gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
680823 Posts in 27616 Topics by 4067 Members - Latest Member: Dae Lims April 25, 2024, 04:08:44 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: should "American Family" have had a part three?  (Read 1187 times)
dwtherealbb
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 181


View Profile
« on: April 14, 2013, 03:41:05 AM »

it seems like the second part was very, shall I say, half-assed. What should have been done was to divide it into two parts (Pet Sounds through 20/20 and Sunflower through Endless Summer). The second part would be similar to what was in the movie but maybe slightly more in depth concerning Brian's brief time in an institution, and the Wild Honey through Friends albums.

The third part was where a lot was left out IMO. They should have gone more into their personal lives beside Brian's. Maybe talk about Dennis' relationship with Barbara (she supposedly did a decent job of keeping him under control). I also don't recall any mention of Jack Rieley and think they should have mentioned how he steered them in a more progressive direction. The main two problems I had in the movie was 1. acting as if Bruce never left the group and 2. no mention of BC and RF and their stay in Holland. I think the movie also undersold Carl and that early 70s period might have been a good time to give a more detailed insight into him as well as his own descent into drug use. It might have also been a good idea to show more about Brian as something other than a drugged out corpse. Maybe talk about his contribution to American Spring or his conflict of interest with his sister in law.

So do you think this would have been legitimate improvements or do you think the movie was incurable?
« Last Edit: April 14, 2013, 03:48:31 AM by dwtherealbb » Logged
Smilin Ed H
Guest
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2013, 05:37:47 AM »

Shouldn't have had Parts 1 ad 2!
Logged
NHC
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 529


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2013, 09:34:35 AM »

Or maybe no parts at all, the way it came off.  Maybe some of us are too close to the band and its history as hard-core fans to ever be satisfied, since we immediately see the flaws and the omissions in these things that the casual watcher doesn't have a clue about.
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2013, 09:45:13 AM »

Or maybe no parts at all, the way it came off.  Maybe some of us are too close to the band and its history as hard-core fans to ever be satisfied, since we immediately see the flaws and the omissions in these things that the casual watcher doesn't have a clue about.

Yeah, but even as just a piece of storytelling, this was lousy.
Logged
NHC
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 529


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2013, 01:56:23 PM »

Or maybe no parts at all, the way it came off.  Maybe some of us are too close to the band and its history as hard-core fans to ever be satisfied, since we immediately see the flaws and the omissions in these things that the casual watcher doesn't have a clue about.

Yeah, but even as just a piece of storytelling, this was lousy.

Yep.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.593 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!