| 681556 Posts in
27642 Topics by 4082
Members
- Latest Member: briansclub
| June 13, 2024, 05:00:24 AM |
| |
1128
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Best radio ad ever?
|
on: October 15, 2010, 11:34:50 PM
|
So, if I have to buy a used table, what has the least chance of being a crapper?
Get a direct drive Technics with a strobe to indicate perfect pitch. Many are available used, and the classic Technics SL 1200 is still available new. If a self identified "audiophile" tries to tell you that a belt drive turntable is superior to any of the direct drive Technics tables listed above, please politely advise said "audiophile" that he/she is full of s**t, then invite him/her to a controlled double blind listening test.
|
|
|
1129
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Henry Miller Library Big Sur Beachboys reunion this Friday!?
|
on: October 09, 2010, 04:50:45 PM
|
My first question would be: from what you observed, do you believe audio/video recordings of this event might accidentally exist?
Don't know about the camera in the middle of the venue, but I was told the videographer who was set up in the back on the deck was given permission to record the entire show only if the video recordings were not posted or distributed. So you got his name and info? Unfortunately, wasn't there! Heard it was a great concert though!
|
|
|
1133
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Where'd they all go?
|
on: October 06, 2010, 10:57:24 PM
|
Custom, did you not read what I posted right before you?
The threads had been ignored already. The "honored guests" were not posting. The threads were inactive. They took up a lot of space. They were moved to a subsection because they were cluttering up the top. If they're not being used, why have them there?
Yes, Wirestone, I did read your post. And yes, some honored guests rarely posted. Some posted in bursts. But with the Honored Guests now on a "Child Board" they are posting even less, and we are posting far fewer questions for them. Like I said, with the current format, it pretty much guarantees that the Honored Guests section will be ignored by one and all. One of the coolest things about this board, imo, is that we have a number of BB experts as members. We are fortunate that people like Doe, Stebbins, Roach, etc. are regular posters in various threads, but when the Honored Guests were at the top of General On Topic Discussions, it was very easy to post a question for them and very easy to check the dates to see if there were any recent posts. As a result, I think they should be brought back to the forefront. How about this -- if an Honored Guest hasn't posted in, say, two years, their thread could be archived and moved to a Child Board, then reactivated if they ever get back to posting again.
|
|
|
1134
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Where'd they all go?
|
on: October 06, 2010, 12:06:51 PM
|
I'd like to see the Honored Guests section restored to the top of 'General On Topic Discussions' where it used to be. As a 'Child Board', the Honored Guests section is now basically totally ignored. I know I never get around to checking it. Yes, many of the Honored Guests also post in regular threads, but it was really nice to have a separate section where specific questions could be asked of the Honored Guests.
My recollection is that two or three people said they took up too much room at the top, so they got moved. I say "Bring 'em back to the forefront!"
|
|
|
1136
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Best radio ad ever?
|
on: October 04, 2010, 07:32:18 PM
|
How bizarre... I wonder; could Mike Love have approved this ad? Almost thought that was Carl speaking at first, too.
I believe that the first half IS Carl! It has to be. And then a different person at the end? Definitely not Carl. I'd say it's the same VO guy throughout.
|
|
|
1137
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Are there any pictures of Bruce Johnston with a moustache?
|
on: October 04, 2010, 06:06:15 PM
|
Now I know who "Custom Machine" is. All I need is his SS# and I'm set........ It's right there on the label!! In those days, RS used to keep it out there for people to see; 419-01-7205 Rolling Stone screwed up! The actual number is 104-52-1045. Henceforth, please be advised that any posts appearing from "Custom Machine" are actually those of "Mikie", who has assumed my identity. I cannot accept any responsibility, nor will I be held liable, for anything he says. Mikie, hope you are enjoying living in my old early 70s college days apartment! Say hello to Al for me when he stops by for a few drags!
|
|
|
1143
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Dear Lord, no...
|
on: October 01, 2010, 02:26:56 PM
|
Hey, I'm lookin' forward to it. Could be a very enjoyable film with some great music. Could be so-so. Could be a bust. But, even if it's a bust, doubtful it could be any worse than some of the worst stuff the BBs, both as a band and individually (well, some of them individually!), have put out.
|
|
|
1144
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Dear Lord, no...
|
on: October 01, 2010, 01:51:14 PM
|
More from imdb: http://farm.imdb.com/news/ni4660394/Fox Wins Beach Boys Musical Bid Wouldn’t It Be Nice? Deadline and Variety are reporting that Twentieth Century Fox have secured rights to produce a musical based on the music of The Beach Boys. Susannah Grant (The Soloist, Erin Brockovich) will write the script not about the group, but rather “a storyline with the surf and fun prevalent in the band’s many hits.” Think Mamma Mia!. Craig Zadan, Neil Meron and John Stamos will produce. The former duo worked on Hairspray as well as Chicago. They are currently working on the Footloose update. All three worked on the TV movie A Raisin in the Sun. I love the Beach Boys and would be down for this.
|
|
|
1145
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Dear Lord, no...
|
on: October 01, 2010, 01:37:35 PM
|
In this case, "acquired rights to the Beach Boys catalogue" would mean that the film producers have been given rights (obviously for a fee) to use the music in their film, as well as subsequent video device/streaming releases.
The article says, "The film is expected to use the band's music." What is not apparent from that statement is, does this mean the film will use the BB's original recordings, or will the main characters and/or others be performing the songs? Could be either, or even a combination of the two, but there is a very good chance it's the latter.
|
|
|
1146
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: MIU album appreciation thread
|
on: September 30, 2010, 12:21:58 AM
|
Doing a quick perusal of Amazon US, (which means I may have easily missed something), it appears the only original material BB albums not currently available as US CDs are MIU/LA Light, Still Crusin, and Summer in Paradise.
As far as MIU is concerned, I absolutely loved listening to most of it when it was released in Sept 1978. I played the album constantly at home, as well as the cassette copy I made for the car, where I left off She's Got Rhythm, since I considered BW's vocals to be a virtually unbearable listening experience, and Hey Little Tomboy, which was such an embarrassing song that I didn't want to take the chance of any passengers hearing it and asking how I could possibly be a Beach Boys fan. After listening to the cassette while driving toward the beach during a camping trip to Big Sur, I was surprised, while walking down to the beach, to encounter Al Jardine's ranch, with a sign "Jardine Arabians" indicating its presence.
So, 32 years later, what do I think of the album? Well, there are still a number of songs I really enjoy, with my favorites being Kona Coast, Woncha Come Out Tonight, Belles of Paris, and My Diane. And, with the exception of the two songs on the album that I've always found irritating, I still like the rest of the album. In fact, I just popped the MIU/LA Light CD into the car to listen to tomorrow on the way to the Padres vs Cubs game.
|
|
|
1147
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Brian's shouty vocals
|
on: September 23, 2010, 05:54:48 PM
|
I deleted it.
That will be $3.50.
^_^
Thanks so much for saving me the intense embarrassment of having a post in the archives that was initially a duplicate, but then changed to a simple hyphen. Please advise me where to send the money. Or, alternatively, I'll be happy to enjoy a Jack Daniel's on the rocks in your honor.
|
|
|
1148
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Brian's shouty vocals
|
on: September 23, 2010, 12:25:14 PM
|
The point was so good it had to be posted twice.
Yeah, and while you were writing I tried to delete the second post, but couldn't figure out how to! I ended up changing the second duplicate post to a "-". Happened when I was pressing the browser back button. Saw the message again and it appeared I hadn't posted it yet, so I hit 'post' again. Is it possible to delete posts?
|
|
|
1149
|
Smiley Smile Stuff / General On Topic Discussions / Re: Brian's shouty vocals
|
on: September 23, 2010, 12:08:41 PM
|
That's just how he sounded by then. Check out his vocals on the Spring album...he sounds EXACTLY the same. Dunno why...maybe all the coke made him sound more nasal Good point. His voice here also sounds a lot like his speaking voice as I recall hearing it when he was on the radio in LA promoting the Spring album.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|