|
Title: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to "Child is Father of The Man" Post by: Jim V. on February 09, 2011, 10:57:07 PM I've been thinking about SMiLE a lot more since the announcement by Al, and I just wanted to see why everybody thought about this question I have: Why didn't Van Dyke have the lyrics to "Child is Father of the Man" done in '67? It seems like every other song that was gonna be released was done. Sure you can say "Look" and "Holidays" didn't, but my guess is they were scrapped, just as "Trombone Dixie" was from Pet Sounds. And "Dada"'s track wasn't finished until after he was gone, so he is off the hook for that. Just seems weird that he never took the time to do the "Child" lyric. especially as he had a chorus lyric.
Obviously, from what we know, "Do You Like Worms", "Wind Chimes", "Heroes And Villains", "Surf's Up", "Cabin Essence", "Wonderful", and "Vega-Tables" all had completed lyrics. I suppose we could also include "I'm In Great Shape" in that list too, I suppose, but who knows what form that "song" was going to take back then. It may have ended up being medley'd with "I Wanna Be Around", but who knows. And as far as "Elements" lyrics, well who knows if there would have been any. Wow....looking at the list of titles from the handwritten list turned into Capitol, and seeing how many of the songs were so close to completion, wow, it still drives me crazy all these years later how close they were. Just some lead vocals in a few places I suppose. Or maybe there was a lot more to do. We will never know. Also, I was never deep into all this session tape stuff, but is it correct that "Child is the Father..." never actually had the chorus vocal on that official Brian assembly of the track, and that a bootlegger added it on? Or whats the story with that? Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: juggler on February 10, 2011, 12:30:23 AM Why didn't Van Dyke have the lyrics to "Child is Father of the Man" done in '67? It seems like every other song that was gonna be released was done. I think it's a mistake to assume that VDP didn't write lyrics to "Child" in 1966. The mere absence of verse lyrics on various bootlegged recordings of CIFOTM does not prove that such lyrics did not (or do not) exist. Until the "Humble Harv" demo surfaced (around 1997, maybe?), did anyone here know the lyrics to I'm in Great Shape? Some of the Barnyard lyrics had been reported by Jules Siegel, but I don't think any recording of them had surfaced either until the "Humble Harv" demo. Also, some of the original "Worms" lyrics were preserved by Frank Holmes. If not for Frank, would anyone have known that VDP wrote original lyrics for DYLW? A lot of folks (including me) have had hopes that someday original Child lyrics will surface. We shall see... Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 10, 2011, 02:48:44 AM Well, VDP has said that he never wrote vocals for Child. Then again, he did say that The Beatles listened to SMiLE tapes and stole alot of Brian's ideas.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Roger Ryan on February 10, 2011, 05:47:02 AM Also, I was never deep into all this session tape stuff, but is it correct that "Child is the Father..." never actually had the chorus vocal on that official Brian assembly of the track, and that a bootlegger added it on? Or whats the story with that? It was fairly common for Brian to do a mono mix/edit of a finished instrumental backing track, then lay that down on one track of a four-track tape and fill the remaining three tracks with vocals. I assume the same thing occurred with "Child..." - the chorus vocals we've heard are probably the overdubs found on the multi-track tape after that official mono mix was laid down on the first track. What makes things a little stickier is that Brian was approaching things in a modular way with SMiLE, so the multi-tracks may only consist of bits of the finished backing track, the parts that Brian had vocals for. I don't know the specifics as to what has been found on the multi-tracks, so I'm just talking off the top of my head here. Maybe someone else can add some more info. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: bossaroo on February 10, 2011, 11:17:49 AM what are the lyrics for "Worms"?
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Jim V. on February 10, 2011, 11:50:47 AM what are the lyrics for "Worms"? The lyrics for "Worms" are the lyrics of "Roll Plymouth Rock". Darian found them in '03 or whatever, and him and Brian couldn't figure out one of the lyrics. So they called up Van Dyke. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Dunderhead on February 10, 2011, 12:04:06 PM I've also heard that one of the four Redwood songs from 1967 had Van Dyke Parks lyrics, any info on that one?
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Jim V. on February 10, 2011, 01:05:35 PM I think the Wilson/Parks song for Redwood was called "Sunflower Maiden". I don't think anything is known about it besides the name and the writers.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Chris Brown on February 10, 2011, 05:07:01 PM You pose an interesting question - perhaps Van Dyke had some trouble coming up with lyrics (hard to imagine, but possible) and decided to put them off until later, but once Brian's focus changed from the album to searching for a single, lyrics for "album cuts" got permanently placed on the back burner.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: juggler on February 10, 2011, 05:24:41 PM Another possibility... What if CIFOTM had lyrics by someone other than VDP? Brian Wilson solo composition perhaps? Or... gasp... Wilson/Love? EXTREMELY unlikely, but who knows? We tend to think of Parks as the lyricist for the Smile album just as Tony Asher was the lyricist for Pet Sounds. However, Tony Asher only is credited on 8 of 13 tracks. One of the PS tracks was Wilson/Love and one was Wilson/Sachen, and, of course, the two instrumental tracks were Wilson only.
At least one Smile track (Good Vibrations) was Wilson/Love. On Smiley Smile, VDP was not originally credited on Wind Chimes and Wonderful. The latter definitely seems like his handiwork, but, frankly, BWPS credits notwithstanding, Wind Chimes' lyrics have never sounded very Parksian to me. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: juggler on February 10, 2011, 05:34:02 PM (deleted)
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: SG7 on February 10, 2011, 09:57:53 PM You would have thought there would have been more Wordsworth stuff in it, considering that's what it's named after.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Dunderhead on February 10, 2011, 10:13:02 PM Personally I consider both Look and Holidays to be psychedelic songs...
"I Ran" I would guess is a euphemism for tripping. I think Brian's exotica kick on this album has to do also with the idea that, in psychedelic terminology, when you "trip" it's like like your brain is "going on a trip" to whatever the mind's equivalent of Hawaii is. In turn I think Da Da, Worms, Holidays, Little Pad and even possibly "I Ran" are all directly related to one another, and represent different sections of the same song or different attempts at a single song idea (Little Pad especially considering it's from Smiley Smile sessions technically). You can definitely hear it on BWPS, the "rock rock roll" part is used. I think possibly that's the reason we don't know about lyrics to some of those early songs. Maybe because somebody threw the tape out because it was embarrassing or had especially psychedelic lyrics. In fact, Brian went in and put down "I Ran" about one week after Revolver had been released, maybe the song was originally an attempt to do something like Tomorrow Never Knows. I guess that's a really ridiculous idea. But it has a certain logic about it doesn't it? Brian did the same thing with Hang on to your Ego, maybe this is just another example of Brian self censoring. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Chris Moise on February 11, 2011, 11:29:19 AM Well, VDP has said that he never wrote vocals for Child. Then again, he did say that The Beatles listened to SMiLE tapes and stole alot of Brian's ideas. I don't beleive that is true. IIRC Van Dyke told someone on this board that he did in fact write Child lyrics in 1966. Van Dyke does mention in Dom's book the 2004 lyrics are new which begs the question why the original lyrics were not used. Maybe they simply forgot them? Considering the amount of work done on Child it would be odd if verse lyrics were not written. Every other song on the list had lyrics.. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 11, 2011, 12:25:36 PM Well, VDP has said that he never wrote vocals for Child. Then again, he did say that The Beatles listened to SMiLE tapes and stole alot of Brian's ideas. I don't beleive that is true. IIRC Van Dyke told someone on this board that he did in fact write Child lyrics in 1966. Van Dyke does mention in Dom's book the 2004 lyrics are new which begs the question why the original lyrics were not used. Maybe they simply forgot them? Considering the amount of work done on Child it would be odd if verse lyrics were not written. Every other song on the list had lyrics.. Good point. I couldn't remember exactly what VDP's words were in reference to not having written lyrics back in '66. I must have remembered from the 2004 book that he said 'original lyrics weren't used' and jumbled it in my head somehow. I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it. Those songs ARE the core songs of the album). At the same time, one of the things that seems to come up in the whole 'Why SMiLE Was Never Finished' debates is that, when VDP left it threw Brian for a loop because there were still unfinished lyrics, and without Van's lyrics, how could the album get finished? Now how many songs, when Van left, needed a bunch of lyrics? Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Les P on February 11, 2011, 01:49:03 PM Well, VDP has said that he never wrote vocals for Child. Then again, he did say that The Beatles listened to SMiLE tapes and stole alot of Brian's ideas. I don't beleive that is true. IIRC Van Dyke told someone on this board that he did in fact write Child lyrics in 1966. Van Dyke does mention in Dom's book the 2004 lyrics are new which begs the question why the original lyrics were not used. Maybe they simply forgot them? Considering the amount of work done on Child it would be odd if verse lyrics were not written. Every other song on the list had lyrics.. I thought I remembered VDP saying he no longer had his original Smile lyrics -- he gave a reason, lost in a fire or some other accident?? (But Durrie Parks apparently got the acetates, presumably upon divorce). And the only reason BWPS had original verse lyrics for DYLW was because Frank Holmes had a copy to work from to do his illustrations. I have to believe there was a set of Child lyrics in 1966 (unless VDP confirms otherwise). Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 11, 2011, 02:03:45 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Jason on February 11, 2011, 02:09:43 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"?
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Jim V. on February 11, 2011, 02:13:17 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: bgas on February 11, 2011, 02:14:20 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. Which is kinda like asking what his favorite song is. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 11, 2011, 02:16:00 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. For cripes sakes, man- you of all people should know that you have to take what Brian says with a grain of salt! ;D Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 11, 2011, 02:20:05 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. For cripes sakes, man- you of all people should know that you have to take what Brian says with a grain of salt! ;D I make no comment one way or the other. BTW, that should be "grain of salt". Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: bgas on February 11, 2011, 02:31:00 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. For cripes sakes, man- you of all people should know that you have to take what Brian says with a grain of salt! ;D I make no comment one way or the other. BTW, that should be "grain of salt". yes yes, love the quotations! Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Dunderhead on February 11, 2011, 02:37:50 PM A cowboy song????
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Ganz Allein on February 11, 2011, 02:44:25 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. Was that before or after Landy intervention number two? During that second Landy go-round, Brian's answers could be even more inconsistent than usual. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: rab2591 on February 11, 2011, 02:51:28 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. "I got a sneak preview of one of the SMiLE tracks the previous night, when Brian played me a piano version of one track, "Child Is Father Of The Man" - a cowboy song - and then gave me the throwaway line of the year: "And this is the prayer I'm working on for it"" - Dennis Wilson in a Hit Parader article Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 11, 2011, 02:57:42 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. Was that before or after Landy intervention number two? During that second Landy go-round, Brian's answers could be even more inconsistent than usual. Before. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 11, 2011, 02:57:53 PM I've always thought it was strange that CIFOTM didn't have lyrics either, considering it was on the infamous tracklist, and IIRC every other song on that tracklist at least has SOME lyrics written (and I know that at this point we have pretty much concluded that Brian didn't write the tracklist. Still, I would assume that even if he didn't actually write it, whomever did showed it to him and he approved of it). Peter Reum showed Brian the handwritten tracklist - the original - in the early 80s. Brian said he'd never seen it before. For cripes sakes, man- you of all people should know that you have to take what Brian says with a grain of salt! ;D I make no comment one way or the other. BTW, that should be "grain of salt". "Thanks" Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 11, 2011, 03:03:01 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. "I got a sneak preview of one of the SMiLE tracks the previous night, when Brian played me a piano version of one track, "Child Is Father Of The Man" - a cowboy song - and then gave me the throwaway line of the year: "And this is the prayer I'm working on for it"" - Dennis Wilson in a Hit Parader article Does that sound like the CIFOTM that we know? Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: rab2591 on February 11, 2011, 03:06:58 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. "I got a sneak preview of one of the SMiLE tracks the previous night, when Brian played me a piano version of one track, "Child Is Father Of The Man" - a cowboy song - and then gave me the throwaway line of the year: "And this is the prayer I'm working on for it"" - Dennis Wilson in a Hit Parader article Does that sound like the CIFOTM that we know? I thought for a second that Brian could have been trying to mix the Heroes and Villains theme with CIFOTM, but even the name 'Child Is Father Of The Man' is philosophical/spiritual and has nothing to do with cowboys. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on February 11, 2011, 03:35:28 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. "I got a sneak preview of one of the SMiLE tracks the previous night, when Brian played me a piano version of one track, "Child Is Father Of The Man" - a cowboy song - and then gave me the throwaway line of the year: "And this is the prayer I'm working on for it"" - Dennis Wilson in a Hit Parader article Does that sound like the CIFOTM that we know? I thought for a second that Brian could have been trying to mix the Heroes and Villains theme with CIFOTM, but even the name 'Child Is Father Of The Man' is philosophical/spiritual and has nothing to do with cowboys. Unless Brian told Dennis a bunch of different titles, and Dennis was confused, which is probably the case. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Dunderhead on February 11, 2011, 03:42:18 PM As anyone from the band ever given a definite comment about smile? I don't think there's any information we have that can be taken at face value.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Chris Brown on February 11, 2011, 03:44:53 PM Didn't Van Dyke go on some kind of record years ago saying that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father of the Man and that it was a "cowboy song"? I think Dennis said that. "I got a sneak preview of one of the SMiLE tracks the previous night, when Brian played me a piano version of one track, "Child Is Father Of The Man" - a cowboy song - and then gave me the throwaway line of the year: "And this is the prayer I'm working on for it"" - Dennis Wilson in a Hit Parader article Does that sound like the CIFOTM that we know? I thought for a second that Brian could have been trying to mix the Heroes and Villains theme with CIFOTM, but even the name 'Child Is Father Of The Man' is philosophical/spiritual and has nothing to do with cowboys. Unless Brian told Dennis a bunch of different titles, and Dennis was confused, which is probably the case. That's what I've always attributed the confusion to. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Chris Moise on February 11, 2011, 06:33:10 PM I wish someone would do an in depth interview with Al and ask about stuff like this. I still can't believe with the dozens of interviews and articles surrounding the 2004 Smile that not one person asked the participants about the Child lyrics. I naively thought at least one or two of the big Smile mysteries would be solved with all of the 2004 activity but we don't know much more than we did before. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Dunderhead on February 11, 2011, 08:10:16 PM I think only Brian can answer most of these questions, so we'll never know. He's probably forgotten a lot of it, and the stuff he does remember he avoids talking about in his usual manner.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: bgas on February 11, 2011, 09:41:31 PM I think only Brian can answer most of these questions, so we'll never know. He's probably forgotten a lot of it, and the stuff he does remember he avoids talking about in his usual manner. Ya know, Coach used to talk about this. Said Brian was sharp as anyone ever; and could, if he wanted to, tell you who played what instrument on which track of what recording for everything he ever did. The problem is getting him to. I think it's still there; But getting him on record is going to be tuff Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Roger Ryan on February 12, 2011, 07:18:48 AM The verse rhythm to "Child..." is essentially a slowed down version of the classic "Happy Trails"-style western rhythm. If Brian played this on the piano for Dennis, it's likely that he emphasized that rhythm. Coming off of PET SOUNDS and "Good Vibrations", Dennis would have suddenly been hearing things like "Heroes & Villains" and snippets like "Home On The Range" and "Who Ran The Iron Horse". In that context, it wouldn't be much of a stretch for Dennis to envision "Child..." as a cowboy song (especially if there were no lyrics to suggest otherwise). Even the recorded version of the track, with that harmonica line on it, evokes a western feeling.
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Julia on September 09, 2025, 04:49:02 PM I was always hoping against hope that lyrics were written, just not recorded, they'd turn up someday. Unfortunately, I think they were never written after all. Van says in the 2005 Priore book that "I think Child was supposed to be an instrumental" when asked why there were no lyrics. (He's clearly wrong but it's unclear if he genuinely believed this at the time or is misremembering, and if the former how could Brian allow him to be so wrong?) In another interview, regarding BWPS, he says "everything I worked on in the '60s is there" implying if he wrote stuff for Child it would've been there.
As for the reason, Im still trying to figure out. I think it's one of the greatest most overlooked mysteries of SMiLE, similar to the track itself. If I had to guess it's that Brian kept changing the song's structure (I've seen more variation in CIFOTM across fanmixes and bootlegs than any other besides Heroes and even then it's neck and neck) so he told Van "don't worry about this one yet, I'm still making up my mind." That, or the plan was for psychology lyrics (according to Brian's new book) with the title phrase expressing how a child's experiences shape the adult they become. I think Van was trying to write lyrics about psychiatric terms or whatever in his usual oblique, indirect, poetic fashion but it was just too much for even him, then over time he either buried this shortcoming or his mind blocked it out. If anyone cared about this poor song as anything more than a glorified intro to Surfs Up, we'd have gotten to the bottom of this decades ago. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: BJL on September 10, 2025, 06:49:12 PM I was always hoping against hope that lyrics were written, just not recorded, they'd turn up someday. Unfortunately, I think they were never written after all. Van says in the 2005 Priore book that "I think Child was supposed to be an instrumental" when asked why there were no lyrics. (He's clearly wrong but it's unclear if he genuinely believed this at the time or is misremembering, and if the former how could Brian allow him to be so wrong?) In another interview, regarding BWPS, he says "everything I worked on in the '60s is there" implying if he wrote stuff for Child it would've been there. As for the reason, Im still trying to figure out. I think it's one of the greatest most overlooked mysteries of SMiLE, similar to the track itself. If I had to guess it's that Brian kept changing the song's structure (I've seen more variation in CIFOTM across fanmixes and bootlegs than any other besides Heroes and even then it's neck and neck) so he told Van "don't worry about this one yet, I'm still making up my mind." That, or the plan was for psychology lyrics (according to Brian's new book) with the title phrase expressing how a child's experiences shape the adult they become. I think Van was trying to write lyrics about psychiatric terms or whatever in his usual oblique, indirect, poetic fashion but it was just too much for even him, then over time he either buried this shortcoming or his mind blocked it out. If anyone cared about this poor song as anything more than a glorified intro to Surfs Up, we'd have gotten to the bottom of this decades ago. I get why, but I think you’re making a mountain out of a molehill, here. Not in terms of how great the song is, or how sad it is that it was never finished—on those counts I agree completely. It’s a major (and gorgeous!) Smile track, and has been robbed of its deserved place in the history of the project because verses were (probably) never written and therefore (almost definitely) don’t exist, and because unlike, say, Worms, the song appears to have been conceived of in such a way that it’s really begging for a verse melody to pull it all together. But the way I see it, in the 60s, when the project was happening, the fact that those verses didn’t get written is nothing, is no big deal. It’s not a mystery that needs to be explained. And I *really* don’t think it can be taken as evidence of some kind of personal or professional or creative failure on the part of Van Dyke Parks. Brian usually collaborated on lyrics before the tracking stage, but not always (see Let’s Go Away for A While and You Still Believe In Me). He sometimes wrote alone, and occasionally brought in someone random to work on a song, like Terry Sachen or Russ Titelman. Brian was the producer—and a hands on, dictatorial producer, at that! It was his job to make lyrics happen. On Child, he could have asked Mike to do it, he could have done it himself, or, of course, he could have given Van Dyke Parks an acetate and said, hey, can you come up with something for this? And of course it’s possible that he *did* do that, and that Parks got stuck or couldn’t make it work. But there’s no evidence for it, and it seems just as likely to me that Brian just didn’t give Parks the assignment. It’s not like Parks could read his mind, or write lyrics for a song he hadn’t properly heard or didn’t understand. And maybe lyrics didn’t happen because Brian was uncertain about what he wanted to do with the song. But again, there’s no evidence for it. And given the trajectory Brian was on, I think it’s just as likely that figuring out the verses was simply, uncomplicatedly on Brian Wilson’s to-do list. If the project hadn’t gotten derailed, he would have simply gotten to it. He’d have enlisted Van Dyke Parks, or Mike, or done it himself, or maybe even found some random person from the band’s circle who he thought would be a better fit if he wanted a different kind of trip for this song, like he did with Hang On To Your Ego or Guess I’m Dumb. And because he was Brian Wilson and it was his album and he was the producer, the lyrics would have been written, probably within the week. And if Brian had scheduled a session for the lead vocals, he would have handed the lyric sheet to Dennis or Carl or Mike or Al, and they would have sung it exactly the way Brian told them to. Or he would have done it himself. None of it happened, like so many things didn’t happen. It’s a tragedy—but it’s not a mystery. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: BJL on September 10, 2025, 07:20:29 PM I had to guess it's that Brian kept changing the song's structure (I've seen more variation in CIFOTM across fanmixes and bootlegs than any other besides Heroes and even then it's neck and neck) so he told Van "don't worry about this one yet, I'm still making up my mind." I think this is a risky assumption, and that the variance in mixes across bootlegs and fan mixes is a result of how the tapes were left and how fans conceptualized Smile in the 80s and 90s, and not an indication of Brian's process or thinking in the 60s. After all, we do have a 3 minute vintage mix of the instrumental track that sounds pretty damn finished, and no evidence I know of that Brian didn't intend to use it. Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: Julia on September 11, 2025, 02:21:59 AM All good points, BJL. I was just speculating but you're probably right
Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: BJL on September 12, 2025, 01:21:00 AM All good points, BJL. I was just speculating but you're probably right Last thing I would ever want is to discourage that kind of speculation! Just sharing my reactions where I think they might be interesting or valuable :) Title: Re: Why didn't Van Dyke finish the lyrics in the 60s to \ Post by: WillJC on September 12, 2025, 07:22:59 AM I can't keep up with all 300 of these threads but I'm enjoying them and appreciating that discussion is still being generated! On the structure of Child, there's nothing from the 60s indicating that Brian ever conceived of it any differently to his rough assembly edit. That chorus/verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge/half-chorus track mixdown put together at the original Western session is the only time he spliced it into the form of a song. Otherwise, there was a rough mix two days later with a single splice from the verse to the chorus to see what it would sound like, and that's all.
Nothing to add to BJL's take on why it didn't get finished, which I think is dead on the money. |