The Smiley Smile Message Board

Non Smiley Smile Stuff => General Music Discussion => Topic started by: Jay on March 26, 2011, 08:20:00 PM



Title: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on March 26, 2011, 08:20:00 PM
Are there any Guns N' Roses fans here? I've been really into them lately. I was only two when Appetite For Destruction came out, and I can just barely remember when the Use Your Illusions I&II albums came out. I watch all of the bootleg videos on YouTube and I really wish I could go back in time, only being as old a I am now, and see the clasic lineup in concert.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 27, 2011, 01:07:23 AM
Appetite For Destruction was the first album I ever bought. Me and my older brother had to pool our pocket money together to afford it. Then when our mother heard how often the 'f' word cropped up she tried to ban us from listening to it!


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on March 27, 2011, 01:58:55 AM
Appetite For Destruction was the first album I ever bought. Me and my older brother had to pool our pocket money together to afford it. Then when our mother heard how often the 'f' word cropped up she tried to ban us from listening to it!
My mom made my dad get a piece of paper and write down which songs I could listen to.  ;D I think Sweet Child O' Mine was the only song by them that I could hear. Unless a "clean version" made it to MTV by way of a music video. The funny thing is, I knew what "the F word" was. I knew what it sounded like, and I knew how to spell it. But I wasn't allowed to hear Axl say it, for some dumb reason.  ::)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: the captain on March 27, 2011, 07:12:28 AM
They were an amazing band, the perfect combination of danger and rawness on one side, but pop appeal on the other, to cut through the very slick-leaning scene of the late '80s. (If you go back to their studio work and photos, though, they were pretty highly styled). Great songs.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: rab2591 on March 27, 2011, 08:06:42 AM
Back in my high school days I used to really be into them. I over-listened to Appetite for Destruction and now I rarely listen to it anymore....but I still think it's a great album.

On the contrary, Chinese Democracy was an unsurprising disappointment...I bought it and still regret buying it to this day.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: the captain on March 27, 2011, 08:26:17 AM
I'm in the same boat on all that. Appetite and Lies were huge to me, and I bought cassettes (ah, those days...) of the Illusions on the day they were released. Not my typical listening fare anymore, but they all still hold a place for me. Then Spaghetti was a mess. And while I was curious enough about Chinese Dem to listen, I didn't even buy it. The best pop music is either perfectly of its time or timeless; new GnR didn't feel like either one to me by that time.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: grillo on March 27, 2011, 08:29:47 AM
The first song I ever learned on guitar was sweet child o mine, which came out the summer of either '88 or '89 (freshmen or sophmore year) and I memorized every inch of those tabs . I can still play most of the key riffs from appetite without even thinking about it. GNR were the first band I got into that wasn't The Beach Boys or Jan & Dean. Or REM.
But  other than GNR Lies I really can't stand the other albums. There are some okay songs but the production is crap and the guy that replaced Steve Adler is a souless clown. Try and find the demos for November Rain and Don't Cry and you'll here what the follow up could've sounded like.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on March 27, 2011, 09:59:14 AM
Big fan here, but only of the original lineup that produced Appetite and GnR Lies. I'm a big Izzy Stradlin fan, and as far as rhythm guitarists go he was one of the best in rock. Any recent interview with Slash, who seems to be popping up everywhere these days, has him mostly praising how good Izzy was. Just for fun, check out some of Izzy's solo albums to hear where his influence fit into the band's style.

THAT was one of the foundations of the band in its glory days. Izzy and Slash bring back Gibson-through-Marshall, tightly played rock guitar. And the songwriting was top notch, seriously - does Sweet Child O Mine ever not sound good on the radio?

I could go on for pages about them, seriously, so I have to limit myself a bit... :) I will add a few things:

- A great memory was having my cassette of Appetite loaded up and blasting on my Walkman on a trip to Los Angeles in early 1989. The videos were still in heavy rotation on MTV, and the band was everywhere. Sitting in LAX and destroying my ears by blasting "Welcome To The Jungle", it was cool. Then "G n R Lies" was a summertime cassette, which I played endlessly on a trip to the Jersey Shore one summer. I still think Patience is a brilliant piece of rock music. It was a ballsy move for a band like Guns to release an all-acoustic, drum-less single and video, and look what happened with the "Unplugged" phenom soon after.

- Definitely seek out the pre-Appetite demos, they're not all good but they do make fascinating listening. Welcome To The Jungle holds up as a demo very well, and is actually "bluesier" in the early form.

- Apart from historical reasons, I think it may be wrong to assume you missed anything by not seeing the original lineup on tour. Direct from people who were there in person, and from a few boots on the Appetite tours, they were sort of a mess on stage. The drugs, the general intoxication levels of various members, the way they just didn't play together - don't get me wrong, they were an intense live band when they were on the Sunset Strip by all accounts,  but their demons got the best of them when they got on the big tours, which is one reason why Adler got fired after a national TV appearance on Farm Aid where he wasn't on his game.

And I agree 100% the replacement drummer never worked for me, that's when I walked away and focused on their older music which I really enjoyed. And that damn "Terminator" video sucked too.

- By all means search for the band's live concert broadcast from Hollywood on MTV in 1988. Intense, star-making stuff, just live raw rock and roll. *THIS* is the version of Knockin On Heavens Door that floored me, and the official album version sucked out all of the intensity of that LA club performance, which included Slash rolling on the floor during his solos, looking totally gone.

The band could have ruled the world of rock for years to come but in all honesty they f***ed it up. After Izzy left they lost what drew me personally to their music in the first place, that Keith Richards-Joe Perry style that is timeless when played by the right people with the right attitude, and GnR owned it for a few years.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 27, 2011, 02:44:18 PM
Bahahaha it's great that everybody else realizes how much of a putz Matt Sorum is. Almost 3 years later and he still hasn't gotten over the fact Scott Weiland jumped the Velvet Revolver ship. He also wants both himself and Adler to play drums if the "original" GNR lineup reunites.  ::)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: A Million Units In Jan! on March 27, 2011, 03:13:47 PM
I was never a huge fan-they were really big towards the end of my middle school, and the beginning of high school years. I will say though, that I love the song 'Patience'. It reminds me of a time when I was young teen and I had no idea what the world was about (sigh). One song I really liked later on was 'Estranged'. Then they had the whole video trilogy mess that had something to do with dolphins. I didn't get it.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: the captain on March 27, 2011, 04:37:39 PM
Then they had the whole video trilogy mess that had something to do with dolphins. I didn't get it.
Hahaha. But yep. The Illusions were when the whole balance of Big Theater and raw rock sort of went off track. Those videos ... wow. Yeah. It's hard to knock, because that kind of creative tension is what mad GnR great. Axl undoubtedly brought that big sensibility to the garage rock of the others. But it went haywire and never came back.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Shady on March 27, 2011, 05:52:55 PM
Huge fan!!

And guess what. I think Chinese Democracy is their best album, even if it's only Axl in the band


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on March 27, 2011, 06:05:01 PM
I seem to be the only GNR fan in the world who thinks that Matt was a better drummer than Steve Adler.  ;D


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Loaf on March 28, 2011, 07:18:03 AM
My favourite GnR album is Use Your Illusion II, and second may be Spaghetti Incident.

I'm a big fan of the Spaghetti Incident and it was the first CD I ever owned. I used to alter the settings on my dad's CD player to put Axl's vocals low in the mix. It was a long time before I knew many of the words.

I like Matt Sorum's work on GnR's records too.

As for post-1993, has anyone heard Gilby Clarke's 'Pawnshop Guitars' album? Great stuff. Imagine GnR with more of a 60s/70s influence.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on March 28, 2011, 09:08:47 AM
I think Gilby was chosen in part because he was into the same style and sounds of playing rock guitar as Izzy Stradlin, as I mentioned earlier. His sound and style was a more instant fit than finding someone who wasn't into those sounds as much. Pawnshop Guitars is a cool record, and again I'd recommend looking for Izzy's other solo albums apart from his first "JuJu Hounds" disc which had the most success/airplay with the song "Shuffle It All" where he wears his Keith Richards influence on his sleeve!

While Izzy has jammed with Slash off and on since leaving Guns, I get the impression he wouldn't be into a GnR reunion or much of anything else related to that band name. And he and Axl were the backbone of the band, in its first incarnations. It was Slash and Steve Adler having been friends and bandmates pre-GnR, and Axl and Izzy forming the band, and Duff joined the band having moved to LA as a guitarist. So there was the group dynamic.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Loaf on March 28, 2011, 09:29:50 AM
I used to own Izzy's 117. It was a bit meh.

I also own a couple of other Gilby Clarke solo albums and it's fair to say he peaked with his first and it was all downhill after that.

Slash's Snakepit's first album is fun.

I was really into Duff McKagan's Believe in Me album when it came out. Haven't heard it in quite a while.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Alex on April 11, 2011, 02:38:46 PM
Was never a huge GNR fan...not that much different from Poison or Motley Crue...but I have to admit, SCOM is a damn catchy song.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: the captain on April 11, 2011, 03:37:47 PM
...not that much different from Poison or Motley Crue...
I would have to disagree pretty strongly with that. I would say GnR was on a far higher level of songwriting and musical competence, not to mention more of a garage-blues (later especially meeting melodramatic bombast) influence. Whereas Poison was purely delightfully shallow, infectious pop only superficially coated with the "metal"-of-the-times sheen. And Motley Crue, a different sort of post British (metal) Invasion with the dopey tough guy/devil imagery, more like a Quiet Riot or something.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Loaf on April 12, 2011, 04:32:47 AM
Was never a huge GNR fan...not that much different from Poison or Motley Crue...

I'd disagree too. GnR aimed for a depth in their songwriting (see especially the "long" songs from UYI 2) that few other vaguely metal bands had.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jason on April 12, 2011, 07:35:36 AM
GNR were definitely not a "hair metal" band. They were kind of like a version of the Stones for the late 80s, full of that bad-boy machismo and great guitar licks. Besides, shouldn't we all love GNR because they covered a Manson track? :)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: D409 on April 12, 2011, 08:17:13 AM
Bahahaha it's great that everybody else realizes how much of a putz Matt Sorum is. Almost 3 years later and he still hasn't gotten over the fact Scott Weiland jumped the Velvet Revolver ship. He also wants both himself and Adler to play drums if the "original" GNR lineup reunites.  ::)
Matt Sorum's a good drummer, but he doesn't have the same feel for G'N'R that Steven Adler had on Appetite For Destruction, i.e. Adler was a better drummer for G'N'R. Appetite was classic. On the very day Use Your Illusion's 1 & 2 came out, I thought they'd never make another album ever again, and they never did until the belated Chinese Democracy, a reasonable album in its own right which has nothing apart from Axl Rose to link it to old school G'N'R.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: pixletwin on April 12, 2011, 11:06:13 AM
I never felt GnR wrote genuine music. I was never convinced by what I heard.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: rab2591 on April 12, 2011, 11:22:05 AM
I never felt GnR wrote genuine music. I was never convinced by what I heard.

What's more genuine: An entire band jamming/singing about the streets of a city which they all walked on, or an entire band singing about surfing and only one member actually surfed? ;D

GnR created some incredibly complex music....the entirety of Appetite For Destruction seems very genuine and convincing to me...however, I'm a very easily convinced person ;D


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 12, 2011, 11:31:04 AM
I never felt GnR wrote genuine music. I was never convinced by what I heard.

Quite the contrary, at least on the Appetite For Destruction and GnR Lies era material. Guns was one of the *few* authentic bands in the LA metal scene, and I've heard other members of other bands who played that scene say they wished they were writing the songs Izzy and Axl were writing because the lyrics were more genuine and real than Poison, the Crue, etc.

Several band members were addicted to smack, and one sold it for profit: Mr. Brownstone is about fighting a heroin addiction. Sweet Child O Mine was a love letter to Axl's girlfriend, with music by Slash playing a guitar exercise over chords Izzy wrote. Welcome To The Jungle was about Axl arriving in LA from the midwest, and the video is even more graphic than the lyrics. One In A Million is also about situations Axl saw in LA. My Michelle is about a real girl who told Axl she wished someone wrote a song about her. Out To Get Me was about Axl's troubles he had in the midwest. Nightrain is about cheap booze the band would drink when they didn't have money. November Rain was written as an epic song before Appetite, and was on early demos from the band: they held it off Appetite because Sweet Child was already on there as a ballad.

The songs are real! They're about the experiences of the actual band - How much more genuine could they have been in the lyrics? They're heads and shoulders above bands like Cinderella, Poison, Winger, and other Sunset Strip denizens from the late 80's who did unfortunately write a lot of contrived, fake stuff. But GnR was different, musically and lyrically.

Disclaimer: This is for Appetite and Lies era, and some of the Use Your Illusion tunes. Anything after that I don't bother with.



Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: pixletwin on April 12, 2011, 03:04:37 PM
I really don't want to come off as trolling, because that is not my intent at all. Really I think it's just Axel that I don't buy. Something about him, I just dunno. It's almost as if he "lived" his lyrics (as you say) for the same of appearing to have street cred.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: the captain on April 12, 2011, 04:22:39 PM
I don't "buy" any of it, and more than that, I don't give any particular value to songs about things the writers lived as opposed to things imagined (or for that matter, written about for the sole reason of profiting). Lou Reed wrote songs about whatever trends he was told to, after all. Frankly, there is something to respect in that: craftsmanship. So for me, the purported reality isn't important at all. What is, is that the songs were just better than most of those of the other bands we're talking about. (Though, for example, I also would be happy to discuss the merits of Poison. There is no shame in shameless enjoyment.)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Mike's Beard on April 12, 2011, 04:29:06 PM
GNR were definitely not a "hair metal" band. They were kind of like a version of the Stones for the late 80s, full of that bad-boy machismo and great guitar licks. Besides, shouldn't we all love GNR because they covered a Manson track? :)

No because it was an abysmal cover.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 12, 2011, 08:33:44 PM
I've really been into the Illusion albums lately. I consider Estranged and November Rain works of art.  Say what you want about Axl, but every artist has his "masterpiece". Those songs are Axl's.  :)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: grillo on April 12, 2011, 08:45:35 PM
I've really been into the Illusion albums lately. I consider Estranged and November Rain works of art.  Say what you want about Axl, but every artist has his "masterpiece". Those songs are Axl's.  :)
Like I said earlier, you need to hear the old demos to know how good November Rain could've been. Check this (forget the visuals, or don't...) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM)
Hope you like


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 12, 2011, 09:37:03 PM
I've really been into the Illusion albums lately. I consider Estranged and November Rain works of art.  Say what you want about Axl, but every artist has his "masterpiece". Those songs are Axl's.  :)
Like I said earlier, you need to hear the old demos to know how good November Rain could've been. Check this (forget the visuals, or don't...) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM)
Hope you like
Have you heard the Estranged demo? Axl was(and probably still is) one hell of a great piano player.  :) This might get deleted, but hopefully somebody will see it before that happens. After getting all the albums Guns put out(except Chinese Democracy), I'm looking to get into the tape trading scene, but I know absolutely nothing about Guns N Roses bootlegs. Any help would be appreciated.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 13, 2011, 07:56:24 AM
I don't "buy" any of it, and more than that, I don't give any particular value to songs about things the writers lived as opposed to things imagined (or for that matter, written about for the sole reason of profiting). Lou Reed wrote songs about whatever trends he was told to, after all. Frankly, there is something to respect in that: craftsmanship. So for me, the purported reality isn't important at all. What is, is that the songs were just better than most of those of the other bands we're talking about. (Though, for example, I also would be happy to discuss the merits of Poison. There is no shame in shameless enjoyment.)

That is all valid and I agree with the craftsmanship of being able to write in the third-person as a character or from a perspective you may not personally have experienced, but the original comment was about the songs being "genuine" and at least on the Appetite album it would be hard to make the case that the songs were anything but genuine since the band was writing about their own situations and lives.

The extreme point would be an artist like Vanilla Ice, claiming to be all kinds of things he was not in order to seem credible to his audience. When the truth comes out the backlash is too much to overcome, because they're tagged as a phony. Saying Vanilla Ice's music is not genuine is miles away from saying Guns N Roses music is not genuine.

And for the record, it was never Axl Rose that made me a fan of the band. It was them as a *band*, and actually I thought Axl was a pain in the ass more often than not, and as soon as his vision for the band became the band. I was done with them.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Mac the Hat on April 14, 2011, 09:55:46 AM
I've really been into the Illusion albums lately. I consider Estranged and November Rain works of art.  Say what you want about Axl, but every artist has his "masterpiece". Those songs are Axl's.  :)
Like I said earlier, you need to hear the old demos to know how good November Rain could've been. Check this (forget the visuals, or don't...) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O70QP80oMM)
Hope you like

I had this verison on a tape before the Use Your Illusion discs came out. (and a longish piano verison too). The acoustic verison is just stunning, I could have wept when I heard the over produced album version. I never really forgave GnR after that.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 15, 2011, 07:11:22 PM
I didn't know that some Illusion demos were being traded even before the songs got officially released. I bet Axl didn't like that.  ;D Personally, I really like November Rain. A lot of people say it's not really a typical "Guns N Roses" sound, but I think it's great.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: ? on April 17, 2011, 12:55:25 AM
This might get deleted, but hopefully somebody will see it before that happens. After getting all the albums Guns put out(except Chinese Democracy)

What, you don't have $1.99?  :lol

I'm looking to get into the tape trading scene, but I know absolutely nothing about Guns N Roses bootlegs. Any help would be appreciated.

Somewhere in my piles of neglected cds I have a boot with the two early versions of November Rain, demos/rehearsals of Appetite songs and some other stuff.  There's a boot out there of the Lies sessions with some alternate takes and an unreleased track.  I really like the dvd boots of the Live At the Ritz MTV show (there's one taken from the broadcast master as I recall, as well as an uncut version in lesser quality) and the '87 acoustic gig at CBGB.

I loved GNR, but after Adler left it was all downhill.  And when Izzy left it was over.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: grillo on April 17, 2011, 08:10:37 AM


Somewhere in my piles of neglected cds I have a boot with the two early versions of November Rain, demos/rehearsals of Appetite songs and some other stuff.  There's a boot out there of the Lies sessions with some alternate takes and an unreleased track.  I really like the dvd boots of the Live At the Ritz MTV show (there's one taken from the broadcast master as I recall, as well as an uncut version in lesser quality) and the '87 acoustic gig at CBGB.

I loved GNR, but after Adler left it was all downhill.  And when Izzy left it was over.
Yeah, i remember having a one or two LP set of Appetite demos that had Don't cry and both versions of Nov. Rain (piano and guitar) that made me pretty hip in High School around 1990. They sounded shitty but they were in vinyl. Sold them along with my copy of the 12" single of Welcome to the Jungle that had the way better mix of Mr. Brownstone on it about 15 years ago!
Even then they were worth good money and I had to pay rent after all.
Forgot about the Ritz show, but I did tape it at the time.
Post Adler is unlistenable. Sorum lacks anything resembling soul.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Alex on April 17, 2011, 04:10:54 PM
Now that I think about it, GNR did have some worthwhile songs...Sweet Child, Patience, Look at Your Game Girl...I think my problem lies mostly with their image and their being aligned with the LA metal scene instead of the alt/indie/college rock movement. I`m superficial like that sometimes. :-O


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 17, 2011, 04:19:40 PM
It does surprise people to tell them November Rain was written and recorded as a demo years before the Use Your Illusion project: It's so tied into Use Your Illusion as an epic song with Axl tinkling away on grand piano and everything from the video - but that song was in fact considered for Appetite but held back in favor of Sweet Child.

That MTV live at The Ritz show is really, really good and I'd highly recommend anyone interested look for that one. I mentioned just a bit of that a few posts ago, but that show was a killer. I remember watching the show itself, then they spun videos like "Paradise City" and "Knockin On Heaven's Door" from that concert and played them semi-regular on MTV's playlist when GnR were huge. There was a time when MTV at night had a request countdown well before Carson Daly turned it into a fucking travesty with all his boy bands and Kid Rock, but they took actual requests.

Among those longest-running number one request videos I remember: GnR Paradise City which seemed to be at the top for weeks on end, and Daydream Believer by the Monkees. Unless my memory is bad...


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 17, 2011, 09:08:43 PM
I've read that November Rain existed during the Appetite For Destruction, but I think I read that it was still unfinished, so I don't think it could have been included on Appetite, even if they wanted to.

I'm starting to become a pretty big fan, but I don't really understand the argument about Izzy. I tend to think that Slash and Duff were the real backbone of the group. I've seen some videos of the group in concert with Gilby Clarke, and they sounded just as great as they did a year or two earier, if not even better.

By the way, am I the only Guns N Roses fan on earth that actually likes Dizzy Reed? Even Slash doesn't like him.  :lol


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 17, 2011, 09:21:52 PM
I've read that November Rain existed during the Appetite For Destruction, but I think I read that it was still unfinished, so I don't think it could have been included on Appetite, even if they wanted to.

I'm starting to become a pretty big fan, but I don't really understand the argument about Izzy. I tend to think that Slash and Duff were the real backbone of the group. I've seen some videos of the group in concert with Gilby Clarke, and they sounded just as great as they did a year or two earier, if not even better.

By the way, am I the only Guns N Roses fan on earth that actually likes Dizzy Reed? Even Slash doesn't like him.  :lol

Who the f*** is Dizzy Reed?  ;D

Just kidding!

It's not hard to find a demo for November Rain which was done before Appetite, and it's as finished as a song might get on a demo before they'd have gone in with a producer and refined the rough spots to make it sound pretty. It could have easily gone on Appetite but they chose not to work on it because they already had a "ballad" in Sweet Child and didn't want another on the same record.

Izzy and Slash were the team that brought that Stones-Aerosmith rhythm and lead sound back in style, and read an interview with Slash where he's asked about it and he'll always praise Izzy as an excellent rhythm player. Izzy got in between the beat the way Keith Richards did best when he had Mick Taylor to play leads, or how Joe Perry and Brad Whitford played that awesome funky rhythm in a tune like "Walk This Way" where neither player is overpowering or getting in the way of the other parts. It's fitting into a pocket of rhythm that drives a full band, including the drums.

Welcome To The Jungle is a fantastic example of this style of rhythm guitar bewteen Slash and Izzy, and what's cool about the way they mixed Appetite is how Izzy's guitar is always panned to the same side on every song. So if you want to hear the song without Izzy, just drop that channel and you'll hear Slash, Duff, and Adler with Axl singing over top.

And it's sounds like it's missing something important. :)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 17, 2011, 09:34:13 PM
I'll have to check that out. Thanks for pointing it out.  ;D

Listening to that acoustic demo of November Rain and then hearing the finished product is quite interesting. The demo has a very bleak mood to it. It has a very raw naked emotion to it. The studio cut is obviously about heartbreak and a loss of love, but on the demo you can actually FEEL it.  It's a lot like the early acoustic version of the Bob Dylan song Idiot Wind, versus the released studio version. The lyrics are pretty much the same, but the difference in mood makes it seem like two completely different songs.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 17, 2011, 09:46:20 PM
On Appetite, Izzy's guitar is panned hard to the left channel the whole time. It's cool because on a song like Welcome To The Jungle some of the leads that may be assumed to be from Slash were actually Izzy, like the intro leads under the echo guitar. And Paradise City is easy to hear the Aerosmith Walk This Way guitar influence in the verses, plus you hear Slash doing technical stuff like pinch harmonics and speed runs in his rhythm track, while Izzy is more classic-rock straightforward. Really cool.



Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: ? on April 17, 2011, 10:21:03 PM
I'm starting to become a pretty big fan, but I don't really understand the argument about Izzy. I tend to think that Slash and Duff were the real backbone of the group. I've seen some videos of the group in concert with Gilby Clarke, and they sounded just as great as they did a year or two earier, if not even better.

To add to guitarfool2002's comments, on Appetite and Lies Izzy was essentially the primary songwriter.  He's all over those albums.  Less so on the Illusions and they suffer for it.  It says something that after Izzy left the band they couldn't get original material together.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 17, 2011, 10:43:42 PM
I've akways wondered who the main song writer was. I knew that Patience was Izzy's song. But with all the things said regarding Axl, I kind of figured that he took charge of most of it. In his book, Slash kind of gives himself a lot of credit for the songs.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Shady on April 20, 2011, 09:11:07 AM
Is this not the best cover ever?

Axl's still got it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsK9gCg32Qw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsK9gCg32Qw)


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 20, 2011, 09:16:55 AM
I don't know why, but I've never liked GNR. I don't care for Slash's style, and Axl Rose's voice is like Freddy Kreuger's nails on a chalkboard.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: shelter on April 21, 2011, 02:52:24 PM
I liked them when I was in my teens and I have all their albums on CD, but I never listen to them anymore.


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on April 21, 2011, 10:56:53 PM
Is this not the best cover ever?
Axl's still got it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsK9gCg32Qw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsK9gCg32Qw)
No.  :p


Title: Re: Guns N' Roses
Post by: Jay on September 18, 2011, 10:12:15 PM
Yesterday was the 20th anniversary of the Use Your Illusions albums. I feel old.  :o