Then I'd suggest re-reading that thread where I listed not only the names but also the corporate interests and companies connected to the ad man who coined the "Occupy Wall Street" phrase as well as the man who was the first to send that phrase on Twitter. To say that man is a political activist would be an understatement, and to say he is grassroots or somehow disconnected from a larger political machine is an outright lie.
My memory is sharp on those things, I'll gladly repost to remind anyone who may have forgotten in the past month.
I remember what you wrote. Neither Ad Busters nor The Tides Foundation are funding or controlling OWS. That was a media fabrication. Yes, some figures in Ad Busters suggested some actions like Occupy, but they really had no control over it. And even if they did, Ad Busters is not a corporation, nor is it run by anyone from the corporate elite. At any rate, Occupy decisions are ultimately made in participatory meetings which are open to everyone.
Then we are at a stalemate because those statements about AdBusters, Tides, Occupy, etc. are not factual, but rather interpretations of evidence. It's all about the funding, and if a name like George Soros is not mentioned as swiftly as the name Koch, it is not 100% factually correct or honest in presenting the facts from either side.