Title: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: The Song Of The Grange on September 11, 2009, 11:03:43 AM I know we have hashed this out before, but I am still unsure about the topic. It came up again while reading David Hajdu's review of BWPS in the Oct 25th 04 issue of The New Republic. He speculates on the new lyrics being either reconstructions, from old notes, or newly written.
We pretty much know that the new Do You Like Worms lyrics are vintage '66, and I think we can say with certainty that the lyrics from On A Holiday are new (the part about the pirate for instance). But what about the rest? Darian suggested in the newer Priore book that the "Rock Rock Roll" chant in On A Holiday was vintage, but I don't buy it. Any of you have insight on the matter? (As always, thanks to the sharp minds on this board for all their wisdom.) Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Jason on September 11, 2009, 11:24:36 AM Regarding the "rock rock roll" vocals on On A Holiday, that reminds me of a comment Al made back in the days of the Good Vibrations box regarding Do You Like Worms.
"They used the wrong one!" Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: juggler on September 11, 2009, 12:01:54 PM Yeah, as far as I know, the only "old" new lyrics are the "Do You Like Worms" verses that had been saved from oblivion by Frank Holmes.
Song for Chlldren - New CIFOTM - New Holidays - New Blue Hawaii - New I enjoy all of the new lyrics, but I was disappointed a bit with CIFOTM. It's such a great track, and I'd always imagined that great verse lyrics existed at one time and would eventually turn up. The 2004 CIFOTM lyrics are a bit underwhelming. Here's hoping that some long lost CIFOTM tape or acetate with different lyrics eventually surfaces... Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Mr. Cohen on September 11, 2009, 12:16:38 PM Wow, putting the Al comment in that context really opened my eyes! Was "Roll Plymouth Rock" recorded to replace "On A Holiday"? After all, both songs had nautical/explorative theme. Perhaps Brian wanted a song that was more modular to fit with his muse? I have a similar theory about "Song For Children", that it was effectively scrapped once part of it's melody was used in the "Good Vibrations" single, replaced by the more modular "Child is Father of the Man" (he would later try to make "Wonderful" more modular, too, with that strange jazzy version). I believe in '66 Brian was going for a particular balance in songwriting: he needed only one nautical song, one childhood/spirituality song ("Song for Children" vs. "Child is Father..."), etc. I doubt he was going to make an album over 30-35 minutes long.
Later, I could see Brian replacing "Roll Plymouth Rock" with the return of "On A Holiday", for these two reasons: 1. The '66 "Roll Plymouth Rock" was a mess. The vocals did not mesh well with the instrumental tracks, particularly the "Bicycle Rider" part, which Brian never seemed to finish, making at" least a dozen versions of it. Brian even admitted later on that during the making of SMiLE some of the songs that he thought sounded great instrumentally didn't always work so well with vocals. And truly, "Roll Plymouth Rock" has a brilliant song structure, quite amazing for '66, but it never works as well as I think it should, IMO anyway. 2. "Bicycle Rider", the heart of the song, got ransacked for "Heroes and Villains". Supporting this, possibly, is the fact that "Do You Like Worms?" (perhaps the working title of SMiLE's nautical song) was purported to have an alternate lyric that went something like "West or East Indies? We always got them confused!", which would have fit in well the Carribean influenced musical elements of "On A Holiday". The "once upon the Sandwich Isle" lyric may have been a replacement lyric written for the more tribal sounding "Roll Plymouth Rock". Personally, I love the '66 "On A Holiday" instrumental and I don't think it gets the credit it deserves. It's ingenious in ways. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on September 11, 2009, 03:07:47 PM You know, for an album that Brian worked for months on, there really doesn't seem to be that many lyrics-either written or recorded....
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: juggler on September 11, 2009, 06:34:51 PM You know, for an album that Brian worked for months on, there really doesn't seem to be that many lyrics-either written or recorded.... I disagree completely. While it's true a lot of new lyrics were added to BWPS, Smile 1967 would likely have been about 15 minutes shorter! By early '67, Brian and Van Dyke almost certainly had enough lyrics for an album of that era. Let's look at the 12 tracks on the handwritten list: Do You Like Worms - Full set of lyrics Wind Chimes - Full set of lyrics Heroes and Villains - Full set of lyrics Surf's Up - Full set of lyrics Good Vibrations - Full set of lyrics Cabin Essence - Full set of lyrics Wonderful - Full set of lyrics I'm in Great Shape - At least partial lyrics Child Is Father of the Man - verse lyrics unknown The Elements - lyrics unknown Vega-Tables - Full set of lyrics The Old Master Painter - Full set of lyrics And it wouldn't surprise me if complete lyrics once existed for "Child Is Father of the Man," but were lost. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: runnersdialzero on September 11, 2009, 06:40:22 PM What's with all this talk of "nautical" Smile tracks? I don't really hear it at all on "Look".
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Mr. Cohen on September 11, 2009, 10:42:26 PM By nautical, I was talking about "Roll Plymouth Rock" (the lyrics mention ocean liners, European sailors were the first Westerners to visit Hawaii, naming it the Sandwich Isles, and Plymouth Rock is where the pilgrims first landed) and "On A Holiday" (the BWPS lyrics clearly have a nautical theme, with the Pirate shanty rap and what-not). I would consider "Look" and "Child is Father" to be about the link between spirituality and childhood, obviously. I didn't mean to lump all four together thematically. The similarity is in the fact that "Look" and "On a Holiday" were some of the earliest SMiLE era recordings and are not modular. "Child is Father..." and "Roll Plymouth Rock" were recorded later on using the modular style Brian developed during the production of "Good Vibrations", and I believe were intended to replace the earlier two songs, having the same themes as their predecessors.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Rocker on September 12, 2009, 01:56:53 PM Regarding the "Rock, rock, roll" vocals, I asked myself a few days ago if the Smile-project was the beginning of Brian's, let me call it "obsession", of putting those words into his rock-songs. I mean you here it everywhere, "Rock and roll music" right through "Proud Mary" and even finding it's way onto "Goin' home". He did it in the hotel-jam from the early 90s and probably other times that I don't remember or don't even know of
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Jason on September 12, 2009, 06:24:57 PM Van Dyke said years ago that he wrote lyrics for Child Is Father Of The Man and that it was a "cowboy song". Read into that what you will.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: punkinhead on September 12, 2009, 08:41:16 PM What does that quote by Al even mean?
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: variable2 on September 12, 2009, 09:16:56 PM Regarding the "Rock, rock, roll" vocals, I asked myself a few days ago if the Smile-project was the beginning of Brian's, let me call it "obsession", of putting those words into his rock-songs. I mean you here it everywhere, "Rock and roll music" right through "Proud Mary" and even finding it's way onto "Goin' home". He did it in the hotel-jam from the early 90s and probably other times that I don't remember or don't even know of what is this hotel jam you speak of.. pm country? Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: runnersdialzero on September 12, 2009, 11:51:05 PM What does that quote by Al even mean? I believe it was a Dennis quote, and I don't think anyone here knows because it probably refers to a set of lyrics that we don't have. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Andrew G. Doe on September 13, 2009, 12:45:47 AM What does that quote by Al even mean? I believe it was a Dennis quote, and I don't think anyone here knows because it probably refers to a set of lyrics that we don't have. A Dennis Wilson (1944-1983) quote about a track on the 1993 box set ? ;D Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: punkinhead on September 13, 2009, 06:37:04 AM that's what i was thinkin
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Mr. Cohen on September 13, 2009, 09:37:41 AM I did think it was Dennis that said "Child Is Father" was a cowboy song, though.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: hypehat on September 13, 2009, 10:48:17 AM I did think it was Dennis that said "Child Is Father" was a cowboy song, though. I think the gist was 'There's a song on the new album called Child Is The Father To The Man, it's a cowboy song, and here's the prayer i'm writing for it!'.... or something Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on September 13, 2009, 01:40:28 PM Page 27 of LLVS, As follows:
I got a sneak preview of one of the tracks the previous night when Dennis played me a piano version of one track, 'Child Of The Man', a cowboy song, and then gave me the throwaway line of the year-'And this is a prayer I'm working on for it!!' So either Dennis was wrong, or the reporter got things messed up, or both. Or, CIFOTM was a cowboy song early on and changed later, which I don't believe, IMO. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Rocker on September 13, 2009, 01:52:12 PM Page 27 of LLVS, As follows: I got a sneak preview of one of the tracks the previous night when Dennis played me a piano version of one track, 'Child Of The Man', a cowboy song, and then gave me the throwaway line of the year-'And this is a prayer I'm working on for it!!' So either Dennis was wrong, or the reporter got things messed up, or both. Or, CIFOTM was a cowboy song early on and changed later, which I don't believe, IMO. Sorry, but I don't understand the line "...this is a prayer I'm working on for it". What's that about? Dennis writing stuff for Smile? Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: runnersdialzero on September 13, 2009, 02:05:13 PM Wasn't it said that "On a Holiday" was an instrumental until 2004, though? I'm with the folks who say "Rock, rock, roll" existing in '66 was just the part of "Do You Like Worms?" that we all know about, not the '66 version of "On a Holiday". I don't think "Worms" was recorded to replace "Holidays", as the 'nautical'ness is just something being read into it.
Same goes for the part of "Look" that appears in "Good Vibrations" - this was all part of Smile, there were sort of motifs occuring everywhere in the form of recurring melodies and ideas. The melody from "Look" also being in "Good Vibrations" is just the same as the similarities between "Bicycle Rider" and the "Vegetables" tag or the melodies that occur in both "Heroes and Villains" and "Vegetables", etc. What does that quote by Al even mean? I believe it was a Dennis quote, and I don't think anyone here knows because it probably refers to a set of lyrics that we don't have. A Dennis Wilson (1944-1983) quote about a track on the 1993 box set ? ;D Ah damn it :( my bad, should have specified that I was talking about the "Cowboy song" quote regarding "Child is the Father". Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: runnersdialzero on September 13, 2009, 02:06:31 PM Page 27 of LLVS, As follows: I got a sneak preview of one of the tracks the previous night when Dennis played me a piano version of one track, 'Child Of The Man', a cowboy song, and then gave me the throwaway line of the year-'And this is a prayer I'm working on for it!!' So either Dennis was wrong, or the reporter got things messed up, or both. Or, CIFOTM was a cowboy song early on and changed later, which I don't believe, IMO. Why is this so hard to believe, though? We don't have the original CIFOTM lyrics nor do we have any indication as to what they could have been. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on September 13, 2009, 02:32:59 PM I didn't say it was hard to believe, just that I personally don't believe it. For some reason I've always believed that CIFOTM was going to be a song that wasn't really tied into the 'Americana' theme. I've always believed-again, no hard facts, just opinion-that it was sort of a companion piece with 'Wonderful', as in they would both touch on innocence, and/or innocence lost.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Mr. Cohen on September 13, 2009, 07:40:06 PM Quote ...as in they would both touch on innocence, and/or innocence lost. It could do that and still be a children's song, kind of like the Nancy Sinatra/Lee Hazlewood song "Bang Bang" (I know they didn't write it). Kids, after all, love to play cowboys and Indians. It could've been the rocking horse to the iron horse. For some reason, I've always felt like the image of a rocking horse really fits in with Smile. Anyway, it's just an idea I like, and like you, I have no reason to believe it's true. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Roger Ryan on September 14, 2009, 02:22:46 PM The clippety-clop rhythm and chord changes during the verses of CIFOTM, not to mention the use of harmonica, suggest it could have been a "cowboy" song. The "wah-wah" of the harmonica, of course, suggests a baby crying. The spooky piano part (which was used to transition to "Surf's Up" on BWPS) does not sound like a "cowboy" song, however, and neither does some of the other backing track sessions featuring vibes and that "fluttering" cello. Perhaps like almost every other SMiLE track, CIFOTM went through a number of major revisions before being abandoned...until 2003.
Thought: Are "Cabin Essence" and "Surf's Up" the only full songs from SMiLE that didn't undergo significant rewrites/re-recordings during '66/'67? Regarding Dennis' prayer: given that both Carl and Brian talked alot about praying for inspiration, or what-have-you, during the PET SOUNDS sessions, I'm thinking that Dennis was responding in a similar fashion by coming up with a prayer or blessing to elevate CIFOTM. When Alan claimed they "used the wrong one" when "Do You Like Worms?" came out on the GV box set, did he mean they used the wrong tape in his mind; meaning that, to Al, DYLW needed verses and the "Bicycle Rider" chorus to be the "right one"? Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Andrew G. Doe on September 14, 2009, 03:08:02 PM When Alan claimed they "used the wrong one" when "Do You Like Worm?" came out on the GV box set, did he mean they used the wrong tape in his mind; meaning that, to Al, DYLW needed verses and the "Bicycle Rider" chorus to be the "right one"? Might be me, and please correct me if I'm wrong... but I thought Alan's comment was something like "That's not "Do You Like Worms"". Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on September 14, 2009, 03:46:44 PM Wha...? So, DYLW is a *different* song none of us heard? Holy sh*t...now I'm curious to hear what the real one sounded like!
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: MBE on September 14, 2009, 04:05:01 PM I'm guessing that there was a more finished take of Worms that Al was refering to. That's a big puzzle.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Sheriff John Stone on September 14, 2009, 04:18:08 PM And, I'm assuming that's all Al said, just that one line? Of course, why elaborate? I know something you don't know.... >:(
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on September 14, 2009, 04:24:49 PM Of course, Al may be wrong, also. He may have thought Worms was something else entirely....
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Rocker on September 14, 2009, 04:28:19 PM Wha...? So, DYLW is a *different* song none of us heard? No, he might've connected that title with another song, but that doesn't meant we haven't heard it. Maybe "Look" was DYLW (just for an example) Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Wilsonista on September 14, 2009, 04:59:07 PM I always thought that Al's beef with "they used the wrong one" was they used the wrong title. There's a story of a hilarious fax machine argument between Al and David Leaf over whether it was called "Do You Like" or "Do You Dig" Worms. Maybe this is what Al is referring to?
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on September 14, 2009, 05:08:06 PM Ahhh...that makes MUCH more sense.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: TdHabib on September 14, 2009, 05:52:52 PM Ahh the Jardine trademark, obsessing over very minor details...probably why Postcard hasn't been sent yet...and why "Loop de Loop" took 28 years. I can believe the title thing in a second.
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Dancing Bear on September 14, 2009, 07:02:08 PM When Alan claimed they "used the wrong one" when "Do You Like Worm?" came out on the GV box set, did he mean they used the wrong tape in his mind; meaning that, to Al, DYLW needed verses and the "Bicycle Rider" chorus to be the "right one"? I think he meant that the track in the boxset didn't sound like his memory of DYLW from '66. At least, that's the more logical explanation, but it's Al Jardine... Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: LostArt on September 15, 2009, 04:57:44 AM When Alan claimed they "used the wrong one" when "Do You Like Worm?" came out on the GV box set, did he mean they used the wrong tape in his mind; meaning that, to Al, DYLW needed verses and the "Bicycle Rider" chorus to be the "right one"? Might be me, and please correct me if I'm wrong... but I thought Alan's comment was something like "That's not "Do You Like Worms"". That's how I remember it. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Mahalo on September 15, 2009, 05:08:43 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ?
Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Rocker on September 15, 2009, 05:10:25 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: LostArt on September 15, 2009, 05:23:02 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... I don't know about that. What about the Frank Holmes drawing for the Smile booklet showing the Sandwich Isles and the big can of worms? Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Andrew G. Doe on September 15, 2009, 06:22:57 AM Of course, Al may be wrong, also. He may have thought Worms was something else entirely.... Indeed - we have to bear in mind here that, until quite recently Alan thought that "Honkin' Down The Highway" (a song he sang lead vocal on) hadn't been released. :o Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: juggler on September 15, 2009, 08:22:42 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... I don't know about that. What about the Frank Holmes drawing for the Smile booklet showing the Sandwich Isles and the big can of worms? Yes! DYLW/DYdigW was, at least in 1966/67, the official name of the song, and no amount of revisionism is going to change that. Why was it changed? Who knows? Probably because Brian Wilson no longer liked the title. As much as many folks like us love the original title, let's face it. It's a weird, wacky title that was a product of 24-year-old Brian's sense of humor. Sixty-something Brian may well have been embarrassed by it. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Dancing Bear on September 15, 2009, 08:25:44 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... I don't know about that. What about the Frank Holmes drawing for the Smile booklet showing the Sandwich Isles and the big can of worms? Yes! DYLW/DYdigW was, at least in 1966/67, the official name of the song, and no amount of revisionism is going to change that. Why was it changed? Who knows? Probably because Brian Wilson no longer liked the title. As much as many folks like us love the original title, let's face it. It's a weird, wacky title that was a product of 24-year-old Brian's sense of humor. Sixty-something Brian may well have been embarrassed by it. Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: runnersdialzero on September 15, 2009, 03:58:24 PM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... I don't know about that. What about the Frank Holmes drawing for the Smile booklet showing the Sandwich Isles and the big can of worms? Yes! DYLW/DYdigW was, at least in 1966/67, the official name of the song, and no amount of revisionism is going to change that. Why was it changed? Who knows? Probably because Brian Wilson no longer liked the title. As much as many folks like us love the original title, let's face it. It's a weird, wacky title that was a product of 24-year-old Brian's sense of humor. Sixty-something Brian may well have been embarrassed by it. I thought I remembered seeing that somewhere on here, too. Hmm... Title: Re: BWPS: which of the new lyrics were actually old lyrics? Post by: Dove Nested Towers on September 16, 2009, 02:03:56 AM Why was the title changed to Roll Plymouth Rock on BWPS ? DYLW probably was always nothing more than a working title, so if Smile was released in '67 it would've had a different name too. I guess there's nothing more to it.... I don't know about that. What about the Frank Holmes drawing for the Smile booklet showing the Sandwich Isles and the big can of worms? Yes! DYLW/DYdigW was, at least in 1966/67, the official name of the song, and no amount of revisionism is going to change that. Why was it changed? Who knows? Probably because Brian Wilson no longer liked the title. As much as many folks like us love the original title, let's face it. It's a weird, wacky title that was a product of 24-year-old Brian's sense of humor. Sixty-something Brian may well have been embarrassed by it. I thought I remembered seeing that somewhere on here, too. Hmm... Interesting. Perhaps Holmes was just using the working title to inspire his booklet illustration because that was all he had to go on at the time, and through the years the more logical "Plymouth Rock" title that Bruce mentioned in '79/80 replaced it within the band (not that I don't love the original title). The fax debate between Jardine and Leaf about whether it was "like" or "dig" also sounds plausible. Whether it was a new grafting (likely) or original concept, the addition of the Roll Plymouth Rock lyric onto "On A Holiday" on BWPS is a nice, symmetrical fit with the melody. I wonder exactly whose bright idea that was if it was first conceived in 2004. ??? |