Title: Mike "Red Jacketed" Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2013, 12:43:45 PM http://www.artistdirect.com/entertainment-news/article/the-beach-boys-mike-love-red-jacketed-by-city-year/10550274
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jason on May 16, 2013, 12:48:30 PM So selfish and greedy of him to donate to good causes.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Lowbacca on May 16, 2013, 12:50:41 PM So selfish and greedy of him to donate to good causes. On the contrary - I think that was very generous of him.Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jason on May 16, 2013, 12:52:12 PM I was being facetious. Of course it was very generous of him. Kind of destroys the image of the "greedy" Michael Love...
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Lowbacca on May 16, 2013, 12:52:34 PM I was being facetious. Of course it was very generous of him. Kind of destroys the image of the "greedy" Michael Love... ;)Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: lee on May 16, 2013, 01:15:51 PM That's cool of Mike but what's with The Real Beach Boy's facetious comment? I want to dislike Mike just because off how annoying your comments are. You are no better than the Brianistas you complain about.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: oldsurferdude on May 16, 2013, 01:20:34 PM I was being facetious. Of course it was very generous of him. Kind of destroys the image of the "greedy" Michael Love... It was his guilty conscience, that's all-yeah, he's still a very greedy tool.Title: Re: Mike Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2013, 01:22:31 PM That's cool of Mike but what's with The Real Beach Boy's facetious comment? I want to dislike Mike just because off how annoying your comments are. You are no better than the Brianistas you complain about. You bet he is! I think you need to read through a few of Mike Love threads to understand why he was being facetious.Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jim V. on May 16, 2013, 01:33:01 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: lee on May 16, 2013, 01:34:07 PM I've read quite a bit of the Mike hater comments but I don't see the point in making a first post like that to a thread acknowledging him for a good cause. Seems like he's trying to generate some more hateful comments by posting like that.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: lee on May 16, 2013, 01:35:13 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. I couldn't care less but I'll keep that in mind. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Cabinessenceking on May 16, 2013, 01:42:30 PM C'mon you guys suprised about TRBB being a Lovester? All his avatars are of ML and he constantly bashes anti-Mike sentiment. I don't intend this as criticism, it's just my observation.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Nicko1234 on May 16, 2013, 01:44:34 PM C'mon you guys suprised about TRBB being a Lovester? All his avatars are of ML and he constantly bashes anti-Mike sentiment. I don't intend this as criticism, it's just my observation. Odd isn't it that it seems to be assumed that Beach Boys fans won't be fans of all of the band members and that they must have their allegiances. Title: Re: Mike Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2013, 01:45:46 PM I've read quite a bit of the Mike hater comments but I don't see the point in making a first post like that to a thread acknowledging him for a good cause. Seems like he's trying to generate some more hateful comments by posting like that. I can say the same for the others posting all the hate comments in other threads. At least TRBB used a bit of levity to lighten up an otherwise weak thread. It wasn't directed at Mike at all, but to the members here who have called him greedy. Actually, it annoys me that you didn't understand that.Title: Re: Mike Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2013, 01:47:40 PM Cripes. Why did I post what I posted?
Title: Re: Mike Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2013, 01:48:43 PM C'mon you guys suprised about TRBB being a Lovester? All his avatars are of ML and he constantly bashes anti-Mike sentiment. I don't intend this as criticism, it's just my observation. Odd isn't it that it seems to be assumed that Beach Boys fans won't be fans of all of the band members and that they must have their allegiances. Title: Re: Mike Post by: Lowbacca on May 16, 2013, 01:48:43 PM Cripes. Why did I post what I posted? :lolTitle: Re: Mike Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2013, 01:58:06 PM Here y'all go, read what you want into this one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/michael-love-taco-fight Title: Re: Mike Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 16, 2013, 02:25:04 PM C'mon you guys suprised about TRBB being a Lovester? All his avatars are of ML and he constantly bashes anti-Mike sentiment. I don't intend this as criticism, it's just my observation. Odd isn't it that it seems to be assumed that Beach Boys fans won't be fans of all of the band members and that they must have their allegiances. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jason on May 16, 2013, 02:25:36 PM That's cool of Mike but what's with The Real Beach Boy's facetious comment? I want to dislike Mike just because off how annoying your comments are. You are no better than the Brianistas you complain about. If a fan's comments color your opinion of another person, that reflects very poorly on you. Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. People think I know Michael personally... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol C'mon you guys suprised about TRBB being a Lovester? All his avatars are of ML and he constantly bashes anti-Mike sentiment. I don't intend this as criticism, it's just my observation. I'm actually not a Mikeista. The handle and the avatar is a long-continued joke between another mod and myself. That and it makes for fun discussions on the board. I am a Beach Boys fan, not a Brian Wilson or Michael Love fan. Title: Re: Mike Post by: Nicko1234 on May 16, 2013, 02:30:43 PM I am a fan of all of them, warts and all. They are my musical heroes. I don't judge them on personal matters. That is their business, not mine. Me too. I do find it odd though that so many are keen to pigeonhole others with the 'Mikeista', Brianista' labels. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Generation42 on May 16, 2013, 02:34:39 PM "Mikeista"? Shouldn't it be "Mike Lover"?
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jason on May 16, 2013, 02:35:29 PM It keeps with the -ista when it comes to the portmanteau.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: runnersdialzero on May 16, 2013, 02:40:18 PM "Mikeista"? Shouldn't it be "Mike Lover"? No, that title is given to a different group of people. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Nicko1234 on May 16, 2013, 02:42:11 PM No, that title is given to a different group of people. A group that numbers many thousands of, for want of a better word, harlots. ;) Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: MBE on May 16, 2013, 02:49:46 PM Right on I love The Beach Boys period. That's the only thing I ever try to put across. I remember a Jan and Dean fan who loved only Jan. It's so strange to me. Obviously Roger Waters was the ass of Pink Floyd but I dig his writing anyhow.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jim V. on May 16, 2013, 02:51:51 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. People think I know Michael personally... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol Ugh. I was being facetious. I think it's super goofy/lame/whatever that you call Mike "Michael" since nobody does that outside of Brian and Carl a handful of times. Press releases call him Mike. Whenever he appears on TV he is introduced as "Mike Love". He's listed in liner notes as "Mike Love". But to you he's Michael. Yup. ::) Title: Re: Mike Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2013, 03:34:49 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. People think I know Michael personally... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol Ugh. I was being facetious. I think it's super goofy/lame/whatever that you call Mike "Michael" since nobody does that outside of Brian and Carl a handful of times. Press releases call him Mike. Whenever he appears on TV he is introduced as "Mike Love". He's listed in liner notes as "Mike Love". But to you he's Michael. Yup. ::) Title: Re: Mike Post by: Jim V. on May 16, 2013, 03:48:54 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. People think I know Michael personally... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol Ugh. I was being facetious. I think it's super goofy/lame/whatever that you call Mike "Michael" since nobody does that outside of Brian and Carl a handful of times. Press releases call him Mike. Whenever he appears on TV he is introduced as "Mike Love". He's listed in liner notes as "Mike Love". But to you he's Michael. Yup. ::) He was probably introduced as Michael because saying Mike Edward Love would sound kinda odd. When you say a full name with first middle and last names, you'd use the proper first name. Title: Re: Mike Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2013, 03:54:14 PM Keep in mind. The name is MICHAEL. The Real Beach Boys knows him. And he prefers Michael. Not Mike. People think I know Michael personally... :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol Ugh. I was being facetious. I think it's super goofy/lame/whatever that you call Mike "Michael" since nobody does that outside of Brian and Carl a handful of times. Press releases call him Mike. Whenever he appears on TV he is introduced as "Mike Love". He's listed in liner notes as "Mike Love". But to you he's Michael. Yup. ::) He was probably introduced as Michael because saying Mike Edward Love would sound kinda odd. When you say a full name with first middle and last names, you'd use the proper first name. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 16, 2013, 05:36:05 PM Even when there's no reason to attack anyone, there's some people to post just to try and be "ironic" and makes this place so sad, what a shame.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Peter Reum on May 16, 2013, 06:01:25 PM I am very well aware of his environmental activism, and I wholly support it. This has been a focus of all of The Beach Boys since the late Sixties, and it is terrific!
Title: Re: Mike Post by: Mikie on May 16, 2013, 09:05:32 PM Cripes. Why did I post what I posted? I dunno, but you forgot to mention that MIKE Love received a nice tax write-off for this 'charitable donation'. And the only original band members I've heard call Mike "Michael" is Carl and Dennis (on stage) a couple of times and I can't even remember hearing Brian calling him "Michael". Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 16, 2013, 09:15:11 PM True fans won't try to tell other fans how they should act. ;)
Save that for the Parrothead crowd. ;D Title: Re: Mike Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on May 16, 2013, 09:18:14 PM Cripes. Why did I post what I posted? I dunno, but you forgot to mention that MIKE Love received a nice tax write-off for this 'charitable donation'. And the only original band members I've heard call Mike "Michael" is Carl and Dennis (on stage) a couple of times and I can't even remember hearing Brian calling him "Michael". Dennis: "This one's for all the ladies here tonight...... Even Michael" >:D Title: Re: Mike Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2013, 10:09:12 PM Cripes. Why did I post what I posted? I dunno, but you forgot to mention that MIKE Love received a nice tax write-off for this 'charitable donation'. And the only original band members I've heard call Mike "Michael" is Carl and Dennis (on stage) a couple of times and I can't even remember hearing Brian calling him "Michael". I didn't "mention" anything. Just posted the link. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Mikie on May 16, 2013, 10:23:53 PM Thanks for not mentioning it.
Title: Re: Mike Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2013, 10:47:05 PM Don't mention it!
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on May 16, 2013, 11:52:08 PM Cool to see another side of Mike Love.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 17, 2013, 03:00:02 AM No, that title is given to a different group of people. A group that numbers many thousands of, for want of a better word, harlots. ;) A name for ML fans? How about Lovites Obviously a play on the word Luddite, but instead of fearing technology, they fear the awesome creative power of Brian Wilson, and try to destroy him at every turn. Do I have to add that I'm joking Knowing this board, I rather think I do........ Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Alan Smith on May 17, 2013, 04:28:26 AM A name for ML fans? How about Lovites How about "Lovies", Darling? Oh, those Girls! Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on May 17, 2013, 05:25:15 AM Way to Be True To Several Schools, Mike!
:thumbsup Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: filledeplage on May 17, 2013, 07:46:21 AM Way to Be True To Several Schools, Mike! :thumbsup Exactly! The City Year program has worked in some very poor schools where I have taught. They do one-on-one tutoring and other activities with many kids whom might otherwise be forgotten and fail in school. It has been around a long time and they do a pretty good job matching volunteers with kids in need of TLC and grade improvement. The kids' attendance improves, motivation and grades. All good! (Check out the CityYear website!) Congrats, Mike! Wear that jacket proudly! ;) Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Doo Dah on May 17, 2013, 09:24:34 AM I dunno. I'm sure the programs have benefit, but the whole presentation smacks of a camera-ready United Way production.
A circle jerk of rich people, slappin' each other on the back and telling each other how great they are. Look at the camera, look at the camera! [click] America drinks and goes home. Nuttin' to see here! Move along! Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Cam Mott on May 17, 2013, 09:27:55 AM Jeez Louise, don't some of you fellas every feel just a little bit ashamed of yourselves?
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Mikie on May 17, 2013, 09:32:21 AM Not me. Not at all.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: RangeRoverA1 on May 17, 2013, 10:16:32 AM Thanks to pass the news. Mike seems to be multi-tasker - sings, sends humanitarian aid to the citizens, makes speeches at various big gatherings etc. Jolly good!
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: filledeplage on May 17, 2013, 10:25:21 AM I dunno. I'm sure the programs have benefit, but the whole presentation smacks of a camera-ready United Way production. Doo Dah - no bigger fakers than in education, (I hear ya!) - but this group seems ok. A circle jerk of rich people, slappin' each other on the back and telling each other how great they are. Look at the camera, look at the camera! [click] America drinks and goes home. Nuttin' to see here! Move along! Kids (especially poor ones) have great instinct and can spot a faker a mile away. ;) Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: lee on May 17, 2013, 12:36:22 PM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about?
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: leggo of my ego on May 17, 2013, 01:54:46 PM sometimes, yes.
sometimes, no. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on May 17, 2013, 02:04:41 PM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about? Unfortunately, the David Leaf/Dominic Priore school of thought was a lot of "fans" way-in to The Beach Boys and it's a hard thing to shake off..... The Brian-as-helpless-genius-and-The-Beach-Boys/Mike-as-bastards narrative it just too strong to resist or see around for some, and I can hardly blame them.... At least OSD's Mike hatred was hard earned over decades as an active fan being annoyed by Mike, so I can at least begrudgingly respect it.... But too many others seem like they've just gotten done watching Beautiful Dreamer and are just punch-drunk/misty eyed and are going to stick to that feeling no matter what other information they might be exposed to. And others are just mean people who will kick at an easy target because someone else told them it's OK. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 17, 2013, 02:36:55 PM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about? I think it's a trickle down effect. I'll bet a band who all get on well and don't have huge rows, have a fanbase that behaves similarly. The Beach Boys have the fans they deserve. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Kurosawa on May 17, 2013, 04:28:39 PM Really appreciate all the charitable work Mike does, it's one of the best things about the guy. He's done it for a long time and I know he's helped a lot of people out.
Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Wah Wah Wah Ooooo on May 17, 2013, 04:50:13 PM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about? I think it's a trickle down effect. I'll bet a band who all get on well and don't have huge rows, have a fanbase that behaves similarly. The Beach Boys have the fans they deserve. That sums up the Beach Boys, their fans and this board pretty much more perfectly than I've ever seen. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Mike's Beard on May 17, 2013, 11:55:04 PM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about? Unfortunately, the David Leaf/Dominic Priore school of thought was a lot of "fans" way-in to The Beach Boys and it's a hard thing to shake off..... The Brian-as-helpless-genius-and-The-Beach-Boys/Mike-as-bastards narrative it just too strong to resist or see around for some, and I can hardly blame them.... At least OSD's Mike hatred was hard earned over decades as an active fan being annoyed by Mike, so I can at least begrudgingly respect it.... But too many others seem like they've just gotten done watching Beautiful Dreamer and are just punch-drunk/misty eyed and are going to stick to that feeling no matter what other information they might be exposed to. And others are just mean people who will kick at an easy target because someone else told them it's OK. What annoys me about all the fans who swallowed Leaf's crap is they all hate Mike with a passion but conveniently seem to forget that he also bashes Carl and Dennis. So if you hate Love because of Leaf's writings than you by proxy should also mildly hate Carl and Dennis too. It's only fair. Anyway props to anybody who donates to a good cause. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Don Malcolm on May 18, 2013, 08:27:24 AM We call him "Mike" because "MICHAEL LOVE NOT WAR" just doesn't work on that (in)famous T-shirt. :smokin
But it's way too late for him to be known as Michael to the general public. He's always been a bit of a "climber" but as he's gotten older his give-back has become more focused and more principled. Some of the credit for that should go to Jacqueline, of course; we should not discount her influence on him in what has easily been his most stable, equal, and enduring marriage. Title: Re: Mike \ Post by: Jason on May 18, 2013, 08:43:06 AM I guess I just don't take the whole fans of Brian vs. fans of Mike thing serious. it's very lame and bitchy to me. Many of the fans here probably argue more than The Beach Boys do. This whole justification of childish posts because "a fan of brianista said this" or "a mike lover said that" is worn out and old. I like and dislike things about all of The Beach Boys as I'm sure everyone does. Is there nothing more interesting to talk about? Unfortunately, the David Leaf/Dominic Priore school of thought was a lot of "fans" way-in to The Beach Boys and it's a hard thing to shake off..... The Brian-as-helpless-genius-and-The-Beach-Boys/Mike-as-bastards narrative it just too strong to resist or see around for some, and I can hardly blame them.... At least OSD's Mike hatred was hard earned over decades as an active fan being annoyed by Mike, so I can at least begrudgingly respect it.... But too many others seem like they've just gotten done watching Beautiful Dreamer and are just punch-drunk/misty eyed and are going to stick to that feeling no matter what other information they might be exposed to. And others are just mean people who will kick at an easy target because someone else told them it's OK. What annoys me about all the fans who swallowed Leaf's crap is they all hate Mike with a passion but conveniently seem to forget that he also bashes Carl and Dennis. So if you hate Love because of Leaf's writings than you by proxy should also mildly hate Carl and Dennis too. It's only fair. Anyway props to anybody who donates to a good cause. You're asking them to engage in ideological consistency. I dare say you're asking too much. |