The Smiley Smile Message Board

Smiley Smile Stuff => General On Topic Discussions => Topic started by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 05:58:29 AM



Title: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 05:58:29 AM
I've seen the following two claims both perpetuated and refuted for decades.  Anyone have the final word on either one of these?

1.  "Sloop John B" was included on Pet Sounds at Capitol's insistence, because it was their latest single, and that it was never intended for that album (easy one for me to believe).

2.  Murray was behind the speeding up of "Caroline No" (difficult for me to believe).  If this is true, how was he even involved enough at point to make such a call?


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 03, 2008, 06:15:26 AM
Quote
1.  "Sloop John B" was included on Pet Sounds at Capitol's insistence, because it was their latest single, and that it was never intended for that album (easy one for me to believe).

Not true. Brian submitted a track listing that included that track,which wasn't even released at the time!


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: shelter on April 03, 2008, 06:21:14 AM
2. Maybe he just made a suggestion and Brian thought it was a good idea?


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: PongHit on April 03, 2008, 07:22:24 AM
2.  Murray was behind the speeding up of "Caroline No" (difficult for me to believe).

     It's not Murray -- it's Murry.  Minutiae indeed!


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Chris Brown on April 03, 2008, 08:14:44 AM
The Murry thing is true I'm pretty sure.  Brian has obviously talked about it, and Bruce mentioned how it bugged him in the booklet that came with the Pet Sounds box.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 08:21:16 AM
So did Murry simply suggest it and they thought it was a good idea?  The versions of the story I've heard/read imply that Murry was in the studio and did this almost surreptitiously.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Chris Brown on April 03, 2008, 08:54:30 AM
So did Murry simply suggest it and they thought it was a good idea?  The versions of the story I've heard/read imply that Murry was in the studio and did this almost surreptitiously.

The story as I've heard it goes that Brian played the track for Murry, he suggested it and Brian agreed.  I don't think it was one of Murry's control things...just more of a tossed off suggestion that Brian thought would sound good.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Mark H. on April 03, 2008, 10:05:18 AM
So did Murry simply suggest it and they thought it was a good idea?  The versions of the story I've heard/read imply that Murry was in the studio and did this almost surreptitiously.

The story as I've heard it goes that Brian played the track for Murry, he suggested it and Brian agreed.  I don't think it was one of Murry's control things...just more of a tossed off suggestion that Brian thought would sound good.

That's the story I've heard as well.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 10:10:53 AM
Thanks for the replies.  The "Sloop John B" rumor is even perpetuated in the liner notes of the mono/stereo Pet Sounds CD, at least in my copy from a few years ago (not sure if it's been remastered since then.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 10:16:05 AM
One more nagging question related to Pet Sounds:

In the late 80s or early 90s, an oddball mix of "Wouldn't it Be Nice" started to be played on oldies radio.  It was mono IIRC and had a different Mike Love vocal on the bridge.  Anyone heard this and know where it originated?

BTW, I'm definitely NOT talking about the the box set version with Brian on the bridge.  The mix I'm discussing was around for several years before the box set came out.

What's the story with this one?


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Bicyclerider on April 03, 2008, 10:46:27 AM
What you describe sounds like the WIBN that came out on Made in the USA.  It also I think was released on a single rerelease by mistake.

Murry suggested the speed change to make Brian's voice sound younger, which he thought suited the song (lost innocence and all).  I prefer the original speed but it was an interesting idea.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Rocker on April 03, 2008, 10:55:50 AM
What you describe sounds like the WIBN that came out on Made in the USA.  It also I think was released on a single rerelease by mistake.



I think it's on "Still cruisin'" too. My experience says that classic rock-stations in Germany tend to play that version (if they play the BBs at all)


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: SG7 on April 03, 2008, 10:57:55 AM
Might be the one that was on Still Crusin' but anyone, feel free to clarify.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Joshilyn Hoisington on April 03, 2008, 11:13:03 AM
Here's another falsehood that's been perpetuated:  Pet Sounds didn't sell when it came out, it bombed, etc.


Later research showed that it went "gold" pretty quickly.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Ana-Lu on April 03, 2008, 11:15:47 AM
Pop stars who have a string of number one hits are quick to call their first single that gets to number 2 a "flop."  It's all relative, but yes, I hear you.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Bicyclerider on April 03, 2008, 11:26:39 AM
George Martin considered Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields a flop because it only made number 2 rather than 1 - apparently because the two songs charted independently and total sales of the single weren't combined.  He wished he'd put "When I'm 64" on the flip of SFF instead.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Rocker on April 03, 2008, 11:32:56 AM
Pop stars who have a string of number one hits are quick to call their first single that gets to number 2 a "flop."  It's all relative, but yes, I hear you.


You know, I always wondered why the Beach Boys "only" had three no.1s in the 60s.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Sam_BFC on April 03, 2008, 01:21:05 PM
Later research showed that it went "gold" pretty quickly.

What of the story that Capitol mis-counted the sales or something like that...so it was awarded Gold status late? Or am I confusing that with something else?

Cheers
Sam


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: HighOnLife on April 03, 2008, 02:11:44 PM
It's been said that Capitol lost paperwork that would have made Pet Sounds at least three times platinum by now.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: southbay on April 03, 2008, 02:30:04 PM
According to Bruce Johnston, Sloop John B was NOT intended for Pet Sounds...


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Joshilyn Hoisington on April 03, 2008, 02:53:24 PM
According to Bruce Johnston, Sloop John B was NOT intended for Pet Sounds...

Another good example of contemporaneous paperwork proving a band member's memory incorrect.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 03, 2008, 03:02:56 PM
Later research showed that it went "gold" pretty quickly.

What of the story that Capitol mis-counted the sales or something like that...so it was awarded Gold status late? Or am I confusing that with something else?

Cheers
Sam

The thing with RIAA certification is that the record company has to request, and pay for, an audit of the album's sales. It's not an automatic thing. The news that Pet Sounds would have gone gold in the summer of 1967 only emerged when an audit was done in 2000 in order to present Brian with a disc at his Roxy shows. The album was certified gold and platinum on February 11th that year.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on April 03, 2008, 03:29:27 PM
I thought I heard/read that Murry was "fired" or let go in 1964, and gradually faded into irrelevance with the group. So, I'm mildly surprised that 1) Murry was in the studio for the Pet Sounds sessions instead of just hearing the album when it came out, 2) that Brian was still listening to Murry's suggestions, and 3) that if Murry did make the suggestion, that he war right! I can't even listen to the slower (original?) "Caroline No" lead vocal.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Joshilyn Hoisington on April 03, 2008, 03:30:49 PM
Another falsehood perpetuated:  The Boys didn't play on Pet Sounds at all.

Brian played on That's Not Me and Pet Sounds
Dennis played on That's Not Me
Carl played on That's Not Me, I'm Waiting for the Day, and God Only Knows
Al very likely contributed to That's Not Me


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Mark H. on April 03, 2008, 03:41:27 PM
I thought I heard/read that Murry was "fired" or let go in 1964, and gradually faded into irrelevance with the group. So, I'm mildly surprised that 1) Murry was in the studio for the Pet Sounds sessions instead of just hearing the album when it came out, 2) that Brian was still listening to Murry's suggestions, and 3) that if Murry did make the suggestion, that he war right! I can't even listen to the slower (original?) "Caroline No" lead vocal.

You can fire your manager....but you can't really fire your father.  I think Brian was always trying to get Murry's approval....I'm sure he played Murry stuff in the studio before it was released.  Hell....Murry co-wrote Breakaway with Brian.  They may have collaberated more I can't recall.  In addition, Murry still held alot of financial sway with sea of Tunes, so I'm sure he would check in periodically to see how investment was doing.

The BB's never really stopped being a family business.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Fun Is In on April 03, 2008, 04:15:11 PM
So, relative to 45 RPM or 33 1/3 RPM, what would be the "original speed" of Caroline No before it was sped up?



Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Bicyclerider on April 03, 2008, 04:18:04 PM
It's not surprising that Brian, after firing Murry, listened to his suggestions for Caroline No.  He cowrote Breakaway with his father in 1969, right?  It was an up and down relationship and as the previous poster said, Brian always wanted his father's approval.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Joshilyn Hoisington on April 03, 2008, 04:21:35 PM
So, relative to 45 RPM or 33 1/3 RPM, what would be the "original speed" of Caroline No before it was sped up?



That would be tricky to figure out.  It's much easier to think of it by pitch, in which case it was sped up a half step from G to Ab.  In terms of percentage, it would be something like a 3-5 percent speed up.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on April 03, 2008, 04:28:31 PM
Don't want to derail the thread, but two posters mentioned it now...

I have to seriously wonder how much Murry contributed to the actual composing of "Breakaway".


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Joshilyn Hoisington on April 03, 2008, 05:08:29 PM
Don't want to derail the thread, but two posters mentioned it now...

I have to seriously wonder how much Murry contributed to the actual composing of "Breakaway".

There's no way of knowing, but I hear Murry's influence in there.  The man could write a song.  They may not by your cup of tea, but he wrote a few good ones all by himself.


Title: Re: Pet Sounds Minutiae - True or False?
Post by: Fun Is In on April 03, 2008, 05:08:47 PM
So, relative to 45 RPM or 33 1/3 RPM, what would be the "original speed" of Caroline No before it was sped up?



That would be tricky to figure out.  It's much easier to think of it by pitch, in which case it was sped up a half step from G to Ab.  In terms of percentage, it would be something like a 3-5 percent speed up.

Thanks!