 | 683366 Posts in
27770 Topics by 4100
Members
- Latest Member: bunny505
| August 22, 2025, 05:37:16 AM |
|  |
Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
1
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Mike and Bruce Tour 2015
|
on: January 10, 2015, 01:46:16 PM
|
Scott Bennett ? Beach Boys ?? Am I missing something here  And you know you're not. No, you're not missing anything. Yes, I mistook the names 'Totten' and 'Bennett'. I have long term memory issues, but I won't make that an excuse and so I apologise to both Scott Totten and Bennett. However, pointing that out in the manner you did is so typical of you, Andy. I hope your interruption and my own reply to doesn't detract from my sincere appreciation of Scott's approach to the gig.
|
|
|
2
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Mike and Bruce Tour 2015
|
on: January 10, 2015, 01:27:22 PM
|
I don't post here all that often and I don't know if Scott Bennett will see this or not (and in the greater scheme of things, I guess it doesn't matter...heh) but I'd like to say that based on what I've heard via YouTube - and not taking anything away from anyone who has come before - that Scott has done an outstanding job (rhetorical question, but how do you make it sound so 'big'?) with the Beach Boys - so much so, I'd love to hear/see them if they ever come to Scotland in the future. Couple of specific questions/comments: great guitar playing, that while different from Carl still manages to sit in there and 'swing'. Also, during the 50th tour - was that a pull-string on Cottonfields? Either way it was cool and the icing on the cake. And generally, thanks for treating that music with the respect it deserves.
|
|
|
5
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: \
|
on: July 01, 2010, 02:32:11 AM
|
Good post. And specifically - Though what I was told by some old timers is some engineers were proficient enough with cutting tape that they could actually edit out specific tracks by cutting into PART of the tape. That blows my mind, but apparently some people could do it.
I've seen an old BBC engineer doing this with a pair of scissors. Amazing.
|
|
|
6
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: \
|
on: June 30, 2010, 11:41:32 PM
|
A device called the Eventide Harmonizer apparently did it too. My (entirely uninformed) guess is that the BBs first used pitch correction -- in some form -- on BB85. There are arguably some sampled vocals on there, and my guess is Steve Levine did something to BW's vox on the album.
Yes, that was one application for the H3000. Back then the wonderfully named 'Publison Infernal Machine' was another option. Along with the aforementioned method of varying the (tape) speed, a notch in the EQ at the right place can also give an apparent shift. Kind of hard to explain, but it removes anything that conflicts with another part of the track but still leaves much of the vocal intact. Maybe Stephen Desper or Mark Linnet could expand on that - without necessarily commenting on Brian's track - and add some more insight? Perhaps the typically contemporary uses of Autotune makes some people quickly write it off as a bad thing or a sign of the artist needing a helping hand. But engineers have always been able to augment performances. I believe one of the benefits of such as Antares is simply to speed-up a process that once took a lot longer. As for the track itself, I think 'The Like in I Love You' sounds very nice, and I'm happy to have new material from Brian to listen to.
|
|
|
8
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Carl's Guitars
|
on: May 01, 2010, 11:03:15 PM
|
Im sure this has been documented elsewhere before, but for a time Carl also used an amp built by Howard Dumble (think Al might have had one too) and for a shorter period a Tom Mitchell amp (not the repair guy).
Also, during the sixties on a UK tour he had another Tele - one with a paisley finish. Back then my uncle was a photographer who shot a lot of artists during that era in the UK. Although the negs are long gone he had some photos of Carl backstage with the paisley tele and also a few of the tele itself (my uncle had never seen that finish before). Every once in a while he finds and scans some 'new' stuff, but he tells me the Carl shots are definitely long gone.
e: I don't recall, but I think the paisley finish was introduced on production models in 1968. The gig he shot was probably in Scotland.
|
|
|
10
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Sunflower Is 40 Years Old
|
on: March 03, 2010, 05:37:44 AM
|
I just thought I'd add my own recollection on hearing Sunflower.
The time must've been either mid or late 70s. I was about eleven years old (I think) and I'd bought the album during lunchtime at school. I don't remember what else I'd heard of by the band by that time, but I was aware of their music beyond the surfing and car stuff. I got home and went to my bedroom, put the album on the turntable and plugged in the headphones. Slip on Through was first up - and right away I noticed that this recording sounded different. At the time I'd been recording my own music in a very primitive way (pre Portastudio days - anyone who's tried to do sound on sound with two el cheapo cassette players will know what I mean...) and so I was already open to the idea that engineering could go a huge way to determining the sound of a recording. My next thought was to stop listening and go down to eat, as I wanted to devote some real time to what I'd just heard.
Afterwards I settled down on top of my bed, headphones once again in place and listened. This Whole World changed a lot of my thinking about recorded music. The first time I heard it (and got over the chord changes) I found that again the sound was captivating and challenging. If there were signposts in my musical life then that track was the biggest. Even now it's something I alway focus on amongst the other gems on that album.
And now many years later and I'm more aware of music, recording, and also my own personal tastes. But when I think of Sunflower I try not to dissect it or examine it too closely anymore. I much rather prefer to allow details in those recordings make themselves known in the wonderful manner that they do. To my mind Sunflower is the product of everyone involved in it (of course) but at the right time for them. From the writing to the engineering, the arrangements, the production and the performances - everything came together and combined into something much more than its parts. I can't even compare it with Pet Sounds, as I believe that Sunflower is the finest group effort I've ever had the pleasure to hear.
|
|
|
11
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: \
|
on: September 08, 2009, 03:30:33 PM
|
I'd bet that was the song Al wanted to run through on acoustic, because from what I've heard the BBs performance of "Winds" at Knebworth was one step away from completely winging it.
I'm sure that's what it was. Thinking more about it now, I'm positive he was playing through a few of the changes while his request for a run through was falling on deaf ears.
|
|
|
12
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: \
|
on: September 08, 2009, 01:22:31 PM
|
Many years ago I heard a board recording of the soundcheck. While it was interesting it was difficult listening. But Good Timin' didn't seem to stand out as being any better/worse than anything else. One thing I do recall is Al wanting to run through a tune, and it seemed that everyone ignored his request. Eventually he said something like "Oh well, I'll just do it with an acoustic guitar".
|
|
|
16
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: \
|
on: June 09, 2009, 02:42:54 AM
|
Ed, I'd just like to add my own appreciation and thanks to you for sharing your insights. And I don't believe you kill any threads - far from it; your time and what you post is deeply valued.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|  |
|