gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683329 Posts in 27766 Topics by 4100 Members - Latest Member: bunny505 August 11, 2025, 01:10:59 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Surf's Up (Part 2)  (Read 10940 times)
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« on: August 25, 2011, 08:19:07 AM »

Instead of using the "Box Set" Thread, lets use this.

I believe that there IS a second movement to Surfs Up, However, it may not have ever been recorded.

Here's the session worksheet for Surf's Up (Part 1):



Notice the "(Movement 1) tag, this proves that a movement 2 EXISTS but MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RECORDED.

Now, most people who have "Heard" it describe it as "Weird" and full of horns and strings. We know of a track with strange horns "George!"
however, it is, in my opinion, to humorous to be part of Surf's Up, or be a song in general.
BUT the horns on george do sound a lot like the "falling apart" horns on Surf's Up (The second verse).

So, what do you guys think?
Logged

puni puni
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 885


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2011, 08:29:03 AM »

the horns on george do sound a lot like the "falling apart" horns on Surf's Up (The second verse).
oh wow that's the best part of surf's up
now i suddenly care about a part 2
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2011, 08:39:40 AM »

Lol, who knows?
Maybe george was just a warm up for surfs up?
Logged

puni puni
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 885


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2011, 08:40:32 AM »

everyone talks about that piece but i've never heard it!
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2011, 08:40:43 AM »

Well, there's no doubt that there's a second movement. Brian wrote the melody, Parks wrote the lyrics, and it was demoed. The question is whether or not Brian figured out what he was going to do with it, and recorded it. As for the former, I honestly find it difficult to believe that at the height of his creative peak, Brian would have figured out the first movement and not the second. I'm sure he had a pretty good idea how it was going to sound. It seems to me that he frequently knew how his track was going to end up sounding, what the feel was going to be, etc. As for it being recorded, it looks unlikely. Maybe what he had planned seemed so epic that it just never came to fruition. It just seems so strange, though, that he wouldn't have recorded it as it was clearly a song he was proud of and invested in.
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2011, 08:58:17 AM »

Exactly, Brian LOVED Surf's Up, and it was the ONLY SMiLE song the public heard back in 67', so WHY would he NOT record it?

That's what i'm hoping we find out with TSS, or maybe, even a release!?!
Logged

Bubba Ho-Tep
Guest
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2011, 09:23:48 AM »

Exactly, Brian LOVED Surf's Up, and it was the ONLY SMiLE song the public heard back in 67', so WHY would he NOT record it?

Because after hearing himself sing it on TV he thought he sounded like a "fairy" and didn't want it to come out anymore.
Logged
Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2011, 09:29:12 AM »

Exactly, Brian LOVED Surf's Up, and it was the ONLY SMiLE song the public heard back in 67', so WHY would he NOT record it?

A very reasonable question.

That being said, most of us are still confounded why Brian would not finish up work on what was at that point his most advanced music. Even that didn't seem to be TOO far from completion.

Again, though, another point in your favor. I can sort of see why he never quite managed to figure out Heroes and Villains during the Smile period. It never seemed to be a complete song. Even at the stage that Brian is playing it for Humble Harv (which happens to be the same day that Brian records the first movement of Surf's Up), it is only really one verse. Surf's Up though seems to be such a complete package. Or (forgive my stream of consciousness)...maybe, on November 4th, Brian and Parks had only written the first part, knowing that a second part would be required and by the time it was written (early December, hypothetically) the vocal sessions were beginning and then the project fell apart.

Thoughts?
Logged
Bicyclerider
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2011, 09:30:39 AM »

Exactly, Brian LOVED Surf's Up, and it was the ONLY SMiLE song the public heard back in 67', so WHY would he NOT record it?

Because after hearing himself sing it on TV he thought he sounded like a "fairy" and didn't want it to come out anymore.

He should have recorded it in 1976 with his 15 Big Ones "manly" voice!
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2011, 09:37:17 AM »

Exactly, Brian LOVED Surf's Up, and it was the ONLY SMiLE song the public heard back in 67', so WHY would he NOT record it?

A very reasonable question.

That being said, most of us are still confounded why Brian would not finish up work on what was at that point his most advanced music. Even that didn't seem to be TOO far from completion.

Again, though, another point in your favor. I can sort of see why he never quite managed to figure out Heroes and Villains during the Smile period. It never seemed to be a complete song. Even at the stage that Brian is playing it for Humble Harv (which happens to be the same day that Brian records the first movement of Surf's Up), it is only really one verse. Surf's Up though seems to be such a complete package. Or (forgive my stream of consciousness)...maybe, on November 4th, Brian and Parks had only written the first part, knowing that a second part would be required and by the time it was written (early December, hypothetically) the vocal sessions were beginning and then the project fell apart.

Thoughts?

I really like this post, comparing the situation of Surf's up to H&V really puts SMiLE into perspective.
Brian knew what he wanted, but he couldn't get it EXACTLY how he wanted, and he is a known perfectionist, so I think that it WAS written and Probably demoed.

I mean, look at H&V part 2, people said "Maybe it exists, maybe not" then we got that released on the GV box.

Now, TSS could give us the "Holy Grail"... lets pray :D
Logged

The Shift
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7429


Biding time


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2011, 09:57:18 AM »

Maybe george was just a warm up for surfs up?

That's what I'd always assumed. As FatherOfTheMan states, it is extremely reminiscent of the "Falling Apart" horns in verse 2 (tho' never heard them called that before).

"George" was recorded on November 7, same day as a Surf's Up session; there was another SU session the following day (this info from www.btinternet.com/~bellagio/gigs66.html).   So it follows – in my mind – that the two must be intimately linked, no matter that they're miles apart in terms of sophistication.
Logged

“We live in divisive times.”
Jason
Guest
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2011, 10:02:08 AM »

George Fell Into His French Horn WAS a Surf's Up overdub session, recorded the day after the tracking session. I doubt it had anything to do with the second movement of Surf's Up.
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2011, 10:04:19 AM »

Maybe george was just a warm up for surfs up?

That's what I'd always assumed. As FatherOfTheMan states, it is extremely reminiscent of the "Falling Apart" horns in verse 2 (tho' never heard them called that before).

"George" was recorded on November 7, same day as a Surf's Up session; there was another SU session the following day (this info from www.btinternet.com/~bellagio/gigs66.html).   So it follows – in my mind – that the two must be intimately linked, no matter that they're miles apart in terms of sophistication.

Just as a comparison for those who haven't heard it, I cut the two parts out and placed them in one file so you can hear (I don't think it's a rule breaker but feel-free to delete the link if it is)
http://www.mediafire.com/?y7x1lofvxomvikv
Logged

FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2011, 10:09:12 AM »

George Fell Into His French Horn WAS a Surf's Up overdub session, recorded the day after the tracking session. I doubt it had anything to do with the second movement of Surf's Up.

It could, however, be a sign of what Brian was thinking about at the time, which could have something to do with the 2nd movement.
Logged

Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2011, 10:12:54 AM »


I really like this post, comparing the situation of Surf's up to H&V really puts SMiLE into perspective.
Brian knew what he wanted, but he couldn't get it EXACTLY how he wanted, and he is a known perfectionist, so I think that it WAS written and Probably demoed.

Well, I think as far as H&V goes, it was never written as a complete song (at least, as we conventionally think of complete songs) and that's what caused Brian difficulties, particularly when it was chosen as the follow-up single to Good Vibrations, which was currently being a smash. I think the success of GV was a factor. Now the public was really anticipating what was next - the game was on. And at no point in the Smile Sessions from what I've heard so far, does H&V sound ready for a single release nor does it have the kind of hook required to be the kind of hit record that Brian surely wanted before Smile came out. I think that the pressure was enormous for H&V not only because it was to follow up the biggest hit the band ever had, but it could also serve as validation to what Brian had been doing with Smile. Pile on the recording race that was going on at the time and Brian must have felt like anybody feels just before a Tetris game ends and all those blocks seem to be falling faster and there's nothing you can do about it.

Quote
I mean, look at H&V part 2, people said "Maybe it exists, maybe not" then we got that released on the GV box.

Okay, but my sense is that was the title given to the collection of extra H&V pieces that Linnet put together for the box set - it wasn't actually anything that Brian put together during the Smile era.
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2011, 10:18:12 AM »

the slower harpsichord part is "Heroes and Villains Part 2" I think I remember that being proven somewhere...
Logged

Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2011, 10:19:05 AM »

Well, there's no doubt that there's a second movement. Brian wrote the melody, Parks wrote the lyrics, and it was demoed.

Source and dates/studio, please ?

Notice the "(Movement 1) tag, this proves that a movement 2 EXISTS but MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RECORDED.

Now, most people who have "Heard" it describe it as "Weird" and full of horns and strings. We know of a track with strange horns "George!"
however, it is, in my opinion, to humorous to be part of Surf's Up, or be a song in general.
BUT the horns on george do sound a lot like the "falling apart" horns on Surf's Up (The second verse).

So, what do you guys think?

1 - proves nothing, other than that someone typed "Surf's Up (Movement 1)" on a Capitol session sheet.

2 - "most people who have heard it"... firstly, that anyone has heard it is third-hand info, and in this instance, those people number exactly 1.

3 - I think... there is no Pt. 2: we'll see in the fullness of time.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2011, 10:26:02 AM by Andrew G. Doe » Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2011, 10:24:31 AM »

I mean, look at H&V part 2, people said "Maybe it exists, maybe not" then we got that released on the GV box.

No, we didn't - we got "H&V" (sections): if it was really "Pt. 2", that's how it would have been listed.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2011, 10:25:26 AM »

Why would they write Surf's Up (Movement 1) on a sheet when there's only 1 movement?!

We know there OBVIOUSLY was a 2nd movement planned, that's obvious!
Logged

Chocolate Shake Man
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2871


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2011, 10:26:09 AM »

Well, there's no doubt that there's a second movement. Brian wrote the melody, Parks wrote the lyrics, and it was demoed.

Source and dates/studio, please ?

I think the fact that you know of a demo where Brian sings "Dove nested towers" is sufficient.
Logged
FatherOfTheMan Sr101
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2289


I made a game


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2011, 10:26:43 AM »

I mean, look at H&V part 2, people said "Maybe it exists, maybe not" then we got that released on the GV box.

No, we didn't - we got "H&V" (sections): if it was really "Pt. 2", that's how it would have been listed.

Part 2 was included as part of the sections, it is added in with the rest of the unused sessions.
Logged

Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2011, 10:28:45 AM »

Why would they write Surf's Up (Movement 1) on a sheet when there's only 1 movement?!

We know there OBVIOUSLY was a 2nd movement planned, that's obvious!

Movement 1 = first half. Thus:

Movement 1 - up to the second chorus fade

Movement 2 - "Dove nested towers..." up to "A children's song"

Coda - Brian's falsetto wail.

Q, E and most probably, D.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2011, 10:29:35 AM »

Well, there's no doubt that there's a second movement. Brian wrote the melody, Parks wrote the lyrics, and it was demoed.

Source and dates/studio, please ?

I think the fact that you know of a demo where Brian sings "Dove nested towers" is sufficient.

Said demo was for the entire song, not just the mythical part two - see previous post.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5214



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 25, 2011, 10:34:40 AM »

Andrew, is there any chance that the "Dove nested towers..." section is part 2? Considering that the way Surf's Up tracking is presented on the Box Set, that section ends where "Are you sleeping, Brother John" is on the 1971 version. Also, hasn't Brian stated since 2003 that the strings were never recorded for that section of the song?


Later Edit: I see that you answered the The first part of my question, above.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2011, 10:36:44 AM by drbeachboy » Logged

The Brianista Prayer

Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen.  ---hypehat
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: August 25, 2011, 10:36:08 AM »

I mean, look at H&V part 2, people said "Maybe it exists, maybe not" then we got that released on the GV box.

No, we didn't - we got "H&V" (sections): if it was really "Pt. 2", that's how it would have been listed.

Part 2 was included as part of the sections, it is added in with the rest of the unused sessions.

Citation, please: I've checked the booklet and this is what it says: "Remember, what you're listening to are unfinished productions, fragments, demos and tracks. Basically the pieces (especially the "Heroes And Villains" vocal sections) have been assembled in what seems like a listenable sequence". No mention of Part 2... not a BW 1966/67 assembly.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.613 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!