Title: Unanswerable Question? Post by: MyGlove on March 12, 2012, 12:34:10 AM Ok, what i'm about to ask is of course impossible to know for sure. But I'm curious about your opinion on this matter. Let's just say Smile was released in January 1967 as originally planned, it had very good critical and commercial reception and all that jazz. What would the Beach Boys have done from there? Go back in the studio and try for another one? Take a breather and make an album like Friends for 1968? Would they have even stayed together? How would their musical peers have responded? Obviously Sgt Pepper hadn't been released by that point. But what about that whole Beatles vs Beach Boys thing? What would have happened to them? Or anyone else. People say the whole psychadelic thing ended with The Rolling Stone's psychadelic album, but i think it's really fair to say that the release of Smiley Smile instead of Smile kind of affected the musical community's attitude toward that whole movement at least. I think that could've seen a lot more success in the years after that. I'd like to think that the Beach Boys would now be considered among everybody the best band ever, but idk if i'm willing to go that far. What about your opinion? Have you ever even thought about it?
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Nicko1234 on March 12, 2012, 12:38:53 AM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either.
If Smile had been released then Brian would still have suffered severe mental health problems and things wouldn't have been too different. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 12, 2012, 02:27:53 AM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. But Pet Sounds wasn't released on the back of a huge worldwide smash hit single, not to mention Derek Taylor's new direction of publicity. If SMiLE had been released, and released at the right time, then I think it would have been huge. And to answer the initial post. I think we would have had a Wild Honey type album next, but with the production values of "Can't Wait Too Long" Moot question though. We have what we have. And it's fantastic. And SMiLE has been hugely inflential despite of and because of it's non release in '67 Has spell check been disablededed? Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 12, 2012, 09:34:52 AM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. But Pet Sounds wasn't released on the back of a huge worldwide smash hit single, not to mention Derek Taylor's new direction of publicity. Well, they weren't as big as Good Vibrations but Barbara Ann had been a huge smash #2 hit five months earlier and Sloop John B was a smash #3 single a few months earlier. They had pretty good momentum at that point. Also, I'm pretty sure Derek Taylor was doing publicity work for them at that point. Ultimately, I think it's impossible to really say but I don't think there would have been a Wild Honey kind of album. Wild Honey really came about because Brian changed his process and method. I am pretty sure he decided that it was the production race that had really been part of the problem with Smile - it was ultimately what stalled production for so long and I think part of the feeling was that he could either keeping aiming for perfection and never put anything out or simply get on with things and construct songs that didn't need such overwhelming production. So if Smile had been released successfully, I just don't see him really writing songs like the Wild Honey songs - which, incidentally, are incredible songs. And if I could tell you what kind of songs he'd have written, I'd probably be a successful songwriter myself. And I'm not. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Ron on March 12, 2012, 10:04:17 AM If they would have released SMiLE, it would have been great like Pet Sounds was.... and THEN Brian would have lost it, 6 months later. He went as long as he could, he wouldn't have held up much longer even if he hadn't started breaking apart.
The big jump in quality, and creativity... was before Pet Sounds. SMiLE wouldn't have changed their paths, Pet Sounds already had. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: pixletwin on March 12, 2012, 10:11:27 AM I personally think Wild Honey would still have happened. Perhaps Brian's collapse wouldn't have come so soon. Or perhaps the success would have accelerated it?
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Mike's Beard on March 12, 2012, 10:44:11 AM In a strange way Smile had more of an impact by being abandoned than it ever would have had, had it been released. With Brian junking it, it achieved mythical proportions. Had it came out, it would have been just another great album in a year of many great albums.
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 12, 2012, 10:50:11 AM If they would have released SMiLE, it would have been great like Pet Sounds was.... and THEN Brian would have lost it, 6 months later. Did Brian really "lose it" around this time? I mean, he lost focus certainly but it was nothing like the real kind of collapse that occured after the Friends album. I think (and this is really more hypothetical than anything else) that part of his eventual collapse was his inability to have control over things like he once did and part of that had to do with not being able to put out Smile but also other things like the growing irrelevance of the band, his father selling his songs and so forth. I think that Brian releasing Smile would have at least kept him in some kind of control for a while. But I do ultimately agree that he was susceptible to breaking down. I just don't think it would have necessarily happened around that time. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: pixletwin on March 12, 2012, 10:55:17 AM If they would have released SMiLE, it would have been great like Pet Sounds was.... and THEN Brian would have lost it, 6 months later. Did Brian really "lose it" around this time? He did do a stint in a mental hospital in 1968. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 12, 2012, 10:56:16 AM Yes. That's the collapse after the Friends album that I was referring to.
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Ron on March 12, 2012, 11:24:54 AM There's no such thing as a 'mental breakdown', but he did 'lose' it, obviously, while recording SMiLE. I think basically he lost confidence in his own abilities, before that time he was at least still capable of finishing what he began, I believe he was unable to decide how to finish the smile album.
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 12, 2012, 11:37:32 AM There's no such thing as a 'mental breakdown', but he did 'lose' it, obviously, while recording SMiLE. I think basically he lost confidence in his own abilities, before that time he was at least still capable of finishing what he began, I believe he was unable to decide how to finish the smile album. I think he did lose confidence in his own abilities to a certain degree but it wasn't to such an extent that it stopped him from still writing a lot of songs and being a significant figure in the studio for Smiley, Wild Honey, and Friends. The very existence of those records, to me, suggests that he was still fairly confident as a songwriter. I do think though that he had a difficult time responding to the pressure of making the next "BIG" album and it started to become a bigger pressure as deadlines were missed and there was a real need to put something out ASAP. But that's a fairly reasonable response, I'd say. His choices were either keep going in this direction, to hell with deadlines, pressure from record company to put something out soon; rush (by his standards) out a record he'd been pouring his heart and soul into for months and have it not entirely the way he likes it (which probably seemed like a waste of all that effort); or, just go on and do something else that would require less time and energy. His choice seems to make some sense. I'm really not so sure I would classify it as "losing it." Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: lee on March 12, 2012, 04:11:44 PM I believe he was unable to decide how to finish the smile album. I agree. Smile was a collaboration between Brian and Van Dyke. I think once Van Dyke left, and Brian didn't have him to bounce ideas off of, he wasn't sure how to finish it. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: SBonilla on March 12, 2012, 05:08:55 PM There's no such thing as a 'mental breakdown', but he did 'lose' it, obviously... I think you've lost something. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on March 12, 2012, 10:33:06 PM I believe he was unable to decide how to finish the smile album. I agree. Smile was a collaboration between Brian and Van Dyke. I think once Van Dyke left, and Brian didn't have him to bounce ideas off of, he wasn't sure how to finish it. That's my own personal choice for Smile's death knell. What would Brian have done if Smile had been released? Really hard to tell, considering that Smile material would populate much of their albums over the next several years. That said, his material in the immediate post Smile/Smiley Smile era was excellent. Wild Honey was a great album, and if it had been released in pristine sound...watch out. Still don't understand why the sound on the SOT release was so much better than the actual album, though. In any case, there was no decline in his abilities at that point. I think the real killer was whatever happened in 1968. Apparently Brian came out 'different' after his release, which makes me wonder what happened... Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Lonely Summer on March 12, 2012, 11:11:30 PM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. I've never understood all these years how a top 10 album can be considered a commercial failure. As far as I know, the Beach Boys never had an album that was number 1 for weeks and weeks like the Beatles did, yet they were considered "popular". Never had a gold record until "Good Vibrations", yet were supposedly one of the biggest selling acts of the era. I'm gonna guess that Smile would've done at least as well as Pet Sounds, far better than the eventual Smiley Smile did...and having gone all the way with Smile in '67, Brian would've been faced with the challenge of "okay, I topped PS with Smile...now how the hell do I top THAT?" At some point, an artist has gone as far "out" as they can, and has to settle back down to earth. So I would guess that a Friends or Wild Honey type album was gonna come anyway, or Brian may have just given up completely. We are fortunate that he didn't give up, and we got Wild Honey, Friends, Sunflower, Holland....If Smile had been released then Brian would still have suffered severe mental health problems and things wouldn't have been too different. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: b00ts on March 14, 2012, 12:20:21 PM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. I've never understood all these years how a top 10 album can be considered a commercial failure. As far as I know, the Beach Boys never had an album that was number 1 for weeks and weeks like the Beatles did, yet they were considered "popular". Never had a gold record until "Good Vibrations", yet were supposedly one of the biggest selling acts of the era. I'm gonna guess that Smile would've done at least as well as Pet Sounds, far better than the eventual Smiley Smile did...and having gone all the way with Smile in '67, Brian would've been faced with the challenge of "okay, I topped PS with Smile...now how the hell do I top THAT?" At some point, an artist has gone as far "out" as they can, and has to settle back down to earth. So I would guess that a Friends or Wild Honey type album was gonna come anyway, or Brian may have just given up completely. We are fortunate that he didn't give up, and we got Wild Honey, Friends, Sunflower, Holland....If Smile had been released then Brian would still have suffered severe mental health problems and things wouldn't have been too different. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Amanda Hart on March 14, 2012, 12:40:11 PM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. I've never understood all these years how a top 10 album can be considered a commercial failure. As far as I know, the Beach Boys never had an album that was number 1 for weeks and weeks like the Beatles did, yet they were considered "popular". Never had a gold record until "Good Vibrations", yet were supposedly one of the biggest selling acts of the era. I'm gonna guess that Smile would've done at least as well as Pet Sounds, far better than the eventual Smiley Smile did...and having gone all the way with Smile in '67, Brian would've been faced with the challenge of "okay, I topped PS with Smile...now how the hell do I top THAT?" At some point, an artist has gone as far "out" as they can, and has to settle back down to earth. So I would guess that a Friends or Wild Honey type album was gonna come anyway, or Brian may have just given up completely. We are fortunate that he didn't give up, and we got Wild Honey, Friends, Sunflower, Holland....If Smile had been released then Brian would still have suffered severe mental health problems and things wouldn't have been too different. I think you'll have a lot of people agree with this. Also, consider that popular music as a whole started moving to a "roots rock" type sound after '67. No matter what happened with Smile, Brian and the Boys would have moved to this more lo-fi sound with the rest of their peers in the next year or two anyway. The band's credibility hit came down to many more factors than just Smile, including their stage outfits, skipping on Monterey Pop and their past image and music. Their decline was nearly inevitable and Smile's release wouldn't have changed things too much, imo, either in '67 or in how they are perceived now. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 01:47:08 PM I actually believe the answer is pretty simple:
Things would have gone essentially the way they did otherwise. SMiLE would have probably done better than SMILEY (commerically and critically), but this idea that the group's demise was tied to SMiLE's non-release is overstated in my opinion. Times were changing and the Beach Boys were bound to change along with them. This includes the stripped down sound which was inevitable for most bands following the overblown Flower Power scene. The following albums would have ended up slightly weaker without the SMiLE tracks to pad them, that's about it. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Lonely Summer on March 14, 2012, 02:12:22 PM Looks like we're all on the same page here. Even the Beatles "stripped down" a bit for the white album - although they still took an incredibly long time in recording it by 1968 standards - to the point where they couldn't stand each other anymore! But that's another subject for a different thread.
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 02:36:48 PM A massive problem that I have with the question is you're immediately supposing that Smile would have had a very good commercial reception. Pet Sounds didn't particularly and I don't think Smile would have either. I've never understood all these years how a top 10 album can be considered a commercial failure. As far as I know, the Beach Boys never had an album that was number 1 for weeks and weeks like the Beatles did, yet they were considered "popular". Never had a gold record until "Good Vibrations", yet were supposedly one of the biggest selling acts of the era. I'm gonna guess that Smile would've done at least as well as Pet Sounds, far better than the eventual Smiley Smile did...and having gone all the way with Smile in '67, Brian would've been faced with the challenge of "okay, I topped PS with Smile...now how the hell do I top THAT?" At some point, an artist has gone as far "out" as they can, and has to settle back down to earth. So I would guess that a Friends or Wild Honey type album was gonna come anyway, or Brian may have just given up completely. We are fortunate that he didn't give up, and we got Wild Honey, Friends, Sunflower, Holland....If Smile had been released then Brian would still have suffered severe mental health problems and things wouldn't have been too different. Pet Sounds was certainly popular by pop music standards. And while chart position doesn't tell the whole story, its performance was disappointing compared to previous releases, including the previous PARTY album. And Capitol rush-released the first of the endless 'BEST OF' comps within a few months of Pet Sounds. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: MyGlove on March 14, 2012, 02:58:42 PM I actually believe the answer is pretty simple: Things would have gone essentially the way they did otherwise. SMiLE would have probably done better than SMILEY (commerically and critically), but this idea that the group's demise was tied to SMiLE's non-release is overstated in my opinion. Times were changing and the Beach Boys were bound to change along with them. This includes the stripped down sound which was inevitable for most bands following the overblown Flower Power scene. The following albums would have ended up slightly weaker without the SMiLE tracks to pad them, that's about it. Do you really think so? Its so hard to figure out cuz EVERYONE has a different freakin opinion about what actually happened. Very Confusing. I think it had to have at least affected their popularity. I mean I don't really think it affected the quality of the future music, considering the music that they did release after that. Top notch. The weird thing tho is that it does seem kinda like what someone else said, that Smile is more popular cuz of its unreleased status than it would have been released. That almost seems true. But idk. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Ebb and Flow on March 14, 2012, 04:03:22 PM If Smile had been a success and more importantly a positive and fulfilling experience for Brian I think there would have been little or no reason for Brian to ditch the way he'd been recording for years and move to the home studio/give the group more control of the reins. Regardless of what music they would have recorded after Smile, continuing to record at Western/Gold Star would have changed their history and the way their 60's albums sounded...no question.
Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 04:09:07 PM I actually believe the answer is pretty simple: Things would have gone essentially the way they did otherwise. SMiLE would have probably done better than SMILEY (commerically and critically), but this idea that the group's demise was tied to SMiLE's non-release is overstated in my opinion. Times were changing and the Beach Boys were bound to change along with them. This includes the stripped down sound which was inevitable for most bands following the overblown Flower Power scene. The following albums would have ended up slightly weaker without the SMiLE tracks to pad them, that's about it. Do you really think so? Its so hard to figure out cuz EVERYONE has a different freakin opinion about what actually happened. Very Confusing. I think it had to have at least affected their popularity. I mean I don't really think it affected the quality of the future music, considering the music that they did release after that. Top notch. The weird thing tho is that it does seem kinda like what someone else said, that Smile is more popular cuz of its unreleased status than it would have been released. That almost seems true. But idk. I mean, I understand the "Heroes & Villains" single that came out was not quite what was originally imagined, but I think it provides insight into the kind of reception that would have greeted SMiLE: reasonably better reaction than SMiLEY, but generally a similar outcome. The Beach Boys were still The Beach Boys; there's a certain stigma there regardless. Ditto playing Monterey. They were just kind of out of step with the times. SMiLE would have still sounded like a 'psychedelic barbershop quartet' to Hendrix. SMiLEY was only such a weird disappointment to those who were following the group. Otherwise, it's just a weird Beach Boys album. Personally, I feel these 'what if' scenarios are interesting, but I don't believe SMiLE was ever finished (now or then, or in 2004) ... just listening to the sessions, there is an aimlessness there. The thing was sort of doomed from the beginning. I don't think it was ever, nor will it ever be, possible to put together a cohesive album in the way it was envisioned. You can tell BW was losing it during the sessions, perhaps (sadly) never had it. Part of SMiLE's appeal is in this reality ... the intangible. For one shining moment, it all worked ("Good Vibrations"). Then the darkness came. Then light at the end of the tunnel (SMILEY). I'm of the opinion that SMILEY is SMiLE, as finished and released in '67. Things progressed from there in the only way possible. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: hypehat on March 14, 2012, 06:07:23 PM ... just listening to the sessions, there is an aimlessness there. The thing was sort of doomed from the beginning. I don't think it was ever, nor will it ever be, possible to put together a cohesive album in the way it was envisioned. You can tell BW was losing it during the sessions, perhaps (sadly) never had it. Part of SMiLE's appeal is in this reality ... the intangible. This becomes incredibly obvious when listening to the sessions in chronological order, especially with the humour stuff - those particularly add to the feeling of him losing control of the situation in some respects, especially since before these start cropping up the sessions are progressing in a logical fashion - Worms, Wind Chimes, Cabin Essence, Wonderful, Holidays, and what we have to assume was the working order of H&V are all tracked in order, and then the thing just gets increasingly minute and fragmented... Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Micha on March 15, 2012, 11:38:47 PM Had it came out, it would have been just another great album in a year of many great albums. I agree with this. And like some other posters here I do think that the next album would have been something like Wild Honey recorded in a real studio. Maybe it would have sounded more like Solful Old Man Sunshine. I vaguely remember that Brian had promised to Mike to write the album after Pet Sounds with him, a promise he broke with SMiLE and then fulfilled with Wild Honey. And about the sound quality of the finished Wild Honey compared to the SOT stuff: Was it Jon Stebbins who posted about the technical stuff about the 60s mixing gear being the key factor? Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Wilson Love on March 18, 2012, 01:27:22 PM It would have taken another exceptional follow- up single of Good Vibrations caliber to have launched Smile in spring of '67., imo.
I think Brian would have been pretty fried anyway, with all that it took out of him in terms of drug-fueled creative sessions to see the album through. That one huge, missing single could have been the deal breaker in terms of Smile being comlpeted and released, I think. In terms of commercial success, you would have had GV, the smash hit follow-up to it, say in late Jan.-Feb '67, then Heroes and Villians, which may have fared better had there been a follow up to GV to keep the momentum going. Speculation, of course, but it feels right to me. They would have beaten the Beatles to the punch and looked upon as the head of the class in the Pop world. Until Sgt. Peppers' release at least. But the BBs would have gotten there first. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: cube_monkey on March 18, 2012, 04:37:23 PM I am one of those warped people that listened to Smiley Smile as a kid and was completely taken by it. Didn't need to know what was going on. Didn't know about drugs. It was just "wild", you know?
Ok, I like Carl and the passions (most of it) so take my comments (cough) with a grain of salt. :) Listening to the Smiley Smile session tapes, Brian sounds pretty "there" on the counts off and talking ect. even though the pressures and drugs and drive to come up with the next big thing kinda destroyed him. I get the impression somewhat that Brian is just bulldozing through the sessions to fulfill the obligation to Capitol. Did he start staying in the bedroom a little later? Course I have heard this album so many times, it sounds "normal". hahahaha. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Lonely Summer on March 18, 2012, 10:31:02 PM I am one of those warped people that listened to Smiley Smile as a kid and was completely taken by it. Didn't need to know what was going on. Didn't know about drugs. It was just "wild", you know? I never knowingly indulged in psycadelic drugs, but you really don't need to if you listen to Smiley Smile. Either you "get it" or you don't. Smiley Smile gets me stoned every time. :hatOk, I like Carl and the passions (most of it) so take my comments (cough) with a grain of salt. :) Listening to the Smiley Smile session tapes, Brian sounds pretty "there" on the counts off and talking ect. even though the pressures and drugs and drive to come up with the next big thing kinda destroyed him. I get the impression somewhat that Brian is just bulldozing through the sessions to fulfill the obligation to Capitol. Did he start staying in the bedroom a little later? Course I have heard this album so many times, it sounds "normal". hahahaha. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: cube_monkey on March 19, 2012, 12:57:37 PM Exactly. And if you have taken them, you go "oh yea, i remember now". :) To me is just "escapism" music. takes my mind off my current problems. to ME, the album is exactly what it should be. I just have never been
a SMILE fan, but I appreciate it. Too polished with studio musicians ect. I like SS because it was one of the first real "Home Recordings" and For the most part, the BB's are playing their own instruments, and a very minimalist production. Somehow through the genius of Brian it sounds like alot more than it is Not always in the mood for it, but when i am, its great. That and Wild Honey of course. Title: Re: Unanswerable Question? Post by: Lonely Summer on March 19, 2012, 02:21:48 PM Exactly. And if you have taken them, you go "oh yea, i remember now". :) To me is just "escapism" music. takes my mind off my current problems. to ME, the album is exactly what it should be. I just have never been Smile and Smiley are both great in their own way. If anyone thought the BB's were a "straight" or "square" band, they should listen to SS. "If I only had a little pad...hahahahahahahahahaha"a SMILE fan, but I appreciate it. Too polished with studio musicians ect. I like SS because it was one of the first real "Home Recordings" and For the most part, the BB's are playing their own instruments, and a very minimalist production. Somehow through the genius of Brian it sounds like alot more than it is Not always in the mood for it, but when i am, its great. That and Wild Honey of course. |