Missing Tapes. It seems plausible that an unknown quantity of Smile tapes could have been seized during litigation as the tapes were no doubt the principal tangible asset of economic interest to both Brother and Capitol.
What do you mean "seized during litigation"? The police/prosecutor can in some cases "seize" evidence, and I think a bankruptcy trustee can too. But you're talking about a civil suit, and there's simply not a procedure to do this, at least not that I've ever heard of. While it would be possible for a party to place a lien on certain assets (meaning the party could claim the right to receive payment from their sale), I don't see how the actual assets could be taken before a judgment is in place.
Simply following the line of reasoning that Capitol paid for the sessions( Not saying this supposition is right or wrong) it would seem to follow that they would only be seizing something that already belonged to them. So the supposition here is they seized tapes, that already belonged to them, and consequently filed and lost them for 44 years.
Since lots of people have been thru the Capitol vaults, where were they kept? Vee Jay's Vaults?
OK, but my point is that U.S. law does not work that way. One can't simply "seize" something based on a claim that he's the rightful owner. First there has to be a judgment by the court awarding the asset.
Jeff and bgas: Re-reading my initial post, I obviously erred! ("seizure" was the wrong idea here. Sorry!) Without getting too fancy, I simply meant to write that some of the tapes may've ended up in the hands of either legal team; if so, they may never have found their way back to the Beach Boys given the subsequent state of the project. (Perhaps this is a suitable question for Nick Grillo or David Anderle...)