 | | 680799 Posts in
27616 Topics by 4067
Members
- Latest Member: Dae Lims
| April 24, 2024, 08:19:51 PM |
|  |
 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 64
|
|
26
|
Non Smiley Smile Stuff / General Music Discussion / Re: Elvis Presley
|
on: September 14, 2021, 06:17:55 PM
|
What's your thoughts on this track? Well, it's ok but I'm not blown away. I love the strings on the master take, especially the lonesome violin, so I miss those. But as with so many of the '71 recordings, Elvis doesn't go the extra mile, therefore staying behind the song's potential. If this was 1970 it would be a totally different story. But let's face it, for the most part 1971 was not a particularly strong year when it comes to studio recordings. There are some very good ones but not enough to justify the release of such a boxset imo. What do you think? I agree, its Elvis, but not as he could be. |
|
|
|
|
30
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: 'CHAOS' The new Manson book
|
on: August 24, 2021, 12:02:07 AM
|
I had read about Tom O'Neill's book and had already explored probably more than the average amount of Manson related histories and theories, and had a pretty solid opinion that most people didn't know the full truth about Charles Manson and how deep the story actually ran beyond Bugliosi's "Helter Skelter" account, which seems to still be the accepted mainstream version of events. But holy crap, when Tom O'Neill was interviewed by Joe Rogan last April about the book...some of the details were brand new, mind-blowing, and pretty much takes the accepted history and mainstream knowledge of the Manson story and ripped it to shreds. I'd highly recommend the book to anyone with even a passing interest of the story, and even more of an interest in hearing the full story behind the accepted versions everyone knows. O'Neill is the real deal, in my opinion. He literally lost his career and a lot in his personal and financial life (it basically bankrupted him with various lawsuits and the like) in order to write and research this book. It took him over 20 years or so to finish it. I don't think the Manson story has ever been told in such detail and with such background in one resource. What readers may find is that they share O'Neill's frustrations in that his research would get him half a step from a true "smoking gun" document or source which would nail it together, only to find those key pieces of evidence were either lost or destroyed. So it becomes a huge collection sometimes of circumstantial evidence, or a collection of everything that would fit...akin to a 5,000 piece puzzle...but the last piece after 4,999 fit would be missing. Short synopsis of a few key points and questions I had prior to the book, with more after the book: Vincent Bugliosi was a deeply flawed man who used tactics most would find immoral if not distasteful in order to win a conviction. So to convict Manson, Bugliosi spun a tale which he thought would convince a judge and jury to win the case. But it wasn't even touching on many (if not most) key areas and individuals involved with Manson. What was left out begs the questions why was it left out, or who wanted it left out? And why did Bugliosi mess with testimony and eyewitnesses as the claims are that he did? Next, and even more compelling if not disturbing: How were Manson and Lee Harvey Oswald's killer Jack Ruby connected? That alone is worth reading the book. And that specific issue also raises the questions of how and why Charles Manson got multiple "get out of jail free" cards after his release, specific to when he was floating around San Francisco in the mid 60's, when any number of infractions he committed would have caused most parolees' parole to be immediately revoked and they'd be sent back to prison. Manson had someone (or something) watching over him, it would seem, and he kept skating by and stayed out of prison when anyone else would not have had such luck with the justice system. It's fascinating reading. No more spoilers. But here's O'Neill on Joe Rogan's show for 3 hours discussing it: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7tcmg3Anyone who believes Bugliosi's "Helter Skelter" accounts, or who wishes to just close the book on Manson entirely for whatever reasons, should seriously consider at least listening to the interview at that link, and reading the book, and then seeing if those opinions of the Manson story change at all. It feels like we've been sold a false bill of goods for 50 years after doing so. Hard pass on Rogan. The blokes wanker. |
|
|
|
|
31
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Demos posted to Brian Wilson's website
|
on: July 21, 2021, 07:05:44 PM
|
It's great to see the Lucky Old Sun session video too, that's been one of my favorites so far. Something that further blows to bits those wacky notions on how "involved" Brian was in that and other projects of the past 20+ years. You see it right on the video, it could have been 1965 as much as the 2000's to see the man working in the studio producing and building up the tracks.
It's great to have them all collected in one place now, with the ones that had been digital posts previously alongside "new" releases. The quality is amazing. And that Smile session material...wow.
And the good man himself sitting next to Brian in the video. |
|
|
|
|
34
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Feel Flows box set
|
on: July 30, 2020, 06:05:33 PM
|
As the official BRI consultant, I was asked my opinion throughout and consulted with brains and heart.
I got the box green-lit by the label.
I saved it from dying on the vine TWICE.
Howie your wordplay makes Van Dyke Parks look like a grade-schooler - impressed with what you've done there. How is this "wordplay"? Who else is coming here and telling you about this box set and being as straight as possible? Don't worry about that comment Howie, thank you for your contributions here. |
|
|
|
|
35
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Feel Flows box set
|
on: July 29, 2020, 06:00:04 PM
|
|
Thank you to Howie and Jon for your contributions. This band has the capacity to elicit many, many emotions.
Anger is generally reserved for one core member/recipient, the trumped up talisman from the Baldwin Hills.
I'd suggest the blockage sits in his lap.
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: David Marks Arrested
|
on: July 29, 2018, 04:24:11 PM
|
Does anybody really give a sh*t what Marks would have to say in a Q&A. He hasn't been with the group since 1963. He was only brought back into the group because Carl died.
I’d imagine far more people give a sh*t about what Beach Boy David Marks has to say in a Q&A than do what some random poster—you, for instance—has to say on a Beach Boys message board. Well let's see what my credentials are : first saw the BB's live in 1969, have met and spent a modest amount of time with all six Beach Boys, co-sponsored the first two Beach Boy conventions in the San Francisco Bay area, seen the original Beach Boys over forty times in concert and spent thousands of dollars regarding my obsession with Brian and the boys. So yeah , I'm a random poster but I think that my opinion matters and carries some weight. Oh, and I actually use my real name when I post. And that gives you a free pass to be a wanker? |
|
|
|
|
50
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Everyone back together for a Beach Boys Q&A for Sirius XM?
|
on: July 25, 2018, 08:37:19 PM
|
A Beach Boys album Captain by Mike love? That would be horrific. Just look at his solo album which is terrible. I can't see this getting done anyway because I just don't see Brian and Mike working together again in a productive environment. Interview them and let it be.
Mike's album is pretty good; certainly not any worse than the stuff coming out under Brian's name in recent years. Are you fair dinkum? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|  |
|
