|
Title: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 "Reissue Of The Year" Post by: PongHit on December 09, 2011, 11:25:26 AM (https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/386509_10150442602749140_8216394139_8277380_1201555317_n.jpg) Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Smilin Ed H on December 09, 2011, 04:13:45 PM Good, but FRicke is an arsehole beyond compare/
Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Reverend Rock on December 09, 2011, 06:08:10 PM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"?
Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: The Heartical Don on December 10, 2011, 03:09:15 AM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"? Let's just celebrate, I say. Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: cablegeddon on December 10, 2011, 05:04:40 AM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"? -> GV box Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Zach95 on December 10, 2011, 01:34:37 PM Re-issue or not...this is very nice to see...and good exposure for the box and the band.
Here's the link by the way ;D http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/10-best-reissues-of-the-year-20111209/the-beach-boys-the-smile-sessions-box-set-19691231 Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Shady on December 10, 2011, 04:56:23 PM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"? Let's just celebrate, I say. Let's celebrate nothing to do with Rolling Stone.. I think they only gave SMiLE 4 and a half stars while they gave the U2 box set 5 I'm still not over that Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: oldsurferdude on December 10, 2011, 06:57:43 PM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"? Let's just celebrate, I say. Let's celebrate nothing to do with Rolling Stone.. I think they only gave SMiLE 4 and a half stars while they gave the U2 box set 5 I'm still not over that Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: ArchStanton on December 11, 2011, 08:54:31 AM So, how does this qualify as a "reissue"? Let's just celebrate, I say. Let's celebrate nothing to do with Rolling Stone.. I think they only gave SMiLE 4 and a half stars while they gave the U2 box set 5 I'm still not over that Rolling Stone has their favorites where everything they say and do is worshipped, and U2/Bono is one of them. Everyone else has pretty much trashed that recent box set release. Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Mikie on December 11, 2011, 09:18:08 AM Everyone else has pretty much trashed that recent box set release. Really? Who? Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: Peter Reum on December 11, 2011, 06:10:36 PM Rolling Stone appears to regard it as a reissue because they accept Brian and Van Dyke's premise that Smile 2004 is the finished version that got 5 stars at that time in RS.
Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: 18thofMay on December 11, 2011, 06:34:39 PM Everyone else has pretty much trashed that recent box set release. Really? Who? I think that's what was being said Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: hypehat on December 11, 2011, 06:41:59 PM well, Pitchfork only gave it a 9.5, and SMiLE a 10.0. So it goes.
Title: Re: ROLLING STONE magazine's #1 \ Post by: ArchStanton on December 12, 2011, 04:30:48 PM Everyone else has pretty much trashed that recent box set release. Really? Who? I think that's what was being said Yeah, the U2 Box set. I read a few reviews of it that came up as recommended reading while reading Smile reviews, but I shouldn't say "everyone is trashing it." But I saw a couple of one-star reviews, and my local paper said it was the worst of the recent mega-boxes.... |