Title: New Mike Love interview Post by: juggler on September 06, 2011, 12:14:25 PM http://clatl.com/atlanta/in-the-beach-boys-mike-love-a-hero-or-villain/Content?oid=3930863
Quote The Beach Boys were working on SMiLE around then, which has become the Holy Grail of lost rock 'n' roll albums. What did you think about Brian and Van Dyke Parks' '04 version? I'm not qualified to comment too much. Here's the deal: When you have Brian at his strongest and Carl, Alan, myself and Bruce singing our asses off in the '60s, doing Pet Sounds, doing "Good Vibrations" and working on SMiLE, you can't top it. People can copy that, but you'd be hard-pressed to come up with that group's level of chemistry and brilliance at that time. When you hear Brian Wilson sing "Wonderful" on the original SMiLE tapes it's unbelievable. Those tapes will be released November 1. Have you been involved with the SMiLE reissue? No, other than to comment on it. I was involved with recording the songs originally, but other people are putting the album together as well as a box set with lots of outtakes and different versions of songs. Do you have a favorite Beach Boys record? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: stack-o-tracks on September 06, 2011, 12:40:41 PM Nice interview. I havent really liked Mike much as a person but I see where he's coming from about the drug stuff. And I think he shouod change his name to Narc. :hat
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: smile-holland on September 06, 2011, 01:01:20 PM Quote You did write the song "Transcendental Meditation" on Friends. I wrote a song more recently called "Cool Head, Warm Water," which was something the Maharishi [Mahesh Yogi] said to me once: "You need to have a cool head in warm water." So I made it into a little pop song. I've been meditating since I learned from him in Paris in 1967. ::) Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 01:38:02 PM Of course Mike couldn't resist one more time talking about the song credits when asked about his relationship with Brian. It's old news but Mike just has to let readers know which songs he wrote. He says he wrote every word to "California Girls" and most of the words to "Help Me Rhonda" and "I Get Around," but Mike makes note of the songs Brian got sole credit for previous to the court date. I'd just like to know if he really did write most of the words to those songs.
And he also wrote the "I'm picking up good vibrations" line as he has told us many times, but what else did he contribute to the song? Along with Wouldn't It Be Nice (which he says he had a part in and has been disqualified by Asher), what else specifically did he write on Good Vibrations?? Same ol' interview where he exercises his bragging rights and the ego kicks in again. Interviewer: "Have you been involved with the SMiLE reissue?" Mike: [Side-stepping the question after a brief promotion] "Do you have a favorite Beach Boys record?" We need an interviewer who has the gonads to press Mike more about Smile and other stuff. Tired of hearing about the drug history. It wasn't just about the drugs, was it Mike? It was about jealousy and your ego that overcame you because you weren't the primary lyricist. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: CarlTheVoice on September 06, 2011, 01:46:35 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on September 06, 2011, 01:52:51 PM Quote You're still hitting those high harmonies after all these years? WTF kind of a question was that?! Wow...just wow. Talk about not knowing whose voice was whose... Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:00:59 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group. Carl was clearly smoking pot, taking LSD, hash, nitrous etc by 1967. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: 18thofMay on September 06, 2011, 02:02:01 PM Brian singing Wonderful?
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:04:53 PM That's my forte, having the lyrics and concepts resonate with the music, whether it be the rhythm, the melody or what have you.
I demand that Mike writes lyrics for all the Smile songs right now. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:05:32 PM Brian singing Wonderful? What about it? You don't like his voice on it? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: CarlTheVoice on September 06, 2011, 02:09:38 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group. Carl was clearly smoking pot, taking LSD, hash, nitrous etc by 1967. Wow, didn't realise it was all that by 67! It does surprise me. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:12:17 PM nice to see mike mention busy doin nothing
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:15:47 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group. Carl was clearly smoking pot, taking LSD, hash, nitrous etc by 1967. Wow, didn't realise it was all that by 67! It does surprise me. I don't know for sure, I'm just throwing out a guess that's probably quite accurate. Come on, it's 1967. Brian first used acid two years previous! You don't think Carl got on that boat with his elder brother? My guess - he took LSD a handful of times or more, smoked grass as much as anyone, hash... did lots of reddi whip nitrous with Brian.... Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: shelter on September 06, 2011, 02:23:06 PM Isn't there someone close to Mike who can tell him to finally give the whole "I came up with the "I'm picking up good vibrations" hook and I wrote 'Kokomo' without Brian's help" thing a rest? I think I've read about two dozen interviews by now where he mentions that and it gets really annoying. If Mike would ever wonder why people see him as the bad guy, that might be the reason. The Wilsons never bragged about their personal contributions like that... And the worst thing is that Mike doesn't even need to toot his own horn like that. He was an essential part of one of the most successful bands in the history of pop music, he sang on dozens of classic pop songs, he's been touring the world for half a century - that's impressive enough. He doesn't need to keep claiming all the little hooks and the album titles that he came up with.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: SMiLE Brian on September 06, 2011, 02:33:31 PM I just think he will never let go of his underdog mentality and feels like he is trapped in Brian's shadow. He should talk about some of his less known accomplishments.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 02:36:42 PM Isn't there someone close to Mike who can tell him to finally give the whole "I came up with the "I'm picking up good vibrations" hook and I wrote 'Kokomo' without Brian's help" thing a rest? I think I've read about two dozen interviews by now where he mentions that and it gets really annoying. If Mike would ever wonder why people see him as the bad guy, that might be the reason. The Wilsons never bragged about their personal contributions like that... And the worst thing is that Mike doesn't even need to toot his own horn like that. He was an essential part of one of the most successful bands in the history of pop music, he sang on dozens of classic pop songs, he's been touring the world for half a century - that's impressive enough. He doesn't need to keep claiming all the little hooks and the album titles that he came up with. Shelter, Mike Love has had deathly low self-esteem ever since going bald in the mid-60s. Cousin Brian rubbed this in by having Mike sing on She's Goin Bald. Not only that but cousin Brian determined to show Mike up till his dying day - which is why Mr Wilson curiously has an entire head of hair intact while his cousin balded 40 years prior. Let Mike enjoy feeling significant and involved, it's good for his sense of well-being. Seriously though - put yourself in Mike's shoes. The whole world keeps talking about Brian this and Brian that. Well guess what? The last number one hit Brian wrote was in 1966! Mike participated in a #1 in 1988! Why not give Mike some Love too? I'm picking up good vibrations is a good part! And Mike's story about Back In The USSR is as endearing as any story [and every story becomes trite when heard too often]. He's speaking to different interviewers who have not been reading every single interview from him ever to know his usual answers. To them and most readers, it's not old news, it's new insights. Now, time to listen to Don't f*** With The Water. Don't you f*** with the water Don't you think it's sad? What's happened to the water Our water's goin bad Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Heysaboda on September 06, 2011, 04:50:43 PM Brian singing Wonderful? What about it? You don't like his voice on it? hey don't eff with the formula, man........ :P Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Amy B. on September 06, 2011, 04:53:32 PM I try to give Mike a chance. I really do. But he just irritates me. Seems like every interview includes the following:
-Mike came up with "I'm picking up good vibrations," which is a crucial part of the song. -And Mike also wrote [insert at least three more titles here] -Mike co-wrote Kokomo [usually he'll mention it was #1] without Brian -Mike hates drugs because look what they did to the Wilsons...Intentionally or not, this expression of love ends up sounding passive aggressive... "Dennis was all messed up on drugs" [no mention of Dennis' accomplishments] In fact, it all comes off as very passive aggressive. He's trying to defend himself, but he never comes off in a very good light. I just can't imagine he'd be easy to hang around with for very long. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 05:09:54 PM I really disagree. When Mike speaks against the drugs it's not putting himself above it, it's his very real concern for these people. It's his LOVE. Mike LOVE, remember? Not Mike Passive-Aggressive.
To Mike, it probably seemed like the Wilson bros WERE going off the deep end in 1966-1967 and perhaps never fully returned after it. Think about it - Dennis got involved with CHARLES MANSON, Carl got into heavy drugs, Brian... DUH - you know? Mike probably took acid once or twice and smoked a fair share of weed but I doubt he has much experience with other drugs. Which means he has no idea what the lifestyle is like from the user's perspective just the observers. So his insights are valid - FOR HIM - hence, for me, observing his observations. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: MBE on September 06, 2011, 05:22:34 PM Good interview, very consistent with his views.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 05:38:49 PM Well, lesse here. First the guy starts off by saying "Talking with Mike Love is like having a conversation with the Devil".
O.K. I'm surprised, even at 70, that Mike didn't kick his ass. Then, apparently, his first question to Mike is "So you're still hitting those high harmonies after all these years" This dumbass has no clue about anything involving the band, even though he's about to ask Mike everything negative he can find about him on the internet. How Mike even puts up with morons like this is beyond me. As Mike usually does, he's completly complimentary to Brian in the entire interview. He treats the interviewer with nothing but respect even though the guy was about to go write an article comparing him to Satan. I mean what the f***. Mike's point about reality being a composite of different people's views, usually gets lost. I like that. Next, the guy completely butchers Mike's song title. It's Cool Head, Warm Heart, dumbass. So he managed to insult Mike Love and Mahesh Yogi in the same sentence. This guy doesn't deserve to interview the great Mike Love. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 05:40:32 PM Well, lesse here. First the guy starts off by saying "Talking with Mike Love is like having a conversation with the Devil". O.K. I'm surprised, even at 70, that Mike didn't kick his ass. Then, apparently, his first question to Mike is "So you're still hitting those high harmonies after all these years" This dumbass has no clue about anything involving the band, even though he's about to ask Mike everything negative he can find about him on the internet. How Mike even puts up with morons like this is beyond me. As Mike usually does, he's completly complimentary to Brian in the entire interview. He treats the interviewer with nothing but respect even though the guy was about to go write an article comparing him to Satan. I mean what the f*ck. Mike's point about reality being a composite of different people's views, usually gets lost. I like that. Next, the guy completely butchers Mike's song title. It's Cool Head, Warm Heart, dumbass. So he managed to insult Mike Love and Mahesh Yogi in the same sentence. This guy doesn't deserve to interview the great Mike Love. Right on man. Mike Love was just TMing the entire time, you know? He was like, I don't give a f*** that this guy is a moron. That's his trip. Aum pretty baby won't you rock with me Henry. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 05:42:56 PM Of course Mike couldn't resist one more time talking about the song credits when asked about his relationship with Brian. It's old news but Mike just has to let readers know which songs he wrote. He says he wrote every word to "California Girls" and most of the words to "Help Me Rhonda" and "I Get Around," but Mike makes note of the songs Brian got sole credit for previous to the court date. I'd just like to know if he really did write most of the words to those songs. And he also wrote the "I'm picking up good vibrations" line as he has told us many times, but what else did he contribute to the song? Along with Wouldn't It Be Nice (which he says he had a part in and has been disqualified by Asher), what else specifically did he write on Good Vibrations?? Same ol' interview where he exercises his bragging rights and the ego kicks in again. You left out part of the interview in your manic attempt to paint Mike as an asshole. He mentioned the song writing credits because he mentioned the lawsuit, because he mentioned that when He and Brian have problems it's really between he and Brian's handlers, which he mentioned because the guy said he's painted as a Villian and how's his relationship with Brian? What else would you have him say? The guy tells him he's an asshole to start off the interview; never met him, just tells him he's read over and over again what a dick he is. Then asks him how is his relationship with Brian? So Mike tells him that he and Brian usually don't have problems, for instance.. blah blah blah. When the asked about Good Vibrations Mike specifically mentioned that Brian's a musical genius and is the genius behind all the harmonies and the sound of the song. What more do you want from him? This is an interview to promote a concert, SANS Brian Wilson! lol Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 05:44:15 PM Isn't there someone close to Mike who can tell him to finally give the whole "I came up with the "I'm picking up good vibrations" hook and I wrote 'Kokomo' without Brian's help" thing a rest? I think I've read about two dozen interviews by now where he mentions that and it gets really annoying. If Mike would ever wonder why people see him as the bad guy, that might be the reason. The Wilsons never bragged about their personal contributions like that... And the worst thing is that Mike doesn't even need to toot his own horn like that. He was an essential part of one of the most successful bands in the history of pop music, he sang on dozens of classic pop songs, he's been touring the world for half a century - that's impressive enough. He doesn't need to keep claiming all the little hooks and the album titles that he came up with. Did you mention the parts where he gave more praise to Brian than himself? Calling Brian a musical genius? Talking about Brian's harmonies? Re-Read it without the jade this time. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 05:46:09 PM I try to give Mike a chance. I really do. But he just irritates me. Seems like every interview includes the following: -Mike came up with "I'm picking up good vibrations," which is a crucial part of the song. -And Mike also wrote [insert at least three more titles here] -Mike co-wrote Kokomo [usually he'll mention it was #1] without Brian -Mike hates drugs because look what they did to the Wilsons...Intentionally or not, this expression of love ends up sounding passive aggressive... "Dennis was all messed up on drugs" [no mention of Dennis' accomplishments] In fact, it all comes off as very passive aggressive. He's trying to defend himself, but he never comes off in a very good light. I just can't imagine he'd be easy to hang around with for very long. Amy maybe you missed the part where the guy asked him why he's painted as the ass, and he explained because in the 60's he wasn't taking drugs like the boys were, and he hated seeing it ruin their lives. Sounds perfectly logical to me. He's a touring band. It's an interview about a concert. You dont' think maybe he'd mention the things he did, so people will come see the show? He went out of his way, over and over again, to talk about how great Brian is. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 06:04:51 PM You're right. If anyone deserves a little credit, it's the guy who announced at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame that he was better than everyone.
Except of course, for Muhammad Ali. Solaimalaima. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 06:04:59 PM Ron just came in this thread and kicked every ass in it. 8)
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Autotune on September 06, 2011, 06:06:52 PM Interviews like this aren't aimed at us hardcore fans, so it's ok for Mike to tell his songwriting stories and claim his credit.
And he's right about the Smile suff. In fact, it's amazing that he has the ability to sum up like that his idea. BTW, he's sounding terrific live these days. Give me anyday a new BW rocker with a ML lead! Cut it with half-assed pseudo artistic statements. Let these guys do it like it's 1961. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 06, 2011, 06:08:03 PM BTW, he's sounding terrific live these days. Give me anyday a new BW rocker with a ML lead! Cut it with half-assed pseudo artistic statements. Let these guys do it like it's 1967 on the Wild Honey album - ala HERE COMES THE NIGHT. Fix'd. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Autotune on September 06, 2011, 06:12:01 PM BTW, he's sounding terrific live these days. Give me anyday a new BW rocker with a ML lead! Cut it with half-assed pseudo artistic statements. Let these guys do it like it's 1967 on the Wild Honey album - ala HERE COMES THE NIGHT. Fix'd. ...or let Brian round-up a Mike Love original like Let the Wind Blow Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 06:14:28 PM I try to give Mike a chance. I really do. But he just irritates me. Seems like every interview includes the following: -Mike came up with "I'm picking up good vibrations," which is a crucial part of the song. -And Mike also wrote [insert at least three more titles here] -Mike co-wrote Kokomo [usually he'll mention it was #1] without Brian -Mike hates drugs because look what they did to the Wilsons...Intentionally or not, this expression of love ends up sounding passive aggressive... "Dennis was all messed up on drugs" [no mention of Dennis' accomplishments] In fact, it all comes off as very passive aggressive. He's trying to defend himself, but he never comes off in a very good light. I just can't imagine he'd be easy to hang around with for very long. I don't see what the problem is! Mike comes right out and says he's an outspoken person who calls people out. He aint' hiding this. Either deal with it or don't. Mike knows damn well the Myke haters will hate him no matter who he saves from falling off a 5 story balcony and nothing he can do can change it. They'll just go fishing for anything to back up their hatred and run with it. All this does is cause Mike to be even more outspoken and to hang into his opinions. Yet he still manages to be polite, composed and complimentary to Brian. And we may not like to dwell on it, but Dennis DID go to an early grave due to his addictions. The subject was drugs and Mike was speaking of the toll they took on his band. And c'mon: Mike can't talk about the words he wrote to so many earth smashingly awesome songs??? How many interviews does Brian do where all they talk about are all the great songs he wrote, and on and on and on!? Let Mike be Mike. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 06:17:41 PM Mike knows damn well the Myke haters will hate him no matter who he saves from falling off a 5 story balcony and nothing he can do can change it. Whoa! When did that happen? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 06:19:42 PM Go talk to David Marks.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 06:22:35 PM I think I would call that fishing more than anything else.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 06:23:26 PM It was just a little point I was making. A positive point at that.
Call it whatever you damn well like. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: oldsurferdude on September 06, 2011, 06:34:51 PM Yeah, poor Myke Luhv. This crumb is the saddest bag of insecurity in music. Give it up, man. Quit braggin'. Get a little humility goin' on. In the next interview, try humbling yourself and tell the world how Gosh Darn lucky you were to have a cousin named Brian Wilson bc if you didn't you'd be a sanitation engineer. >:D >:D >:D
Don't go near my bald spot Its gettin' kinda big- The way its fallin' out I'll have to find a wig. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 06:45:54 PM Oh no, OSD! Are we getting the pun ball rolling again??? :)
"Propecia n soap'll make what's under this hat a mess" "So let's avoid a psycho-follicle-aftermath" "Beginning with Oldsurferdude, beginning with me-eeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeee" Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: oldsurferdude on September 06, 2011, 06:49:52 PM ...and I didn't say GOSH DARN! ::)
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 06:55:32 PM You left out part of the interview in your manic attempt to paint Mike as an butthole. He mentioned the song writing credits because he mentioned the lawsuit. I left out a whole lot about Mike. Mike has already been painted as a butthole many times over from different directions. One more opinion is not going to make any difference here. I don't hate Mike by any means. He's got to be congratulated on 50 years of spreading the word of Brian. Any negative feelings that people have for him is his own fault. A good example of this is the R & R Hall of Fame speech. The interviewer asked Brian, "How is your relationship with Brian?" And Mike immediately refers to the past and his lawsuit about the song credits. That was what, way back in 1992 - 19 years ago! What's that got to do with his relationship with Brian now? He could have said he talked/saw Brian recently and they had dinner or recorded together or maybe talked reunion - why dredge up negative stuff from the past? He didn't mention the fact that back in '05 the court threw out his lawsuit against Brian and the Daily Mail. But why did Mike even go there? Again? Is that the first thing that came to his mind? He still wants to be recognized for the lyrics he wrote to the songs. He still mentions the lyrics he wrote for songs during Beach Boys concerts! From a recent interview: How do you react to the continued attention paid to "Smile"? ML: What's left of "Smile" is a shell. It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments. Who wants to hear about Brian's mental problems anyway? Sweet Insanity. A whole album of Brian's madness that no one wants to release and still everyone says he's a genius! I make "Kokomo", it goes to number one in the charts and I'm still the dumb, know-nothing, talentless Mike Love. NOW you know why Mike side-stepped the question concerning SMiLE. It still fries him to talk about it. A guy from this board e-mailed me today. He has an interview with Mike Love in a couple of days and asked me what I would like to ask Mike. Any ideas from the board members here that I can pass on? ;D Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 06:59:20 PM Why do we all sit around assuming Mike is supposed to be completely sane and reasonable?
Let's remember he IS related to The Wilsons by blood! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 07:02:27 PM and the primary reasons so many bands break-up and have lingering anger that boils over on occasion (sometimes into absolute violence) is over songwriting credits, royalties, interlopers, general $$$ B.S!
Why is Mike supposed to be immune to such things/feelings? I mean, we KNOW he was screwed out of songwriting credits!! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Amy B. on September 06, 2011, 07:02:36 PM I try to give Mike a chance. I really do. But he just irritates me. Seems like every interview includes the following: -Mike came up with "I'm picking up good vibrations," which is a crucial part of the song. -And Mike also wrote [insert at least three more titles here] -Mike co-wrote Kokomo [usually he'll mention it was #1] without Brian -Mike hates drugs because look what they did to the Wilsons...Intentionally or not, this expression of love ends up sounding passive aggressive... "Dennis was all messed up on drugs" [no mention of Dennis' accomplishments] In fact, it all comes off as very passive aggressive. He's trying to defend himself, but he never comes off in a very good light. I just can't imagine he'd be easy to hang around with for very long. Amy maybe you missed the part where the guy asked him why he's painted as the ass, and he explained because in the 60's he wasn't taking drugs like the boys were, and he hated seeing it ruin their lives. Sounds perfectly logical to me. He's a touring band. It's an interview about a concert. You dont' think maybe he'd mention the things he did, so people will come see the show? He went out of his way, over and over again, to talk about how great Brian is. As I say, I want to like him, but he comes off this way in every interview. Yes, his reputation is that he's an ass. That's not only because of David Leaf. That's also because of things MIKE has said. When you go around saying, "I did this" and "I did that" over and over, you look bitter and defensive. I can understand where he's coming from. It seems like he feels he didn't get enough credit, and he's right. I'm not a Mike hater. He just irritates me, that's all, and I can see why a lot of people groan when they read his interviews. I do. And he'd better praise Brian, if he's expecting to be praised himself. So I expect nothing less. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 07:03:41 PM Brian talks himself up too!
Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 07:08:23 PM Brian talks himself up too! Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Yes. But that difference is crucial. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: BillA on September 06, 2011, 07:11:56 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group. Carl was clearly smoking pot, taking LSD, hash, nitrous etc by 1967. Wow, didn't realise it was all that by 67! It does surprise me. iI had always thought that Carl didn't have a drug problem (as opposed to using) iuntil 1977-78. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Amy B. on September 06, 2011, 07:14:54 PM Carl's drug taking is mentioned again here, as he was my fave BB I'd like to know to what extent it affected his performances etc and whether he was a druggie from early on as Brian seems to have been. It's easy to think Carl was the 'clean and sensible' one of the group. Carl was clearly smoking pot, taking LSD, hash, nitrous etc by 1967. Wow, didn't realise it was all that by 67! It does surprise me. iI had always thought that Carl didn't have a drug problem (as opposed to using) iuntil 1977-78. There's a difference between taking drugs recreationally by choice and having a drug problem. McCartney tried LSD and cocaine and smoked lots of pot, but I wouldn't say he had a drug problem. It sounds like Carl's problems did start much later. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 07:21:59 PM Brian talks himself up too! Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Yes. But that difference is crucial. Really? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: BillA on September 06, 2011, 07:26:00 PM Some questions I would like to ask Mike Love:
Name some songs that you think have been overlooked (what songs would knock the casual fan off their feet if they heard them for the first time)? What do you think each member brought to the band? What do you miss most about Dennis and Carl? What do you tthink of 'Love You', 'Wild Honey', 'Friends' and 'Smiley Smile'. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 07:26:29 PM Brian talks himself up too! Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Yes. But that difference is crucial. Really? Of course. There is a difference between someone asking you to talk about your work, and you bringing it up on your own. That's elementary. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: SMiLE Brian on September 06, 2011, 07:29:03 PM You left out part of the interview in your manic attempt to paint Mike as an butthole. He mentioned the song writing credits because he mentioned the lawsuit. I left out a whole lot about Mike. Mike has already been painted as a butthole many times over from different directions. One more opinion is not going to make any difference here. I don't hate Mike by any means. He's got to be congratulated on 50 years of spreading the word of Brian. Any negative feelings that people have for him is his own fault. A good example of this is the R & R Hall of Fame speech. The interviewer asked Brian, "How is your relationship with Brian?" And Mike immediately refers to the past and his lawsuit about the song credits. That was what, way back in 1992 - 19 years ago! What's that got to do with his relationship with Brian now? He could have said he talked/saw Brian recently and they had dinner or recorded together or maybe talked reunion - why dredge up negative stuff from the past? He didn't mention the lawsuit back in '05 where the court threw out his lawsuit against Brian and the Daily Mail. But why did Mike even go there? Again? Is that the first thing that came to his mind? He still wants to be recognized for the lyrics he wrote to the songs. He still mentions the lyrics he wrote for songs during Beach Boys concerts! From a recent interview: How do you react to the continued attention paid to "Smile"? ML: What's left of "Smile" is a shell. It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments. Who wants to hear about Brian's mental problems anyway? Sweet Insanity. A whole album of Brian's madness that no one wants to release and still everyone says he's a genius! I make "Kokomo", it goes to number one in the charts and I'm still the dumb, know-nothing, talentless Mike Love. NOW you know why Mike side-stepped the question concerning SMiLE. It still fries him to talk about it. A guy from this board e-mailed me today. He has an interview with Mike Love in a couple of days and asked me what I would like to ask Mike. Any ideas from the board members here that I can pass on? ;D Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Cam Mott on September 06, 2011, 07:29:18 PM If you want to think Mike is a prick you are going to find evidence to support your belief. It is an interview with him and he praises Brian out the ying yang but he's a hindend because he talks about himself in an interview of him. I swan.
SMiLE would have been great but it is unfinished. Is that a dodge or untrue? http://brianwilsonfans.com/page10.php Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 07:32:56 PM Quote:
He should just listen to the box without his bias and see how the SMiLE box contains beautiful material that is not just "snipits" I don't even think he has listened to BWPS. Comparing SMiLE to Sweet Insanity is just is nasty and uncalled for. Mike just can't seem to let grudges go, hell he probably would still yell at Tony Asher or Van Dyke Parks for taking his lyricist role all those years ago. Mike shouldn't even use Kokomo as an example of a hit song without Brian, the song was written mostly by Papa John Phillips. Yeah! But he can't get too down on Smile these days because he's about to get a chunk of change in royalties for it. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 07:34:01 PM Brian talks himself up too! Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Yes. But that difference is crucial. Really? Of course. There is a difference between someone asking you to talk about your work, and you bringing it up on your own. That's elementary. Sure, but maybe the interviewer should not have opened up the interview by telling Mike what a dick he is. But he did, therefore Mike felt the need to back himself up a bit and speak about his contributions. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 07:37:41 PM Brian talks himself up too! Only difference is the interviewers goad him on! Yes. But that difference is crucial. Really? Of course. There is a difference between someone asking you to talk about your work, and you bringing it up on your own. That's elementary. Sure, but maybe the interviewer should not have opened up the interview by telling Mike what a dick he is. But he did, therefore Mike felt the need to back himself up a bit and speak about his contributions. ??? It seems that the first question is "You're still hitting those high harmonies after all these years?" Granted, it's not informed, but it's hardly "telling Mike what a dick he is." Furthermore, as several posters have suggested, this is Mike's usual position in interviews (he's gone further and claimed responsibility for the Beach Boys success elsewhere), so it typically doesn't really matter what the interviewer asks. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 07:39:25 PM SMiLE would have been great but it is unfinished. Is that a dodge or untrue? I would say that saying the album was "nothing" and just fragments, as he has done in the interview you provide, is untrue and something he knows very well given his participation in the album. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Cam Mott on September 06, 2011, 07:43:29 PM That interview was from 1993. The SMiLE album was nothing, there was no album, and it was fragments. Is that untrue?
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: oldsurferdude on September 06, 2011, 07:45:49 PM Some questions I would like to ask Mike Love: Why are you the most hated man in rock and roll?Name some songs that you think have been overlooked (what songs would knock the casual fan off their feet if they heard them for the first time)? What do you think each member brought to the band? What do you miss most about Dennis and Carl? What do you tthink of 'Love You', 'Wild Honey', 'Friends' and 'Smiley Smile'. Did you go all the way through clown school or are you a dropout? What is your explaination for wearing turbans? Do you feel that you were justified in making the R&R HOF speech? Do you think that if the real surviving BBs get together for a show will you bring your own bottle of salad dressing? Go ahead, ask those questions-make my day. ;) Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: tpesky on September 06, 2011, 07:51:43 PM In general I think it's a good thing that more truth has come to light about Mike recently and I would venture to say his reputation on these boards and amongst many fans has actually improved over these past few years. It seemed like several years ago what was said about Mike was FAR WORSE on these boards than what takes place currently and that's a good thing. I am all about giving Mike credit and I believe his accomplishments should be noted.
What concerns me is an opposite backlash. I worry that people are defending Mike Love JUST to defend Mike Love and searching too hard to trumpet his accomplishments. This is no better than being one sided about Brian's accomplishments. Mike did a lot of good but let's face it some of the negative things in his reputation are there for a reason and to try to justify and rationalize each one is not good either. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 07:52:13 PM That interview was from 1993. The SMiLE album was nothing, there was no album, and it was fragments. Is that untrue? Yes. If you want to pretend that by "nothing", Mike Love meant "unreleased" then fair enough. But even by that time (the link you give suggests that the interview was in 1995) the Good Vibrations box set was out and made legitimate a good deal of the Smile recordings which illustrate how substantial the recordings were. Not only that the fragments could be easily placed together - sure some things didn't have a home, but it was quite clear how many of the songs could be structured and pieced together. Hell, it was clear enough to The Beach Boys in 1968 how Cabin Essence could come together. More over how could anyone who sang on Our Prayer and Wonderful simply say that the music was fragments? Again, to repeat, the terms used are pretty shameful. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 07:52:18 PM I find it difficult to have respect for the Mike haters. I have to admit it. I find it difficult because they don't even attempt to utilize any logic or empathy or natural human consideration. It's like they've been indoctrinated to a train of thought and, like the George W Bush mentality, they will hang onto it no matter what opposing evidence/common sense might attempt to present itself.
It's not like I can't understand their logic and where it comes from. But if you look at Mike as an actual human being and put yourself in his shoes or try and relate his experiences to any of your own that have created jealousy resentment, lack of due credit: it makes sense. I'm not defending any of the silly things Mike has said over the years, but I can certainly empathize with the emotions that may have caused some of these things. It would be simple if Brian wasn't presented as such a helpless soul/wounded bird. If Brian was taken on his words and actions alone, the story would be different. But he's crazy and helpless and THE genius, so there it is: critical thinking isn't necessary. Pete Townsend scrapped "Lifehouse" in part due to the indifference/criticism of his fellow bandmates, but no one feels sorry for Townsend, so it's not even an issue. "It was a great mistake to put Brian in full control. He was always the ultimate Producer, but little did he know that in his absence people grew up. People became as sensitive as the next guy. Why do I relinquish my rights as an artist? The whole process was a little bruising" That's a Dennis quote (regarding 15 Big Ones) that I don't hear anyone complaining about or trashing him over. But let's just imagine if it was Mike who'd said that! There would be 10000 page threads on that very quote blowing up this forum if that had been the case. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 07:54:53 PM That interview was from 1993. The SMiLE album was nothing, there was no album, and it was fragments. Is that untrue? There was plenty to Smile in 1993 - a lot more than fragments. A few things from Smile made to Beach Boys albums previously and the 1993 box set, in addition to material booted many years before that. Look at all the session material that was compiled for the SOT sets in 1999 and even more after that. And I'm sure Mike was approached with the idea of releasing Smile on quite a few occasions over the years. He even mentioned an impending release of Smile in a concert back in 1972. Not much has changed with him since then. He knows what's out there. But again, I can't see him bitching about it too much these days because he's making a couple of bucks off of it. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 07:56:39 PM I have to say, after reading the comments here I expected one thing.
Then I read Mike's actual interview. He is plainspoken and frank. He defends himself, acknowledges Brian and promotes his show. He clearly has a few issues and hobbyhorses, but who at age 70 wouldn't? Nothing to see here. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:00:55 PM I find it difficult to have respect for the Mike haters. I have to admit it. I find it difficult because they don't even attempt to utilize any logic or empathy or natural human consideration. It's like they've been indoctrinated to a train of thought and, like the George W Bush mentality, they will hang onto it no matter what opposing evidence/common sense might attempt to present itself. Erm, excuse me? There have been endless quotations in this thread alone from Mike and you go off about hanging onto opinions "no matter what opposing evidence/common sense might attempt to present itself"? Sorry, you're right, next time I should trust the evidence you entirely made up about the interviewer being a dick to Mike. I suppose that would be the kind of common sense you would appreciate. Quote But if you look at Mike as an actual human being and put yourself in his shoes or try and relate his experiences to any of your own that have created jealousy resentment, lack of due credit: it makes sense. It does not make sense for him to take credit for The Beach Boys success. Period. It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Sure, Mike was screwed for some things and, unfortunately, that has absolutely nothing to do with his behaviour which he exhibited as far back as the Surfin' demo when after Brian jokingly threatened to "pop" Dennis in the mouth and that Dennis could pop him back, Mike took it his eloquent step further by saying that he would pop Dennis in the mouth so hard, he couldn't pop him back. Quote Pete Townsend scrapped "Lifehouse" in part due to the indifference/criticism of his fellow bandmates, but no one feels sorry for Townsend, so it's not even an issue. Speculative. Quote "It was a great mistake to put Brian in full control. He was always the ultimate Producer, but little did he know that in his absence people grew up. People became as sensitive as the next guy. Why do I relinquish my rights as an artist? The whole process was a little bruising" That's a Dennis quote (regarding 15 Big Ones) that I don't hear anyone complaining about or trashing him over. But let's just imagine if it was Mike who'd said that! There would be 10000 page threads on that very quote blowing up this forum if that had been the case. Speculative. And this demonstrates precisely that you don't even understand why people dislike Mike Love. For you, you have created in your mind the reason - which is that people don't like Mike Love because he's Mike Love. No wonder you have such a problem with these arguments. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 08:06:27 PM Quote It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Which is why he didn't do it. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:06:50 PM "It does not make sense for him to take credit for The Beach Boys success. Period. It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Sure, Mike was screwed for some things and, unfortunately, that has absolutely nothing to do with his behaviour which he exhibited as far back as the Surfin' demo when after Brian jokingly threatened to "pop" Dennis in the mouth and that Dennis could pop him back, Mike took it his eloquent step further by saying that he would pop Dennis in the mouth so hard, he couldn't pop him back."
Amazing how a founding/core member, frequent lyric writer (including those for some hits) of a successful band can't even make mere mention of his contributions (while himself giving Brian higher acclaim) without someone coming stampeding up accusing him of taking credit for their success and using this as irrefutable evidence to support their own complex opinions of the guy! Why do I even try? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:08:43 PM "It does not make sense for him to take credit for The Beach Boys success. Period. It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Sure, Mike was screwed for some things and, unfortunately, that has absolutely nothing to do with his behaviour which he exhibited as far back as the Surfin' demo when after Brian jokingly threatened to "pop" Dennis in the mouth and that Dennis could pop him back, Mike took it his eloquent step further by saying that he would pop Dennis in the mouth so hard, he couldn't pop him back." Amazing how a founding/core member, frequent lyric writer (including those for some hits) of a successful band can't even make mere mention of his contributions (while himself giving Brian higher acclaim) without someone coming stampeding up accusing him of taking credit for their success and using this as irrefutable evidence to support their own complex opinions of the guy! Why do I even try? And you're splitting serious hairs regarding the popping in the mouth B.S. Brian opened the subject up and Mike just ran with it! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:12:37 PM Amazing how a founding/core member, frequent lyric writer (including those for some hits) of a successful band can't even make mere mention of his contributions (while himself giving Brian higher acclaim) without someone coming stampeding up accusing him of "taking credit for their success" and using this as irrefutable evidence to support their own complex opinions of the guy! Why do I even try? I'm actually referring directly to his comments in the Endless Harmony documentary where he said, verbatim: "Ultimately I think the Beach Boys meant so much to so many people because of the positivity and that was me." Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:14:40 PM And you're splitting serious hairs regarding the popping in the mouth B.S. Brian opened the subject up and Mike just ran with it! To be honest, I don't think so. I think the moment is telling of their characters. Brian is playing the role of dominating big brother with Dennis (no surprise) but Mike is the one who puts forth the idea that he is so tough that Dennis won't even be able to fight back. Yes, it's all in good fun, but it is telling of the distinctions between the two. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:16:17 PM I see what you mean, but if there was already underlying tension (which David Marks speaks of) between Dennis and Mike, then it makes sense.
My older cousins and friends actually DID pop me in the mouth for acting up when I was that age, and I don't hate any of them! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:16:40 PM Quote It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Which is why he didn't do it. There's an article given on this very thread where he says exactly that. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:17:03 PM And wasn't it actually Dennis who punched Mike out in the end?
Just saying. Let's not be sore winners here :p Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:19:45 PM OK, but it's not the fighting itself that really concerns me here. It's character. Mike Love's character is what bothers people - and mostly, I think, it's the arrogance. I used the Surfin' example to suggest that this was a significant part of Mike's character well before he was screwed out of royalties.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:24:24 PM And Mike's arrogance is a lot of the charm in his early vocals. It comes across, but is an integral part of their early sound.
And yes, I was speculating regarding The Who and Lifehouse, but it was educated speculation. Below is an interesting page. Eerily similar to the Smile situation. Only in this case, Lifehouse fell apart and their "cobbled together" replacement album was an absolute classic! http://www.earcandymag.com/rrcase-lifehouse.htm Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:30:13 PM And Mike's arrogance is a lot of the charm in his early vocals. It comes across, but is an integral part of their early sound. Agreed - but arrogance in art is a different thing than arrogance in real life. And even then, I think, some arrogance is tolerable in particular contexts. But Mike Love strikes me as someone who just doesn't get it - he doesn't know how to socialize properly with other people. Quote And yes, I was speculating regarding The Who and Lifehouse, but it was educated speculation. Below is an interesting page. Eerily similar to the Smile situation. Only in this case, Lifehouse fell apart and their "cobbled together" replacement album was an absolute classic! http://www.earcandymag.com/rrcase-lifehouse.htm And that might be part of the reason. I am familiar with Lifehouse. I think in that case, most people can't fathom how Pete Townshend could have put that album together. Smile, though, seemed so close to being finished and the things that needed to be done should have been easily accomplished by the man who had already done such much in 1966. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:34:06 PM Well, please remember Mike is a Wilson relative: a rock star: a guy who's never really had to grow up like the rest of us and go get a job. He's just as messed up as a lot of other guys in his position.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 08:35:50 PM Well, please remember Mike is a Wilson relative: a rock star: a guy who's never really had to grow up like the rest of us and go get a job. He's just as messed up as a lot of other guys in his position. That's fine. But others in his position have had far better social skills. In fact, just about everyone else. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:36:46 PM We can certainly agree on that point!
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chris Brown on September 06, 2011, 08:39:21 PM Amazing how a founding/core member, frequent lyric writer (including those for some hits) of a successful band can't even make mere mention of his contributions (while himself giving Brian higher acclaim) without someone coming stampeding up accusing him of "taking credit for their success" and using this as irrefutable evidence to support their own complex opinions of the guy! Why do I even try? I'm actually referring directly to his comments in the Endless Harmony documentary where he said, verbatim: "Ultimately I think the Beach Boys meant so much to so many people because of the positivity and that was me." And obviously the snicker he had when he said that doesn't come across via text, but to me, that's always been probably the most spiteful sounding Mike moment I've seen. I get bragging about what he achieved, all the lyrics he wrote, the success of "Kokomo", etc. And it's clear that he truly loves and admires Brian, taking every opportunity to praise him and his genius. But that quote (including the subsequent line about Brian being melancholy) is just a blatant lie, and he knows it. It just makes him sound so bitter. Direct, disarming honesty is one thing, but that doesn't bug me - re-writing history does. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mr. Wilson on September 06, 2011, 08:40:17 PM If i consented to a interview And saw the headlines a few days later ..Saying the vilified beach boy.. Jeez i think id stop giving interviews..Poor guy cant win..Yes he has done some stupid stuff..Ha vent we all.??..And that Mike interview was from Goldmine magazine 92-93.. Front cover has Mike in concert on it.. I don't know what to say.. I have issues with Mike also.... I once saw Him standing onstage next to Dennis singing Surfer Girl.. Dennis leaned back on Electric Piano and it moved and he almost fell over..Meanwhile Mike moved in opposite direction.. No help for Dennis.. Its also in a concert video from late 70"s.. Carter Inaugural..?? My point is i think allot of you are overreacting.... I also don't like he wanted to turn BB into oldies act long before they should have been..!.. I don't think the interview was that bad just that he repeats himself too much.... He is 70 years old..Try to imagine BB without Mike.. You cant..Peace..!
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: drbeachboy on September 06, 2011, 08:40:27 PM As many of you know, I am not a Mike hater and believe he deserves his due, but he does often come off as arrogant in interviews. I believe this is due from knowing that you made important contributions, but have to endlessly toot your own horn because others tend to ignore it and only heap the praise on Brian. As great as Brian's compositions are, I doubt that most or any of them would have been Top 40 hits without lyrics. After 45 years of this type of self promotion, you would think he would take a different tack, but I assume Mike likes the anti-hero role; the Villain to Brian's Hero.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 06, 2011, 08:46:11 PM Can we please remember it was Dennis who ever actually punched anyone in the band out, and that it was Mike getting the punching?
Once again: let's not be sore winners. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Cam Mott on September 06, 2011, 08:46:54 PM Maybe it's me but there seems to agreement with what Mike says while disagreeing with what he means. Mike says SMiLE is great; how would that mean it's "nothing" in the sense that is being projected on it? He says the album was unfinished, it was in fragments. Some songs had been redone, some retro fitted, and conglomerated but the album was nothing in 1993 as it was unfinished and in fragments.
Well anyway if Mike speaks untruth wail away, argue with his perceptions if you were there and know better, and disrespect him for mentioning his under-appreciated accomplishments when he is asked about his career if you think that is fair and how you would want to be treated. Carry on. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 08:51:48 PM I once saw Him standing onstage next to Dennis singing Surfer Girl.. Dennis leaned back on Electric Piano and it moved and he almost fell over..Meanwhile Mike moved in opposite direction.. No help for Dennis.. Its also in a concert video from late 70"s. Reminds me of the time.......didn't I read somewhere where Mike tried to push a piano over on Brian while on stage? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 08:59:49 PM Quote Quote Quote It does not make sense for him to call Smile "nothing". Which is why he didn't do it.There's an article given on this very thread where he says exactly that. He did not say any such thing in the article this thread is about. In an article from 1993, Mike -- who had just gone through a bitterly contested lawsuit with his cousin -- was asked about the album. Part of what he said: "It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments." Notice: He said Smile was potentially great record. And that it was fragmented. Both of these things are true. To say he simply called the album "nothing" is like saying that he called Smile a "great record." Both statements use words he uttered in the quote, but they both use them ludicrously out of context. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:08:48 PM Maybe it's me but there seems to agreement with what Mike says while disagreeing with what he means. Mike says SMiLE is great; how would that mean it's "nothing" in the sense that is being projected on it? Well, in the interview you pasted, he doesn't say it's great. He says it "would have" been great but unfortunately because of Brian's lack of will and ability, it is nothing. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:14:08 PM From the 1993 interview:
"ML: What's left of "Smile" is a shell. It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments." There's only one way that I interpret that quote, and it's in context. He's minimizing the importance of SMiLE by saying it's "nothing, just fragments". It's not a completed album, so it's "nothing", he's insinuating. He's also saying that the attention that Brian gets because of Smile is B.S. That's how I see it. And my response to that is if it's "nothing", then why they are now making three different CD and vinyl sets out of it, including a large 5 CD and 2 vinyl album box set with a book? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:21:07 PM Did anybody notice Mike praise SMiLE in the interview?
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:23:18 PM What interview.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:24:27 PM Quote From the 1993 interview: "ML: What's left of "Smile" is a shell. It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments." There's only one way that I interpret that quote, and it's in context. He's minimizing the importance of SMiLE by saying it's "nothing, just fragments". It's not a completed album, so it's "nothing", he's insinuating. He's also saying that the attention that Brian gets because of Smile is B.S. That's how I see it. And my response to that is if it's "nothing", then why they are now making three different CD and vinyl sets out of it, including a large 5 CD and 2 vinyl album box set with a book? Why waste your time writing so much about a man you clearly hate? Quote What interview. The 2011 one. You know, the one this thread is about. Here, I'll do it for you: "Here's the deal: When you have Brian at his strongest and Carl, Alan, myself and Bruce singing our asses off in the '60s, doing Pet Sounds, doing "Good Vibrations" and working on SMiLE, you can't top it. People can copy that, but you'd be hard-pressed to come up with that group's level of chemistry and brilliance at that time. When you hear Brian Wilson sing "Wonderful" on the original SMiLE tapes it's unbelievable." Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:24:58 PM He did not say any such thing in the article this thread is about. I never said he did. Quote In an article from 1993, Mike -- who had just gone through a bitterly contested lawsuit with his cousin -- was asked about the album. I'm not sure what the lawsuit has to do with his opinions on the album. Quote Part of what he said: "It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments." Notice: He said Smile was potentially great record. And that it was fragmented. Both of these things are true. To say he simply called the album "nothing" is like saying that he called Smile a "great record." Both statements use words he uttered in the quote, but they both use them ludicrously out of context. Actually what's ludicrous is the comparison you're making. In this interview Mike Love did not say Smile was a great album. He did say it was nothing. So the example you give is quite flagrantly inaccurate. Like you mentioned, he said the album could have been great. In other words, in the state it was in, it wasn't great. This is a matter of opinion, of course, but I would disagree. Furthermore, the impression that Mike gives of the album is entirely inaccurate. It was not "just fragments" as I've already dealt with here but it clearly bears repeating. Anyone who participated in the recording of both Our Prayer and Wonderful has to feel ashamed for coming to such a conclusion. Furthermore, many of the pieces that were fragments had a very definable place (Do You Like Worms, Wind Chimes, etc.) - so definable that The Beach Boys themselves easily placed them together with Cabin Essence as did Mark Linett with other tracks on the box set that Love himself had heard. Saying Smile was "just fragments" is almost akin to saying Good Vibrations is just fragments (as Phil Spector did to much of our ridicule here). Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Cam Mott on September 06, 2011, 09:30:23 PM Maybe it's me but there seems to agreement with what Mike says while disagreeing with what he means. Mike says SMiLE is great; how would that mean it's "nothing" in the sense that is being projected on it? Well, in the interview you pasted, he doesn't say it's great. He says it "would have" been great but unfortunately because of Brian's lack of will and ability, it is nothing. "It would have been a great record but he just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it." It is "nothing" because Brian didn't have the will or ability to finish, it is in fragments; it is not nothing because it is ungreat or because a lot of "Brian's bullshit" revolves around it or because Brian lacked will or ability. It was to be an album, it would have been great when finished but unfortunately it was not finished, it is nothing, it is fragments. It seems to me Mike's point is that it is great but unfinished? OK, well anyway. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:31:32 PM Why pillory Mike for a 17-year-old interview that has been in public circulation for that entire time? What about the praise for Brian and the sessions in the current interview?
And it's basic reading comprehension that the original quote, the original interview, is coming from someone who is irritated and PO'd at Brian. But he doesn't say the album is disaster or terrible -- he says its a bunch of potentially brilliant fragments. Which is also true! Wonderful and some of those other songs had already been released in 1993. Mike is speaking about the project as a whole, which did indeed drown in multiple retakes of smaller and smaller sections of songs. Edit -- And while I was typing this, Cam made the same point, much better. Mike is using the word "nothing" to connote the unfinished status of the album. not its quality. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:33:03 PM Again, people are reading and seeing what they want to see. IN THE INTERVIEW THE POST IS ABOUT, Mike is asked about SMiLE. This is his complete sane, completely complimentary to Brian, completely honest, completely loving response. He can't win for losing.
The Beach Boys were working on SMiLE around then, which has become the Holy Grail of lost rock 'n' roll albums. What did you think about Brian and Van Dyke Parks' '04 version? "I'm not qualified to comment too much. Here's the deal: When you have Brian at his strongest and Carl, Alan, myself and Bruce singing our asses off in the '60s, doing Pet Sounds, doing "Good Vibrations" and working on SMiLE, you can't top it. People can copy that, but you'd be hard-pressed to come up with that group's level of chemistry and brilliance at that time. When you hear Brian Wilson sing "Wonderful" on the original SMiLE tapes it's unbelievable. Those tapes will be released November 1." He just called Brian's version of Wonderful unbelievable. He just said that the stuff they recorded on smile cannot be topped. OF COURSE, the haters didn't notice it. Haters gotta hate. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:33:29 PM Like I clarified in a previous post, Wirestone, (the one you skipped over) I do not hate Mike Love. Far from it. And if you read my second or third post on this thread, I also posted that excerpt from the interview! But if you want to twist and turn it to your liking, you go right ahead. It's pretty obvious to me that he did not like Smile, at least in 1993! And I believe he's not real high about the music of Smile today.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:35:51 PM Quote And I believe he's not real high about the music of Smile today. Well, all we have are his words to go on. And he has high praise currently. So he's either a villain because he doesn't like it, or he's a villain because he's lying and says he does. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:37:27 PM MIkie, i'm not talking about you. You're so vain.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:38:48 PM Quote And I believe he's not real high about the music of Smile today. Well, all we have are his words to go on. And he has high praise currently. So he's either a villain because he doesn't like it, or he's a villain because he's lying and says he does. THE FUCKING INTERVIEWER STARTED WITH THE ASSUMPTION HE WAS A VILLIAN. lol (I lowercased lol so it would have some contrast to the caps. Like a chuckle) Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:41:13 PM Quote And I believe he's not real high about the music of Smile today. Well, all we have are his words to go on. And he has high praise currently. So he's either a villain because he doesn't like it, or he's a villain because he's lying and says he does. I'm sorry but anyone who happened onto these interviews who had never heard of The Beach Boys before would be suspicious. Love's remarks on the album both in 1993 and later in 1998 were fairly consistent. He didn't like listening to the Smile album - he said the same thing, years apart, and well beyond the lawsuit that PO'd him. Now just months before a major release, his words are mostly positive about it -- which is fair enough. I'd rather him not go slagging off the album to the public before it is due to be released. Nevertheless what he does say is enormously convenient. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: MBE on September 06, 2011, 09:42:01 PM See to me if Mike likes Smile doesn't matter. He did a good job singing on the sessions and helped considerably with Good Vibrations. The Asher lyrics were terrible.
Frankly he probably disliked it more once he got blamed for it not coming out. Maybe now he can hear it with a little less subjectivity, but he explained how he felt (as of 1998) and why in Endless Harmony. He has a right to think what he wants. Being in a band with Brian, Dennis, or Carl by 1978 probably colored his view of their early and fairly harmless drug use. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:43:09 PM THE friggin' INTERVIEWER STARTED WITH THE ASSUMPTION HE WAS A VILLIAN. lol You mean the article starts off that way because it makes for an interesting start to an article? High school journalism at its finest. Still, I wouldn't put too much import on it. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:43:26 PM The interviewer is such a brilliant piece of work he thinks Mike is much like the devil and sang all the high parts. No wonder Mike asked him if he had a favorite Beach Boys song.
I mean can you imagine the nerve? Here's this young punk writing for creative loafing telling him about things he supposedly did in the 60's, and trying to talk drugs with a guy who was living this sh*t and saw family members die from it. The whole interview was out of line. If the guy thinks Mike is the devil, he wouldn't have had a noun to compare me to because he never would have forgot that interview. My interview would have started something like "Look motherf*cker. I'm not a villian and I didn't sing the high parts. Brian and I exchange christmas cards. You buy his christmas cd. There's a difference. If you mention somebody I know that's dead, I'm going to whip your ass" Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:43:42 PM Plus, Wirestone, you say that Mike went through a "bitterly contested lawsuit" which I guess to you somehow accounted for his negative demeanor in the 1993 interview(?)
1. The outcome of the lawsuit was the year before the 1993 interview. Mike won. Big time. No reason for him to hold onto grudges. 2. It wasn't bitterly contested. Brian pretty much folded like a wet noodle, fell asleep, and didn't contest anything. 3. Ultimately it was Murry that Mike had to blame for the lack of song credits, not Brian. Somewhere in the '93 interview I read where Mike said that the label on the Good Vibrations single didn't have his name credited. I have an original copy of Good Vibrations (U.S.) which says (Brian Wilson/Mike Love). Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:46:36 PM The interviewer is such a brilliant piece of work he thinks Mike is much like the devil and sang all the high parts. No wonder Mike asked him if he had a favorite Beach Boys song. I mean can you imagine the nerve? Here's this young punk writing for creative loafing telling him about things he supposedly did in the 60's, and trying to talk drugs with a guy who was living this sh*t and saw family members die from it. The whole interview was out of line. If the guy thinks Mike is the devil, he wouldn't have had a noun to compare me to because he never would have forgot that interview. My interview would have started something like "Look motherf*cker. I'm not a villian and I didn't sing the high parts. Brian and I exchange christmas cards. You buy his christmas cd. There's a difference. If you mention somebody I know that's dead, I'm going to whip your ass" I really am unclear at this point - do you believe that the interviewer read the introduction of his article to Mike Love? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:47:16 PM The interviewer is such a brilliant piece of work he thinks Mike is much like the devil and sang all the high parts. No wonder Mike asked him if he had a favorite Beach Boys song. The author of the interview obviously wrote the "Devil" introduction before or (presumably after) the interview. I'm sure Mike never saw or heard that part prior or during the interview. Maybe he'll see it now. ;D Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:50:56 PM And moreover, the interviewer only draws the comparison between Mike Love and the Devil in order to say that Mike Love is "charming" and an "excellent conversationalist" (though if you have read Paradise Lost, you'll note that he does have a tendency to go on). The same paragraph ends with the journalist basically concluding that the negative press against Mike Love has been a consequence of one-sidedness.
But I suppose if you are hyper-defensive, you would want to ENTIRELY MISREAD what the journalist is saying. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:51:26 PM I have to say, too, that I've never been an ML fan. I find the voice and attitude off-putting, and have for awhile. But I have to say, his interviews over the last few years have been getting steadily more reasonable.
And then to see people get incensed over an interview like this -- which is more or less Mike's personal version of the boilerplate Brian usually mumbles, only with about ten times the coherency -- it's kinda nuts. HE PRAISES SMILE. He toots his own horn, of course, but why wouldn't he? He's promoting his band. See, this is the thing. We all love BW here. But who would want to spend more than a few minutes interacting with him in a social situation? Doesn't it seem like it would be kind of a chore? On the other hand, I bet going out for dinner with Mike would be really entertaining. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on September 06, 2011, 09:53:38 PM See, this is the thing. We all love BW here. But who would want to spend more than a few minutes interacting with him in a social situation? Doesn't it seem like it would be kind of a chore? On the other hand, I bet going out for dinner with Mike would be really entertaining. Nah. Like I said, I'm not sure if I could name anyone from a 60s rock and roll band who has poorer social skills than Mike Love. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Ron on September 06, 2011, 09:56:00 PM The interviewer is such a brilliant piece of work he thinks Mike is much like the devil and sang all the high parts. No wonder Mike asked him if he had a favorite Beach Boys song. I mean can you imagine the nerve? Here's this young punk writing for creative loafing telling him about things he supposedly did in the 60's, and trying to talk drugs with a guy who was living this sh*t and saw family members die from it. The whole interview was out of line. If the guy thinks Mike is the devil, he wouldn't have had a noun to compare me to because he never would have forgot that interview. My interview would have started something like "Look motherf*cker. I'm not a villian and I didn't sing the high parts. Brian and I exchange christmas cards. You buy his christmas cd. There's a difference. If you mention somebody I know that's dead, I'm going to whip your ass" I really am unclear at this point - do you believe that the interviewer read the introduction of his article to Mike Love? I believe the interviewer clearly said "Most of the books and articles written about the Beach Boys portray you as a villain in the group". then proceeded to ask Mike 100 questions about Brian Wilson (who, if you don't know, doesn't tour with the Beach Boys and won't be at Friday's show that the interview was supposed to be about). Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:56:11 PM Quote 1. The outcome of the lawsuit was the year before the 1993 interview. Mike won. Big time. No reason for him to hold onto grudges. Well, if Mike is as you portray him, why wouldn't he? Quote 2. It wasn't bitterly contested. Brian pretty much folded like a wet noodle, fell asleep, and didn't contest anything. It actually went to trial. That's pretty unusual for a case like this. Settlements are generally reached -- and Mike's side offered one that would have saved Brian a lot of time and money. It says a lot about the team surrounding Brian and how they reacted to Mike's request for credit. Do you think that didn't sting Mike? That to get what was rightfully his -- credit on some of the band's biggest songs -- that he had to drag his cousin into court? It's insane. My view: At the time he saw Brian as weak and easily manipulated. He feels betrayed by his cousin. It's a theme that runs throughout the interview and shades a lot of what he says. Quote 3. Ultimately it was Murry that Mike had to blame for the lack of song credits, not Brian. So? Mike blamed Brian for not standing up to Murry. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mr. Wilson on September 06, 2011, 09:56:19 PM That incident with pushing a piano ..Mike into BW i believe occured at CBS convention late 70"s London England.. Cause BW was bored just playin the OLD stuff..I believe..
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: MBE on September 06, 2011, 09:57:38 PM Even Domenic Priore thought Mike was pretty funny in person.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 09:57:56 PM See to me if Mike likes Smile doesn't matter. He did a good job singing on the sessions and helped considerably with Good Vibrations. The Asher lyrics were terrible. I really like 'em. And I like the way Brian sang them. Liked it ever since I first heard them on "The Beach Boys Best Summers Of Our Lives" radio show in 1976. I played that version over and over on a cassette back then. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 09:59:57 PM Quote The Asher lyrics were terrible. Hear, hear. Mike's lyrics for GV are one of his finest moments as a writer. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pied Piper on September 06, 2011, 10:06:55 PM Not wanting to be pro or con Mike (here) but I thought it was interesting that Brian sez (Pet Sounds DVD) that he told him in 1966 that using an outside lyricist for Pet Sounds was "just this once". Also, it would take a lot less time to read and glean information from some of these threads if there wasn't so much insistence on having the last word once you've already made your point. IMHO.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 06, 2011, 10:09:31 PM It actually went to trial. That's pretty unusual for a case like this. Settlements are generally reached -- and Mike's side offered one that would have saved Brian a lot of time and money. It says a lot about the team surrounding Brian and how they reacted to Mike's request for credit. Do you think that didn't sting Mike? That to get what was rightfully his -- credit on some of the band's biggest songs -- that he had to drag his cousin into court? It's insane. No. Mike didn't mind. He has always had disdain for Brian's lawyers, management, and thought, "Let's go get 'em". It was a huge payday for Mike (which of course continues to this day) and he jumped all over the chance when Brian's lawyers pursued it in court. Why would that "sting" Mike? And again, I didn't read about any bitterness, at least on the part of Mike or Brian. In fact, Brian seemed to not care at all. And I'll bet you'll say that Mike was so stung and bitter about the 1992 lawsuit (which he won) that he turned around and sued Brian again in 2004. Yeah, Mike felt real bad about doing that, didn't he? I'm glad he lost that one. It was frivolous. Another case where Mike thought he'd go after Brian's management, eh? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Wirestone on September 06, 2011, 10:10:43 PM I dunno. This all seems slightly nuts to me. Night, all.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: MBE on September 06, 2011, 10:19:36 PM See to me if Mike likes Smile doesn't matter. He did a good job singing on the sessions and helped considerably with Good Vibrations. The Asher lyrics were terrible. I really like 'em. And I like the way Brian sang them. Liked it ever since I first heard them on "The Beach Boys Best Summers Of Our Lives" radio show in 1976. I played that version over and over on a cassette back then. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chris Moise on September 06, 2011, 10:40:28 PM A guy from this board e-mailed me today. He has an interview with Mike Love in a couple of days and asked me what I would like to ask Mike. Any ideas from the board members here that I can pass on? ;D Ask him what I'm in Great Shape was and if he remembers any of the 1966 CITFOTM verse lyrics. I'm 75% kidding ;D Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Micha on September 06, 2011, 11:24:49 PM Part of what he said: "It would have been a great record but he [Brian] just didn't have the will or the ability to finish it. See, a lot of the Brian bullsh*t rests around that album and it's nothing, it's just fragments." Aw, you know, spoken language is even more washy than written language. When Mike says "it's nothing" he might as well refer to the "Brian bullsh*t", then skip themes in his mind and refer to the album with "it's in fragments". It is very pointless to get hung up on this phrasing. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: hypehat on September 07, 2011, 01:22:55 AM Oh goody, a 5 page thread arguing about Mike Love. :deadhorse
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Andrew G. Doe on September 07, 2011, 04:07:26 AM Mike's done some questionable things, said a lot that's, at best, ill-advised and has a character that rubs a lot of folk up the wrong way. But... Brian's done a lot of reprehensible stuff too, as have all the others.
No hereos, no villains, only shades of gray. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Cam Mott on September 07, 2011, 04:42:28 AM Not wanting to be pro or con Mike (here) but I thought it was interesting that Brian sez (Pet Sounds DVD) that he told him in 1966 that using an outside lyricist for Pet Sounds was "just this once". Also, it would take a lot less time to read and glean information from some of these threads if there wasn't so much insistence on having the last word once you've already made your point. IMHO. What!?! We do not!! Get out [pointing indignantly]! Mike rules and poops rainbows and pees root beer!! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Autotune on September 07, 2011, 05:24:22 AM That incident with pushing a piano ..Mike into BW i believe occured at CBS convention late 70"s London England.. Cause BW was bored just playin the OLD stuff..I believe.. David Leaf reported that, I believe. I can hear no incident in the recording of that show. Not that it did not happen. I'd like it if Mike were more outspoken (and questioned in interviews) about songs like Let the Wind Blow, All I Wanna do. About his various singing styles. About the fact that he's sounding great live these days. We're lucky that he's still around. Go see him. Cut the bashing Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: LostArt on September 07, 2011, 07:04:38 AM Mike's done some questionable things, said a lot that's, at best, ill-advised and has a character that rubs a lot of folk up the wrong way. But... Brian's done a lot of reprehensible stuff too, as have all the others. No hereos, no villains, only shades of gray. This. Yeah, Mike is Mike, Brian is Brian. Nobody's perfect. This new interview is old news. Why is everyone so upset? What I find surprising is that no one has mentioned this... "I wrote a song more recently called "Cool Head, Warm Water," which was something the Maharishi [Mahesh Yogi] said to me once: "You need to have a cool head in warm water." So I made it into a little pop song." What the frick is that all about? Was Mike just feeding him some crap because the interviewer was kind of clueless and a bit rude? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: hypehat on September 07, 2011, 07:08:48 AM Even more annoying is that he says that when the interviewer asks him about the song Transcendental Meditation. I have the feeling someday Mike's not going to have his morning cup of coffee when they mention that song and say 'Yeah, I gave Brian some really calm, spiritual lyrics and he put motherf*cking saxophones on it. The goddamm hippie". Then ruin any goodwill each camp has for the other in for the forseeable ;D
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 07, 2011, 12:56:35 PM See, this is the thing. We all love BW here. But who would want to spend more than a few minutes interacting with him in a social situation? Doesn't it seem like it would be kind of a chore? On the other hand, I bet going out for dinner with Mike would be really entertaining. Nah. Like I said, I'm not sure if I could name anyone from a 60s rock and roll band who has poorer social skills than Mike Love. Keith Moon?????? C'mon man! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on September 07, 2011, 01:03:01 PM Mike's done some questionable things, said a lot that's, at best, ill-advised and has a character that rubs a lot of folk up the wrong way. But... Brian's done a lot of reprehensible stuff too, as have all the others. No hereos, no villains, only shades of gray. Can we put this quote up in stone on the main page of this board? It's really all that needs to be said, and if you dare to be a fan of The Beach Boys, it should be something of a mantra or credo! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Aegir on September 07, 2011, 01:47:23 PM "I wrote a song more recently called "Cool Head, Warm Water," which was something the Maharishi [Mahesh Yogi] said to me once: "You need to have a cool head in warm water." So I made it into a little pop song." What the frick is that all about? Was Mike just feeding him some crap because the interviewer was kind of clueless and a bit rude? This is a simple issue of whoever transcribed the interview not being aware of the song and mishearing Mike. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: ghost on September 07, 2011, 01:48:39 PM HEART sounds nothing like WATER.
Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Micha on September 07, 2011, 02:01:09 PM See to me if Mike likes Smile doesn't matter. He did a good job singing on the sessions and helped considerably with Good Vibrations. The Asher lyrics were terrible. I really like 'em. And I like the way Brian sang them. You mean on BWPS? Because I think the "Early take" has Carl on vocals too, but with a more Wild Honey singing style. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: shelter on September 07, 2011, 02:45:54 PM Isn't there someone close to Mike who can tell him to finally give the whole "I came up with the "I'm picking up good vibrations" hook and I wrote 'Kokomo' without Brian's help" thing a rest? I think I've read about two dozen interviews by now where he mentions that and it gets really annoying. If Mike would ever wonder why people see him as the bad guy, that might be the reason. The Wilsons never bragged about their personal contributions like that... And the worst thing is that Mike doesn't even need to toot his own horn like that. He was an essential part of one of the most successful bands in the history of pop music, he sang on dozens of classic pop songs, he's been touring the world for half a century - that's impressive enough. He doesn't need to keep claiming all the little hooks and the album titles that he came up with. Did you mention the parts where he gave more praise to Brian than himself? Calling Brian a musical genius? Talking about Brian's harmonies? Re-Read it without the jade this time. Fine, if you re-read my post without automatically assuming that I'm anti-Mike Love... And did you notice that I'm actually praising Mike? Mike Love probably isn't the type of guy I'd like to hang out with if he wouldn't have been a Beach Boy, but he was a very important and essential part of a band that I love to death. I very much respect and admire him for that. Whenever I read an interview like this, I don't think "Wow, what an a**hole", I'm more like "Man, you don't need this, you should stand above this kind of petty BS. Don't lower yourself like that." Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Pretty Funky on September 07, 2011, 03:13:07 PM This subject has been covered many times and one thing mentioned in the past is that a guy sits down and interviews a person for maybe 30 minutes or so then we read the story in 3 minutes. Mike may have gone on for most of a interview about nothing but the positive but the writer targets the negative, which may have been a small part of the discussion.
As for a question to ask Mike. Often a one-off gig like the Reagan show, Good Morning America, Dancing with the Stars, his voice sounds a bit weak, yet it gets stronger during a summer of constant touring. Does he notice it himself? Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 07, 2011, 03:19:03 PM Because I think the "Early take" has Carl on vocals too, but with a more Wild Honey singing style. This is what I'm talking about. The two verses, probably recorded around February, 1966: I, I love the colorful clothes she wears, And she's already working on my brain. I only looked in her eyes, But I picked up something I just can't explain. And I'm pickin' up Good, good, good, good vibrations, yeah! A-well I'm pickin' up Good, good, good, good vibrations, yeah! I, I bet I know what she's like, And I can feel how right she'd be for me. It's weird how she comes in so strong, And I wonder what she's pickin' up from me. Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh, Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh. Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh, Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Chris Brown on September 07, 2011, 03:22:27 PM See to me if Mike likes Smile doesn't matter. He did a good job singing on the sessions and helped considerably with Good Vibrations. The Asher lyrics were terrible. I really like 'em. And I like the way Brian sang them. You mean on BWPS? Because I think the "Early take" has Carl on vocals too, but with a more Wild Honey singing style. No way that's Carl - why would Brian call Carl in to sing on what's clearly a demo? Besides, no way Carl could hit that high B flat in full voice at that point in time. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Micha on September 07, 2011, 10:05:34 PM Because I think the "Early take" has Carl on vocals too, but with a more Wild Honey singing style. This is what I'm talking about. The two verses, probably recorded around February, 1966: I, I love the colorful clothes she wears, And she's already working on my brain. I only looked in her eyes, But I picked up something I just can't explain. And I'm pickin' up Good, good, good, good vibrations, yeah! A-well I'm pickin' up Good, good, good, good vibrations, yeah! I, I bet I know what she's like, And I can feel how right she'd be for me. It's weird how she comes in so strong, And I wonder what she's pickin' up from me. Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh, Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh. Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh, Hum de dum, Hum de dum, oh-oh. Where is the version to be found that you are referring to? I was thinking of the "Early take" on th SS/WH two-fer, track 25, which hasn't got the Humdedums, so that's obviously not the track you mean. Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Mikie on September 07, 2011, 11:25:49 PM The '76 BB radio special played various takes of Good Vibrations, including instrumental tracks using different instruments and all of the vocals that you hear on the Smiley 2-fer (track 25) plus the hum de dum part and a different ending. If you have the Smiley 2-fer, the '93 GV box set, the 40th Anniversary GV EP, and/or boots with the Good Vibrations sessions, like SOT 15, then you've heard it all already.
How 'bout that Hammond B-3 with the Leslie speaker eh? Ol' Larry Knechtel played the manuals with one hand on that. Really felt good, let's play it! Title: Re: New Mike Love interview Post by: Micha on September 08, 2011, 12:19:29 AM If the vocals you refer to are the Asher lyrics as heard on track 25 of the two-fer - I'm pretty certain that's already Carl, not Brian.
|