borrowed modal notes F-G-F-D. These vocal parts create a massive swirling choral-like sound which defines the chorus and creates yet another production hook.

Second Verse (0:46-1:08): All of the instruments return to playing their parts from the first verse, resuming that rolling feel with the multi-keyboard “loop” and the band once again filling their rhythmic roles. This time around, though, backing vocals are added to the double-tracked lead. These wordless backing vocals follow the harmonies brilliantly, with contrary motion between the bass and upper parts, and interesting phrasing that is anything but static. This creates interesting flowing background lines where others may have chosen to harmonize on each chord change.

Second Chorus (1:08-1:31): Same roles and parts as the first chorus, with the addition of a high vibraphone part, primarily playing one note on beat one of each bar. This seemingly minor addition cuts through the thick arrangement due to its metallic high pitch, and adds a “magical” chiming sound that helps build this second chorus and set it apart from the first.

The Bridge (1:31-1:56): The brilliant way in which Brian approaches this bridge can be found in the bass line. In his previous choruses, after the G7-Dminor7-G7 modal progression, the bass line walked up on the notes G, A,B…and either added a C# on a weak beat 8th note to lead to the tonic note “D”, or deceptively went from the ascending G,A,B to “D” instead of the expected strong resolution to “C”. Brian, instead of deceiving us again, finally resolves that ascending bass line, and the bridge begins on and is based in the key of C. The chords are more difficult to hear in this section, but it sounds like Brian is once again borrowing the Mixolydian modal motif from the chorus and using a v minor chord in the initial progression: Cmajor(I)- Gminor(v)- Cmajor(I) - Fmajor(IV) - Fmajor; then C - Gminor - C - F (I’m analyzing this key/mode as C Mixolydian, which offers the flatted seventh note Bb needed to form the G minor). Notice he also adds an extra measure and plays the first F major chord for two bars rather than one. The next phrase (‘Aren’t you glad we finally got away’) has these chords: Aminor7 - Dminor7 - Aminor7 - Dminor7 - Aminor7 - Aminor7-Dminor7 - Dmajor. These chords are part of the C major scale, and can be analyzed as such, but I’m almost hearing them as a minor progression, with A minor temporarily acting as the i chord and D minor as iv. Whatever the analysis, it changes the overall sound to a minor tonality which we’ve not heard previously, and builds tension in conjunction with the melody and other instruments. This temporary minor tonality is different enough to make this bridge section stand out, but not radical enough to confuse the listener. It’s very difficult to hear this in the mix, but the brilliant chord in this section is the implied final chord just before the last verse: it sounds like that D minor changes to D major, which returns us to the original major-key tonality for the verse in an unexpected way. Notice that the fixed-pitch instruments sounding the note “F natural”, especially the vocals, stop just before this last chord (1:54-1:55). That F natural note defines the D minor tonality, and changing or even suggesting the change of that note up a half step to F# leads us back to the defining note of the D major tonality. It’s difficult to hear and confirm, but it’s almost being suggested by what’s happening in the arrangement.

Instrumentally, the bridge is enhanced by the addition of strings and brass instruments, as well as what sounds like a muted piano or muted harpsichord, possibly revisiting a familiar Brian Wilson sonic trademark from previous albums. The other keyboard instruments from the verse and chorus have dropped out, all but the piano doubling the bass. The drums and bass are playing these new harmonies with the same basic rhythm patterns as before. The brass, which is primarily playing lower-register notes and static lines, starts off complimenting a sustained mid-range string note. The vibraphone is now playing a busier quarter-note arpeggio part in a lower register than it had played in the chorus. Then, after the massive “deep and wide” vocal line, the strings launch into a very cinematic-sounding and busy part, eventually building the part to an incredible crescendo which reaches into the upper range of the instruments, a string part dependant more on feel and effect than precise pitch. This is one of the most exciting and visual instrumental parts Brian ever created, as visual and powerful as his similar instrumental work on Smile, and matching perfectly the message of the lyrics: “aren’t you glad we finally got away?”. The sound of those strings reaching into the stratosphere perfectly captures the mood of wanting to get away, another example of Brian capturing the essence of a lyric within an instrumental part.

Vocally, the bridge begins with only the double-tracked lead in front of a more sparse instrumental backing. But the track literally explodes on the words “deep and wide”, done in harmony, pushed up very loud in the mix, and with a massive reverb added. That reverb could convince us that we are really “looking down through the valley so deep and wide”, and is a perfect example of using a studio effect like reverb to further enhance the visual aspect of a lyric. After this explosion of vocals, the wordless backing vocals re-appear, and help build the intensity of the bridge by adding some thick minor-seventh sounding harmonies to the gathering storm of the string part. As stated before, these minor-seventh flavored vocals drop out just before the last measure of the bridge.

Special Note: In the alternate versions of Time To Get Alone, including the version on the Hawthorne disc and the Redwood version, there is an instrumental section which precedes the bridge as released by the Beach Boys. Included in this section is a whistled melody, a low brass part that sounds like a “Salvation Army”-style line, and sleigh bells. This “lost” pre-bridge section also modulates to the key of C, and very brilliantly follows the same line cliché in the bass as the previous choruses had followed, in the new key. You can hear a very brief “jingle” of the sleigh bells from this lost section in the Beach Boys’ released version, right before the bridge enters at 1:31.

Third Verse (1:56-2:07): Actually, this verse is half the length of the previous two verses, with all of the instruments and vocal parts covering the same parts as they had done on verse 2, minus the vibes. It does sound as if this verse were mixed somewhat louder than the others, or perhaps some of the parts were brought up for this last verse to continue the level of intensity from the bridge to the last choruses.

Third Chorus and Fade-Out (2:07-end): The final chorus, with the important addition of a counter-melody from the strings which compliments the already busy vocal parts from earlier choruses. It also sounds like the backing vocals were pushed up a bit on the mix for this final chorus, or perhaps that is a sonic illusion caused by the addition of the strings making an already full sound even fuller. This final string part adds what I hear to be emotional warmth and another layer of meaning to the lyrics of the track, almost like the feeling some get when listening to a Sinatra track with similar-sounding strings. In other words, it creates the perfect mood to end the song, a mood once again expressed instrumentally by Brian Wilson.

I feel that Time To Get Alone is one of the most perfect productions heard on any Beach Boys record, or on most pop records from any artist. It can easily stand alongside the best work from Pet Sounds and Smile, and it in no way suggests a lesser quality of work and skills from Brian from a time where it has been said he deliberately under-produced certain records. On this song, every instrumental part is exactly where it should be, the tools he uses to build the song section-by-section are textbook examples of creating and maintaining interest throughout a song, from a musical perspective it is complex and advanced in its structure and composition, the vocal and instrumental performances on the record are flawless, the mix sounds rich and full, and it captures, near-perfectly, Brian Wilson’s ability as a producer and songwriter to convey and compliment the visual imagery of a lyric through instrumental music.

Analyzing this song was a fantastic opportunity to learn what made this song great, piece-by-piece and section-by-section. Many musicians are given assignments to similarly deconstruct and analyze works by the great composers such as Bach and Beethoven, with the end result of such exercises hopefully being a greater understanding of the techniques used to create such masterpieces, techniques which can then be applied to that musician’s own work. I feel just as strongly about the value of analyzing Time To Get Alone for any fans of Brian Wilson who are interested in studying his musical techniques. The fact that this song comes from a period in Brian’s history that is often overlooked or misunderstood is even more of an inspiration to look more closely at it from a different perspective, and perhaps recognize Time To Get Alone as the artistic triumph it is.

               
Logged

"All of us have the privilege of making music that helps and heals - to make music that makes people happier, stronger, and kinder. Don't forget: Music is God's voice." - Brian Wilson
CarlTheVoice
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 355



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 25, 2015, 11:24:02 PM »

Thanks Guitarfool for such a great analysis, it's clear from the posts on this thread that it's not just me who considers this to be a truly great song. That's what makes it even more strange that it's not well known! In a way, considering the controversy surrounding the production of this, I'm surprised there's not a lot of info ot there on how the subsequent sessions panned out.
Logged
Mike's Beard
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4265


Check your privilege. Love & Mercy guys!


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 25, 2015, 11:36:04 PM »

I think "Do It Again" and "I Can Hear Music" were the correct choices for singles; "Bluebirds Over The Mountain" not as much. "Time To Get Alone" is a great song, but I think Friends and Sunflower shows that the general listening public just wasn't into mellow Beach Boys at that time. I think "Time To Get Alone might've stiffed as a single.

I think there's a very good chance it would have gone top 10 in the UK.
Logged

I'd rather be forced to sleep with Caitlyn Jenner then ever have to listen to NPP again.
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.761 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!