The Smiley Smile Message Board

Smiley Smile Stuff => General On Topic Discussions => Topic started by: CenturyDeprived on October 22, 2014, 02:10:16 PM



Title: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: CenturyDeprived on October 22, 2014, 02:10:16 PM
What’s everybody’s consensus of the re-recorded SIP tracks for the UK CD, vs the originally-released SIP US CD tracks?

I’ve only ever owned the originally-issued version of the album (and I find about roughly half of it ok/pretty decent, and the rest super bad). I’ve only ever heard the remixed UK versions that are on Youtube (which aren’t all of them).

In my opinion, they improved some songs, and totally messed up other ones. Who’s idea was it to re-record the songs anyway? Was this something the band ever publicized and went out of their way to mention?

- “Strange Things Happen” (regardless of version, definitely the best or second best song on the album; shortening this for the UK was a GOOD thing that improved the song, it sounded rambling and unfinished towards the end on the US version).

- “Island Fever” (one of the better songs on the US version, but I think the UK version is seriously bad. I think every change they made was super lame and hurt the song).

- "Under the Boardwalk" (I have never heard the remix, but the US version sucks pretty damn hard. Is the remix any better?).

- “Summer in Paradise” (not a huge fan of the song in either version, but I don’t hate it either. I probably would call this a wash in terms of which one is better). Adding McGuinn was certainly gimmicky, but being a huge Byrds fan, I can live with it.

- "Forever" (I have never heard the remixes, apparently there are two, one from the UK version and one from a promo CD version… I can kinda sorta dig the US version as a guilty pleasure).

- "Remember (Walking in the Sand)" - has anyone heard this unreleased remix? Good/bad?  I also think the US version sucks pretty damn hard.

Opinions?



Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: startBBtoday on October 22, 2014, 03:16:36 PM
I had never heard the US versions until today. I don't particularly like either version of Island Fever, but I might like the US version more. Both are so repetitive.

The US version of Summer In Paradise is a bit more sterile, but I like the harmonies during the verses.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Fall Breaks on October 22, 2014, 03:23:44 PM
The British "UTB" utilizes Al on the line "under the sun" in the chorus, which is quite nice.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: southbay on October 22, 2014, 05:29:21 PM
Never understood why Terry Melcher replaced Carl on the UK Island Fever.  Tragic. TRAGIC. Makes an otherwise bad song completely unlistenable.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: CenturyDeprived on October 22, 2014, 05:55:43 PM
Never understood why Terry Melcher replaced Carl on the UK Island Fever.  Tragic. TRAGIC. Makes an otherwise bad song completely unlistenable.

+1. Although I'd say that it was a pretty ok song (for that era BBs, at least) before they tinkered with it. While in general I love hearing Al's voice, I think replacing Carl's voice there was a real boneheaded move, because all the new parts and lyrics really, really don't work. (Plus, because Carl's part/voice was the best part of the song too!) You can tell that there was a very active attempt to rework the song into even more of a commercial Kokomo soundalike than it was previously, but they really broke all the good things about it in the process.  

I'm speculating that Terry Melcher replaced Carl not out of specifically not wanting Carl to sing the new part, but maybe because Carl made himself unavailable for it? Maybe Carl didn't want to polish what he deemed a turd, that makes the most sense to me. Carl moreso than any of his mates had the good sense to not appear in some of the more embarrassing late era BBs product (Wipeout video, anyone?), so I'm thinking the re-record was an example of that.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: joshferrell on October 22, 2014, 09:34:44 PM
well you can't polish a turd  ;D


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: debonbon on October 22, 2014, 10:37:27 PM
This is the first I've heard about there being two versions (mostly because I think the album is a joke and have only heard it once) but am very interested into why this was done. Anyone have the full story? How long apart was the US and UK release?


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: CenturyDeprived on October 22, 2014, 11:16:44 PM
This is the first I've heard about there being two versions (mostly because I think the album is a joke and have only heard it once) but am very interested into why this was done. Anyone have the full story? How long apart was the US and UK release?

I feel pretty confident in assuming that the main reasons were the poor sales of the US version (hoping re-records would make a difference), plus I think I read that Bruce or Terry mentioned it having been rushed to completion to meet a deadline, so that might have put the desire to "fix" unfinished (to their satisfaction) songs in their minds. Island Fever sounds like a really desperate ill-fated attempt to remake the song as a hit. But I'd love to know the full story too.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Eric Aniversario on October 22, 2014, 11:33:33 PM
I've always thought that the US version of Island Fever would have been an excellent single that might have gotten some AC airplay. The UK version sounds absolutely horrible and the whole "doctor doctor" and "my baby can't dance" parts were way too repetitive and sounded looped rather than resung.

I like both versions of Under The Boardwalk, though I thought the US Version was more radio friendly. Al's part, though well sung, did not really mesh too well with the rest of the song, and sounded flown in, which it was.

The US version of SIP is way better than the UK version.

Both versions of Strange Things Happen are fine, but the UK edit made it more radio friendly (though I doubt either got any airplay).

The other versions of Forever are pretty unnecessary as the original US version is superior to them all.



Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Matt H on October 23, 2014, 11:26:14 AM
This is the first I've heard about there being two versions (mostly because I think the album is a joke and have only heard it once) but am very interested into why this was done. Anyone have the full story? How long apart was the US and UK release?

I feel pretty confident in assuming that the main reasons were the poor sales of the US version (hoping re-records would make a difference), plus I think I read that Bruce or Terry mentioned it having been rushed to completion to meet a deadline, so that might have put the desire to "fix" unfinished (to their satisfaction) songs in their minds. Island Fever sounds like a really desperate ill-fated attempt to remake the song as a hit. But I'd love to know the full story too.

I wonder what the deadline was, they released it on their own label, I would think they could change the deadline, unless it had something to do with being the first album recorded on Protools.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Nicko1234 on October 23, 2014, 03:54:54 PM


I wonder what the deadline was, they released it on their own label, I would think they could change the deadline, unless it had something to do with being the first album recorded on Protools.

I think Bruce has said it was the distribution company (I may be remembering that wrong).


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: donald on October 23, 2014, 07:19:59 PM
well you can't polish a turd  ;D

yes, you can.    It just must first be dried in the sun and then coated heavily in polyurethane.   Many records are manufactured in this manner.


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: joshferrell on October 23, 2014, 09:23:36 PM
well you can't polish a turd  ;D

yes, you can.    It just must first be dried in the sun and then coated heavily in polyurethane.   Many records are manufactured in this manner.
lol...


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: kookadams on November 14, 2014, 06:50:10 PM
What was the deal with the distro on SIP? Brother entertainment had a logo than brother records. ?? And didnt capitol release it?


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Nicko1234 on November 14, 2014, 07:17:33 PM
What was the deal with the distro on SIP? Brother entertainment had a logo than brother records. ?? And didnt capitol release it?

Navarre distributed it didn`t they?


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Alan Smith on November 14, 2014, 11:33:45 PM
What was the deal with the distro on SIP? Brother entertainment had a logo than brother records. ?? And didnt capitol release it?

Navarre distributed it didn`t they?
Yeah, Navarre Corp, Minneapolis.

The Eco Pak was produced by Shorewood Packaging, NY


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on November 21, 2014, 11:42:16 AM
Owning both CDs [my beautiful pair of bargains I paid less than £20 for - in total], I always take the UK CD in my car. The US mixes seem strange to me now...


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: PhilSpectre on November 21, 2014, 12:31:55 PM
The US mixes seem strange to me now...

But then, Strange Things Happen ...


Title: Re: Summer in Paradise re-recorded UK versions vs. US versions
Post by: southbay on November 21, 2014, 03:14:09 PM
What was the deal with the distro on SIP? Brother entertainment had a logo than brother records. ?? And didnt capitol release it?

Brother/Navarre in the US, EMI in the UK