|
Title: Licensing Post by: Beckner on December 30, 2005, 09:00:46 AM Now seriously why isn't there BBs product out there like the Beatles and just about every other "classic rocK" (gawd I hate the term) group around?
Love is so worried about the legacy-- I think some hip shirts would help get the image out there a bit more-- and none of that crap "giant letter Bs" logo from the last twenty years. I think if I heard Hot Topic was stocking some Pet Sounds or Friends shirts Id crap myself. Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 09:02:57 AM The young people wouldn't get it.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: the captain on December 30, 2005, 09:04:09 AM They might if you convinced them it's ironic. Out-of-style stuff always becomes stylish for its very unhipness.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Beckner on December 30, 2005, 09:05:51 AM I don't know man, I think if marketed right you could sell "Pet Sounds" as the newest in emo hip.
Seriously, what's more "emo" than Pet Sounds? Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 09:06:07 AM 'Til I Die.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: the captain on December 30, 2005, 09:06:34 AM But emo's dying, at least in these-here parts.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 09:07:31 AM If you want the Boys to have some hip cred, promote them as the founding fathers of "baroque pop"!
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: JRauch on December 30, 2005, 09:08:46 AM "They might if you convinced them it's ironic."
I wear a Beatles-shirt, and noone gets that itīs ironic. ??? Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 09:10:43 AM The Beatles are hip nowadays. But someone needs to tell all those young Beatles fans that Pet Sounds is the equal of anything the Beatles ever did.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: the captain on December 30, 2005, 09:17:55 AM Regarding hipsters and their somewhat baffling insistence on irony...enjoy.
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/43032 Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Beckner on December 30, 2005, 09:24:22 AM yeah yeah, read that the first time D posted it :)
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: the captain on December 30, 2005, 09:29:18 AM A thousand pardons and all apologies. Or a hundred and a few. Or some such fake sentiment.
I don't think it required TWO yeahs... Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Beckner on December 30, 2005, 10:06:15 AM just fucking with ya.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: the captain on December 30, 2005, 10:08:45 AM Assumed so.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Beckner on December 30, 2005, 01:37:32 PM I dont think this one is licensed.
link (http://cgi.ebay.com/COCOMO-beach-boys-ooooh-VINTAGE-t-shirt-retro-new-M_W0QQitemZ8368184537QQcategoryZ55539QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting) Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Matinee Idyll on December 30, 2005, 01:44:03 PM Beach Boys... oooohhhh...
This is the best selling of a song I've ever read: "Cocomo was the greatest song of the 80's bar none! ooooh Jamaica come on pretty mama! The beach boys made it out of the retirement village to churn out one last all time classic and for that we salute you. Cocomo- Get there fast and take it slow." Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Reverend Joshua Sloane on December 30, 2005, 01:44:40 PM How to spark the curiosity of a young music fan
The Beach Boys are better than the Beatles. Brian Wilson alone held more creative spark in him than each Beatle and their fifth together. Discover for yourself. Done. Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Matinee Idyll on December 30, 2005, 01:47:10 PM That's how to spark a fire in your front yard.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: I. Spaceman on December 30, 2005, 01:48:18 PM That T-shirt RULES!
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Matinee Idyll on December 30, 2005, 01:50:05 PM That T-shirt RULES! And it's only 19 hours from my house :o Title: Re: Licensing Post by: I. Spaceman on December 30, 2005, 01:51:16 PM Go and get it, a spiritual pilgrimage...to Cocomo.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 02:17:35 PM That shirt is funny as hell.....mainly because it's misspelled in reference to the song.
Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Matinee Idyll on December 30, 2005, 02:24:28 PM mainly because it's misspelled in reference to the song. ...whoosh. Title: Re: Licensing Post by: I. Spaceman on December 30, 2005, 02:26:21 PM HAHA!!!!!!!!!!
I got a third-degree burn on that one. Title: Re: Licensing Post by: Jason on December 30, 2005, 02:27:15 PM ...whoosh. My original comment was much meaner. Never would've passed the filter without a lot of foda and merda. |