gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
681378 Posts in 27636 Topics by 4082 Members - Latest Member: briansclub June 05, 2024, 07:13:11 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Acid Alliteration: A Historical Perspective  (Read 1150 times)
nakostopoulos
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« on: May 31, 2015, 01:48:18 PM »

"I coined the term 'acid alliteration.' That's what I called it. It's absolutely true that I have an issue with doing lyrics that are so obscure and oblique that they can't be relatable to by most people. I mean they can be appreciated, and I do appreciate the art form itself. But I like art that relates to people to the point where a song has a chance to go to number one. So I am guilty of liking songs that are artistic as well as popular."
- Mike Love, 10/2009

I know I could be opening up a whole new can of worms, but something about Mike's populist "Will the people get it?" defense has always felt weak to me.

By December of 1966 (the infamous "What do the words mean, Van?" blowup), not only had Lennon given us the first glimpse of the Beatles' foray into psychedelia with "Tomorrow Never Knows" off "Revolver" (what's more "acid alliterative" than ripping off Timothy Leary?); Bob Dylan had vanished in a puff of smoke after giving us an Electric Trilogy that spanned eighteen months from March of '65 to July of 66-- beginning with the speaker "mixing up the medicine", and ended with a twelve minute ode to a woman's "geranium kiss". Rightly, "Bringing it All Back Home", "Highway 61 Revisited" and "Blonde on Blonde" are now considered classics, but it should be noted, they made Dylan a phenomenally rich superstar.

So, I find Mike's rationalization a little curious, and pretty absurd. For a man interested in commercialism, was he just totally ignoring what was going on in other people's music, or was he really that panicked over not losing the existing fanbase at the time?

And has any interview ever tried to challenge him on his objections, vis-a-vis what was clearly working at the time?
« Last Edit: May 31, 2015, 02:01:07 PM by nakostopoulos » Logged
the professor
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 982


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2015, 11:54:12 PM »

your're right. but Mike was not thinking of creating something arcane that scholars would later canonize as visionary.   He wanted to reach kids simply and directly, and thought, rightly as it turns out, that Smile was not top 10 material.  No one goes to the beach with the top down , cruisin to "who ran the i-ron horse." (well, we do). The BB have 2 related legacies--the beach fun (eternal and brilliant) and the stuff Bernstein liked (eternal and brilliant). Mike was hung up on the former at that moment.
Logged
Shane
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 620



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2015, 12:03:04 AM »

Thumbs up to the Professor's post above!  I think I'm gonna try some Iron Horse next time i'm Goin' To The Beach.
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.322 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!