Title: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on September 09, 2012, 05:13:01 PM can anyone give me some info on this version of a questionably amazing song? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45WwGS_tke0&feature=relmfu
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: EgoHanger1966 on September 09, 2012, 05:30:21 PM I discovered this for myself a couple months ago and put it in the various discussions thread thingy. It is so much better than the released version it's silly. Double tracked vocal, alternate lyrics. No piano outro. I think if this version was the one released on Sunflower, it wouldn't get so much flak.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Don Malcolm on September 09, 2012, 06:05:15 PM I discovered this for myself a couple months ago and put it in the various discussions thread thingy. It is so much better than the released version it's silly. Double tracked vocal, alternate lyrics. No piano outro. I think if this version was the one released on Sunflower, it wouldn't get so much flak. Agree 100%. Bruce hams up the lead too much in the released version. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: The infamous Baldwin Organ on September 09, 2012, 06:21:04 PM Thanks for sharing that. I hadn't heard that version before, and I have to say, it does sound better IMO than the album version.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Jason on September 09, 2012, 06:52:17 PM Just an alternate vocal take. But it's excellent.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: runnersdialzero on September 09, 2012, 06:59:07 PM I swear, just a few months ago, everyone agreed that the alternate version was laughably bad and very much inferior to the final. I haven't really given the alternate version a super srs listen, but teh hell.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: EgoHanger1966 on September 09, 2012, 07:09:50 PM I swear, just a few months ago, everyone agreed that the alternate version was laughably bad and very much inferior to the final. I haven't really given the alternate version a super srs listen, but teh hell. Other way around. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: runnersdialzero on September 09, 2012, 07:25:49 PM I swear, just a few months ago, everyone agreed that the alternate version was laughably bad and very much inferior to the final. I haven't really given the alternate version a super srs listen, but teh hell. Other way around. I can't even remember what thread it was. Someone said "tears in teh mornin suxxx" and someone else said "I like it. At least give credit to Bruce for salvaging it from the pile of sh*t it was", then talked about how the early version was even more cheesy and made use of some arcane term, which, according to the author of the post, was amusing/in poor taste. And then everyone else chimed in "lol yeah it sux" and such. I SWEAR. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: runnersdialzero on September 09, 2012, 08:30:57 PM Just an alternate vocal take. But it's excellent. Hrm, this sound drastically different in spots, to me, and not just the vocal. The first chorus, for instance. Commas, commas. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on September 09, 2012, 08:32:56 PM The horns are brassier, it sounds great.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: runnersdialzero on September 09, 2012, 08:40:46 PM I think I very much prefer the mix/feel here in general, but prefer the lyrics/vocal of the final. His vocal on this version is a bit too "excited little puppy dog" for me. The brassier brassiness is indeed a big plus. Wasn't the final version the result of some record company d00d requesting the song be tweaked?
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: The Shift on September 09, 2012, 08:44:21 PM Alternate lyrics?
Surely the big difference is the lack of backing vox; maybe a different mix of instrumental track, but it's the lack of vocals that really differentiate it. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Gertie J. on September 09, 2012, 09:25:32 PM norbit
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Dunderhead on September 09, 2012, 09:46:39 PM After watching the Desper video I think they could have done some really cool stuff with a double tracked lead. Imagine if the second track was a female singer, and if the verses the two tracks sang countermelodies in opposite channels, and then in the chorus the two voices are both panned to the center.
That could have given the song a whole new dimension that it didn't originally. Bruce could have gotten his wife to pair with him, or the lyrics could have been turned over to Brian and Marilyn. One of the best things about Sunflower is its' sense of family (just look at the cover!), and sometimes I wish they took the whole Beach Boys as one big family idea further, and incorporated the families a little more. Murray's cocredit on Breakaway is a perfect example from that era that would have meant even more on Sunflower than on its' own as a single. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Gertie J. on September 09, 2012, 09:51:58 PM norbit
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on September 09, 2012, 10:56:39 PM can anyone give me some info on this version of a questionably amazing song? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45WwGS_tke0&feature=relmfu WOOO! ANother one of my YouTube uploads! On Topic: yeah, I do really like this version, but then again I have an interest in any alternate versions of anything, so... Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Aegir on September 09, 2012, 11:00:14 PM I definitely don't think this version is "better". I hate that weird processing* on Bruce's voice. and without the backing vocals this just sounds like a demo. And who uses "nepenthe" in a pop song? Geeze.
*or the effects of reel to reel tape being converted to an acetate being converted to a cassette tape being converted to another cassette tape being converted to another cassette tape being converted to a CD being converted to a digital file being converted to a video and then being uploaded to youtube. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Quzi on September 10, 2012, 12:54:17 AM I swear, just a few months ago, everyone agreed that the alternate version was laughably bad and very much inferior to the final. I haven't really given the alternate version a super srs listen, but teh hell. Other way around. I can't even remember what thread it was. Someone said "tears in teh mornin suxxx" and someone else said "I like it. At least give credit to Bruce for salvaging it from the pile of sh*t it was", then talked about how the early version was even more cheesy and made use of some arcane term, which, according to the author of the post, was amusing/in poor taste. And then everyone else chimed in "lol yeah it sux" and such. I SWEAR. Oh man, BJ and his nepenthe. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Generation42 on September 10, 2012, 04:36:05 AM I find the key change in the alt version gives the performance a feel which better suits the lyric.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: RONDEMON on September 10, 2012, 06:46:37 AM After watching the Desper video I think they could have done some really cool stuff with a double tracked lead. Imagine if the second track was a female singer, and if the verses the two tracks sang countermelodies in opposite channels, and then in the chorus the two voices are both panned to the center. That could have given the song a whole new dimension that it didn't originally. Bruce could have gotten his wife to pair with him, or the lyrics could have been turned over to Brian and Marilyn. One of the best things about Sunflower is its' sense of family (just look at the cover!), and sometimes I wish they took the whole Beach Boys as one big family idea further, and incorporated the families a little more. Murray's cocredit on Breakaway is a perfect example from that era that would have meant even more on Sunflower than on its' own as a single. Wait, what "Desper video" are you talking about? Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Gertie J. on September 10, 2012, 07:00:25 AM Go to SWD thread. That's AWESOME, i'll tell ye!!!
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: RONDEMON on September 10, 2012, 07:23:20 AM So awesome. Thank you!
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Don Malcolm on September 10, 2012, 08:59:25 AM Perhaps Mr. Desper has some recollections concerning the evolution of "Tears." Opinions regarding the relative worth of the versions notwithstanding, the song's placement as the lead track on Sunflower side two remains as baffling to me today as it did when I first heard it forty-odd years ago. That doesn't matter nearly as much today, of course, since "sides" of LPs are obsolete, but it meant something back then and many of us were simply scratching our heads at this decision.
Bruce is a great backup singer, but he is by far the weakest lead singer in the group. I get the impression that the reworking was done in order to give the song an echo-y tag that would make for a "preview" of the infinitely more accomplished "All I Wanna Do," when the best thing to have done (IMO) was simply start side two with it instead of "Tears." Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: I. Spaceman on September 10, 2012, 09:01:55 AM Ha, you think that's bad. Tears is the first song on the 8 track of Sunflower.
Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Aegir on September 10, 2012, 11:33:16 AM I think it's so funny that Tears in the Morning comes only two tracks after Deirdre, especially on the CD / digitally when you don't get any time gap between It's About Time and Tears.
Deirdre: "oh my god, my girlfriend who left is back. I was so sad when she was gone! now we can have a wonderful life together!" It's About Time: vaguely political hippie intermission (I've never really understood if this song actually meant something) Tears in the Morning: "oh god, she left again, everything's horrible again, I'm so depressed" If the placement was switched it looks like Bruce wins in the end, but with this it's like you break up with a girl and then you get back together for like a week, and then the second time you break up is so much worse than the first. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: chris.metcalfe on September 10, 2012, 11:40:46 AM And who uses "nepenthe" in a pop song? Geeze. The Fifth Dimension (Jimmy Webb): http://www.myspace.com/thefifthdimension/music/songs/dreams-pax-nepenthe-remastered-2000-28412528 Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: SufferingFools on September 13, 2012, 05:59:07 AM I think it's so funny that Tears in the Morning comes only two tracks after Deirdre, especially on the CD / digitally when you don't get any time gap between It's About Time and Tears. Deirdre: "oh my god, my girlfriend who left is back. I was so sad when she was gone! now we can have a wonderful life together!" It's About Time: vaguely political hippie intermission (I've never really understood if this song actually meant something) Tears in the Morning: "oh god, she left again, everything's horrible again, I'm so depressed" If the placement was switched it looks like Bruce wins in the end, but with this it's like you break up with a girl and then you get back together for like a week, and then the second time you break up is so much worse than the first. That's one of the reasons I prefer the old European vinyl sequence, which put Deirdre before Got to Know the Woman. :smokin Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: runnersdialzero on September 13, 2012, 06:03:08 AM It's About Time: vaguely political hippie intermission Not quite, Aegirrrrrr. Title: Re: Tearrrrrrssssss Post by: Aegir on September 17, 2012, 03:51:55 PM It's About Time: vaguely political hippie intermission Not quite, Aegirrrrrr. What do you think it's about (don't say "time")? I remember once reading the story of how the song was written by Bob Burchman but I couldn't find it on the board so I don't know where it's from. The chorus was written by Carl or Al, unrelated to the verses, and Burchman says Al (or Carl, whichever one didn't write the chorus, I can't remember) just got added on the writing credits for monetary reasons. I think Burchman has some explanation of what the song's about if someone can find that interview, or essay, or whatever it is. |