The Smiley Smile Message Board

Smiley Smile Stuff => General On Topic Discussions => Topic started by: Awesoman on January 22, 2012, 04:30:24 PM



Title: What "commemorative releases" should we expect for the 50th anniversary?
Post by: Awesoman on January 22, 2012, 04:30:24 PM
Forget the reunion album--I'm far more excited about the 50th anniversary releases that Capitol is expected to put out.  Supposedly a "career-spanning" box set is in the works, as is another greatest hits compilation.  Can we expect any deluxe editions of any of their albums (hopefully *not* Pet Sounds, although it is inevitable).  There was talk of a stereo version of "Wild Honey" being released; not sure if it's just the song or the album of the same name.  What else should we expect?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: BJL on January 22, 2012, 06:39:15 PM
I'm far, far from the most knowledgeable member of this board, but my recollection is that the talk of a stereo wild honey was not actually reflective of any planned release.  What Mark and Alan were talking about was how they found the 67 version of Surf's Up, and they were saying was that they had been generally going through the entire catalogue to figure out what they had to work with, in terms of future releases and particularly future stereo remixes, and the reason Wild Honey in specific was mentioned was because they found Smile stuff on those tapes, not because Wild Honey in particular was planned for anything.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocker on January 23, 2012, 12:02:18 PM
The new album is the biggest thing in my mind at this point. But for catalogue releases I more than once mentioned that I'd love to have the '65 Chicago concert. That's on top of my list. I also would like to see a CD (or two) with all the single mixes that were different to the album mixes and aren't available. California saga, It's ok, Here comes the night '78 and Rock and roll music appeared on the Best Of The Brother Years.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on January 23, 2012, 12:38:41 PM
I want the complete box set of their entire catalog in mini-LP reproduction packaging. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 23, 2012, 01:21:31 PM
1. Live box set, spanning 50 years (including Chicago '65, Michigan '66, Hawaii and New York '67, Paris '68, Carnegie '72, Red Barn Unplugged '93, etc.).
2. Wild Honey (and Smiley Smile) in stereo with boner tracks.
3. Scrape the barrel and release another Endless Harmony/Hawthorne set (emphasizing the Brother years).
4. Greatest Hits comp with more titles in stereo that haven't been released and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on January 23, 2012, 01:23:44 PM
1. Live box set, spanning 50 years (including Chicago '65, Michigan '66, Hawaii and New York '67, Paris '68, Carnegie '72, Red Barn Unplugged '93, etc.).
2. Wild Honey (and Smiley Smile) in stereo with boner tracks.
3. Scrape the barrel and release another Endless Harmony/Hawthorne set (emphasizing the Brother years).
4. Greatest Hits comp with more titles in stereo that haven't been released and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again".

Been dreaming about that live box....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on January 23, 2012, 01:58:39 PM
Think of the tackiest thing you can imagine and then add a surf board ;)

Seriously, I'm expecting the usual stuff, tee shirts with the reunion logo on them, re-issued albums, all with a prominent reunion sticker on all the front of the cases (stuff like the SMiLE sessions will have the sticker added on them too). How I would do it would be release Two albums a week (priced reasonably, not £15 like the Beatles reissues) starting ASAP, that's 14 weeks, and on the 15th week after loads of hype and coverage of the tour they release the new album.

OR they could do what Sparks done with their reissues, perform a song or two from each album in concert and after the tour re-release the albums with these new live versions added as a couple of the bonus tracks.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on January 23, 2012, 02:02:17 PM
Seriously, I'm expecting the usual stuff, tee shirts with the reunion logo on them, re-issued albums, all with a prominent reunion sticker on all the front of the cases (stuff like the SMiLE sessions will have the sticker added on them too).

Wouldn't be surprised if they added the sticker on all the Full House DVD sets too.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 23, 2012, 02:18:26 PM
1. Live box set, spanning 50 years (including Chicago '65, Michigan '66, Hawaii and New York '67, Paris '68, Carnegie '72, Red Barn Unplugged '93, etc.).
2. Wild Honey (and Smiley Smile) in stereo with boner tracks.
3. Scrape the barrel and release another Endless Harmony/Hawthorne set (emphasizing the Brother years).
4. Greatest Hits comp with more titles in stereo that haven't been released and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again".


Been dreamin' bout them boner tracks  :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on January 23, 2012, 02:18:46 PM
I'd prefer another Endless Harmony or Hawthorne set over  rereleasing all the individual albums with a couple bonus tracks.

I really hope we get a few live releases from the vaults.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 23, 2012, 02:21:24 PM
How I would do it would be release Two albums a week (priced reasonably, not £15 like the Beatles reissues) …

I'm happy to pay the going rate if it's done right. Good packaging, good bonus tracks, top mastering, remixing where called for…  If the Beatles packages had been remixed (I'm talking proper stereo), they'd've been worth even more than we paid for them.


Title: I love boner tracks!!!
Post by: rogerlancelot on January 23, 2012, 02:44:05 PM
A live 70's box would be my dream. They recorded many shows from 1972-1973 not to mention the Beachago shows from 1975. Or maybe the Complete Mike Love & Adrian Baker Sessions Box Set. Nah.....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SG7 on January 23, 2012, 02:45:45 PM
Adult Child?



 ;D


Title: Re: What
Post by: Mikie on January 23, 2012, 02:57:23 PM
Been dreamin' bout them boner tracks  :lol

Dreaming and boner tracks kinda go hand in hand, John.  :P


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocker on January 23, 2012, 03:08:51 PM
I think a DVD with their TV appearances would be great


Title: Re: I love boner tracks!!!
Post by: Mikie on January 23, 2012, 03:15:34 PM
They recorded many shows from 1972-1973 not to mention the Beachago shows from 1975.

How 'bout Luxemborg. As in Radio Luxemborg?  Both New Jersey and Bumfuct, North Dakota were other good live ones from '74.

You know, I use to be all for the Beachago shows. Still am. One of the best Beach Boys concerts I ever saw. But since this new Chicago live release just came out (with the Chicago/Beach boys recorded in 1975 but the Beach Boys cut out) I just wonder if that's the only thing close to a Beachago concert that's going to come out. Not sure why the Beach Boys were edited out of the mix (contractual issues?) but anyway I think the way to go is to include Beachago tracks in the Beach Boys live box, with just the highlights - the best stuff with the Chicago horn section and "Wishing You Were Here" and "Saturday In The Park" and "Darlin'" and stuff like that with both bands on stage. That's all that's needed, not necessarily an entire Beachago concert. But since this new Chicago live release came out with no Beach Boys vocals heard on it, I wonder if we would be able to get both bands recorded live together. Maybe not.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 23, 2012, 03:33:43 PM
They recorded many shows from 1972-1973 not to mention the Beachago shows from 1975.

How 'bout Luxemborg. As in Radio Luxemborg?  Both New Jersey and Bumfuct, North Dakota were other good live ones from '74.

You know, I use to be all for the Beachago shows. Still am. One of the best Beach Boys concerts I ever saw. But since this new Chicago live release just came out (with the Chicago/Beach boys recorded in 1975 but the Beach Boys cut out) I just wonder if that's the only thing close to a Beachago concert that's going to come out. Not sure why the Beach Boys were edited out of the mix (contractual issues?) but anyway I think the way to go is to include Beachago tracks in the Beach Boys live box, with just the highlights - the best stuff with the Chicago horn section and "Wishing You Were Here" and "Saturday In The Park" and "Darlin'" and stuff like that with both bands on stage. That's all that's needed, not necessarily an entire Beachago concert. But since this new Chicago live release came out with no Beach Boys vocals heard on it, I wonder if we would be able to get both bands recorded live together. Maybe not.

I wondered if they were holding back on the BBs set for a 50th anniversary release.

Also, I assume the 1975 Wembley gig was recorded from the soundboard, as the Elton John segment has already been released as part of the Captain Fantastic & the Brown Dirt Cowboy deluxe edition.   That show has such a fantastic reputation; would love to hear whether it's justified.

Update: according to an eye-witness customer review on Amazon.uk, the gig was filmed as well…  Fingers crossed!


Title: Re: What
Post by: hypehat on January 23, 2012, 03:47:21 PM
They recorded many shows from 1972-1973 not to mention the Beachago shows from 1975.

How 'bout Luxemborg. As in Radio Luxemborg?  Both New Jersey and Bumfuct, North Dakota were other good live ones from '74.

You know, I use to be all for the Beachago shows. Still am. One of the best Beach Boys concerts I ever saw. But since this new Chicago live release just came out (with the Chicago/Beach boys recorded in 1975 but the Beach Boys cut out) I just wonder if that's the only thing close to a Beachago concert that's going to come out. Not sure why the Beach Boys were edited out of the mix (contractual issues?) but anyway I think the way to go is to include Beachago tracks in the Beach Boys live box, with just the highlights - the best stuff with the Chicago horn section and "Wishing You Were Here" and "Saturday In The Park" and "Darlin'" and stuff like that with both bands on stage. That's all that's needed, not necessarily an entire Beachago concert. But since this new Chicago live release came out with no Beach Boys vocals heard on it, I wonder if we would be able to get both bands recorded live together. Maybe not.

I wondered if they were holding back on the BBs set for a 50th anniversary release.

Also, I assume the 1975 Wembley gig was recorded from the soundboard, as the Elton John segment has already been released as part of the Captain Fantastic & the Brown Dirt Cowboy deluxe edition.   That show has such a fantastic reputation; would love to hear whether it's justified.

Update: according to an eye-witness customer review on Amazon.uk, the gig was filmed as well…  Fingers crossed!

Isn't that this show? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRbBPhodF4Q


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 23, 2012, 04:03:19 PM
Pretty sure that clip's from an earlier show as Blondie and Ricky had left the band by '75.

Eric's excellent gig archive:
http://members.tripod.com/~fun_fun_fun/6-21-75.html

The clip is more likely June 3, 1972, Crystal Palace Bowl, London, the line-up of which also featured Elton John, among others. (as reported at AGD's Bellagio site; to quote: "Broadcast on June 28th by NBC TV as 'Good Vibrations from London', with four songs from the BB. Elton John guested on the encore.").

So there's another potential anniversary release!

What's struck me while looking the gigs up is the set list from the Wembley gig. This was the set list supposedly full of hits that blew Elton, the Eagles etc off stage.

Yes, it has hits included, but also Sail On Sailor, The Trader, Surf´s Up, California Saga/California & You Are So Beautiful (then a pretty new song).

Among the hits played are Wouldn´t It Be Nice, I Can Hear Music, Heroes & Villains, Don´t Worry Baby, & Darlin´.

Then there's the staples  - Sloop John B, California Girls & Good Vibes – and the encore guarantees – I Get Around, Surfin´ USA, Barbara Ann, Fun, Fun, Fun.

I'd be happy to hear them play that set list this year.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on January 23, 2012, 04:06:29 PM
Ah, '75. Missed that....  I'm getting slow in my old age.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lowbacca on January 23, 2012, 04:35:41 PM
I think a DVD with their TV appearances would be great
That would be great. Yet it would be complicated to acquire the rights for publishing from the various holders of rights (TV stations or whatever). Don't think that's gonna happen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lowbacca on January 23, 2012, 04:39:48 PM
1. Live box set, spanning 50 years (including Chicago '65, Michigan '66, Hawaii and New York '67, Paris '68, Carnegie '72, Red Barn Unplugged '93, etc.).
2. Wild Honey (and Smiley Smile) in stereo with boner tracks.
3. Scrape the barrel and release another Endless Harmony/Hawthorne set (emphasizing the Brother years).
4. Greatest Hits comp with more titles in stereo that haven't been released and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again".

Some of that, probably.

Regarding the studio LPs I guess they will just reissue the old 2fers with a reunion sticker on the front (like GuyOnTheBeach said). I don't see a new WILD HONEY mix happening... same goes for SMILEY SMILE.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on January 23, 2012, 05:47:41 PM
I'd say I prefer all the albums to be remastered, and have each be released separately instead of in two-fers. I think the two-fer approach kinda undervalues the great work on some of those albums.

I'd assume that since a lot of the albums are so short, they would put bonus tracks on them. Although I would imagine the new box set will have a nice helping of unreleased material.

However, I wouldn't mind a compilation focusing on just unreleased material. Maybe just one disc. Hopefully like 20 to 25 songs. That would be fine with me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on January 23, 2012, 05:58:16 PM
A complete studio albums box set released in stereo is what I'm dreaming about..

If it ends up just being 2 new compilation albums and the new album I'll be devastated  :-\


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocky Raccoon on January 23, 2012, 05:59:09 PM
They should start a bootleg series (a la Bob Dylan) that collects classic concert recordings and rare demos.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on January 23, 2012, 08:38:04 PM
I'm of the opinion that they should go as far as to release "three-fers" if they're remastering the albums. I'd squeeze the first three albums, the second set of three albums and Smiley Smile-Wild Honey-Friends all on onc cd each. Today-Summer Nights would be the fourth remaster and the fifth would be 20/20 with all of the bonus tracks from the aforementioned 14 albums (since 20/20 is a catchall LP, anyway).

Those five CDs along with the already released 40th Anniversary of Pet Sounds, the Smile sessions (the two disc) and the Ultimate Christmas CD could all be packaged into one boxed set.


There would then be a 1970's boxed set that mimics the original LP layout with one CD for each album. Each CD would include bonus tracks, so there'd be nine discs, one for each album (including one for Mount Vernon and Fairway) along with a tenth disc of extra material.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 23, 2012, 09:44:54 PM
I don't see a new WILD HONEY mix happening... same goes for SMILEY SMILE.

Me neither. I can state my preferences though, and that's all I'm doing. I'm also a realist, though. The live box is probably very doable. Not sure about the demand for a Wild Honey album in stereo, other than us hardcores. It's been talked about. Even a legit downloadable would be nice, but probably not gonna happen unfortunately. A Greatest Hits comp is most likely - just asking if they hafta do it, give us some incentive to buy another one by giving us more stereo tracks and and unreleased song or two. As far as re-releasing single Beach Boys albums, I don't see that happening either - if anything 2-fers coming out again would be the way to go for economic reasons. Sure wouldn't mind seeing an 'Obi' Japan release of the individual albums in paper sleeves - that's been successful for other artists. I say release those or the Pastmasters series in the USA. I know, just dreaming about that last part.... 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 24, 2012, 01:22:58 AM
I think I'm going to have to go with the general consensus here and say career spanning Live Box Set (4 CD's with a bonus DVD included). I would be willing to spend big bucks on it.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 24, 2012, 01:35:57 AM
I think I'm going to have to go with the general consensus here and say career spanning Live Box Set (4 CD's with a bonus DVD included). I would be willing to spend big bucks on it.

See, I don't think a 4CD & DVD box would cover 50 years of live performances. Needs more. For political reasons you can't exclude the Mike & Bruce era, as they've flown the flag for more than a decade as The Beach Boys. I'd be happy with a 50CD series, with one live gig for each year but I doubt that's going to happen. There is, however, an awful lot of recorded shows (and a lot of recorded awful shows) that ought to se the light of day eventually - this might as well be the year, while there's still a market for tangible product.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 24, 2012, 01:51:56 AM
I think I'm going to have to go with the general consensus here and say career spanning Live Box Set ( 5 CDs with a bonus DVD included). I would be willing to spend bigger bucks on it.
 ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on January 24, 2012, 08:27:52 AM
Sounds of Summer with a 50th anniversary celebration t shirt according to Amazon.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Smilin Ed H on January 24, 2012, 11:36:13 AM
I'll settle for a series of good T-shirts - cover of Surfin' Safari, SMiLE, Surf's Up - that sort of thing.  And a Brian Wilson bath robe. And a hot girl called Rhonda. Or Caroline. Or Wendy.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Smilin Ed H on January 24, 2012, 12:13:18 PM
And a rarities/outtakes set covering 69-79, of course.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on January 24, 2012, 12:57:01 PM
I would like all their albums to be released as single discs with stereo/mono mixes/singles and if room unreleased songs ,new stereo mixes if old ones don't exist or if they can't do ANY stereo mix do "fake stereo" JUST for the songs that can't be remixed into stereo (like they did with the Beatles "capitol records" cd sets),and of course the latter years only stereo,a two or three disc set of all unreleased/rarities from the 60's til the 90's including ALL the songs from various soundtracks,tribute albums,duets etc (Excluding those that are on "Still Cruising" cd re-issue,read below) and a box set with all their songs in chronlogical order (Mono and stereo) without unreleased songs on it.."Still Cruisin" should be re-issued WITHOUT the older tracks and it should have the songs from the 80's and 90's that are out of print.."Sip" should have both american and uk mixes and if room rare songs that are out of print (Like Still Cruisin) but wihtout repeating anything from the 2 or 3 disc box set..there should be NO double dipping with the unreleased songs,all the songs from the first two-fers should be excluded so they can put other unreleased songs and not douple dipping..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 24, 2012, 01:27:00 PM
You obviously have money to burn.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on January 24, 2012, 01:39:59 PM
You obviously have money to burn.
no I just want to have a choice ,I don't think it would be fair to have JUST a boxset and not the sinlge discs and JUST have the unreleased songs on the expensive box set,so I can pick and choose which single discs I want wihtout having to buy an expensive box set..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 24, 2012, 03:00:12 PM
The ultimate would be a mono box set and a stereo box set for all of the Beach Beach Boys albums. Just like Capitol did for the Beatles. Too bad it isn't going to happen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on January 24, 2012, 03:28:52 PM
Ill put my expectations + hopes on a live box set and some live DVD releases + A Rarities//Unreleased series..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on January 24, 2012, 05:22:50 PM
I'd honestly settle for the twofers being kept in print/remastered (if so, pre-65 in mono, please) and a big rarities collection being released.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Zach95 on January 24, 2012, 07:00:44 PM
The ultimate would be a mono box set and a stereo box set for all of the Beach Beach Boys albums. Just like Capitol did for the Beatles. Too bad it isn't going to happen.

Are you sure...? I'm REALLY hoping for this too...and I just...can't accept that it just isn't going to happen.  :-\


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 24, 2012, 08:26:20 PM
Yeah, I'm sure. They could do a mono box, no problem. But to do a stereo box, they need the multi-track tapes. Some of those are missing for albums such as Little Deuce Coupe and Shut Down II.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ebb and Flow on January 24, 2012, 08:43:42 PM
Yeah, I'm sure. They could do a mono box, no problem. But to do a stereo box, they need the multi-track tapes. Some of those are missing for albums such as Little Deuce Coupe and Shut Down II.

Just because they're missing some of the multitracks doesn't invalidate the stereo mixes Chuck Britz created in 1963/64.  About the only tracks from those two albums I can think of that can't be released in stereo: A Young Man Is Gone and 409.  Shut Down Vol. 2 can be released in stereo now (the tapes for Denny's Drums and Pom Pom Playgirl were found in 2008), though some tracks would still be "lop-sided".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 24, 2012, 09:01:06 PM
Yeah, well, now we also have "Don't Worry Baby" and "Why Do Fools Fall In Love" in stereo because the tapes were found recently. But not all of the tapes are around to make a complete stereo album. Sure, suedo stereo mixes can be made of some of them, but it's not like having the multi's to do true stereo releases.

Listening to some of those SOT discs, you can get a feel what some of the tracks might sound like in suedo stereo. I'd like stereo releases of everything of course, but being realistic, it's hit or miss for nice sounding stereo tracks.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on January 24, 2012, 09:41:01 PM
Think ill stay over here..No one is arguing about Mike Love.!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ebb and Flow on January 24, 2012, 09:55:19 PM
Yeah, well, now we also have "Don't Worry Baby" and "Why Do Fools Fall In Love" in stereo because the tapes were found recently. But not all of the tapes are around to make a consistent complete album. Sure, suedo mixes can be made of some of them, but it's not like having the multi's to do true stereo releases.

I'm not really sure what you mean by "Pseudo" stereo.  The '64 stereo mixes for Don't Worry Baby, Warmth Of The Sun and Keep and Eye On Summer aren't ideally mixed, but they're still in stereo...and they're all we have.  To me, a mono/stereo box would ideally include the BW mono mixes, the Chuck Britz stereo mixes and any modern remixes that can be made using the multitracks as bonus tracks.

Your goal for "a consistent complete album" is frankly unrealistic when accounting for missing tapes and the way BW mixed/recorded many songs.  Just because a stereo mix isn't possible for every song, that shouldn't prevent them from releasing a stereo catalog "where available".

Any tracks that can't be mixed in stereo whatsoever should just use the mono mix instead.  This is exactly the way stereo albums like Little Deuce Coupe and All Summer Long were released back then.  I also think that songs they have the multitrack for but are missing overdubs (like Help Me, Rhonda) should receive "incomplete/alternate" stereo mixes.

If they really get the go-ahead from Capitol to release multi-disc releases of every album why shouldn't they release everything and the kitchen sink?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 24, 2012, 10:03:17 PM
Any tracks that can't be mixed in stereo whatsoever should just use the mono mix instead.

Nah, I wouldn't want that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ebb and Flow on January 24, 2012, 10:22:07 PM
Any tracks that can't be mixed in stereo whatsoever should just use the mono mix instead.

Nah, I wouldn't want that.

Vintage Stereo Beach Boys albums that did exactly that:

Little Deuce Coupe (409, A Young Man Is Gone)
Shut Down Vol. 2 (Why Do Fools Fall In Love, Denny's Drums)
All Summer Long (I Get Around, All Summer Long, Our Favorite Recording Sessions)
20/20 (Do It Again)

This all or nothing mentality when it comes to archival releases that people are starving for really baffles me.  It makes me glad that they had all the tapes for Pet Sounds and they were willing to release the songs missing overdubs.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 25, 2012, 06:48:41 AM
Doesn't baffle me at all.  In fact, I have my own stereo comp of all of the remixed songs in stereo.  Sounds great!

Go back to what I proposed earlier in the thread.  A mono box and a stereo box like they did for the Beatles. What would people think if a lot of those tracks in the stereo box were in mono? Would they feel a little ripped off? I would.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jeff on January 25, 2012, 11:55:42 AM
I would like all their albums to be released as single discs with stereo/mono mixes/singles and if room unreleased songs ,new stereo mixes if old ones don't exist or if they can't do ANY stereo mix do "fake stereo" JUST for the songs that can't be remixed into stereo (like they did with the Beatles "capitol records" cd sets),and of course the latter years only stereo,a two or three disc set of all unreleased/rarities from the 60's til the 90's including ALL the songs from various soundtracks,tribute albums,duets etc (Excluding those that are on "Still Cruising" cd re-issue,read below) and a box set with all their songs in chronlogical order (Mono and stereo) without unreleased songs on it.."Still Cruisin" should be re-issued WITHOUT the older tracks and it should have the songs from the 80's and 90's that are out of print.."Sip" should have both american and uk mixes and if room rare songs that are out of print (Like Still Cruisin) but wihtout repeating anything from the 2 or 3 disc box set..there should be NO double dipping with the unreleased songs,all the songs from the first two-fers should be excluded so they can put other unreleased songs and not douple dipping..

That would be a great plan if you really, really wanted to insult the Beach Boys' legacy.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Zach95 on January 25, 2012, 12:51:36 PM
Doesn't baffle me at all.  In fact, I have my own stereo comp of all of the remixed songs in stereo.  Sounds great!

Go back to what I proposed earlier in the thread.  A mono box and a stereo box like they did for the Beatles. What would people think if a lot of those tracks in the stereo box were in mono? Would they feel a little ripped off? I would.

My reply was saying are you sure it's not possible for EITHER of those two. I would gladly accept a mono box set.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 25, 2012, 01:16:18 PM
Sure, of course I would.  But if I want to listen to the monos, I'll just pull out my Capitol 2-fers and PastMasters and box sets. If they were to remaster all of the albums (with the correct mixes!) in mono, that would give me an incentive to buy all of them again, confirming first that they're the best versions available audio wise.

I have both the mono and stereo Beatles boxes but all I listen to these days are the stereo discs. Pretty much the same way with The Stones, Kinks, and Who albums.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on January 25, 2012, 01:18:05 PM
I would like all their albums to be released as single discs with stereo/mono mixes/singles and if room unreleased songs ,new stereo mixes if old ones don't exist or if they can't do ANY stereo mix do "fake stereo" JUST for the songs that can't be remixed into stereo (like they did with the Beatles "capitol records" cd sets),and of course the latter years only stereo,a two or three disc set of all unreleased/rarities from the 60's til the 90's including ALL the songs from various soundtracks,tribute albums,duets etc (Excluding those that are on "Still Cruising" cd re-issue,read below) and a box set with all their songs in chronlogical order (Mono and stereo) without unreleased songs on it.."Still Cruisin" should be re-issued WITHOUT the older tracks and it should have the songs from the 80's and 90's that are out of print.."Sip" should have both american and uk mixes and if room rare songs that are out of print (Like Still Cruisin) but wihtout repeating anything from the 2 or 3 disc box set..there should be NO double dipping with the unreleased songs,all the songs from the first two-fers should be excluded so they can put other unreleased songs and not douple dipping..

That would be a great plan if you really, really wanted to insult the Beach Boys' legacy.
all I'm saying is if there aren't any stereo mixes of certain songs and it can't be done and it's a complete album mono/stereo release than what kind of stereo can they put on the stereo part of the cd or would you just simply leave those songs off the stereo part of the cd and then it wouldn't a complete stereo album?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on January 25, 2012, 01:21:58 PM
Yeah, well, now we also have "Don't Worry Baby" and "Why Do Fools Fall In Love" in stereo because the tapes were found recently. But not all of the tapes are around to make a consistent complete album. Sure, suedo mixes can be made of some of them, but it's not like having the multi's to do true stereo releases.

I'm not really sure what you mean by "Pseudo" stereo.  The '64 stereo mixes for Don't Worry Baby, Warmth Of The Sun [...] aren't ideally mixed, but they're still in stereo...and they're all we have




Erm, those two have received genuine new stereo mixes.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jeff on January 25, 2012, 01:49:04 PM
I would like all their albums to be released as single discs with stereo/mono mixes/singles and if room unreleased songs ,new stereo mixes if old ones don't exist or if they can't do ANY stereo mix do "fake stereo" JUST for the songs that can't be remixed into stereo (like they did with the Beatles "capitol records" cd sets),and of course the latter years only stereo,a two or three disc set of all unreleased/rarities from the 60's til the 90's including ALL the songs from various soundtracks,tribute albums,duets etc (Excluding those that are on "Still Cruising" cd re-issue,read below) and a box set with all their songs in chronlogical order (Mono and stereo) without unreleased songs on it.."Still Cruisin" should be re-issued WITHOUT the older tracks and it should have the songs from the 80's and 90's that are out of print.."Sip" should have both american and uk mixes and if room rare songs that are out of print (Like Still Cruisin) but wihtout repeating anything from the 2 or 3 disc box set..there should be NO double dipping with the unreleased songs,all the songs from the first two-fers should be excluded so they can put other unreleased songs and not douple dipping..

That would be a great plan if you really, really wanted to insult the Beach Boys' legacy.
all I'm saying is if there aren't any stereo mixes of certain songs and it can't be done and it's a complete album mono/stereo release than what kind of stereo can they put on the stereo part of the cd or would you just simply leave those songs off the stereo part of the cd and then it wouldn't a complete stereo album?

If a complete true stereo album can't be done, I wouldn't try to do it.

And I wouldn't release or re-release anything later than early '81.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Nicko1234 on January 25, 2012, 02:01:11 PM
There are some songs from the wilderness years that deserve to be stuck on a box set somewhere. eg. It's a Beautiful Day, East Meets West, Chasin' the Sky, Rock and Roll to the Rescue, Make it Big (movie version), Somewhere Near Japan (single mix), Summer in Paradise (U.K. version) etc.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ebb and Flow on January 25, 2012, 02:43:03 PM
Yeah, well, now we also have "Don't Worry Baby" and "Why Do Fools Fall In Love" in stereo because the tapes were found recently. But not all of the tapes are around to make a consistent complete album. Sure, suedo mixes can be made of some of them, but it's not like having the multi's to do true stereo releases.

I'm not really sure what you mean by "Pseudo" stereo.  The '64 stereo mixes for Don't Worry Baby, Warmth Of The Sun [...] aren't ideally mixed, but they're still in stereo...and they're all we have




Erm, those two have received genuine new stereo mixes.

"Warmth Of The Sun" hasn't.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocker on January 26, 2012, 11:47:46 AM
Something like this would be nice:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkqsCCivX-Y (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkqsCCivX-Y)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 26, 2012, 01:46:09 PM
Yes!!  And more yes!!  That's the ticket!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on January 27, 2012, 02:33:34 AM
Still Cruisin probably deserves a two disc deluxe edition reissue. That album has gone up in standing for a lot of fans over the years and I think we can all admit that tracks 8-10 are definitely three of the best songs they did in their later years....hell, they practically rival the stuff they did in the 60's!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on January 27, 2012, 02:51:28 AM
How about Greatest Hits, Volume 4: The Tanner Years (1987-2012)?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on January 27, 2012, 02:52:44 AM
Stars and Stripes: Volume II - Mike's Tea Party Demonstration Time?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 03:06:39 AM
Welcome back, ghost - we'll soon be rid of you again, I'm thinking.  ::)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on January 27, 2012, 03:08:30 AM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 03:21:02 AM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

Rule #1 for trolls - don't feed them.

Rule #2 - if they deny they're a troll, they are.  ;D

S'OK, I'm just having a laugh.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 27, 2012, 07:31:09 AM
By the way, next month, there's going to be a reissue of "Sounds of Summer" with an added T-shirt. Is that the "commemorative" product Capitol spoke of? What a letdown. But as I have said, if the archival products that many hoped for(or even the 50-song hits compilation that Mr.Doe hinted at) don't materialize, I won't be broken hearted. At least we did get "Smile".

If I want a 50-song 2-disc Beach Boys hits set, I could create one from my own CD collection. Perhaps Mr.Doe could propose a tracklisting similar(or identical) to what Capitol would have released. This would spare Capitol the effort of actually releasing the 50-song collection that Mr.Doe spoke of.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on January 27, 2012, 07:45:43 AM
Round 2 between Phil and AGD begins.... :pirate


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 27, 2012, 07:48:26 AM
I don't think this'll be the one, Phil, honestly. This is a little opportunism ahead of the big push, I'm sure.  This is too soon ahead of the tour publicity to cash-in properly, for starters, let alone too far ahead of the summer market.

Bear in mind the growth of download sales, and the fact that this release doesn't exactly lend itself to that medium. They'd be daft to miss out on that market with the new hits package, and there'll be little appetite for an iTunes download version of this Sounds of Summer Merchandise Kit – after all, how the hell is anyone going to be able to download a T-shirt?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on January 27, 2012, 08:11:41 AM
Daft. 


Title: Re: What
Post by: Rocker on January 27, 2012, 10:17:58 AM
They'd be daft to miss out on that market with the new hits package,


I think a new hits album isn't needed. Sounds [And Sights] Of Summer is a very good one. They should get that out again (like it seems they are doing with the T-shirt edition) and promote it. Why should a new hits package sell more ? It's probably the same material after all. The only exception would be new stereo mixes of course but I don't think they would move more records with a new best of otherwise. They should sell Sounds Of Summer (and maybe the new album ?) at the concerts


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 27, 2012, 10:45:32 AM
They'd be daft to miss out on that market with the new hits package,


I think a new hits album isn't needed. Sounds [And Sights] Of Summer is a very good one. They should get that out again (like it seems they are doing with the T-shirt edition) and promote it. Why should a new hits package sell more ? It's probably the same material after all. The only exception would be new stereo mixes of course but I don't think they would move more records with a new best of otherwise. They should sell Sounds Of Summer (and maybe the new album ?) at the concerts

I absolutely agree. But barely a year has gone by when there hasn't been a new greatest hits package, needed or not.  I think it'll happen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 27, 2012, 03:04:24 PM
Round 2 between Phil and AGD begins.... :pirate

No, not really. If Capitol proposed a track listing for a 50-track 2-CD hits package, then changed their minds and decided not to issue it, then there would be no harm in Mr.Doe telling us what the track listing would have been. Then we could re-create the set on our own CD burners. Even if Mr.Doe decides not to tell us, we could each easily select our 50 favorite Beach Boys tracks and make a 2-disc set anyhow. It's not a big deal. There's no shortage of Beach Boys hits compilations on the market.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 27, 2012, 03:34:57 PM
Utterly bizarre...  I'm sure if Andrew knew the track list he, like anyone else here, would have passed comment by now... Especially if it included his favourite Barbara Ann! ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 03:37:31 PM
Round 2 between Phil and AGD begins.... :pirate

Not really. I don't engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed adversary.

And to prove my point to perfection...

No, not really. If Capitol proposed a track listing for a 50-track 2-CD hits package, then changed their minds and decided not to issue it, then there would be no harm in Mr.Doe telling us what the track listing would have been.

The words "confidence" and "trustworthy" just aren't in your dictionary, are they ? Suppose, for the sake of argument, that I was privvy to a proposed track-listing for a 50-song/2CD set (which comment, btw, was entirely off the cuff, not that you'll believe me) via someone involved in the project who'd asked me to keep it to myself, and that said notion was subsequently abandoned, or morphed into something else (just as 40 Top 40s did back in 2003). According to Cohen, that the project will now not come to fruition is all the justification and excuse I'd need to break the confidence shown in my ability to keep something to myself. Of course, as any sentient being would appreciate, what would actually happen is that said source would dry up at warp speed and take several more with it. And that, my friends, is why some folk have these sources, and Phil Cohen doesn't. That's it. No more on this topic. Been there, done that, won the battle.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 27, 2012, 03:40:41 PM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

35 posts in 5 days is pretty much the same thing we had from ghost, though to be fair you haven't yet started trying to convince everyone that Brian is better off on hard drugs or that everything Brian ever did is psychedelic.  :)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on January 27, 2012, 03:52:19 PM
Round 2 between Phil and AGD begins.... :pirate

Not really. I don't engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed adversary.
Well put AGD 8)
http://www.examiner.com/beach-boys-in-national/sounds-of-summer-the-very-best-of-the-beach-boys


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 03:56:07 PM
At $20 for a CD and a tshirt (and a nifty box), that's a steal !

(http://www.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_full_width/hash/ba/f3/Sounds%20Of%20Summer%20CD%20%26%20T-shirt%20box%20-%20product%20shot_0.JPG)


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 27, 2012, 04:29:10 PM
Sorry folks but that package is pure opportunism - going by that artwork, it's not even a 50th anniversary T ... Probably some left over stock from 2003 when that set was first put out. Great set, but I don't need either a fourth copy or a lame T.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 04:31:25 PM
Sorry folks but that package is pure opportunism - going by that artwork, it's not even a 50th anniversary T ... Probably some left over stock from 2003 when that set was first put out. Great set, but I don't need either a fourth copy or a lame T.

Some 'fan' you are !  :-D


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on January 27, 2012, 04:59:04 PM
I might have sprung for it had the tee shirt been the 50th Anniversary logo, but not for this shirt. I already have Sounds Of Summer and Sights And Sounds Of Summer. This fan is passing on this first round offering.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 27, 2012, 05:23:30 PM
Round 2 between Phil and AGD begins.... :pirate

Not really. I don't engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed adversary.

And to prove my point to perfection...

No, not really. If Capitol proposed a track listing for a 50-track 2-CD hits package, then changed their minds and decided not to issue it, then there would be no harm in Mr.Doe telling us what the track listing would have been.

The words "confidence" and "trustworthy" just aren't in your dictionary, are they ? Suppose, for the sake of argument, that I was privvy to a proposed track-listing for a 50-song/2CD set (which comment, btw, was entirely off the cuff, not that you'll believe me) via someone involved in the project who'd asked me to keep it to myself, and that said notion was subsequently abandoned, or morphed into something else (just as 40 Top 40s did back in 2003). According to Cohen, that the project will now not come to fruition is all the justification and excuse I'd need to break the confidence shown in my ability to keep something to myself. Of course, as any sentient being would appreciate, what would actually happen is that said source would dry up at warp speed and take several more with it. And that, my friends, is why some folk have these sources, and Phil Cohen doesn't. That's it. No more on this topic. Been there, done that, won the battle.


But this time, we're not talking about unreleased material. With or without your cooperation, any of us computer owners with a CD burner and a thorough collection of Beach Boys CD's could create a 50-song collection of Beach Boys hits. You're not exactly dealing from a position of power this time. And I have no doubt that if I look on Amazon.com, that Capitol or one of their licensees, somewhere in the world have already released one or more 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys collections. I tend not to hold onto Beach Boys compilations unless they have previously unreleased outtakes or remixes, but I used to have a 2-CD Beach Boys hits collection from Toshiba/EMI called "Twin Best 40". After better sounding CD releases of those songs became available, there was no reason to keep that 2-CD set in my collection.

The 50-song set(even if it ends up being released) will have nothing to interest the avid collector. Its reasons for existence are commercial, not artistic. In short, it's "product", and not worth another jousting match with you.

And really, what difference does it make(to Beach Boys CD collectors) whether they release this hits package or not? With the release of the 2-CD & 5-CD "Smile" boxes,  Mr.Doe has become obsolete.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 27, 2012, 06:32:22 PM
... Brief moment of silence before the cantina crowd return to their drinks...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on January 27, 2012, 07:57:57 PM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

35 posts in 5 days is pretty much the same thing we had from ghost, though to be fair you haven't yet started trying to convince everyone that Brian is better off on hard drugs or that everything Brian ever did is psychedelic.  :)

Leave the poor bastard alone. All he wants to do is talk about The Beach Boys and you guys are calling him out on something he has absolutely no idea about. I thought this place was friendlier.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 27, 2012, 08:19:49 PM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

35 posts in 5 days is pretty much the same thing we had from ghost, though to be fair you haven't yet started trying to convince everyone that Brian is better off on hard drugs or that everything Brian ever did is psychedelic.  :)

Leave the poor bastard alone. All he wants to do is talk about The Beach Boys and you guys are calling him out on something he has absolutely no idea about. I thought this place was friendlier.

Whoa their Hypehat, my post wasn't unfriendly! I wasn't accusing him of being the latest incarnation of nobody/so cold i go burr/ghost, I was just saying he has posted quite a lot in a short period since joining which was similar to ghost and then went on to say that he hadn't been posting like ghost - my post even had a smiley on the end to show I was being nice!

In fact reading your post YOU are the one being unfriendly - you called him a poor bastard!  :) :-D ;D (Smileys added to show that this post is lighthearted and merely the result of a misunderstanding).


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 27, 2012, 08:28:27 PM
And to get back on topic I'm sure the Sounds Of Summer + T-Shirt box is merely intended to get the ball rolling for the Celebration and we can expect more stuff to be released around summertime.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Alan Smith on January 27, 2012, 10:10:38 PM
I've passed on 'Sounds of...' up until now - I cannot resist a "nifty" box; the t-shirt is just the melted cheese on the toast  :o


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 27, 2012, 11:56:51 PM
But this time, we're not talking about unreleased material. With or without your cooperation, any of us computer owners with a CD burner and a thorough collection of Beach Boys CD's could create a 50-song collection of Beach Boys hits. You're not exactly dealing from a position of power this time. And I have no doubt that if I look on Amazon.com, that Capitol or one of their licensees, somewhere in the world have already released one or more 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys collections. I tend not to hold onto Beach Boys compilations unless they have previously unreleased outtakes or remixes, but I used to have a 2-CD Beach Boys hits collection from Toshiba/EMI called "Twin Best 40". After better sounding CD releases of those songs became available, there was no reason to keep that 2-CD set in my collection.

The 50-song set(even if it ends up being released) will have nothing to interest the avid collector. Its reasons for existence are commercial, not artistic. In short, it's "product", and not worth another jousting match with you.

And really, what difference does it make(to Beach Boys CD collectors) whether they release this hits package or not? With the release of the 2-CD & 5-CD "Smile" boxes,  Mr.Doe has become obsolete.

Unquestionably the funniest piece of sh*t I've read on this board for months ! You keep thinkin' Butch, that's what you're good at.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: The Shift on January 28, 2012, 12:05:26 AM
Hey Mr Doe, you've already forgotten that you're not dealing from a position of power. Embrace your obsolescence, accept it humbly and let Mr Cohen's ascensdency achieve its pinnacle. Anyone with a CD burner and access to an Iron-on T-shirt transfer can be a Beach Boys Historian now, and you'd be as well to remember that.

Edit: almost forgot:  ;D. ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: over and over on January 28, 2012, 02:06:27 AM
They should put some uncirculating songs on the new box. I read a while back that Brian had done a recording of himself at the piano singing "In the back of my mind" in 1975. This box could be the only chance we have to finally hear it. Alan Boyd is a very cool dude, he gets to hear it whenever he wants. 8)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on January 28, 2012, 03:02:13 AM
At $20 for a CD and a tshirt (and a nifty box), that's a steal !

(http://www.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_full_width/hash/ba/f3/Sounds%20Of%20Summer%20CD%20%26%20T-shirt%20box%20-%20product%20shot_0.JPG)

Good god that's an ugly tshirt

I'll stick to my black flag one


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 28, 2012, 03:21:49 AM
They should put some uncirculating songs on the new box. I read a while back that Brian had done a recording of himself at the piano singing "In the back of my mind" in 1975. This box could be the only chance we have to finally hear it. Alan Boyd is a very cool dude, he gets to hear it whenever he wants. 8)

Boyd is indeed a cool dude – as evidenced by all his good acts to date – and will, I'm sure, do his best to enable us to hear as much (of the best stuff that's not yet circulating, please sir!) as possible


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 28, 2012, 03:28:19 AM
Everyone's assuming Alan will be centrally involved in the C50 reissue program: I sincerely hope this is so, but maybe he got TSS'd out last year and is taking a break (and I wouldn't blame him).


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 28, 2012, 03:32:05 AM
I'm guessing though that no-one knows the vaults like him (and Mark L). I propose that all shore leave be cancelled until the party's over…  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on January 28, 2012, 06:39:55 AM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

35 posts in 5 days is pretty much the same thing we had from ghost, though to be fair you haven't yet started trying to convince everyone that Brian is better off on hard drugs or that everything Brian ever did is psychedelic.  :)

Leave the poor bastard alone. All he wants to do is talk about The Beach Boys and you guys are calling him out on something he has absolutely no idea about. I thought this place was friendlier.

Whoa their Hypehat, my post wasn't unfriendly! I wasn't accusing him of being the latest incarnation of nobody/so cold i go burr/ghost, I was just saying he has posted quite a lot in a short period since joining which was similar to ghost and then went on to say that he hadn't been posting like ghost - my post even had a smiley on the end to show I was being nice!

In fact reading your post YOU are the one being unfriendly - you called him a poor bastard!  :) :-D ;D (Smileys added to show that this post is lighthearted and merely the result of a misunderstanding).

I was a particularly humourless drunk last night, so this probably explains it.  :)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 28, 2012, 12:56:18 PM
I'm not this ghost person and I'm just having a laugh. I'm not a troll.

35 posts in 5 days is pretty much the same thing we had from ghost, though to be fair you haven't yet started trying to convince everyone that Brian is better off on hard drugs or that everything Brian ever did is psychedelic.  :)

Leave the poor bastard alone. All he wants to do is talk about The Beach Boys and you guys are calling him out on something he has absolutely no idea about. I thought this place was friendlier.

Whoa their Hypehat, my post wasn't unfriendly! I wasn't accusing him of being the latest incarnation of nobody/so cold i go burr/ghost, I was just saying he has posted quite a lot in a short period since joining which was similar to ghost and then went on to say that he hadn't been posting like ghost - my post even had a smiley on the end to show I was being nice!

In fact reading your post YOU are the one being unfriendly - you called him a poor bastard!  :) :-D ;D (Smileys added to show that this post is lighthearted and merely the result of a misunderstanding).

I was a particularly humourless drunk last night, so this probably explains it.  :)

No worries dude, all is as it should be.  :angel:


Title: Re: What \
Post by: smile-holland on January 28, 2012, 01:32:07 PM
At $20 for a CD and a tshirt (and a nifty box), that's a steal !

(http://www.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_full_width/hash/ba/f3/Sounds%20Of%20Summer%20CD%20%26%20T-shirt%20box%20-%20product%20shot_0.JPG)

Good god that's an ugly tshirt

I'll stick to my black flag one

ehm, yeah, I might even buy that one....

But I'm in a good mood today, just having found that reissue boot of the Carnegie 1972 concert.  ;D (plus a few other goodies I never thought I would find in one day... me loves those small record fairs....)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: obscurereference on January 30, 2012, 07:43:49 AM
What I'd like:
2 CD reissues of every album, containing stereo mixes & a contemporary live concert and lots of rarities.

What I wouldn't like:
- An expensive career spanning box set sprinkled with a few previously unreleased tracks
- Another best of!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 30, 2012, 07:36:52 PM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on January 30, 2012, 07:47:00 PM
I have to admit this SOS Tee Shirt box is a pretty anemic way to start off a 50th Anniversary Celebration. Leave it to Capitol and The Beach Boys to f*** up a perfect opportunity to kick off such an important historical musical moment.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 30, 2012, 11:23:38 PM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.

Hmmm, how to take "business as usual" and turn it into "Honey, I need to spend some time alone for a while..."!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 30, 2012, 11:44:30 PM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.

This post is just begging for an AGD reply.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 30, 2012, 11:45:19 PM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.

I'm still clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product and a lot of other BB fans are clamoring for it too, if more people were clamoring and got on board with the clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product then Capitol execs might consider our clamoring and say 'Hey, there are lots of Beach Boys fans clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product on the world renowned Smiley Smile message board which is famous for it's clamoring, maybe the general public are also clamoring for a possible CD product too, we should respect their clamoring!'. Clearly, clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product is the way foward people.




















Clamoring.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 31, 2012, 12:04:12 AM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.

This post is just begging for an AGD reply.

No point. We all know what the outcome was re: the last major project.  :)

As for the SOS repromotion, I'm pretty sure it's got more to do with getting a triple platinum certification before the C50 project takes off than the 50th anniversary shenanigans: note the tshirt doesn't have the Celebration logo.

Also, someone who doesn't grasp why the anticipation for TSS - the news of which came out of the blue (as planned for the beginning of the project) - would inevitably far outstrip that for a 50th anniversary in both the BB cosmos and the larger rock world probably shouldn't be out in the community, for their own good.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on January 31, 2012, 12:07:11 AM
honestly, I don't give a damn what they do. it's not like other bands I like have had 50th anniversaries that I can compare this one to.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 31, 2012, 12:33:25 AM
honestly, I don't give a damn what they do. it's not like other bands I like have had 50th anniversaries that I can compare this one to.

Well said. :)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 31, 2012, 09:52:02 AM

It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.


This post is just begging clamoring for an AGD reply.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 10:00:55 AM

It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.


This post is just begging clamoring for an AGD reply.


Phil has bought into one of the biggest myths of capitalist culture which suggests that profit maximization and utility maximization are basically the same thing when in fact, utility maximization is pretty much the opposite of profit maximization.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on January 31, 2012, 10:23:37 AM
I get the feeling that's the least of Phil's problems.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 11:38:35 AM
But, if consumer interest in these projects quiets down to near total silence, does that really benefit Capitol's interests? At this point, there really nothing to discuss without some vague description of what these projects are.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 11:42:26 AM
But, if consumer interest in these projects quiets down to near total silence, does that really benefit Capitol's interests? At this point, there really nothing to discuss without some vague description of what these projects are.

Capitol, surely, doesn't care and doesn't have to. Consumer interest can be created if need be. The consumer ultimately doesn't matter - profits are where it's at.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 12:21:39 PM
But publicity is designed to create public awareness and interest, leading to people buying the product. Capitol seems to not really give a damn this time. Maybe it's because the 5-CD "Smile Sessions" box didn't sell well. Or maybe because EMI & Capitol are in limbo awaiting European & American government approval for the takeover by Universal Music.

I get the sneaky feeling that even if (this time) Mr.Doe told us what he knows of Capitol's plans(if he does know anything), we wouldn't be very excited. We'd be yawning.

Eventually, I will sit down with pencil and paper and create a 2-CD Beach Boys compilation, perhaps with even more than 50 songs. I will focus mainly on the 1960's songs, because there were only a handful of post-1960's hits(at least in the U.S.A.). Don't worry: I won't overlook "Sail on Sailor", "Rock n'Roll Music", "Come Go With Me", "Good Timin' " & "Kokomo"


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 12:29:19 PM
But publicity is designed to create public awareness and interest, leading to people buying the product. Capitol seems to not really give a damn this time. Maybe it's because the 5-CD "Smile Sessions" box didn't sell well. Or maybe because EMI & Capitol are in limbo awaiting European & American government approval for the takeover by Universal Music.

I think, perhaps, the most reasonable explanation is that they don't have to. Some things require much more publicity than others. Publicity in itself can be costly - how one goes about publicizing is part of a profit-making strategy.

Plus if they are making enough profit in other areas, they could be releasing things just to keep the brand name within the public consciousness.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dr. Tim on January 31, 2012, 12:41:52 PM
Did I miss something?  I thought I read (on this board in fact) that TSS did quite well, so much so that a second pressing had to be ordered up.  Sure it wasn't going to sell a million units in January - nothing does anymore - but the word was that Capitol's expectations were happily exceeded, and the sales were far from disappointing.  Is that now considered wrong?   The TSS group of releases is a giganto stinkburger? 

True, assuming big success for TSS doesn't foreshadow a similar monster box set in 2012, nevertheless - big record labels are masters at failing to read the tea leaves, have been for fifteen years now, since Da Intranetz came along.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 31, 2012, 01:01:34 PM
The total sales of TSS exceeded Capitol's expectations, as did the reviews. They're very happy with the outcome.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 31, 2012, 01:21:22 PM
Eventually, I will sit down with pencil and paper and create a 2-CD Beach Boys compilation, perhaps with even more than 50 songs. I will focus mainly on the 1960's songs, because there were only a handful of post-1960's hits(at least in the U.S.A.). Don't worry: I won't overlook "Sail on Sailor", "Rock n'Roll Music", "Come Go With Me", "Good Timin' " & "Kokomo"

You really don't know anything about The Beach Boys, do you ? Post-60s USA Top 100 hits:

2/70     Add Some Music To Your Day  64
10/71    Long Promised Road  89
2/73     Sail On, Sailor  79
5/73     California (On My Way To Sunny Californ-i-a)  84
7/74     Surfin' USA 36 [R]   
3/75     Sail on, Sailor  49 [R]   
5/76     Rock And Roll Music  5
8/76     It's OK  29
8/78     Peggy Sue 59
2/79     Here Comes the Night 44
4/79     Good Timin'/Love Surrounds Me  40
3/80     Goin' On  83
7/81     The Beach Boys Medley 12
11/81   Come Go With Me 18
5/85     Getcha Back 26
8/85     It's Gettin' Late 82
7/86     Rock And Roll To The Rescue  68
8/86     California Dreamin' 57
7/87     Wipe Out (w/Fat Boys) 12
7/88     Kokomo 1
7/89     Still Cruisin'  93

19 Hot 100 hits (excluding the two reissues)... 8 top 40... 4 top 20... and a #1. Quite a handful.  More than most bands manage in a whole career, never mind past their commercial & artistic peak.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on January 31, 2012, 03:00:14 PM
But publicity is designed to create public awareness and interest, leading to people buying the product. Capitol seems to not really give a damn this time. Maybe it's because the 5-CD "Smile Sessions" box didn't sell well. Or maybe because EMI & Capitol are in limbo awaiting European & American government approval for the takeover by Universal Music.

I get the sneaky feeling that even if (this time) Mr.Doe told us what he knows of Capitol's plans(if he does know anything), we wouldn't be very excited. We'd be yawning.

Eventually, I will sit down with pencil and paper and create a 2-CD Beach Boys compilation, perhaps with even more than 50 songs. I will focus mainly on the 1960's songs, because there were only a handful of post-1960's hits(at least in the U.S.A.). Don't worry: I won't overlook "Sail on Sailor", "Rock n'Roll Music", "Come Go With Me", "Good Timin' " & "Kokomo"

You're right on one aspect Phil – I'm yawning!   :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on January 31, 2012, 03:26:19 PM
Eventually, I will sit down with pencil and paper and create a 2-CD Beach Boys compilation, perhaps with even more than 50 songs. I will focus mainly on the 1960's songs, because there were only a handful of post-1960's hits(at least in the U.S.A.). Don't worry: I won't overlook "Sail on Sailor", "Rock n'Roll Music", "Come Go With Me", "Good Timin' " & "Kokomo"

You really don't know anything about The Beach Boys, do you ? Post-60s USA Top 100 hits:

2/70     Add Some Music To Your Day  64
10/71    Long Promised Road  89
2/73     Sail On, Sailor  79
5/73     California (On My Way To Sunny Californ-i-a)  84
7/74     Surfin' USA 36 [R]   
3/75     Sail on, Sailor  49 [R]   
5/76     Rock And Roll Music  5
8/76     It's OK  29
8/78     Peggy Sue 59
2/79     Here Comes the Night 44
4/79     Good Timin'/Love Surrounds Me  40
3/80     Goin' On  83
7/81     The Beach Boys Medley 12
11/81   Come Go With Me 18
5/85     Getcha Back 26
8/85     It's Gettin' Late 82
7/86     Rock And Roll To The Rescue  68
8/86     California Dreamin' 57
7/87     Wipe Out (w/Fat Boys) 12
7/88     Kokomo 1
7/89     Still Cruisin'  93

19 Hot 100 hits (excluding the two reissues)... 8 top 40... 4 top 20... and a #1. Quite a handful.  More than most bands manage in a whole career, never mind past their commercial & artistic peak.


What an awesome and hilarious list (c'mon, going from a # 1 directly to a # 93: with an arguably better song! THAT'S what you call a roller coaster of a career)!

It's also amazing to look at that list which is, according to legend, in the horse latitudes/doldrums of the Band's career, and realize just how many current bands/new artists would be backslapping themselves in a frenzy over scoring any one of those chart positions ever in their careers.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Les P on January 31, 2012, 03:31:23 PM
Speaking of commemorative releases...  A couple of nights ago I dreamed I saw a handwritten memo similar to the original Wild Honey liner notes that said the proposed Star Line [!] stereo CD of the Wild Honey album was vetoed by Capitol.  I was very bummed, then woke up relieved it was just a dream.  I need to spend less time on this board...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 31, 2012, 03:36:16 PM
Jeez, Mr Cohen you really are a negative nancy aren't you? Do you need a hug?  :grouphug


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 05:00:08 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on January 31, 2012, 05:25:04 PM
Phil, you are aware of the release The SMiLE Sessions, correct? Well, they just fucking released it a few months ago. I think it is ok if they wait a little bit to announce some new stuff, especially if that stuff isn't gonna be released for a little while. Just chill out.

Plus, you say that hardly have anything good left to put out anyways? So what do you care? You shouldn't be excited about any upcoming releases anyways.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on January 31, 2012, 05:28:24 PM
Phil is a troll who just wants to annoy everybody.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 31, 2012, 05:30:07 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Good for you, maybe you would like to run along onto these 'other artists' message boards?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: rab2591 on January 31, 2012, 05:34:48 PM
amen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 05:47:21 PM
Phil, you are aware of the release The SMiLE Sessions, correct? Well, they just f*cking released it a few months ago. I think it is ok if they wait a little bit to announce some new stuff, especially if that stuff isn't gonna be released for a little while. Just chill out.

Plus, you say that hardly have anything good left to put out anyways? So what do you care? You shouldn't be excited about any upcoming releases anyways.

But when Mark Linett was asked(on the Icon Fetch interviews) if there was any more unreleased 1960's Beach Boys material, he mentioned the possibility of doing some stereo remixes of previously mono songs. He didn't say that there is any further unreleased material from the 1960's.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 05:49:34 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Good for you, maybe you would like to run along onto these 'other artists' message boards?

That is, if those artists had message boards.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 05:51:09 PM
But, if consumer interest in these projects quiets down to near total silence, does that really benefit Capitol's interests? At this point, there really nothing to discuss without some vague description of what these projects are.

Capitol, surely, doesn't care and doesn't have to. Consumer interest can be created if need be. The consumer ultimately doesn't matter - profits are where it's at.

Unless consumers know about the product and purchase it, there are no profits.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on January 31, 2012, 05:53:10 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Good for you, maybe you would like to run along onto these 'other artists' message boards?

That is, if those artists had message boards.
Why come here?, You don't like The Beach Boys or anybody here on this board...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on January 31, 2012, 05:55:29 PM
Phil, you are aware of the release The SMiLE Sessions, correct? Well, they just f*cking released it a few months ago. I think it is ok if they wait a little bit to announce some new stuff, especially if that stuff isn't gonna be released for a little while. Just chill out.

Plus, you say that hardly have anything good left to put out anyways? So what do you care? You shouldn't be excited about any upcoming releases anyways.

But when Mark Linett was asked(on the Icon Fetch interviews) if there was any more unreleased 1960's Beach Boys material, he mentioned the possibility of doing some stereo remixes of previously mono songs. He didn't say that there is any further unreleased material from the 1960's.

Well. I wasn't aware their career ended in 1969. I was pretty sure they had some pretty freakin' good unreleased material all the way up to 1995.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 06:06:51 PM
Phil, you are aware of the release The SMiLE Sessions, correct? Well, they just f*cking released it a few months ago. I think it is ok if they wait a little bit to announce some new stuff, especially if that stuff isn't gonna be released for a little while. Just chill out.

Plus, you say that hardly have anything good left to put out anyways? So what do you care? You shouldn't be excited about any upcoming releases anyways.

But when Mark Linett was asked(on the Icon Fetch interviews) if there was any more unreleased 1960's Beach Boys material, he mentioned the possibility of doing some stereo remixes of previously mono songs. He didn't say that there is any further unreleased material from the 1960's.

Well. I wasn't aware their career ended in 1969. I was pretty sure they had some pretty freakin' good unreleased material all the way up to 1995.

But, it was during the 1960's when the involvement of the very brilliant Brian Wilson was at its peak; the era that produced the group's most popular and beloved songs. Those songs are the basis of the group's career to this day. There were some(occasional) good songs after that period, but only when Brian decided to participate.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 06:07:43 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 06:11:13 PM
But, if consumer interest in these projects quiets down to near total silence, does that really benefit Capitol's interests? At this point, there really nothing to discuss without some vague description of what these projects are.

Capitol, surely, doesn't care and doesn't have to. Consumer interest can be created if need be. The consumer ultimately doesn't matter - profits are where it's at.

Unless consumers know about the product and purchase it, there are no profits.

There is a tour coming up where there will inevitably be a place to buy the CD. The CD will inevitably be promoted by the tour itself both from what is said at the live concerts as well as the attention that the band will get from all sorts of media sources. Furthermore, because The Beach Boys are fairly high profile, the CD will most likely occupy a fairly prominent place in the music store when it is released. Barring that, like I said, if a company is making profits elsewhere, it can just put something out there (like, say, a fairly cheap to make compilation CD) that functions not for people to buy it, but to keep the brand name in the public consciousness.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on January 31, 2012, 06:26:42 PM
Phil, you are aware of the release The SMiLE Sessions, correct? Well, they just f*cking released it a few months ago. I think it is ok if they wait a little bit to announce some new stuff, especially if that stuff isn't gonna be released for a little while. Just chill out.

Plus, you say that hardly have anything good left to put out anyways? So what do you care? You shouldn't be excited about any upcoming releases anyways.

But when Mark Linett was asked(on the Icon Fetch interviews) if there was any more unreleased 1960's Beach Boys material, he mentioned the possibility of doing some stereo remixes of previously mono songs. He didn't say that there is any further unreleased material from the 1960's.

Well. I wasn't aware their career ended in 1969. I was pretty sure they had some pretty freakin' good unreleased material all the way up to 1995.

But, it was during the 1960's when the involvement of the very brilliant Brian Wilson was at its peak; the era that produced the group's most popular and beloved songs. Those songs are the basis of the group's career to this day. There were some(occasional) good songs after that period, but only when Brian decided to participate.
[/color]

I have to disagree with this statement completely. I'd say there were several "Brian-less" high points post 1969.

Trader
Feel Flows
California Saga
Only With You
Big Sur
Steamboat
Full Sail
Goin South
Keepin The Summer Alive
Kokomo
Somwhere Near Japan
Love Surrounds Me
Sumahama
Lookin At Tomorrow
Long Promised Road
I Can Hear Music
Leaving This Town
All This Is That
Lady Lynda
Baby Blue
Slip On Through
Forever
Cuddle Up
Disney Girls
Getcha Back

To name a few.......


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 06:36:51 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.

If nobody buys the disc, what profits are there for Capitol?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on January 31, 2012, 06:46:30 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.

If nobody buys the disc, what profits are there for Capitol?

Sometimes releasing an album is as much as an investment as, say, promotion or, in fact, releasing an album is in and of itself promotion. You have to understand, though, how branding works, what its purpose is, etc.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 31, 2012, 07:16:10 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.

If nobody buys the disc, what profits are there for Capitol?

What the....? This is incredible, are you actually suggesting that absolutely no-one would buy a new Beach Boys CD, compilation or otherwise? Your latest posts are just a continuation of your pitiful whining in the build up to the Smile Sessions release and your ceaseless negativity is just plain bizzarre, you seriously need help sir, you are operating in a fantasy world.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on January 31, 2012, 07:30:53 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.

If nobody buys the disc, what profits are there for Capitol?

What the....? This is incredible, are you actually suggesting that absolutely no-one would buy a new Beach Boys CD, compilation or otherwise? Your latest posts are just a continuation of your pitiful whining in the build up to the Smile Sessions release and your ceaseless negativity is just plain bizzarre, you seriously need help sir, you are operating in a fantasy world.

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is, that if no one knows that a new CD is about to be released(whether it's a hits compilation, a new studio recording or an archival rarities collection), then how will consumers know there's a CD to seek out, whether from a local store or online dealer. Of course people will buy a Beach Boys CD....if they know that such a CD exists, if the record company wants to build some advance "buzz", if they want the public to know that such a CD is being released.  If Capitol is going to release a CD or CD's, I assume that they DO want people to buy them. They're in business to sell stuff, after all. I don't "get" the strategy of "anti-promotion".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on January 31, 2012, 07:59:28 PM
Oh well, there's a number of other artists releasing expanded archival CD's over the next 4 months, and these artists, groups or surviving group members are already revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's. I'll turn my attention towards those artists' releases. At least for those releases, there is something for those artists' fans to discuss.

Again, you fundamentally have no idea how big business works. You act as if you, as a consumer, are rewarding companies because they are pleasing you in some way, by "revealing at least some information about what will be included in these CD's." The fact is, no big business is interested in pleasing you whatsoever. They couldn't care less about you. If a company purposefully reveals information, they are doing because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long term. If a company does not waste time, manpower, attention, etc. in doing that, it's also because they believe that will yield the most profits in the long run. The company is not particularly interested in whether somebody decides for whatever reason not to buy the product. They care only about maximum profits.

If nobody buys the disc, what profits are there for Capitol?

What the....? This is incredible, are you actually suggesting that absolutely no-one would buy a new Beach Boys CD, compilation or otherwise? Your latest posts are just a continuation of your pitiful whining in the build up to the Smile Sessions release and your ceaseless negativity is just plain bizzarre, you seriously need help sir, you are operating in a fantasy world.

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is, that if no one knows that a new CD is about to be released(whether it's a hits compilation, a new studio recording or an archival rarities collection), then how will consumers know there's a CD to seek out, whether from a local store or online dealer. Of course people will buy a Beach Boys CD....if they know that such a CD exists, if the record company wants to build some advance "buzz", if they want the public to know that such a CD is being released.  If Capitol is going to release a CD or CD's, I assume that they DO want people to buy them. They're in business to sell stuff, after all. I don't "get" the strategy of "anti-promotion".

Wow, now you seem to be suggesting that Capitol are going to go to the trouble and expense of compiling a new CD release...and then not tell anyone about it, incredible. :wall

Clearly, in the Beach Boys 50th Anniverary year, there are going to be new releases of some kind, they even said so in the initial announcement, and when they have formalized these releases they will let us know, simple as that!

You seem to still be (wrongly) upset with Capitol over The Smile Sessions because they didn't provide daily updates as to when the set would come out and what it would contain and you are carrying this on now, please stop, you are just embarrasing yourself again. 

:deadhorse


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on January 31, 2012, 07:59:39 PM
Hey, I understand the point Phil is trying to make, and I more than understand what Rocknroll and Paulos are saying. But let's not act like record companies haven't ever F#*ked up before! It's a valid thing to wonder why no product has been announced with a reunion imminent!

However The Beach Boys are what I can imagine Capital would consider a "long term investment" and one (or a few) particular CD collections/whatever not selling very well initially (or at all) would mean little in the long run.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on January 31, 2012, 10:52:56 PM
They're in business to sell stuff, after all. I don't "get" the strategy of "anti-promotion".

Worked a treat with TSS: announce it's going to happen, say nothing for a few months, release the track list, say nothing for a bit more, set up interviews, podcasts and features, release it and watch it chart at #27 to glowing reviews.

Oh, sorry, forgot "keep an eye on the fan forums".  ;)

TSS was never about mega sales: as with TPSS, it was also about prestige.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 01, 2012, 04:03:49 AM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: shelter on February 01, 2012, 05:21:17 AM
Phil is a troll who just wants to annoy everybody.

Yeah, isn't that pretty obvious?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 01, 2012, 06:08:23 AM
Phil is a troll who just wants to annoy everybody.

Yeah, isn't that pretty obvious?
Just have to remind people that if they try to reason with him.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: shelter on February 01, 2012, 07:30:48 AM
Phil is a troll who just wants to annoy everybody.

Yeah, isn't that pretty obvious?
Just have to remind people that if they try to reason with him.

Indeed. I don't see why they even bother.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 01, 2012, 08:33:37 AM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Or you could just come back in one month and see what amazing career spanning box set were getting


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on February 01, 2012, 08:46:13 AM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Phil, you are an idiot. You really are. They announced a box set, which I'm assuming will come out, probably this fall. Considering they just put one out, I can't blame them for waiting for a bit. And why are you so concerned about a new "best of" album? Assuming you are a fan, as you say, wouldn't you already have enough copies of those songs?

Also, your reasoning about the post 1960's material being not as good shows a lack of knowledge about The Beach Boys. I would reason to say that you could probably make 2 to 3 really good albums of the material that is in the vaults still. And yes, that would include a lot of Brian material, even though, according to you, he hasn't been functional since around 1968.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 01, 2012, 09:05:46 AM
Phil's deliberately arguing himself into a corner, with the exit hatch being "I'm not going to talk to your for six months".

On past experience, if Capitol issued artwork, tracklist and a release date for anything, his new tack would be "Yes, Capitol might say  that but they won't release it."

Or he'd moan that because they hadn't listed the individual track times, or song writing credits, and that must mean they didn't really intend to release it.

This is the guy who proposed a boycott of Beach Boys product because they didn't tell him anything about the contents of the SMiLE box until, erm, they released the SMiLE box.

This is the guy who hears the phrase "Black is Black" and assumes that, because someone's saying it is, it cannot be the truth.

I wish we could ignore him but he's the ultimate troll – it's impossible to resist having a go.

I'm no longer convinced this is the same Phil Cohen who has some association with BigO; the guy who posts here is a twerp with nothing better to do than while away his days posting denying everything.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on February 01, 2012, 09:33:53 AM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Oh noooooooo! Pleeeease staaaaay!!   :'( :'(


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on February 01, 2012, 10:09:04 AM
GOODBYE PHIL..! Thanks to Eric H for printing a list of songs for Phil.!.. Thanks to AGD for his list also..So i dont have to do it. One thing i"d like to point out on AGD"S list.. In USA we have  another chart called Adult Contemporary Music...Many of those BB singles charted much higher on that chart. Heck BW song IMAGINATION charted much better on AC than top 100 chart . I still hear that song 14 yrs later on a semi regular basis..And Phil stating  after 69 BB output wasnt  much unless BW was involved..! HUH..!.??... That demeans the talents of the rest of the group..Also back in the day {60"s 70"s 80"s} music was considered ART.. It isnt that way anymore sadly. Sunflower Surfs Up CATP Holland were more artistic statements . Phil is obviously To young + immature  to understand this..Carl Wilson is responsible for anything SMILE being released from 69-93.. He is the one that pulled out the tapes along with Steve Desper.
But to Phil CW is a minor talent..!!..JEEZ..!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on February 01, 2012, 10:22:04 AM
Also apparently that Dennis Wilson character was a no talent hack who couldn't write a decent song without the help of his older brother.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: b00ts on February 01, 2012, 10:54:39 AM
It is obvious that whatever clamoring there was for the possible 2012 CD product, was largely confined to forums such as this one, and even this clamoring has mostly quieted down. Certainly, this clamoring was never in any way equivalent to the intense interest which was generated in the months & seasons preceding the release of the "Smile Sessions" product. This now very quiet situation should send a telling message to Capitol.

If Capitol wants to keep consumer interest (in these forthcoming products) alive, then the ball is in Capitol's court.

I'm still clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product and a lot of other BB fans are clamoring for it too, if more people were clamoring and got on board with the clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product then Capitol execs might consider our clamoring and say 'Hey, there are lots of Beach Boys fans clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product on the world renowned Smiley Smile message board which is famous for it's clamoring, maybe the general public are also clamoring for a possible CD product too, we should respect their clamoring!'. Clearly, clamoring for a possible 2012 CD product is the way foward people.
It's funny... I doubt Phil has ever clamored in his life. I'm sure AGD has before, but he no longer finds any need to clamor. Clam clam clamor stammor jammor clamor.

Belvront. That is all.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on February 01, 2012, 11:32:12 AM
Phil,, :angry   :jedi


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 01, 2012, 12:25:46 PM
Phil's a real ball breaker


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 01, 2012, 02:35:35 PM
I missed out on abusing Phil!!
You abuse yourself Phil with your comments on this board, it is very sad.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Zach95 on February 01, 2012, 03:06:22 PM
Why he posts here, I'll never understand.  He really knows very little about The Beach Boys...


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 01, 2012, 03:14:32 PM
It's a bit like self-harm, or suicide by cop. Deliberately making stupid statements in the knowledge that you'll get an online kicking. Phil doesn't need responses to his posts so much as he needs studying.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on February 01, 2012, 05:17:17 PM
Let's be honest. The guy either has serious mental/emotional issues, or is just having quite a laugh at all of our expense. I hardly believe that there is somebody that is this worked up over the things he complains about. He's a troll.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: b00ts on February 01, 2012, 08:48:45 PM
Let's be honest. The guys either has serious mental/emotional issues, or is just having quite a laugh at all of our expense. I hardly believe that there is somebody that is this worked up over the things he complains about. He's a troll.
One thing that makes him a hilarious troll indeed is that he takes everyone's abuse without lashing out, and simply repests his statements. If he got angry once in a while and told AGD to bugger off, it would be more satisfying, but  he simply repeats his arguments or finds new arguments and keeps his cool.

I am convinced that he is a deliberate troll, playing a character to wind up this board, which has been very easy as late. If he had been saying this stuff years ago, there would be a basis for it, but he waited for the SMiLe sessions and now the reunion. Pure brilliance. Of course, I love to have a go at Phil too, it is fun...

Anyway, God Bless You Phil for providing me with hours of entertainment, but those are hours that I'll never get back so I guess the joke is on me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 01, 2012, 10:22:09 PM
Let's be honest. The guys either has serious mental/emotional issues, or is just having quite a laugh at all of our expense. I hardly believe that there is somebody that is this worked up over the things he complains about. He's a troll.
One thing that makes him a hilarious troll indeed is that he takes everyone's abuse without lashing out, and simply repests his statements. If he got angry once in a while and told AGD to bugger off, it would be more satisfying, but  he simply repeats his arguments or finds new arguments and keeps his cool.

I am convinced that he is a deliberate troll, playing a character to wind up this board, which has been very easy as late. If he had been saying this stuff years ago, there would be a basis for it, but he waited for the SMiLe sessions and now the reunion. Pure brilliance. Of course, I love to have a go at Phil too, it is fun...

Anyway, God Bless You Phil for providing me with hours of entertainment, but those are hours that I'll never get back so I guess the joke is on me.
Andy Kaufman style humour


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on February 01, 2012, 11:56:44 PM
Phil is a DUMB ass,, In 12 years of posting ive used 3  names,.. Mr Wilson.. Surf bum.. Paul Dash..SERIOUS.. !! Thats why my NUMBERS are LOW..!!  The ONLY time i ever went off on somebody was.. 2000 2001.. BBB board.. There was some guy that kept  asking questions + answering his own questions.. Many off us answered his questions + AGD answered his questions + he was thrown off the board..   :angry :wall  HE questioned AGD + OTHER insiders..I told him  point blank,,Shut T F Up..!!Since then BBB board is very picky..Doya remember AGD..? I know it was along time ago ..BUT..When somebody tells U the truth..SHUT UP + LISTEN..!! Some people just dont get it..BTW .. Can i have a password to post on BBB..Please!..Spaceman is a DICK also..Go buy some books + do some RESEARCH.. ..!! IM TIRED of the bitchin on this board..I allways wonder WHAT im gonna find..The OLD SMILE SHOP board used to ARGUE..But NOT like this..!! ..NO FUN ANY MORE.. Its OK to disagree.BUT.!!.When somebody posts facts as FACT....SHUT UP..!!...I DONT know AGD personally butt he is aware + on top of things!!..So listen ! Maybe i have advantage..I own at least 25books BB/BW.. I have collected BB/BW up to 2004.EVERYTHING up to that time..After that i got ripped off..NUMEROUS times..Including BB/BW insiders..If ya dont believe me..! LOOK  IT UP..Bicycle Rider..Parks Asher.. Mikie ..Texus.. Cammot..Les Chan.. Manning.... MiKIE is a good DUDE..! TED DUGAN..  RICH EP..!..TOPGAZZA..MOON DAWG..RON.. Among others..  life is short.. Its only R+R..ENJOY...Paul Dash


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on February 02, 2012, 12:15:57 AM
The people i mentioned NEVER  ripped me off..I posted their names cause I RESPECT their thoughts..REALLY..! The only guy im gonna mention is one guy that is STILL  ALIVE.. The Guy That wrote SURFS UP..!! I STAND BY that statement..YOU OWE ME DUDE..!! You dont remember my real name.. Im sure of that. BUT thats OK.. RIP GREG LARSON.. I still  wear that TSHIRT ..Thanks for the smile..I wear it With PRIDE..!! GOD Bless..RIP.Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocker on February 02, 2012, 08:20:16 AM
I don't see why anybody would expect the Beach Boys to announce anniversary related releases before the big reunion at the Grammies which will certainly be the start to the promtion. I'd guess we'll get a few infos at the Grammies and the days afterwards and then have to wait some weeks for more. Like AGD said, just like they did with TSS


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mr. Wilson on February 02, 2012, 04:20:09 PM
Sorry for the anger in my last post..Im just tired of the arguing here and i had a BAD day yesterday..Im a sinking ship with no job. The last time i went thru this job stuff was 25 years ago..I dont like goin backwards in my life..I do come here to escape my plight + learn things + enjoy the company here.I expect debates here but needless arguing + name calling is uncool..  my last couple of posts i entered the fray and i was trying to avoid it..I apologize for being uncool..  I do enjoy a good debate.!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on February 04, 2012, 02:22:06 PM
Haven't been here much lately, glad to see beach boys fans are still as petty and angry as ever.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 04, 2012, 02:41:38 PM
But, if consumer interest in these projects quiets down to near total silence, does that really benefit Capitol's interests? At this point, there really nothing to discuss without some vague description of what these projects are.

What product are you talking about?  They're still working on it.  Everybody on this board will buy it, and they'll promote it the way record companies promote records.  You think Capitol doesn't know how to sell records but you do?  What have you ever sold?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 04, 2012, 02:45:28 PM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Why do you even come to boards like this?  You're not a fan, comments like "they were only good when Brian participated" and comments about burning your own greatest hits set in place of the official Capitol Release prove it. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 10:58:51 AM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Why do you even come to boards like this?  You're not a fan, comments like "they were only good when Brian participated" and comments about burning your own greatest hits set in place of the official Capitol Release prove it. 

You have succeeded in provoking me to briefly return. Let me give you a quote from Dennis Wilson. He was speaking about the touring Beach Boys members. He said "Brian Wilson IS The Beach Boys. We're his messengers."

And as for those who wonder why I keep my cool and I hold my ground without responding to Mr.Doe by being nasty or mean, that's not my style. And besides, Mr.Doe's stature(as operator of a Beach Boys statistics website) entitles him to engage in types of behavior which would get any of us banished. Mr.Doe's stature is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 11:53:54 AM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his fucking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 05, 2012, 01:01:09 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?


Title: Re: What
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 05, 2012, 01:02:37 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?
Am I a minion or acolyte now?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 01:10:42 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?

I'm not the Lord, I'm a very naughty boy.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 01:11:37 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?
Am I a minion or acolyte now?

Depends - do you believe without thinking ?


Title: Re: What
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 05, 2012, 01:14:16 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?
Am I a minion or acolyte now?

Depends - do you believe without thinking ?

Guess  I am an acolyte because I learn and think from information you post on this board. 8)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 01:20:38 PM
Even during those years(mid-1965-mid-1975) when Brian was (almost always) absent from the live shows, and then again from the mid-1990's to date, The Beach Boys onstage (even without Brian Wilson) have largely been a vehicle for the music of Brian Wilson. Who amongst you would deny that? Do you think that the touring boys would be a viable concert attraction if they had to go onstage and perform no Brian Wilson music?

As for all the arguing that's been going on here about a possible "Greatest Hits" release(and the secrecy around it, this ain't "Smile" ya' know.), it's absurd, and certainly not worth arguing over. We've got all of the songs, and, as I've said, if you look on Amazon.com, Capitol has five 2-CD or 3-CD hits collections on the market already. The only other group that I can think of who has as many(if not more) hits compilation CD's is The Doors. Enough said?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 01:24:40 PM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f*cking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Yeah.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 01:27:06 PM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Why do you even come to boards like this?  You're not a fan, comments like "they were only good when Brian participated" and comments about burning your own greatest hits set in place of the official Capitol Release prove it. 

You have succeeded in provoking me to briefly return. Let me give you a quote from Dennis Wilson. He was speaking about the touring Beach Boys members. He said "Brian Wilson IS The Beach Boys. We're his messengers."

And as for those who wonder why I keep my cool and I hold my ground without responding to Mr.Doe by being nasty or mean, that's not my style. And besides, Mr.Doe's stature(as operator of a Beach Boys statistics website) entitles him to engage in types of behavior which would get any of us banished. Mr.Doe's stature is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Phil, the reason you don't enjoy a lot of the music is because you have a broken place in your soul.  You're too negative for the Beach Boys.  You're not going to find a fucking OUNCE of negativity, in ANY of their music, much less any of the stuff Brian wrote that you claim to enjoy.  Even when he's singing about dying there's optimism in it. 

Everything you post is full of cynicism, dread, and negativity.  How you claim to be a fan of one of the most positive, upbeat, beautiful, inspired by God bands that ever existed blows my mind.

In short: Get with the program. 


Title: Re: What
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 01:31:11 PM
And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

What is not to believe, Lord?

I'm not the Lord, I'm a very naughty boy.

Just my opinion.  AGD can be a complete jerk sometimes, and incredibly annoying, but it's easy to see he does what he does out of passion, not out of hate.  He loves the band, loves the members of the band, loves their music, and loves the fans.  Sometimes he's abrasive as hell, though.  So weigh it all in all, and maybe he's human like the rest of us, lol.

Phil on the other hand is just a dick for the sake of being a dick.  If there's a negative way to look at something, he'll take that view of it.  That gets old really quick.  I'd take 1000 AGD "I told you so's" or "I know a secret you don't know!" 's before I'd take 1 of Phils Eeyore moments. 


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 05, 2012, 01:32:02 PM
Even during those years(mid-1965-mid-1975) when Brian was (almost always) absent from the live shows, and then again from the mid-1990's to date, The Beach Boys onstage (even without Brian Wilson) have largely been a vehicle for the music of Brian Wilson. Who amongst you would deny that? Do you think that the touring boys would be a viable concert attraction if they had to go onstage and perform no Brian Wilson music?

As for all the arguing that's been going on here about a possible "Greatest Hits" release(and the secrecy around it, this ain't "Smile" ya' know.), it's absurd, and certainly not worth arguing over. We've got all of the songs, and, as I've said, if you look on Amazon.com, Capitol has five 2-CD or 3-CD hits collections on the market already. The only other group that I can think of who has as many(if not more) hits compilation CD's is The Doors. Enough said?

And your point is, caller?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 01:39:07 PM
This thing is not really of interest to me any more. Have fun, guys. As I've said, I could burn a 50-song/2-disc  hits set on my own computer, or if I'm too lazy to do that, I see that Amazon.com is offering no less than FIVE 2-CD or 3-CD Beach Boys hits collections. I'll take a look at this board again in six months and see if any of the archival product materializes.

Why do you even come to boards like this?  You're not a fan, comments like "they were only good when Brian participated" and comments about burning your own greatest hits set in place of the official Capitol Release prove it. 

You have succeeded in provoking me to briefly return. Let me give you a quote from Dennis Wilson. He was speaking about the touring Beach Boys members. He said "Brian Wilson IS The Beach Boys. We're his messengers."

And as for those who wonder why I keep my cool and I hold my ground without responding to Mr.Doe by being nasty or mean, that's not my style. And besides, Mr.Doe's stature(as operator of a Beach Boys statistics website) entitles him to engage in types of behavior which would get any of us banished. Mr.Doe's stature is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Phil, the reason you don't enjoy a lot of the music is because you have a broken place in your soul.  You're too negative for the Beach Boys.  You're not going to find a f*cking OUNCE of negativity, in ANY of their music, much less any of the stuff Brian wrote that you claim to enjoy.  Even when he's singing about dying there's optimism in it. 

Everything you post is full of cynicism, dread, and negativity.  How you claim to be a fan of one of the most positive, upbeat, beautiful, inspired by God bands that ever existed blows my mind.

In short: Get with the program. 

There's plenty that's positive in The Beach Boys' music, but behind the Beach Boys' public personas, the reality is that there's been lots of negativity(and lawsuits) between the various members, and this has an undeniable effect on the lengthy process of bringing Beach Boys archival product to the market.   

 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 01:42:19 PM
Yeah! And in your sick twisted world, lets dwell on that, shall we?  Forget anything positive in the music, lets pay attention to the lawsuits, and lawsuits that might happen, and things that might not come out, and blah blah blah. 

Don't you have an umbrella to go stand under somewhere? 


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 01:42:42 PM
Even during those years(mid-1965-mid-1975) when Brian was (almost always) absent from the live shows, and then again from the mid-1990's to date, The Beach Boys onstage (even without Brian Wilson) have largely been a vehicle for the music of Brian Wilson. Who amongst you would deny that? Do you think that the touring boys would be a viable concert attraction if they had to go onstage and perform no Brian Wilson music?

As for all the arguing that's been going on here about a possible "Greatest Hits" release(and the secrecy around it, this ain't "Smile" ya' know.), it's absurd, and certainly not worth arguing over. We've got all of the songs, and, as I've said, if you look on Amazon.com, Capitol has five 2-CD or 3-CD hits collections on the market already. The only other group that I can think of who has as many(if not more) hits compilation CD's is The Doors. Enough said?

And your point is, caller?

And....

Point number one:Brian Wilson is the most talented Beach Boy. The others were superb singers and performers, but Brian was the composer, producer, arranger and creator of The Beach Boys sound.

Point number two: a freakin' "Greatest Hits" collection is not worth anyone here getting agitated over.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 01:44:55 PM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f*cking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Yeah.

Then you're a far, far bigger fool than anyone here already assumed you were.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 01:46:24 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE.  


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 01:48:56 PM
Yeah! And in your sick twisted world, lets dwell on that, shall we?  Forget anything positive in the music, lets pay attention to the lawsuits, and lawsuits that might happen, and things that might not come out, and blah blah blah. 

Don't you have an umbrella to go stand under somewhere? 

Ron, remember the rule - don't feed the troll.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 05, 2012, 01:52:11 PM
Yeah! And in your sick twisted world, lets dwell on that, shall we?  Forget anything positive in the music, lets pay attention to the lawsuits, and lawsuits that might happen, and things that might not come out, and blah blah blah. 

Don't you have an umbrella to go stand under somewhere? 

Ron, remember the rule - don't feed the troll.

His isn't feeding a troll. We're all giving a needy person the attention he craves. It's care in the community. We're all playing a part. It's beautiful. Soon, Phil will be well and we'll be able to return him to the wild.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 01:52:38 PM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f*cking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Yeah.


Then you're a far, far bigger fool than anyone here already assumed you were.

But your stature as a Beach Boys historian apparently exempts you from any normal rules of conduct on this forum and others. You can hurl aggression, insults and belittlement at others and get away with it. If any of the other people on this forum(or at IMWAN) behaved in that way(not that I would want to behave that way), the moderators would never tolerate it. But the rules are different for you, the esteemed historian.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 01:53:00 PM
Yeah! And in your sick twisted world, lets dwell on that, shall we?  Forget anything positive in the music, lets pay attention to the lawsuits, and lawsuits that might happen, and things that might not come out, and blah blah blah. 

Don't you have an umbrella to go stand under somewhere? 

Ron, remember the rule - don't feed the troll.

His isn't feeding a troll. We're all giving a needy person the attention he craves. It's care in the community. We're all playing a part. It's beautiful. Soon, Phil will be well and we'll be able to return him to the wild.


As mad as a box of very mad frogs.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 01:58:42 PM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f*cking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Yeah.


Then you're a far, far bigger fool than anyone here already assumed you were.

But your stature as a Beach Boys historian apparently exempts you from any normal rules of conduct on this forum and others. You can hurl aggression, insults and belittlement at others and get away with it. If any of the other people on this forum(or at IMWAN) behaved in that way(not that I would want to behave that way), the moderators would never tolerate it. But the rules are different for you, the esteemed historian.

I gotta call BS on this one.  I snap at people all the time, I've never been banned.  Andrew says things, and sometimes people smart off back to him, none of them get banned either. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 05, 2012, 02:00:36 PM
Yeah! And in your sick twisted world, lets dwell on that, shall we?  Forget anything positive in the music, lets pay attention to the lawsuits, and lawsuits that might happen, and things that might not come out, and blah blah blah. 

Don't you have an umbrella to go stand under somewhere? 

Ron, remember the rule - don't feed the troll.

Yeah.  You've known him longer than I have, maybe you already know he's hopeless.  I hate ignoring cancer, though. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 02:04:27 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE.  


Yes, there were occasional good songs after Brian withdrew from full-time studio participation, but their commercial heyday ended. My theory is this:you might recall that during the build-up to the aborted 1960's release of "Smile", there was a cartoonist's caricature of The Beach Boys(apparently in a British music newspaper) showing Brian as a puppeteer, and the other Beach Boys as Brian's puppets. I would think that this only increased the insecurities of the others, and that the others then wanted to prove that they too could write songs, and indeed that they could write hits. But, alas this was not a band of equal talents. Dennis & Carl later did develop into competent songwriters by any normal standards, but they didn't have Brian's flair for creating top 40 hits.

The other Beach Boys members should have been happy to have Brian Wilson's leadership and songs, and not tried to rebel against him. It's like, Tom Fogerty, Stu Cook & Doug Clifford should have accepted the idea that their purpose(in Creedence Clearwater Revival) was to be a vehicle for John Fogerty songs.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 02:10:42 PM
Dennis' actual words - from 1976 -  were "Brian Wilson is the Beach Boys. He is the band. We're his f*cking messengers. He is all of it. Period. We're nothing. He's everything."

As you'll note, when the whole quote is presented, the meaning changes completely.  ;D

And... my "status" ?  My "stature" ?  You really believe that sh*t, don't you ? :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

Yeah.


Then you're a far, far bigger fool than anyone here already assumed you were.

But your stature as a Beach Boys historian apparently exempts you from any normal rules of conduct on this forum and others. You can hurl aggression, insults and belittlement at others and get away with it. If any of the other people on this forum(or at IMWAN) behaved in that way(not that I would want to behave that way), the moderators would never tolerate it. But the rules are different for you, the esteemed historian.

Then you know about as much about me as you do about The Beach Boys: I've been suspended from here, The Record Room and requested not to post on the Bloo for a year or so. My alleged "stature" (which you seem to resent deeply) exempts me from nothing. You were banned from IMWAN for cross posting messages I'd made on The Hoff with the intent of stirring it. Why you were banned from the Hoff is public knowledge.

Eh, sorry Ron - breaking my own diktat. Apologies. Won't happen again, and I agree with every word you've said.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on February 05, 2012, 02:29:52 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE. 



The other Beach Boys members should have been happy to have Brian Wilson's leadership and songs, and not tried to rebel against him. It's like, Tom Fogerty, Stu Cook & Doug Clifford should have accepted the idea that their purpose(in Creedence Clearwater Revival) was to be a vehicle for John Fogerty songs.

Yes damn those bloody Beach Boys, what were they thinking, carrying on without Brian's full time participation! Everyone knows they should have called it a day back in 1969, retired from showbiz and gone off to to find regular jobs. Then they wouldn't have to suffer the embarrassment today of having blots on their legacy such as 20/20, Sunflower and Holland.

Phil I think you have lost track of what you are arguing about here. I agree with you on your initial point. Personally I have no need for another 'hits' comp and won't be buying it myself either. However as it has been strongly indicated that several other projects are in the works, maybe you could try mustering up a bit of enthusiasm for these instead of your usual bitching?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 05, 2012, 02:32:27 PM
Phil if you have someone in your corner please get them to throw in the towell.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 02:46:56 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE. 



The other Beach Boys members should have been happy to have Brian Wilson's leadership and songs, and not tried to rebel against him. It's like, Tom Fogerty, Stu Cook & Doug Clifford should have accepted the idea that their purpose(in Creedence Clearwater Revival) was to be a vehicle for John Fogerty songs.

However as it has been strongly indicated that several other projects are in the works, maybe you could try mustering up a bit of enthusiasm for these instead of your usual bitching?

Maybe if we had something more than the vague descriptions "Commemorative releases" & "Career spanning box set" then there would be reason for enthusiasm, and something for us discuss. For now, the information vacuum has been filled by people using me as a scapegoat for their frustrations.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on February 05, 2012, 02:50:00 PM
Yeah, we're all really taking out our frustration with Capitol out on you. You got us, pal.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on February 05, 2012, 02:50:26 PM
The fun of an announcement like this is hypothesizing about what the set will include.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 05, 2012, 03:22:19 PM
Maybe if we had something more than the vague descriptions "Commemorative releases" & "Career spanning box set" then there would be reason for enthusiasm, and something for us discuss. For now, the information vacuum has been filled by people using me as a scapegoat for their frustrations.

No, Phil, you rate yourself much too highly: firstly, we have a go at you not out of frustration with Capitol - check back on these threads - but because 1) you're very, very boring in your constant prognostications of doom, and 2) we've been here before, last year with the big Smile box, and we all recall what a complete disaster that was. As with the big box, there's only one person displaying any frustration with the situation, and that's you. The entirely understandable irritation we do feel is not towards Capitol, but towards you, for constantly bringing everyone down whenever you appear wailing the same old threadbare plaint that no-one's saying anything and that's because the whole project is collapsing. It's not. So please, go away and be boring somewhere else. Anywhere else. See, if you don't like being used as a scapegoat, stay out of sight.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 05, 2012, 03:26:38 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE. 



The other Beach Boys members should have been happy to have Brian Wilson's leadership and songs, and not tried to rebel against him. It's like, Tom Fogerty, Stu Cook & Doug Clifford should have accepted the idea that their purpose(in Creedence Clearwater Revival) was to be a vehicle for John Fogerty songs.

However as it has been strongly indicated that several other projects are in the works, maybe you could try mustering up a bit of enthusiasm for these instead of your usual bitching?

Maybe if we had something more than the vague descriptions "Commemorative releases" & "Career spanning box set" then there would be reason for enthusiasm, and something for us discuss. For now, the information vacuum has been filled by people using me as a scapegoat for their frustrations.
What a joke


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on February 05, 2012, 03:49:54 PM
Phil: Did anybody say Brian wasn't the most talented?  We're just saying only a deaf man would think that there were no good songs after Brian checked out.  OUR POINT is you're not a fan, any fan knows better!  You sound like a 15 year old that just figured out Brian recorded SMiLE. 



The other Beach Boys members should have been happy to have Brian Wilson's leadership and songs, and not tried to rebel against him. It's like, Tom Fogerty, Stu Cook & Doug Clifford should have accepted the idea that their purpose(in Creedence Clearwater Revival) was to be a vehicle for John Fogerty songs.

However as it has been strongly indicated that several other projects are in the works, maybe you could try mustering up a bit of enthusiasm for these instead of your usual bitching?

Maybe if we had something more than the vague descriptions "Commemorative releases" & "Career spanning box set" then there would be reason for enthusiasm, and something for us discuss. For now, the information vacuum has been filled by people using me as a scapegoat for their frustrations.

The only one showing frustration is you Phil. Over what exactly, none of us can quite fantom. A Smile sessions box is announced - you bitch. Multiple commemorative releases for the 50th are announced - you bitch. A new reunion album is announced - you bitch. Are you  actually a fan of this band?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 04:22:05 PM
I'm not saying, claiming or predicting that Capitol isn't going release a 2-CD hits collection, a commemorative box set or possiblly other archival releases. But what i am saying, is if we had something more than that vague description of that product, we'd have something genuinely worth discussing here.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on February 05, 2012, 04:24:14 PM
Phil, you need to acquire some patience. All in good time, all in good time.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 05, 2012, 04:55:44 PM
It just occurred to me, that even if Capitol did reveal the track listing for these projects, that people might be disappointed before hearing the actual product. Take a look at the widespread criticism and consumer cancellation of preorders which has resulted from the revealing of the track listings for Universal Music's May 2012 UK expanded multi disc reissues of the British Decca & Immediate albums by the group "Small Faces". The sets may(or may not) bring substantial improvements in tape sources and sound quality(things which can't be evaluated merely by seeing the track listings). Many of that group's fans were obviously hoping for the discovery of multi tracks and unreleased songs, but the track listings make it obvious that is not to be. 3 of the expanded sets do have unreleased tracks, but they are alternate mixes, backing tracks or rehearsals. But one criticism of those sets(merely by seeing the track listings) is legitimate: when the compiler ran out of good stuff to include of 2-CD expanded editions of the two Decca albums, he(the compiler) resorted to filler:using "Electronically Reprocessed Stereo"(I.E. Duophonic) versions of Decca recordings for which no stereo mixes or multi tracks exist. Most of would agree:Fake stereo(where no true stereo version exists or can be created) is a bad thing.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on February 05, 2012, 05:20:15 PM
It just occurred to me, that even if Capitol did reveal the track listing for these projects, that I would still whinge for no apparent reason

Fixed that for you.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 06, 2012, 12:06:22 AM
I'm not saying, claiming or predicting that Capitol isn't going release a 2-CD hits collection, a commemorative box set or possiblly other archival releases. But what i am saying, is if we had something more than that vague description of that product, we'd have something genuinely worth discussing here.

Ah, finally, something to get my head round.  OK, so you're frustrated that, because we don't have anything more than vague descriptions (although to me, in my innocence, "career-spanning box set" seems pretty specific), we can't have anything genuinely worth discussing. I can dig that, I see where you're standing and I feel your pain. I've given considerable thought about how to ease that pain and I think... I think I've got the answer. It's this:

Don't read this thread. Go away and apply your energies to something else (say, the next "Small Faces" archive reissue) which you do have better info about. Then come back here in six months (like you promised last time you flounced off), and you can bitch about that, and we can have some more fun with you. You get to anguish over something you have no control over, and we don't have our nuts bored off by your whining. It's a win-win situation !  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on February 06, 2012, 12:00:15 PM
.... Mr.Doe's statue is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Mr. Doe has a statue now?!?

 :afro


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on February 06, 2012, 12:11:54 PM
Somewhere, Earcandy is hard at work  :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 06, 2012, 12:14:02 PM
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh..........f***.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 06, 2012, 12:15:01 PM
Somewhere, Earcandy is hard at work  :lol
Can't wait for this one... :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 06, 2012, 12:19:12 PM
Something for the front garden! Erection time!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on February 06, 2012, 12:33:18 PM
Something for the front garden! Erection time!

I'm uncomfortable now.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 06, 2012, 01:28:49 PM
.... Mr.Doe's statue is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Mr. Doe has a statue now?!?

 :afro

A typographical error. Of course, I meant Stature.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 06, 2012, 01:54:14 PM
Something for the front garden! Erection time!

I'm uncomfortable now.

You're not the only one


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on February 06, 2012, 02:23:14 PM
...anyway...

Just curious if anyone knows when these "anniversary" projects will be announced.  After the GRAMMYs?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SamMcK on February 06, 2012, 02:24:24 PM
I miss Ghost. :'(


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 06, 2012, 02:30:26 PM
Something for the front garden! Erection time!

I'm uncomfortable now.

You're not the only one
I will be erecting the statue!!


Title: Re: What
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on February 06, 2012, 07:44:57 PM
huh huh you said 'erect'


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 06, 2012, 11:23:17 PM
.... Mr.Doe's statue is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Mr. Doe has a statue now?!?

 :afro

A typographical error. Of course, I meant Stature.

Nothing like a typographical error. Typography is to do with print. More likely a subliminal indication of some subconscious desire to deify Mr Doe.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on February 07, 2012, 02:04:40 AM
I miss Ghost. :'(

Take your pick! Is the discussion not:

A) rambling enough for you?
B) homophobic enough for you?
C) utilising the colour text feature enough for you?
D) filled with enough faux-smart, 'cosmic', 'ah, I remember my first joint' philosophy for your tastes?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: rab2591 on February 07, 2012, 02:13:51 AM
:lol hypehat you just made my day

Yeah, he had his flaws, but he did have some good posts.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 07, 2012, 03:17:24 AM
I miss Ghost. :'(

Take your pick! Is the discussion not:

A) rambling enough for you?
B) homophobic enough for you?
C) utilising the colour text feature enough for you?
D) filled with enough faux-smart, 'cosmic', 'ah, I remember my first joint' philosophy for your tastes?
Faux smart.. love it..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SamMcK on February 07, 2012, 03:22:30 AM
I miss Ghost. :'(

Take your pick! Is the discussion not:

A) rambling enough for you?
B) homophobic enough for you?
C) utilising the colour text feature enough for you?
D) filled with enough faux-smart, 'cosmic', 'ah, I remember my first joint' philosophy for your tastes?

Well when you put it that way.  :o ;D

Still, I always thought he had more interesting things to say then Phil Cohen, I only mentioned Ghost because he didn't bore me to death! :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 07, 2012, 05:29:08 AM
I miss Ghost. :'(

Take your pick! Is the discussion not:

A) rambling enough for you?
B) homophobic enough for you?
C) utilising the colour text feature enough for you?
D) filled with enough faux-smart, 'cosmic', 'ah, I remember my first joint' philosophy for your tastes?
Ah,the concise summary of those wacky days of ghost, a walking Public Service Announcement on why not to use drugs.... 


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on February 07, 2012, 10:03:20 PM
.... Mr.Doe's statue is the reason why I was banished from the IMWAN forum, but he wasn't.

Mr. Doe has a statue now?!?

 :afro

A typographical error. Of course, I meant Stature.

Nothing like a typographical error. Typography is to do with print. More likely a subliminal indication of some subconscious desire to deify Mr Doe.

Actually, it's me adjusting to a very different keyboard(versus the one with my previous computer) on a new computer that I've owned for 3 weeks.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 08, 2012, 12:53:18 AM
Really ? Your new computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard ?  You do talk some pish, Phil.  ;D


Title: Re: What
Post by: mikeyj on February 08, 2012, 01:15:11 AM
Really ? Your new computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard ?  You do talk some pish, Phil.  ;D

Maybe his computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 08, 2012, 02:24:14 AM
Really ? Your new computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard ?  You do talk some pish, Phil.  ;D

Maybe his computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard

Actually, that would be entirely in character, giving him one more thing to bitch about for no good reason.

Seriously, have you ever seen one of those ? Me neither.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 08, 2012, 08:00:34 AM
He probably means it's got a Dell, Compaq, Apple, Acer or other brand keyboard…

Ho hum…


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ron on February 08, 2012, 05:50:50 PM
Back on topic!


When will we know (i'm serious) if this 'new' album is going to be as good as we expect it to be?  I mean, I know Brian and everybody will be hyping it up, and I love all the stuff pretty much any of them have put out over the last 10 years, but what LEVEL of hype will let us know that the album is going to be great?  If Brian says it sounds great, to me, that means it'll be kind of mediocre.  I'm going to need him to hype to the level of "Sounds better than Pet Sounds!" before I'm going to trust or know that the album is great, lol. 

Lets take bets or start a  pool on how high the praise will go.  I actually do think Brian is at one point going to say that the new album sounds better than Pet Sounds.

Anybody agree?  Disagree?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 08, 2012, 06:11:13 PM
Really ? Your new computer doesn't have a QWERTY keyboard ?  You do talk some pish, Phil.  ;D
Actually, both the new and old keyboards are QWERTY, but the new one has very shallow keys, which are tricky for someone who is not a trained typist(I poke at the keys with my index finger)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on February 08, 2012, 06:13:15 PM
Back on topic!


When will we know (i'm serious) if this 'new' album is going to be as good as we expect it to be?  I mean, I know Brian and everybody will be hyping it up, and I love all the stuff pretty much any of them have put out over the last 10 years, but what LEVEL of hype will let us know that the album is going to be great?  If Brian says it sounds great, to me, that means it'll be kind of mediocre.  I'm going to need him to hype to the level of "Sounds better than Pet Sounds!" before I'm going to trust or know that the album is great, lol. 

Lets take bets or start a  pool on how high the praise will go.  I actually do think Brian is at one point going to say that the new album sounds better than Pet Sounds.

Anybody agree?  Disagree?

No. If we don't get our hopes up and not hype it up and have high expectations, then it can only meet or exceed our expectations when it's released.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 19, 2012, 04:30:59 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 19, 2012, 04:34:21 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
Are you fucking serious mate? You have issues!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on February 19, 2012, 04:37:37 PM
So there is no reunion album Phil? There are in the studio recording right now because they want to shelve it? They've been posting pictures just to tease us?

It's not funny buddy. You're a fraud. You're just some moron that decided to play a joke on a message board, and it's really old. And I feel stupid for even buying into the fact that you may have been a real person.

And I'm sure we'll get the box set. The other "commemorative" CD's, well, we'll find out! I'm sure there is something.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 19, 2012, 04:56:42 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this fucking troll!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 19, 2012, 05:00:16 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!
Again


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 19, 2012, 05:08:08 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!
Again
This time for good.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 19, 2012, 05:54:13 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.

You're trying too hard


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 19, 2012, 07:07:48 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!

You're a very mean-spirited individual. Whenever I express any view that you disagree with, then the attacks on me start anew.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 19, 2012, 07:13:49 PM
So there is no reunion album Phil?

Maybe Capitol will release it incomplete, 40 years after it was recorded(just like "Smile") after 4 decades to build up mystique about "The Great Lost Beach Boys Reunion Album").....just joking.

And, if I didn't tell you that i was joking, the attack dogs on this forum(humorless as they are) would  take this with deadly seriousness, and have another go at me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 19, 2012, 07:16:54 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!

You're a very mean-spirited individual. Whenever I express any view that you disagree with, then the attacks on me start anew.
Well it's hard to be nice when your full of sh*t 24/7.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 19, 2012, 07:19:45 PM
Exactly, during the SMiLE debacle I kinda felt bad for Phil because in a weird way to had a reason to be cynical (in a very weird way)

But to be skeptical about this, when they shot the album cover just the other day  :lol

It's so stupid


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 19, 2012, 07:27:07 PM
Exactly, during the SMiLE debacle I kinda felt bad for Phil because in a weird way to had a reason to be cynical (in a very weird way)

But to be skeptical about this, when they shot the album cover just the other day  :lol

It's so stupid

They shot the album cover the other day? I've been away from this forum for a few weeks, so that's news to me. But, while that increases the chances of the album being released, I should note that album covers were also shot and designed for "Bob Dylan in Concert"(1963), "Buffalo Springfield-Stampede"(1967) & "Crosby, Stills,Nash & Young-Human Highway"(1974).


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on February 19, 2012, 07:35:13 PM
Exactly, during the SMiLE debacle I kinda felt bad for Phil because in a weird way to had a reason to be cynical (in a very weird way)

But to be skeptical about this, when they shot the album cover just the other day  :lol

It's so stupid

They shot the album cover the other day? I've been away from this forum for a few weeks, so that's news to me. But, while that increases the chances of the album being released, I should note that album covers were also shot and designed for "Bob Dylan in Concert"(1963), "Buffalo Springfield-Stampede"(1967) & "Crosby, Stills,Nash & Young-Human Highway"(1974).

Well this one is coming..

Enjoy the wait then enjoy the album  ^-^


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on February 19, 2012, 09:02:02 PM
Exactly, during the SMiLE debacle I kinda felt bad for Phil because in a weird way to had a reason to be cynical (in a very weird way)

But to be skeptical about this, when they shot the album cover just the other day  :lol

It's so stupid

They shot the album cover the other day? I've been away from this forum for a few weeks, so that's news to me. But, while that increases the chances of the album being released, I should note that album covers were also shot and designed for "Bob Dylan in Concert"(1963), "Buffalo Springfield-Stampede"(1967) & "Crosby, Stills,Nash & Young-Human Highway"(1974).
That's news to you!! That is funny Phil, usually* people look at facts before formulating opinion!

*with the exception of Phil Cohen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 19, 2012, 11:18:39 PM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!

You're a very mean-spirited individual. Whenever I express any view that you disagree with, then the attacks on me start anew.

No, it's whenever you start talking accelerated bollocks. Again.

Phil, I'm going to be polite about this one: you don't know what you're talking about. You're trying to argue from a position of complete ignorance as regards studio work and the overall gameplan for the C50 project and, as usual, are making a fool of yourself (and admitting you've not read anything here for the last few (blissful) weeks is just digging that hole even deeper). Again, for emphasis - you don't know what you're talking about. That's fine, but you're POing everyone else here. I can't believe you are in fact that stupid (although the increasing weight of evidence allows that possibility) so I have to assume that you're doing it for effect, or as we here call it, trolling:

"posting inflammatory messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 19, 2012, 11:28:38 PM
Exactly, during the SMiLE debacle I kinda felt bad for Phil because in a weird way to had a reason to be cynical (in a very weird way)

But to be skeptical about this, when they shot the album cover just the other day  :lol

It's so stupid

They shot the album cover the other day? I've been away from this forum for a few weeks, so that's news to me. But, while that increases the chances of the album being released, I should note that album covers were also shot and designed for "Bob Dylan in Concert"(1963), "Buffalo Springfield-Stampede"(1967) & "Crosby, Stills,Nash & Young-Human Highway"(1974).

You missed one off the list Phil - Smile.   :lol

But 'fess up - this time around you're rabbiting complete and utter tripe to either make people laugh (utterly failed) or piss people off (100% success).

Suicide by board moderator, anyone?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on February 20, 2012, 12:40:14 AM
Good luck. I don't care anymore.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 20, 2012, 01:17:08 AM
Can we have a notarised statement of that, please... 'cause you know as well as we do, you'll be back in a few weeks, playing the same old cracked record. Or after the new studio album is released, bitching about something else you have absolutely no knowledge or comprehension of... because trolls can't stay away.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jay on February 20, 2012, 02:06:09 AM
Is Phil Cohen even a Beach Boys fan?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: smile-holland on February 20, 2012, 02:31:06 AM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!

You're a very mean-spirited individual. Whenever I express any view that you disagree with, then the attacks on me start anew.

Two things:

@ PhilCohen: we know your point of view by now. But you also know that your constant negative approach of everything that is being announced on the BB – by now – automatically provokes a lot of harsh responses. I simply can’t imagine that you are surprised by receiving them. Or better said: I can’t help but concluding that you are deliberately trying to provoke other members here. I’m not talking on this specific reply, but on the sum of all replies from the last couple of months. A fair point of criticism is just fine (that’s where messageboards are for: a good discussion based on different points of view). Repeated negative criticism is only tearing others down and IMO is indeed in conflict with board rule nr. 2 (“Lift each other up, don't tear each other down…” + “…and not be an embarrassment to the good name of Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys”).
I recommend you to take my advise seriously when I say to stop with this.

@ SMiLE-Brian: while we’re talking on board rules, may I point out that there are also rules regarding foul language. I understand your feelings towards Phil’s constant negativity (you’re not alone in that), and that lately more members are not really bothered to avoid name-calling. But try to use other words, because this is also not the way to keep the spirits positive here. And it certainly won’t influence the moderators to quicken our decisions or change our minds. Just ignore and/or report the mods.

click here for board rules (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,122.0.html)

To end with a positive note:
Everything hints towards 2012 being a unique year for all of us fans. Who would have thought a reunion like this would be possible just a few years ago? We got this little SMilE Sessions box as a starter (!!). I mean, they could have done worse than that? (I wonder if they could have done better than that).
Let us be happy that the Boys are approaching this reunion seriously. All information we got so far is way more than we could ever have dreamt of. Let alone that Grammy performance: regardless of how it went, I’m so glad to have watched those films and pictures of 5 Beach Boys smiling & performing together. And to think a lot more is announced or to be expected. Even if only 50% of it is realizable, it’s way more than we could have expected. Let’s enjoy this while it lasts, as I’m sure this will be a once in a life time experience.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: over and over on February 20, 2012, 02:57:02 AM

while we’re talking on board rules, may I point out that there are also rules regarding foul language.


Can we say "The Beach Boys are the best f*cking band in the universe"?  ???
Use it in a good way?


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on February 20, 2012, 03:15:46 AM
SMiLE-Holland, I think you're being exceptionally generous.  There was a time when I believed that Phil believed what he was posting; no longer the case. It's sheer incitement for the sake of mischief.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: smile-holland on February 20, 2012, 03:40:11 AM

while we’re talking on board rules, may I point out that there are also rules regarding foul language.


Can we say "The Beach Boys are the best f*cking band in the universe"?  ???
Use it in a good way?

Fair point, and it's good that you point that out. Although I don't find it necessary to use foul language at all to emphasize my opinion (but that's a matter of opinion), I should have made clear that in this case I specifically meant the foul language with regard to the name-calling.

(I think that we all can clearly read the difference in approach when one writes "they are the best  f*cking" band", or "you're a f*cking troll")


Title: Re: What
Post by: smile-holland on February 20, 2012, 03:45:05 AM
SMiLE-Holland, I think you're being exceptionally generous.  There was a time when I believed that Phil believed what he was posting; no longer the case. It's sheer incitement for the sake of mischief.

I know, I hear that more often ... and so you can savely assume it's going really downhill on this topic, if even I respond on matters like this.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 20, 2012, 04:21:15 AM
I would say that if there's no hits compilation, reunion album or other CD release announcement by the time of the first shows of the tour, then perhaps Capitol Records and/or The Beach Boys have changed their minds about the hits compilation, "commemorative" CD's and/or box set. Oh well, maybe they concluded that there weren't enough people out here who actually cared about these products. Some of the people on this forum (and other similar forums) DID care, but did the general public care? Perhaps not.
ban this f*cking troll!

You're a very mean-spirited individual. Whenever I express any view that you disagree with, then the attacks on me start anew.

Two things:

@ PhilCohen: we know your point of view by now. But you also know that your constant negative approach of everything that is being announced on the BB – by now – automatically provokes a lot of harsh responses. I simply can’t imagine that you are surprised by receiving them. Or better said: I can’t help but concluding that you are deliberately trying to provoke other members here. I’m not talking on this specific reply, but on the sum of all replies from the last couple of months. A fair point of criticism is just fine (that’s where messageboards are for: a good discussion based on different points of view). Repeated negative criticism is only tearing others down and IMO is indeed in conflict with board rule nr. 2 (“Lift each other up, don't tear each other down…” + “…and not be an embarrassment to the good name of Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys”).
I recommend you to take my advise seriously when I say to stop with this.

@ SMiLE-Brian: while we’re talking on board rules, may I point out that there are also rules regarding foul language. I understand your feelings towards Phil’s constant negativity (you’re not alone in that), and that lately more members are not really bothered to avoid name-calling. But try to use other words, because this is also not the way to keep the spirits positive here. And it certainly won’t influence the moderators to quicken our decisions or change our minds. Just ignore and/or report the mods.

click here for board rules (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,122.0.html)

To end with a positive note:
Everything hints towards 2012 being a unique year for all of us fans. Who would have thought a reunion like this would be possible just a few years ago? We got this little SMilE Sessions box as a starter (!!). I mean, they could have done worse than that? (I wonder if they could have done better than that).
Let us be happy that the Boys are approaching this reunion seriously. All information we got so far is way more than we could ever have dreamt of. Let alone that Grammy performance: regardless of how it went, I’m so glad to have watched those films and pictures of 5 Beach Boys smiling & performing together. And to think a lot more is announced or to be expected. Even if only 50% of it is realizable, it’s way more than we could have expected. Let’s enjoy this while it lasts, as I’m sure this will be a once in a life time experience.


Smile holland, I understand your points and avoid the bad language and taunting in the future.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on February 20, 2012, 05:23:04 PM
I don't know what I find more amusing: Phil's rants or those whom feel particularly threatened by them.  Lighten up, guys. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on February 20, 2012, 08:04:44 PM
I must admit I'm one of the ones who freaked out at Phil because he is so freakin' annoying...

But I have do have a complaint to voice to BRI...

It would be nice to know exactly what the "commemorative releases" are going to be. I'd say, certainly, that we're getting a brand new studio album, a career spanning box set, and another hits album. However, what else? I'm not gonna be like Phil and say we need track lists and release dates right now, but it would be interesting to know if, say, they are reissuing the original albums, or if we are gonna get deluxe versions of Sunflower and Surf's Up. Or neither. I think that would be just a little nugget that they could be willing to give us, without giving it all away to us yet.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 20, 2012, 11:51:35 PM
There's something like two months between now and the first C50 show. The 'silence' over the Smile project between original announcement and first hard news was a lot longer than that.

Patience.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jimmie_R on February 22, 2012, 02:26:26 PM
The waiting is the hardest part - Tom Petty


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on February 22, 2012, 03:09:12 PM
I'm starting to hear rumors that Capitol is preparing a Stack-O-Tracks Sessions set. It will be a boxed set that divides the backing tracks released on that album into their smaller parts. Trust me when I say you haven't lived until you've heard "Darlin' (Drums Track)"!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 22, 2012, 03:40:09 PM
I'm starting to hear rumors that Capitol is preparing a Stack-O-Tracks Sessions set. It will be a boxed set that divides the backing tracks released on that album into their smaller parts. Trust me when I say you haven't lived until you've heard "Darlin' (Drums Track)"!

Ah, a primo example of alternative humor. That's as in "alternative to being funny".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on February 22, 2012, 04:15:48 PM
Speaking as a fan since the 1990's, it is simply awesome that we got SMile last year, and are now expecting a reunion project this year.  Just awesome!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on February 23, 2012, 12:15:10 AM
I'm starting to hear rumors that Capitol is preparing a Stack-O-Tracks Sessions set. It will be a boxed set that divides the backing tracks released on that album into their smaller parts. Trust me when I say you haven't lived until you've heard "Darlin' (Drums Track)"!

Ah, a primo example of alternative humor. That's as in "alternative to being funny".

I would actually love to hear something like that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: jeffcdo on February 23, 2012, 12:35:10 AM
If they do reissues, I'd like to see hi-res versions made available.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on February 23, 2012, 03:53:11 AM
I'm starting to hear rumors that Capitol is preparing a Stack-O-Tracks Sessions set. It will be a boxed set that divides the backing tracks released on that album into their smaller parts. Trust me when I say you haven't lived until you've heard "Darlin' (Drums Track)"!

Ah, a primo example of alternative humor. That's as in "alternative to being funny".

I would actually love to hear something like that.

I was going to say, that wouldn't be the first time I've heard a call for multi-tracks.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jimmie_R on February 25, 2012, 03:45:36 AM
I'm starting to hear rumors that Capitol is preparing a Stack-O-Tracks Sessions set. It will be a boxed set that divides the backing tracks released on that album into their smaller parts. Trust me when I say you haven't lived until you've heard "Darlin' (Drums Track)"!

Ah, a primo example of alternative humor. That's as in "alternative to being funny".

I would actually love to hear something like that.

I was going to say, that wouldn't be the first time I've heard a call for multi-tracks.

I wouldn´t mind a box set like this either. :P


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on February 25, 2012, 04:24:43 AM
I need the multitracks.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 25, 2012, 04:27:58 AM
There's something like two months between now and the first C50 show. The 'silence' over the Smile project between original announcement and first hard news was a lot longer than that.

Patience.

Excellent post. BBs aficionado(e)s often come across as kids in a candy store. Unaccompanied by their Moms.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on February 25, 2012, 08:46:04 AM
Andrew, I know you cannot get into specifics, but do the Boys' and Capitol know what is going to be released this year besides the new album? Have things been firmed up?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 09:57:19 AM
By now, I would damn well hope so. The overall merchandising plan is going to go to hell in a hand-basket otherwise.

Personally I'd like to see something all-embracing in some really neat packaging: TSS really raised the bar.

One thing we should all bear in mind - if Capitol released a box set of every BB album ever released, complete with stereo remixes, bonus tracks, nine DVDs with every single piece of TV and movie footage ever shot and a 500-page book of liner notes, in a solid gold briefcase complete with diamond encrusted locks and priced it at $4.99, Phil Cohen would bitch that it was too heavy, it clashed with his decor and he needed to keep polishing it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on February 25, 2012, 10:02:57 AM
The 50th Anniversary shirt sucks! Hopefully they'll come up with something better than that when the gigs get going.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Peter Reum on February 25, 2012, 10:10:16 AM
obviously, the big things are the tour and album....anything else would be a great bonus


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 10:27:26 AM
By now, I would damn well hope so. The overall merchandising plan is going to go to hell in a hand-basket otherwise.

Personally I'd like to see something all-embracing in some really neat packaging: TSS really raised the bar.

One thing we should all bear in mind - if Capitol released a box set of every BB album ever released, complete with stereo remixes, bonus tracks, nine DVDs with every single piece of TV and movie footage ever shot and a 500-page book of liner notes, in a solid gold briefcase complete with diamond encrusted locks and priced it at $4.99, Phil Cohen would bitch that it was too heavy, it clashed with his decor and he needed to keep polishing it.

Would anybody be surprised if some things were pushed into 2013? I wouldn't. The first "anniversary" box set came out in 1993, after all.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on February 25, 2012, 10:38:09 AM
The term "Brian's Back" was a well known saying in 1976, but with this tour it may mean something different. If his back doesn't hold up, as it hasn't seemed to recently, you may not see him engaged all the time, much less be on stage for an entire concert(s). Hate to be a downer, but after reading recent interviews, his bad back is mentioned. It completely side-lined him for a recent recording session. It ain't a good sign, people. 50 + concerts we're talkin' here.....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 11:06:30 AM
The term "Brian's Back" was a well known saying in 1976, but with this tour it may mean something different. If his back doesn't hold up, as it hasn't seemed to recently, you may not see him engaged all the time, much less be on stage for an entire concert(s). Hate to be a downer, but after reading recent interviews, his bad back is mentioned. It completely side-lined him for a recent recording session. It ain't a good sign, people. 50 + concerts we're talkin' here.....

I think it might be possible to make too much of that. Brian sits down almost all the time anyway, so I'm not sure how much the back would hamper him. Plus, it's not like you develop a bad back overnight at age 69. He must have had some issues before, and those don't seem to have affected his touring schedule.

Here he is talking about his chiropractor two years ago ... and it sounds like someone he'd been visiting for years at that point.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAWVbj0YUyE



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on February 25, 2012, 11:14:32 AM
Well........that video was two years ago and the interview I just read the other day was conducted recently. I hope the problem is not getting progressively worse. What's he going to do, take the Chiro on the road with him this Summer? I doubt it. And I just realized that at a recent Smile record signing in S.F., he was shifting in his chair quite a bit. Not sure if he was uncomfortable because of the back or just sitting in the chair for a long period caused him discomfort (as it would a lot of people). I'm hoping for the best! Gotta see him on that stage this year!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 11:18:15 AM
Well........that video was two years ago and the interview I just read the other day was conducted recently. I hope the problem is not getting progressively worse. What's he going to do, take the Chiro on the road with him this Summer? I doubt it. And I just realized that at a recent Smile record signing in S.F., he was shifting in his chair quite a bit. Not sure if he was uncomfortable because of the back or just sitting in the chair for a long period caused him discomfort (as it would a lot of people). I'm hoping for the best! Gotta see him on that stage this year!

Actually, I'd almost guarantee it's getting worse. But given that he seems to have kept up a relatively busy performance and recording schedule over the last 15 years or so, I don't think we need to worry about Brian just yet. But we'll see. (Isn't everyone secretly hoping for just  a bit -- a teensy bit -- of drama on this tour? I know I shouldn't, but I kind of am. Imagine the awful things that could happen!  >:D)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 11:19:23 AM
Mike's had a dodgy back for a few years now. Funny, he can still do close to 100 shows a year, and not sitting down, either.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on February 25, 2012, 11:44:52 AM
Mike will still be performing at 100 in a wheelchair, hooked up to an iv drip, mark my words.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Rocker on February 25, 2012, 11:57:53 AM
Has Brian any concerts before the first Beach Boys show ? If not, there's a lot of time for his back to get better


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on February 25, 2012, 12:20:55 PM
Reminds me of that quote from Dennis many years ago - something about "we'll still be on stage in our wheel chairs", or something like that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: buddhahat on February 26, 2012, 02:21:05 PM
I'm a bit out of the loop with all this 50th anniversary stuff, my thirst for BB discussion temporarily sated by the Smile box release  8)

However I feel the inevitable twitching of curiosity, the inexorable pull of the Smiley board ....

I haven't had a chance to read all these pages so am just wondering what the current expectations/rumours are about archival releases or are we still in the dark? Stereo Wild Honey perhaps .... Live In Carnegie Hall .... ?!!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 27, 2012, 12:36:26 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ebb and Flow on March 27, 2012, 01:15:52 PM
In 2009 Summer Love Songs was announced on April 6th and was released on May 19th.  Just because they've been quiet doesn't mean a 50th release isn't being worked on.  Look at what happened with the Smile Sessions.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 27, 2012, 01:30:59 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: GoodToMyBaby on March 27, 2012, 01:32:55 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.
A release date of June 5th is rumored for the reunion album. Nothing is more or less clear than before about the archival releases you pronounce dead. Have a little faith.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 27, 2012, 02:32:32 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

Your guess is, as usual, entirely wrong. The new album will be released on June 5th, coincidentally (or possibly not) two days before the 90-minute "Summer's Gone" PBS TV special. The gameplan never was to have it readied for the start of the tour. Sounds Of Summer has been selling quite nicely since 2003 and needs no repromotion, while the 1993 box set is still in print. As for avid fans looking for new BB CD product, may I direct them towards The Smile Sessions.  Come summer, there will be more BB product. :)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 27, 2012, 03:55:20 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.
[/color]


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on March 27, 2012, 04:29:54 PM
The new album will be released on June 5th, coincidentally (or possibly not) two days before the 90-minute "Summer's Gone" PBS TV special.

drool.............. slobber........ Sign Me Up!

 :afro


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on March 27, 2012, 04:31:36 PM
And will leak a week before that  :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on March 27, 2012, 04:45:52 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.

Phil, well, first of all, you sent me an email telling me you were leaving Smiley Smile....apparently not my friend! But anyways, first off, The Beach Boys just released The SMiLE Sessions in November and they are also releasing a brand new album in June. So that would basically make it 2 new albums in around 7-8 months. Sounds pretty good to me, regardless of the band. Then, the band also says that within the year we will also receive a new best-of and a career-spanning boxset.

First off, I don't understand the obsession with the new best-of. Who cares? Why do you care if their 38th best-of comes out? Do you need to hear "Little Deuce Coupe" in another collection that badly?

Then, the boxset. It's coming. They said it is. It would probably make sense not to release it the same day as their new album. I'm assuming we'll probably see it near the end of the year. And that's fine. We'll probably get more details after the new album is out. Is that so bad? It's not like there is millions of people hanging on worrying about the new Beach Boys archival material. When it comes out, we'll listen if there is enough interesting stuff included. They will release what they want, when the want to. These are ultimately the works of The Beach Boys, and whatever material they want to come out will come out whenever they want it to come out.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 27, 2012, 05:37:27 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.



This is kind of sad and disappointing.

Phil, well, first of all, you sent me an email telling me you were leaving Smiley Smile....apparently not my friend! But anyways, first off, The Beach Boys just released The SMiLE Sessions in November and they are also releasing a brand new album in June. So that would basically make it 2 new albums in around 7-8 months. Sounds pretty good to me, regardless of the band. Then, the band also says that within the year we will also receive a new best-of and a career-spanning boxset.

First off, I don't understand the obsession with the new best-of. Who cares? Why do you care if their 38th best-of comes out? Do you need to hear "Little Deuce Coupe" in another collection that badly?

Then, the boxset. It's coming. They said it is. It would probably make sense not to release it the same day as their new album. I'm assuming we'll probably see it near the end of the year. And that's fine. We'll probably get more details after the new album is out. Is that so bad? It's not like there is millions of people hanging on worrying about the new Beach Boys archival material. When it comes out, we'll listen if there is enough interesting stuff included. They will release what they want, when the want to. These are ultimately the works of The Beach Boys, and whatever material they want to come out will come out whenever they want it to come out.

I agree that we hardly need another 2-CD greatest hits collection(since Capitol already has several of them on the market)but Mr.Doe has hinted that such a project is in the works. But if Capitol includes a few new remixes, it would give completists a reason to buy it. For the past few decades, the way that the music industry has operated, is that a singer or group tours to promote its latest album, and the tour & album release are closely coordinated. Why does that concept suddenly seem so strange to you guys?

As for The Beach Boys not having to release anything if they don't want to, that is undoubtedly correct. My view(now that we've gotten the most eagerly sought Beach Boys material: Smile), is this: If they want to release more CD's(whether newly recorded material or archival material), then they will(and I'll buy them), and if they don't want to release such product, then they won't. I will leave you with a quote from the booklet from the "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" box set: "Maybe one day, The Beach Boys will make one last extraordinary record.  Maybe they won't. Certainly, as you'll hear on this collection, they've given us a lifetime supply of sublime sound."

Maybe they'll release all these rumored CD projects, or maybe they won't, but we'd all prefer that they do release them, and we're here to make it known that there ARE people out here who would buy these CD's.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 27, 2012, 05:49:06 PM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.

Phil, well, first of all, you sent me an email telling me you were leaving Smiley Smile....apparently not my friend!

Sorry, I got bored, and I probably knew (even before I posted) that this particular discussion thread was basically a dead end street. And so it was........ and is.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 27, 2012, 06:58:00 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 27, 2012, 07:18:39 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 27, 2012, 07:35:56 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.
GO AWAY PHIL


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on March 27, 2012, 08:36:18 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.

Haven't you learned to trust AGD yet?

What has he ever been wrong about besides my ability to operate or not operate a CD player??? (actually, he was right about that too)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 27, 2012, 09:09:44 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.

Oh ok then!

The person who decided to restart this thread after a month with no new information must be a right tool then huh?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: bossaroo on March 27, 2012, 09:26:05 PM
no idea why i'm engaging, but here goes...

first, this tour is celebrating the Beach Boys 50th anniversary, not their new album.

secondly, the commemorative releases are not "rumored" ...they were confirmed in official press release.

and finally... THERE IS NO WALL OF SECRECY. Try saying that aloud, Phil. Repeat it a few times. Write it on an index card and keep it in your pocket. Take it out and look at it from time to time. I hope this helps.  ;)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 27, 2012, 11:52:19 PM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.

No information ?

Newly recorded album released on June 5th, including tracks entitled "Why God Made The Radio"and "Beaches In Mind"... 90-minute PBS TV special with previously unseen live footage... 'career-spanning' box set (i.e. it goes beyond 1988 unlike the 1993 release)... new best of (and why not - they sell)... other archival releases.

Oh, and a 60 date tour.  :)

And that's just the information that's been made public. I'm confident there are surprises up sleeves.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 28, 2012, 12:07:21 AM

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


True dat!

Sorry you got bored Phil but can you take your feud with AGD elsewhere please?

We're not feuding at the moment. With no information about the "50th Anniversary" product, there's nothing to keep this thread going.

No information ?

Newly recorded album released on June 5th, including tracks entitled "Why God Made The Radio"and "Beaches In Mind"... 90-minute PBS TV special with previously unseen live footage... 'career-spanning' box set (i.e. it goes beyond 1988 unlike the 1993 release)... new best of (and why not - they sell)... other archival releases.

Oh, and a 60 date tour.  :)

And that's just the information that's been made public. I'm confident there are surprises up sleeves.
Like an Oceania Leg of the tour?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 28, 2012, 01:45:08 AM
For the past few decades, the way that the music industry has operated, is that a singer or group tours to promote its latest album, and the tour & album release are closely coordinated. Why does that concept suddenly seem so strange to you guys?

Music doesn't sell like it used to so most bands are touring even when they don't have a new album or a popular single because it is the only way for them to make money.

"The way the music industry has operated" has completely changed in the past decade.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 28, 2012, 02:01:21 AM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.

Phil, well, first of all, you sent me an email telling me you were leaving Smiley Smile....apparently not my friend!

Sorry, I got bored, and I probably knew (even before I posted) that this particular discussion thread was basically a dead end street. And so it was........ and is.

You could have spent the time learning how to use the "quote" function properly for starters.

Thread popularity goes up and down all the time. Have  a look at how many other threads have come and gone since this one was last at its peak.  Just cos no-one's talking about something doesn't mean it won't be revived. After all, you've revived it, even though you've nothing constructive to offer, just the usual pessimism about the sky falling down and the end of the world being nigh.

By the way, I think I've found the unconventional, non-qwerty keyboard you were struggling with a while back:

(http://www.comparestoreprices.co.uk/images/vt/vtech-dora-the-explorer-laptop.jpg)

If you need technical advice, my daughter's home from playgroup after 12.

Are you the real Phil Cohen?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Val on March 28, 2012, 02:15:49 AM
Phil is a bit of an old misery guts, isn't he?  Sorry, Phil, but...

I definitely think we can expect some surprises along this journey and not abandon all hope etc. etc.

back to Life...but with one eye on the big Beach Ball...


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 28, 2012, 02:43:00 AM
Phil is a bit of an old misery guts, isn't he?  Sorry, Phil, but...

I definitely think we can expect some surprises along this journey and not abandon all hope etc. etc.

back to Life...but with one eye on the big Beach Ball...

Not sure this is the same Phil who first showed up here…


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 07:59:53 AM
It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.

Phil, well, first of all, you sent me an email telling me you were leaving Smiley Smile....apparently not my friend!

Sorry, I got bored, and I probably knew (even before I posted) that this particular discussion thread was basically a dead end street. And so it was........ and is.

You could have spent the time learning how to use the "quote" function properly for starters.


Occasionally, due to a malfunction in the website's system, despite my posting my response properly, my response  appears as part of the quote, rather than appearing separately.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on March 28, 2012, 09:42:42 AM
Newly recorded album released on June 5th, including tracks entitled "Why God Made The Radio"and "Beaches In Mind".....

Again, this is such wonderful news.  Truly, 2011 and 2012 are the best years ever, Ever, for Beach Boys fans!

How soon will the track lists be made public?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 11:53:19 AM

Occasionally, due to a malfunction in the website's system, despite my posting my response properly, my response  appears as part of the quote, rather than appearing separately.


Thats it then. This sites days are numbered! :thud


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 28, 2012, 12:02:45 PM
Why can't Phil be banned the hell off this board, he is just troll with a "feud" with AGD at this point.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 12:05:15 PM
Why can't Phil be banned the hell off this board, he is just troll with a "feud" with AGD at this point.

We don't have any feud at the moment. Our recent exchanges have been comparatively polite. Read them.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 28, 2012, 12:11:51 PM
Why can't Phil be banned the hell off this board, he is just troll with a "feud" with AGD at this point.

We don't have any feud at the moment. Our recent exchanges have been comparatively polite. Read them.
Don't pretend your not mad at AGD, your still pissed at him proving your smile box doom predictions incorrect. You just want to see him be incorrect about a new boxset, hence why you are ignoring the BBs new tour and album.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 12:21:50 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

By contrast, in this year's vaguely promised projects, we are talking about less sensitive, less controversial materials, that are unlikely to rock the boat with any of the surviving members: a reunion album, a 2-CD hits set, an updated box set, and (perhaps) a CD/DVD set of early 1970's concert recordings, and (perhaps) stereo remixes of several (previously) mono-only albums. There is nothing in any of those projects that is likely to cause any conflict amongst the surviving Beach Boys. Then, is there really a need for extreme secretiveness this time?

By the way, the CD/DVD set of early 1970's concert recordings could very well happen. Mark Linett publicly stated that he was working on such a project at the same time that he stated that he was doing research and tape cataloging on "Smile" tapes(this was 2 to 3 years before the "Smile" box was announced)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 12:25:56 PM
Why can't Phil be banned the hell off this board, he is just troll with a "feud" with AGD at this point.

We don't have any feud at the moment. Our recent exchanges have been comparatively polite. Read them.
Don't pretend your not mad at AGD, your still pissed at him proving your smile box doom predictions incorrect. You just want to see him be incorrect about a new boxset, hence why you are ignoring the BBs new tour and album.

Wrong. I'm happy that the "Smile Sessions" box was released. Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence. All we know concerning the reunion album is that a "TBD"(to be determined, yet to be titled) Beach Boys album has a tentative June release, on the forthcoming release lists of EMI affiliates in several European countries. We assume that this album is the reunion album. I hope so.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 28, 2012, 12:36:54 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

By contrast, in this year's vaguely promised projects, we are talking about less sensitive, less controversial materials, that are unlikely to rock the boat with any of the surviving members: a reunion album, a 2-CD hits set, an updated box set, and (perhaps) a CD/DVD set of early 1970's concert recordings, and (perhaps) stereo remixes of several (previously) mono-only albums. There is nothing in any of those projects that is likely to cause any conflict amongst the surviving Beach Boys. Then, is there really a need for extreme secretiveness this time?

I'm excited for when five months after the release of the new stuff, you justify what you call silence thereby rendering all your complaints invalid again.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 28, 2012, 12:38:23 PM
Why can't Phil be banned the hell off this board, he is just troll with a "feud" with AGD at this point.

We don't have any feud at the moment. Our recent exchanges have been comparatively polite. Read them.
Don't pretend your not mad at AGD, your still pissed at him proving your smile box doom predictions incorrect. You just want to see him be incorrect about a new boxset, hence why you are ignoring the BBs new tour and album.

Wrong. I'm happy that the "Smile Sessions" box was released. Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence. All we know concerning the reunion album is that a "TBD"(to be determined, yet to be titled) Beach Boys album has a tentative June release, on the forthcoming release lists of EMI affiliates in several European countries. We assume that this album is the reunion album. I hope so.
Planning and releasing product takes time, companies don't have any obligation for constant updates to the fans. All they can say is if the product is coming out or not. Capitol said the box would be released in 2011, and it was November 1, 2011.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 12:42:56 PM
If there weren't such an extreme silence concerning the 2012 product, then we'd be discussing that product on this forum now, and we'd be getting excited and overjoyed about what we would (soon?) be getting. Would that positive advance "buzz" be such a bad thing? it's called promotion, and other labels and artists do create advance buzz.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on March 28, 2012, 12:53:06 PM
Wrong. I'm happy that the "Smile Sessions" box was released. Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence. All we know concerning the reunion album is that a "TBD"(to be determined, yet to be titled) Beach Boys album has a tentative June release, on the forthcoming release lists of EMI affiliates in several European countries. We assume that this album is the reunion album. I hope so.

Funnily enough, I don't recall anyone worrying and only one very vocal Chicken Little. Sounds oddly familiar this time around too.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 01:27:31 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

By contrast, in this year's vaguely promised projects, we are talking about less sensitive, less controversial materials, that are unlikely to rock the boat with any of the surviving members: a reunion album, a 2-CD hits set, an updated box set, and (perhaps) a CD/DVD set of early 1970's concert recordings, and (perhaps) stereo remixes of several (previously) mono-only albums. There is nothing in any of those projects that is likely to cause any conflict amongst the surviving Beach Boys. Then, is there really a need for extreme secretiveness this time?

I'm excited for when five months after the release of the new stuff, you justify what you call silence thereby rendering all your complaints invalid again.

Even when I'm trying to be more conciliatory, you guys keep bashing me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 01:46:17 PM
Wrong. I'm happy that the "Smile Sessions" box was released. Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence. All we know concerning the reunion album is that a "TBD"(to be determined, yet to be titled) Beach Boys album has a tentative June release, on the forthcoming release lists of EMI affiliates in several European countries. We assume that this album is the reunion album. I hope so.

Funnily enough, I don't recall anyone worrying and only one very vocal Chicken Little. Sounds oddly familiar this time around too.

The same. Most here looked at things in a positive way. More material had been found, better final product, waiting on the ok for the original artwork. That kind of thing.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 01:51:00 PM

By contrast, in this year's vaguely promised projects, we are talking about less sensitive, less controversial materials, that are unlikely to rock the boat with any of the surviving members: a reunion album, a 2-CD hits set, an updated box set, and (perhaps) a CD/DVD set of early 1970's concert recordings, and (perhaps) stereo remixes of several (previously) mono-only albums. There is nothing in any of those projects that is likely to cause any conflict amongst the surviving Beach Boys. Then, is there really a need for extreme secretiveness this time?


I look forward to surprises on my birthday and Christmas. Not all of us want to know in advance. Perhaps the secretiveness this time is a result of some fans seeing the negative each time a delay in the boxset occured.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 28, 2012, 02:35:33 PM
Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence.

I wasn't worried one bit, even after two or three release dates were rescheduled. Didn't bother me because I knew the delays were due to the fact that they needed more time to get a good high quality product out.  And they did.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on March 28, 2012, 02:37:27 PM
Capitol & the group did cause many fans needless worry during the 5 months of silence.

I wasn't worried one bit, even after two or three release dates were rescheduled. Didn't bother me because I knew the delays were due to the fact that they needed more time to get a good high quality product out.  And they did.

This x a ridiculously high number.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 28, 2012, 02:39:11 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

Once again, you demonstrate that you've neither the least concept of what you're talking about, or what really happened. I admire your consistency. The box was released, in a form expanded from the original three-disc concept (that's a hint, btw) and no amount of theorising on your part can change the inescapable fact that every last thing you claimed about the box being delayed was wrong... and now you've bumped a long-dormant thread for the sole purpose of doing the ashes & sackcloth routine once more: if anything is "kind of sad and disappointing" then it's this.

(... and walks away)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: southbay on March 28, 2012, 02:47:30 PM
This whole thing could easily be solved if people just ignored him...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 02:57:22 PM
This whole thing could easily be solved if people just ignored him...

The whole thing could also easily be solved if Capitol revealed at least some information, then we'd have something positive to discuss(the music) , but instead we're sniping at each other.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 03:02:42 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

Once again, you demonstrate that you've neither the least concept of what you're talking about, or what really happened. I admire your consistency. The box was released, in a form expanded from the original three-disc concept (that's a hint, btw) and no amount of theorising on your part can change the inescapable fact that every last thing you claimed about the box being delayed was wrong... and now you've bumped a long-dormant thread for the sole purpose of doing the ashes & sackcloth routine once more: if anything is "kind of sad and disappointing" then it's this.

(... and walks away)

Why was the thread long-dormant? Because Capitol won't reveal the information that would give us something positive to discuss: the music(i.E. the original purpose of this thread: to discuss the contents of the "50th Anniversary" CD releases).


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 28, 2012, 03:11:40 PM
 :-X


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on March 28, 2012, 03:30:03 PM
In retrospect, there may have been legitimate reasons for the 5 months of silence during the creation of the "Smile" box. Capitol & the box set's compilers were walking on eggshells, dealing with the permission givers over recordings whose creation(in the 1960's) left still-raw emotional wounds and interpersonal resentments amongst the surviving Beach Boys. If any of the permission givers had gotten offended during the compiling process, the box set project could have easily derailed(if any one of the permission givers had withdrawn their permission). It may be that the 5 month silence reduced the chance of that happening.

Once again, you demonstrate that you've neither the least concept of what you're talking about, or what really happened. I admire your consistency. The box was released, in a form expanded from the original three-disc concept (that's a hint, btw) and no amount of theorising on your part can change the inescapable fact that every last thing you claimed about the box being delayed was wrong... and now you've bumped a long-dormant thread for the sole purpose of doing the ashes & sackcloth routine once more: if anything is "kind of sad and disappointing" then it's this.

(... and walks away)

Why was the thread long-dormant? Because Capitol won't reveal the information that would give us something positive to discuss: the music(i.E. the original purpose of this thread: to discuss the contents of the "50th Anniversary" CD releases).

You're just looking for attention. We have an original album, PBS documentary and 60-date tour confirmed. Whether you like it or not, it's clear from TSS experience that Capitol doesn't blow smoke these days when it comes to BB releases, either. If they say it's coming out, it will. They might not drip feed us news, but they deliver in the end. It's nonsense to expect anything else at this point.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on March 28, 2012, 03:40:11 PM
... ... We have an original album, PBS documentary and 60-date tour confirmed. Whether you like it or not, it's clear from TSS experience that Capitol doesn't blow smoke these days when it comes to BB releases, either. If they say it's coming out, it will. They might not drip feed us news, but they deliver in the end. It's nonsense to expect anything else at this point.

I'd go so far as to say that The Beach Boys are the Crown Jewel of Capitol Records and they (Capitol) finally know it!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on March 28, 2012, 03:51:07 PM
The notion that a company should release info for the soul purpose of forum discussion makes me  :lol.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on March 28, 2012, 03:57:00 PM
maybe they are simply still figuring the specifics out right now and that's why we don't know anything..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 28, 2012, 03:59:10 PM
This whole thing could easily be solved if people just ignored him...

The whole thing could also easily be solved if Capitol revealed at least some information, then we'd have something positive to discuss(the music) , but instead we're sniping at each other.
You would just whinge about whatever they said..

Don't you get it the whole world knows except you!! Your stuck in a matrix of self doubt and pity, thus not revealing the true revelations of the 5oth anniversary celebrations.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 04:07:31 PM
... ... We have an original album, PBS documentary and 60-date tour confirmed. Whether you like it or not, it's clear from TSS experience that Capitol doesn't blow smoke these days when it comes to BB releases, either. If they say it's coming out, it will. They might not drip feed us news, but they deliver in the end. It's nonsense to expect anything else at this point.

I'd go so far as to say that The Beach Boys are the Crown Jewel of Capitol Records and they (Capitol) finally know it!


Let's not be delusional. Beatles music is EMI's commercially most important product.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 04:16:33 PM
Thats not what he said.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 04:24:52 PM
Let's be matter of fact. We are fans(meaning fanatics, and in the case of this group's music, completists that will buy any new CD product), but to the general public(even people that have a reasonable fondness for Beach Boys music), they are content with a Greatest Hits CD, and perhaps a few of the group's most famous albums("Pet Sounds","Surfin' U.S.A.","All Summer Long", "Summer Days...and Summer Nights!"). Even if some of those mainstream consumers are aware of Capitol's vague December 2011 announcement of a reunion album or archival products, after a certain number of months or seasons,  if the product(or release announcement) doesn't materialize, those consumers' memories of the December 2011 announcement will eventually fade away.

The sort of people who post here(or on similar fan forums) are the people who care the most about these proposed CD's . The typical CD or download consumer either doesn't know about this proposed CD product, or doesn't care. Without a certain amount of completist fans, there would be no reason for Capitol to release these CD's.

Whether you are pessimistic or optimistic that Capitol will eventually release some or all of these CD projects, the people on this forum are the keepers of the flame(keeping the subject of these proposed CD's afloat), no matter how discouraging(at some points) things may  get.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 28, 2012, 04:29:52 PM
Let's be matter of fact. We are fans(meaning fanatics, and in the case of this group's music, completists that will buy any new CD product), but to the general public(even people that have a reasonable fondness for Beach Boys music), they are content with a Greatest Hits CD, and perhaps a few of the group's most famous albums("Pet Sounds","Surfin' U.S.A.","All Summer Long", "Summer Days...and Summer Nights!"). Even if some of those mainstream consumers are aware of Capitol's vague December 2011 announcement of a reunion album or archival products, after a certain number of months or seasons,  if the product(or release announcement) doesn't materialize, those consumers' memories of the December 2011 announcement will eventually fade away.

The sort of people who post here(or on similar fan forums) are the people who care the most about these proposed CD's . The typical CD or download consumer either doesn't know about this proposed CD product, or doesn't care. Without a certain amount of completist fans, there would be no reason for Capitol to release these CD's.

Whether you are pessimistic or optimistic that Capitol will eventually release some or all of these CD projects, the people on this forum are the keepers of the flame(keeping the subject of these proposed CD's afloat), no matter how discouraging(at some points) things may  get.
Go away


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 28, 2012, 04:30:11 PM
Let's be matter of fact. We are fans(meaning fanatics, and in the case of this group's music, completists that will buy any new CD product), but to the general public(even people that have a reasonable fondness for Beach Boys music), they are content with a Greatest Hits CD, and perhaps a few of the group's most famous albums("Pet Sounds","Surfin' U.S.A.","All Summer Long", "Summer Days...and Summer Nights!"). Even if some of those mainstream consumers are aware of Capitol's vague December 2011 announcement of a reunion album or archival products, after a certain number of months or seasons,  if the product(or release announcement) doesn't materialize, those consumers' memories of the December 2011 announcement will eventually fade away.

The sort of people who post here(or on similar fan forums) are the people who care the most about these proposed CD's . The typical CD or download consumer either doesn't know about this proposed CD product, or doesn't care. Without a certain amount of completist fans, there would be no reason for Capitol to release these CD's.

Whether you are pessimistic or optimistic that Capitol will eventually release some or all of these CD projects, the people on this forum are the keepers of the flame(keeping the subject of these proposed CD's afloat), no matter how discouraging(at some points) things may  get.
*logs off computer, turns on ion turntable with Smile sessions LP.*


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 04:30:48 PM
A related reply from Ponghit after meeting Alan Boyd last week.  

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12489.75.html

In part....

   Then he said had prepared an iTunes playlist for me, consisting of 86 tracks. After the paramedics arrived to resuscitate my ticker, I geeked-out with his headphones and iPad for... a couple hours, I guess. Here are some specifics from my memories:

   I believe the dates ranged from circa 1963, the 'Audree tapes,' to 1996, the S&S sessions. Many tracks were familiar titles — things like "Little Bird" with BGV & track (no lead), vocal-only of "Time To Get Alone," and "We're Together Again" with strings — but also many completely unreleased titles. I think all eras were represented, including solo Mike.


 "Live Again" is as great as rumored, but not a departure from Dennis's style of the period. "Cuddle Up"/"Old Movie" (2 different tracks/takes) is possibly even moodier and more dramatic/emotional than "Live Again." "Little Red Book" is very cool. "My Solution" is a funny oddity, experimental and interesting — but rough, and ultimately not a terribly important part of the canon; understandably unreleased. Dennis's "Ecology," however, while also experimental and rough, I thought it was of more consequence. Another very cool thing that I hadn't known about is Dennis & Carl's "Barnyard" (no connection to the SMILE tune?). I thought Brian's lead on the 1974 "California Feeling" sounded so odd that I wasn't even sure it was him — Carl's later retake sounds 'right' to my ears. There was an aborted "2,000 Years" string intro/overture for Dennis's "Friday Nights" that contained dated, sitar-sounding elements. Dennis's piano demo of "Be With Me" is a great fly-on-the wall moment. "All Day, All Night" was a highly-repetitive mediation that became "Whistle In." Alternate version of "Add Some Music" is very good, different lyrics. "Walkin'" and "Where Is She?" are SUNFLOWER outtakes. The "Caroline, No" BGV from S&S sessions were shockingly gorgeous, and have a "My Prayer" vibe. And I remember a few live tracks: "Please Let Me Wonder" (1965?), "All I Want To Do," and "Wild Honey" (1972-'73?).

   Overall impression: this batch of material demonstrates, once again, the dynamic and diverse body of work our favorite band created. But it requires the painstaking efforts of people like Alan and Mark Linett to mine the archives for nuggets of gold — and I'm convinced they have the BB's integrity in mind; that's their motivation. (The ENDLESS HARMONY film and HAWTHORNE comp. being just 2 examples.)

   More specifically, based on this collection, I'm guessing most of the best of the unreleased early/'golden era' material has already been tapped — of course, I'd love to be wrong about this presumption. Aficionados of the later periods (post-SMILE), however, have a lot to look forward to if/when these things see the light of day.

   Apparently the music I heard is being potentially considered for a proposed archive compilation, because he asked me which of the tracks stand-out as things that should definitely be released. And Alan is aware of this forum, of course, and reads it occasionally, so our input might have an influence, to an extent.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 04:31:50 PM
The notion that a company should release info for the soul purpose of forum discussion makes me  :lol.

But if they(Capitol) don't care enough to keep this proposed/upcoming  CD product in the consumers' consciousness, then why should anyone else(other than a bunch of hardcore Beach Boys CD collectors) care?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 04:40:53 PM
Because it is only a 'bunch of hardcore Beach Boys CD collectors' who will buy it!

CD's don't cost as much to produce as they once did. Heck....I would just pay for a itunes version of most unreleased stuff. How much would that cost Capitol to release? Nothing, aside from any copy right issues I guess.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 05:02:19 PM
The notion that a company should release info for the soul purpose of forum discussion makes me  :lol.

But if they(Capitol) don't care enough to keep this proposed/upcoming  CD product in the consumers' consciousness, then why should anyone else(other than a bunch of hardcore Beach Boys CD collectors) care?


Those guys at Apple must be right dummies for not promoting the ipad 4 yet!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 28, 2012, 07:04:58 PM
This has become the Frowny Frown forum; a joyless thing. My attempt to revive this discussion led us all right back to where we were. No progress has been made towards getting the desired information.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 28, 2012, 08:18:26 PM
No progress has been made towards getting the desired information.

Huh?

Again, Ponghit wrote above.

....Apparently the music I heard is being potentially considered for a proposed archive compilation, because he asked me which of the tracks stand-out as things that should definitely be released. And Alan is aware of this forum, of course, and reads it occasionally, so our input might have an influence, to an extent.









Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 28, 2012, 10:45:27 PM
And Alan is aware of this forum, of course, and reads it occasionally, so our input might have an influence, to an extent.

Not just Alan. Oh no indeed.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on March 28, 2012, 11:15:51 PM
And Alan is aware of this forum, of course, and reads it occasionally, so our input might have an influence, to an extent.

Not just Alan. Oh no indeed.
The Beach Boys should  come to Australia in 2012


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 28, 2012, 11:16:49 PM
This has become the Frowny Frown forum; a joyless thing. My attempt to revive this discussion led us all right back to where we were. No progress has been made towards getting the desired information.

Your original post, positive in yellow, negative in red:

"It is now obvious that neither the reunion album or the 50-song hits collection(that Mr.Doe spoke of) will be ready for release to coincide with the start of the tour. A reunion album may (possibly) be released this summer, but what is the fate of the "commemorative" releases?

My guess, is that in the absence of any new product to sell(in conjunction with the tour) that Capitol will press more copies of "Sounds of Summer", "Endless Summer" or "Good Vibrations:30 Years of The Beach Boys" and re-promote those products, but for the avid fans looking for new Beach Boys CD product to buy, they are(indefinitely) out of luck. But, to be realistic, the re-promoting of those existing products will be quite satisfactory to the general public, and make plenty of money for Capitol.

And, I should note, that without the feud between Myself & Mr.Doe to keep this thread alive(or at least my presence, to enable people to use me as a scapegoat), this thread quietly came to a halt more than a month ago. I was correct in saying, that with Capitol continuing to stonewall it with the wall of secrecy, that, with respect to archival CD product, there is really nothing more to discuss.

This is kind of sad and disappointing.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 29, 2012, 01:40:12 AM
Ok, for bettter or worse this thread is up and running again so lets move on.

Andrew or others. What about those songs mentioned by Ponghit?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on March 29, 2012, 01:44:54 AM
Jesus Christ, Phil. You don't advertise things by constantly saying 'hey, this album that hasn't been finished and these compilations that haven't been finalised, mastered, designed or whathaveyou is coming out many many months from now, but as they aren't done we can't tell you when!' week in week out. It's all ready when it's ready, and will all be marketed accordingly. I noticed you didn't respond to the news that over 80 tracks are being considered for the rarities set. mind.

Patience is a virtue, mate.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 29, 2012, 02:39:10 AM
Phil's trolling; getting this reaction turns him on.  He needs a bucket of cold water throwing over him to cool his arousal.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 29, 2012, 04:10:08 AM
Been dreamin' bout them boner tracks  :lol

Dreaming and boner tracks kinda go hand in hand, John.  :P

You forgot to include a bit of gymnastics.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on March 29, 2012, 04:51:35 AM
Possibly just a coincidence, but my local branch of HMV now has 5, yes, 5 Beach Boys CDs in stock instead of 2 they had this time last year

Today/Summer Days
Pet Sounds
Sunflower/Surf's Up
Sounds of Summer
SMiLE (1 and 2 disk configurations)

Now would be the time to start putting this all into motion with regards to restocking CDs, and I stand by what I said earlier in this thread that they should be putting stickers on all the previous CDs with the 50th logo on to start generating some interest.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on March 29, 2012, 05:01:13 AM
A related reply from Ponghit after meeting Alan Boyd last week.  

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12489.75.html

 "Live Again" is as great as rumored, but not a departure from Dennis's style of the period.
To me, it's derived from "Golden Slumbers," but with rounded edges.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on March 29, 2012, 10:38:16 AM
Glad to see that our little ray of sunshine is back, Phil, what is the obsession with the phrase 'CD product', you use it with strange regularity. As for the rest of your posts, this -  :violin


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 29, 2012, 11:53:31 AM
Glad to see that our little ray of sunshine is back, Phil, what is the obsession with the phrase 'CD product'

It's a record industry term. I guess that term is familiar to me, since I was a CD box set compiler in the 1990's. "CD product" would cover all possibilities; newly recorded material, album remasters & reissues, compilations & box sets. It is all "CD product". Industries produce "Product".  The music biz is an industry. Pop music is an art form, but it is a commercial art form. The companies who market this commercial art are,collectively, an industry.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on March 29, 2012, 12:16:39 PM
Glad to see that our little ray of sunshine is back, Phil, what is the obsession with the phrase 'CD product'

It's a record industry term. I guess that term is familiar to me, since I was a CD box set compiler in the 1990's. "CD product" would cover all possibilities; newly recorded material, album remasters & reissues, compilations & box sets. It is all "CD product". Industries produce "Product".  The music biz is an industry. Pop music is an art form, but it is a commercial art form. The companies who market this commercial art are,collectively, an industry.

I would just say CD's, saves quite a lot of typing and people would still understand what you meant even with the superfluous 'product' missing. Oh, and I'm quite aware that the music industry treats everything as a product. You confuse me Phil, I looked back through some of your posts when you first joined this board and you seem to have a genuine passion for the band, which makes the position you have taken over the past 12 months all the more strange. I think you perhaps need a hug.  :hug


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 29, 2012, 02:05:16 PM
Glad to see that our little ray of sunshine is back, Phil, what is the obsession with the phrase 'CD product'

It's a record industry term. I guess that term is familiar to me, since I was a CD box set compiler in the 1990's. "CD product" would cover all possibilities; newly recorded material, album remasters & reissues, compilations & box sets. It is all "CD product". Industries produce "Product".  The music biz is an industry. Pop music is an art form, but it is a commercial art form. The companies who market this commercial art are,collectively, an industry.

I would just say CD's, saves quite a lot of typing and people would still understand what you meant even with the superfluous 'product' missing. Oh, and I'm quite aware that the music industry treats everything as a product. You confuse me Phil, I looked back through some of your posts when you first joined this board and you seem to have a genuine passion for the band, which makes the position you have taken over the past 12 months all the more strange. I think you perhaps need a hug.  :hug

I do have a genuine passion for the band. Though I rarely go to concerts in the 21st century, the one time that I went to a Beach Boys concert was at a time when "Friends" was the group's latest album(the "Do It Again" single had been released, but the "20/20" album had yet to be released). The concert hall(Miami Beach Auditorium, now known as "The Theater of the Performing Arts") was nearly full, but no local department store had the "Friends" album, so I special ordered it(I had seen an advertisement for the album in a local music newspaper, and liked the colorful album cover). There were no dedicated record stores in my area until the end of 1968. I bought the "Friends" album because I had liked the group's previous albums. "Friends" didn't get any airplay. I hadn't heard the album before buying it.

In the 21st century ,the music industry has become a paranoid, belligerent "Big Brother" type of industry, but, obviously, older artists such as The Beach Boys(who are from an earlier era) are not to blame for what the music industry has recently become.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 29, 2012, 03:14:47 PM
It is a bit disappointing that the compiling of the proposed box set or outtakes collection is only beginning now(which is suggested by a forum member who recently met Alan Boyd), which reduces the chance that it will be released this year. Even if the compiling work, artwork & liner notes are completed in the next 90 days, Capitol may decide, after releasing a reunion album, that they don't want another "new" Beach Boys CD release competing against the reunion album.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 29, 2012, 03:27:22 PM
Phil. You are making progress. Stay positive! ;D

For all we know those 86 (?) songs mentioned, or some of them, may already be well into being considered for a release this year. Ponghit was just asked his opinion. Probably not but any project could be more advanced than was let on.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 29, 2012, 03:28:48 PM
*sigh* Phil, why do you predict doom for every BBs project...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 29, 2012, 03:45:24 PM
The title of this thread is "What 'commemorative releases' should we expect for the 50th anniversary" ?  The answer, according to our resident voice of doom is "none whatsoever", thus I humbly suggest we close, indeed scrub, this whole thread, as we all know that what he says inevitably comes to pass and we are therefore only wasting our time here.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on March 29, 2012, 03:46:12 PM
But we LIKE shooting fish in a barrel!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on March 29, 2012, 03:46:42 PM
Even if the compiling work, artwork & liner notes are completed in the next 90 days, Capitol may decide, after releasing a reunion album, that they don't want another "new" Beach Boys CD release competing against the reunion album.

My guess, is that the Capitol/BB marketing plan will "flood" the market with "product" as you put it, inticing new and old fans to buy BOTH the new Beach Boys album AND some type of rarities/anthology release.  Both packages will be offered in several configurations.

Then, at the same time, announcements will be made about reconfigured catalog releases, all of them which will start to follow 3 - 12 months after the above.  MORE goodies and GREAT music.

The Beach Boys have a LOT going for them these days: the band has reunited for some EPIC concerts, and they are going to produce a new WONDERFUL record in the 21st century.  (Something the Beatles can't do, sadly.)

IT'S GONNA BE A TOTAL BLAST MAN



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on March 29, 2012, 03:48:55 PM

A FREAKING BLAST!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 29, 2012, 04:07:47 PM
*sigh* Phil, why do you predict doom for every BBs project...

My prediction is, in the remaining months of 2012, some of the proposed projects will appear, while others will either be cancelled or "bumped" into 2013. And I would say, that if we don't have an announcement of a finalized title and track listing for the reunion album by early summer, that at least some of the archival projects are in doubt.....or at least in long-term limbo.

When is the time to start worrying? After five months of the Wall of Secrecy have passed(in mid-May 2012).  After all, a five month Wall of Secrecy is what we got after the initial announcement of the "Smile" project.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 29, 2012, 04:20:42 PM
Worry??  I ain't worried at all. If it happens this year, great! If it happens in 2013, great!  It's really not gonna make much difference if new product is released in weeks, months, or years. It's completely out of our control. So why worry??

See?  No worries, no stress, no anxiety.  No runs, no hits, no errors, nobody left on.

Are you just trying to solicit attention here, Phil?   Do you like to bug people just to get their reactions?  Are you getting a big woodie when posters respond to you personally?  Just wondering.  Try to stay positive and have patience, son.  Good things come to those who wait.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 29, 2012, 04:38:46 PM
Just a quick survey.

Last year if the SMiLE set was ready to go in August, would anyone have objected if Capitol had put it on hold until November for the original Holmes artwork alone?


It was delayed for whatever reason, be it artwork, new tracks or the information inclosed. Good things come to those who wait remember.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: bossaroo on March 29, 2012, 05:21:01 PM
Phil-

what was your reaction to Friends when you heard it in '68?

how long had you been a fan? were you familiar with all the albums up to that point? how old were you, if you don't mind me asking?


how was the concert? was the Maharishi present? did they do any Friends songs? did you know that Brian was not part of the performing group? did you even know who Brian Wilson was specifically?


so many questions... I would love to hear more about the show, anything you may recall.

tell us more Phil! tear down this Wall of Secrecy!!!  ;)




Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 29, 2012, 10:47:10 PM
*sigh* Phil, why do you predict doom for every BBs project...

My prediction is, in the remaining months of 2012, some of the proposed projects will appear, while others will either be cancelled or "bumped" into 2013. And I would say, that if we don't have an announcement of a finalized title and track listing for the reunion album by early summer, that at least some of the archival projects are in doubt.....or at least in long-term limbo.

When is the time to start worrying? After five months of the Wall of Secrecy have passed(in mid-May 2012).  After all, a five month Wall of Secrecy is what we got after the initial announcement of the "Smile" project.

The album is being released June 5th to tie in with the TV special. I'm guessing the track list and title will be finalized before that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on March 29, 2012, 10:52:50 PM
*sigh* Phil, why do you predict doom for every BBs project...

My prediction is, in the remaining months of 2012, some of the proposed projects will appear, while others will either be cancelled or "bumped" into 2013. And I would say, that if we don't have an announcement of a finalized title and track listing for the reunion album by early summer, that at least some of the archival projects are in doubt.....or at least in long-term limbo.

When is the time to start worrying? After five months of the Wall of Secrecy have passed(in mid-May 2012).  After all, a five month Wall of Secrecy is what we got after the initial announcement of the "Smile" project.

The album is being released June 5th to tie in with the TV special. I'm guessing the track list and title will be finalized before that.

Happy birthday to me


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 29, 2012, 11:28:01 PM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 29, 2012, 11:59:24 PM
Phil-

what was your reaction to Friends when you heard it in '68?

how long had you been a fan? were you familiar with all the albums up to that point? how old were you, if you don't mind me asking?


how was the concert? was the Maharishi present? did they do any Friends songs? did you know that Brian was not part of the performing group? did you even know who Brian Wilson was specifically?


so many questions... I would love to hear more about the show, anything you may recall.

tell us more Phil! tear down this Wall of Secrecy!!!  ;)




At the time of "Friends" release, I thought that it had only a few good songs, but over the years, the album's tranquil "vibe" grew on me, and the album is now one of my favorites. As for the concert, it was a good show. The group(without Brian or Maharishi) seemed to be playing on their own. There were no visible additional players. I was 12 years old at the time. Somewhere, I still have the concert program booklet, which was strictly photos, no information. I had been collecting Beach Boys records since late 1967, buying "Smiley Smile" first, then(in January 1968) "Wild Honey". In fact, I do remember buying "Wild Honey" at a local department store, buying The Rolling Stones' "Their Satanic Majesties Request" on the same visit. Many sources may describe "Wild Honey" as a December 1967 release, but it wasn't available in my area until January 1968.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on March 30, 2012, 03:24:10 AM
Phil-

what was your reaction to Friends when you heard it in '68?

how long had you been a fan? were you familiar with all the albums up to that point? how old were you, if you don't mind me asking?


how was the concert? was the Maharishi present? did they do any Friends songs? did you know that Brian was not part of the performing group? did you even know who Brian Wilson was specifically?


so many questions... I would love to hear more about the show, anything you may recall.

tell us more Phil! tear down this Wall of Secrecy!!!  ;)




At the time of "Friends" release, I thought that it had only a few good songs, but over the years, the album's tranquil "vibe" grew on me, and the album is now one of my favorites. As for the concert, it was a good show. The group(without Brian or Maharishi) seemed to be playing on their own. There were no visible additional players. I was 12 years old at the time. Somewhere, I still have the concert program booklet, which was strictly photos, no information. I had been collecting Beach Boys records since late 1967, buying "Smiley Smile" first, then(in January 1968) "Wild Honey". In fact, I do remember buying "Wild Honey" at a local department store, buying The Rolling Stones' "Their Satanic Majesties Request" on the same visit. Many sources may describe "Wild Honey" as a December 1967 release, but it wasn't available in my area until January 1968.

It's really a shame they released it when they did. I think if they would have say on it until April/May/June it could have done much better. Darlin' is a summer single for sure and it came too quickly in the aftermath of the summer of love, nobody was ready for something like Wild Honey.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 30, 2012, 08:16:31 AM
Many sources may describe "Wild Honey" as a December 1967 release, but it wasn't available in my area until January 1968.

Including the Capitol Records release sheet for the week ending December 24th 1967: it was released on Monday the 18th.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on March 30, 2012, 08:34:02 AM
Many sources may describe "Wild Honey" as a December 1967 release, but it wasn't available in my area until January 1968.

Including the Capitol Records release sheet for the week ending December 24th 1967: it was released on Monday the 18th.

But, in the 1960's in the U.S.A., even after an album's official release date, there would be a few weeks where you could hear an album's featured single on the (AM) radio, but the album would not(in reality) be available to purchase. This may(or may not) have been because the sellers of records were (typically) department stores during those days. In most parts of the U.S.A.(excepting New York City & Los Angeles), dedicated record stores began to appear simultaneous with the emergence of rock music on FM radio in late 1968; stations which played album tracks & "underground" music. I would know about these things, having lived during that era. I'm the same age as AGD.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 30, 2012, 09:12:55 AM
Me too.  Days apart.

Christmas '67 I received The Beatles' "Yesterday & Today" album with a pasteover butcher cover.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on March 30, 2012, 10:40:29 AM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on March 30, 2012, 11:16:39 AM
Many sources may describe "Wild Honey" as a December 1967 release, but it wasn't available in my area until January 1968.

Including the Capitol Records release sheet for the week ending December 24th 1967: it was released on Monday the 18th.

But, in the 1960's in the U.S.A., even after an album's official release date, there would be a few weeks where you could hear an album's featured single on the (AM) radio, but the album would not(in reality) be available to purchase. This may(or may not) have been because the sellers of records were (typically) department stores during those days. In most parts of the U.S.A.(excepting New York City & Los Angeles), dedicated record stores began to appear simultaneous with the emergence of rock music on FM radio in late 1968; stations which played album tracks & "underground" music. I would know about these things, having lived during that era. I'm the same age as AGD.
We had Tower Records in Sacramento.  They stocked things in a timely fashion.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 30, 2012, 11:28:16 AM
Phil, a point for you to ponder: why do you think last year I was so sure you were 100% wrong concerning every last thing you claimed or theorised about The Smile Sessions (and was proven correct) ?

Got an answer ?  Good. Now apply that to the current situation you've got your shorts in a knot about (again) and you'll understand why I'm laughing fit to bust every time you hit the Eeyore button.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 30, 2012, 11:45:24 AM
Edit.  :P


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 30, 2012, 11:48:32 AM
We had Tower Records in Sacramento.  They stocked things in a timely fashion.

Two Tower Records in Sac. One on Broadway and one on Watt. My Beatles butcher cover came from the one on Broadway. So did my stack of "BB Making of Holland" books. Use to go to this used record store on 9th St. too. And one at 804 'K' Street in the mall. And one on Alhambra. There was a Beach Boys Concert program from '64 for sale in the 9th St. store. My friend asked to look at it, and the guy behind the counter said, "Careful turning the pages, the staples are rusted and it might fall apart".   ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on March 30, 2012, 11:59:38 AM
We had Tower Records in Sacramento.  They stocked things in a timely fashion.

Two Tower Records in Sac. One on Broadway and one on Watt. My Beatles butcher cover came from the one on Broadway. So did my stack of "BB Making of Holland" books. Use to go to this used record store on 9th St. too. And one at 804 'K' Street in the mall. And one on Alhambra. There was a Beach Boys Concert program from '64 for sale in the 9th St. store. My friend asked to look at it, and the guy behind the counter said, "Careful turning the pages, the staples are rusted and it might fall apart".   ;D
Actually, there were three. There was one in South Sac. Was the shopping center called Southgate (On Florin Road, I believe)? Anyway, I rode my bike there to buy Blonde On Blonde, the day it came out.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on March 30, 2012, 12:20:04 PM
Yeah, the third Tower didn't open up until the mid-80's though.

When I was a little kid, I use to live in Southgate, in Parkway Estates off Florin Rd. near the mall.  This was when the first three Beach Boys albums were out and when they first played the Memorial Auditorium.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on March 30, 2012, 06:10:26 PM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 12:18:12 AM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

In as much as both are entirely fictional constructs, I completely agree with you.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 12:50:33 AM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

In as much as both are entirely fictional constructs, I completely agree with you.

It's like water off a troll's back.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on March 31, 2012, 01:02:28 AM
I don't know how many times I need to say it, we desperately need a suicide emoticon.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 01:50:22 AM
I don't know how many times I need to say it, we desperately need a suicide emoticon.

That or the return of the 'ignore' button.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on March 31, 2012, 02:41:02 AM
I wonder if we got you and Phil together in the same room we'd see a good ol' fashioned fist fight.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 31, 2012, 03:09:04 AM
I wonder if we got you and Phil together in the same room we'd see a good ol' fashioned fist fight.

In the mud. Yes! I don't know about their pugilistic skills, however...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 03:33:54 AM
I wonder if we got you and Phil together in the same room we'd see a good ol' fashioned fist fight.

Someone once challenged a writer - the name Voltaire comes to mind - to a duel over something he'd written. His response was along the lines of:

"Very well, since you have challenged me I have the choice of weapons: I choose words. You're dead."  ;D

Or as a tshirt someone gave me years ago put it, "I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent".


Title: Re: What
Post by: Mikie on March 31, 2012, 07:46:37 AM
Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

More like the "Cohen of Silence"......


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 08:29:45 AM
Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

More like the "Cohen of Silence"......



Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 09:02:03 AM
Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

More like the "Cohen of Silence"......

Looks like AGD's speechless for once!

Allow me:

 :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol ;D :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :-D :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol


Title: Re: What
Post by: 18thofMay on March 31, 2012, 11:22:45 AM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.
Your off your wig!


Title: Re: What
Post by: Dunderhead on March 31, 2012, 11:54:30 AM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.
Your off your wig!

Who isn't these days. Governmental corruption, economic disaster, environmental catastrophe, Wilsonian conspiracy. Choose your poison my friend.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on March 31, 2012, 02:47:43 PM
Has Christmas been cancelled guys? It's just that I haven't received a list of the presents I should be getting yet and I get the impression there some Wall of Secrecy going on. Anyone know the date? Maybe it's been bumped into 2013?

"Wall of Secrecy" heh heh heh

Why not the Cone of Silence??

 >:D

For those of you who don't know, The Cone of Silence is a reference to the 1960's comedy program "Get Smart", a comedy-spoof of James Bond-type thrillers, starring Don Adams as Agent Maxwell Smart. When Agent Smart and his superiors were at a meeting and they got underneath the Cone of Silence, no one could hear what anyone else was saying, rendering communication impossible.

Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.
Your off your wig!

Who isn't these days. Governmental corruption, economic disaster, environmental catastrophe, Wilsonian conspiracy. Choose your poison my friend.

Wilsonian conspiracy? More like Capitol(records) punishment.

* Note: The original meaning of the phrase "Capitol Punishment" was Mike Love's description of The Beach Boys' harsh 3 albums per year 1960's recording contract. In the 1960's,the group found clever ways of dealing with the situation: 3 "Best of" L.P.'s, two concert albums, a Christmas Album, a Karaoke album, and a sloppy acoustic hootenanny sing-along album. In fact, it would appear that with "Stack O Tracks", that The Beach Boys invented Karaoke. As for "Live in London", you'll remind me that it wasn't released until 1972(in Holland) & 1976(in the U.S.A.). That's correct, but the recordings themselves were from 1968, and it would appear that the reason why Capitol were ultimately permitted to release it, was so that the group could avoid giving another studio album to Capitol.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 03:15:02 PM
Note: The original meaning of the phrase "Capitol Punishment" was Mike Love's description of The Beach Boys' harsh 3 albums per year 1960's recording contract. In the 1960's,the group found clever ways of dealing with the situation: 3 "Best of" L.P.'s, two concert albums, a Christmas Album, a Karaoke album, and a sloppy acoustic hootenanny sing-along album. In fact, it would appear that with "Stack O Tracks", that The Beach Boys invented Karaoke. As for "Live in London", you'll remind me that it wasn't released until 1972(in Holland) & 1976(in the U.S.A.). That's correct, but the recordings themselves were from 1968, and it would appear that the reason why Capitol were ultimately permitted to release it, was so that the group could avoid giving another studio album to Capitol.

You do write some alarming old tosh for someone who's been involved with the music biz, don't you ?

Firstly, the three Best Of... were the idea of Capitol, not the band, so bang goes your premise on that point. Secondly, Live In London was originally released in May 1970, in the UK, but was handed to Capitol in the US in early 1970 (it was mixed at the Tower in late January that year) in lieu of the Reverberation album the band had prepared for their final Capitol offering but decided to hang on to to use as a basis for the first Reprise release. For whatever reason (probably the fact that it didn't chart in the UK), Capitol declined to release it until 1976.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on March 31, 2012, 07:06:48 PM
Note: The original meaning of the phrase "Capitol Punishment" was Mike Love's description of The Beach Boys' harsh 3 albums per year 1960's recording contract. In the 1960's,the group found clever ways of dealing with the situation: 3 "Best of" L.P.'s, two concert albums, a Christmas Album, a Karaoke album, and a sloppy acoustic hootenanny sing-along album. In fact, it would appear that with "Stack O Tracks", that The Beach Boys invented Karaoke. As for "Live in London", you'll remind me that it wasn't released until 1972(in Holland) & 1976(in the U.S.A.). That's correct, but the recordings themselves were from 1968, and it would appear that the reason why Capitol were ultimately permitted to release it, was so that the group could avoid giving another studio album to Capitol.

You do write some alarming old tosh for someone who's been involved with the music biz, don't you ?

Firstly, the three Best Of... were the idea of Capitol, not the band, so bang goes your premise on that point. Secondly, Live In London was originally released in May 1970, in the UK, but was handed to Capitol in the US in early 1970 (it was mixed at the Tower in late January that year) in lieu of the Reverberation album the band had prepared for their final Capitol offering but decided to hang on to to use as a basis for the first Reprise release. For whatever reason (probably the fact that it didn't chart in the UK), Capitol declined to release it until 1976.

The Netherlands release of "Live in London"(the import that Americans encountered) had to be released 1972 or later, because, inside the gatefold sleeve, there were advertisements for other Bovema/EMI Beach Boys albums, including "Surf's Up"


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 11:40:01 PM
Not denying that, but the UK release - which you seem to be completely unaware of as you didn't mention it ("As for "Live in London", you'll remind me that it wasn't released until 1972(in Holland) & 1976(in the U.S.A.).") - came out two years earlier and was definitely available on import shortly after in the States.

Whatever, it's late here, I've just had a pretty tiring journey and need some sleep as tomorrow could be a most interesting day.


Title: Re: What
Post by: smile-holland on April 01, 2012, 02:51:29 AM
The Netherlands release of "Live in London"(the import that Americans encountered) had to be released 1972 or later, because, inside the gatefold sleeve, there were advertisements for other Bovema/EMI Beach Boys albums, including "Surf's Up"

In The Netherlands Live In London was originally released in March 1971. According to Dutch reviews I've read, probably either in the week of March 22-28th, or a week earlier (15-21st).
I have at least 4 different different pressings, one of them being a copy with a fold-out front, showing part of the Pet Sounds Cover, and with ads for (a.o.) the Surf's Up album. But that probably is a later pressing, which is apparently the one you also have, Phil.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 01, 2012, 03:05:34 AM
I've just had a pretty tiring journey and need some sleep as tomorrow could be a most interesting day.


Really....New album news, expanded tour, re-release news?

Or just a big day in front of the telly? ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 01, 2012, 04:45:26 AM
I've just had a pretty tiring journey and need some sleep as tomorrow could be a most interesting day.


Really....New album news, expanded tour, re-release news?

Or just a big day in front of the telly? ;D

Andrew is going to reveal himself to the world as Supereme Overlord Of The Known And Unknown Universes, just look at his avatar! Unfortunately, due to it being April Fools day no-one will take Andrews proclamation seriously.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:14:50 AM
I've just had a pretty tiring journey and need some sleep as tomorrow could be a most interesting day.


Really....New album news, expanded tour, re-release news?

Or just a big day in front of the telly? ;D

Andrew is going to reveal himself to the world as Supereme Overlord Of The Known And Unknown Universes, just look at his avatar! Unfortunately, due to it being April Fools day no-one will take Andrews proclamation seriously.

 :lol he's going to announce that the new album will make TSS stink.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 01, 2012, 07:15:35 AM
The Netherlands release of "Live in London"(the import that Americans encountered) had to be released 1972 or later, because, inside the gatefold sleeve, there were advertisements for other Bovema/EMI Beach Boys albums, including "Surf's Up"

In The Netherlands Live In London was originally released in March 1971. According to Dutch reviews I've read, probably either in the week of March 22-28th, or a week earlier (15-21st).
I have at least 4 different different pressings, one of them being a copy with a fold-out front, showing part of the Pet Sounds Cover, and with ads for (a.o.) the Surf's Up album. But that probably is a later pressing, which is apparently the one you also have, Phil.



Yes, the pressing that I have is the one with the fold-out front.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on April 01, 2012, 09:08:44 AM
Here are the ones I have.  Back in the mid 70's, the first two were fairly difficult to find new in record stores.

http://www.discogs.com/Beach-Boys-Live-In-London/release/607442

http://www.musicstack.com/item/143491659

http://www.musicstack.com/item/213560412

http://www.discogs.com/Beach-Boys-Live-In-London/release/1943881


Title: Re: What \
Post by: smile-holland on April 01, 2012, 09:20:26 AM
Here are the ones I have.  Back in the mid 70's, the first two were fairly difficult to find new in record stores.

http://www.discogs.com/Beach-Boys-Live-In-London/release/607442

http://www.musicstack.com/item/143491659

http://www.musicstack.com/item/213560412

http://www.discogs.com/Beach-Boys-Live-In-London/release/1943881

the second one (with the Pet Sounds pic) is available in 2 variations: one as a fold out (the 1970 pic being the part that folds out) and one with a standard cover (same layout, but in one piece).  (EDIT: must admit that I can't find the standard cover right away in my collection, but I'm sure it exists)

Live In London can be found in many variations. Unique covers from the UK, Germany, Australia, and South Africa.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on April 01, 2012, 09:40:36 AM
Can't remember if I've ever seen one without the gatefold sleeve (w/Pet Sounds). Just remember I couldn't find ANY copy of Live In London in the Bay Area and ended up finding one at Peaches Records in Los Angeles. That's all they had was ONE. And this was around '74 or '75, not that long after the release!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 01, 2012, 05:25:15 PM

Whatever, it's late here, I've just had a pretty tiring journey and need some sleep as tomorrow could be a most interesting day.

Hmmm....It was posted early morning Uk time yet it is 'late here'.

He's a party animal and just got home.
or
He's visiting Phil (where ever he is) to 'discuss a few matters!'
or
He's in LA. Liner notes for re-releases or such? Taking over falsetto from Jeff and Matt?



Funny sort of comment IMO. And thats from a guy who has said a few! :lol


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on April 02, 2012, 03:32:14 PM
Capitol's Wall of Secrecy is a bit like the Cone of Silence.

More like the "Cohen of Silence"......

hardee hardee har har har

"sorry about that, Chief!"


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on April 03, 2012, 08:29:11 AM
If there's not a "Cohen of Silence", then there's definitely a Cohenspiracy here.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jaco on April 10, 2012, 07:24:06 AM
Ok let's break the silence

Yesterday, the ninth of april I heard an alt mix of Surfin' Safari on the Dutch radio 1.

listen here: http://nos.nl/radiouitzending/9579-met-het-oog-op-morgen-2300-uur.html (http://nos.nl/radiouitzending/9579-met-het-oog-op-morgen-2300-uur.html)

42:42 to 45:38 = almost 3 minutes long!

Alt mix means including overdubbed new instruments.
Now my question is: Has anybody heard this, is this a remix by an outsider, or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jaspy on April 10, 2012, 07:28:08 AM
Thanks for the link!

or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?

please no!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 10, 2012, 07:45:03 AM
Ok let's break the silence

Yesterday, the ninth of april I heard an alt mix of Surfin' Safari on the Dutch radio 1.

listen here: http://nos.nl/radiouitzending/9579-met-het-oog-op-morgen-2300-uur.html (http://nos.nl/radiouitzending/9579-met-het-oog-op-morgen-2300-uur.html)

42:42 to 45:38 = almost 3 minutes long!

Alt mix means including overdubbed new instruments.
Now my question is: Has anybody heard this, is this a remix by an outsider, or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?

I think that's definitely an outside job. None of those overdubs sound like real instruments, it's like a karaoke backing track. Horrible, just horrible. What do the presenters say just before they play the track?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jaco on April 10, 2012, 07:54:12 AM
before: they talk about the american politics, and after: they talk about a surf museum in Great Brittain.

& she only said: these were the Beach Boys, of course


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 10, 2012, 08:18:29 AM
before: they talk about the american politics, and after: they talk about a surf museum in Great Brittain.

& she only said: these were the Beach Boys, of course

Oh right thanks for that! Weird that they would play that instead of the original though! Probably just a mistake by somebody at the station I guess.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jaco on April 10, 2012, 08:43:49 AM
I don't know... it's not a station that would play very obscure mixes, and...

maybe this was done around the time of that other overdub session: the 'new' Do It Again.

I wouldn't be surprised if that piano was played by Scott Bennett. That glissando on the keys is his style.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 10, 2012, 08:52:31 AM
Sounds like they took the vocal from an early take of the song and added modern music to make it sound decent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiEgYq1PxdU


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on April 10, 2012, 08:56:28 AM
I can't imagine that remix being on the new cd,let's be honest if they do a remix it will end up being something with a dance beat,rap/techno,this sounds like a fan mix and sounds real cheesy..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Roger Ryan on April 10, 2012, 08:59:27 AM
The fact that the song is extended via a bad edit back to the second chorus (the rest just repeats) demonstrates how amateurish this track is. Perhaps a test edit for a Beach Boys Rock Band game?  :p


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 10, 2012, 02:59:58 PM
...or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?

I sincerely hope you're joking when you say that. If not then it's the flat-out dumbest thing I've ever seen posted on any BW board, at any time, any where.  >:(


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Custom Machine on April 10, 2012, 03:59:25 PM
Although I frequently checked for Beach Boys product at record stores in the early 70s, i was unaware of the existence of Live in London until sometime in 1972 when a friend bought a copy of the Netherlands pressing at an independent record store.  I rushed over to the store to get a copy as well, but they said they had no more.  They told me they would attempt to get one for me, but both they and the other record stores I contacted were unable to do.  It would be around a year or two later when I finally procured my own copy, which was of the UK pressing. 

I do recall that there was a period of time when the major US record companies discouraged record stores from carrying imports, I think by claiming that the US companies alone had the rights to distribute products in the US by artists who were under contract to those companies.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on April 10, 2012, 10:34:41 PM
...or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?

I sincerely hope you're joking when you say that. If not then it's the flat-out dumbest thing I've ever seen posted on any BW board, at any time, any where.  >:(

Looks like AGD had nails for breakfast again.   :afro


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 11, 2012, 07:13:05 AM
...or is this an official part of a forthcoming 'commemorative release'?

I sincerely hope you're joking when you say that. If not then it's the flat-out dumbest thing I've ever seen posted on any BW board, at any time, any where.  >:(

Looks like AGD had nails for breakfast again.   :afro

Nah, just pointing out that anyone who seriously thinks that pile of sh*t would be on an official 50th anniversary release either needs hearing aids or shouldn't be out in the community without a minder.

I've heard it before somewhere a few years ago.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 12, 2012, 09:09:02 PM
Just spotted that a download-only remastered version of the Surfin' Safari album is scheduled to become available at Amazon Uk on April 19. Don't think this is legit in the usual way and wonder if it's down to a copyright expiry? Is Capitol in danger of dropping a ball? (I somehow doubt it...)

No bonus tracks

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007KT5V76/


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jim V. on April 12, 2012, 09:38:48 PM
Just spotted that a download-only remastered version of the Surfin' Safari album is scheduled to become available at Amazon Uk on April 19. Don't think this is legit in the usual way and wonder if it's down to a copyright expiry? Is Capitol in danger of dropping a ball? (I somehow doubt it...)

No bonus tracks

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007KT5V76/

Hmm that looks very bootleg-esque.

But anyways, since there hasn't been much in the way of news lately, what does everybody think we will get as far as the "commemorative releases" besides the box set. I would love for another compilation like Endless Harmony to come out with a bunch of totally previously unreleased songs, but I somewhat get the feeling that they will probably just use the best unreleased material that is still in the can on the box set.

I also think there is the possibility that maybe we get new special editions of certain albums, most likely Sunflower and Surf's Up, as I'm pretty sure it was mentioned in a Linnett/Boyd interview as a possibility. And if they had to choose albums to do two-disc special editions, those are likely the ones I would pick, as there is supposedly some prime material to choose from, with things like "I'm Going Your Way" and "Where Is She" from Sunflower and stuff like "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" and probably some other cool stuff for Surf's Up.

Therefore, I gotta say that either a rarities compilation or deluxe editions of a few classic albums is within reason.

Then less realistically, I kinda was hoping that they would reissue the groups entire discography on standalone CDs. However as over a quarter of the year has gone by since the announcement, I just kinda get the feeling that they won't do that, especially as non "hits" albums by The Beach Boys besides Pet Sounds and SMiLE probably won't shift that many copies, especially compared to other Capitol/EMI artists like The Beatles and Pink Floyd. However, if they actually did re-release all the albums on their own with bonus tracks, that would probably be the best thing we could wish for. I doubt it though.

It's fun to dream at least. Hopefully we'll hear some news on the tracklist and title of the new studio album soon, and also some updates on the catalog releases, so we will be able to more realistically assess what might be coming our way.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 13, 2012, 02:54:10 PM
(deleted by author)


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 13, 2012, 02:56:45 PM
Just spotted that a download-only remastered version of the Surfin' Safari album is scheduled to become available at Amazon Uk on April 19. Don't think this is legit in the usual way and wonder if it's down to a copyright expiry? Is Capitol in danger of dropping a ball? (I somehow doubt it...)

No bonus tracks

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B007KT5V76/

Hmm that looks very bootleg-esque.

But anyways, since there hasn't been much in the way of news lately, what does everybody think we will get as far as the "commemorative releases" besides the box set. I would love for another compilation like Endless Harmony to come out with a bunch of totally previously unreleased songs, but I somewhat get the feeling that they will probably just use the best unreleased material that is still in the can on the box set.

I also think there is the possibility that maybe we get new special editions of certain albums, most likely Sunflower and Surf's Up, as I'm pretty sure it was mentioned in a Linnett/Boyd interview as a possibility. And if they had to choose albums to do two-disc special editions, those are likely the ones I would pick, as there is supposedly some prime material to choose from, with things lie "I'm Going Your Way" and "Where Is She" from Sunflower and stuff like "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" and probably some other cool stuff for Surf's Up.

Therefore, I gotta say that either a rarities compilation or deluxe editions of a few classic albums is within reason.

Then less realistically, I kinda was hoping that they would reissue the groups entire discography on standalone CDs. However as over a quarter of the year has gone by since the announcement, I just kinda get the feeling that they won't do that, especially as non "hits" albums by The Beach Boys besides Pet Sounds and SMiLE probably won't shift that many copies, especially compared to other Capitol/EMI artists like The Beatles and Pink Floyd. However, if they actually did re-release all the albums on their own with bonus tracks, that would probably be the best thing we could wish for. I doubt it though.

It's fun to dream at least. Hopefully we'll hear some news on the tracklist and title of the new studio album soon, and also some updates on the catalog releases, so we will be able to more realistically assess what might be coming our way.

We'll be lucky if, sometime later this year, that the reunion album is actually released. As for archival releases, they are looking increasingly like a lost cause.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 13, 2012, 03:14:21 PM
As ever, talking through your arse.

1 - the album will NOT be released 'later this year'. It will be released, at the latest, in early June. Fact. So STFU. You, as ever, don't know what you're talking about. Others do. There's a reason they don't talk to you. You're an idiot, and that is the exact word used to me by someone who does know what's going on.  ;D

2 - the archival reissue program is similarly on track. There's a lot of the year left.

3 - stop pontificating on subjects which you have absolutely no knowledge of. It makes other folk annoyed, and makes you look more of a complete fool than you already appear.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 13, 2012, 03:17:30 PM
Agree absolutely Phil. That album that's reportedly almost there is Probably a figment of the Beach Boys' collective deluded imaginations.

Apparently this craziness is spreading - bunch of folk had a collective mass hysteria the other day and reported seeing the Beach Boys perform at a Dodgers game. Poor fools...

Apparently - get this - some hoaxers are making big bucks selling tickets for a "beach Boys 50th reunion tour"! It'd be funny if it wasn't so serious.

Archive releases? Who takes that idea seriously? No-one here. Let's sit down and chat about it while your nurse gets here. How did you sneak out by the way...?




Title: Re: What
Post by: Paulos on April 13, 2012, 03:19:26 PM
Agree absolutely Phil. That album that's reportedly almost there is Probably a figment of the Beach Boys' collective deluded imaginations.

Apparently this craziness is spreading - bunch of folk had a collective mass hysteria the other day and reported seeing the Beach Boys perform at a Dodgers game. Poor fools...

Apparently - get this - some hoaxers are making big bucks selling tickets for a "beach Boys 50th reunion tour"! It'd be funny if it wasn't so serious.

Archive releases? Who takes that idea seriously? No-one here. Let's sit down and chat about it while your nurse gets here. How did you sneak out by the way...?





 :lol

Burned!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 13, 2012, 03:30:49 PM
Here's Phil right now:
(http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/282218_o.gif)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 13, 2012, 03:32:13 PM
Accompanying video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yunSRfnsVck


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 13, 2012, 03:45:22 PM
Accompanying video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yunSRfnsVck

Wonderful! And nice to put a face to the name... (?)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 13, 2012, 04:37:40 PM
As ever, talking through your arse.

1 - the album will NOT be released 'later this year'. It will be released, at the latest, in early June. Fact. So STFU. You, as ever, don't know what you're talking about. Others do. There's a reason they don't talk to you. You're an idiot, and that is the exact word used to me by someone who does know what's going on.  ;D

2 - the archival reissue program is similarly on track. There's a lot of the year left.

3 - stop pontificating on subjects which you have absolutely no knowledge of. It makes other folk annoyed, and makes you look more of a complete fool than you already appear.


If the reunion album was really going to be released in early June(7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future. To date, this group has not delivered the goods.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 13, 2012, 04:40:43 PM
heh heh

maybe they'll be issuing "Landlocked" on June 5.........

 8)


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 13, 2012, 04:48:33 PM


Archive releases? Who takes that idea seriously?




Not Me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on April 13, 2012, 05:00:07 PM
As ever, talking through your arse.

1 - the album will NOT be released 'later this year'. It will be released, at the latest, in early June. Fact. So STFU. You, as ever, don't know what you're talking about. Others do. There's a reason they don't talk to you. You're an idiot, and that is the exact word used to me by someone who does know what's going on.  ;D

2 - the archival reissue program is similarly on track. There's a lot of the year left.

3 - stop pontificating on subjects which you have absolutely no knowledge of. It makes other folk annoyed, and makes you look more of a complete fool than you already appear.


If the reunion album was really going to be released in early June(7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future. To date, this group has not delivered the goods.

Yes, it might well have a title and track listing. But we wouldn't necessarily know those things.

You. Are. A. Troll.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 13, 2012, 05:06:01 PM
As ever, talking through your arse.

1 - the album will NOT be released 'later this year'. It will be released, at the latest, in early June. Fact. So STFU. You, as ever, don't know what you're talking about. Others do. There's a reason they don't talk to you. You're an idiot, and that is the exact word used to me by someone who does know what's going on.  ;D

2 - the archival reissue program is similarly on track. There's a lot of the year left.

3 - stop pontificating on subjects which you have absolutely no knowledge of. It makes other folk annoyed, and makes you look more of a complete fool than you already appear.


If the reunion album was really going to be released in early June(7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future. To date, this group has not delivered the goods.

Yes, it might well have a title and track listing. But we wouldn't necessarily know those things.

You. Are. A. Troll.

You are unrealistic.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on April 13, 2012, 05:06:59 PM
Well, you have been right about everything so far....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 13, 2012, 05:27:32 PM
 :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on April 13, 2012, 06:44:05 PM
Well, you have been right about everything so far....

Exactly.  :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 14, 2012, 12:23:36 AM
As ever, talking through your arse.

1 - the album will NOT be released 'later this year'. It will be released, at the latest, in early June. Fact. So STFU. You, as ever, don't know what you're talking about. Others do. There's a reason they don't talk to you. You're an idiot, and that is the exact word used to me by someone who does know what's going on.  ;D

2 - the archival reissue program is similarly on track. There's a lot of the year left.

3 - stop pontificating on subjects which you have absolutely no knowledge of. It makes other folk annoyed, and makes you look more of a complete fool than you already appear.


If the reunion album was really going to be released in early June(7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future. To date, this group has not delivered the goods.

May I point out that just because you've heard nothing about any of this doesn't mean it's not been happening. I'm going to say it again - other people know stuff that you have not the faintest notion about. The promo machine is rolling along. Here's an example: announced release date of new album, June 5th... air date of the PBS Summer's Gone TV special, June 7th. Whoa, isn't that an amazing coincidence ? The album is being released two days before a 90-minute TV special - incredible !

Wait...

You don't think... maybe... someone arranged it like that. Like, some kind of promotional thing ?


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 14, 2012, 01:09:45 AM
Andrew, you're gonna have to give us more than that.

First, is this documentary you claim is being/has been made going to be broadcast on ITV or BBC? The fact that you're withholding such information suggests you're complicit in this cover-up by Capitol, the Beach Boys, Phil's nurse and the FBI.  Clearly if it's going out on ITV then it's hardly going to be 90 minutes in actualarianism, as they have to allow for several ad breaks of up to five minutes.

Second, erm, that's it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 14, 2012, 01:22:52 AM
There's sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much more I could tell you.*

But I won't, just to piss Phill off.  ;D

[* - denotes statement which may or may not be true]


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 14, 2012, 04:55:38 AM
Phil is like a back pimple


Title: Re: What \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 14, 2012, 05:41:58 AM
I'm actually worried. Because Phil Cohen is wrong about *absolutely* everything, always, so we now know the album will come out on time... but he hasn't said it'll be terrible and worse than Summer In Paradise, so it might still actually be bad. If we just can get him to say that, then we'll know we'll have something that combines the best elements of Pet Sounds, Smile and Love You into a coherent whole...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 14, 2012, 05:59:55 AM
There's sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much more I could tell you.*

But I won't, just to piss Phill off.  ;D

[* - denotes statement which may or may not be true]
Your an expert at messing with Phil's head at this point. :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 14, 2012, 06:19:39 AM
I'm actually worried. Because Phil Cohen is wrong about *absolutely* everything, always, so we now know the album will come out on time... but he hasn't said it'll be terrible and worse than Summer In Paradise, so it might still actually be bad. If we just can get him to say that, then we'll know we'll have something that combines the best elements of Pet Sounds, Smile and Love You into a coherent whole...

Funny that you mention "Summer in Paradise". It is one of only two Beach Boys CD's that I don't have(the other is "Stars and Stripes", the collaboration with country singers). Country music isn't my bag, and I didn't buy "Summer in Paradise" because it has no Brian Wilson involvement. Now deleted, "Summer in Paradise" now brings big money(near $100) as a rarity.



Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 14, 2012, 08:06:17 AM
Well, you have been right about everything so far....

Statistically speaking, as long as he persists, he will in all likelihood, eventually, get something right.  Eventually.






Possibly.









Perhaps.













And Hell might freeze over…


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 14, 2012, 10:06:11 AM
Well, you have been right about everything so far....

Statistically speaking, as long as he persists, he will in all likelihood, eventually, get something right.  Eventually.






Possibly.









Perhaps.













And Hell might freeze over…

Well, Hell DID freeze over......for Don Henley, Glenn Frey, Timothy B. Schmit, Joe Walsh & Don Felder ! (check out their album "Hell Freezes Over")


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 14, 2012, 10:28:20 AM
Well I never.  Did you know that the "B" in Timothy B. Schmit (only one "t" by the way, and "i" after "m" – as in Smit, not Shimt) stands for Bruce, coincidentally the adopted name of Bruce Johnston, of The Beach Boys, who joined the band in 1965 following the departure of Glen Campbell who had been temporarily recruited to allow Brian Wilson to spend more time in the studio. Bruce Johnston is actually a stage name; he was born Benjamin Baldwin on June 27, 1942. That was the date on which the last of eight Nazi saboteurs, intent on damaging the US arms industry, were held by the FBI. The two events – Benjamin's birth and the arrest of the Nazi agents – are unrelated.  None of the Nazi agents was called Schmit.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 14, 2012, 11:11:10 AM
Well I never.  Did you know that the "B" in Timothy B. Schmit (only one "t" by the way, and "i" after "m" – as in Smit, not Shimt) stands for Bruce, coincidentally the adopted name of Bruce Johnston, of The Beach Boys, who joined the band in 1965 following the departure of Glen Campbell who had been temporarily recruited to allow Brian Wilson to spend more time in the studio. Bruce Johnston is actually a stage name; he was born Benjamin Baldwin on June 27, 1942. That was the date on which the last of eight Nazi saboteurs, intent on damaging the US arms industry, were held by the FBI. The two events – Benjamin's birth and the arrest of the Nazi agents – are unrelated.  None of the Nazi agents was called Schmit.

Benjamin Baldwin's adoptive parents legally changed his name to Bruce Arthur Johnston, so it is not a stage name. It has been his actual name since early childhood.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 14, 2012, 02:02:44 PM
Well I never.  Did you know that the "B" in Timothy B. Schmit (only one "t" by the way, and "i" after "m" – as in Smit, not Shimt) stands for Bruce, coincidentally the adopted name of Bruce Johnston, of The Beach Boys, who joined the band in 1965 following the departure of Glen Campbell who had been temporarily recruited to allow Brian Wilson to spend more time in the studio. Bruce Johnston is actually a stage name; he was born Benjamin Baldwin on June 27, 1942. That was the date on which the last of eight Nazi saboteurs, intent on damaging the US arms industry, were held by the FBI. The two events – Benjamin's birth and the arrest of the Nazi agents – are unrelated.  None of the Nazi agents was called Schmit.

Benjamin Baldwin's adoptive parents legally changed his name to Bruce Arthur Johnston, so it is not a stage name. It has been his actual name since early childhood.

Brilliant!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on April 14, 2012, 02:23:22 PM
I know there's a lot of Smiler's out there who want a box set of the concert released...and I'm one of them. But let's say Capitol was testing the waters and just made a 2 disc set to see how it'd do and they basically put out a "greatest concert performances" disc out...what would you put on there? I myself would love to put on some rarities for the most part. Heck, give us the better parts of the more "well known" concerts: a handful of songs from Lei'd in Hawaii, 5 songs from live in Chicago in 65, 5 goodies from Big Sur from the early 70s, selections we never heard from the first In Concert (Jumpin Jack Flash, You Need a Mess of Help, etc), some Beachago tunes, the left overs from Live in Knebworth in 80, and some of the rarities performed during the "box set" tour/concert (from 93 I believe?) 

Just an idea to chew on for a bit


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on April 15, 2012, 12:28:30 PM
I really don't like compilation concert albums. I'd rather have a full night, or like at least have all the songs be from the same 12 month period or something.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on April 15, 2012, 03:49:50 PM
I really don't like compilation concert albums. I'd rather have a full night, or like at least have all the songs be from the same 12 month period or something.

I think an approach like Dylan's Rolling Thunder Bootleg Series would be the way to go for a 70's live release (so much of the coolest stuff was only done once or twice, like the Dennis material), but all the other periods are easily representable by one show.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on April 15, 2012, 04:50:40 PM
The beach boys went through 4 or 5 distinct eras in the 70s, to combine them into one release would be criminal. Unless, of course, it was just the hits. Surfer girl in 73 won't sound too different from surfer girl in 78.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 15, 2012, 04:57:25 PM
The beach boys went through 4 or 5 distinct eras in the 70s, to combine them into one release would be criminal. Unless, of course, it was just the hits. Surfer girl in 73 won't sound too different from surfer girl in 78.

Weren't Brian and Dennis' voices in better shape and Bruce not in the group in '73?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 15, 2012, 05:00:05 PM
The beach boys went through 4 or 5 distinct eras in the 70s, to combine them into one release would be criminal. Unless, of course, it was just the hits. Surfer girl in 73 won't sound too different from surfer girl in 78.

Weren't Brian and Dennis' voices in better shape and Bruce not in the group in '73?
Compare this video to the "in concert" version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmDUAvCl87g


Title: Re: What \
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 15, 2012, 05:33:59 PM
In the Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly we discuss the release.  Box set and compilation are both on the way!! Subscribe to ESQ today!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on April 15, 2012, 05:44:04 PM
Awesome! Gotta get mine


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on April 15, 2012, 06:58:18 PM
Not sure if this has been mentioned but on Amazon there is a preorder for a 2 disc Good Timin': Live at Knebworth with a May 29 release date. Maybe this will be the complete show?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: metal flake paint on April 15, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
Not sure if this has been mentioned but on Amazon there is a preorder for a 2 disc Good Timin': Live at Knebworth with a May 29 release date. Maybe this will be the complete show?

Or perhaps a CD/DVD combo  :(


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on April 15, 2012, 07:36:45 PM
Oh, good call. I didn't even think about that. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 16, 2012, 01:20:06 AM
In the Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly we discuss the release.  Box set and compilation are both on the way!! Subscribe to ESQ today!

 :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

In your face Phil!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on April 16, 2012, 01:43:25 AM
The beach boys went through 4 or 5 distinct eras in the 70s, to combine them into one release would be criminal. Unless, of course, it was just the hits. Surfer girl in 73 won't sound too different from surfer girl in 78.

Duh, should have clarified - an early 70's release, which imo wouldn't be best served by just releasing, say, the Carnegie Hall 72 show.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: shelter on April 16, 2012, 06:43:28 AM
Not sure if this has been mentioned but on Amazon there is a preorder for a 2 disc Good Timin': Live at Knebworth with a May 29 release date. Maybe this will be the complete show?

Could be nothing - I've seen one of those shady budget reissues once of Live at Knebworth, with the regular tracks spread over two discs. But who knows.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 16, 2012, 08:18:15 AM
this stuff is discussed in ESQ


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 16, 2012, 08:39:59 AM
Aye, but it's nice to discuss it here too…  !   ;D


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 16, 2012, 08:43:04 AM
This fresh Knebworth release is listed as being on Eagle Rock.  They put out the original CD and DVD packages early last decade, and the later combo, so I suspect it's a re-issue of the latter. Nothing on their website yet…

Maybe there's something in the new issue of ESQ? Anyone?    ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Stegibo on April 16, 2012, 09:12:23 AM
Yeah, the new issue of ESQ will reveal it all!  :banana


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on April 16, 2012, 09:34:12 AM
I just want the complete studio albums box set.  I hope they give us that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 16, 2012, 10:50:57 AM
I just want the complete studio albums box set.  I hope they give us that.

At around 30 albums, that would be some hefty box. Maybe they'll package it some other way.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 16, 2012, 10:51:18 AM
I want a Pet Sounds multi-tracks disc. No, make that every album.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on April 16, 2012, 11:20:00 AM
I just want the complete studio albums box set.  I hope they give us that.

At around 30 albums, that would be some hefty box. Maybe they'll package it some other way.

Hefty indeed!  It's been done with some great results with Miles Davis' complete Columbia recordings (totaling 52 albums in 70cd's + 1dvd + booklet)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Complete-Columbia-Album-Collection/dp/B00305GXWG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334599998&sr=8-1
(http://images.search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A2KJke1HYoxPTj4Ar..jzbkF;_ylu=X3oDMTBtdXFkOWthBHNlYwNmcC1hdHRyaWIEc2xrA2ZpbWc-/SIG=14182ar5q/EXP=1334629063/**http%3a//www.losslessjazz.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Miles-Davis-The-Complete-Columbia-Album-Collection.jpg)

YouTube video of the unboxing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LydJ8nHg4I


Title: Re: What
Post by: Myk Luhv on April 16, 2012, 12:00:25 PM
Yeah but jazz heads are all seriously minted and obsessive about that sort of stuff it seems -- I doubt even a lot of serious Beach Boys fans would spring for a huge 30-albums-plus box set, especially when some of those 30 albums are just terrible and space-wasters!


Title: Re: What
Post by: Justin on April 16, 2012, 12:36:32 PM
Yeah but jazz heads are all seriously minted and obsessive about that sort of stuff it seems -- I doubt even a lot of serious Beach Boys fans would spring for a huge 30-albums-plus box set, especially when some of those 30 albums are just terrible and space-wasters!


I would of course welcome new remasters of the albums released individually instead of putting them into one big box but I believe the BB deserve to have a nice complete box set right alongside The Beatles or Pink Floyd.  Considering the BB catalog is half the size of this Miles Davis set, I don't see how a 30 (replica mini-LP packaging) CD set going for probably around $150-$180 would be completely out of the question for many fans.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on April 16, 2012, 12:44:17 PM
this stuff is discussed in ESQ

Do you guys have an alternative online payment method other than PayPal? 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 10:16:22 AM
Does this mean anything?

http://www.lastfm.com/music/The+Beach+Boys/Surfin%27+Safari+%28Classic+Album+Digitally+Remastered%29


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Peter Reum on April 21, 2012, 10:27:06 AM
Surfin' Safari


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SG7 on April 21, 2012, 10:29:07 AM
A mono box?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 10:30:05 AM
Surfin' Safari
Yeah.. right... thanks.  ??? ;)


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 21, 2012, 10:31:26 AM
It's on amazon too but the "label" means nothing. I think it might be a bit of licensed opportunism...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 21, 2012, 10:56:24 AM
No post from Eeyore of late? He must be fuming about the Do It Again Zinepak and the Thats Why God Made The Radio promo!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 21, 2012, 01:52:22 PM
No post from Eeyore of late? He must be fuming about the Do It Again Zinepak and the Thats Why God Made The Radio promo!

If you are referring to me(I don't know what an Eeyore is, though I've seen that term used before), having the fans buy a magazine & 10 already released tracks, to get one unreleased track(the remake of "Do It Again") is not exactly a good value. And typically, the Walmart in my area won't stock these "sold only at Walmart" CD's. At least that's what happened with John Fogerty & Jimi Hendrix items manufactured only for Walmart. A Hendrix fan in New York(who contacted me through an online music forum) bought six spare Hendrix CD singles at his local Walmart, and(out of the kindness of his heart) gave them to fans who couldn't obtain the item at their local Walmart. I returned the favor by cloning a 6-CD Hendrix bootleg("Astro Man") for him.

As for the reunion album, I'm not going to waste any more effort on it. This isn't "Smile", you know? I can only hope that (if for whatever reasons) that the group can't complete & release the reunion album, then at least the archival projects might still be released. I'll buy the reunion album(if Capitol releases it), but the unreleased /remixed stuff from the "Good Ol' Days" is what I want most.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 02:17:19 PM
Eeyore, as you damn well know, is the pessimistic, gloomy, depressed, anhedonic*, old grey stuffed donkey from the Winnie The Pooh stories. And Capitol, as you equally damn well know, will release the new album according to schedule: currently it's in the final stages of mixing. This is not conjecture, or my opinion, this is fact. The 'single' has been previewed, albeit not entirely legally, and the WalMart deal isn't aimed at the likes of us.

[* - anhedonia: the inability to experience pleasure from activities usually found enjoyable]


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 02:39:17 PM
No post from Eeyore of late? He must be fuming about the Do It Again Zinepak and the Thats Why God Made The Radio promo!

...having the fans buy a magazine & 10 already released tracks, to get one unreleased track(the remake of "Do It Again") is not exactly a good value. And typically, the Walmart...
Not a good value for who? I think it is a good value for the very casual music consumer. Record companies have long known that the Walmart crowd (I have never set foot in one, just for the record) are middle America; many do not regularly buy music. If you can penetrate this segment of the market, it will pay off. This package makes perfect commercial sense.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 02:42:37 PM
Phil can't be a real person can he? 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 02:44:01 PM
Phil can't be a real person can he? 

It's life Jim, but not as we know it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 21, 2012, 02:45:55 PM
No post from Eeyore of late? He must be fuming about the Do It Again Zinepak and the Thats Why God Made The Radio promo!

...having the fans buy a magazine & 10 already released tracks, to get one unreleased track(the remake of "Do It Again") is not exactly a good value. And typically, the Walmart...
Not a good value for who? I think it is a good value for the very casual music consumer. Record companies have long known that the Walmart crowd (I have never set foot in one, just for the record) are middle America; many do not regularly buy music. If you can penetrate this segment of the market, it will pay off. This package makes perfect commercial sense.



But some of the avid fans might want to have the remake of "Do It Again" in their collections, too.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 21, 2012, 05:27:08 PM
Eeyore, as you damn well know, is the pessimistic, gloomy, depressed, anhedonic*, old grey stuffed donkey from the Winnie The Pooh stories. And Capitol, as you equally damn well know, will release the new album according to schedule: currently it's in the final stages of mixing. This is not conjecture, or my opinion, this is fact. The 'single' has been previewed, albeit not entirely legally, and the WalMart deal isn't aimed at the likes of us.

[* - anhedonia: the inability to experience pleasure from activities usually found enjoyable]

Anhedonia? There might be an element of truth in that. I haven't become totally incapable of experiencing pleasure, but, after 46 years of seriously collecting recorded music(though I had a few records before that), it is definitely a case of diminishing pleasure, as the quest to obtain more sometimes gets in the way of enjoying what I've already got. There's no doubt that I find it very unfunny when performers or record companies play games with the fans over the release of CD product. And as the years go by, and fewer classic rock artists have any vault material remaining, the remaining artists who hold vault materials are, increasingly, being temperamental prima donnas about it(the worst of these artists are undoubtedly Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young). My critics will probably call me impatient, but it's not exactly that. It's a feeling that these companies & artists aren't treating the fans/consumers with the respect that they deserve. To any of these artists who float the idea of box sets or archival releases in front of their fans, then don't deliver the goods, I say this: your fans aren't getting any younger. How 'bout releasing these materials while the original fans are still on this planet? If these artists wait too long, one of these days, the fans(and the music industry) will be dead and buried.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on April 21, 2012, 05:56:28 PM
How dare they not give a release date for the new album and not send out promotional materials containing the new single and the group talking about how great it is  for us!

Oh, hang on....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 10:37:53 PM
It's a feeling that these companies & artists aren't treating the fans/consumers with the respect that they deserve. To any of these artists who float the idea of box sets or archival releases in front of their fans, then don't deliver the goods, I say this: your fans aren't getting any younger.

Shall I tell you the degree of respect the average record company - and artist - extend to the fans & consumers ? They follow the Barnum dictum to the letter: "there's one born every minute". Not just the archival stuff either - you taken a look at the career of Katy Perry or Lady Gaga recently ?

And... if something isn't giving you the pleasure it used to - move on and find something new that does. I'm not saying this out of any real concern for your well-being, more because it would result in you stopping being such a complete f*ckwit and boring the nuts off all of us here into the bargain.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 10:43:11 PM
Eeyore, as you damn well know, is the pessimistic, gloomy, depressed, anhedonic*, old grey stuffed donkey from the Winnie The Pooh stories.

oh, come on, Andrew. you always get mad when people don't properly cite your website as a source, and here you are barely paraphrasing wikipedia.

from the Wikipedia Eeyore article: "He is generally characterized as a pessimistic, gloomy, depressed, anhedonic, old grey stuffed donkey who is a friend of the title character, Winnie-the-Pooh."

This was easy to spot because I learned the word anhedonic from the Eeyore article.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 11:16:34 PM
I'm not 'barely paraphrasing', I'll have you know - it's a straight cut & paste.  ;D

And you gotta admit, it's a scarily accurate summary of Cohen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 22, 2012, 02:13:46 AM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 22, 2012, 02:33:26 AM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.

Actually, no - it's just you they tell nothing: everyone else here has been aware of what's been happening in real time.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 22, 2012, 06:57:50 AM
No post from Eeyore of late? He must be fuming about the Do It Again Zinepak and the Thats Why God Made The Radio promo!

If you are referring to me(I don't know what an Eeyore is, though I've seen that term used before), having the fans buy a magazine & 10 already released tracks, to get one unreleased track(the remake of "Do It Again") is not exactly a good value. And typically, the Walmart in my area won't stock these "sold only at Walmart" CD's. At least that's what happened with John Fogerty & Jimi Hendrix items manufactured only for Walmart. A Hendrix fan in New York(who contacted me through an online music forum) bought six spare Hendrix CD singles at his local Walmart, and(out of the kindness of his heart) gave them to fans who couldn't obtain the item at their local Walmart. I returned the favor by cloning a 6-CD Hendrix bootleg("Astro Man") for him.

As for the reunion album, I'm not going to waste any more effort on it. This isn't "Smile", you know? I can only hope that (if for whatever reasons) that the group can't complete & release the reunion album, then at least the archival projects might still be released. I'll buy the reunion album(if Capitol releases it), but the unreleased /remixed stuff from the "Good Ol' Days" is what I want most.


For fecks sake, the new album will be released on June 05th 2012 as confirmed by the band, the record label, ESQ and others whether you like it or not. The album is available for pre-order on amazon.com. Just what the hell is wrong with you? The above statement higlighted in bold beggars belief.



Oh and the below is the well known and beloved character Eeyore, which apparently you have never heard of.  ::)

(https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTlxibQsu5cGysngTmyrLZEMR0o2gww79OlE6KFWrVhoruJeUJd4Q)


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 22, 2012, 08:07:26 AM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.

Chump.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seanmurd on April 22, 2012, 08:42:54 AM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.

I generally try to stay out of the Neverending Phil And Andrew Battle Royale And Periodic Dick-Waving Contest -- both sides inevitably end up looking less than classy -- but Phil, you chose the wrong example in this instance when you cited McCartney's RAM reissue. If you look at the details of that one, it was arguably WORSE than how the BBs handled the SMiLE box set. First off, Paul started off a YEAR-AND-A-HALF of speculation by simply IMPLYING that Ram would be an upcoming reissue, with a little slip of paper inserted into the BOTR reissue. It was only confirmed in March 2012 that Ram would indeed be the next album reissued, and it the full contents and configurations were only finally announced on Macca's website last week, a mere month before the release date. In contrast, the BBs announced that SMiLE would be released "later this year" in February 2011, followed that up with a Record Store Day release in April, followed THAT up with a special 45 in MOJO in June, and then announced all the configurations and track lists on September 1st, a full 2+ months before the release date. You were wrong about SMiLE last year, and I pretty much expect that you're wrong about everything this year too. In fact, if you wouldn't mind giving us all a heads-up on what the next Mega Millions numbers WON'T be, we can all go in on the tickets, and we'll be able to afford all this stuff you think won't be released this year.

Cheers, and please stop.
Your pal and occasional defender,


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on April 22, 2012, 08:57:31 AM
Sean, while you correct on every respect, I take exception with you calling out Andrew. Anyone here has a right to call out Phil every time he posts his malarky. Like you say, he is always off the mark with all his naysaying  posts regarding The Boys, and especially Capitol and it's marketing strategies. You would think that after all that has happened to him here, that he would rethink his own thoughts and strategies. He never has, and I suspect that he never will. Our reactions are the express reason why he posts here. For Phil, he reaps what he sows.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 22, 2012, 11:37:08 AM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.

I generally try to stay out of the Neverending Phil And Andrew Battle Royale And Periodic Dick-Waving Contest -- both sides inevitably end up looking less than classy -- but Phil, you chose the wrong example in this instance when you cited McCartney's RAM reissue. If you look at the details of that one, it was arguably WORSE than how the BBs handled the SMiLE box set. First off, Paul started off a YEAR-AND-A-HALF of speculation by simply IMPLYING that Ram would be an upcoming reissue, with a little slip of paper inserted into the BOTR reissue. It was only confirmed in March 2012 that Ram would indeed be the next album reissued, and it the full contents and configurations were only finally announced on Macca's website last week, a mere month before the release date. In contrast, the BBs announced that SMiLE would be released "later this year" in February 2011, followed that up with a Record Store Day release in April, followed THAT up with a special 45 in MOJO in June, and then announced all the configurations and track lists on September 1st, a full 2+ months before the release date. You were wrong about SMiLE last year, and I pretty much expect that you're wrong about everything this year too. In fact, if you wouldn't mind giving us all a heads-up on what the next Mega Millions numbers WON'T be, we can all go in on the tickets, and we'll be able to afford all this stuff you think won't be released this year.

Cheers, and please stop.
Your pal and occasional defender,

Amazon.com has stated the complete track listing for the deluxe box edition for Paul McCartney's "Ram" for more than a month.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seanmurd on April 22, 2012, 12:05:18 PM
For better(or I would say worse), it is obvious that the "strategy"(if you could call it that) of Capitol Records & The Beach Boys is totally opposite of most record companies & classic rock back catalogue artists, with respect to promoting an upcoming archival release. Most other artists/labels reveal track listings & release dates months in advance and build consumer "buzz" through publicity(such as that for upcoming archival releases such as the expanded editions of Paul McCartney's "Ram" or the expanded multi disc reissues by Small Faces). As for The Beach Boys & Capitol, their strategy is make an initial vague announcement, then tell the public absolutely nothing until 6 months later, while keeping all individuals involved in these projects gagged with strict secrecy/confidentiality contracts.

I generally try to stay out of the Neverending Phil And Andrew Battle Royale And Periodic Dick-Waving Contest -- both sides inevitably end up looking less than classy -- but Phil, you chose the wrong example in this instance when you cited McCartney's RAM reissue. If you look at the details of that one, it was arguably WORSE than how the BBs handled the SMiLE box set. First off, Paul started off a YEAR-AND-A-HALF of speculation by simply IMPLYING that Ram would be an upcoming reissue, with a little slip of paper inserted into the BOTR reissue. It was only confirmed in March 2012 that Ram would indeed be the next album reissued, and it the full contents and configurations were only finally announced on Macca's website last week, a mere month before the release date. In contrast, the BBs announced that SMiLE would be released "later this year" in February 2011, followed that up with a Record Store Day release in April, followed THAT up with a special 45 in MOJO in June, and then announced all the configurations and track lists on September 1st, a full 2+ months before the release date. You were wrong about SMiLE last year, and I pretty much expect that you're wrong about everything this year too. In fact, if you wouldn't mind giving us all a heads-up on what the next Mega Millions numbers WON'T be, we can all go in on the tickets, and we'll be able to afford all this stuff you think won't be released this year.

Cheers, and please stop.
Your pal and occasional defender,

Amazon.com has stated the complete track listing for the deluxe box edition for Paul McCartney's "Ram" for more than a month.

Actually, the track list was leaked and posted on a number of websites starting on March 21st, but Amazon was NOT among them at first. It was a few more weeks before Amazon posted track listings. Either way, your response is a classic example of a sad "gotcha!" rebuttal while missing the entire larger point of my response.


Title: Re: What
Post by: seanmurd on April 22, 2012, 12:13:32 PM
Sean, while you correct on every respect, I take exception with you calling out Andrew. Anyone here has a right to call out Phil every time he posts his malarky. Like you say, he is always off the mark with all his naysaying  posts regarding The Boys, and especially Capitol and it's marketing strategies. You would think that after all that has happened to him here, that he would rethink his own thoughts and strategies. He never has, and I suspect that he never will. Our reactions are the express reason why he posts here. For Phil, he reaps what he sows.

I think about 99% of the "calling out" in my post was aimed at Phil, but I'll stand by what I said in the other 1%. I do understand that AGD's seemingly bottomless well of enmity for Phil comes mostly from frustration at having to read his consistently wrong prognostications while knowing the specific details (even if he doesn't share them with us) of just how wrong he is. However, and this is only my own opinion, a lot of Andrew's "corrective" posts come across as mean-spirited and petty -- maybe it's just the cumulative tonnage of rebuttals he feels he needs to post, but I do think that in his zeal to convince Phil to "STFU" (AGD's usual refrain), he lowers himself in the process. Personally, I think that Phil's reputation for gloom-and-doom -- and his record of being dead wrong -- is established well enough that a silent eye roll and a scroll to the next post is more than enough response.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 22, 2012, 12:44:32 PM
By the way, I have one bit of good news for you:unlike other CD exclusives created for Walmart, Walmart will accept online orders for the Zinepack, sparing me and many others from an in-person trip to Walmart that would have likely resulted in coming home empty-handed. The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

Also, when my existing CD backorders(21 preordered discs which run through May 30,2012) have run their course, I intend to go on hiatus from the hobby of music collecting for a while. May all the CD's that you wish for come to be.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 22, 2012, 01:33:46 PM
By the way, I have one bit of good news for you:unlike other CD exclusives created for Walmart, Walmart will accept online orders for the Zinepack, sparing me and many others from an in-person trip to Walmart that would have likely resulted in coming home empty-handed. The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

Also, when my existing CD backorders(21 preordered discs which run through May 30,2012) have run their course, I intend to go on hiatus from the hobby of music collecting for a wIile. May all the CD's that you wish for come to be.

Sadly Walmart doesn't ship international.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 22, 2012, 03:23:29 PM
By the way, I have one bit of good news for you:unlike other CD exclusives created for Walmart, Walmart will accept online orders for the Zinepack, sparing me and many others from an in-person trip to Walmart that would have likely resulted in coming home empty-handed. The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

Also, when my existing CD backorders(21 preordered discs which run through May 30,2012) have run their course, I intend to go on hiatus from the hobby of music collecting for a wIile. May all the CD's that you wish for come to be.

Sadly Walmart doesn't ship international.

Sort of like the situation that I encounter with "Stones Archives", an official Rolling Stones website which sells both MP3 & lossless FLAC downloads of previously unreleased Rolling Stones concerts...but they won't sell to people in the U.S.A.(The Stones' U.S.A. licensee "Google Music" sells only MP3 versions), so I get people outside the U.S.A. to copy the lossless versions for me. No way am I going to pay for the less than CD sound quality of MP3.

No doubt, the Zinepack will be resold on Ebay, and you'll be able to find it there.


Title: Re: What
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 22, 2012, 06:30:35 PM
Quote
The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

What does the neighborhood have to do with anything?


Title: Re: What
Post by: 18thofMay on April 22, 2012, 07:08:00 PM
Quote
The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

What does the neighborhood have to do with anything?
I have already reached my point of absolute hatred with Phil and then he makes a comment like that.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 22, 2012, 07:32:19 PM
Quote
The nearest Walmart is in a predominately African-American neighborhood, and yet, oddly, their selection of CD's is mainly Cuban music.

What does the neighborhood have to do with anything?
I have already reached my point of absolute hatred with Phil and then he makes a comment like that.

Because a big retailer will tailor their stock to what the customers in that neighborhood want to buy. There is no market for rock(vintage or modern) in that particular neighborhood(North Miami Beach,Florida). I'm sure that some of you are going to accuse me of racism. It is not. Walmart is supplying what they think the market in that particular neighborhood wants to buy. Why stock items that customers in that neighborhood won't buy? It is a fact that the stock of CD's at that particular store is mostly Spanish-language dance & salsa music.

I've learned from past experience that when a Walmart-exclusive rock CD or DVD is released, that this store won't stock it. Fortunately, Walmart is offering the Beach Boys "Zinepack" through the Walmart website, so I ordered it. For previous Walmart-exclusive rock CD's or DVD's, if your local Walmart didn't stock the item, then the consumer was out of luck.


Title: Re: What
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 22, 2012, 07:35:28 PM
That is an anomaly. I used to work for Wal-Mart...the ENDCAPS are tailored towards whatever market they are in, not the general release section. And, it goes by region of states (northeast, west coast, ect),not neighborhood....which is why you have a selection of Cuban music that seems to stand out by the neighborhood's demographic.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: sea of tunes on April 22, 2012, 09:32:13 PM
It's a pipe dream I know, but I would really appreciate a 2nd U.S. Singles Collection going from 1965-1969.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 12:04:54 AM
It's a pipe dream I know, but I would really appreciate a 2nd U.S. Singles Collection going from 1965-1969.

But, though I purchased the first box, more people copied it than purchased it. I DID copy it:for myself; recording it complete on two discs, which made the material far more convenient to play.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on April 23, 2012, 08:21:31 AM
It's a pipe dream I know, but I would really appreciate a 2nd U.S. Singles Collection going from 1965-1969.
I agree. But really, the best would be the Brother years with added singles by Dennis (Lady/Sound of Free & River Song/You and I)...maybe Celebration singles (Almost Summer)...It's a Beautiful Day...etc. PLUS the single mixes that aren't on the albums (R&R Music, Honkin' Down the Highway, Hey Little Tomboy, Come Go With Me, Lady Lynda, Male Ego, School Days, Chasin' the Sky, Rock and Roll to The Rescue, Lady Liberty). I'm sure the Medlies would be added.  ::)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lance on April 23, 2012, 10:29:52 AM
I would love to see all the various unavailable released releases released, but not if there's going to be, like, 2 songs per CD. Just collate them on one or two CDs and I will make my own Deluxe albums. Some unreleased already bootlegged/not yet bootlegged stuff would be cool, too.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 23, 2012, 11:30:00 AM
I would love to see all the various unavailable released releases released, but not if there's going to be, like, 2 songs per CD. Just collate them on one or two CDs and I will make my own Deluxe albums. Some unreleased already bootlegged/not yet bootlegged stuff would be cool, too.

Do you mean songs like the following?

What'd I Say (Live)
The Monkey's Uncle
Karen
With A Little Help From My Friends
The Letter
We Got Love
Sea Cruise
It's A Beautiful Day
Happy Endings
East Meets West
Rock n  Roll to The Rescue
California Dreamin' (Original version)
Chasin' The Sky
Runaway (Live)
Lady Liberty
Crocodile Rock
Problem Child

Because that would be sweet (apart from the last three)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lance on April 23, 2012, 12:20:54 PM
Exactly what I mean.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seanmurd on April 23, 2012, 12:27:18 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 12:45:02 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

"The music, [Johnston] says, "reminds me of our 'Sunflower' album, which is probably one of our least-selling albums, and some of the songs there are stunning. This album has elements, kind of, of everything."

Smart cookie!

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 12:49:46 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 23, 2012, 12:53:12 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!

(http://th01.deviantart.net/fs71/150/f/2010/326/6/6/sigh_meme_by_thepadlokchild-d33dhib.jpg)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 12:55:01 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!
What is honestly your problem? What the heck do you want that would make happy? :wall


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 01:02:00 PM
But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on April 23, 2012, 01:13:53 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!
What is honestly your problem? What the heck do you want that would make happy? :wall
Yes, if only there was a Vine Street webcam in front of The Tower, we could just check it. I'm sure we wouldn't be seeing any heads rolling south, toward Wilshire. Tranquilo, dude.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 01:21:50 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!

Phil, you've been associated with small, quasi-independent labels that specialise in archival reissues on a limited scale. Capitol are (still) a major label with facilities at their disposal far larger than anything you've experienced, and this is a major, major release. The date June 5th is all over the place, and cannot be delayed by anything more than 24 hours because of the tie-in with the PBS TV special. That date was set months ago and they will have 'booked' the time and the facilities to get the album manufactured and out to the shops As quickly as they can. Concisely, you're talking bollocks again, as usual.

You know what I think would be the one thing make your day, give you an intense orgasm of pleasure ? If the entire band were involved in some fatal incident, and Capitol, out of respect, decided to pull all the C50 products from schedule permanently... because then you'd be able to say "see, I told you it would never be released". And you would, you know you would. I believe this, I truly do, because for the last 18 months or so, ever since the Smile rumors started circulating, you've not said one single positive thing about that or the current projects but wallowed in the misery of telling us all that they would never happen. In this respect, you are truly a sick and twisted person, and I hope you decide to get some treatment for it. We don't want your kind here.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 01:24:53 PM
But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrr...



With thanks to AGD for proof-reading.


Blooming' iPhones...


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 01:36:50 PM
I think you mean, like this:

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrrr...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 23, 2012, 01:38:12 PM
I was kinda excited to hear a new Bruce Johnston song, and we get "She Believes In Love Again" AGAIN! Eh, whatever, I don't hate that song, but I'm not a fan of it. I guess we'll see.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Bedroom Tapes on April 23, 2012, 01:45:12 PM
I think it'd be cool if the new album came with a bonus/second disc of rarities.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 01:52:58 PM
Bad news for Phil -- the new album is done and being mixed. On schedule for June 5th release.

http://www.billboard.com/news#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

Even if they send the digital masters to the pressing plant today, it is still questionable whether they can get the discs into stores by June 5th. It takes 5 to 6 weeks to get the CD's pressed. Good luck!

Phil, you've been associated with small, quasi-independent labels that specialise in archival reissues on a limited scale. Capitol are (still) a major label with facilities at their disposal far larger than anything you've experienced, and this is a major, major release. The date June 5th is all over the place, and cannot be delayed by anything more than 24 hours because of the tie-in with the PBS TV special. That date was set months ago and they will have 'booked' the time and the facilities to get the album manufactured and out to the shops As quickly as they can. Concisely, you're talking bollocks again, as usual.

You know what I think would be the one thing make your day, give you an intense orgasm of pleasure ? If the entire band were involved in some fatal incident, and Capitol, out of respect, decided to pull all the C50 products from schedule permanently... because then you'd be able to say "see, I told you it would never be released". And you would, you know you would. I believe this, I truly do, because for the last 18 months or so, ever since the Smile rumors started circulating, you've not said one single positive thing about that or the current projects but wallowed in the misery of telling us all that they would never happen. In this respect, you are truly a sick and twisted person, and I hope you decide to get some treatment for it. We don't want your kind here.

Andrew, none of the major labels own CD pressing plants any more. They all rely on outside suppliers to press the discs.  Why haven't I said anything positive about the projects that you refer to? Because we have no information about what those projects are. How can we discuss archival projects whose contents are being kept 100% secret?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on April 23, 2012, 01:57:22 PM
DO NOT FEED THE TROLL

(maybe he will go away if we don't feed his attention whoring)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 01:59:29 PM
 Why haven't I said anything positive about the projects that you refer to? Because we have no information about what those projects are. How can we discuss archival projects whose contents are being kept 100% secret?

I'm talking about the new album to be released on June 5th, not anything archival. You say it won't be released then (if ever), all the available evidence says it will. Never said Capitol had their own pressing plant, just that they had facilities at their disposal, which they doubtless booked back in the winter.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 02:05:52 PM
I think you mean, like this:

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrrr...

So Andrew, you seen a tentative track list? More than the most of us know?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 02:13:27 PM
I think you mean, like this:

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrrr...

So Andrew, you seen a tentative track list? More than the most of us know?

You remember the TV series "House of Cards" ?   ::)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 02:13:40 PM
I'm not saying that a reunion album won't be released, but the longer that the group procrastinates about finalizing mixes, establishing an album title & track listing, the less chance that they have of getting the album onto the marketplace by June 5,2012. The logistics of manufacturing, printing & distribution are not imaginary things.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 02:17:38 PM
I think you mean, like this:

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrrr...

So Andrew, you seen a tentative track list? More than the most of us know?

You remember the TV series "House of Cards" ?   ::)

Is that the one where Bruce Johnston plays an aging rock star who single-handedly resuscitates his career by rerecording overlooked 80s  catalogue tracks but gets eaten by a velociraptor just before his single hits Number One?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 02:20:32 PM
I think you mean, like this:

But why in the hell has he reworked She Believes in Love Again?  Reckon that's a typical BJ put-on - possibly even for our benefit!

Nope.  ;)

Grrrrr...

So Andrew, you seen a tentative track list? More than the most of us know?

You remember the TV series "House of Cards" ?   ::)

Is that the one where Bruce Johnston plays an aging rock star who single-handedly resuscitates his career by rerecording overlooked 80s  catalogue tracks but gets eaten by a velociraptor just before his single hits Number One?

Not... exactly.

Not at all, truth be told.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Stegibo on April 23, 2012, 02:20:50 PM
I'm not saying that a reunion album won't be released, but the longer that the group procrastinates about finalizing mixes, establishing an album title & track listing, the less chance that they have of getting the album onto the marketplace by June 5,2012. The logistics of manufacturing, printing & distribution are not imaginary things.
Well Brian was talking about not wanting to be around zany Mike & Bruce while the reunion had already been in the works.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 03:22:06 PM
I'm not saying that a reunion album won't be released, but the longer that the group procrastinates about finalizing mixes, establishing an album title & track listing, the less chance that they have of getting the album onto the marketplace by June 5,2012. The logistics of manufacturing, printing & distribution are not imaginary things.
Well Brian was talking about not wanting to be around zany Mike & Bruce while the reunion had already been in the works.

Phil's point is entirely valid if taken at face value. If they really are still recording, mixing, mastering selecting between cuts etc then they would be taking it to the wire somewhat, under normal circumstances.

However, I suspect that Brian's creative team has been working on this for longer than we've appreciated and that what's happening now is some final tweaking, maybe even less.

I also suspect that the machinery is set rumble the second a product is delivered to Capitol. Pressing plant time will be booked, booklet printing slots allocated etc etc; just a matter of filling a few remaining gaps.

This has all be in the works longer than we've been led to believe.

It's not that long since Brian was stating categorically that he'd never work with these lads again, when he already apparently was doing just that, or at least putting down tracks for them to auto tune their harmonies over the top of.

I doubt Phil's really been taken in by the mock cloak of deception; it just serves his type of trolling perfectly. He'll continue to wind us up for months to come.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 03:29:14 PM
I'm not sure anymore if Phil is trolling or delusional. I want him banned regardless.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Eireannach on April 23, 2012, 03:30:08 PM
ABBA finished recording The Visitors on 11/14 and it was released 16 days later on 11/30 - this was 1981.  Just sayin'...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 03:37:09 PM
I'm not sure anymore if Phil is trolling or delusional. I want him banned regardless.


....so that you'll have a boring forum where everyone is an Andrew G. Doe Yes-man, and where everyone agrees on everything!


Title: Re: What
Post by: Stegibo on April 23, 2012, 03:40:58 PM
Yes, sir! I agree!


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 03:42:25 PM
I'm not sure anymore if Phil is trolling or delusional. I want him banned regardless.

....so that you'll have a boring forum where everyone is an Andrew G. Doe Yes-man, and where everyone agrees on everything!

Phil, you have to understand that your own chain of posts have frequently been tedious as hell. Vapid and pointless. Depressing and pessimistic without cause.

Liven up lad.

It's summer.

The Beach Boys are in town…


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 03:44:08 PM
I'm not sure anymore if Phil is trolling or delusional. I want him banned regardless.


....so that you'll have a boring forum where everyone is an Andrew G. Doe Yes-man, and where everyone agrees on everything!
No, we will have AGD and Fishmonk creating a balance on the board.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on April 23, 2012, 06:11:54 PM
Since apparently I am the only one not willing to feed Phil's ego, please, by all means, carry on feeding it.  :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on April 23, 2012, 07:33:24 PM
In Phil's defense, didn't Neil Young take about 5 months mixing "Weld," permanently damaging his hearing in the process? Apparently he fired engineer after engineer until he was actually locked out of his own barn-studio and the album finished by others..... And this was the work of just one crazy person rather than 5!

And where is My Bloody Valentines fabled follow up to Loveless? Didn't they put Creation Records into bankruptcy attempting to record it?

I'm just saying there is precedent for where Phil is coming from.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 07:39:18 PM
In Phil's defense, didn't Neil Young take about 5 months mixing "Weld," permanently damaging his hearing in the process? Apparently he fired engineer after engineer until he was actually locked out of his own barn-studio and the album finished by others..... And this was the work of just one crazy person rather than 5!

And where is My Bloody Valentines fabled follow up to Loveless? Didn't they put Creation Records into bankruptcy attempting to record it?

I'm just saying there is precedent for where Phil is coming from.
The MBV followup to loveless is the new smile.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on April 23, 2012, 07:40:39 PM
So, we'll have a virtual box set in about 25 more years??  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 07:44:27 PM
So, we'll have a virtual box set in about 25 more years??  ;D
Yes, Kevin Shields is also like BW when it comes to releasing unfinished albums. I heard the follow up is really far out.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 07:57:36 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 23, 2012, 08:11:08 PM
Yeah they are Phil. Because the reunion is something I've wanted for a long time, and to have them releasing a brand new studio album around seven months after the release of The SMiLE Sessions is mindblowing. Brian with The Beach Boys is always something I will listen intently for, and if the new "Do It Again" is the only good thing that comes from it, that is ok. Because that was awesome, and I'm sure there will be other great new songs. Maybe not an album packed full of great songs, but I think we're gonna get some more Beach Boys classics from Brian.

And on the archival front, "Where Is She", Brian's 1974 "California Feelin'" recording, and "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" are likely coming soon, I hope. That is worth it to me. If just those three songs came out, that would be enough for me. I love this band, and I'm sure I'll get some spiritual satisfaction from hearing more music from Brian and the guys. So yes, its worth it, Phil.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on April 23, 2012, 08:11:14 PM
Hey, until I have Summer in Paradise on either vinyl or a two-fer with Stars N Stripes, I will never be happy!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 23, 2012, 08:32:07 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).
:wall :deadhorse :thud


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 08:39:59 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).
Alright, what would the BBs do in your perfect world?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 10:34:12 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).

WE are not being put through anything - you're torturing yourself (and pissing us off into the bargain) with delusions that something everyone here but you wants won't happen. This may come as a shock to you, but The BB, and especially the C50 junket, aren't my sole preoccupation right now: I have a job that while agreeable calls on me to work  a 13-hour day at least once a week, currently dodgy health, pressing financial problems and some other stuff. The Beach Boys come some way down the list. This place used to be a respite from all that, but since you've cropped up again like an unlanced boil, it's not so much fun any more. You don't see what's wrong with what you're doing, so I'll say it again: you're a clinically sick person who needs urgent treatment. And yes, banning.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: MBE on April 23, 2012, 10:54:22 PM
Hey, until I have Summer in Paradise on either vinyl or a two-fer with Stars N Stripes, I will never be happy!
I have a vinyl Summer In Paradise!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 10:58:27 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).
Alright, what would the BBs do in your perfect world?

For starters, reveal a title, track list & artwork for the reunion album, so that the people preordering from Amazon & other online dealers can get a general idea what they are preordering. Then confirm whether some or any of the archival products will be released this year, and give us some partial information what those projects are.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mike's Beard on April 23, 2012, 11:32:59 PM
Billy if you read this, please ban this f.ucking idiot.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on April 23, 2012, 11:35:20 PM
Is what we're being put through(to extract a reunion album & archival projects from The Beach Boys) really worth it? There's no doubt that the best Beach Boys songs and versions are already in our hands, and we've now got the most sought item(the Smile recordings).

WE are not being put through anything - you're torturing yourself (and pissing us off into the bargain) with delusions that something everyone here but you wants won't happen. This may come as a shock to you, but The BB, and especially the C50 junket, aren't my sole preoccupation right now: I have a job that while agreeable calls on me to work  a 13-hour day at least once a week, currently dodgy health, pressing financial problems and some other stuff. The Beach Boys come some way down the list. This place used to be a respite from all that, but since you've cropped up again like an unlanced boil, it's not so much fun any more. You don't see what's wrong with what you're doing, so I'll say it again: you're a clinically sick person who needs urgent treatment. And yes, banning.

Just an observation:  Why are we so invested in what one person has to say?  Why do we feel so threatened by his pessimistic comments; especially since most of them have been proven to be bunk?  Which is why Phil don't bother me none.  He wants to think the Earth is flat?  Let 'im.  I ain't losin' any sleep over it.   :listening


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 11:49:17 PM
Because it's disruptive, like a bad smell returning, like the tramp on the street always trying to hit on you for some change to buy more drink: we have a good thread going then this attention-seeking f*ckwit turns up... and I know, don't read him - tricky, as there's no 'ignore' function to blank out his drivel.

One thing I do find amusing, if not downright ironic, is that someone involved in the bootlegging industry is badmouthing a legit record company so much.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 23, 2012, 11:56:24 PM
Because it's disruptive, like a bad smell returning, like the tramp on the street always trying to hit on you for some change to buy more drink: we have a good thread going then this attention-seeking f*ckwit turns up... and I know, don't read him - tricky, as there's no 'ignore' function to blank out his drivel.

One thing I do find amusing, if not downright ironic, is that someone involved in the bootlegging industry is badmouthing a legit record company so much.

Wait a second. I've never been involved in the manufacture of any bootleg CD.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 12:51:05 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on April 24, 2012, 01:26:35 AM
Because it's disruptive, like a bad smell returning, like the tramp on the street always trying to hit on you for some change to buy more drink: we have a good thread going then this attention-seeking f*ckwit turns up... and I know, don't read him - tricky, as there's no 'ignore' function to blank out his drivel.

One thing I do find amusing, if not downright ironic, is that someone involved in the bootlegging industry is badmouthing a legit record company so much.

Wait a second. I've never been involved in the manufacture of any bootleg CD.

Phil - I don't know you from Adam but any idiot can see the new album; tour; commemorative releases; have been meticulously planned and in the works for a long, long time.  And AGD has been in on it from the start, dropping subtle hints and clues as to what's up. This is like someone arguing with George Martin about the bass track on "Penny Lane".

I've had my share of dust-ups with AGD (and made my share of idiotic arguments) but your relentless 'doubting thomas' posts just make you look stupid!
Why don't you give it a rest and come back when all the dust has settled (though I'd change my name on the board first if I were you, cause your gonna have egg all over your face-already do!).

If you are really a Beach Boy fan, you should just sit back and enjoy this "last, long ride". Surf's Up!


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 01:31:56 AM
AGD has been in on it from the start, dropping subtle hints and clues as to what's up.

Subtle ? Moi ??

Some mistake, surely.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 01:50:58 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





There is a difference between making material available to another collector, which that other collector then(initially without my knowledge, since they didn't get it directly from me) puts onto the internet as a free download, versus being a participant in the pressing or sale of an actual physical disc bootleg CD, which is then sold for profit.

AND, GO TO THAT LINK. IT SAYS THAT THOSE TRACKS ARE "NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 01:58:25 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





There is a difference between making material available to another collector, which that other collector then puts onto the internet as a free download, versus being a participant in the pressing or sale of an actual physical disc bootleg CD, which is then sold for profit.

You licensed those tracks from the copyright holders and paid the publishing ?  One-on-one tape/CDR/mp3 trading is one thing - we've all done that - but supplying the material, artwork and burning instructions to a site like that (and you're all over it offering not just BB material) and saying you're not involved in 'legging... like to see that one defended in court.  ;D

Reminds me of the folk who sold grape juice during prohibition, with specific instructions what NOT to do to allow it to ferment into wine.  :lol


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 24, 2012, 01:59:20 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





There is a difference between making material available to another collector, which that other collector then(initially without my knowledge, since they didn't get it directly from me) puts onto the internet as a free download, versus being a participant in the pressing or sale of an actual physical disc bootleg CD, which is then sold for profit.

AND, GO TO THAT LINK. IT SAYS THAT THOSE TRACKS ARE "NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD".

They were available for months.

In fact Andrew's point is, I believe, simply that they were available.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 02:05:56 AM
The links were active eight months ago, according to the comments.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 02:06:39 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





There is a difference between making material available to another collector, which that other collector then(initially without my knowledge, since they didn't get it directly from me) puts onto the internet as a free download, versus being a participant in the pressing or sale of an actual physical disc bootleg CD, which is then sold for profit.

AND, GO TO THAT LINK. IT SAYS THAT THOSE TRACKS ARE "NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD".

They were available for months.

In fact Andrew's point is, I believe, simply that they were available.

Until The Beach Boys offered "Smile" officially, "Smile"(as the most legendary unreleased album in pop music history) was fair game. That download spared many people from overpaying and getting loads of filler and poor sounding tracks. The download offered the best of what was then in circulation. Would you have preferred to have been unable to listen to "Smile" material between 1985 & 2011.The people that you call "bootleggers" kept interest in "Smile" alive for all these years, creating a market for an official set. Do think that if the material hadn't escaped into circulation, that The Beach Boys would have been willing to release it?


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 24, 2012, 02:09:12 AM
Still available:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - SACRAMENTO 1964

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - STEREO MIXES

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - MICHIGAN 1966

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - SEATTLE 1977

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BREAKAWAY TO A BETTER LIFE

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: THE PET SOUNDS

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: SURFER’S MOOD

not to mention:

THE PHIL COHEN COLLECTION - THE VINYL HENDRIX

THE PHIL COHEN COLLECTION: PROCOL HARUM - WITH THE LONDON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA 1973

THE PHIL COHEN COLLECTION: GENESIS - BIRMINGHAM 1998

THE PHIL COHEN COLLECTION: JEFF BECK - BBC 1971

All still available.

Not really knocking the practice – I love a boot as much as the next fan – but you're not in an unassailable position here.  It's because of stuff like this that the record companies tighten up security and drip-feed information rather than dolloping it around everywhere.

Quit moaning and get back to putting together a 50th selection of rarities to share on Big0, eh?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 02:17:08 AM
Would you have preferred to have been unable to listen to "Smile" material between 1985 & 2011.

30 minutes of previously unreleased Smile material was released on the 1993 box, with further odds & ends on Endless Harmony and Hawthorne CA in 1998 and 2001.

Further, I think you'll find the 2011 release had less to do with the boots being out there and more to do with an impending anniversary (oops, cat out of bag time - yes, the Smile release and the C50 events are all part of the same gameplan: who could have possibly guessed ?). The 1993 box was certainly informed by the then-available boots, I'll grant, but not last years big box.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 02:20:34 AM


Quit moaning and get back to putting together a 50th selection of rarities to share on Big0, eh?

As for your request, I'll see what I can do(just joking!)

Anyhow, I've had enough of  people slinging mud at me here. I'm going to find other destinations on the internet, and do things that are more pleasurable.

Mr.Doe singles me out for criticism for so-called "bootlegging" but he doesn't criticize the so-called "fan mixers" who in many instances detrimentally altered the music; some of them even creating Hip-Hop "Mash-ups" of "Smile" music.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 02:31:24 AM
Mr.Doe singles me out for criticism for so-called "bootlegging" but he doesn't criticize the so-called "fan mixers" who in many instances detrimentally altered the music; some of them even creating Hip-Hop "Mash-ups" of "Smile" music.

You don't read my posts - if you did, you'd know that by and large, I detest such so-called mixes for being overwhelmingly clumsy and a travesty of the music presented, not to mention not being mixes at all, but rather fan mashups.

Hopefully this time you'll keep your promise to never darken our (metaphorical) doors again. But somehow, I doubt it. Still, any respite is welcome.  ;)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 02:46:06 AM
And one last(important) note: anything recently being offered on the internet as being from "The Philip Cohen Collection" does NOT originate from my collection at all. My only service has been to pre-screen material to ensure that any tracks that are available officially get omitted from the download, and fans are instructed where to find those omitted tracks on officially released CD's.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 02:57:38 AM
Yet you've allowed it to be posted as "The Phil Cohen Collection". Can you say, 'disingenuous' ? I trust in the very near future this oversight will be rectified ?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 24, 2012, 03:41:24 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 24, 2012, 04:26:06 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.




exactly and I have coped flak because of my bagging of Phil. You are a grub Phil..
PLEASE BANISH HIM

This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 08:00:47 AM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol

At that point Jardine HAD retracted his announcement of an official "Smile" set. All of this is now a moot point. It's 2012, and an official "Smile" box is now here and (hopefully) we are all now enjoying it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 08:16:09 AM
The "event" of material from my collection appearing on the internet started like this: a friend made me aware of a Southeast Asian website, because he thought that I would enjoy it, but the first time that I looked at the website, I immediately noticed that a collection of unreleased songs(no, NOT by The Beach Boys) that had to have originated from my collection appeared there, and that looking further into the archive list on that site, the "Smile" compilation(originally created for myself and 3 other friends) appeared there, and I realized this: that any rare material that I had ever burnt to CD-R for anyone(even CD-R's burnt before the internet or downloading ever existed) or material that I had copied for friends on cassette(before the CD or CD-R formats ever existed) could all potentially appear on the internet. My decision to cooperate was motivated by a desire to pre-empt the possibility of poor quality multi-generation copies from circulating. And, by the way, with the exception of eight discs of material by 1960's British artists, none of the material had ever been truly exclusive to my collection. That website could have(and probably would have) obtained it elsewhere.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on April 24, 2012, 09:33:45 AM
Still available:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - SACRAMENTO 1964

John:

You forgot:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: THE WIGGLES -- LIVE, SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 2007

 >:D


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 09:54:42 AM
Still available:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BEACH BOYS - SACRAMENTO 1964

John:

You forgot:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: THE WIGGLES -- LIVE, SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 2007

 >:D


Who the F@#k are The Wiggles?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on April 24, 2012, 10:05:48 AM

You forgot:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: THE WIGGLES -- LIVE, SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 2007

 >:D


Who the F@#k are The Wiggles?

Phil, The Wiggles are an Australian children's group, well known to people with kids.

I was having a bit of Fun with you!

 ;D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wiggles


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 10:21:24 AM

You forgot:

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: THE WIGGLES -- LIVE, SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 2007

 >:D


Who the F@#k are The Wiggles?

Phil, The Wiggles are an Australian children's group, well known to people with kids.

I was having a bit of Fun with you!

 ;D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wiggles

O.K. then.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 24, 2012, 04:56:40 PM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol

At that point Jardine HAD retracted his announcement of an official "Smile" set. All of this is now a moot point. It's 2012, and an official "Smile" box is now here and (hopefully) we are all now enjoying it.

Yes but the rest of us thought/knew that he had been told to retract it because he'd jumped the gun with his announcement whereas you being the doom merchant you are labelled his announcement a hoax. The hoax part was the bit that floored me not that Al had retracted his statement.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 24, 2012, 05:51:22 PM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol

At that point Jardine HAD retracted his announcement of an official "Smile" set. All of this is now a moot point. It's 2012, and an official "Smile" box is now here and (hopefully) we are all now enjoying it.

Yes but the rest of us thought/knew that he had been told to retract it because he'd jumped the gun with his announcement whereas you being the doom merchant you are labelled his announcement a hoax. The hoax part was the bit that floored me not that Al had retracted his statement.

It's quite obvious Phil is a legend in his own mind. He *wanted* SMiLE's release to be cancelled so he could remain "on top" (in his own mind). He also is quite possessive of unreleased material. He seems to think these artists owe us new albums and archive material.

The way I look at it, is this new Beach Boys album is just a cherry on top. And the zinepak CD, thats great too. And when the box set comes out, that'll be great too. And if certain songs that I was looking forward happen to be on it, I'll be even happier. But I won't die of depression if they aren't, because The Beach Boys don't owe me anything. Nor do any of the other artists. We choose to follow them, and they should follow their muse, and if they decide it is appropriate to release certain material at a certain time, then that is fine with me. I'm not going to get mad at them having a schedule or whatnot, and follow it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 06:37:18 PM
Really ?  From here: http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702 (http://bigozine2.com/roio/?p=702)

"This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations."

Your being a 'legger doesn't concern me, but the hypocrisy does.





This comment floored me... "As it turns out, Al Jardine started a hoax, which he has now retracted. “Smile” is not going to be released officially. The “Smile” that you get on Big O is the best “Smile” you’ll ever get." - By Philip Cohen on Feb 15, 2011

 :lol

At that point Jardine HAD retracted his announcement of an official "Smile" set. All of this is now a moot point. It's 2012, and an official "Smile" box is now here and (hopefully) we are all now enjoying it.

Yes but the rest of us thought/knew that he had been told to retract it because he'd jumped the gun with his announcement whereas you being the doom merchant you are labelled his announcement a hoax. The hoax part was the bit that floored me not that Al had retracted his statement.

It's quite obvious Phil is a legend in his own mind. He *wanted* SMiLE's release to be cancelled so he could remain "on top" (in his own mind). He also is quite possessive of unreleased material. He seems to think these artists owe us new albums and archive material.

The way I look at it, is this new Beach Boys album is just a cherry on top. And the zinepak CD, thats great too. And when the box set comes out, that'll be great too. And if certain songs that I was looking forward happen to be on it, I'll be even happier. But I won't die of depression if they aren't, because The Beach Boys don't owe me anything. Nor do any of the other artists. We choose to follow them, and they should follow their muse, and if they decide it is appropriate to release certain material at a certain time, then that is fine with me. I'm not going to get mad at them having a schedule or whatnot, and follow it.

If I was "Posessive" of unreleased material, then I wouldn't have shared every rarity I've got with the world. I DID want the "Smile" box to be released, but with a minimum of game-playing with the fans who had eagerly awaited it for decades. The Beach Boys' past history of arguing with each other over archival projects, gave me reason to worry during Capitol's 5 month Wall of Secrecy which followed the initial announcement.

And, be careful what you wish for in wanting artists to "follow their muse" and "release certain material at a certain time", because, when taken to its extreme, the result is the mentality of Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young", who repeatedly float possible vault tapes projects in interviews, then, invariably never deliver the goods.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on April 24, 2012, 06:54:17 PM
I'm guessing the concept of foreplay is completely lost on PC.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 24, 2012, 08:21:54 PM

If I was "Posessive" of unreleased material, then I wouldn't have shared every rarity I've got with the world. I DID want the "Smile" box to be released, but with a minimum of game-playing with the fans who had eagerly awaited it for decades. The Beach Boys' past history of arguing with each other over archival projects, gave me reason to worry during Capitol's 5 month Wall of Secrecy which followed the initial announcement.

And, be careful what you wish for in wanting artists to "follow their muse" and "release certain material at a certain time", because, when taken to its extreme, the result is the mentality of Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young", who repeatedly float possible vault tapes projects in interviews, then, invariably never deliver the goods.

Is your name Lewis Digges.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 24, 2012, 08:35:58 PM

If I was "Posessive" of unreleased material, then I wouldn't have shared every rarity I've got with the world. I DID want the "Smile" box to be released, but with a minimum of game-playing with the fans who had eagerly awaited it for decades. The Beach Boys' past history of arguing with each other over archival projects, gave me reason to worry during Capitol's 5 month Wall of Secrecy which followed the initial announcement.

And, be careful what you wish for in wanting artists to "follow their muse" and "release certain material at a certain time", because, when taken to its extreme, the result is the mentality of Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young", who repeatedly float possible vault tapes projects in interviews, then, invariably never deliver the goods.

Is your name Lewis Digges.

Ha.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 24, 2012, 08:49:46 PM

If I was "Posessive" of unreleased material, then I wouldn't have shared every rarity I've got with the world. I DID want the "Smile" box to be released, but with a minimum of game-playing with the fans who had eagerly awaited it for decades. The Beach Boys' past history of arguing with each other over archival projects, gave me reason to worry during Capitol's 5 month Wall of Secrecy which followed the initial announcement.

And, be careful what you wish for in wanting artists to "follow their muse" and "release certain material at a certain time", because, when taken to its extreme, the result is the mentality of Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young", who repeatedly float possible vault tapes projects in interviews, then, invariably never deliver the goods.

Is your name Lewis Digges.

Who?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Quzi on April 24, 2012, 09:51:52 PM

If I was "Posessive" of unreleased material, then I wouldn't have shared every rarity I've got with the world. I DID want the "Smile" box to be released, but with a minimum of game-playing with the fans who had eagerly awaited it for decades. The Beach Boys' past history of arguing with each other over archival projects, gave me reason to worry during Capitol's 5 month Wall of Secrecy which followed the initial announcement.

And, be careful what you wish for in wanting artists to "follow their muse" and "release certain material at a certain time", because, when taken to its extreme, the result is the mentality of Crosby,Stills, Nash & Young", who repeatedly float possible vault tapes projects in interviews, then, invariably never deliver the goods.

Is your name Lewis Digges.
Hahahahaha!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 12:57:44 PM
So it's looking like the only releases we will be getting for the 50th anniversary besides The SMiLE Sessions, the new album, and the zinepak are going to be the box set and the new best of. At least according to the press release they sent out earlier, where it says:

"The Beach Boys and Capitol/EMI have also partnered for 50th Anniversary commemorative releases celebrating the band’s entire catalog, with a new hits collection and a career-spanning box set planned for later this year."

So I guess our only chance to get unreleased songs will be the box set. Lets hope they choose some really good stuff for that. I hope they give us the cream of the crop.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 25, 2012, 01:00:54 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 01:02:40 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be a Phil-like character. I just wanted to get everybody's hopes in check. I'm super excited still.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 25, 2012, 01:11:45 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be a Phil-like character. I just wanted to get everybody's hopes in check. I'm super excited still.

Sorry Jim, my post was a joke directed at Phil, not you.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on April 25, 2012, 01:25:35 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be a Phil-like character. I just wanted to get everybody's hopes in check. I'm super excited still.

Sorry Jim, my post was a joke directed at Phil, not you.
Even with all this today, Phil will think up some new conspiracy between Capitol & The Beach Boys. ;)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 01:31:54 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

The announcement was in mid-December 2011, so it has been more than several hours!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 25, 2012, 01:33:17 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

The announcement was in mid-December 2011, so it has been more than several hours!

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Please. Forever?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 01:37:34 PM
Apparently, the reunion album is titled "That's Why God Made The Radio", and an (unconfirmed) track listing is mentioned at the Steve Hoffman forum. We now await word from Capitol as to whether the track listing is truth or rumor.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on April 25, 2012, 01:39:34 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

The announcement was in mid-December 2011, so it has been more than several hours!

I was just messing with you Phil, I hope we do get a great new box set with previously unreleased stuff on it - it would be great and it might finally make you happy. Promise not to get all ansty if Capitol don't give us daily updates on the box set?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 03:01:32 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

The announcement was in mid-December 2011, so it has been more than several hours!

I was just messing with you Phil, I hope we do get a great new box set with previously unreleased stuff on it - it would be great and it might finally make you happy. Promise not to get all ansty if Capitol don't give us daily updates on the box set?

It would be reasonable to say that it would be necessary for Capitol to reveal info about the archival projects by early November 2012 to be able to have the product in stores this year.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 25, 2012, 03:16:19 PM
Just had the new BigO newsletter by email. Guess what this week's free download is?

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BOB DYLAN - COMPLETE BASEMENT TAPES

I'm really upset at being put through this kind of thing - Phil, you could have given us some advance notice, maybe a release date, track list... A few bones at least. Instead we have to endure this wall of secrecy, this deliberate policy not to keep the fans informed.

;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 25, 2012, 03:21:38 PM
Well it's been several hours since Capitol announced the possibility of archival Beach Boys CD product and we have heard nothing! NOTHING!!!!!  ;D

The announcement was in mid-December 2011, so it has been more than several hours!

I was just messing with you Phil, I hope we do get a great new box set with previously unreleased stuff on it - it would be great and it might finally make you happy. Promise not to get all ansty if Capitol don't give us daily updates on the box set?

It would be reasonable to say that it would be necessary for Capitol to reveal info about the archival projects by early November 2012 to be able to have the product in stores this year.
Thats the spirit!


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 03:50:40 PM
Just had the new BigO newsletter by email. Guess what this week's free download is?

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BOB DYLAN - COMPLETE BASEMENT TAPES

I'm really upset at being put through this kind of thing - Phil, you could have given us some advance notice, maybe a release date, track list... A few bones at least. Instead we have to endure this wall of secrecy, this deliberate policy not to keep the fans informed.

;D

Be advised, that for all recent downloads on that website that are credited(by the website operator's courtesy) to "The Philip Cohen Collection" that I have NOT supplied the material. My only input was to pre-screen Discs one through four, to ensure that the website operator does not offer anything that is on Sony/Columbia's official "The Basement Tapes" 2-CD set. I advised that several tracks on Disc Four should be omitted, since they were released officially by Sony/Columbia. Be advised that some of the tracks on that "Basement Tapes" bootleg(particularly on Disc One) are badly distorted.....unlistenable. Fortunately the Dylan fans won't have to pay to get this low-fidelity crap.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on April 25, 2012, 04:23:25 PM

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BOB DYLAN - COMPLETE BASEMENT TAPES

I'm really upset at being put through this kind of thing - Phil, you could have given us some advance notice, maybe a release date, track list... A few bones at least. Instead we have to endure this wall of secrecy, this deliberate policy not to keep the fans informed.

;D

or in this case, the Cohen of Silence!

"Sorry about that, Chief!"

 :hug


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 04:35:22 PM
Just had the new BigO newsletter by email. Guess what this week's free download is?

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BOB DYLAN - COMPLETE BASEMENT TAPES

I'm really upset at being put through this kind of thing - Phil, you could have given us some advance notice, maybe a release date, track list... A few bones at least. Instead we have to endure this wall of secrecy, this deliberate policy not to keep the fans informed.

;D
Be advised, that for all recent downloads on that website that are credited(by the website operator's courtesy) to "The Philip Cohen Collection" that I have NOT supplied the material. My only input was to pre-screen Discs one through four, to ensure that the website operator does not offer anything that is on Sony/Columbia's official "The Basement Tapes" 2-CD set. I advised that several tracks on Disc Four should be omitted, since they were released officially by Sony/Columbia. Be advised that some of the tracks on that "Basement Tapes" bootleg(particularly on Disc One) are badly distorted.....unlistenable. Fortunately the Dylan fans won't have to pay to get this low-fidelity crap.

I still don't understand how this stuff isn't considered "in your collection" if the f*ckign page is called "The Philip Cohen Collection".


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 05:09:32 PM
Just had the new BigO newsletter by email. Guess what this week's free download is?

THE PHILIP COHEN COLLECTION: BOB DYLAN - COMPLETE BASEMENT TAPES

I'm really upset at being put through this kind of thing - Phil, you could have given us some advance notice, maybe a release date, track list... A few bones at least. Instead we have to endure this wall of secrecy, this deliberate policy not to keep the fans informed.

;D


I still don't understand how this stuff isn't considered "in your collection" if the f*ckign page is called "The Philip Cohen Collection".
Be advised, that for all recent downloads on that website that are credited(by the website operator's courtesy) to "The Philip Cohen Collection" that I have NOT supplied the material. My only input was to pre-screen Discs one through four, to ensure that the website operator does not offer anything that is on Sony/Columbia's official "The Basement Tapes" 2-CD set. I advised that several tracks on Disc Four should be omitted, since they were released officially by Sony/Columbia. Be advised that some of the tracks on that "Basement Tapes" bootleg(particularly on Disc One) are badly distorted.....unlistenable. Fortunately the Dylan fans won't have to pay to get this low-fidelity crap.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 25, 2012, 05:15:13 PM
Answer:The website operator is thanking me for my "consulting" by making these titles an (honorary) part of "The Philip Cohen Collection". The website operator has used no actual material from my collection in the year 2012.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 25, 2012, 10:56:15 PM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 26, 2012, 01:33:54 AM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.

The bottom line is this: I myself have never uploaded as much as one note of music onto the internet.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on April 26, 2012, 02:21:15 AM
"I did not have sex with that woman."

"... but I didn't inhale..."

"the cheque's in the post"

"of course I love you, erm, honey?"

"I'll never work with those guys again"

"the Smile tapes are gone, I burned 'em"

"of course I won't come to Vermouth"


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 08:00:43 AM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.

The bottom line is this: I myself have never uploaded as much as one note of music onto the internet.

That's like saying "I never killed anyone - I just supplied the guy who did with the gun and the shells".

Taking only the Smile download into account, you supplied the tracks, the artwork, the liner notes and the instructions on how to burn it to achieve a smooth flow. I guess when you passed all that on to the guy who runs the site, you never for a single moment thought he'd upload it to the 'net, did you ? Bottom line: you've knowingly supplied a long-established 'legging site with archive, copyrighted material from your own collection. That, my seriously dumb friend, makes you at best an accomplice to a criminal act: by any reasonable definition, it makes you a 'legger yourself, and in court you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. so stop fooling yourself. You're a bootlegger, end of.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 26, 2012, 01:14:48 PM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.

The bottom line is this: I myself have never uploaded as much as one note of music onto the internet.


That's like saying "I never killed anyone - I just supplied the guy who did with the gun and the shells".

Taking only the Smile download into account, you supplied the tracks, the artwork, the liner notes and the instructions on how to burn it to achieve a smooth flow. I guess when you passed all that on to the guy who runs the site, you never for a single moment thought he'd upload it to the 'net, did you ? Bottom line: you've knowingly supplied a long-established 'legging site with archive, copyrighted material from your own collection. That, my seriously dumb friend, makes you at best an accomplice to a criminal act: by any reasonable definition, it makes you a 'legger yourself, and in court you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. so stop fooling yourself. You're a bootlegger, end of.

But, if you look back at earlier posts, you will see that I DIDN'T provide the "Smile" compilation to that website, but once I became aware that they had it(and the typewritten "liner notes" that I had created for, and photocopied for 3 friends), I provided a brief bit of updated introductory liner notes, and I told them which[officially released] tracks to omit from their download, that's it. And the website in question ceased offering the material shortly before Capitol released "The Smile Sessions". You are being a hypocrite, Mr.Doe, because there are people on this forum who continue(to this day)to post links to file storage sites which contain those forum members' "Smile" fan mixes, and these fan mixes are being offered AFTER Capitol already released the recordings officially. And yet you're not accusing those forum members of being bootleggers.

And I will reiterate, the new offerings on the main page of that website(to which you refer), and even the list of "re-started" older recordings on that main page no longer(effective January 2012) features any recordings that actually come from my collection regardless of how they are being designated. And I didn't "supply" the "Smile" artwork. It comes from a 1990's Japanese CD release, known to fans as "T-2580"


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 01:23:04 PM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.

The bottom line is this: I myself have never uploaded as much as one note of music onto the internet.


That's like saying "I never killed anyone - I just supplied the guy who did with the gun and the shells".

Taking only the Smile download into account, you supplied the tracks, the artwork, the liner notes and the instructions on how to burn it to achieve a smooth flow. I guess when you passed all that on to the guy who runs the site, you never for a single moment thought he'd upload it to the 'net, did you ? Bottom line: you've knowingly supplied a long-established 'legging site with archive, copyrighted material from your own collection. That, my seriously dumb friend, makes you at best an accomplice to a criminal act: by any reasonable definition, it makes you a 'legger yourself, and in court you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. so stop fooling yourself. You're a bootlegger, end of.
But, if you look back at earlier posts, you will see that I DIDN'T provide the "Smile" compilation to that website

Really ? From said site, direct cut & past, unaltered:

"State of the art computer editing and noise reduction techniques have been used to properly assemble “Smile” for the first time (remember, this was compiled between 2000-2003), using the best possible sources. And we’re proud to present a full fidelity source for “Holidays” (previously mis-titled as “Tones”).

This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations. Thanks to my friend Mike (who has apparently gone to the great CD mastering studio in the sky) for his considerable computer editing and noise reduction system expertise. The artwork has been “Borrowed” from a Japanese “Smile” bootleg. -
Philip Cohen

"...one of my greatest CD creations."

Know something ? Lying to yourself is worse than lying to everyone else here. It's called delusion, or denial. And you can't provide any shred of a defence because all I'm doing here is using your own words against you. Unless, of course,  you're prepared to admit to lying about compiling the CDs as well. You're a sad, sad, deluded man with a very unhealthy persecution complex. fact is, aside from your infringing their copyrights, Capitol don't give a flying one about your paranoia over the (non-existant) wall of Silence... but they do know about your bootlegging activities, so you'd be well advised to be very, very careful in the future.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 01:32:30 PM
can't you guys just do this in PMs? this has nothing to do with "commemorative releases".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 01:32:56 PM
I'm done.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 26, 2012, 01:34:57 PM
Honorary or not (and in the vast majority of the pages, it's not), your name is still in the strapline, and directly associated with a site that offers downloads of material that infringes every copyright law there is, or in other words, bootlegs (and this has not gone unnoticed in the relevant quarters - I'd be very, very careful what I say and post here, were I you).

And, uh, I thought you were taking yourself off somewhere else ? Seems the respite lasted about 34 seconds.

The bottom line is this: I myself have never uploaded as much as one note of music onto the internet.


That's like saying "I never killed anyone - I just supplied the guy who did with the gun and the shells".

Taking only the Smile download into account, you supplied the tracks, the artwork, the liner notes and the instructions on how to burn it to achieve a smooth flow. I guess when you passed all that on to the guy who runs the site, you never for a single moment thought he'd upload it to the 'net, did you ? Bottom line: you've knowingly supplied a long-established 'legging site with archive, copyrighted material from your own collection. That, my seriously dumb friend, makes you at best an accomplice to a criminal act: by any reasonable definition, it makes you a 'legger yourself, and in court you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. so stop fooling yourself. You're a bootlegger, end of.
But, if you look back at earlier posts, you will see that I DIDN'T provide the "Smile" compilation to that website

Really ? From said site, direct cut & past, unaltered:

"State of the art computer editing and noise reduction techniques have been used to properly assemble “Smile” for the first time (remember, this was compiled between 2000-2003), using the best possible sources. And we’re proud to present a full fidelity source for “Holidays” (previously mis-titled as “Tones”).

This two-CD “Smile” set is one of my greatest CD creations. Thanks to my friend Mike (who has apparently gone to the great CD mastering studio in the sky) for his considerable computer editing and noise reduction system expertise. The artwork has been “Borrowed” from a Japanese “Smile” bootleg. -
Philip Cohen

"...one of my greatest CD creations."

Know something ? Lying to yourself is worse than lying to everyone else here. It's called delusion, or denial.

Saying it was "My creation" and creating mock liner notes was my idea. I am a music fan who frequently creates a historical essay to include when creating compilations of rare material for my close friends. Putting the collection onto the internet wasn't my idea. The original compiling was done about six to seven years before that download site existed. As for creating "liner notes" when I'm making a CD-R only for one collector, I like giving things the deluxe treatment. It's a holdover from my 1970's days as a hippie. I've got some some "good stuff"(in this case, rare or unreleased material that you couldn't buy officially, even if you wanted to), and I want to "Turn People On".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 01:37:42 PM
can't you guys just do this in PMs? this has nothing to do with "commemorative releases".

Cohen has a very bad record with PMs - he can't grasp that the P stands for "private".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 26, 2012, 01:39:03 PM
can't you guys just do this in PMs? this has nothing to do with "commemorative releases".

I agree.Let's go back to talking about "50th Anniversary" releases. "The Smile Sessions" now provides the definitive collection of "Smile" recordings. Let's enjoy it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 26, 2012, 01:40:06 PM
I brought all this up when you first started bagging SMiLE and saying it would never come out blah blah..Remember that Phil? You wasted some good money on SMiLE material..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on April 26, 2012, 01:57:07 PM
I brought all this up when you first started bagging SMiLE and saying it would never come out blah blah..Remember that Phil? You wasted some good money on SMiLE material..

You fail to understand(given The Beach Boys' past history with vault projects) why a 5 month Wall of Silence caused me and some others to wonder if the official "Smile" project had gone into permanent limbo.....or been cancelled.
The past is now prologue. "The Smile Sessions" is here. It's time for forum bullies to stop ganging up on me, and cool it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 02:17:32 PM
I didn't truly believe The Smile Sessions was going to come out until I held it in my hands. It's Smile, the fact that it was never released is one of its defining features.

But for some random new album which probably hasn't been recorded in sections that are hard to piece together, probably didn't make Brian believe he set the building across the street on fire, probably doesn't have to compete with Paul McCartney's latest release "iTunes Live from Capitol Studios", et cetera, there's no reason to believe it won't be released. Yeah, details aren't coming in as quickly as we want them to, but just be patient.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 02:25:07 PM
I didn't truly believe The Smile Sessions was going to come out until I held it in my hands.

I did. In fact, I more than believed: I knew.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Runaways on May 08, 2012, 07:42:24 PM
y'know what i want on the next release?  an official release of the original "big sur".  i'd love that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 08, 2012, 07:47:20 PM
y'know what i want on the next release?  an official release of the original "big sur".  i'd love that.

Definitely. Would love a clean version of "Marilyn Rovell" as well.

There's a lot of stuff we've heard in sh*t quality that would be pretty revealing to hear in full quality.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 08, 2012, 07:51:05 PM
y'know what i want on the next release?  an official release of the original "big sur".  i'd love that.

How this and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again?" have eluded the huge number of releases containing rarities baffles me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 08, 2012, 08:15:52 PM
imo they REALLY need to re-release all their albums in vinyl replica and re-remastered, but like releasing them like normal cds, not two albums in one cd/box ... i, i just can't stand that concept, really, it ain't that hard is it..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 08, 2012, 08:17:59 PM
imo they REALLY need to re-release all their albums in vinyl replica and re-remastered, but like releasing them like normal cds, not two albums in one cd/box ... i, i just can't stand that concept, really, it ain't that hard is it..

You're right. Paying 25-30 dollars for two different albums is much better than paying 10 dollars for two albums.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on May 08, 2012, 08:22:48 PM
imo they REALLY need to re-release all their albums in vinyl replica and re-remastered, but like releasing them like normal cds, not two albums in one cd/box ... i, i just can't stand that concept, really, it ain't that hard is it..
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: donald on May 08, 2012, 09:24:40 PM
I really need a new and improved and expanded box.  And a career spanning Live Box to include Early, Primo Ricky and Blondie, Nassau and Paramount, Beachago, (and this new tour?)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on May 08, 2012, 09:27:23 PM
I'm hoping for an updated box set.  Hope it has some nice rarities, new mixes (maybe that stereo mix of "Wild Honey" will show up!) and some good unreleased stuff.  Perhaps they can salvage a Beach Boys version of "Soul Searchin'"!


Title: Re: What
Post by: obscurereference on May 09, 2012, 06:27:21 AM
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.
I have to admit that when I first started getting into the Beach Boys as a student it was great that I was able to buy two albums + bonus tracks for £5. However now I'm an even bigger fan I'd love to see each album have it's own release with a second disc of bonus tracks. It doesn't seem right that an album as great as say, Sunflower doesn't have it's own deluxe edition - especially as the two-fer release teases all these unreleased songs in the booklet but doesn't contain a single bonus track!

A box set of rarities would be amazing, but I get the feeling they'll release another career spanning box set with a sprinkling of unreleased tracks. It seems to be what was hinted at in the press releases.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on May 09, 2012, 06:43:05 AM
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.
… It doesn't seem right that an album as great as say, Sunflower doesn't have it's own deluxe edition - especially as the two-fer release teases all these unreleased songs in the booklet but doesn't contain a single bonus track!

I've had a feeling for several months that a deluxe Sunflower might be on the cards this year.


(awaits AGD's thwarting of said-feeling…!)  ;D


Title: Re: What
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 09, 2012, 07:11:10 AM
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.
I have to admit that when I first started getting into the Beach Boys as a student it was great that I was able to buy two albums + bonus tracks for £5. However now I'm an even bigger fan I'd love to see each album have it's own release with a second disc of bonus tracks. It doesn't seem right that an album as great as say, Sunflower doesn't have it's own deluxe edition - especially as the two-fer release teases all these unreleased songs in the booklet but doesn't contain a single bonus track!

A box set of rarities would be amazing, but I get the feeling they'll release another career spanning box set with a sprinkling of unreleased tracks. It seems to be what was hinted at in the press releases.

I'm with you, the twofers were great for me as I was just a kid when I got into the BB's so being able to buy two (usually) great albums for a fiver was handy. Now however I want to see each album stand on its own with a quality vinyl replica sleeve (none of this jewel case nonsense), new liner notes and additional bonus tracks and sessions. Albums like Sunflower, Surf's Up and Holland deserve this treatment.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 09, 2012, 12:39:42 PM
imo they REALLY need to re-release all their albums in vinyl replica and re-remastered, but like releasing them like normal cds, not two albums in one cd/box ... i, i just can't stand that concept, really, it ain't that hard is it..

You're right. Paying 25-30 dollars for two different albums is much better than paying 10 dollars for two albums.

Where did i said it wasn't a good deal? it just the idea of putting two albums on one cd that i think is kinda dumb and really bothers me (and plus, in only one package/box).


imo they REALLY need to re-release all their albums in vinyl replica and re-remastered, but like releasing them like normal cds, not two albums in one cd/box ... i, i just can't stand that concept, really, it ain't that hard is it..
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.

As others have already mentioned, a boxset would be indeed quite nice! didn't thought about it at first but why not, many bands are doing it these days.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on May 10, 2012, 05:18:06 AM
I was wondering the last time an archival release contained anything past the Holland era....You could say Ultimate Christmas and Live at Knebworth, but really, that's been forever. You think it's the guys tellin em not to put out anything from 73-88? and even more so than that?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 10, 2012, 08:08:48 AM
I was wondering the last time an archival release contained anything past the Holland era....You could say Ultimate Christmas and Live at Knebworth, but really, that's been forever. You think it's the guys tellin em not to put out anything from 73-88? and even more so than that?

The 1993 box has a whole disc of post-Surf's Up material. The Warmth Of the Sun (2007) has five songs (from twenty-eight) post-Surf's Up.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Heysaboda on May 10, 2012, 09:40:52 AM
For those of us that ain't made of money, the 2-fers are a great deal. Most places you can buy them for the same price or just a bit more than a 12 track CD. I wonder if something is up though, because tonight Amazon had very few copies left of the original albums with no "more on the way" comment. So, maybe they do have new re-releases coming later this year.
… It doesn't seem right that an album as great as say, Sunflower doesn't have it's own deluxe edition - especially as the two-fer release teases all these unreleased songs in the booklet but doesn't contain a single bonus track!

I've had a feeling for several months that a deluxe Sunflower might be on the cards this year.

THIS would be very cool!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on May 10, 2012, 09:47:57 AM
I was wondering the last time an archival release contained anything past the Holland era....You could say Ultimate Christmas and Live at Knebworth, but really, that's been forever. You think it's the guys tellin em not to put out anything from 73-88? and even more so than that?

The 1993 box has a whole disc of post-Surf's Up material. The Warmth Of the Sun (2007) has five songs (from twenty-eight) post-Surf's Up.
Right, but 93 isn't too recent, and in my opinion, the 4th disc gave us the least amount of unreleased songs of the 5 (or 6, if you live in UK) discs (that is the GV box set)....really, I meant archival/unreleased material from post Holland, not already released music, nobody wants songs they already own 5 times.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 10, 2012, 11:03:06 AM
something like The Beatles/Pink Floyd boxset would be nice.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mark H on May 13, 2012, 05:14:31 AM
I want the complete box set of their entire catalog in mini-LP reproduction packaging. 

This was my dream also but I've just accepted that it's probably never going to happen and have since got all the albums on Japanese Mini LP (wasn't cheap!) over the course of a year or so.

This obsession started in the Tower Records in Shibuya, Tokyo where I got Pet Sounds through Holland and was just hooked, Holland even comes with a little Mt Vernon cover inside!

Whenever there are 'mini lp' box sets released in the west they aren't of the same reproduction quality just a naff sleeve.

Who knows maybe Japan will do a 'complete collection' of reissues.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SamMcK on May 13, 2012, 08:15:50 AM
Never mind Vinyl replicas I want to see actual 180g Vinyl records being made with deluxe bonus content, liner notes and audiophile sound! ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on May 14, 2012, 07:23:23 AM
I want a commemorative 50th Anniversary book! Not just that one from the Wal-Mart special one, I want one like the Beatles Anthology book or at least something half as thick as that, that is updated...each BB has their own section and the interviewer asked the same basic questions that we hardcore fans wanna hear...like what's your favorite early album? favorite album after Smile? favorite Brother Years album? Favorite single? make comments about each and every album...I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...We could take archived  interviews for Denny and Carl to add in their opinions. Have each Beach Boy discuss different time eras...I'd love  abook like this...whatcha think?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 10:47:30 AM
I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...

Given that he had precisely nothing to do with the former, so would I.  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on May 14, 2012, 10:59:39 AM
I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...

Given that he had precisely nothing to do with the former, so would I.  ;D
EXACTLY! Besides hot topics that I'd wanna discuss, much of the latter half of their career, I'd like to ask about.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on May 14, 2012, 11:01:27 AM
I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...

Given that he had precisely nothing to do with the former, so would I.  ;D
EXACTLY! Besides hot topics that I'd wanna discuss, much of the latter half of their career, I'd like to ask about.
At least ask him about every song he wrote for which album. For SIP, ask him how many stars he'd give it? What he thinks of the remake of Surfin'....does he like any of it? Was he jealous that he wasn't asked to do it or does he give a crap


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:05:21 AM
I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...

Given that he had precisely nothing to do with the former, so would I.  ;D
EXACTLY! Besides hot topics that I'd wanna discuss, much of the latter half of their career, I'd like to ask about.
At least ask him about every song he wrote for which album. For SIP, ask him how many stars he'd give it? What he thinks of the remake of Surfin'....does he like any of it? Was he jealous that he wasn't asked to do it or does he give a crap

I'd wager a tidy sum he's never even heard it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on May 14, 2012, 11:05:51 AM
I want the complete box set of their entire catalog in mini-LP reproduction packaging. 

This was my dream also but I've just accepted that it's probably never going to happen and have since got all the albums on Japanese Mini LP (wasn't cheap!) over the course of a year or so.

This obsession started in the Tower Records in Shibuya, Tokyo where I got Pet Sounds through Holland and was just hooked, Holland even comes with a little Mt Vernon cover inside!

Whenever there are 'mini lp' box sets released in the west they aren't of the same reproduction quality just a naff sleeve.

Who knows maybe Japan will do a 'complete collection' of reissues.

something like The Beatles/Pink Floyd boxset would be nice.

I've brought up the complete studio box set earlier in the thread and was surprised to see people raise issue with the expected cost of such a box set.  Um...what?  The two-fers may be a good deal but I completely hate that their catalog is cheapened by this method of slapping two albums together like that.  What exactly are we saying by doing this?  Beach Boys fans have less money than Beatles fans or Elvis fans?  I mean, two albums..on one CD?  Terrible message.  Each album should get its own release individually, at the very least. 

The Beach Boys simply deserve it--period.  This 50th anniversary is a great time to reintroduce the catalog to the public.  With all the obscure cuts they're adding in the setlist on tour from Sunlfower and even So Tough---it could get people to go back and revisit these albums.  They even put the picture of the album artwork on the screen when they play these songs--they did it with "This Whole World" by putting up the Sunflower album.  So having a box set available would be great timing. 

A complete studio box set ala The Beatles/Pink Floyd should be done--among other things.  But this career-spanning box set is on top of my priorities.

It's been done with some great results with Miles Davis' complete Columbia recordings (totaling 52 albums in 70cd's + 1dvd + booklet)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Complete-Columbia-Album-Collection/dp/B00305GXWG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334599998&sr=8-1
YouTube video of the unboxing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LydJ8nHg4I


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mark H on May 14, 2012, 12:13:37 PM
I want the complete box set of their entire catalog in mini-LP reproduction packaging. 

This was my dream also but I've just accepted that it's probably never going to happen and have since got all the albums on Japanese Mini LP (wasn't cheap!) over the course of a year or so.

This obsession started in the Tower Records in Shibuya, Tokyo where I got Pet Sounds through Holland and was just hooked, Holland even comes with a little Mt Vernon cover inside!

Whenever there are 'mini lp' box sets released in the west they aren't of the same reproduction quality just a naff sleeve.

Who knows maybe Japan will do a 'complete collection' of reissues.

something like The Beatles/Pink Floyd boxset would be nice.

I've brought up the complete studio box set earlier in the thread and was surprised to see people raise issue with the expected cost of such a box set.  Um...what?  The two-fers may be a good deal but I completely hate that their catalog is cheapened by this method of slapping two albums together like that.  What exactly are we saying by doing this?  Beach Boys fans have less money than Beatles fans or Elvis fans?  I mean, two albums..on one CD?  Terrible message.  Each album should get its own release individually, at the very least. 

The Beach Boys simply deserve it--period.  This 50th anniversary is a great time to reintroduce the catalog to the public.  With all the obscure cuts they're adding in the setlist on tour from Sunlfower and even So Tough---it could get people to go back and revisit these albums.  They even put the picture of the album artwork on the screen when they play these songs--they did it with "This Whole World" by putting up the Sunflower album.  So having a box set available would be great timing. 

A complete studio box set ala The Beatles/Pink Floyd should be done--among other things.  But this career-spanning box set is on top of my priorities.

It's been done with some great results with Miles Davis' complete Columbia recordings (totaling 52 albums in 70cd's + 1dvd + booklet)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Complete-Columbia-Album-Collection/dp/B00305GXWG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334599998&sr=8-1
YouTube video of the unboxing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LydJ8nHg4I

Agreed, even though I've spent through the nose getting all the Japanese mini lps I would pay again for a 'complete' box set if it was done well.

To make me buy a new set I would like bonus cuts on each album, especially the 70's albums.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 02:28:35 PM
I'd love to hear what Brian says now about SIP or MIU...

Given that he had precisely nothing to do with the former, so would I.  ;D
EXACTLY! Besides hot topics that I'd wanna discuss, much of the latter half of their career, I'd like to ask about.
At least ask him about every song he wrote for which album. For SIP, ask him how many stars he'd give it? What he thinks of the remake of Surfin'....does he like any of it? Was he jealous that he wasn't asked to do it or does he give a crap

I'd wager a tidy sum he's never even heard it.

I'm sure he's heard it but would claim not to have heard it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on May 15, 2012, 05:18:44 AM
I'd prefer to buy unreleased studio/live material than re-issues of albums I already have on cd and vinyl.

I do like the idea someone mentioned of releasing some deluxe versions of albums like Sunflower, Holland, etc. As long as there is enough extra material to make it worthwhile of course.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 28, 2012, 11:16:48 AM
If you're wondering why I've been absent, it is because I've been worn down and defeated by the Wall of Secrecy. There's nothing more to say. If you guys want to continue dreaming, I guess there's no harm in that.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on May 28, 2012, 11:38:36 AM
We're merely speculating about the releases that will be coming later this year. That's all.

Oh, and how did that new BB studio album that couldn't possibly appear on June 5 work out, Phil?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on May 28, 2012, 11:49:17 AM
If you're wondering why I've been absent, it is because I've been worn down and defeated by the Wall of Secrecy. There's nothing more to say. If you guys want to continue dreaming, I guess there's no harm in that.
I dont give a fying f*** why you have been absent. Us guys and girls will continue dreaming and said dreams will become real once more.
Smile-check.New Album-check.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 28, 2012, 12:26:01 PM
We're merely speculating about the releases that will be coming later this year. That's all.

Oh, and how did that new BB studio album that couldn't possibly appear on June 5 work out, Phil?


I'm not saying that the new album won't be good(I haven't heard any of it yet, so I don't know), but whatever its merits, it isn't archival material.
Maybe Capitol & The Beach Boys are waiting for people to stop caring about the archival material, so that there will no longer be any demand for it, and they can then get away with releasing nothing.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on May 28, 2012, 12:29:51 PM
Did someone break wind?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on May 28, 2012, 01:30:47 PM
Personally if I had a choice between the stereo masters and the original Brian Wilson Mono mixes I would choose the original mono mixes just because we haven't got them yet (in full),of course I'm hoping they do both..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seanmurd on May 28, 2012, 02:02:41 PM
If you're wondering why I've been absent, it is because I've been worn down and defeated by the Wall of Secrecy. There's nothing more to say. If you guys want to continue dreaming, I guess there's no harm in that.
That's pretty much exactly what you said a year ago, right down to calling anyone who wasn't exactly like you a "dreamer."


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on May 28, 2012, 04:57:45 PM
"Dreamer" is cool. Lately, all of my dreams have come true. :)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on May 28, 2012, 09:15:38 PM
We're merely speculating about the releases that will be coming later this year. That's all.

Oh, and how did that new BB studio album that couldn't possibly appear on June 5 work out, Phil?


I'm not saying that the new album won't be good(I haven't heard any of it yet, so I don't know), but whatever its merits, it isn't archival material.
Maybe Capitol & The Beach Boys are waiting for people to stop caring about the archival material, so that there will no longer be any demand for it, and they can then get away with releasing nothing.

Phil, will you admit you are wrong when the box set comes out this year?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Runaways on May 28, 2012, 09:22:33 PM
We're merely speculating about the releases that will be coming later this year. That's all.

Oh, and how did that new BB studio album that couldn't possibly appear on June 5 work out, Phil?


I'm not saying that the new album won't be good(I haven't heard any of it yet, so I don't know), but whatever its merits, it isn't archival material.
Maybe Capitol & The Beach Boys are waiting for people to stop caring about the archival material, so that there will no longer be any demand for it, and they can then get away with releasing nothing.

Phil, will you admit you are wrong when the box set comes out this year?

never!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pretty Funky on May 28, 2012, 09:49:11 PM
If you're wondering why I've been absent, it is because I've been worn down and defeated by the Wall of Secrecy. There's nothing more to say. If you guys want to continue dreaming, I guess there's no harm in that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23IFMZBFFoY


Title: Re: What \
Post by: LostArt on May 29, 2012, 04:41:15 AM
Maybe Capitol & The Beach Boys are waiting for people to stop caring about the archival material, so that there will no longer be any demand for it, and they can then get away with releasing nothing.

Or maybe they're waiting until all of the t's are crossed and the i's are dotted before making an announcement about something that is still being tweaked.  Perhaps they're still working on the tracklist.  Perhaps they're waiting on artwork or liner notes...whatever.  It doesn't make sense to announce something now if the plans are to, say, take advantage of the Christmas buying season and release the thing in November.  They just released an expensive box set last fall.  They're releasing a new album that they want to push right now.  Marketing costs money, which the record labels don't have much of these days.  Also, the general public's memory is short these days with all of the electronic media we're bombarded with on a daily basis.  Maybe, just maybe, the plan is to sell as many units of TWGMTR as they can before they start confusing people with news of another new Beach Boys product.  It's all about timing.  Space the releases out, let folks absorb each new release for awhile, and then hit us with the big marketing push for the next one a month or two before it's release (which I predict will be the career-spanning box set sometime this fall).  That's plenty enough time to get the general public interested in another new expensive product.  People on message boards such as this one are likely going to buy the thing whenever it gets released (or not, I guess).  I don't care right now about a tracklist for something that is coming out, say, 4 or 5 months from now.  Right now, I'm all excited about buying a brand new Beach Boys album in a week.  I've not heard a note, except for TWGMTR (the song), and I'm pretty frickin' excited about that right now.  Then, in a month or so from now, I'm going to see them live.  The Beach Boys will be playing for me.  Isn't that awesome, Phil?  Isn't this a frickin' great time to be a Beach Boys fan, Phil?  Soak it all in.  Be happy.  We'll get the next announcement when things are ready to be announced.  Every time the Beach Boys announce a new product, I find myself typing this word on this board.  PATIENCE.

Have a nice day, Phil, would ya?  I checked the news this morning, and the sky isn't going to fall. 



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 29, 2012, 07:23:41 AM
If you're wondering why I've been absent...

I'll stop you there - we haven't. In fact, we've been rejoicing in your absence and the delightful atmosphere that results.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on May 29, 2012, 02:36:30 PM
Seriously Phil, aren't you happy that The Beach Boys have a brand new album coming out in a week? Isn't that awesome?

And aren't you excited that the greatest hits album that you had your panties in a wad about is also coming out soon? With some new, unreleased stuff on there!

And then, on top of that we are getting a brand new box set, which will probably contain the very best unreleased archival material that they've got. Is that good, or no?

Because, ya know, like, every band puts out a long awaited album both in a two disc and five-disc version, a brand new studio album, a hits album that also features new songs, and also a career spanning box set within a year. Right? Oh wait, no they don't!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on May 29, 2012, 02:40:31 PM
I don't even know this Phil character and I can't believe people here are actually addressing him and trying to talk some sense into him.  He's a lost cause.  There's no one on this or any other site who is going to spoil this for me. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 29, 2012, 03:15:53 PM
As of mid-June, the latest "Wall of Secrecy" has lasted six months(by contrast, the "Wall of Secrecy" during the wait for the "Smile Sessions" box lasted five months). At what point do you guys think that there would be reason for concern about the fate of the box set and "commemorative releases" ? At what point does "Dreaming" turn to "Discouragement" or "Dismay"?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 29, 2012, 03:22:24 PM
Maybe Capitol & The Beach Boys are waiting for people to stop caring about the archival material, so that there will no longer be any demand for it, and they can then get away with releasing nothing.

.......and the sky isn't going to fall. 




No, the sky isn't going to fall, but I'd rather have the archival product than not have it. As for the reunion album, I preordered it. I hope it's good.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 29, 2012, 04:07:07 PM


And aren't you excited that the greatest hits album that you had your panties in a wad about is also coming out soon? With some new, unreleased stuff on there!


At one point, Mr.Doe hinted at a 50-song hits set(something that neither The Beach Boys or Capitol ever officially confirmed), but where did you get the information that this project is back on again, and specifically that it will contain unreleased material?



Title: Re: What \
Post by: 18thofMay on May 29, 2012, 04:40:22 PM
As of mid-June, the latest "Wall of Secrecy" has lasted six months(by contrast, the "Wall of Secrecy" during the wait for the "Smile Sessions" box lasted five months). At what point do you guys think that there would be reason for concern about the fate of the box set and "commemorative releases" ? At what point does "Dreaming" turn to "Discouragement" or "Dismay"?
In Australia we have certain traits or characteristics. One trait is telling people exactly how we feel. We also have different terms for various types of people. We would classify you as a 100% certified f*cking Wanker!! Why continue with this crap Phil, are you that f*cked in the head? On a scale of zero to one hundred (0-100) your credibility is ZERO (0) and Andrews is one hundred (100)! He is respected, you are not! His posts are factual, yours are not! GO AWAY..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: lee on May 29, 2012, 07:08:16 PM
The Good Vibrations has been "temporarily out of stock" on Amazon for the past few months. Now it is "unavailable" on Amazon. I take that as a good sign. Capitol would not stop production of that box set during this tour and media hype unless they were getting ready to release something in it's place.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: LetHimRun on May 29, 2012, 07:14:57 PM
The Good Vibrations has been "temporarily out of stock" on Amazon for the past few months. Now it is "unavailable" on Amazon. I take that as a good sign. Capitol would not stop production of that box set during this tour and media hype unless they were getting ready to release something in it's place.

It's a trick on the eyes, like 3D TV glasses.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on May 29, 2012, 07:18:03 PM
Alright dreamers: keep on dreamin'

There's no further point(at the present time) visiting here.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on May 29, 2012, 07:26:31 PM


And aren't you excited that the greatest hits album that you had your panties in a wad about is also coming out soon? With some new, unreleased stuff on there!


At one point, Mr.Doe hinted at a 50-song hits set(something that neither The Beach Boys or Capitol ever officially confirmed), but where did you get the information that this project is back on again, and specifically that it will contain unreleased material?



In the latest issue of the Endless Summer Quarterly, which confirmed both the hits album (with new songs) and the box set, along with That's Why God Made the Radio.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 07:30:29 PM


And aren't you excited that the greatest hits album that you had your panties in a wad about is also coming out soon? With some new, unreleased stuff on there!


At one point, Mr.Doe hinted at a 50-song hits set(something that neither The Beach Boys or Capitol ever officially confirmed), but where did you get the information that this project is back on again, and specifically that it will contain unreleased material?



In the latest issue of the Endless Summer Quarterly, which confirmed both the hits album (with new songs) and the box set, along with That's Why God Made the Radio.

What are the new songs ? stuff that didn't made the album or unreleased material ?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on May 29, 2012, 10:05:05 PM


And aren't you excited that the greatest hits album that you had your panties in a wad about is also coming out soon? With some new, unreleased stuff on there!


At one point, Mr.Doe hinted at a 50-song hits set(something that neither The Beach Boys or Capitol ever officially confirmed), but where did you get the information that this project is back on again, and specifically that it will contain unreleased material?



In the latest issue of the Endless Summer Quarterly, which confirmed both the hits album (with new songs) and the box set, along with That's Why God Made the Radio.

What are the new songs ? stuff that didn't made the album or unreleased material ?

I don't think anybody knows yet. Probably stuff they recorded during the sessions for the new album and earmarked them for the greatest hits album. Who knows? Regardless, more new Beach Boys! Fine with me!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 29, 2012, 11:37:46 PM
Alright dreamers: keep on dreamin'

There's no further point (at the present time) visiting here.

And yet you did.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on May 30, 2012, 01:57:10 AM
Suspect this is simply Phil's way of bumping the thread.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: seanmurd on May 30, 2012, 05:00:43 AM
As of mid-June, the latest "Wall of Secrecy" has lasted six months(by contrast, the "Wall of Secrecy" during the wait for the "Smile Sessions" box lasted five months). At what point do you guys think that there would be reason for concern about the fate of the box set and "commemorative releases" ? At what point does "Dreaming" turn to "Discouragement" or "Dismay"?

There is no "wall of secrecy" at all; they are not going to talk about a hits collection or a box set when they are trying to focus on the new album.  Your "Wall of Secrecy Doomsday Clock" needs to be re-set to "0:00" on the day the new album is released.

Of course, there was no "wall of secrecy" last year either; those five months of "silence" were punctuated by brief reminders that The Smile Sessions WAS real and WAS happening -- namely, the MOJO single and the Record Store Day single. Nobody here had any doubt that TSS was going to be released in 2011 -- except you, of course. We were all wide awake, and YOU were the one who was dreaming. A nightmare, apparently, that you've slipped into again.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on May 30, 2012, 06:23:10 AM
As of mid-June, the latest "Wall of Secrecy" has lasted six months(by contrast, the "Wall of Secrecy" during the wait for the "Smile Sessions" box lasted five months). At what point do you guys think that there would be reason for concern about the fate of the box set and "commemorative releases" ? At what point does "Dreaming" turn to "Discouragement" or "Dismay"?

There is no "wall of secrecy" at all; they are not going to talk about a hits collection or a box set when they are trying to focus on the new album.  Your "Wall of Secrecy Doomsday Clock" needs to be re-set to "0:00" on the day the new album is released.

Of course, there was no "wall of secrecy" last year either; those five months of "silence" were punctuated by brief reminders that The Smile Sessions WAS real and WAS happening -- namely, the MOJO single and the Record Store Day single. Nobody here had any doubt that TSS was going to be released in 2011 -- except you, of course. We were all wide awake, and YOU were the one who was dreaming. A nightmare, apparently, that you've slipped into again.

Seriously, its the week before the first new recordings the band has released since what, 1996, and the guy is complaining that this is all they are releasing! How dare they wait until, say, November to release archival material! And you know that even if they release "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again", the 1974 demo of "California Feelin'", and unearth some classic previously unreleased Brian Wilson compositions, Phil will be here saying "why didn't they release the 1970 demo of "Back Home"? Why are there no Pet Sounds outtakes? Blah blah."

I guarantee he will complain when they release the all important archival material. Obviously, yes, I wanna hear the best stuff the band has in the vaults still. I cannot wait to hear things like "California Feelin'" 1974, "Where Is She", and "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again", but I also understand that the band wants to do things on their own timeline, and as they have a brand new album out next week, I'll be okay to wait.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Lookit on May 30, 2012, 07:39:29 AM
Even in my short time (mainly lurking) on this board, it's pretty clear you are a fantasist of the highest order, Phil. Your minute credibility was torpedoed by the SMiLE release. What's diffferent this time?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 05, 2012, 12:01:17 AM
While waiting for a sluggish Amazon.com to ship my CD of the reunion album, I found an unofficial MP3 of the album on the internet, so that I could hear it. I've just finished playing it. The album is not bad; neither their best nor worst. It's consistent and melodic.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 12, 2012, 08:46:17 PM
Hey, don't wanna get anybody's hopes up by bringing this thread back, but I wanted to ask the moderators if maybe we could change the title of the thread to "Commemorative release discussion and info" and pin it up in the top instead of the "new album" one, since the new album has already come and gone and now we have the box set and hits album to look forward too, and maybe other stuff (hopefully)!

Anyways, just an idea.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 13, 2012, 02:05:49 AM
No fault of sweetdudejim's, it's just unfortunate timing; but given the recent news about Alan Boyd maybe belay this thought until we have news of Boyd's return to fitness.

I'm sure all of us here hold the hope that any archival release will benefit from his unique expertise and insight, and that first priority should be for him to be fit and healthy, with any archival release somewhere down the list.

Plus, promoting this thread by pinning it would just give Phil an excuse to let tedium rain down upon us all!  ;D


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jim V. on June 13, 2012, 06:15:10 AM
No fault of sweetdudejim's, it's just unfortunate timing; but given the recent news about Alan Boyd maybe belay this thought until we have news of Boyd's return to fitness.

I'm sure all of us here hold the hope that any archival release will benefit from his unique expertise and insight, and that first priority should be for him to be fit and healthy, with any archival release somewhere down the list.

Plus, promoting this thread by pinning it would just give Phil an excuse to let tedium rain down upon us all!  ;D

Oh boy, yeah, I posted this last night before anything about Alan had come up.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on June 13, 2012, 12:44:34 PM
With all the shows they've taped over the years it'd be a huge shame to let them sit in the vaults--the fanbase isn't getting any younger and any reason to hold on to them and wait for a better time would be ridiculously dumb. 

I hope the BB follow what the Stones are currently doing: to commemorate their 50th Anniversary they're releasing six (hopefully more!) never-before-released live recordings from the band's career as digital downloads.  They're remastered by Bob Clearmountain (long time engineer for the Stones) and they have been spectacular.  At $5 a download for a 2+ hour show-- it is a riduclously great deal and the fans have been eating them up.  The time for deluxe editions and huge box sets for all these live recordings are over.  Cut the costs of production (say goodbye to artwork and fancy packaging), make a few bucks out of the process and make the fans happy...that's the way to go at this point. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on June 13, 2012, 01:10:38 PM
With all the shows they've taped over the years it'd be a huge shame to let them sit in the vaults--the fanbase isn't getting any younger and any reason to hold on to them and wait for a better time would be ridiculously dumb.  

I hope the BB follow what the Stones are currently doing: to commemorate their 50th Anniversary they're releasing six (hopefully more!) never-before-released live recordings from the band's career as digital downloads.  They're remastered by Bob Clearmountain (long time engineer for the Stones) and they have been spectacular.  At $5 a download for a 2+ hour show-- it is a riduclously great deal and the fans have been eating them up.  The time for deluxe editions and huge box sets for all these live recordings are over.  Cut the costs of production (say goodbye to artwork and fancy packaging), make a few bucks out of the process and make the fans happy...that's the way to go at this point.  

Thanks for the tip!


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 13, 2012, 02:03:12 PM
I'm sure all of us here hold the hope that any archival release will benefit from his unique expertise and insight, and that first priority should be for him to be fit and healthy, with any archival release somewhere down the list.

Plus, promoting this thread by pinning it would just give Phil an excuse to let tedium rain down upon us all!  ;D

You're assuming that Alan was any part of this summer's archival releases in the first place.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Jim V. on June 13, 2012, 02:47:47 PM
I'm sure all of us here hold the hope that any archival release will benefit from his unique expertise and insight, and that first priority should be for him to be fit and healthy, with any archival release somewhere down the list.

Plus, promoting this thread by pinning it would just give Phil an excuse to let tedium rain down upon us all!  ;D

You're assuming that Alan was any part of this summer's archival releases in the first place.

This summer's archival releases?? I assume that was a mistake, as I can't imagine anything will be out until fall. Although maaaayyyybe...


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 13, 2012, 02:53:28 PM
I'm sure all of us here hold the hope that any archival release will benefit from his unique expertise and insight, and that first priority should be for him to be fit and healthy, with any archival release somewhere down the list.

Plus, promoting this thread by pinning it would just give Phil an excuse to let tedium rain down upon us all!  ;D

You're assuming that Alan was any part of this summer's archival releases in the first place.

Perhaps "hoping" rather than just "assuming"! 

"Summer" was your phrase!   :D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: over and over on June 13, 2012, 04:33:21 PM
BEACHBOYSCENTRAL.COM!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 13, 2012, 05:02:06 PM
BEACHBOYSCENTRAL.COM!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what is this, don't they already have their own website


Title: Re: What \
Post by: over and over on June 13, 2012, 07:25:39 PM
BEACHBOYSCENTRAL.COM!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what is this, don't they already have their own website

Hopefuly it will be a site with instrumental mixes, alternative mixes, and unbootlegged stuff. But someone on this board said its been in the making since 2006.  :(


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 13, 2012, 07:31:47 PM
BEACHBOYSCENTRAL.COM!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what is this, don't they already have their own website

Hopefuly it will be a site with instrumental mixes, alternative mixes, and unbootlegged stuff. But someone on this board said its been in the making since 2006.  :(
holy moly


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 13, 2012, 07:37:24 PM
BEACHBOYSCENTRAL.COM!!!!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what is this, don't they already have their own website

Hopefuly it will be a site with instrumental mixes, alternative mixes, and unbootlegged stuff. But someone on this board said its been in the making since 2006.  :(
holy moly

Don't get your hopes up. It won't happen.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Catbirdman on June 13, 2012, 08:07:50 PM
Recently, all of a sudden, I've been feeling incomplete due to the unavailability of the original mono mixes of the early albums on CD. All the details you need are here, as ever, on Andrew's site:

http://www.btinternet.com/~bellagio/monostereo.html

I wouldn't want to see such mixes take up precious space on the promised box set, as I'm drooling much, much more over the prospect of unreleased/unbooted material. But still, it hurts for poor sods like myself without a turntable, not having these mixes at hand. Short of getting deluxe editions of each album in mono/stereo/instrumental/vocal/outtakes format, which is the ultimate dream, it sure would be great if beachboyscentral finally got functional and offered up stuff like this.

Even more desired, of course, are new stereo mixes of '65-'67 material. Much more than mono mixes (which technically are available, if not in print), that's something you hear pop up a lot on fans' want lists. I salivate over that too, believe me. The dribs and drabs we've gotten over various compilations have been great, but to see complete albums remixed in stereo would be amazing. I say that with the acknowledgment that certain parts have been added during mixdown; yes, I understand that. So, fine: make a few tough calls here and there about how to handle that - either mix it without the added part, or try some trickery if/when it seems artistically justified.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 15, 2012, 04:32:53 PM
I'm pleased to see that the new album is doing well commercially. There's talk of a 3-album deal & 16 further unreleased songs from the recent sessions. But, in light of the commercial success of the "That's Why God Made The Radio" album, it won't surprise me if the proposed archival projects are subject to a long postponement(if they happen at all), and that Capitol might prefer more mainstream product, such as a live CD or DVD, or perhaps another 2012 studio album. From Capitol's viewpoint, as long as "That's Why God Made The Radio" is selling well, there's no need to release any additional Beach Boys product.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 15, 2012, 05:09:28 PM
Hey, I'm pleased that you're pleased - that's a positive take on things... Like the therapy's paying off!

I don't see any reason why Capitol should delay the archival releases beyond 2012 though. A new album would be great but I'd bet on 2013 for that, especially as the tour will wrap up in a couple of months.

Only reason for releasing a second studio album this year would be if the tour was extended further, with full tours of the Uk, Europe, NZ and Oz, Japan etc, to give them something to promote.

But I'm also reckoning on the wives having a say, and Melinda and Jackie have probably had enough of ironing Hawaiian shirts for one summer.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 11:27:21 AM
But the bottom line is this: if the reunion album(and possible follow-up studio or live albums under the group's new contract with Capitol) are TOO commercially successful, it will be less likely that there will be any archival product this year. From my viewpoint, that is not a good thing. My main interest is in recordings from when The Beach Boys were in the prime of their musical lives.

There's been some references to Alan Boyd's health problems in this thread, though I don't know the specifics.  If he can't continue working on Beach Boys archival projects, an ideal replacement compiler/remixer would be Andrew Sandoval(who assembled the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack"). Sandoval would give us wider stereo separation than the Boyd/Linett team.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 16, 2012, 11:37:39 AM
Can you imagine recuperating in the hospital, checking an online message board, and people can't wait to replace you to get "wider stereo separation?" Maybe a little tact and class for a fellow poster who is in fact a human being who has given years and years of his life in underpaid servitude to our eardrums is in order?

So you're saying if the Beach Boys are too successful this year, Capitol won't want to take advantage of that by putting out the archival products they have already paid for? That would be a first for the record biz. "We better hold on to this, it's not a good idea to release it while demand for BB product is high. Let's wait till they are flatlining and barely drawing attention except for the hardcore fanbase. That would be a great time to release an expensive  set."


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on June 16, 2012, 12:02:22 PM
I'm pleased to see that the new album is doing well commercially. There's talk of a 3-album deal & 16 further unreleased songs from the recent sessions. But, in light of the commercial success of the "That's Why God Made The Radio" album, it won't surprise me if the proposed archival projects are subject to a long postponement(if they happen at all), and that Capitol might prefer more mainstream product, such as a live CD or DVD, or perhaps another 2012 studio album. From Capitol's viewpoint, as long as "That's Why God Made The Radio" is selling well, there's no need to release any additional Beach Boys product.

Reminds me of the 70's when my record player needle would get stuck in a groove...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 16, 2012, 12:03:27 PM
Yeah, it's kind of funny the first two or three times if it's some goofy phrase being repeated over and over... and then you just scream and race across the room to take the record off.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on June 16, 2012, 12:07:48 PM
Hey, I'm pleased that you're pleased - that's a positive take on things... Like the therapy's paying off!

I don't see any reason why Capitol should delay the archival releases beyond 2012 though. A new album would be great but I'd bet on 2013 for that, especially as the tour will wrap up in a couple of months.

Only reason for releasing a second studio album this year would be if the tour was extended further, with full tours of the Uk, Europe, NZ and Oz, Japan etc, to give them something to promote.

But I'm also reckoning on the wives having a say, and Melinda and Jackie have probably had enough of ironing Hawaiian shirts for one summer.

Marketing 101 - keep the momentum going.  Once the 50th hype stops, interest will decline.

 This whole thing has been meticulously planned.  All the videos, tv shows, Rolling Stone.....  Amazing PR /marketing campaign.  #3 album.  You betcha there is a boxset coming!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 16, 2012, 12:23:42 PM
There's been some references to Alan Boyd's health problems in this thread, though I don't know the specifics.  If he can't continue working on Beach Boys archival projects, an ideal replacement compiler/remixer would be Andrew Sandoval(who assembled the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack"). Sandoval would give us wider stereo separation than the Boyd/Linett team.

1 - once again, just because he worked on previous BB archival projects, everyone's assuming Alan will be working on the upcoming archival releases. Maybe he won't. Maybe he doesn't want to. It's a moot point anyway as right now the paramount thing is his health and not some transient reissue program. Considering the circumstances, Boyd's doing remarkably well. Let's keep it that way.

2 - Andrew Sandoval, for whatever reason, fell out of favor with BRI, BriMel and Capitol back in the late 1990s: I don't know the specifics* but I'm doubtful he'll be asked again.


[* indicates a statement that may or may not be disingenuous to some degree]


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 12:24:09 PM
Can you imagine recuperating in the hospital, checking an online message board, and people can't wait to replace you to get "wider stereo separation?" Maybe a little tact and class for a fellow poster who is in fact a human being who has given years and years of his life in underpaid servitude to our eardrums is in order?


But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack". Sandoval's mixes DO have much wider stereo separation than the Linett mixes. I prefer the Sandoval mixes, and I think that it is unfortunate that his association with The Beach Boys didn't continue.

Sandoval is an excellent compiler/remixer. Check out his extensive work with The Monkees for Rhino Records. He's presently working for Universal Music/UK on their Kinks reissue series.

By the way, what is the nature of Alan Boyd's health problems? This thread has only vague references to it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 16, 2012, 12:28:59 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 12:34:09 PM
....and Joe Thomas fell VERY out of favor with BRIMEL after the "Brian Wilson-Imagination" album, but now he's working with Brian again(on "That's Why God Made The Radio"). Apparently, the bad vibrations weren't permanent or unforgivable.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 12:40:21 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 16, 2012, 12:48:56 PM
There's been some references to Alan Boyd's health problems in this thread, though I don't know the specifics.  If he can't continue working on Beach Boys archival projects, an ideal replacement compiler/remixer would be Andrew Sandoval(who assembled the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack"). Sandoval would give us wider stereo separation than the Boyd/Linett team.

[as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.

I gotta agree with Andrew here. This is a new low for you Phil. This is a man who has a large hand in making The Beach Boys SMiLE a real, official release. And besides that, just an all around great guy. And you use his having fallen ill as an excuse to try to bump him out of projects he may or may not have any involvement in. Stay classy, Phil.

I won't lie. I cannot wait to get the archival releases that The Beach Boys have planned. I really hope I get to own copies of "California Feelin'" from 1974, "Where Is She", "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" very soon, and I can't wait for the day I log online to read about how all these things are coming out. But I will wait, and I definitely won't kick dirt in the face of one of the guys who plays a huge part in trying to get the "good stuff" out there to us.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on June 16, 2012, 12:56:00 PM
By the way, what is the nature of Alan Boyd's health problems? This thread has only vague references to it.
You are nosey. Tell us, do you have a social cognitive disorder?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 12:56:59 PM
There's been some references to Alan Boyd's health problems in this thread, though I don't know the specifics.  If he can't continue working on Beach Boys archival projects, an ideal replacement compiler/remixer would be Andrew Sandoval(who assembled the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack"). Sandoval would give us wider stereo separation than the Boyd/Linett team.

[as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.

I gotta agree with Andrew here. This is a new low for you Phil. This is a man who has a large hand in making The Beach Boys SMiLE a real, official release. And besides that, just an all around great guy. And you use his having fallen ill as an excuse to try to bump him out of projects he may or may not have any involvement in. Stay classy, Phil.



I won't lie. I cannot wait to get the archival releases that The Beach Boys have planned. I really hope I get to own copies of "California Feelin'" from 1974, "Where Is She", "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" very soon, and I can't wait for the day I log online to read about how all these things are coming out. But I will wait, and I definitely won't kick dirt in the face of one of the guys who plays a huge part in trying to get the "good stuff" out there to us.

I'm not trying to kick anyone out of The Beach Boys' archival projects, but if Mr.Boyd is unable to continue due to health problems, Mr.Sandoval and/or Mr.Linett are the obviously qualified replacements. Is it a crime to say that I prefer Mr.Sandoval's remixing style? Gosh, you guys(under your leader Mr.Doe) are a gang of rabies-infected attack dogs.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 16, 2012, 12:59:30 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Your touching concern for Alan's health and well-being is truly an inspiration to us all.

You're despicable.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 01:04:30 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Your touching concern for Alan's health and well-being is truly an inspiration to us all.

You're despicable.


And you are a self-righteous bully, who sees himself as the ringleader of the forum and as leader of the discussion. We're discussing who should (if necessary) replace Mr.Boyd as Beach Boys archival supervisor, and we are discussing Mr.Sandoval's remixing "philosophy"(versus that of Mr.Linett or what Mr.Linett would do under Mr.Boyd's supervision), yet you turn this discussion into a launching pad for more personal attacks against me. And no one has answered the question of what Mr.Boyd's health crisis is, since this thread has only vague references to it. I'm not kicking anyone when they're down. That's in your imagination Mr.Doe.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on June 16, 2012, 01:07:03 PM
How dare you not express concern for one of the 7 billion people on Earth you don't know! What's wrong with you?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 16, 2012, 01:07:58 PM
EDIT: aw, never mind. Somebody is obviously "missing social cues" here.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 16, 2012, 01:14:37 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Your touching concern for Alan's health and well-being is truly an inspiration to us all.

You're despicable.


And you are a self-righteous bully, who sees himself as the ringleader of the forum and as leader of the discussion. We're discussing who should (if necessary) replace Mr.Boyd as Beach Boys archival supervisor, and we are discussing Mr.Sandoval's remixing "philosophy"(versus that of Mr.Linett or what Mr.Linett would do under Mr.Boyd's supervision), yet you turn this discussion into a launching pad for more personal attacks against me. And no one has answered the question of what Mr.Boyd's health crisis is, since this thread has only vague references to it. I'm not kicking anyone when they're down. That's in your imagination Mr.Doe.

No, WE are not discussing if Alan should be replaced in a position he may not even occupy - YOU are, and without exhibiting the merest shred of concern for someone who has done more for the BB archival releases (and cataloging of said archive) than anyone else ever has, or will. More importantly, Alan is one of the very nicest guys you could ever hope to meet, and if trying to make you perceive this makes me a self-righteous bully, then yes, dammit I am. As for the nature of Alan's illness, has it not occurred to you that maybe the man would like a little privacy at such a time ?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on June 16, 2012, 01:18:18 PM
It is not possible for me to be callous or insensitive towards Mr.Boyd's illness, when I don't even know what the illness is. I hope that he recovers and is able to continue his Beach Boys archival projects.

Mr.Doe, obviously, you see yourself as ringleader of the forum, and as leader of the discussion; a leader who does not tolerate any dissent.

Well, starting right here and now, THIS IS YOUR FORUM.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SBonilla on June 16, 2012, 01:20:45 PM
It is not possible for me to be callous or insensitive towards Mr.Boyd's illness, when I don't even know what the illness is. I hope that he recovers and is able to continue his Beach Boys archival projects.

Mr.Doe, obviously, you see yourself as ringleader of the forum, and as leader of the discussion; a leader who does not tolerate any dissent.

Well, starting right here and now, THIS IS YOUR FORUM.
Go away.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 16, 2012, 01:21:27 PM
Phil, cut us some slack. Put things in context - tell us what lies in your past that has rendered you such a dispassionate, uncaring insensitive soul? Without that information to inform our understanding of your seemingly heartless posts, we have no option but to assume you're some kind of dispassionate, uncaring, insensitive, heartless soul. Apologies if I come across as sounding like a disgruntled spouse or spurned parent...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 16, 2012, 01:22:05 PM
It is not possible for me to be callous or insensitive towards Mr.Boyd's illness, when I don't even know what the illness is.

Is it so essential for you to know the exact nature of someone's illness to display some/a little/any compassion or concern ? Patently.

I hope that he recovers and is able to continue his Beach Boys archival projects.

You're all heart, ain'tcha ?


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 16, 2012, 01:34:22 PM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Your touching concern for Alan's health and well-being is truly an inspiration to us all.

You're despicable.


And you are a self-righteous bully, who sees himself as the ringleader of the forum and as leader of the discussion. We're discussing who should (if necessary) replace Mr.Boyd as Beach Boys archival supervisor, and we are discussing Mr.Sandoval's remixing "philosophy"(versus that of Mr.Linett or what Mr.Linett would do under Mr.Boyd's supervision), yet you turn this discussion into a launching pad for more personal attacks against me. And no one has answered the question of what Mr.Boyd's health crisis is, since this thread has only vague references to it. I'm not kicking anyone when they're down. That's in your imagination Mr.Doe.

No, WE are not discussing if Alan should be replaced in a position he may not even occupy - YOU are, and without exhibiting the merest shred of concern for someone who has done more for the BB archival releases (and cataloging of said archive) than anyone else ever has, or will. More importantly, Alan is one of the very nicest guys you could ever hope to meet, and if trying to make you perceive this makes me a self-righteous bully, then yes, dammit I am. As for the nature of Alan's illness, has it not occurred to you that maybe the man would like a little privacy at such a time ?

Andrew beat me to it... Phil, my biggest gripe with your posts has long-been your presumption to speak for the masses, whereas in fact you speak only for yourself... and seemingly from a very dark corner.

I really do wish you'd lighten up and join the debates here instead of mutating them into a licking frenzy. You seem a knowledgeable articulate bloke and am sure you'd be able to contribute to the core knowledge but instead you seem determined , as I've suggested before, to commit suicide-by-admin.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on June 17, 2012, 02:48:15 AM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't Brian really unhappy with Sandoval's remix of California Girls and asked Mark Linnett to remix it again when Endless Harmony was re-issued with the different cover?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 17, 2012, 02:49:31 AM
But compare Sandoval's stereo remixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls" from the first edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack" versus the Boyd-supervised Linett mixes from the second edition of "Endless Harmony Soundtrack".

1 - Alan did not 'supervise' anything in regard to Mark's mixes: that you could even think this indicates your complete lack of grasp concerning any BB reissue program, past, present or future.

2 - as has been said, you're essentially kicking someone when they're down for your own ends. It would be nice to see you express even a little concern for one of the nicest guys in the BB world. It would also be totally out of character.


But Mr.Sandoval's remixing "Philosophy" does  favor wider stereo separation than Mark Linett, or perhaps I should say "Than Mark Linett presently does". Mr.Linett mixed the "Pet Sounds Session" box with wide stereo separation, but, in later projects Linett moved away from wide separation towards a more vague stereo "picture", possibly at the insistence of Brother Records or specific Beach Boys members.

In any event, whenever I assemble a homemade "Today"/"Summer Days" stereo "Two-fer", I use the Sandoval mixes of "Kiss Me Baby" & "California Girls".

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't Brian really unhappy with Sandoval's remix of California Girls and asked Mark Linnett to remix it again when Endless Harmony was re-issued with the different cover?

That's how the story goes.


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on June 17, 2012, 07:27:11 AM
Well, the Sandoval stereo version sounds like the 45 mix, and probably why Brian wasn't happy with it. Brian remixed the mono version for the Summer Days... Album. Mark's stereo remix sounds more like the album mono mix. Funny, Sandoval is the only person to release the original 45 mono version on CD too. Even the U.S. Singles Box uses the mono album mix, instead of the original mix.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jason on June 17, 2012, 09:36:33 AM
It is not possible for me to be callous or insensitive towards Mr.Boyd's illness, when I don't even know what the illness is.

It's also none of your g*ddamned business.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on June 17, 2012, 10:43:01 AM
Awful thread, just awful.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Runaways on June 17, 2012, 10:49:02 AM
i think everyone needs to chill and stop treating phil like a criminal.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: DonnyL on June 17, 2012, 10:58:23 AM
The last few pages of this thread are inappropriate and should be deleted.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PongHit on June 17, 2012, 11:51:39 AM
As for the nature of Alan's illness, has it not occurred to you that maybe the man would like a little privacy at such a time ?

Agreed; maybe the news shouldn't have been posted here in the first place.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 17, 2012, 02:50:14 PM
I'd have no objection at all to this thread being wiped. Too much gratuitous trolling and instinctive responding which must seem pretty unpleasant to all.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 17, 2012, 03:24:35 PM
As for the nature of Alan's illness, has it not occurred to you that maybe the man would like a little privacy at such a time ?

Agreed; maybe the news shouldn't have been posted here in the first place.

Fair comment. I asked those concerned first and posted accordingly.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on June 17, 2012, 05:19:55 PM
Has there been any useful news about the archival releases? I don't feel like wading through all the bickering.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Shady on June 17, 2012, 05:36:34 PM
Has there been any useful news about the archival releases? I don't feel like wading through all the bickering.

No


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on June 17, 2012, 06:31:14 PM
Has there been any useful news about the archival releases? I don't feel like wading through all the bickering.

No

Thanks Shady.
See why can't the thread be more like this, where we're nice to one another and say things like 'please' and 'thank you'? I think that would be a much better thread than the AGD Vs Phil Cohen slapfight.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on June 17, 2012, 09:11:58 PM
Has there been any useful news about the archival releases? I don't feel like wading through all the bickering.

No

Thanks Shady.
See why can't the thread be more like this, where we're nice to one another and say things like 'please' and 'thank you'? I think that would be a much better thread than the AGD Vs Phil Cohen slapfight.

Seconded.  Let's get back to the actual *topic* at hand.  I'm the one that started it for crying out loud.  :-)  So if we have no info as to *what* the commemorative releases will be, do we at least have a *when* Capitol decides to reveal this info? 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 18, 2012, 02:53:36 AM
So if we have no info as to *what* the commemorative releases will be, do we at least have a *when* Capitol decides to reveal this info?  

Yes.

Later. Not right now. Currently they've got a red-hot new chart album to push. As with Smile, there's a gameplan and it's unrolling nicely, the only difference being this time someone kept their mouth shut.  ;D

It's June 18th. Lots of summer, lots of the year left. I doubt the BB have had this high an recognition factor since 1976 or 1983. It's all good.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 18, 2012, 12:47:39 PM
I'm happy to be patient. I'm still listening to TWGmTR and will be for a while yet! The archive release can wait a while... Maybe mid-Sept, so there's something to promote when the Beach Gents play Wembley! ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: egon spengler on June 23, 2012, 04:13:25 PM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on June 23, 2012, 07:28:32 PM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)
weird how we haven't heard ANYTHING about this yet.

There needs to be a disc from each Beach Boy of what they think are their career spanning (without duplicates) plus their favorite songs that they sang lead/wrote/produced plus unreleased stuff by themselves. Bruce can finally put 10 Years of Harmony on there, and whatever he wants from Goin' Public & whatever he's been holding onto for years. Or a Mike disc, he can put out some of his solo stuff that never was released plus some Celebration material....etc.....I'd buy it!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on June 23, 2012, 09:41:06 PM
Lawd I pray this will include witntla and cf....


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 23, 2012, 10:38:27 PM
Lawd I pray this will include witntla and cf....

Man, even if "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" and the 1974 "California Feelin'" were the only new/unreleased tracks, I'd be happy. However I hope we get a lot of cool unreleased stuff. And not just stuff we know about. Hopefully some surprises on the level of "Surf's Up 1967" or the extra vocals on "Child Is Father Of The Man".

I think Brother and Capitol are getting the idea that people really dig The Beach Boys really artistic material and that there is quite a market for their unreleased material. Hopefully I'm right.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 23, 2012, 10:38:41 PM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)
weird how we haven't heard ANYTHING about this yet.

It's the Cohen of Silence...  :o


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on June 24, 2012, 06:10:18 AM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)
weird how we haven't heard ANYTHING about this yet.

It's the Cohen of Silence...  :o
excuse me?

I'm one of the Cohen brothers?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on June 24, 2012, 09:03:44 AM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)
weird how we haven't heard ANYTHING about this yet.

It's the Cohen of Silence...  :o
excuse me?

I'm one of the Cohen brothers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGEWQRL2sJk


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Aegir on June 24, 2012, 12:00:08 PM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)

well, that's obviously hyperbole. I'm not saying it won't be cool, but that makes it seem like it's going to be the best box set in history.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on June 24, 2012, 01:03:07 PM
a July 2012 EMI partner newsletter seeking sponsors for a Beach Boys event refers to the "fall release of the ULTIMATE career-spanning boxset"  8)
weird how we haven't heard ANYTHING about this yet.

It's the Cohen of Silence...  :o

Funny!!!  If only Phil could "Get Smart"!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: LdC on June 24, 2012, 08:17:34 PM
Personally I hope Joe Thomas does his "other" job and records the Beach Boys live at ,say Hollywood Bowl(I know they played already!),Red Rock amphitheartre ,Wembley or...Sydney (for my own reasons..lol). And would it be too much to ask for them too shoot in 3D?? That would be awesome..I think we need more live releases!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on June 24, 2012, 08:51:52 PM
Personally I hope Joe Thomas does his "other" job and records the Beach Boys live at ,say Hollywood Bowl(I know they played already!),Red Rock amphitheartre ,Wembley or...Sydney (for my own reasons..lol). And would it be too much to ask for them too shoot in 3D?? That would be awesome..I think we need more live releases!

Yeah, because seeing a bunch of old geezers in 3-D would make the whole thing that much more exciting...

But seriously, here's hoping some documentation (DVD/Blu-Ray/CD) of these concerts is forthcoming...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 24, 2012, 09:40:31 PM
Personally I hope Joe Thomas does his "other" job and records the Beach Boys live at ,say Hollywood Bowl(I know they played already!),Red Rock amphitheartre ,Wembley or...Sydney (for my own reasons..lol). And would it be too much to ask for them too shoot in 3D?? That would be awesome..I think we need more live releases!

I do not understand why so many people want a live album or DVD. I hope they concentrate more on getting the box set out there (with all kinds of good unreleased stuff), and then after that, the greatest hits package (which I'm excited for because of MORE NEW SONGS!), and then hopefully another new studio album! Forget that live business, we already got Cooncert, Live In London, In Concert, and Knebworth, not to mention Songs From Here & Back. That is more than enough for now.

But if they do indeed do a live release, I hope it includes things like "This Whole World", "It's OK", and "Marcella".


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on June 24, 2012, 10:56:42 PM
The way I see it, the more the merrier.  Of course I'm looking forward to the "commemorative releases", but I wouldn't complain if they threw in a live album of the reunion tour as well.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 25, 2012, 06:27:30 AM
The way I see it, the more the merrier.  Of course I'm looking forward to the "commemorative releases", but I wouldn't complain if they threw in a live album of the reunion tour as well.

I don't wanna sound like Phil, but you gotta wonder how much new Beach Boys stuff Capitol will put out. They aren't the cash cow that The Beatles and Pink Floyd are, and I feel like one really low-selling release could end it, so I'm just hoping they get the important stuff (i.e. box set) out there before they've decided the 50th anniversary releases are over.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 25, 2012, 10:35:12 AM
I don't wanna sound like Phil, but you gotta wonder how much new Beach Boys stuff Capitol will put out.

Exactly as much as they've been planning to since the project was announced. The tour and the new CD have proved there's a market for BB material.  Tell you what, let's remove all possible suspense - I'll tell the powers that be not to release anything at all in the archive line. That way no-one gets disappointed and at least one person will have a multiple orgasm.

And yes, you sound like He Who Must Not Be Mentioned.  :old


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on June 27, 2012, 02:04:48 AM
The Boys need a two CD compilation that spans their entire career and tells the story in chronological order. That doesn't really exist at the moment unfortunately. Sounds of Summer/The Warmth of the Sun probably work as the best introduction to the band, but again, they aren't chronological and your average consumer has no idea that Warmth of the Sun is a followup to Sounds of Summer (hence its much, much lower sales amount).


CD 1:


1. Surfin' Safari
2. 409
3. Surfin' USA
4. Shut Down
5. Lonely Sea
6. Surfer Girl
7. Little Deuce Coupe
8. Catch A Wave
9. In My Room
10. Hawaii
11. Be True To Your School
12. Don't Worry Baby
13. Fun, Fun, Fun
14. The Warmth of The Sun
15. All Summer Long
16. I Get Around
17. Little Honda
18. Wendy
19. When I Grow Up (To Be A Man)
20. She Knows Me Too Well
21. Dance, Dance, Dance
22. Do You Wanna Dance?
23. Please Let Me Wonder
24. Help Me, Rhonda
25. Kiss Me Baby
26. California Girls
27. Let Him Run Wild
28. You're So Good To Me
29. Then I Kissed Her
30. Girl Don't Tell Me
31. Barbara Ann
32. Sloop John B
33. Caroline, No

- I'm assuming this all fits on one disc. I could be wrong.


CD 2:

1. Wouldn't It Be Nice
2. God Only Knows
3. I Guess I Just Wasn't Made For These Times
4. Good Vibrations
5. Our Prayer
6. Gee
7. Heroes and Villains
8. Cabin Essence
9. Wonderful
10. Surf's Up
11. Wild Honey
12. Darlin'
13. Friends
14. Do It Again
15. Bluebirds Over The Mountain
16. I Can Hear Music
17. Break Away
18. Add Some Music To Your Day
19. This Whole World
20. Forever
21. Long Promised Road
22. Disney Girls
23. 'Til I Die
24. Marcella
25. Sail On, Sailor
26. It's Ok
27. The Night Was So Young
28. Good Timin'
29. Kokomo
30. That's Why God Made The Radio

- Again, haven't checked the runtime of this in iTunes, but Our Prayer/Gee is pretty short. Should all fit well on one disc.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on June 27, 2012, 05:33:15 AM


5. Our Prayer
6. Gee
7. Heroes and Villains


 ;)


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 27, 2012, 06:47:33 AM
Just out of interest, how many Smiley boarders might be working on the archive release(s) on this occasion?  Some folks just don't seem to be here as frequently as they once was*.

Anyone care to 'fess up?   :D



* okay, maybe they're working for a livin' but worth a shot!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wah Wah Wah Ooooo on June 27, 2012, 07:07:24 AM
The Boys need a two CD compilation that spans their entire career and tells the story in chronological order. That doesn't really exist at the moment unfortunately. Sounds of Summer/The Warmth of the Sun probably work as the best introduction to the band, but again, they aren't chronological and your average consumer has no idea that Warmth of the Sun is a followup to Sounds of Summer (hence its much, much lower sales amount).


CD 1:


1. Surfin' Safari
2. 409
3. Surfin' USA
4. Shut Down
5. Lonely Sea
6. Surfer Girl
7. Little Deuce Coupe
8. Catch A Wave
9. In My Room
10. Hawaii
11. Be True To Your School
12. Don't Worry Baby
13. Fun, Fun, Fun
14. The Warmth of The Sun
15. All Summer Long
16. I Get Around
17. Little Honda
18. Wendy
19. When I Grow Up (To Be A Man)
20. She Knows Me Too Well
21. Dance, Dance, Dance
22. Do You Wanna Dance?
23. Please Let Me Wonder
24. Help Me, Rhonda
25. Kiss Me Baby
26. California Girls
27. Let Him Run Wild
28. You're So Good To Me
29. Then I Kissed Her
30. Girl Don't Tell Me
31. Barbara Ann
32. Sloop John B
33. Caroline, No

- I'm assuming this all fits on one disc. I could be wrong.


CD 2:

1. Wouldn't It Be Nice
2. God Only Knows
3. I Guess I Just Wasn't Made For These Times
4. Good Vibrations
5. Our Prayer
6. Gee
7. Heroes and Villains
8. Cabin Essence
9. Wonderful
10. Surf's Up
11. Wild Honey
12. Darlin'
13. Friends
14. Do It Again
15. Bluebirds Over The Mountain
16. I Can Hear Music
17. Break Away
18. Add Some Music To Your Day
19. This Whole World
20. Forever
21. Long Promised Road
22. Disney Girls
23. 'Til I Die
24. Marcella
25. Sail On, Sailor
26. It's Ok
27. The Night Was So Young
28. Good Timin'
29. Kokomo
30. That's Why God Made The Radio

- Again, haven't checked the runtime of this in iTunes, but Our Prayer/Gee is pretty short. Should all fit well on one disc.

Add "Cottonfields," "Rock and Roll Music" and "Come and Go With Me."  They may be covers, but they're hits singles.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 27, 2012, 07:14:13 AM
Just out of interest, how many Smiley boarders might be working on the archive release(s) on this occasion?  Some folks just don't seem to be here as frequently as they once was*.

Anyone care to 'fess up?   :D

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin ?

What is the sound of one hand clapping ?

Who ran the Iron Horse ?

(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again ?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: shelter on June 27, 2012, 07:25:00 AM
OMG, DID AGD JUST CONFESS THAT HE'S INVOLVED IN THE MAKING OF AN ARCHIVE RELEASE THAT INCLUDES WIBNTLA?

;) ;D



Title: Re: What \
Post by: TV Forces on June 27, 2012, 07:34:01 AM
Tell you what, let's remove all possible suspense - I'll tell the powers that be not to release anything at all in the archive line. That way no-one gets disappointed and at least one person will have a multiple orgasm.

Yeah, no archive releases wouldn't be disappointing at all!
[/sarcasm]


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 27, 2012, 07:47:45 AM
OMG, DID AGD JUST CONFESS THAT HE'S INVOLVED IN THE MAKING OF AN ARCHIVE RELEASE THAT INCLUDES WIBNTLA?

;) ;D


Gotta be true – he didn't use a smiley!  

Cheers!
:beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer :beer


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 27, 2012, 07:49:13 AM
OMG, DID AGD JUST CONFESS THAT HE'S INVOLVED IN THE MAKING OF AN ARCHIVE RELEASE THAT INCLUDES WIBNTLA?

;) ;D



Lemme think about that for a bit...

...

....

.....

......

No, I don't believe I did.

Y'know, were I of an evil disposition, I could seriously f*** with some people's minds here.

Hmmmmmmmmmm...

 >:D


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 27, 2012, 07:50:08 AM
OMG, DID AGD JUST CONFESS THAT HE'S INVOLVED IN THE MAKING OF AN ARCHIVE RELEASE THAT INCLUDES WIBNTLA?

;) ;D



Lemme think about that for a bit...

...

....

.....

......

No, i don't believe I did.

Well, cheers anyway  ;D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: shelter on June 27, 2012, 07:52:58 AM
Y'know, were I of an evil disposition, I could seriously f*** with some people's minds here.

No doubt about that.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 27, 2012, 07:57:48 AM
Y'know, were I of an evil disposition, I could seriously f*** with some people's minds here.
…  >:D

Is that an "if" :o?


Title: Re: What
Post by: drbeachboy on June 27, 2012, 08:01:30 AM
Come on Andrew, pull a reverse Cohen on us.


Title: Re: What
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 27, 2012, 08:12:07 AM
Come on Andrew, pull a reverse Cohen on us.

That would get you a five to ten stretch where I live, aside from being anatomically highly inadvisable, if not actually impossible.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Jim V. on June 27, 2012, 08:13:35 AM
I don't wanna sound like Phil, but you gotta wonder how much new Beach Boys stuff Capitol will put out.

Exactly as much as they've been planning to since the project was announced. The tour and the new CD have proved there's a market for BB material.  Tell you what, let's remove all possible suspense - I'll tell the powers that be not to release anything at all in the archive line. That way no-one gets disappointed and at least one person will have a multiple orgasm.

And yes, you sound like He Who Must Not Be Mentioned.  :old

I do believe we will get a box set and a hits collection, as per the original press release, but I wonder if there is anything else. I do feel that their catalog could use a full-sale overhaul, specifically having every studio album (including Stack-o-Tracks and Still Cruisin') reissued as a stand-alone CD, possibly with appropriate bonus tracks.

However, don't get me wrong, I'm very happy about the box set and the hits collection, and I'm excited to hear some news on them, hopefully soon. By the way, when was the SMiLE tracklisting revealed? Around August I think, right? So hopefully we'll hear something soon if they wanna get this stuff out by November.


Title: Re: What
Post by: hypehat on June 27, 2012, 08:14:56 AM
Come on Andrew, pull a reverse Cohen on us.

That would get you a five to ten stretch where I live, aside from being anatomically highly inadvisable, if not actually impossible.

A "Reverse Cohen"

(http://magazine.ucla.edu/features/water-warrior.jpg)

(Cheers, Google Image Search)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: LdC on June 27, 2012, 08:57:14 AM
Personally I hope Joe Thomas does his "other" job and records the Beach Boys live at ,say Hollywood Bowl(I know they played already!),Red Rock amphitheartre ,Wembley or...Sydney (for my own reasons..lol). And would it be too much to ask for them too shoot in 3D?? That would be awesome..I think we need more live releases!

Yeah, because seeing a bunch of old geezers in 3-D would make the whole thing that much more exciting...

But seriously, here's hoping some documentation (DVD/Blu-Ray/CD) of these concerts is forthcoming...

Sad, but if this is your opinion of the Beach boys than I can only wonder why you are here.Please no offense. Most can only hope to wish to be that active and great at 70. They are an inspiration. 3D would only make the feeling of the concert more interactive and "real"...Besides I want something mixed properley for multi-channel and is lossless. A DTS MSTR mix would sound amazing in my opinion, and learning Joe Thomas is part of the company for the tour only makes this more likely to me.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on June 27, 2012, 09:03:59 AM

Y'know, were I of an evil disposition, I could seriously f*** with some people's minds here.

Hmmmmmmmmmm...

 >:D

Maybe you already have, Andrew ... ... ... maybe, you already ... have ... ... ...

 :lol


Title: Re: What \
Post by: KokoNO on June 27, 2012, 04:13:50 PM
Add "Cottonfields," "Rock and Roll Music" and "Come and Go With Me."  They may be covers, but they're hit singles.

My thought process was to try and actively avoid covers since I wanted to present the band's history as best I could on two discs. The lack of more than 160 minutes to play around with means the covers needed to be avoided at all costs. Then I Kissed Her is at least from their prime period and was a sizable hit outside of the United States while Barbara Ann clearly needs to be on here regardless. Bluebirds and I Can Hear Music are pretty much unknown to the general public in their original versions, so they can be on here as well.

Basically, the first cover you mentioned has been done better by some other artists, noticeably CCR, and the latter two are just god-awful covers from their later period. As you can see, I went out of my way to avoid spending much time on the post-Holland period as there's just too many classics that would be left off in favor of later, dated hits like Getcha Back.


Thinking more about it, the best Beach Boys two-disc compilation would probably end at Holland and be called "The First Ten Years" since it covers everything they recorded from 1962-1972 (with Holland being released only a week into 1973). That would free up a lot of extra space between the two discs and kind of represents their last hurrah before they became a popular oldies act (15 Big Ones), put their hands on a Brian solo album (Love You) and then put out records that are mostly pointless to the general public ever since. The only exception, of course, is the new one. However, since it just came out, it's not like tracks from it would really need to be on a compilation like this. A two disc set that ended at Holland would get universal acclaim (including a "10" from Pitchfork) and would get a lot of the younger, hipper crowd into the band without pushing the cheesier latter-day stuff onto them.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on June 27, 2012, 07:07:25 PM
they should release two cd sets and call them the red and blue albums the first disc (red) could have their early hits while the second cd (blue) could have their latter hits,the first cover could be them young looking down from a stairway  and the blue none could be them now looking down the same starway,it would be so unique and original I'm sure NO ONE has ever thought of such a release before..


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on June 27, 2012, 07:21:21 PM
they should release two cd sets and call them the red and blue albums the first disc (red) could have their early hits while the second cd (blue) could have their latter hits,the first cover could be them young looking down from a stairway  and the blue none could be them now looking down the same starway,it would be so unique and original I'm sure NO ONE has ever thought of such a release before..

Almost as original as having a suite on your supposed last album that ends with a really self-conscious farewell song!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on June 28, 2012, 10:28:39 PM

Seconded.  Let's get back to the actual *topic* at hand.  I'm the one that started it for crying out loud.  :-)  So if we have no info as to *what* the commemorative releases will be, do we at least have a *when* Capitol decides to reveal this info? 

Hopefully, Al Jardine will be spilling the beans any day now!

 >:D


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Phoenix on June 28, 2012, 11:17:03 PM
they should release two cd sets and call them the red and blue albums the first disc (red) could have their early hits while the second cd (blue) could have their latter hits,the first cover could be them young looking down from a stairway  and the blue none could be them now looking down the same starway,it would be so unique and original I'm sure NO ONE has ever thought of such a release before..

Almost as original as having a suite on your supposed last album that ends with a really self-conscious farewell song!


Zing!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on June 28, 2012, 11:26:12 PM
NO MORE COMPILATIONS!!!!!!!

Please!

What household doesn't least have one or two "Best Of The Beach Boys" configurations.

Mike can make his own personal two CD set and go door to door and stand on corners pushing up, but please leave it's existence out of my psyche.






Title: Re: What \
Post by: lance on June 29, 2012, 01:18:31 AM
Add "Cottonfields," "Rock and Roll Music" and "Come and Go With Me."  They may be covers, but they're hit singles.

My thought process was to try and actively avoid covers since I wanted to present the band's history as best I could on two discs. The lack of more than 160 minutes to play around with means the covers needed to be avoided at all costs. Then I Kissed Her is at least from their prime period and was a sizable hit outside of the United States while Barbara Ann clearly needs to be on here regardless. Bluebirds and I Can Hear Music are pretty much unknown to the general public in their original versions, so they can be on here as well.

Basically, the first cover you mentioned has been done better by some other artists, noticeably CCR, and the latter two are just god-awful covers from their later period. As you can see, I went out of my way to avoid spending much time on the post-Holland period as there's just too many classics that would be left off in favor of later, dated hits like Getcha Back.


Thinking more about it, the best Beach Boys two-disc compilation would probably end at Holland and be called "The First Ten Years" since it covers everything they recorded from 1962-1972 (with Holland being released only a week into 1973). That would free up a lot of extra space between the two discs and kind of represents their last hurrah before they became a popular oldies act (15 Big Ones), put their hands on a Brian solo album (Love You) and then put out records that are mostly pointless to the general public ever since. The only exception, of course, is the new one. However, since it just came out, it's not like tracks from it would really need to be on a compilation like this. A two disc set that ended at Holland would get universal acclaim (including a "10" from Pitchfork) and would get a lot of the younger, hipper crowd into the band without pushing the cheesier latter-day stuff onto them.
That would be cool, but I think there are definitely 2 discs worth of gems spanning 76-2012. So 2 2-disc sets.
Or just a box set. It could be called: Good Vibrations: 50 years of the Beach Boys.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on June 29, 2012, 07:12:00 AM
Personally I hope Joe Thomas does his "other" job and records the Beach Boys live at ,say Hollywood Bowl(I know they played already!),Red Rock amphitheartre ,Wembley or...Sydney (for my own reasons..lol). And would it be too much to ask for them too shoot in 3D?? That would be awesome..I think we need more live releases!

Yeah, because seeing a bunch of old geezers in 3-D would make the whole thing that much more exciting...

But seriously, here's hoping some documentation (DVD/Blu-Ray/CD) of these concerts is forthcoming...

Sad, but if this is your opinion of the Beach boys than I can only wonder why you are here.Please no offense. Most can only hope to wish to be that active and great at 70.

I was being facetious, chief.  But thanks for playing.


They are an inspiration. 3D would only make the feeling of the concert more interactive and "real"...Besides I want something mixed properley for multi-channel and is lossless. A DTS MSTR mix would sound amazing in my opinion, and learning Joe Thomas is part of the company for the tour only makes this more likely to me.

Sorry, but putting this concert in 3-D is not a really good idea.  3-D is a tacky, gimmicky idea anyway.  It may be more suitable for a concert like Justin Bieber, but the Beach Boys?  Forget it.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: bgas on June 29, 2012, 10:20:35 AM
 Say, if they do this in 3D, will I be able to use a projection TV to make it seems as if they're playing in the middle of my entertainment room?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Heysaboda on June 29, 2012, 10:33:33 AM

What household doesn't least have one or two "Best Of The Beach Boys" configurations.

Erm
I'm thinking I have around 8 or 9 compiliations NOT counting the box sets.  My wife says I'm obsessed........  8)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 29, 2012, 10:38:42 AM
They should release "The One & Only Amazing Compilation Huge Volume Super Greatest Of The Best Mega Ultra Collection BIG Deluxe Of The Ultimate Essential From The Top Great Of The Platinum Of The Beach Boys" imo.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Paulos on June 29, 2012, 11:50:39 AM
Add "Cottonfields," "Rock and Roll Music" and "Come and Go With Me."  They may be covers, but they're hit singles.

My thought process was to try and actively avoid covers since I wanted to present the band's history as best I could on two discs. The lack of more than 160 minutes to play around with means the covers needed to be avoided at all costs. Then I Kissed Her is at least from their prime period and was a sizable hit outside of the United States while Barbara Ann clearly needs to be on here regardless. Bluebirds and I Can Hear Music are pretty much unknown to the general public in their original versions, so they can be on here as well.

Basically, the first cover you mentioned has been done better by some other artists, noticeably CCR, and the latter two are just god-awful covers from their later period. As you can see, I went out of my way to avoid spending much time on the post-Holland period as there's just too many classics that would be left off in favor of later, dated hits like Getcha Back.


Thinking more about it, the best Beach Boys two-disc compilation would probably end at Holland and be called "The First Ten Years" since it covers everything they recorded from 1962-1972 (with Holland being released only a week into 1973). That would free up a lot of extra space between the two discs and kind of represents their last hurrah before they became a popular oldies act (15 Big Ones), put their hands on a Brian solo album (Love You) and then put out records that are mostly pointless to the general public ever since. The only exception, of course, is the new one. However, since it just came out, it's not like tracks from it would really need to be on a compilation like this. A two disc set that ended at Holland would get universal acclaim (including a "10" from Pitchfork) and would get a lot of the younger, hipper crowd into the band without pushing the cheesier latter-day stuff onto them.
That would be cool, but I think there are definitely 2 discs worth of gems spanning 76-2012. So 2 2-disc sets.
Or just a box set. It could be called: Good Vibrations: 50 years of the Beach Boys.

If they were smart they would call the box set 'Celebration: 50 Years of The Beach Boys'.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on June 29, 2012, 11:51:45 AM

What household doesn't least have one or two "Best Of The Beach Boys" configurations.

Erm
I'm thinking I have around 8 or 9 compiliations NOT counting the box sets.  My wife says I'm obsessed........  8)

Tell her from me you're a lightweight. And that's from a comparatively lightweight lightweight, ya lightweight.  Yours, lightweight.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: punkinhead on June 30, 2012, 08:52:05 AM
Every reunion on dvd and cd.  ::)


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on July 05, 2012, 10:09:50 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: joshferrell on July 05, 2012, 10:16:46 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?
a greatest hits cd with the sun on the cover..lol...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on July 05, 2012, 10:18:48 AM
I was kind of hoping he was alluding to a live DVD.  :smokin


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on July 05, 2012, 11:30:17 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

"Shiny" eh? Glow Crescent Grow springs to mind...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on July 05, 2012, 11:39:39 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

Perchance he omitted the word "new" ?


Title: Re: What
Post by: Wirestone on July 05, 2012, 11:49:29 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

"Shiny" eh? Glow Crescent Grow springs to mind...


It's a band that Scott is in. Nothing to do with the BBs.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on July 05, 2012, 11:50:47 AM
 :lol


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on July 05, 2012, 12:11:19 PM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

"Shiny" eh? Glow Crescent Grow springs to mind...


It's a band that Scott is in. Nothing to do with the BBs.

:blush


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on July 05, 2012, 12:50:59 PM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

Perchance he omitted the word "new" ?

indubitably, my good sir!

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/483673/483673,1286396413,3/stock-vector-victorian-gentleman-smoking-pipe-cartoon-62474875.jpg)


Title: Re: What
Post by: buddhahat on July 05, 2012, 01:10:11 PM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

"Shiny" eh? Glow Crescent Grow springs to mind...


It's a band that Scott is in. Nothing to do with the BBs.

Now I'm lost. Is this a joke or was Bennett plugging his own band's new album? Or should we be excited for new BB product?!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on July 05, 2012, 01:19:21 PM
Pretty sure he was plugging his band at this point.  :afro


Title: Re: What \
Post by: buddhahat on July 05, 2012, 01:23:55 PM
Pretty sure he was plugging his band at this point.  :afro

How dare he.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: GoogaMooga on July 06, 2012, 08:06:40 AM
I don't know whether I should buy the 50th anniv comp for that one rerecording of Do it Again. How vital is it?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on July 06, 2012, 08:14:51 AM
Pretty sure he was plugging his band at this point.  :afro

How dare he.

Yes truly. Has he no shame?  ::)


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on July 06, 2012, 08:32:33 AM
I don't know whether I should buy the 50th anniv comp for that one rerecording of Do it Again. How vital is it?

I got it on the zinepak comp in a trade recently (many thanks !!!) but I prefer the version in the YouTube vid for the chatter at the end where someone says something along the lines of "No we DON'T got it…" Feels more of a rock n roll ending, and nicely substitutes for the  original LP version's Workshop ending.

But hey, I regard anything by this band as essential (except the Spotify Playlist) so I'm perhaps not the most objective person to be answering.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: rab2591 on July 06, 2012, 08:42:18 AM
I don't know whether I should buy the 50th anniv comp for that one rerecording of Do it Again. How vital is it?

I came SO close to buying the Zinepack at my local Wal Mart the other day. But in the end, I realized I was paying $14 for 1 song. Personally I don't think it's vital at all.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: MBE on July 06, 2012, 02:05:00 PM
I still think the only thing that would be cool are radically different alternates, good vintage live shows, and most inportantly unreleased songs from all era's. I don't care a damn about new mixes or collections. The only reissues I would buy are titles (w bonus cuts, box sets, CD only) not on vinyl as of today.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 09:52:54 AM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 04, 2012, 11:24:23 AM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

When I met him backstage, he said "LET'S PLAY MONEY MAKING GAME." I thought *I* was gonna be the one making money given what he said, but as I approached him, he took fourty dollars from my wallet in a matter of seconds and without even moving. I was angry and tried to stab him in the face, but it went right through him as if he was invisible or something. I had no choice but to leave, but that's okay, as there were two large fires in the room (in perfectly symmetrical positions in the room on both sides of him, strangely enough) and I have to assume they only grew in size to the point of trapping and killing him.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on August 04, 2012, 11:48:07 AM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 12:04:16 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: GoodToMyBaby on August 04, 2012, 12:11:05 PM
"One disc" is a standard place holder for new CD listings on Amazon.


Title: Re: What
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on August 04, 2012, 12:22:52 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 12:29:46 PM
"One disc" is a standard place holder for new CD listings on Amazon.

But the pricing implies that the one-disc description is correct.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on August 04, 2012, 12:31:58 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Put on those thick glasses again and read what Al Jardine told me about "50 Big Ones".  

Now stop your idiotic babble!  You just look foolish!


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 12:52:11 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on August 04, 2012, 01:00:04 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says there is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 01:02:30 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on August 04, 2012, 01:05:54 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.

It's called "Marketing" Phil.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 01:28:23 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.

It's called "Marketing" Phil.

Poor marketing. Most record companies try to build up consumer interest for months before the release of a compilation, archival release or box set, but Capitol gives the fans stony silence.


Title: Re: What
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on August 04, 2012, 01:46:37 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.

It's called "Marketing" Phil.

Poor marketing. Most record companies try to build up consumer interest for months before the release of a compilation, archival release or box set, but Capitol gives the fans stony silence.
Right - Capitol has really screwed up by making The Smile Box set a huge success, "That's Why God Made the Radio" a top 10 album and the tour raking in millions.  Not to mention the DVD about to come out. 

Obviously, they haven't a clue!


Title: Re: What
Post by: rab2591 on August 04, 2012, 02:12:51 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.

It's called "Marketing" Phil.

Poor marketing. Most record companies try to build up consumer interest for months before the release of a compilation, archival release or box set, but Capitol gives the fans stony silence.
Right - Capitol has really screwed up by making The Smile Box set a huge success, "That's Why God Made the Radio" a top 10 album and the tour raking in millions.  Not to mention the DVD about to come out. 

Obviously, they haven't a clue!

Phil is proved wrong time and time again. I think I speak for mostly everyone when I say: Phil, get a hobby...preferably one that doesn't include you being a sadist on a Beach Boys message board.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 04, 2012, 02:18:24 PM
Amazon always lists items early, often times before any announcement has been made, and there are always errors in the title, number of discs, etc. That's on Amazon, not Capitol. As SurfRiderHawaii just pointed out, they sure must be doing something right with their marketing given how well they've done with recent items. Every record company and band has a temporary "wall of secrecy" surrounding new albums, compilations etc. because things are still tentative and in the works and making an announcement before things are set in concrete is foolish for a number of reasons, primarily because the final product will be different from the early product and promising the consumers something and then taking it back will piss people off. In comparison to a great deal of other labels and bands, Capitol and the Beach Boys are actually pretty damn good with letting on that something is happening and then having the results come within a year, often times even six months, and having the product be satisfying.

We'll hear more soon, so just sit tight.


Title: Re: What
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 03:02:14 PM
To revive this long-dormant thread, I'd like to ask this question:

Could it be, that the reason that the 2-CD "50th Anniversary" greatest hits set never happened, is because Capitol decided that the many already existing hits CD's were satisfactory to serve those consumers who wanted the hits, I.E. that a new "Greatest Hits" collection was not needed?

Phil, you need glasses. Put um on and see the "New GH due Sept" thread".

I looked at the link to Amazon.com. It's a one-disc, not the 2-CD, 50 song collection that Mr.Doe hinted we'd get. Perhaps Capitol is scaling back their plans for 50th Anniversary CD product. At this point, perhaps all we can hope for is that EMi Japan will continue their remasters series with more titles. Apparently, Capitol doesn't think that there's a market in the U.S.A. for any Beach Boys material other than 21st century studio or live material.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Interrupting, Pessimistic Phil.
Interrupting, Pessimistic Ph-NO ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CAPITOL, LABEL GOING UNDER, YOUR LEADER AGD WRONG, REMASTERS EXCLUSIVE TO JAPAN FOREVER.

You say that I'm pessimistic , yet here is one indisputably true statistic: The news blackout during the development of the "50th Anniversary" CD box set and CD "Commemorative" product has now gone on for 8 months. That is 3 months longer than the news blackout during the creation of the "Smile Sessions" box set.

As far as I'm concerned, if the Japanese release more remastered titles, and they bring us a stereo "Wild Honey" album, then my quest for Beach Boys archival CD product ends with that disc. As for whatever archival CD's or box set Capitol may someday offer in the U.S.A., I'm increasingly convinced that whatever we're going to have to go through to extract these releases from a reluctant Capitol Records, it just ain't worth it. And this post is from an avid fan, who has collected Beach Boys music for 44 years(including spending $2200 on Beach Boys bootleg CD's in the 1990's)

Now that Al Jardine says their is a collection called "50 Big Ones" coming out, consider your news blackout over.

The disc listed on Amazon is a one-disc called "Greatest Hits". There's been no statement from Capitol, so, as for Capitol, their news blackout and "Wall of Secrecy" is still in effect.

It's called "Marketing" Phil.

Poor marketing. Most record companies try to build up consumer interest for months before the release of a compilation, archival release or box set, but Capitol gives the fans stony silence.
Right - Capitol has really screwed up by making The Smile Box set a huge success, "That's Why God Made the Radio" a top 10 album and the tour raking in millions.  Not to mention the DVD about to come out. 

Obviously, they haven't a clue!

Phil is proved wrong time and time again. I think I speak for mostly everyone when I say: Phil, get a hobby...preferably one that doesn't include you being a sadist on a Beach Boys message board.


I'm no more sadistic than Andrew G.Doe........and I don't threaten arson against people's homes.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 03:57:12 PM
......in a more ideal world, we would have gotten deluxe expanded editions of individual 1960's albums: the stereo & mono versions, plus previously unreleased bonus tracks & attractive packaging and notes, on affordable U.S.A.-manufactured CD's, but it is not to be, because some mogul at a desk doesn't think that they will sell. Mark Linett is NOT to blame.  In the past, on at least one(possibly two) occasions, he offered to create such deluxe editions, but Capitol Records executives didn't want them. As for the fact that there is now a reunited Beach Boys that performs concert tours, does this make back catalogue Beach Boys albums more marketable? In Capitol's opinion, NO.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Wirestone on August 04, 2012, 04:00:33 PM
I would like to point out, that whatever AGD and Phil's disagreements, they do both doubt that the remasters will make it to the U.S. or Europe.

Irksome as it might be for folks, we're just not getting them.


Edit: I was wrong!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: PhilCohen on August 04, 2012, 04:20:40 PM
I would like to point out, that whatever AGD and Phil's disagreements, they do both doubt that the remasters will make it to the U.S. or Europe.

Irksome as it might be for folks, we're just not getting them.

Mr.Doe & I have more in common than you would think. We're both in our mid-50's, and have been avid music collectors since early childhood. And we've seen a lot of changes in the music industry(and its attitudes towards the consumer) over the years, and changes to quality of the consumer's experiences in obtaining recorded music. There isn't any doubt: these experiences are more stressful, and not as much fun as they were in the music industry's heyday. What the industry has, in recent years become, is, more and more, sucking much of the joy out of the music collecting hobby. Believe it or not, there was a time when The Beach Boys released 3 albums per year, they were released on schedule, and the consumer would go to a local record shop/store and obtain them easily. We'd then take the record home and enjoy it that day. But the world has changed, and not neccessarily for the better.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Alan Smith on August 04, 2012, 05:52:58 PM

Mr.Doe & I have more in common than you would think. We're both in our mid-50's...

Finally, I think we're heading towards the stark truth - Andrew and Phil may be the same person. 

Is "Phil" really an outlet for AGD to make rash comments borne from the occasionally stifling weight of 50+ years of BB facts, figures and direct/indirect contact events piling up in his head?

Is "AGD" really an avenue for Phil to dodge his pessimism and reach out to share his considered and knowledgeable thoughts on our favourite band?

Has anyone ever seen them together in the same place, at the same time?

And as for the remasters non-release, C'est la vie - as has been said earlier, spend your money on the originally released vinyl, and hear things the way the band intended.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 04, 2012, 07:35:17 PM

Irksome as it might be for folks, we're just not getting them.

Certainly not as is and certainly not within the next couple months, at the very earliest. I don't understand how folks think these will never be released here until the end of time or something, especially when we have no official word stating either way.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: TV Forces on August 04, 2012, 08:25:21 PM
Amazon always lists items early, often times before any announcement has been made, and there are always errors in the title, number of discs, etc. That's on Amazon, not Capitol.

This is true.  Amazon listed McCartney's "Ram" deluxe as 1 disc for a long time.  Last year around this time when "The SMiLE Sessions" showed up for pre-order, Amazon put it up for $118.  The next day it jumped to $146.  The next day it was $172.  Also, $13.99 for a 2-CD best of doesn't seem that unheard of to me in this day and age.  Especially with the Beach Boys, who have about as many compilations as anybody.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Dunderhead on August 04, 2012, 08:40:23 PM
My biggest concern about this whole thing is with the mixing.
I've spend a lot of time listening to TSS, and there's just something unpalatable about the mixing. The stereo mix of H&V for example just sounds...worse than the one on Hawthorne. And the stereo remixes on Summer Love Songs aren't really my favorites either.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 05, 2012, 12:25:40 AM
The Smile Sessions is interesting in that it really, really seemed to go for sounding like a muddy Brian mono mix from 1967 throughout and does a fairly decent job of it. It sounds very... saturated, or something, in a way that a lot of those old mixes/masters sounded, albeit not totally spot on given they were working with digital instead of analog only.

So yeah - compare The Smile Sessions to any other recent stereo mix and you'll hear a difference.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: rab2591 on August 07, 2012, 07:01:10 AM
Greatest Hits: 50 Big Ones is on amazon for $35.

http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Hits-50-Big-Ones/dp/B008U6QAA0/ref=sr_1_3?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1344347946&sr=1-3 (http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Hits-50-Big-Ones/dp/B008U6QAA0/ref=sr_1_3?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1344347946&sr=1-3)

release date: September 25. Same day the re-issues become available on Amazon.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: pixletwin on August 07, 2012, 07:13:26 AM
Ordered. Thanks for the heads up.

It is interesting that the "Greatest Hits" place holder has not updated to match this.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: rab2591 on August 07, 2012, 07:38:22 AM
Ordered. Thanks for the heads up.

It is interesting that the "Greatest Hits" place holder has not updated to match this.

Though it may not be a placeholder at all - could just be a dumbed-down version of 50 big ones.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on August 07, 2012, 11:53:30 AM
Is it appropriate to revive this post of Jon's now, here in this thread?

Can't help but think this would be a bloomin' marvellous release for the 50th anniversary:


9/4/09

BEACH BOYS ARCHIVE INCLUDES LEGENDARY 1972 CARNEGIE HALL TAPES

by Howie Edelson

The Beatles aren't the only '60s icons preserving their legendary catalogue and vault; the Beach Boys' team is hard at work cataloging the thousands of tapes which make up their archive. The team -- chief archivist Alan Boyd and producer/engineer Mark Linett -- has recently collected all of the known elements of the band's unfinished 1967 album Smile, and have now uncovered the multi-tracks for the Beach Boys' two historic concerts at New York's Carnegie Hall on November 23rd, 1972.

For years, only half of one of the shows has been available in pristine stereo on the underground market. Boyd says that the band's company Brother Records is in possession of all of the multi-track masters of the shows, and is now collecting appropriate film and video footage which could be included on a potential project.

Elvis Costello saw the Beach Boys six months prior to the Carnegie Hall show in his then-hometown of Liverpool, and was amazed at how the band's current image and musicality transcended their iconic '60s image: "I saw the Beach Boys in Liverpool at the Liverpool Empire. That was a very different experience. They were in that... one of the periods, although Carl and Dennis (Wilson) were singing in the band, Brian (Wilson) wasn't with them, but the Surf's Up album and the beautiful Carl And The Passions album were out -- and Holland -- those records were out. Dennis sang an extraordinary version of "Cuddle Up" at that gig, which I'll never forget. That was an incredible thing to see; because although the main writer wasn't present, you realize that they had reclaimed themselves as a creative band away from the cliched idea of these guys that sing these car songs and dress in stripey shirts."

The songs performed by the Beach Boys at Carnegie Hall: "Sloop John B.," "You Need A Mess Of Help To Stand Alone," "Leaving This Town," "Darlin'," "Only With You," "Heroes And Villains," "Long Promised Road," "Don't Worry Baby," "Student Demonstration Time," "I Get Around," "Marcella," "California Saga," "Help Me, Rhonda," "Medley: Wonderful/Don't Worry Bill," "God Only Knows," "Do It Again," "Wouldn't It Be Nice," "Wild Honey," "Good Vibrations," "Surfin' U.S.A," "Fun, Fun, Fun," and "Jumpin' Jack Flash."

The official members of the Beach Boys at the time were Dennis and Carl Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, Blondie Chaplin, and Ricky Fataar.

Alan Boyd says that his and Linett's primary public duties for the Beach Boys are locating the masters to the band's earlier work, and remixing them into modern stereo mixes for the band's numerous career-spanning compilations: "The fans and the public at large really seem to like these new stereo mixes, and that was really apparent when Mark did Pet Sounds in 1997. And the reaction to that is so strong that he started looking at other albums and other tracks, so every time we have the opportunity -- we did a lot of this on the Hawthorne record -- we've been going back and doing that, 'cause there's so much pressure brought to bear, y'know, in the market, for things to be in stereo."

Boyd and Linett -- both Grammy nominees -- have collaborated on such recent Beach Boys collections as Endless Harmony, Hawthorne, CA, Good Timin': Live At Knebworth England 1980, The Warmth Of The Sun, The Original U.S. Singles Collection The Capitol Years 1962-1965 box set, and the recently released Summer Love Songs.

Linett is also known for his work with Brian Wilson over the past two decades -- including the revamping of the entire Beach Boys' catalogue beginning in the late 1980's. Linett's work on 2004's Brian Wilson Presents Smile was nominated for a Grammy for Best Engineered Album (Non-Classical).

The Beach Boys -- featuring Mike Love and Bruce Johnston -- perform tomorrow night (September 5th) in Saint Petersburg, Florida at Tropicana Field.

Beach Boys cofounder David Marks will join Southern California rock legends Dean Torrence of Jan & Dean and Billy Hinsche at Endless Summer Quarterly's East Coast Convention dubbed the "Pet Sounds Safari" on September 11th and 12th in Cornelius and Davidson, North Carolina -- which is just 20 minutes North of the Charlotte Metro area. Proceeds from the convention will benefit the Cornelius Animal Shelter. For ticket, schedule, and venue information, log on to endlesssummerquarterly.blogspot.com.

Brian Wilson kicks off his next series of solo dates on October 23rd in Mount Pleasant, Michigan at the Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort.

Wilson has just added a new date to his itinerary, and will play on November 12th in Lowell, Massachusetts at the Lowell Memorial Auditorium.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on August 22, 2012, 12:25:05 PM
Nice to see that even in the so-called "dying CD age" fans can still get some great box sets of their favorite artists:  Add Johnny Cash to the list of artists who will have their entire catalog available in a mega-huge box set.  Out in October 2012:

59 albums
63 CDs
Plus two new compilations: The Singles, Plus a 2-CD, 55-song collection of single sides that did not originally appear on albums

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-INdqkgoMSkA/UDKpd2CdDJI/AAAAAAAAT5s/ceOdsVFXQHk/s1600/Cash+Complete.jpg)


If the Beach Boys aren't going to follow suit we can't say the reason is because there is no "market" for such a release.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on August 22, 2012, 02:53:04 PM
Snap!

Johnny Cash is getting a new box set of all his Columbia albums.... Makes the theoretical BBs album idea look workable - it'd be fewer albums and arguably just as saleable.

I know it now looks like we're getting a six CD set but this shows an alternate path that coulda been travelled; or perhaps even a complementary path...

http://theseconddisc.com/2012/08/20/the-fabulous-and-complete-johnny-cash-legacy-announces-columbia-album-collection/


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on August 22, 2012, 03:05:31 PM
Nice!--I've been in and out of that thread, not really catching everything there.

Columbia sure loves their artists because this new Johnny Cash set mirrors the Miles Davis set I've been harping about since Day 1. 

70 CDs (all 52 of Miles' Columbia recordings in Japanese-styled mini LP jackets)
1 DVD,
250-page book with a biography, a fully annotated discography, a complete song index, and rare photos.

(http://blacren.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/miles-davis-collection.jpg)

Everyone poo-poo'd that idea saying it'd be too cost prohibitive for fans and that these type of box sets are only catered for snooty jazz fans.  I guess we can also add Johnny Cash fans to the list of "elite sophisticates" who enjoy their complete catalog box sets too.  Apparently, Beach Boys fans can't shell out the big bucks?



Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 22, 2012, 03:08:28 PM
They're waiting for Brian to die in order to maximize profits.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Justin on August 22, 2012, 03:13:16 PM
You'd think a 50th Anniversary with a newly reunited band fronted by both Brian Wilson and Mike Love would do the trick to maximize profits.  Guess not...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: SloopJohnnyB on August 22, 2012, 04:12:52 PM
You'd think a 50th Anniversary with a newly reunited band fronted by both Brian Wilson and Mike Love would do the trick to maximize profits.  Guess not...

Did I miss something? Did Capital announce that there will NEVER be a Beach Boys (complete works) Box set released? We have the remasters on the way. The 50th tour DVD is on the way. A new box set collection is on the way. So many new BB products! Are we forgetting SMILE? I don't see how those involved would have time to release a complete works box set this year.

The tour and new album was a huge success. A follow up album and tour is inevitable. I don't see the group ending things after the current tour.

My concern is that we buy the remasters and they end up being on the 'complete works' box set.



Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on August 22, 2012, 04:20:09 PM
You'd think a 50th Anniversary with a newly reunited band fronted by both Brian Wilson and Mike Love would do the trick to maximize profits.  Guess not...

Did I miss something? Did Capital announce that there will NEVER be a Beach Boys (complete works) Box set released? We have the remasters on the way. The 50th tour DVD is on the way. A new box set collection is on the way. So many new BB products! Are we forgetting SMILE? I don't see how those involved would have time to release a complete works box set this year.

The tour and new album was a huge success. A follow up album and tour is inevitable. I don't see the group ending things after the current tour.

My concern is that we buy the remasters and they end up being on the 'complete works' box set.



Yeah seriously.  We're getting a pretty good deal here.  The only thing missing is the kitchen sink!

I wouldn't be surprised if Capitol released a "phase 2" of the Beach Boys remastered catalog which would include albums such as Friends, Holland, Wild Honey, Love You and 20/20.  They've released all these albums before...


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on August 22, 2012, 06:54:22 PM
We're getting a pretty good deal here.  The only thing missing is the kitchen sink!

They should release that too!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: TV Forces on August 22, 2012, 07:42:27 PM
Nice to see that even in the so-called "dying CD age" fans can still get some great box sets of their favorite artists:  Add Johnny Cash to the list of artists who will have their entire catalog available in a mega-huge box set.  Out in October 2012:

59 albums
63 CDs
Plus two new compilations: The Singles, Plus a 2-CD, 55-song collection of single sides that did not originally appear on albums

Even though it's 63 CDs, it's not his "entire catalog" as you say.  It's his entire Columbia Records catalog, but he also recorded for Sun Records, Mercury Records, American Recordings, and some various projects on smaller labels.  This set includes about 28 Sun songs, which is a little less than half the number available.  It's still gonna be awesome.  I pre-ordered it. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 22, 2012, 08:23:18 PM

Yeah seriously.  We're getting a pretty good deal here.  The only thing missing is the kitchen sink!

I wouldn't be surprised if Capitol released a "phase 2" of the Beach Boys remastered catalog which would include albums such as Friends, Holland, Wild Honey, Love You and 20/20.  They've released all these albums before...

I don't recognize some of those albums. They did nothing worthwhile after Mike told Brian he couldn't do the Smile album, finished Surf's Up (shitty album except "Til I Die" and "Surf's Up"), did "Kokomo" in the 80s, and then Brian finally got out of bed to make That Why God Made The Radio. Capitol won't release that sh*t.


Title: Re: What
Post by: The Shift on August 22, 2012, 08:50:21 PM
We're getting a pretty good deal here.  The only thing missing is the kitchen sink!

They should release that too!

If they did, Capitol would probably fail to plug it to tap the band's popularity. Any press release would likely be a load of old flannel. The Kitchen Sink Box Set wouldn't even wash its face.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Mikie on August 22, 2012, 09:38:22 PM
Regarding the kitchen sink - I just remembered what Bruce Johnston said a few years ago (I think on the B B Britain board) that releasing rarities, outtakes, and alternate versions of Beach Boys songs was "scraping the barrel".   

The fans disagreed. 'Endless Harmony' & 'Hawthorne' were released and did fairly well and I'm sure Bruce received some nice residuals from them.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 22, 2012, 09:43:32 PM
Regarding the kitchen sink - I just remembered what Bruce Johnston said a few years ago (I think on the B B Britain board) that releasing rarities, outtakes, and alternate versions of Beach Boys songs was "scraping the barrel" and that we should all save our pennies for the next Beach Boys hits compilation instead.


Title: Re: What \
Post by: Awesoman on August 22, 2012, 10:15:58 PM
Regarding the kitchen sink - I just remembered what Bruce Johnston said a few years ago (I think on the B B Britain board) that releasing rarities, outtakes, and alternate versions of Beach Boys songs was "scraping the barrel".   

The fans disagreed. 'Endless Harmony' & 'Hawthorne' were released and did fairly well and I'm sure Bruce received some nice residuals from them.

I'd say that both the fans and Bruce are correct.  I imagine there are some great lost gems that have yet to be unearthed.  But also probably more than twice the amount of truly awful material to go with it.  There was some anonymous guy who made several YouTube accounts and proceeded to upload an assload of unreleased BB material.  Some of it was pretty interesting.  However having listened to a lot of it, I came to the conclusion that there was a very good reason most of that material never saw a proper release. 


Title: Re: What \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on August 22, 2012, 11:06:37 PM
For anyone interested, I'm only buying "Today!" because the mix I have is sh*t compared to the vinyl.
There's going to be a complete works box. Eventually. 20/20 can't stay out of print. It features the freaking "song of the reunion"!!!


Title: Re: What \
Post by: hypehat on August 23, 2012, 02:17:03 PM
Scott Bennett told me on facebook last night to "Look for Shiny album in a month." Any one have a clue what he may have been alluding to?

When I met him backstage, he said "LET'S PLAY MONEY MAKING GAME." I thought *I* was gonna be the one making money given what he said, but as I approached him, he took fourty dollars from my wallet in a matter of seconds and without even moving. I was angry and tried to stab him in the face, but it went right through him as if he was invisible or something. I had no choice but to leave, but that's okay, as there were two large fires in the room (in perfectly symmetrical positions in the room on both sides of him, strangely enough) and I have to assume they only grew in size to the point of trapping and killing him.

Just saw this post and I love you, man.