Title: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 04:59:42 AM EYE was a short-lived magazine from the Hearst Corporation, lasted a year and a half. What do you think of this cover? One of the last of Mike without a cap? What's all that smarmy hugging about? What do you think of the photo, how does it figure in the context of that period in the band's career?
(https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/13124446_1116671138395402_4141670399160844096_n.jpg?oh=6d1579dd0095b8f4f235d3da9ddf4c54&oe=57E31532) Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Ian on May 04, 2016, 05:26:05 AM Not to discourage you from posting cool stuff-but if you look in the Media section this was posted a long time ago. Still it is an amazing cover!! Wow-talk about a fashion disaster!!
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Emdeeh on May 04, 2016, 06:14:39 AM I like the hugging pose because it's different -- not the usual staged photo pose. The ice cream suits, not so much....
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 06:43:50 AM Not to discourage you from posting cool stuff-but if you look in the Media section this was posted a long time ago. Still it is an amazing cover!! Wow-talk about a fashion disaster!! Sorry for the repeat, that's what I get for not checking in regularly. You guys leve no stone unturned, it's hard to find stuff that hasn't been covered here already! :) I am a bit ambivalent about the cover, on the one hand it's good fun, but it's also a bit unctuous, I think, even if ironic. From a period when Brian stayed away from most publicity shots. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Cool Cool Water on May 04, 2016, 06:51:27 AM Not to discourage you from posting cool stuff-but if you look in the Media section this was posted a long time ago. Still it is an amazing cover!! Wow-talk about a fashion disaster!! Sorry for the repeat, that's what I get for not checking in regularly. You guys leve no stone unturned, it's hard to find stuff that hasn't been covered here already! :) I am a bit ambivalent about the cover, on the one hand it's good fun, but it's also a bit unctuous, I think, even if ironic. From a period when Brian stayed away from most publicity shots. Still a cool pic, if it's a re-bump, thanks for posting! Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: urbanite on May 04, 2016, 07:24:53 AM A great picture. People dressed like that in 1968.
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 07:51:28 AM There was a similar "Dandy" fashion going on in the UK at that time.
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: The Shift on May 04, 2016, 07:57:16 AM More than likely the photographer asked them to get huggy: a good snapper would know the best composition/shape for that title that left space for masthead, cover lines, price details (and these days a barcode…). I wouldn't read too much into the apparent chumminess! :)
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 08:01:08 AM .
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 08:01:48 AM More than likely the photographer asked them to get huggy: a good snapper would know the best composition/shape for that title that left space for masthead, cover lines, price details (and these days a barcode…). I wouldn't read too much into the apparent chumminess! :) It's not often seen, though, remember the (in)famous Montrose album cover, bare-chested men getting chummy: (http://historyguy.com/musicalbiography/montrose-album-cover.jpg) Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: The LEGENDARY OSD on May 04, 2016, 08:08:01 AM Bought this when it came out and in 68 there wasn't much being written about the group. They'd hit the bottom with the Smile debacle, the disastrous Smiley Smile, and the ridiculous maharishi ::)episode. It wasn't easy time being a fan with so many rejecting their albums and live appearances. I saw them several times between 67 and 69 and they were very good.
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: KDS on May 04, 2016, 08:10:46 AM More than likely the photographer asked them to get huggy: a good snapper would know the best composition/shape for that title that left space for masthead, cover lines, price details (and these days a barcode…). I wouldn't read too much into the apparent chumminess! :) It's not often seen, though, remember the (in)famous Montrose album cover, bare-chested men getting chummy: (http://historyguy.com/musicalbiography/montrose-album-cover.jpg) That's one for the great album / terrible cover list. That list would likely feature a BB release or two. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Cam Mott on May 04, 2016, 08:11:28 AM Bought this when it came out and in 68 there wasn't much being written about the group. Me too. Was this the one with the feature article about Brian being a genius who was deaf in one ear? It doesn't look like it is. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: filledeplage on May 04, 2016, 10:10:51 AM A great picture. People dressed like that in 1968. Yes, indeed! ;)Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Emdeeh on May 04, 2016, 10:28:57 AM More than likely the photographer asked them to get huggy: a good snapper would know the best composition/shape for that title that left space for masthead, cover lines, price details (and these days a barcode…). I wouldn't read too much into the apparent chumminess! :) Or the art director -- spot on, John! Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: CenturyDeprived on May 04, 2016, 10:56:08 AM If Brian had participated in this photo session, where do y'all think he'd have been positioned within the pic? Would he have been one of the huggees in the middle? Or one of the outer huggers on the outside of the group? Or would he have just been standing off to the side?
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: The Shift on May 04, 2016, 11:17:04 AM More than likely the photographer asked them to get huggy: a good snapper would know the best composition/shape for that title that left space for masthead, cover lines, price details (and these days a barcode…). I wouldn't read too much into the apparent chumminess! :) It's not often seen, though, remember the (in)famous Montrose album cover, bare-chested men getting chummy: (http://historyguy.com/musicalbiography/montrose-album-cover.jpg) Cripes, one scary cover! Was it artistically brave to obscure the artists' faces with type or just a piss-poor decision?! Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Shane on May 04, 2016, 07:09:20 PM That Montrose cover is nothing compared to this Orleans album. Ahhh, the 1970s.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b8/Waking_and_Dreaming.jpg) Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 04, 2016, 07:14:10 PM That Montrose cover is nothing compared to this Orleans album. Ahhh, the 1970s. (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b8/Waking_and_Dreaming.jpg) yeah, that was the other example I had in mind! :-D But I couldn't remember the band's name! Thanks! Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: adamghost on May 04, 2016, 11:43:46 PM (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--p8407KNoRo/T38Xe9kG3-I/AAAAAAAAMhI/uvty5DfaWPQ/s1600/julies-sixteenth-birthday-john-bult.jpg)
Nothing to do with anything, it's just always fun to have an excuse to put this out there. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: The Shift on May 04, 2016, 11:51:32 PM (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--p8407KNoRo/T38Xe9kG3-I/AAAAAAAAMhI/uvty5DfaWPQ/s1600/julies-sixteenth-birthday-john-bult.jpg) Nothing to do with anything, it's just always fun to have an excuse to put this out there. I really appreciate that. Especially at breakfast! :( Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: CosmicDancer on May 05, 2016, 05:06:50 AM (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--p8407KNoRo/T38Xe9kG3-I/AAAAAAAAMhI/uvty5DfaWPQ/s1600/julies-sixteenth-birthday-john-bult.jpg) Nothing to do with anything, it's just always fun to have an excuse to put this out there. Easily the most disturbing cover I've ever seen between the creepy vibe John Bult is giving off and the regretful, sad and scared look "Julie" is presenting. Yikes. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Bill30022 on May 05, 2016, 05:50:42 PM I wonder if she is a tomboy or if she roller skates?
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: RangeRoverA1 on May 06, 2016, 08:49:32 AM I like the hugging pose because it's different -- not the usual staged photo pose. The ice cream suits, not so much.... Agree with the 1st bit. I like goofy pics. With the last bit, I didn't know they're called "ice cream". To me, they look very stylish, down to the right choice of color for each. Or do I've bad sense of fashion?Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Emdeeh on May 06, 2016, 10:15:38 AM "Ice cream suits" is a fannish term for the brightly-colored suits. Actually, I like the color just fine, but not so much the fabric itself.
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: MyDrKnowsItKeepsMeCalm on May 06, 2016, 10:49:31 AM The thing that strikes me about this cover is that the photo looks like it could be any random 60s pop group.
Absent any sun/surf/sand backgrounds, and with the name of the group so understated and towards the bottom, would casual fans even know who these people were? Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Amy B. on May 09, 2016, 12:24:18 PM (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--p8407KNoRo/T38Xe9kG3-I/AAAAAAAAMhI/uvty5DfaWPQ/s1600/julies-sixteenth-birthday-john-bult.jpg) Nothing to do with anything, it's just always fun to have an excuse to put this out there. I prefer to think that these are Julie's parents, who are worried that Julie has gone out for her 16th birthday and may be up to no good. Because if that's Julie in the photo, it's just too creepy. Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Dove Nested Towers on May 13, 2016, 12:50:29 AM The psychedelic Brian cover photo is one of my favorite images of him, I've suggested to various t-shirt makers that they should try to track it down and put it on one. Could anyone please post this if they have it handy?
Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: Cliff1000uk on May 13, 2016, 02:28:52 AM (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--p8407KNoRo/T38Xe9kG3-I/AAAAAAAAMhI/uvty5DfaWPQ/s1600/julies-sixteenth-birthday-john-bult.jpg) Nothing to do with anything, it's just always fun to have an excuse to put this out there. I prefer to think that these are Julie's parents, who are worried that Julie has gone out for her 16th birthday and may be up to no good. Because if that's Julie in the photo, it's just too creepy. "It's OK.....I have a friend called Dennis......" Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: RangeRoverA1 on May 13, 2016, 04:43:58 AM "Ice cream suits" is a fannish term for the brightly-colored suits. Actually, I like the color just fine, but not so much the fabric itself. Thanks for the info. Color=flavor then.Title: Re: EYE , November 1968 Post by: GoogaMooga on May 13, 2016, 06:03:33 AM "It's OK.....I have a friend called Dennis......" :lol |