| 680740 Posts in
27613 Topics by 4068
Members
- Latest Member: Dae Lims
| April 18, 2024, 08:52:01 AM |
| |
126
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff / The Sandbox / Re: ObamaCare - Free HealthCare 4 Ever! Hip-hip...hooray!?
|
on: November 24, 2012, 08:30:08 AM
|
I love it! Violence (aka the government aka ) What are you talking about? is used to force individuals to pay money for something they would be much better off staying away from (big pharma and the medical industrial complex) You're sort of right - I mean, Obamacare is a slight improvement on the previous US healthcare system which was barbaric but the US should employ an actual socialized medicare plan and eliminate big pharma and the medical industrial complex. all in the name of, what, freedom? Better health? Freedom? When used like people like yourself, it is a mere buzzword with no real meaning. Better health? Most definitely. Better for the economy? Most definitely. Better for the American people in general? Most definitely. Corporations are Legal Fictions that the GOVERNMENT created, therefore their power comes from the gun that the state carries around everywhere. I'm glad your "message to lefties" is this stupid. Which corporations? Which government? How do you account for the fact that in many cases corporations have more power than the government? So, in this case, for example, the government is prevented from negotiating drug prices which is one of the reasons why drugs are far more expensive in the US than in other countries in the industrialized world where the government has more control over healthcare. Last time I checked Wal-Mart doesn't have military-garbed police kicking in doors and shooting your dog because you have the wrong plant-matter in your closet.
No, they just exploit humans in order to profit off of their labor and toss them aside like chattel if they step out of line. In the case you outline, we can participate in a way that prevents such actions. In the case I outline, we can't, at least not without fundamentally altering and undermining the very structure of the corporation. This is why corporations are inherently tyrannical while governments aren't, which is why I can never accept your use of terms like "freedom" as being anything other than a trivial buzzword arbitrarily evoked to con people with genuine desires for some kind of real autonomy. Okay... The government IS violence, period. The only way the government functions is using coercion (force, threats of force, etc.) to take individuals wealth (property, money). The government creates nothing at all, other than debt for the unborn. The US health care industry exists as it is Because of government interference, not despite it. Forcing me (or anyone) to help support it is absurd at best. Freedom = the rights of the individual to self-ownership, the right to be free from the aggression and intrusion of others, the sanctity of justly acquired private property, and voluntary exchange, voluntary association and voluntary contracts. When used by people like me... All corporations. And since we are talking about Obamacare, I am speaking of the US government (though all governments are by definition monopolies of violence). So undermine the corporation taking away the power that the state gives to it. Stop pretending that government is the savior (in the twentieth century alone governments are responsible for the deaths of over half a billion people. This is called democide.) Why defend this institution that has been tried for, oh, what, 10,000 years? It is failed. Voluntary interactions are 100% of the time preferable. Stop defending the use of violence against me and everyone else.
|
|
|
127
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff / The Sandbox / Re: ObamaCare - Free HealthCare 4 Ever! Hip-hip...hooray!?
|
on: November 24, 2012, 07:47:23 AM
|
I love it! Violence (aka the government aka ) is used to force individuals to pay money for something they would be much better off staying away from (big pharma and the medical industrial complex) all in the name of, what, freedom? Better health? Hilarious. I'm looking forward to the announcement that we've always been at war with eastasia. I think the right and the left can really come together on this topic...enslave everyone for your own desires. Good job all you folks who still prop up the legitimacy of the system by doing your religious, I'm sorry, moral duty every couple of years and voting. Boy, all these wonderful gifts from on high...what next? National Deficit! Oh, you mean that money which is stolen from future generations in order to prop up the expansion of the state. Stop making excuses for violence and theft. Time to evolve ideas, folks. One more reminder (this is for the lefties out there); Corporations are Legal Fictions that the GOVERNMENT created, therefore their power comes from the gun that the state carries around everywhere. Last time I checked Wal-Mart doesn't have military-garbed police kicking in doors and shooting your dog because you have the wrong plant-matter in your closet. No, that would be your friend (and humanity's foe) the State.
|
|
|
134
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff / General Music Discussion / Re: Jan & Dean Stereo and Mono Album Mixes
|
on: October 06, 2012, 10:53:51 PM
|
I tried over at the Jan & Dean board, but didn't get any help with this.
Does anyone know if their albums, specifically Folk'n'Roll were mixed differently or if the mono is basically a stereo fold down? Its one of my favorites, but I find it unlistenable on headphones due to the "visual stereo." I was going to use music editing software to do a fold down, but only if it represents how the original album in mono would've sounded.
Thanks so much for any help!
I know most Jan & dean albums have entirely different mono/stereo mixes, sometimes with different edits, instruments, and parts. My turntable is crapped out right now, so I can't do an A/B test. I would always tend toward mono for most things until at least 1967, especially with Jan since he had such crisp and tight mono mixes.
|
|
|
135
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: 50 Big Ones (Remixes?)
|
on: October 04, 2012, 07:46:10 PM
|
Hmmm.
Is PLMW from the 2012 mix of Today!? It sounds a lot worse than the one released a few years ago.
Or I'm going insane, and it's the same one.
I don't know, but I've always thought the stereo mix of PLMW sounded kinda out of sync, definitely too mid-rangy and the organ bass is almost inaudible. For some reason those mono mixes from 64-67 sound so fuckin full I think all the stereo mixes (except Pet Sounds) are way lacking.
|
|
|
137
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: '72 Smile
|
on: August 31, 2012, 10:19:42 PM
|
Similar to the OP, for the fans who were around in 1988 (with many more years and many more changes in the band since 1972), were you looking at the possibility of a release as the band's finished, wholly-realized vision for the album, or more of an archival release meant to get the material out and generate some buzz for the group? What do you think it would have meant to you, had you held that LP/cassette in your hands?
I imagined it would have been something like the Three album/2 cd Vigotone stuff that came out shortly after that...In other words I pictured all the usual songs, plus Can't Wait Too Long on 1 cd and maybe some alternates and sessions on another cd, but really I think I expected one cd...and i would have been psyched. I was in High School and I remember a guy who just thought the Beatles were the best and having some kind of official SMiLe cd would have helped my case (or a Pet Sounds cd for that matter).
|
|
|
141
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / Ask The Honored Guests / Re: The Stephen Desper Thread
|
on: August 13, 2012, 09:25:42 PM
|
COMMENT:========================================================================================================================================================================Announcement & Guidelines for Use
With help from Will C. Music Productions I am proud to announce the first of many study-videos that will explore the sound production techniques I used in the making of Beach Boy and other artists’ music. These studies also include examples of my favorite mastering techniques applied to finished works. I believe you will find they clarify the music and expand the presentation in the stereo panorama. However, this "privilege of study" can cease to be, if abused.
The study-videos provided under password covenant involve the use of copyrighted material. Copyright “Fair Use” rules and regulations allow for study and examination of copyrighted material provided that certain requirements are met. Navigating the Fair Use regulations is a slippery slope and open to much interpretation, depending on each particular situation.
Openly posted copies of copyrighted works proliferate the Internet today. In most cases these postings remain unchallenged by the copyright holder, and thus seem to be setting a broader precedence for tolerance. However, I caution you to be vigilant. The studies I am providing are not for use by the general public and are not openly posted nor should be openly posted. I have placed all these studies behind a password and non-descriptive web-address for a reason. Please respect my request that anything protected behind a password remain within and must be confined to this study. They are not be copied or posted elsewhere, such as Youtube.com, or to become the subject of a bootleg copy. To do otherwise is to tempt and/or “push” the Fair Use doctrine to a point that may not be tolerable or allowed by the copyright holder, resulting in the forced removal of the study(s).
I’m sorry to be so restrictive in my requests, but posting comments is one thing. Posting the actual music is another – even if used in a study format. All of these studies are available by privilege. Let us all respect that privilege and not violate the opportunity granted us for study by abusing the rules.
This message board is where I post. It is not connected with these study-videos.
These studies are provided for use by the dedicated and interested Beach Boy fan. Please feel free to share the study-site with fellow interested fans. But if you share, please caution those with whom you share of the restrictions that must be followed under this privilege. Any copy of music or commentary should (1) be for personal use only, (2) not be for monetary gain, and (3) be in addition to purchased copies of the same material, i.e., not be used in place of the original purchasing of the musical product from a retail or Internet store.
All of the provided studies are designed to be reproduced over any stereo system, from small to large. I would encourage you to connect your computer to a good set of speakers or to your stereo system (via the headphone or output jack) for a complete realization of the music-subject explored in each study. I master for good sound. Connect your computer to the best sound you can. The listening rewards are enormous. Required passwords can be seen by clicking on my name, then look under Website.
Please post all comments and/or discussions back onto this thread.
Thank you and Good Listening, ~Stephen W. Desper ====================================================================================First Study Link >>> http://vimeo.com/willcmusicproductions/w583rthv42tr808ccw==================================================================================== Mr. Desper, That was one of the most satisfying listening experiences I've ever had! You really touch the nerd nerve in me. Really great insight...Too much to take in in one listen... Thanks so much for everything!
|
|
|
143
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Details on the new greatest hits albums and remasters
|
on: August 09, 2012, 07:29:21 AM
|
I wrote this in another thread, but it seems to be focussed on interpersonal board relationship discussions at the moment.
I've already preordered Today, Summer Days and Smiley. I'm considering purchasing the earlier albums for the mono mixes, but I have a general question about them. Are there a lot of discernable and interesting differences between the mono and stereo mixes of those early Beach Boys songs? I'm thinking of the Beatles mixes, and how there are various edits, mistakes, and mixing decisions that pop out at you when you've heard the alternative mix many times. Is the early BB catalog at all like that when going from stereo to mono? Any insights you may have are welcome.
The Mono mixes are always my go-to since they (a) sound really punchy and tight and (b) they are the mixes BW made. Often they have longer fades and other slight edits. If you haven't given the mono early albums a listen then you have a lot to look forward to!
|
|
|
145
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff / The Sandbox / Re: The What Are You Reading? Thread
|
on: August 04, 2012, 08:22:29 PM
|
Teaching a Detective Fiction course in the Fall so I'm starting to get prepped for that. Currently reading Poe's Murders in the Rue Morgue. Next on the agenda will be a Doyle short story and an Agatha Christie novel. Actually, maybe you can take a look at my reading list I will be proposing and if any of you are detective fiction fans (I was just given the course and have no real background on the subject and have only done the most superficial research so far for the course), let me know if there is something that might be worthwhile putting on (I'm also thinking of a film, but I'm not sure which era to choose).
Poe, “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” (1841) Doyle, “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” (1892) Agatha Christie, The Murder at the Vicarage (1930) Raymond Chandler, The Big Sleep (1939) Woody Allen, “The Whore of Mensa” (1974) P.D. James, An Unsuitable Woman for The Job (1972) Paul Auster, City of Glass (1985) Walter Mosley, Devil in a Blue Dress (1990) Michael Chabon, The Yiddish Policeman's Union (2007)
I'm also writing a book on Mennonite autobiography too, but I might not share those texts here as I'm not sure what the interest level would be!
Almost any Ross MacDonald book (The Underground Man or Sleeping Beauty are two of my faves) The Postman always rings Twice by Cain. Tough Guys Don't Dance by Norman Mailer
|
|
|
146
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Smiley Smile given high praise in Steve Tyler interview new Time magazine
|
on: August 02, 2012, 09:06:30 PM
|
Must admit I never listened to Aerosmith, didn't yet get to them. From various interviews & ceremonies Mr. Tyler seems to be very nice human. Though what is the most fascinating is that of all The BBs albums he prefers Smiley Smile. As it is also known from Wiki, Pete Townshend & Robbie Robertson are another famous Smiley Smile fans. Interesting that many musicians like Smiley Smile. I wonder who are other artists-SS fans. Anyway, thanks for the info re Steven Tyler & other little contributions to the thread. Most of it is unfamiliar to me, & other board people too, I suppose.
Check out this perfect song from "Rocks". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsUUkvjliWU
|
|
|
147
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: New LP Vinyl out now ...
|
on: July 27, 2012, 08:00:17 AM
|
I got the impression it was mostly folks (maybe europeans ?) who's parents only had cds around when the kids were growing up and maybe english isn't their primary language so somehow Vinyls was the word they started using, and now it seems like the under 20 crown everywhere uses it. I don't understand adding the 's', but whatever...
Same Europeans who don't capitalise "european"? Who use "who's" (a contraction of "who is" or "who has") instead of the possessive "whose"? Who don't capitalise "English" but do capitalise "vinyl"? Who use commas before "and" and "but"? Who put an apostrophe either end of a quotation? Who pop a space before a question mark? You're right, the language is going to the dogs! Yeah, sure, except it's capitalize, with a "z", unless you're one of those poor, uncapitalized europeans...
|
|
|
148
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: New LP Vinyl out now ...
|
on: July 27, 2012, 12:24:06 AM
|
Sort of strange to spread a >40 minute album on two vinyls. Vinyls isn't a word. When did people start saying this? It bugs the f*** out of me. I got the impression it was mostly folks (maybe europeans ?) who's parents only had cds around when the kids were growing up and maybe english isn't their primary language so somehow Vinyls was the word they started using, and now it seems like the under 20 crown everywhere uses it. I don't understand adding the 's', but whatever...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|