|
Title: "Tolerant" leftists in John Bull's Tyranny riot over David Cameron's re-election Post by: Douchepool on May 10, 2015, 07:04:23 AM http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-05-10/riots-erupt-in-london-against-re-election-of-david-cameron/6458098
Can someone in the UK please tell me why we should take this uncivilized behavior seriously? If you're trying to keep the Tories out of power, shows of idiocy like this aren't really going to change pro-Tory minds, are they? Title: Re: \ Post by: Mike's Beard on May 10, 2015, 07:19:46 AM Defacing a war monument is pretty low. Clowns like that don't deserve the right to vote.
Title: Re: \ Post by: Douchepool on May 10, 2015, 07:22:01 AM Labour voters are so desperate to tolerate everything that they have to act like animals when they don't get their way. I bet if the UKIP supporters were the ones rioting those leftist degenerates would be all over the news denouncing them.
By the way, how in the blue hell can the SNP get 56 seats on 1.5 million votes but UKIP can only retain one on 4 million? Title: Re: \ Post by: Mike's Beard on May 10, 2015, 07:39:39 AM SNP gets all it's votes from Scotland. UKIP gets more votes overall but it's spread out throughout the nation so they don't win the majority.
Title: Re: \ Post by: JK on May 10, 2015, 10:45:34 AM Defacing a war monument is pretty low. Clowns like that don't deserve the right to vote. Too true. Assholes. Title: Re: \ Post by: Douchepool on May 10, 2015, 02:09:53 PM I don't know why all the Labour voters are having a chimp out anyway. They wanted a social democrat and they got one. His name is David Cameron. That's apparently what the UK "majority" wants. Of course, only 39% of registered voters actually went out to vote, so...what, they thought Ed Miiiband or Nick Clegg (or the annoying incomprehensible woman in charge of the SNP) was going to be DIFFERENT?! Choosing between Ed Miliband, David Cameron, and Nick Clegg is like choosing between Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Gary Johnson or Coke, Pepsi, and Mr. Pibb - one may be sweeter than the others but they're all bad for you.
Title: Re: \ Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 10, 2015, 06:00:48 PM We need the TRBB party in the USA/UK. ;)
Title: Re: \ Post by: Douchepool on May 10, 2015, 07:37:34 PM We need the TRBB party in the USA/UK. ;) Talk about fucking with the formula! It'll be so inappropriate. EVERYONE will want the innocence. :lol Title: Re: \ Post by: Mike's Beard on May 10, 2015, 10:20:36 PM Labour voters are so desperate to tolerate everything that they have to act like animals when they don't get their way. I bet if the UKIP supporters were the ones rioting those leftist degenerates would be all over the news denouncing them. Thought you might find this interesting.By the way, how in the blue hell can the SNP get 56 seats on 1.5 million votes but UKIP can only retain one on 4 million? http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/heres-how-the-election-results-would-look-under-a-proportional-voting-system--gJenQmaW2gW (http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/heres-how-the-election-results-would-look-under-a-proportional-voting-system--gJenQmaW2gW) Title: Re: \ Post by: Douchepool on May 11, 2015, 10:15:36 AM A proportional voting system would mean the Tories and Labour might actually have to worry about UKIP.
|