Title: Rolling Stone - "Beach Boys" Concert Review from 2000 Post by: HeyJude on August 02, 2017, 12:34:39 PM Rolling Stone - August 4, 2000
Keeping the Beach Boys Alive There are some really good reasons to loathe Mike Love’s Beach Boys. There is the authenticity problem: There is no one named Wilson onstage, and Love is the only founding member present. We can get personal: Love sued his cousin Brian Wilson for songwriting credit, refused to tour with Carl Wilson when he was sick and legally prevented founding member Alan Jardine from using any part of the Beach Boys name. Then there’s the show: The band’s current set list concentrates on its surf years, with only a cursory nod to its richest music. Finally, there is something really ludicrous about a nearly sixty-year-old guy prancing around, singing songs about high school and pretending to be a “boy.” The complaints may be irrelevant. Brian Wilson partisans have long since stopped attending these shows. As for authenticity, there are no veteran bands now touring who still have all of their original guys. All this certainly didn’t matter to the sellout crowd who gathered at Seattle’s Pier 62. As the sun set over Puget Sound, this music machine cranked out a sped-up set of surf oldies and assorted gems, following its now-established pattern of thirty songs in ninety minutes. Throughout, Love seemed to want to give us even more reasons not to like him. He went off on several sophomoric pro-Bush/anti-Clinton rants. This was so strident that it probably made even the Bush people in the audience feel creepy (and last we looked, Bush was running against Gore). He then dedicated “Why Do Fools Fall In Love” to Diana Ross “who isn’t feeling too good right now.” Then, his smarmy lieutenant Bruce Johnston razzed the “rental Supremes.” Careful, Bruce. Beleaguered as the recent Supremes tour may have been, it still had a greater percentage of original members than these Beach Boys. Still, this version of the Beach Boys plays crisp, clean and competent music. That is to say, close your eyes and this could be the old days. Guitarists Adrian Baker and Philip Bardowell bracketed Love and Johnston onstage, adding passion and enthusiasm to the mix. Bassist Chris Farmer -- who looked like a healthy Brian Wilson -- and drummer Mike Kowalski gave the band depth. In fact, Love and Johnston (who spent much of the set singing off-mike) only went through the motions, becoming vestigial organs in the band they are supposed to lead. While it’s obvious that Love won’t grow up, he also can’t last forever. Documents filed last year in the court case versus Jardine stated that he has about five years of touring left. But that doesn’t mean the Beach Boys should pack it in. Love has already tossed authenticity out the window, and proven that a group of ringers can perform these songs very well indeed. One by one, the Wilson brothers and Jardine went away, with no appreciable change in the sound. So it goes to follow that Love could leave and much of the audience wouldn’t really notice. One day Bruce Johnston could become leader. This is doubly horrifying, as they would probably have to let him play his “I Write the Songs” all the way through. But maybe it really doesn’t matter. As repugnant as it may be to purists, an officially sanctioned cover band bringing Brian Wilson’s music to a new generation of fans may not be entirely A bad thing. (The precedent for this behavior is called the Glenn Miller Orchestra.) What would Love do if he were no longer up front? We will surely miss witticisms such as his perspective on Brian Wilson: “My cousin is such a genius. He’s stayed home since 1965 and we send him money.” He may be angling for a job in the Bush cabinet. Failing that, he threatened to move to Seattle for a month, get a condo (perhaps forgetting Jimi Hendrix’ admonition that the planet should “never hear surf music again”) and spend the time visiting the Experience Music Project. “That place is amazing,” he said. “It would take weeks for you to see everything that’s in there.” “I wish,” Johnston piped up, “that we were in there.” Title: Re: Rolling Stone - \ Post by: southbay on August 02, 2017, 01:13:14 PM "smarmy lieutenant Bruce Johnston..."
Title: Re: Rolling Stone - \ Post by: HeyJude on August 02, 2017, 01:33:29 PM I'm curious if this is the actual show where the semi-infamous “My cousin is such a genius. He’s stayed home since 1965 and we send him money" line comes from.
I recall reading some reviews from around this time and, perhaps because of the then-ongoing lawsuits and whatnot, Mike and Bruce were supposedly a bit more catty/feisty on stage in terms of commentary. Title: Re: Rolling Stone - \ Post by: Rocky Raccoon on August 02, 2017, 01:38:56 PM "refused to tour with Carl Wilson when he was sick"
That's not really true, is it? I've never heard that. Carl continued to tour in '97, I thought he stopped when he was no longer physically able to do it anymore. Title: Re: Rolling Stone - \ Post by: HeyJude on August 02, 2017, 01:41:38 PM "refused to tour with Carl Wilson when he was sick" That's not really true, is it? I've never heard that. Carl continued to tour in '97, I thought he stopped when he was no longer physically able to do it anymore. This is mentioned in slightly more detail in another article from around the same time that I posted today in another thread: http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,25340.0.html But essentially, yes, it is true and is confirmed by Elliott Lott in the article. To give it more perspective, Ray Lawlor offered some key information regarding this confusing period of time, confirming that Mike essentially threatened to quit if Carl continued to tour: http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,18436.msg481404.html#msg481404 Title: Re: Rolling Stone - \ Post by: Dove Nested Towers on August 04, 2017, 12:56:33 AM Yeccch, yeccch, a thousand times yeccch.
|