gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683329 Posts in 27766 Topics by 4100 Members - Latest Member: bunny505 August 11, 2025, 05:08:14 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Mark Linett Billboard Interview About SMiLE  (Read 88330 times)
Shady
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6484


I had to fix a lot of things this morning


View Profile
« on: March 11, 2011, 07:09:17 PM »

Sorry if it's been posted

http://www.billboard.com/#/features/beach-boys-engineer-talks-about-the-smile-1005071622.story

While Mark Linett is a two time Grammy Award winning engineer and producer who has worked with the Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Jane's Addicition, Los Lobos and Randy Newman among others, he most closely associated with his work with the Beach Boys. For nearly 25 years, Linett has worked on the band's catalog and has produced the reissues of the entire Beach Boys catalog including the "Pet Sounds Sessions" and "Good Vibrations" box sets. He also works on Brian Wilson solo album including doing research in preperation for the 2004 release of "Brian Wilson Presents... SMiLE," for which Linett was nominated for a Grammy for best engineered recording. Here he chats about working on the SMiLE sessions, which he is producing in conjunction with long-time Beach Boy archivist Alan Body, for release later this year.

 

Beach Boys' Lost 'Smile' Album to See Release in 2011

 

How long have you been working on the "Smile" project to get it ready for release?

In one sense I began working on it 25 years ago. I have been working with Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys catalog since 1987. We first took a quick look at the "Smile" material back in 1988 and then it was shelved again until Brian Wilson put out "Smile" in 2004. We started working on it about August or September of last year [and] doing our digital transfers last fall; even though the project hadn't been confirmed, it seemed likely. That way when the project did get a green light, we would be a way a head of the game. And we knew we would be dealing with roughly 50 separate recording sessions for the project and that doesn't even include the sessions for "Good Vibrations."

How much work have you put into it?

At this point I would say we have put in a couple of hundred hours going through the roughly 50 sessions because we want to present them in a form similar to what we did on the "Pet Sounds" box, where the sessions are condensed down to the most interesting and informative to get the fly on the wall bits to give a real sense of how this project was created.

The Beach Boys have a tremendous amount of material in their vaults. We do know of things that have gone missing over the past 40-odd years. Now that the project has the green light, we think we have a better opportunity to make sure there is nothing else out there that we haven't been able to locate because the project has never come to fruition. So one of the objects here is to make sure that everything that still exists can be a part of this project.

How much of this project was completed before it was abandoned?

We are still working on the sessions so we haven't begun assembling what would normally be considered an album, which in this case will only be a representation of where the project got before it was put aside by Brian and the group. All of the tracks were recorded. A lot of the vocals seem to not have been completed.

Brian spent a tremendous amount of time on "Heroes & Villains". [There's] even a slightly longer version of the one that was released as a single, which includes several extra sections doesn't even have to begin to encompass every variation of that song. And I should point out that the most interesting thing about "Smile" is that it took Brian's original concept, which he first used with "Good Vibrations,"-he would record the song in sections in different variations and then sort of like a jigsaw puzzle, assemble the final backing track before going on to vocals.

So Brian spent most of his time on "Good Vibrations" and "Heroes & Villains"?

"Good Vibrations," if memory serves, was recorded twice as a complete songs. After the first two sessions, he started to record pieces. They would do a verse, a chorus, a bridge at various sessions and in different ways. "Good Vibrations" was extremely complicated, I can't remember exactly how many sessions were actually used to create the final backing tracks but it was quite a few - I think there were in excess of 20 backing track sessions that were considered for that song.

I am always astounded that if you listen, as I have, to the entire recorded output on that song; and then look at what was assembled as the final backing tracks and some of the experiments that didn't get used-it was an amazing accomplishment. I am just amazed that not only was he able to put that together, but of course it was so influential and successful at the same time. And originally, the song was much more of you would describe a Wilson Pickett kind of R&B number in the chorus and that ultimately didn't get used. When he got to "Smile," "Heroes & Villains" took that a step further and recorded enormous amount of different pastiches of themes both vocally and instrumentally.

What will the changes in studio technology bring to "Smile" today?

[Brian] was doing this with very primitive technology that we now do on a daily basis with digital recordings, reusing sections and moving them around. Its interesting to surmise if he had the current technology what might have happened. It would have been so much easier to do these experiments.

The advantage that we have now is digital editing that we didn't even have in 1996 when we were editing for the "Pet Sounds" boxset; it was still on tape with razor blades. So it goes a lot faster but there is still about 20 times as much material [on "Smile"]. But that almost makes it 20 times as interesting to present that much material.


"Smile" is one of the most bootlegged albums of all time. What will be new for the listener?

For most of them, the whole thing will be new. The Beach Boys have an enormous amount of material from their whole career and [since] we have been actively doing an archive project for about 10 years, there are things that we have discovered that the bootleggers missed.

And the other important thing is bootleggers tend to present every single take... We are obviously going to use the best versions and there are things that we can do that was just technologically impossible when those bootlegs were made in the 1980's.

For example, we can put Brian's vocal back into "Surf's Up," which was a group track in the 1970s [on the "Surf's Up" album]. Brian recorded a basic track with a full band for part one. And he also recorded a sort of a demo version, its just him double-tracked and a piano track. What the band did was they used the part one backing track and tried to fly Brian's vocal into that, but the technology at the time really made that impossible. So what happened was that Carl sang the [lead] vocal and overdubs were added [forthe Surf's Up album version]. And for the second half, they used Brian's piano vocal piece and added very few additions.

With the technology we have today, its much much easier to take Brian's vocal for part one and put it onto the backing track. I have done it and its quite nice. Now we have the ability to shift time things very easily so those synchronizations can be accomplished.

Will there be one complete version of the album in the way it was presented 2004 and will that album serve as the guide line for the "Smile" Sessions track listing?

We have gaps, we have missing vocals. We aren't missing any music which is heartening. All the songs were recorded. Most of it is there. I can't be sure that we won't still come up with something because we do know that there were other things recorded, but the tapes are no longer in the group's possession. And unfortunately they may have been destroyed years ago.

We have some rough mixes from 1966, which will probably become part of the quote album. There seems to be less of that than you might expect. That also leads to believe, it really wasn't close to being finished when it was put aside to go to the next project.

If you take Brian's 2004 version as a blueprint, [it will have] all of that music, all of the significant parts and even the little segue ways. For the most part, that project was heavily researched by myself and others to make sure Brian had available all the parts that had been recorded back in 1966 and 1967. Some lyric additions were made in 2004 that hadn't been completed before the project was abandoned. That's some of the questions that we have to do deal with. How will we are going to present those few pieces. But there really aren't too many. The biggest one is the song that became Blue Hawaii, which started out as a thing called "Loved to Say Dada," which is sort of the water section of the piece. That had background but no lead vocal.

What will you do. Will you add vocals?

Don't know yet.  The general consensus appears to be not to do any recording just because this is a historic piece, but its a little premature because we are still trying to get 30 hours worth of sessions down to some kind of playable length. Even at that, it will be at least 3 CD to represent the sessions.

But will you attempt to present it as an album in a certain song order?

Oh sure, we will present it probably on a single CD, and the vinyl will have to be three sides; I am not sure what the fourth side will encompass at this point. When we did Brian's version in 2004, it had to span 3 sides to fit. And there is another indication of I just don't know. I don't know if he was going to eliminate songs; it was surely never proposed than more than a single album to Capital at that time. Fortunately we don't have that restriction anymore; the CD will allow us 80 minutes which is more than enough. But we will certainly going to present the whole piece as close to it as was envisioned, or as is envisioned, as possible. Obviously, [it will be] with input from Brian as from everybody else.

Will it be in mono or stereo?

At this point I would probably say mono because that's the way Brian intended it, although the sessions will be presented in stereo. One other consideration, with some of the bonus space, we ight present at least some of the album, the stack of tracks version in stereo.

Were the Beach Boys on the tracks or was it mainly the legendary L.A. session musicians, the Wrecking Crew?

The tracks are, by and large, the Wrecking Crew. Carl is on some of the sessions; Dennis is on a few of them. And of course the vocals, there are numerous vocal sessions that are all the Beach Boys, depending on who is taking the lead, sometimes its Carl, sometimes it Dennis, sometimes its Brian. Most of the significant vocal sessions are group sessions and Brian seem to have gone back to the idea of doing the vocals with the group around one mike as opposed to doing the lead separate from the background, especially with "Heroes and Villains."

Will Paul McCartney be on the album?

If Paul McCartney is on "Vegetables," it is that version. This is one of those stories that has been told over the years and you would really have to ask somebody who was there to confirm whether Paul was there. Yes, there are two versions of "Vegetables," well there are three if you count the "Smiley Smile" version; and certainly one that will appear on the album version as well as the special version is that one Paul McCartney purportedly is participating in the vegetable crunching.

That is another point. There is versions of these songs that were not used. Brian re-recorded some of these songs again. It's clear which versions were meant for the album, but towards the end of the project he started thinking that some of these needed to be re-recorded and got as far as cutting tracks for two or three of them. And those will also be presented. There are a few extras., the song, "You're Welcome," which was the b-side of "Heroes & Villains" doesn't seem like that was ever going to be a part of the album; it didn't wind up being part of Brian's 2004 version, so that will be included in the sessions.

We are acting as the producers. But until we got something pretty well laid out, we are not going to get a whole lot of feedback from anybody. Some of these questions are hard to answer because not only haven't we assembled them yet, then this has to be played for Brian and the other members of the group and see what kind of input they have. Just because Brian did it the way he did it in 2004, [who knows if] he won't say we'll lets add, "You're Welcome," it will be a nice throwdown.

So how will you go about assembling the sessions portion of the project?

The boxset will present hopefully all of the [50] recording sessions [which comprise 30 hours] but do it in a condensed form so what the listener hears is like being the fly on the wall; so the listener hears the most important and most interesting parts musically and also the interaction between Brian and the group and the musician.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2011, 07:11:05 PM by Shady » Logged

According to someone who would know.

Seriously, there was a Beach Boys Love You condom?!  Amazing.
Dunderhead
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1643



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2011, 07:48:36 PM »

So everything they can get will be on this release.
"For most of them, the whole thing will be new. The Beach Boys have an enormous amount of material from their whole career and [since] we have been actively doing an archive project for about 10 years, there are things that we have discovered that the bootleggers missed."

Sounds promising. I guess this probably won't answer any questions like "what would air have been?" or "what were the lyrics for Look" or anything like that. But at least everything will be put out in the open.
Logged

TEAM COHEN; OFFICIAL CAPTAIN (2013-)
Runaways
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2008


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2011, 07:59:20 PM »

good luck mr. linett.
Logged
TheLazenby
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 550


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2011, 07:59:48 PM »

So.... "Air" ISN'T "Wind Chimes"?  Or was that just a bootleg assumption at one point that people (including Brian and Darian for the 2004 line-up) stuck with?

It just seems so cut and dry - Fire is "Mrs. O'Leary" (duh), Water is "I Love To Say Da Da"/"Cool Cool Water"/whatever, Earth is "Vega-Tables" (as per the original Smile booklet), and Air is "Wind Chimes".
Logged
Emdeeh
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3010



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2011, 09:10:17 PM »

It sounds like they're planning to cut Carl's lead out of "Surf's Up" -- grumble, grumble, grrrrr.  Cry

I've never heard a version of SU with Brian on lead on the first half that I liked as much as Carl's lead. But that's just personal taste. YMMV







Logged
Runaways
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2008


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2011, 09:15:57 PM »

i'm happy to hear the switch.  carl doesn't sound quite right to me singing surf's up. 
Logged
Dunderhead
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1643



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2011, 09:25:56 PM »

BUT that also means no tag.  Cry
Logged

TEAM COHEN; OFFICIAL CAPTAIN (2013-)
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6063



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2011, 09:26:39 PM »

Very interesting. Sounds a little less set than the Capitol press release would suggest.

I do agree with folks that I find the BWPS template a strange starting point -- I would hope that if they do it, they just use the full tracks with pauses in between. I would hate to hear it with the segues, etc., since those are so clearly 2003-2004 additions. I like them in the context of the later work, which is really a wholescale reconsideration of the project, with a nod toward its history, but they would not work in an archival project.

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2011, 09:30:01 PM by Wirestone » Logged
Chris Moise
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2011, 09:54:50 PM »

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

I agree, I think shoe horning the vocals from the piano version over the backing track is an absolutely awful idea.
Logged
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4941



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2011, 09:58:19 PM »

Very interesting. Sounds a little less set than the Capitol press release would suggest.

I do agree with folks that I find the BWPS template a strange starting point -- I would hope that if they do it, they just use the full tracks with pauses in between. I would hate to hear it with the segues, etc., since those are so clearly 2003-2004 additions. I like them in the context of the later work, which is really a wholescale reconsideration of the project, with a nod toward its history, but they would not work in an archival project.

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

I think we may be missing the point. It seems it is going to be the best of both worlds.
Logged
Ebb and Flow
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 599



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2011, 10:04:53 PM »

I don't mind any experimentation they do.   I'm surprised they're doing it though, given how conservative they've been with the catalog at times.  No stereo mixes of stuff like "Do You Wanna Dance" or "Help Me Rhonda" because of missing guitar solos but at the same time willing to time-shift vocals from the demo version and fly it into the backing track?

I do have to say that the mono-only thing distresses me.  If you're working from the session tapes, why not put the thing out there in stereo?  It's not 1967 and Brian isn't mixing.  Not to mention that a lot of the "finished" tracks were already released this way on the GV box set.
Logged
Ron
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5086


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2011, 10:24:40 PM »

He acted like they had most of the segueways from the original tapes.  What? 


Somebody knowledgeable, count up the known SMiLE recording sessions, see if we already know about 50. 
Logged
letsmakeit31
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2011, 11:38:50 PM »

I think all of this sounds great, Of course there's going to be people who won't like the Smile is presented but for me I'm going to have to go with what ADG said in another post and just be thankful to hold a copy of Smile on cd in my hands. Mark Linett has got a hell of a task ahead of him and I think we should all support him for having the balls to make an "Pet sounds" alike box set for us all to enjoy. I think when this Box set comes out it will be the last physical cd Box set I will be buying. I don't have any money but somehow I will scrap together the cash to buy the mega box set I've got at least a few months or so to save. And so let's all give our support to Mark Linett and the team unless of course he adds George fell into his french horn he he
Logged
?
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2011, 11:47:20 PM »

Very interesting. Sounds a little less set than the Capitol press release would suggest.

I do agree with folks that I find the BWPS template a strange starting point -- I would hope that if they do it, they just use the full tracks with pauses in between. I would hate to hear it with the segues, etc., since those are so clearly 2003-2004 additions. I like them in the context of the later work, which is really a wholescale reconsideration of the project, with a nod toward its history, but they would not work in an archival project.

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

I agree.  I don't mind using BWPS as a template for the running order since that was Brian's final statement on the album IMO, but I also hope they don't try to segue it all together.  Just give me the songs in the best quality available and I'm happy.  I also don't care for the idea of trying to recreate things that weren't there by flying in vocals.  I don't like that approach on any of the boots that try it and even though I'm sure Mark would do a better job I don't want to see it here either.  The Surf's Up backing track is great.  The piano demo is great.  Leave them alone!

I'm definitely intrigued by the remark about the longer version of the H&V single with the additional sections.  If they've uncovered a previously unreleased vintage assembly of that song that would be worth price of admission by itself.

Logged
lance
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1018


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2011, 12:01:38 AM »

I'm gonna be a real puss and say: however they do it, I will be pleased. Unless there are new vocals referring to Kokomo or something.
Logged
Dove Nested Towers
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 877

Goodnight, Mrs. Calabash, wherever you are!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2011, 12:15:21 AM »

"Now that the project has the green light, we think we have a better opportunity to make sure there is nothing else out there that we haven't been able to locate because the project has never come to fruition. So one of the objects here is to make sure that everything that still exists can be a part of this project".

Amen and Godspeed, fellas! Shocked

Logged

"The police aren't there to create disorder,
they're there to preserve disorder!" -Mayor
Daly, Chicago 1968
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2011, 12:22:08 AM »

It sounds like they're planning to cut Carl's lead out of "Surf's Up" -- grumble, grumble, grrrrr.  Cry

Yes - because it was recorded in 1970-71. I like what they're doing. Historical integrity.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2011, 12:24:38 AM »

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

It would disrespect history more to have an early 70s vocal on a mid-60s track. I'm with Mark & Alan here: anything recorded post May 1967 - out.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6063



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2011, 12:26:33 AM »

I guess it just depends on how much fiddling of this type is done, and, honestly, how satisfying the final product is.

(Obviously discs 2-4 will be awesome. My comments in this thread have been exclusively directed toward the prospective disc 1.)
Logged
juggler
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1170


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2011, 01:30:26 AM »

Quote
Some lyric additions were made in 2004 that hadn't been completed before the project was abandoned. That's some of the questions that we have to do deal with. How will we are going to present those few pieces. But there really aren't too many. The biggest one is the song that became Blue Hawaii, which started out as a thing called "Loved to Say Dada," which is sort of the water section of the piece. That had background but no lead vocal.

VERY interesting comment.  How many here would have said that the biggest gap on Smile is the missing lead vocal on I Love to Say Da Da?  I know I wouldn't have.  The  apparently missing lead vocals on DYLW and CIFOTM and several others seem much more significant.  Perhaps some of those lead vocals aren't missing after all? 

Heck, I Love to Say Da Da wasn't even a listed Smile track.  I enjoy the piece, but if it were eliminated completely from the hypothetical Smile album on Disc 1, would that be so bad?
Logged
Runaways
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2008


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2011, 05:56:31 AM »

i kinda want them to tag it with "you're welcome".  Hopefully brian and the boys have some suggestions.  I want them to put together the best album they can with what they got, no worries about what a piece of paper "tracklist" said.

and heck yes to putting brian's full vocal back in surf's up.  No reason to put the 71 version with 67 recordings.  plus carl has never sounded right singing it to me. 
Logged
theCOD
Guest
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2011, 06:04:06 AM »

I'm happy with whatever tinkering they do to piece it together.  I'm sure it will be done tastefully and sound great.  I've been listening to fan mixes and sessions long enough; I want to hear it presented as an official album by The Beach Boys, even if it never was.
Logged
PhilCohen
Guest
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2011, 07:04:01 AM »

I don't mind any experimentation they do.   I'm surprised they're doing it though, given how conservative they've been with the catalog at times.  No stereo mixes of stuff like "Do You Wanna Dance" or "Help Me Rhonda" because of missing guitar solos but at the same time willing to time-shift vocals from the demo version and fly it into the backing track?


Whenever I assemble or revise(with new material) my homemade "The Beach Boys Today"/"Summer Days...And Summer Nights" stereo two-fer, these two tracks are a source of frustration, but certainly Mark Linett could create stereo mixes better than the "Sea of Tunes" bootleg efforts. Yes, any stereo mix of "Do You Wanna Dance" inherently has to use the rejected guitar solo(replaced by a live during mono mix overdub on the released version), but the bootleg stereo mix lacks Dennis' overdub which doubled his lead vocal, but Mark Linett has that overdubbed voice on a "stage 2" multitrack(after the multitrack to multitrack reduction), which the bootleggers didn't have access to. While a Linett mix would still have the rejected guitar solo, it would have the double-tracked lead vocal.

As for "Help Me Rhonda", there's something that could be done there too. As you are aware, the piano & guitar solo were a live-during-mono mixdown effort. My idea: during the instrumental section, put a new mix of the basic tracks at left & center, and the original mono mix(with the guitar & piano) at the far right(I.E. synchronising the two tapes)
Logged
drbeachboy
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5214



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2011, 07:05:47 AM »

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

It would disrespect history more to have an early 70s vocal on a mid-60s track. I'm with Mark & Alan here: anything recorded post May 1967 - out.
Why does it disrespect history? Isn't the early 70's part of the past? Isn't the early 70's part of Smile's past, as well? It was worked on for release by Warner's wasn't it? This is a Beach Boys release, not a Brian Wilson release. If the Boys' worked on it later, than it should be included as well. Plus, I agree with Emdeeh that Carl's vocal on Surf's Up is sweeter and best suites the lyric. That first disc will sound incomplete if there are too many missing vocals. Disc one is supposed to be the close approximation of what the released version might have sounded like.
Logged

The Brianista Prayer

Oh Brian
Thou Art In Hawthorne,
Harmonied Be Thy name
Your Kingdom Come,
Your Steak Well Done,
On Stage As It Is In Studio,
Give Us This Day, Our Shortenin' Bread
And Forgive Us Our Bootlegs,
As We Also Have Forgiven Our Wife And Managers,
And Lead Us Not Into Kokomo,
But Deliver Us From Mike Love.
Amen.  ---hypehat
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2011, 07:18:14 AM »

Also, flying in Brian's vocal over the Surf's Up track seems pretty -- um -- odd. What's the point? To have it over the first part, then the piano demo (which is a 71 compromise) then "Child" vocals? Where would the "Child" vox come from?

I _really_ don't want a cut-and-paste, BWPS-sounding thing. It disrespects the history, and it disrespects BWPS, which should be allowed to stand on its own terms.

It would disrespect history more to have an early 70s vocal on a mid-60s track. I'm with Mark & Alan here: anything recorded post May 1967 - out.
Why does it disrespect history? Isn't the early 70's part of the past? Isn't the early 70's part of Smile's past, as well? It was worked on for release by Warner's wasn't it? This is a Beach Boys release, not a Brian Wilson release. If the Boys' worked on it later, than it should be included as well. Plus, I agree with Emdeeh that Carl's vocal on Surf's Up is sweeter and best suites the lyric. That first disc will sound incomplete if there are too many missing vocals. Disc one is supposed to be the close approximation of what the released version might have sounded like.

Once again...

This release is called The Smile Sessions. Those sessions took place 1966-67.

Carl's vocals on "Cabinessence" and "Surf's Up" were recorded for release on, respectively, 20/20 (1969) and Surf's Up (1971), not Smile. Therefore they are not part of the original sessions on two counts, time and intent. With me so far ?

Smile was not, to my best knowledge, worked on at all for release on Reprise. the tapes were auditioned, copied and put back in storage.

"Disc one is supposed to be the close approximation of what the released version might have sounded like." In 1967, therefore the presence of 1968/71 vocals would be, at best, incongruous, more honestly misleading.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 07:46:42 AM by Andrew G. Doe » Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
gfx
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 1.896 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!