The Smiley Smile Message Board

Smiley Smile Stuff => General On Topic Discussions => Topic started by: roll plymouth rock on February 13, 2012, 06:48:22 AM



Title: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on February 13, 2012, 06:48:22 AM
So what do we know so far? Recording at Ocean Way, produced by Brian... executive producer Mike, some songs written with Joe Thomas, grammy band

Titles announced so far:
Do It Again
Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
That's Why God Made the Radio


Anything I'm missing?

2012 is gonna be fun!!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on February 13, 2012, 07:06:39 AM
No cheesy surf titles so far. This is sounding good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 13, 2012, 07:20:09 AM
These tunes have quirky BW titles. :thumbsup


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: shelter on February 13, 2012, 07:53:43 AM
Shelter

8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 13, 2012, 08:11:08 AM
These tunes have quirky BW titles. :thumbsup

Yep, well spotted.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on February 13, 2012, 08:18:22 AM
No cheesy surf titles so far.

Yea, like Kowabunga! It's Party Time or The Ballad of The Ho Dad and The Honey. Or, Surf's Up, USA.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on February 13, 2012, 08:22:18 AM
I don't see "Cuddle Up" with John Stamos on that list.. :lol :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on February 13, 2012, 08:58:13 AM
So what do we know so far? Recording at Ocean Way, produced by Brian & Mike, some songs written with Joe Thomas, grammy band

Titles announced so far:
Do It Again
Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
That's Why God Made the Radio


Anything I'm missing?


The Private Life Of Bill and Sue ??????
Blimey that sounds like the title of a homemade porn movie  :lol

2012 is gonna be fun!!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 13, 2012, 09:00:15 AM
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
When/where was this title announced?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on February 13, 2012, 09:07:50 AM
No cheesy surf titles so far.

Yea, like Kowabunga! It's Party Time or The Ballad of 'Ol Ho Dad and The Honey. Or, Surf's Up, USA.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on February 13, 2012, 09:08:05 AM
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
When/where was this title announced?

I think it was announced here first: http://www.knoxville.com/news/2011/oct/14/wayne-bledsoe-brian-wilson-on-disney-songs-and/?partner=RSS

Could the admins put a pin on this topic so we can keep new album info in one spot??  :)

New Beach Boys album featuring all the guys!! Who would've thought, hey?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 13, 2012, 09:31:56 AM
Correction -- mike isn't producing the album with Brian. He is the executive producer, which is a largely honorary title meaning he probably has some say in song selection, sequencing or general creative direction.

The last we've heard anything quasi-official, BW was producing the album with Joe Thomas. Joe hasn't shown up in recent studio shots, though, so his continued involvement is unclear.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joe_blow on February 13, 2012, 09:52:56 AM
The Private Life of Bill and Sue with lyrics by Van Dyke Parks?.....


Mike: "The Private Life if Bill and Sue, what does that title mean?"
VDP: "I don't know I haven't a clue."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on February 13, 2012, 09:57:24 AM
maybe it's "lazy lizzy" with updated lyrics with Bill following Sue home from school.."sexy suzie I want to see you again....."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SamMcK on February 13, 2012, 10:09:34 AM
That's Why God Made the Radio


Was I the only one that immediately thought of that song by Paul Simon, "That's Why God Made the Movies"? :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on February 13, 2012, 10:54:42 AM
That's Why God Made the Radio Was I the only one that immediately thought of that song by Paul Simon, "That's Why God Made the Movies"? :p


No , I thought of that song from One Trick Pony as well (great song though)
Might be a re-write however lets hope its a new song


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on February 13, 2012, 10:55:18 AM
"That's Why God Made the Radio"

Hmmm Another one of those that lists bands/artists that comprise the spirit of rock and roll?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: harrisonjon on February 13, 2012, 10:57:54 AM
Have any other BB's done any songwriting for this project?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 13, 2012, 10:58:57 AM
Love has mentioned he might work on some material with David, right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 13, 2012, 11:09:55 AM
Joe Thomas is mentioned here (thanks to That's Not Me for the link)

http://www.billboard.com/news/grammys-2012-19-things-you-didn-t-see-on-1006177472.story#/news/grammys-2012-19-things-you-didn-t-see-on-1006177472.story (http://www.billboard.com/news/grammys-2012-19-things-you-didn-t-see-on-1006177472.story#/news/grammys-2012-19-things-you-didn-t-see-on-1006177472.story)


EDIT:

here are two quotes from two different interviews about Mike wanting to work with Dave on some stuff. No title(s) mentioned, though.

Mike interview:

How's the album coming so far?
We have not done much on that. There have been some songs written and we have recorded on a few things, just a handful of things. The next couple months are going to be, that's going to be our to-do list. There's a lot of creativity coming from myself, coming from Brian. David Marks has a title I really like, so I'm going to work with him on that

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/exclusive-mike-love-talks-beach-boys-50th-anniversary-tour-20111219#ixzz1mI6ySSvV



David interview:

BBE:  What do you envision your contributions to the new album being?
DM: Well, I’ve already recorded a couple of guitar parts and I’m looking forward to more time in the studio.  Mike has heard some of my new songs and likes a couple of them, so I’m optimistic we’ll work together on one of those. There is no shortage of great material so I’ll have to see, but I’m all about being a team player this time around so I’m happy to play whatever role I’m needed to fill.

Continue reading on Examiner.com David Marks is ready to 'Do It Again' - National Beach Boys | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/beach-boys-in-national/david-marks-is-ready-to-do-it-again#ixzz1mI7Dm6uv


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on February 13, 2012, 11:32:46 AM
Quote
Could the admins put a pin on this topic so we can keep new album info in one spot??

Sounds like a plan


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 13, 2012, 01:06:22 PM
That's Why God Made the Radio Was I the only one that immediately thought of that song by Paul Simon, "That's Why God Made the Movies"? :p


No , I thought of that song from One Trick Pony as well (great song though)
Might be a re-write however lets hope its a new song

.... And I thought of No Wrong Notes in Heaven by Scotty Bennett.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 13, 2012, 04:09:44 PM
Love has mentioned he might work on some material with David, right?


...and didn't Mike like something David came up with and thought it may make a great album title?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 13, 2012, 04:21:55 PM
No, Mike's use of the word "title" in the RS interview means "song." Not title for the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 13, 2012, 04:22:23 PM
That's Why God Made the Radio Was I the only one that immediately thought of that song by Paul Simon, "That's Why God Made the Movies"? :p


No , I thought of that song from One Trick Pony as well (great song though)
Might be a re-write however lets hope its a new song

.... And I thought of No Wrong Notes in Heaven by Scotty Bennett.

Scotty Bennett and Brian Wilson, actually.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on February 13, 2012, 06:34:51 PM
I love "No Wrong Notes in Heaven"! It would be a great one for the BBs to record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joe_blow on February 13, 2012, 08:15:35 PM
Bill Jackson?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on February 14, 2012, 04:22:07 AM
That's Why God Made the Radio Was I the only one that immediately thought of that song by Paul Simon, "That's Why God Made the Movies"? :p


No , I thought of that song from One Trick Pony as well (great song though)
Might be a re-write however lets hope its a new song

.... And I thought of No Wrong Notes in Heaven by Scotty Bennett.


Scotty Bennett and Brian Wilson, actually.


"No Wrong Notes In Heaven" made its initial appearance on ESQ's 2003 Dennis Wilson tribute CD, "One In A Million."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on February 14, 2012, 04:30:13 AM
"That's Why God Made The Radio" sounds worlds closer to being something Summer In Paradise-esque than any classic Beach Boys track. I'm wary, but then I realize it's just a song title, so we'll see.

"The Private Life of Bill And Sue", on the other hand, sounds purty interesting.

Mike, God bless 'im, being named executive producer is a little scary, as well. I love 'im to death, but I can't think of many Mike Love-centric projects in the past that I've been a huge fan of. Obviously "executive producer" is a bit ambiguous, but it's generally the guy who have the most authority over what goes, what stays, how it should sound, how it should be presented, etc. etc. etc. "Do It Again" goes down well enough, so hay, we'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 14, 2012, 05:12:42 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:



FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on February 14, 2012, 05:54:51 AM
I'm gonna guess Bruce is playing that God/Radio tune....sounds like there is a lot of buzz surrounding that track  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on February 14, 2012, 05:57:42 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:



FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on February 14, 2012, 06:06:35 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:



FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?

Lets just say thanks to the happy sounds inside its sure to sell a million units, in January


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 14, 2012, 07:11:10 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:

FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?

Meaning, I think, that they're getting on a bit age-wise, are content, living in the moment and just aren't concerned with making an album that appeals to the mass market. They're letting their artistic juices flow, enjoying themselves, and have enough money in the bank for album sales not to matter - they can just make music that pleases them, and hopefully us.




I hope…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on February 14, 2012, 07:29:23 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:

FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?

Meaning, I think, that they're getting on a bit age-wise, are content, living in the moment and just aren't concerned with making an album that appeals to the mass market. They're letting their artistic juices flow, enjoying themselves, and have enough money in the bank for album sales not to matter - they can just make music that pleases them, and hopefully us.




I hope…
I see it as Brian and Mike contractually having artistic control of this project; as such, the record company will be bound to accept and release whatever is delivered to them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 14, 2012, 10:35:41 AM
That Bruce quote sounds great.  I'm really thankful they're not singles-driven here.  I pray that Mike has restrained himself from dropping more Beach Boy song titles in the lyrics.... "We were good vibratin' on a Grammy stage, thinking wouldn't it be nice to do it again???"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: D409 on February 14, 2012, 11:01:55 AM
That Bruce quote sounds great.  I'm really thankful they're not singles-driven here.  I pray that Mike has restrained himself from dropping more Beach Boy song titles in the lyrics.... "We were good vibratin' on a Grammy stage, thinking wouldn't it be nice to do it again???"


Don't tempt him !  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 14, 2012, 11:50:30 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:

FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?

Meaning, I think, that they're getting on a bit age-wise, are content, living in the moment and just aren't concerned with making an album that appeals to the mass market. They're letting their artistic juices flow, enjoying themselves, and have enough money in the bank for album sales not to matter - they can just make music that pleases them, and hopefully us.




I hope…
I see it as Brian and Mike contractually having artistic control of this project; as such, the record company will be bound to accept and release whatever is delivered to them.

I see it as Brian viewed PS's. It was the whole album rather than a hit or hits with filler. Nice if that turns out to be the case.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on February 14, 2012, 05:12:41 PM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

"THE BEACH BOYS HAVE FOUR REUNION TRACKS IN THE CAN
 
 
2012 will be the year that the surviving Beach Boys hit the road behind a new album for the first time in over 25 years. Over the course of their press duties publicizing their brief -- but acclaimed -- appearance on Sunday's (February 12th) Grammy telecast, the band revealed several titles of new songs, which have already whetted the appetite of fans.

The preeminent Beach Boys message board, SmileySmile.net, posted that a total of four newly recorded tracks have been announced: "Shelter," "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue," "That's Why God Made The Radio" -- and the group's initial reunion track, the remake of their 1968 classic "Do It Again," which the band laid down last June.
No title or release date for the set has been made public, but the Beach Boys' tour itinerary will be announced tomorrow (February 15th). The Beach Boys are: Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, David Marks, and Bruce Johnston.
 
We asked Brian Wilson if he was happy with the way the group gelled in the studio after 15 years apart: ["Oh yeah, I was thrilled! Not one of those guys needs any work -- they're all great. Yeah, they're all good."] SOUNDCUE (:04 OC: . . . they're all good)
Beach Boys co-founder Al Jardine met Brian Wilson when they were both in high school in Southern California playing on the Hawthorne Cougars football team back in the late 1950's. He told us that even as teens Wilson's talent was always there: ["Brian was like a divining rod. Whenever he touched the keys to that piano, something happened and I don't even think he understands it."] SOUNDCUE (:07 OC: . . . he understands it)
FAST FACTS
 
The Beach Boys' only officially announced shows in the U.S. are set for April 27th at the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival and May 12th in Uncasville, Connecticut at the Mohegan Sun Arena."
 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on February 14, 2012, 05:17:19 PM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

"THE BEACH BOYS HAVE FOUR REUNION TRACKS IN THE CAN
 
 
2012 will be the year that the surviving Beach Boys hit the road behind a new album for the first time in over 25 years. Over the course of their press duties publicizing their brief -- but acclaimed -- appearance on Sunday's (February 12th) Grammy telecast, the band revealed several titles of new songs, which have already whetted the appetite of fans.

The preeminent Beach Boys message board, SmileySmile.net, posted that a total of four newly recorded tracks have been announced: "Shelter," "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue," "That's Why God Made The Radio" -- and the group's initial reunion track, the remake of their 1968 classic "Do It Again," which the band laid down last June.
No title or release date for the set has been made public, but the Beach Boys' tour itinerary will be announced tomorrow (February 15th). The Beach Boys are: Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, David Marks, and Bruce Johnston.
 
We asked Brian Wilson if he was happy with the way the group gelled in the studio after 15 years apart: ["Oh yeah, I was thrilled! Not one of those guys needs any work -- they're all great. Yeah, they're all good."] SOUNDCUE (:04 OC: . . . they're all good)
Beach Boys co-founder Al Jardine met Brian Wilson when they were both in high school in Southern California playing on the Hawthorne Cougars football team back in the late 1950's. He told us that even as teens Wilson's talent was always there: ["Brian was like a divining rod. Whenever he touched the keys to that piano, something happened and I don't even think he understands it."] SOUNDCUE (:07 OC: . . . he understands it)
FAST FACTS
 
The Beach Boys' only officially announced shows in the U.S. are set for April 27th at the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival and May 12th in Uncasville, Connecticut at the Mohegan Sun Arena."
 

Definite  :lol  :lol  :lol  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 14, 2012, 05:19:03 PM
So who wants to bump this old thread of mine....?  :lol

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,8854.0.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on February 14, 2012, 07:58:02 PM
just one bruce??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 14, 2012, 11:40:45 PM
Guys....

I really want this to be good


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on February 15, 2012, 12:40:18 AM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 15, 2012, 01:07:33 AM
Sometimes having AGD around is a good thing...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on February 15, 2012, 02:57:43 AM
This was posted by Bruce on BBBritain:

FYI: The album we are recording has some amazing moments and we are not driven by the stress of 'are there any hit singles in the new album'......
But there is one Brian song that I play over & over & over!
As in "we don't care" or "there are plenty of them"?

Meaning, I think, that they're getting on a bit age-wise, are content, living in the moment and just aren't concerned with making an album that appeals to the mass market. They're letting their artistic juices flow, enjoying themselves, and have enough money in the bank for album sales not to matter - they can just make music that pleases them, and hopefully us.




I hope…
Sounds good to me.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on February 15, 2012, 09:49:04 AM
Sometimes having AGD around is a good thing...

he's just a big cuddly teddy bear!

 >:D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on February 15, 2012, 10:37:04 AM

Mike, God bless 'im, being named executive producer is a little scary, as well. I love 'im to death, but I can't think of many Mike Love-centric projects in the past that I've been a huge fan of. Obviously "executive producer" is a bit ambiguous, but it's generally the guy who have the most authority over what goes, what stays, how it should sound, how it should be presented, etc. etc. etc. "Do It Again" goes down well enough, so hay, we'll see.

+1   

I hope there's a Quality Control system in place apart from the Executive Producer.  And considering the participants, there is probably a team of lawyers who have to approve the final product.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 15, 2012, 11:38:38 AM

Mike, God bless 'im, being named executive producer is a little scary, as well. I love 'im to death, but I can't think of many Mike Love-centric projects in the past that I've been a huge fan of. Obviously "executive producer" is a bit ambiguous, but it's generally the guy who have the most authority over what goes, what stays, how it should sound, how it should be presented, etc. etc. etc. "Do It Again" goes down well enough, so hay, we'll see.

+1   

I hope there's a Quality Control system in place apart from the Executive Producer.  And considering the participants, there is probably a team of lawyers who have to approve the final product.
Probably truer than we know, too. ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on February 15, 2012, 04:37:03 PM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol

Yeah, if they were quoting AGD, Jon S. or other honored guests.

They haven't.  Haven't heard AGD confirm those titles (cept Do It Again of course)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bossaroo on February 15, 2012, 08:48:43 PM
wasn't Mike "executive producer" of the Pet Sounds Sessions?

it's like a little paper crown he can wear so he feels important.


i think it would be cool if Do It Again doesn't make it onto the album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on February 15, 2012, 10:00:55 PM
Usually 'executive producer' is the 'money man'. Most of the time it's just an honorary title. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on February 15, 2012, 11:28:00 PM
I'm sure I'm not the only one here who is both excited and very apprehensive re this album. 'Do It Again' on the (suspected) line-up is kind of playing to all my worst fears, i.e. that it'll be a mawkish, regressive and corny, an album worth of 'Brian is Back's'. Let's hope they're genuinely more concerned with producing something credible than commercial. It's taken a fair while for the BB's legacy to get where it is now after the awful '80's, and now they're probably more highly critically respected than ever, after SMiLE etc. Don't ruin it guys! 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 12:28:03 AM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol

Yeah, if they were quoting AGD, Jon S. or other honored guests.

They haven't.  Haven't heard AGD confirm those titles (cept Do It Again of course)

"Shelter" & "Bob & Sue" have been mentioned to me by one of my better sources. Dudes name was... Cohen, or something like that.

Personally, being the fact freak I am, I'll be fascinated to see if all the new material is indeed new, as in newly composed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 12:28:58 AM
Sometimes having AGD around is a good thing...

he's just a big cuddly teddy bear!

 >:D

And getting bigger...  :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 16, 2012, 12:59:52 AM
Sometimes having AGD around is a good thing...

he's just a big cuddly teddy bear!

 >:D

And getting bigger...  :(

There can't be enough Doe in the world.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 16, 2012, 01:33:24 AM
wasn't Mike "executive producer" of the Pet Sounds Sessions?

it's like a little paper crown he can wear so he feels important.

i think it would be cool if Do It Again doesn't make it onto the album

I think they should already have punted Do It Again to radio stations etc to ride the Grammy publicity bandwagon. At least then the jocks would have had something to play to go with the Grammy news.  It's a treat to release the vid for fans, for sure, but they could also have put the thing to work for them…  Maybe they have…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 16, 2012, 02:38:08 AM


I think they should already have punted Do It Again to radio stations etc to ride the Grammy publicity bandwagon. At least then the jocks would have had something to play to go with the Grammy news.  It's a treat to release the vid for fans, for sure, but they could also have put the thing to work for them…  Maybe they have…
[/quot


Maybe they have a better single in mind. Or it's simply too early. If they release a single too far in advance of the album, it might work
against them.

I wonder  if the actual leaks of song titles, or other info, is actually a few steps behind actual developments. They are saying four songs are in
the can, but maybe it's more by now. Maybe they will record 20 tracks and whittle it down to the best ten. Who knows?

Andrew Doe just gave us a clue, when he said something about, I wonder if they are all new songs as in recently composed.
I would suspect a few old songs or old song ideas that were never completed are likely to be pulled out of the old song bag,
in addition to some songs that are being composed now, or very recently composed.

I say that because historically Wilson and the Beach Boys have released new albums, with unreleased songs from years before.
Also because Andrew Doe is kind of hinting about that.

I was so excited about the Smile release, and I am equally excited about this new album. In a span of two years, less than two years,
The Beach Boys are giving us the mythical Smile and a brand new album! How damm cool is that!

Is there a number I can call to ask them to hurry up, why is the Do it Again video not on Youtube anymore ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 02:47:52 AM
As stated on this forum, the "DIA" video was leaked without the permission of BRI or anyone involved.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 16, 2012, 03:11:51 AM
As stated on this forum, the "DIA" video was leaked without the permission of BRI or anyone involved.


I did not know that, I don't have time to read everything.

Thats cool, yeah it's just all so exciting, I can't wait to hear the new album. I sincerely hope
there are several new video's associated with the album, and that they are available in some
type of deluxe version of the album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 16, 2012, 05:16:42 AM
As stated on this forum, the "DIA" video was leaked without the permission of BRI or anyone involved.


I did not know that, I don't have time to read everything.

Thats cool, yeah it's just all so exciting, I can't wait to hear the new album. I sincerely hope
there are several new video's associated with the album, and that they are available in some
type of deluxe version of the album

Sure. A 5-CD box, with a double LP version, two singles, a case-bound book, a photo book, a poster, and oh, 100+ other items.

I blame Mike.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 16, 2012, 05:30:23 AM
…why is the Do it Again video not on Youtube anymore ?

What YouTube you looking at?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23U7kegA5gc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23U7kegA5gc)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 16, 2012, 05:44:56 AM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol

Yeah, if they were quoting AGD, Jon S. or other honored guests.

They haven't.  Haven't heard AGD confirm those titles (cept Do It Again of course)

"Shelter" & "Bob & Sue" have been mentioned to me by one of my better sources. Dudes name was... Cohen, or something like that.

Personally, being the fact freak I am, I'll be fascinated to see if all the new material is indeed new, as in newly composed.

This of course might have been putting people off the scent, but studio shots of BW last summer did say he was working on re-recording unreleased material with Joe Thomas, right?

Personally, if they do resurrect anything, it should be Chain Reaction of Love.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 16, 2012, 07:27:27 AM
All this about the new album, has reminded me of an obvious question.

Will a couple of archival tracks be used in a manner similar to Soul Searchin
so that Carl and or Dennis Wilson will be on the album ?

I have no prediction, but I really am curious about it, I thought
Soul Searchin on the Gettin In Over My Head album was good.
I was surprised there was archival material of that quality lying
around unused. It wasn't the greatest track I ever heard, by any
means, but it was one of the better cuts on that album IMO


I can't stand the anticipation, so ok, semi confirmed sources say
there are four tracks in the can, So depending how fresh that information
is, there could easily be a couple more by now.

Bruce Johnston, was quoted saying, he keeps playing the one cut over
and over again, somebody should just ask him to be a pal, and post a 
30 second clip! or at least give us the name of the one he likes.

So Wilson cuts the backing tracks and then the guys fly in to sing their
parts, like the pet sounds days ? I would tend to doubt that, because
Love and Marks are quoted as saying, they are involved in writing some
material, so if it was your song wouldn't you at least be at the studio
through the whole process?

If Johnston is in England, does that mean no recording is going on until
he flies back to the states or is that a misconception on my part.

If they only have four in the can, I hope they hold a couple sessions and
get that number up so they have a realistic chance of getting it out by
late summer. I wish we could get a little more info. I guess its still too early
I am expecting a second single to follow DIA closer to release time, that
just seems obvious.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 16, 2012, 07:38:33 AM
We don't know how many songs are in the can.  We've simply heard rumors of four titles.  They have been recording off and on for awhile.  David was just in the studio putting down some guitar on some track the other day.  Darian was in the studio with Brian the other day.  Who cares what song it is that Bruce likes.  We can't hear it yet anyway.  And he's not in England, he lives in California.  Mike has mentioned that he'd like to write some stuff, but we haven't heard of anything definite.  Same with Dave.  We'll get more info when they want us to have more info.  I'll repeat something here that I had to repeat over and over when we were waiting for info on TSS...Patience.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lee on February 16, 2012, 07:53:07 AM
Is DIA definitely going to be on the new album? Seems strange to me to have a new album of new material and then one re-recorded song thrown on there.

I think it would be a cool idea to keep DIA off of the new album and release it as a colored 7" single. Maybe with a re-recorded Friends or a live in studio track as the b side.  That would make for a great Record Store Day release this year.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 16, 2012, 07:55:19 AM
We don't know how many songs are in the can.  We've simply heard rumors of four titles.  They have been recording off and on for awhile.  David was just in the studio putting down some guitar on some track the other day.  Darian was in the studio with Brian the other day.  Who cares what song it is that Bruce likes.  We can't hear it yet anyway.  And he's not in England, he lives in California.  Mike has mentioned that he'd like to write some stuff, but we haven't heard of anything definite.  Same with Dave.  We'll get more info when they want us to have more info.  I'll repeat something here that I had to repeat over and over when we were waiting for info on TSS...Patience.


Right you are. I have no idea about anything. I got excited about the "four songs in the can" and the Johnston remark, about the one tune.
Then I watch the DIA video, and get pumped up some more.

I don't even know what methods or procedures they use, if Brian cuts the tracks, and then they come in, or its different for
every track or what. If they cut just enough, or prune it down from lots of tracks.

It's way too early, I need to chill, and wait two or three months. for some news.

The only thing is I cant help it, I have a feeling the album could be special. DIA sounds good, they sounded good on the Grammys
and I need to wait, I feel they were pretty cool about dribbling out info for the fans on Smile, and It looks like they are gonna continue
spoonfeeding the faithful with a few tidbits, AGD will see we know something



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 08:13:54 AM
If Johnston is in England, does that mean no recording is going on until
he flies back to the states or is that a misconception on my part.

Serious misconception ! Bruce is in California, where he's been since the last tour ended.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bossaroo on February 16, 2012, 08:51:14 AM

I think it would be a cool idea to keep DIA off of the new album and release it as a colored 7" single. Maybe with a re-recorded Friends

a re-recorded Friends would be so cool


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 16, 2012, 10:01:23 AM
Some studio shots (from facebook)


(http://www.thebeachboys.ch/Galerie/albums/userpics/421054_250829961662519_125419450870238_559488_1597365785_n.jpg)


(http://www.thebeachboys.ch/Galerie/albums/userpics/398657_304759406249028_100001449127373_877335_1605484069_n.jpg)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 16, 2012, 10:07:29 AM
Al and Bruce both standing on boxes.  Just like the old days.  8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 16, 2012, 10:09:12 AM
I wonder what they're discussing while sitting in a circle?

And cue everyone posting fake dialogue for this picture in 3...2..1...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 12:30:23 PM
We don't know how many songs are in the can.  We've simply heard rumors of four titles.  They have been recording off and on for awhile.  David was just in the studio putting down some guitar on some track the other day.  Darian was in the studio with Brian the other day.  Who cares what song it is that Bruce likes.  We can't hear it yet anyway.  And he's not in England, he lives in California.  Mike has mentioned that he'd like to write some stuff, but we haven't heard of anything definite.  Same with Dave.  We'll get more info when they want us to have more info.  I'll repeat something here that I had to repeat over and over when we were waiting for info on TSS...Patience.


Right you are. I have no idea about anything. I got excited about the "four songs in the can" and the Johnston remark, about the one tune.
Then I watch the DIA video, and get pumped up some more.

I don't even know what methods or procedures they use, if Brian cuts the tracks, and then they come in, or its different for
every track or what. If they cut just enough, or prune it down from lots of tracks.

It's way too early, I need to chill, and wait two or three months. for some news.

The only thing is I cant help it, I have a feeling the album could be special. DIA sounds good, they sounded good on the Grammys
and I need to wait, I feel they were pretty cool about dribbling out info for the fans on Smile, and It looks like they are gonna continue
spoonfeeding the faithful with a few tidbits, AGD will see we know something



So here's the deal.

1.) Brian started recording backing tracks for some sort of project last year. This was documented by several sources.

2.) Eddie Bayers, a session player used by Imagination co-producer Joe Thomas, tweeted that he was working on new BW material.

3.) Jean Seivers, Brian's publicist, said at the time that Brian was recording some previously unreleased but already written material at Joe's studio in Illinois.

4.) In subsequent interviews, Brian talked about having written new songs, including the Shelter and Bill and Sue tunes, but in collaboration with Joe Thomas and Jeff.

5.) The Do It Again sessions likewise took place in the middle of last year.

6.) All of this happened before there was any news of an official reunion.

7.) Once that came out, news of the album started flowing fast and furious. There has been no more mention of Joe Thomas as a co-producer, but he is mentioned as co-writer of the God / Radio song.

8.) The group apparently recorded on some of Brian's stuff before the end of 2011, and they have obviously been going at it over the last month or so.

9.) Mike and Brian were writing a song in the studio a week or two ago, according to Andrew.

10.) Dave and Mike have some songs they have brought to the project and hope to include as well.

So, taking these 10 points together, let's draw some conclusions.

It seems likely that tracks for the album were recorded throughout last year by Brian, Joe and Jeff. It is probably relatively quick and easy for the group to put vocals on top of those and finish them up. Even if they only managed 4 or 5 titles, they could have finished a third to half of the album this way.

Some of those tracks might well be trunk songs, dating back to the 70s, 80s or 90s. We had official word that Brian was working on some older tunes. Now, whether those are older tunes fans are familiar with or not, who knows.

It also seems clear that Brian and Mike are doing some on-the-spot writing. So a track or two (or three) on the final album could well come from these last couple of months' worth of sessions. Is Joe Thomas involved? No one knows. But given that Darian has been shown in the studio, it looks like some of Brian's band is.

Finally, you have material from Mike and Dave. (Al and Bruce haven't said anything about contributing). So perhaps a couple of tracks on the finished album could come from them.

Therefore, I'd predict a finished album along these lines:

Ocean Way
The Beach Boys (Capitol, 2012)

Do It Again 2012
Shelter (JT session)
Black Widow (with lyrics rewritten by Mike)
The Private Life of Bill and Sue (JT session)
New Mike song (possibly with a BW credit added for cred)
That's Why God Made the Radio (JT session)
Dancin' the Night Away (possibly with Carl's voice kept)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
New Dave M. song (with ML and BW credits added)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
Still A Mystery (JT session)

Now, the exact old songs being used will probably be different. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if we ended up with something like this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on February 16, 2012, 12:51:56 PM
I just wanted to point out that the Facebook photo of the band standing around the microphone is clearly staged for the "Do It Again" video (note the production lights) and should not be considered representative of the band recording the new album. The boxes could be there simply to elevate the shorter members to improve shot composition and may have nothing to do with recording.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 16, 2012, 01:00:49 PM
(http://www.thebeachboys.ch/Galerie/albums/userpics/398657_304759406249028_100001449127373_877335_1605484069_n.jpg)


So you agree Mike and Bruce get Stamos if Brian gets Foskett? Ok. Lets move on to clause 112 subsection 15a.  'Mike to make no mention of Brians footwear Jan1-Dec 31 2012.'
 



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 01:08:36 PM
We don't know how many songs are in the can.  We've simply heard rumors of four titles.  They have been recording off and on for awhile.  David was just in the studio putting down some guitar on some track the other day.  Darian was in the studio with Brian the other day.  Who cares what song it is that Bruce likes.  We can't hear it yet anyway.  And he's not in England, he lives in California.  Mike has mentioned that he'd like to write some stuff, but we haven't heard of anything definite.  Same with Dave.  We'll get more info when they want us to have more info.  I'll repeat something here that I had to repeat over and over when we were waiting for info on TSS...Patience.


Right you are. I have no idea about anything. I got excited about the "four songs in the can" and the Johnston remark, about the one tune.
Then I watch the DIA video, and get pumped up some more.

I don't even know what methods or procedures they use, if Brian cuts the tracks, and then they come in, or its different for
every track or what. If they cut just enough, or prune it down from lots of tracks.

It's way too early, I need to chill, and wait two or three months. for some news.

The only thing is I cant help it, I have a feeling the album could be special. DIA sounds good, they sounded good on the Grammys
and I need to wait, I feel they were pretty cool about dribbling out info for the fans on Smile, and It looks like they are gonna continue
spoonfeeding the faithful with a few tidbits, AGD will see we know something



So here's the deal.

1.) Brian started recording backing tracks for some sort of project last year. This was documented by several sources.

2.) Eddie Bayers, a session player used by Imagination co-producer Joe Thomas, tweeted that he was working on new BW material.

3.) Jean Seivers, Brian's publicist, said at the time that Brian was recording some previously unreleased but already written material at Joe's studio in Illinois.

4.) In subsequent interviews, Brian talked about having written new songs, including the Shelter and Bill and Sue tunes, but in collaboration with Joe Thomas and Jeff.

5.) The Do It Again sessions likewise took place in the middle of last year.

6.) All of this happened before there was any news of an official reunion.

7.) Once that came out, news of the album started flowing fast and furious. There has been no more mention of Joe Thomas as a co-producer, but he is mentioned as co-writer of the God / Radio song.

8.) The group apparently recorded on some of Brian's stuff before the end of 2011, and they have obviously been going at it over the last month or so.

9.) Mike and Brian were writing a song in the studio a week or two ago, according to Andrew.

10.) Dave and Mike have some songs they have brought to the project and hope to include as well.

So, taking these 10 points together, let's draw some conclusions.

It seems likely that tracks for the album were recorded throughout last year by Brian, Joe and Jeff. It is probably relatively quick and easy for the group to put vocals on top of those and finish them up. Even if they only managed 4 or 5 titles, they could have finished a third to half of the album this way.

Some of those tracks might well be trunk songs, dating back to the 70s, 80s or 90s. We had official word that Brian was working on some older tunes. Now, whether those are older tunes fans are familiar with or not, who knows.

It also seems clear that Brian and Mike are doing some on-the-spot writing. So a track or two (or three) on the final album could well come from these last couple of months' worth of sessions. Is Joe Thomas involved? No one knows. But given that Darian has been shown in the studio, it looks like some of Brian's band is.

Finally, you have material from Mike and Dave. (Al and Bruce haven't said anything about contributing). So perhaps a couple of tracks on the finished album could come from them.

Therefore, I'd predict a finished album along these lines:

Ocean Way
The Beach Boys (Capitol, 2012)

Do It Again 2012
Shelter (JT session)
Black Widow (with lyrics rewritten by Mike)
The Private Life of Bill and Sue (JT session)
New Mike song (possibly with a BW credit added for cred)
That's Why God Made the Radio (JT session)
Dancin' the Night Away (possibly with Carl's voice kept)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
New Dave M. song (with ML and BW credits added)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
Still A Mystery (JT session)

Now, the exact old songs being used will probably be different. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if we ended up with something like this.

I'd hope for more than 10 tracks, and some better 'archive' reworkings. Plus something representing Dennis.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 01:23:04 PM
Not to nitpick, but there are 11 tracks there. Given the time pressures, how many more do you think they could realistically finish, mix and master for a June-ish release?

As for archival stuff, I was thinking that the Boys might go back to the mid-90s just for the chance to get a couple of Carl vocals. Dancin' isn't great, but it is a BW/ML co-write, correct? Black Widow was a total shot in the dark. Maybe they'll go with Adult Child material instead.  ;D

Finally, I understand the desire for a Dennis tribute, but I don't know how it would work. Dennis's songs wouldn't really fit. What else is in the can that could be used for an album like this that wouldn't work better on an all-archival release?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 16, 2012, 02:36:40 PM
Finally, I understand the desire for a Dennis tribute, but I don't know how it would work. Dennis's songs wouldn't really fit. What else is in the can that could be used for an album like this that wouldn't work better on an all-archival release?

You know I hate to be a downer, but one good reason for not including any of Dennis's material might be that it'd show the rest up.

And we can't have that…  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on February 16, 2012, 03:01:01 PM
Not to nitpick, but there are 11 tracks there. Given the time pressures, how many more do you think they could realistically finish, mix and master for a June-ish release?

As for archival stuff, I was thinking that the Boys might go back to the mid-90s just for the chance to get a couple of Carl vocals. Dancin' isn't great, but it is a BW/ML co-write, correct? Black Widow was a total shot in the dark. Maybe they'll go with Adult Child material instead.  ;D

Finally, I understand the desire for a Dennis tribute, but I don't know how it would work. Dennis's songs wouldn't really fit. What else is in the can that could be used for an album like this that wouldn't work better on an all-archival release?

I'd rather hear "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" in its original, archival form but maybe it's not outside the realm of possibility they'd rework it for a new album.  What would be cooler, maybe, would be doing vocals for "I've Got a Friend".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on February 16, 2012, 03:08:56 PM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol

Yeah, if they were quoting AGD, Jon S. or other honored guests.

They haven't.  Haven't heard AGD confirm those titles (cept Do It Again of course)

"Shelter" & "Bob & Sue" have been mentioned to me by one of my better sources. Dudes name was... Cohen, or something like that.

Personally, being the fact freak I am, I'll be fascinated to see if all the new material is indeed new, as in newly composed.

I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GoodToMyBaby on February 16, 2012, 03:19:25 PM
I think this is hilarious  :lol :lol :lol :lol

The  B104 FM music news page is now quoting this board, and it's posts, as an official news source on the new album.
http://www.b104fm.com/musicnews.htm

 
You haven't hung around here long have you?  Some of the guys here can spot a recycled riff a measure away

Hey, were more legit than most news sources  :lol

Yeah, if they were quoting AGD, Jon S. or other honored guests.

They haven't.  Haven't heard AGD confirm those titles (cept Do It Again of course)

"Shelter" & "Bob & Sue" have been mentioned to me by one of my better sources. Dudes name was... Cohen, or something like that.

Personally, being the fact freak I am, I'll be fascinated to see if all the new material is indeed new, as in newly composed.

I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 16, 2012, 03:30:15 PM
I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.

Unless you've heard it before somewhere, of course.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on February 16, 2012, 03:47:04 PM
I hope Brian reworked "Oh Lord", however I highly doubt that, there are probably a lot of things he doesn't want reminding of in that song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Firemellow on February 16, 2012, 04:48:15 PM
Just to clarify,  Bill and Sue are

Wonderbill and Susie Cincinnati, all grown up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Melt Away on February 16, 2012, 05:49:08 PM
Mike messaged me back on the post I put on his Facebook saying "In the studio as we speak.". So at least we know they're doing more recording  ;D! I'm really hoping this album is out before the tour starts!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 06:56:53 PM
The tour starts in fewer than 70 days. I think they could probably finish recording in that time, but I doubt the album could be mixed, mastered, designed, promoted and ready for release in that time.

I might be wrong, but I would expect the album in June or July. Possibly May if they go all out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on February 16, 2012, 07:33:04 PM
Not to nitpick, but there are 11 tracks there. Given the time pressures, how many more do you think they could realistically finish, mix and master for a June-ish release?

Really hard to estimate without knowing how many they've already recorded, how many they've already written, who all is contributing songwriting, and what the average production value of a song is going to be on the album.

Obviously, if it's going to be Pet Sounds II, the individual songs are probably going to take longer than if it's a couple elaborate Brian songs and the rest are surfin' songs.  If they use as much auto-tune as they did on the  "Do It Again" video, they can probably crank out the vocals pretty quick.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 07:44:35 PM
Really hard to estimate without knowing how many they've already recorded, how many they've already written, who all is contributing songwriting

Quite so.

I would expect, though, that the album is 90 percent (if not more) Brian Wilson-written material. The market demands it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 16, 2012, 10:16:30 PM
Do you guys think the whole album will sound like the new Do It Again?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 16, 2012, 10:34:59 PM
We don't know how many songs are in the can.  We've simply heard rumors of four titles.  They have been recording off and on for awhile.  David was just in the studio putting down some guitar on some track the other day.  Darian was in the studio with Brian the other day.  Who cares what song it is that Bruce likes.  We can't hear it yet anyway.  And he's not in England, he lives in California.  Mike has mentioned that he'd like to write some stuff, but we haven't heard of anything definite.  Same with Dave.  We'll get more info when they want us to have more info.  I'll repeat something here that I had to repeat over and over when we were waiting for info on TSS...Patience.


Right you are. I have no idea about anything. I got excited about the "four songs in the can" and the Johnston remark, about the one tune.
Then I watch the DIA video, and get pumped up some more.

I don't even know what methods or procedures they use, if Brian cuts the tracks, and then they come in, or its different for
every track or what. If they cut just enough, or prune it down from lots of tracks.

It's way too early, I need to chill, and wait two or three months. for some news.

The only thing is I cant help it, I have a feeling the album could be special. DIA sounds good, they sounded good on the Grammys
and I need to wait, I feel they were pretty cool about dribbling out info for the fans on Smile, and It looks like they are gonna continue
spoonfeeding the faithful with a few tidbits, AGD will see we know something



So here's the deal.

1.) Brian started recording backing tracks for some sort of project last year. This was documented by several sources.

2.) Eddie Bayers, a session player used by Imagination co-producer Joe Thomas, tweeted that he was working on new BW material.

3.) Jean Seivers, Brian's publicist, said at the time that Brian was recording some previously unreleased but already written material at Joe's studio in Illinois.

4.) In subsequent interviews, Brian talked about having written new songs, including the Shelter and Bill and Sue tunes, but in collaboration with Joe Thomas and Jeff.

5.) The Do It Again sessions likewise took place in the middle of last year.

6.) All of this happened before there was any news of an official reunion.

7.) Once that came out, news of the album started flowing fast and furious. There has been no more mention of Joe Thomas as a co-producer, but he is mentioned as co-writer of the God / Radio song.

8.) The group apparently recorded on some of Brian's stuff before the end of 2011, and they have obviously been going at it over the last month or so.

9.) Mike and Brian were writing a song in the studio a week or two ago, according to Andrew.

10.) Dave and Mike have some songs they have brought to the project and hope to include as well.

So, taking these 10 points together, let's draw some conclusions.

It seems likely that tracks for the album were recorded throughout last year by Brian, Joe and Jeff. It is probably relatively quick and easy for the group to put vocals on top of those and finish them up. Even if they only managed 4 or 5 titles, they could have finished a third to half of the album this way.

Some of those tracks might well be trunk songs, dating back to the 70s, 80s or 90s. We had official word that Brian was working on some older tunes. Now, whether those are older tunes fans are familiar with or not, who knows.

It also seems clear that Brian and Mike are doing some on-the-spot writing. So a track or two (or three) on the final album could well come from these last couple of months' worth of sessions. Is Joe Thomas involved? No one knows. But given that Darian has been shown in the studio, it looks like some of Brian's band is.

Finally, you have material from Mike and Dave. (Al and Bruce haven't said anything about contributing). So perhaps a couple of tracks on the finished album could come from them.

Therefore, I'd predict a finished album along these lines:

Ocean Way
The Beach Boys (Capitol, 2012)

Do It Again 2012
Shelter (JT session)
Black Widow (with lyrics rewritten by Mike)
The Private Life of Bill and Sue (JT session)
New Mike song (possibly with a BW credit added for cred)
That's Why God Made the Radio (JT session)
Dancin' the Night Away (possibly with Carl's voice kept)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
New Dave M. song (with ML and BW credits added)
New Brian-Mike collaboration
Still A Mystery (JT session)

Now, the exact old songs being used will probably be different. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if we ended up with something like this.

I'd hope for more than 10 tracks, and some better 'archive' reworkings. Plus something representing Dennis.




THAT ALL SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE EDUCATED GUESS, INCLUDING AGD's CAVEAT

I WOULD GUESS THAT MAYBE THEY WILL TRY AND CUT A COUPLE EXTRA TRACKS AS BEST BUY OR ITUNES
EXCLUSIVES<,OR JUST TO HAVE A COUPLE EXTRA FOR SOME FUTURE COMPILATION BECAUSE LIKELY THEY WILL NEVER
CUT ANOTHER STUDIO ALBUM AT AGE 70

I WOULD GUESS YES, THEY WILL AT LEAST CONSIDER TRYING TO USE ONE OR TWO CARL WILSON PERFORMANCES

PERHAPS DENNIS WILSON IS CONSIDERED TO BE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY SAMPLED SOME OF HIS DRUMS OR PERCUSSION
ALREADY FOR DIA.

I AM THINKING THIS ALBUM WILL SOUND LIKE A RECENT BRIAN WILSON ALBUM< LUCKY OLD SUN OR SOMETHING WITH
BEACH BOYS VOCALS INSTEAD OF THE SOLO ALBUM GROUP , THAT IS, THE WILSON SOLO BAND VOCALS WITH ALL THOSE CATS>

I UH JUST HANDICAPPING , GUESSING WOULD THINK< THAT THERE WILL BE A BIT MORE MIKE LOVE BEACH BOYS SURFy GIRLS CAR STUFF
INFLUENCE< TO A DEGREE> BUT THEN AGAIN LUCKY OLD SUN< HAD FOREvER YOU'LL BE MY SURFER GIRL SO WHO IS KIDDING WHO
PET SOUNDS TWO, IN OUR DREAMS. MAYBE THEY SEEM KIND OF INSPIRED AND INTO IT, THEY HAVE TO REALiZE THIS MIGHT BE THE LAST
TIME THEY RECORD TOGETHER< THIS ALBUM IS GONNA BE GREAT!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 10:37:40 PM
Do you guys think the whole album will sound like the new Do It Again?

Instrumentally, probably not. If some backing tracks feature Joe Thomas's musicians, then expect something more adult contemporary (and Brian did call the album "mellow").

Vocally, I would expect it to be similar. It's the four guys plus Foskett (maybe David on a tune or two).

Brian's band may contribute some backing tracks too, which would mean something slightly less slick, although they're a pretty well-oiled ensemble themselves.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 16, 2012, 10:46:19 PM
Do you guys think the whole album will sound like the new Do It Again?

Instrumentally, probably not. If some backing tracks feature Joe Thomas's musicians, then expect something more adult contemporary (and Brian did call the album "mellow").

Vocally, I would expect it to be similar. It's the four guys plus Foskett (maybe David on a tune or two).

Brian's band may contribute some backing tracks too, which would mean something slightly less slick, although they're a pretty well-oiled ensemble themselves.

I don't know how I feel about that. I don't know if it would be better for the album to be strange but bad or decent but boring.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 16, 2012, 11:09:38 PM
How about half and half?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 16, 2012, 11:15:59 PM
They should just rerelease Love You and see if anybody notices....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on February 17, 2012, 12:09:46 AM
Do you guys think the whole album will sound like the new Do It Again?

Instrumentally, probably not. If some backing tracks feature Joe Thomas's musicians, then expect something more adult contemporary (and Brian did call the album "mellow").

Vocally, I would expect it to be similar. It's the four guys plus Foskett (maybe David on a tune or two).

Brian's band may contribute some backing tracks too, which would mean something slightly less slick, although they're a pretty well-oiled ensemble themselves.

I don't know how I feel about that. I don't know if it would be better for the album to be strange but bad or decent but boring.

If the boys put something down with passion and sincerity, it will make up for any unders or overs in the backing track department


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 17, 2012, 05:31:40 AM
Well Do It Again  was a quick fix arrangement and recording to test the waters - that could maybe explain the autotune, as time wasn't plentiful to get takes 'just so'. Hopefully the album has more thought and care put  into the arrangements of the new songs. It looks like, from the studio photos, that Brian's band is on them - we haven't seen any other musicians, right - and that is heartwarming. I  just hope rushing the album for a summer release doesn't mean it's, y'know, rushed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on February 17, 2012, 06:21:35 AM
I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.

If the recording is old, you can tell. There are specific sound characteristics to certain time frames. If the recording is new, you can't tell how old the song is if you haven't heard it before.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on February 17, 2012, 06:51:04 AM
Apart from SURFIN' SAFARI and SURFIN' USA, has there ever been a Beach Boys (or solo) album that did not utilize a melody, song or track that had been sitting around for a couple of years or more?

I would be surprised if the new album is completely new.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 17, 2012, 07:02:26 AM
I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.

If the recording is old, you can tell. There are specific sound characteristics to certain time frames. If the recording is new, you can't tell how old the song is if you haven't heard it before.

With todays technology, I believe you could take a song from the 80's or 90's and with new overdubs, it could sound
like a recent recording, which in fact, part of it would be new. It just depends on so many variables.

Autotune or no, rushed or not, I think the DIA remake sounds good, and it sounds remarkably like the Beach Boys, which
is not a given. The recent WHO album in 2006, didin't really sound ike them. McCartney and Ringo don't sound like the Beatles
most of the time, on their solo records. The new Three Dog Night songs don't sound like them.

What is the definition of rushed anyway? If you spend say a week or ten days on one fairly simple song, is that really rushed?
Sometimes if you spend a month or two on each song, you get overkill. It just depends, sometimes you get Good Vibrations,
but the technology was so different in 66-67 its not a fair comparison.

The only thing I have against the DIA remake is that it's a remake.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lee on February 17, 2012, 07:35:19 AM
I'll be happy to have a new Beach Boys album regardless, I just hope that the production isn't too slick.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 17, 2012, 09:57:51 AM
Apart from SURFIN' SAFARI and SURFIN' USA, has there ever been a Beach Boys (or solo) album that did not utilize a melody, song or track that had been sitting around for a couple of years or more?

I would be surprised if the new album is completely new.

Even they weren't 100% new -  "Surfin' USA" (the song) was hardly original, a fact not lost on Chuck Berry's lawyers, and of course the début album's title track was a re-recording (not forgetting "Surfin'", leased from Hite Morgan).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on February 17, 2012, 10:25:49 AM
Apart from SURFIN' SAFARI and SURFIN' USA, has there ever been a Beach Boys (or solo) album that did not utilize a melody, song or track that had been sitting around for a couple of years or more?

I would be surprised if the new album is completely new.

Even they weren't 100% new -  "Surfin' USA" (the song) was hardly original, a fact not lost on Chuck Berry's lawyers, and of course the début album's title track was a re-recording (not forgetting "Surfin'", leased from Hite Morgan).

Right. I guess I thought I would make an exception for material worked on within a year previously*.

*Using that barometer (and excluding albums that contained covers of songs released more than a year previously), I'm thinking ALL SUMMER LONG, FRIENDS and BEACH BOYS '85 (?) would be the only albums of all new original material that the band ever released!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 17, 2012, 10:48:37 AM
Apart from SURFIN' SAFARI and SURFIN' USA, has there ever been a Beach Boys (or solo) album that did not utilize a melody, song or track that had been sitting around for a couple of years or more?

I would be surprised if the new album is completely new.

Even they weren't 100% new -  "Surfin' USA" (the song) was hardly original, a fact not lost on Chuck Berry's lawyers, and of course the début album's title track was a re-recording (not forgetting "Surfin'", leased from Hite Morgan).

Right. I guess I thought I would make an exception for material worked on within a year previously*.

*Using that barometer (and excluding albums that contained covers of songs released more than a year previously), I'm thinking ALL SUMMER LONG, FRIENDS and BEACH BOYS '85 (?) would be the only albums of all new original material that the band ever released!

"Little Bird" has a "CIFTTM" riff... the track for "Drive-in" was cut at the 10/63 "LSN" sessions (thus could well have David on it), while "Do You Remember" was roughed out as "The Big Beat" at least a year earlier... and "California Calling" has been carbon dated to 1982 9composition, not recording)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 11:26:07 AM
Well Do It Again  was a quick fix arrangement and recording to test the waters - that could maybe explain the autotune, as time wasn't plentiful to get takes 'just so'. Hopefully the album has more thought and care put  into the arrangements of the new songs. It looks like, from the studio photos, that Brian's band is on them - we haven't seen any other musicians, right - and that is heartwarming. I  just hope rushing the album for a summer release doesn't mean it's, y'know, rushed.

As I stated in my compilation post, we have reason to believe that Joe Thomas's session musicians could be on a chunk of the album's tracks. You know, the Imagination guys.

As for rushing, I wouldn't worry. Most of Brian's albums over the last decade have been recorded in the span of a couple of weeks. (Work on vocals sometimes continues for a couple of months, on and off.) Brian doesn't really have the patience for much else.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on February 17, 2012, 12:03:44 PM
Not to nitpick, but there are 11 tracks there. Given the time pressures, how many more do you think they could realistically finish, mix and master for a June-ish release?

As for archival stuff, I was thinking that the Boys might go back to the mid-90s just for the chance to get a couple of Carl vocals. Dancin' isn't great, but it is a BW/ML co-write, correct? Black Widow was a total shot in the dark. Maybe they'll go with Adult Child material instead.  ;D

Finally, I understand the desire for a Dennis tribute, but I don't know how it would work. Dennis's songs wouldn't really fit. What else is in the can that could be used for an album like this that wouldn't work better on an all-archival release?

I'd rather hear "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" in its original, archival form but maybe it's not outside the realm of possibility they'd rework it for a new album.  What would be cooler, maybe, would be doing vocals for "I've Got a Friend".

Re reworking WIBNTLA - no, no, no, no, NO! Please God, no. Either release the original - and seriously, why the hell not just re-release the original? - or just pay tribute to Dennis in the sleeve notes, but no covers please, guys. If you don't have enough decent new material then what you releasing an album for? I wouldn't want to listen to their new version of Do It Again when I could listen to the original, likewise any song from their 60s-70s prime.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 17, 2012, 12:11:25 PM
Has anyone heard an album produced by Joe Thomas in the last few years. Is the sound he is
getting nowadays, any different from the sounds he got on the Your Imagination album.

Thomas worked on songs dating back to the sixties for the Imagination album, so he
certainly wouldn't have an aversion to reviewing unreleased older material. If he is involved
on the new album.

What else has he done that people can listen to.


I had no idea Wilson's Gershwin and Disney albums were cut in a matter of weeks. what about
Lucky Old Sun ? Lucky Old Sun would have been a great Beach Boys album.

Hopefully we will get a preview of the album with a second single, the titles, That's why God Made the Radio
and Bill and Sue whatever it is, those titles don't remind me of Midnights another day that's for sure.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 17, 2012, 12:16:42 PM

Thomas worked on songs dating back to the sixties for the Imagination album, so he
certainly wouldn't have an aversion to reviewing unreleased older material.



Sometimes I get the feeling, people think it's not right no revisit old material that was never recorded or released. As long as tthe material is good and the new recordings are as well, I'm totally fine with it. If it turns out to be GIOMH-like, that's something else... But Imagination's "She says that she needs me" is great and doesn't even sound too sterile compared to much of the other recordings on that album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on February 17, 2012, 01:22:44 PM
I wouldn't mind if the songs were old but never heard of. Besides, there's no way of telling if an unfamiliar song is new or old by merely listening to it.

Unless you've heard it before somewhere, of course.

In which case it wouldn't be unfamiliar.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 02:01:01 PM
I had no idea Wilson's Gershwin and Disney albums were cut in a matter of weeks. what about
Lucky Old Sun ? Lucky Old Sun would have been a great Beach Boys album.

TLOS is more complicated. It originates with demos cut in the summer of 2006 -- many of Brian's leads on the album come from his demos.

The live performances in London were recorded and then used as the building blocks for the band's work in the studio (one of the reasons Bob Lizik, who had departed the band between the live shows and the studio recording, is credited as bassist for some of the tracks).

So the album was patched together from 1.) Brian and Scott's demos, 2.) the first live performances and 3.) some work at the Capitol Records studio. The time spent in the studio was pretty quick, though -- certainly closer to weeks rather than months.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 17, 2012, 02:14:00 PM
TLOS is more complicated. It originates with demos cut in the summer of 2006 -- many of Brian's leads on the album come from his demos.

The live performances in London were recorded and then used as the building blocks for the band's work in the studio (one of the reasons Bob Lizik, who had departed the band between the live shows and the studio recording, is credited as bassist for some of the tracks).

So the album was patched together from 1.) Brian and Scott's demos, 2.) the first live performances and 3.) some work at the Capitol Records studio. The time spent in the studio was pretty quick, though -- certainly closer to weeks rather than months.

I'm not aware of any live recording at the RFH in 2007: certainly no mobile was visible. There was an abortive attempt to record it in January 2008, then the sessions resumed in April. The liners make no mention of remote recording, and if any live shows had been used, then Jim Hines would have been credited as well, as he was also there in 2007. Not sure where you got that idea from, but it's spurious.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 17, 2012, 02:30:59 PM

Thomas worked on songs dating back to the sixties for the Imagination album, so he
certainly wouldn't have an aversion to reviewing unreleased older material.



Sometimes I get the feeling, people think it's not right no revisit old material that was never recorded or released. As long as tthe material is good and the new recordings are as well, I'm totally fine with it. If it turns out to be GIOMH-like, that's something else... But Imagination's "She says that she needs me" is great and doesn't even sound too sterile compared to much of the other recordings on that album.



I Love SHE SAYS THAT SHE NEEDS ME from the Imagination album. I had never heard of the song, in recent years I heard an original demo from the sixties
and realized it was an old tune. That they had used for the album in 99, or whatever year that was.

GIOMH has a couple nice tracks on it as well, Personally I like the one he wrote with Van Dyke and Soul Searchin, and one or two more. The song With
Elton John I didin't understand at all, it sounded like an Elton John record with harmonies by Wilson, and the one with McCartney had to be the biggest
letdown of the year. To think two people that great would finally cut a track and have it sound like that was baffling. It's awful that song. I love the Desert Drive song, that sounds like an old Beach Boys record, I love that one. I know thats an earlier song from some Paley sessions.

I find it interesting that Wilson cuts his albums in a matter of weeks or a couple months now. I expect TLOS is a more complicated album musically
than the new Beach Boys album will be.Anyway historically as AGD pointed out, almost all Beach Boy albums have tunes written a good deal earlier.
Wilson solo albums have the same thing.

Why Do people hate GIOMH, I hate parts of it, but I Like a few tunes, the one with Clapton is bad too, because its not a Wilson type of recording.




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 17, 2012, 02:40:55 PM
I'd love to hear "Still A Mystery" and "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" given an official release on this new record. The latter would be a beautiful tribute to Dennis.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 02:41:14 PM
http://www.emusician.com/news/0766/another-day-peering-into-the-creative-genius-of-brian-wilson/139364

Mark Linett:

"Some arrangement changes were made on the floor. This is something they had already played live as a 36-minute suite of songs at London’s Royal Festival Hall. Although this music had been performed, and we actually already recorded a live version at that point, once you get in the studio, things tend to change."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Too Much Sugar on February 17, 2012, 05:45:42 PM
The New York Times recently talked with Brian and Mike.  Some interesting tidbits on the album.  According to Brian, it's about "half way done". 

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/a-few-words-with-the-beach-boys/



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on February 17, 2012, 06:13:35 PM
The New York Times recently talked with Brian and Mike.  Some interesting tidbits on the album.  According to Brian, it's about "half way done". 

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/17/a-few-words-with-the-beach-boys/




That's a great interview!  Thanks for the link.
Oh, and the new Wilsonism: "On the album, one song flows into another and that flows into another like that, until it’s over, until there’s no more album."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on February 17, 2012, 06:40:15 PM
It is noteworthy that Mike says that one song is as good anything they've ever done.  I hope he means it and that he's not talking meaningless hype.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on February 17, 2012, 07:52:14 PM
Am I the only who is not convinced the new 'Do It Again' will be on the album?  I mean, if it's really going to be a 'mellow' album with a suite at the end, this track would stick out like a sore thumb.  I've not seen any mention anywhere that this new recording will be on the new album.  It's been described as a recording made 'just to see what it would sound like' and seems to be used to promote the tour and the reunion in general.

in fact, by the time the album comes out, 'Do It Again' will be old news.  I'm sure the 'lead' track will be something else entirely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 08:07:56 PM
Given that both Brian and the Beach Boy have never been shy about including remakes on their past albums -- including remakes of big hits -- I don't think the inclusion of Do It Again 2012 is inconceivable. As a purely aesthetic matter, I would prefer it be left off, too. But maybe they think it's a hit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 17, 2012, 10:10:40 PM
Am I the only who is not convinced the new 'Do It Again' will be on the album?  I mean, if it's really going to be a 'mellow' album with a suite at the end, this track would stick out like a sore thumb.  I've not seen any mention anywhere that this new recording will be on the new album.  It's been described as a recording made 'just to see what it would sound like' and seems to be used to promote the tour and the reunion in general.

in fact, by the time the album comes out, 'Do It Again' will be old news.  I'm sure the 'lead' track will be something else entirely.


I'll play devil's advocate and say, possibly, they might need to use the DIA remake if all the other material is
on the mellow side. Even a mellow album, might need one or two songs that rock a little, or offer contrast to the main
body of songs.

That New York Times article, the reporter says, Love and Wilson's description is a bit like Pet Sounds or SmiLe, and they
agree with the reporter, yes, there is a (he didn't say medley) a bit on the end, and Wilson says all the songs, flow into
one another, I Got excited as hell when I read that, and dreamed as big as the moon, wondering could there be the Smile
Sessions and a new album that was actually up there with their great work, WOW.


OK back to the question, Who knows, DIA could be a exclusive bonus track on Itunes or Best Buy, it could be on the album
proper, it could depend on the final sequence, the running time, if they end with a finished album of 36 minutes, might they
not be tempted, to , add DIA to add length. They could use it on the album, and say the reason, was primarily because
Dennis Wilson was included on the album that way. Because some of his playing was sampled.

I like to gamble when I have nothing at stake, I haven't a clue whether they will use it or not. I would say they will, if they
need another song that rocks a little. Even a mellow album needs one or two rockier songs, for contrast, in most instances.


OK now whats the over under on whether a theramin makes it to the album ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 17, 2012, 10:53:11 PM
http://www.emusician.com/news/0766/another-day-peering-into-the-creative-genius-of-brian-wilson/139364

Mark Linett:

"Some arrangement changes were made on the floor. This is something they had already played live as a 36-minute suite of songs at London’s Royal Festival Hall. Although this music had been performed, and we actually already recorded a live version at that point, once you get in the studio, things tend to change."

A live version, and no mention of it either being from an RFH show or used at all in the final version.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 11:16:16 PM
TLOS is more complicated. It originates with demos cut in the summer of 2006 -- many of Brian's leads on the album come from his demos.

The live performances in London were recorded and then used as the building blocks for the band's work in the studio (one of the reasons Bob Lizik, who had departed the band between the live shows and the studio recording, is credited as bassist for some of the tracks).

So the album was patched together from 1.) Brian and Scott's demos, 2.) the first live performances and 3.) some work at the Capitol Records studio. The time spent in the studio was pretty quick, though -- certainly closer to weeks rather than months.

I'm not aware of any live recording at the RFH in 2007: certainly no mobile was visible. There was an abortive attempt to record it in January 2008, then the sessions resumed in April. The liners make no mention of remote recording, and if any live shows had been used, then Jim Hines would have been credited as well, as he was also there in 2007. Not sure where you got that idea from, but it's spurious.

That Lucky Old Sun DVD.

In the bonus features. "Behind the Scenes in the Studio for the Making of the Album."

45 seconds in. Probyn, Sucherman, Scott Bennett, Jeff and Walusko get ready to play. (No bass player present.)

Probyn: "Oh, is there someone playing bass on this?"

Scott: "Yeah. I've got Lizik's live bass that I've pro tooled on with the clicks."



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 17, 2012, 11:53:57 PM
Therefore.

The January TLOS sessions didn't work out. Bob Lizik was not part of the April sessions -- at least not as depicted in the DVD. So is it crazy to extrapolate that the reason he is credited on the TLOS album is because Scott pro-tooled in bass lines from a live show?

However.

I likely overstated my case in saying the live recording was used as a foundation for the '08 studio work. While bass parts are certainly foundational, that same doc suggests that elements from the BW/SB '06 demos were also used as guides in the studio.

I'll also admit that I have no idea where live recording was done. I had thought that the only place TLOS had been played live up to that point was in London. Looking at Eric's setlist archive, I see it was also performed in Manchester and Birmingham, so recording could have been done at either site.

Finally.

The fact that "The liners make no mention of remote recording" strikes me as a weak point in this case. Many of Brian's vocals on the album come from his summer 2006 work with Scott in his house. However, Scott receives no engineering or studio credit on the record, and those sessions are not mentioned.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jay on February 18, 2012, 02:16:05 AM
Apart from SURFIN' SAFARI and SURFIN' USA, has there ever been a Beach Boys (or solo) album that did not utilize a melody, song or track that had been sitting around for a couple of years or more?

I would be surprised if the new album is completely new.

Even they weren't 100% new -  "Surfin' USA" (the song) was hardly original, a fact not lost on Chuck Berry's lawyers, and of course the début album's title track was a re-recording (not forgetting "Surfin'", leased from Hite Morgan).

Right. I guess I thought I would make an exception for material worked on within a year previously*.

*Using that barometer (and excluding albums that contained covers of songs released more than a year previously), I'm thinking ALL SUMMER LONG, FRIENDS and BEACH BOYS '85 (?) would be the only albums of all new original material that the band ever released!

"Little Bird" has a "CIFTTM" riff... the track for "Drive-in" was cut at the 10/63 "LSN" sessions (thus could well have David on it), while "Do You Remember" was roughed out as "The Big Beat" at least a year earlier... and "California Calling" has been carbon dated to 1982 9composition, not recording)
I read somewhere(many years ago) that Getcha Back existed in some form when Dennis was alive. Is this true?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on February 18, 2012, 02:37:06 AM
I read somewhere(many years ago) that Getcha Back existed in some form when Dennis was alive. Is this true?

I'd not heard that, but it's just about possible - Hungry Heart came out in 1980, and Uptown Girl in September 83, so it's possible that between September and December either Love or Melcher said "Let's do Hungry Heart, but with the whoahs from Uptown Girl - and why not stick in the hook from Sail On Sailor, slowed down a bit and in four/four time?"

(It's not really the most original of songs)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on February 18, 2012, 12:48:24 PM
Therefore.

The January TLOS sessions didn't work out. Bob Lizik was not part of the April sessions -- at least not as depicted in the DVD. So is it crazy to extrapolate that the reason he is credited on the TLOS album is because Scott pro-tooled in bass lines from a live show?

However.

I likely overstated my case in saying the live recording was used as a foundation for the '08 studio work. While bass parts are certainly foundational, that same doc suggests that elements from the BW/SB '06 demos were also used as guides in the studio.

I'll also admit that I have no idea where live recording was done. I had thought that the only place TLOS had been played live up to that point was in London. Looking at Eric's setlist archive, I see it was also performed in Manchester and Birmingham, so recording could have been done at either site.

Finally.

The fact that "The liners make no mention of remote recording" strikes me as a weak point in this case. Many of Brian's vocals on the album come from his summer 2006 work with Scott in his house. However, Scott receives no engineering or studio credit on the record, and those sessions are not mentioned.

I believe TLOS was also performed in Australia, late 2007.  And I believe Bob's basslines were flown in from the demos, just like some of Brian's vocals.  The demos as they have been leaked are pretty elaborate & well-produced, and we know Scott and Darian worked on them pretty extensively while Brian and the rest of the band were touring Europe in the summer of '07, so it's not hard to imagine they had Bob in adding basslines at some point between 2006 and 2007.  Finally, Scott DOES receive studio credit on the record:  "Additional Production" (as well as co-mixing).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 18, 2012, 01:36:01 PM
Close enough - first week of January 2008.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 18, 2012, 01:39:32 PM
Therefore.

The January TLOS sessions didn't work out. Bob Lizik was not part of the April sessions -- at least not as depicted in the DVD. So is it crazy to extrapolate that the reason he is credited on the TLOS album is because Scott pro-tooled in bass lines from a live show?

However.

I likely overstated my case in saying the live recording was used as a foundation for the '08 studio work. While bass parts are certainly foundational, that same doc suggests that elements from the BW/SB '06 demos were also used as guides in the studio.

I'll also admit that I have no idea where live recording was done. I had thought that the only place TLOS had been played live up to that point was in London. Looking at Eric's setlist archive, I see it was also performed in Manchester and Birmingham, so recording could have been done at either site.

Finally.

The fact that "The liners make no mention of remote recording" strikes me as a weak point in this case. Many of Brian's vocals on the album come from his summer 2006 work with Scott in his house. However, Scott receives no engineering or studio credit on the record, and those sessions are not mentioned.

I believe TLOS was also performed in Australia, late 2007.  And I believe Bob's basslines were flown in from the demos, just like some of Brian's vocals.  The demos as they have been leaked are pretty elaborate & well-produced, and we know Scott and Darian worked on them pretty extensively while Brian and the rest of the band were touring Europe in the summer of '07, so it's not hard to imagine they had Bob in adding basslines at some point between 2006 and 2007.  Finally, Scott DOES receive studio credit on the record:  "Additional Production" (as well as co-mixing).

When I said studio credit, I meant that literally. Scott's home studio was not credited as a place where the album was recorded.

Good points, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 18, 2012, 01:41:41 PM
The mystery remains, however, why Scott would say that he had flown in Bob's bassline from a live show. I mean, why not from a demo, then? Or if there were "personnel issues," why even bring it up at all?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 18, 2012, 02:51:33 PM
He didn't say it was from a live show, just that it was a 'live' bass - presumably, as opposed to sampled.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on February 18, 2012, 05:29:16 PM
He didn't say it was from a live show, just that it was a 'live' bass - presumably, as opposed to sampled.

yes, or perhaps 'live' as in, all playing together


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: juggler on February 18, 2012, 06:54:04 PM
It is noteworthy that Mike says that one song is as good anything they've ever done.  I hope he means it and that he's not talking meaningless hype.


As much as we'd all like Mike's statement to be proven true, I think that the chances are pretty slim that they're going to knock out something on par with 'God Only Knows' or 'Good Vibrations' or any of the classics of that era. 

Hope for the best, but prepare for something less.  And "less" is fine, as far as I'm concerned.  The body of work that Brian and Co. have produced over the last 50 years speaks for itself. Anything else that we get is gravy at this point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 19, 2012, 12:02:11 AM
It is noteworthy that Mike says that one song is as good anything they've ever done.  I hope he means it and that he's not talking meaningless hype.


As much as we'd all like Mike's statement to be proven true, I think that the chances are pretty slim that they're going to knock out something on par with 'God Only Knows' or 'Good Vibrations' or any of the classics of that era. 

Hope for the best, but prepare for something less.  And "less" is fine, as far as I'm concerned.  The body of work that Brian and Co. have produced over the last 50 years speaks for itself. Anything else that we get is gravy at this point.


That's what came to my mind also, when I read those comments, as good as Good Vibrations or God Only Knows?
Maybe it really is. Or close. Maybe Mike Love doesn't consider the songs from Pet Sounds or SMiLe to be their peak.
Maybe and I really have no idea, but perhaps Love thinks of California Girls or Help Me Rhonda or Warmth of the sun
as the Beach boys peak, or Holland or Friends,

Whatever the case, I am hoping, that, the Beach Boys themselves are thinking, we haven't made an album in 15-20 years
together, this could well be the last time. We'll make enough money just on the live shows, and DVD, We want our new
album to be special.

Maybe Wilson has been sandbagging a couple of great songs for some years, in case this ever happened. Or maybe
at this late date, Love and Jardine and Johnston will bring out the best Brian Wilson has to offer, even though Wilson
denied it to himself, and even without his brothers, Maybe Wilson is inspired to hit one more out of the Park.

When they start talking about a song suite to end the album, and one song flowing into another, and one song being
as good as anything they ever did, when they agree with the interviewer, that the new album, has a bit of SMile and Pet sounds
in it's ambiance or songwriting, don't tell me you're not excited. Come on!

I think these guys have always been super competitive and I have a hunch this album is important to them, that they are happy
to be in the limelight and well regarded with the Smile release, This might be special.

I have no facts or inside information. They are my homeboys, LA's favorite native sons, I'm rooting for the home team.
I think they are gonna deliver something good, not just to make a buck, SMile or Pet Sounds no I doubt it. But something
better than we thought.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 19, 2012, 12:30:06 AM
Will this be the best album since Love You?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 19, 2012, 12:39:41 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RadBooley on February 19, 2012, 12:43:52 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D
Counting The SMiLE Sessions in there?  :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 19, 2012, 12:47:36 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D

Dr. Primrose, may your faith be an inspiration to us all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 19, 2012, 01:40:02 AM
Well Do It Again  was a quick fix arrangement and recording to test the waters - that could maybe explain the autotune, as time wasn't plentiful to get takes 'just so'. Hopefully the album has more thought and care put  into the arrangements of the new songs. It looks like, from the studio photos, that Brian's band is on them - we haven't seen any other musicians, right - and that is heartwarming. I  just hope rushing the album for a summer release doesn't mean it's, y'know, rushed.

As I stated in my compilation post, we have reason to believe that Joe Thomas's session musicians could be on a chunk of the album's tracks. You know, the Imagination guys.


We do? Only thing I can think of is a) Joe Thomas' involvement itself and b) that drummer tweeting he was involved with Do It Again in june last year despite this not being the case on the final mix.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 19, 2012, 01:56:13 AM
As I stated in my compilation post, we have reason to believe that Joe Thomas's session musicians could be on a chunk of the album's tracks. You know, the Imagination guys.

I don't see that as meaning the new album will sound like Imagination. That was a contemporary sound at the time and it's not anymore.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on February 19, 2012, 02:23:32 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D

I don't know... if they manage something as competent as LA (Light Album) at this point I will be very happy and very surprised.
On the other hand, I can't see it possibly being any worse than KTSA or any of the albums after that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 19, 2012, 05:44:10 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D

I don't know... if they manage something as competent as LA (Light Album) at this point I will be very happy and very surprised.
On the other hand, I can't see it possibly being any worse than KTSA or any of the albums after that.

How about something in the spirit of 'Still Cruisin'' then? A half-new LP with some rap. And a Beach Boys Medley. I think it's a great idea.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 19, 2012, 06:31:16 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D

I don't know... if they manage something as competent as LA (Light Album) at this point I will be very happy and very surprised.
On the other hand, I can't see it possibly being any worse than KTSA or any of the albums after that.

How about something in the spirit of 'Still Cruisin'' then? A half-new LP with some rap. And a Beach Boys Medley. I think it's a great idea.

Don, you missed the "C" off "rap".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 19, 2012, 06:51:52 AM
Given the competition... very likely.  ;D

I don't know... if they manage something as competent as LA (Light Album) at this point I will be very happy and very surprised.
On the other hand, I can't see it possibly being any worse than KTSA or any of the albums after that.

How about something in the spirit of 'Still Cruisin'' then? A half-new LP with some rap. And a Beach Boys Medley. I think it's a great idea.

Don, you missed the "C" off "rap".

That was me being mild and modest as ever. These are only two of my myriad outstanding qualities.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 19, 2012, 07:42:57 AM
Maybe the new album, is just part of a highly calculated business plan, to top off the
retirement funds, or ancillary to the other marketing, Tour, Merchandise, live DVD.
Maybe the album was simply another revenue stream, cooked up by businessmen.

I have no idea really of the behind the scenes workings. Maybe it started that way
and has evolved, because of the success of SMiLe and the joy they experienced, when
they actually sang together.

In my mind trying to walk in their shoes for a moment. I see the Beach Boys legacy as
being on an upswing after being tarnished by some lesser albums near the end of their
run. SmiLe made them hero's again. They are back on Capitol, getting full label support,
Everyone involved seems to be jazzed, Mike and Brian and Al are all giving interviews.
This has the appearance of the Beach Boys really trying to sing together, and make the
best album they can, and possibly a near great album, possibly great.

Am I wrong, is this album just a cash stream, I really feel that it's not just that. Will the
politics between them and their management, make this album just another way to make cash.

I feel the label and the band are all very excited, and smug, because they know they have a good
album on their hands.

I see they are also getting lots of free press in big publications. Beach Boys finally getting their
due with their swan song?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on February 19, 2012, 09:38:47 AM
I could be wrong, but I don't see the album as an essential part of the reunion "business plan."  If anything, it's a risk because if it's a dud it could set them back slightly.  So I hope you're right and they are sitting on something good that will only help the "cause."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 19, 2012, 10:00:19 AM
I was just reading wikipedia and a couple things about Joe Thomas, he produces rock video for television.
He seems like an aggressive guy who almost fits the description more of, a business man, or Don Kirshner
gets the financing in order, makes the trains run on time.

Nowhere is there any mention, he is an arranger, or musician or has actual musical credentials. He seems
more like a manager than what I think of as a record producer. But record producer is a variable term.

I think of Phil Spector, Richard Perry, Rick Rubin, Jack White, It doesn't matter to me. I Like parts of the
Imagination album, I found it to be somewhat bloated, 80's MOR sounding, and the Beach Boy covers
baffling, why do those? The Beach Boys already did them well.

So I'm not knocking the guys involvement, but I do see equal parts, Don Kirshner, Gene Landy, and Irv Azoff
more than what we typically think of as a guy, helping to arrange material, or who is known for a musical
sound as a result of his particular expertise or style.

Maybe he just see's that things get done, and cuts through red tape or visualizes the big picture. I don't know.

For me Cry, Lay Down Burden, She Says That's she needs me and Your Imagination, those four cuts, are terrific
good choice of material and execution at any rate. The Two Beach Boys remakes while sounding good, whats
the point of that? When a guy releases his first album in a decade, do we want two of the ten songs to be remakes
of successful Beach Boys tracks from the sixties?

Enough about Thomas, when do we get to hear the lead off single ? May ? when will something leak? Any chance
we'll hear something in April? Would they debut a single 6-10 weeks before the album comes out? I know they probably
wouldn't, but one can hope. Rock on Beach Boys!

I still believe, particularly after the success of TLOS, SMiLE and the DIA video, a tremendous album is not out of the question.
I can't picture them (Johnston, Love Wilson) hyping how terrific it is, if they didn't really believe it. They must all be pretty
comfortable financially, and the tour and DVD will make them a mint.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on February 19, 2012, 11:37:13 AM
Quote
I don't see that as meaning the new album will sound like Imagination. That was a contemporary sound at the time and it's not anymore.

It wasn't contemporary at that time either...that was one of the reasons why I hated it on first listen. Instantly dated and sterile sounding.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 19, 2012, 12:23:16 PM
Given Brian's run of albums since BWPS I think a great album is well within their grasp. Really at the moment we know zip about the new material. I'll not bother speculating on what might be from the info given so far in interviews. My personal preference would be that it's all new Brian Wilson compositions in collaboration with whoever he chooses and if other band member material is included it is because it merits inclusion. No remakes or finishing tracks by Dennis or Carl . All new stuff please boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 19, 2012, 01:07:53 PM
Two things that come to mind as being in their favour as I read Vintagemusic's post:

1. Sufficient time has passed since their last band albums for the public at large to have forgotten the likes of BBs85, Summer In Paradise, and Stars & Stripes. In the minds of the man in the street, the Beach Boys have again come to be Pet Sounds, SMiLE and Today. The cream has risen to the top, as far as memories of the Beach Boys output in concerned.

2. Whether or not he's hands-on with the board, instructs others to do his bidding or merely passes judgement on what others lay before him in his name, Brian Wilson has reasserted himself as a producer. GIOMH might have been so-so but BWPS, TLOS, BWRiG and IKoD represent a string of albums which have all been either good, bloody good or bloody marvellous.

Almost as if BW's been in training while the Beach Boys lie low in terms of recording and effectively have their slate wiped clean by natural forces. Almost as if things are aligning themselves for everything to come together and create something wonderful.

My, this Glenfiddich is hitting the spot. Thing is, give it six months and we might all be crying into our whisky, whiskey, bourbon or meths...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 19, 2012, 01:17:17 PM
Given Brian's run of albums since BWPS I think a great album is well within their grasp. Really at the moment we know zip about the new material. I'll not bother speculating on what might be from the info given so far in interviews. My personal preference would be that it's all new Brian Wilson compositions in collaboration with whoever he chooses and if other band member material is included it is because it merits inclusion. No remakes or finishing tracks by Dennis or Carl . All new stuff please boys.


Well I agree The Thomas production technique of Imagination, was dated by about a decade. Kind of MOR 80's.

Now as far as the material, as AGD pointed out, rarely if ever, has Wilson or the Beach Boys ever released an album
that didn't have some older material from the song bag included. I'd say it depends on what they have on Carl Wilson
in the can, if they have a good sounding vocal of a good tune, and they can redo some or all of the backing, and include
one or two songs that include Carl Wilson why not. But I don't know they would even consider that. I would agree the
album would benefit from mostly new songs, but good songs the public has never heard, would have to be the biggest
factor, or songs that go well together, regardless of whether it was written five or ten years ago.

An album of several remakes would be kind of a disappointment
I get the feeling, certainly Mike Love and maybe the other Beach Boys will get some co-writers
or writers credits.o obviously Wilson is the great songwriter of the bunch. I don't think anyone disagrees with that

I mean if Love really did write the lyrics to California Girls and Good Vibrations and some of those tunes, as credited
I don't see how they can block him from co writing at least one or two songs. Johnston and Jardine have written
some good Beach Boy tunes, wouldn't they get one song each perhaps.

I'd rather a see a Brian Wilson dominated album (compositionally) in the feel of Pet Sounds, who wouldn't?

My friend a Beach Boy fan and watcher, disagrees, he thinks with Love's influence we are more apt to get a Today or
Summer Days type of album. Either way wouldn't it be nice

When will descriptions of tracks or a single start to leak or some snippets? or first hand accounts

Love said in the New York Times interview dated te 17th Feb, that in a couple weeks sessions would start
and go until they were finished. I found that odd, because Wilson said a few songs were still yet to be written. Maybe
it will be very quick once they have the momentum of 7-8 songs in the can



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 19, 2012, 02:32:40 PM
Well Do It Again  was a quick fix arrangement and recording to test the waters - that could maybe explain the autotune, as time wasn't plentiful to get takes 'just so'. Hopefully the album has more thought and care put  into the arrangements of the new songs. It looks like, from the studio photos, that Brian's band is on them - we haven't seen any other musicians, right - and that is heartwarming. I  just hope rushing the album for a summer release doesn't mean it's, y'know, rushed.

As I stated in my compilation post, we have reason to believe that Joe Thomas's session musicians could be on a chunk of the album's tracks. You know, the Imagination guys.


We do? Only thing I can think of is a) Joe Thomas' involvement itself and b) that drummer tweeting he was involved with Do It Again in june last year despite this not being the case on the final mix.

That's not what the drummer (Eddie Bayers) said. While there may have been a tweet or two involved, I was actually thinking of a quote from Rolling Stone article.

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,11177.msg216183.html#msg216183

"Beach Boys session vet Eddie Bayers says he recently played drums on new Wilson tracks slated for a Beach Boys reunion record. 'Brian's new creations are just unbelievable,' says Bayers."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on February 19, 2012, 03:24:03 PM
I've got the perfect album title and cover concept :-D:

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/52684612/BeachBoys50.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 19, 2012, 04:43:53 PM
How about something that has nothing to do with the ocean? that would be something. but I doubt it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 19, 2012, 05:58:31 PM
They are such an iconic group they could probably get away without their name on the front cover. We here are not keen on the 'Beach' aspect and 'Boys'?  ;)

Last week group shots were done according to David himself. I hope these are for inside or maybe the back rather than the cover.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 19, 2012, 06:29:19 PM
They are such an iconic group they could probably get away without their name on the front cover. We here are not keen on the 'Beach' aspect and 'Boys'?  ;)

Last week group shots were done according to David himself. I hope these are for inside or maybe the back rather than the cover.




Let's see here. We are fans of this band, yet it sounds like we are ashamed of their name (no name on the cover), their age (no picture of the band), and maybe don't try to sound like The Beach Boys, because from since 1978 The Beach Boys tried too hard to sound like The Beach Boys (from another thread, here). sh*t, these guys don't stand a chance of pleasing us, their die-hard fans. Yikes! ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on February 19, 2012, 07:48:02 PM
The Five-O suggestion isn't bad.  Unless it's really clever, it's probably better to stay away fron ocean and beach references, and please no titles like reunion or celebration.  My favorite title that's been tossed around is The Fading Rock Group Revival.   


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on February 19, 2012, 09:08:13 PM
Please close this thread, Phil say's it is not coming out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 19, 2012, 10:16:44 PM
Please close this thread, Phil say's it is not coming out.
Huh?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on February 20, 2012, 12:14:12 AM
Please close this thread, Phil say's it is not coming out.
Huh?

haha, that's just a joke

The albums on


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 20, 2012, 12:54:59 AM
They are such an iconic group they could probably get away without their name on the front cover. We here are not keen on the 'Beach' aspect and 'Boys'?  ;)

Last week group shots were done according to David himself. I hope these are for inside or maybe the back rather than the cover.




Let's see here. We are fans of this band, yet it sounds like we are ashamed of their name (no name on the cover), their age (no picture of the band), and maybe don't try to sound like The Beach Boys, because from since 1978 The Beach Boys tried too hard to sound like The Beach Boys (from another thread, here). sh*t, these guys don't stand a chance of pleasing us, their die-hard fans. Yikes! ;)


Not at all. Its just that group cover ohoto's seem so dated and old fashioned. Shall we haul a Woody up to Paradise Cove for ya? :lol

                                                                                           


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on February 20, 2012, 04:21:47 AM
Given Brian's run of albums since BWPS I think a great album is well within their grasp. Really at the moment we know zip about the new material. I'll not bother speculating on what might be from the info given so far in interviews. My personal preference would be that it's all new Brian Wilson compositions in collaboration with whoever he chooses and if other band member material is included it is because it merits inclusion. No remakes or finishing tracks by Dennis or Carl . All new stuff please boys.

Brian has had a good run of albums since BWPS...let us not forget the Christmas record too...in addition to the aforementioned TLOS, Gershwin and Disney. A run of albums which are all coherent, fairly consistent in quality and each of which has at least one standout track.

Given that we know Mike has some unreleased songs he's been working on for a while, there is no reason why the guys together cannot produce a high quality album. As for Mike referencing one Brian song that is supposedly great....Take a look at the better work on TLOS and you will possibly agree with me that Brian still has it within him to come up with stunning melodies and harmonies.

Mike is being pretty magnanimous these days, opening 'his' band to bring in half of Brian's...talking openly about playing SMiLE tracks on the tour....this could just be a perfect storm brewing for one last really good (if not great) BB record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on February 20, 2012, 04:55:42 AM
The mystery remains, however, why Scott would say that he had flown in Bob's bassline from a live show. I mean, why not from a demo, then? Or if there were "personnel issues," why even bring it up at all?

Sorry, I missed the "live" part of the aforementioned quote.  Alright, you make good points.  A few other points worth mentioning: he also said there was a click track present...it would've been easy enough for the players in the live band to have been given an in-ear monitor feed with the click track for live performances, hence it would make sense to start a partial (mostly) studio re-recording with the same click track (and bass part, as it were).  As to why Bob's bass wasn't used on the track "Southern California":  the studio version was longer than the live version, with the added bridge, so it had to be redone by Scott (or Scott had a longer studio demo in the can from which his bass was flown in). 

As to why there was no mentiion of the location of the live performance recording: well, if you look at the studio credits in the liner notes, they only appear after the assistant engineers' names (i.e. "Aaron Walk and Paul Smith at Capitol and Kevin Mills at Henson);  Mark Linett is credited as the "over all" engineer, which implies there could've been other recording locations for which Mark was the sole engineer, but there was no need to mention them since there were no other engineers involved (even though it's likely that he would have an assistant or two for all sessions and including the live recordings, and it still doesn't explain why Scott wasn't given a credit along the lines of "Additional engineering" or "Demo engineering").  But a better reason might simply be due to oversight (in the course of my research, I've discovered there were a few times in the BB's career where a studio or two was left out of the liner notes, such as on the "L.A. Light Album" for instance). 

As to why the drums had to be re-recorded for the album:  during the recording of the live performance, the drums were mic'd (had to be, since they were real acoustic drums, not the electronic kind), so naturaully there would be a fair amount of leakage from other sources (the audience, the rest of the band), particularly in the overhead mics.  Eliminating that problem required the tracking of new drum performances in the studio.  The live bass, on the other hand, would have been recorded directly from a line out rather than with a microphone in front of the amp, hence no leakage.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: filledeplage on February 20, 2012, 06:07:04 AM
I've got the perfect album title and cover concept :-D:

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/52684612/BeachBoys50.jpg)

Cracked me up! 

Very clever...

The "Five-0" might be protected...

But, not the wave!   ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on February 20, 2012, 12:09:30 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems wierd to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 20, 2012, 12:10:22 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.




Summer Celebration
How's about that ?  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 20, 2012, 12:29:02 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems wierd to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)

Bassist Brett Simons' personal website lists the title as being "Celebration."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 20, 2012, 12:40:12 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems wierd to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)

Bassist Brett Simons' personal website lists the title as being "Celebration."

Celebration was also the name of Mike's almost-fogotten band way back when, which did a few tracks for the Almost Summer soundtrack.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on February 20, 2012, 01:21:40 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems wierd to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)

Bassist Brett Simons' personal website lists the title as being "Celebration."

Couldn't help but notice that Brett is rather busy on Tour with Melissa Etheridge and has a number of dates which conflicts with not only the preperation for the BB's Tour but also some BB's gig dates therefore;
1) Is there going to be a rotation of Bass Players on the tour ??
2) Who is playing Bass on the new album ?
or 3) Have the backing tracks already been laid down ??

Interesting 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on February 20, 2012, 01:24:11 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems wierd to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)



And a rather enjoyable follow up album simply named 'Celebration' , always liked 'Starbaby' and the Cover of 'Gettin' Hungry'



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on February 20, 2012, 02:01:32 PM
This 50th anniversary album is a sham: This is Brian's way of getting the guys to sing on his Pleasure Island album ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 20, 2012, 07:08:50 PM
I have no inside knowledge, but I have a gut feeling the new album will be called 'Celebration', for good or ill. It seems to be an appropriate Beach Boys brand name for the whole 50th anniversary tour/ album package. At least the title doesn't have 'Summer' in it.

I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released), as it seems weird to me to have the Beach Boys without Carl (and Dennis for that matter) represented. But then, Summer in Paradise had no Brian input at all, so I guess for me, you can have the Beach Boys as long as you have at least one Wilson brother involved. Otherwise, it's a 'BB related' project.  :)

Bassist Brett Simons' personal website lists the title as being "Celebration."




On a scale of one to ten, ten being best. I would give the title "Celebration" about a four possibly five.
Just the way it grabs you, it's meaning, It certainly isn't a good title like Pet Sounds or Smile or Abbey Road or Band on the Run
Layla and other assorted love songs, it's not that good. It's kind of sterile sounding, not a lot of imagination.
At least it's not a terrible title. it's acceptable but not very good. IMO


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dmcguire70 on February 20, 2012, 07:16:52 PM
I really hope and pray that the boys don't use any kind of excessive pitch correction on the vocals for the new album, after listening however to Do it Again-Particularly Mikes main vocal- it's looking quite possible that may be the case.
I hope I'm wrong!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alex on February 20, 2012, 08:34:01 PM
If Brett is going to be on the road with Melissa Etheridge,  it would be the perfect oppurtuity to get Eddie Carter back into the BBs band.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 20, 2012, 08:43:21 PM
If Brett is going to be on the road with Melissa Etheridge,  it would be the perfect oppurtuity to get Eddie Carter back into the BBs band.

His website explicitly says he will be with her for February and March dates. The BBs start in April.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on February 20, 2012, 09:36:47 PM
I actually think Celebration is a good title too.  need a good cover though.  I wish the guy who did TLOS would do it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 21, 2012, 12:30:18 AM
1) Is there going to be a rotation of Bass Players on the tour ??
2) Who is playing Bass on the new album ?
or 3) Have the backing tracks already been laid down ??

1) yeah - Carol Kaye/James Jamerson/Carol Kaye/Bob Lizik/Carol Kaye. Carol will also be playing drums, guitar, keys, tannerin and mallets
2) see above.
3) Some have.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 21, 2012, 12:54:56 AM
1) Is there going to be a rotation of Bass Players on the tour ??
2) Who is playing Bass on the new album ?
or 3) Have the backing tracks already been laid down ??

1) yeah - Carol Kaye/James Jamerson/Carol Kaye/Bob Lizik/Carol Kaye. Carol will also be playing drums, guitar, keys, tannerin and mallets
2) see above.
3) Some have.


  Please Tell us more Andrew, about any backing tracks, songs, overdubs, vocals. anything about the recordings
that doesn't violate or go over the line of any confidences, or bean spilling. Tell us what you can, without upsetting you're friends


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on February 21, 2012, 01:34:12 AM
Celebration would be a sensible if uninspired title. All of the promotion for this album should obviously be focused on the 50 year anniversary and the reunion element meaning that the style of music contained within would be less important and they could leave the fun in the sun stuff behind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 21, 2012, 01:49:19 AM
1) Is there going to be a rotation of Bass Players on the tour ??
2) Who is playing Bass on the new album ?
or 3) Have the backing tracks already been laid down ??

1) yeah - Carol Kaye/James Jamerson/Carol Kaye/Bob Lizik/Carol Kaye. Carol will also be playing drums, guitar, keys, tannerin and mallets
2) see above.
3) Some have.


  Please Tell us more Andrew, about any backing tracks, songs, overdubs, vocals. anything about the recordings
that doesn't violate or go over the line of any confidences, or bean spilling. Tell us what you can, without upsetting you're friends

I think AGD's already going to have upset Carol Kaye by breaking her confidence regarding her upcoming work with the Beach Lads.  Bet she never talks to him again!   :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on February 21, 2012, 11:17:04 AM
I also hope they manage to find and include at least one quality 'new' Carl lead vocal (not Soul Searchin, already released)

But it's not the same "Soul Searchin'" as the BB's one, since Carl's middle-eight was replaced by Brian's lead and there are no BB backing vox. I'd dearly love to see the version with Carl singing the whole song over the BB's backing vocals given a proper release.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 21, 2012, 11:24:48 AM
I wouldn't mind if the cover of the album is a variation of this slick, simple look:

(http://www.rockon.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/beach-boys-50-celebration.jpg)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 21, 2012, 12:04:18 PM
That's by far the better anniversary logo than this other one which bases on Dean Torrence's famous Beach Boys logo. Hope they'll stick with this, but the official tour shirt has the Torrence logo + 50


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 21, 2012, 06:28:11 PM
Hey, guys! Mike just responded to a question I left on his Facebook page regarding whether the new record would be all newly written material or if we'd see some old unreleased material reworked for the album. Here's his response:

Quote
There will be a combination of both to look forward to. Really excited about some new stuff we are working on however.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 21, 2012, 07:11:16 PM
I'm surprised whoever is behind Mike's FB page is as responsive as they are.  It's not really Mike is it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 21, 2012, 07:18:32 PM
I'm surprised whoever is behind Mike's FB page is as responsive as they are.  It's not really Mike is it?
I think it is him. To be honest, whoever is behind the page is not really that responsive. I see tons of wall posts that aren't replied to. It seems like Mike is a pretty busy guy hence he wouldn't have the time to go through and respond to everything that is written on his page.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on February 21, 2012, 07:26:37 PM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on February 21, 2012, 07:58:23 PM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on February 21, 2012, 08:06:40 PM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud

Right!?

My father, a great artist, made me a collage for Christmas: he assembled tiny pieces of cut up $ bills to form the Brother logo. My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw it. If I could figure out how to post pictures to the board I'd definitely show you all...it's pretty incredible. I love that logo so much.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 21, 2012, 09:21:53 PM
I'm surprised whoever is behind Mike's FB page is as responsive as they are.  It's not really Mike is it?
I think it is him. To be honest, whoever is behind the page is not really that responsive. I see tons of wall posts that aren't replied to. It seems like Mike is a pretty busy guy hence he wouldn't have the time to go through and respond to everything that is written on his page.

It's definitely not him. No way, no how.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 21, 2012, 09:40:19 PM
It's definitely not him. No way, no how.
Regardless of whether it's him or not, at least we have official confirmation now that they're looking at old material and reworking it for the new record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 21, 2012, 11:05:35 PM
If it's not him, then how is it official?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 21, 2012, 11:24:20 PM
It's Mike's official FB page. You think Brian checks out the Bloo every day ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 21, 2012, 11:43:45 PM
Hey, guys! Mike just responded to a question I left on his Facebook page regarding whether the new record would be all newly written material or if we'd see some old unreleased material reworked for the album. Here's his response:

Quote
There will be a combination of both to look forward to. Really excited about some new stuff we are working on however.


Two points, first, classic rock guys responding to email messages, they do. I have had many responses from, people
similar to Mike Love. Similar in stature and time frame. Whether I ever met them in the biz, or never had, I have had
responses from BBoys, Beatle people, various people. But I only ask the type of questions that you asked. Hey is this
unreleased song coming out, are you working on an album. I don't ask personal questions. Other than, hope things are
cool for you, or something simple.


As to the admission by Mike Love, that, YES, the new album will feature some old material. Can we clarify, old material,
which has never been heard in public, or reworkings of old B Boys hits like Do It Again, or reworkings of hits by other 60's
artists or what ?

What I'm trying to say, previously unreleased B Boys songs, would be great, something akin to Soul Searchin or She Says
that she needs me.  But remakes of old Jan and Dean hits or Johnny Rivers or remakes of classic Beach Boys hits, I don't want
that, Do it Again is ok, but the last thing I wanna hear is a 1/3 or half the album is remakes of Good Vibrations or Don't Worry Baby.
Wat the heck for? that will be on the live Celebration DVD anyway.

Andrew you can step in anytime, with a tidbit, about what "old Material" means, in the context of the new BBoy's album.

My personal hunch after reading,Love's comments, it means at least one song featuring Carl Wilson's vocals Will be reworked
maybe two songs. And a couple of cool B Boys tracks that were never officially released in the past. Combined with X number
of newer songs. That's my interpretation of Love's remarks. But that's just what would make sense to me, who knows. Andrew
probably knows, if he spills the beans too soon, he would jeopardize his contacts.

Maybe it's just too soon, and nobody actually has the answers yet. Maybe they have 17 tracks on the drawing board, Old, new,
and eventually a dozen cuts will make the album. If they do two or three extra, they can use them as exclusive bonus tracks, or some
future compilation album, featuring two brand new songs in 2016~!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 21, 2012, 11:44:12 PM
If it's not him, then how is it official?

It can still be official even when he has his "people" run it for him.  Considering they've uploaded some pictures from the Grammys and recording sessions that only people from the "inside" would have access to--it's clear that it's not a fake page run by some fan.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 22, 2012, 04:03:52 AM
As to the admission by Mike Love, that, YES, the new album will feature some old material. Can we clarify, old material,
which has never been heard in public, or reworkings of old B Boys hits like Do It Again, or reworkings of hits by other 60's
artists or what ?

The way I phrased the question would make it seems that he's referring to previously unreleased material being given a second look. Hopefully we see songs like "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" and "Still A Mystery". At least, those are the two I'm hoping for the most.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 22, 2012, 04:32:00 AM
[edit.. wrong thread]


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on February 22, 2012, 04:34:05 AM
Maybe the thread title could be changed to New Album Speculation (as it rolls out...)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 22, 2012, 05:56:34 AM
Hopefully he's not talking abouzt re-recording old hits. That would ruin the whole thing for me.
How's about asking him that ? That woud be interesting to know, because as far as I have seen, most, if not all Beach Boys fans would hate re-recordings of already released material


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 22, 2012, 09:09:46 AM
Hopefully he's not talking abouzt re-recording old hits. That would ruin the whole thing for me.
How's about asking him that ? That woud be interesting to know, because as far as I have seen, most, if not all Beach Boys fans would hate re-recordings of already released material

If we get any re-recordings of old songs, I could see them doing one tops, likely "Do It Again". Any more than that would be a waste of CD space.

Say the record is 12 tracks; one remake of a classic tune, two-three remakes of unreleased Dennis/Carl songs and eight or so totally new compositions. I could definitely live with that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on February 22, 2012, 11:09:19 AM
As to the admission by Mike Love, that, YES, the new album will feature some old material. Can we clarify, old material,
which has never been heard in public, or reworkings of old B Boys hits like Do It Again, or reworkings of hits by other 60's
artists or what ?

The way I phrased the question would make it seems that he's referring to previously unreleased material being given a second look. Hopefully we see songs like "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" and "Still A Mystery". At least, those are the two I'm hoping for the most.
Imagine "WIBNTLA" makes it onto the new album, we are all excited, and it is just the version of "Wouldn't It Be Nice" from Pet Sounds, with "to live again" spoken audibly after the "Wouldn't it be nice..." break.

Experts like AGD talk about how brilliant it is, and when we point out that it is just the original WIBN song with three extra words, he acts like we are crazy. That would be funny and a great comedic payoff after all this build-up.

Still though, I am psyched as heck for the tune, and we stand a better chance of getting it this coming year than we ever have before. I would imagine that this one would make it to the new box set or rarities compilation as opposed to the new studio album. Time to listen to the Marsland version...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 22, 2012, 12:57:46 PM
I wouldn't mind if the cover of the album is a variation of this slick, simple look:

(http://www.rockon.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/beach-boys-50-celebration.jpg)



Yes please!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 22, 2012, 01:03:19 PM
As to the admission by Mike Love, that, YES, the new album will feature some old material. Can we clarify, old material,
which has never been heard in public, or reworkings of old B Boys hits like Do It Again, or reworkings of hits by other 60's
artists or what ?

The way I phrased the question would make it seems that he's referring to previously unreleased material being given a second look. Hopefully we see songs like "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" and "Still A Mystery". At least, those are the two I'm hoping for the most.

WIBNTLA just wouldn't fit, if you ask me. Too much of a different era. It should appear on an archival release, not a reunion record produced by Joe Thomas. I would really prefer that any use of earlier material be re-recorded, so the album would have a cohesive sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on February 22, 2012, 01:45:11 PM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud

Right!?

My father, a great artist, made me a collage for Christmas: he assembled tiny pieces of cut up $ bills to form the Brother logo. My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw it. If I could figure out how to post pictures to the board I'd definitely show you all...it's pretty incredible. I love that logo so much.

So do I.. dont we all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 22, 2012, 01:53:16 PM
WIBNTLA just wouldn't fit, if you ask me. Too much of a different era. It should appear on an archival release, not a reunion record produced by Joe Thomas. I would really prefer that any use of earlier material be re-recorded, so the album would have a cohesive sound.
We have absolutely no idea what this new album will sound like, though. Who knows? Maybe with the reunion roster performing the song and someone other than Dennis singing lead, it might fit in just fine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 23, 2012, 12:20:04 AM
Well as a few people have noted already. There is certainly some speculation in this particular thread.
But so what. My guess is, the general consensus that's building. will turn out to be correct or nearly so.

7-9 new songs. Perhaps one or two archival tracks, spruced up with new overdubs, featuring Carl Wilson
on vocals. Maybe a similar archival track featuring Dennis Wilson in some way. Probably the DIA remake.
Although Wilson we are expecting to write or cowrite the bulk of the material, there will most certainly be
a couple of Mike Love co-writes, and perhaps one each from Jardine, Johnston and Marks.. at least one cowrite
each. Probably

We have heard that the songs, flow into one another, in a way that reminds one of Smile or Pet Sounds or
TLOS. that there is if not a full blown medley, some sort of musical suite that is intended to end the album,
At least according to Love, at this early, intermediate stage of making the album.

We know they need to write at least two or three more songs, perhaps more. But that several new songs
are both written and recorded. Two songs were about done, and several more are partially done...

Wilson and Love didn't shoot down the New York Times reporter, when the reporter suggested, Pet Sounds or
SMile had some commonality with the new stuff. or new album.

Love said there is one song already recorded as good as anything they have ever done is his opinion. Bruce Johnston
raved about one new song, he kept playing over and over. Love admitted yesterday? that there would be some archival
or old material included on the album. We know there are sessions coming up shortly, where they expect to work on through
to the finish, or at least close, at least to the mixing stage.


People are speculating on the Wouldn't it Be nice to Live again tune, ( I have no idea what that song is) and the Mystery song
which apparently is a  well known bootleg, with a Carl Wilson vocal. I've heard a boot of that, what I heard wasn't so great, but
I also heard a boot of "Soul Searchin" on the same tape, so maybe there is a cleaner version I never heard.

So that part is a little speculative, but it's based on deep beach boy fans, and their knowledge of the archival material.

We even know, that the album title could well be "celebration" so some of the stuff is speculation, but mostly it's fact or
educated guessing. More than just wild fantasy.

I mean the Beach Boys are making an album, they are using a few old songs, from the archives, the songs are recorded and
arranged in a way that they dovetail into one another, there is a suite on the end.

What's the difference between a medley and a suite ?? Anybody?

To me suite means, something written and designed from the get go to be heard as one piece, and medley is more like
an arrangement of pre existing songs,

So have we learned anything today? I know realistically, it's time to take a chill pill, its gonna be a few months, and plans
change in the middle of albums all the time. A songs gets written at the last minute displacing something else, or upon review
a different idea comes to the fore, but I think we are starting to get a sketch of it. But with music, until you hear something it's
all just so much blather isn't it.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RickD on February 23, 2012, 12:30:52 AM
Anyone unfamiliar with WIBNTLA needs to buy Adam's CD - in fact  anyone who hasn't needs to anyway!

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000NJWTH0/ref=mp_s_a_1?qid=1329985913&sr=8-1


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 23, 2012, 01:11:27 AM
I've never heard Adam's version. I'm actually purposely preventing myself from listening to it. I remember reading Adam saying they changed the key and played a different guitar solo to replace the apparently extremely simplistic placeholder solo on the track. I want to hear the BBs version fresh before I hear a cover.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 23, 2012, 02:48:00 AM
Well it's not on youtube and there are no samples on the link to buy the album. If its never been booted
how, did he get it to do a cover?

Alan Boyd from the SMile sessions is in a Beach Boys cover band, do I understand that correctly?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 23, 2012, 03:15:30 AM
Sometimes I wonder if the Beach Boys is a five piece rock band, or a trough, where hundreds of
ancillary people feed.


Did anybody message Mike Love today, call him in the booth, let us hear 30 seconds off his cell phone
on the playback.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 23, 2012, 03:29:10 AM
Well it's not on youtube and there are no samples on the link to buy the album. If its never been booted
how, did he get it to do a cover?

Alan Boyd from the SMile sessions is in a Beach Boys cover band, do I understand that correctly?

Adam and Alan are friends, so I guess that's how.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on February 23, 2012, 03:39:52 AM
Well it's not on youtube and there are no samples on the link to buy the album. If its never been booted
how, did he get it to do a cover?

Alan Boyd from the SMile sessions is in a Beach Boys cover band, do I understand that correctly?

Have a poke around on his webpage - http://www.adammarsland.com/bio.html -  you'll find the good stuff like this:

"(Adam Marsland's Chaos Band) mounted an ambitious tribute to Beach Boys Carl and Dennis Wilson with Beach Boys archivist (and co-producer of THE SMILE SESSIONS) Alan Boyd. This drew the attention of Beach Boy Al Jardine, who appeared with the band at a few shows that year."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on February 23, 2012, 04:50:56 AM
Hmmm suites and medleys. While the above definition is very useful I would say that a medley usually uses partial songs rather than daisy-chaining complete songs.

So you might, for example, get the intro and verse of Song A merging into the chorus of Song B, a verse from Song C and then an instrumental fadeout courtesy of Song D.

A suite is certainly designed to go together, but you can have existing songs adapted for a suite. However the crucial difference with a medley would be that you'd be using the complete songs rather than fragments.

An example might be the opening of the 3rd side of BWPS (I'm In Great Shape/I Wanna Be Around/Workshop) which plays like a medley...some partial song ideas melded into one track. Whereas TLOS is songs brought together to make a suite.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 23, 2012, 06:06:59 AM
I don't think the whole album will have songs flowing into one another.  I know Brian said that, but I think he was talking about the ending bit that Mike was talking about.  I wouldn't get too excited about the differences between a medley and a suite...these guys aren't trained musicians.  Medley and suite and songs flowing into one another likely mean the same thing to Mike and Brian.  Remember, Brian called BWPS a rock opera, when it is certainly not.  The ending sounds really interesting, whatever it is, but I don't think the whole album is going to be that way...just the end 'little bit of a suite' thing (until there's no more album).

And in the end
The Love you take
Is equal to the Love...you make.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on February 23, 2012, 06:22:34 AM
I don't think the whole album will have songs flowing into one another.  I know Brian said that, but I think he was talking about the ending bit that Mike was talking about.  I wouldn't get too excited about the differences between a medley and a suite...these guys aren't trained musicians.  Medley and suite and songs flowing into one another likely mean the same thing to Mike and Brian.  Remember, Brian called BWPS a rock opera, when it is certainly not.  The ending sounds really interesting, whatever it is, but I don't think the whole album is going to be that way...just the end 'little bit of a suite' thing (until there's no more album).

And in the end
The Love you take
Is equal to the Love...you make.

The modular approach, stimulated by Lenny Waronker, worked nicely on BW 1988, not so nicely on Imagination. The idea of continuum worked fine in BWPS and TLOS. However, there is no obligation or need to release a product in that form. I'm sure someone over BW camp thinks that this helps portray Brian as a serious musician and that's why they keep doing it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 23, 2012, 06:33:59 AM
Or maybe, Brian is just into that approach, right now. Musically, he does think on his own too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on February 23, 2012, 07:21:27 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if Brian saw the new album as the Beach Boys' ABBEY ROAD (as in the last album) and figured he'd end it with all the little snippets/feels he has laying around. As long as the "suite" isn't a Beach Boys greatest hits medley!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 23, 2012, 11:31:41 AM
I don't think the whole album will have songs flowing into one another.  I know Brian said that, but I think he was talking about the ending bit that Mike was talking about.  I wouldn't get too excited about the differences between a medley and a suite...these guys aren't trained musicians.  Medley and suite and songs flowing into one another likely mean the same thing to Mike and Brian.  Remember, Brian called BWPS a rock opera, when it is certainly not.  The ending sounds really interesting, whatever it is, but I don't think the whole album is going to be that way...just the end 'little bit of a suite' thing (until there's no more album).

And in the end
The Love you take
Is equal to the Love...you make.

The modular approach, stimulated by Lenny Waronker, worked nicely on BW 1988, not so nicely on Imagination. The idea of continuum worked fine in BWPS and TLOS. However, there is no obligation or need to release a product in that form. I'm sure someone over BW camp thinks that this helps portray Brian as a serious musician and that's why they keep doing it.





That's fascinating. We all have our own view. The Warner staff producers were good. I Miss the way Warnner used to have it together.
I don't know if Brian Wilson is a musical genius in today's world, or some sort of product or puppet, manipulated by the solo band
or various advisors, He said the songs all flow into one another, and we have a caveat, from one poster, who thinks they mean just
the end of the album, not the whole thing. I'm not being disrespectful, I really don't know what the truth is, Did Brian Wilson compose
TLOS and put it together like that? or did Scott Bennett do it, Heck I don't know.

Something I do notice, is Brian Wilson seems more engaged in these recent interviews, he seems less maudlin,  more articulate,
he seems happy about the Beach Boy thing, maybe just having the Beach Boys, being back at Capitol, having the support of the label
The wives seem happy in the DIA video,  this seems to be an enjoyable project, several people are claiming  Wilson has written some
classic material. I don't know. Maybe we can all go down to the studio and we can watch them work for a few hours! (HA!)

He said the songs all flow into each other until you run out of album! HAH!

I don't really want to hear a record they made at 84, 70 is cool, with modern medicine, 70 is the new 58, Love and Jardine look
pretty healthy, DIA sounds good, but I am sure this will be the last album, maybe if this is a big hit, the label will insist on a follow up
but I doubt it, I think everybody see's this as the final Beach Boys album. Can somebody give us a report on what they are hearing
at the studio, there must be 200 people hanging around in there, from the look of the video, can somebody tell us what it
sounds like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on February 23, 2012, 11:45:25 AM
The wives looked happy in the "Do It Again" video?   I didn't think Melinda Wilson looked so happy....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 23, 2012, 11:58:31 AM
The wives looked happy in the "Do It Again" video?   I didn't think Melinda Wilson looked so happy....
Wondering if ex-wives like Marylin were allowed to visit?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 23, 2012, 12:12:55 PM
The wives looked happy in the "Do It Again" video?   I didn't think Melinda Wilson looked so happy....


Well she appeared, happier, than I had seen her in other previous video's. Perhaps she is not
a particularly happy woman in general I don't know. Perhaps she is the Yoko of Surf rock, I don't know.

But you know, a sesssion, where the wives are in the video, and all the backslapping, and smiling and
it just seems to be a happy time. I realize the footage was manipulated with editing, but you still get a sense
that everyone is pleased.

I have trouble imagining a session with so many people, it reminds of long long ago in the golden age of rock
when things like that used to happen more. Mike Love and the Beatles with Donovan and the Maharishi comes
to mind. Three Dog Night sessions used to be like that, with seven hundred people coming in and out all day.
The studio certainly seems spacious,   I thought that was the big room downstairs at Capitol, with all those large
baffles, thats the only room I've ever seen thats enormous like that, but apparently that was Ocean Way, which
I have never seen that I remember.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaco on February 24, 2012, 04:56:32 AM
http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html (http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html)

Quote
And Love likes what he's hearing.

"It's sounding really good in the studio," he says. "The tracks are pretty much done. We're still working on finishing up all the vocals, but it's sounding fantastic so far."

To Wilson's ears, "The word for this new album is mellow. It's the '60s revisited, kind of a dip back into the past, but it retains a little bit of the 2000s, too. So all in all, it's a very good album."

My guess for the album title: The Beach Boys - In A Mellow Tone


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 24, 2012, 05:10:48 AM
[He said the songs all flow into one another, and we have a caveat, from one poster, who thinks they mean just
the end of the album, not the whole thing. I'm not being disrespectful, I really don't know what the truth is,

I don't know what the truth is either.  But why would Mike make a point to say that there is a "little bit of a suite that's meant to end the album", if the whole album was going to be that way?  I'm looking forward to whatever they decide to release.
 
my favorite part of the interview
Q: Any theremin on there?
Wilson: That I can't answer. Mike, what do you think?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 24, 2012, 05:25:58 AM
http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html (http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html)

Quote
And Love likes what he's hearing.

"It's sounding really good in the studio," he says. "The tracks are pretty much done. We're still working on finishing up all the vocals, but it's sounding fantastic so far."

To Wilson's ears, "The word for this new album is mellow. It's the '60s revisited, kind of a dip back into the past, but it retains a little bit of the 2000s, too. So all in all, it's a very good album."

Thanks for posting!  Sounds good.

My guess for the album title: The Beach Boys - In A Mellow Tone

My guess is...probably not. ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 24, 2012, 05:36:21 AM
http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html (http://beachboysnews.blogspot.com/2012/02/424-brian-wilson-and-beach-boys-reunion.html)

Quote
And Love likes what he's hearing.

"It's sounding really good in the studio," he says. "The tracks are pretty much done. We're still working on finishing up all the vocals, but it's sounding fantastic so far."

To Wilson's ears, "The word for this new album is mellow. It's the '60s revisited, kind of a dip back into the past, but it retains a little bit of the 2000s, too. So all in all, it's a very good album."

My guess for the album title: The Beach Boys - In A Mellow Tone

No. I won't enter Kenny G. hell. Not me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 24, 2012, 06:05:38 AM
I don't think anyone here mentioned entering Kenny G, Don. I know it's a Friday and all, but some things are best left unsaid  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on February 24, 2012, 06:34:01 AM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud

Right!?

My father, a great artist, made me a collage for Christmas: he assembled tiny pieces of cut up $ bills to form the Brother logo. My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw it. If I could figure out how to post pictures to the board I'd definitely show you all...it's pretty incredible. I love that logo so much.

So do I.. dont we all.

Here's that piece of art my father made me for Christmas. It's assembled with incredibly tiny cut up pieces of dollar bills. (thanks Alholio71 for the uploading instructions!)

(http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/5562/dscn1347x.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 24, 2012, 06:37:23 AM
Dude, that is SO COOL


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on February 24, 2012, 06:43:57 AM
Right!? It looks much better in person....I'm still in awe when I see it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on February 24, 2012, 07:10:24 AM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud

Right!?



My father, a great artist, made me a collage for Christmas: he assembled tiny pieces of cut up $ bills to form the Brother logo. My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw it. If I could figure out how to post pictures to the board I'd definitely show you all...it's pretty incredible. I love that logo so much.

So do I.. dont we all.

Here's that piece of art my father made me for Christmas. It's assembled with incredibly tiny cut up pieces of dollar bills. (thanks Alholio71 for the uploading instructions!)

(http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/5562/dscn1347x.jpg)


Gorgeous , I now want one made out of old £1 notes


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on February 24, 2012, 07:29:54 AM
I don't get the Indian on horseback logo and the Beach Boys.  Is that the original Brother Records logo?   I think they can do better than that today.
:wall :angry :thud :thud :thud

Right!?



My father, a great artist, made me a collage for Christmas: he assembled tiny pieces of cut up $ bills to form the Brother logo. My jaw dropped to the floor when I saw it. If I could figure out how to post pictures to the board I'd definitely show you all...it's pretty incredible. I love that logo so much.

So do I.. dont we all.

Here's that piece of art my father made me for Christmas. It's assembled with incredibly tiny cut up pieces of dollar bills. (thanks Alholio71 for the uploading instructions!)

(http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/5562/dscn1347x.jpg)


Gorgeous , I now want one made out of old £1 notes

I want one made out of new £1 coins!

Seriously, that is tremendous. Worth its weight in, well, dollar bills at least.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amanda Hart on February 24, 2012, 08:37:10 AM
That is seriously the coolest thing I have ever seen. Your father should be very proud.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 24, 2012, 08:41:51 AM
rab,

Can I use that for my avatar? That is super-freaking cool! Well-done Dad! :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on February 24, 2012, 08:51:36 AM
rab,

Can I use that for my avatar? That is super-freaking cool! Well-done Dad! :)

most definitely!

@Amanda: He was really happy with it! I can't even imagine the amount of hours it took to make it....but it was well worth it I think!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on February 24, 2012, 09:13:50 AM
This piece of art is amazing! :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 24, 2012, 09:15:51 AM
rab,

Can I use that for my avatar? That is super-freaking cool! Well-done Dad! :)
most definitely!

@Amanda: He was really happy with it! I can't even imagine the amount of hours it took to make it....but it was well worth it I think!
Thank you, muchly!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on February 24, 2012, 05:33:50 PM
Beautiful, I would buy one in a second


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 06:17:50 PM
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-beach-boys-20120225,0,3559719.story

New album information. And some silliness.

"Waves of Love" seems to be another title we can add to the list -- and an already recorded Carl vocal.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MarcellaHasDirtyFeet on February 24, 2012, 06:43:45 PM
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-beach-boys-20120225,0,3559719.story

New album information. And some silliness.

"Waves of Love" seems to be another title we can add to the list -- and an already recorded Carl vocal.

And then a stunned, angry silence filled the message board...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RickD on February 24, 2012, 06:57:12 PM
"I'd like to reach back into the catalog a ways and go back to 'Lonely Sea' and 'Farmer's Daughter' and esoteric things that people haven't heard in a long time or ever," Jardine said. "That would be lovely. "
Good


Jardine said with a sad smile. "I wish there was a way to get Dennis on there too."
Not so good - btw Al, there is.

It's going to be included on the new album in a song called "Waves of Love."
now he's just taking the ....




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 24, 2012, 06:57:52 PM
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-beach-boys-20120225,0,3559719.story

New album information. And some silliness.

"Waves of Love" seems to be another title we can add to the list -- and an already recorded Carl vocal.


OK now I am getting excited, OK we have confirmation Carl Wilson is included on the one song, I think
that's nice. Anybody ever heard the tune?

Now yes that artwork, is great with the dollar bills, kudo's to your dad for being cool enough to do that,
and to you for being cool enough to share a photo of it.

Now back to the album there is another quote yesterday, where Love said all the tracks are done, but
this conflicts with Wilson's statement the other day that , they still need to write a few more tunes. So
Love was in te studio today or (whenever the article was written) writing lyrics, that's probably what Wilson
meant, that the tracks were down, but they need to write lyrics to few songs. So we also know, that There
will be a couple or three new Wilson/Love cowrites, but did anybody ever doubt that?


Now we are    hearing how mellow the new album sounds, and that's cool, but putting on my objective hat
I have to believe DIA and one other song will rock a bit, you can have say, a dozen songs, and ten of them
can be mellow, but you still need say two that rock or are uptempo, I mean there is no rule, but there is,
to maintain interest objectively, I just assume they have already considered that issue.


So I think AGD can step in pretty soon, and tell us more. We know a lot, Jardine confirmed Carl will be singing!

someone should do a synopsis of everything we know, but by the time its done, it will probably be out of date!

my blood smells the first single in about six or eight weeks! As soon as Wilson signs off on these new Love lyrics
they can bang out all the vocals to half a dozen songs in two weeks don't you think? Apparently, they have already
laid down vocals for at least a few.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the final new Beach Boys studio album, is almost upon us.

This is such a great thing, for them, for us, for the label, for the tour people, the audience at the shows,

Has anybody heard clips of the album or heard playback in the studio?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 07:33:36 PM
Vintage, I would calm down. I doubt AGD -- or anyone outside of the principals -- has heard much from the new record. I'm sure we'll know more in a couple of months. Waves of Love is an old Al tune (aren't they all) that he wanted to put on Postcard from California.

Speaking of which, why the weird vibes about the song? Is Al not supposed to get a tune on the record?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RickD on February 24, 2012, 09:21:19 PM
Speaking of which, why the weird vibes about the song?

just the title - could you fit any more BB cliches in 3 words! - I'm surprised Mike never used it for an album!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 09:33:53 PM
Speaking of which, why the weird vibes about the song?

just the title - could you fit any more BB cliches in 3 words! - I'm surprised Mike never used it for an album!  ;D

Heh. True enough. Matt Jardine posted about it last summer:

Quote
Just got back from Jeff Peters' studio where we did overdubs on Al Jardine's original song "Waves of Love". A rough demo version from '95 is currently on his Postcards CD but this new recording is KILLER!! Mike Kowalski on skins, Ed Carter on bass, Mike Meros on B3, Richie Cannata on baritone sax, Jeff Peters & Randy Mitchel on guitars, Al & Matt Jardine & Carl Wilson on vocals. I'm really excited about this "new" song.

Sounds like it was written during preparations for the 95 reunion album and that Carl did some work on it then. Who knows if this new instrumental track survives -- I'd love to have those guys on BB reunion record, even if it's for only one track.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Matt-Jardine-Music/138373012847174


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on February 24, 2012, 09:35:13 PM
Has this been picked up from the LA times story above?


"Their Grammy appearance did put the band back in front of the public but it's hard to tell if anyone was put off by the obvious lip-synching."



WTF! First article on the grammies to claim that isn't it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 09:37:47 PM
That's what I referred to as the silliness.

To the Times' credit, their author didn't say that. It was a person they were quoting, and the Beach Boys were allowed to forcefully deny it.

FWIW, though, I'm sure the guy was talking about Jeff singing for Brian, which did look a lot like lip syncing if you don't know how the BW stage setup works.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 24, 2012, 09:41:42 PM
Vintage, I would calm down. I doubt AGD -- or anyone outside of the principals -- has heard much from the new record. I'm sure we'll know more in a couple of months. Waves of Love is an old Al tune (aren't they all) that he wanted to put on Postcard from California.

Speaking of which, why the weird vibes about the song? Is Al not supposed to get a tune on the record?



Well I hope it's a better tune than, uh, Don't Fight The Sea, which although I love hearing the Beach Boys
sing, it does sound, kind of like a dorky Terry Jacks song. Maybe it's just me, and whenever I hear the words
Terry Jacks, I think of Seasons in the Sun, and hide in my room for two days until the sickness goes away! LOL

I gather, the reason people diss that, is because there is strong sentiment here, to include the Carl Wilson vocal
from the song "She is a Mystery" instead.

The finished "soul searchin on GIOMH sounded great to me, much better, than the lo fi demos I heard of it, I don't
know if that is a spruced up Paley session or what, but I like Soul Searchin and Desert Drive, and the song co written
with Van Dyke Parks,

Anyway, yeah great, Jardine gets one song, on there, Just a thought, Bear in mind, if, if, they do kind of a medley
suite thing on the end of the album, maybe they will do some editing Ala Abbey Road, and  there will be several short
pieces all edited together, Long Story short, you would get maybe 16-17 songs, because several were just snippets.
pieced together, maybe one verse only, or just several pieces that are only less than two minutes, each, and maybe the
Carl Wilson bridge is the piece they really want.

But what does the original Jardine song sound like, how would it compare to say, Don't Fight The Sea. There is just something
about that song, I Like the harmonies, the sentiment is OK, I like the sound effects, I think the track really sounds dated
maybe that's it. I just worked on a thing, with old backing tracks, and by the time we got through with the overdubs it
sounded new. Don;t Fight the Sea sounds like a 1980 track.


I should calm down I know. But this place is a repository and message board for Beach Boy fanatics, and if we can't talk about
the album here, where do I go!!!!


Somehow the cards are right, this album is just happening with good vibes, Pet Sounds maybe not, but they are so positive
and Carl Wilson is included.

I am slightly worried, about " A Mellow" album. Generally speaking for a whole album to flow, you still need a couple
upbeat things, even if its mostly ballads. I think these guys are aware of that kind of stuff, and have about 700 paid
and unpaid advisers, record producers, engineers, session men, the record label, wives, roadies, friends, managers.


My gut tells me this album will be the best thing they have done since their heyday, circa 64-75 or 77 whatever.

My observation, working together, is inspiring Brian Wilson, more than at any point, in many years, and his illnesses
have been treated, and are largely in remission or controlled with medication.


Seeing as how Danny Hutton is still a drinker, I wonder if people like that are allowed down to the studio.

I'm a much bigger fan of lyrics by Van Dyke Parks and others versus Mike Love, but at this late date, I think Mike
Love will do fine, Love is competent, if not superb. and I should calm down, or maybe you guys should get more excited.

The album is gonna be good, all the signs and vibes point to it. I wish it was five years earlier when their voices were
a bit younger, but they still sound good, Johnston is the only one I haven't heard sing in recent years, I cant pick him
out that much on DIA or the Grammy performance, what I could hear he seemed OK, and its gonna rock, I sincerely hope
they get the cotton out of their ears, and give us at least one upbeat song besides DIA remake.  

I was only a moderate Beach Boys fan, I admired them, and their sixties work, and Some of Wilson's solo work, but I am
recognizing, that they were one of the top five bands of alltime and to have one more album is just so cool, Smile and a new album!

I think it's telling they are with Capitol and working at an old studio where they worked in the sixties, even with the death of
most studios, due to protools,, there are still tons of studios in LA and the fact they are revisiting an old studio, they want that
"sound" I bet they achieve a great album in Spades, I hope so, for their sake and ours, this last album will go a long way to
reminding people and restoring their historical legacy as one of the great bands.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: warnakey on February 24, 2012, 10:20:18 PM
I think the Beach Boys should avoid using old material like "waves of love" and "do it again" as much as humanly possible. I'm up for some new music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 10:25:09 PM
I think the Beach Boys should avoid using old material like "waves of love" and "do it again" as much as humanly possible. I'm up for some new music.

Well, "Waves of Love" has never been released or heard, has it?

Big difference between that and something like "Do It Again," which has not only been released before, but recorded multiple times!

Realistically, too, we're looking at a pretty quick turnaround for this album. Maybe five or six months total. I think we have to expect a certain portion of the tracks to be previously written (but hopefully not officially released) material.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 24, 2012, 10:26:56 PM
I don't get Al's quote about not being able to have Dennis' voice on the record. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't consider re-recording "WIBNTLA".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RadBooley on February 24, 2012, 10:31:52 PM
I don't get Al's quote about not being able to have Dennis' voice on the record. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't consider re-recording "WIBNTLA".
What do we actually know about WIBNTLA? I hear the title thrown around a lot but I really don't know anything about the song. Has anyone heard it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on February 24, 2012, 10:33:45 PM
I'm hoping for a Rio Grande style suite on the new record!! :P :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 24, 2012, 10:35:17 PM
What do we actually know about WIBNTLA? I hear the title thrown around a lot but I really don't know anything about the song. Has anyone heard it?

A cover of the song appears on this album: http://www.amazon.com/Long-Promised-Road-Dennis-Wilson/product-reviews/B000NJWTH0 (http://www.amazon.com/Long-Promised-Road-Dennis-Wilson/product-reviews/B000NJWTH0). To my knowledge, only a few people have actually heard Dennis' original recording.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 10:36:51 PM
Well I hope it's a better tune than, uh, Don't Fight The Sea, which although I love hearing the Beach Boys
sing, it does sound, kind of like a dorky Terry Jacks song. Maybe it's just me, and whenever I hear the words
Terry Jacks, I think of Seasons in the Sun, and hide in my room for two days until the sickness goes away! LOL

Don't Fight the Sea is a Terry Jacks song. Al wrote the lyrics to an additional verse.

Waves of Love is an Al Jardine song, which he co-wrote with a friend named Larry Dvoskin.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 10:38:03 PM
I don't get Al's quote about not being able to have Dennis' voice on the record. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't consider re-recording "WIBNTLA".

I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 24, 2012, 11:09:04 PM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on February 24, 2012, 11:09:40 PM
EDIT: Double post


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 24, 2012, 11:39:31 PM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.

Frankly, I would prefer that neither be on there. It would be interesting to hear what the band can do today. Old recordings just make the whole thing seem weird to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 25, 2012, 12:35:32 AM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.

Frankly, I would prefer that neither be on there. It would be interesting to hear what the band can do today. Old recordings just make the whole thing seem weird to me.
I'm with you, leave the old stuff for an archival release. Lets have the band as they are now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on February 25, 2012, 12:48:06 AM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.

Frankly, I would prefer that neither be on there. It would be interesting to hear what the band can do today. Old recordings just make the whole thing seem weird to me.
Agreed. New album = new material (as much as possible).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 25, 2012, 01:18:20 AM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.

Frankly, I would prefer that neither be on there. It would be interesting to hear what the band can do today. Old recordings just make the whole thing seem weird to me.
Agreed. New album = new material (as much as possible).




Hey all opinions are valid, but let me please state the following.

So far as we can tell, the bulk of the material is new, with a few archival songs. and those are going to be heavily
reworked with new overdubs etc. Also Wilson and the Beach Boys, have a career long habit, of, dipping into the song
bag for a percentage of the material. Look at TLOS for example. The title track is from a  1949 record by Frankie Lane
and it sounds nothing like Frankie Lane, it sounds like Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys, and that gorgeous little edit piece
near the end, from 1968? whats that called, can't wait too long? gorgeous, Honestly, those were my favorite bits on the album.
Also these cats are all 70 years old, and the fact that they are even doing this at all, modern medicine increased lifespan, its
remarkable man. This is a methodology that they have always used, writing some new material, and using certain choice archival stuff
because either they were a couple songs short on material, or the material just filled a gap in the album. Sloop John B, is not an original
song, it's an old folk standard or whatever. But when I hear Sloop John B, I'm not thinking anything except wow that sounds good.


If there are  hypothetically, a dozen tunes on the album, and eight or nine are new, and three or four are old, this is just the common way of
assembling an album the Beach Boys or Wilson has always employed.


Harrison, Lennon and McCartney do this, Crosby Stills and Nash do this, Lindsey Buckingham does this, I think, especially for older guys
this is a typical thing to do. I agree with your sentiment however, Lets hear a fresh new Beach Boys album! and we will, but a few of the
tunes are gonna be reworked.

As far as Carl and Dennis Wilson, being included, I think it's great. Dennis is included, as a musician his drums or percussion being sampled
on DIA, and maybe he will be sampled elsewhere, as far as his being included as a songwriter, I only know  of two solo albums, and a few
Beach Boys songs, he died young, maybe nothing that would sound good is available. Carl Wilson they have more tracks available, he lived
much longer, and they have fairly modern recordings of his voice that can be adapted, for use on the new album.

Look This album will represent the three surviving Beach Boys, along with Johnston, who has been with them 46 years? and Marks
who is kind of an original member. And Foskett had to be brought in for the vocals because Brian Wilson can't hit the high falsetto
anymore. Carl Wilson was a very important Beach Boy, its very cool, they will have one or two songs, with him, I understand what
you're saying, new material, the bulk of songs will be new, and the old songs will be freshly reworked and overdubbed, or cut from
scratch with the old vocals flown on top. Most of the album will be reflecting the surviving Beach Boys as they are today,


If they cut several of their old hits, I'll be sick to my stomach, but that doesn't seem to be whats happening.
We are very lucky this is happening, Most of the old masters from the sixties can't do this because too many
band members have died, or they just refuse to do it. Simon and Garfunkel wont do it, The Beatles can't with both
Harrison and Lennon dead, and George Martin is like 86 years old. The WHO could but they wont. The Kinks could but
they wont. This is one of the last opportunities of our lives, to hear one of the great original bands cut something fresh.
Maybe the last time. The Stones or Pink Floyd or someone might do it one day, maybe. This is possibly the last fresh album
we will ever hear from the great bands of the sixties.







Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on February 25, 2012, 02:35:02 AM
I think some things are more suited for archival release. Especially when you get to things like this song, which go back so far. (And which may well show up the rest of the more recent material on the record.) You have to draw the line somewhere, right?

Perhaps, but judging the song solely on Adam Marsland's cover, I would conclude that "WIBNTLA" was a very good, but not earth-shattering song.

Even if including "WIBNTLA" is out of the question, I find it ridiculous that Dennis would have no presence on this new record. He was no less of a Beach Boy than either of his two brothers.

Frankly, I would prefer that neither be on there. It would be interesting to hear what the band can do today. Old recordings just make the whole thing seem weird to me.
Agreed. New album = new material (as much as possible).




Hey all opinions are valid, but let me please state the following.

So far as we can tell, the bulk of the material is new, with a few archival songs. and those are going to be heavily
reworked with new overdubs etc. Also Wilson and the Beach Boys, have a career long habit, of, dipping into the song
bag for a percentage of the material. Look at TLOS for example. The title track is from a  1949 record by Frankie Lane
and it sounds nothing like Frankie Lane, it sounds like Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys, and that gorgeous little edit piece
near the end, from 1968? whats that called, can't wait too long? gorgeous, Honestly, those were my favorite bits on the album.
Also these cats are all 70 years old, and the fact that they are even doing this at all, modern medicine increased lifespan, its
remarkable man. This is a methodology that they have always used, writing some new material, and using certain choice archival stuff
because either they were a couple songs short on material, or the material just filled a gap in the album. Sloop John B, is not an original
song, it's an old folk standard or whatever. But when I hear Sloop John B, I'm not thinking anything except wow that sounds good.


If there are  hypothetically, a dozen tunes on the album, and eight or nine are new, and three or four are old, this is just the common way of
assembling an album the Beach Boys or Wilson has always employed.


Harrison, Lennon and McCartney do this, Crosby Stills and Nash do this, Lindsey Buckingham does this, I think, especially for older guys
this is a typical thing to do. I agree with your sentiment however, Lets hear a fresh new Beach Boys album! and we will, but a few of the
tunes are gonna be reworked.

As far as Carl and Dennis Wilson, being included, I think it's great. Dennis is included, as a musician his drums or percussion being sampled
on DIA, and maybe he will be sampled elsewhere, as far as his being included as a songwriter, I only know  of two solo albums, and a few
Beach Boys songs, he died young, maybe nothing that would sound good is available. Carl Wilson they have more tracks available, he lived
much longer, and they have fairly modern recordings of his voice that can be adapted, for use on the new album.

Look This album will represent the three surviving Beach Boys, along with Johnston, who has been with them 46 years? and Marks
who is kind of an original member. And Foskett had to be brought in for the vocals because Brian Wilson can't hit the high falsetto
anymore. Carl Wilson was a very important Beach Boy, its very cool, they will have one or two songs, with him, I understand what
you're saying, new material, the bulk of songs will be new, and the old songs will be freshly reworked and overdubbed, or cut from
scratch with the old vocals flown on top. Most of the album will be reflecting the surviving Beach Boys as they are today,


If they cut several of their old hits, I'll be sick to my stomach, but that doesn't seem to be whats happening.
We are very lucky this is happening, Most of the old masters from the sixties can't do this because too many
band members have died, or they just refuse to do it. Simon and Garfunkel wont do it, The Beatles can't with both
Harrison and Lennon dead, and George Martin is like 86 years old. The WHO could but they wont. The Kinks could but
they wont. This is one of the last opportunities of our lives, to hear one of the great original bands cut something fresh.
Maybe the last time. The Stones or Pink Floyd or someone might do it one day, maybe. This is possibly the last fresh album
we will ever hear from the great bands of the sixties.







That is a fine realistic observation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 02:55:41 AM
I don't get Al's quote about not being able to have Dennis' voice on the record. I seriously don't understand why they wouldn't consider re-recording "WIBNTLA".

Because the original is just awesome - reworking anything on it would be a complete f*cking disaster. Far, far, far worse than what happened with "Soul Searchin'".

Plus, you may have noted that two of the song's vocalists are now dead.

"Waves Of Love" was - was - scheduled to be on the physical reissue of Alan's solo album: there's more info on it in a recent issue of ESQ, as related by the co-composer. Carl's vocal is not a finished one, nor recorded in a studio environment.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 25, 2012, 03:05:57 AM

I am slightly worried, about " A Mellow" album. Generally speaking for a whole album to flow, you still need a couple
upbeat things, even if its mostly ballads.


Don't worry about that. "Mellow" in Brian's world doesn't necessarily mean just ballads. IIRC he once described "Do it again" as a mellow rock song (which it is). Though I hope DIA won't be on the new album, I wouldn't be surprised if something like it would appear


I'm excited to hear Carl on "Waves of love". Hopefully it's a good tune. I don't know what people would have against it. It is practically new material. And it's certainly not a finished song they just put on the album. It will probably be re-recorded from scratch plus Carl's vocal. If they use "You're still a mystery" I hope they would re-work that one too.

I mentioned more than once that I'd like to hear them finish Dennis' "California slide" because I love that song. But I don't think they will do it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 25, 2012, 06:29:18 AM

I am slightly worried, about " A Mellow" album. Generally speaking for a whole album to flow, you still need a couple
upbeat things, even if its mostly ballads.


Don't worry about that. "Mellow" in Brian's world doesn't necessarily mean just ballads. IIRC he once described "Do it again" as a mellow rock song (which it is). Though I hope DIA won't be on the new album, I wouldn't be surprised if something like it would appear


I'm excited to hear Carl on "Waves of love". Hopefully it's a good tune. I don't know what people would have against it. It is practically new material. And it's certainly not a finished song they just put on the album. It will probably be re-recorded from scratch plus Carl's vocal. If they use "You're still a mystery" I hope they would re-work that one too.

I mentioned more than once that I'd like to hear them finish Dennis' "California slide" because I love that song. But I don't think they will do it.


I am not that hip to the world of unreleased Beach Boy songs, but I have heard some of them.

Sometimes with big groups like this, fans assume, that the surviving Beach Boys, know all about all the Dennis Wilson or Carl Wilson
tracks in the archives. That may not be true. If there is some great unreleased track by Carl or Dennis Wilson, Somebody should get
a mix of it, and go through Channels, to make sure the surviving Beach Boys know whats available, if they are or were looking for
an archival track.


Case in point, just to illustrate by example. In the case of the Beatles reunion tracks, subpar, mono cassette
demos were given to the surviving Beatles by Yoko Ono. Actually there were additional songs, and the songs Yoko
gave them, existed in a cleaner form with less generations. None of the surviving Beatles were aware of that, at the time.
Years later cleaner versions of the reunion songs surfaced on the internet, and they were much better, they could have had
a lot more to work with. But the other Beatles weren't familiar with John Lennon bootlegs and demos.


So if there is some cool Carl Wilson track, or something or Dennis Wilson, don't assume , go through channels and  get a copy
to the right person, a manager or one of the engineers or band members. In the case of the Beach Boy tribe, there are so many
sharp people, Scott Bennet, Darian Sanja, the managers, Mark Linnett,maybe they do know, but maybe they don't. The Beatles didn't.

I have some friends in old hit groups, and I will say when did you do this song, or that song, and sometimes they have no idea
or recollection about stuff like that. I think the new Pink Floyd archive set, somebody found some song, no one was aware of until
the last minute. 

I keep hearing about this song,  She is a Mystery an unreleased Carl Wilson vocal, and that Dennis Wilson song
Wouldn't it be nice to live again. Are you sure the Beach Boys even know about those songs? It's probably too late now
but six weeks ago, or three months ago, somebody should have told them.They probably know, but maybe the song only
exists on a cassette or reel to reel with the vocal locked into the backing track, maybe the multis to some of these old
tracks don't exist anymore. There are a whole bunch of bands that were signed to ABC Dunhill/MCA and somehow all
the multitracks got lost or thrown away, and those bands like Steppenwolf and Three Dog Night, can't even do remixes of their
albums because the multis are long gone, even some of the first generation mixes. So maybe they cant use a Carl or Dennis
Wilson vocal because it only exists mixed into a copy tape. Maybe they are doing the Jardine song with Carl Wilson, because
it's the only one where they have the multis. I found a bunch of multitracks in a trash can in the garage by Nils Lofgren once.
I called MCA and returned them. They should have given me a reward or something.


Well I hope Brian Wilson likes Mike Love's lyrics, and stays enthused, would he really argue much with Love if he didn't like them?
or would he just get passive and wrap it up quickly. Love knows whats at stake here, he'll do a good job on this album, this is probably
the last time he and cousin Brian will do an album.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 07:36:23 AM
Alan Boyd has been compiling an inventory of the Brother archives for close on a decade. I think that answers your "do they even know ?" question.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PS on February 25, 2012, 08:08:42 AM
Carl will be on the new album:

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-beach-boys-20120225,0,3559719.story

(---sorry, I should have read the most recent posts first - this news is redundant. Which begs the obvious question: how does one remove one's post?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 25, 2012, 08:41:36 AM
I feel for all you people who are setting themselves up for a disappointment. Just about every album released from Pet Sounds on has a song that was from an earlier period. You Still Believe In Me, Smile songs on various albums, When Girls Get Together, Good Timin', Good Time, Susie Cincinnati, etc. are older songs used for their current album of the time. Why would you expect anything different with the new album? Come on folks, be realistic here. I know, we know more than the band, itself. I get it! ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 09:03:39 AM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 25, 2012, 09:14:07 AM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?
Read the thread and you'll see exactly what my point is. People pissing and moaning that every song should be brand spanking new. That ain't gonna happen in Beach Boys world. Why argue this stuff. If you know your Beach Boys history, you know that there is always a good chance of old songs being used on new albums.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 25, 2012, 09:47:49 AM
Maybe I'm just having a bad day or something, but some days are just worse than others when reading this board. I find it frustrating with the history of this band that we argue about this kind of stuff. These guys are "The Beach Boys", but we argue over seeing surfboards associated with them, or a beach or the sun on a cover of an album. We argue over song names like "Waves Of Love" being cliche, etc.. Apparently, the band is embracing this image. Geez, they were signing and selling surfboards with The Smile Sessions Box Set. It has been this way since 1976, over 35 years, now. We keep trying to make them into something that they are not. All I'm hoping for is that they give their best efforts for the new album and the tour.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 11:20:24 AM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?
Read the thread and you'll see exactly what my point is. People pissing and moaning that every song should be brand spanking new. That ain't gonna happen in Beach Boys world. Why argue this stuff. If you know your Beach Boys history, you know that there is always a good chance of old songs being used on new albums.

That wasn't the point I was making at all. I think everyone knows the album will feature some material familiar to "collectors." My point was simply that I would prefer the album be an all-new recording, with only the current lineup performing. No ghostly, edited in vocals, please.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 25, 2012, 11:53:32 AM
Carl was a very big part of their sound and a well respected band member. I suppose it is their way to honor him and include his countenance in the reunion. Just speculating here. Bedsides, he was quite alive when those vocals were performed. Nothing ghostly about it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on February 25, 2012, 12:35:32 PM
No moaning here!

I think the whole 50th is going great. Who'd have believed it. SMiLE. The boys back togerher. A tour. A new album, which sounds very interesting judging by the info we have so far.

Never thought we'd have even one of those things.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 25, 2012, 01:47:41 PM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?
Read the thread and you'll see exactly what my point is. People pissing and moaning that every song should be brand spanking new. That ain't gonna happen in Beach Boys world. Why argue this stuff. If you know your Beach Boys history, you know that there is always a good chance of old songs being used on new albums.

That wasn't the point I was making at all. I think everyone knows the album will feature some material familiar to "collectors." My point was simply that I would prefer the album be an all-new recording, with only the current lineup performing. No ghostly, edited in vocals, please.
My point entirely, I'm not moaning I welcome any new album, exactly as they want it, Just my personal preference for a new song cycle.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 25, 2012, 02:56:21 PM
Alan Boyd has been compiling an inventory of the Brother archives for close on a decade. I think that answers your "do they even know ?" question.


Yeah I saw him in the long SmiLe documentary, did that come with the box set? I only have the two disc which I love.
He seemed like a sharp and dedicated guy, I guess he would have access to get ahold of the band? He and those
other guys all seemed like good archivists, They really have good people around them. The Darian Sanja, Scott Bennett
crowd, Mark Linnett, Alan Boyd, the Beach Boys and Brian Wilson are  looked after, like an American Icon or treasure now.

I am quite pleased how while still preserving some privacy, all these people, seem to help get info to the fans about
recordings and projects. You too Andrew, thanks for maintaining the groups privacy and dignity, but getting us some
good info.


We are starting to get info every 24-48 hours, When is the kick off date in New Orleans 3 months? I bet we get the single
in advance of the show, I'm just talking out my ass, but I have a feeling they are all inspired and want the single out
at least by the kickoff date, They have to be a little further along than they tell us in the press, I can't stop blabbing the
whole thing is so great!


Andrew please explain one thing, Soul Searchin was a debacle why ? it sounded good on GIOMH, are you saying
Wilson and company scrubbed some BBoys vocals to make it just a duet for the solo album, is that why you think its
blasphemy? The Soul Searchin and She's a Mystery boots I heard, sounded rough, if Wilson wanted to include a song
with his brother, why couldn't he leave on the other vocals also? or is it they scrubbed a good backing track?


If Mystery is that good, maybe they are doing that one also, and Jardine neglected to mention it, because it's not his song.


I'm blabbing too much, always better to listen rather than talk, especially me not being an expert, but the whole thing
is so damn exciting, a new Beach Boys album in 2012 who would have thought that!


When you type Darian Sanja, and do your spell check before posting, it comes up Sanka, astronaut coffee!!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on February 25, 2012, 02:57:01 PM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?
Read the thread and you'll see exactly what my point is. People pissing and moaning that every song should be brand spanking new. That ain't gonna happen in Beach Boys world. Why argue this stuff. If you know your Beach Boys history, you know that there is always a good chance of old songs being used on new albums.

That wasn't the point I was making at all. I think everyone knows the album will feature some material familiar to "collectors." My point was simply that I would prefer the album be an all-new recording, with only the current lineup performing. No ghostly, edited in vocals, please.
My point entirely, I'm not moaning I welcome any new album, exactly as they want it, Just my personal preference for a new song cycle.
Same here. I will be happy with anything the boys put out, and I am well aware of their pedigree, often finishing older songs for a new album.

The only thing that has me worried is the choice of "Do it Again" as a lead-off promo (hoping it will be on the album only as a bonus track). There is also a history here - Postcard from California is riddled with remakes and Al seems to still be in that mindset; the last album we got from the Boys was Stars and Stripes, which was all remakes.

If the group wants to use a Carl vocal, that's a-OK with me, especially since it is a previously unheard song. I am actually a big fan of "Free as a Bird" and "Real Love." I just hope they don't go back to the well of old songs and old ideas too often for the new record.

They already led off an album with "Do it Again," and that album was 20/20. See my point?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 25, 2012, 03:11:55 PM
Congratulations on telling us what we all knew anyway. Your point is ?
Read the thread and you'll see exactly what my point is. People pissing and moaning that every song should be brand spanking new. That ain't gonna happen in Beach Boys world. Why argue this stuff. If you know your Beach Boys history, you know that there is always a good chance of old songs being used on new albums.
at wasn't the point I was making at all. I think everyone knows the album will feature some material familiar to "collectors." My point was simply that I would prefer the album be an all-new recording, with only the current lineup performing. No ghostly, edited in vocals, please.
My point entirely, I'm not moaning I welcome any new album, exactly as they want it, Just my personal preference for a new song cycle.
Same here. I will be happy with anything the boys put out, and I am well aware of their pedigree, often finishing older songs for a new album.

The only thing that has me worried is the choice of "Do it Again" as a lead-off promo (hoping it will be on the album only as a bonus track). There is also a history here - Postcard from California is riddled with remakes and Al seems to still be in that mindset; the last album we got from the Boys was Stars and Stripes, which was all remakes.

If the group wants to use a Carl vocal, that's a-OK with me, especially since it is a previously unheard song. I am actually a big fan of "Free as a Bird" and "Real Love." I just hope they don't go back to the well of old songs and old ideas too often for the new record.

They already led off an album with "Do it Again," and that album was 20/20. See my point?
Real Love was pretty good, but hey I'm a BB's fan, I expect better than alright. Thats how much I respect these guys. If an old song 9s reworked then we will all have a jaundiced view of it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 03:29:40 PM
Andrew please explain one thing, Soul Searchin was a debacle why ? it sounded good on GIOMH, are you saying
Wilson and company scrubbed some BBoys vocals to make it just a duet for the solo album, is that why you think its
blasphemy?

The original BB backing vox were scrubbed, and they were far superior to what Brian did.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 25, 2012, 04:04:33 PM
Andrew please explain one thing, Soul Searchin was a debacle why ? it sounded good on GIOMH, are you saying
Wilson and company scrubbed some BBoys vocals to make it just a duet for the solo album, is that why you think its
blasphemy?

The original BB backing vox were scrubbed, and they were far superior to what Brian did.


Oh that is nasty. He made a duet with his brother, but scrubbed other parts by the BBoys, that is kind of
awful. Because it's a very good song, and wow that's too bad. I can see the more you peel the onion, there
are reasons for hurt feelings everywhere. Happily everybody has gotten over it. At least to where they are
all digging the new album.


As to the Free As A bird Real Love example, I Love them, the Beatles doing two new songs! My point was
they got a really bad inferior tape to work with, a mono cassette, down a couple or three generations. There
were cleaner copies, and better takes they could have used, and the two reunion songs would have sounded
better, but the Beatles were unaware of that. They did not have an Alan Boyd kind of guy, ferreting out that
kind of issue.

Jardine only mentioned Carl Wilson on the one song, the wave song that he (Jardine) wrote. But I don't think
that excludes the possibility of the Beach Boys using "She's A Mystery" or some second song featuring Carl Wilson.
The only thing Jardine excluded in his comments, was using a Dennis Wilson vocal. Maybe they just don't have
any Dennis Wilson to work with. Carl Wilson's beautiful tenor and voice timbre is unmistakable however. I hope
they can use his voice on two songs, it will really give the effect to the listener of a complete new Beach Boys
album, current and new but still with Carl Wilson.I just can't wait, I need to go do something else for a bit
come back in a week see what we have learned.


So anyway we learned, there will be a Jardine song, so my question is OK, Brian will be the one with the most
songwriting credits, but we know for sure, Mike Love and Al Jardine are getting some writing credits also.
Can we assume that Mr Disney Girls will get one song after 46 years of loyal service, or does his song get bumped
with Brian back in the studio? I'd say one song on this album for a songwriter has to be worth, several hundred
grand, Does Johnston get a salary on the road, or a split? I heard he is a nice guy, I hope he gets a piece of
the tour this is a big payday,


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on February 25, 2012, 04:29:22 PM
It never sat well with me that SIP or I guess Stars And Stripes was the last Beach Boys album, so I'm pretty well satisfied with the way things are going overall.  As others have said, I'd prefer the archival tracks stayed on archival releases myself, but I won't complain.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 04:35:48 PM
Andrew please explain one thing, Soul Searchin was a debacle why ? it sounded good on GIOMH, are you saying
Wilson and company scrubbed some BBoys vocals to make it just a duet for the solo album, is that why you think its
blasphemy?

The original BB backing vox were scrubbed, and they were far superior to what Brian did.

IIRC, Brian isn't even on the Beach Boys' version of SS. It's Mike (very audible), Carl, Al, Bruce and Matt Jardine.

The same thing happened, incidentally, on the version of "In My Room" that the band recorded with Tammy Wynette. It was a gorgeous version, with some great stuff from Carl. When Tammy's version of the song turned up on a tribute album, the band's voices had been replaced by a wall-o-Brians.

Andrew please explain one thing, Soul Searchin was a debacle why ? it sounded good on GIOMH, are you saying
Wilson and company scrubbed some BBoys vocals to make it just a duet for the solo album, is that why you think its
blasphemy?

The original BB backing vox were scrubbed, and they were far superior to what Brian did.
Oh that is nasty. He made a duet with his brother, but scrubbed other parts by the BBoys, that is kind of
awful. Because it's a very good song, and wow that's too bad. I can see the more you peel the onion, there
are reasons for hurt feelings everywhere. Happily everybody has gotten over it. At least to where they are
all digging the new album.

I don't know if there were actually hurt feelings over that. The band had refused to finish or put out the track, so Brian went ahead and did it. I've never heard that anyone in the band felt one way or another about it.

Jardine only mentioned Carl Wilson on the one song, the wave song that he (Jardine) wrote. But I don't think
that excludes the possibility of the Beach Boys using "She's A Mystery" or some second song featuring Carl Wilson.

The song is called "You're Still a Mystery." The lead vocal is by Brian, with Mike adding some key lines. I don't recall Carl being especially audible in it. I don't doubt he's there, but it's hardly a "featuring Carl Wilson track."

So anyway we learned, there will be a Jardine song, so my question is OK, Brian will be the one with the most
songwriting credits, but we know for sure, Mike Love and Al Jardine are getting some writing credits also.
Can we assume that Mr Disney Girls will get one song after 46 years of loyal service, or does his song get bumped
with Brian back in the studio? I'd say one song on this album for a songwriter has to be worth, several hundred
grand, Does Johnston get a salary on the road, or a split? I heard he is a nice guy, I hope he gets a piece of
the tour this is a big payday

Until we see a tracklist and writing credits, we don't know what will be on the album. Al's tune is clearly in contention, but who knows if it makes the cut or not? Until that interview, most of the talk had been about Brian's contributions to the album.

I believe Bruce is salaried. Also, I doubt that, even if he does have a song on the album, it would be worth "several hundred grand." I'm not sure there's money like that in writing an album track in this day and age. CDs aren't selling well, and digital sales are pretty tiny. I doubt he's on it as a writer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 25, 2012, 07:09:28 PM
Thanks for the correction Wirestone. As well as the info.


I know CD sales are way down, In my mind I made a few suppositions, that the forthcoming album
will be big in Europe as well as the USA and some other parts of the world. That the album is being
supported by a huge 50Th Anniv. tour. That the B Boys are getting lots of free publicity, in the New York
Times, Los Angeles Times, that much more free media will follow, and I was thinking, this album will
have a long shelf life as probably the Beach Boys final studio album. The label is hot for this, for
commercial reasons as well as historical. I was thinking 3-5 million units worldwide, and ongoing
sales as part of the catalogue and official canon, and so I very unscientifically thought, oh that's
gotta be worth several hundred grand for an album cut on here.

I should chill a bit, I had some free time, and am just excited about the forthcoming album. Unlike
other classic bands who do a project, the Beach Boys are somewhat tight lipped, but they do offer
some updates directly, and through "channels" and there is some leakage from participants or
personell from the studio , record label or other ancillary people.

This is such a rare gift, people my grandfathers age, didn't normally live past 70, let alone make a possible
masterpiece, and the sad legacy of rock, Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Hendrix, Lennon, Keith Moon, Dennis Wilson
Carl Wilson, etc etc. The surviving groups who could do something but don't. This may be the last great album
from one of the sixties era greats, unless perhaps the Stones or Simon & Garfunkel or somebody does it once more.
I know I talk a bit too much, but this is just a great thing.

My guess today, is that the performance and recording quality will be quite good, if they have some great songs
then this is a home run. People slammed and ignored the recent "Eagles" studio album. I mean they sold some copies
but spent years making it, and people seemed unhappy. I think the opposite will happen with this Beach Boys album
I can't put my finger on it, but it feels in my gut like this is gonna be huge. I Love it when some of my musical hero's
climb the charts and show people what it's really all about, take the youngsters to school, I am biased, I want this
to succeed, on paper this is about the biggest classic rock album, it's possible to make. When people talk about the
Beatles or Stones or Dylan or Spector and Leave the Beach Boys out of that top five list of all time, I don't think they
have ever liked that. This one is gonna work, and sell forever, erase the memory of the last couple Beach Boy studio
albums that were just not up to that high standard. Come on Beach Boys! Yes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on February 25, 2012, 09:39:51 PM
All this talk about using an unreleased Carl vocal, and no one has mentioned "Dancing the Night Away"? THAT was a beautiful vocal on his part. The track for that is also lovely, a rockin' little thing, and also a wonderful group vocal for the "somewhere out in Malibu" part. I'm kinda bummed that "Waves of Love" got scrapped for the Postcard re-release, but eh, so be it. Is anybody even sure "Waves of Love" was even supposed to really be a "Beach Boys" song? I know Carl is on it, and Bruce (I think), but I'm pretty sure it was recorded in the mid-'90s for an Al solo thing. All I know is I hope this album isn't dragged down by politics and makes it so we have to get one solo "Mike", one solo "Al" and one solo "Bruce" written track to please everybody. Hopefully they just pick the best material available, and if it happens to mostly be written by Brian, than so be it, and if Carl happens to be on a few tracks, so be it, and if he doesn't, that's ok too, because they should pick the best stuff, and I don't think Carl or Dennis will be forgotten any time soon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 10:37:51 PM
All I know is I hope this album isn't dragged down by politics and makes it so we have to get one solo "Mike", one solo "Al" and one solo "Bruce" written track to please everybody.

Well, that's up to "executive producer" Love, I guess.

I don't know how you avoid a bit of that. I mean, all the guys are writing (not sure about Bruce). But people want an album with Brian at the helm. So you have to balance that somehow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 25, 2012, 10:43:27 PM
Jardine only mentioned Carl Wilson on the one song, the wave song that he (Jardine) wrote. But I don't think
that excludes the possibility of the Beach Boys using "She's A Mystery" or some second song featuring Carl Wilson.

Lead vocal on that is Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on February 25, 2012, 11:07:17 PM
I was thinking 3-5 million units worldwide, and ongoing
sales as part of the catalogue and official canon, and so I very unscientifically thought, oh that's
gotta be worth several hundred grand for an album cut on here.

 :lol  Where to begin? Still Cruisin' is the only studio album since Pet Sounds that we know has sold over 1 million copies worldwide. That relied on the massive success of 'Kokomo' and also featured three classic tracks. Also, 3-5 million in album sales worldwide is enough to get you into yearly top ten lists....so you're talking Rihanna territory there.

I think the tour will give it a boost and such, but I'd be shocked if it did any better than 300K worldwide and that's being very, very generous. It could just as well sink below 100K worldwide. A solo songwriting credit on one song on the album won't really amount to much to be honest. We're talking like a few grand.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on February 25, 2012, 11:44:22 PM
Is this Waves of Love song on Jardine's album available online somewhere for me to listen to? Never heard this one, I'd like to listen to it and imagine a full Beach Boys recording of it to get a pseudo feel for what the new album will be like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 25, 2012, 11:56:50 PM
Is this Waves of Love song on Jardine's album available online somewhere for me to listen to? Never heard this one, I'd like to listen to it and imagine a full Beach Boys recording of it to get a pseudo feel for what the new album will be like.

I've looked. Haven't found. "You're Still a Mystery" was out there at one point , but Brother Records has pulled it down now, which could suggest something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 25, 2012, 11:58:15 PM
Don't know whether it's been booted, but it was slated to be a bonus track on Al's re-released album until that got canned.

Aren't BRI pretty astute with finding things on youtube nowadays?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Myk Luhv on February 26, 2012, 12:03:55 AM
Yeah, I mean, sh*t -- if BRI was as good at uploading as they are at taking down, Beach Boys Central might even be a reality this year!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on February 26, 2012, 12:07:49 AM
Ahh, I see. I thought it was released/booted. That's a bummer.

Would looove to see Still A Mystery on the new album, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 26, 2012, 01:13:39 AM
I was thinking 3-5 million units worldwide, and ongoing
sales as part of the catalogue and official canon, and so I very unscientifically thought, oh that's
gotta be worth several hundred grand for an album cut on here.

 :lol  Where to begin? Still Cruisin' is the only studio album since Pet Sounds that we know has sold over 1 million copies worldwide. That relied on the massive success of 'Kokomo' and also featured three classic tracks. Also, 3-5 million in album sales worldwide is enough to get you into yearly top ten lists....so you're talking Rihanna territory there.

I think the tour will give it a boost and such, but I'd be shocked if it did any better than 300K worldwide and that's being very, very generous. It could just as well sink below 100K worldwide. A solo songwriting credit on one song on the album won't really amount to much to be honest. We're talking like a few grand.


I didn't realize the sales numbers for the Beach Boys had sunk that low, but those last couple studio albums were not that great,
and maybe I am just dead wrong, but they are gonna do much better than a couple hundred thousand units, huge free media coverage
the big tour, and supposedly the high quality of this new album, and the drama of the reunion, and the swansong, if this album is as good
as they say it's going to be, I still say 1-2 million units worldwide.

Didn't Brian Wilson presents Smile 2004 surpass between one and two million worldwide. Now that was 8 years ago
but still, this has the Beach Boy name, and everything else, if the album is good, they will do well. I hope.

Now I realize you were quoting numbers for sales going back to the late sixties, I find that hard to believe that some of those albums
didn't do better, but that best of package sold several million , a few years ago, No if this album is good, they'll do a couple million
world wide, too many good things are happening, the stars are right this time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 26, 2012, 01:40:06 AM
I was thinking 3-5 million units worldwide, and ongoing
sales as part of the catalogue and official canon, and so I very unscientifically thought, oh that's
gotta be worth several hundred grand for an album cut on here.

 :lol  Where to begin? Still Cruisin' is the only studio album since Pet Sounds that we know has sold over 1 million copies worldwide. That relied on the massive success of 'Kokomo' and also featured three classic tracks. Also, 3-5 million in album sales worldwide is enough to get you into yearly top ten lists....so you're talking Rihanna territory there.

I think the tour will give it a boost and such, but I'd be shocked if it did any better than 300K worldwide and that's being very, very generous. It could just as well sink below 100K worldwide. A solo songwriting credit on one song on the album won't really amount to much to be honest. We're talking like a few grand.


I didn't realize the sales numbers for the Beach Boys had sunk that low, but those last couple studio albums were not that great,
and maybe I am just dead wrong, but they are gonna do much better than a couple hundred thousand units, huge free media coverage
the big tour, and supposedly the high quality of this new album, and the drama of the reunion, and the swansong, if this album is as good
as they say it's going to be, I still say 1-2 million units worldwide.

Didn't Brian Wilson presents Smile 2004 surpass between one and two million worldwide. Now that was 8 years ago
but still, this has the Beach Boy name, and everything else, if the album is good, they will do well. I hope.

Now I realize you were quoting numbers for sales going back to the late sixties, I find that hard to believe that some of those albums
didn't do better, but that best of package sold several million , a few years ago, No if this album is good, they'll do a couple million
world wide, too many good things are happening, the stars are right this time.
3-5 million? No chance. Outside of a small group of music fans, no-one gives a sh*t about a BB's reunion I'm afraid. The world has moved on check out the sales of the last Who album in 2006, their first since 1982. The world yawned, scratched it's arse and went back to bed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Tord on February 26, 2012, 01:41:28 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Features/2012-02-26-PNI0226ae-beach-boysPNIBrd_ST_U.htm (http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Features/2012-02-26-PNI0226ae-beach-boysPNIBrd_ST_U.htm)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 26, 2012, 01:51:27 AM
'Wilson says, "I don't think we're gonna do 'Smile.' I personally don't want to. We're not gonna do 'Smile.'"
At this point, Love steps in.
"Brian, you don't think we might do one song, like 'Heroes and Villains' or something?" he asks.
"Oh, absolutely," Wilson says. "I thought you meant the whole thing. Of course we can do 'Heroes and Villains.'"

Oh Bri.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on February 26, 2012, 04:07:48 AM
Hilarious  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Cam Mott on February 26, 2012, 04:13:54 AM
I love the sound of that. Sounds like two old cousins ought to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 26, 2012, 04:39:43 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Features/2012-02-26-PNI0226ae-beach-boysPNIBrd_ST_U.htm (http://www.usatoday.com/USCP/PNI/Features/2012-02-26-PNI0226ae-beach-boysPNIBrd_ST_U.htm)


Oddly, some of the USA today article seemed to be a verbatim reprint from the times article
the other day, but certain portions of this article seemed new.

They are getting so much press on this, and the guys  seem to be so content and into this project.
If the album is really good, I think this is gonna go big. I know conventional wisdom says, they can only
move a few hundred thousand units worldwide, and the audience for classic rock has left the station
years ago. But I think this is gonna cross over to young and old and really be a hit. As long as the album
is as good as they are making seem.I haven't been this excited since I heard SMiLe was coming out.

They sure delivered the goods on SmiLe , they are gonna deliver on the new album too Damn I can't
wait to hear the gosh darn thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Cam Mott on February 26, 2012, 10:41:55 AM
I wasn't expecting much albumwise but DIA and the Grammys have raised my expectations considerably. However, even if the album is a steaming pile of crap I am very excited about the Boys getting back to together and the love going around already. Winning.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 26, 2012, 07:40:32 PM
I wasn't expecting much albumwise but DIA and the Grammys have raised my expectations considerably. However, even if the album is a steaming pile of crap I am very excited about the Boys getting back to together and the love going around already. Winning.

That's the spirit!

The album won't be crap, it might even be the best thing they have done since the late sixties, early seventies.
I think people get sentimental as they age, and fifty years is fifty years, sadly as solo artists, it's tough for them
to even get deals, or get their work out. Once they finally started hanging out, and working, I think they started
enjoying themselves. They don't have the skills or concentration they might have had 20-30 years ago, but they
have so much experience, desire to uplift their legacy, such a good supporting team, the label seems to be 110%
behind them. The press is eating it up like candy from a baby.Modern recording technology is a big asset, I think
most of us prefer the old magnetic tape at 30 ips, but they have the best microphones, room acoustics, engineer staff
the editing capabilities now are amazing. All they need is three or four great songs, and three or four good songs
and they have a borderline masterpiece on their hands.

Some people knocked the sound, saying it was all autotuned, I didn't really here that,nor did other professionals
I work with who heard it. It might have been autotuned, but we didn't notice that. It sounded to us like the timber
of their voices had aged, but that sounded good. DIA remake I am talking about. The thing about TLOS, Wilson's
lead vocals didn't sound so hot, but he sounded better on Gershwin and Disney I don't understand that, maybe it
is the autotune. Who cares, before autotune, many other similar methods were employed, punching in, vari tape speed
the album is gonna be good. When my father was 70, about all he cared about was reading the paper or just waking
up at all. To be making a good album is fantastic! they sort of look seventy, but they seem to have the energy of
guys 10-15 years younger. Particularly Jardine and Love, Wilson looks a bit older, but he's smiling a lot and joking
in all these interviews, they seem happy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on February 27, 2012, 05:57:48 AM
'Wilson says, "I don't think we're gonna do 'Smile.' I personally don't want to. We're not gonna do 'Smile.'"
At this point, Love steps in.
"Brian, you don't think we might do one song, like 'Heroes and Villains' or something?" he asks.
"Oh, absolutely," Wilson says. "I thought you meant the whole thing. Of course we can do 'Heroes and Villains.'"

Oh Bri.  ;D

Mike Love encouraging Brian to do "Heroes And Villains".  Yet another never-thought-I'd-see-the-day.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doinnothin on February 27, 2012, 07:07:01 AM
Maybe they'll finish Can't Wait Too Long [Been Way Too Long] for the record!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 27, 2012, 08:39:35 AM
Maybe they'll finish Can't Wait Too Long [Been Way Too Long] for the record!


Don't think so. Brian used part of it on TLOS and I don't believe he would be up for working on it again.



Quote
Mike Love encouraging Brian to do "Heroes And Villains".  Yet another never-thought-I'd-see-the-day.  :-)


You know, it makes a lot of sense to do that song. The Smile box is a big seller and people probably would like to hear some of it so that makes a lot of sense. And to play it on the anniversary tour, which should show as many sides of Beach Boys music as possible would make sense. And that tour... it just makes a lot of sense to tour together for the anniversary and play some Beach Boys songs, which makes sense because what other songs should they play that would make sense ? Of course they could play Chcuk Berry's "Rock and roll music" which was a hit for the Beach Boys in 1976, that was before "Kokomo" became No 1 in 1988, so that would make sense..... sense, sense,sense...... :3d

I'm happy that Mike is a better lyricist that speaker......  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on February 27, 2012, 11:15:59 AM
CD/LP/download sales are so low these days that as another poster has said, almost nothing sells millions these days. Only a few over-hyped and under-talented artists beloved of teenagers sell that sort of tonnage.

The Beach Boys could pull a great album out of the bag, get great reviews, even air play and a couple of genuine hit singles...the album could crack the top 10 in the USA and UK....and still not sell a million worldwide. That's not because they are The Beach Boys but because music sales are very low.

I'll buy this new record even if is a steaming pile of dung....though to be honest at this point my least expectations are of an album that is listenable with 3 or 4 really good tracks - and it could well end up being better than that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on February 27, 2012, 12:05:39 PM
I very much doubt this would happen, but even if they can't (due to technical limitations of separating vocals and music on old recordings) or don't want to use a Dennis Wilson song/ vocal (too old, poor sound quality etc), it would be lovely if they put in a snatch or two of him singing, talking, playing the drums (beyond any such sample of his drums on DIA) or even laughing at the beginning or end of a track (in some kind of context within the song/ album) as recognition to the cool dude who was as much a Beach Boy as anyone on the new record. He deserves at least that much, if we are talking 50 years of the group, and not just a snapshot of the group today. He was the real Beach Boy after all, whose surf, cars and girls lifestyle inspired many of their earliest songs  8) .


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on February 27, 2012, 12:40:32 PM


and supposedly the high quality of this new album, and the drama of the reunion, and the swansong, if this album is as good
as they say it's going to be, I still say 1-2 million units worldwide.

Didn't Brian Wilson presents Smile 2004 surpass between one and two million worldwide. Now that was 8 years ago
but still, this has the Beach Boy name, and everything else, if the album is good, they will do well. I hope.


Jesus. Ok, you know how crazy it would be for them to sell 2 million albums worldwide? Last year, the tenth best selling album in the United States was Lady Antebellum's Own The Night. It sold 1.2 million copies in the United States which is probably about how many The Beach Boys would have to sell here to reach 2 million worldwide. There's no way. They won't get any music video play on television (as if there's much of that anymore, anyway) and Adult Contemporary stations are the only ones that will play their tunes (and that's if they have a soft rock number or whatever that's very, very good). This band doesn't even get played on classic rock stations, only Oldies stations of which most of the country don't even have access to One.


Brian Wilson's Smile has sold a few hundred thousand copies worldwide. I'd guess about 300,000, maybe slightly more. In the UK where the band seems to have their biggest cult following, it sold over 100,000. Based on its US chart success, I couldn't imagine more than 150,000 State-side. Again, you're way overestimating album sales in today's market. Surpassing 200K in the US in one year is now enough to make Billboard's Annual Top 100.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 27, 2012, 02:15:27 PM
'Wilson says, "I don't think we're gonna do 'Smile.' I personally don't want to. We're not gonna do 'Smile.'"
At this point, Love steps in.
"Brian, you don't think we might do one song, like 'Heroes and Villains' or something?" he asks.
"Oh, absolutely," Wilson says. "I thought you meant the whole thing. Of course we can do 'Heroes and Villains.'"

Oh Bri.  ;D

Mike Love encouraging Brian to do "Heroes And Villains".  Yet another never-thought-I'd-see-the-day.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I would love to see Heroes and Villains with Mike in the band. I love how he does the Heroes and Villains Part 2 bass vocal, "duh heroes, duh heroes, the heroes and villains".

on a related note, I hate how during the Grammy performance of Good Vibrations, Jeff did the Asher-version "AND I'M PICKIN' UP" thing before the chorus.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 27, 2012, 08:23:03 PM


and supposedly the high quality of this new album, and the drama of the reunion, and the swansong, if this album is as good
as they say it's going to be, I still say 1-2 million units worldwide.

Didn't Brian Wilson presents Smile 2004 surpass between one and two million worldwide. Now that was 8 years ago
but still, this has the Beach Boy name, and everything else, if the album is good, they will do well. I hope.


Jesus. OK, you know how crazy it would be for them to sell 2 million albums worldwide? Last year, the tenth best selling album in the United States was Lady Antebellum Own The Night. It sold 1.2 million copies in the United States which is probably about how many The Beach Boys would have to sell here to reach 2 million worldwide. There's no way. They won't get any music video play on television (as if there's much of that anymore, anyway) and Adult Contemporary stations are the only ones that will play their tunes (and that's if they have a soft rock number or whatever that's very, very good). This band doesn't even get played on classic rock stations, only Oldies stations of which most of the country don't even have access to One.


Brian Wilson's Smile has sold a few hundred thousand copies worldwide. I'd guess about 300,000, maybe slightly more. In the UK where the band seems to have their biggest cult following, it sold over 100,000. Based on its US chart success, I couldn't imagine more than 150,000 Stateside. Again, you're way overestimating album sales in today's market. Surpassing 200K in the US in one year is now enough to make Billboard's Annual Top 100.


OK , if numbers have gone down that far Jesus. I knew album sales were way down, progressively over the last decade, but
no I didn't know it was that bad. If I understood you guys correctly,  ten albums sold a million units in the  USA last year, probably only
a handful of singles. I knew it was bad, but not that bad! Yikes


Still we have a couple things in their favor, one take the Smile five disc or Beadle remaster boxes, people were paying for
either five discs (beach boys) 14 discs (beatle remasters) or two discs (Beach boys 2 disc set) but the jerk people who count
that stuff only counted each five disc box set as one unit. It really is five, you are getting the money for five, you have issued five
but in their magic math everytime someone bought five discs of Smile Billboard and the other organizations   said it was one copy
which is pretty expensive since people were paying like a 150 bucks apiece. the Beatles one is even worse, people were plunking
down enough money for 14 discs! a pretty penny indeed, and it was counted by the I dint know what to call them, crooks, so there is
the whole what constitutes a unit. They might give you  credit for a hundred thousand but you really just pocketed the money
for a half a million


Second,    McCartney and new Beatles projects do still sell a couple million   So this is a perfect time for the Beach Boys to be able to
do that on this one, if the album is good.  The label is behind them. All the original members are hitting the road hard. They are getting
enormous free did I say free Press in the largest news and music publications in the country, there is an enormous swell of support
for the Beach Boys, what they have been through, a great deal of pride in them as an American institution, they appeal to California    
people because they are the native sons,  people do surf here and ride those kind of cars, and AL that. The right wing parents like them
and their right wing beach kids are encouraged to like them. Because they are politically safe playing benefits for Ronald Reagan, inoffensive
lyrics, music that makes you feel good.  All the conservatives like them because the message is so compelling, a human interest story.
The liberals and artists like them, because of their prowess in the studio, innovation,   musical chops. The country needs hero's'
people are outta work, whole communities    are losing their homes and ability to support their family. Here comes nutty Brian Wilson
and the Beach Boys with a message of peace and love, and a good time,   They are to America what the Beatles are to the UK,
They are making every right move, it's a human interest story, a message of hope, overcoming adversity, and a great musical story
they are going to sing one more time on record and across America and the world. meanwhile they will keep getting on every television
and radios station for free press, day after day, week after week. The last time one of the original genius groups of the sixties will
ever offer a new album...


If this is played right with the delivery of a really good album., the label going for broke behind them, all the free publicity,  a successful tour
where literally millions of Americans and Britons will see and hear them in their local town, and read about this heartwarming story in the
local press, and with all the sharp dedicated people who work with them

There may be only ten gold albums per year in America right now, but this has a shot at being one of them. This is a special moment..



Any more news on the music, song titles,   descriptions anything fresh?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on February 28, 2012, 01:43:05 AM
Every unit in a multidisc set is counted as long as it is a certain length. So the Smile box does count as five units per set sold. Also, gold albums are for only half a million in sales and platinum is the award for one million copies sold.

You are right about McCartney as his new, proper studio albums do reach the million mark. A lot of that is due to the tour. If two million people see him live and one in four buys the album, he is halfway there. The tour for the Boys will dwarf any other promotion for this album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on February 28, 2012, 03:38:21 AM
You are right about McCartney as his new, proper studio albums do reach the million mark.

...actually, I don't think he's had a platinum studio album since the mid-'80s.  They all go gold (and then some), but don't reach a million in the US.  Worldwide, though, they probably top a million.

His live sets tend to go platinum, but they're multi-disc...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 28, 2012, 04:37:18 AM
Every unit in a multidisc set is counted as long as it is a certain length. So the Smile box does count as five units per set sold. Also, gold albums are for only half a million in sales and platinum is the award for one million copies sold.

You are right about McCartney as his new, proper studio albums do reach the million mark. A lot of that is due to the tour. If two million people see him live and one in four buys the album, he is halfway there. The tour for the Boys will dwarf any other promotion for this album.

Look I think you are partially right. Billboard and the RIAA and whoever else have some funky rules regarding how
old music, or multidisc music is counted, I don't have all the facts in front of me, and it's been hard for me to find
that stuff on line. Needless to say I am not an accountant, math whiz or Business man.

Music is down, sales. But this new album and tour is an iconic moment. Its historical, this new album is the kind of thing
that can be bought by libraries, school districts for art, music and history classes. This album could be a cultural phenomenon
If the album is good, a wide cross section of people could dig this album. The arty younger music crowd, the California crowd,
the traditional Beach Boy fan, the old classic rock fan, social and political Conservatives  who normally tend to shy away from
pop artists. The Beach Boys have a long history of being associated with republicans like Ronald Reagan. All the parents that
want to turn their kids on to something cool. My cousins turned me on to Sgt pepper through the headphones in 67, that's how
it began for me. All the marketing that will remind people of what a historic moment this is, the last new album from one of the
iconic sixties bands, they are all dead or unavailable. The press is eating up this story, The New York Times, LA Times, USA TODAY
Rolling Stone, and they haven't even played one show or released a single new song yet. Brian Wilson's heartwarming return
after living in the abyss of mental illness.

Radio play, well, oldies , adult contemporary, and   they really need a good single, and some promoters with muscle to break
that for Billboard hot 100. They need to muscle that single into the top 20 or higher. At least for two weeks. They need to play it
on Letterman, Jay Leno, and everybody else. They need a cool video, the animated Hero's and Villians  video was interesting, but
kind of primitive. I Like the DIA video, something more like that, with a brand new killer song.    

People are rooting for  them. Now what do they play five thousand seaters? that's only a quarter million people, but you add
the extra shows, and European shows, a few big venues on special nights, maybe that number goes up to half a million. 10-20 million
just saw them on the grammys, they need to do the new song on televising on late night TV or CNN everywhere they can, they can
add perhaps 10-15 million people that will see the song,  


It doesn't matter, I just wanna hear the new album. But I can see, how this is their moment, and they can do very well with some
push and muscle and work. But the album and single have to deliver. They are not gonna go big based on their 70 year old appearance
and camaraderie in front of the camera. People wanna give them free TV exposure for this, both as entertainment, nostalgia, national pride
a human interest story, I hope they have a title more inspiring than, "that's why God made the radio" although, people say the song is
killer, so if it is. bring it on. Springsteen hit the cover of time and newsweek within a few weeks of each other,in I think 1975, it launched
him as the new Dylan, the new superstar, he launched into the stratosphere overnight, for my money he is a lucky guy, not anywhere on
the level of the Beach Boys or Beatles or Dylan. Or even Elvis Costello. The Beach Boys are poised to get that same kind of press,

Sorry for taking up your time. They all have more money in the bank than I'll ever have, I just hope I enjoy the album. But I really
do see how this is their moment to soar.


"thats why God made the radio"  Doesn't exactly roll off the tongue or imagination like, God Only Know's or Good Vibrations
But then California Girls is not exactly high lyrical art, yet it's a great song, so fingers crossed. You can't judge a song by it's title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on February 28, 2012, 04:43:55 AM
Just so everyone knows - you currently need to sell 500,000 units to earn a RIAA gold record certification.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on February 28, 2012, 06:10:00 AM
Just so everyone knows - you currently need to sell 500,000 units to earn a RIAA gold record certification.

Yeah that's not gonna happen..

Selling 50 thousand first week get's you a number 1, that's how bad it is these days..

Well for everyone expect Adele, man that numbers she is racking up, simply incredible


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 28, 2012, 07:56:49 AM
Every unit in a multidisc set is counted as long as it is a certain length. So the Smile box does count as five units per set sold.

Seven units, actually.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on February 28, 2012, 08:27:36 AM
So how many sells would it take to make a #1 on the singles charts?

What I'm getting at is that us hardcore fans in a coordinated effort maybe could create a hit, although maybe not a #1, for them by buying multiple downloads of the same song during the same week. Would that be realistic?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 28, 2012, 09:07:54 AM
So how many sells would it take to make a #1 on the singles charts?

What I'm getting at is that us hardcore fans in a coordinated effort maybe could create a hit, although maybe not a #1, for them by buying multiple downloads of the same song during the same week. Would that be realistic?

Singles are different, I think ... people do buy them in relatively large numbers as downloads. We'd probably have more impact as a coordinated album buying (both physical and digital) campaign.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on February 28, 2012, 12:50:20 PM
You are right about McCartney as his new, proper studio albums do reach the million mark.

...actually, I don't think he's had a platinum studio album since the mid-'80s.  They all go gold (and then some), but don't reach a million in the US.  Worldwide, though, they probably top a million.

His live sets tend to go platinum, but they're multi-disc...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Yeah, I was thinking on a global scale where he's clearly passed the million mark often lately. Should be noted though that his solo career has done far, far better in the United States than it has in the UK or most anywhere else. I think it's because, like a lot of other big acts, he plays all over this country due to the large amount of people/money there is to be had here. In the UK, his albums just kind of meet with a shrug and tend to fall off the charts quickly.

I'd expect the opposite for The Beach Boys though. In the UK, people listen to a wider array of music and understand the importance of this band. In the US, the idea of rock is so dominated by "RAWK!" that pretty much everything that isn't loud gets ignored (just turn on your local modern rock station to see what I mean). Granted, we have a lot of older baby boomers Stateside that are into the band's early surf stuff, but it's just weird how much easier it is to flip through the dial and hear AC/DC or Aerosmith in the United States than it is to hear The Beach Boys or Beatles.




[/quote]
Every unit in a multidisc set is counted as long as it is a certain length. So the Smile box does count as five units per set sold.

Seven units, actually.  ;D


Ah, you're right. Counting it as seven thanks to the two vinyl set for the album is the correct way to go about it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 28, 2012, 01:29:21 PM
Just so everyone knows - you currently need to sell 500,000 units to earn a RIAA gold record certification.


Look whatever the country by country breakdown turns out to be, I am thinking more in terms of
worldwide sales, because the Beach Boys have fans all over the world, like Britain for example,where
they me be more respected than in the states.

I realize it's half a million for gold and a million for platinum, but there must be some sort of gold or platinum
status based on the world wide sales totals also,

Anyway main point, the country,music world and both the entertainment and regular media are giving
huge attention to the Beach Boys celebration, reunion, and that bodes very well for sales and critical acclaim
when you consider the heartbreaking and joyous   circumstances, the loss of Carl and Dennis Wilson, the ressurrection
of Brian Wilson, the drive and desire of Brian Mike and Al, and Bruce and David, the media saturation, combined
with this large scale tour, promoting themselves on Letterman, CNN, Leno, and the other shows, the radio programmers
who really want to give them a break, if the album delivers the real goods, and they push a single hard, hopefully
with a vieo that can go viral.  Remember my example of Springsteen and how two back to back covers on Time and Newsweek
launched him into the stratosphere,  along with a good new album. THis is not just another album by Brian or the B Boys
this is a historic thing, this is a once in a lifetime, and they have all the muscle at Capitol behnid them, they are poised
everything, all the stars are right, if the album really delivers, people will be slapping them on he back and saying
so what have you guys been up to!, This is their moment, all their people, supporting staff, musicians, label, managers
people working radio, everybody has to go all out, this is their big shot. for commercial and critical ressurection.



Look they don;t need half a million sales to be vindicated commercially or artistically. This is their year, just so long
as Brian delivers a good album.  Brians band many be technically better, but that Beach Boys blend with Wilsons
vocal arrangements has the chemistry, and wisely they are using some of Wilson's guys and Mike's guys aren't bad
either, that Cowsill drummer seems to have a good feel, hard to tell from just the remake, but if he is a Cowsill he
probably well understands the chemistry of a vocal group and family group..



Any word on new titles or overdubs or freshly written songs, or anything informative


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on February 28, 2012, 05:59:59 PM
Look they don;t need half a million sales to be vindicated commercially or artistically. This is their year, just so long
as Brian delivers a good album.  Brians band many be technically better, but that Beach Boys blend with Wilsons
vocal arrangements has the chemistry, and wisely they are using some of Wilson's guys and Mike's guys aren't bad
either, that Cowsill drummer seems to have a good feel, hard to tell from just the remake, but if he is a Cowsill he
probably well understands the chemistry of a vocal group and family group..

The band line-up is actually what's convinced me that everything's being done right - because Cowsill and Totten are the two people from Mike and Bruce's band that I'd have chosen to join Brian's band. John Cowsill will *amaze* you - he's easily the best drummer any Beach Boys related act has had, as well as being a phenomenal vocalist. Watch the video of the Grammys if you can find it anywhere online now, and just look at his interplay with Nelson Bragg, and remember that while he knows the song, that's the first time he'd played in public with that band.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on February 28, 2012, 07:31:03 PM
Yes I've really enjoyed Cowsill's work as of late.  He's got a powerful sound and I think it's a great match for the band.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jackstar74 on February 28, 2012, 08:10:50 PM
Look they don;t need half a million sales to be vindicated commercially or artistically. This is their year, just so long
as Brian delivers a good album.  Brians band many be technically better, but that Beach Boys blend with Wilsons
vocal arrangements has the chemistry, and wisely they are using some of Wilson's guys and Mike's guys aren't bad
either, that Cowsill drummer seems to have a good feel, hard to tell from just the remake, but if he is a Cowsill he
probably well understands the chemistry of a vocal group and family group..

The band line-up is actually what's convinced me that everything's being done right - because Cowsill and Totten are the two people from Mike and Bruce's band that I'd have chosen to join Brian's band. John Cowsill will *amaze* you - he's easily the best drummer any Beach Boys related act has had, as well as being a phenomenal vocalist. Watch the video of the Grammys if you can find it anywhere online now, and just look at his interplay with Nelson Bragg, and remember that while he knows the song, that's the first time he'd played in public with that band.

As good as Cowsill is....the distinction of the best drummer any Beach Boys related act easily goes to Todd Sucherman


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on February 29, 2012, 03:08:11 AM
So how many sells would it take to make a #1 on the singles charts?

What I'm getting at is that us hardcore fans in a coordinated effort maybe could create a hit, although maybe not a #1, for them by buying multiple downloads of the same song during the same week. Would that be realistic?

Singles are different, I think ... people do buy them in relatively large numbers as downloads. We'd probably have more impact as a coordinated album buying (both physical and digital) campaign.
Good point. Unfortunately more expensive to carry out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on February 29, 2012, 04:24:28 AM
I've only seen some videos of Cowsill singing, but it wasn't that impressive. As a drummer though he's great


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 29, 2012, 05:14:28 AM
I've only seen some videos of Cowsill singing, but it wasn't that impressive. As a drummer though he's great


Well the thing about that, his name is Cowsill, so I presume, based on his apparent age, and appearance, he is
one of the "Cowsill" family. Which of course was a very successful sixties family band, which is what the Partridge Family
TV show was based on. if he is indeed from that clan, he is well used to hit records, going on the road, knowing how
to fit in, a backround in supporting melodic songs with the drums, the dynamics of a family band ala Wilson=Love
he is familiar with the great sixties music in general particularly melodic pop, and music wise, even though I just
saw the one song, he seemed to be a good fit, and he seemed to get along , the guys seemed comfortable around him.
Just a lot of small advantages that could be useful.
'

Oftentimes when a band who grew up together or is related loses a member, when they seek a replacement, they
seek someone with the chemistry to fit in. plus his chops and fills and tasty playing seemed Right

Now of course if he is not one of the Cowsills or their nephew or something I am really wiping the egg off my face,

Except for Foskett who seems to behave like a suspicious off duty policeman, all the guys I've met from Wilson's band
seem like sharp, but easy going mellow people I hope one of them leaks a song title or some information soon.

There are so many engineers, singers, musicians, publicists, family members, friends, working on this album, it may be
like a movie and even people who play on the album,have no idea what the whole picture looks like, There may not be one
engineer or drummer or bass player who has worked on the whole album and can offer a picture of what its like. I always get
nervous when the Beach Boys say they are akin an album that cant be explained or understood, until they edit it all
togethe! Yikes!

Just Kidding, we should get some more news soon on how much progress they have made in the studio, how many songs are done
some more song titles an overall description of what it sounds like, how many tracks on the album, whats the first single
who played on the album. Besides the Beach boys and Foster did anyone else sing on anything (god I hope not) Who played
did any of the living wrecking crew members pop in and play on a song. More info on the ending song suite medley. Are they filming
the recording sessions so we can see a highlight film.are they recording on tape at all, and then dumping it into protools
or are they going directly to protools from the beginning. Will there be any bonus tracks. Will Carl Wilson be featured on just
the one Al Jardine song, or is it likely Carl Wilson could be on two songs. Do they have anything groovy in mind for the artwork
Frank Holmes redux, standard Capitol art department. Any chance they'll go to Jardines remote Northern Cal retreat and do some vocals
up there to stay away from prying eyes. Do the guys take dinner break together. Do they have their own private lounges at Oceanway, do
they work like a easy noon to six kind of deal and call it, leave the engineer to do the tedious work, or do they go in there and do 12 hour
days,

Other than that, I don't have any questions till next week.




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on February 29, 2012, 05:23:26 AM
Look they don;t need half a million sales to be vindicated commercially or artistically. This is their year, just so long
as Brian delivers a good album.  Brians band many be technically better, but that Beach Boys blend with Wilsons
vocal arrangements has the chemistry, and wisely they are using some of Wilson's guys and Mike's guys aren't bad
either, that Cowsill drummer seems to have a good feel, hard to tell from just the remake, but if he is a Cowsill he
probably well understands the chemistry of a vocal group and family group..

The band line-up is actually what's convinced me that everything's being done right - because Cowsill and Totten are the two people from Mike and Bruce's band that I'd have chosen to join Brian's band. John Cowsill will *amaze* you - he's easily the best drummer any Beach Boys related act has had, as well as being a phenomenal vocalist. Watch the video of the Grammys if you can find it anywhere online now, and just look at his interplay with Nelson Bragg, and remember that while he knows the song, that's the first time he'd played in public with that band.

As good as Cowsill is....the distinction of the best drummer any Beach Boys related act easily goes to Todd Sucherman

Correct!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on February 29, 2012, 05:35:47 AM
Well the thing about that, his name is Cowsill, so I presume, based on his apparent age, and appearance, he is
one of the "Cowsill" family.
He is.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on February 29, 2012, 05:42:59 AM
Maybe they'll finish Can't Wait Too Long [Been Way Too Long] for the record!

That would be a great thing for the BB to do.
Brian spent so much time in 1966/67/68 creating excellent backing tracks and then, what a shame, they just didnt' finish the vocals!
Would love, love, love the hear this song completed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on February 29, 2012, 09:10:12 AM
Look they don;t need half a million sales to be vindicated commercially or artistically. This is their year, just so long
as Brian delivers a good album.  Brians band many be technically better, but that Beach Boys blend with Wilsons
vocal arrangements has the chemistry, and wisely they are using some of Wilson's guys and Mike's guys aren't bad
either, that Cowsill drummer seems to have a good feel, hard to tell from just the remake, but if he is a Cowsill he
probably well understands the chemistry of a vocal group and family group..

The band line-up is actually what's convinced me that everything's being done right - because Cowsill and Totten are the two people from Mike and Bruce's band that I'd have chosen to join Brian's band. John Cowsill will *amaze* you - he's easily the best drummer any Beach Boys related act has had, as well as being a phenomenal vocalist. Watch the video of the Grammys if you can find it anywhere online now, and just look at his interplay with Nelson Bragg, and remember that while he knows the song, that's the first time he'd played in public with that band.

As good as Cowsill is....the distinction of the best drummer any Beach Boys related act easily goes to Todd Sucherman


I've never seen Sucherman play live, only heard him on recordings with BW's band, but based on those I'd say he might be a more technically precise drummer but he doesn't have Cowsill's feel for the music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on February 29, 2012, 12:15:56 PM
Well the thing about that, his name is Cowsill, so I presume, based on his apparent age, and appearance, he is
one of the "Cowsill" family.
He is.  :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s6Pq4xcwHo

This is the best John Cowsill vocal performance! singing Folsom Prison Blues as a fresh-faced kid who probably never even jaywalked.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on February 29, 2012, 01:50:42 PM
I've seen John Cowsill play with Mike's band a couple of times.  Reminds me of DW.  That makes him perfect for the reunion.  There are any number of highly talented drummers out there.  Believe me, this guy "fits".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on February 29, 2012, 03:20:10 PM
The album is likely going to be a bit rushed, let's be honest. It will be too hard for them to finish it during the tour and they'd also like the fans to either hear it before the shows or buy the album because they attended the tour. That means that they kind of have an enforced deadline which means we might get some weaker songs or parts of songs that probably would have been thrown our or changed with just a few more months in the studio.

On the other hand, we know that the preparation and songwriting has been going on for awhile and that there's at least a half dozen songs they're happy enough to have already committed to/finished. That's a great sign.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on February 29, 2012, 03:53:43 PM
I've seen John Cowsill play with Mike's band a couple of times.  Reminds me of DW.  That makes him perfect for the reunion.  There are any number of highly talented drummers out there.  Believe me, this guy "fits".

Absolutely agree. Best man for the job. Great drummer, great singer, great musical heritage, great presence, great hair.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on February 29, 2012, 03:58:20 PM
The album is likely going to be a bit rushed, let's be honest. It will be too hard for them to finish it during the tour and they'd also like the fans to either hear it before the shows or buy the album because they attended the tour. That means that they kind of have an enforced deadline which means we might get some weaker songs or parts of songs that probably would have been thrown our or changed with just a few more months in the studio.

On the other hand, we know that the preparation and songwriting has been going on for awhile and that there's at least a half dozen songs they're happy enough to have already committed to/finished. That's a great sign.

It won't be rushed at all. Or rather, Brian does not spend that long recording albums anymore, and hasn't since Imagination.

Brian and his band recorded the tracks to That Lucky Old Sun in two days. Most of BWPS was recorded in three days. Even a project like BWRG was mainly recorded in a week or two, with work on vocals taking a month or two more.

We know that Brian was recording backing tracks at various points last year (with Joe Thomas and Jeff). The Beach Boys started recording vocals in May (the DiA session) and IIRC reconvened in the studio in November-December. They were recording last month and this month, and plan more work in March.

That means that, overall, Brian will have spent the better part of a year assembling tracks and the group will have had some five months to put down vocals.

I can see things getting tight if they want the album out in April, but I doubt that will happen. My guess is it comes out in May or June, which gives the production folks a couple of months to mix and promote the project.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on February 29, 2012, 04:56:05 PM
If you check Andrew's site you will see how fast they got Carl and the Passions "So Tough" finished and released. April 18th was the last session for Make It Good and the album was released on May 15th. Less than a month. An April release date for the new album with sessions ending in March isn't too far fetched.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on February 29, 2012, 04:59:15 PM
And if you want to play it that way, Pet Sounds was recorded in a few months. Certainly nothing longer than what's going on here. And the combination of BW's multi-instrumentalist band and modern recording tech means overdubs for a more layered production can happen even quicker than they might have done in days gone by.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on February 29, 2012, 05:07:54 PM
And if you want to play it that way, Pet Sounds was recorded in a few months. Certainly nothing longer than what's going on here. And the combination of BW's multi-instrumentalist band and modern recording tech means overdubs for a more layered production can happen even quicker than they might have done in days gone by.



Some sort of vague deadline, is perhaps even helpful. Focus to get it done. Not the ridiculous pressure of the sixties, turn it in by Wednesday
to get it on the radio Thursday, and the stores the following Monday.

From the description of sessions and schedules explained  here, it seems they have had plenty of time. Furthermore as an older man Wilson
can't do the 17 hour day everyday focus that helped lead to his breakdown years and years ago.


Rushed would be making them do the whole album in a month. Many of the great albums of all time were done in 1-5 months.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on February 29, 2012, 08:38:59 PM
If you check Andrew's site you will see how fast they got Carl and the Passions "So Tough" finished and released. April 18th was the last session for Make It Good and the album was released on May 15th. Less than a month. An April release date for the new album with sessions ending in March isn't too far fetched.

Hmmmm...maybe that's why it was only 8 tracks long...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 29, 2012, 09:05:33 PM
If you check Andrew's site you will see how fast they got Carl and the Passions "So Tough" finished and released. April 18th was the last session for Make It Good and the album was released on May 15th. Less than a month. An April release date for the new album with sessions ending in March isn't too far fetched.

Hmmmm...maybe that's why it was only 8 tracks long...

Or maybe they just wanted to save 10 Years of Harmony for a special occasion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on February 29, 2012, 11:14:47 PM
The album is likely going to be a bit rushed, let's be honest.

Why ?  Has anyone been touring recently ? Nope. Do we know if they've been in the studio or not ? Yes. Was Brian recording tracks back last summer ? Yes.

You any kin to Phil Cohen ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on February 29, 2012, 11:18:53 PM
The album is likely going to be a bit rushed, let's be honest.

Why ?  Has anyone been touring recently ? Nope. Do we know if they've been in the studio or not ? Yes. Was Brian recording tracks back last summer ? Yes.

You any kin to Phil Cohen ?

I think Phil's last night might actually be Thornhill


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 01, 2012, 04:19:54 AM
If you check Andrew's site you will see how fast they got Carl and the Passions "So Tough" finished and released. April 18th was the last session for Make It Good and the album was released on May 15th. Less than a month. An April release date for the new album with sessions ending in March isn't too far fetched.

Hmmmm...maybe that's why it was only 8 tracks long...
8 tracks is not the point. They could have taken a year or one month to record all of the tracks (they had sessions for more than 8 tracks), but It is the fact that it only took less than a month to release it since the final session.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 02, 2012, 02:06:43 AM
The album is likely going to be a bit rushed, let's be honest.

Why ?  Has anyone been touring recently ? Nope. Do we know if they've been in the studio or not ? Yes. Was Brian recording tracks back last summer ? Yes.

You any kin to Phil Cohen ?

I think Phil's last night might actually be Thornhill


I don't know what Thornhill is, is that a venue or TV show?

I guess even Mr Contrarian Phil Cohen doesn't dispute this new album is real, thank God.

I find that time passes very slowly while this new album is pending, a day without fresh news from the studio feels
like two weeks! I find myself muttering while I patter around the living room and kitchen, "well we should get news on the lead
single any day now"

It's funny how myopic people like me can be. First against million to one odds in Vegas, we get both a deluxe SmiLe sessions and
a new album, tour and DVD, future archival releases, rumors that the new album is top notch, and the only thing I can say is, God
I wish they would hurry up and release another video.

I don't have any feel for what the album sounds like based on the DIA remake, I tend to believe hearing one of the new tracks
will give us a much clearer idea what the actual album sounds like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 02, 2012, 11:06:05 AM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it? no one. don't get your hopes up. It's not like Mike would say in an interview, "yeah, there's a few good moments on here but nothing essential. we just don't have it the way we used to. track 5 is absolutely horrible."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 02, 2012, 12:53:53 PM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it?

Well, who else would know at this point?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Puggal on March 02, 2012, 01:18:39 PM
I really hope "Do it Again" is not included; I think remaking old hits is one of the most shamelessly lazy things a music group can do.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 02, 2012, 01:35:57 PM
I wouldn't mind hearing a little snippet at least of a new song, just to affirm that it's going to sound good, hopefully.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 02, 2012, 02:02:54 PM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it?

Well, who else would know at this point?

but again, it would be pretty dumb of them to say anything but good things about it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 02, 2012, 04:35:07 PM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it? no one. don't get your hopes up.

Who *ever* says an album is good besides the people working on it? Ben Clayton from Montana hasn't heard the fuckin' thing, thus I don't expect to hear his opinion on it any time soon and if I did, I wouldn't put too much stock in it.

It's not even half-finished at this point, so I doubt anyone from the press has heard anything. So... what, then?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 02, 2012, 05:18:42 PM
It's not even half-finished at this point, so I doubt anyone from the press has heard anything. So... what, then?

Your source on that would be?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 02, 2012, 06:03:05 PM
I really hope "Do it Again" is not included; I think remaking old hits is one of the most shamelessly lazy things a music group can do.


Just a thought on DIA. It has been made to market the band for promoters.

It serves the purpose of showing the band at work and what this NEW line-up can sound like.

It is a commercial.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 02, 2012, 07:34:28 PM
It's not even half-finished at this point, so I doubt anyone from the press has heard anything. So... what, then?

Your source on that would be?

Isn't that basically what Mike said a week or two ago?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 02, 2012, 07:38:19 PM
It's not even half-finished at this point, so I doubt anyone from the press has heard anything. So... what, then?

Your source on that would be?

Isn't that basically what Mike said a week or two ago?

He might have been talking about vocals. Given the mechanics of everything going on, it seems plausible that the vast majority of the album is already written and instrumental tracks cut. We do know Brian was recording tracks last summer with Joe and Jeff, and writing with them too. It also seems like a lot of that material is being used for this record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 02, 2012, 07:58:26 PM
It's not even half-finished at this point, so I doubt anyone from the press has heard anything. So... what, then?

Your source on that would be?

Isn't that basically what Mike said a week or two ago?


A Lot can happen in a week or two. Presuming that the news leaks aren't already
a couple weeks or months behind, what is actually happening.

In other words, I wouldn't be surprised if when they say something to the press,
its a little out of date already, that they are really somewhat further advanced than
they let on. I base that on reports there were sessions happening nearly a year or
9 months ago.

As to DIA being a good commercial, I agree, I don't think that means it won't be on the
album though. I think that depends on how much material is in the can, and how it sounds
next to the other songs. If it doesn't fit, I would expect it to be some sort of bonus track
if on the other hand, it seems to flow with the album, I would expect it to be on there, unless
they have several extra songs in the can.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 03, 2012, 12:31:25 AM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it?

Well, who else would know at this point?

 ::)





















OK, just messin' wit yo heads...  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on March 03, 2012, 12:50:41 AM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it?

Well, who else would know at this point?

 ::)





















OK, just messin' wit yo heads...  ;D

MoFo  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 03, 2012, 02:12:12 PM
Sure would love to hear a clip of song Mike and Al have been raving about.
C'mon throw us a bone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on March 03, 2012, 06:41:25 PM
who's saying the album is good besides the people working on it?

Well, who else would know at this point?

 ::)





















OK, just messin' wit yo heads...  ;D

:lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 03, 2012, 08:40:55 PM
The "half-finished" comment really had next to nothing to do with the rest of my post, guys :'( no need to over-analyze or anythang.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 03, 2012, 09:32:04 PM
The "half-finished" comment really had next to nothing to do with the rest of my post, guys :'( no need to over-analyze or anythang.

But we don't have anything else to do!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 04, 2012, 01:53:05 AM
I'm rather surprised by just how many copies some posters think this is going to shift. 50,000 units worldwide is optimistic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 04, 2012, 03:15:23 AM
I'm rather surprised by just how many copies some posters think this is going to shift. 50,000 units worldwide is optimistic.


That's crazy. Certainly you just say that to get a rise out of people.

Music sales are way way down, and the Beach Boys have been declining for decades.
However, this is a monumental occasion. The 50Th anniversary and the swan song or
final album, from one of the five or ten most significant acts in the history of the rock era.

All the surviving original members singing together, a huge tour. a live DVD to follow.
The label seems to be fully behind the project, with whatever muscle they can still project
in a pinch. For historic Capitol records, this is a prestige project, and it should make some
much needed money as well. It should also shine a light on the back catalogue for increased
sales there as well.


We don't yet know how many versions of the new album will be available, just the standard version
or will there be a deluxe version, or signed limited editions. Bonus tracks for Itunes or Best buy
or a double album version at double the price.


If they deliver with a good album, say something as good as That Lucky Old Sun, but with the Beach Boy
blend   instead of that well meaning but saccharine sounding solo group. (no offense to them)

This is the real undiluted deal man, this is the Owsley bomb, the Occam's razor, the Mt Everest of living classic
rock bands... These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

This is them, they even have Carl Wilson in the can to make a vocal appearance on one or two songs.  This is the four
way window pane of your musical soul.


Cream won't do it. The Beatles can't. The WHO can't and Won't. Hendrix is dead, so is Jim Morrison, so is Janis Joplin
Pink Floyd, could possibly do it, but they have refused. The Stones seemed to have uttered their last.As a group.


This album soon to be before you is the last of an extinct breed, one of the great iconic, hallowed bands of the sixties man.
The last album from survivors of the Happy revolution. Vietnam, Nixon, Woodstock a man on the moon, and who really killed
Kennedy...


This is it. If the album delivers, the sky is the limit, even with on line piracy, changing musical tastes, ageing vocal chords
Brian Wilson's fried brain and resorting to archival material to get Carl Wilson on the album.


This is not just another album. This is the last of its kind, and it is getting the full Monty treatment
from the record label, the faithful, a world tour. and supposedly some songs that will bring a tear
to our eyes and remember when.

Wouldn't you have liked to seen Sandy Koufax throw that last game, or Babe Ruth hit those
three homers when he was nearly through.. They still revere Abbey Road the last Beatles album
I think it sold two or three million downloads and remasters that one, 45 years after it came out.


Because of all things considered, the piracy, the changing types of music, their age, I say one to two
million world wide, in its initial run, unless they get lucky and catch a tailwind

If the album can fairly be described as Pet Sounds 2, or even just a great album, then the sky
is the limit, if they get lucky they could sell five million, depends on the single, how hard the label pushes
how many ads they buy on TV, radio and print, and on line,

They are getting tons of free advertising from the largest news and music publications on the planet.


A lot of people thought Mike Tyson was gonna knock out Buster Douglas too, but they weren't paying attention
to the fights before that one.


This album should do very very well, unless it stinks or the promotion people are bad at their jobs,
this  should go through the roof with hard work, experience, and the sentimental vote


1-2 million first year . more if they get lucky, much less if the album is a disappointment.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 04, 2012, 03:26:34 AM
These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

I beg to differ.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 04, 2012, 04:02:58 AM
These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

I beg to differ.  ::)

[bWhat do you Mean Andrew? Because some of them have died?

Hal Blaine is 83, Carl Wilson is dead, Brian Wilson took lots of drugs, nothing can be done
about those things.

What do you mean? it can't be the same because its 40 odd years later?




It's as much the same as is possible, with  deaths, old age, and the passage of half a century.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 04, 2012, 04:12:08 AM
These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

I beg to differ.  ::)


[bWhat do you Mean Andrew? Because some of them have died?

Hal Blaine is 83, Carl Wilson is dead, Brian Wilson took lots of drugs, nothing can be done
about those things.

What do you mean? it can't be the same because its 40 odd years later?




It's as much the same as is possible, with  deaths, old age, and the passage of half a century.

Being picky - Bruce wasn't on Today !, David wasn't on any of them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 04, 2012, 04:23:07 AM
These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

I beg to differ.  ::)


[bWhat do you Mean Andrew? Because some of them have died?

Hal Blaine is 83, Carl Wilson is dead, Brian Wilson took lots of drugs, nothing can be done
about those things.

What do you mean? it can't be the same because its 40 odd years later?




It's as much the same as is possible, with  deaths, old age, and the passage of half a century.

Being picky - Bruce wasn't on Today !, David wasn't on any of them.


Oh I see


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sam_BFC on March 04, 2012, 05:13:21 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 04, 2012, 05:29:42 AM

That's crazy. Certainly you just say that to get a rise out of people.

Music sales are way way down, and the Beach Boys have been declining for decades.
However, this is a monumental occasion. The 50Th anniversary and the swan song or
final album, from one of the five or ten most significant acts in the history of the rock era.

All the surviving original members singing together, a huge tour. a live DVD to follow.
The label seems to be fully behind the project, with whatever muscle they can still project
in a pinch. For historic Capitol records, this is a prestige project, and it should make some
much needed money as well. It should also shine a light on the back catalogue for increased
sales there as well.


We don't yet know how many versions of the new album will be available, just the standard version
or will there be a deluxe version, or signed limited editions. Bonus tracks for Itunes or Best buy
or a double album version at double the price.


If they deliver with a good album, say something as good as That Lucky Old Sun, but with the Beach Boy
blend   instead of that well meaning but saccharine sounding solo group. (no offense to them)

This is the real undiluted deal man, this is the Owsley bomb, the Occam's razor, the Mt Everest of living classic
rock bands... These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

This is them, they even have Carl Wilson in the can to make a vocal appearance on one or two songs.  This is the four
way window pane of your musical soul.


Cream won't do it. The Beatles can't. The WHO can't and Won't. Hendrix is dead, so is Jim Morrison, so is Janis Joplin
Pink Floyd, could possibly do it, but they have refused. The Stones seemed to have uttered their last.As a group.


This album soon to be before you is the last of an extinct breed, one of the great iconic, hallowed bands of the sixties man.
The last album from survivors of the Happy revolution. Vietnam, Nixon, Woodstock a man on the moon, and who really killed
Kennedy...


This is it. If the album delivers, the sky is the limit, even with on line piracy, changing musical tastes, ageing vocal chords
Brian Wilson's fried brain and resorting to archival material to get Carl Wilson on the album.


This is not just another album. This is the last of its kind, and it is getting the full Monty treatment
from the record label, the faithful, a world tour. and supposedly some songs that will bring a tear
to our eyes and remember when.

Wouldn't you have liked to seen Sandy Koufax throw that last game, or Babe Ruth hit those
three homers when he was nearly through.. They still revere Abbey Road the last Beatles album
I think it sold two or three million downloads and remasters that one, 45 years after it came out.


Because of all things considered, the piracy, the changing types of music, their age, I say one to two
million world wide, in its initial run, unless they get lucky and catch a tailwind

If the album can fairly be described as Pet Sounds 2, or even just a great album, then the sky
is the limit, if they get lucky they could sell five million, depends on the single, how hard the label pushes
how many ads they buy on TV, radio and print, and on line,

They are getting tons of free advertising from the largest news and music publications on the planet.


A lot of people thought Mike Tyson was gonna knock out Buster Douglas too, but they weren't paying attention
to the fights before that one.


This album should do very very well, unless it stinks or the promotion people are bad at their jobs,
this  should go through the roof with hard work, experience, and the sentimental vote


1-2 million first year . more if they get lucky, much less if the album is a disappointment.


vintagemusic is the anti-PhilCohen!  ;)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SonoraDick on March 04, 2012, 06:51:25 AM

That's crazy. Certainly you just say that to get a rise out of people.

Music sales are way way down, and the Beach Boys have been declining for decades.
However, this is a monumental occasion. The 50Th anniversary and the swan song or
final album, from one of the five or ten most significant acts in the history of the rock era.

All the surviving original members singing together, a huge tour. a live DVD to follow.
The label seems to be fully behind the project, with whatever muscle they can still project
in a pinch. For historic Capitol records, this is a prestige project, and it should make some
much needed money as well. It should also shine a light on the back catalogue for increased
sales there as well.


We don't yet know how many versions of the new album will be available, just the standard version
or will there be a deluxe version, or signed limited editions. Bonus tracks for Itunes or Best buy
or a double album version at double the price.


If they deliver with a good album, say something as good as That Lucky Old Sun, but with the Beach Boy
blend   instead of that well meaning but saccharine sounding solo group. (no offense to them)

This is the real undiluted deal man, this is the Owsley bomb, the Occam's razor, the Mt Everest of living classic
rock bands... These are the very same people who did, Good Vibrations, Pet Sounds, SmiLe, Today, and Summer Days.

This is them, they even have Carl Wilson in the can to make a vocal appearance on one or two songs.  This is the four
way window pane of your musical soul.


Cream won't do it. The Beatles can't. The WHO can't and Won't. Hendrix is dead, so is Jim Morrison, so is Janis Joplin
Pink Floyd, could possibly do it, but they have refused. The Stones seemed to have uttered their last.As a group.


This album soon to be before you is the last of an extinct breed, one of the great iconic, hallowed bands of the sixties man.
The last album from survivors of the Happy revolution. Vietnam, Nixon, Woodstock a man on the moon, and who really killed
Kennedy...


This is it. If the album delivers, the sky is the limit, even with on line piracy, changing musical tastes, ageing vocal chords
Brian Wilson's fried brain and resorting to archival material to get Carl Wilson on the album.


This is not just another album. This is the last of its kind, and it is getting the full Monty treatment
from the record label, the faithful, a world tour. and supposedly some songs that will bring a tear
to our eyes and remember when.

Wouldn't you have liked to seen Sandy Koufax throw that last game, or Babe Ruth hit those
three homers when he was nearly through.. They still revere Abbey Road the last Beatles album
I think it sold two or three million downloads and remasters that one, 45 years after it came out.


Because of all things considered, the piracy, the changing types of music, their age, I say one to two
million world wide, in its initial run, unless they get lucky and catch a tailwind

If the album can fairly be described as Pet Sounds 2, or even just a great album, then the sky
is the limit, if they get lucky they could sell five million, depends on the single, how hard the label pushes
how many ads they buy on TV, radio and print, and on line,

They are getting tons of free advertising from the largest news and music publications on the planet.


A lot of people thought Mike Tyson was gonna knock out Buster Douglas too, but they weren't paying attention
to the fights before that one.


This album should do very very well, unless it stinks or the promotion people are bad at their jobs,
this  should go through the roof with hard work, experience, and the sentimental vote


1-2 million first year . more if they get lucky, much less if the album is a disappointment.


vintagemusic is the anti-PhilCohen!  ;)


Not that there's anything wrong with that!    :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 04, 2012, 07:03:17 AM


vintagemusic is the anti-PhilCohen!  ;)


Not that there's anything wrong with that!    :)

Didn't say there was.   :-D
 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 04, 2012, 09:30:49 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?

Hmm… anyone know the sales figures for the last Joe Thomas-produced project?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 04, 2012, 09:31:41 AM
vintagemusic, no disrespect meant but if you really think the reunion album is going to sell between 1-5 million copies then you have no grip on the music industry in this day and age. 50,000 copies on initial release is much more likely. Check how much The Smile Sessions sold.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 04, 2012, 03:38:07 PM
Screw the number of sales.

Any album of songs with a 'Lucky', 'Postcard' etc theme with even a hint of 'Pet Sounds' could be a better 'final' work  than the country album that holds that (cough) honor at present.

Respectable numbers moved will be an added bonus but not the most important for this fan.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 04, 2012, 04:55:52 PM
vintagemusic, no disrespect meant but if you really think the reunion album is going to sell between 1-5 million copies then you have no grip on the music industry in this day and age. 50,000 copies on initial release is much more likely. Check how much The Smile Sessions sold.

While it's tough to predict sales, I would be wary of using TSS as any sort of benchmark. It was a seven disc archival release aimed at a specific group of fans -- and even then it outperformed expectations.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 05, 2012, 01:57:53 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?

Hmm… anyone know the sales figures for the last Joe Thomas-produced project?

Anyone know what the last album Joe Thomas produced was?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 05, 2012, 04:21:28 AM
Stevie Nicks' The Soundstage Sessions in 2009, I think. #47 on Billboard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 05, 2012, 04:35:16 AM
Many thanks Andrew.

Guradian review:

When a performer needs an album more than the listener, you know you're in for trouble. As Fleetwood Mac embark on the latest of their reincarnations with a 43-date tour across America and Canada and with plans to return to the studio later this year, Nicks pops her own money spinner on the merch stall. These 10 tracks recorded alongside her 2007 solo tour cover career highlights such as "Stand Back", "Sara" and "Landslide", but remain bewilderingly unchanged decades on. Even a cover of "Crash Into You" receives little interpretation from the Dave Matthews Band original. Only for diehard fans.

I hate trying to second guess how the BBs will be treated…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 05, 2012, 04:51:14 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?

Hmm… anyone know the sales figures for the last Joe Thomas-produced project?

Anyone know what the last album Joe Thomas produced was?



Well if the  idea is to go by what Joe Thomas has produced, the project would be in trouble sales wise
Joe Thomas seems like a sharp guy, who produces rock videos on vintage groups like Stevie Nicks, and
somehow stumbled into a relationship with Brian Wilson, producing the Imagination album. Much of his work
seemed to be farmed out to Session men and arrangers, and I know of no other artist of any merit Thomas
has ever produced, in the context of a new album.

Obviously Rick Rubin, Jack White, T Bone Burnett, there are qualified producers or co producers available.

But that doesn't matter. The Beach Boys have 50 years experience in the studio, and a cast of sidemen, that
could all be producers, writers and artists in their own right.

The question is, label support, timing, and the fact that this is no ordinary album., the label has something
special to sell, the original Beach Boys, more or less, doing a real bonafide special album, for the first time
in decades. I don't know how much Joe Thomas adds in the studio, but he seems to obey cardinal rule number
one, don't F up the music, he may not add much, but he doesn't force a bunch of incompetent choices to be made.,.
if he creates a good vibe in the studio, and makes the guys feel comfortable if he offers a little centeredness, in a sea
of quirky artists fine, that's his role, not the role of Phil Spector or George Martin, but a guy who attends to things,
makes sure the string section shows up, makes sure an arranger has charts ready, then fine.


No one knows how well this will sell, no one knows what kind of job the label or promo people will do. How much
money will be spent on ads, how much word of mouth there will be from the tour and album

But they have a special product here, it may be the death knell of classic sixties rock, but still this album can go
big big big, the final studio album from one of the most iconic groups of all time. A sympathetic press, dying to interview
the boys, much like the press used to interview the Beatles in the sixties, most of the groups are dead, or retired, and
here we have Brian Wilson, Mike Love and Al Jardine, and Bruce Johnston, mixing it up with the press, video clips of them
singing on a group overhead microphone in the Capitol tower, this is a red carpet nostalgia trip for baby boomers, and all
the suburban kids will hear from their parents, oh yeah, there was the Beatles, the Stones and the Beach Boys, and this
is a very special moment, little Johny, little Melissa,

Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and Time could offer front covers for this tour and album, and if the reviews say, oh this album is
special, this album transports you back to California Girls, Good Vibrations and God Only Knows., and if a great single starts
getting airplay, because Capitols promoters and indies start twisting arms, and if they buy ads, and it could go viral on the web
and , the all that free Establishment press eating up the story like candy, and Dear Carl Wilson include due to the wizardry of
magnetic tape

If the single is good, and Capitol pushes really really hard, and they start getting feature stories in time and newsweek, this
is gonna be very very big, three times four times bigger than Neil Diamond with Delirious Love

A group is more appealing, than stone faced broody Neil Diamond, there is the funny Beach Boy, the Clever Beach Boy, the spiritual
Beach Boy,

If this is played right, this stands in as a surrogate album for the Beatles album that never happened. This can go very very big, if they
play it right, if they play it hard, this can go big.


If everybody treats it, like eh, this means nothing, then that's what will happen, if on the other hand, you turn on your evening news
and see Paul McCartney or Pete Townsend say, this reminds me of what I wish we could have done, if your local CNN or ABC Broadcaster
looks dead into the camera and says, Ladies and Gentleman, the unbelievable has happened, The Beach Boys have recreated the time
and mood of so long ago with a brilliant new album, being raved about from wall street to London, this may be the most significant rock
album of the last twenty years.


If you start seeing that kind of press, watch what happens. But they gotta have a few first class songs, that live up to the hype
and Capitol has to open their wallets, and they need to call in every favor from every journalist, DJ and promo man they can,

Just watch,. this album is a rare opportunity. We will know pretty soon. Its all up to Brian and the boys delivering, and the PR machine
if they tell people this is one of the most significant albums in a decade, people will listen, people will believe, and in part, it might even
be the truth.

If they let this album die with ordinary promotion efforts, I will be very disappointed, the American Press is practically begging for interviews
they need a first rate journalist in the studio documenting the sessions for the special to air on ABC a week before the albums release.


The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last
final album.






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 05, 2012, 05:10:38 AM
If everybody treats it, like eh, this means nothing, then that's what will happen, if on the other hand, you turn on your evening news
and see Paul McCartney or Pete Townsend say, this reminds me of what I wish we could have done, if your local CNN or ABC Broadcaster
looks dead into the camera and says, Ladies and Gentleman, the unbelievable has happened, The Beach Boys have recreated the time
and mood of so long ago with a brilliant new album, being raved about from wall street to London, this may be the most significant rock
album of the last twenty years.

._.
You can't really be expected McCartney and Townsend to do publicity for this, and for it to be the most significant album of the past twenty years, can you?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 05, 2012, 05:11:43 AM
But The Beatles Anthology was done in the 90's, when record sales were stronger on the whole.

The industry really doesn't pull those sort of numbers any more, or at least certainly not old bands. You could have the most sympathetic press in the world, but the Beach Boys won't pull 5 million units. I mean, that is Gaga numbers (Born This Way has shipped 8 million). Even other pop stars of the moment don't come close - Drake's latest has 'only' sold 1.5 million to date, Kanye West's latest has sold 1.2 to date, and Adele's 21, the bestselling British album of the 21st Century, has sold 4 million. Katy Perry's latest has sold 2 million, but then it was released in 2010! You expect the Beach Boys to easily surpass in initial sales what Katy Perry, who the kids actually give a crap about, has done in two years? These are insanely popular albums too. No way will the group get close. It'll sell well, I'll buy one, but they won't get close to popstar numbers.

As Undesirable Element says, screw the number of sales. It's not important, the record is what matters. Although your faith is rather nice, just unrealistic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 05, 2012, 05:11:56 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?

Hmm… anyone know the sales figures for the last Joe Thomas-produced project?

Anyone know what the last album Joe Thomas produced was?



Well if the  idea is to go by what Joe Thomas has produced, the project would be in trouble sales wise
Joe Thomas seems like a sharp guy, who produces rock videos on vintage groups like Stevie Nicks, and
somehow stumbled into a relationship with Brian Wilson, producing the Imagination album. Much of his work
seemed to be farmed out to Session men and arrangers, and I know of no other artist of any merit Thomas
has ever produced, in the context of a new album.

Obviously Rick Rubin, Jack White, T Bone Burnett, there are qualified producers or co producers available.

But that doesn't matter. The Beach Boys have 50 years experience in the studio, and a cast of sidemen, that
could all be producers, writers and artists in their own right.

The question is, label support, timing, and the fact that this is no ordinary album., the label has something
special to sell, the original Beach Boys, more or less, doing a real bonafide special album, for the first time
in decades. I don't know how much Joe Thomas adds in the studio, but he seems to obey cardinal rule number
one, don't F up the music, he may not add much, but he doesn't force a bunch of incompetent choices to be made.,.
if he creates a good vibe in the studio, and makes the guys feel comfortable if he offers a little centeredness, in a sea
of quirky artists fine, that's his role, not the role of Phil Spector or George Martin, but a guy who attends to things,
makes sure the string section shows up, makes sure an arranger has charts ready, then fine.


No one knows how well this will sell, no one knows what kind of job the label or promo people will do. How much
money will be spent on ads, how much word of mouth there will be from the tour and album

But they have a special product here, it may be the death knell of classic sixties rock, but still this album can go
big big big, the final studio album from one of the most iconic groups of all time. A sympathetic press, dying to interview
the boys, much like the press used to interview the Beatles in the sixties, most of the groups are dead, or retired, and
here we have Brian Wilson, Mike Love and Al Jardine, and Bruce Johnston, mixing it up with the press, video clips of them
singing on a group overhead microphone in the Capitol tower, this is a red carpet nostalgia trip for baby boomers, and all
the suburban kids will hear from their parents, oh yeah, there was the Beatles, the Stones and the Beach Boys, and this
is a very special moment, little Johny, little Melissa,

Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and Time could offer front covers for this tour and album, and if the reviews say, oh this album is
special, this album transports you back to California Girls, Good Vibrations and God Only Knows., and if a great single starts
getting airplay, because Capitols promoters and indies start twisting arms, and if they buy ads, and it could go viral on the web
and , the all that free Establishment press eating up the story like candy, and Dear Carl Wilson include due to the wizardry of
magnetic tape

If the single is good, and Capitol pushes really really hard, and they start getting feature stories in time and newsweek, this
is gonna be very very big, three times four times bigger than Neil Diamond with Delirious Love

A group is more appealing, than stone faced broody Neil Diamond, there is the funny Beach Boy, the Clever Beach Boy, the spiritual
Beach Boy,

If this is played right, this stands in as a surrogate album for the Beatles album that never happened. This can go very very big, if they
play it right, if they play it hard, this can go big.


If everybody treats it, like eh, this means nothing, then that's what will happen, if on the other hand, you turn on your evening news
and see Paul McCartney or Pete Townsend say, this reminds me of what I wish we could have done, if your local CNN or ABC Broadcaster
looks dead into the camera and says, Ladies and Gentleman, the unbelievable has happened, The Beach Boys have recreated the time
and mood of so long ago with a brilliant new album, being raved about from wall street to London, this may be the most significant rock
album of the last twenty years.


If you start seeing that kind of press, watch what happens. But they gotta have a few first class songs, that live up to the hype
and Capitol has to open their wallets, and they need to call in every favor from every journalist, DJ and promo man they can,

Just watch,. this album is a rare opportunity. We will know pretty soon. Its all up to Brian and the boys delivering, and the PR machine
if they tell people this is one of the most significant albums in a decade, people will listen, people will believe, and in part, it might even
be the truth.

If they let this album die with ordinary promotion efforts, I will be very disappointed, the American Press is practically begging for interviews
they need a first rate journalist in the studio documenting the sessions for the special to air on ABC a week before the albums release.


The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last
final album.


I note the most repeated word is "if". 'Nuff said.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 05, 2012, 05:16:02 AM
The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last
final album.

No, and you're missing the point entirely. It sold that many because it was The Beatles.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 05, 2012, 05:18:35 AM
The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last
final album.

No, and you're missing the point entirely. It sold that many because it was The Beatles.

Also, to play the RIAA's game, it was 3 double disc sets. The numbers are gonna be inflated.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 05, 2012, 05:37:18 AM
Neil Diamond's previous (?) album (the one produced by Rick Rubin) went to number one in both the US and UK.  I don't think it is unreasonable to hope for a similar outcome for our guys.  But does anyone have any idea of what sales were like for the Neil Diamond album?

Hmm… anyone know the sales figures for the last Joe Thomas-produced project?

Anyone know what the last album Joe Thomas produced was?



Well if the  idea is to go by what Joe Thomas has produced, the project would be in trouble sales wise
Joe Thomas seems like a sharp guy, who produces rock videos on vintage groups like Stevie Nicks, and
somehow stumbled into a relationship with Brian Wilson, producing the Imagination album. Much of his work
seemed to be farmed out to Session men and arrangers, and I know of no other artist of any merit Thomas
has ever produced, in the context of a new album.

Obviously Rick Rubin, Jack White, T Bone Burnett, there are qualified producers or co producers available.

But that doesn't matter. The Beach Boys have 50 years experience in the studio, and a cast of sidemen, that
could all be producers, writers and artists in their own right.

The question is, label support, timing, and the fact that this is no ordinary album., the label has something
special to sell, the original Beach Boys, more or less, doing a real bonafide special album, for the first time
in decades. I don't know how much Joe Thomas adds in the studio, but he seems to obey cardinal rule number
one, don't F up the music, he may not add much, but he doesn't force a bunch of incompetent choices to be made.,.
if he creates a good vibe in the studio, and makes the guys feel comfortable if he offers a little centeredness, in a sea
of quirky artists fine, that's his role, not the role of Phil Spector or George Martin, but a guy who attends to things,
makes sure the string section shows up, makes sure an arranger has charts ready, then fine.


No one knows how well this will sell, no one knows what kind of job the label or promo people will do. How much
money will be spent on ads, how much word of mouth there will be from the tour and album

But they have a special product here, it may be the death knell of classic sixties rock, but still this album can go
big big big, the final studio album from one of the most iconic groups of all time. A sympathetic press, dying to interview
the boys, much like the press used to interview the Beatles in the sixties, most of the groups are dead, or retired, and
here we have Brian Wilson, Mike Love and Al Jardine, and Bruce Johnston, mixing it up with the press, video clips of them
singing on a group overhead microphone in the Capitol tower, this is a red carpet nostalgia trip for baby boomers, and all
the suburban kids will hear from their parents, oh yeah, there was the Beatles, the Stones and the Beach Boys, and this
is a very special moment, little Johny, little Melissa,

Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and Time could offer front covers for this tour and album, and if the reviews say, oh this album is
special, this album transports you back to California Girls, Good Vibrations and God Only Knows., and if a great single starts
getting airplay, because Capitols promoters and indies start twisting arms, and if they buy ads, and it could go viral on the web
and , the all that free Establishment press eating up the story like candy, and Dear Carl Wilson include due to the wizardry of
magnetic tape

If the single is good, and Capitol pushes really really hard, and they start getting feature stories in time and newsweek, this
is gonna be very very big, three times four times bigger than Neil Diamond with Delirious Love

A group is more appealing, than stone faced broody Neil Diamond, there is the funny Beach Boy, the Clever Beach Boy, the spiritual
Beach Boy,

If this is played right, this stands in as a surrogate album for the Beatles album that never happened. This can go very very big, if they
play it right, if they play it hard, this can go big.


If everybody treats it, like eh, this means nothing, then that's what will happen, if on the other hand, you turn on your evening news
and see Paul McCartney or Pete Townsend say, this reminds me of what I wish we could have done, if your local CNN or ABC Broadcaster
looks dead into the camera and says, Ladies and Gentleman, the unbelievable has happened, The Beach Boys have recreated the time
and mood of so long ago with a brilliant new album, being raved about from wall street to London, this may be the most significant rock
album of the last twenty years.


If you start seeing that kind of press, watch what happens. But they gotta have a few first class songs, that live up to the hype
and Capitol has to open their wallets, and they need to call in every favor from every journalist, DJ and promo man they can,

Just watch,. this album is a rare opportunity. We will know pretty soon. Its all up to Brian and the boys delivering, and the PR machine
if they tell people this is one of the most significant albums in a decade, people will listen, people will believe, and in part, it might even
be the truth.

If they let this album die with ordinary promotion efforts, I will be very disappointed, the American Press is practically begging for interviews
they need a first rate journalist in the studio documenting the sessions for the special to air on ABC a week before the albums release.


The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last
final album.





Reality check please, plot lost.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 05, 2012, 05:47:23 AM
You guy's AGD, Hypehat, you all score fair points, but you are missing my greater point.
I used some hypotheticals, I consider possible, even likely, to illustrate something.

If the music is really good, the wheels are greased for it to go big, the timing, the circumstances
the plethora of major press interested in the story.

McCartney, Townshend, CNN, number of units sold is hypothetical.

But this is no ordinary album, and the label, I  believe is very much behind this
project, and the Beach Boys, I think (hope) are very much into this project.

Capitol records puts two or three in house guys behind this, hustling radio not
much will  happen, if they hire, 20 indie guys with muscle for six to eight weeks
to ram this record at radio, and really buy some nice ads on TV and the most pertinent
press journals, combined with the wonderful story of overcoming adversity, and giving
us one more trip back into the sixties.

They could do very very well. I haven't seen a classic rock album of new music poised
to do so well in a long time. The Pink Floyd and Beatles remasters were old music after all
and did very good business. I don't live in a well or a cave, I am in general terms aware
of the decline in music sales, classic rock sales, on line piracy, changes in musical taste,
the fact that the Beach Boys are not as big a name as the Beatles.


I just feel based on my observations, this is poised to do very very well.

It would make me happy, personally to see them get a lot of recognition and sales, but
I will be happy with copy of the album, especially if it knocks me out.

I assume Capitol has their "A" team on this, that independents are being hired for additional
promotion and press liaison, When we hear the single in say six or eight weeks, and if that
harkens back to God Only Knows, or California Girls or Please Let Me Wonder, I think they have
a home run, if on the other hand it sounds lame or run of the mill, maybe you're right.


I am very optimistic, but I have no inside information, and I have not heard one note of the
new music. We will all know soon enough,

I was trying as best I could to explain why I was optimistic, and why this could be viewed by
the world as a very special album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 05, 2012, 06:04:41 AM
But they have a special product here, it may be the death knell of classic sixties rock, but still this album can go
big big big, the final studio album from one of the most iconic groups of all time. A sympathetic press, dying to interview
the boys, much like the press used to interview the Beatles in the sixties, most of the groups are dead, or retired, and
here we have Brian Wilson, Mike Love and Al Jardine, and Bruce Johnston, mixing it up with the press, video clips of them
singing on a group overhead microphone in the Capitol tower, this is a red carpet nostalgia trip for baby boomers, and all
the suburban kids will hear from their parents, oh yeah, there was the Beatles, the Stones and the Beach Boys, and this
is a very special moment, little Johny, little Melissa,

If these are baby boomers talking to their kids, then the reply to that will be "Oh God, Dad's started calling me 'little Johnny' even though I'm forty-five. Better have the doctor check him out for Alzheimer's..."

Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and Time could offer front covers for this tour and album,

And my boss could tell me "don't bother to ever come into work again, I'm just going to keep paying you because I like you so much". I doubt it though.

If the single is good, and Capitol pushes really really hard, and they start getting feature stories in time and newsweek, this
is gonna be very very big, three times four times bigger than Neil Diamond with Delirious Love

That album was one of an unbroken run of Gold or Platinum albums for Diamond stretching back 36 years at the time. Every two years or so, he releases an album, and it goes at least top twenty, pretty consistently. Other than Still Cruisn' (which was a) full of old hits,  b) the album containing the band's fluke hit single Kokomo and c) twenty-three years ago itself) the Beach Boys haven't released a gold record i*in* thirty-six years. They've not had one since 15 Big Ones.

A group is more appealing, than stone faced broody Neil Diamond, there is the funny Beach Boy, the Clever Beach Boy, the spiritual
Beach Boy,

Which one's which? To the extent they have any public profile at all there's the Mentally Ill Beach Boy, the Lawsuit Beach Boy, the Anonymous Beach Boy, the Other Anonymous Beach Boy and the Other Other Anonymous Beach Boy.


If this is played right, this stands in as a surrogate album for the Beatles album that never happened.

What Beatles album that never happened?

If everybody treats it, like eh, this means nothing, then that's what will happen, if on the other hand, you turn on your evening news
and see Paul McCartney or Pete Townsend say, this reminds me of what I wish we could have done, if your local CNN or ABC Broadcaster
looks dead into the camera and says, Ladies and Gentleman, the unbelievable has happened, The Beach Boys have recreated the time
and mood of so long ago with a brilliant new album, being raved about from wall street to London, this may be the most significant rock
album of the last twenty years.

That simply isn't going to happen.

The Beatles anthology sold around 20 million units on the strength of two new songs, and some film clips, there was no new, last final album.

Two new songs, some film clips, six CDs of outtakes, an eight-hour long TV series broadcast on prime-time network TV worldwide over the Christmas period, it being the first new releases by the most successful band in history in twenty-five years, a renewed wave of interest in the Beatles even before the reunion, and *THEM BEING THE BEATLES*.

Look, it's nice to fantasise, we all know that. But *best* case scenario goes as follows:

The new album is as good as That Lucky Old Sun or the better material from Gettin' In Over My Head. It gets solid four-star reviews in most broadsheet newspapers and in Mojo. Maybe there are a few interviews in the Guardian Weekend section or USian equivalent. The music magazines aimed at younger people either give it five stars or one star based entirely on the prejudices of the writer in question. The single gets no airplay at all on US radio because it doesn't fit any formats, but gets mild rotation on Radio 2 in the UK. The album goes top ten for a week or two based mostly on the tour.

That's *best*-case, seriously, for this album.

The general public doesn't care any more about the Beach Boys' reunion than about, say, the Monkees reunion last year -- possibly less, because there hadn't been a band calling itself the Monkees touring in the intervening time, and people actually know the names of the individual Monkees. The boomer audience in general isn't particularly interested in new music by the musicians they love, and mostly gave up on the Beach Boys around Pet Sounds.

And that's *if* they manage a half-decent album. I think it's promising, based on Brian's recent form, but I know people -- people who know and love the best of the BBs' music -- who find the idea risible. The last time they released a half-decent album was LA (Light Album). The last time they released something *good* - Love You - was before I was born.

I get that you're excited, but popular culture has moved on. Even if the Beach Boys release the best album of their career, it will matter to the general public about as much as if Benny Goodman had released the album of his career in the 1970s.

You're setting yourself up for a massive, massive disappointment. If it goes as I've described, I'll be ecstatic, frankly, while you'll be horrified. Think about this rationally, and realign your expectations with what is possible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 05, 2012, 08:23:56 AM
You could be right friend. After all, this place is a forum for some of the biggest Beach Boys fans
and supporters on the planet, and if people here don't even believe the new album can go gold
and platinum what chance is there?


Who would have thought 85 year old Tony Bennett would have recently scored his first number
one on the Billboard charts ever! 85 years old!

It's gotta be a lot harder to sell the great Tony Bennett at age 85 all the way to number one, than
to pitch the Iconic Beach Boys up near the top.

Baby boomers children are not all 45 years old, millions of baby boomer children are still teens
or young adults, my own included. I'm not too far past 45 myself. Further than I'd like.

There is a special chance here, careers ebb and flow, not every great act is on top all the time, there
are many examples of great artists, singers, actors, who achieve great success go through a dry period
and end up on top again..

I won't be disappointed either way, for me the music counts, if I enjoy the work they did on the album
that will be satisfying. But I admit I would like to see them score one for the classic rock team.

Another thing that makes it more than possible is the lack of good competition, there were a lot of
good songs on the radio in 1965 or even 1975 or maybe even 1985, there aren't that many now, and
if the boys get some airplay and exposure with a great song, I am confident they can be successful, I have
already stated my reasons. I don't need to keep rebutting, or explaining, we will all know soon enough

Meanwhile when can we get some more fresh news on whats happening with the progress of the album
in the studio.

Remember many millions of us classic rock lovers are still here, you see sales in the many millions on some of
these re issues. We don't have a lot of albums we want to buy in these tough economic times. Its not that we
are only interested in the old songs from the classic groups. It also that the classic artists haven't been delivering
much in the way of new product anyone likes. If people like the new album, Millions of people will come out of
the woodwork to buy it. If they know about it. Most of my classic rock friends were not even aware of Smile, and
they were also confused about how it was possible when Brian Wilson had put all that to rest in 2004. The Smile
sessions was the third time those songs had been sold, the original singles and albums the songswere issued on
like Smiley Smile, the Wilson solo version, and then the Beach Boy version. There won't be any such confusion
with this upcoming new album.


We all win either way, a new and final Beach Boys studio album, that is supposed to be quite good. If Capitol is
investing a million bucks to pay for the recording of it, then surely they can spend another milllion or two, to push
the darn thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 05, 2012, 08:37:39 AM
Oh sure, I think it has a high chance of going number one. But that Tony Bennett album hasn't gone gold or platinum (except in Canada). You're saying two different things. Will it sell? Unless it's a pile of crap, yes! Will it go diamond, have celebrities raving it about it on network TV, send all the young kids going crazy for the group, and find me a cheaper haircut? No!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 05, 2012, 08:59:14 AM
I had a dream I heard TWGMR last night

It was incredible


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 05, 2012, 09:02:54 AM
On the topic of record sales had SOS gone triple platinum yet? I remember reading that still sells a couple of thousand every week


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 05, 2012, 10:43:31 AM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 05, 2012, 12:22:00 PM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.

Yes but WALL OF TEXT


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 05, 2012, 12:22:30 PM
I had a dream I heard TWGMR last night

It was incredible

what is TWGMR? why do people feel the need to abbreviate everything?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 05, 2012, 12:25:33 PM
I had a dream I heard TWGMR last night

It was incredible

what is TWGMR? why do people feel the need to abbreviate everything?

IDK.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 05, 2012, 12:50:13 PM
I had a dream I heard TWGMR last night

It was incredible

what is TWGMR? why do people feel the need to abbreviate everything?

That's why god made radio

Not an easy song title to write on a phone


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on March 05, 2012, 12:55:35 PM
You really cannot compare Tony Bennett with the Beach Boys.

Bennett has, guided by his manager (also his son), cleverly and carefully nurtured his image for the last 20+ years....touring and recording frequently, appearing on the "right" TV shows, festivals and so on.....and all the time sticking to old standards which are pretty timeless. The Beach Boys music may be timeless in some respects but they don't have 20 years in which to nurture an image with the audience at large.

The Beach Boys as an entity have not really had consistent output since 1966 or so, and have not projected a consistent image. They're still well known and people will turn out in their thousands to hear "Surfin' USA" or "God Only Knows"......but are they really interested in new material?

If they were...then Brian's albums in the last few years would have sold *tonnage*....Mike would have been able to easily release his projected album that he's been hawking for a few years now...ditto Al.

Just looking at the music industry these days, nothing sells millions now. The best case scenario is that somehow the Boys do become 'in fashion' again...but that would be pure luck. The album could end up being pretty good with good reviews and a bit of air play and some appearances on the 'right' TV shows. It might top the charts in several countries.....but even then it may not sell a million.

A realistic hope is that the record is good, between them the Beach Boys probably have 40-50 minutes worth of good material which Brian and the producers can fashion into a coherent LP. Further realistic hope is that there might be one moderately successful hit single - by which I mean top 40, maybe top 20 but no better...and not in the charts more than 2-3 weeks. The album itself I wouldn't expect to chart for more than a month...even if it is great.

The music scene has moved on. Heck, The Beatles anthology was 18 years ago now...another world in the industry.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 05, 2012, 01:03:33 PM

A realistic hope is that the record is good, between them the Beach Boys probably have 40-50 minutes worth of good material which Brian and the producers can fashion into a coherent LP. Further realistic hope is that there might be one moderately successful hit single - by which I mean top 40, maybe top 20 but no better...and not in the charts more than 2-3 weeks. The album itself I wouldn't expect to chart for more than a month...even if it is great.



Can I add also that it continues to be available and sell in years to come?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 05, 2012, 01:34:54 PM
You really cannot compare Tony Bennett with the Beach Boys.

Bennett has, guided by his manager (also his son), cleverly and carefully nurtured his image for the last 20+ years....touring and recording frequently, appearing on the "right" TV shows, festivals and so on.....and all the time sticking to old standards which are pretty timeless. The Beach Boys music may be timeless in some respects but they don't have 20 years in which to nurture an image with the audience at large.

The Beach Boys as an entity have not really had consistent output since 1966 or so, and have not projected a consistent image. They're still well known and people will turn out in their thousands to hear "Surfin' USA" or "God Only Knows"......but are they really interested in new material?

If they were...then Brian's albums in the last few years would have sold *tonnage*....Mike would have been able to easily release his projected album that he's been hawking for a few years now...ditto Al.

Just looking at the music industry these days, nothing sells millions now. The best case scenario is that somehow the Boys do become 'in fashion' again...but that would be pure luck. The album could end up being pretty good with good reviews and a bit of air play and some appearances on the 'right' TV shows. It might top the charts in several countries.....but even then it may not sell a million.

A realistic hope is that the record is good, between them the Beach Boys probably have 40-50 minutes worth of good material which Brian and the producers can fashion into a coherent LP. Further realistic hope is that there might be one moderately successful hit single - by which I mean top 40, maybe top 20 but no better...and not in the charts more than 2-3 weeks. The album itself I wouldn't expect to chart for more than a month...even if it is great.

The music scene has moved on. Heck, The Beatles anthology was 18 years ago now...another world in the industry.


Actually Tony Bennet's son and Tony, began formulating their marketing plan, more like 35 years ago. What it came down to was, do the music in your
heart and people will come, and they did. What they did, was get Tony on MTV or VH1 and on the bill with modern acts, but stuck to their guns
about what the musical content would be. They reached out and marketed, it to different people. It worked.

You say if all Brian Wilson had to do, was make fresh music, that would have already done the trick. But the music was uneven, Smile 2004 did well
The other albums of fresh material, although containing a few fresh very good songs, were not up to the quality of Pet Sounds, Smile or California Girls.
Vocally Wilson was not as strong as the group, and the Beach Boy name was absent. Also the drama of 50 years, and , the reunion, and the final studio
album were absent.

Some of you guys talk like football coaches or Military men, handicapping, if you do this, you can expect that, you are leaving out the intangibles.
I am no Beach Boys expert, or marketing expert, I can just see a window  of a very rare opportunity here. One reason albums don't sell is piracy
another reason albums don't sell, is because the record people who groom artists and product for the public, Well they gradually let the quality
of the work and the artist and repertoire sink to all time lows. If you do a good marketing job with something people want to buy, they will buy it.
There are seven billion people on the planet, more than double in the Beach Boys heyday. Believe me, at least a million of those people will be interested
in this product (album) if the album is good and it is well marketed. From your arguments, you say even the top contemporary groups aren't selling
a million, lots of people have ten or fifteen bucks to spend on an album. They must not like the albums being offered them. Or the marketing leaves
the people unaware of the albums very existence.

Now as to the other argument I am hearing, that it will take producers and staff just to assemble a coherent album, because there is not much
there of a spiritual or commercial value,, well that's different. I think this is the first time Brian Wilson has really tried to make a good Beach Boy
album in 25-30 years, with his effort, and the Beach Boy blend, that makes a lot of difference. I didn't buy Gershwin or Disney, I did buy TLOS and
admired it, but I don't listen to it, vocally it wasn't nearly as good as the Beach Boys, the blend wasn't there.

Look I don't want to be odd man out here, or the butt of jokes, enough, we will see what happens.

I'd like to get some more info from the studio, do we have any more song titles, or updates of any kind, they seem to have gone silent over
at the studio for the last ten days or so, prior to that we were getting leaks and interviews everyday.

Does "that's why God made the radio, sound like a great title, or a parody, something from a Hollywood B picture. I can't decide, it reminds
me of something gimmicky like Rhinestone Cowboy or cover of the rolling stone


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Howie Edelson on March 05, 2012, 04:14:39 PM
Actually, it reminds me of Paul Simon's "That's Why God Made The Movies."

I agree with pretty much everything that Andrew Hickey said.

Contrary to what the press would have you believe, "pirating" really doesn't have the affect on album sales as you think.

No offense to the remaining good people at Capitol I'm friendly with, this thought that they "get a team of the best people" to work this album on radio is ridiculous. It doesn't work that way and hasn't in eons. There's no "record plugger" zig-zagging the U.S. shmoozing jocks to get a tune on the air. EVER. For ANYBODY.

Although no label can predict a definitive path to getting a new Beach Boys album maximum attention, two labels -- Concord/Hear Music and UMe would've been the smartest move for the powers to be to pursue. Now, as we all know Capitol just might (hopefully) BE a part of UMe this time next year -- or sooner -- but that really does no help for the project at hand in the short run.

Now, like most of us, I can't really find much to complain about thus far. Everything is still operating at the "best case scenario" level and I suspect that the band's own publicity will be working the album in addition to the label, which will give it a far stronger push than, say, Ringo's 'Liverpool 8' LP. Jean, Paki and their crew have done awesome work for each new BW release regardless of what label the album's been released on -- FAR better than acts repped by the likes of Nasty Little Man, Shorefire, etc. If they're left to do their jobs -- this LP/tour will reach the masses and proper outlets.

As long as everybody sounds good on the road, no one's back gives out, no one pulls any sh it regarding their cut of the cash before April -- or worse, two weeks into the tour -- on paper at least, this might be as good as we hope it'll be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on March 05, 2012, 05:21:42 PM
The general public doesn't care any more about the Beach Boys' reunion than about, say, the Monkees reunion last year -- possibly less, because there hadn't been a band calling itself the Monkees touring in the intervening time, and people actually know the names of the individual Monkees. The boomer audience in general isn't particularly interested in new music by the musicians they love, and mostly gave up on the Beach Boys around Pet Sounds.

See, I'm not expecting sales of five squillion for the album, but I think this picture is underselling it almost as much as the other postings are overselling it.

The Monkees tour didn't sell out in minutes and have to keep adding dates.  The Monkees didn't play in front of a record-setting 41.2 million viewers on the Grammys.  The Monkees don't have an evergreen multi-million-selling greatest-hits set that's still raking 'em in (the Monkees' last greatest-hits didn't even go gold).  And the Monkees, quite simply, are not America's Band.

Now -- is that enough to get a gold record out of it?  I don't know.  It'd be a stretch.  But in 2001, McCartney's last greatest-hits collection went double platinum, and off the back of a successful comeback tour his album *eventually* went gold.  And yeah, the Boys aren't in Macca's league...  but I think they're way closer to that league than to the Monkees.

(No offence to fellow Monkees fans...)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 05, 2012, 05:53:44 PM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.

Yes but WALL OF TEXT

WTF?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 05, 2012, 06:47:42 PM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.

Yes but WALL OF TEXT

WTF?

It seemed like for every reasonable reality check regarding the commercial prospects of the new BBs album, there was a wall (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253357.html#msg253357) of (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253259.html#msg253259) text (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253240.html#msg253240) in response.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on March 05, 2012, 07:04:48 PM
The Monkees are not a good comp to the Beach Boys.  I like them OK, but it's not even close.  I see where you were going with it, but I disagree, strongly.   


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 05, 2012, 07:15:22 PM
How about we all just wait and see?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 05, 2012, 07:24:56 PM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.

Yes but WALL OF TEXT

WTF?

It seemed like for every reasonable reality check regarding the commercial prospects of the new BBs album, there was a wall (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253357.html#msg253357) of (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253259.html#msg253259) text (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253240.html#msg253240) in response.




Yeah it was kind of a smarmy insulting jibe at me. Because I hold a minority view that the new album could be
a very very successful,even historic album.

Also because I have made long posts, been long winded and passionate on the subject. Although
normally I don't post here that much. This particular thread was of great interest to me. So several
have inferred, I am nuts or delusional, because my view of the album's commercial potential did not
agree with the majority view. Therefore it was OK to insult me as well as my opinion. Particularly when
I repeated and expounded on my reasoning. Reality check indeed.

We'll all know soon enough. Apparently there is no new information regarding the album to discuss instead.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on March 05, 2012, 08:34:46 PM
The Beach Boys have been pegged as a golden oldies band since 1973. With the exception of one nostalgic mega hit 25 years ago and the album that rode it's coattails, nothing of new material has sold huge numbers since their '60s heyday. This new album is not going to change that. It will sell to the faithfull, gather critical repsect if it's good, be dumped upon if it's bad and be be forgotten by the world at large within a year of it being released. I love The Beach Boys but dude, reality check time.

Yes but WALL OF TEXT
nothing wrong with hope and positivism regarding the beachboys.....we all have our hopes and expectations for this thing as it unfolds.

"Remember Red, hope is a good thing,  maybe the best of things"
......Andy Dufresne.....

WTF?

It seemed like for every reasonable reality check regarding the commercial prospects of the new BBs album, there was a wall (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253357.html#msg253357) of (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253259.html#msg253259) text (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12286.msg253240.html#msg253240) in response.




Yeah it was kind of a smarmy insulting jibe at me. Because I hold a minority view that the new album could be
a very very successful,even historic album.

Also because I have made long posts, been long winded and passionate on the subject. Although
normally I don't post here that much. This particular thread was of great interest to me. So several
have inferred, I am nuts or delusional, because my view of the album's commercial potential did not
agree with the majority view. Therefore it was OK to insult me as well as my opinion. Particularly when
I repeated and expounded on my reasoning. Reality check indeed.

We'll all know soon enough. Apparently there is no new information regarding the album to discuss instead.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alex on March 05, 2012, 10:42:40 PM
1 million over the course of several months/a couple years might be possible, but platinum right out of the gate? Not since the 90s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on March 06, 2012, 01:19:37 AM
They should give the album away with concert tickets like Prince did. Could be very successful that way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on March 06, 2012, 04:08:23 AM



Yeah it was kind of a smarmy insulting jibe at me. Because I hold a minority view that the new album could be
a very very successful,even historic album.


It could be. But even if it is...it won't be selling 2+ million copies. It may not even be recognised as an historic album until well after the event.

Not everyone recognised Pet Sounds, Revolver, Highway 61 Revisited, Dark Side of the moon (to pluck a few examples from my grey matter) as being landmark albums until some time had passed.

And, for myriad reasons, music just doesn't sell well these days.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 06, 2012, 05:10:08 AM



Yeah it was kind of a smarmy insulting jibe at me. Because I hold a minority view that the new album could be
a very very successful,even historic album.


It could be. But even if it is...it won't be selling 2+ million copies. It may not even be recognised as an historic album until well after the event.

Not everyone recognised Pet Sounds, Revolver, Highway 61 Revisited, Dark Side of the moon (to pluck a few examples from my grey matter) as being landmark albums until some time had passed.

And, for myriad reasons, music just doesn't sell well these days.


Well said. I happen to agree with you. There are probably even a couple of current bands doing what will become classics
I just don't have a clue who it might be.

The thing about this new Beach Boy album, there were lots of classic albums in the 60's 70's a golden age. This is not
a golden age for rock, so that's what's exciting, they don't make many classics like they used to.

And as far as the taking a couple years to sell a million, I agree with that also, I don't think it's likely they sell several
million in the first six months, unless they really get lucky and take off.

I am dying for some more news, song titles, descriptions of the sound, when a single might leak or some 30 second clips.
More info on writers credits, number of tracks to be included on the album. Expected finish date or release date.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 06, 2012, 05:33:20 AM



...when a single might leak..

Oh, the things we expect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 06, 2012, 05:35:57 AM
The industry seems to be getting good at shutting down leaks - The new Spiritualized album has been in the hands of the press since November, and nothing. TSS didn't leak, either. I guess it's all ready when it's ready, just like with TSS


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 06, 2012, 05:53:07 AM
The industry seems to be getting good at shutting down leaks - The new Spiritualized album has been in the hands of the press since November, and nothing. TSS didn't leak, either. I guess it's all ready when it's ready, just like with TSS

I think about the upcoming tour and album; and I like the feeling of anticipation and excitement.  Maybe I'm nostalgic but please, let me wonder.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on March 06, 2012, 05:59:18 AM
I don't know why you guys are spending so much time discussing how the wheels or whatever are greased for one last big album from the BBs. It's going to sell poorly, even if it does have a generous first week helping from industry-wide interviews/advertisements.

i'm not talking 'Summer in Paradise level' of poor sales, but half a million worldwide would far exceed my expectations. It'll go top 30 for one week in the USA, one week top 20 in the UK and then plummet until heavily discounted.

This is, of course, no reflection on the music. I am assuming that there will be a few tracks with by-the-numbers plasticky-trebly stratocaster surf-twangs and poorly-mixed drums, but i'm also hoping for a couple of moments of genuine inspiration.

#cohenrant



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: D Cunningham on March 06, 2012, 07:38:02 AM
Good points, and consider...

The news seems to indicate that the group will act as slaves to the concept of a 12-song album.  Brian Wilson and the other 70-year-olds creating 12 incredible new songs?  Give me a break.
The market will sink it...justly so.

They should have finished their career with a great 2-sided single.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 06, 2012, 07:42:16 AM
Oh please. Like you aren't even a little bit happy about a new Beach Boys album.


I know, it's weak trolling, but I'm bedbound and bored  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 06, 2012, 07:55:15 AM
The industry seems to be getting good at shutting down leaks - The new Spiritualized album has been in the hands of the press since November, and nothing. TSS didn't leak, either. I guess it's all ready when it's ready, just like with TSS
[/quote

I think about the upcoming tour and album; and I like the feeling of anticipation and excitement.  Maybe I'm nostalgic but please, let me wonder.

Agreed.  Sit back for a minute and rememeber that we will never experience this "anticipation" again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: D Cunningham on March 06, 2012, 07:59:41 AM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 08:10:13 AM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing. 

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]
Well, maybe you will have a great single along with an album. I take it that you would rather them go out with SIP as their last album? If Brian gives us anything on par with TLOS, that will be fine with me. And what if we get Farting Synths and Autotune vocals, then what? It's a dirty shame, they get criticized for everything they do; good, bad or indifferent.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 06, 2012, 09:53:34 AM
Here's what the new album will consist of - 2 or 3 really good tracks (probably ballads), a cover of an oldie (be it one of theirs or another group's), several 'fun in the sun' retreads where Mike will namecheck old song titles as he nasals it up, the almost now obligatory 'Smile style' progressive track which may or may not work, several really bad songs with Foskett's hideous "OOOOOWHHHHWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOO" falsetto running wild, a nice accapella number (probably towards the end), inaudible rhythm guitar from Al Jardine, a slushy Bruce number (if he gets a look in songwriting wise), subtle and not so subtle lyrical references to Brian's history of mental illness and a handfull of songs that will be forgotten by the listener as soon as they are over.

This is much more likely than Pet Sounds 2.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 06, 2012, 10:30:04 AM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 06, 2012, 10:52:42 AM
My post was done slightly tongue in cheek (apart from the bit about Foskett).
I do like quite a lot of Brian's solo stuff but not to the degree where I feel that it can hold a candle to what he was doing in his prime.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 06, 2012, 11:25:00 AM
Here's what the new album will consist of - 2 or 3 really good tracks (probably ballads), a cover of an oldie (be it one of theirs or another group's), several 'fun in the sun' retreads where Mike will namecheck old song titles as he nasals it up, the almost now obligatory 'Smile style' progressive track which may or may not work, several really bad songs with Foskett's hideous "OOOOOWHHHHWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOO" falsetto running wild, a nice accapella number (probably towards the end), inaudible rhythm guitar from Al Jardine, a slushy Bruce number (if he gets a look in songwriting wise), subtle and not so subtle lyrical references to Brian's history of mental illness and a handfull of songs that will be forgotten by the listener as soon as they are over.

This is much more likely than Pet Sounds 2.

I'm not sure how much I agree with this, but this still sounds better than "Summer In Paradise" or "Still Crusin'" or many other projects they've done, and I'm not sure whether this is a good or bad thing. :)

Musicianship-wise, I don't think any of these guys will figure prominently apart from any lead guitar parts from David. Musicianship has never been their thing much, regardless of how good or bad they are at their instruments. (For the record, I used to think Al was probably a solid rhythm guitarist and not much more, but I watched a show a few years ago where he did a few early-era leads that sounded like like Carl/David, so Al probably *could* be a more prominent guitarist if he wanted to).

The description we've heard of Brian simply cutting some backing tracks last year and having those as the basis for some of the new BB songs, that might be a good way to go. That is, if Brian is just using whatever is his "new" stuff (whether new is truly new or partly re-treaded old stuff he wrote) as the basis for the album, it might give us an approximation of what it would sound like if they had been sporadically doing albums the past 20 years and just did another one, as opposed to doing a bunch of songs tuned specifically for an "anniversary" album (e.g. "Brian's Back.... Again!!!!").

I did like hearing in the one Mike interview that Al is featured on some leads. They should really feature him prominently on vocals, that's his strong suit among those guys at this point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 06, 2012, 11:28:42 AM
Good points, and consider...

The news seems to indicate that the group will act as slaves to the concept of a 12-song album.  Brian Wilson and the other 70-year-olds creating 12 incredible new songs?  Give me a break.
The market will sink it...justly so.

They should have finished their career with a great 2-sided single.

I'm optimistic about the idea that the BB's don't care how well this album does on the charts. As far as how much product they should give us, my take is that *not* doing a full album isn't going to make any theoretical "two sided single" better, so I'm all for having a full album if for no other reason than to have 12 (or however many) shots at getting a good song. I don't picture them working harder and making a better product if they confine themselves to two songs. These are the guys that went through their vaults in 1979 for "new" stuff and picked "When Girls Get Together", so I'm not convinced they could pick a good "two sided single."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 06, 2012, 01:03:25 PM

The general public doesn't care any more about the Beach Boys' reunion than about, say, the Monkees reunion last year -- possibly less, because there hadn't been a band calling itself the Monkees touring in the intervening time, and people actually know the names of the individual Monkees.

Well sure--the Monkees were actors on a popular TV show.  Of course people will know their names.  The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 06, 2012, 01:05:09 PM
The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band
Monkees too...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 01:10:15 PM
I'm frankly, a little concerned that the album will be finished at all. 

Sitting here listening to "Still I Dream of It"--I wouldn't mind if they re-recorded this one.  A song of this calibre would absolutely knock critics/new listeners/new fans/old fans out of the park.  I almost wish this song never was released in any form--either the demo or the version that appears on "Adult/Child"....to have them lay this song on us for this album--never hearing it before--would have been huge.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 06, 2012, 01:12:48 PM
The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band
Monkees too...

No, they were a manufactured band.  They didn't all form together in Peter Tork's garage; they were hired actors on a TV show.  Sure, they had musical ability and I enjoy some of their songs, but there is a reason why they are referred to as the "Pre-fab Four"...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 06, 2012, 01:16:19 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 01:20:01 PM
The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band
Monkees too...

No, they were a manufactured band.  They didn't all form together in Peter Tork's garage; they were hired actors on a TV show.  Sure, they had musical ability and I enjoy some of their songs, but there is a reason why they are referred to as the "Pre-fab Four"...

The way they came together may have been unconventional and even "manufactured" but they eventually developed into a working unit that put out some good music that was written and played by the actual members.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 06, 2012, 01:23:18 PM

The general public doesn't care any more about the Beach Boys' reunion than about, say, the Monkees reunion last year -- possibly less, because there hadn't been a band calling itself the Monkees touring in the intervening time, and people actually know the names of the individual Monkees.

Well sure--the Monkees were actors on a popular TV show.  Of course people will know their names.  The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band
On all of "Headquarters",all of "Picses" except "hard to believe", parts of "Birds bees", a couple songs off of "Head" and all of "Jutus" they were a legitimate band as well as some outakes that ended up on the "missing Links" cd series and some of the songs from 33 1/3 monkees per revolution tv special..and in their live performances augmenteed in recent years with other musicians like the beach boys...and they sang on ALL the monkees songs,although they didn't sing the songs together you have at least one member per song sometimes all 4,sure  the first two albums "Monkees" and "more of the monkees" and their last "changes" and "pool it"  had "fake background singers" but the other albums from "head quarters" to "monkees presents" and "justus" they sang their own background singing..so those albums are just as legitimate as anything the Beach Boys released..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 06, 2012, 01:24:08 PM
The Beach Boys however were a legitimate band
Monkees too...

No, they were a manufactured band.  They didn't all form together in Peter Tork's garage; they were hired actors on a TV show.  Sure, they had musical ability and I enjoy some of their songs, but there is a reason why they are referred to as the "Pre-fab Four"...

The way they came together may have been unconventional and even "manufactured" but they eventually developed into a working unit that put out some good music that was written and played by the actual members.
That's what I meant.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 06, 2012, 01:24:46 PM
I'm frankly, a little concerned that the album will be finished at all. 

Sitting here listening to "Still I Dream of It"--I wouldn't mind if they re-recorded this one.  A song of this calibre would absolutely knock critics/new listeners/new fans/old fans out of the park.  I almost wish this song never was released in any form--either the demo or the version that appears on "Adult/Child"....to have them lay this song on us for this album--never hearing it before--would have been huge.

You don't have the 1993 box set, do you ?  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 01:35:08 PM
I'm frankly, a little concerned that the album will be finished at all. 

Sitting here listening to "Still I Dream of It"--I wouldn't mind if they re-recorded this one.  A song of this calibre would absolutely knock critics/new listeners/new fans/old fans out of the park.  I almost wish this song never was released in any form--either the demo or the version that appears on "Adult/Child"....to have them lay this song on us for this album--never hearing it before--would have been huge.

You don't have the 1993 box set, do you ?  :-D


haha D'oh!  They released it first there, didn't they?  Well, let's hope they play it on stage...along with "Shortnin' Bread!"  8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 06, 2012, 01:42:59 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

I remember when it were all fields around here....  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 06, 2012, 01:50:30 PM
On all of "Headquarters",all of "Picses" except "hard to believe", parts of "Birds bees", a couple songs off of "Head" and all of "Jutus" they were a legitimate band as well as some outakes that ended up on the "missing Links" cd series and some of the songs from 33 1/3 monkees per revolution tv special..and in their live performances augmenteed in recent years with other musicians like the beach boys...and they sang on ALL the monkees songs,although they didn't sing the songs together you have at least one member per song sometimes all 4,sure  the first two albums "Monkees" and "more of the monkees" and their last "changes" and "pool it"  had "fake background singers" but the other albums from "head quarters" to "monkees presents" and "justus" they sang their own background singing..so those albums are just as legitimate as anything the Beach Boys released..

I will give you that the Monkees *tried* to pass as a legitimate band, but you simply can't erase the fact that they came together as a manufactured group for a TV series.  Their greatest successes came during the time their TV show was popular.  But once the show ended nobody (maybe unfairly) wanted to take them seriously.  That doesn't mean they didn't have any talent or don't deserve any credit.  They have their place in music history.  But because of their manufactured roots, it is unfair to draw certain comparisons between them and groups that formed on their own terms and earned their own success organically.  Which is why it's a rather moot point saying the members of the Monkees (who were all actors on a popular TV show) might be more recognizable than members of the Beach Boys.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on March 06, 2012, 01:54:33 PM
You know, for years i've heard the argument that, contrary to what the industry and media will have us believe, piracy hasn't really harmed record sales, but so then what has? Because whenever i hear that argument, there is no real explanation given for what IS harming sales. I find it hard to believe that it would just be a general decline in interest.

There is so much talk that the record industry is really dying and on its way out, which does kind of seem to be the case. What do you all think the picture is going to look like for recording artists 10, 15, 20 years from now? Do you think that, with the exception of hugely popular (and probably manufactured) figures, that the business of recorded music is going to be similar to, say, the culture of self-publishing zines, or like what people on Etsy do with handcrafted stuff? It's so weird to think of recorded music in those terms.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 06, 2012, 02:09:46 PM
On all of "Headquarters",all of "Picses" except "hard to believe", parts of "Birds bees", a couple songs off of "Head" and all of "Jutus" they were a legitimate band as well as some outakes that ended up on the "missing Links" cd series and some of the songs from 33 1/3 monkees per revolution tv special..and in their live performances augmenteed in recent years with other musicians like the beach boys...and they sang on ALL the monkees songs,although they didn't sing the songs together you have at least one member per song sometimes all 4,sure  the first two albums "Monkees" and "more of the monkees" and their last "changes" and "pool it"  had "fake background singers" but the other albums from "head quarters" to "monkees presents" and "justus" they sang their own background singing..so those albums are just as legitimate as anything the Beach Boys released..

I will give you that the Monkees *tried* to pass as a legitimate band, but you simply can't erase the fact that they came together as a manufactured group for a TV series.  Their greatest successes came during the time their TV show was popular.  But once the show ended nobody (maybe unfairly) wanted to take them seriously.  That doesn't mean they didn't have any talent or don't deserve any credit.  They have their place in music history.  But because of their manufactured roots, it is unfair to draw certain comparisons between them and groups that formed on their own terms and earned their own success organically.  Which is why it's a rather moot point saying the members of the Monkees (who were all actors on a popular TV show) might be more recognizable than members of the Beach Boys.  
ok cool..I understand where you are coming from now :-)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 06, 2012, 02:34:54 PM
Record sales? Who cares?
The only thing I'm holding out hope for is a good sounding album.
Farting Synths? sh*t on a dinner plate? Hasn't Brian already done this?

Having heard Brian and his band, plus Al in a live setting (Pet Sounds Tour) gives me hope for a potentially fantastic sounding record.
Add Mike and Bruces' voices to the mix and it only gets better. Songwriting and arranging are key of course, with production being the wild card that could make it or break it.
I like the fact that Joe Thomas is onboard if only for the brightness and clarity that brought to life such songs as 'Imagination", "She Says That She Needs Me", "Cry" and "Lay Down Burden". The addition of some of the "group vocal" sound to some particularly focused and inspired sonwriting has got my expectaions cautiously high. The potential is certainly there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 06, 2012, 02:47:05 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 06, 2012, 02:47:33 PM
I like the fact that Joe Thomas is onboard if only for the brightness and clarity that brought to life such songs as 'Imagination", "She Says That She Needs Me", "Cry" and "Lay Down Burden".

Meh.  I think Thomas was just a little too liberal with the lip gloss on Imagination's production.  Thanks to the sterile sheen, the album hasn't aged too well sonically.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 06, 2012, 02:56:33 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

And that happened exactly when hating Foskett became fashionable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 06, 2012, 03:09:41 PM
On all of "Headquarters",all of "Picses" except "hard to believe", parts of "Birds bees", a couple songs off of "Head" and all of "Jutus" they were a legitimate band as well as some outakes that ended up on the "missing Links" cd series and some of the songs from 33 1/3 monkees per revolution tv special..and in their live performances augmenteed in recent years with other musicians like the beach boys...and they sang on ALL the monkees songs,although they didn't sing the songs together you have at least one member per song sometimes all 4,sure  the first two albums "Monkees" and "more of the monkees" and their last "changes" and "pool it"  had "fake background singers" but the other albums from "head quarters" to "monkees presents" and "justus" they sang their own background singing..so those albums are just as legitimate as anything the Beach Boys released..

I will give you that the Monkees *tried* to pass as a legitimate band, but you simply can't erase the fact that they came together as a manufactured group for a TV series.  Their greatest successes came during the time their TV show was popular.  But once the show ended nobody (maybe unfairly) wanted to take them seriously.  That doesn't mean they didn't have any talent or don't deserve any credit.  They have their place in music history.  But because of their manufactured roots, it is unfair to draw certain comparisons between them and groups that formed on their own terms and earned their own success organically.  Which is why it's a rather moot point saying the members of the Monkees (who were all actors on a popular TV show) might be more recognizable than members of the Beach Boys.  

All the tired old saws that people use to invalidate the Monkees can just as easily apply to "legitimate" bands.  The Sex Pistols and The Clash were artificially assembled groups put together by their managers.  The Beach Boys didn't play on their records.  {Everybody} used outside writers.

The fact is The Monkees could have just been good compliant little actors, taken the money and read their lines and mimed and danced around and done their two seasons, and that would have been that.  The fact that they were talented and ambitious enough to actually become a real working band and do things for themselves is something they deserve a lot of credit for.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 06, 2012, 03:20:27 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
I would absolutely LOVE to have a  mid-'60s "Today", "Summer Days" type production but I'm trying to be realistic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 03:22:10 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 06, 2012, 03:23:44 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

And that happened exactly when hating Foskett became fashionable.

Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 06, 2012, 03:26:53 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.
aren't some of the Andy paley stuff in stereo? they sound pretty good if so..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on March 06, 2012, 03:29:13 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

And that happened exactly when hating Foskett became fashionable.

Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I think it's fine, they just need to slightly bury it in the mix. On Do It Again it stands out like a sore thumb - hell, like an amputated thumb. Like I said, I like his voice but they just need to make it less predominant.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 03:33:35 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.
aren't some of the Andy paley stuff in stereo? they sound pretty good if so..
They are stereo, just not Wall of Sound. The Wall of Sound is basically many instruments making one sound and is best accomplished in mono.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 06, 2012, 03:38:33 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.
aren't some of the Andy paley stuff in stereo? they sound pretty good if so..
They are stereo, just not Wall of Sound. The Wall of Sound is basically many instruments making one sound and is best accomplished in mono.
ok..well if it sounds like the Andy Paley stuff then I think that would be cool..or maybe a limited edition mono release from best buy or target or something like with a wall of sound mix that would be cool as well..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 06, 2012, 03:46:03 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing.  

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

And that happened exactly when hating Foskett became fashionable.

Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I think it's fine, they just need to slightly bury it in the mix. On Do It Again it stands out like a sore thumb - hell, like an amputated thumb. Like I said, I like his voice but they just need to make it less predominant.

That's just it, I don't care for the quality of his voice. Not enough resonance for a falsetto. Always sounds like a commercial facsimile to my ears.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 06, 2012, 03:47:56 PM
hh...no problem (and I saw your profanity-laced unedited post...heh)...my point was that I am not happy...right.  They might have created a marvelous signal to the ages with a brief small final perfection.
More likely there will be a bunch of dull songs with whatever electronic effects for smoothing. 

On the other hand, maybe Brian will revert to the fart synth and give us a weird final blast...  [dreaming]

Heh, I figured I need to cut down on the profanity on here.  :lol

Well, it all depends on how you like TLOS, the last blast of BW songwriting we've had. I happen to think it's lovely and bodes well, although not without the caveats Mike's Beard states - you could blame Scott Bennett for the lyrics. But then I never get the hate for Foskett here (it's not like anyone else in The BB's circle can do it as well, I don't rate Matt Jardine that much and he comes closest), and fans like to gripe, as drbeachboy says.

IDK, people here go on about some formula for Brian's records since BWPS, the whole 'acapella opener-few songs-progressive one-lets put the bass harmonica on-few more songs-instrumental-acapella closer, and let's make into a quasi-suite if we can' as if it's such a common, tired formula for music making? For starters, Brian wants it that way. And, point me to more (Beach Boys or otherwise) records which work in the same way, please.

Why has liking BW's solo work suddenly become the unfashionable position to take?


Around the same time that praising Mike and slagging off Van Dyke became fashionable, I guess.

And that happened exactly when hating Foskett became fashionable.

Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I think it's fine, they just need to slightly bury it in the mix. On Do It Again it stands out like a sore thumb - hell, like an amputated thumb. Like I said, I like his voice but they just need to make it less predominant.

That's just it, I don't care for the quality of his voice. Not enough resonance for a falsetto. Always sounds like a commercial facsimile to my ears.

They need Matt Jardine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 03:49:28 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.
aren't some of the Andy paley stuff in stereo? they sound pretty good if so..
They are stereo, just not Wall of Sound. The Wall of Sound is basically many instruments making one sound and is best accomplished in mono.
ok..well if it sounds like the Andy Paley stuff then I think that would be cool..or maybe a limited edition mono release from best buy or target or something like with a wall of sound mix that would be cool as well..
If you have the U.S. Singles Collection, play disc 13 and play the 2 Do You Wanna Dance tracks and you will hear the difference between the mono wall of sound and the stereo track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 03:50:54 PM
Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I always feel bad when I read this because I have never noticed anything wrong with Jeff's falsetto.

Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 06, 2012, 03:55:44 PM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullshit, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds. If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell. And really, it's about the same half-dozen guys who won't shut up about it.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 04:02:25 PM
Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I always feel bad when I read this because I have never noticed anything wrong with Jeff's falsetto.

Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail into) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...
If you like his falsetto then don't listen to Wilson Love. Enjoy it! There is lots of music that sounds terrific to my ears, yet to read the Hoffman board it is the worst listening one can endure. Just go with what sounds good to you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 04:03:56 PM
Interesting...thanks Wirestone.  I suspected there was some BS invovled here but considering there were more and more comments ragging on his singing, it made me wonder what was really going on there.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 06, 2012, 04:07:06 PM
Fosketts' falsetto does not cut it. I wish they could find someone who could.

I always feel bad when I read this because I have never noticed anything wrong with Jeff's falsetto.

Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail into) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...
If you like his falsetto then don't listen to Wilson Love. Enjoy it! There is lots of music that sounds terrific to my ears, yet to read the Hoffman board it is the worst listening one can endure. Just go with what sounds good to you.

Will do...I thought I was going crazy or something because everyone kept putting Jeff's falsetto down and I was thinking, "Damn, is there something wrong with me??  Why can't I hear it??"

I see you there on the Hoffman board, Dr!  We posted in the same BB thread earlier today!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 06, 2012, 04:14:26 PM
I would rather have a wall of sound production ala: andy paley sessions/today/pet sounds/summer days etc in stereo of course,maybe a mono counterpart that us fans could buy..
It is really hard to do the Wall of Sound in stereo. Stereo just splits that wall apart, ala Pet Sounds.
aren't some of the Andy paley stuff in stereo? they sound pretty good if so..
They are stereo, just not Wall of Sound. The Wall of Sound is basically many instruments making one sound and is best accomplished in mono.

Actually, the Paley tracks are in mono. However, arrangement wise they aren't really wallo'sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 04:59:10 PM
I need to relisten to those tracks again. I probably haven't listened to them for 8 years or so.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 06, 2012, 05:07:34 PM
I need to relisten to those tracks again. I probably haven't listened to them for 8 years or so.

I started to, once, and lost interest after a few intros.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 06, 2012, 05:12:22 PM
I need to relisten to those tracks again. I probably haven't listened to them for 8 years or so.

I started to, once, and lost interest after a few intros.
Yep, most were just so-so, but a few were terrific. Soul Searchin', You're A Mystery and It's Not Easy Being Me are really catchy and would have been a great back bone for the new Beach Boys album back then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amanda Hart on March 06, 2012, 05:27:18 PM

Yep, most were just so-so, but a few were terrific. Soul Searchin', You're A Mystery and It's Not Easy Being Me are really catchy and would have been a great back bone for the new Beach Boys album back then.

You're Still A Mystery is the winner for me. I hope when they're talking about revisiting older songs for this album, that's one of the ones I hope they consider. It's Not Easy Being Me would be a good choice too, but You're Still A Mystery had a good vocal arrangement in the incarnation I heard and wouldn't take much work to finish for this album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 06, 2012, 05:28:12 PM
I need to relisten to those tracks again. I probably haven't listened to them for 8 years or so.

I started to, once, and lost interest after a few intros.
Yep, most were just so-so, but a few were terrific. Soul Searchin', You're A Mystery and It's Not Easy Being Me are really catchy and would have been a great back bone for the new Beach Boys album back then.

I would still like to see a proper release of these songs, maybe they could be included on the potential box set?  And was it always the group's intention for the Paley tracks to be in mono, or were these just demo mixes that were leaked out?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on March 06, 2012, 05:31:29 PM
Quote
Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...

For me personally, his voice is too sterile, too clean.  Even when Brian's voice was pristine it still had some bite to it. It's like comparing Rod Stewart in the 70s to his (mostly) 70s covers album he did several years ago. One is the real deal, the other sounds like one of those K-Tel knockoffs. I'm not saying Foskett is a bad singer (far from it), just that I'm not that big of a fan as much as I could be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 06, 2012, 09:54:41 PM
Quote
Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...

For me personally, his voice is too sterile, too clean.  Even when Brian's voice was pristine it still had some bite to it. It's like comparing Rod Stewart in the 70s to his (mostly) 70s covers album he did several years ago. One is the real deal, the other sounds like one of those K-Tel knockoffs. I'm not saying Foskett is a bad singer (far from it), just that I'm not that big of a fan as much as I could be.

Agreed. The biggest difference between smile 67 and smile 2004 were the background vocals. The ones on BWPS are very good, but there's just something missing from them compared to the montage on the box.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 06, 2012, 09:58:32 PM
Deleted

See below


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 06, 2012, 10:00:15 PM

I will give you that the Monkees *tried* to pass as a legitimate band, but you simply can't erase the fact that they came together as a manufactured group for a TV series.  Their greatest successes came during the time their TV show was popular.  But once the show ended nobody (maybe unfairly) wanted to take them seriously.  That doesn't mean they didn't have any talent or don't deserve any credit.  They have their place in music history.  But because of their manufactured roots, it is unfair to draw certain comparisons between them and groups that formed on their own terms and earned their own success organically.  Which is why it's a rather moot point saying the members of the Monkees (who were all actors on a popular TV show) might be more recognizable than members of the Beach Boys.  


John Lennon formed the Quarrymen.  They played a few gigs and after a while some kid named Paul showed em his stuff backstage.  John liked what he saw and extended an invitation to the group.  Paul (after getting permission from his parents) accepted.  He then told John about George.  Same deal.  Eventually when they got signed, George M. didn't think their drummer was good enough to use on the recordings and fearing the worst, the guys had Brian sack him and asked Ringo to join.

Bob Rafelson and Bert Schneider liked what they saw in each of the prospective Monkees and essentially told Nesmith, Dolenz, Jones, and Tork, "Congratulations, you guys are now a group.  Here are the songs you're going to record."

Now is that second scenario REALLLLLLY that much different than what Brian did to his brothers, cousin, and neighbor?  :P ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 06, 2012, 11:24:59 PM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on March 06, 2012, 11:40:02 PM
I happen not to like Foskett's voice, but not because of any prejudice/jealousy etc. fundamentally I think he sings in a range that is not natural to him. He has a great mid range which is where he should sing.  But he's obviously a massive Brian Wilson fan so loves doing the falsetto. To me his falsetto is strained and a bit "thick", not crisp or natural. Matt J has got s crisp falsetto. In addition, he lacks subtlety, his oohs and aahs are somehow over the top.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 06, 2012, 11:46:03 PM
I would never argue that Brian's band at all equals the classic BB vocals. And Jeff doesn't sound exactly like a twentysomething Brian Wilson. But that falsetto role is very hard to fill, and given Foskett's bona fides, he's probably the best we could hope for in Brian's records and solo touring.

I think a lot of the appreciation for Matt Jardine has to do 1.) with the family connection and 2.) the time when he toured with the BBs, he was precisely the right age -- late 20s, early 30s -- to have a really great youthful sound in his voice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 06, 2012, 11:53:43 PM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

Headquarters is better than most Beach Boys albums of that decade.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 12:01:52 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

Headquarters is better than most Beach Boys albums of that decade.

Bought it today, actually. Sounds pretty strong to these ears. The outside writers do allow them to eat their cake and have it too, however.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 12:15:48 AM


Bought it today, actually. Sounds pretty strong to these ears. The outside writers do allow them to eat their cake and have it too, however.

Absolutely. Mike Nesmith was the only member of the band who was a really gifted songwriter as his successful solo career attests to. Peter Tork and Mickey Dolenz wrote one or two good songs here and there. Davy Jones wasn't a songwriter.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 07, 2012, 12:22:56 AM
I would never argue that Brian's band at all equals the classic BB vocals. And Jeff doesn't sound exactly like a twentysomething Brian Wilson. But that falsetto role is very hard to fill, and given Foskett's bona fides, he's probably the best we could hope for in Brian's records and solo touring.

I think a lot of the appreciation for Matt Jardine has to do 1.) with the family connection and 2.) the time when he toured with the BBs, he was precisely the right age -- late 20s, early 30s -- to have a really great youthful sound in his voice.

A more recent video of Matt's falsetto: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_yoEEN0tBQ


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 12:32:11 AM


A more recent video of Matt's falsetto: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_yoEEN0tBQ

Not a good vocal performance but I don't think that is reflective of his singing as a whole. When Jeff Foskett sang this song acoustic with David Marks a few years ago he also sounded substandard.

Both Matt and Jeff are good singers. With Matt, generally speaking, having a slight edge.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 12:34:08 AM
Here's Jeff in a very clear audience video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7o2noJlPs8


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 07, 2012, 12:46:02 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

Shut the front door.  If you don't like Sunny Girlfriend you're just soulless. Do we need any further confirmation of what we've all suspected for so long? AGD is some type of automaton...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 12:47:00 AM
Headquarters is better than most Beach Boys albums of that decade.

Beach Boys albums of "that decade" i.e. the 60s:

Surfin' Safari
Surfin' USA
Surfer Girl
Shut Down Volume 2
All Summer Long
Christmas Album
Concert
Today
Summer Days...
Party
Pet Sounds
Smiley Smile
Wild Honey
Friends
20/20


So you're saying that Headquarters is better than eight of those ? Think you're on the wrong board, pal.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 07, 2012, 12:47:39 AM
Only a monster wouldn't smile at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0emLj0d66DQ
Better than the HN version imo. I've always wanted a coat like the one Michael is wearing in that clip.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 12:50:17 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

Shut the front door.  If you don't like Sunny Girlfriend you're just soulless. Do we need any further confirmation of what we've all suspected for so long? AGD is some type of automaton...

I was prepped by folk here and elsewhere for some amazing musical revelation when I heard the non-hits, and yes, it was amazing - amazing how very poor most of them were. Less surprising was that Davy sang a lot of them, and rather badly. Probably my fave Monkees track is "Porpoise Song", and that sounds like an MMT outtake.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 12:53:09 AM
Only a monster wouldn't smile at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0emLj0d66DQ
Better than the HN version imo. I've always wanted a coat like the one Michael is wearing in that clip.

Yeah, it's cute and very nice. But rock & roll - or even pop - it ain't. Pure 19th century English music hall.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 07, 2012, 12:54:13 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

Shut the front door.  If you don't like Sunny Girlfriend you're just soulless. Do we need any further confirmation of what we've all suspected for so long? AGD is some type of automaton...

I was prepped by folk here and elsewhere for some amazing musical revelation when I heard the non-hits, and yes, it was amazing - amazing how very poor most of them were. Less surprising was that Davy sang a lot of them, and rather badly. Probably my fave Monkees track is "Porpoise Song", and that sounds like an MMT outtake.

I'll agree with you AGD, The Monkees are not as strong of a band as TBB, but then again, few bands are. However I find them overall to be very enjoyable, I can put on PAC&J LTD anytime and enjoy it from start to finish. They're not a radical experimental band, but they're fun and overall very very solid for what they did do. Much better than somewhat similar acts like Harper's Bizarre


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 12:58:18 AM
For sure, enjoyable, but the party line was that when they got artistic control, they produced some amazing stuff - and to these ears, they fell way short. Your personal mileage will, of course, vary. Which is overall a grand thing.  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 07, 2012, 01:01:06 AM
The Monkees never did a top tier album like Notorious Byrd Brothers, Forever Changes, or Pet Sounds. They weren't a top tier band. But they are fucking great regardless. Don't think about it so much Andrew, just put Headquarters on a cd and listen to it as you drive around the english countryside.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 01:07:57 AM
When out and about on my estates, I only listen to the likes of Elgar, Vaughn Williams and Delius.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 01:10:59 AM
When out and about on my estates, I only listen to the likes of Elgar, Vaughn Williams and Delius.  ;D

And those guys are fucking amazing, too.

Really.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on March 07, 2012, 01:13:16 AM
Dr. Primrose usually just gets his beautiful daughters to regal him with ballads whenever the squire stops by


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 01:19:15 AM


Beach Boys albums of "that decade" i.e. the 60s:

Surfin' Safari
Surfin' USA
Surfer Girl
Shut Down Volume 2
All Summer Long
Christmas Album
Concert
Today
Summer Days...
Party
Pet Sounds
Smiley Smile
Wild Honey
Friends
20/20


So you're saying that Headquarters is better than eight of those ? Think you're on the wrong board, pal.

Sorry. I didn't fully appreciate that you giving each Monkees album a listen makes you an expert whose opinion can't be questioned.  :)

Just because I'm a fan of The Beach Boys doesn't mean that I (or other posters on this board) can't appreciate other bands. It also doesn't mean that I can't try to take a critical look the group's albums.

Now Headquarters is regularly listed as one of the top 100 albums of the sixties and seems to receive almost universal praise.

Pet Sounds is obviously considered to be far superior. Today possibly is as well.

But there are several BBs album from that decade (SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party) which are not generally considered to be in the same stratosphere.

All of the other albums are debatable but I would say that Headquarters has a better reputation than quite a few of them.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 01:22:02 AM


Yeah, it's cute and very nice. But rock & roll - or even pop - it ain't. Pure 19th century English music hall.

And?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 01:34:16 AM
Sorry. I didn't fully appreciate that you giving each Monkees album a listen makes you an expert whose opinion can't be questioned.  :)

Remember, I came to these albums entirely fresh, albeit primed by both Monkees and general music fans to expect something slightly extraordinary from the non-hits and singles. I don't hear this, despite repeated listenings. I hear poor album fodder thinly produced. To compare, I knew maybe three Zombies singles when I first heard Odessey & Oracle about five years ago, and that album totally blew me away out of the traps.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 01:52:06 AM

Remember, I came to these albums entirely fresh, albeit primed by both Monkees and general music fans to expect something slightly extraordinary from the non-hits and singles. I don't hear this, despite repeated listenings. I hear poor album fodder thinly produced. To compare, I knew maybe three Zombies singles when I first heard Odessey & Oracle about five years ago, and that album totally blew me away out of the traps.


And? You think that your opinion is of any particular importance why?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MBE on March 07, 2012, 02:36:40 AM
Sorry. I didn't fully appreciate that you giving each Monkees album a listen makes you an expert whose opinion can't be questioned.  :)

Remember, I came to these albums entirely fresh, albeit primed by both Monkees and general music fans to expect something slightly extraordinary from the non-hits and singles. I don't hear this, despite repeated listenings. I hear poor album fodder thinly produced. To compare, I knew maybe three Zombies singles when I first heard Odessey & Oracle about five years ago, and that album totally blew me away out of the traps.
I heard a lot of Monkees songs as I was in a band with a collector. I like them OK and enjoyed the show as a kid but only bought one 45 of Daydream Believer (which I still think Bruce could have nailed though he kind of mocked the song when I brought it up to him). The flip (it's a reissue 45 is Listen To The Band and that is a good song too.  When you hear something new that gets you (doesn't matter when it was cut-new to an individual is what I mean) you know it. We all have different tastes and none of the next sentence means anything other than my subjective viewpoint. I am glad the Monkees got reconsidered to a point, but there are better bands from the period are a lot more unjustly obscure. The Head period was cool though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 02:40:20 AM

Remember, I came to these albums entirely fresh, albeit primed by both Monkees and general music fans to expect something slightly extraordinary from the non-hits and singles. I don't hear this, despite repeated listenings. I hear poor album fodder thinly produced. To compare, I knew maybe three Zombies singles when I first heard Odessey & Oracle about five years ago, and that album totally blew me away out of the traps.


And? You think that your opinion is of any particular importance why?

As valid as yours: no more, no less.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 02:44:41 AM
Dr. Primrose usually just gets his beautiful daughters to regal him with ballads whenever the squire stops by

The gatehouse at Bellagio Manor:

(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/268310_10150706362495510_854765509_19892504_4704772_n.jpg)

... and the manor itself:

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/269470_10150706375580510_854765509_19892760_6133582_n.jpg)

It's not much, but I call it home.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 02:51:19 AM

As valid as yours: no more, no less.

Indeed. Not sure why you were so surprised that anyone should consider the album better than 8 (or 13) Beach Boys albums from that era though. A fairly widely held viewpoint.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MBE on March 07, 2012, 02:59:57 AM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullsh*t, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds. If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell. And really, it's about the same half-dozen guys who won't shut up about it.


I didn't know that religous stuff about Jeff until now but I'll weigh in.

Not liking Love You is fine by me as I don't dig it much.  I do think he shouldn't stop Brian from playing it if he in fact does. Religion doesn't matter to me when looking at a person. Everybody has or doesn't have beliefs of their own. If Jeff pushes it on people is one thing, but if he doesn't its nothing that is a concern or even notable. The only thing I ever heard that bothered me along that line of a minder is that I understand (I haven't seen it myself) he has told Brian to change his responces in public sometimes in front of people. If it's true that's kind of sad, but everybody I have talked to that would know has said Brian needs a minder of some sort since the mid seventies. Landy and his team gave that role a bad name, but it seems Brian (to be fair like many other people who are famous or who have emotional issues) needs help staying on track.  

Musically he's OK as he does hit the notes fine. He doesn't have the kind of soul the original Beach Boys had in their prime but nobody does. I never minded his presence at the shows.

I


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MBE on March 07, 2012, 03:02:23 AM
Dr. Primrose usually just gets his beautiful daughters to regal him with ballads whenever the squire stops by

The gatehouse at Bellagio Manor:

(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/268310_10150706362495510_854765509_19892504_4704772_n.jpg)

... and the manor itself:

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/269470_10150706375580510_854765509_19892760_6133582_n.jpg)

It's not much, but I call it home.
How about having me over for dinner? Great shots!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 03:14:10 AM

As valid as yours: no more, no less.

Indeed. Not sure why you were so surprised that anyone should consider the album better than 8 (or 13) Beach Boys albums from that era though. A fairly widely held viewpoint.

Because, to these ears, it isn't. Others disagree: personally, I think it's a case of the pendulum swinging back too far. Again, just my take. I was primed for excellence, and I didn't, and don't, hear it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on March 07, 2012, 03:43:40 AM
I always feel it's a bit wrong to judge albums after one or two listens, in fact it took me about 5-6 listens before Pet Sounds revealed its true beauty. Same with Love You - first few times I remember thinking 'what IS this?', didn't listen to it for awhile then gave it another go and voila, awesomness ensued!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 03:52:57 AM
Chemistry Chemistry Chemistry!

The Beach Boys, or Beatles or whoever it might be, have a sound, something that happens when
they get in a room together, it's intangible, one of my pet theories, is usually, when bands are related
or grow up together in the neighborhood, or both, occasionally you get a chemistry that is hard to define
or explain. It just is..

No session guys can ever beat that. It's like a gift from God.

On Foskett's vocals, I don't care for his falsetto, no matter what it' gonna be wrong, because it isn't that
chemistry of the original group. But it has nothing to do with talent or ability.

I agree with an earlier poster, Foskett is a bit too hot in the mix, (IMO) and equally important, they are
using some modern equipment and techniques on the new recordings, and they just don't sound the same.
The limitations of the early four and eight track equipment, shaded things, certain things weren't as clear, but
in an odd paradox, that limitation helped make the sound, you heard it on the playback and said, Eureka that's it!


I am sure they are using some vintage gear, but the digital recorders just don't sound the same, or the modern consoles
probably they are using vintage mics.

if you turned Foskett down a hard in the mix, and if you actually degraded the fidelity by recording on magnetic tape on an
old multitrack recorder, it would probably sound closer to the Beach Boys.

But when I listened to DIA the remake, I noticed all those things, but it didn't spoil it for me, I would have tried recording
on an old four or eight track machine and then dumping it into pro tools later,but anyway, it's not that Foskett is bad, he
just isn't Brian Wilson circa 1960's, he was slightly loud, and the clarity and sound of the modern equipment changes things.


As the album evolves and gets recorded and mixed, the Beach Boys and engineers, may notice some of those things, and
make adjustments by the time the final album comes out.

Although they want to, and will sound like the Beach Boys, I don't think they are especially thinking about replicating every
move they made in 1966. Also the timber of their voices has changed so much over 40 years and Carl and Dennis have died.
So you could do things, to duplicate the original sound a little more, but I think DIA demonstrated clearly, it still sounds like
the freaking Beach Boys, because it is.

If the songs sound like Beach Boys compositions, I think it will be a real winner, the performance is remarkably good for a bunch
of 70 year old guys, but are they able to write songs that sound similar to old Beach Boy tunes, I think Lucky Old Sun, proves
they probably can, Think of Lucky Old Sun with the Beach Boy Blend and more Mike Love lyrics instead of Scott Bennett lyrics
and you get some idea, Beach Boys 1965  or 1969

I Liked that Van Dyke Parks, between song, interlude dialogue stuff, too bad nothing like that will be happening.
I imagine Van Dyke writing lyrics would have caused the whole project to implode from Mike Love's point of view
so I am expecting California Girls as opposed to Hero's and Villians.......

Can Wilson write some interesting melodies and arrangements, God I hope so.

I think the leaks we get are all deliberate, I hope they give us a deliberate leak pretty soon., I am dying
of curiosity




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 04:00:41 AM
Is that really your house Andrew? It looks like Friar park! That's amazing, my house would fit inside that
about five times from the look of it.

I guess you get more for your money living out in a small village. I Like my little house, but I gotta say
that is impressive and colorful. It must get drafty. Do old English houses like that have modern electric heat
or do you have to burn wood or oil.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 04:02:44 AM
Is that really your house Andrew? It looks like Friar park! That's amazing, my house would fit inside that
about five times from the look of it.

I guess you get more for your money living out in a small village. I Like my little house, but I gotta say
that is impressive and colorful. It must get drafty. Do old English houses like that have modern electric heat
or do you have to burn wood or oil.


 :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 04:04:13 AM
Is that really your house Andrew? It looks like Friar park! That's amazing, my house would fit inside that
about five times from the look of it.

I guess you get more for your money living out in a small village. I Like my little house, but I gotta say
that is impressive and colorful. It must get drafty. Do old English houses like that have modern electric heat
or do you have to burn wood or oil.


The house comes with it's own cemetary? Thats a neat place congrats, you call that modest? It looks rather
large to me, like a small castle for non billionaires


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 07, 2012, 06:02:25 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".

Nesmith was writing and producing from the beginning. And while they weren't allowed to play (apart from Tork on a couple of tracks) on the first couple of albums, they took over creative control, including for singles like Pleasant Valley Sunday and Daydream Believer.

Quote
Speaking of The Monkees, over the weekend, I sat down and listened to the entire Monkees' output during their classic period, just to see what all the fuss was about and to find out what their deep catalog was like, given that their fans were forever going on about how they were valid musicians and not just the Pre-Fab Four. The hits remain, of course, excellent, sometimes outstanding pop, but the album tracks ? Filler, and sometimes really thin filler in both composition and execution. There is no deep catalog, as we understand it in the BB/Beatles sense.

I'd disagree quite strongly. The only album that works as a coherent whole is Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd, but that's more because of bad choices made during sequencing than because of a lack of good material. As far as good Monkees 'deep cuts' go, I'd suggest the following:
Writing Wrongs
Nine Times Blue
The Girl I Knew Somewhere
Cuddly Toy
Sweet Young Thing
Shorty Blackwell
My Share Of The Sidewalk
Someday Man
Saturday's Child
Papa Gene's Blues
Riu Chiu
Propinquity
Love Is Only Sleeping
The Door Into Summer
What Am I Doing Hangin' Round
Daily Nightly
Don't Call On Me
And a lot more.

Unfortunately, though, quite a lot of their best stuff remained unreleased on the actual albums, and has only seen legitimate release on rarities compilations and bonus tracks, so if you're just listening to the actual 1960s albums only Pisces and (arguably) Head stand up, because of the need to accomodate Davy Jones' fairly awful Broadway-rock.

For those with Spotify though, I've put together a playlist at http://open.spotify.com/user/stealthmunchkin/playlist/0ZbNc89WtrcsHreWrazgGV that should show there was more to the band than just the hits (though it's no coincidence that of the 25 songs in that playlist, 17 have Nesmith as either lead vocalist or songwirter).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 07, 2012, 06:21:40 AM
Although those being rude to AGD because he doesn't like the music should show him a little slack. There is *plenty* of filler on those albums, and some of the good stuff takes several listens to get into. Partly because of the necessity to incorporate a load of bad Davy Jones tracks, the Monkees never made a classic album like Pet Sounds, Odessey And Oracle or Forever Changes, though I'd argue that Pisces comes close. They had one great singer (Dolenz), one great songwriter (Nesmith), one great instrumentalist (Tork), plus Davy Jones who was great as a live frontman and TV actor but added little of worth to the records. When they split those roles properly (say The Girl I Knew Somewhere, with Dolenz singing a Nesmith song and a great harpsichord solo by Tork) they sounded great. When they didn't, they didn't.

As for Foskett, I get the impression that the people who dislike him mostly dislike him for his perceived artistic conservatism -- from what I can tell his favourite Brian/Beach Boys stuff is the music from roughly All Summer Long through Pet Sounds and he's not that enamoured of the later stuff -- and that affects their perception of his vocals. He does have some flaws as a vocalist - he tends to hit the notes a tiny bit flat then pull himself up to the right note -- but he's perfectly good at what he does. I'd say he's not as good as Matt Jardine or Scott Totten, but better than Randell Kirsch. And anyone complaining about him should just remember -- we could have had Adrian Baker instead. be grateful for small mercies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 07, 2012, 06:56:03 AM
Only a monster wouldn't smile at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0emLj0d66DQ
Better than the HN version imo. I've always wanted a coat like the one Michael is wearing in that clip.

Yeah, it's cute and very nice. But rock & roll - or even pop - it ain't. Pure 19th century English music hall.

Written, of course, by one of the finest American songwriters of the period.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 07:12:09 AM
Sorry. I didn't fully appreciate that you giving each Monkees album a listen makes you an expert whose opinion can't be questioned.  :)

Remember, I came to these albums entirely fresh, albeit primed by both Monkees and general music fans to expect something slightly extraordinary from the non-hits and singles. I don't hear this, despite repeated listenings. I hear poor album fodder thinly produced. To compare, I knew maybe three Zombies singles when I first heard Odessey & Oracle about five years ago, and that album totally blew me away out of the traps.

I listened to O&O by the Zombies having only heard the hits too, absolutely outstanding album that I personally rank higher than any Beatles album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 09:06:57 AM
Indeed. Not sure why you were so surprised that anyone should consider the album better than 8 (or 13) Beach Boys albums from that era though. A fairly widely held viewpoint.

Is it really? I mean, I know that the album is well-regarded, but the BBs have sustained a fairly high critical (and popular!) reputation for their '60s work, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 07, 2012, 09:36:49 AM
You do talk some tosh, don't you ?

Firstly, did Brian place an advert and then audition some 200 odd people who replied ? And I think you'll find The Monkees were actually told "These are the instrumental tracks for the songs going on your albums and singles, all you have to do is sing on them".



Obviously, just poking the bear a bit (I just didn't intend to poke THE bear on this board).  :)   But the point I was making is people knock the Monkees formation because they were just "put together" and didn't "pay their dues", playing dives along the way.  And while the Boys worked hard to go from "Surfin'" to "California Girls", they were also, pretty much "put together", albeit by a member of the group.  And by the time the Monkees hit the scene (1966), they were even using a lot of the same session musicians on tracks (some written and produced by a member of the group) that they added vocals and additional instrumentation too.  

Yes, it's a big stretch but it's also not AS big a stretch as their detractors make it out to be.   :-\

As for post-creative control deep cuts, my very top suggestions include
The Girl I Knew Somewhere
You Told Me
You Just May Be The One
For Pete's Sake
Daily, Nightly
Goin' Down
Auntie's Municpal Court


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 10:00:04 AM
I listened to O&O by the Zombies having only heard the hits too, absolutely outstanding album that I personally rank higher than any Beatles album.

Wow.  That's just.............................wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 07, 2012, 10:01:43 AM
With Headquarters it's worth noting that it was the first album where The Monkees were not just adding vocals to finished backing tracks written, performed and produced by other people, so in many ways it the band's DEBUT album. When you consider it in that light Headquarters is one of the finest debuts of the 1960s. What really did The Monkees in was that once they gained artistic controll they soon realised that they had nothing in common musically and essentially became solo artists, putting out their individual songs under The Monkees brand.

Also they suffered under The Beach Boys/Bob Dylan syndrome of often leaving some of their best works in the can.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 10:09:02 AM
I listened to O&O by the Zombies having only heard the hits too, absolutely outstanding album that I personally rank higher than any Beatles album.

Wow.  That's just.............................wrong.

No it's not wrong, note I say "personally" in my post, that means it's my opinion. If you want to believe that it's not as good as the Beatles albums then that's your opinion which I wholeheartedly respect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 07, 2012, 10:10:32 AM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullsh*t, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds. If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell. And really, it's about the same half-dozen guys who won't shut up about it.



I had no idea of Jeff's religious convictions and frankly could give a sh#t, dislike a chunk of Love You myself and admire anyone who's willing to take on the task of keeping an eye out for Brian. It still doesn't mean I can't find his falsetto annoying as hell.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 10:12:53 AM
If you want to believe that it's not as good as the Beatles albums then that's your opinion which I wholeheartedly respect.

Well, thanks for that anyway.  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 10:14:56 AM
If you want to believe that it's not as good as the Beatles albums then that's your opinion which I wholeheartedly respect.

Well, thanks for that anyway.  :-D

"Let's be friends..."  :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 10:17:17 AM
Headquarters is better than most Beach Boys albums of that decade (60's)

That's complete horse poo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 07, 2012, 10:21:23 AM
Haha. You're not in a good mood today, are you?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 10:24:26 AM
"Let's be friends..."  :p

Well after that somewhat lame statement saying O&O is better than any Beatle album, it's kinda hard to be friends with you.............but.............I guess it's OK.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 10:27:21 AM
Why thank you kind sir!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 10:27:54 AM
Haha. You're not in a good mood today, are you?

Yeah, I'm fine!   Do you agree with Craig and Nickorama, R&R?   I can't.  I..........I just can't!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 07, 2012, 10:29:23 AM
Headquarters is better than most Beach Boys albums of that decade (60's)

That's complete horse poo.

It's at least better than half of their sixties output IMO.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 07, 2012, 10:32:06 AM
I'd rank O&O higher than the ever-overrated Sgt. Pepper any day of the week.









By the way, we're getting far off-topic, aren't we?  :-X


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 07, 2012, 10:33:14 AM
Haha. You're not in a good mood today, are you?

Yeah, I'm fine!   Do you agree with Craig and Nickorama, R&R?   I can't.  I..........I just can't!

Well, I would put Odessey in my top 5 favourite albums but it would be behind Revolver and The White Album. It would also be very close to Rubber Soul. So, I guess, in my opinion, it's better than lots of Beatles albums but that in no way reduces the greatness of those Beatles albums and certainly doesn't damage The Beatles position at the top of my favourite bands list.

As for Headquarters -- I do think it's a great album. It's certainly no better than Pet Sounds, Wild Honey or Today! but it may give some of the others a run for their money.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 07, 2012, 11:06:39 AM
When out and about on my estates, I only listen to the likes of Elgar, Vaughn Williams and Delius.  ;D

No Prokofiev?  Seriously, check out his piano Tocatta!

Wowzers!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 11:21:18 AM
I'd rank O&O higher than the ever-overrated Sgt. Pepper any day of the week.

Ahhhh, c'mon. Now you're reachin'. Next you're gonna say it's better than the White and Abbey Rd. "Odessey & Oracle" is a damn fine album for sure, but..................I dunnnnnno.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on March 07, 2012, 11:32:21 AM
I'd rank O&O higher than the ever-overrated Sgt. Pepper any day of the week.

Ahhhh, c'mon. Now you're reachin'. Next you're gonna say it's better than the White and Abbey Rd. "Odessey & Oracle" is a damn fine album for sure, but..................I dunnnnnno.

It depends on personal taste I guess.

Nothing on Sgt. Pepper stands out emotionally for me. Whereas on O&O each song is psychedelic/beautiful/emotional. Just my preference though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 07, 2012, 11:37:44 AM
I'd rank O&O higher than the ever-overrated Sgt. Pepper any day of the week.

Ahhhh, c'mon. Now you're reachin'. Next you're gonna say it's better than the White and Abbey Rd. "Odessey & Oracle" is a damn fine album for sure, but..................I dunnnnnno.
Those are all very different pieces of music.. Regarding the Beatles catalogue I never really got the hype about Sgt. Pepper - in my book it's by far not their best LP. That's why I would rank O&O higher, any time. Okay, you can't really compare O&O musically with Abbey Road or The Beatles, but I'd say: it's on par with Abbey Road and also the white album. Both have superfluous tracks and songs I just don't care about sprinkled among the stand-out tracks. O&O on the other hand is consistent and maintains a damn fine quality of songs throughout.

But that's just taste, obviously..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 07, 2012, 11:41:32 AM
The gatehouse at Bellagio Manor:

(http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/268310_10150706362495510_854765509_19892504_4704772_n.jpg)

... and the manor itself:

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/269470_10150706375580510_854765509_19892760_6133582_n.jpg)

It's not much, but I call it home.

HEY EVERYBODY!

PARTY AT ANDREW'S!!!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 07, 2012, 11:46:54 AM
that's EXACTLY the kind of house I pictured AGD would live in for some reason.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 07, 2012, 11:47:07 AM

HEY EVERYBODY!

PARTY AT ANDREW'S!!!!!!

:woot


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on March 07, 2012, 11:47:40 AM
But you have to dress as your favorite Jane Austin character.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 11:48:35 AM
Those are all very different pieces of music.. Regarding the Beatles catalogue I never really got the hype about Sgt. Pepper - in my book it's by far not their best LP. That's why I would rank O&O higher, any time. Okay, you can't really compare O&O musically with Abbey Road or The Beatles, but I'd say: it's on par with Abbey Road and also the white album. Both have superfluous tracks and songs I just don't care about sprinkled among the stand-out tracks. O&O on the other hand is consistent and maintains a damn fine quality of songs throughout. But that's just taste, obviously..

Good argument. Yeah, there's a lot of great albums you could put up against those and be in the ballpark. The best Stones, Kinks, and Who albums come immediately to mind....and of course it's a matter of opinion and taste.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 07, 2012, 12:32:53 PM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullsh*t, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds. If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell. And really, it's about the same half-dozen guys who won't shut up about it.



I've never posted before concerning Fosketts' voice.
The only reason I don't like it is because I simply don't like the quality of his falsetto.
I know it's tough to match Brians' in his peak years.  Jeffs' sounds too "thin" and he doesn't emote with his voice , it just sounds like him trying to approximate Brians. And he falls far too short of the mark.
I can't believe how many people think it's satisfactory.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 07, 2012, 12:37:23 PM
Quote
Can you please elaborate on (and feel free to go into excruciatingly tedious detail) why you think Jeff's fallsetto doesn't cut it?  Would love to read your and everyone else's thoughts on that...

For me personally, his voice is too sterile, too clean.  Even when Brian's voice was pristine it still had some bite to it. It's like comparing Rod Stewart in the 70s to his (mostly) 70s covers album he did several years ago. One is the real deal, the other sounds like one of those K-Tel knockoffs. I'm not saying Foskett is a bad singer (far from it), just that I'm not that big of a fan as much as I could be.
Thanks, that's definitely part of it. I think  of what you call "bite" is sort of a "for lack of a better word" phlemy whininess" to Brians' great falsetto. And again, I don't hear foskett emoting. Brians' falsetto conveys  so much feeling, like unwritten words.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 07, 2012, 12:45:27 PM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullsh*t, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds. If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell. And really, it's about the same half-dozen guys who won't shut up about it.



I had no idea of Jeff's religious convictions and frankly could give a sh#t, dislike a chunk of Love You myself and admire anyone who's willing to take on the task of keeping an eye out for Brian. It still doesn't mean I can't find his falsetto annoying as hell.
Yep. And I don't think it's the mix or equipment, either. He just doesn't have the vocal chops for a satisfactory falsetto, imo. Not for Beach Boys music anyway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 01:20:04 PM
Indeed. Not sure why you were so surprised that anyone should consider the album better than 8 (or 13) Beach Boys albums from that era though. A fairly widely held viewpoint.

Is it really? I mean, I know that the album is well-regarded, but the BBs have sustained a fairly high critical (and popular!) reputation for their '60s work, too.

Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

Now as I said, Headquarters is regularly listed as one of the top 100 albums of the 60s. Are all of the other BB albums from the era such as Smiley Smile and SDASN all considered in the same way?

The Monkees albums did indeed generally contain filler but almost all of The Beach Boys albums did as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 07, 2012, 01:21:26 PM
RE: Jeff o'the Foskett

Of course you can have problems with his falsetto, I'm not THAT much of a Brianista, but it's the 'Jeff Foskett is a proponent of Satan' talk that goes round from here that grates.

Someone posted a very valid point that a problem with Jeff doubling Brian is that their voices don't blend together well at all - I can dig that, especially in Brian's more shaky moments. But he doesn't deserve all the hate.

Besides, nobody can do Brian's 60's falsetto. Because it wasn't a falsetto  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 07, 2012, 01:21:52 PM
Jeffs falsetto sticks out like a sore thumb

He seems like a nice guy though


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 07, 2012, 01:23:01 PM
But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

5, actually - Surf's Up was released in 1971.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 07, 2012, 01:29:42 PM
RE: Jeff o'the Foskett

Besides, nobody can do Brian's 60's falsetto. Because it wasn't a falsetto  ;)
Geez, let us not get back on that topic, PLEASE!!!!! :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 01:40:47 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 01:56:45 PM
But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

5, actually - Surf's Up was released in 1971.

Surfin USA


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 07, 2012, 01:58:42 PM
I look at it this way: The Monkees were, after all, a damn fine band, even though they started out as a TV show.  A great writer and some great songs.  Not bad at all.

But the Beach Boys, well, the "peer group" of the Beach Boys is The Beatles.  That's it.  The end.
The Beach Boys AND The Beatles are the top o' the heap.  Everyone else is under them!

(I say this as a lifetime Beatles fan.)

Seriously, no one else is in the same "class" (i.e. musical level) as the Beach Boys and The Beatles.

Now, what the HECK was this thread about anyway?!?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 02:01:33 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

Diddums.

If you think that Surfin' Safari is a better album then Headquarters then all power to you.

Not sure what Davy Jones's funeral being a private affair has to do with anything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 02:04:31 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

That just seems irrelevant.

Regarding Foskett -- who can do better? The YT clip posted earlier suggests that Matt Jardine's voice has thinned out quite a bit. Adrian Baker is terrible. My take on it is that the falsetto slot is very hard to fill, period. Foskett isn't perfect, but to my ears he comes the closest, and is the most faithful to the music, of those available.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: meltedwhiskeyinmyhand on March 07, 2012, 02:05:09 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

Haha, thats rich, a Beach Boys fan making fun of a band member refusing to do reunion tours.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 07, 2012, 02:14:37 PM


Haha, thats rich, a Beach Boys fan making fun of a band member refusing to do reunion tours.

Indeed and there is a similarity, up to a point, between Mike's and Brian's situations.

Both going off to do successful (critically at least) solo careers which caused resentment among their bandmates. And occasionally tempted into reunions which never lasted too long.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 07, 2012, 02:56:22 PM
That just seems irrelevant.

Seems that way, huh Clayton?  I just threw that stuff out there for conjecture..........because I can.  Did you know that Mike Nesmith's Mom has been losing money on "White-out" since PC's and Mac's started coming out in the late 70's/early 80's? Hope she saved up her millions before then.

Don't harass me, now, Wirestone, or we'll have to take it to the Sandbox!!  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: gsmile on March 07, 2012, 03:06:52 PM
I don't want to be a stick in the mud, because I find the Monkee debate fascinating, but maybe that conversation should get moved to the Music Forum; my heart leaps everytime I see the "new" icon next to this thread and I think it's actual news about the new Beach Boys album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 07, 2012, 03:08:30 PM
Hey Mods, here is a thought. Can this whole "discussion" be moved somewhere else? This wasonce intended to be a thread for the new Beach Boys album. I logged on today and saw thee news pages and actually thought I missed something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 07, 2012, 03:41:24 PM
Great minds, huh?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 07, 2012, 03:42:50 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

That just seems irrelevant.

Regarding Foskett -- who can do better? The YT clip posted earlier suggests that Matt Jardine's voice has thinned out quite a bit. Adrian Baker is terrible. My take on it is that the falsetto slot is very hard to fill, period. Foskett isn't perfect, but to my ears he comes the closest, and is the most faithful to the music, of those available.

I know this is off-topic, but hey this is what we end up talking about when there's no news on the album.

1. Regarding the falsetto parts and who can do them besides Foskett or Matt, the answer is easy: the guy who sings in Mike and Bruce's band. He has a straightforward, unaffected delivery and a thick and easy tone throughout his whole falsetto register. However, Foskett earned his place in this reunion: he's been involved for three decades with this music, has Brian's trust and friendship, and is IMO a more complete artist than any of the other possiblities. He can sing the high parts and do jusice to them and plays really good guitar in a band that's full of guitar players (for whatever reason, his playing has also been bashed in this very board).

2. Brian did sing falsetto in the early years. Period. The tag to Fun Fun Fun, about 80% of DWB, about 90% of She knows me too well, 50% of Don't talk... I can go on and on... But we can take it out of this topic if needed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 04:26:12 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

That just seems irrelevant.

Regarding Foskett -- who can do better? The YT clip posted earlier suggests that Matt Jardine's voice has thinned out quite a bit. Adrian Baker is terrible. My take on it is that the falsetto slot is very hard to fill, period. Foskett isn't perfect, but to my ears he comes the closest, and is the most faithful to the music, of those available.

I know this is off-topic, but hey this is what we end up talking about when there's no news on the album.

1. Regarding the falsetto parts and who can do them besides Foskett or Matt, the answer is easy: the guy who sings in Mike and Bruce's band. He has a straightforward, unaffected delivery and a thick and easy tone throughout his whole falsetto register. However, Foskett earned his place in this reunion: he's been involved for three decades with this music, has Brian's trust and friendship, and is IMO a more complete artist than any of the other possiblities. He can sing the high parts and do jusice to them and plays really good guitar in a band that's full of guitar players (for whatever reason, his playing has also been bashed in this very board).

2. Brian did sing falsetto in the early years. Period. The tag to Fun Fun Fun, about 80% of DWB, about 90% of She knows me too well, 50% of Don't talk... I can go on and on... But we can take it out of this topic if needed.

1. Interesting. I guess that's Randall Kirsch. Here's DWB with him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OzFFLQiYuM. I like it!

2. I'm assuming you're talking about the touring. And it's true. But he never sang enough of it to qualify as the falsetto vocalist for the band -- he just did it now and then. I might quibble with your percentages -- he did all of DWB for quite awhile, although in a lower key. Not familiar with his version of SKMTW. And he did sing all of Don't Talk, at least at the Pet Sounds shows I saw -- again, in a lower key, but he definitely went into falsetto for it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 04:33:32 PM
I can understand why this might get moved, the thread's went off a little bit but I would like to chime in with one thing about the Jeff/Falsetto debate.

Why do we have to have just one guy do the falsetto? The fact is that some of the guys sound better on some songs, Matt Jardine was/is untouchable on things like Hushabye and the tag at the end of All This Is That whereas Jeff is better on other songs. I will say that I never ever liked Jeff's vocal on I Get Around, it doesn't work for me, i'd prefer someone like Randall Kirsch do that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 07, 2012, 04:46:09 PM
I can understand why this might get moved, the thread's went off a little bit but I would like to chime in with one thing about the Jeff/Falsetto debate.

Why do we have to have just one guy do the falsetto? The fact is that some of the guys sound better on some songs, Matt Jardine was/is untouchable on things like Hushabye and the tag at the end of All This Is That whereas Jeff is better on other songs. I will say that I never ever liked Jeff's vocal on I Get Around, it doesn't work for me, i'd prefer someone like Randall Kirsch do that.

I think it's perfectly fine to have this thread ebb and flow. It's not like there was much new news when it was focused, either. I did start a thread awhile back called "Let's all argue about Jeff Foskett here," but I accidentally put it in the "Welcome to the Smiley Smile Board" section. If some mod could move that into the "general discussions" section, we could migrate this talk over there.

I do think your point is good, but the problem is that you have to have a manageable group, size-wise, to tour with. It would be a strain on the budget to tour with five falsetto singers!

That being said, I know more people in Brian's band are capable of falsetto. I believe Probyn can sing in that range, for example, although with less power than Jeff. And of course Taylor did a few "falsetto" parts here and there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 07, 2012, 05:00:13 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

That just seems irrelevant.

Regarding Foskett -- who can do better? The YT clip posted earlier suggests that Matt Jardine's voice has thinned out quite a bit. Adrian Baker is terrible. My take on it is that the falsetto slot is very hard to fill, period. Foskett isn't perfect, but to my ears he comes the closest, and is the most faithful to the music, of those available.

I know this is off-topic, but hey this is what we end up talking about when there's no news on the album.

1. Regarding the falsetto parts and who can do them besides Foskett or Matt, the answer is easy: the guy who sings in Mike and Bruce's band. He has a straightforward, unaffected delivery and a thick and easy tone throughout his whole falsetto register. However, Foskett earned his place in this reunion: he's been involved for three decades with this music, has Brian's trust and friendship, and is IMO a more complete artist than any of the other possiblities. He can sing the high parts and do jusice to them and plays really good guitar in a band that's full of guitar players (for whatever reason, his playing has also been bashed in this very board).

2. Brian did sing falsetto in the early years. Period. The tag to Fun Fun Fun, about 80% of DWB, about 90% of She knows me too well, 50% of Don't talk... I can go on and on... But we can take it out of this topic if needed.

1. Interesting. I guess that's Randall Kirsch. Here's DWB with him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OzFFLQiYuM. I like it!

2. I'm assuming you're talking about the touring. And it's true. But he never sang enough of it to qualify as the falsetto vocalist for the band -- he just did it now and then. I might quibble with your percentages -- he did all of DWB for quite awhile, although in a lower key. Not familiar with his version of SKMTW. And he did sing all of Don't Talk, at least at the Pet Sounds shows I saw -- again, in a lower key, but he definitely went into falsetto for it.

I'm sorry. Point 2. was addressed at another poster who said that Brian's falsetto was not falsetto.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 05:09:15 PM
I can understand why this might get moved, the thread's went off a little bit but I would like to chime in with one thing about the Jeff/Falsetto debate.

Why do we have to have just one guy do the falsetto? The fact is that some of the guys sound better on some songs, Matt Jardine was/is untouchable on things like Hushabye and the tag at the end of All This Is That whereas Jeff is better on other songs. I will say that I never ever liked Jeff's vocal on I Get Around, it doesn't work for me, i'd prefer someone like Randall Kirsch do that.

I think it's perfectly fine to have this thread ebb and flow. It's not like there was much new news when it was focused, either. I did start a thread awhile back called "Let's all argue about Jeff Foskett here," but I accidentally put it in the "Welcome to the Smiley Smile Board" section. If some mod could move that into the "general discussions" section, we could migrate this talk over there.

I do think your point is good, but the problem is that you have to have a manageable group, size-wise, to tour with. It would be a strain on the budget to tour with five falsetto singers!

That being said, I know more people in Brian's band are capable of falsetto. I believe Probyn can sing in that range, for example, although with less power than Jeff. And of course Taylor did a few "falsetto" parts here and there.

Obviously the size of the band has to be taken into account but like you say there are other people in the band already who could cover some of those parts. Probyn has a great voice, I think he covers Bruce's part at the end of California Girls doesn't he? I'm sure I seen him sing that part and he captured the essence and character of that line perfectly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 07, 2012, 05:15:58 PM
Dr Lenny, according to the highly esteemed, and well-trained in the field of music poster aeijtzsche, Brian sings in a very high head voice, which accounts for his very full tone up in those ranges. Falsetto is just a term for 'high vocals' no matter what is actually going on. I was also kidding a little  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 07, 2012, 06:05:44 PM
1. Regarding the falsetto parts and who can do them besides Foskett or Matt, the answer is easy: the guy who sings in Mike and Bruce's band. He has a straightforward, unaffected delivery and a thick and easy tone throughout his whole falsetto register. However, Foskett earned his place in this reunion: he's been involved for three decades with this music, has Brian's trust and friendship, and is IMO a more complete artist than any of the other possiblities. He can sing the high parts and do jusice to them and plays really good guitar in a band that's full of guitar players (for whatever reason, his playing has also been bashed in this very board).

There are actually two people taking the falsetto parts in Mike & Bruce's band - Randell Kirsch and Scott Totten. Randell (who's actually collaborated with Foskett off and on for more than thirty years) has a thicker, stronger voice, while Scott has a thinner voice but appears to be able to hit the high notes more comfortably than Randell. They often double each other. Randell will take leads like Don't Worry Baby which are at the low end of the falsetto. Scott takes fewer leads, but when he does (Let Him Run Wild, Ballad Of Ole Betsy) he's scarily good - he sounds spookily like mid-60s Brian on Let Him Run Wild.

Scott T is in the touring band for the reunion tour, so hopefully we'll see him take the 'Brian' parts of the harmony stack while Jeff takes 'Carl', as that would suit both their voices.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 06:15:58 PM
A lot of people seem interested in micro managing Beach Boy decisions, about who should
sing the falsetto, who should produce, what the new songs should emulate in terms of past work.
Who should get to co-write, how many they should get to co-write. Which archival songs  they
should rework for the new album. What artwork they should use.

I have never seen a band so beloved on the one hand, and where those same people believe
they know what decisions should be made, rather than the band itself. It's very odd, I love the
Beach boys, but they should do this, and not do that, this is wrong, this is right.

How can you say you love a band on the one hand, and want to micromanage and control
everything on the other? from the songwriting, to the vocal blend, to the artwork, archival tracks
choice of producer, and on and on and on. How can you love something if you have no faith or
interest in the choices they themselves make?
for one percent of the overall information on the album. They chose to go with a guy who has been with
them 25-30 years. They could have picked somebody else, they could have asked Jimmy Webb to write songs
or McCartney, they could flown to Hawaii to get a tropical vibe, with a mobile studio on a beach, they could
have hired a hip younger backing band with some rock n roll chops, they could have brought in a true  name
producer with chops on these sort of new old album from old sixties people. Producers like Rick Rubin, or T Bone
Burnett. Or even Jeff Lynne. They could have brought in Van Dyke Parks, they could have done anything, but
they made some decisions and that's the way it is.

Nobody does this to the Stones or Bob Dylan or Paul McCartney, or Bruce Springsteen, you don't see threads
no no they should fire that drummer, they hire this guy, why is it with the Beach Boys, people do this? Like
they don't have brains of their own or something.

As far as comparing the Monkees to a real band or comparing discographies between the Beach Boys and Monkees
it would be more fair to compare Boyce and Hart, and say that Boyce and Hart used the Monkees as their vehicle.
Not unlike saying all the Phil Spector sixties groups were really him as the actual artist, and the groups merely his
vehicle. When the Monkees indeed began to write and produce their own aterial, no one liked it very much. Which is
why Lester Sill or whoever was running the deal didn't want them writing and producing in the first place.

Nesmith did go on to a critically acclaimed solo career, but to my knowledge ever had a hit record of any stature
whatsoever. None of that is really a fair comparison to the artistry of Brian Wilson.

As far as comparing the Zombies Odyssey and Oracle album as a great work worthy to stand alongside other great
sixties works, that's valid, I agree with AGD and his point, that was something when he heard it, it was like wow this
is great work, brilliant. The Monkees were not even in that league. The Monkees hits were good because Boyce and Hart
and Neil Diamond and people like that wrote those songs, great people played the tracks, and good producers supervised
but the real artists were Boyce and Hart and the wrecking crew not the Monkees themselves, they were merely a vehicle
to frame the work.


Is there any news whatsoever about the album., are they in the studio, what are they doing, how many songs are
scheduled for the album, apparently they cut all the backing tracks first, and are now going back to do all the vocals
that in itself is very interesting, and recalls the methods used on Pet Sounds and other albums. That is not a given that
you would do it that way, very often you wouldn't do it that way. you would work on one or two, go back cut another
track, work on that , cut one or two more, etc etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 07, 2012, 06:26:20 PM
Oh actually I forgot about Scotty T and his vocal on Betsy, i'm sure they did it when I seen them in 08 and I was mighty impressed then!

The reason we have opinions on who should sing what is surely because we're fans? Why should fans sit back and have no opinion on details like that? And let's be honest, with all due respect to my favourite group, at various points in the bands history they've shown their decision making to be dubious at best. I mean do you think it was really the best idea to force Brian out front in the early 80's and have him tackle leads like Don't Worry Baby? You mention McCartney and Springsteen's bands and I agree to the best of my knowledge their fans don't argue on details like we do here. Looking beyond that though, the BB's have an unprecedented number of quality vocalists connected with the band in one way or another so it's only natural that we start asking things like - "Would such and such sound better on that part of the song?" Personally I love Darian's voice and he really channels Carl when he sings Darlin' but I don't like it when he sings Bruce's part at the end of God Only Knows and think that Probyn would be a better fit for this in Brian's live shows, obviously Bruce will handle this part himself on the reunion tour.

I wish we had some album news to talk about!!  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 07, 2012, 07:27:22 PM
Sure they do. But Headquarters does have a much better reputation that SS, SU, LDC, SDV2, Concert and Party. That's 6 for a start.

BFD. I gotcher effing reputation right here.  I'll take all those Beach Boys albums over 'Headquarters' all day and all night.

Headquarters.  From a group who can't even show up to Davy Jones' funeral!  Mike Nesmith didn't even want to join their reunions because of his huge ego! And when the 3 of them did reunite on the road, they couldn't do it for longer than a few months, if that!

That just seems irrelevant.

Regarding Foskett -- who can do better? The YT clip posted earlier suggests that Matt Jardine's voice has thinned out quite a bit. Adrian Baker is terrible. My take on it is that the falsetto slot is very hard to fill, period. Foskett isn't perfect, but to my ears he comes the closest, and is the most faithful to the music, of those available.


My sentiments EXACTLY!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 07, 2012, 07:35:41 PM
Just to say something on topic, I am so excited for this album  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 07, 2012, 07:49:07 PM
Just to say something on topic, I am so excited for this album  ;D

Awesome.  And I can't stand Adrian Baker, Randell Kirsch or the Monkees (what the heck, may as well chime in)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 07:49:39 PM
Yeah Craig Boyd, I understand, and live is something else. But for the studio, opinions is one thing
Oh I think Matt Jardine would have been better on the falsetto, thats an opinion. But it goes way
beyond that, it gets into minutiea

and rancor, I can easily see why they went with the guy who is close to Wilson for some 30 years
now, if you were trying to get a guy, to duplicate the original falsetto sound, they probably could have
found some guy off the street via auditions, but realistically, in most cases, you pick someone who is
part of your crowd, when the Stones got Ron Wood, it was as much for his being a mate, and fitting in
that way, there are always zillions of guys who can play or sing, but the chemistry of fitting in at rehearsal
and sitting in the studio and the personal vibe is important, I can certainly understand why they made that
choice.

It goes beyond opinions. it gets into micro managing, something I have not seen before in fan sites for
other groups, with passionate followers.

Can someone give us some news about the albums progress or song titles or some kind of info we don't have yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sound of Free on March 07, 2012, 07:52:43 PM
Wow, talk about a buzzkill.

I'm off the board for a couple of days and see that the "new album" thread that had been proceeding slowly has seven new pages!

Have more song titles come out? Has one of the band members given a big interview dropping hints of great new tunes? Maybe even a track has leaked!

What? It's almost all about the Monkees?  :(

Although since we're still debating a title for the new Beach Boys album, maybe they can call it "Gemini, Pisces, Virgo, Leo and Johnston."  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on March 07, 2012, 08:59:36 PM
As far as comparing the Monkees to a real band or comparing discographies between the Beach Boys and Monkees it would be more fair to compare Boyce and Hart, and say that Boyce and Hart used the Monkees as their vehicle.

...I think the phrase might be "their f***in' messengers".  :-)  And again, as with the Beach Boys when Brian stepped back, the messengers proved they could do damn good stuff without them.

Incidentally, AGD -- if you look for one Monkees deep cut, I'd suggest "Goin' Down" (not on any actual album, but the B-side to "Daydream Believer").  It's the one that converted me.  And yeah, the Monkees didn't write those lyrics -- Diane Hildebrand was their Tony Asher...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 07, 2012, 10:40:56 PM
As far as comparing the Monkees to a real band or comparing discographies between the Beach Boys and Monkees
it would be more fair to compare Boyce and Hart, and say that Boyce and Hart used the Monkees as their vehicle.
Not unlike saying all the Phil Spector sixties groups were really him as the actual artist, and the groups merely his
vehicle. When the Monkees indeed began to write and produce their own aterial, no one liked it very much. Which is
why Lester Sill or whoever was running the deal didn't want them writing and producing in the first place.

Just two points of clarification:

1.  Kirshner was the one in charge of the music at the beginning and he didn't want them writing, not for lack of talent but because it was his job to get songs for the group.  Even under Kirshner, Nesmith was promised two spots on each album to be written and produced by him so it wasn't like he thought they (or at least Mike had NO talent.)  Once Raybert (specifically Bert Schneider) sided with the group over Kirshner, he was out of a job, just like he knew he'd be.  (Sill was put in place as the liaison between the band and the songwriters and studios, once Kirshner was gone.) 

The problem is, the Monkees didn't mind outside songwriters.  Why would they, since the majority of them (not the ones Kirshner was giving album slots to just because they were his personal friends) were top notch craftsmen (and women)?  They also didn't mind supplemental players (as they did use a handful, sparingly, even on Headquarters).  The control they wanted was the opportunity to perform on the instrumental tracks (rather than be forbidden to) and the right to approve or veto any of the musical supervisor's choices.  And even the second request isn't as crazy as it sounds when you listen to Kirshner approved tracks like "Laugh" and (their absolute worst track, hands down) "The Day We Fall In Love".


2.  As for the Monkees being Boyce & Hart's messengers, that's another exaggerated myth.  Tommy (when he was alive) and Bobby have at least one song on every original Monkees album, with the exception of Head and 1996's fully self-penned Justus.  However, they only produced the majority of ONE Monkees album (their debut).  Kirshner was behind the eight ball when he was hired so he gave the album (with the exception of Mike's two tracks) to Boyce & Hart, because time was running out and they could work fast and cheap.  While they put together the album, Kirshner starting mining his resources for the next LP.  By the time it was released Boyce & Hart were just as surprised as Nesmith, as both he and them were led to believe the second album would be "theirs".  (Nesmith was promised more songs and a greater say, while Boyce & Hart were told the album would be made up completely of songs from their sessions with the group.  As it was, both of those entities (Nesmith and Boyce & Hart) got only two songs each on the second album.

In the end, the Monkees recorded a bunch of Tommy & Bobby's songs because they liked them personally (and therefore worked well with them) and they respected them as songwriters, and further appreciated that they could write specifically for the group's main vocalists and overall sound (since they helped establish it).  However,  The Monkees only RELEASED a total of 20 songs on 10 albums (including 8 on their debut) during the 60's.  Since then, they've released two initially unreleased tracks on the Missing Links rarities collection and two more new (at the time) Bobby Hart tracks during the 80's.  That's a grand total of 24.  By comparison, they're released 22 written by Nesmith during the 60's, with an additional 12 since, for a total of 36!

And just for the sake of curiosity here's a few more breakdowns:
Gerry Goffin and/or Carole King - 10 + 4 = 14 (The second largest number of songs provided by any outside songwriters, behind Boyce & Hart)
Micky Dolenz - 8 + 9 = 17
Davy Jones - 8 + 9 = 17
Peter Tork - 6 + 7 = 13

So contrary to popular belief, Boyce & Hart weren't nearly as much as "the guys who wrote 'em", as we've been led to believe.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 07, 2012, 11:38:23 PM
In the defence of Davy Jones, as the heartthrob of the group, he was often handed slush to make all the little girls gooey.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 07, 2012, 11:48:08 PM
As far as comparing the Monkees to a real band or comparing discographies between the Beach Boys and Monkees
it would be more fair to compare Boyce and Hart, and say that Boyce and Hart used the Monkees as their vehicle.
Not unlike saying all the Phil Spector sixties groups were really him as the actual artist, and the groups merely his
vehicle. When the Monkees indeed began to write and produce their own aterial, no one liked it very much. Which is
why Lester Sill or whoever was running the deal didn't want them writing and producing in the first place.

Just two points of clarification:

1.  Kirshner was the one in charge of the music at the beginning and he didn't want them writing, not for lack of talent but because it was his job to get songs for the group.  Even under Kirshner, Nesmith was promised two spots on each album to be written and produced by him so it wasn't like he thought they (or at least Mike had NO talent.)  Once Raybert (specifically Bert Schneider) sided with the group over Kirshner, he was out of a job, just like he knew he'd be.  (Sill was put in place as the liaison between the band and the songwriters and studios, once Kirshner was gone.) 

The problem is, the Monkees didn't mind outside songwriters.  Why would they, since the majority of them (not the ones Kirshner was giving album slots to just because they were his personal friends) were top notch craftsmen (and women)?  The also didn't mind supplemental players (as they did use a handful, sparingly, even on Headquarters).  The control they wanted was the opportunity to perform on the instrumental tracks (rather than be forbidden to) and the right to approve or veto any of the musical supervisor's choices.  And even the second request isn't as crazy as it sounds when you listen to Kirshner approved tracks like "Laugh" and (their absolute worst track, hands down) "The Day We Fall In Love".


2.  As for the Monkees being Boyce & Hart's messengers, that's another exaggerated myth.  Tommy (when he was alive) and Bobby have at least one song on every original Monkees album, with the exception Head and 1996's fully self-penned Justus.  However, they only produced the majority of ONE Monkees album (their debut).  Kirshner was behind the eight ball when he was hired so he gave the album (with the exception of Mike's two tracks) to Boyce & Hart, because time was running out and they could work fast and cheap.  While they put together the album, Kirshner starting mining his resources for the next LP.  By the time it was released Boyce & Hart were just as surprised as Nesmith, as both he and them were led to believe the second album would be "theirs".  (Nesmith was promised more songs and a greater say, while Boyce & Hart were told the album would be made up completely of songs from their sessions with the group.  As it was, both of those entities (Nesmith and Boyce & Hart) got only two songs each on the second album.

In the end, the Monkees recorded a bunch of Tommy & Bobby's songs because they liked them personally (and therefore worked well with them) and they respected them as songwriters, and further appreciated that they could write specifically for the group's main vocalists and overall sound (since they helped establish it).  However,  The Monkees only RELEASED a total of 20 songs on 10 albums (including 8 on their debut) during the 60's.  Since then, they've released two initially unreleased tracks on the Missing Links rarities collection and two more new (at the time) Bobby Hart tracks during the 80's.  That's a grand total of 24.  By comparison, they're released 22 written by Nesmith during the 60's, with an additional 12 since, for a total of 36!

And just for the sake of curiosity here's a few more breakdowns:
Gerry Goffin and/or Carole King - 10 + 4 = 14 (The second largest number of songs provided by any outside songwriters, behind Boyce & Hart)
Micky Dolenz - 8 + 9 = 17
Davy Jones - 8 + 9 = 17
Peter Tork - 6 + 7 = 13

So contrary to popular belief, Boyce & Hart weren't nearly as much as "the guys who wrote 'em", as we've been led to believe.


That's a very good synopsis of the credits and story behind it. I think since the first album launched them that first album was a vehicle
for Boyce and Hart. In so far as the songwriting credits, by the band, no doubt Nesmith had the goods, but he couldn't write "hit monkee songs"
Dolen I think was a decent Lead vocalist, sounds good on a lot of their best tunes. The original songs they wrote, were not generally well regarded
by the public at the time, but hey I like their hits, and grew up with them, and liked the TV show.

I remember Richie Podolor had a group Fountain of Youth with Jimmy Panza and Gary Itri, trying to cash in on that whole craze, and Lester
Sill was behind that whole deal with Colgems or whatever it was called.

Its a fascinating expose of how the LA session machine worked , the LA sound in te sixties, similar to the Beach Boy machine except the Monkees
couldn't sing great harmony and didint have a Brian Wilson, in their membership.

I like the LA sound, I grew up with it, and I think it's important to recognize, that while the LA groups were not self contained entities with the in house
talent of the Beatles or Beach Boys, the wrecking crew, Boyce and Hart, a lot of the writers, the LA product was just as hip and slick as the London product
but the LA product was more manufactured by industry people and packaged as a group. of course there were some great LA groups, like the Beach Boys
but there were lots of great records made, but they were usually assembled by a crew of producers. session men, impresarios....but shortly after that an
explosion of self contained California groups began recording to great success with their own songs, self contained units, Steppenwolf, Three Dog Night, Iron Butterfly, Electric Prunes, Byrd's and many others. When Jim Gordon and Glen Campbell, and Hal Blaine and Tedesco and Leon Russell, are cutting your tracks
those are some pretty good people.

But the monkees were a manufactured parcelled out thing, bands rehearse, grow up together, develop their own sounds, have a signature and unique element to their style, the drumming or writing or the sound of the guys voice, the Monkees were very generic, Nesmith did go on to be something, but he couldn't really
do the Monkee hit single thing....






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on March 08, 2012, 12:29:40 AM
You bring up a lot of great points that people tend to forget.  The difference between London and L.A was like day and night.  In L.A., "everyone" used session musicians; usually the same guys.   Melcher even (initially) used the Wrecking Crew with the Byrds, leaving McGuinn the only band member playing on "Mr. Tambourine Man".  I understand the circumstances that brought the Monkees together but with the L.A. recording scene being what it was, they were more of a "real" band than most of them.  Groups like the Temptations or The Mamas and The Papas all used backing musicians but you never saw Mama Cass or any "band member" behind the drums when they went on tour. 

The Monkees live shows always get forgotten (or never known about).  Not only were their shows longer than most of their contemporaries, they actually put on a real show, using stuff like multimedia and costume changes from day one.  And with the exception of the band's opening act backing three of the four individual Monkees' solo spots, it was just those four guys on stage.  Even after Tork left in 1969, the band's next appearance (on the Glen Campbell Goodtime Hour) saw the band perform as a three piece, with Jones on bass.  (On that performance, they mimed to their newest single but played a live medley of their hits).  It was only for the 1969 tour that they first played with ANY backing musicians (aside from the previously mentioned solo spots).

One last thing to think about when considering them being a "real" band (beyond their origins) is that absolutely no backing musicians were used on their 1996 album AND on more than half (one full set, plus the encores) of each performance on their 1997 British tour.  That's something many "real" bands like The Beach Boys, The Eagles, The Bee Gees, and The Rolling Stones haven't done for a very, very long time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 08, 2012, 04:24:35 AM

Its a fascinating expose of how the LA session machine worked , the LA sound in te sixties, similar to the Beach Boy machine except the Monkees
couldn't sing great harmony and didint have a Brian Wilson, in their membership.

Actually they *could* sing great harmony, they just didn't very often because that wasn't their sound - go to youtube and watch the video of them singing Riu Chiu together - that's as good an a capella performance as I've seen.

Quote
But the monkees were a manufactured parcelled out thing, bands rehearse, grow up together, develop their own sounds, have a signature and unique element to their style, the drumming or writing or the sound of the guys voice, the Monkees were very generic, Nesmith did go on to be something, but he couldn't really
do the Monkee hit single thing....

The Monkees *did* do all that - just after, rather than before, their first two albums. And they did have a unique sound - Micky Dolenz's voice.

BTW some people in this thread seem to be crediting the Wrecking Crew for playing on the early Monkees records. They played on very little, and none of the hits. The sessions produced by Boyce & Hart used Boyce & Hart's band, The Candy Store Prophets, augmented by a couple of other musicians. The sessions produced by Jeff Barry or Goffin & King used New York session players. On the first two albums it's actually only Nesmith's tracks, plus Laugh and The Day We Fall In Love (the two mentioned earlier as the two worst tracks they ever did - also the only two Carol Kaye is known to have played on) that the Wrecking Crew played on. And Peter Tork played on the Nesmith tracks too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 08, 2012, 04:37:20 AM
As far as comparing the Monkees to a real band or comparing discographies between the Beach Boys and Monkees
it would be more fair to compare Boyce and Hart, and say that Boyce and Hart used the Monkees as their vehicle.
Not unlike saying all the Phil Spector sixties groups were really him as the actual artist, and the groups merely his
vehicle. When the Monkees indeed began to write and produce their own aterial, no one liked it very much. Which is
why Lester Sill or whoever was running the deal didn't want them writing and producing in the first place.

Except that they had more hit singles after the Monkees took over making their own records than before, as well as the huge hit albums Headquarters (second biggest selling album of 67 after Sgt Pepper), Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn and Jones Ltd, and The Birds, The Bees And The Monkees.

Quote
The Monkees hits were good because Boyce and Hart
and Neil Diamond and people like that wrote those songs, great people played the tracks, and good producers supervised
but the real artists were Boyce and Hart and the wrecking crew not the Monkees themselves, they were merely a vehicle
to frame the work.

Pleasant Valley Sunday and Daydream Believer, two of the very biggest hits the band ever had, featured the band instrumentally, were arranged by Peter Tork and Chip Douglas, and were produced by Chip Douglas (a friend of Nesmith's who'd never produced before being asked by Nesmith to produce the Monkees' records). Randy Scouse Git, a huge hit in the UK, was written by Micky Dolenz and had all four Monkees playing on it. The Wrecking Crew played on precisely zero of the Monkees' hits.

Even if the Wrecking Crew had played on every track, though, why is someone playing a bass part written by someone else more of a 'real artist' than someone singing a vocal melody written by someone else?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 08, 2012, 04:42:01 AM
Dr Lenny, according to the highly esteemed, and well-trained in the field of music poster aeijtzsche, Brian sings in a very high head voice, which accounts for his very full tone up in those ranges. Falsetto is just a term for 'high vocals' no matter what is actually going on. I was also kidding a little  ;D

Yeah, I know what Josh thinks, and I esteem him. However, that's a field I kinda know about, and H's views are extremely debatable. We could start a thread on this and support our views with examples. But let's get back to Foskett or, better, the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 08, 2012, 05:48:07 AM
Dr Lenny, according to the highly esteemed, and well-trained in the field of music poster aeijtzsche, Brian sings in a very high head voice, which accounts for his very full tone up in those ranges. Falsetto is just a term for 'high vocals' no matter what is actually going on. I was also kidding a little  ;D

Yeah, I know what Josh thinks, and I esteem him. However, that's a field I kinda know about, and H's views are extremely debatable. We could start a thread on this and support our views with examples. But let's get back to Foskett or, better, the new album.

Quite so.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 08, 2012, 09:23:51 AM
Nez wrote "The Girl That I Knew Somewhere" which was a huge hit and is also my favourite Monkees song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 08, 2012, 09:35:38 AM
Nez wrote "The Girl That I Knew Somewhere" which was a huge hit and is also my favourite Monkees song.


The Girl That I knew Somewhere, peaked at #39 for one week. So yes it did crack the top 40. I don't if I would classify
that as a "Huge Hit" however.

It does prove that self penned songs did crack the top 40 in the Monkees legacy.


I would love to get into some new details about the forthcoming new studio album
by the BEACH BOYS wow fantastic

Can someone save us with just a bit of news regarding the album! It is nearly mid March after all
the single should be puttering along in the next six weeks or so dontcha think?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sam_BFC on March 08, 2012, 09:41:37 AM
Dr Lenny, according to the highly esteemed, and well-trained in the field of music poster aeijtzsche, Brian sings in a very high head voice, which accounts for his very full tone up in those ranges. Falsetto is just a term for 'high vocals' no matter what is actually going on. I was also kidding a little  ;D

Yeah, I know what Josh thinks, and I esteem him. However, that's a field I kinda know about, and H's views are extremely debatable. We could start a thread on this and support our views with examples. But let's get back to Foskett or, better, the new album.

We did have a debate about it a while back

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,9940.0.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 08, 2012, 09:43:17 AM
Nez wrote "The Girl That I Knew Somewhere" which was a huge hit and is also my favourite Monkees song.


The Girl That I knew Somewhere, peaked at #39 for one week. So yes it did crack the top 40. I don't if I would classify
that as a "Huge Hit" however.

It does prove that self penned songs did crack the top 40 in the Monkees legacy.


I would love to get into some new details about the forthcoming new studio album
by the BEACH BOYS wow fantastic

Can someone save us with just a bit of news regarding the album! It is nearly mid March after all
the single should be puttering along in the next six weeks or so dontcha think?


The Nesmith song by the way, was the "B: side of an actual single, which was a big hit called A little Bit me a little bit you
which is probably what propelled the B side by Nesmith onto the charts, because the A side was a smash number two on the
Billboard hot 100

The Monkees I believe had a total, including everything of a dozen top 40 hits basically in a two or three year period.
By Contrast   Wings had about 28 in the seventies. Elton John had about 29, Billy Joel had a ton, Three Dog Night had 23
so while a dozen is a lot, there are probably, oh I don't know 40-50 groups who beat that total. Or more.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 08, 2012, 10:05:08 AM

I thought this thread was titled: Nez album info (as it rolls out...)

LOL


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: slickman9696 on March 08, 2012, 11:21:13 AM
Yea, I didn't think the new album was a cover album of Monkees material or Foskett's falsetto. We need to get this puppy back on topic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 08, 2012, 11:26:20 AM
Yea, I didn't think the new album was a cover album of Monkees material or Foskett's falsetto. We need to get this puppy back on topic.

Go for it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 08, 2012, 11:31:11 AM
So we can pretty much scratch off the idea that the new album will be released in time for the tour, eh?

If they finish it in the next few weeks...we should expect it by summer and during that time they'll be right in the middle of the US tour.  Do we think they'll still add the new songs to the set like they were thinking of doing?  It would be pretty bold for them to include them in the show when the album hasn't been released yet.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 08, 2012, 12:01:10 PM
I just wanna pre order this puppy already...

And the new box set, my visa is ready


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 08, 2012, 12:36:25 PM
So we can pretty much scratch off the idea that the new album will be released in time for the tour, eh?

Well, there's still nearly two months to go until the tour begins. My entirely uneducated guess is that we will hear something from the album -- if only a digital single -- before the tour starts, or at about the same time. And they'll play that tune at the shows.

I've said for awhile that I expect the album to be released in May or early June. Either way, they will still have many shows in the tour yet to play, and the summer will be stretching ahead.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 08, 2012, 12:40:35 PM
So we can pretty much scratch off the idea that the new album will be released in time for the tour, eh?

If they finish it in the next few weeks...we should expect it by summer and during that time they'll be right in the middle of the US tour.  Do we think they'll still add the new songs to the set like they were thinking of doing?  It would be pretty bold for them to include them in the show when the album hasn't been released yet.  


Well if that's true, maybe we can hold out hope, that the lead off single will precede the full album by 2-4 weeks
which would be normal, and we can at least hear that, (possibly with a B side) for a few weeks while we await
the main course.

I am not aware if singles typically precede the full album by a few weeks, as used to be the norm. But I don't see
why they couldn't do that. Perhpas the album is further along than we know, and they pull our leg and give us info
thats a few weeks out of date when they do one of their press blurbs. Wouldn't be the first time that's happened
in rock cloak and dagger

What are the odds running right now, that "that;s why God made the radio will be the lead single. I'd have to say
two to one in favor of it, from the way they kept alluding to it.


When does the tour begin by the way? how much more time is there?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 08, 2012, 01:02:45 PM
No news yet on the new album?
Ok, let's get back to micro-managing the band!
If we have permission, of course.


Someone mentioned the guy in Mike Loves' band that did the falsetto on "Ballad Of Ol' Betsy". I'd completely  forgotten about that as I'd seen them do that live a few years ago. I wasn't expecting much vocally from Mikes' Beach Boys,  as I'd already seen Brian and his band perform many times . I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and actually somewhat blown away at how good the vocals were in his show.
As a fan of the BEACH BOYS as an entity dating back to the beginning, I reserve the right to discuss what I feel they could possibly benefit from. I belong to no subset of fans in any specified "camp", but certainly acknowledge and love the  genius of Brian. I was aware since about age 10 in the  mid-'60s, that Brian was the magical force behind the music. Watching those orange and yellow swirls on the turntable with the writing credits of Brian Wilson-Mike Love and "Produced by Brian Wilson" made it obvious even though I didn't know what "producing" entailed at the time. Seeing those credits on a record guaranteed that there would be something outstanding emanating from those grooves.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on March 08, 2012, 01:24:06 PM
Someone mentioned the guy in Mike Loves' band that did the falsetto on "Ballad Of Ol' Betsy". I'd completely  forgotten about that as I'd seen them do that live a few years ago. I wasn't expecting much vocally from Mikes' Beach Boys,  as I'd already seen Brian and his band perform many times . I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and actually somewhat blown away at how good the vocals were in his show.

Yeah - Scott Totten and John Cowsill are both *extraordinarily* good singers, Randell Kirsch can be very good indeed, and Christian Love is limited but when he's got the right material he can sound spookily like Carl.
With Totten and Cowsill added to most of Brian's band, we should be in for some vocally spectacular shows.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 08, 2012, 01:42:34 PM
Someone mentioned the guy in Mike Loves' band that did the falsetto on "Ballad Of Ol' Betsy". I'd completely  forgotten about that as I'd seen them do that live a few years ago. I wasn't expecting much vocally from Mikes' Beach Boys,  as I'd already seen Brian and his band perform many times . I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and actually somewhat blown away at how good the vocals were in his show.

Yeah - Scott Totten and John Cowsill are both *extraordinarily* good singers, Randell Kirsch can be very good indeed, and Christian Love is limited but when he's got the right material he can sound spookily like Carl.
With Totten and Cowsill added to most of Brian's band, we should be in for some vocally spectacular shows.
That's good indeed.  Hopefully they'll be open to including them on the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 08, 2012, 01:54:24 PM
I think Christian Love not being included in the reunion (whether it was his choice or someone else's) is pretty unfortunate. His vocals on Mike's solo album are great.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on March 08, 2012, 03:08:44 PM
The Monkees I believe had a total, including everything of a dozen top 40 hits basically in a two or three year period.

They had exactly 12 which is the same amount as these artists that are in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame:

Bob Dylan, Donovan, The Hollies, Jackson Browne, Martha & The Vandellas, R.E.M., The Righteous Brothers and The Shirelles. That's pretty good company. However, they're hardly amongst the luminaries when it comes to Billboard chart hits. I counted 193 names with more Top 40 hits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-charting_U.S._music_artists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-charting_U.S._music_artists)

However, I do think that that The Monkees stand up favorably compared to similar artists in the Hall of Fame that had a great run of sixties hits. The Lovin' Spoonful, The Small Faces, The Rascals and the aformentioned Hollies and Donovan all fit the bill of having had enough hits/impact on rock history as a whole that they deserve to be listed amongst, say, The Top 300 or so artists of all time (and so do The Monkees). All told, they had a very impressive run although nobody's arguing that they're in the upper echelon of artists that have shaped this movement over the past sixty years.


As for The Beach Boys, they clock in with 36 Top 40 hits, putting them in a three-way tie for 18th on the All Time list. They end up in roughly the same place for All Time Hits on the Top 100 with an impressive 56 tracks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...) Not the Freaking Monkees
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 08, 2012, 04:07:09 PM
This isn't the thread to keep talking about the freaking monkees.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 08, 2012, 04:13:54 PM
Someone mentioned the guy in Mike Loves' band that did the falsetto on "Ballad Of Ol' Betsy". I'd completely  forgotten about that as I'd seen them do that live a few years ago. I wasn't expecting much vocally from Mikes' Beach Boys,  as I'd already seen Brian and his band perform many times . I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and actually somewhat blown away at how good the vocals were in his show.

Yeah - Scott Totten and John Cowsill are both *extraordinarily* good singers, Randell Kirsch can be very good indeed, and Christian Love is limited but when he's got the right material he can sound spookily like Carl.
With Totten and Cowsill added to most of Brian's band, we should be in for some vocally spectacular shows.
That's good indeed.  Hopefully they'll be open to including them on the new album.

My suspicion is the only vocalists on the album will be Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce and Jeff. Possibly a bit of Dave. They'll want to keep the vocal blend as close to the original core group as possible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...) Not the Freaking Monkees
Post by: Shady on March 08, 2012, 04:23:35 PM
This isn't the thread to keep talking about the freaking monkees.

This

Really, the Monkees?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 08, 2012, 04:43:32 PM
Come on -- was every 300+ page of The Smile Sessions box set thread about Smile or even The Beach Boys? Did people miss out on info as a result? Was anyone seriously hurt as a result?

Either we curb conversation and, in effect, silence it by forcing people to stay on topic (especially when there is really no new information to discuss) or we acknowledge how conversations actually work and wait patiently.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 08, 2012, 05:00:42 PM
Waiting patiently is fine.  Take the freaking Monkees somewhere else


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on March 08, 2012, 05:38:29 PM
Hey, Hey to the Beach Boys
The best harmonic band around
The're to busy singing to put anybody down


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: acedecade75 on March 08, 2012, 06:00:46 PM
 I really thought we'd have a release date by now for the new album.  I assume it'll be finished before the tour begins on April 24th. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on March 08, 2012, 06:39:45 PM
double post


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 08, 2012, 07:56:18 PM
Well, with the PBS special featuring new material and archive footage called "Summer's Gone," I am wondering if that is going to be the album title for what is likely their final album, and at the very least their "autumn years" album.

Thoughts?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 08, 2012, 08:01:58 PM
Seems a little dark to me. But not bad, if that's what they're going with.

I would definitely put it down for a plausible song title, at the very least.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: slickman9696 on March 08, 2012, 08:04:34 PM
I'm glad someone else mentioned the Christian Love thing. As far as vocals on the CD, it would be great it Matt Jardine did the falsetto and Christian Love came in the mix. Matt has the closest sound IMO to Brian, and he did his time all in the 90s and currently with Al in perfecting that sound. His Hushabye is incredible and very close to Brian. And Christian Love has a very close sound to Carl's voice. I know it's not a replacement, but with a timbre so similar to Carl's, adding it to the album mix will give them something close to having an original sound. I know with all of them old it'll never reach 60s early 70s quality, but still close. For a great Christian Love reference, find the youtube video of him singing God Only Knows with the orchestra. It's a damn good tribute to the style of Carl. And finally, it would keep all the vocals with family members, which is one of their trademarks. Being America's Family band. Thoughts?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on March 08, 2012, 08:07:44 PM
You'd think they're missing an opportunity to sell the album at the shows... Maybe Brian's pulling a 1967 on us.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 08, 2012, 08:43:13 PM
Seems a little dark to me. But not bad, if that's what they're going with.

I would definitely put it down for a plausible song title, at the very least.
It is a bit dark, yet summery, and as such it has the potential to intrigue the "All Summer Long" crowd and the "Til I Die" crowd. As someone who tends towards the latter style, I have to say that it is probably the only summer or beach-related title that would not make me slightly worried about the album. "Summer's End" could be another personal statement from Brian, just as Pet Sounds communicated where he was at in his early 20s, and Love You chronicled his time wandering in the desert.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on March 09, 2012, 06:04:02 AM
Well, with the PBS special featuring new material and archive footage called "Summer's Gone," I am wondering if that is going to be the album title for what is likely their final album, and at the very least their "autumn years" album.

Thoughts?

wait what?? What  PBS special?? Have I missed something?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 09, 2012, 06:11:18 AM
Well, with the PBS special featuring new material and archive footage called "Summer's Gone," I am wondering if that is going to be the album title for what is likely their final album, and at the very least their "autumn years" album.

Thoughts?

wait what?? What  PBS special?? Have I missed something?

Check the "Big News" thread…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 09, 2012, 07:57:09 AM
Summer's Gone, is one heck of a neat song title, if that's what it is.

For me it conjures up a lot of melodic images in a minor key, melancholy
beachy, hey this is it, kind of like the Beatles saying goodbye on the
Abbey Road medley with "The End"

Of course there may be no such song! It could be in a major key, and it could
be an upbeat throwaway number!

Tantalizing though isn't it!

You say there is a PBS special? when does it air? The advertisement says there will be new material?
Is that true?

After a dryspell of a week or so, it looks like we may be getting some new information, I need to read
that link, one thing, we could expect the album or single by the date of the show, I presume, if  the show
features new material, do they really wanna debut the new songs on PBS when they could get a larger
audience on mainstream television or a national radio show with a big audience

Can someone with some info chime in, can we find out if Summer's Gone is an actual song title, that's
tantalizing as hell, good title, doesn't say a lot, but it implies a lot, conjures lots of images.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 09, 2012, 08:12:26 AM
Summer's Gone, is one heck of a neat song title, if that's what it is.

For me it conjures up a lot of melodic images in a minor key, melancholy
beachy,

Tell me about it. I wrote it last year.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 09, 2012, 08:30:21 AM
Summer's Gone, is one heck of a neat song title, if that's what it is.

For me it conjures up a lot of melodic images in a minor key, melancholy
beachy,

Tell me about it. I wrote it last year.

Don't joke about stuff like that, that has happened to me for real, and you can't do a thing, titles
are not copywritable

Now did you have anything to do with this television special, or send a tape of it to Joe Thomas or
the Beach Boys, even if you could prove that, you can;t touch a title, and they are pretty generic
words it's plausible two human beings could come up with a title like that, independent of one another.


Now if you wrote a song title that was out there, say, Muggle 77 on Hapworth Road, well then maybe
you could make a case of sorts, but "summer's Gone" not a chance.

Can we confirm, that this is actually a song title on the new Beach Boy album, it sure is a good one
if it's true.

By the way, was your song, in a minor key with kind of a ballad nature, just curious.

I have been kind of worried, when I kept hearing the song title "That's Why God Made The Radio"
I had visions of Snuff Garrett producing a Cher or John Denver session or something, I know that unfair
it could be a great song, but the images from the title, were well that's what I thought of, Snuff garrett in
a denim jacket talking to Sonny Bono on the phone while Kenny Rogers sings between bites of chicken.

But then I hear "Summer's Gone" and I picture that painting from the Surf's Up album cover and I say
I need to hear this new album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 09, 2012, 08:31:25 AM
Summer's Gone, is one heck of a neat song title, if that's what it is.

...one thing, we could expect the album or single by the date of the show, I presume, if  the show
features new material, do they really wanna debut the new songs on PBS when they could get a larger
audience on mainstream television or a national radio show with a big audience


I really like SUMMER'S GONE. TV Special, song title, album title... We'll see.

PBS programs attract boomers. Wouldn't you think that a generation that grew up with the band and has disposable cash  would be the likely group to target in the marketing campaign for this The Beach Boys project? . It's a good move.  They can spread out from there to other major media. And throw a few bones to secondary outlets. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on March 09, 2012, 08:35:47 AM
Summer's Gone, is one heck of a neat song title, if that's what it is.

For me it conjures up a lot of melodic images in a minor key, melancholy
beachy,

Tell me about it. I wrote it last year.

Don't joke about stuff like that, that has happened to me for real, and you can't do a thing, titles
are not copywritable

Now did you have anything to do with this television special, or send a tape of it to Joe Thomas or
the Beach Boys, even if you could prove that, you can;t touch a title, and they are pretty generic
words it's plausible two human beings could come up with a title like that, independent of one another.


Now if you wrote a song title that was out there, say, Muggle 77 on Hapworth Road, well then maybe
you could make a case of sorts, but "summer's Gone" not a chance.

Can we confirm, that this is actually a song title on the new Beach Boy album, it sure is a good one
if it's true.

By the way, was your song, in a minor key with kind of a ballad nature, just curious.

I have been kind of worried, when I kept hearing the song title "That's Why God Made The Radio"
I had visions of Snuff Garrett producing a Cher or John Denver session or something, I know that unfair
it could be a great song, but the images from the title, were well that's what I thought of, Snuff garrett in
a denim jacket talking to Sonny Bono on the phone while Kenny Rogers sings between bites of chicken.

But then I hear "Summer's Gone" and I picture that painting from the Surf's Up album cover and I say
I need to hear this new album!


Well, I'm not suggesting that they stole it from me! I'm merely saying that my Beach Boys-y song called "Summer's Gone" will seem a lot less interesting (if it indeed ever was!) if it actually becomes the title of a Beach Boys song and that saddens me a bit.

But yes, it is in a minor key and a bit of a ballad, using the season change as a metaphor for a relationship. I have a video of it of me practicing it on a cheap keyboard on youtube to prove all of this but I am hesitant to put a video up where I am so visible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 09, 2012, 09:46:40 AM
I think Summer's Gone would be an exceptional title.  Matt Jardine is great, would love to see him in the mix.  I think Christian Love would be fine in there as well, but I have never thought he sounds remotely close to Carl.  I know that he tries to achieve that sound on things like Cool Head, Warm Heart, but he just doesn't come close.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 09, 2012, 09:53:20 AM
I think Summer's Gone would be an exceptional title.  Matt Jardine is great, would love to see him in the mix.  I think Christian Love would be fine in there as well, but I have never thought he sounds remotely close to Carl.  I know that he tries to achieve that sound on things like Cool Head, Warm Heart, but he just doesn't come close.
"Remotely"? Come on! His voice is not as strong as Carl's was, but he has the timbre like Carl. Carl was the first person I thought of when I first heard him sing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 09, 2012, 10:09:05 AM
Cautionary note: We have no confirmation from any source that "Summer's Gone" is the title of anything except the PBS doc.

It well could be -- indeed, it seems strange for such a title to come from nowhere -- but we do not know for sure.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 09, 2012, 11:02:37 AM
Cautionary note: We have no confirmation from any source that "Summer's Gone" is the title of anything except the PBS doc.

It well could be -- indeed, it seems strange for such a title to come from nowhere -- but we do not know for sure.
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 09, 2012, 11:13:14 AM
"Summer's Gone" would/could be a great title (I know it's not official) but wouldn't something like "Almost Summer" be more, uh, optimistic?

P.S.

I'll vote again for Ocean Way, with the cover showing all the Beach Boys walking in the crosswalk..........


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 09, 2012, 11:17:13 AM
"Summer's Gone" sounds just a bit too melancholy for an album title....it would turn a few heads, yes..but it's a bit heavy handed.  Perfect for just a song title, though. 

"Ocean Way" would be really fitting--mainly because it's just a great title---but I don't want the Beach Boys taking a page out of The Beatles handbook with the whole "Abbey Road" connection at this stage of the game. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 09, 2012, 11:56:24 AM
Summer's Gone is what I tried to say when I meant that Almost Summer sounded melancholy to me. Neat title. Hope it delivers what it promises imo -» melancholy tunes in a way Pet Sounds sounds melancholy, so upbeat numbers can very well be a part of it and lots of beautiful harmonies and not nostalgic retrospection a la Still Surfin'

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 09, 2012, 12:02:14 PM
"Summer's Gone" would/could be a great title (I know it's not official) but wouldn't something like "Almost Summer" be more, uh, optimistic?

P.S.

I'll vote again for Ocean Way, with the cover showing all the Beach Boys walking in the crosswalk..........


Bit tricky - no crosswalk outside Oceanway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 09, 2012, 12:03:15 PM
Yeah I'm alright with melancholy...nothing wrong with that but as a title to their probably last album on this, their 50th Anniversary seems a little forced.

But I'm on the fence if this will be the title of the album as well.  Considering the PBS special will consist of mostly archival footage and a bonus of a few new songs--I don't think they'd lend the album title to this project.  If it were a documentary about the making of the new album or perhaps the actual live DVD document of the new tour, sure, the product can share the name with the album, but an off to the side project?  Dunno about that...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on March 09, 2012, 12:08:26 PM
Yeah I'm alright with melancholy...nothing wrong with that but as a title to their probably last album on this, their 50th Anniversary seems a little forced.

But I'm on the fence if this will be the title of the album as well.  Considering the PBS special will consist of mostly archival footage and a bonus of a few new songs--I don't think they'd lend the album title to this project.  If it were a documentary about the making of the new album or perhaps the actual live DVD document of the new tour, sure, the product can share the name with the album, but an off to the side project?  Dunno about that...






Just a thought , maybe 'Summers Gone' is the name of a song from the new album ( and maybe a single ) hence the 1976 TV Special 'Its Ok'   ie They didn't call that TV Special '15 Big Ones' ( thankfully )


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 09, 2012, 12:12:46 PM
Could very well be, Rob.  I'd be very interested to hear a song with that title. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 09, 2012, 12:30:03 PM
1968: Summer's Almost Gone

(http://thumbs.ebaystatic.com/pict/270905364174_0.jpg)


2012: Summer's Gone. For Real.

(http://thumbs.ebaystatic.com/pict/330693808938_0.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 09, 2012, 02:39:06 PM
I've got the perfect "reunion" song for them. Subtle, no hackneyed references to the past but could be interpreted as a healing, bittersweet homage to many years of knowing someone through good and bad times and reconciling to the impermanance of life situations.
In a similar vein as "Please Let Me Wonder" , very "1965".
Too bad I can't get it to them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 09, 2012, 02:41:55 PM
Let's hear it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 09, 2012, 02:50:04 PM
Let's hear it.
That would be a little tough, I just wrote it today!
It's called "Glad I'm With You".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 09, 2012, 03:26:05 PM
I think Summer's Gone would be an exceptional title.  Matt Jardine is great, would love to see him in the mix.  I think Christian Love would be fine in there as well, but I have never thought he sounds remotely close to Carl.  I know that he tries to achieve that sound on things like Cool Head, Warm Heart, but he just doesn't come close.
"Remotely"? Come on! His voice is not as strong as Carl's was, but he has the timbre like Carl. Carl was the first person I thought of when I first heard him sing.

He is a poor man's Carl Wilson.  You want someone that does sound close to Carl? Justyn. Listen to his harmony vocals on Carnie's version of Heaven.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 09, 2012, 03:31:51 PM
Hope we don't find out that the title was accidentally shortened by PBS, and that's its really "Summer's Gone WILD!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 09, 2012, 03:43:19 PM
His (Christian's) voice is not as strong as Carl's was, but he has the timbre like Carl. Carl was the first person I thought of when I first heard him sing.

Me too.  Sometimes he sounds just like him.

I really like the current 50th tour line-up though.  We'll see how it pans out with those guys singing Carl's parts.  Don't count Al out either - he and Carl use to trade off high parts (i.e Don't Worry Baby) in the early 70's.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 09, 2012, 03:47:22 PM
Hope we don't find out that the title was accidentally shortened by PBS, and that's its really "Summer's Gone WILD!"
well as long as it's like "Girls gone wild" then I won't complain TOO much..lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on March 09, 2012, 03:58:20 PM
I like Summer's Gone as a song title, not as an album title, the meaning is too negative, as the not so subtle message of the Beach Boys' reunions is that the summer is back.  For what it's worth, if Summer's Gone is about getting old and looking back on the joyful days (and loves) of summer in one's youth, I'm all for it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 09, 2012, 04:02:00 PM
Hope we don't find out that the title was accidentally shortened by PBS, and that's its really "Summer's Gone WILD!"

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 09, 2012, 04:02:41 PM
I think Summer's Gone would be an exceptional title.  Matt Jardine is great, would love to see him in the mix.  I think Christian Love would be fine in there as well, but I have never thought he sounds remotely close to Carl.  I know that he tries to achieve that sound on things like Cool Head, Warm Heart, but he just doesn't come close.
"Remotely"? Come on! His voice is not as strong as Carl's was, but he has the timbre like Carl. Carl was the first person I thought of when I first heard him sing.

He is a poor man's Carl Wilson.  You want someone that does sound close to Carl? Justyn. Listen to his harmony vocals on Carnie's version of Heaven.
Poor man, rich man? The point is, he does "remotely" sound like Carl.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 09, 2012, 04:07:48 PM
Just wondering what others think about the context of ''Summer's Gone'?

To you does it mean.

- Many years of summers that have past.
-This particular years summer has finished.
-A word play, combination of both of the above.

 ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 09, 2012, 04:14:06 PM
It's almost too perfect.  It's like Mike said "it has to have "summer" in the title", and Brian said "it has to be kind of sad".   Obviously this has been debated endlessly already as far as what kind of tone the album should have, but it should be clear there's a wing of the audience who wants fun & sun, and then there's a wing who wants paralyzing melancholy, and if this title reflects an intention to actually recognize & play to both those sides of the BBs base, I think it's kind of brilliant.  Then again maybe I'm reading too much into it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 09, 2012, 04:19:00 PM
I think Summer's Gone would be an exceptional title.  Matt Jardine is great, would love to see him in the mix.  I think Christian Love would be fine in there as well, but I have never thought he sounds remotely close to Carl.  I know that he tries to achieve that sound on things like Cool Head, Warm Heart, but he just doesn't come close.
"Remotely"? Come on! His voice is not as strong as Carl's was, but he has the timbre like Carl. Carl was the first person I thought of when I first heard him sing.

He is a poor man's Carl Wilson.  You want someone that does sound close to Carl? Justyn. Listen to his harmony vocals on Carnie's version of Heaven.
Poor man, rich man? The point is, he does "remotely" sound like Carl.

yeah, I will give you remotely. But Justyn is much closer


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 09, 2012, 04:26:29 PM
Just wondering what others think about the context of ''Summer's Gone'?

To you does it mean.

- Many years of summers that have past.
-This particular years summer has finished.
-A word play, combination of both of the above.

 ???

It doesn't mean anything to me. It's an intriguing title, but I don't want to occupy myself with speculation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 09, 2012, 04:47:05 PM
Some of you guys are so clever, it's fun just reading the thread.

Now look, we have some inside people here, PBS and the press
let it out already, rules of fairplay, somebody tell us if "Summer's Gone"
is a song title, unrelated television title, album title or what,

I know there are people who know the answer, PBS Leaks like I don't know
what, public television doesn't care a whit about rock band politics or secrecy.

The press has published it, can someone tell us if its just a television producer's
documentary title, or if the title is related to a song or album.

Absolutely, we will find out in a couple days, worst comes to worst, we can
get ahold of some of the PBS people and find out.

So what's the date? July 7 ?

So folks, we can surmise a few things, a little bit more of the album is in
the can, than we were told, or they couldn't have made that commitment
with the television people. Also by that date, we all have vcr's we will have a
piece of the album to evaluate by that date.

Someone said it's a great demographic with baby boomers and disposable income
brilliant analysis. But I still think, there will be at least one other media source by that
date, its a great great demographic, but you don't have to give public television exclusives
like you do with regular networks, there will be another media outlet around that date on
radio or elsewhere on tv.

MY GOD! We'll have the bloody thing in our hands by July isin't this fantastic!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on March 09, 2012, 04:59:50 PM
It's almost too perfect.  It's like Mike said "it has to have "summer" in the title", and Brian said "it has to be kind of sad".   Obviously this has been debated endlessly already as far as what kind of tone the album should have, but it should be clear there's a wing of the audience who wants fun & sun, and then there's a wing who wants paralyzing melancholy, and if this title reflects an intention to actually recognize & play to both those sides of the BBs base, I think it's kind of brilliant.  Then again maybe I'm reading too much into it.

Really well put and made me excited about this potentially being the title, though we are as in the dark as ever.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 09, 2012, 05:01:06 PM
Good title (and I'd wager it'd be a song title at least), but lets not get ahead of ourselves!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 09, 2012, 05:02:08 PM
Summer's gone is great title to serve as a coda to "endless summer"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 09, 2012, 05:02:59 PM
I'd be pretty surprised if it wasn't either an album title, a song title, or at least a prominent lyric, but yeah, who knows.  The title of the special is an opportunity for brand reinforcement and cross-promotion so we should expect it to have some relation to the product.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 09, 2012, 05:13:13 PM
But I don't want to occupy myself with speculation.

SMART MAN!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sound of Free on March 09, 2012, 05:51:37 PM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.
[/quote]

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 09, 2012, 06:22:14 PM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol

I think it's quite likely that is what the song is like.

That is, you start with something sad --

"I hate to say that summer's gone --"

But Mr. Positivity turns it around --

"But it's coming back next year!"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 09, 2012, 06:30:34 PM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol
[/quote]
I personally think that Mike Love will be looking for depth and artistic credibility to counter his "don't f*** with the formula" repuation. These are the lyrics to Warmth of the Sun Part II (Summer's Gone)

Mike:
"It's 2012, and summer's gone...
The surfers and the california girls moved on...
They're retiring now from their nine to five's...
Whatever happened to keepin' the summer alive?"

Al:
"Summer's gone, but I sure would love to surf again,
It's OK, come on let's catch a wave in our 409s!"

Brian:
"Sadness, sorrow, Lookin' at tomorrow, and..."

All:
"Summer's gone, summer's gone, oooo ooo summer's gone..."

Mike:
"We had fun, fun, fun in our little deuce coupes,
But It's Over Now."

These leaked lyrics demonstrate beyond any doubt that The Beach Boys will not just be going for the fun and sun feel. Mike's lyrical style still references old Beach Boys tunes as it did back in 1990, but he is doing it in a very Brian-esque lyrical idiom. The leak that I heard is extremely melancholy and is in a minor key. He even let Brian do his "Til I Die"-esque bridge about sadness, sorrow, et cetera.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 09, 2012, 06:33:39 PM
 :lol :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 09, 2012, 06:41:51 PM
Quote
Brian:
"Sadness, sorrow, Lookin' at tomorrow, and..."

I will be so sad if this isn't on the album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on March 09, 2012, 10:58:19 PM
Just heard some exclusive information.....this new album is going to be the band's first to feature new material in twenty years!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 09, 2012, 11:02:08 PM
Bear in mind that when the first graphics for the reunion turned up, a lot of folk assumed the new album was called Celebration. What do we know for sure about any potential title ? Nothing. Could be called Summer's Gone, could be called Do It Again, could be called... oh, That's Why God Made The Radio. Given past efforts, could be called The Pendletones: Don't Give Us Any Sh*t.

Frankly, I hope they call it We Were Nearly Called The Woodies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 09, 2012, 11:26:09 PM
Bear in mind that when the first graphics for the reunion turned up, a lot of folk assumed the new album was called Celebration. What do we know for sure about any potential title ? Nothing. Could be called Summer's Gone, could be called Do It Again, could be called... oh, That's Why God Made The Radio. Given past efforts, could be called The Pendletones: Don't Give Us Any Sh*t.

Frankly, I hope they call it We Were Nearly Called The Woodies.
The Beach Boys: Stars and Stripes Volume VI is my best guess. Or "East St. Louis."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Myk Luhv on March 09, 2012, 11:32:00 PM
They should call the album Greatest Hits Volume 4!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 10, 2012, 02:22:54 AM
If they're so confident that it's a Pet Sounds 2, they should call it........ Pet Sounds 2: The Sequel!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on March 10, 2012, 02:32:22 AM
They should call the album Greatest Hits Volume 4!

Actually, I heard they're planning to release a fourth volume in the Greatest Hits series. It will cover the highlights post-1985, so the best tracks from Still Cruisin', Summer In Paradise, Stars and Stripes...."Problem Child", etc.  :hat


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 10, 2012, 05:32:51 AM
I'd like "The Beach Boys 2012"
The '85 album was just called "The Beach Boys", right ?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jon Stebbins on March 10, 2012, 10:29:04 AM
The new album should be called Smiley Smile Dot Net


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 11:07:26 AM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol

I think it's quite likely that is what the song is like.

That is, you start with something sad --

"I hate to say that summer's gone --"

But Mr. Positivity turns it around --

"But it's coming back next year!"


Yeah, who needs "Mr. Positivity"? Look at all of the '60s hits the Beach Boys would have had without him............oops, nevermind.

I think the  hipper than thou paranoia is probably unfounded in the present BBs recording environment. With the inclusion of Brians' band members  and potentially their legacy at stake, we'll hopefully  see the best song and lyric writing  (by all parties) come to the fore. Let's not forget Brian is also capable of churning out some pretty inane material as well.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 11:12:02 AM
Bear in mind that when the first graphics for the reunion turned up, a lot of folk assumed the new album was called Celebration. What do we know for sure about any potential title ? Nothing. Could be called Summer's Gone, could be called Do It Again, could be called... oh, That's Why God Made The Radio. Given past efforts, could be called The Pendletones: Don't Give Us Any Sh*t.

Frankly, I hope they call it We Were Nearly Called The Woodies.

That would be "Stuck With A Woodie" (the Viagra overdose song)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 11:14:51 AM
If they're so confident that it's a Pet Sounds 2, they should call it........ Pet Sounds 2: The Sequel!
Or they could go with a "darker" theme, and have their own "Butcher Cover" album...
The Sounds Of Pets.....being slaughtered


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 12:15:09 PM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol

I think it's quite likely that is what the song is like.

That is, you start with something sad --

"I hate to say that summer's gone --"

But Mr. Positivity turns it around --

"But it's coming back next year!"


Yeah, who needs "Mr. Positivity"? Look at all of the '60s hits the Beach Boys would have had without him............oops, nevermind.

I think the  hipper than thou paranoia is probably unfounded in the present BBs recording environment. With the inclusion of Brians' band members  and potentially their legacy at stake, we'll hopefully  see the best song and lyric writing  (by all parties) come to the fore. Let's not forget Brian is also capable of churning out some pretty inane material as well.



Well, except for the fact that Mike didn't write Surfin' U.S.A., or Surfer Girl, or Little Deuce Coupe, or In My Room, or Don't Worry Baby (pre lawsuit), or God Only Knows ... people seem to forget that Roger Christian and Gary Usher existed, and had a large say in the lyrics of those first albums. And Mike didn't sing lead on all of those hits either. Or write the music. Or produce the records.

I don't see any "hipper than thou paranoia," either. Simply some jesting to pass the time.

Brian's band members are involved in the tour. Some of them played on the DIA remake. But there is no evidence they're on any tracks of the new album. (Given that many -- if not most -- of the tracks seem to have been produced by Joe Thomas with his Chicago-area session musicians, we may see precious little of Brian's band on the album at all.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 10, 2012, 12:15:29 PM
If they're so confident that it's a Pet Sounds 2, they should call it........ Pet Sounds 2: The Sequel!
Or they could go with a "darker" theme, and have their own "Butcher Cover" album...
The Sounds Of Pets.....being slaughtered


hahahaha !! yeah, the last seconds of Caroline, no's fade serve as the intro to that album !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 10, 2012, 12:18:02 PM
(Given that many -- if not most -- of the tracks seem to have been produced by Joe Thomas with his Chicago-area session musicians, we may see precious little of Brian's band on the album at all.)



 :o who says so ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 12:25:52 PM
Yes, I was just suggesting that it is a possibility - but it could be the title of a track on the album, it could be a phrase used on the album, or it could just be the title of the PBS special and nothing else. Time will tell. This is all speculation, aside from the title of the PBS special.

This made me think of a nightmare scenario. The PBS special begins with the music video of the Beach Boys' all-new single. It starts silently, in black and white, with Brian walking down the beach in a winter coat. Brian stops and says to himself, Wow, summer's gone." Then Mike appears and says, "No, Brian, summer's not gone. We can bring it BACK!"

Begin the music, to a Kokomo-type beat, the picture goes from black and white to color and Brian and Mike take off their coats to reveal bathing suits (and shirt, thankfully). Al, Bruce, David and Jeff, along with bikini-clad girls join then, and Mike begins singing:

"We're bringin' summer back to this great big nation!
We're bringin' lots of love and good vibrations!"

Al, Bruce and Dave: "Bringin' bringin' summer back."
Jeff and Brian: "AH-Ah-ah-ah!"

End my nightmare scenario.  :lol

I think it's quite likely that is what the song is like.

That is, you start with something sad --

"I hate to say that summer's gone --"

But Mr. Positivity turns it around --

"But it's coming back next year!"


Yeah, who needs "Mr. Positivity"? Look at all of the '60s hits the Beach Boys would have had without him............oops, nevermind.

I think the  hipper than thou paranoia is probably unfounded in the present BBs recording environment. With the inclusion of Brians' band members  and potentially their legacy at stake, we'll hopefully  see the best song and lyric writing  (by all parties) come to the fore. Let's not forget Brian is also capable of churning out some pretty inane material as well.



Well, except for the fact that Mike didn't write Surfin' U.S.A., or Surfer Girl, or Little Deuce Coupe, or In My Room, or Don't Worry Baby (pre lawsuit), or God Only Knows ... people seem to forget that Roger Christian and Gary Usher existed, and had a large say in the lyrics of those first albums. And Mike didn't sing lead on all of those hits either. Or write the music. Or produce the records.

I don't see any "hipper than thou paranoia," either. Simply some jesting to pass the time.

Brian's band members are involved in the tour. Some of them played on the DIA remake. But there is no evidence they're on any tracks of the new album. (Given that many -- if not most -- of the tracks seem to have been produced by Joe Thomas with his Chicago-area session musicians, we may see precious little of Brian's band on the album at all.)

Wow, that's the first I heard that it was only the Joe Thomas crew playing on the album. Uh-oh.

I  was responding to the mocking of the potential "Mr. Positivity" lyrics, not saying he was the only early lyricist. Although he was the most prolific.
So why not mention some of the Biggest hits?  I Get Around, Help Me Rhonda, California Girls, Dance Dance Dance, Fun Fun Fun, Good Vibrations?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 12:27:03 PM
(Given that many -- if not most -- of the tracks seem to have been produced by Joe Thomas with his Chicago-area session musicians, we may see precious little of Brian's band on the album at all.)



 :o who says so ?

It's been confirmed in at least two places that Brian was recording and writing throughout last year with Joe Thomas (including by Brian). Eddie Bayers, a drummer regularly used by Thomas, told Rolling Stone he was playing on new BW tracks last year. In his most recent interview, Mike said this: "Brian’s come up with a lot of great tracks and tunes. And the rest of us come in and do our vocal parts." That suggests the tracks and songs (or at least a number of them) were already done by the time the group started working on them.

Now, it might be that Brian's band worked with Thomas on the tracks. But given Bayers' participation, and the past tension between Thomas and the group, it makes more sense to assume he used his own guys.

Edited as per AGD below.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 12:30:27 PM
I responding to the mocking of the potential "Mr. Positivity" lyrics, not saying he was the only early lyricist. Although he was the most prolific.
So why not mention some of the Biggest hits?  I Get Around, Help Me Rhonda, California Girls, Dance Dance Dance, Fun Fun Fun, Good Vibrations?

Of course he did those. And sang lead on many more besides. But my point is simply that you can't say Mike was somehow Brian's equal in the early success of the group. Yes, he was extremely important. But Brian wrote and produced quite a few hits without Mike's input. Mike didn't do the reverse. That being said, I think you really needed the whole group -- critically including Dennis -- to have achieved the success they did. No man was an island.

As Jon Stebbins said, it can just be fun to poke at Mike.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 10, 2012, 12:31:32 PM
We've also had pictures of Darian in the studio with BW. Who knows?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 10, 2012, 12:35:52 PM


Now, it might be that Brian's band worked with Thomas on the tracks. But given Bayers' participation, and the past tension between Thomas and the group, it makes more sense to assume he used his own guys.


yeah, but i don't think brian (melinda) would not let brian's band be not on that record


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 10, 2012, 12:38:54 PM
It's been confirmed in at least two places that Brian was recording and writing throughout last year with Joe Thomas (including by Brian). Eddie Bayers, a drummer regularly used by Thomas, told Rolling Stone he was playing on new BW tracks last year. In his most recent interview, Mike said this: "Brian’s come up with a lot of great tracks and tunes. And the rest of us come in and do our vocal parts." That suggests the tracks and songs (or at least a number of them) were already done by the time the group started working on them.

The only time Brian's worked with JT recently was a few days (two, three ?) at the end of July last year at the beginning of the US non-BWRG dates, when he stayed in St. Charles with Thomas. All the other tracks have been cut in LA. Your last sentence is indeed accurate.

My belief is that JT is in charge of the DVD side of things - nothing more.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 12:43:22 PM
It's been confirmed in at least two places that Brian was recording and writing throughout last year with Joe Thomas (including by Brian). Eddie Bayers, a drummer regularly used by Thomas, told Rolling Stone he was playing on new BW tracks last year. In his most recent interview, Mike said this: "Brian’s come up with a lot of great tracks and tunes. And the rest of us come in and do our vocal parts." That suggests the tracks and songs (or at least a number of them) were already done by the time the group started working on them.

The only time Brian's worked with JT recently was a few days (two, three ?) at the end of July last year at the beginning of the US non-BWRG dates, when he stayed in St. Charles with Thomas. All the other tracks have been cut in LA. Your last sentence is indeed accurate.

My belief is that JT is in charge of the DVD side of things - nothing more.

Well, that would be a relief. But it was reported that Brian was writing with JT, no? Even recent articles have talked about that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 10, 2012, 12:44:05 PM

My belief is that JT is in charge of the DVD side of things - nothing more.


That sounds plausible but didn't he co-write some songs wih Brian ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 12:48:57 PM
I responding to the mocking of the potential "Mr. Positivity" lyrics, not saying he was the only early lyricist. Although he was the most prolific.
So why not mention some of the Biggest hits?  I Get Around, Help Me Rhonda, California Girls, Dance Dance Dance, Fun Fun Fun, Good Vibrations?

Of course he did those. And sang lead on many more besides. But my point is simply that you can't say Mike was somehow Brian's equal in the early success of the group. Yes, he was extremely important. But Brian wrote and produced quite a few hits without Mike's input. Mike didn't do the reverse. That being said, I think you really needed the whole group -- critically including Dennis -- to have achieved the success they did. No man was an island.

As Jon Stebbins said, it can just be fun to poke at Mike.  ;D
I never said that "Mike was somehowBrians' equal". I was saying that Mike is capabable of writing excellent lyrics.

I agree that the whole group was needed. Brian needed the supporting cast around him. And I believe Mike was Brians' musical foil. They'd been collaborating and harmonizing from day one and I think they depended on each other.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 02:27:09 PM
And I believe Mike was Brians' musical foil. They'd been collaborating and harmonizing from day one and I think they depended on each other.

That's certainly what Mike believes, and what a lot of people who are fans of Mike believe. I'm not sure if Brian necessarily agreed when he sought out a sequence of other co-writers in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jmc on March 10, 2012, 02:50:26 PM
Regarding the new album title, they could always recycle an old, but never used title - Landlocked.  Afterall, it was the early title for the last great full-band effort....which became Sunflower.  I vote for no posed pictures of the band on the cover - too cheesy.  Save it for the liner notes. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 10, 2012, 02:52:53 PM
And I believe Mike was Brians' musical foil. They'd been collaborating and harmonizing from day one and I think they depended on each other.

That's certainly what Mike believes, and what a lot of people who are fans of Mike believe. I'm not sure if Brian necessarily agreed when he sought out a sequence of other co-writers in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s.
I think that Brian, like the rest of us, knows that Mike is a great lyricist, but Brian also likes to continually try different things musically and lyrically. I don't think Brian's choice to collaborate with others is because Mike is an inadequate or untalented lyricist. Mike could never write lyrics like Van Dyke Parks, and vice-versa. A lot of Brian's collaborator choices also have to do with his comfort zone - Scott Bennett, for instance, seems like someone Brian is comfortable around.

One thing that is true about Mike Love is that he is viewed as being somewhat limited in scope. He typically goes for a certain feel, subject matter, and rhyme scheme in his lyrics. I think that Mike recognized this as early as the late 60s, and he made an effort to branch out on Friends, 20/20, Sunflower, Surfs Up, and Holland.  This was a mixed bag, of course, as a listen to "Student Demonstration Time" confirms... but "Let The Wind Blow" and "Big Sur" show a more artistic side of Love that a lot of fans prefer to ignore.

Judging by the interview with Mike Love that I read earlier today, he is writing lyrics for several tracks on the new Beach Boys album, but not all of them. He is clearly cognizant of the fact that Brian and the group benefit from having different lyricists on different tracks. I would imagine that he is also doing his best to not intimidate his cousin. It looks like everybody in the group knows their place, finally, after all this time. This is a miracle of sorts, and a beautiful resolution to The Beach Boys story.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 10, 2012, 03:05:48 PM
Brian as a musical force (in contrast to Mike) has (almost) always been about trying new things, new ways of expressing himself, for which he needs outside help and influences especially in the lyrics department. So when wandering off towards new directions, away from the stuff that is classicly collaborated on with Mike, he obviously needed/needs other people (than Mike). Always has.

Brian and Mike are a superb songwriting duo - for a specific range of material. And the reunion album will obviously contain some of that typical Mike/Brian material. It's what most of the band's initial mid-60's (and later) success is based on.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 10, 2012, 03:07:49 PM
oops


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 03:15:04 PM
Brian and Mike are a superb songwriting duo - for a specific range of material.

I do wholeheartedly agree with this. Also, Mike's talent for hooks should not be underestimated.  (And by that, I mean lines like "Tack it up / Tack it up / Buddy gonna shut you down" or the "Whoa baby's" in "Kiss Me Baby.") It's one of the great things to look out for if you ever listen to Summer in Paradise. Mike created earworm bass and lyrical hooks all over the thing.The problem is, they're affixed to generally subpar songs.

There is genuine talent and ability there, but it needs a great songwriter's output to work with -- like, say, Kokomo. Really. You have a nice nostalgic John Phillips tune -- then Mike writes this silly-stupid-catchy chorus with Terry Melcher. And you have a no. 1 record. Mike's greatest songwriting talent, lyrics aside, is as a gifted enhancer of other people's tunes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 10, 2012, 03:18:41 PM
Mike's greatest songwriting talent, lyrics aside, is as a gifted enhancer of other people's tunes.
Most classic example maybe:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=s_Gh_pOM9n0#t=14s


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 10, 2012, 03:20:05 PM
And I believe Mike was Brians' musical foil. They'd been collaborating and harmonizing from day one and I think they depended on each other.

That's certainly what Mike believes, and what a lot of people who are fans of Mike believe. I'm not sure if Brian necessarily agreed when he sought out a sequence of other co-writers in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s.
I think that Brian, like the rest of us, knows that Mike is a great lyricist, but Brian also likes to continually try different things musically and lyrically. I don't think Brian's choice to collaborate with others is because Mike is an inadequate or untalented lyricist. Mike could never write lyrics like Van Dyke Parks, and vice-versa. A lot of Brian's collaborator choices also have to do with his comfort zone - Scott Bennett, for instance, seems like someone Brian is comfortable around.

One thing that is true about Mike Love is that he is viewed as being somewhat limited in scope. He typically goes for a certain feel, subject matter, and rhyme scheme in his lyrics. I think that Mike recognized this as early as the late 60s, and he made an effort to branch out on Friends, 20/20, Sunflower, Surfs Up, and Holland.  This was a mixed bag, of course, as a listen to "Student Demonstration Time" confirms... but "Let The Wind Blow" and "Big Sur" show a more artistic side of Love that a lot of fans prefer to ignore.

Judging by the interview with Mike Love that I read earlier today, he is writing lyrics for several tracks on the new Beach Boys album, but not all of them. He is clearly cognizant of the fact that Brian and the group benefit from having different lyricists on different tracks. I would imagine that he is also doing his best to not intimidate his cousin. It looks like everybody in the group knows their place, finally, after all this time. This is a miracle of sorts, and a beautiful resolution to The Beach Boys story.
Nice post!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 10, 2012, 03:32:33 PM
Mike's greatest songwriting talent, lyrics aside, is as a gifted enhancer of other people's tunes.
Most classic example maybe:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=s_Gh_pOM9n0#t=14s

Exactly. A song that was already written, already tracked, already had a theme -- but what does he add? He makes up that little line to sing along with the bass. It's kind of stupid on it's own, but its genius in the context of the whole song. And makes it catchy in an entirely different way!

(Speaking of which, I've always talked up Mike's lyrics for GV. I don't know of another situation where he did more with less. The lyrics are genuinely good, and compare favorably to anything Asher or Parks did around the same time.


I, I love the colorful clothes she wears
And the way the sunlight plays upon her hair
I hear the sound of a gentle word
On the wind that lifts her perfume through the air

I'm pickin' up good vibrations
She's giving me excitations

Close my eyes, she's somehow closer now
Softly smile, I know she must be kind
When I look in her eyes
She goes with me to a blossom world (we find -- good edit, Brian!)

I'm pickin' up good vibrations
She's giving me excitations

I don't know where but she sends me there
Oh my, my, what a sensation
Oh my, my, what elations

Gotta keep those lovin' good vibrations
A happenin' with her.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 10, 2012, 03:40:06 PM
'I don't know where, but she sends me there' is one of the greatest lines in popular music. Whilst it's fun to bash Mike, you cannot deny that.

Just chiming in with how OnTeeMoney the pair of you are, don't mind me  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 10, 2012, 10:39:51 PM
the entire Wild Honey album has some super lyrics.  Brian & Mike's best collaboration I'd say.

("with all the other stud bees buzzin' all around her hive ...")


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amanda Hart on March 11, 2012, 01:26:01 PM


(Speaking of which, I've always talked up Mike's lyrics for GV. I don't know of another situation where he did more with less. The lyrics are genuinely good, and compare favorably to anything Asher or Parks did around the same time.


I think that "Had To Phone Ya" is a good example of this too. His lyrics for the 15 Big Ones version make the song more universal than the original Spring version. Obviously this wasn't turned into the monster hit the Good Vibes was, and the changes in instrumentation help a lot too, but Mike's contributions make a big difference.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 11, 2012, 03:54:53 PM
I wish we could get some news.

I don't know if I agree with some of these comments about the genius of
Mike Love, and yet, obviously there is something about the combination and
chemistry of these guys, or I wouldn't be more excited about the forthcoming
Beach Boy album, than I am about a new Brian Wilson release.

Whether Mike Love has been unfairly underrated I don't know, but there is something
these guys are able to do together, that they can't do individually, same with the Beatles
or anybody else. No matter how talented someone may be, Brian Wilson, McCartney, whoever
it might be, There is something about the combo that just is. Chemistry.

I am excited as hell about the new album, !!!!

AGD gave as a very interesting clue yesterday, he said, Joe Thomas was handling the video
production, but not the production of the new album, if I understood AGD's post correctly.

I keep thinking about Love and Wilson's comments to the press, that this album sounds like
the Beach Boys in the sixties. What more could a guy ask for in 2012

That is very exciting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on March 11, 2012, 04:43:33 PM
how about the boys tackling Lane Steinberg's - Tidal Wave  (Trombone Dixie music ++ ) for the new CD.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 11, 2012, 09:38:46 PM
A few lines in "Good Vibrations" just irk me. Like they're just trying their damnedest to fit in with the current music scene. "I love the colorful clothes she wears"? "She goes with me to a blossom world"? Just reeks of the whole "FLOWER POWER, MAAAAAAAAN" thing of the day.

Mike has written much better lyrics several times over, albeit I'll admit "Good Vibrations" does have a few nice lines.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 11, 2012, 09:42:58 PM
blossomed world is the only one that dates the tune in my mind.  colorful clothes is good for any decade.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lonely Summer on March 11, 2012, 09:47:57 PM
vintagemusic, no disrespect meant but if you really think the reunion album is going to sell between 1-5 million copies then you have no grip on the music industry in this day and age. 50,000 copies on initial release is much more likely. Check how much The Smile Sessions sold.

While it's tough to predict sales, I would be wary of using TSS as any sort of benchmark. It was a seven disc archival release aimed at a specific group of fans -- and even then it outperformed expectations.
It did? What were the expectations? Someone must have thought 7 discs were too much for the typical consumer, so they came up with the 2 disc version. And how well did that version sell? Pretty poorly, if the chart performance is any indication. I agree that the reunion album is going to be a tough sell except to us die hards.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 11, 2012, 09:50:40 PM
Well over 90 percent of the Foskett hate is because --

1.) He's Brian's "minder" on the road.

2.) He's an evangelical Christian.

3.) He doesn't like Love You.

In other words, people don't think he's cool enough to have the job he has.

It's bullsh*t, and it has nothing to do with how he sounds.

My biggest issue with him is how he sounds and how his voice dominates the mix in every song he's a part of. It's like, it's not enough that his voice grates, but it's always right up front. I've talked to many people outside the boards who agree.

In other words, if he sounded decent, I'd cut him some slack elsewhere. I'm sure the guy, stated or otherwise, used his status as Brian's minder as leverage in getting a spot on the new album/tour. I don't care what religion he is, for the record.

Also, you forgot to list that creepy-ass dead-end gaze he gives on stage at all times.

Quote
If you told people some random live track was Matt Jardine, but it was actually Foskett, I doubt most people here could tell.

Not true at all. Not even a little. Matt's voice is far from perfect, but I'd much rather have him doing the falsetto vocals than Jeff. I'd rather have a lot of people there other than Jeff, honestly. There's this hoarse, bloated "ooph"ness in all his falsetto vocals that is just unpleasant, which is backed with it just sounding incredibly cold and sterile. That combined with him constantly modifying Brian's original written parts is... yeah :\

Christian Love and Matt Jardine being, erm, created by the original members, I feel they have much more of a place in this reunion than Jeff, who admittedly has been around for some time, but joined as a touring member during the 80s. 80s Beach Boys. Blech. They're skilled and they're family.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 11, 2012, 10:25:25 PM
vintagemusic, no disrespect meant but if you really think the reunion album is going to sell between 1-5 million copies then you have no grip on the music industry in this day and age. 50,000 copies on initial release is much more likely. Check how much The Smile Sessions sold.

While it's tough to predict sales, I would be wary of using TSS as any sort of benchmark. It was a seven disc archival release aimed at a specific group of fans -- and even then it outperformed expectations.
It did? What were the expectations? Someone must have thought 7 discs were too much for the typical consumer, so they came up with the 2 disc version. And how well did that version sell? Pretty poorly, if the chart performance is any indication. I agree that the reunion album is going to be a tough sell except to us die hards.

Andrew has stated repeatedly on the board that The Smile Sessions -- in all incarnations and whatever the chart placements -- handily outperformed Capitol's expectations. IIRC, I believe there is actually a shortage of the two-disc sets.

And my point is that comparing TSS, an archival release with a relatively limited print run and multiple discs, aimed squarely at an enthusiast market, with a BB reunion album is folly. It's apples and oranges.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 12, 2012, 06:21:57 AM

And my point is that comparing TSS, an archival release with a relatively limited print run and multiple discs, aimed squarely at an enthusiast market, with a BB reunion album is folly. It's apples and oranges.


I agree. But I think that the succes and public attention of TSS might have an effect on the new Beach Boys album. They're kinda in the spotlight right now


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 12, 2012, 06:27:14 AM
My biggest issue with him is how he sounds and how his voice dominates the mix in every song he's a part of. It's like, it's not enough that his voice grates, but it's always right up front. I've talked to many people outside the boards who agree.

It doesn't matter to me what 'many people outside this board' think.  There are some folks who don't like his voice, and there are others who do like his voice...or who don't think his voice is bad.  I think he handles his parts fine, and I don't mind his tone at all.

In other words, if he sounded decent, I'd cut him some slack elsewhere.

What does that mean, 'cut him some slack elsewhere'?  Where?

I'm sure the guy, stated or otherwise, used his status as Brian's minder as leverage in getting a spot on the new album/tour.

So you think that Foskett decided that he would force his way into this tour/album?  You don't think that Brian or his people wanted Jeff there for Brian?

Also, you forgot to list that creepy-ass dead-end gaze he gives on stage at all times.

Never noticed. 

Christian Love and Matt Jardine being, erm, created by the original members, I feel they have much more of a place in this reunion than Jeff, who admittedly has been around for some time, but joined as a touring member during the 80s. 80s Beach Boys. Blech. They're skilled and they're family.

Not sure about Matt Jardine, but Andrew has indicated that Christian Love had no interest in participating.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on March 12, 2012, 10:33:37 AM
I have just joined this board.  I have read all the posts and am comforted to know that i am not alone in waiting in anxious care about the album.  May I summarize some hopes and, perhaps, provide a focused platform for future information:

1. Are the BB playing instruments, such as on Sunflower and 20 other albums, or are ALL the tracks pre-done, with the BB only adding vocals?

2. DIA is obviously a different category because we see already how it was produced: only David playing.

3. Are Mike and Brian writing new songs together ex nihil? Or is Mike adding lyrics to already written songs?

4. Will David's song make the album?

5. Any writing by Bruce and Al?

6. Will TWGMR come out as a "single,"  whatever that means in the modern world?

7. Will they do the late-nite TV shows to promote the new album?

Beyond that, the bits of interview released, including KEarth 101, reveal a happy and joyous pair of cousins, at peace and working together.  I hope the album manifests "authenticity" by as many measures as the fans on this site can devise.

Have I failed to summarize any of the major questions?  I have tickets for the Bowl and Irvine and can think of nothing else (save duty and work of course) but the BB. Thank you all for your information and fellowship.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 12, 2012, 10:58:02 AM
I have just joined this board.  I have read all the posts and am comforted to know that i am not alone in waiting in anxious care about the album.  May I summarize some hopes and, perhaps, provide a focused platform for future information:

1. Are the BB playing instruments, such as on Sunflower and 20 other albums, or are ALL the tracks pre-done, with the BB only adding vocals?

2. DIA is obviously a different category because we see already how it was produced: only David playing.

3. Are Mike and Brian writing new songs together ex nihil? Or is Mike adding lyrics to already written songs?

4. Will David's song make the album?

5. Any writing by Bruce and Al?

6. Will TWGMR come out as a "single,"  whatever that means in the modern world?

7. Will they do the late-nite TV shows to promote the new album?

Beyond that, the bits of interview released, including KEarth 101, reveal a happy and joyous pair of cousins, at peace and working together.  I hope the album manifests "authenticity" by as many measures as the fans on this site can devise.

Have I failed to summarize any of the major questions?  I have tickets for the Bowl and Irvine and can think of nothing else (save duty and work of course) but the BB. Thank you all for your information and fellowship.


We know Al Jardine wrote one song, which will feature vocals from Carl Wilson. So yes you forgot to ask if Carl and Dennis would be represented.
So you get two for one there!

I think we all assume they will do the late night TV circuit, they have a major special coming on PBS featuring a look at their career and some new
songs, from the album called, (the show is called) Summer's Gone, on PBS I believe it's July 7Th ?

We know at least some of Mike Love's lyrics are being written to tunes, (Possibly tracks) Wilson had already written.

I am under the impression, Marks will play guitar possibly on more cuts.


The album has been said to be, similar to Pet Sounds, and the album supposedly ends with a musical suite or medley, and Brian Wilson
said all the songs flow into one another, and he said it's a very mellow album, Love said the song "that's Why God made the Radio" sounds
like The Beach Boy's in the sixties, he also said, one of the songs is as good as anything the Beach Boys have ever done,  it's not clear whether
Love is talking about the song "that's why God made the radio" but it seems likely.

The Beach Boys may play some parts on the album, I do not know, but for the most part, session players seem to be doing most or all
of the tracks, with Marks playing some guitar, that's just my guess, ask Andrew or someone who knows.


I'm hoping for the single in late may , probably a pipe dream on my part, probably by June if the PBS show has new material
the first week in July.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on March 12, 2012, 11:23:11 AM
Thank you, vintagemusic; that is very helpful. I suppose we al lhave been filling the space of hope with theory and speculation, and it's good to collect our basics together thus.  I will retun now to listening to all the corpus and watching DIA for the 400th time. What a wonder that the music-- and the promise of new music-- can so stir our hearts.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 12, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 12, 2012, 03:40:30 PM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Probably the un-touched recording from the 90s as he stated that the song will be on the new Beach Boys album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 12, 2012, 03:47:43 PM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Probably the un-touched recording from the 90s as he stated that the song will be on the new Beach Boys album
How much was Al involved with the song back in the 90's to justify a release on his solo LP? Especially if it's "untouched"...

And isn't it a bit weird/unusual that a song (in 2 versions or not) pops up on two different albums the same year? Oh well, it's the Beach Boys...


The more we get out of this year, the better.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on March 12, 2012, 04:46:40 PM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Probably the un-touched recording from the 90s as he stated that the song will be on the new Beach Boys album

Well, Al has been known to speak out of turn of late! The new release date seems weird though and I can't see Waves Of Love being on both APFC and the new BB album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 12, 2012, 09:11:10 PM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Hey can we get some big guns, with inside info on this, that makes no sense whatsoever.
Are you kidding did Jardine say that on Facebook, a date of March, and for his solo album?

Listen, those remarks by Jardine, make it seem to me, like they bumped the song from the
Beach Boys album, like they wrote and recorded some more songs, found another song
with Carl Wilson on it they liked better,

That makes no sense whatsoever, who the hell would be doing the last BBoys album, first album in 20 years
getting more and better press on this new B Boys album, than they have gotten in decades, and one of the
great final Beach Boys songs, Jardine gets a writers on the final B Boys album, and he announces its gonna
be a bonus track on his solo album, two or three months before the new Beach Boys album!

That makes no sense, its either someones drunk or they bumped the song from the Beach Boys album because
they are finding they have lots of material

Who in their right mind would put the song on both albums, and let the Jardine solo version come out three
months before the Beach Boys version

Does that make any sense to anyone?

 Mr Doe, what the heck is going on with that


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 12, 2012, 10:34:47 PM
uh, is it even a good song?  maybe there was better, with or without carl.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 12, 2012, 11:59:24 PM
That makes no sense whatsoever, who the hell would be doing the last BBoys album, first album in 20 years
getting more and better press on this new B Boys album, than they have gotten in decades, and one of the
great final Beach Boys songs
, Jardine gets a writers on the final B Boys album, and he announces its gonna
be a bonus track on his solo album, two or three months before the new Beach Boys album!

I take it you've heard it, then, and know this statement to be true ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 13, 2012, 05:22:48 AM
that's what i was wondering.  odds are stacked against it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 13, 2012, 06:15:57 AM
This Waves of Love thing is very strange.  I wouldn't think that the same song would be included on both Al's album and the Beach Boys album...not even different versions of the same song.  I went back and re-read the article where Al mentions the song as being part of the 'new album'.  It is possible that Al started talking to the writer of the article about his own album, and the writer mistakenly thought that he was talking about the new Beach Boys album.  I don't know.

What do we know about this song? 

It's a song that Al wrote with a friend of his, Larry Dvoskin.

A rough demo was recorded in '95.

Carl did some vocal work for the song then, but it wasn't finished, and it wasn't in a studio environment (according to AGD from an ESQ article?).

Al announces that the song would be included as a bonus track on 'Postcard'.

Al redid the track last summer with Beach Boys vets Mike Kowalski, Ed Carter, Mike Meros, Richie Cannata, Matt Jardine and others.
 
The song gets mentioned in a new article about the Beach Boys reunion tour and album, and the article seems to indicate that the song will be included on the new Beach Boys album.

Al announces that the song will indeed be a bonus track on 'Postcard'.


Does anyone know anything else?  I didn't read the ESQ article that AGD mentions.  Is there any more info there?  Can anyone shed more light on this subject?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 13, 2012, 06:52:13 AM
Al just announced on his facebook page that "Waves of Love" will be a bonus track for the March CD release of Postcard...


Probably the un-touched recording from the 90s as he stated that the song will be on the new Beach Boys album
How much was Al involved with the song back in the 90's to justify a release on his solo LP? Especially if it's "untouched"...




Well, he co-wrote the song and iirc he, Matt and Carl added voices to the demo recording.

If a finished version appears on the Beach Boys album, then I think it's ok to release the original demo. Everyone would like to have it as a bonus track, this way that bonus track will be available on Al's album. Probably a nice gesture to help him get some copies rolling. I wouldn't release the demo before the finished version though. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 13, 2012, 07:01:10 AM
I have just joined this board.  I have read all the posts and am comforted to know that i am not alone in waiting in anxious care about the album.  May I summarize some hopes and, perhaps, provide a focused platform for future information:

1. Are the BB playing instruments, such as on Sunflower and 20 other albums, or are ALL the tracks pre-done, with the BB only adding vocals?

2. DIA is obviously a different category because we see already how it was produced: only David playing.

3. Are Mike and Brian writing new songs together ex nihil? Or is Mike adding lyrics to already written songs?

4. Will David's song make the album?

5. Any writing by Bruce and Al?

6. Will TWGMR come out as a "single,"  whatever that means in the modern world?

7. Will they do the late-nite TV shows to promote the new album?

Beyond that, the bits of interview released, including KEarth 101, reveal a happy and joyous pair of cousins, at peace and working together.  I hope the album manifests "authenticity" by as many measures as the fans on this site can devise.

Have I failed to summarize any of the major questions?  I have tickets for the Bowl and Irvine and can think of nothing else (save duty and work of course) but the BB. Thank you all for your information and fellowship.


We know Al Jardine wrote one song, which will feature vocals from Carl Wilson. So yes you forgot to ask if Carl and Dennis would be represented.
So you get two for one there!

Well, we're not sure about this one now.  Al's album or the Beach Boys album?  I can't see the song being on both.

I think we all assume they will do the late night TV circuit, they have a major special coming on PBS featuring a look at their career and some new
songs, from the album called, (the show is called) Summer's Gone, on PBS I believe it's July 7Th ?

I could see them doing Leno or Kimmel or other late night shows.  The PBS thing isn't really a special, it's part of series called Front Row Center, which features a different musical act every week.  The Beach Boys segment, titled Smmer's Gone will air June 7th, and will feature never-before-seen archival concert footage, plus songs from their new album.

We know at least some of Mike Love's lyrics are being written to tunes, (Possibly tracks) Wilson had already written.

I am under the impression, Marks will play guitar possibly on more cuts.  The Beach Boys may play some parts on the album, I do not know, but for the most part, session players seem to be doing most or all of the tracks, with Marks playing some guitar, that's just my guess, ask Andrew or someone who knows.

Yeah, Dave will likely play some guitar, and I wouldn't be surprised if Al played some guitar, and Bruce some keys.  Heck Brian could play some keys, but I think a lot of the tracks will be done by others.   

The album has been said to be, similar to Pet Sounds, and the album supposedly ends with a musical suite or medley, and Brian Wilson
said all the songs flow into one another, and he said it's a very mellow album, Love said the song "that's Why God made the Radio" sounds
like The Beach Boy's in the sixties, he also said, one of the songs is as good as anything the Beach Boys have ever done,  it's not clear whether
Love is talking about the song "that's why God made the radio" but it seems likely.

Well, Al mentioned Pet Sounds while talking about the new album, but I don't recall anyone saying that the new album is similar to Pet Sounds.  Bruce, Mike and Brian have all said that they think TWGMTR is a great song.  Yeah, what do you expect them to say?  They are in heavy self-promotion mode right now.

I'm hoping for the single in late may , probably a pipe dream on my part, probably by June if the PBS show has new material
the first week in July.

Again, June 7th is the air date for the Summer's Gone segment of Front Row Center.  We'll be hearing new Beach Boys tracks in less than three months.  :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 13, 2012, 09:38:34 AM
maybe they were planning on putting it on the cd but decided at the last minute not too for whatever reason OR they had two songs with Carl on it and found a Dennis song to finish taking off one of the Carl songs and told Al he could release it on his cd instead OR like what was said above they misunderstood Al and thought he meant the Beach Boys album when he meant his own..I'm hoping it's the second option..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 13, 2012, 10:49:27 AM
That makes no sense whatsoever, who the hell would be doing the last BBoys album, first album in 20 years
getting more and better press on this new B Boys album, than they have gotten in decades, and one of the
great final Beach Boys songs
, Jardine gets a writers on the final B Boys album, and he announces its gonna
be a bonus track on his solo album, two or three months before the new Beach Boys album!

I take it you've heard it, then, and know this statement to be true ?

No No Mr Doe, I haven't heard the tune. What I meant in my emotional state, was this.
Here We have the final Beach Boy studio album, and an Al Jardine tune features Carl Wilson
singing part of the song, and then Jardine is going to premiere the same song, in advance of
this highly anticipated Beach Boy album, as a bonus track on his solo album?

That doesn't make any sense to me.Particularly with perhaps the only song that will feature
Carl Wilson singing. So far as we know so far.


So to my way of thinking, based on the limited facts I have, I thought, well they must be ending
up with more Beach Boy material than they thought a few weeks ago, and they Beach Boys
bumped that song, since Al said it was gonna be on the new Beach Boy album.


Someone else suggested it was more a matter of the demo version, versus the posh and polished
Beach Boy version. In other words, the Jardine Bonus track will be a demo, and the Beach Boy version
will be wholly different, with a plush backing track and much bigger vocals by the Beach Boys, a bigger
arrangement..


So I don't know Mr Doe. On the face of it, it doesn't seem to make any sense, and I was hoping someone
would clarify the situation.

Maybe in the last couple weeks, they got into that "she is a mystery song, with a Carl vocal and the other Beach Boys
said, hey Al keep this song for your album, we're gonna do this one instead, it works better on the ending medley suite
because of the key it's in.

I am just speculating, trying to make logical guesses. perhaps you could enlighten us.. As to the situation
with that track or song...

Maybe it's like a quantum physics particle, in two places at the same time. I could see if Jardine used the song as a bonus
track a few months after the Beach Boy album came out. For the life of me, I can't imagine premiering the song first on a solo
album, when the Group album is coming out six or eight weeks later to huge fnafare and anticipation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 13, 2012, 11:05:23 AM
As has been stated multiple times on this board and thread, the song is "You're Still a Mystery", and Carl did NOT sing it, Brian did. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 13, 2012, 11:30:31 AM
As has been stated multiple times on this board and thread, the song is "You're Still a Mystery", and Carl did NOT sing it, Brian did. 
[/Hquote]
Hey, let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story............
I'd rather see mostly entirely new material on this album unless they resurrect something lost from the '60s. I'm not thrilled by what I've heard from 'later sessions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 13, 2012, 11:31:06 AM
No offense, vintagemusic, but why does it seem like every one of your posts is a rambling essay?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 13, 2012, 11:37:34 AM
No offense, vintagemusic, but why does it seem like every one of your posts is a rambling essay?

And the weird paragraph formatting really doesn't help either.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 13, 2012, 12:51:36 PM
Re the late night TV circut. Both the BB's and Brian have been on Letterman before promoting new material. I would think with all those NY area gigs later in the year that another slot may happen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 13, 2012, 01:28:26 PM
No offense, vintagemusic, but why does it seem like every one of your posts is a rambling essay?

Suit yourself. Why tallk about the album, when you can do this instead. Good luck to you


What do i have to do, so that I am no longer a member? which button do i push


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 13, 2012, 01:40:06 PM
Suit yourself. Why tallk about the album, when you can do this instead. Good luck to you


What do i have to do, so that I am no longer a member? which button do i push
Your posts come across as stream of conscious rambling, that's all. Surely I can't be the only one who has noticed?

Whenever I visit this forum and pop into this thread, I do so hoping to come across news regarding the new album, but most of what I find is a lot of arguably pointless speculation regarding little details we can't POSSIBLY know anything about at this juncture in time.

Believe me, I hate singling out people on a message board, especially when they obviously share the same passion as I do. I just felt it was something that should be addressed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 13, 2012, 01:46:21 PM
What do i have to do, so that I am no longer a member? which button do i push
This place is like the Hotel California; "You can check out anytime you want, but you can never leave." ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 13, 2012, 01:49:04 PM
Suit yourself. Why tallk about the album, when you can do this instead. Good luck to you


What do i have to do, so that I am no longer a member? which button do i push
Your posts come across as stream of conscious rambling, that's all. Surely I can't be the only one who has noticed?



No


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 13, 2012, 01:52:37 PM
If you search through vintagemusic's post history, you'll find not one post that is less than 3 full paragraphs.  I'm not saying there's a limit on how much anyone should post...but honestly, there's a time and a place.  This new album topic as it stands right now, does not call for large dissertations being written.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 13, 2012, 01:53:37 PM
Wall of Text posts are what make the internet great.

Nice seeing somebody with PASSION about something. So much apathy everywhere.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on March 13, 2012, 02:00:06 PM
I for one have enjoyed reading vintagemusic's posts. Especially in the Threetle thread.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 13, 2012, 02:13:33 PM
I for one have enjoyed reading vintagemusic's posts. Especially in the Threetle thread.

I thought THIS was the Threetles thread!  LOL


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 13, 2012, 03:24:40 PM
That makes no sense whatsoever, who the hell would be doing the last BBoys album, first album in 20 years
getting more and better press on this new B Boys album, than they have gotten in decades, and one of the
great final Beach Boys songs
, Jardine gets a writers on the final B Boys album, and he announces its gonna
be a bonus track on his solo album, two or three months before the new Beach Boys album!

I take it you've heard it, then, and know this statement to be true ?

No No Mr Doe, I haven't heard the tune. What I meant in my emotional state, was this.
Here We have the final Beach Boy studio album, and an Al Jardine tune features Carl Wilson
singing part of the song, and then Jardine is going to premiere the same song, in advance of
this highly anticipated Beach Boy album, as a bonus track on his solo album?

That doesn't make any sense to me.Particularly with perhaps the only song that will feature
Carl Wilson singing. So far as we know so far.


So to my way of thinking, based on the limited facts I have, I thought, well they must be ending
up with more Beach Boy material than they thought a few weeks ago, and they Beach Boys
bumped that song, since Al said it was gonna be on the new Beach Boy album.


Someone else suggested it was more a matter of the demo version, versus the posh and polished
Beach Boy version. In other words, the Jardine Bonus track will be a demo, and the Beach Boy version
will be wholly different, with a plush backing track and much bigger vocals by the Beach Boys, a bigger
arrangement..


So I don't know Mr Doe. On the face of it, it doesn't seem to make any sense, and I was hoping someone
would clarify the situation.

Maybe in the last couple weeks, they got into that "she is a mystery song, with a Carl vocal and the other Beach Boys
said, hey Al keep this song for your album, we're gonna do this one instead, it works better on the ending medley suite
because of the key it's in.

I am just speculating, trying to make logical guesses. perhaps you could enlighten us.. As to the situation
with that track or song...

Maybe it's like a quantum physics particle, in two places at the same time. I could see if Jardine used the song as a bonus
track a few months after the Beach Boy album came out. For the life of me, I can't imagine premiering the song first on a solo
album, when the Group album is coming out six or eight weeks later to huge fnafare and anticipation.

No, my point was, you seem to know this is one of the 'great final BB songs', as you've made such an unequivocal statement. Most unwise in this company.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on March 13, 2012, 03:32:47 PM
Is Waves of Love better or worse than Don't Fight the Sea? Because imo DFtS is not a very good song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 13, 2012, 03:37:24 PM
Is Waves of Love better or worse than Don't Fight the Sea? Because imo DFtS is not a very good song.

Same here.  Can we presume Al thought DFTS was the superior  track as he placed that on the original album over Waves of Love, or was there another reason ( i.e, Waves was simply not in a form that could be completed at the time?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 13, 2012, 03:43:56 PM
Wall of Text posts are what make the internet great.

Nice seeing somebody with PASSION about something. So much apathy everywhere.

Passion or :smokin?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 13, 2012, 03:54:00 PM
If you search through vintagemusic's post history, you'll find not one post that is less than 3 full paragraphs.  I'm not saying there's a limit on how much anyone should post...but honestly, there's a time and a place.  This new album topic as it stands right now, does not call for large dissertations being written.

You'll get no argument from me Adolph, just tell me which freakin button to push, so I can resign my membership here,
and you and your pals, can meanwhile get elected to the selection committee

I no longer wish to be a part of this group, keep it, it belongs to you Adolph, just tell me which freakin
button to push, and I will never come here and disturb you and the other "superiors" again, fair enough
Adolph?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 13, 2012, 04:55:38 PM
If you search through vintagemusic's post history, you'll find not one post that is less than 3 full paragraphs.  I'm not saying there's a limit on how much anyone should post...but honestly, there's a time and a place.  This new album topic as it stands right now, does not call for large dissertations being written.

You'll get no argument from me Adolph, just tell me which freakin button to push, so I can resign my membership here,
and you and your pals, can meanwhile get elected to the selection committee

I no longer wish to be a part of this group, keep it, it belongs to you Adolph, just tell me which freakin
button to push, and I will never come here and disturb you and the other "superiors" again, fair enough
Adolph?

::) Quit being such a drama queen.   A little criticism won't hurt you. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 13, 2012, 04:57:14 PM
If you search through vintagemusic's post history, you'll find not one post that is less than 3 full paragraphs.  I'm not saying there's a limit on how much anyone should post...but honestly, there's a time and a place.  This new album topic as it stands right now, does not call for large dissertations being written.

You'll get no argument from me Adolph, just tell me which freakin button to push, so I can resign my membership here,
and you and your pals, can meanwhile get elected to the selection committee

I no longer wish to be a part of this group, keep it, it belongs to you Adolph, just tell me which freakin
button to push, and I will never come here and disturb you and the other "superiors" again, fair enough
Adolph?

::) Quit being such a drama queen.   A little criticism won't hurt you. 

Surely, the proper time to compare your situation to the death of millions of Jews is when people are vaguely annoyed at you on the internet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 13, 2012, 05:03:49 PM
We're all such a testy bunch, so fuckin what if somebody likes writing long posts, it shouldn't matter at all

No need to make somebody who's doing no harm feel unwanted


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 13, 2012, 05:26:30 PM
If you search through vintagemusic's post history, you'll find not one post that is less than 3 full paragraphs.  I'm not saying there's a limit on how much anyone should post...but honestly, there's a time and a place.  This new album topic as it stands right now, does not call for large dissertations being written.

You'll get no argument from me Adolph, just tell me which freakin button to push, so I can resign my membership here,
and you and your pals, can meanwhile get elected to the selection committee

I no longer wish to be a part of this group, keep it, it belongs to you Adolph, just tell me which freakin
button to push, and I will never come here and disturb you and the other "superiors" again, fair enough
Adolph?

::) Quit being such a drama queen.   A little criticism won't hurt you. 

That's what I thought.  It wasn't just me but a few members that mentioned it.  It was an observation, nothing more.  No need for people to get in a huff over it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MarcellaHasDirtyFeet on March 13, 2012, 06:33:33 PM
Words! I'm typing words! Angry face  >:(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on March 13, 2012, 06:47:48 PM
We're all such a testy bunch, so f*ckin what if somebody likes writing long posts, it shouldn't matter at all

No need to make somebody who's doing no harm feel unwanted

Wholeheartedly agree. All of this senseless bickering is ridiculous - I mean, i guess it's expected: we're all humans trying to boost our ego every chance we get. But come on guys, it's a Beach Boys forum, let's not get out of control lol.

Ps: Vintagemusic, please don't leave! I too enjoy your posts (ie, they're usually insightful, thought provoking, and they've never pissed me off). I'm glad you're not starting topics about your sex life, or rambling about what a joy acid and Love You are together, or picking senseless fights at every turn like other members here have done!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 13, 2012, 07:04:36 PM
You'll get no argument from me Adolph, just tell me which freakin button to push, so I can resign my membership here,
and you and your pals, can meanwhile get elected to the selection committee

I no longer wish to be a part of this group, keep it, it belongs to you Adolph, just tell me which freakin
button to push, and I will never come here and disturb you and the other "superiors" again, fair enough
Adolph?
Who's Adolph?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 13, 2012, 07:07:27 PM
We're all such a testy bunch, so f*ckin what if somebody likes writing long posts, it shouldn't matter at all

No need to make somebody who's doing no harm feel unwanted

Wholeheartedly agree. All of this senseless bickering is ridiculous

What else are you supposed to do on the Internet?  Get along?!

Ps: Vintagemusic, please don't leave! I too enjoy your posts (ie, they're usually insightful, thought provoking, and they've never pissed me off). I'm glad you're not starting topics about your sex life, or rambling about what a joy acid and Love You are together, or picking senseless fights at every turn like other members here have done!

I have nothing against Vintage; his Beatles posts were interesting at the very least.  But when one gets into a big huff over one little remark made about their pretentiousness, and then starts comparing themselves to the Holocaust, well they are practically *begging* to be mocked.  And I won't deny such requests.   :ohyeah


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 13, 2012, 07:36:01 PM
with references to Adolph Hitler, i can't tell if vintagemusic is 15 or 65.  REGARDLESS, i enjoy his posts.

anyway.  i would wager at least 5 dollars that waves of love isn't a very good song. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 13, 2012, 07:37:09 PM
"Waves of love" is also a phrase found in the lyrics to "Winds of Change."

Hmm. No it isn't. I could have sworn I heard it in a BB tune, though.

Pitter Patter. That's it. Although I guess they say "ways of love" there.

So, erm, nevermind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 13, 2012, 08:35:34 PM
anyway.  i would wager at least 5 dollars that waves of love isn't a very good song.

It just needs that BW touch.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 14, 2012, 12:58:07 AM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on March 14, 2012, 02:28:04 AM
I hope they lay low with all the 80´s sounding keyboards! It makes me cringe..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on March 14, 2012, 02:46:43 AM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.

Oh stop bullying Vintagemusic, everyone. Since when is correct grammar and use of paragraphing a prerequisite of Smiley membership?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on March 14, 2012, 03:32:23 AM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.

Oh stop bullying Vintagemusic, everyone. Since when is correct grammar and use of paragraphing a prerequisite of Smiley membership?

Or any forum for that matter?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 14, 2012, 04:13:44 AM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.

Oh stop bullying Vintagemusic, everyone. Since when is correct grammar and use of paragraphing a prerequisite of Smiley membership?

I've always considered reasonable grammar, spelling and punctuation a prerequisite of being an averagely educated person. It helps you get your point across without being misunderstood. But maybe that's just me being unreasonable.

Mmmmmmmmmm...

No, I'm not being unreasonable in this supposition. It's a matter of basic education: there are people posting here whose first language isn't English, and they put him to shame. Note, I posted this after his tasteless "Adolf" comments which, as someone who lost family members in 1941 to the Nazi regime, I could legitimately raise an almighty stink about. But I'll just assume he's as ignorant of history as he is of basic grammar.

BTW, that's not bullying, that's pointing out that any ideas he may have to share are diminished by the poor presentation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Real Barnyard on March 14, 2012, 04:27:55 AM
Probyn Gregory recording for the new album, and singing with Brian in the car!!

http://www.facebook.com/probyngregory


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 14, 2012, 05:09:59 AM
Ever think the reason people rag on Brian's band is because they are all secretly jealous they get to do sh*t like that?  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 14, 2012, 07:49:05 AM
Ever think the reason people rag on Brian's band is because they are all secretly jealous they get to do sh*t like that?  :lol
There was a time (as I am sure you're aware, but some others on the board may not be) when Brian's band was universally respected. Now after a decade and change, it is not unheard of for Brian to tour constantly and release new albums on a consistent basis, so the inevitable backlash is in full swing.

"They're not the Beach Boys!" When that is the chief complaint about Brian's band, you know they are doing something right.

Also jealousy though, yes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: smile-holland on March 14, 2012, 07:56:43 AM
No, I'm not being unreasonable in this supposition. It's a matter of basic education: there are people posting here whose first language isn't English, and they put him to shame. Note, I posted this after his tasteless "Adolf" comments which, as someone who lost family members in 1941 to the Nazi regime, I could legitimately raise an almighty stink about. But I'll just assume he's as ignorant of history as he is of basic grammar.

... and in case fo the Adolph-remark: both.

But regarding the problem some people have with the "essays" that vintagemusic writes. Maybe to some it's not very readable, but - hey - you don't have to read it. And if we had to discuss everyones spelling errors here, than we might as well start a new sub-board...

Back on-topic please.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 14, 2012, 08:47:19 AM
No, I'm not being unreasonable in this supposition. It's a matter of basic education: there are people posting here whose first language isn't English, and they put him to shame. Note, I posted this after his tasteless "Adolf" comments which, as someone who lost family members in 1941 to the Nazi regime, I could legitimately raise an almighty stink about. But I'll just assume he's as ignorant of history as he is of basic grammar.

... and in case fo the Adolph-remark: both.

But regarding the problem some people have with the "essays" that vintagemusic writes. Maybe to some it's not very readable, but - hey - you don't have to read it. And if we had to discuss everyones spelling errors here, than we might as well start a new sub-board...

Back on-topic please.
You are exactly right, and in some cases, I did just that and didn't read further. No excuse for spelling though, as we do have Spell Check here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 14, 2012, 10:50:43 AM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.

Oh stop bullying Vintagemusic, everyone. Since when is correct grammar and use of paragraphing a prerequisite of Smiley membership?

I've always considered reasonable grammar, spelling and punctuation a prerequisite of being an averagely educated person. It helps you get your point across without being misunderstood. But maybe that's just me being unreasonable.

Mmmmmmmmmm...

No, I'm not being unreasonable in this supposition. It's a matter of basic education: there are people posting here whose first language isn't English, and they put him to shame. Note, I posted this after his tasteless "Adolf" comments which, as someone who lost family members in 1941 to the Nazi regime, I could legitimately raise an almighty stink about. But I'll just assume he's as ignorant of history as he is of basic grammar.

BTW, that's not bullying, that's pointing out that any ideas he may have to share are diminished by the poor presentation.


Great critique Mr. Doe. Yes by the way I do know about history, especially the part about Nazi's. If I call someone Adolph, I guess it means, I am calling
them an intolerant ass. Yes I have spelling errors, I type quickly, have some visual problems, and probably should have used more caution.
I won't be  making anymore long posts, the question I asked, which still has not been answered, is which button do I push, to delete my
membership. I have my new album to worry about, my kids, my business, maintaining my home, and my disabled wife, the financial meltdown,
and I guess now, I should return the awards I've won for my songs, because apparently, I can't speak English well enough to deserve keeping them.

Yes I admit, I made some long posts, used some bad grammar and punctuation, and I as I said, I have visual problems on this laptop, I am remiss
in educating myself how to operate computers. I thought I was talking about the new Beach Boys album among friends, and didn't realize (until now)
what a burden it's been for some of you, Somehow paragraph formatting is coming out wrong when I type posts, so enough said, I'm sure I"ll be fine
elsewhere, and you'll be relieved of the burden of having to talk down to me.  Had you been truly concerned about my typing skills, surely a private email
would have shown a bit more class than to dress me down  in your posts, that goes for your friends as well. My view is that you are more comfortable
when free thinking newcomers to sully your otherwise pristine board are gone. OK enough said. All I need to know is which damn button gets me off of here.

I was educated in a way that encouraged, discussion, dialogue, questions, theories, I didn't realize there was some sort of Andrew Doe litmus test as to
someones level of formal education, income, political affiliation, or viewpoints. I hah, thought this was a Beach Boys discussion forum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on March 14, 2012, 11:13:38 AM
Let's not drive members away guys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Eireannach on March 14, 2012, 11:17:25 AM
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-im_CKn9PPI8/T0dtSJ0lUFI/AAAAAAAAAzY/0vIyQ9SYpt4/s1600/abe-simpson-gif.gif)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 11:21:05 AM
But back to the album ...

The interview with Probyn thread has a lot of new stuff.

-- Joe Thomas is overseeing the band in the studio. Probyn said he thought he was an "executive producer."
-- Bruce seems to have written at least one song for the album.
-- Probyn has only played on a three or so tracks (at the time of the interview -- he seems to have done more since). Many more were recorded last year and early this year not including him (such as the God radio song).
-- He describes some of the other songs as sounding like "80's Beach Boys." If that means "Somewhere Near Japan," I'm in. If it means "Wipeout," we'll see.
-- Some of the songs feature a small chamber orchestra group.
-- Brian has co-written most of the songs, with Mike helping on a couple.
-- There may be theremin on at least one tune.
-- Apparently D'Amico and Walusko will be on the tour!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 11:26:11 AM
Also, I think vintagmusic's posts are perfectly fine. He's on topic and he's engaged.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 14, 2012, 11:33:03 AM
But back to the album ...

The interview with Probyn thread has a lot of new stuff.

-- Joe Thomas is overseeing the band in the studio. Probyn said he thought he was an "executive producer."
-- Bruce seems to have written at least one song for the album.
-- Probyn has only played on a three or so tracks (at the time of the interview -- he seems to have done more since). Many more were recorded last year and early this year not including him (such as the God radio song).
-- He describes some of the other songs as sounding like "80's Beach Boys." If that means "Somewhere Near Japan," I'm in. If it means "Wipeout," we'll see.
-- Some of the songs feature a small chamber orchestra group.
-- Brian has co-written most of the songs, with Mike helping on a couple.
-- There may be theremin on at least one tune.
-- Apparently D'Amico and Walusko will be on the tour!

Yeah if I had to label this--considering what limited info we have---I'd say this was all very promising.  The fact that Probyn has such high regard for the "God/Radio" song says a lot, I think.  But I kinda wish we would've found that out on our own rather than by all this hype...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 14, 2012, 11:37:07 AM
Also, I think vintagmusic's posts are perfectly fine. He's on topic and he's engaged.

.............and I think he's from the San Francisco Bay Area, so he can't be all bad.  :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 14, 2012, 11:48:48 AM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 11:57:45 AM
Well, Probyn seemed to suggest that the Stamos thing isn't as set as some here have suggested. The band doesn't know anything about it.

I will be very curious to see how all those musicians are used myself.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 14, 2012, 12:17:02 PM
-- Brian has co-written most of the songs, with Mike helping on a couple.
-- There may be theremin on at least one tune.
-- Apparently D'Amico and Walusko will be on the tour!
Very encouraging stuff!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 14, 2012, 12:26:07 PM
But back to the album ...

The interview with Probyn thread has a lot of new stuff.

-- Joe Thomas is overseeing the band in the studio. Probyn said he thought he was an "executive producer."
-- Bruce seems to have written at least one song for the album.
-- Probyn has only played on a three or so tracks (at the time of the interview -- he seems to have done more since). Many more were recorded last year and early this year not including him (such as the God radio song).
-- He describes some of the other songs as sounding like "80's Beach Boys." If that means "Somewhere Near Japan," I'm in. If it means "Wipeout," we'll see.
-- Some of the songs feature a small chamber orchestra group.
-- Brian has co-written most of the songs, with Mike helping on a couple.
-- There may be theremin on at least one tune.
-- Apparently D'Amico and Walusko will be on the tour!
"Sounding like 80's Beach Boys", oh dear that's just about the worse comparison he could have come up with. Does not whet my appetite. Could tie in with JT being an executive producer. I just hope his description is inaccurate.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 12:32:33 PM
"Sounding like 80's Beach Boys", oh dear that's just about the worse comparison he could have come up with. Does not whet my appetite. Could tie in with JT being an executive producer.

Well, I would worry about it sounding like "90s Beach Boys" more. Summer in Paradise dates from 92, IIRC.

But yeah, if Joe Thomas is involved -- as we have known since late last year, at least -- the album will probably have a degree of slickness to it. I mean listen to the version of "Do It Again" that's out! I've been banging this drum for awhile now, and I'm astonished that people are still taken aback or trying to wishful-think their way out of this.

Joe Thomas involvement, Joe Thomas musicians = Slicker, adult contemporary sound.

That's just the way it is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 14, 2012, 12:44:18 PM
"Sounding like 80's Beach Boys", oh dear that's just about the worse comparison he could have come up with. Does not whet my appetite. Could tie in with JT being an executive producer.

Well, I would worry about it sounding like "90s Beach Boys" more. Summer in Paradise dates from 92, IIRC.

But yeah, if Joe Thomas is involved -- as we have known since late last year, at least -- the album will probably have a degree of slickness to it. I mean listen to the version of "Do It Again" that's out! I've been banging this drum for awhile now, and I'm astonished that people are still taken aback or trying to wishful-think their way out of this.

Joe Thomas involvement, Joe Thomas musicians = Slicker, adult contemporary sound.

That's just the way it is.
You are likely right, but I just hope the fact that he may be an executive producer rather than producer as such might mean there's less slickness going on than might otherwise have been the case.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 14, 2012, 01:07:27 PM
Well to be honest, I've not heard any modern pop record to never sound "slick."  The only time I come across an true organic sound on any recent music, it's always coming from indie alt-country bands.  Even Amy Winehouse's "Back To Black" may have been ridiculously retro (yet still modern) but there was still some "slickness" to it.  There's no way around it...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 01:22:57 PM
Well to be honest, I've not heard any modern pop record to never sound "slick."  The only time I come across an true organic sound on any recent music, it's always coming from indie alt-country bands.  Even Amy Winehouse's "Back To Black" may have been ridiculously retro (yet still modern) but there was still some "slickness" to it.  There's no way around it...

Plenty of ways around it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 14, 2012, 01:28:17 PM
Well to be honest, I've not heard any modern pop record to never sound "slick."  The only time I come across an true organic sound on any recent music, it's always coming from indie alt-country bands.  Even Amy Winehouse's "Back To Black" may have been ridiculously retro (yet still modern) but there was still some "slickness" to it.  There's no way around it...

Plenty of ways around it.
All you need is a decent producer........


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 01:30:21 PM
Well to be honest, I've not heard any modern pop record to never sound "slick."  The only time I come across an true organic sound on any recent music, it's always coming from indie alt-country bands.  Even Amy Winehouse's "Back To Black" may have been ridiculously retro (yet still modern) but there was still some "slickness" to it.  There's no way around it...

Plenty of ways around it.

Yes, and all of them involve not hiring Joe Thomas.

That being said, I'd bet Joe has become involved mainly as a co-writer. And whatever one thinks of his production style, he has written some good tunes with Brian. (Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden, most notably.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 14, 2012, 02:12:52 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 14, 2012, 02:20:54 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that

Well that's what I mean....there will be always be some element of "slick" in pop albums.  Plus, for most of us here who are used to listening to more raw/untouched music (as they did in the 60's/70's)...even the littlest amount of "slickness" will be noticed and perhaps be grating on our ears.   If they can achieve a great balance like Winehouse did--that would be a great thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 14, 2012, 02:50:46 PM

[/quote]
"Sounding like 80's Beach Boys", oh dear that's just about the worse comparison he could have come up with. Does not whet my appetite. Could tie in with JT being an executive producer. I just hope his description is inaccurate.
[/quote]
Whoa, I don't know. "80s"? I liked "Getcha Back". That's as far as I can go with something from that time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 03:08:42 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that

the 'props' go to Gabe Roth; the 'slick' to Ronson.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 03:10:42 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that

Well that's what I mean....there will be always be some element of "slick" in pop albums.  Plus, for most of us here who are used to listening to more raw/untouched music (as they did in the 60's/70's)...even the littlest amount of "slickness" will be noticed and perhaps be grating on our ears.   If they can achieve a great balance like Winehouse did--that would be a great thing.

Aside from the tastes and behavior of human beings (such as Joe Thomas and the Beach Boys themselves), there is no reason an album can't be made today that is sonically very similar to a '60s album, i.e. without the 'slick'.

... I'm just saying, it's not like there is a veil of automatic 'slick' simply because this is 2012.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 14, 2012, 03:48:49 PM
Re: vintagemusic, just checked out the Beatles/Threatles thread, and frankly, his posts are very hard going, and close to unreadable because they're so very badly written (as they are here - if you mean to say "post-capitol era" then write "post-Capitol era") and definitely not proofed before being posted. He may be saying something of interest but it's difficult to tell. Is English his first language ?  If so, he should be thinking remedial classes.

Oh stop bullying Vintagemusic, everyone. Since when is correct grammar and use of paragraphing a prerequisite of Smiley membership?

I've always considered reasonable grammar, spelling and punctuation a prerequisite of being an averagely educated person. It helps you get your point across without being misunderstood. But maybe that's just me being unreasonable.

Mmmmmmmmmm...

No, I'm not being unreasonable in this supposition. It's a matter of basic education: there are people posting here whose first language isn't English, and they put him to shame. Note, I posted this after his tasteless "Adolf" comments which, as someone who lost family members in 1941 to the Nazi regime, I could legitimately raise an almighty stink about. But I'll just assume he's as ignorant of history as he is of basic grammar.

BTW, that's not bullying, that's pointing out that any ideas he may have to share are diminished by the poor presentation.


Great critique Mr. Doe. Yes by the way I do know about history, especially the part about Nazi's. If I call someone Adolph, I guess it means, I am calling
them an intolerant ass. Yes I have spelling errors, I type quickly, have some visual problems, and probably should have used more caution.
I won't be  making anymore long posts, the question I asked, which still has not been answered, is which button do I push, to delete my
membership. I have my new album to worry about, my kids, my business, maintaining my home, and my disabled wife, the financial meltdown,
and I guess now, I should return the awards I've won for my songs, because apparently, I can't speak English well enough to deserve keeping them.

Yes I admit, I made some long posts, used some bad grammar and punctuation, and I as I said, I have visual problems on this laptop, I am remiss
in educating myself how to operate computers. I thought I was talking about the new Beach Boys album among friends, and didn't realize (until now)
what a burden it's been for some of you, Somehow paragraph formatting is coming out wrong when I type posts, so enough said, I'm sure I"ll be fine
elsewhere, and you'll be relieved of the burden of having to talk down to me.  Had you been truly concerned about my typing skills, surely a private email
would have shown a bit more class than to dress me down  in your posts, that goes for your friends as well. My view is that you are more comfortable
when free thinking newcomers to sully your otherwise pristine board are gone. OK enough said. All I need to know is which damn button gets me off of here.

I was educated in a way that encouraged, discussion, dialogue, questions, theories, I didn't realize there was some sort of Andrew Doe litmus test as to
someones level of formal education, income, political affiliation, or viewpoints. I hah, thought this was a Beach Boys discussion forum

Firstly, I never complained about the length of your posts, just the poor writing. Secondly, I've been called far worse here and elsewhere: it's life, get used to it or get out of the kitchen. Thirdly, paragraphing is simple - you press the 'enter' key.

Finally, this is indeed a BB discussion forum, one that assumes not only a basic level of BB/BW knowledge but also an equal level of literacy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 14, 2012, 04:05:52 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that
Daptone Studio's acoustics, equipment and owner deserve the props for the sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 14, 2012, 04:35:31 PM
Also, I think vintagmusic's posts are perfectly fine. He's on topic and he's engaged.

I agree w/ Wirestone on this.  The thread and exchange between VM & John Mill (on Beatles/Threetles) was quite brilliant, I thought.  I'm willing to overlook a few typos and crazy word wrapping.

That's Why God Invented The Internet.

And, seriously, not everyone can write as brilliantly as Mr. Doe!   ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 14, 2012, 04:41:35 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pinder's Gone To Kokomo And Back Again on March 14, 2012, 04:50:44 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that

the 'props' go to Gabe Roth; the 'slick' to Ronson.

The slickness in Back To Black is in that the rather small team of musicians play very tightly and "on it" while the overall sound/vibe is both retro and modern. The SOUND itself does not sound AOR at all......... to my ears.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on March 14, 2012, 04:55:52 PM
If there are some new songs after the fashion of Goin' On and Getcha back, plus Brian Wilson BV's and "slick orchestration", add to the mix songs by Al & Bruce:

Instant Classic!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 05:08:55 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that
Daptone Studio's acoustics, equipment and owner deserve the props for the sound.

That's what I said; Gabe Roth is the owner.  And the equipment and acoustics have less to do with it than him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on March 14, 2012, 05:10:48 PM
Winehouse albums are slick, retro but then sound organic AND modern.  Def give props to ronson for that

the 'props' go to Gabe Roth; the 'slick' to Ronson.

The slickness in Back To Black is in that the rather small team of musicians play very tightly and "on it" while the overall sound/vibe is both retro and modern. The SOUND itself does not sound AOR at all......... to my ears.

nah, the slickness is Ronson & Winehouse (not present in the other Daptone recordings).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on March 14, 2012, 05:29:09 PM
The 80's Beach Boys comment really scares me - that's a far cry from what we've heard from the boys, making comparisons to Pet Sounds and their 60's material.  As others have said, I suppose the involvement of Joe Thomas shouldn't make this much of a surprise, and maybe I'll be proven wrong, but I think that the "80's Beach Boys" sound needs to stay in the 80's, and nowhere near this album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on March 14, 2012, 05:38:04 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

Dennis would have kicked his ass.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 14, 2012, 05:40:29 PM
Well, first we all can be sure that the Pet Sounds comparisons are just promo. Especially with Mike I have the feeling that he always pulls out the Pet Sounds comparisons when talking about a ballad. Maybe the same goes for Al. But I really can't see how anyone really would believe the words of the guys that this new album will be any new Pet Sounds (and if it is I will be disappointed because I wouldn't like them to repeat themselves).

And secondly, 80s Beach Boys doesn't necessaily mean that they go for an 80s sound (I hope they won't). Maybe it's just (if you take Beach Boys '85 as an example) that everyone will contribute in songwriting. And say what you want, Beach Boys '85 was a very contemporary sounding record (I really like that album) so maybe that's what Probyn Gregory meant (contemporary; that would fit with his description of the Radio-song). We just have to wait.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AllIWannaDo on March 14, 2012, 06:14:15 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on March 14, 2012, 09:03:03 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

A Stamos appearance would be retro to the wrong era.  But its hard to guess what this committee of Beachboys will do.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 14, 2012, 10:54:12 PM
"Sounding like 80's Beach Boys", oh dear that's just about the worse comparison he could have come up with. Does not whet my appetite. Could tie in with JT being an executive producer.

Well, I would worry about it sounding like "90s Beach Boys" more. Summer in Paradise dates from 92, IIRC.

But yeah, if Joe Thomas is involved -- as we have known since late last year, at least -- the album will probably have a degree of slickness to it. I mean listen to the version of "Do It Again" that's out! I've been banging this drum for awhile now, and I'm astonished that people are still taken aback or trying to wishful-think their way out of this.

Joe Thomas involvement, Joe Thomas musicians = Slicker, adult contemporary sound.

That's just the way it is.

Well I guess it could be worse--they could get Steve Levine to do the album...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 14, 2012, 11:30:39 PM
but if probyn is calling JT "executive producer" and an "overseeer" then i don't see how his influence musically will be that prominent.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 14, 2012, 11:53:07 PM
I wonder when they'll get back to work on the album?...don't they have rehearsals for the tour to worry about pretty soon?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 14, 2012, 11:56:19 PM
but if probyn is calling JT "executive producer" and an "overseeer" then i don't see how his influence musically will be that prominent.

We'll see!

I wonder when they'll get back to work on the album?...don't they have rehearsals for the tour to worry about pretty soon?

They're working on it now. According to the Probyn interview, no rehearsals are planned until next month.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 15, 2012, 12:40:15 AM
but if probyn is calling JT "executive producer" and an "overseeer" then i don't see how his influence musically will be that prominent.

Think wider than just the album project (and this isn't any insider info - it's been underlined in a recent article).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 15, 2012, 12:42:16 AM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X

Poor spelling, not poor grammar.  :-D  I offer you the Whitman defence:

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on March 15, 2012, 12:46:23 AM
The TV thing, right...?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 15, 2012, 01:27:40 AM
The new album should contain an ode to Andrew G. Doe, for all the dedication and work thoughout all those years.

Throw me a title, guys and gals.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 15, 2012, 01:40:30 AM
Ode to Doe

The Good Grammer  Grammar Album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 15, 2012, 02:29:55 AM
Doe, a seer, a Beach Boys seer..........


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 15, 2012, 02:57:36 AM
I present the two-birds/one stone solution - honour the recently deceased Whitney Houston and the owner of Farnham's loudest shirt by singing this to the popular air of the former, in 17 part harmony with Stamos on lead...

And AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-GEEEEEE-DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE KNOWS BETTER THAN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU (cue soaring Jeff falsetto)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 15, 2012, 03:13:20 AM
I present the two-birds/one stone solution - honour the recently deceased Whitney Houston and the owner of Farnham's loudest shirt by singing this to the popular air of the former, in 17 part harmony with Stamos on lead...

And AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-GEEEEEE-DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE KNOWS BETTER THAN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU (cue soaring Jeff falsetto)

 :lol

That is brilliant. I hear Phil Cohen's on drums.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 15, 2012, 03:41:06 AM
Doe, a seer, a Beach Boys seer..........

Stone fucking genius.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 15, 2012, 04:15:09 AM
Doe, a seer, a Beach Boys seer..........

Stone f*cking genius.  ;D

I thank you......

The musical's on the way!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on March 15, 2012, 05:07:46 AM
"A Day In the Life Of AGD" ???



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Val on March 15, 2012, 05:13:18 AM
"HE  Knows US Too Well"

 ;D

You know that you are all just encouraging him, don't you?

 8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 15, 2012, 08:02:52 AM
Go ahead and encourage him!! I dig the guy and all his posts. I have even felt the wrath of AGD and wear my wounds proudly like battle scars!! :p :p :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on March 15, 2012, 08:14:39 AM
"A Day In the Life Of AGD" ???



Doe Hurt My Little Sister
Doe It Again
Doe You Wanna Dance
Doe Go Near The Water
Doe , You Like Worms ??

There are some many of his hits , but my favourite hit of his is

'Doe Only Knows'

Sorry for the spealing errurs  ;D
Love You


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 15, 2012, 08:24:07 AM
"A Day In the Life Of AGD" ???



Doe Hurt My Little Sister
Doe It Again
Doe You Wanna Dance
Doe Go Near The Water
Doe , You Like Worms ??

There are some many of his hits , but my favourite hit of his is

'Doe Only Knows'

Sorry for the spealing errurs  ;D
Love You

Slow day in the office, huh Rob ?  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Val on March 15, 2012, 11:25:49 AM
Go ahead and encourage him!! I dig the guy and all his posts. I have even felt the wrath of AGD and wear my wounds proudly like battle scars!! :p :p :p

Have you discussed your masochistic tendencies with your psycho analyst lately, jimmy?

I jest! I jest!

I too suffer the Wrath of Doe,  over the layout of the BBB mag, amongst  other things.   Don't ever tell him this, will you, but he is often right.

And he does stroke his beard before he gives you an answer.
 :wink


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 15, 2012, 12:47:07 PM
I just read the entire Probyn Gregory interview and I find it interesting that the only song he was raving about (or had anyting positive to elaborate on) was the God/Radio one that he didn't even play on.
He did say that some of the songs had a BBs '80s vibe to it as has been pointed out here already. I do not undertand that at all. Of all the  eras to sound like, that would certainly be one to avoid.
He didn't describe the songs that he worked on at all. I find that kind of puzzling, and not in a good way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on March 15, 2012, 01:01:00 PM
I just read the entire Probyn Gregory interview and I find it interesting that the only song he was raving about (or had anyting positive to elaborate on) was the God/Radio one that he didn't even play on.
He did say that some of the songs had a BBs '80s vibe to it as has been pointed out here already. I do not undertand that at all. Of all the  eras to sound like, that would certainly be one to avoid.
He didn't describe the songs that he worked on at all. I find that kind of puzzling, and not in a good way.

I can ask him about it, it was just the way the conversation went. I wouldn't overly run into it....its really just a conversation between friends you are reading


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 15, 2012, 01:08:27 PM
I just read the entire Probyn Gregory interview and I find it interesting that the only song he was raving about (or had anyting positive to elaborate on) was the God/Radio one that he didn't even play on.
He did say that some of the songs had a BBs '80s vibe to it as has been pointed out here already. I do not undertand that at all. Of all the  eras to sound like, that would certainly be one to avoid.
He didn't describe the songs that he worked on at all. I find that kind of puzzling, and not in a good way.

I can ask him about it, it was just the way the conversation went. I wouldn't overly run into it....its really just a conversation between friends you are reading
Ah. That would be great, thanks. Would love to hear anything concerning the new recordinds/songs.!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 15, 2012, 01:32:34 PM
Ah some of these posts made my day!  ;D



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 15, 2012, 01:53:14 PM
I just read the entire Probyn Gregory interview and I find it interesting that the only song he was raving about (or had anyting positive to elaborate on) was the God/Radio one that he didn't even play on.
He did say that some of the songs had a BBs '80s vibe to it as has been pointed out here already. I do not undertand that at all. Of all the  eras to sound like, that would certainly be one to avoid.
He didn't describe the songs that he worked on at all. I find that kind of puzzling, and not in a good way.

I can ask him about it, it was just the way the conversation went. I wouldn't overly run into it....its really just a conversation between friends you are reading
Ah. That would be great, thanks. Would love to hear anything concerning the new recordinds/songs.!

We'll know everything in a couple of months, good or bad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 15, 2012, 02:29:37 PM
Ah some of these posts made my day!  ;D


Ah, so. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on March 15, 2012, 04:27:31 PM
I just read the entire Probyn Gregory interview and I find it interesting that the only song he was raving about (or had anyting positive to elaborate on) was the God/Radio one that he didn't even play on.
He did say that some of the songs had a BBs '80s vibe to it as has been pointed out here already. I do not undertand that at all. Of all the  eras to sound like, that would certainly be one to avoid.
He didn't describe the songs that he worked on at all. I find that kind of puzzling, and not in a good way.

I can ask him about it, it was just the way the conversation went. I wouldn't overly run into it....its really just a conversation between friends you are reading
Ah. That would be great, thanks. Would love to hear anything concerning the new recordinds/songs.!

We'll know everything in a couple of months, good or bad.

Yeah, I mean I don't want to bug him. It sounds like everything is going cool with the album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 15, 2012, 04:42:54 PM
i wouldn't mind clarification on "80s", he had to know that's a bit of a red flag thing to say


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 15, 2012, 05:10:46 PM
i wouldn't mind clarification on "80s", he had to know that's a bit of a red flag thing to say
Well, Brian Wilson was a Beach Boy, and his 1988 solo album was great, so maybe that's what he was referring to?  ;)

EDIT:

An update from Mike via his Facebook page:

Quote
Thank you to everyone for the birthday wishes. I really appreciate the kindness. I am enjoying my birthday in Mexico with a little rest and relaxation before heading back into the studio finalizing the new album. Look for us coming soon on CBS Sunday morning news to be aired in the near future as Brian, Myself, Al, Bruce, and Marks share more of our 50th Anniversary plans with our fans. Can't wait to see everybody out on the road this year. Looking forward to celebrating the 50th with all our fans and friends.

Mucho Gusto,

Mike


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 15, 2012, 06:46:25 PM
Why did he refer to Dave as Marls? >:( >:(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 15, 2012, 06:50:17 PM
He said "Marks"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on March 15, 2012, 10:41:07 PM
The new album should contain an ode to Andrew G. Doe, for all the dedication and work thoughout all those years.

Throw me a title, guys and gals.

D'oe!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 15, 2012, 11:41:34 PM
Why did he refer to Dave as Marls? >:( >:(

Same reason that just about everyone I know refers to a certain Alan as "Boyd".  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 16, 2012, 03:46:06 AM
i wouldn't mind clarification on "80s", he had to know that's a bit of a red flag thing to say

Are we over-scrutinizing this comment? Yes--we are.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 16, 2012, 04:27:08 AM
I think so - from Probyn's interview, it sounds like a lot of 'natural' instruments are being used. Mertens seems to be doing a lot of work, they're laying down possibly cello tracks (although Probyn's friend could well have been there as part of a larger ensemble), a few songs have french horn and stuff he plays, that sort of thing. I don't think they're mixing that up with OTT synth patches and vocal processing, ala BB85.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 16, 2012, 04:47:45 AM
Yeah, I wouldn't try to read too much into the '80s comment.  He had only heard one tune, and if they were playing it for the media, it is probably near complete.  He said he only played on '3 or 4' others (at the time), and if he's doing instrumental tracking, he may have only heard parts of those songs, or only certain elements of those recordings...perhaps without vocals, as those are usually last.  So, let's just wait and see.  Mike said the songs were like mid-60's songs.  Brian said they were mellow, '60s style songs, but with some 2000's in there, too.  Probyn said a couple of the things he heard sound like the '80s Beach Boys, but he also said that the God/radio song sounded like it could be a hit today.  Again, we'll know soon enough.  Also looking forward to the CBS Sunday Morning segment. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on March 16, 2012, 07:11:12 AM
I think the '80s comment may stem from another thing. When listening to the vocals, he probably heard that "Kokomo"/"Still Cruisin'"/"Cool Head Warm Heart" kind of vocal from Mike, which accompanied by a slick sounding track blasting out of studio speakers, would probably sound '80s.

I think one thing a lot of people are forgetting is that Mike can't really sing like he used to. His voice is probably the weakest of the main surviving Beach Boys. Brian's voice might be a bit different than it used to be, but he still can turn out a strong vocal, whereas from listening to the albums worth of songs that Mike made in the early 2000's it sounds like the only voice he can do comfortably is that whispery "Kokomo" type delivery. And when he tries to sound like the guy who sang "I Get Around" or "California Girls" he ends up having to get super nasal, like "Getcha Back" or things of that nature.

I pretty much agree with whoever sound the sound will probably amount to Imagination meets That Lucky Old Sun. Which is fine with me. Because honestly, I love Imagination. It's my second favorite BW solo, behind his 1988 debut album. There are a few garbage songs on it, but his vocals were so great on it. My only thing is whether the material will be that great. I'm probably not in the majority, but I didn't think the songwriting on TLOS was that great. I never really go back to it. I know everybody loves "Midnight's Another Day" and others, but it really doesn't move me. "Good Kind of Love" is good though, very Brian. But I'm really hoping that being back with The Beach Boys really inspired him to pull out some classic material on this one.

But overall, and I have nothing to found this on but speculation, I think vocally this will be the best Beach Boys album since Sunflower. Say what you will about Imagination, but the vocals, in my opinion, sounded absolutely gorgeous from Brian. And now, coupled with the fact that Brian is singing with a subtlety and emotion that we hadn't heard in years, I think there is gonna be some special moments if Brian comes up with some worthy songs. I think Al and Bruce will sound great too, and combined with the more mellow Mike Love vocal delivery, I think the album will be, as Brian has said, mellow with great vocals.

*Sorry for going all vintagemusic on you guys. I just kept writing and writing, ha.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 16, 2012, 08:52:23 AM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on March 16, 2012, 11:02:31 AM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?

Well, I assume it was probably recorded around 2003 or so, because I'm pretty sure Mike's "album" leaked around 2004 or 2005.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 16, 2012, 11:09:53 AM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?

Well, I assume it was probably recorded around 2003 or so, because I'm pretty sure Mike's "album" leaked around 2004 or 2005.
there's an older recording but I'm not sure if it's from the late 70's or early 80's


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 16, 2012, 12:10:00 PM
I think the '80s comment may stem from another thing. When listening to the vocals, he probably heard that "Kokomo"/"Still Cruisin'"/"Cool Head Warm Heart" kind of vocal from Mike, which accompanied by a slick sounding track blasting out of studio speakers, would probably sound '80s.

I think one thing a lot of people are forgetting is that Mike can't really sing like he used to. His voice is probably the weakest of the main surviving Beach Boys. Brian's voice might be a bit different than it used to be, but he still can turn out a strong vocal, whereas from listening to the albums worth of songs that Mike made in the early 2000's it sounds like the only voice he can do comfortably is that whispery "Kokomo" type delivery. And when he tries to sound like the guy who sang "I Get Around" or "California Girls" he ends up having to get super nasal, like "Getcha Back" or things of that nature.


Mike reached his nasal zenith in 1983. Since then, his singing became gradually more natural. You can hear him in videos from recent shows sounding better than 20 years ago. Besides, all of them can sound great in the studio...

The biggest difference between studio and stage is Brian's, though: he's still to sing a decent California Girls (the 2008 video recently posted is good only of you are familiar with the standard), and yet is sounding gorgeous in recent albums. An then, he sang really good in the Grammy ceremony.

I don't know, I think the pieces are falling in the right places for this celebration. Seems like all of them will be more than up to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 16, 2012, 12:27:38 PM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?

Well, I assume it was probably recorded around 2003 or so, because I'm pretty sure Mike's "album" leaked around 2004 or 2005.
there's an older recording but I'm not sure if it's from the late 70's or early 80's

Do you know if this is available on any bootlegs?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 16, 2012, 12:29:55 PM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?

Well, I assume it was probably recorded around 2003 or so, because I'm pretty sure Mike's "album" leaked around 2004 or 2005.
there's an older recording but I'm not sure if it's from the late 70's or early 80's

Do you know if this is available on any bootlegs?
it exists but I don't know which boot it's on..I think it's a solo boot of Mike maybe even "First love" or one of those..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 16, 2012, 02:06:15 PM
What year was "Cool Head, Warm Heart" originally written/recorded?

Well, I assume it was probably recorded around 2003 or so, because I'm pretty sure Mike's "album" leaked around 2004 or 2005.
there's an older recording but I'm not sure if it's from the late 70's or early 80's

Do you know if this is available on any bootlegs?
it exists but I don't know which boot it's on..I think it's a solo boot of Mike maybe even "First love" or one of those..

You're getting your songs confused - there are several re-recorded First Love songs on MLNW, but "Cool Head..." isn't one of them. It's a relatively new composition, and the only version I'm aware of is the finished one we all know.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 16, 2012, 02:10:49 PM
You're getting your songs confused - there are several re-recorded First Love songs on MLNW, but "Cool Head..." isn't one of them. It's a relatively new composition, and the only version I'm aware of is the finished one we all know.
Thanks for the clarification, Andrew!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 17, 2012, 10:35:44 AM
opps sorry it was "Too Cruel" I was thinking of


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on March 18, 2012, 10:53:04 AM
opps sorry it was "Too Cruel" I was thinking of

I love that song!, I think it'd still be a very radio friendly track too

[EDIT]
Actually, if Mike is going to be looking at that album for material, I'd love to hear what they could do with "Pisces Brothers"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on March 18, 2012, 11:16:55 AM

Actually, if Mike is going to be looking at that album for material, I'd love to hear what they could do with "Pisces Brothers"

Some call it cheesy, and I can see their point, but I really like this track. I'm not sure it belongs on the new BB album though, because that'd be yet another BB-Beatles link, and we don't need that.

Mike's still-unreleased recent solo effort had quite a few good tunes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on March 18, 2012, 05:05:04 PM
I think Mike's last unreleased album did have a few really nice tunes, but if I'm given the choice of either having a Mike Love composition or an unheard Brian Wilson composition, I'm gonna go with Brian's. Even though some of the songs from Mike's latest work were pretty good, I think the only that is truly Beach Boys worthy is "Cool Head". The others are good within a Mike Love solo project, but I think the standard for material should be a bit higher than that for this Beach Boys album. Maybe it'll come to be known that Mike's stuff was better than the stuff that they came up with for the new album, but I doubt it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RCTID on March 18, 2012, 05:20:14 PM
if we're talking 80's sound and solo Mike Love tracks... i think they should bust out a cover of "Rockin' the Man in the Boat"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alex on March 18, 2012, 09:47:50 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X

Poor spelling, not poor grammar.  :-D  I offer you the Whitman defence:

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

Sorry, but I've got to call you (and for that matter, all Brits) out on this one: D-E-F-E-N-S-E         :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 19, 2012, 12:59:46 AM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X

Poor spelling, not poor grammar.  :-D  I offer you the Whitman defence:

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

Sorry, but I've got to call you (and for that matter, all Brits) out on this one: D-E-F-E-N-S-E         :lol

You Americans have America's Band, we Brits have the English language. Read the name. It's named after a place in Britland, called England.

You know, near London.

We Brits have always cherished both.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 19, 2012, 01:04:17 AM
Richard II (circa 1595), act 2 scene 1:

"This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house..."

 ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 19, 2012, 03:30:00 AM
I think Mike's last unreleased album did have a few really nice tunes, but if I'm given the choice of either having a Mike Love composition or an unheard Brian Wilson composition, I'm gonna go with Brian's. Even though some of the songs from Mike's latest work were pretty good, I think the only that is truly Beach Boys worthy is "Cool Head". The others are good within a Mike Love solo project, but I think the standard for material should be a bit higher than that for this Beach Boys album. Maybe it'll come to be known that Mike's stuff was better than the stuff that they came up with for the new album, but I doubt it.

Daybreak is absolutely worthy of revisiting. Remarkably dumb of the band not to have done so already.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 19, 2012, 05:39:06 AM
I think Mike's last unreleased album did have a few really nice tunes, but if I'm given the choice of either having a Mike Love composition or an unheard Brian Wilson composition, I'm gonna go with Brian's. Even though some of the songs from Mike's latest work were pretty good, I think the only that is truly Beach Boys worthy is "Cool Head". The others are good within a Mike Love solo project, but I think the standard for material should be a bit higher than that for this Beach Boys album. Maybe it'll come to be known that Mike's stuff was better than the stuff that they came up with for the new album, but I doubt it.

Daybreak is absolutely worthy of revisiting.


Yeah, that song came to my mind as well.
I also love "I don't wanna know" (the original from the 70s is also great). Imo one of Mike's best songs ever. But it wouldn't fit on a Beach Boys album imo unless it's a Wild Honey-style record


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on March 19, 2012, 01:12:09 PM
According to the examiner.com, Mark Lindsay (of Paul Revere & The Raiders) has co-written a  song with Brian on the new Beach Boys album...

http://www.examiner.com/retro-music-in-austin/mark-lindsay-of-the-raiders-releases-new-cd-writes-song-for-beach-boys-album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 19, 2012, 02:36:42 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X

Poor spelling, not poor grammar.  :-D  I offer you the Whitman defence:

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

Sorry, but I've got to call you (and for that matter, all Brits) out on this one: D-E-F-E-N-S-E         :lol

You Americans have America's Band, we Brits have the English language. Read the name. It's named after a place in Britland, called England.

You know, near London.

We Brits have always cherished both.

We should copyright the English language, and penalise cuuntries who misspell words!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 19, 2012, 02:42:28 PM
According to the examiner.com, Mark Lindsay (of Paul Revere & The Raiders) has co-written a  song with Brian on the new Beach Boys album...

http://www.examiner.com/retro-music-in-austin/mark-lindsay-of-the-raiders-releases-new-cd-writes-song-for-beach-boys-album

Interesting if Brian really did write a song with him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on March 19, 2012, 09:48:48 PM
This is getting rather far afield.. I hate to seem so pedantic, but may we have  more scholarly, focused discussions with real information according to the rubric of this topic? Perhaps I do not understand the genre of a message board, but I want concrete information and  learned speculation.  The Lindsay info is usefully, but much else is off topic over the past several days. Perhaps it is simply the product of our collective frustration and anticipation over this new album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on March 19, 2012, 09:56:47 PM
This is getting rather far afield.. I hate to seem so pedantic, but may we have  more scholarly, focused discussions with real information according to the rubric of this topic? Perhaps I do not understand the genre of a message board, but I want concrete information and  learned speculation.  The Lindsay info is usefully, but much else is off topic over the past several days. Perhaps it is simply the product of our collective frustration and anticipation over this new album?
The genre of a message board? Use the Professor persona only when you understand the words you are typing.

If you really don't understand messageboards, there is a great introduction: some jerk correcting your grammar/spelling/syntax.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: endofposts on March 19, 2012, 11:18:57 PM
This is getting rather far afield.. I hate to seem so pedantic, but may we have  more scholarly, focused discussions with real information according to the rubric of this topic? Perhaps I do not understand the genre of a message board, but I want concrete information and  learned speculation.  The Lindsay info is usefully, but much else is off topic over the past several days. Perhaps it is simply the product of our collective frustration and anticipation over this new album?

Van Dyke?  Is that you?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 19, 2012, 11:27:37 PM
This is getting rather far afield.. I hate to seem so pedantic, but may we have  more scholarly, focused discussions with real information according to the rubric of this topic? Perhaps I do not understand the genre of a message board, but I want concrete information and  learned speculation.  The Lindsay info is usefully, but much else is off topic over the past several days. Perhaps it is simply the product of our collective frustration and anticipation over this new album?

Van Dyke?  Is that you?



I think it might be!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 19, 2012, 11:38:17 PM
Judging by his posting history it's not

VDP would not watch the "do it again" video 400 times


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: endofposts on March 19, 2012, 11:39:23 PM
Hiding by his posting history it's not

VDP would not watch the "do it again" video 400 times

He's trying to be ironic and facetious.  That's how he rolls. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 20, 2012, 12:18:02 AM
Not sure where to post this picture but anyway...

From Mike's FB...over the weekend while in Mexico during his birthday.  Anyone know why Bruce has ear monitors?  Did they do perform while in Mexico?  Seems a bit weird....

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/430406_270553646356817_125419450870238_604938_1761731054_n.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 20, 2012, 12:33:07 AM
Looks like the boys were at Philip greens exclusive birthday

They must have performed


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 20, 2012, 12:43:16 AM
Maybe he was on his 401th listen of DIA, on his iPod?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 20, 2012, 06:17:21 AM
This is getting rather far afield.. I hate to seem so pedantic, but may we have  more scholarly, focused discussions with real information according to the rubric of this topic? Perhaps I do not understand the genre of a message board, but I want concrete information and  learned speculation.  The Lindsay info is usefully, but much else is off topic over the past several days. Perhaps it is simply the product of our collective frustration and anticipation over this new album?
Ooo get you sista!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 20, 2012, 07:45:51 AM
Not sure where to post this picture but anyway...

From Mike's FB...over the weekend while in Mexico during his birthday.  Anyone know why Bruce has ear monitors?  Did they do perform while in Mexico?  Seems a bit weird....

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/430406_270553646356817_125419450870238_604938_1761731054_n.jpg)

So, Bruce was a guest at Mike's b-day party in Mexico, huh? I guess those two are real buddies then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 20, 2012, 08:20:49 AM
They might just be ear plugs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 20, 2012, 08:38:18 AM
And Ronnie Wood too!!! :smokin :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on March 20, 2012, 09:02:08 AM
And Ronnie Wood too!!! :smokin :smokin
Ronnie's wearing the special garment that was given out to those invited to the bash.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 20, 2012, 01:14:45 PM
Nice photo.  Cool to see Wood hanging with the guys.  Didn't Bruce have some medical procedure a few years ago?  It seems like he has aged considerably in the last few years...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on March 21, 2012, 05:32:11 AM
Nice photo.  Cool to see Wood hanging with the guys.  Didn't Bruce have some medical procedure a few years ago?  It seems like he has aged considerably in the last few years...

Bruce had a quadruple heart bypass around the time Brian debuted SMiLE


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on March 21, 2012, 05:42:16 AM
 :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Real Barnyard on March 21, 2012, 05:38:00 PM
Will Don't Fight The Sea be on the new album?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=373838322647451&set=at.205985672766051.55341.100000638589261.100001449127373.1839964198&type=1&theater


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AllIWannaDo on March 21, 2012, 05:42:38 PM
What's D'Amico gonna do. His initial responsibility in Brian's band was a percussionist, then Nelson took over after Mike left. Then he got back in the band and became the drummer after Sucherman and Hines left. He's another multi-talented guy, though, and can play guitar, keys, and bass when called upon.

But The Boys already have a drummer and 1/2 in Cowsill and Stamos and about 5 guitarists, two keyboardists, and a bass player.  Man, if D'Amico joins too, that stage is really gonna be full!

I seriously doubt Stamos will feature on any more than a very few US shows: remember how he announced he was taking part than swiftly retracted it a few days later ? Personally speaking, one would be far too many.

may i say i am slightly saddened with the poor grammar shown on here  :lol  :o :lol :lol :-X

Poor spelling, not poor grammar.  :-D  I offer you the Whitman defence:

"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."

Sorry, but I've got to call you (and for that matter, all Brits) out on this one: D-E-F-E-N-S-E         :lol

You Americans have America's Band, we Brits have the English language. Read the name. It's named after a place in Britland, called England.

You know, near London.

We Brits have always cherished both.

We should copyright the English language, and penalise cuuntries who misspell words!

Dear Lord, Look at the monster i have created  :lol :'( :'( :jedi


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 21, 2012, 05:45:50 PM
Will Don't Fight The Sea be on the new album?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=373838322647451&set=at.205985672766051.55341.100000638589261.100001449127373.1839964198&type=1&theater


I believe Al said in a recent interview that they were making a video for the U.S. government that features the song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Real Barnyard on March 21, 2012, 05:57:56 PM
Will Don't Fight The Sea be on the new album?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=373838322647451&set=at.205985672766051.55341.100000638589261.100001449127373.1839964198&type=1&theater


I believe Al said in a recent interview that they were making a video for the U.S. government that features the song.

Ok, I forgot I had read it in the interview.
I prefer Don't Fight The Sea not to be included in the new album because I want all new songs  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rich Panteluk on March 21, 2012, 07:01:40 PM
While I, too, would prefer new material for the new BB album, it makes me very happy to see Matt Jardine doing the high parts here.  I feel Matt comes the closest to the feel of Brian's high parts.  I know there has been talk (some unpleasant) regarding Jeffrey Foskett, but I still like his vocals (Thru My Window is one of the best BB flavoured albums and if you haven't heard it, it is very much worth your time).  But in my semi-celebrity mud wrestling match between Foskett, Kirsch, Baker, and Matt J for the coveted prize of delivering the high parts at the reunion gig I would give the nod to Matt. I have much respect for all of those singers though as those are very tough parts and hard shoes to fill.  I'd love to see Matt Jardine throw in a few high parts for the album or reunion tour.  He has a bit of that whinge that made Brian's parts ooze with a good kind of yearning.  Maybe that's just me though...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 21, 2012, 07:38:55 PM
I really hope don't fight the sea is not on the new album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 21, 2012, 07:51:27 PM
Will Don't Fight The Sea be on the new album?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=373838322647451&set=at.205985672766051.55341.100000638589261.100001449127373.1839964198&type=1&theater


I believe Al said in a recent interview that they were making a video for the U.S. government that features the song.

He said last night at his concert that they were filming it today


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on March 21, 2012, 09:25:21 PM
Don't Fight the Sea was described by some as the "holy grail" when it came out because it was the closest we could ever come to a reunion; that Carl was there as well gave it obvious, further appeal.  But now that we have a real reunion on our hands, I too prefer that it not be duplicated here.  it's a good song, but the "polar bear" verse is politically facile and is becoming, in fact, cringe worthy. Overt political statements in music often fail, and that "global warming" verse is overwrought and mawkish. Let the song make its own fate as composed (Terry Jacks et al?), performed by several BB, and produced ,so lovingly, by Al.

By the way, I am not VDP, though I was flattered by the courtly comparison.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on March 21, 2012, 09:28:22 PM
Don't Fight the Sea was described by some as the "holy grail" when it came out because it was the closest we could ever come to a reunion; that Carl was there as well gave it obvious, further appeal.  But now that we have a real reunion on our hands, I too prefer that it not be duplicated here.  it's a good song, but the "polar bear" verse is politically facile and is becoming, in fact, cringe worthy. Overt political statements in music often fail, and that "global warming" verse is overwrought and mawkish. Let the song make its own fate as composed (Terry Jacks et al?), performed by several BB, and produced ,so lovingly, by Al.


I agree with VDP; we don't need another recording of this song.  And without Carl involved?  Nuts to that.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on March 22, 2012, 02:14:09 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/532438_10150691157372487_183982922486_9390144_536176837_n.jpg)

From the Facebook.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 22, 2012, 02:26:50 AM
Bruce, Matt & Dave = harmonising.
Brian = "how the heck did I get here?"
Al = "heck guys, he's coming round..."
Mike = "try to look like you're singing - he'll think it's 1964!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on March 22, 2012, 04:14:44 AM
Please God don't let Bruce wear shorts for any of the reunion gigs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 22, 2012, 04:46:25 AM
Please God don't let Bruce wear shorts for any of the reunion gigs.


T.H.I.S.






BTW It's great to see Matt with the guys. Hope he will be part of the reunion anyway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 22, 2012, 04:49:01 AM
So that's Matt Jardine at a reunion vocal session? Cool beans.


Does that mean everybody won't bitch about Foskett's falsetto ruining the new record, and how they wish Matt Jardine were doing it?  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 22, 2012, 06:27:48 AM
I also think it would be great if Matt Jardine was involved in the new album; his falsetto does blend the best with them in my opinion. I fear this new photo may be part of a video shoot, in which case they may just be staging some studio footage to mix into this video they’re apparently doing for the song. Hard to say; it looks like the mics are really hooked up and whatnot. Whether this session is “real” or not, hopefully Matt J. got to be part of some of the new album sessions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 22, 2012, 06:37:09 AM
Don't Fight the Sea was described by some as the "holy grail" when it came out because it was the closest we could ever come to a reunion; that Carl was there as well gave it obvious, further appeal.  But now that we have a real reunion on our hands, I too prefer that it not be duplicated here.  it's a good song, but the "polar bear" verse is politically facile and is becoming, in fact, cringe worthy. Overt political statements in music often fail, and that "global warming" verse is overwrought and mawkish. Let the song make its own fate as composed (Terry Jacks et al?), performed by several BB, and produced ,so lovingly, by Al.

By the way, I am not VDP, though I was flattered by the courtly comparison.

I think the one and only reason not to include the song on a new album is because we’ve already seen it released. It would be redundant. But I don’t think anything about the song is “facile” enough to warrant being kept off an album. I’m not making any assumption about the lyrics on the upcoming new album, but my guess is lyrics of the type found in “Don’t Fight the Sea” will end up not being as “facile” as some of the lyrics we may hear on this new album.

I most definitely don’t want to turn this into a debate, and I’m not a huge pro-active advocate for global warming awareness and whatnot, but while Al may intend the song as an overt political statement now, I view it more as an interesting take on not messing with nature. More like, “Don’t f--- with the ocean, because nature is way more powerful than you are.” I actually found this to be an interesting complement to the ocean imagery and references in past BB tracks. In any event, this type of message seems much less overtly political.

I would say that if they are inclined to use stuff on the new album that we’ve already had released, which is something I don’t want to see, then “Don’t Fight the Sea” would make sense as an inclusion. I do wonder if Al would have held it back in 2009/2010 or earlier if he had known that a full-blown reunion album was going to happen in 2012.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on March 22, 2012, 06:58:50 AM
Does that mean everybody won't bitch about Foskett's falsetto ruining the new record, and how they wish Matt Jardine were doing it?  ::)

It means that when the records comes out, everybody will bitch about Matt's falsetto ruining the new record and how they wish Jeff had done them.
That's how BB fandom works.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 22, 2012, 07:24:53 AM
Ah, but of course!

It does worry me that the session is for Don't Fight The Sea. Regardless of whether it's any good or not (hint: I think it's dull and stayed in the can for a very good reason) but it's an actual bonafide track on Al's solo album. Waves Of Love was slated as a bonus, and you'd be able to just not put it on the reissue of Al's solo record. But this will come out on both! That's just terrible business, even for The Beach Boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on March 22, 2012, 09:15:34 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/532438_10150691157372487_183982922486_9390144_536176837_n.jpg)

From the Facebook.

Judging from the cucoloris used to create that background lighting effect, I'd say this was staged for a video. Either that or the Beach Boys only record in studios that employ a full-time gaffer and lighting crew.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 22, 2012, 09:54:26 AM
Hmmm... never seen a cookalorus that shape...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 22, 2012, 10:29:51 AM
Will Don't Fight The Sea be on the new album?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=373838322647451&set=at.205985672766051.55341.100000638589261.100001449127373.1839964198&type=1&theater


I believe Al said in a recent interview that they were making a video for the U.S. government that features the song.


I heard that too. So it doesn't mean that DFTS will be on the new album and therefor this picture might not be from an actual album session (although - to use Mike's expressions - it would make a lot of sense to record while being in a recording studio).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on March 22, 2012, 11:41:09 AM
Ah, but of course!

It does worry me that the session is for Don't Fight The Sea. Regardless of whether it's any good or not (hint: I think it's dull and stayed in the can for a very good reason) but it's an actual bonafide track on Al's solo album. Waves Of Love was slated as a bonus, and you'd be able to just not put it on the reissue of Al's solo record. But this will come out on both! That's just terrible business, even for The Beach Boys.

I hear ya, but anyone that will buy Al Jardine's record will buy the Beach Boys one.  I can't imagine a bunch of people buying the Jardine album and passing the Beach Boys reunion.  Just my opinion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 22, 2012, 11:53:37 AM
"Don't Fight the Sea" has, for whatever reason, been marketed and framed in some interesting ways in the past. It was a Beach Boys recording, but then Al used it for his solo album even though it has more Beach Boys singing on it than some tracks that have been released under the "Beach Boys" name. Then he put it on a charity single with a Beach Boys track on the flip side, but with "Don't Fight the Sea" credited to all of the individual Beach Boys' names rather than the group. So now the Beach Boys are adding to a video for the song, but it's technically the reunited Beach Boys doing a video for an Al Jardine solo track, sort of.

As for putting either or both Al solo tracks on the BB album, it only makes a difference to those of us who simply want more completely "new" songs. It's not really bad marketing in the sense that casual fans that buy the new BB album won't be familiar with Al's solo album, so they won't know or care; and anybody that's a big enough fan to buy Al's solo album will of course buy the BB album. Including "Don't Fight the Sea" or "Waves of Love" will not hurt sales. If anything, it's possible that "Don't Fight the Sea" (or "Waves of Love") might be stronger than some of the other stuff on the album. We just don't know yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on March 22, 2012, 11:58:00 AM
I acknowledge Hey Jude's comments; no need for debate; he correctly associates DFTS with the imagery and themes of the larger corpus.  I am bothered mostly by the "polar bear verse," which is a bit OTT, no? I agree that the main reason the song ought not to be on the album is our thirst for new material and no retreading.

I will never debate to seek victory on a message board; rather, I enjoy learning and being informed.  

I wonder if the available information so far indicates the existence, or the proposed existence, of a Wilson-Love composition (as opposed to Mike's adding a few lyrics to an already written song).

thank you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 22, 2012, 12:43:10 PM
So that's Matt Jardine at a reunion vocal session? Cool beans.

It's not a reunion vocal session.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 22, 2012, 12:55:07 PM
I have just joined this board.  I have read all the posts and am comforted to know that i am not alone in waiting in anxious care about the album.  May I summarize some hopes and, perhaps, provide a focused platform for future information:

1. Are the BB playing instruments, such as on Sunflower and 20 other albums, or are ALL the tracks pre-done, with the BB only adding vocals?

No idea. David Marks is adding guitar parts, at the very least. Substantial tracking preceded the vocal sessions, but there could well be additional tracking done.

Quote
2. DIA is obviously a different category because we see already how it was produced: only David playing.

Although not on the original track. His parts were added later.

Quote
3. Are Mike and Brian writing new songs together ex nihil? Or is Mike adding lyrics to already written songs?

A good question. No definitive answer yet.

Quote
4. Will David's song make the album?

A good question. No definitive answer yet.

Quote
5. Any writing by Bruce and Al?

Probyn has suggested that Bruce was working on a song. And Al has mentioned that "Waves of Love," which he co-wrote in the mid-90s, might be on the record. But we do not know any of this definitively.

Quote
6. Will TWGMR come out as a "single,"  whatever that means in the modern world?

No idea. Although it's the only tune people have really highlighted so far.

Quote
7. Will they do the late-nite TV shows to promote the new album?

No idea. But it would seem like a good idea. Depends on where they would be during the tour, I suspect. They seem to be in the NY area during the first half of May, so it might make sense to do it then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 22, 2012, 01:04:50 PM
"I went out in a boat, that was gently afloat"…

To my ears, possibly one of the the worst lyrical openings to a song, ever, reminds me of the Duck in the Truck kids' book.  Was it being steered by a goat, I wonder?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 22, 2012, 01:46:37 PM
"I went out in a boat, that was gently afloat"…

To my ears, possibly one of the the worst lyrical openings to a song, ever, reminds me of the Duck in the Truck kids' book.  Was it being steered by a goat, I wonder?

Not a shining example of exemplary lyrical composition I suppose, but I’m always wary of singling something about as among the worst ever, of anything. It’s been awhile since a Beach Boys product had a lot of great lyrics going on. I could start running through BB and solo song openings, and probably find some stuff that’s more cringe-worthy. Certainly, stuff like some of the “Love You” lyrics are among the most embarrassing. But for some fans stuff like that is okay because it’s Brian being eccentric and different and innocent.

I’ve never felt like “Don’t Fight the Sea” is A-level BB material, but it’s well above average for the group (or solo variations) both musically and lyrically. Take away the novelty of it being a sort-of “new” BB song, and I still feel it’s better than most of their output since probably “LA (Light Album).”


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 22, 2012, 03:00:40 PM
Certainly, stuff like some of the “Love You” lyrics are among the most embarrassing.


Love You lyrics are genius. I will fist fight anyone who disagrees


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 22, 2012, 03:23:19 PM
Certainly, stuff like some of the “Love You” lyrics are among the most embarrassing.


Love You lyrics are genius. I will fist fight anyone who disagrees

Exactly; I know a lot of fans love that album immensely. I quite like it myself. I don't even need to cite the obvious examples, but to *some*, there are some dire lyrics on that album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on March 22, 2012, 04:46:32 PM
Lyrically, I dislike stuff like Don't Go Near the Water and Take a Load off Your Feet way more than anything on Love You.  I'll take mere awkwardness over trying-too-hard preachiness any day.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 23, 2012, 10:07:59 AM
A new EP ?  :-D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtaESOeLmRg&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtaESOeLmRg&feature=related)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on March 23, 2012, 11:02:03 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on March 23, 2012, 11:58:22 AM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ez0P6NHRAlU/T0VxObgSQkI/AAAAAAAAADk/A01D4oaEgxU/s1600/Troll-Doll-troll-dolls-1353646-302-450.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on March 23, 2012, 12:15:36 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.

(Justin staring blankly)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 23, 2012, 12:17:15 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
No


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 23, 2012, 12:51:56 PM
From facebook:

(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s320x320/553080_327518503973118_100001449127373_943340_725994770_n.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 23, 2012, 01:11:11 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
I hope it is. I agree a change of pace would be nice. Smile has been done, let's move on.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 23, 2012, 04:33:17 PM
brian saying the album is mellow is probably the best news we good have.  They're older gents, they don't rock very well anyway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on March 23, 2012, 05:14:41 PM
Rolling Stone today quoting Glen Frey saying the band has re-thought calling the next tour their 40th Anniversary Tour because it reminds fans of just how old The Eagles are.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 23, 2012, 09:24:30 PM
From facebook:

(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/s320x320/553080_327518503973118_100001449127373_943340_725994770_n.jpg)

Ah, cool pic


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on March 24, 2012, 03:17:36 AM
Sadly, I don't have time to read all of this thread, though great news about a new album!

Could all 35 pages be summed up in a single, knowledgeable, paragraph?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 24, 2012, 03:38:38 AM
Suite like, apparently
Brian says mellow
Probyn says 'eighties'
Al says Pet Sounds
Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.
We may or may not have a track from Al's solo record on it - either Don't Fight The Sea or Waves of Love
Mike has mentioned he might write a song with David.
Brian has been writing with Jeff and Thomas, and maybe Mike.
Mertens is doing string arrangements, Probyn has done a bunch of horn stuff.
We have seen a bunch of photos with Brian's band doing stuff in the studio. Wirestone, however, believes Thomas is bringing in his own musicians. Hopefully the cast for DIA is indicative.
The only new song that they've mentioned, 'That's Why God Invented The Radio' is supposed to be the best thing since peanut butter kitkats.

Think that's all the information thus far. Where's the coffee at?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on March 24, 2012, 04:00:34 AM
mmm, peanut butter kitkats...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 24, 2012, 04:32:57 AM

Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.



I thought Mike was the executive producer. That's what it says in the press release.

You forgot to mention that Brian wrote a song with Mark Lindsay for the new album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on March 24, 2012, 04:45:03 AM
Suite like, apparently
Brian says mellow
Probyn says 'eighties'
Al says Pet Sounds
Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.
We may or may not have a track from Al's solo record on it - either Don't Fight The Sea or Waves of Love
Mike has mentioned he might write a song with David.
Brian has been writing with Jeff and Thomas, and maybe Mike.
Mertens is doing string arrangements, Probyn has done a bunch of horn stuff.
We have seen a bunch of photos with Brian's band doing stuff in the studio. Wirestone, however, believes Thomas is bringing in his own musicians. Hopefully the cast for DIA is indicative.
The only new song that they've mentioned, 'That's Why God Invented The Radio' is supposed to be the best thing since peanut butter kitkats.

Think that's all the information thus far. Where's the coffee at?  ;D

Excellent! Thanks very much.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 24, 2012, 08:56:53 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 24, 2012, 09:11:05 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 24, 2012, 09:29:06 AM
see how 80s was an attempt at 60s, i'm not sure what you'd expect. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 24, 2012, 10:30:51 AM
Suite like, apparently
Brian says mellow
Probyn says 'eighties'
Al says Pet Sounds
Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.
We may or may not have a track from Al's solo record on it - either Don't Fight The Sea or Waves of Love
Mike has mentioned he might write a song with David.
Brian has been writing with Jeff and Thomas, and maybe Mike.
Mertens is doing string arrangements, Probyn has done a bunch of horn stuff.
We have seen a bunch of photos with Brian's band doing stuff in the studio. Wirestone, however, believes Thomas is bringing in his own musicians. Hopefully the cast for DIA is indicative.
The only new song that they've mentioned, 'That's Why God Invented The Radio' is supposed to be the best thing since peanut butter kitkats.

Think that's all the information thus far. Where's the coffee at?  ;D

You forgot to mention Bruce might be doing a song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 24, 2012, 11:00:41 AM
see how 80s was an attempt at 60s, i'm not sure what you'd expect. 
We've got a different Brian now, than in the '80s. And I mean that in a good way, so thereis potential for a "Today" type introspective ballad or 2, I'm hoping for miracles. "She Says That She Needs Me" kind of astounded me, even though it was actually written in '65. Brians' vocals were excellent and they did "finish" it in the '90s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 24, 2012, 11:06:34 AM
yeah the more brian the better.  I hope he's really into it, seems like he is


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 24, 2012, 01:15:25 PM
Suite like, apparently
Brian says mellow
Probyn says 'eighties'
Al says Pet Sounds
Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.
We may or may not have a track from Al's solo record on it - either Don't Fight The Sea or Waves of Love
Mike has mentioned he might write a song with David.
Brian has been writing with Jeff and Thomas, and maybe Mike.
Mertens is doing string arrangements, Probyn has done a bunch of horn stuff.
We have seen a bunch of photos with Brian's band doing stuff in the studio. Wirestone, however, believes Thomas is bringing in his own musicians. Hopefully the cast for DIA is indicative.
The only new song that they've mentioned, 'That's Why God Invented The Radio' is supposed to be the best thing since peanut butter kitkats.

Think that's all the information thus far. Where's the coffee at?  ;D

I don't "believe" anything, one way or the other. We know that Brian was tracking last year, and some of the work he did was with musicians Joe used on Stars and Stripes and Imagination. At least, according to Rolling Stone:

"Beach Boys session vet Eddie Bayers says he recently played drums on new Wilson tracks slated for a Beach Boys reunion record. "Brian's new creations are just unbelievable," says Bayers."

www.rollingstone.com/music/news/beach-boys-plan-anniversary-blowout-with-likely-reunion-tour-20110928#ixzz1q4D85GHE

I also don't believe the entire album is supposed to be suite-like. Just a closing batch of songs.

As AGD just said, Probyn did say that it seems like Bruce is contributing a track to the record as well.


Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.



I thought Mike was the executive producer. That's what it says in the press release.

You forgot to mention that Brian wrote a song with Mark Lindsay for the new album

In the Probyn Gregory interview from a week or so ago, he said JT was the executive producer.

Also, the Mark Lindsay thing is unconfirmed for now. One source says the song is written:

"Mark revealed some exciting project news to his fans. He wrote a song with Brian Wilson for the new Beach Boys album."

http://www.examiner.com/retro-music-in-austin/mark-lindsay-of-the-raiders-releases-new-cd-writes-song-for-beach-boys-album#ixzz1q4ERMOw5

But another source -- from the same day -- says it's just a possibility. (Both things are from March 14):

"I had an opportunity to chat with Mark for a few minutes about music. He spoke about the possibility of doing something with Brian Wilson, which I know would be a thrill for Mark, as well as for us! "

http://community.marklindsay.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/594107531/m/60420945941/r/26720674151


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mtaber on March 24, 2012, 01:34:07 PM
I had a dream two nights ago.  The new album was out and I bought it on vinyl.  It was a double album, but when I opened it I found that the 2nd side of record #2 was totally blank.  I thought to myself "what a horribly bad marketing idea"... then I played a track titled "Worth It", written by Brian and Mike, only to find that it was actually a (poorly done) re-make of "Wouldn't It Be Nice".  Also, side 3 featured a 12-minute track written by Bruce.  In my dream, I said aloud "you've got to be fu*king kidding me!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 24, 2012, 02:02:27 PM
I had a dream two nights ago.  The new album was out and I bought it on vinyl.  It was a double album, but when I opened it I found that the 2nd side of record #2 was totally blank.  I thought to myself "what a horribly bad marketing idea"... :lol then I played a track titled "Worth It", written by Brian and Mike, only to find that it was actually a (poorly done) re-make of "Wouldn't It Be Nice".  Also, side 3 featured a 12-minute track written by Bruce.  In my dream, I said aloud "you've got to be fu*king kidding me!"  :lol :lol :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 24, 2012, 02:17:16 PM
I had a dream two nights ago.  The new album was out and I bought it on vinyl.  It was a double album, but when I opened it I found that the 2nd side of record #2 was totally blank.  I thought to myself "what a horribly bad marketing idea"... then I played a track titled "Worth It", written by Brian and Mike, only to find that it was actually a (poorly done) re-make of "Wouldn't It Be Nice".  Also, side 3 featured a 12-minute track written by Bruce.  In my dream, I said aloud "you've got to be fu*king kidding me!"



I dreamed last night that the album was out and track number 2 was called "Island Kokomo". It was "Kokomo" only with a spoken introduction. The rest of the album wasn't any better but the only title I remember is "Amore only knows". How's that for a bad dream ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 24, 2012, 02:21:42 PM
I had a dream two nights ago.  The new album was out and I bought it on vinyl.  It was a double album, but when I opened it I found that the 2nd side of record #2 was totally blank.  I thought to myself "what a horribly bad marketing idea"... then I played a track titled "Worth It", written by Brian and Mike, only to find that it was actually a (poorly done) re-make of "Wouldn't It Be Nice".  Also, side 3 featured a 12-minute track written by Bruce.  In my dream, I said aloud "you've got to be fu*king kidding me!"
actaully that side is going to consist of the tracks "surfin #9","Two Surfers","The surfers album" and "life with the surfers" with a bonus track called "Carnival of surfers" and "the sufers sound callage"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 24, 2012, 06:51:32 PM
Suite like, apparently
Brian says mellow
Probyn says 'eighties'
Al says Pet Sounds
Thomas is 'executive producing', which implies he's not actually producing.
We may or may not have a track from Al's solo record on it - either Don't Fight The Sea or Waves of Love
Mike has mentioned he might write a song with David.
Brian has been writing with Jeff and Thomas, and maybe Mike.
Mertens is doing string arrangements, Probyn has done a bunch of horn stuff.
We have seen a bunch of photos with Brian's band doing stuff in the studio. Wirestone, however, believes Thomas is bringing in his own musicians. Hopefully the cast for DIA is indicative.
The only new song that they've mentioned, 'That's Why God Invented The Radio' is supposed to be the best thing since peanut butter kitkats.

Think that's all the information thus far. Where's the coffee at?  ;D

I don't "believe" anything, one way or the other. We know that Brian was tracking last year, and some of the work he did was with musicians Joe used on Stars and Stripes and Imagination. At least, according to Rolling Stone:

"Beach Boys session vet Eddie Bayers says he recently played drums on new Wilson tracks slated for a Beach Boys reunion record. "Brian's new creations are just unbelievable," says Bayers."

www.rollingstone.com/music/news/beach-boys-plan-anniversary-blowout-with-likely-reunion-tour-20110928#ixzz1q4D85GHE

I also don't believe the entire album is supposed to be suite-like. Just a closing batch of songs.



We haven't heard any further indication that it's Thomas' guys - but then, the evidence for it all being Brian's band or the touring Beach Boys isn't plentiful. We just don't know who's playing on it!

I'll concede the suite thing - I misremembered Brian's interview.

Man..... I wanna hear this album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 24, 2012, 09:37:16 PM
I had a dream two nights ago.  The new album was out and I bought it on vinyl.  It was a double album, but when I opened it I found that the 2nd side of record #2 was totally blank.  I thought to myself "what a horribly bad marketing idea"... then I played a track titled "Worth It", written by Brian and Mike, only to find that it was actually a (poorly done) re-make of "Wouldn't It Be Nice".  Also, side 3 featured a 12-minute track written by Bruce.  In my dream, I said aloud "you've got to be fu*king kidding me!"

I dreamed last night that the album was out and track number 2 was called "Island Kokomo". It was "Kokomo" only with a spoken introduction. The rest of the album wasn't any better but the only title I remember is "Amore only knows". How's that for a bad dream ?

lolololololololol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 07:21:20 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews; whereas images of five old men in flowery t-shirts on a beach reinforces the misconception of the BB's as 'surfing doris days', and a backwards-looking album of nostalgia is liable to do likewise.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on March 25, 2012, 08:42:07 AM
It is interesting how we look at 45-year-old pop music as being experimental and progressive, but the 47 to 50-year-old pop music (which was in its own way experimental and progressive) as nostalgic or passe. There was a tremendous amount of creativity in both of the primary understandings of the band, but both are long since stuff of the past. Recreating either sound is going to result in equal pastiche; it's just a matter of the subject being fetishized. And no result is going to do much more than sell a shitload of copies to people who are already fans of the band. There will be no grand introduction to a young audience suddenly in love with septagenarians (or soon-to-bes).

So the safe bet commercially is going to be the Today-through-Pet Sounds sound, with enough (by now well-worn) quirks inserted to give the casual Brianista something to think shows he's still 24 and doing something new. That's their bread and butter that hits the sweet spot for most all listeners and band members.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 25, 2012, 08:54:37 AM
Good or bad, any new tracks played live during the reunion will be the signal for most to hit the can and the refreshment stand.

Just the way it is.  :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 10:11:19 AM
It is interesting how we look at 45-year-old pop music as being experimental and progressive, but the 47 to 50-year-old pop music (which was in its own way experimental and progressive) as nostalgic or passe. There was a tremendous amount of creativity in both of the primary understandings of the band, but both are long since stuff of the past. Recreating either sound is going to result in equal pastiche; it's just a matter of the subject being fetishized. And no result is going to do much more than sell a sh*tload of copies to people who are already fans of the band. There will be no grand introduction to a young audience suddenly in love with septagenarians (or soon-to-bes).

So the safe bet commercially is going to be the Today-through-Pet Sounds sound, with enough (by now well-worn) quirks inserted to give the casual Brianista something to think shows he's still 24 and doing something new. That's their bread and butter that hits the sweet spot for most all listeners and band members.

I see your point, although i DON'T consider the 47-to-50 year old music as passe; it was considered shockingly new and, yes, experimental at the time, and listening to, say, Custom Machine or Dont Back Down can still leave me in awe of just how much musical invention Brian could fit into such short, catchy songs. But... the constant regression to this period of their music for what has been the best part of four decades now... it really does seem to consistently dent their critical (if not commercial) standing. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on March 25, 2012, 10:18:08 AM
But exceptions to stagnation, regression, or dissolution over decades of pop music are few and far between. We'd all love to see our favorites continuously progress artistically and ideally commercially, but the truth is most acts can do neither. Honestly, the fact that the Beach Boys can continue to be a successful touring act, that Brian Wilson can continue to captivate the media and a certain segment of the public, and that the back catalog remains popular is pretty remarkable in itself. That already defies realistic expectations.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 25, 2012, 10:37:40 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews; whereas images of five old men in flowery t-shirts on a beach reinforces the misconception of the BB's as 'surfing doris days', and a backwards-looking album of nostalgia is liable to do likewise.
The fact is they are five older men in flowery shirts. What's that have to do with the music. I don't know who wants a "backwards looking album  of nostalgia"? Not me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 11:19:37 AM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews; whereas images of five old men in flowery t-shirts on a beach reinforces the misconception of the BB's as 'surfing doris days', and a backwards-looking album of nostalgia is liable to do likewise.
The fact is they are five older men in flowery shirts. What's that have to do with the music. I don't know who wants a "backwards looking album  of nostalgia"? Not me.

I didn't say anyone WANTED it, just that that's what we might well get. And re 'what has the flowery shirt photos got to do with the music' - as the group's fortunes showed circa 1967-1970 - image is (sadly) important.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 25, 2012, 12:09:18 PM
... and suddenly a piece of the puzzle fell into place with a considerable thud. Damn, I'm good.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 12:18:04 PM
... and suddenly a piece of the puzzle fell into place with a considerable thud. Damn, I'm good.  ;D

Huh??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on March 25, 2012, 12:20:27 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews;

The opposite opposite is the case.  

1.  Nobody buys CD's anymore.  Even less people buy 100 dollar boxsets.  

2.  Out of the few people that actually Do buy CD's, none of them bought the Smile Sessions outside of people with usernames on this board, or people that are actually in Brian's band.  Nobody in Mike's band bought The Smile Sessions.  Bruce has one, but Capitol Records gave it to him for free.  He accidentally left it in a VFW lodge in Wisconsin about 4 months ago.  

3.  If the Beach Boys record an album full of Doris Day covers and call it "Summer's Gone"... it will sell at least twice as many copies as the Smile Sessions.

Just thought I'd put that back in perspective for you, you've kind of lost the plot.  

You need to eventually get to the point where you do not care what critics say about their music, and enjoy it because YOU enjoy it, not some snot-nosed kid who writes a review on Amazon and says he doesn't like their shirts.  

Who gives a sh*t what the critics thing, or what the Beach Boys legacy is?  If people don't enjoy the music, that's their loss, not mine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 12:36:34 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews;

The opposite opposite is the case.  

1.  Nobody buys CD's anymore.  Even less people buy 100 dollar boxsets.  

2.  Out of the few people that actually Do buy CD's, none of them bought the Smile Sessions outside of people with usernames on this board, or people that are actually in Brian's band.  Nobody in Mike's band bought The Smile Sessions.  Bruce has one, but Capitol Records gave it to him for free.  He accidentally left it in a VFW lodge in Wisconsin about 4 months ago.  

3.  If the Beach Boys record an album full of Doris Day covers and call it "Summer's Gone"... it will sell at least twice as many copies as the Smile Sessions.

Just thought I'd put that back in perspective for you, you've kind of lost the plot.  

You need to eventually get to the point where you do not care what critics say about their music, and enjoy it because YOU enjoy it, not some snot-nosed kid who writes a review on Amazon and says he doesn't like their shirts.  

Who gives a sh*t what the critics thing, or what the Beach Boys legacy is?  If people don't enjoy the music, that's their loss, not mine.

Hmm yes, just one slight problem with everything you've just said, in that... it was all b*llocks!

The Smile box SOLD OUT in the UK. And of course critical evaluations play a part in the groups legacy (in any groups legacy for that matter...). Otherwise Jon Stebbins, Andrew G Doe, etc would just be wasting their time. It'd be nice to simply sheild oneself from everyone else's opinions and just think 'Yeah I'm right and everyone else is wrong', but some of us care so passionately about the group that the group's critical standing and reputation matters and is important to us.

Oh, and while i can't speak for the condition of your own nostrils, I'm 30 and mine are relatively snot-free. And I've never ordered anything on and/or written anything on Amazon in my life.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 25, 2012, 12:43:44 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews;

The opposite opposite is the case.  

1.  Nobody buys CD's anymore.  Even less people buy 100 dollar boxsets.  

2.  Out of the few people that actually Do buy CD's, none of them bought the Smile Sessions outside of people with usernames on this board, or people that are actually in Brian's band.  Nobody in Mike's band bought The Smile Sessions.  Bruce has one, but Capitol Records gave it to him for free.  He accidentally left it in a VFW lodge in Wisconsin about 4 months ago.  

3.  If the Beach Boys record an album full of Doris Day covers and call it "Summer's Gone"... it will sell at least twice as many copies as the Smile Sessions.

Just thought I'd put that back in perspective for you, you've kind of lost the plot.  

You need to eventually get to the point where you do not care what critics say about their music, and enjoy it because YOU enjoy it, not some snot-nosed kid who writes a review on Amazon and says he doesn't like their shirts.  

Who gives a sh*t what the critics thing, or what the Beach Boys legacy is?  If people don't enjoy the music, that's their loss, not mine.
An honest and accurate rebuttal , thank you, Ron.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 25, 2012, 12:46:18 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews;

The opposite opposite is the case.  

1.  Nobody buys CD's anymore.  Even less people buy 100 dollar boxsets.  

2.  Out of the few people that actually Do buy CD's, none of them bought the Smile Sessions outside of people with usernames on this board, or people that are actually in Brian's band.  Nobody in Mike's band bought The Smile Sessions.  Bruce has one, but Capitol Records gave it to him for free.  He accidentally left it in a VFW lodge in Wisconsin about 4 months ago.  

3.  If the Beach Boys record an album full of Doris Day covers and call it "Summer's Gone"... it will sell at least twice as many copies as the Smile Sessions.

Just thought I'd put that back in perspective for you, you've kind of lost the plot.  

You need to eventually get to the point where you do not care what critics say about their music, and enjoy it because YOU enjoy it, not some snot-nosed kid who writes a review on Amazon and says he doesn't like their shirts.  

Who gives a sh*t what the critics thing, or what the Beach Boys legacy is?  If people don't enjoy the music, that's their loss, not mine.

Hmm yes, just one slight problem with everything you've just said, in that... it was all b*llocks!

The Smile box SOLD OUT in the UK. And of course critical evaluations play a part in the groups legacy (in any groups legacy for that matter...). Otherwise Jon Stebbins, Andrew G Doe, etc would just be wasting their time. It'd be nice to simply sheild oneself from everyone else's opinions and just think 'Yeah I'm right and everyone else is wrong', but some of us care so passionately about the group that the group's critical standing and reputation matters and is important to us.

Oh, and while i can't speak for the condition of your own nostrils, I'm 30 and mine are relatively snot-free. And I've never ordered anything on and/or written anything on Amazon in my life.
The ship has sailed on the groups' "image", get in touch with reality. The only thing that matters is the music,


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 12:51:13 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.
This dude is a glutton for punishment >: ::) ::)
Don't know why, he's got a valid point. Smile was a blip on the BBs career radar screen. Some hit-like material would be fantastic and a breath of fresh air. "60's -type hit material, not '80s.

I would say the exact opposite is the case: the SMiLE cd and boxset has been a real reminder to the music-buying public at large re Brian and the Beach Boys experimental genius and their musical originality and credibility, recieving as it has almost universal praise and good reviews;

The opposite opposite is the case. 

1.  Nobody buys CD's anymore.  Even less people buy 100 dollar boxsets. 

2.  Out of the few people that actually Do buy CD's, none of them bought the Smile Sessions outside of people with usernames on this board, or people that are actually in Brian's band.  Nobody in Mike's band bought The Smile Sessions.  Bruce has one, but Capitol Records gave it to him for free.  He accidentally left it in a VFW lodge in Wisconsin about 4 months ago. 

3.  If the Beach Boys record an album full of Doris Day covers and call it "Summer's Gone"... it will sell at least twice as many copies as the Smile Sessions.

Just thought I'd put that back in perspective for you, you've kind of lost the plot. 

You need to eventually get to the point where you do not care what critics say about their music, and enjoy it because YOU enjoy it, not some snot-nosed kid who writes a review on Amazon and says he doesn't like their shirts. 

Who gives a sh*t what the critics thing, or what the Beach Boys legacy is?  If people don't enjoy the music, that's their loss, not mine.

Hmm yes, just one slight problem with everything you've just said, in that... it was all b*llocks!

The Smile box SOLD OUT in the UK. And of course critical evaluations play a part in the groups legacy (in any groups legacy for that matter...). Otherwise Jon Stebbins, Andrew G Doe, etc would just be wasting their time. It'd be nice to simply sheild oneself from everyone else's opinions and just think 'Yeah I'm right and everyone else is wrong', but some of us care so passionately about the group that the group's critical standing and reputation matters and is important to us.

Oh, and while i can't speak for the condition of your own nostrils, I'm 30 and mine are relatively snot-free. And I've never ordered anything on and/or written anything on Amazon in my life.
The ship has sailed on the groups' "image", get in touch with reality. The only thing that matters is the music,

Yes, why not completely misunderstand what it is i'm saying? Oh, you already have. Well done.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 25, 2012, 12:54:47 PM
um i'm pretty sure more than 50 people bought the smile sessions.  unless we have the power to chart on billboard lol. if Ron was serious, that was pretty laughable. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 01:01:05 PM
um i'm pretty sure more than 50 people bought the smile sessions.  unless we have the power to chart on billboard lol. if Ron was serious, that was pretty laughable. 

Yes, see my previous post for a perfect one-word description of what he is talking. A clue: begins with B, ends with K, eight letters. Rhymes with frollocks.

Smile was a success; and the suggestion that it's positive reception isn't important to the group (and Brian) is just ridiculous...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 25, 2012, 01:04:39 PM
'Nobody in Mike's band bought the Smile sessions'?

Could this be the single worst rebuttal to an argument in the history of the English language?

Curious as to how you know though? You a personal friend of 'Mike's band'? Or did Mike officially announce 'No one in my band bought the Smile sessions'? Must've missed that one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 25, 2012, 01:13:16 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 25, 2012, 01:48:15 PM
'Nobody in Mike's band bought the Smile sessions'?

Could this be the single worst rebuttal to an argument in the history of the English language?

Curious as to how you know though? You a personal friend of 'Mike's band'? Or did Mike officially announce 'No one in my band bought the Smile sessions'? Must've missed that one.
I'm pretty sure Ron was being facetious in his remarks but  the truth lies therein.
It's obvious to me that he's addressing a "segment" of BBs fandom that tends to diminish the importance of Brians' (and the bands') work prior to Pet Sounds-Smile era. Maybe I'm wrong. Also the concern for the bands' image is ludicrous at this point.  If it wasn't for the flowery shirts, if it wasn't for Mikes dancing....come on the BBs are who they are, you can't change history and trying to convince "non-believers" into recognizing the greatness of their career as a complete entity is a toal waste of time. I've loved the music during the most difficult years to be a fan (late '60s) , so I know of what I speak.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on March 25, 2012, 02:09:49 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.

Fantastic.

I honestly never thought we'd get another album out of them, them meaning with Brian. I can't wait! Very excited.

June 6th 1988. When I first heard a Beach Boys album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 25, 2012, 02:28:49 PM
I just want The Beach Boys to be known for rocking again. The Smile Sessions was a huge disappointment and didn't have enough guitar-ness to be awesome. I can't wait for this new album to come out and completely tower over the release of the material from that ill-begotten era. I just get the feeling that this new studio effort is what everyone will be talking about for the next ten years instead of Smile.

I'm sorry, but any recordings of the Beach Boys or its members "rocking" since some time in the early 80s have almost always been hilariously bad and sounded extremely dated.  There are different approaches, really - "Morning Beat" is kind of a rock song, but "rocks" in a tasteful way. However, instances of this have been pretty rare.

Meanwhile, I've heard way too many things from these folks that sound like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84v9v1ucFxQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84v9v1ucFxQ)

And man, I just can't listen to this sort of sound without picturing some kind of "HILARIOUS" Full House-esque montage going over the top of it. Or a God damn baby dancing in the middle of it or something. Cliche rock chord progressions, sterile production, and no doubt, absolutely "silly" falsetto going on, probably supplied by Jeff.

No no no no no no no. This is the last thing I want to hear out of these kids nowadays. Besides, no Carl = no rock.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on March 25, 2012, 02:31:41 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.


f*** yeah.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on March 25, 2012, 03:39:58 PM
Quote
Besides, no Carl = no rock.

As great as Carl was, David is/was a better guitar player.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 25, 2012, 03:42:18 PM
Quote
Besides, no Carl = no rock.

As great as Carl was, David is/was a better guitar player.


"Rock" doesn't necessarily mean "guitar playing".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 25, 2012, 03:49:56 PM
Besides, no Carl = no rock.
No Carl no rock..? No Dennis no rock!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on March 25, 2012, 04:00:00 PM
Quote
Besides, no Carl = no rock.

As great as Carl was, David is/was a better guitar player.


"Rock" doesn't necessarily mean "guitar playing".
Rock that Theremin! :woot


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 25, 2012, 05:00:19 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.
What's the Hoff?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on March 25, 2012, 06:28:36 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.
What's the Hoff?
The Steve Hoffman Forum. Steve Hoffman is a Mastering Engineer who has done work for DCC and Audio Fidelity, in case you don't know who he is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: astroray on March 25, 2012, 07:35:46 PM
06/05/12
[CD]: 5099960282422
[VINYL]: 5099946319913


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on March 25, 2012, 07:44:50 PM
Someone's posted a release date of June 5th over on the Hoff, with UPC codes. That would make sense, two days before the TV special airs.
:woot :woot :woot :woot


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 25, 2012, 08:02:26 PM
Wow, so a little more than 2 months?

I wonder how long before that they will release a single...................................................


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 25, 2012, 08:49:10 PM
single in a month i'd think?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 25, 2012, 08:58:50 PM
Awesome news, were so close now


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on March 25, 2012, 10:03:24 PM
Quote
Besides, no Carl = no rock.

As great as Carl was, David is/was a better guitar player.


"Rock" doesn't necessarily mean "guitar playing".
Rock that Theremin! :woot

Or bang that piano!
Happy Birthday, Elton! :3d


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on March 26, 2012, 12:28:48 AM
'Nobody in Mike's band bought the Smile sessions'?

Could this be the single worst rebuttal to an argument in the history of the English language?

Curious as to how you know though? You a personal friend of 'Mike's band'? Or did Mike officially announce 'No one in my band bought the Smile sessions'? Must've missed that one.
I'm pretty sure Ron was being facetious in his remarks but  the truth lies therein.
It's obvious to me that he's addressing a "segment" of BBs fandom that tends to diminish the importance of Brians' (and the bands') work prior to Pet Sounds-Smile era. Maybe I'm wrong. Also the concern for the bands' image is ludicrous at this point.  If it wasn't for the flowery shirts, if it wasn't for Mikes dancing....come on the BBs are who they are, you can't change history and trying to convince "non-believers" into recognizing the greatness of their career as a complete entity is a toal waste of time. I've loved the music during the most difficult years to be a fan (late '60s) , so I know of what I speak.

I think you're wrongly assuming Ron was being in some way ironic, or ironic even. I don't think this was the case at all, or that his intended argument was the same as the one you've just given above.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 26, 2012, 03:08:31 PM
Quote
Besides, no Carl = no rock.

As great as Carl was, David is/was a better guitar player.

Sorry, I was talking more vocally. Didn't mean to discredit David or anyone with saying that, but if there was ever a rock vocalist in the Beach Boys, it was definitely Carl.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on March 26, 2012, 03:22:50 PM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 26, 2012, 03:57:26 PM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.

It's a trick, the "new album" will, in fact, be another Capitol compilation: Summer Love Songs 2: Additional Summer Love Songs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on March 26, 2012, 08:22:14 PM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.

It's a trick, the "new album" will, in fact, be another Capitol compilation: Summer Love Songs 2: Additional Summer Love Songs.

:)  Too funny, what's sad is I'd likely buy it if it had a version of I Get Around with one extra second on it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on March 26, 2012, 09:56:59 PM
Just posted on Facebook

"I'm home from Florida tonight after a couple of very tough travel days. Lookin' forward to some down time with my family before I head back to LA. Exciting stuff in the wind &, if things work out, people will be surprised at what's being worked on right now." Matt Jardine


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 26, 2012, 10:04:19 PM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.

It's a trick, the "new album" will, in fact, be another Capitol compilation: Summer Love Songs 2: Additional Summer Love Songs.

:)  Too funny, what's sad is I'd likely buy it if it had a version of I Get Around with one extra second on it.

(Nasal Domination Version)

Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrround round get


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 27, 2012, 01:58:08 AM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.

Neil Young & Crazy Horse album due the same day… we must all have been very good boys and girls recently!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on March 27, 2012, 03:44:20 AM
10 weeks today until the new album, hoping for a title and tracklisting soon.

Neil Young & Crazy Horse album due the same day… we must all have been very good boys and girls recently!

We must have been good boys and girls, by June we will have had the Smile Session, the reunion and new album all within a 7 month period.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 27, 2012, 08:05:51 AM
Just posted on Facebook

"I'm home from Florida tonight after a couple of very tough travel days. Lookin' forward to some down time with my family before I head back to LA. Exciting stuff in the wind &, if things work out, people will be surprised at what's being worked on right now." Matt Jardine


"If things work out..."?!?  Don't say that Matthew.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 27, 2012, 08:30:10 AM
Just posted on Facebook

"I'm home from Florida tonight after a couple of very tough travel days. Lookin' forward to some down time with my family before I head back to LA. Exciting stuff in the wind &, if things work out, people will be surprised at what's being worked on right now." Matt Jardine


"If things work out..."?!?  Don't say that Matthew.
maybe he's talking about promotion or  if things work out as far as getting alot of people to hear it  or something like that,maybe there's a fear it won't get promoted the right way..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 27, 2012, 09:09:17 AM
According to  Mike's facebook page, they were back in the studio yesterday. Do we think Matt's comments might mean he is now involved in the recording, and that the recent photos weren't just staged shots for the DFTS video?  AGD...???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 27, 2012, 11:28:02 AM
According to  Mike's facebook page, they were back in the studio yesterday. Do we think Matt's comments might mean he is now involved in the recording, and that the recent photos weren't just staged shots for the DFTS video?  AGD...???

I think it's quite likely those DFTS shots were staged, but that doesn't mean Matt isn't recording with them. It sounds like the new album is a mixture of different musicians and lineups, so I wouldn't be surprised if Matt ends up somewhere on the album even if nobody outside of perhaps the BB's themselves actually appear on every single track on the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on March 27, 2012, 12:17:47 PM
According to  Mike's facebook page, they were back in the studio yesterday. Do we think Matt's comments might mean he is now involved in the recording, and that the recent photos weren't just staged shots for the DFTS video?  AGD...???

I think it's quite likely those DFTS shots were staged, but that doesn't mean Matt isn't recording with them. It sounds like the new album is a mixture of different musicians and lineups, so I wouldn't be surprised if Matt ends up somewhere on the album even if nobody outside of perhaps the BB's themselves actually appear on every single track on the album.
Sounds about right.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 27, 2012, 12:44:29 PM
According to  Mike's facebook page, they were back in the studio yesterday. Do we think Matt's comments might mean he is now involved in the recording, and that the recent photos weren't just staged shots for the DFTS video?  AGD...???

I think it's quite likely those DFTS shots were staged, but that doesn't mean Matt isn't recording with them. It sounds like the new album is a mixture of different musicians and lineups, so I wouldn't be surprised if Matt ends up somewhere on the album even if nobody outside of perhaps the BB's themselves actually appear on every single track on the album.
Sounds about right.

Yeah, I'll buy that too.  For my money, the more M. Jardine on there the better.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 27, 2012, 04:46:50 PM
I just hope we get a nice blend.  It's nice to see the young jardine there, i'd say his falsetto makes a much more "beach boy" blend than fosketts


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 27, 2012, 06:02:38 PM
I just hope we get a nice blend.  It's nice to see the young jardine there, i'd say his falsetto makes a much more "beach boy" blend than fosketts

This x 3959395329853298583285


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 27, 2012, 06:07:26 PM
The April 12 issue of Rolling Stone speaks of a cut from the new album called "Beaches In Mind".Also states that more than a dozen songs were finished. Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 27, 2012, 06:13:50 PM
He also says that "is not going to be silly..like SMILEY SMILE.He adds "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice". ??? ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 27, 2012, 06:39:30 PM
He adds "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice". ??? ???
He really said that? Wow, that's really dark.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on March 27, 2012, 06:42:27 PM
I just hope we get a nice blend.  It's nice to see the young jardine there, i'd say his falsetto makes a much more "beach boy" blend than fosketts

This x 3959395329853298583285

Totally.

... And maybe I'm nuts, but I'm hoping for at least one or two falsetto moments from Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 27, 2012, 06:45:29 PM
Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D

Sounding like "Today!" is probably the best thing we could possibly ask for.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 27, 2012, 06:54:08 PM
The April 12 issue of Rolling Stone speaks of a cut from the new album called "Beaches In Mind".Also states that more than a dozen songs were finished. Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D
Dos Beaches and hos is in my mind...word..homebooooooooy


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 27, 2012, 07:11:56 PM
Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D

Sounding like "Today!" is probably the best thing we could possibly ask for.

summer days and summer nights is what i thought of.  That's more what i would expect


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 27, 2012, 07:12:58 PM
can we get anymore details from the rolling stone issue?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 27, 2012, 07:24:08 PM
Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D

Sounding like "Today!" is probably the best thing we could possibly ask for.

summer days and summer nights is what i thought of.  That's more what i would expect
I hope that means we get the wall of sound type thing or at least something close to it..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 27, 2012, 08:06:46 PM
Was there any sort of description of this "Beaches in Mind" song?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on March 27, 2012, 08:12:51 PM
Am I the only one who things a very dark final Brian album called "Summers Gone" that mixes Pet Sounds, Til' I Die and a bit of nostalgia would be amazing?

Song titles like:
That's Why God Made The Radio
And...
Beaches in Mind
Could be Zen! Haha


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 27, 2012, 08:42:41 PM
can we get anymore details from the rolling stone issue?

This!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sound of Free on March 27, 2012, 09:51:54 PM
According to  Mike's facebook page, they were back in the studio yesterday. Do we think Matt's comments might mean he is now involved in the recording, and that the recent photos weren't just staged shots for the DFTS video?  AGD...???

I think it's quite likely those DFTS shots were staged, but that doesn't mean Matt isn't recording with them. It sounds like the new album is a mixture of different musicians and lineups, so I wouldn't be surprised if Matt ends up somewhere on the album even if nobody outside of perhaps the BB's themselves actually appear on every single track on the album.

Plus I would think if Al is contributing a song he would have Matt do the falsetto instead of Jeff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 27, 2012, 11:01:25 PM
Was there any sort of description of this "Beaches in Mind" song?
No sir.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on March 27, 2012, 11:03:33 PM
can we get anymore details from the rolling stone issue?
That is really about all there was. No album title either.It was a tiny article. :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 27, 2012, 11:33:41 PM
can we get anymore details from the rolling stone issue?
That is really about all there was. No album title either.It was a tiny article. :-D

Anybody expecting more than a little blurb about real music in Rolling Stone obviously hasn't read an issue of the magazine in several years.

Obama, Ke$ha and Justin Beaver are more likely to get a cover story than The Beach Boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on March 28, 2012, 05:50:25 AM
The April 12 issue of Rolling Stone speaks of a cut from the new album called "Beaches In Mind".Also states that more than a dozen songs were finished. Mike says it sounds like the 1965 era BB's. No bull. ;D

Mike's been saying that from the start.  Brian has said '65 mixed with the 2000s.  And mellow.  I wonder if Mike's 'hospice' comment has to do with trying to write lyrics to songs that are mellow.

So, we have another rumored title to add to the list.

That's Why God Made the Radio
The Secret Private Life of Bill and Sue
Shelter
Waves of Love
Beaches In Mind


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on March 28, 2012, 07:30:48 AM
The Secret Life of Bill and Sue

Not that it would be important, but it's actually "The Private Life of Bill and Sue".

Wasn't there a couple Sue/Bill posting on the Blueboard?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on March 28, 2012, 08:56:58 AM
(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/553080_327518503973118_100001449127373_943340_725994770_n.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 28, 2012, 09:31:15 AM
Beaches in mind ? Really ? What a silly title. But well, maybe it works with the music. But my first impression is shudder...



Oh, is the whole article online ? Or is anyone able to typewrite it for us ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 28, 2012, 09:49:08 AM
it's a song about this
http://packagemuseum.com/exhibits/beechnut01/beechnut01.htm
sure if they could sing about root beer why not gum??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 28, 2012, 09:51:39 AM
it's a song about this
http://packagemuseum.com/exhibits/beechnut01/beechnut01.htm
sure if they could sing about root beer why not gum??


I thought it was "Bleaches in mind"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on March 28, 2012, 10:12:47 AM
Beaches in mind ? Really ? What a silly title. But well, maybe it works with the music. But my first impression is shudder...



Oh, is the whole article online ? Or is anyone able to typewrite it for us ?
Could've been worse. Could've been something like "Beaches We Used To Catch A Wave At". But that a band called the Beach Boys for their last album gets together and puts a song out with the word "beach" in it is fine with me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 28, 2012, 10:35:38 AM
Beaches in mind ? Really ? What a silly title. But well, maybe it works with the music. But my first impression is shudder...



Oh, is the whole article online ? Or is anyone able to typewrite it for us ?
Could've been worse. Could've been something like "Beaches We Used To Catch A Wave At". But that a band called the Beach Boys for their last album gets together and puts a song out with the word "beach" in it is fine with me.


I hear ya. You're right of course, but to my ears "Beaches in mind" does sound like "Beaches We Used To Catch A Wave At". But I won't judge it before I have heard it. Maybe it's something really good


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fall Breaks on March 28, 2012, 10:41:02 AM
Beaches in mind ? Really ? What a silly title. But well, maybe it works with the music. But my first impression is shudder...



Oh, is the whole article online ? Or is anyone able to typewrite it for us ?
Could've been worse. Could've been something like "Beaches We Used To Catch A Wave At". But that a band called the Beach Boys for their last album gets together and puts a song out with the word "beach" in it is fine with me.
I hear ya. You're right of course, but to my ears "Beaches in mind" does sound like "Beaches We Used To Catch A Wave At". But I won't judge it before I have heard it. Maybe it's something really good
Granted, it could very well contain self-referential lines à la Summer In Paradise. But, as you said, let's wait until we hear it. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on March 28, 2012, 01:00:01 PM
I'm just hoping they'll renew their artistic collaboration with the Fat Boys for a proper rerecording of Brian's Smart Girls.

Also, a stack of lead vocals by John Stamos would be awesome.  :hat

More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

One does wonder, if this album is well received and sells fairly well, whether there'll be a temptation to do a follow-up. If so, I just hope they continue to get on well and enjoy each others company, as appears to be the case this time around.

I'm still getting my head around there being a proper, brand new Beach Boys album in the works. They really deserve a good send-off album, to help round off their legacy. It would have been sad if Summer in Paradise and Stars and Stripes (both of which imo have their limited pleasures) really were their final utterances as a group. Sonically, I anticipate a sound somewhere between Brian's Imagination and That Lucky Old Sun albums, which would be in the right general ball park for me, just hope the instruments are all real, not synthy versions.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on March 28, 2012, 01:27:45 PM
A thought crossed my mind today--What if the name of that PBS special airing in June, "Summer's Gone", is taken from one of the new song titles?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on March 28, 2012, 01:35:00 PM
A thought crossed my mind today--What if the name of that PBS special airing in June, "Summer's Gone", is taken from one of the new song titles?

It's either a song title, the album title, or completely unrelated to the new music they're producing.

Soon, my friend....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 28, 2012, 02:22:51 PM
More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

Not sure where you got this info. Waves of Love (which had some Carl vox recorded in the 90s) has been mentioned offhand as a possible track, but if the just-released version from Al is anything to go by, Carl isn't singing lead.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 28, 2012, 04:41:22 PM
More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

Not sure where you got this info. Waves of Love (which had some Carl vox recorded in the 90s) has been mentioned offhand as a possible track, but if the just-released version from Al is anything to go by, Carl isn't singing lead.

From what I've heard, Carl is on the lead for some portin of the song, I believe one article mentioned it was a bridge of the song. The Amazon clip doesn't have this section, but I think Carl does some lead lines on it, not just backing vocals.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: vintagemusic on March 28, 2012, 07:17:06 PM
I Just heard the Amazon clip of Waves Of Love, and based on the clip only.
Wow it's great. Sounds very 65 Beach Boys.

Don't Fight The Sea, sounded much better than the version I heard on youtube, either the fidelity
is vastly improved, or there are new overdubs, or maybe just a better mix. I think it is overdubs
that are not present on the youtube versions.

Waves of Love is really good. Which Beach Boys are singing on the Jardine version, I tried to buy
the song, but you have to purchase the whole album. Itunes didn't even have it at all. Sometimes
the clips at different vendors use different pieces of the song. It's advertised on ITUNES from Jardine's
site  I believe so I don't know why it's not there.

Don't Fight The Sea, has sort of that Terry Jacks sing song unpleasant vibe, but Waves Of Love Knocked me out
If the Beach Boy version is even better, look out, if they are bumping this song, because it's not good enough, then
the new material must be phenomenal, there is no way they could bump this song because it's not good enough, sometimes
these 30 second clips can be misleading, but this track is great, why on earth didn't he put it on the regular album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SonoraDick on March 28, 2012, 07:55:32 PM

I tried to buy the song, but you have to purchase the whole album. Itunes didn't even have it at all.


Al's album hasn't been released yet; that's why you can't buy it. IF there are no further delays, it'll be available next Tuesday, April 3. However, extra, or bonus tracks, often are only available with the purchase of the entire album. That's usually the case with iTunes, but Amazon might be different. However, I feel the whole album is definitely worth the $10 or so that Amazon wants. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on March 28, 2012, 08:35:24 PM
Some of the fat boys are dead.  So that won't be happening.

Also "last beach boys album" isn't set in stone.  Nobody's said it's their last album.



Does anybody think "The Private life of Bill and Sue" sounds very Beatlish?  I dont' know if it's just because it makes me think of Eleanor Rigby, or what.  It sounds like something Paul or John would write....


with that said... perhaps the album DOES have a mid '60's vibe to it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 28, 2012, 08:41:31 PM
Some of the fat boys are dead.  So that won't be happening.

Also "last beach boys album" isn't set in stone.  Nobody's said it's their last album.



Does anybody think "The Private life of Bill and Sue" sounds very Beatlish?  I dont' know if it's just because it makes me think of Eleanor Rigby, or what.  It sounds like something Paul or John would write....


with that said... perhaps the album DOES have a mid '60's vibe to it. 
Probebly because of ths song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCAEE0JEgIM


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on March 28, 2012, 08:43:31 PM
He also says "I'm trying"

THIS is what i'm excited about.  I think Mike is motivated and doesn't want to screw this up.  He's capable of GREATNESS like we know Brian is.  The thought of Brian Wilson making music, and Mike love actually TRYING to write good lyrics for that song keeps me thinking of "Warmth of the Sun".  When so much of the Beach Boys music has been hit or miss, hearing that Brian and Mike are actually trying to make music together is very exciting to me.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on March 28, 2012, 08:44:43 PM
Some of the fat boys are dead.  So that won't be happening.

Also "last beach boys album" isn't set in stone.  Nobody's said it's their last album.



Does anybody think "The Private life of Bill and Sue" sounds very Beatlish?  I dont' know if it's just because it makes me think of Eleanor Rigby, or what.  It sounds like something Paul or John would write....


with that said... perhaps the album DOES have a mid '60's vibe to it. 
Probebly because of ths song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCAEE0JEgIM


Actually I've never heard that song by John.  It just seems like something he (or Paul) would write, though. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on March 29, 2012, 12:07:22 AM
Im not really crazy about that Waves of Love sample. Doesn't sound 1965 to me in fact doesn't sound like a Beach Boys song of any era to me. Someone else said earlier it sounds like Status Quo. It also reaffirms my thought that just because Al's voice is most intact, doesn't mean I want a whole load of Al leads on th new album. I think he seems to be singing slightly beyond his range on that that song and it just grates a bit. I think Brian's voice may be different but he's still an emotive and engaging lead vocalist when he's trying and he's who I want to hear the most.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 29, 2012, 05:06:56 AM
Im not really crazy about that Waves of Love sample. Doesn't sound 1965 to me in fact doesn't sound like a Beach Boys song of any era to me. Someone else said earlier it sounds like Status Quo. It also reaffirms my thought that just because Al's voice is most intact, doesn't mean I want a whole load of Al leads on th new album. I think he seems to be singing slightly beyond his range on that that song and it just grates a bit. I think Brian's voice may be different but he's still an emotive and engaging lead vocalist when he's trying and he's who I want to hear the most.

I don't know why Waves of Love should sound like a BB song of any particular era. Anyway, the track has a Goin' to the Beach feel to it. And, say what you want, I think it's great when Al sings in his higher range. It is exciting when he hits that high G, even if -or perhaps because- he strains a bit. And it's be great to hear many Brian leads on the new BB album, but I've heard plenty of them recently. I want to hear the other guys also. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 29, 2012, 09:47:18 AM
Im not really crazy about that Waves of Love sample. Doesn't sound 1965 to me in fact doesn't sound like a Beach Boys song of any era to me. Someone else said earlier it sounds like Status Quo. It also reaffirms my thought that just because Al's voice is most intact, doesn't mean I want a whole load of Al leads on th new album. I think he seems to be singing slightly beyond his range on that that song and it just grates a bit. I think Brian's voice may be different but he's still an emotive and engaging lead vocalist when he's trying and he's who I want to hear the most.

Based on the 30-second sample, I don’t think “Waves of Love” sounds like 1965. But I don’t think that matters. I’m not concerned with what era a song sounds like or whether it “sounds like the Beach Boys” as much as I’m concerned with whether a song is good. “Waves of Love” sounds like at least a decent song, and it sounds well above average compared to BB or BW albums from the last 30 or so years. 

As for Al’s voice, I don’t think a BB album with all Al leads makes sense. But I hope they don’t take the guy with the strongest lead voice in the band and have him just sing on a song or two. Brian’s voice can still be engaging. It’s also not always in tip-top shape, and this is a Beach Boys album rather than a Brian Wilson album. I hope Brian had some leads on the album too, but I’d rather not have the album sound like Brian’s next solo album with BB backing vocals.

I hope they give Al leads where his voice suits the song. That is, rather than trying to politically divide up the lead vocals (e.g. Brian and Mike get four, Al gets two, Bruce gets one, etc.), they have whoever can sing the song best sing it. I think that would probably be Al in many cases, so I hope that is kept in mind on this new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on March 29, 2012, 10:54:39 AM
 
Im not really crazy about that Waves of Love sample. Doesn't sound 1965 to me in fact doesn't sound like a Beach Boys song of any era to me. Someone else said earlier it sounds like Status Quo. It also reaffirms my thought that just because Al's voice is most intact, doesn't mean I want a whole load of Al leads on th new album. I think he seems to be singing slightly beyond his range on that that song and it just grates a bit. I think Brian's voice may be different but he's still an emotive and engaging lead vocalist when he's trying and he's who I want to hear the most.

Based on the 30-second sample, I don’t think “Waves of Love” sounds like 1965. But I don’t think that matters. I’m not concerned with what era a song sounds like or whether it “sounds like the Beach Boys” as much as I’m concerned with whether a song is good. “Waves of Love” sounds like at least a decent song, and it sounds well above average compared to BB or BW albums from the last 30 or so years. 

As for Al’s voice, I don’t think a BB album with all Al leads makes sense. But I hope they don’t take the guy with the strongest lead voice in the band and have him just sing on a song or two. Brian’s voice can still be engaging. It’s also not always in tip-top shape, and this is a Beach Boys album rather than a Brian Wilson album. I hope Brian had some leads on the album too, but I’d rather not have the album sound like Brian’s next solo album with BB backing vocals.

I hope they give Al leads where his voice suits the song. That is, rather than trying to politically divide up the lead vocals (e.g. Brian and Mike get four, Al gets two, Bruce gets one, etc.), they have whoever can sing the song best sing it. I think that would probably be Al in many cases, so I hope that is kept in mind on this new album.


Yes I was responding to a previous poster who said it sounded like 1965. Of course it doesn't have to sound like 1965 to be good. It just doesn't sound that great. But yeah it is 30 seconds so who knows. Agree with you on best vocalist for the job should get it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 29, 2012, 11:08:20 AM
I might get killed for it, but I don't think Al's vocal on the 30-sec preview sounds that good. Nothing like say Brian's vocals on his last two albums. Do we know if Al's voice on WOL is from '95 or more recently?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 29, 2012, 11:32:16 AM
I might get killed for it, but I don't think Al's vocal on the 30-sec preview sounds that good. Nothing like say Brian's vocals on his last two albums. Do we know if Al's voice on WOL is from '95 or more recently?

I don't think we know anything for sure about where Al's vocal comes from. It seems like he's been tinkering for quite some time in his home studio on tracks like this, so it's just as likely it's from '95 or '96 or from last year, or somewhere in between. Matt Jardine reported on a background vocal overdub session last year.

It's hard to compare Al and Brian's voice at this stage, but I'd say that objectively Al's voice has across the board sounded stronger than Brian's has in ages. Brian's voice sounds smoothed out in the studio these days much more than at his live shows (how much if at all Brian is using autotune is debatable), but while the actual peformance of something like "Waves of Love" may or may not be Al's strongest, his voice across the board sounds better than Brian's.

I hope we hear them both plentifully on the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 29, 2012, 11:39:02 AM
If really into it, Brian has been sounding good/verygood/excellent live these past few years - especially on new material and songs dear to his heart. Comparing a good current live vocal by Al and Brian (maybe on "God Only Knows"), I'd say they are not that far apart. Studio work, on the other hand, is of course a whole different deal. But I'd say if Brian is, again, really into a song - he'll do fine. As will Al.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wrightfan on March 29, 2012, 12:03:18 PM
Some of the fat boys are dead.  So that won't be happening.

Also "last beach boys album" isn't set in stone.  Nobody's said it's their last album.



Does anybody think "The Private life of Bill and Sue" sounds very Beatlish?  I dont' know if it's just because it makes me think of Eleanor Rigby, or what.  It sounds like something Paul or John would write....


with that said... perhaps the album DOES have a mid '60's vibe to it. 
Probebly because of ths song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCAEE0JEgIM


Lennon has some nice unfinished songs. There's a reconstruction/rearrangement of some of these songs out there called "Somewhere in Dakota". The guy is a dead ringer for John's voice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 29, 2012, 12:35:33 PM
I might get killed for it, but I don't think Al's vocal on the 30-sec preview sounds that good. Nothing like say Brian's vocals on his last two albums. Do we know if Al's voice on WOL is from '95 or more recently?

I don't think it does either and i'm a big fan of Al's voice normally. Check out his version of California Dreamin' from the Roxy the other week, his voice is really great on that and he does a nice falsetto here and there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 29, 2012, 02:54:13 PM
Yes, live it's Al over Brian imo (and I can only judge from youtube clips as I haven't seen Brian sicne 2004) as Al seems more constant. But Brian's last two/three studio albums were really strong vocally from his side. And "Waves of love" (and I'm only talking about that 30 seconds clip and not Al's other recent studio recordings) just doesn't hold up imo. He sounds flat when he gets higher and almost loses it. I hope the vocal (or at least that part, 'cause the - yet unheard - rest might be great) will be reworked.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on March 29, 2012, 03:00:45 PM
Yes, live it's Al over Brian imo (and I can only judge from youtube clips as I haven't seen Brian sicne 2004) as Al seems more constant. But Brian's last two/three studio albums were really strong vocally from his side. And "Waves of love" (and I'm only talking about that 30 seconds clip and not Al's other recent studio recordings) just doesn't hold up imo. He sounds flat when he gets higher and almost loses it. I hope the vocal (or at least that part, 'cause the - yet unheard - rest might be great) will be reworked.
Brian's voice has very much improved since 2004. I last saw him in 2009 and was stunned by his vocals on some of the tunes, mainly GOK and MAD (but he was generally sounding (very) good). Judging from the 2010/2011 Youtube clips I've seen this trend has continued. If he's having fun on tour this year it's going to be goooooood. All of the Boys seem to be in good vocal shape recently. I'm psyched.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Real Barnyard on March 29, 2012, 03:04:25 PM
From Al's Facebook:

Mike Love on the new Beach Boys album: "Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile--it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65. I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 29, 2012, 03:04:50 PM
Yes, live it's Al over Brian imo (and I can only judge from youtube clips as I haven't seen Brian sicne 2004) as Al seems more constant. But Brian's last two/three studio albums were really strong vocally from his side. And "Waves of love" (and I'm only talking about that 30 seconds clip and not Al's other recent studio recordings) just doesn't hold up imo. He sounds flat when he gets higher and almost loses it. I hope the vocal (or at least that part, 'cause the - yet unheard - rest might be great) will be reworked.
Brian's voice has very much improved since 2004. I last saw him in 2009 and was stunned by his vocals on some of the tunes, mainly GOK and MAD (but he was generally sounding (very) good). Judging from the 2010/2011 Youtube clips I've seen this trend has continued. If he's having fun on tour this year it's going to be goooooood. All of the Boys seem to be in good vocal shape recently. I'm psyched.



And I'm glad they go on tour right from the studio (it seems) because that means they are in form and don't need too much time to warm up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 29, 2012, 03:13:35 PM
From Al's Facebook:

Mike Love on the new Beach Boys album: "Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile--it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65. I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."
1965 Beach Boys- Today! or Summer Days.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on March 29, 2012, 03:17:37 PM
From Al's Facebook:

Mike Love on the new Beach Boys album: "Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile--it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65. I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."
1965 Beach Boys- Today! or Summer Days.

Don't forget Party!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 29, 2012, 03:24:46 PM
From Al's Facebook:

Mike Love on the new Beach Boys album: "Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile--it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65. I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."
1965 Beach Boys- Today! or Summer Days.

Don't forget Party!
Knowing Mike, its got to be Summer Days with California Girls.... ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on March 29, 2012, 08:14:48 PM
Who are songwriters of "That's Why God Made the Radio"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 29, 2012, 08:52:15 PM
Who are songwriters of "That's Why God Made the Radio"?

Brian, definitely. I'm guessing a co-write with Joe Thomas.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on March 29, 2012, 11:13:53 PM
Who are songwriters of "That's Why God Made the Radio"?

Brian, definitely. I'm guessing a co-write with Joe Thomas.

My guess is BW with Scotty Bennett... But that's nothing more than a guess.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on March 30, 2012, 04:34:26 AM
Who are songwriters of "That's Why God Made the Radio"?

Brian, definitely. I'm guessing a co-write with Joe Thomas.

My guess is BW with Scotty Bennett... But that's nothing more than a guess.

Could be BW with Jeffrey Foskett and/or Joe Thomas.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 30, 2012, 04:59:40 AM
could be brian wilson and the easter bunny too. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on March 30, 2012, 08:27:56 AM
From Al's Facebook:

Mike Love on the new Beach Boys album: "Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile--it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65. I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."
1965 Beach Boys- Today! or Summer Days.

Don't forget Party!
so this could  be an "uplugged" album without ANY production with party sounds? :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on March 30, 2012, 09:43:29 AM
Could this be the new album cover?  :lol

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/03/16/Magazine/Advance/Images/peep-best-beachboy2.jpeg

Here's the link to the full article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/peeps-show-vi/2012/03/27/gIQAswMmfS_gallery.html#photo=27




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 30, 2012, 03:06:44 PM
More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

Not sure where you got this info. Waves of Love (which had some Carl vox recorded in the 90s) has been mentioned offhand as a possible track, but if the just-released version from Al is anything to go by, Carl isn't singing lead.

From what I've heard, Carl is on the lead for some portin of the song, I believe one article mentioned it was a bridge of the song. The Amazon clip doesn't have this section, but I think Carl does some lead lines on it, not just backing vocals.

According to the Waves of Love thread, this is not the case. Carl does not seem to sing any lead lines on the song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on March 30, 2012, 04:08:11 PM
More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

Not sure where you got this info. Waves of Love (which had some Carl vox recorded in the 90s) has been mentioned offhand as a possible track, but if the just-released version from Al is anything to go by, Carl isn't singing lead.

From what I've heard, Carl is on the lead for some portin of the song, I believe one article mentioned it was a bridge of the song. The Amazon clip doesn't have this section, but I think Carl does some lead lines on it, not just backing vocals.

According to the Waves of Love thread, this is not the case. Carl does not seem to sing any lead lines on the song.

That's what it's looking like based on that the description in that thread. Of course, prior to that person hearing it, I don't think anybody knew if Carl was singing lead on it. I suppose if we look back, maybe nobody ever said Carl was singing lead, but simply that he sang on it. I somehow, rather justifiably or not, had the impression for the last couple of years that Carl did at least a bit of the lead.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 30, 2012, 04:58:19 PM
More seriously, am glad they appear to be featuring Carl on lead vocals on at least one track, hope the song is a good one too.

Not sure where you got this info. Waves of Love (which had some Carl vox recorded in the 90s) has been mentioned offhand as a possible track, but if the just-released version from Al is anything to go by, Carl isn't singing lead.

From what I've heard, Carl is on the lead for some portin of the song, I believe one article mentioned it was a bridge of the song. The Amazon clip doesn't have this section, but I think Carl does some lead lines on it, not just backing vocals.

According to the Waves of Love thread, this is not the case. Carl does not seem to sing any lead lines on the song.

That's what it's looking like based on that the description in that thread. Of course, prior to that person hearing it, I don't think anybody knew if Carl was singing lead on it. I suppose if we look back, maybe nobody ever said Carl was singing lead, but simply that he sang on it. I somehow, rather justifiably or not, had the impression for the last couple of years that Carl did at least a bit of the lead.

I actually thought you were probably right ... I had just never seen it confirmed one way or the other. It would be odd to have Al talk about Carl being a song if he's buried in the harmony stack, no? And yet that seems what the strange Mr. Jardine has done ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on March 30, 2012, 08:47:00 PM
Heads up from BW.com.


New Rolling Stone magazine article about upcoming new Beach Boys album

(posted by Tom Tobben on March 30, 2012 at 7:29 pm)

Message:

The new April 12 issue of Rolling Stone has a capsule article about the upcoming Beach Boys album, due for release in June. I couldn't find a link to the article, so here it is the full text of the article:

Spring Music Preview section of RS Issue #1154

The Beach Boys
Title TBD -- June

"It's a sentimental thing for me," Brian Wilson says of the Beach Boys' first all-new studio LP in decades. "We've been together 50 years -- that's a long time." Since reuniting last year, the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties. Expect lots of big harmonies and familiar subjects on songs like the mellow rocker "Beaches in Mind" and the nonstalgic ballad "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile -- it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65," adds Mike Love. "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."

-- Patrick Doyle




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on March 30, 2012, 08:53:14 PM
well now we know TWGMTR is a ballad!!  WEEEEE. and mellow rocker?  what's a mellow rocker lol.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 30, 2012, 08:58:14 PM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on March 31, 2012, 03:08:11 AM
WEEEEE. and mellow rocker?  what's a mellow rocker lol.



Do It Again is a mellow rocker. I heard/read Brian describing it as such. "Beaches in mind" might be a DIA part 2. Even the title sounds like that imo


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 31, 2012, 05:51:55 AM
I rather like the 'hospice' remark...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on March 31, 2012, 11:46:14 AM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.

Yeah, that bugs me too.  At least Brian did use United Studio A a few times in the '60s..."The Surfer Moon" track, the late '65 orchestral session ("Three Blind Mice", "How Deep Is The Ocean", "Stella By Starlight"), one SMiLE-era session (for "Vegetables"/"With Me Tonight"), and the late '68 Honeys session ("Goodnight My Love" and "Tonight You Belong To Me").  Then in the 2000s he used Studio B there for "Desert Drive", and I'm not sure which studio but he did record his 2005 Christmas album and I think both Disney albums at Ocean Way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 01:31:27 PM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.

Yeah, that bugs me too.  At least Brian did use United Studio A a few times in the '60s..."The Surfer Moon" track, the late '65 orchestral session ("Three Blind Mice", "How Deep Is The Ocean", "Stella By Starlight"), one SMiLE-era session (for "Vegetables"/"With Me Tonight"), and the late '68 Honeys session ("Goodnight My Love" and "Tonight You Belong To Me").  Then in the 2000s he used Studio B there for "Desert Drive", and I'm not sure which studio but he did record his 2005 Christmas album and I think both Disney albums at Ocean Way.

Thanks for the specifics. I figured he must have recorded at United at some point in the 60s, but it certainly wasn't for the legendary sessions. (And a lot of his recent studio work has been there, too, as you point out.)

It's my understanding that the two buildings -- United and Western -- are basically identical in terms of the studios within. Is that right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Melt Away on March 31, 2012, 01:53:14 PM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on March 31, 2012, 01:59:12 PM
sorry, wrong thread


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 02:01:58 PM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.

Yeah, that bugs me too.  At least Brian did use United Studio A a few times in the '60s..."The Surfer Moon" track, the late '65 orchestral session ("Three Blind Mice", "How Deep Is The Ocean", "Stella By Starlight"), one SMiLE-era session (for "Vegetables"/"With Me Tonight"), and the late '68 Honeys session ("Goodnight My Love" and "Tonight You Belong To Me").  Then in the 2000s he used Studio B there for "Desert Drive", and I'm not sure which studio but he did record his 2005 Christmas album and I think both Disney albums at Ocean Way.

Thanks for the specifics. I figured he must have recorded at United at some point in the 60s, but it certainly wasn't for the legendary sessions. (And a lot of his recent studio work has been there, too, as you point out.)

It's my understanding that the two buildings -- United and Western -- are basically identical in terms of the studios within. Is that right?

No - the studios at United were much bigger, as the big bands tended to record there. Sinatra recorded at United. Western was the rock department, so to speak.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on March 31, 2012, 02:04:06 PM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..

Beach Boys fans: album is not out yet. But we know it sucks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 02:12:12 PM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.

Yeah, that bugs me too.  At least Brian did use United Studio A a few times in the '60s..."The Surfer Moon" track, the late '65 orchestral session ("Three Blind Mice", "How Deep Is The Ocean", "Stella By Starlight"), one SMiLE-era session (for "Vegetables"/"With Me Tonight"), and the late '68 Honeys session ("Goodnight My Love" and "Tonight You Belong To Me").  Then in the 2000s he used Studio B there for "Desert Drive", and I'm not sure which studio but he did record his 2005 Christmas album and I think both Disney albums at Ocean Way.

Thanks for the specifics. I figured he must have recorded at United at some point in the 60s, but it certainly wasn't for the legendary sessions. (And a lot of his recent studio work has been there, too, as you point out.)

It's my understanding that the two buildings -- United and Western -- are basically identical in terms of the studios within. Is that right?

No - the studios at United were much bigger, as the big bands tended to record there. Sinatra recorded at United. Western was the rock department, so to speak.

Not sure that this is true ... at least looking at the room dimensions for the studios listed at their websites.

http://www.oceanwayrecording.com/studios-hollywood.php
http://www.eastwest-studios.com/home


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 02:13:03 PM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..

Beach Boys fans: album is not out yet. But we know it sucks.

At least we won't be disappointed if it's good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on March 31, 2012, 02:41:03 PM
Beach Boys fans: album is not out yet. But we know it sucks.

Thanks Phil!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on March 31, 2012, 03:22:22 PM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..
C'mon man that is one ridiculous statement, I've feared many an album only to be very fuckin' surprised. Case in point BW Presents SMiLE.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on March 31, 2012, 03:28:38 PM
C'mon man that is one ridiculous statement, I've feared many an album only to be very f*ckin' surprised. Case in point BW Presents SMiLE.

I think that record surprised everyone, dude  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on March 31, 2012, 08:44:16 PM
the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties.

As I've written before, this is not true. Rolling Stone should know better. The current Ocean Way studios in LA is the former United Studios. Brian recorded Pet Sounds at Western Studios, which was sold off in the 90s and briefly renamed Cello Studios before being purchased again and renamed EastWest Studios.

Both studios were originally owned by Bill Putnam and known collectively as United Western, which is the source of all this confusion. But they are in fact two different buildings.

Yeah, that bugs me too.  At least Brian did use United Studio A a few times in the '60s..."The Surfer Moon" track, the late '65 orchestral session ("Three Blind Mice", "How Deep Is The Ocean", "Stella By Starlight"), one SMiLE-era session (for "Vegetables"/"With Me Tonight"), and the late '68 Honeys session ("Goodnight My Love" and "Tonight You Belong To Me").  Then in the 2000s he used Studio B there for "Desert Drive", and I'm not sure which studio but he did record his 2005 Christmas album and I think both Disney albums at Ocean Way.

Thanks for the specifics. I figured he must have recorded at United at some point in the 60s, but it certainly wasn't for the legendary sessions. (And a lot of his recent studio work has been there, too, as you point out.)

It's my understanding that the two buildings -- United and Western -- are basically identical in terms of the studios within. Is that right?

No - the studios at United were much bigger, as the big bands tended to record there. Sinatra recorded at United. Western was the rock department, so to speak.

Not sure that this is true ... at least looking at the room dimensions for the studios listed at their websites.

http://www.oceanwayrecording.com/studios-hollywood.php
http://www.eastwest-studios.com/home

It's true in terms of Studio Three at Western, where most of Brian's work in the '60s with the BBs was done.  It's signifcantly smaller than Studios One and Two.  It could be considered their "rock room".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 01, 2012, 12:49:39 AM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..

Beach Boys fans: album is not out yet. But we know it sucks.

The Beach Boys haven't released a good album in 35 years. Aside from the SMiLE album, Brian's solo work has been hit & miss.

I have a feeling it's gonna be all adult contemporary with sugar coated production. I hope they toned down the autotune because in my book Do It Again really suffers from that. Needs more feel, less gloss. We'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 01, 2012, 02:26:44 AM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:47:15 AM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.

Agree. From M.I.U. onwards (bad production, as is KTSA), he's not really in charge IMHO. L.A. Album is so smoothed over (Boettcher, Johnston), then there is the 1986 album with Stewart Levine, and so on and so forth. Love You is totally Brian in some adventurous minimalist 'punk' mood... and there it stops.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 01, 2012, 07:47:57 AM
He definitely produced "On Christmas Day"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuptvX3xYlg

Hard to guess outside of that, but I'd imagine on certain songs, he probably still does something like this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 01, 2012, 07:53:57 AM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.

Agree. From M.I.U. onwards (bad production, as is KTSA), he's not really in charge IMHO. L.A. Album is so smoothed over (Boettcher, Johnston), then there is the 1986 album with Stewart Levine, and so on and so forth. Love You is totally Brian in some adventurous minimalist 'punk' mood... and there it stops.

Steve Levine, 1985


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:56:17 AM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.

Agree. From M.I.U. onwards (bad production, as is KTSA), he's not really in charge IMHO. L.A. Album is so smoothed over (Boettcher, Johnston), then there is the 1986 album with Stewart Levine, and so on and so forth. Love You is totally Brian in some adventurous minimalist 'punk' mood... and there it stops.

Steve Levine, 1985
Cheers for that. And the poster just above you may be well right. 'This Song Wants To Sleep With You Tonight' (that I really adore) sounds like a genuine BW thing too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Melt Away on April 01, 2012, 08:30:35 AM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..
C'mon man that is one ridiculous statement, I've feared many an album only to be very f*ckin' surprised. Case in point BW Presents SMiLE.

Likening this NEW material to a reconstructed version of a failed album is ridiculous! The only thing you could compare it to is Imagination, since Thomas virtually ruined that record with his glossy adult contemporary bullsh*t. JT is credited on 5 songs, 2 of which are "Your Imagination" and "Lay Down Burdon", well known songs within BW/BB fans(well known not favorite). Anyway, I guess I'm not completely against Thomas being involved in some songwriting but I can't stand his production! Oh yeah, those other 3 songs he co-wrote? They're horrible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 01, 2012, 08:44:58 AM
This long-time Brian Wilson/Beach Boys fan likes both Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 08:58:35 AM
Not sure why though


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 01, 2012, 09:01:19 AM
This long-time Brian Wilson/Beach Boys fan likes both Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Melt Away on April 01, 2012, 09:12:04 AM
This long-time Brian Wilson/Beach Boys fan likes both Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden.

Yeah, I was just saying they're probably not anyone's favorites but two good tunes indeed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 09:23:51 AM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.

Agree. From M.I.U. onwards (bad production, as is KTSA), he's not really in charge IMHO. L.A. Album is so smoothed over (Boettcher, Johnston), then there is the 1986 album with Stewart Levine, and so on and so forth. Love You is totally Brian in some adventurous minimalist 'punk' mood... and there it stops.

None of those albums you mention have a "produced by Brian Wilson" credit. So no, they don't sound like it.

Brian's role in the production of his modern albums varies by the record. I've written about this at length. But suffice to say that he still contributes. He does use a lot of collaborators, but we must never forget that Chuck Britz was essentially an uncredited co-producer on most of the 60s classics. Brian has said that in interviews. And that the Wrecking Crew helped arrange songs they played on. And that Carl had to finish both 15BO and LY after Brian lost interest in them mid-production. The present is simpler than we think and the past is more complex.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 10:23:01 AM
Generally I don't care when other people produce Brian's songs, the only time is when it's distracting like imagination. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on April 01, 2012, 01:11:39 PM
This long-time Brian Wilson/Beach Boys fan likes both Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden.
I have to second that! Great songs, and the production does them justice. Not pure Brian production sound, but very good.
And that, is why people like them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 01:35:22 PM
This long-time Brian Wilson/Beach Boys fan likes both Your Imagination and Lay Down Burden.
I have to second that! Great songs, and the production does them justice. Not pure Brian production sound, but very good.
And that, is why people like them.

There are also BW touches on both, and not just the vocal arrangements. He plays keys on each of them, for one thing. On the first, the drum fills have always sounded like a BW part to me, and there's a distinctive baritone sax mixed low in the tag to the second.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 01, 2012, 02:17:11 PM
I think Your Imagination is every bit of a masterpiece as Love and Mercy is  (this only applies if you consider L&M a masterpiece...)

Yeah, it's over produced, but L&M has those synth sounds all over it and most people don't crap on it for that. You have to think, the majority of Imagination as an album is SO good that most people think it's still at least an OK album despite the horrible, horrible production values.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 02:26:16 PM
the production on both of those songs isn't great.  the first like 15 seconds of "your imagination" are so cringe inducing, and for me, the chorus is pretty mediocre, and that awful trumpet thing at the end, ugh it's just bad.  I don't blame love and mercy though, that was the sound of the times, and it's soo good live so whatever.  Love and mercy is way superior to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 03:57:32 PM
anyone notice this tweet from the band OneRepublic?

OneRepublic ‏ @OneRepublic
Just left the studio- workin away...gotta hang with the Beach Boys for a bit and hear their new stuff- gonna be amazing!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 01, 2012, 04:21:40 PM
I think Your Imagination is every bit of a masterpiece as Love and Mercy is  (this only applies if you consider L&M a masterpiece...)

Yeah, it's over produced, but L&M has those synth sounds all over it and most people don't crap on it for that. You have to think, the majority of Imagination as an album is SO good that most people think it's still at least an OK album despite the horrible, horrible production values.

L&M's strength as a song in its own right has ensured its survival, despite it's period production values, IMHO.

As for Your Imagination, I've posted before on this board and others about how I heard this on the radio just before the album's release without knowing it was BW and can still recall thinking "whoa, if only the Beach Boys could knock one out like that!" I was delighted and astonished to hear the DJ tell me after the track finished that it was in fact BDW.  Still regard that as possibly the best Beach Boys track that wasn't from the last 20 years.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: endofposts on April 01, 2012, 05:33:59 PM
"Your Imagination" still gets played on the Musak at drugstores.  I suppose that's a sign it's stood the test of time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 01, 2012, 07:15:14 PM
To what extent does Brian produce his records these days anyway? I hear pretty mixed reports on this, but I've generally gotten the impression that he's more of an honorary producer at this point than anything else. Before Love You there's a clear line running through Brian's work, you can hear him evolving towards 15 Big Ones and Love You on some of his Sunflower era songs and on Funky Pretty. After Love You it's hard to discern any definite thread in his songs in terms of production, and it always sounds to me like other people started taking over for him. He just doesn't really seem to have a 'voice' as a producer anymore like he used to.

Agree. From M.I.U. onwards (bad production, as is KTSA), he's not really in charge IMHO. L.A. Album is so smoothed over (Boettcher, Johnston), then there is the 1986 album with Stewart Levine, and so on and so forth. Love You is totally Brian in some adventurous minimalist 'punk' mood... and there it stops.

None of those albums you mention have a "produced by Brian Wilson" credit. So no, they don't sound like it.

Brian's role in the production of his modern albums varies by the record. I've written about this at length. But suffice to say that he still contributes. He does use a lot of collaborators, but we must never forget that Chuck Britz was essentially an uncredited co-producer on most of the 60s classics. Brian has said that in interviews. And that the Wrecking Crew helped arrange songs they played on. And that Carl had to finish both 15BO and LY after Brian lost interest in them mid-production. The present is simpler than we think and the past is more complex.

This is fair, to an extent. I wouldn't argue that some of the band's engineers had an important role as co-producers, whether it be Chuck Britz or Steve Desper, but I think Brian usually had a clear vision of what he wanted to accomplish. It's hard to articulate this particular point so I apologize, but Brian had a meta-understanding of himself as a producer, and that's what I think is missing since Love You. He knew what he was doing, knew how his overall sound was supposed to develop, where he was going and where he had been. He relied on a lot of talented people to help him, but he had something in his head which he was compelled to express. That impulse, that necessity is what defines his best work. I enjoy plenty of the songs both from his official solo albums and from the bootlegged sessions during the 80s/90s, but all that material feels divorced from the continuous artistic evolution that forms a line from Surfer Girl to Love You. There's an arc, a thread which unites Brian's songs, you can follow it, see where it starts and where it leads.
After Love You that clear development stops, like Brian lost a clear understanding of himself as a producer, like he stopped caring about how new material fit into the total scheme of his artistic work. You can't really characterize BWRG or TLOS in the same way you can Pet Sounds or Love You. I don't doubt that he was the primary producer on those albums, but I do doubt that he exercised that authority in a meaningful way, that he had a real vision that reflected a natural and organic development of his interests in recording technology and sound engineering. He seems happy to have his records simply sound like "Brian Wilson" recordings, and to delegate they're creation and that sound to people whom he trusts or depends on. It's no longer coming from within his imagination or artistic spirit, but from sources outside of himself. He allows those sources to determine how he feels, what he wants, what his vision is, and isn't motivated to complete and total control over his output.

I hope that all makes sense, I think this is an interesting topic and I haven't read some of the things like Gary Usher's writings on Brian's work in the 80s, so I'd be more than happy to entertain every perspective on this issue, but this has been my general take on things. Also which songs on Love You did Carl produce? I was aware he mixed 15 Big Ones and Love You, but I was under the impression that Brian had done a great deal of the work himself including the instrumental work. Where did Carl pick things up on that project, did he also do the production on Adult/Child? I never would have thought that from listening to the recordings.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 08:06:23 PM
Fishmonk: There's a lot to be written on the subject, and I've gone over it at length earlier on the board. I disagree with you about the meta view and the through line. I understand the point, but it's impossible to disentangle it from what happened to Brian mentally in the second Landy period, from the circumstances of his life, and from what happens to older artists in general.

(Also, "He allows those sources to determine how he feels, what he wants, what his vision is," seems extreme. It's impossible to know something like that. It's probably true some of the time, but it's probably false some of the time too.)

This is my thesis: Brian's production and hand in same has always been directly linked to the resources he has available -- when the BBs were making their own records, they sounded stripped down. When he hired Spector's people, they sounded like Spector records. When he recorded on his own, it sounded like Love You. And this general approach continues to the day -- he has a band assembled explicitly to re-create his biggest hits (and rarities) from the mid-60s. Using that band means his present-day records sound a lot like the mid-60s.

There are a handful of other issues. No question, Brian leads less on the production side than in his halcyon days. He is not a hugely ambitious producer on his own (I mean, the records over the last 15 years or so that he has the clearest claim to producing solo are "Everything I Need" -- the original, unreleased mix -- "Christmas Day," "Walking Down the Path of Life," "This Spirit of Rock and Roll" and the TLOS demos -- all of which are pleasant, but hardly outrageous). But I also see that as directly linked to his illness and the byzantine complexities of his life and the record business. Would fans appreciate all his recent records sounding really stripped down? Maybe. Would anyone else? Hard to say.

Secondly, I think Brian really exited the production race after Smile's collapse. He had good ideas that he executed well after that point, but always as individual tracks rather than albums. Realistically, 15BO and LY are much more about Carl and the band cleaning up Brian's ramshackle studio recordings and demos respectively. Yes, that sound can be an aesthetic, but I don't know how consciously BW made that decision. (Testimony from the time suggests that he was basically forced to record 15BO and raced through it without trying.) So when I talk about Brian leading less, I don't think he's really led (in the Pet Sounds sense) for some four decades.

A broader problem: Who of Brian's generation is still "advancing" sonically? What other artists of that age are still actively trying new things? There are a handful -- Paul Simon comes to mind -- but most of them, including folks like McCartney and Dylan, use the forms and sounds that they are comfortable with to make their new music. Most of McCartney's stuff (experimental projects aside) sounds like the late 60s or early 70s. Most of Dylan's sounds like records from the 40s and 50s. As mature musicians, they're not as interested in experimentation for the sake of experimentation. And they're not really having hits anymore, so they're not chasing some hot new sound.

So while we may be disappointed that Brian transitioned from being a record-making mastermind to a singer-songwriter who produces his albums with lots of help, the same thing has happened to a lot of people. And the flashes of that former mastermind can still be glimpsed often enough to add excitement to even mundane projects.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 10:02:26 PM
i hope we get at least one song where you can tell brian was pushing himself creatively.  Like "midnight's another day" on TLOS.  that song sticks out, and it isn't surprising when brian says he pushed himself to write a good song for that one


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 01, 2012, 10:48:13 PM
Also which songs on Love You did Carl produce? I was aware he mixed 15 Big Ones and Love You, but I was under the impression that Brian had done a great deal of the work himself including the instrumental work. Where did Carl pick things up on that project, did he also do the production on Adult/Child? I never would have thought that from listening to the recordings.

Carl basically took Brian's original productions and - "Good Time" & "Ding Dang" excepted - polished them up some (in some cases, a lot) via a remix and a few overdubs. Brian's original mixes are out there and they're curiously flat and lifeless.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 01, 2012, 11:32:07 PM
Fishmonk: There's a lot to be written on the subject, and I've gone over it at length earlier on the board. But I generally think that Brian's production and hand in same has always been very connected to the resources he has on hand at any given time -- when the BBs were making their own records, they sounded stripped down. When he hired Spector's people, they sounded like Spector records. When he recorded on his own, it sounded like Love You. And this general approach continues to the day -- he has a band assembled explicitly to re-create his biggest hits (and rarities) from the mid-60s. Using that band is going to create records that sound like what the band was hired to do.

Now, there are a handful of other issues here. I do think it's undeniable that Brian has led less in the production side of things than in his halcyon days. He is not a hugely ambitious producer on his own (I mean, the records over the last 15 years or so that he has the clearest claim to producing solo are "Everything I Need" -- the original, unreleased mix -- "Christmas Day," "Walking Down the Path of Life" and the TLOS demos -- all of which are pleasant, but hardly outrageous). But I also see that as very hard to separate from his illness and the byzantine complexities of his life. Would fans appreciate all his recent records sounding really stripped down? Maybe. But would anyone else? Hard to say.

Secondly, I think Brian really exited the production race after Smile's collapse. He had good ideas that he executed well after that point, but always as individual tracks rather than albums. Realistically, 15BO and LY are much more about Carl and the band cleaning up Brian's ramshackle studio recordings and demos respectively. Yes, that sound can be an aesthetic, but I don't know how consciously BW made that decision, if that makes sense. (Testimony from the time suggests that he was basically forced to record 15BO and raced through it without really trying.) So when I talk about Brian leading less, I suppose I actually mean that I don't think he's really led creatively for some four decades.

But a broader problem is that who of Brian's generation is still "advancing" sonically? What other artists of that age are still actively trying new things? There are a handful -- Paul Simon comes to mind -- but most of them, including folks like McCartney and Dylan, use the forms and sounds that they are comfortable with to make their new music. Most of McCartney's stuff (side projects aside) sounds like the late 60s or early 70s. Most of Dylan's sounds like records from the 40s and 50s. As mature musicians, they're simply not as interested in experimentation for the sake of experimentation. And they're not really having hits anymore, so they're not chasing some hot new sound.

In that sense, while there's an element of disappointment that Brian transitioned from being a record-making mastermind to a singer-songwriter who produces his albums with lots of help, the same thing has happened to a lot of people.

Excellent points Wirestone. If I may respond to some of it,
Firstly I think Brian's records started sounding like Spector records primarily because that's how he wanted them to sound. He hired Spector people because he wanted a Spector sound, it was no accident. He attended Spector sessions and made a deliberate attempt to understand what techniques were being used. Furthermore he was very conscious of what he was doing to develop that sound. In Goodbye Surfing, Hello God there's a part where he draws a chart showing where he was in relation to Spector and what direction he was going in. My point is, he had a broader meta-understanding of production, a philosophical or theoretical approach to the art of recording. There are times in interviews when he tries to get into this or discuss what makes a record well produced. It's an artform that isn't well understood to this day, what constitutes the actual production of a record, what are the goals of the producer, what makes a production successful? Great writers and artists have this type of understanding of their own technique, they follow their instincts but guide their impulses with self critical analysis of their own style and approach. I think this is something Brian did, something that he possessed.

That's what always made the the development between Smiley Smile and Friends so interesting to me. It's easy to discount this period, after all it represented the near total collapse of the band's popularity and commercial viability, and is usually seen as a haphazard grasping at musical straws by Brian. I can't help hearing something very intelligent going on during those 9 or so months however. A controlled process of self instruction and reorientation. He deconstructed his sound and started over from the ground level, instilling his music with a new economy and restraint along the way. I think it's a very impressive and disciplined evolution, at least that's how I've always interpreted things. To say that Brian was in a "production race" seems like nothing more than a myth to me, with whom was he racing? George Martin? I think he was more in a competition for acclaim and sales with The Beatles than he was for pure advancement and innovation in production. If he believed he was explicitly in a race with another dedicated producer during the Smile-era it would have undoubtedly been Phil Spector, even though Spector fell off the radar after River Deep, Mountain High (likely the primary inspiration for Heroes & Villains). I really think that aspect has been grossly overstated and Brian's production from Smiley Smile up until things like Old Man River shows a definite explication and advancement of production technique and aesthetic, although I will grant you it was not uninhibited and was constrained, to an extent, by growing pressures; the birth of his first daughter, the commercial turmoil the band experienced, and the more assertive voices of the other Beach Boys, things which all led to a purposeful suppression of his creative instincts and ostensible abandonment of his own artistic aspirations.

Following the release of Friends however I do not believe that Brian was able to contain himself, despite his best attempts to escape his musical career. I think partially he felt a sense of bitterness towards the rest of the band, which caused him to indulge certain tendencies in his music more willingly as part of a general self destructive pattern, as if he was trying to render himself unfit for continued contribution. More importantly I think he began to adopt his peculiar manner as a self defense mechanism. During the Smile era he was vocally concerned with how he would appear to his audience, and his work up to Friends had a vulnerable side which he made an attempt to conceal through an ironic sort of impish humor. His work in 1969/1970 has always told an interesting story to me. Games Two Can Play, Good Time, H.E.L.P. Is On The Way, Loop De Loop, Take A Load Off Your Feet. Where did these new songwriting impulses come from? I think aesthetically these show a clear link Friends-era material, Old Man River, and Tonight You Belong To Me, though it's hard to parse out Brian's work during this time as these songs are not often recognized as an important singular development of Brian's music especially because, from what I understand, something like Loop De Loop hasn't been released in a form reflecting Brian's original work on it. I would characterize these songs as a sort of missing link between Friends and Love You. They're very revealing lyrically, showing a new sense of ironic insincerity, and overall signify a clear evolution of Brian's "voice", but they have unfortunately been whitewashed and sort of shunned in the band's catalog.

Cows In The Pasture is another album that would definitely aid this type of examination, I can't help but imagine it as sounding something like the music discussed above translated into the country idiom, which might explain why it hasn't surfaced. Though that is simply speculation on my part. Another case study is This Whole World, which is generally considered a classic. I understand the track as released on Sunflower was produced by both Brian and Carl, and though I can't remember the specific information regarding it, I do recall hearing Brian first produced the track and that Carl produced the vocals, and that like 15 Big Ones it was mixed in a way inconsistent with Brian's original approach. Though I won't claim to know the full story, I'm simply going on things I've read around these parts. The American Spring version of the song is really interesting in this respect, I've always imagined it as a more purely Brian take on the song, but then again it's an unresolved mystery as to who contributed what on the Spring album. Different sources have said different things, Desper minimized Brian's input while Marilyn indicated it was more significant than that. Regardless the Spring album feels like one more in line with Brian's evolving sound, whether it be Sweet Mountain, Good Time, or Had To Phone Ya. It would be useful to know more about what was done on that project, but I still view it as pointing the way forward in any case.

It's unfortunate that so many of his songs from this period haven't been really bootlegged, or have been erased or lost, or maybe even never actually recorded because it's harder to trace what he was really up to. Funky Pretty and Mount Vernon are pretty clear demonstrations though, and this is where Brian starts becoming more entrenched I think, working on songs he probably knew the other band members wouldn't support and embracing instincts he knew wouldn't be approved. But again, you can see him working his way forwards and subsuming new ideas into his M.O., likely from the Switched On Bach LP. What happened after Holland is uncertain, I still don't really understand what led to the band trying to put Brian back in charge, which is something they seemed to attempt even before 15 Big Ones during the Caribou sessions. Why at a time when it was obvious that Brian wasn't willing to create music that would advance the band commercially was it that he was given even more control? I can see the promise of another Brian produced album had a certain marketable allure, but how was the band possibly able to negotiate that amongst themselves? Especially after the Caribou sessions. Certainly they must have known what would happen, why did Carl, Dennis or even Brian go along with it? It's impossible to figure out, but in any case the coloring of 15 Big Ones as a rushed album seems unfair. Others on this board have indicated that Brian's original work on that album was much better than Carl's final mix made it out to be, and Brian's fatigue is somewhat understandable as it seems at least 30 songs were worked on, and the nature of the album didn't appear to be concrete enough to bring things to a prompt close. Until we hear the original mix, and learn more about what the intention was and why specifically things fell apart, I don't think anyone can say with any definite certainty what happened, though I will maintain until then that it's a significant data point on Brian's curve. Both 15 Big Ones and Love You seem to me something much more than unusuable demos polished off by Carl. They're the unmistakable product or Brian's creative evolution up until that point, from Friends, Old Man River, Walk On By, and Tonight You Belong To Me, to Brian's 1969/1970/1971 songs, to Sweet Mountain and Funky Pretty and Mount Vernon. Love You is the obvious next step, the logical continuation of everything he was doing over the last six or seven years.

I would still like to know what specific work Carl did on Love You, based on the Brian Loves You boot I can't help but be curious. Was it simply the mixing? Did Carl go back in and record additional instrumentation, if so what? This also begs the question of whether or not he produced Adult/Child. I've never gotten that impression, and it seems strange to me that Brian would grow weary of producing Love You only to immediately begin work on a set of songs written at the same time. Is the contention that Love You more represented Carl's vision than Brian's? Or that he simply did some tinkering on it? The latter I would grant but the former I think is a major overstatement. Yes some people helped Brian in his recording, I wouldn't argue that, but I don't always believe that help was positive after 1970, 15 Big Ones being the definite example. It seems more often other people tinkered with Brian's work in order to make it more commercial, which doesn't seem to diminish the inherent artistry of them or override Brian's original vision, suggesting only that one has to do a little digging to see what Brian was really doing. All the impulses are there, you just have to put them together, and maybe one day we'll hear more of the missing links out there.

On Adult/Child you can hear Brian moving towards something new on Deep Purple, It's Over Now, and Life Is For The Living. Here is where Brian was pointing in 1977, this seems to have been his future. After this, I simply can't identify how he got his 80s work. I'm not able to listen to Sweet Insanity or Landylocked in terms of what came before. I can't see logically how he arrived at that point, based on what he was doing in 1977. It doesn't seem to be connected. The same is true for the last decade of his solo albums, they seem to largely ignore what Brian did between 1968 and 1977. It's like they skip over that whole decade and look back at 1965 and 1966 more than anything else. It just doesn't appear to be logical if that makes sense. I can't really tell how he got from point A to point B. That's what I miss in his work, this sense of resolution, of fulfillment. It's a sense of craftsmanship as a producer, of deduction and refinement. I don't care what direction he would have gone in or what his records would have sounded like had he kept producing them, I think we all would be able to sense the type of derivation I'm talking about. That's why Love You just sounds so right to us fans, it's supremely logical in terms of Brian Wilson the producer and artist. The music he's been involved with over the last 20 or 30 years is music without a history without a past without meaning or context. The forthcoming album will only be another album apart from the legacy Brian worked so hard to create. Sure lots of musicians fall into apathy in their later careers, but many of those musicians weren't also producers, and had Brian continued to develop, I think his work would end up meaning a whole lot more. And that's what I desperately wish we could hear on this album, rather than an 'executive producer' credit in the liner notes.

Sorry for the length of this, it just sort of all came out without me trying.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 02, 2012, 12:12:14 AM
I don't blame love and mercy though, that was the sound of the times, and it's soo good live so whatever.  Love and mercy is way superior to me.

The album take of "Love And Mercy" may be the worst recording I've ever heard. I just pictures this 80s lady with shitty poodle hair wearing a headset, talking about getting your degree in computer science at DeVry or some sh*t whenever I hear it. I never want to hear it ever again ever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 01:05:05 AM
Thanks to Fishmonk & Wirestone  –  excellent reading.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 01:08:33 AM
Thanks to Fishmonk & Wirestone  –  excellent reading.

Seconded.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MarcellaHasDirtyFeet on April 02, 2012, 04:34:39 AM
I haven't heard Adult/Child, but I see a very clear connection between Love You and BW88. The same kind of funky, thick basslines, simple lyrical themes, and just plain fun melodies. BW88 seems like Love You part II to these ears. They're also both albums I wouldn't want my friends to catch me listening to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on April 02, 2012, 05:15:48 AM
I knew Joe Thomas would ruin this record. I'm probably speaking a little too soon but it's not looking good..
C'mon man that is one ridiculous statement, I've feared many an album only to be very f*ckin' surprised. Case in point BW Presents SMiLE.

Likening this NEW material to a reconstructed version of a failed album is ridiculous! The only thing you could compare it to is Imagination, since Thomas virtually ruined that record with his glossy adult contemporary bullsh*t. JT is credited on 5 songs, 2 of which are "Your Imagination" and "Lay Down Burdon", well known songs within BW/BB fans(well known not favorite). Anyway, I guess I'm not completely against Thomas being involved in some songwriting but I can't stand his production! Oh yeah, those other 3 songs he co-wrote? They're horrible.
I didn't liken this new music to anything. Your statement was that Joe Thomas had ruined the new album. My point was/is that your statement is ridiculous as we've yet to hear it. I'm no great fan of Imagination but I won't pre-judge music that is yet to be heard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 05:55:08 AM
I haven't heard Adult/Child, but I see a very clear connection between Love You and BW88. The same kind of funky, thick basslines, simple lyrical themes, and just plain fun melodies. BW88 seems like Love You part II to these ears. They're also both albums I wouldn't want my friends to catch me listening to.

To each his own, then.

I find them very different soundwise. Love You is basic, BBs in 'punk' mode. Only one or some synths on each track, primitive drums, a horn and some surf guitar here and there, and mostly very coarse vocals. Still: broad stereo, good dynamics.

BW88: overdone, odd compressed production (perhaps an influence of Jeff Lynne's?), way too much typically '80s syndrums (sometimes doubletracked), thin layers of vocals, and most of the tracks sound too crowded anyway to these ears.

Summary: Love You IS the BBs at that time, BW88 WAS MADE to sound like the BBs of yore.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 06:01:17 AM
probably the main reason i haven't sat down and listened to BW88 is the production and his voice.  there's just the overwhelming attack of compressed 80s production and it hurts my ears


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 06:27:05 AM
probably the main reason i haven't sat down and listened to BW88 is the production and his voice.  there's just the overwhelming attack of compressed 80s production and it hurts my ears

Yep. I can just about stand my vinyl copy via cans.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 02, 2012, 11:57:38 AM
Fishmonk, that was an excellent post. And your interpretation of Brian's late-60s stuff is very interesting. Personally, I can't help but think the change in credit from "Produced by Brian Wilson" to "Produced by the Beach Boys" carries enormous import. And as involved as Brian was in many of those records, I've tended to think that he was making a different kind of music then, something that was purposefully anti-commercial. When 15BO, Love You and Adult Child come along, Brian (in my opinion) was once again trying to be broadly appealing. He had changed, and was already (at least in 15BO) purposefully trying to re-create his 60s sound (Palisades Park, anyone?)

As far as Carl's influence on the Love You release -- I simply mention it because I think it weakens one of your main points. That is, that Brian had a clear and traceable creative direction that he understood as such. He may have had such an idea for the record at one point, but he did not follow it through -- he was unwilling or incapable of doing so. People who are proud of their work as a producer and want to create a complete album don't just abandon the recording process when semi-usable takes of several songs have been tracked. Likewise, in Adult Child, Brian comes up with the big band concept -- and uses it for only three tracks. He loses interest and fills the rest of the record with old songs or demo-like productions.

Again, the point is not that Brian doesn't have a creative vision in the 70s -- it's that he really can't fulfill it on his own. And I think this is a critical point, because it hugely influences how I see Brian's creative trajectory in the 80s through today. What's more, I see his creative journey over the last 30 years as being quite traceable (if not always consistent or self-directed) and of a piece with his output since the 70s. I will return to this point.

Quote
The same is true for the last decade of his solo albums, they seem to largely ignore what Brian did between 1968 and 1977. It's like they skip over that whole decade and look back at 1965 and 1966 more than anything else. It just doesn't appear to be logical if that makes sense.

I don't think that's quite true. At least not with the Moog synths on TLOS and the Disney record, the very Love You sound of the TLOS bonus tracks, and a bunch of other things. But Brian is also not being called on to release an album a year by a record company thrilled to put out whatever he gives them. That means he has to tailor his album-length output to the deals his folks make. And that often includes a certain retro component.

Quote
It's a sense of craftsmanship as a producer, of deduction and refinement. I don't care what direction he would have gone in or what his records would have sounded like had he kept producing them, I think we all would be able to sense the type of derivation I'm talking about.

I simply don't agree with you here. Brian has always been less-than-perfectionist (witness the shoddy original mix of Pet Sounds), and "deduction and refinement" are subjective. The Gershwin album does sound refined and crafted to these ears, and I think that was largely Brian's doing. And I don't know if "we all would have been able to sense" what you say.

Tastes change, and our sense of history changes. Making records has a political dimension. And what listeners hear changes by the decade. 15 Big Ones, for instance, is in the midst of being reassessed -- after years of loathing. Imagination was rethought after the release of GIOMH. BW88, after years of criticism for the synths, has been rehabilitated thanks to the reissue. And even Pet Sounds and Smile are being rethought -- with many superfans (like yourself) calling attention to the albums that immediately followed. The point is that fan reaction is an imperfect barometer -- at best -- to understanding the actual creative process behind any particular album. Take 15 Big Ones -- accounts about its origin suggest it was just as "forced" on Brian as any project from the 80s to today. Yet enough time has passed that we no longer mind that the 1975 Brian was pressured to turn out a BB comeback record. Time heals all.

Quote
That's why Love You just sounds so right to us fans, it's supremely logical in terms of Brian Wilson the producer and artist.

Why does art have to be logical? Surely part of being an artist is upending logic. I mean, what does "Party" have to do with "Pet Sounds"? How do those two things logically connect, besides both being by Brian Wilson? It's a bigger distance between those two records than between the glossy AC of "Imagination" and the '50s retro vibe of GIOMH. So why is the difference between the first two evidence of Brian's genius and the difference between the second evidence that he now lacks an artistic soul?

Quote
The music he's been involved with over the last 20 or 30 years is music without a history without a past without meaning or context.

I have a hard time understanding how we can say that his current music is too reminiscent of mid-60s Beach Boys records and then call it "music without a history without a past." I understand that you're underlining your basic point -- that Brian's presence is simply not that audible in his recent work -- but that doesn't mean his current work is lacking a past. If anything, you should be arguing that it has too much of a past!

Quote
Had Brian continued to develop, I think his work would end up meaning a whole lot more.

I find Brian's solo work to be the most meaningful part of his output, at least to me personally. Folks' mileage varies here.

Quote
And that's what I desperately wish we could hear on this album, rather than an 'executive producer' credit in the liner notes.

According to the original press release, Mike is the executive producer and Brian is the producer on the new record. (Probyn Gregory suggested Joe Thomas was EP, so that may have changed.)

Anyway, this is fun! I'm planning a separate post that outlines Brian's creative journey from the beginning of the second Landy period to the present -- and I hope it might fill in some empty spaces for you on this. I think the evolution of BW for the last 30 years can be followed pretty easily -- it's just that you have to do it through interviews and obscure tracks. But it's there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 02:26:52 PM

According to the original press release, Mike is the executive producer and Brian is the producer on the new record. (Probyn Gregory suggested Joe Thomas was EP, so that may have changed.)

I'm struggling to find that interview online anymore. I wondered at the time whether Probyn had been a little too frank in being so honest and open, and whether the publishing website has been asked to remove it.  If anyone knows different, I'll happy be contradicted.  Welcome it, in fact.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on April 02, 2012, 03:51:15 PM
EDIT: Well, I said that I would delete the post if anyone had a problem with it. The last thing I want to do is cause trouble for our beloved Beach Boys! To anyone who thinks this is censorship: I volunteered to delete the post if there were any problems with it, so yes, it is self-censorship.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 06:19:40 PM
i'd like to hear what brian says about "that's why god made the radio"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 02, 2012, 07:43:01 PM
Interviewer:So Brian tell us about "that's why God made the radio."
Brian: I don't know why he created the radio,I guess so people can hear music
Interviewer:I mean the song
Brian:what song?
Interviewer:"that's why God made the radio"
Brian: what radio? you mean that one? (points to his living room stereo)
Interviewer:The song
Brian:there are so many songs,my favorite is "be my baby"
Interviewer:No I mean the song you wrote about God creating the radio
Brian:God created the radio? how can that be I thought a person invented it
Interviewer:No the song
Brian: people create songs too..
Interviewer:I mean the single
Brian: no I'm married
Interviewer:No the song about God creating the radio that is on your new cd
Brian:I don't have a new cd, you mean the disney cd?
Interviewer:no the new beach boys one
Brian: the greatest hits package?
Interviewer:no the NEW one
Brian: oh you mean postcards from california? the beach boys sang on that one.
Interviewer:no the actual beach boys cd
Brian:oh yeah it's good,sounds real mellow
Interviewer:so what about the song about God creating the radio
Brian:yeah there are many mellow songs since God created the radio
Interviewer:AAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!! (the end)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on April 02, 2012, 08:05:02 PM
I don`t think there`s too much that`s inexplicable about Brian`s work from the mid-70s onwards.

For 15BO and LY he went back to those oldies and recorded children`s songs because they were comfortable for him in his fragile mental state. He showed periods of enthusiasm for LY and Adult/Child because that`s another symptom of mental illness... Spells of feverish activity before losing interest. It happened again very briefly for KTSA I guess.

As for the music, in the 70s he used the Moog because it was there and by the 80s music had moved onto the Synth. Loads of empty headed fools were over-using it so no surprise that Brian`s people were happy for him to do the same. When he returned in the 90s that fad had passed and the people he was working with clearly knew it. Throughout Brian`s solo career the role of the people he has worked with can`t be underestimated.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 02, 2012, 09:03:51 PM
I don`t think there`s too much that`s inexplicable about Brian`s work from the mid-70s onwards.

For 15BO and LY he went back to those oldies and recorded children`s songs because they were comfortable for him in his fragile mental state. He showed periods of enthusiasm for LY and Adult/Child because that`s another symptom of mental illness... Spells of feverish activity before losing interest. It happened again very briefly for KTSA I guess.

As for the music, in the 70s he used the Moog because it was there and by the 80s music had moved onto the Synth. Loads of empty headed fools were over-using it so no surprise that Brian`s people were happy for him to do the same. When he returned in the 90s that fad had passed and the people he was working with clearly knew it. Throughout Brian`s solo career the role of the people he has worked with can`t be underestimated.

I wouldn't agree with this necessarily. It's too easy an interpretation of the lyrical content of Love You. Examining Brian's lyrical themes presents an unfortunate challenge as he so rarely assumed this obligation. You can go back quite a long way in an effort to provide greater context to the lyrics of the Love You songs. I'm Bugged At My Old Man is one of the earlier songs attributed to Brian Wilson solely. Are those lyrics so far removed from what Brian was writing in 1976? How about Busy Doin' Nothing? Or the songs he worked on during the Sunflower period like Games Two Can Play. Irony is crucial to understanding Brian Wilson the lyricist and the role of irony on Love You should not be underestimated.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 02, 2012, 10:41:55 PM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 02, 2012, 11:09:35 PM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

Are we allowed to have an explanation? Seems kind of ridiculous seeing as it was a good interview. Probyn gave honest answers and that's the only thing I could see anyone getting their knickers in a twist about. I just don't get it. Either way, I've got it saved just in case we'll never get to see it again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 02, 2012, 11:10:49 PM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

Are we allowed to have an explanation? Seems kind of ridiculous seeing as it was a good interview. Probyn gave honest answers and that's the only thing I could see anyone getting their knickers in a twist about. I just don't get it. Either way, I've got it saved just in case we'll never get to see it again.

"Probyn gave honest answers and that's the only thing I could see anyone getting their knickers in a twist about."

Congratulations - you just answered your own question.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on April 02, 2012, 11:14:29 PM
The only thing I can see some of Brian's people not being too happy about is the Tonto thing. but if it was just one or two problems they didn't have to take down the whole interview.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 11:17:51 PM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety.

Sincere thanks b00ts…

Not sure what Andrew's alluded-to "reason" for its removal was…

BRI/EMI/Capitol whoever asking for a contentious, inaccurate, libelous (insert another reason here) post by a fan to be removed is one thing; having what appears to be a legitimate interview taken down, without reason, has a smear of press censorship about it.

That said, I'm not finding a lot of detail about the site that the interview was posted on.

Any reason you're able to share please, Andrew?  Even in a PM…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 02, 2012, 11:21:52 PM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

Are we allowed to have an explanation? Seems kind of ridiculous seeing as it was a good interview. Probyn gave honest answers and that's the only thing I could see anyone getting their knickers in a twist about. I just don't get it. Either way, I've got it saved just in case we'll never get to see it again.

"Probyn gave honest answers and that's the only thing I could see anyone getting their knickers in a twist about."

Congratulations - you just answered your own question.  :)

lol woohoo!

That's still pretty lame, imo. Heaven forbid the guy has his own point of view and opinions. There wasn't anything real damaging, hurtful, or bad in the interview from what I could tell. I still love the Beach Boys, I'm still buying the new cd, and I still have my tickets for the tour. Taking that interview down just seems to me like a bunch of unnecessary work and effort over practically nothing. It's like punishing a child for saying "crap" or something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on April 02, 2012, 11:50:11 PM
If anyone has seen Dom Priore's post on Facebook recently, it could spark some controversy!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 03, 2012, 12:09:37 AM
This is the thing about reuniting the Beach Boys. Everything suddenly becomes much higher stakes. More money, more opportunities, more egos to massage. The fact that it's gone so well (i.e., quietly) up to this point is probably due to all the principals keeping things as quiet as possible. Any unapproved messages from the center of things -- even ones that seem harmless and fun -- are probably seen as damaging to a carefully constructed equilibrium.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alex on April 03, 2012, 12:56:55 AM
If anyone has seen Dom Priore's post on Facebook recently, it could spark some controversy!!

I love Mr. Priore's/Dom's/whatever he prefers to be called's books, and admire his passion for Smile...It pains me to say this, but it looks like he's still on his damn "Smile was one or two sessions away from being finished" trip. Seems like he'd be a pretty interesting guy to meet in person, though...I'd bet one could debate SMiLE to the death with him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on April 03, 2012, 02:24:21 AM
If anyone has seen Dom Priore's post on Facebook recently, it could spark some controversy!!

I love Mr. Priore's/Dom's/whatever he prefers to be called's books, and admire his passion for Smile...It pains me to say this, but it looks like he's still on his damn "Smile was one or two sessions away from being finished" trip. Seems like he'd be a pretty interesting guy to meet in person, though...I'd bet one could debate SMiLE to the death with him.
Brian had it in the can...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 03, 2012, 02:30:22 AM
Tell the people who don't Facebook what that post is! I did some creepin' on Google but apparently can't look at his wall if I'm not signed into the account I don't have .  :afro


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 03, 2012, 02:45:00 AM
Interviewer:So Brian tell us about "that's why God made the radio."
Brian: I don't know why he created the radio,I guess so people can hear music
Interviewer:I mean the song
Brian:what song?
Interviewer:"that's why God made the radio"
Brian: what radio? you mean that one? (points to his living room stereo)
Interviewer:The song
Brian:there are so many songs,my favorite is "be my baby"
Interviewer:No I mean the song you wrote about God creating the radio
Brian:God created the radio? how can that be I thought a person invented it
Interviewer:No the song
Brian: people create songs too..
Interviewer:I mean the single
Brian: no I'm married
Interviewer:No the song about God creating the radio that is on your new cd
Brian:I don't have a new cd, you mean the disney cd?
Interviewer:no the new beach boys one
Brian: the greatest hits package?
Interviewer:no the NEW one
Brian: oh you mean postcards from california? the beach boys sang on that one.
Interviewer:no the actual beach boys cd
Brian:oh yeah it's good,sounds real mellow
Interviewer:so what about the song about God creating the radio
Brian:yeah there are many mellow songs since God created the radio
Interviewer:AAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!! (the end)
;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 03, 2012, 05:25:58 AM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

The words that I've bolded and colored are the words that concern me.  I get the 'freedom of speech' argument, but I get the impression that this interview caused some grief among certain folks.  I wouldn't want there to be any problems either within the band, or with management because these words are again out there for all to see.  Here's another vote to please delete.  We now know that there are people here who have saved this interview, so if you haven't read it, perhaps you could PM the poster who posted it.  If you have read it, you shouldn't care if it's deleted. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 05:48:30 AM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

The words that I've bolded and colored are the words that concern me.  I get the 'freedom of speech' argument, but I get the impression that this interview caused some grief among certain folks.  I wouldn't want there to be any problems either within the band, or with management because these words are again out there for all to see.  Here's another vote to please delete.  We now know that there are people here who have saved this interview, so if you haven't read it, perhaps you could PM the poster who posted it.   

The Beach Boys have experienced, let's see… physically and psychologically abusive parenting, drug addiction, alcoholism, death by cancer, death by drowning, nervous breakdowns, law suits, group sex, estrangement, infidelity, divorce, abusive doctors, mental illness, and plenty more.

I hope that, by now, their hides are tough enough to deal with a little honesty in an interview by a fellow musician, one who's very much admired and respected by their fans.

Just my 2p-worth.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 03, 2012, 06:19:42 AM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

The words that I've bolded and colored are the words that concern me.  I get the 'freedom of speech' argument, but I get the impression that this interview caused some grief among certain folks.  I wouldn't want there to be any problems either within the band, or with management because these words are again out there for all to see.  Here's another vote to please delete.  We now know that there are people here who have saved this interview, so if you haven't read it, perhaps you could PM the poster who posted it.   

The Beach Boys have experienced, let's see… physically and psychologically abusive parenting, drug addiction, alcoholism, death by cancer, death by drowning, nervous breakdowns, law suits, group sex, estrangement, infidelity, divorce, abusive doctors, mental illness, and plenty more.

I hope that, by now, their hides are tough enough to deal with a little honesty in an interview by a fellow musician, one who's very much admired and respected by their fans.

Just my 2p-worth.

Probyn is an employee (or a hired musician for that matter)... it's understandable if Brian's people claim control over what their employees talk publicly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 03, 2012, 07:17:41 AM
maybe John Stamos' people had the article removed... :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MarcellaHasDirtyFeet on April 03, 2012, 07:35:19 AM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on April 03, 2012, 08:09:39 AM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.
OK, done. Thanks for the heads-up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 03, 2012, 08:54:47 AM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Dennis and the Mansonites?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 09:12:45 AM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 03, 2012, 09:15:33 AM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.
Can you give a sanitized summary of events in the book? ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 09:22:41 AM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.
Can you give a sanitized summary of events in the book? ;)

To be honest I'd rather not. A summary might involve reading sections again and reading this dirt about the band I regard as heroes wasn't pleasant first time around. The book itself isn't a nice contribution to the BBs' story.  I'm not normally squeamish but this just wasn't pleasant…

(and now that I've written that, watch its sales soar on Amazon…   ::)   )   :(

Buy Peter Carlin's book, or Jon's FAQ for the important stuff that counts, please…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 03, 2012, 09:58:38 AM
Well, it appears "Read it Later" has come in handy for me... Here is the Probyn interview in its entirety. I doubt that the interview was taken down for any real reason, i.e. BRI being unhappy with it. If that's the case though, and someone from BRI is reading this, just PM me and I will delete this post.

This interview was taken down for a very good reason, so I feel your reposting it in full isn't going to be at all helpful bearing in mind that 9especially now) all related boards are monitored regularly. Suggest you delete this ASAP.

The words that I've bolded and colored are the words that concern me.  I get the 'freedom of speech' argument, but I get the impression that this interview caused some grief among certain folks.  I wouldn't want there to be any problems either within the band, or with management because these words are again out there for all to see.  Here's another vote to please delete.  We now know that there are people here who have saved this interview, so if you haven't read it, perhaps you could PM the poster who posted it.  

The Beach Boys have experienced, let's see… physically and psychologically abusive parenting, drug addiction, alcoholism, death by cancer, death by drowning, nervous breakdowns, law suits, group sex, estrangement, infidelity, divorce, abusive doctors, mental illness, and plenty more.

I hope that, by now, their hides are tough enough to deal with a little honesty in an interview by a fellow musician, one who's very much admired and respected by their fans.

Just my 2p-worth.

This is basically what I was thinking. They've been to hell and back. A measly interview shouldn't matter one way or the other. You'd think they'd spend their time more wisely and on more serious issues than this. I appreciated Probyn's honesty when reading the interview; it was a very real perspective as opposed to sugar coating everything and practically lying. With books floating around like The Wilson Project and all of the information we have on the band's career and all of the things we know they've been through, I couldn't see what this interview entailed that has them on the frits trying to get rid of it.

But I do understand that the honesty could possibly keep them from certain opportunities that depend on outside forces. Just kind of stupid.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SG7 on April 03, 2012, 12:00:03 PM
Shame, I actually really liked that interview. It certainly gives the reader a candid glimpse into the proceedings. His stories about the Grammy proceedings were especially interesting.

"And the managements red glare, the red tape bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that censorship is still there..."  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 12:08:57 PM
Yep, so incredibly stupid and dangerous that a person's words could vanish because of the whims and desires of a corporate entity.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 03, 2012, 01:00:12 PM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.

More than anything I found that book boring beyond belief and the 'revelations' in it were few, I mean who'd have guessed that members of The Beach Boys had sex with groupies?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 03, 2012, 01:02:44 PM
Yep, so incredibly stupid and dangerous that a person's words could vanish because of the whims and desires of a corporate entity.

You know, it is not really stupid or dangerous.  As another poster stated up thread, Probyn is technically an employee of the band. Employers do (very logically  and rightfully) have control over what their employees say about them in the media.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 01:12:23 PM
Ugh, I'm deleting what I wrote since I already have one thread dangling in Off Topics that I have no time to contribute to. Suffice it to say, I find that argument to be not very compelling or convincing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 03, 2012, 01:18:55 PM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.

More than anything I found that book boring beyond belief and the 'revelations' in it were few, I mean who'd have guessed that members of The Beach Boys had sex with groupies?
But Carl and Al had been thought as family men. :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 01:28:33 PM
Yep, so incredibly stupid and dangerous that a person's words could vanish because of the whims and desires of a corporate entity.

You know, it is not really stupid or dangerous.  As another poster stated up thread, Probyn is technically an employee of the band. Employers do (very logically  and rightfully) have control over what their employees say about them in the media.

Thought that kind of ownership of worker units went out with the Industrial Revoution...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 03, 2012, 02:54:08 PM
Yep, so incredibly stupid and dangerous that a person's words could vanish because of the whims and desires of a corporate entity.

You know, it is not really stupid or dangerous.  As another poster stated up thread, Probyn is technically an employee of the band. Employers do (very logically  and rightfully) have control over what their employees say about them in the media.

Thought that kind of ownership of worker units went out with the Industrial Revoution...

There's confidentiality clauses in certain contracts, for instance.

I don't know what the exact cause for the removal of this article: probably it was Brian's management. Maybe the people managing this celebration do not want positive reunion stuff along with stories about a man taking a pass at Brian while at a mental institution... Or what a crap of a time the Grammy Ceremony was.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on April 03, 2012, 03:42:57 PM
old news


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 03, 2012, 04:36:42 PM
That's what always made the the development between Smiley Smile and Friends so interesting to me. It's easy to discount this period, after all it represented the near total collapse of the band's popularity and commercial viability, and is usually seen as a haphazard grasping at musical straws by Brian. I can't help hearing something very intelligent going on during those 9 or so months however. A controlled process of self instruction and reorientation. He deconstructed his sound and started over from the ground level, instilling his music with a new economy and restraint along the way. I think it's a very impressive and disciplined evolution, at least that's how I've always interpreted things.

WOW, very nicely put, FM.  And, I agree totally.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 03, 2012, 05:13:59 PM
That's what always made the the development between Smiley Smile and Friends so interesting to me. It's easy to discount this period, after all it represented the near total collapse of the band's popularity and commercial viability, and is usually seen as a haphazard grasping at musical straws by Brian. I can't help hearing something very intelligent going on during those 9 or so months however. A controlled process of self instruction and reorientation. He deconstructed his sound and started over from the ground level, instilling his music with a new economy and restraint along the way. I think it's a very impressive and disciplined evolution, at least that's how I've always interpreted things.

WOW, very nicely put, FM.  And, I agree totally.


Yes, I also think FM has a nice interpretation of things there. I'm not persuaded it was totally Brian's evolution, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 03, 2012, 07:57:16 PM
Ugh, I'm deleting what I wrote since I already have one thread dangling in Off Topics that I have no time to contribute to. Suffice it to say, I find that argument to be not very compelling or convincing.

That's fine. I'm not here to convince anyone of what is wrong, right or indifferent. The simple  truth is that an employer has the legal right to  institute certain controls over what their employees say about THEM in media outlets. They can't control what people say, there is free speech, but they can have employees enter into agreements agreeng not to divulge information. They also have the right to terminate relationships. Now, like you, I'd really rather talk about the new album...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 03, 2012, 08:56:10 PM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.
Can you give a sanitized summary of events in the book? ;)

To be honest I'd rather not. A summary might involve reading sections again and reading this dirt about the band I regard as heroes wasn't pleasant first time around. The book itself isn't a nice contribution to the BBs' story.  I'm not normally squeamish but this just wasn't pleasant…

(and now that I've written that, watch its sales soar on Amazon…   ::)   )   :(

Buy Peter Carlin's book, or Jon's FAQ for the important stuff that counts, please…

I've heard good and bad on this book, and it's been on my "to read" shelf since I bought it( I'm WAY behind; reading is a distant last from everything else in life)
But having just doen some skimming, it doesn't seem that bad. The BBs were human on tour. yeah. disgusting. huh?
Guess I'll have to take the time to read it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 03, 2012, 09:30:56 PM
Damn it all, I knew I should have saved that interview, didn't even get a chance to finish it. Anyone still have it saved and want to PM me? Sorry to turn it into one of "those" threads, but damn.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 03, 2012, 09:35:17 PM
Damn it all, I knew I should have saved that interview, didn't even get a chance to finish it. Anyone still have it saved and want to PM me? Sorry to turn it into one of "those" threads, but damn.

It's being blown out of proportion at this point. I think the offending bit was like one sentence. Nothing very interesting in all honesty. If AGD hadn't of said anything it probably wouldn't have been too big a deal. AGD should know, the more you tell somebody they can't have something the more they want it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 03, 2012, 09:36:59 PM
By the way I'm really eagerly awaiting the next post from wirestone. If you're reading this wirestone, lets get this thread back into productive territory with a solid post.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 03, 2012, 10:00:42 PM
By the way I'm really eagerly awaiting the next post from wirestone. If you're reading this wirestone, lets get this thread back into productive territory with a solid post.

 :P And I was saving up all these mafia jokes! It might be a day or two, I'm afraid. Things are getting busy in these parts.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dunderhead on April 03, 2012, 10:19:30 PM
By the way I'm really eagerly awaiting the next post from wirestone. If you're reading this wirestone, lets get this thread back into productive territory with a solid post.

 :P And I was saving up all these mafia jokes! It might be a day or two, I'm afraid. Things are getting busy in these parts.

Take your time my friend. In the mean time I'll continue to obsessively listen to 15 Big Ones.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Custom Machine on April 03, 2012, 11:16:11 PM
Heads up from BW.com.

New Rolling Stone magazine article about upcoming new Beach Boys album

(posted by Tom Tobben on March 30, 2012 at 7:29 pm)

Message:

The new April 12 issue of Rolling Stone has a capsule article about the upcoming Beach Boys album, due for release in June. I couldn't find a link to the article, so here it is the full text of the article:

Spring Music Preview section of RS Issue #1154

The Beach Boys
Title TBD -- June

"It's a sentimental thing for me," Brian Wilson says of the Beach Boys' first all-new studio LP in decades. "We've been together 50 years -- that's a long time." Since reuniting last year, the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios -- where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the Sixties. Expect lots of big harmonies and familiar subjects on songs like the mellow rocker "Beaches in Mind" and the nonstalgic ballad "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish or silly like Smiley Smile -- it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65," adds Mike Love. "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."

-- Patrick Doyle


Got this issue in the mail last week and found it cool that in addition to the short write-up in the Spring Music Preview (which, unlike most of the write ups, includes a photo and is in a separate highlighted box), the Beach Boys are also listed on the cover.  I'm thinking it's probably been a close to zillion years since the words "Beach Boys" have appeared on the cover of (the) Rolling Stone.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on April 04, 2012, 01:54:10 AM
Maybe they've all grown tits and are wearing bikinis.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 04, 2012, 03:40:29 AM
Maybe they've all grown tits and are wearing bikinis.

Earcandy?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on April 04, 2012, 04:26:08 AM
Maybe they've all grown tits and are wearing bikinis.

Earcandy?

:lol

I'd be psychologically damaged after seeing such a photoshopped image.

I got that RS issue too; I love how the 3 main headlines aren't about music at all...what a garbage magazine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 04, 2012, 04:45:29 AM
We need Earcandy to make a serious mock album cover along with humor pictures.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 04, 2012, 05:40:10 AM
We need Earcandy to make a serious mock album cover along with humor pictures.

Yeah. Remember the SMiLE-Mobile?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 05, 2012, 11:34:12 AM
Hopefully Earcandy has been too busy to come on here because he's got employment which utilises his talents both for Photoshop and satire.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 06, 2012, 02:52:30 PM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.
Can you give a sanitized summary of events in the book? ;)

To be honest I'd rather not. A summary might involve reading sections again and reading this dirt about the band I regard as heroes wasn't pleasant first time around. The book itself isn't a nice contribution to the BBs' story.  I'm not normally squeamish but this just wasn't pleasant…

(and now that I've written that, watch its sales soar on Amazon…   ::)   )   :(

Buy Peter Carlin's book, or Jon's FAQ for the important stuff that counts, please…

I've heard good and bad on this book, and it's been on my "to read" shelf since I bought it( I'm WAY behind; reading is a distant last from everything else in life)
But having just doen some skimming, it doesn't seem that bad. The BBs were human on tour. yeah. disgusting. huh?
Guess I'll have to take the time to read it.

Having just finished reading the book, I have to say it's really not that bad. It does jump around and there seem to be problems  with his memories, at least as far as what shows took place in what order; other than that he says the Beach Boys did drugs, and had sex with people while on the road (which I have to believe they did) it's not a terrible book. It's easy to read. It's all told( obviously) from the authors viewpoint, and centers( mostly) on what he did while with the BBs. Which is what I'd expect.
Me, I don't know if the things he wrote all happened, or happened the way he wrote them, but it didn't hurt me to read it.
However:  If what you want to read is a book about the BBs that doesn't show them to be real people, who did things that don't fit the Pat Boone image,  then yeah, don't read this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on April 06, 2012, 03:07:37 PM
Group sex...? >:D

EDIT: A Google search of "Beach Boys group sex" does NOT turn up the desired results :lol

Hmm…   has no-one else here read "Endless Summer – My Life With The Beach Boys" by Jack Lloyd? Possibly the grottiest piece of turd-wrangling cash-in that's marred my shelves.  Not pleasant and not respectful either.
Can you give a sanitized summary of events in the book? ;)

To be honest I'd rather not. A summary might involve reading sections again and reading this dirt about the band I regard as heroes wasn't pleasant first time around. The book itself isn't a nice contribution to the BBs' story.  I'm not normally squeamish but this just wasn't pleasant…

(and now that I've written that, watch its sales soar on Amazon…   ::)   )   :(

Buy Peter Carlin's book, or Jon's FAQ for the important stuff that counts, please…

I've heard good and bad on this book, and it's been on my "to read" shelf since I bought it( I'm WAY behind; reading is a distant last from everything else in life)
But having just doen some skimming, it doesn't seem that bad. The BBs were human on tour. yeah. disgusting. huh?
Guess I'll have to take the time to read it.

Having just finished reading the book, I have to say it's really not that bad. It does jump around and there seem to be problems  with his memories, at least as far as what shows took place in what order; other than that he says the Beach Boys did drugs, and had sex with people while on the road (which I have to believe they did) it's not a terrible book. It's easy to read. It's all told( obviously) from the authors viewpoint, and centers( mostly) on what he did while with the BBs. Which is what I'd expect.
Me, I don't know if the things he wrote all happened, or happened the way he wrote them, but it didn't hurt me to read it.
However:  If what you want to read is a book about the BBs that doesn't show them to be real people, who did things that don't fit the Pat Boone image,  then yeah, don't read this.

You mean to tell me they don't sh*t vanilla ice cream? I'm shocked, revolted, and disgusted.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 06, 2012, 03:11:49 PM
Nope, they sh*t chocolate ice cream, just like everybody else.  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 06, 2012, 04:04:52 PM
Ugh!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on April 06, 2012, 05:02:00 PM
Maybe they've all grown tits and are wearing bikinis.

Earcandy?

:lol

I'd be psychologically damaged after seeing such a photoshopped image.

I got that RS issue too; I love how the 3 main headlines aren't about music at all...what a garbage magazine.

I love the magazine, but no, not generally for it's music coverage.  They've probably had the best coverage of the financial meltdown of any magazine or publication.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 07, 2012, 11:15:51 AM
The Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly features interviews with Mike, Brian, Al and David.

Plus articles from Peter Reum and Andrew G. Doe.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 07, 2012, 04:55:42 PM
The Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly features interviews with Mike, Brian, Al and David.

Plus articles from Peter Reum and Andrew G. Doe.



Great. When does it mail?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 07, 2012, 07:59:29 PM
When are we finally going to get a press release for all these Beach Boys releases coming up?  Not just the new album, but also the "commemorative releases" that were planned?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 07, 2012, 08:05:56 PM
The Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly features interviews with Mike, Brian, Al and David.

Plus articles from Peter Reum and Andrew G. Doe.



Great. When does it mail?

It's got to be soon; on March 15th he said it would be a few weeks


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 09, 2012, 06:23:20 AM
I just realized again how lucky we are that we'll get new material. Even Fogerty is now going he nostalgic re-recording way with his new album  ::) :

http://vanguardrecords.tumblr.com/post/20416127315/press-release-legendary-john-fogerty-to-release-new (http://vanguardrecords.tumblr.com/post/20416127315/press-release-legendary-john-fogerty-to-release-new)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on April 09, 2012, 09:57:57 AM
Much as I love him, Fogerty has been revisiting old material for some time now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on April 09, 2012, 10:29:12 AM
You think so, Ed?  Seems like he's done a few albums with original material the past few years. Only thing that's a blast from the past is the live CD/DVD from '97 and another one in 2005. That's what people want to hear, but I really like some of his originals from the last 10 years too.

A little surprised by this Vanguard label. I thought he re-signed with Fantasy (distributed by Concord) a few years ago.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 09, 2012, 10:39:16 AM
He did one or two old songs on "Blue ridge ranger rides again" (Change in the weather) but iirc there were no re-recordings after that (and even before I can't think of any right now). Live recordings don't count imo 'cause in concert you play your hits, that's the way it is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on April 10, 2012, 12:11:01 AM
I didn't mean it that way, Mikie, just that a lot of his good new stuff doesn't sound too far away from his good old stuff. For some people, that would be a bad thing. Me? I love the guy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 10, 2012, 02:21:51 AM
The Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly features interviews with Mike, Brian, Al and David.

Plus articles from Peter Reum and Andrew G. Doe.



Great. When does it mail?

This week.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on April 10, 2012, 02:52:48 AM
Is it possible to buy a download version in pdf format of the current magazine?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on April 10, 2012, 04:36:52 PM
Is it possible to buy a download version in pdf format of the current magazine?

I asked a few months ago and was told no. Annoying isn't it? Seems like it would be money for old rope on their part.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on April 10, 2012, 04:53:59 PM
Well then they have one buyer less.  :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 10, 2012, 07:00:47 PM
And thousands of illegal downloads less.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 10, 2012, 07:05:49 PM
Still waiting to hear back from the editor for ESQ, but anyways, does anybody how much it costs for just this one issue? And if I send it via paypal? Or if you have to subscribe? Cuz I'd like to buy just the one and I've messaged him, but alas, nothing!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on April 10, 2012, 07:11:04 PM
And thousands of illegal downloads less.
I would BUY it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 10, 2012, 07:47:46 PM
And thousands of illegal downloads less.
I would BUY it.

I'm not saying YOU would pirate it, but a lot of people in this age of internet use who prefer instant gratification are also quite partial to not paying for digital media.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 10, 2012, 10:06:50 PM
So lets see, if we look at the last few years and try to extrapolate what this album will sound like... imagine an album with


1. a few covers (I hope not, but have we heard for sure none of them are covers?)

2. a couple songs like Al does on Postcards from California... I would be completely fine with that

3. a couple songs like Brian did on TLOS, or ballads like sung on Disney/Gerswin... I would love that

I think the "wild card" here is Mike Love.  We know what Al's capable of, and we know what Brian's likely to show up with, but what kind of catalyst is Mike going to be?  Other than "Cool Head Warm Heart" which I enjoyed, He hasn't done anything in forever and could either be horrible or great. 

Will the band have the balls to let David write?  Will Bruce have the balls to attempt to write again?  Two more wild cards.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 10, 2012, 10:48:05 PM
Good questions!

So lets see, if we look at the last few years and try to extrapolate what this album will sound like... imagine an album with

1. a few covers (I hope not, but have we heard for sure none of them are covers?)

Not for sure, but I would be surprised. Of course, anything is possible.

Quote
2. a couple songs like Al does on Postcards from California... I would be completely fine with that

I'm sure we'll get Al leads. But I doubt it will sound like Postcards. Whatever your take on that album (and I've gone both directions) -- it's one of the best-sounding, most organic of the BB-related productions to come out since -- well, the 70s at least. I suspect this will be a slicker affair. Which is too bad.

Quote
3. a couple songs like Brian did on TLOS, or ballads like sung on Disney/Gerswin... I would love that

I think this is a lock. Good call.

Quote
I think the "wild card" here is Mike Love.  We know what Al's capable of, and we know what Brian's likely to show up with, but what kind of catalyst is Mike going to be?  Other than "Cool Head Warm Heart" which I enjoyed, He hasn't done anything in forever and could either be horrible or great. 

Have you heard "Mike Love Not War"? Or whatever his mid-2000s album is? It's surprisingly not wretched. (Cool Head comes from there.)  He really dials back the cheese, and it works.

Quote
Will the band have the balls to let David write?  Will Bruce have the balls to attempt to write again?  Two more wild cards.

I think Mike was going to work with David on a song. Haven't heard anything more about it, though. It would be nice. Bruce seems to be a lock -- Probyn G. said that he seemed to have a tune in the mix.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 10, 2012, 11:07:35 PM
Well then I'm officially excited about a Bruce Johnston song.  I think the guy's very talented and still has the potential for greatness in him.  I've always liked Bruce, I hope he gets an opportunity to shine again.  Maybe even *gasp* a lead from him? 

I haven't heard any of Mike's solo albums... personally I don't mind even the cheeze but it's hard for anybody to take that seriously.  I'm not quite a big enough asshole either to say his 'peaceful meditation' philosophy is b.s. or hypocritical, the man has proclaimed that for 40 years, it's not my place to say he's not sincere when he writes those songs... so I'd love to hear "Mike Love, Not War" ... I'll have to download it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 11, 2012, 04:29:46 AM
Well then I'm officially excited about a Bruce Johnston song.  I think the guy's very talented and still has the potential for greatness in him.  I've always liked Bruce, I hope he gets an opportunity to shine again.  Maybe even *gasp* a lead from him? 

Seriously. Bruce is severely wasted in the history of the group. He's no genius like Brian, sure, but he knows exactly what's up with the way Brian writes his songs and can imitate that effortlessly. What's a shame is that he has barely done that in his career, because he loves the cheese... But I have no reason to doubt that he could knock something out of the park on this record given the right prompting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 11, 2012, 06:41:11 AM
Well then I'm officially excited about a Bruce Johnston song.  I think the guy's very talented and still has the potential for greatness in him.  I've always liked Bruce, I hope he gets an opportunity to shine again.  Maybe even *gasp* a lead from him? 

Seriously. Bruce is severely wasted in the history of the group. He's no genius like Brian, sure, but he knows exactly what's up with the way Brian writes his songs and can imitate that effortlessly. What's a shame is that he has barely done that in his career, because he loves the cheese... But I have no reason to doubt that he could knock something out of the park on this record given the right prompting.

I understand what you are saying, but why would you want Bruce to imitate Brian's style? I'd rather hear Bruce being Bruce, even if that means "She Believes in Love Again" or "Tears in the Morning" (aka schlocky schlock). However, a Brian/Bruce composition might be quite interesting.

The only thing that scares me is Bruce's current affinity for shitty modern day country music. I personally have no problem with country music, but most of the modern stuff in that genre is just bad overproduced '90/'00s chart pop with the occasional steel guitar added. But yeah, I doubt his new song would be country, and I'm kinda interested which direction he would go in. Cuz I couldn't imagine his usual quiet overwrought "Bruce and electric piano" type thing being on this album. So it'll be interesting. Probably a faux doo-wop little thing, as he along with Mike doesn't seem to care about much other than maintaining The Beach Boys image as sock-hop, hamburger stand, "Duke of Earl" singing '50s relics, despite the fact that they started in the '60s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 11, 2012, 06:51:29 AM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 11, 2012, 08:26:28 AM
Apologies if this was already posted. A recent interview with Al Jardine:

http://www.insiteatlanta.com/beachboys.asp

He says "Waves of Love" will be on the album in a "different version."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 08:32:30 AM
"I hope we do some a capella on this tour. I’d like to try to sing one nice a capella song. I think we’re talking about this thing called “Our Prayer,” a real beautiful thing off of Smile but that‘s a pretty monstrous song, I don‘t know. That’s a lot of harmony."





I've gotta go change my fu*king pants.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 11, 2012, 08:39:19 AM
THEY NEED TO BALLS UP.

OF COURSE they can sing "Our Prayer" !  It may not be as smooth as Brian's band sings it, but god dammit they're the beach boys, EXACTLY WHEN DID THEY NEUTER THEMSELVES ?

To hear Al Jardine act like he can't sing just breaks my heart. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 11, 2012, 08:43:05 AM
Yeah, I knew there was another bit in the interview that I wanted to highlight but forgot. Al seems keen on doing on “Our Prayer” on the tour. Brian’s band did it every night for several tours, so I’m pretty sure they could do it on this tour and just add in the actual BB voices as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on April 11, 2012, 10:13:25 AM
So Bruce can 'write like Brian"? That's news to me..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on April 11, 2012, 12:45:19 PM
What bothers me more is Al calling the song a "thing", twice, and then saying it was from SMiLE. I think he should have said it was from 20/20 out of respect for the decades that passed between releases.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 02:02:29 PM
What bothers me more is Al calling the song a "thing", twice, and then saying it was from SMiLE. I think he should have said it was from 20/20 out of respect for the decades that passed between releases.

It's a smile song imo


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 11, 2012, 02:09:43 PM
What bothers me more is Al calling the song a "thing", twice, and then saying it was from SMiLE. I think he should have said it was from 20/20 out of respect for the decades that passed between releases.

It's a smile song imo
Yes, and he knows to promote the band's recent release, not a catalog item.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 11, 2012, 05:22:39 PM
So Bruce can 'write like Brian"? That's news to me..


Sarcasm is the lowest form of humour....  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 06:36:42 PM
So Bruce can 'write like Brian"? That's news to me..


Sarcasm is the lowest form of humour....  ::)

I would say puns are


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Puggal on April 11, 2012, 06:42:23 PM
Apologies if this was already posted. A recent interview with Al Jardine:

http://www.insiteatlanta.com/beachboys.asp

He says "Waves of Love" will be on the album in a "different version."

Why can't they just write new songs, it's not like "Waves of Love" is a particularly good song anyway (though Carl sings on it, I guess)?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on April 11, 2012, 07:24:34 PM
I really like the alternative version, Al sounds so great.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 11, 2012, 07:46:51 PM
What bothers me more is Al calling the song a "thing", twice, and then saying it was from SMiLE. I think he should have said it was from 20/20 out of respect for the decades that passed between releases.

...have we run out of things to talk about?  Don't see what the problem is here.  Al is a 70-year-old guy; who cares how he addresses the music he worked on?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 11, 2012, 07:49:55 PM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)

That's something that has always frustrated me about Bruce - he's got the musical ability in spades, but has essentially wasted it on cheesy schlock (albeit a few of them are gems).  I would kill to hear a Bruce/Brian collaboration, I think that could sound really great.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 11, 2012, 07:51:56 PM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)

That's something that has always frustrated me about Bruce - he's got the musical ability in spades, but has essentially wasted it on cheesy schlock (albeit a few of them are gems).  I would kill to hear a Bruce/Brian collaboration, I think that could sound really great.

Well here ya go:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWR_qL_mxo0


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 11, 2012, 07:58:22 PM
Yeah, I knew there was another bit in the interview that I wanted to highlight but forgot. Al seems keen on doing on “Our Prayer” on the tour. Brian’s band did it every night for several tours, so I’m pretty sure they could do it on this tour and just add in the actual BB voices as well.

I'd love to see them do it, but only if they kept the sidemen out of it - I want to hear the Beach Boys themselves, ragged old voices and all, sing it by themselves (in a lower key, obviously).  Otherwise, I feel like it might turn into something like the performance at the baseball game yesterday, i.e. the Boys singing with 4 crutches next to them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 11, 2012, 08:01:51 PM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)

That's something that has always frustrated me about Bruce - he's got the musical ability in spades, but has essentially wasted it on cheesy schlock (albeit a few of them are gems).  I would kill to hear a Bruce/Brian collaboration, I think that could sound really great.

Well here ya go:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWR_qL_mxo0

Should have clarified, meant on the new album.  Maybe they could recapture some of the magic they found on "Deirdre."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on April 13, 2012, 02:37:54 AM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)

That's something that has always frustrated me about Bruce - he's got the musical ability in spades, but has essentially wasted it on cheesy schlock (albeit a few of them are gems).  I would kill to hear a Bruce/Brian collaboration, I think that could sound really great.

Well here ya go:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWR_qL_mxo0

Should have clarified, meant on the new album.  Maybe they could recapture some of the magic they found on "Deirdre."

If anything on the new album approaches Sunflower standards I'll be surprised and delighted.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 13, 2012, 08:33:50 AM
I think Brian still has the production and sound down enough that the weak point will be the lyrics.  I'm very happy with the way Brian's two cover albums sounded, I listen to them all the time... but his solo albums in many ways have suffered because the lyrics are so hit and miss.  If one of the guys writes a decent song, or Brian does, I'm confident it'll end up well arranged and produced.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 14, 2012, 08:54:14 PM
I think Scott Bennett is Brian's best collaborator in years, so if Brian writes with someone other than Mike I hope it's him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 14, 2012, 09:01:50 PM
I think Scott Bennett is Brian's best collaborator in years, so if Brian writes with someone other than Mike I hope it's him.

Me too. Sadly, the latest collaborators seem to be Jeff and Joe.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 15, 2012, 03:39:42 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 15, 2012, 03:42:25 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)
Audio CD (June 5, 2012)
Number of Discs: 1
Label: Capitol

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_gu1wlAwdunU/TGIb7VMA-tI/AAAAAAAAA9k/HDCHIsOAn0k/s400/free-MrBurnsExcellent.gif)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 15, 2012, 04:55:25 AM
Well I finally dreamt about hearing the new tunes


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 15, 2012, 07:20:10 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)

This is clearly fake, if the reunion album was really going to be released in early June (7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future.




Sorry, I was possessed by Phil for a minute there...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 15, 2012, 08:28:29 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)

This is clearly fake, if the reunion album was really going to be released in early June (7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future.

Absolutely. This has no bearing at all on the promised archival releases. In fact if anything the fact that the new album is possibly at the pressing plant only serves to emphasise the fact that archival releases are becoming less likely by the day.  By very definition an archival release is one that is older than a new release. As the new album would now appear to be being pressed, that means older archival ones cannot be pressed in its wake, as anything pressed subsequent to a new album can only be newer than the new album, and therefore not archival in nature. Hence, anything pressed after the new album must be defined as a newer album.  If Mr Doe were to claim that the Beach Boys are to release successive new albums throughout 2012 I would be inclined to believe him. However, his refusal to admit that the band has recorded more than one new album for 2012 only serves to alienate himself and the band from the fans even more. In conclusion, his complicit collusion with Capitol confirms lots of other alliterative words beginning with "C" that I just don't have the energy to think of right now. The only conclusion one can draw therefore is that someone has to disappear up his own arse before the rain of mockery beginneth.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 15, 2012, 08:36:04 AM
Wow, what an imaginative titlle! New Release is gonna be great!  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 15, 2012, 09:51:08 AM
 This just proves it: No new album, ever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on April 15, 2012, 10:34:11 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)

This is clearly fake, if the reunion album was really going to be released in early June (7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future.




Sorry, I was possessed by Phil for a minute there...

*Chortles and Snorts*  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 15, 2012, 10:44:12 AM
Bruce has always said he writes like Brian - The Nearest Faraway Place being his stab at a Pet Sounds-esque instrumental, and he mentioned something along the lines of 'we needed songs like Brian Wilson wrote songs, but Brian wasn't writing them' in reference to Disney Girls (I think in Endless Harmony, although I'm probably wrong).

Bruce writes schlock, but musically speaking it's very advanced shlock - Tears In The Morning certainly could have been written by Brian, say (if you ignore the lyrics)

That's something that has always frustrated me about Bruce - he's got the musical ability in spades, but has essentially wasted it on cheesy schlock (albeit a few of them are gems).  I would kill to hear a Bruce/Brian collaboration, I think that could sound really great.

Well here ya go:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWR_qL_mxo0

Should have clarified, meant on the new album.  Maybe they could recapture some of the magic they found on "Deirdre."

If anything on the new album approaches Sunflower standards I'll be surprised and delighted.

The thing about Sunflower is that the album was produced SO DAMN WELL that it's just timeless. Like Pet Sounds.

I think that sound could be found here... If Brian's up to the challenge...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 15, 2012, 11:34:26 AM
The thing about Sunflower is that the album was produced SO DAMN WELL that it's just timeless. Like Pet Sounds.

I think that sound could be found here... If Brian's up to the challenge...

Produced and engineered so well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 15, 2012, 11:38:35 AM
The thing about Sunflower is that the album was produced SO DAMN WELL that it's just timeless. Like Pet Sounds.

I think that sound could be found here... If Brian's up to the challenge...

Produced and engineered so well.

Absolutely, thanks for reminding me :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Myk Luhv on April 15, 2012, 11:40:08 AM
Why doesn't Brian employ Desper these days anyway? They seemed to work amazingly well together!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 15, 2012, 05:28:32 PM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)

This is clearly fake, if the reunion album was really going to be released in early June (7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future.

Sorry, I was possessed by Phil for a minute there...

There most certainly is a reunion album in the foreseeable future.
http://ESQuarterly.com/merchandise.html#spring2012 Be sure to order the new edition of the world's leading #BeachBoys publication, Endless Summer Quarterly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 15, 2012, 07:05:00 PM
So is it out?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lee on April 15, 2012, 07:09:39 PM
Amazon also has a vinyl release listed for the new album. That makes me happy to see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 15, 2012, 07:43:48 PM
Oh sh*t, excited now  ;D ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 15, 2012, 09:30:12 PM
I wonder if there's gonna be some deluxe version with a DVD.  I kinda just want regular cd and vinyl


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 16, 2012, 01:13:32 AM
http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/New-Release-2012-Beach-Boys/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_1?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1334480775&sr=1-1)

This is clearly fake, if the reunion album was really going to be released in early June (7 weeks from now), then the album would have a title and track listing, the album would be at CD pressing plants in the manufacturing stage, reviewers would have reviewer's test pressings or promotional CD's, and distributors would now be accepting preorders from dealers, and online dealers would be accepting preorders from consumers. None of these things are happening. Until those things happen, there is no reunion album in the foreseeable future.

Sorry, I was possessed by Phil for a minute there...

There most certainly is a reunion album in the foreseeable future.
http://ESQuarterly.com/merchandise.html#spring2012 Be sure to order the new edition of the world's leading #BeachBoys publication, Endless Summer Quarterly.


I know David, I was just joking and had copied and pasted a Phil Cohen rant from another thread for comedic effect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 16, 2012, 08:20:21 AM
Cheers!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilCohen on April 17, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 17, 2012, 01:23:48 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.
Is it a cover? From what I've read it was written for the Beach Boys, much like Andy Paley writing Soul Searchin' for the Beach Boys, and specifically Carl, to sing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 17, 2012, 01:36:41 PM
It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.
Bode schmode.  It's the new Beach Boys single.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 17, 2012, 01:50:56 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.
Is it a cover? From what I've read it was written for the Beach Boys, much like Andy Paley writing Soul Searchin' for the Beach Boys, and specifically Carl, to sing.

Yep, I wouldn't even call it a "cover", at least based on the way I would use the word in this context. The song has never been released before, so it's not a cover of a previously-issued recording.

We also don't even know for sure that no BB names will appear on the new single. Maybe Brian added some music or lyrics to it and has a co-writer credit. We don't know for sure.

I like it when artists write their own stuff. But I also don't think we need to be so limiting as to not allow collaboration or acceptance of a song that was written just for you. "Kokomo" isn't a cover either, as Love at least helped with that one a bit. Yes, it appears that was another one that other writers had worked on before it was used by the BB's. But at the end of the day, it's about the strength of the song. If the BB's perform the song well and it's a good song, I don't care if the Survivor guy co-wrote it. That he apparently targeted it as a potential BB song may make it even more enjoyable.

I hope we find out soon!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 02:20:04 PM
For Phil:  

Even if it was a cover, I guess these Beach Boys covers (singles) didn't bode well on the Billboard Hot 100:

Do You Wanna Dance  #12
Then I Kissed Her #4 (UK)
Sloop John B  #3  
Barbara Ann  #2
Rock & Roll Music  #5
Come Go With Me  #18
I Can Hear Music  #24 (#10 UK)
Bluebirds Over The Mountain  #61
Cottonfields  #5 (UK)
Peggy Sue  #59
Wipeout #12 (#2 UK)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 17, 2012, 02:24:53 PM
cover?!?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 17, 2012, 02:53:48 PM
cover?!?

Apparently Jim Peterik, Joe Thomas and someone else wrote That's Why God Made The radio in the 90s for the BBs, though it's never been released by anyone, and we don't know to what extent (if any) it's been rewritten by any of the band members since (remember that Kokomo, for example, was originally written and demoed by John Philips and Scott Mackenzie, but that Mike and Terry Melcher *radically* altered it. The same kind of thing may -- or may not -- have happened here).

I *was* worried, because "written by Jim Peterik" is a phrase to strike terror into the hearts of music lovers everywhere, but now that Phil The Eternally Wrong has announced that it'll be bad, I can only presume that Peterik was temporarily possessed by the spirit of Johann Sebastian Bach while writing it.

Phil, any chance of making an authoritative pronouncement that the Beach Boys won't play a surprise intimate set in my front room, and that I won't win the lottery next week without even buying a ticket?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 17, 2012, 03:29:08 PM
cover?!?

Apparently Jim Peterik, Joe Thomas and someone else wrote That's Why God Made The radio in the 90s for the BBs, though it's never been released by anyone, and we don't know to what extent (if any) it's been rewritten by any of the band members since (remember that Kokomo, for example, was originally written and demoed by John Philips and Scott Mackenzie, but that Mike and Terry Melcher *radically* altered it. The same kind of thing may -- or may not -- have happened here).

I *was* worried, because "written by Jim Peterik" is a phrase to strike terror into the hearts of music lovers everywhere, but now that Phil The Eternally Wrong has announced that it'll be bad, I can only presume that Peterik was temporarily possessed by the spirit of Johann Sebastian Bach while writing it.

Phil, any chance of making an authoritative pronouncement that the Beach Boys won't play a surprise intimate set in my front room, and that I won't win the lottery next week without even buying a ticket?

I get it, they didn't write it (that we know of, yet).  Doesn't make their original recording of it a "cover"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 04:02:44 PM
If The Beach Boys did their own version of a song written and recorded by someone else, would that be a "cover"? Probably.

Did Brian Wilson "cover" the songs on the "I Just Wasn't Made For These Times" CD?  They were his songs and previously recorded and released solo and by his band, right? So are they covers?  Probably.

If a song was cut (recorded) previously as a demo (i.e. "Don't Fight The Sea" and Wilson/Paley/Usher songs) and ultimately released, does that make it a "cover"? Probably not, as defined by "cover". 

If a song was completed but unreleased, and then they went back and changed a few lyrics or did some vocal overdubs (i.e. Loop De Loop") and then they released it, would that be a "cover" version? Probably not.

Was "Surfin' U.S.A. a cover? It was a rewrite of an existing song with different lyrics, right? Probably not a cover then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 17, 2012, 04:29:25 PM
Whilst not totally ideal, it's not like using outside songwriters is an entirely alien concept to pop music.

I can't be too annoyed about TWGMTR being an outside job until I hear it. If it's sh*t, well, easy come easy go. If it's good, I'll just have to deal with having a great song with The Beach Boys singing on it in 2012. Lord knows how I'll manage that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on April 17, 2012, 04:34:00 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.

Again, for all we know, the song could've started with Brian (perhaps a title and a hook riff, maybe even a typical Brian chord progression) and was given to Thomas, Peterik, et al, to finish off (which could definitely mean a substantial amount of work:  verse melody, lyrics, complete bridge section, who knows).  Anyone here heard the demo for "Your Imagination"?  Someone other than Brian (Joe Thomas, I think I read) is humming the melody.  So just because other people worked on the writing and demoing doesn't mean it's a non-Beach Boys composition.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 17, 2012, 04:41:08 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.

Again, for all we know, the song could've started with Brian (perhaps a title and a hook riff, maybe even a typical Brian chord progression) and was given to Thomas, Peterik, et al, to finish off (which could definitely mean a substantial amount of work:  verse melody, lyrics, complete bridge section, who knows).  Anyone here heard the demo for "Your Imagination"?  Someone other than Brian (Joe Thomas, I think I read) is humming the melody.  So just because other people worked on the writing and demoing doesn't mean it's a non-Beach Boys composition.

And we know at least two other songs that have been inspired by Brian's off-handed comments -- "No Wrong Notes in Heaven" by Scott Bennett, which was based on something BW said during the GIOMH sessions, and on which Brian added some harmony and tag things once Scotty finished it, and "Miracle" by the Wilsons, which is a take off of Brian exclaiming "Am I a fool to expect a miracle" while he was trying to write a song with Carnie. Again, he then seems to have added a few harmony bits and chord changes after the basic thing was written.

I wouldn't be surprised if the something similar didn't happen here -- Brian made this comment, and Joe and Jim wrote a tune around it. Brian will then probably add something bridge-y or tagg-y. It would be more than he contributed to Deirdre!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 17, 2012, 04:50:46 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.

Again, for all we know, the song could've started with Brian (perhaps a title and a hook riff, maybe even a typical Brian chord progression) and was given to Thomas, Peterik, et al, to finish off (which could definitely mean a substantial amount of work:  verse melody, lyrics, complete bridge section, who knows).  Anyone here heard the demo for "Your Imagination"?  Someone other than Brian (Joe Thomas, I think I read) is humming the melody.  So just because other people worked on the writing and demoing doesn't mean it's a non-Beach Boys composition.

And we know at least two other songs that have been inspired by Brian's off-handed comments -- "No Wrong Notes in Heaven" by Scott Bennett, which was based on something BW said during the GIOMH sessions, and on which Brian added some harmony and tag things once Scotty finished it, and "Miracle" by the Wilsons, which is a take off of Brian exclaiming "Am I a fool to expect a miracle" while he was trying to write a song with Carnie. Again, he then seems to have added a few harmony bits and chord changes after the basic thing was written.

I wouldn't be surprised if the something similar didn't happen here -- Brian made this comment, and Joe and Jim wrote a tune around it. Brian will then probably add something bridge-y or tagg-y. It would be more than he contributed to Deirdre!

Eh, if it were true, which we don't know, therefore this is all very speculative. If that is the case with the song then how come he hasn't been given credit from the start.

I agree with Hypehat, it's not totally ideal. Hearing something like, "There's a great new Brian Wilson song!" gives you a different feeling than "There's a great new Joe Thomas and Jim Peterik song!" But who knows? It could very well be marvelous...

Also, I always thought Brian was given credit on Deirdre because of its similarity to We're Together Again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 17, 2012, 04:54:07 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.

Again, for all we know, the song could've started with Brian (perhaps a title and a hook riff, maybe even a typical Brian chord progression) and was given to Thomas, Peterik, et al, to finish off (which could definitely mean a substantial amount of work:  verse melody, lyrics, complete bridge section, who knows).  Anyone here heard the demo for "Your Imagination"?  Someone other than Brian (Joe Thomas, I think I read) is humming the melody.  So just because other people worked on the writing and demoing doesn't mean it's a non-Beach Boys composition.

And we know at least two other songs that have been inspired by Brian's off-handed comments -- "No Wrong Notes in Heaven" by Scott Bennett, which was based on something BW said during the GIOMH sessions, and on which Brian added some harmony and tag things once Scotty finished it, and "Miracle" by the Wilsons, which is a take off of Brian exclaiming "Am I a fool to expect a miracle" while he was trying to write a song with Carnie. Again, he then seems to have added a few harmony bits and chord changes after the basic thing was written.

I wouldn't be surprised if the something similar didn't happen here -- Brian made this comment, and Joe and Jim wrote a tune around it. Brian will then probably add something bridge-y or tagg-y. It would be more than he contributed to Deirdre!

Eh, if it were true, which we don't know, therefore this is all very speculative. If that is the case with the song then how come he hasn't been given credit from the start.

I agree with Hypehat, it's not totally ideal. Hearing something like, "There's a great new Brian Wilson song!" gives you a different feeling than "There's a great new Joe Thomas and Jim Peterik song!" But who knows? It could very well be marvelous...

Also, I always thought Brian was given credit on Deirdre because of its similarity to We're Together Again.

Well, he didn't write We're Together Again, either. Edit: I guess he might have had a co-write. But I was always under the impression it was a Ron Wilson thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on April 17, 2012, 05:02:45 PM
I beleive that's true in the case of "We're Together Again" (Ron Wilson all the way...but probably Brian's vocal arrangement).  As for "Deirdre", Bruce has said he tried writing the song with Brian, but Brian was tossing out all kinds of unuseable lyrics.  Bruce gave up, but still split the credit with him even though BW only wrote a line or two of the finished song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 17, 2012, 05:17:47 PM
WHAT THE f***

I've been reading here, trying to figure out why everybody's so desperate to prove that Brian wrote part of this song, then finally noticed it was because Phil Cohen came out from under his bridge again and said since it's not original the whole reunion is a flop.

Phil, if it's that bad, just end it.  If you have nothing to look forward to, why are you here?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 17, 2012, 05:20:08 PM
I beleive that's true in the case of "We're Together Again" (Ron Wilson all the way...but probably Brian's vocal arrangement).  As for "Deirdre", Bruce has said he tried writing the song with Brian, but Brian was tossing out all kinds of unuseable lyrics.  Bruce gave up, but still split the credit with him even though BW only wrote a line or two of the finished song.

Exactly. This was my understanding, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 17, 2012, 05:22:33 PM
WHAT THE f*ck

I've been reading here, trying to figure out why everybody's so desperate to prove that Brian wrote part of this song, then finally noticed it was because Phil Cohen came out from under his bridge again and said since it's not original the whole reunion is a flop.

Phil, if it's that bad, just end it.  If you have nothing to look forward to, why are you here?
He is what you call, a Killjoy. I am sure he believes in the Mayan calendar too. ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 17, 2012, 05:26:44 PM
I saw a thing the other day explaining that the Mayan Calandar didn't use Leap Years... so the end of the Mayan calandar was about 8 months ago, lol. 

Anyways.  Back on topic.  I just think it's strange that someone who obviously is very learned and studious tends to look at the darkest possible light anytime possible. 

So at first, reading the replies I thought everybody was stretching, saying maybe Brian suggested the title, but hell, up against Mr. Negativity, I agree with their point.  We have no clue whether or not Brian was involved with this, he may have came up with the title. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on April 17, 2012, 05:29:07 PM
I saw a thing the other day explaining that the Mayan Calandar didn't use Leap Years... so the end of the Mayan calandar was about 8 months ago, lol. 

Anyways.  Back on topic.  I just think it's strange that someone who obviously is very learned and studious tends to look at the darkest possible light anytime possible. 

So at first, reading the replies I thought everybody was stretching, saying maybe Brian suggested the title, but hell, up against Mr. Negativity, I agree with their point.  We have no clue whether or not Brian was involved with this, he may have came up with the title. 

It IS a pretty Brian-y title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 17, 2012, 06:30:33 PM
I saw a thing the other day explaining that the Mayan Calandar didn't use Leap Years... so the end of the Mayan calandar was about 8 months ago, lol.  

Anyways.  Back on topic.  I just think it's strange that someone who obviously is very learned and studious tends to look at the darkest possible light anytime possible.  

So at first, reading the replies I thought everybody was stretching, saying maybe Brian suggested the title, but hell, up against Mr. Negativity, I agree with their point.  We have no clue whether or not Brian was involved with this, he may have came up with the title.  
Well, we kind of know that whether Brian wrote it or not, as he did with the Gershwin & Disney albums, or the songs they remade over the years, that he will give it the Beach Boy treatment. It doesn't concern me too much if he didn't have a hand in writing it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 17, 2012, 06:40:36 PM
Me neither. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 17, 2012, 08:45:04 PM
There is no doubt, that excepting an occasional hit with a non-original composition("Rock n'Roll Music", "Cottonfields", "Kokomo") that the Beach Boys' career has been(mostly) based on original songs. It doesn't bode well that the song which will be the promoted track from "New Release 2012" will be a cover version of a non-Beach Boys composition.

What are you talking about?  I thought the song they were promoting was "That's Why God Made The Radio".  Wasn't that written by the band?

EDIT: Nevermind...did a little digging around here and found the answer to my question.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 17, 2012, 11:14:17 PM
Howsabout some of us actually base their comments on having heard the song in question as opposed to who wrote it ?  Rumor has it the song in question isn't too shabby. Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 17, 2012, 11:20:27 PM
Howsabout some of us actually base their comments on having heard the song in question as opposed to who wrote it ?  Rumor has it the song in question isn't too shabby. Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]

Would the rumor imply whether the song is an uptempo one or a ballad?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 17, 2012, 11:43:32 PM
Feeling some kind of guilt here as t'was I who found the original interviews from the blokes who sang on the demo and wrote the track back in the 1700s. And I who voiced (well, typed) some regret that the first product of the regenerated Beach Boys wasn't homemade but something they seemingly commissioned at a craft workshop. Had I known that Phil would take these dark materials and mould them into something nefarious I would never have let them out of the bottle.

Lesson learned though. If you want to find out who really wrote Barbara Ann you'll have to Google it yourselves. But some of you might not want to take that path... There lies madness and surely suicide.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on April 18, 2012, 04:38:46 AM
Howsabout some of us actually base their comments on having heard the song in question as opposed to who wrote it ?  Rumor has it the song in question isn't too shabby. Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]

Would the rumor imply whether the song is an uptempo one or a ballad?

According to Rolling Stone, it's a ballad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 18, 2012, 07:48:39 AM
Had I known that Phil would take these dark materials and mould them into something nefarious I would never have let them out of the bottle.

Don't worry, the fans are already lining up outside of the SiriusXM studios, a local newscrew caught a picture of Phil mingling with the fans.... he seems happier.

(http://bluebuddies.com/gallery/Color_Smurfs_Pictures/jpg/Smurfs_Color_Pictures_Gargamel_Azrael_Net.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on April 18, 2012, 09:55:00 AM
Howsabout some of us actually base their comments on having heard the song in question as opposed to who wrote it ?  Rumor has it the song in question isn't too shabby. Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]
I looked it up (british reference- cowboys) and there seem to be multiple meanings. Could you elaborate? ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 18, 2012, 10:11:10 AM
Howsabout some of us actually base their comments on having heard the song in question as opposed to who wrote it ?  Rumor has it the song in question isn't too shabby. Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]
I looked it up (british reference- cowboys) and there seem to be multiple meanings. Could you elaborate? ;D

It usually refers to builders, (construction workers to you) who do a terrible job.

Now for your next lesson, look up "builder's bum"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on April 18, 2012, 10:29:28 AM
I'm guessing that is what we call "plumber's crack" in the States...?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 18, 2012, 12:09:52 PM
I'm guessing that is what we call "plumber's crack" in the States...?

Didn't Murry do a song about this on his album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on April 18, 2012, 03:31:07 PM
ha wow.....50 pages!!

what do we have in terms of concrete info so far -- i'm a bit out of the loop and don't wanna read 50 pages worth of info ha. a quick update?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 18, 2012, 04:24:16 PM
ha wow.....50 pages!!

what do we have in terms of concrete info so far -- i'm a bit out of the loop and don't wanna read 50 pages worth of info ha. a quick update?


Basically no new news since your first post expect apparently we have a release date, late June


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 18, 2012, 04:25:23 PM

Basically no new news since your first post expect apparently we have a release date, late June

Late June? I thought it was June 5th?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 18, 2012, 04:38:04 PM
I'm guessing that is what we call "plumber's crack" in the States...?

Didn't Murry do a song about this on his album?

yeah, "the Plumber's Tune"written by a 40 year old( at the time) plumber. listen here, if you're so inclined: http://www.sendspace.com/file/5iuj0v


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 18, 2012, 05:22:12 PM

Basically no new news since your first post expect apparently we have a release date, late June

Late June? I thought it was June 5th?

Might be, can't really remember


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 18, 2012, 06:06:52 PM

Basically no new news since your first post expect apparently we have a release date, late June

Late June? I thought it was June 5th?

Might be, can't really remember

June 5th is indeed the alleged date.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 18, 2012, 09:02:51 PM
These kids need to take their damn time on this instead of rushing it out before summer because zomg the beach boys zomg summer fun in teh sun


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 18, 2012, 09:18:28 PM
Just noticed this tweet from a few hours ago...Not sure who this woman is but she appears to be a journalist of some sort.

Sophie Gilbert ‏ @sophieGG
Mike Love tells me the new Beach Boys album will probably be called either "Beaches in Mind" or "That's Why God Made the Radio."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 18, 2012, 09:42:24 PM
Just noticed this tweet from a few hours ago...Not sure who this woman is but she appears to be a journalist of some sort.

Sophie Gilbert ‏ @sophieGG
Mike Love tells me the new Beach Boys album will probably be called either "Beaches in Mind" or "That's Why God Made the Radio."

Nice find

Two great titles IMO


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 18, 2012, 09:53:08 PM
Just noticed this tweet from a few hours ago...Not sure who this woman is but she appears to be a journalist of some sort.

Sophie Gilbert ‏ @sophieGG
Mike Love tells me the new Beach Boys album will probably be called either "Beaches in Mind" or "That's Why God Made the Radio."

Nice find

Two great titles IMO

Honestly don't think either title is all that great for an album title.  My vote is for Still Croakin'.   :serenade


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 18, 2012, 09:55:16 PM
I like 'New Release 2012' better.
Or 'Pet Sounds Vol. 2'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 18, 2012, 09:55:31 PM
"That's Why God Made The Radio" is a fine song title but it's too long and clunky of an album title. "Beaches in Mind" is better, but I'm betting it'll be something else entirely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 18, 2012, 09:57:15 PM
meh, not good album titles.  I liked Summer's Gone!  i like it when album's aren't named after songs on the album. 

slash, no wonder there's no news to report.  they haven't even named the thing??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 18, 2012, 10:03:03 PM
meh, not good album titles.  I liked Summer's Gone!  i like it when album's aren't named after songs on the album. 

slash, no wonder there's no news to report.  they haven't even named the thing??

I think "Summer's Gone" would be a little depressing. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 18, 2012, 10:05:49 PM
meh, not good album titles.  I liked Summer's Gone!  i like it when album's aren't named after songs on the album. 

slash, no wonder there's no news to report.  they haven't even named the thing??

I think "Summer's Gone" would be a little depressing. 

Better than "Beaches In Mind" or "That's Why God Made The Radio." Especially the latter since the band didn't write it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 18, 2012, 10:07:55 PM
i think "summer's gone" would fit with the so called "mellow album" and "nostalgic ballad" of TWGMTR.  and i just don't like the phrasing of "beaches in mind", it doesn't evoke anything for me.  I'm not so sure those are the two titles, those are the two songs rolling stone mentioned.  Maybe mike was just talking.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 18, 2012, 10:10:02 PM
Maybe they'll just call it Pendle Tones


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 18, 2012, 10:10:14 PM
I would call it "Just kiddin'" or "Auto-tuned Vibrations".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 19, 2012, 12:01:50 AM
It can't possibly be called Summer's Gone or Beaches in Mind... That would just be pandering to the summer & sand cliche and would rather contradict Mike's statement in the new ESQ in which he refutes the idea that the name "the Beach Boys" limits them in terms of writing; he states that  "that has never limited us in terms of what kind of music or subject matter that we do."

(on the other hand Al states: "we're trying to get the Beach Boys sound back and we're attempting to recreate the Beach Boys formula.")

Didn't someone f*ck with that 45 years ago?

I'm so confused, I don't know what to believe!   :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 19, 2012, 01:12:10 AM
I'm in the "Summer's Gone" camp. As someone on here recently suggested, that title would lie perfectly between Mike's commercialism and Brian's melancholy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on April 19, 2012, 02:00:13 AM
Get in a younger demographic.

'Beaches & Ho's'


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on April 19, 2012, 02:20:10 AM
Maybe not another "Midnight...", but not something built by cowboys* either.

[* obscure Brit reference - google it ;D]
Well, My goog search returned "After Midnight" by London Cowboys - perhaps way off base, but happy to have stumbled across this band, so many thanks  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 19, 2012, 02:31:38 AM
Get in a younger demographic.

'Beaches & Ho's'

"Thand in yer Thong"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on April 19, 2012, 02:32:28 AM
Quote from: Runaways link=topic=12286.msg262865#msg262865 LOL date=1334811435
meh, not good album titles.  I liked Summer's Gone!  i like it when album's aren't named after songs on the album. 

slash, no wonder there's no news to report.  they haven't even named the thing??

I think "Summer's Gone" would be a little depressing. 

I agree - it's not an "up" title unless in the context of some further lyrics.

The (ugh) album title SIP differs from it's in song context - album title positive, song and lyrics a bit down (I am struggling   :lol).

It's likely there wil be some kind of beachy/sun and fun theme - but I would expect a Summer Regained type thing over Summer's gone...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 19, 2012, 04:07:58 AM
Summer's Gone is not a good title for an album to be released on June 5th, right before the commencement of.... Summer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 04:32:22 AM
Summer's Gone is not a good title for an album to be released on June 5th, right before the commencement of.... Summer.
Maybe that's just a part of the actual album title, and they go the Summer Days (and Summer Nights!!) route:

Summer's Gone (Or Is It??) (2012)


It's obvious which band member came up with the latter part of the title.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 19, 2012, 05:09:43 AM
Summer's Gone is not a good title for an album to be released on June 5th, right before the commencement of.... Summer.

i don't really think this matters


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 19, 2012, 05:18:31 AM
As other said, both titles would sound terrible for an album title. In fact "new release" has a nice sound and is kinda funny. I wouldn't choose that title of course but honestly, for an album imo it would sound better


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaco on April 19, 2012, 06:06:57 AM
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2q9ddakvX1rqueqco4_400.png)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 19, 2012, 06:18:39 AM
.....what is that?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 06:24:38 AM
.....what is that?
I hope it's not the leaked album cover art.. compared to that the ITKOD cover was high art.

(http://www.vinylexchange.co.uk/images/pics/1147wilsoninthecdr.jpg)


And if it's just a mock cover art done by Jaco: er.. good job, man!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaco on April 19, 2012, 06:32:04 AM
.....what is that?

It's my suggestion for a title


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 06:33:42 AM
.....what is that?

It's my suggestion for a title
The Beach Boys on the Radio?
What's the writing behind the "On The Radio" part? Can't make it out..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 19, 2012, 06:40:53 AM
Summer's Gone is not a good title for an album to be released on June 5th, right before the commencement of.... Summer.

i don't really think this matters
Not a very positive note saying "Summer's Gone" before it even starts. The Beach Boys are "Summer", at least here in the U.S.A.. Just sounds too negative.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 19, 2012, 07:20:48 AM
Better than "Beaches In Mind" or "That's Why God Made The Radio." Especially the latter since the band didn't write it.

I also thought it was interesting to hear Mike talk about TWGMTR and talk about Brian's chord progessions and vocal arrangements in the song...

I have no way to know, of course, but I have a feeling that Brian wrote some part of it, and that we're going to see a Brian co-writing credit on the song.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 19, 2012, 07:27:50 AM
Better than "Beaches In Mind" or "That's Why God Made The Radio." Especially the latter since the band didn't write it.

I also thought it was interesting to hear Mike talk about TWGMTR and talk about Brian's chord progessions and vocal arrangements in the song...

I have no way to know, of course, but I have a feeling that Brian wrote some part of it, and that we're going to see a Brian co-writing credit on the song.





Of course you can re-arrange some chord progressions of a song you didn't write but if Mike talks about Brian's chord progressions on that song it really sounds like he (Brian) had a hand in writing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 19, 2012, 07:38:55 AM
Don't think it's Brian baby. Because in a recent interview with him and Mike he wasn't even sure which song the interviewer meant. He hummed a bit of it and asked Mike "This one?".
But who knows, perhaps he thought the interview will air on radio and just wanted to give the fans a preview... All possible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaco on April 19, 2012, 09:07:43 AM
This is just in via twitter

http://www.chartsinfrance.net/The-Beach-Boys/news-79259.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter (http://www.chartsinfrance.net/The-Beach-Boys/news-79259.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter)

it's in french, it says the single will be released at the end of April.

(http://www.chartsinfrance.net/style/breves/2/photo_1334838984.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 19, 2012, 09:14:29 AM
Great, nice, just wish they'd lose that horrible 80's Beach Boys typeface. It doesn't fit with that old radio


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 19, 2012, 09:15:53 AM
Great, nice, just wish they'd lose that horrible 80's Beach Boys typeface. It doesn't fit with that old radio

It's from the 70's. And it's Dean Torrence's-- not that that makes it worthwhile to keep.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 09:16:11 AM
YES!! NICE! Dig the artwork.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 19, 2012, 09:27:41 AM
Better than "Beaches In Mind" or "That's Why God Made The Radio." Especially the latter since the band didn't write it.

I also thought it was interesting to hear Mike talk about TWGMTR and talk about Brian's chord progessions and vocal arrangements in the song...

I have no way to know, of course, but I have a feeling that Brian wrote some part of it, and that we're going to see a Brian co-writing credit on the song.





Of course you can re-arrange some chord progressions of a song you didn't write but if Mike talks about Brian's chord progressions on that song it really sounds like he (Brian) had a hand in writing.
If Brian reharmed the song with his own chords and voicings, he may or may not get credit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 19, 2012, 09:38:29 AM
Great, nice, just wish they'd lose that horrible 80's Beach Boys typeface. It doesn't fit with that old radio

It's from the 70's. And it's Dean Torrence's-- not that that makes it worthwhile to keep.

50's-style if you ask me. :-D

Nice cover. But end of April? I want it now!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sam_BFC on April 19, 2012, 09:40:57 AM
Agree about the 70s typeface...don't dig!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 19, 2012, 09:42:04 AM
I don't think this will be the single cover anyway, nice photoshop job.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 19, 2012, 09:43:25 AM
Yeah doesnt seem real


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 09:50:47 AM
From the looks of it I think it could be real. Maybe them french guys weren't supposed to reveal it this early. Could have been a classic "jardine".  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 19, 2012, 09:59:06 AM
My suggestion for an album title:

OLD GUYS RULE


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 19, 2012, 10:08:01 AM
I think at this point that the Beach Boys logo is just that, a logo rather than a font choice. It’s their equivalent of the “drop T” Beatles logo at this point. They’ve been using it pretty regularly since 1976. “15 Big Ones”, “Keepin’ the Summer Alive”, “Summer in Paradise”, “Sounds of Summer”, various merchandise (hats, etc.), promotional photos, singles, etc.

I like the logo, it’s evocative of being something “official.” I think we think of it as a 70’s or 80’s thing because that’s when we saw it prevalently on album artwork, t-shirts, Mike’s hats, etc. I think they are using it to stamp the product as official, and because they feel it’s their strongest logo-based trademark sort of thing. I don’t think the style or font of the logo is immediately as noticeable as something like the Beatles logo, so I don’t think it would be imperative for them to always use the logo. But I don’t mind it being used. It does make everything look a bit more like “product” than art in terms of album cover artwork, but I don’t mind it. It’s not as if they always succeed when not using the logo. The “Warmth of the Sun” compilation has bland font and artwork to the point of looking like a cheap drugstore compilation. A lot of people didn’t like either or both versions of the “Endless Harmony” artwork (moreso the first “orange” version).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on April 19, 2012, 10:15:38 AM
From the looks of it I think it could be real. Maybe them french guys weren't supposed to reveal it this early. Could have been a classic "jardine".  ;D

Yeah, the article pretty much says that it's the official cover that has just been revealed and that it was sent by EMI (or something like that).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 19, 2012, 10:25:40 AM
From the looks of it I think it could be real. Maybe them french guys weren't supposed to reveal it this early. Could have been a classic "jardine".  ;D

Yeah, the article pretty much says that it's the official cover that has just been revealed and that it was sent by EMI (or something like that).

>>100 million albums sold. Tubes such as "I Get Around", "Good Vibrations", "Surfin ' USA" or "California Girls". The Beach Boys will make their comeback with a new album to be published June 4. A disk which it knows not yet name. " Harmonies of inimitable, voice a machine tubes, the Californian group returned with a new album to embellish our summer ", promises to EMI in a press release that has just reached us.
 
A first single will be sent to radio at the end of the month, April 30. It is the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" which the package is to be unveiled. Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston and David Marks had not registered of new songs since "Summer in Paradise" in 1992. Four years later, in 96, they had insured the choirs of occasions of their tubes by other artists in "Stars and Stripes Vol. 1". <<


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on April 19, 2012, 10:27:30 AM
Thanks! was too tired to try and focus on a translation..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 19, 2012, 10:35:35 AM
And please note -- in Europe, music is issued on Mondays. In the U.S., Tuesdays.

Thus, the album is listed as coming out on June 4. It's scheduled for June 5 in the U.S.

The single is listed as April 30 -- but would therefore come out May 1 in the States.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 19, 2012, 11:20:36 AM
Ahh, this is going to be a long wait


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on April 19, 2012, 12:12:57 PM
If they had the The Beach Boys imprinted on the face of the radio in the photo, just like the album title, with the same type of lettering, that would be better than the 1970's logo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 01:33:55 PM
(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/76813924/The+Beach+Boys+thebeachboys2012.jpg)

(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/76813878/The+Beach+Boys+beachboys2012.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 19, 2012, 01:50:54 PM
Wow, fantastic pictures


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 19, 2012, 01:55:45 PM
I like the logo.  Sure, it's outdated, but so is

. the band members
. their voices
. their style
. love songs
. doo wop songs
. pinky rings
. admitting to being a fan of rosemary clooney whenever asked


So in other words, I think the logo sums the band up well.  What else is a logo supposed to do?  Can't wait for this album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 19, 2012, 01:55:53 PM
(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/76813924/The+Beach+Boys+thebeachboys2012.jpg)




Shorts ? Surfboard ? I hope this doesn't mean much

Nice to see the boys around a piano. Wish I could've been there listening to the harmonizing


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 19, 2012, 02:18:12 PM
That's a really nice picture! Ah....


The 30th of April means I can buy myself the single as a reward for finishing my degree the next day! Cheers, Beach Boys!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 19, 2012, 02:46:11 PM
That's a really nice picture! Ah....


The 30th of April means I can buy myself the single as a reward for finishing my degree the next day! Cheers, Beach Boys!  ;D

I hope you get your reward; the way I read it, the single goes to Radio on the 30th, meaning, maybe, it actually gets sold the week after. or the week after that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 19, 2012, 03:21:33 PM
(http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/76813924/The+Beach+Boys+thebeachboys2012.jpg)




Shorts ? Surfboard ? I hope this doesn't mean much

Nice to see the boys around a piano. Wish I could've been there listening to the harmonizing
Bare feet too. They are called The Beach Boys, you know. And yes, great pix of the Boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 19, 2012, 03:23:32 PM
where did the new pix come from?  Link?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 19, 2012, 03:35:49 PM
I haven't seen any of these beach house pics being used anywhere...are they saving them for promotions when the tour finally gets going?  It's kind of weird that these few images have been available yet I've not seen them used anywhere...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 19, 2012, 03:41:52 PM
I haven't seen any of these beach house pics being used anywhere...are they saving them for promotions when the tour finally gets going?  It's kind of weird that these few images have been available yet I've not seen them used anywhere...

I'm having them printed on TP, so more people can use them


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on April 19, 2012, 03:41:57 PM
It's from Amazon :
http://www.amazon.com/The-Beach-Boys/e/B000APTGZ0
;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 19, 2012, 03:43:01 PM
cool, thanks


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 19, 2012, 03:43:57 PM
Ah yup there they are.  Thanks. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 19, 2012, 05:26:59 PM
Bruce wearing shorts!

His way of saying 'screw you smileysmilers' IMO! ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 19, 2012, 07:58:29 PM
I like the logo.  Sure, it's outdated, but so is

. the band members
. their voices
. their style
. love songs
. doo wop songs
. pinky rings
. admitting to being a fan of rosemary clooney whenever asked


So in other words, I think the logo sums the band up well.  What else is a logo supposed to do?  Can't wait for this album!

The logo is like the Brother indian-- except that the latter is a work of art. I think it has to stay. Along with the surfboards, the barefeet and everything else. Where did this mani come from?... the urge to change everything surrounding the very essence of the band in order to make it appealing to the non-believers.

So far, everything --Brother logo, interviews, photos, etc.- has been managed in a classy way. Those pictures rule, and so does the 50th. Ann. logo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 19, 2012, 08:53:42 PM
interesting that amazon.com is listing 17.78 for the price.  One, that's a weird price.  Two, why so expensive if it's just a single disc album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 19, 2012, 09:42:53 PM
interesting that amazon.com is listing 17.78 for the price.  One, that's a weird price.  Two, why so expensive if it's just a single disc album?

It's a placeholder. Bet you it's down to $9.99 by release day.

Also, the pictures are great. Trying to remember the last formal group shots -- were they back in 85? I kind of think they were. Odd that some folks look better!

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-HySOqLbr_s/TS4Lb0wXI6I/AAAAAAAAAFY/RcJaasBowAw/s1600/bb85.jpg)

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/71w3lei2OhL.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 19, 2012, 10:25:36 PM
Could have been a classic "jardine".  ;D

:lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 20, 2012, 12:13:26 AM
Well I guess the last promo shots featuring Brian with the group would probably be 1988/1989, Still Cruisin' era.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003873-PP.jpg)

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003924-PP.jpg)

I gotta say Brian looks pretty cool in the first pic, almost somewhat Lindsey Buckingham-esque. He looks good in the second one too, but the Hawaiian shirt look does the group no favors. Brian did seem to age quite quickly in the beginning of the '90s and I'm sure it had a bit to do with the work of Gene Landy. However, recently its seemed he kinda has a bit of that refined look back, especially in these newer photos with the other boys.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 20, 2012, 01:33:34 AM
Well I guess the last promo shots featuring Brian with the group would probably be 1988/1989, Still Cruisin' era.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003873-PP.jpg)

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003924-PP.jpg)

I gotta say Brian looks pretty cool in the first pic, almost somewhat Lindsey Buckingham-esque. He looks good in the second one too, but the Hawaiian shirt look does the group no favors.

Seeing as the 2nd shot is a promo for the 25th anniversary TV (not so-)special shot in Hawaii, I'd say your point is mooter than a moot thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 20, 2012, 01:58:34 AM
My only comment is that Al's long hair never worked, neither does colouring.

Sing if you're glad to be grey!  Grow old with gra(y)ce.

Al's one of my top nine Beach Boys, as are the others, so I say this in good spirit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 20, 2012, 02:57:43 AM
I remember Bruce commenting on that second shot 5 plus years ago on the brit board. I'm sure he said it was taken right after the show and was never authorised by the band. He was a bit peeved. I got the impression it was more of a fan shot.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 20, 2012, 05:42:46 AM
I bet Brian had just had a facelift before the B&W picture with Al and Bruce sitting back to back. I remember seeing that for the first time and thinking "what happened to his face?". But then Mike's skin looks funny also.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 20, 2012, 06:18:45 AM
Well I guess the last promo shots featuring Brian with the group would probably be 1988/1989, Still Cruisin' era.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003873-PP.jpg)

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003924-PP.jpg)

I gotta say Brian looks pretty cool in the first pic, almost somewhat Lindsey Buckingham-esque. He looks good in the second one too, but the Hawaiian shirt look does the group no favors.

Seeing as the 2nd shot is a promo for the 25th anniversary TV (not so-)special shot in Hawaii, I'd say your point is mooter than a moot thing.

Ah. Well that would explain the change in their looks.

Btw, is the 3rd pic from the Summer in Paradise era? That was the only formal promo shot I've been able to find for that era, as far as I know.

And I think my point would still stand, saying that there were promo shots after the 1985 album. But thanks Andrew, it feels good feeling the wrath of the might AGD, haha.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amanda Hart on April 20, 2012, 07:59:06 AM


I gotta say Brian looks pretty cool in the first pic, almost somewhat Lindsey Buckingham-esque. He looks good in the second one too, but the Hawaiian shirt look does the group no favors. Brian did seem to age quite quickly in the beginning of the '90s and I'm sure it had a bit to do with the work of Gene Landy. However, recently its seemed he kinda has a bit of that refined look back, especially in these newer photos with the other boys.

I think that "refined" look comes down to owning where he is now. Brian, or his management/promotional people, are accepting where he is looks and age-wise and making the best of it. They've finally stopped trying so hard to make him look younger or hip. Age appropriate is the best look for anyone. All the boys have looked great in these shots with their natural looks and classic button downs in saturated colors.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 08:08:28 AM
Well I guess the last promo shots featuring Brian with the group would probably be 1988/1989, Still Cruisin' era.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003873-PP.jpg)

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003924-PP.jpg)

I gotta say Brian looks pretty cool in the first pic, almost somewhat Lindsey Buckingham-esque. He looks good in the second one too, but the Hawaiian shirt look does the group no favors. Brian did seem to age quite quickly in the beginning of the '90s and I'm sure it had a bit to do with the work of Gene Landy. However, recently its seemed he kinda has a bit of that refined look back, especially in these newer photos with the other boys.

(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.

The hawaiian shirts the group were wearing the second photo and the tv special were from their short lived "HOBO" clothing line from 86-87, designed by Sherry Holt (thus the HOBO moniker)




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Tord on April 20, 2012, 10:28:47 AM
A new interview with Al:

http://theadvocate.com/utility/homepagestories/2599661-129/beach-boys-starting-reunion-tour (http://theadvocate.com/utility/homepagestories/2599661-129/beach-boys-starting-reunion-tour)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 11:03:28 AM
Thanks Tord.

“We’re still doing song selection right now,” Jardine said. “There’s a lot to choose from. It feels like Pet Sounds to me. It has that deep, thoughtful kind of relationship-based theme.

 :o ;D

"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

 :o :-\


“That’s Why God Made the Radio” will be the album’s first single, Jardine said. “Brian loves the radio, so that was something he came up with. It’s got a lot of lush harmonies, a very beautiful song.”

 ???

“We’re putting a Beach Boys stamp on ‘Waves of Love’ for this new Beach Boys album or, if not this album, the follow-up album. It’s a really cool song. It reminds of ‘Do It Again.’ ”

 :o :o



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 20, 2012, 11:05:39 AM
Thanks Tord.

“We’re still doing song selection right now,” Jardine said. “There’s a lot to choose from. It feels like Pet Sounds to me. It has that deep, thoughtful kind of relationship-based theme.

 :o ;D

"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

 :o :-\


“That’s Why God Made the Radio” will be the album’s first single, Jardine said. “Brian loves the radio, so that was something he came up with. It’s got a lot of lush harmonies, a very beautiful song.”

 ???

Al's quote suggests that Brian did indeed have some sort of role in writing TWGMTR. Do you think that 'islandy songs' = Beaches In Mind?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 11:07:39 AM
Thanks Tord.

“We’re still doing song selection right now,” Jardine said. “There’s a lot to choose from. It feels like Pet Sounds to me. It has that deep, thoughtful kind of relationship-based theme.

 :o ;D

"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

 :o :-\


“That’s Why God Made the Radio” will be the album’s first single, Jardine said. “Brian loves the radio, so that was something he came up with. It’s got a lot of lush harmonies, a very beautiful song.”

 ???

Al's quote suggests that Brian did indeed have some sort of role in writing TWGMTR. Do you think that 'islandy songs' = Beaches In Mind?

Islands in the Sun


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 20, 2012, 11:09:31 AM
Al's quote suggests that Brian did indeed have some sort of role in writing TWGMTR.
Guess it's like saying: Brian came up with (our distinct version of) Sloop John B.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 11:12:15 AM
Al's quote suggests that Brian did indeed have some sort of role in writing TWGMTR. Do you think that 'islandy songs' = Beaches In Mind?

It may support the idea that Brian came up with some part of the song but Al makes it seem that he wrote the entire thing...which we know isn't true.  So it seems that Al doesn't know much about the song's original history and/or origins.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 20, 2012, 11:17:52 AM
So it seems that Al doesn't know much about the song's original history and/or origins.
Or he's putting it like that for promotional reasons. Who knows. Maybe Brian came up with a serious make-over for the tune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 20, 2012, 11:19:31 AM
C'mon guys, we all know that if Al says something it must be true, e.g. The Smile Sessions, 50th AnniveReunion Tour.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 11:22:53 AM
So it seems that Al doesn't know much about the song's original history and/or origins.
Or he's putting it like that for promotional reasons. Who knows. Maybe Brian came up with a serious make-over for the tune.

Perhaps so.  Would be great to know that all the stories we heard about this song involved a very early draft and Brian had completely rewrote it since then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 11:24:35 AM
C'mon guys, we all know that if Al says something it must be true, e.g. The Smile Sessions, 50th AnniveReunion Tour.

True...if so, then we apparently have a "follow-up" album to look forward to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 20, 2012, 11:28:20 AM
C'mon guys, we all know that if Al says something it must be true, e.g. The Smile Sessions, 50th AnniveReunion Tour.
You're right. Which also means: the Boys will definitely carry on after the reunion year and at least record another LP.  :spin
That Jardine guy is a brilliant one-man guerilla promotional machine, that's what he is.

(http://www.kansaiscene.com/images/stories/february2011/listings/Live/Al-Jardine.jpg)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 20, 2012, 11:34:53 AM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on April 20, 2012, 11:39:09 AM
So it seems that Al doesn't know much about the song's original history and/or origins.
Or he's putting it like that for promotional reasons. Who knows. Maybe Brian came up with a serious make-over for the tune.

Perhaps so.  Would be great to know that all the stories we heard about this song involved a very early draft and Brian had completely rewrote it since then.
That's Why God Made The Radio (Thomas, Peterik, Wilson, Corleone, Montana) is the songwriting credit I am expecting. I'm sure Brian added something to it, if not in actual songwriting, then in production.

It's nice to get further confirmation of Brian producing. It seems like every interview, we get mixed signals; Brian is producing but there are some "Island-type" songs on there, etc. Still, this has potential to be the best Beach Boys album since 1978. I only hope we don't get "Easter Bunny's Hopping to Kokomo."

As for "Waves of Love..." featuring it on both Al's album and the reunion album doesn't make much sense at all. We have all already heard it, and I for one would rather hear something else on the reunion album. "Waves of Love" is cool and it's nice to hear Carl's voice again, but it is also derivative ("Bye, Bye Love" and "You're My Best Friend") and not really what I would consider to be "A" material.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 11:54:21 AM
Still, this has potential to be the best Beach Boys album since 1978.

That seems like an easy feat!  8)

As for "Waves of Love..." featuring it on both Al's album and the reunion album doesn't make much sense at all. We have all already heard it, and I for one would rather hear something else on the reunion album. "Waves of Love" is cool and it's nice to hear Carl's voice again, but it is also derivative ("Bye, Bye Love" and "You're My Best Friend") and not really what I would consider to be "A" material.

I agree although Al is constantly making it sound like the Beach Boys version will be different enough.  Even so, I wouldn't want this song to be in place of another song they just wrote and recorded recently.  It should simply be a bonus cut along with DIA (if they do in fact decide to tag it onto the album).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 20, 2012, 12:02:02 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..
Cool for some, but how commercially viable would that be?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 20, 2012, 12:13:30 PM
Quote
“We’re still doing song selection right now,” Jardine said. “There’s a lot to choose from. It feels like Pet Sounds to me. It has that deep, thoughtful kind of relationship-based theme.

YES!! 

Quote
"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

NO!! 

Quote
“We’re putting a Beach Boys stamp on ‘Waves of Love’ for this new Beach Boys album or, if not this album, the follow-up album. It’s a really cool song. It reminds of ‘Do It Again.’ ”
 

I always love how Al just very subtly slips in possible future plans. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 20, 2012, 12:49:11 PM
Quote
"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

NO!! 
Could mean stuff like "Little Pad"...  :3d I'm game.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 20, 2012, 12:59:11 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..

I would focus on releasing a quality, good album (something they haven't done in a *LONG* time).  The rest of the material will come out eventually.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 20, 2012, 01:01:10 PM
I think some are putting WAY too much stock into how band members (or anybody else for that matter) characterize these songs. I think it’s pointless to call something “like Pet Sounds” or anything along those lines. What does that mean. Lush harmonies like PS? Dense backing tracks? Just the fact that there are some melancholy songs? A song may sound like PS or like an “cute island song” to one person, and sound like something else to another.

I’ve read people use one song to describe another where I completely disagree. This goes for casual fans and the band members, and everybody in between.

I don’t think we’re going to get either extreme with this album. We’re not going to get “Pet Sounds 2” or “Summer in Paradise 2.”

We’ve heard too many descriptors for this album already. It sounds like “80’s Beach Boys” and “Pet Sounds” at the same time apparently. That along should give us pause about investing much in reports about this album, at least thus far. When someone actually gets to hear the whole album and can do a track by track rundown, I’ll put some additional stock in that. Even then, I’ve read detailed reports of albums that, when I listen to the album myself, make no sense. Music is way too hard to describe in these cases. Especially for non-musicians, they are left with generic characterizations (ballad, up-tempo, etc.) or direct comparisons to something else.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 20, 2012, 01:39:19 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..

I think theres like a .001% chance the band wrote enough worthy songs for a double album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 20, 2012, 01:41:16 PM
Quote
“We’re putting a Beach Boys stamp on ‘Waves of Love’ for this new Beach Boys album or, if not this album, the follow-up album. It’s a really cool song. It reminds of ‘Do It Again.’ ”
 

I always love how Al just very subtly slips in possible future plans. 
Why, isn't he just about the most loveable loose cannon you've ever seen? Bless his little heart.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 01:41:39 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..

I think theres like a .001% chance the band wrote enough worthy songs for a double album

That's the key word there.  I'd rather have a solid 12 track album than an uneven, filler-filled 24 track double album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on April 20, 2012, 02:35:18 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..

I think theres like a .001% chance the band wrote enough worthy songs for a double album

That's the key word there.  I'd rather have a solid 12 track album than an uneven, filler-filled 24 track double album.
After all, if there aren't a half-dozen unreleased tracks out there, what will everyone claim were better than the ones that eventually made the album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 20, 2012, 04:26:36 PM
(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.

Man you can't criticise somebody for smiling.  Really?  REALLY?  lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 20, 2012, 05:01:43 PM
(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.
The BBs at low tide.... They look like parodies of themselves with the worst clothes the 1990s could offer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 20, 2012, 05:42:55 PM
LOVING the Mullets.  How in the hell two different Bald Men had mullets, I'll never know.  It kind of looks like a lost episode of "Tales from the Crypt". 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 20, 2012, 05:46:09 PM
That's what I call a 'skullet' ^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AllIWannaDo on April 20, 2012, 06:33:13 PM
(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.

Man you can't criticise somebody for smiling.  Really?  REALLY?  lol

y'know its kinda fair to say overall Mike Love comes out the best in the pic, need i say more..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 20, 2012, 06:35:03 PM
Quote
“We’re putting a Beach Boys stamp on ‘Waves of Love’ for this new Beach Boys album or, if not this album, the follow-up album. It’s a really cool song. It reminds of ‘Do It Again.’ ”
 

I always love how Al just very subtly slips in possible future plans. 
Why, isn't he just about the most loveable loose cannon you've ever seen? Bless his little heart.

Keep it clean with Al Jardine!  :love


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on April 20, 2012, 08:37:18 PM
well if they have ALL those songs to pick through why not do a "white album" or "All things must pass" type cd equal to a double album or something like that.now THAT wold be cool..

I think theres like a .001% chance the band wrote enough worthy songs for a double album

That's the key word there.  I'd rather have a solid 12 track album than an uneven, filler-filled 24 track double album.

What you're most likely going to have to decide, tho: are you happy with an uneven filler-filled 12 track album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 20, 2012, 08:43:35 PM
Quote
"....There are a couple of cute little islandy songs on there, too.”

NO!! 
Could mean stuff like "Little Pad"...  :3d I'm game.

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 20, 2012, 10:02:21 PM
Quote
The original “Do It Again,” a 1968 hit for the Beach Boys, has been re-recorded for the group’s upcoming reunion album.

“Wait till you hear this version,” Jardine said. “It’s is so much better, with full-on production and really great vocals. That’s gonna surprise people, because we never finished the production on that earlier one. But the new one has good saxophones on it, baritone and tenor. You won’t believe it.”

Wow, can't wait to hear the new version. Must be completely different to the (unfinished) 1968 version or what Brian released on his live releases. ;D

No, what I wanted to say is: This statement says it all for me.

The credits on TWGMTR will be interesting. I hope it doesn't make me lose my believe in prior Brian Wilson-credits.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 20, 2012, 10:59:09 PM
Aye, agreed.

First off, I hope all the writing credits accurately reflect the contributions made by each named; I know they don't usually apportion but if someone's changed one word in a song, it shouldn't really merit a credit.

Second, I hope Mike Love's credit is deliberately left off a few songs... all this getting-along-fine business is disconcerting and we need a few lawsuits to restore the natural order.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 02:14:05 AM

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on April 21, 2012, 02:33:51 AM

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.


No No No , you all have it wrong ! take out the first 2 letters I and S and then you have

LANDY SONGS   :lol     all containing great lyrics that i am sure will be rejected by Capitol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 21, 2012, 04:04:39 AM
Second, I hope Mike Love's credit is deliberately left off a few songs... all this getting-along-fine business is disconcerting and we need a few lawsuits to restore the natural order.

I mean, we haven't had one in a few years! I'm starting to get worried about Mike's mental health....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 05:43:59 AM
 ::)

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.

 ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on April 21, 2012, 08:20:28 AM

The credits on TWGMTR will be interesting. I hope it doesn't make me lose my believe in prior Brian Wilson-credits.

I don't think it's unheard of for people to purchase songs outright, credits and all.  If Peterik or whoever isn't credited...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 21, 2012, 12:28:12 PM

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.

Is that a joke? Surely, "Sunshine" more than qualifies as a piece of faux-island tripe.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 12:57:39 PM

The credits on TWGMTR will be interesting. I hope it doesn't make me lose my believe in prior Brian Wilson-credits.

I don't think it's unheard of for people to purchase songs outright, credits and all.  If Peterik or whoever isn't credited...
Giving, sharing, selling, buying, and appropriating song credits has been going for a very long time. Credit with no money can be more valuable than money with no credit. Peterik's name will be there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on April 21, 2012, 03:02:27 PM
Ok all
after looking at the TWGCR promo, I noticed the ending seems to refer to the new CD as "The BEACH BOYS 50"
at least that is what It looks like to me...    :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 03:19:04 PM
Ok all
after looking at the TWGCR promo, I noticed the ending seems to refer to the new CD as "The BEACH BOYS 50"
at least that is what It looks like to me...    :)
"Five Guys Hang Ten" means about the same thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 03:22:03 PM
Ok all
after looking at the TWGCR promo, I noticed the ending seems to refer to the new CD as "The BEACH BOYS 50"
at least that is what It looks like to me...    :)

i don't get that sense at all


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 21, 2012, 03:43:01 PM
Yeah, that's been the reunion logo since the reunion was announced iirc. Wonder if they'll go the self-titled route again, it doesn't seem to have a title yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on April 21, 2012, 06:50:51 PM
TWGMR would be a good title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 21, 2012, 07:18:52 PM
TWGMR would be a good title.

Not enough vowels.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 10:40:02 PM

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad. 

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.

Is that a joke? Surely, "Sunshine" more than qualifies as a piece of faux-island tripe.

it's arguable, I'll give you that. but my point was, don't discount the album because you think it's full of kokomos when it's nothing of the sort.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 04:59:06 AM

this is what i thought of.  granted, i don't own SIP or KTSA so my thoughts on "islandy songs" are skewed to little pad.  

Of course, there are no "islandy songs" on KTSA.

Is that a joke? Surely, "Sunshine" more than qualifies as a piece of faux-island tripe.

it's arguable, I'll give you that. but my point was, don't discount the album because you think it's full of kokomos when it's nothing of the sort.

i discount it because what i've heard is crap, never thought it was full of kokomos (which probably would be a popular album).  I was probably misremembering hearing more islandy songs on it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 22, 2012, 07:17:58 AM
Ok all
after looking at the TWGCR promo, I noticed the ending seems to refer to the new CD as "The BEACH BOYS 50"
at least that is what It looks like to me...    :)
Yup. I thought the same thing after watching it this morning. I was so psyched about hearing the song, I didn't notice it yesterday, but this video rather plainly refers to the new album as 'The Beach Boys 50', or maybe the official title will simply be '50'. I  would have liked a title with more razzle dazzle, but I honestly don't know how else to interpret what it says. It could be that my original concept for the album title 'The Beach Boys Five-0' wasn't far off the mark.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 07:34:31 AM
I saw it more as the logo that has been used on everything. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 22, 2012, 08:18:27 AM
It is the logo that's been used on everything, but it may also be the title of the album.  Here's what it says:

             Brian Wilson, Mike Love
  Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston, David Matks

            The Beach Boys 50 (logo)
         The Brand New Studio Album
                     June 5, 2012

               Includes The New Hit
     "That's Why God Made The Radio"
                   Available Now

So, this promo video was produced with the thought that it would be released at the same time as or just after the single release (see Available Now) to promote both the single and the album.  Why then would they not put the name of the album on there?  Well, maybe they did.  "The Beach Boys 50", the brand new studio album.  Doesn't make sense to produce the video like this, and then go back later and change it to put the name of the album in there.  That's how I'm seeing it.  Of course, I could be wrong.  We'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: gsmile on April 22, 2012, 09:25:50 AM
"50 Big Ones"!  My, how time flies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 22, 2012, 09:36:39 AM
It is the logo that's been used on everything, but it may also be the title of the album.  Here's what it says:

             Brian Wilson, Mike Love
  Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston, David Matks

            The Beach Boys 50 (logo)
         The Brand New Studio Album
                     June 5, 2012

               Includes The New Hit
     "That's Why God Made The Radio"
                   Available Now

So, this promo video was produced with the thought that it would be released at the same time as or just after the single release (see Available Now) to promote both the single and the album.  Why then would they not put the name of the album on there?  Well, maybe they did.  "The Beach Boys 50", the brand new studio album.  Doesn't make sense to produce the video like this, and then go back later and change it to put the name of the album in there.  That's how I'm seeing it.  Of course, I could be wrong.  We'll see.

If this is a test version of the commercial using the BB50 logo as a place setter, it is just a matter of replacing  the logo graphic with the new album artwork. I don't think that's a major editing job.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 09:54:06 AM
i wish someone would hype up some of the songs on the album, i need some details on the original tunes


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on April 22, 2012, 11:17:50 AM
i wish someone would hype up some of the songs on the album, i need some details on the original tunes
Yes indeed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: slickman9696 on April 22, 2012, 03:34:31 PM
Yea, it's probably not called Beach Boys 50. I mean, the promo did say the single was available now, and it's clearly not. All probably a place holder to show the guys what it would look like. Then they can give their yes or no to it and replace the appropriate information. But, as always, one could be wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 22, 2012, 04:47:27 PM
Adele started the trend with her albums '19' and '21'. Now it's the Beach Boys' '50'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on April 22, 2012, 05:34:04 PM
(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.
The BBs at low tide.... They look like parodies of themselves with the worst clothes the 1990s could offer.

they look great!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 07:43:07 PM
If it was just called "50"... that might make sense.  I hope they come up with something better, but something like "Summer's Over" isn't really any better.  I'd be alright with "50", though... but hopefully something more classy comes along. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 08:42:06 PM
holy sh*t i need to hear the wilson/love songs GAAAAAAAHHHH


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 22, 2012, 11:55:05 PM
(http://images.wolfgangsvault.com/the-beach-boys/promo-print/memorabilia/ZZZ003872-PP.jpg)

This photo however, yuck. Nice hair, Al? And what is up with Bruce's scrunchface smile? It seems to get worse as the years go by. Its super annoying, and it always bothers me when I see photos with him looking like that, cuz it makes him look older, and the group look cheesier, in my opinion.
The BBs at low tide.... They look like parodies of themselves with the worst clothes the 1990s could offer.

they look "great"!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 23, 2012, 04:33:20 AM
If it was just called "50"... that might make sense.  I hope they come up with something better, but something like "Summer's Over" isn't really any better.  I'd be alright with "50", though... but hopefully something more classy comes along. 

Yeah.  See, I don't care what the album is called, or what the cover art looks like, as long as the songs are good.  Sure, it'd be nice if it was something classy, but just like the music itself, what's classy to one is crap to another.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 08:08:09 AM
Yeah, at least '50' makes sense to everybody that picks up the album.  Anything else might not! 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 08:32:45 AM
Yeah, at least '50' makes sense to everybody that picks up the album.  Anything else might not! 

Is it necessary to tell everyone that it's the 50 anniversary?  Wait, why would an album title confuse people, it's just the title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 23, 2012, 08:36:52 AM
The way that promo ends, it looks like "The Beach Boys 50" may indeed be the title. The wording underneath "The Brand New Studio Album", makes it seem so, anyway. Otherwise they should of used "Their" instead of "The". Maybe they will also use the logo in front of the ocean and sky, as the cover. I would be quite happy with that, plus it would match the Reunion Tour advertising.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 09:34:02 AM
The way that promo ends, it looks like "The Beach Boys 50" may indeed be the title.

Highly unlikely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 11:33:54 AM
http://www.billboard.com/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story


(http://www.billboard.com/photos/stylus/1992459-beach-boys-grammys-617-409.jpg)
Beach Boys Album: 'It's All Brand New'
by Gary Graff, Detroit  |   April 23, 2012 2:00 EDT
The Beach Boys' reunion album is nearly mixed and on target for a planned June 5 release, according to the group's Bruce Johnston.


"It's all brand new," Johnston tells Billboard. "There's a lot of what you'd hope to hear from Brian (Wilson) on there. It's not a quilt or a pot luck dinner; it's not like, 'OK, everybody show up with your songs.' It's not one of those kind of albums. There's a lot of Brian in there, and Mike (Love). It's just nice to know there is a Mike Love and a Brian Wilson still around to write together."

Johnston says the album's first single, "That's Why God Made the Radio," was in contention to be the title track but was deemed too long, so alternatives are being considered. Returning member Al Jardine -- who's joining Wilson, Love, Johnston and David Marks for the album and tour, which kicks off April 24 in Tucson -- has revealed that some vocals recorded by the late Carl Wilson will be used on a Jardine-penned song called "Waves of Love," while Johnston says that Brian Wilson composed "a little suite" for the set as well.

The music, he says, "reminds me of our 'Sunflower' album, which is probably one of our least-selling albums, and some of the songs there are stunning. This album has elements, kind of, of everything. And we don't have EMI, Capitol, acting like they did when I joined the band just so paranoid -- 'We gotta have hits! We gotta have hits! Come on, is that a hit?!,' just coming to the sessions and torturing you. It wasn't like that this time. They've listened to the stuff and go, 'Wow, that's pretty nice.'"

Johnston, who composed the fan favorite "Disney Girls," contributed one song, "She Believes in Love Again" that dates back to the mid-80s. "I took it from a recording we made of it in '85 and just stripped it down and softened it up and finally got it right," Johnston says. "I have no idea if it's going in or not. The label picks the songs, not me." The group also recorded a new version of "Do It Again" as a "warm-up" during the sessions, which will be used in a 50th anniversary 'ZinePak due out May 1.

Even as the Beach Boys get ready to hit the road, Johnston says he's surprised that the oft-talked about reunion has become reality. "It was not even my greatest fantasy that this would happen because I thought it would redefine the word 'impossible,' " he says. "I think marking such a milestone as 50 years, especially coming from the world of rock 'n' roll...I mean, Tony Bennett has 50 years, and B.B. King. All of a sudden, and the (Rolling) Stones are gonna find this out, it's 50 years and you're going to celebrate it. I think that's got to be the impetus that got everybody to talk about doing it. Nobody was enemies. Everyone had fake judo fights over the years, but no one got hurt. It was pretty easy."


The Beach Boys currently have dates booked until Aug. 19 in North America, Germany and Japan. More might be added, but Johnston does not think the reunion will turn into a permanent concern. "I don't think that will happen. I think it's going to be one special tour and that's it," Johnston says. "It's with Al and Dave and Brian, so it makes it really kind of special. But Brian's not going to be a touring guy; he would never tour as much as we do. He would hate it. I happen to love it. So does Mike. But it would probably be too much stress on Brian, I think. But this tour will be fun for Brian, I think, and for the rest of us."



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on April 23, 2012, 11:39:20 AM
It's all 'brand new' but he's recorded She Believes in Love Again... again. I like the song, but  surely you've come up with other stuff in the last 25 or so years, Bruce...?!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wrightfan on April 23, 2012, 11:41:03 AM
"The music, he says, "reminds me of our 'Sunflower' album, which is probably one of our least-selling albums, and some of the songs there are stunning."

Classic Brianism  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 11:44:45 AM
Some interesting tidbits. He claims the label is picking the tracklisting. I hope somebody tells them “She Believes In Love Again” is a 27-year-old song (and single) that fans already heard on an album that has already been released that was by no means a hit single or album and not necessarily a fan favorite.

I’m less hard on doing covers and re-makes and all of that, but just make this stuff b-sides or “deluxe edition” bonus tracks. Same thing for “Do It Again” (which may be what they’re doing with the Walmart package). Maybe Bruce bettered the old version of “She Believes….”. But it’s not “new”, so make it a “Best Buy Exclusive Bonus Track” or something.

You gotta admire it in a strange way. Only the Beach Boys can do that sort of interview or story that leaves you with this weird whiplash, this weird “whaaaa?” reaction. It’s all “new”, and then we hear about a remake of a nearly three-decade old 80’s cheesefest ballad.

Hopefully this isn’t the Bruce song Probyn was talking about. Hopefully he knows the BB catalog well enough that he would recognize that one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on April 23, 2012, 11:52:21 AM
What the hell's Bruce doing. It's been done, Bruce!! It was already on a Beach Boys album and single almost 30 years ago! It was done right the first time with you, Carl, and Mike on the vocals. Why? Don't you have anything good written or in the can, Bruce, or are you saving the best for your next solo album? I don't get it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 23, 2012, 11:57:02 AM
C'mon Bruce, no re-recording. And without Carl it won't be worth it. It's a nice song and I happen to love it but what made it so good is Carl's vocal. Why are they so keen on re-recording songs that have already been released ? What's the point ? F*ck it, if there's just one re-recording (of released material) I'm going berserk


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 11:59:46 AM
I mean this semi-jokingly, but I have to wonder with all of the talk of the “powers” watching us on the interwebs here, it would seem to indicate they are watching us much more than listening to us. If they were listening to fans and taking their pulse, I would think someone would tell the whole camp that fans probably aren’t going to be too into remakes of any kind on the first new BB album in 20 years, and especially a remake of “She Believes in Love Again.” Plus, it sounds like it’s not even a remake, but a partial re-recording or remix utilizing elements of the original recording.

It’s not too distressing. I’ve been expecting some of these sort of things on this album and tour. BB fans have to take this stuff in stride. The album overall and the tour may well turn out much better than we’re thinking.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 12:03:09 PM
 It’s also interesting to note if indeed the album is due in six weeks and they still don’t have a final tracklisting or album title. I still contend that may be one of the reasons they haven’t already put the single out; They need to know the exact specs of the album that the single will be promoting.

Or they can just put “from the forthcoming album ‘Eight Arms to Hold You’” on the label. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 23, 2012, 12:14:03 PM
"Its all new.  Its not a quilt.  It's all Brian and Mike. Its not like we all came in with our songs." GREAT.  "But I have this old piece of 80's schlock I re-recorded for the album."  SAY WHAT?!?  Sigh.  Typical. Whatever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 12:18:18 PM
Unless of course...Bruce ridiculously changed this song to where it's almost unrecognizable to the '85 original?  I doubt it but that's the only way this could fly, in my book.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on April 23, 2012, 12:36:43 PM
Schlock's a bit strong.  Wonder if Carl's vocals are on it too?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 12:44:02 PM
Can't believe Bruce's song bag is this empty, he could have wrote an album during touring with Mike from 1998-2010.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 23, 2012, 01:00:19 PM
Interestingly, before we've heard anything about the new album and it's songs, say at the beginning of the reunion talk I'd have said that Mike and Bruce will go the nostalgia, oldie, re-record way. Don't get me wrong, I think Bruce seems like a nice guy but I'm not surprised that he wants to go that route. I'm much more surprised Mike doesn't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ohthosegirls on April 23, 2012, 01:00:45 PM
Bruce seems to like to re-do a lot of stuff, even adding things to Brian's songs like "Caroline, No" from that hotel party jam video.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 23, 2012, 01:04:16 PM
It’s also interesting to note if indeed the album is due in six weeks and they still don’t have a final tracklisting or album title. I still contend that may be one of the reasons they haven’t already put the single out; They need to know the exact specs of the album that the single will be promoting.


For me, they know more than they are telling. There has been a lot of secrecy and misleading remarks regarding certain aspects of this album. The information they've given in interviews has been very vague, which would lead you to believe they don't know.  Now that'd be strange considering the amount of time they've been investing into this. Same thing with the setlist for the shows... tour starts tomorrow, for God's sake!

To me it seems like a directed PR move: "don't talk much, just give this or that detail, hype up TWGMTR, etc".

They're creating an enormous level of expectation among the fanbase. And that's good promotion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 23, 2012, 01:07:40 PM
hard on


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 23, 2012, 01:10:30 PM
As long as the remix and/or reworking and/or re-recording of "She Believes In Love Again" bumps something else off the tracklist, which I don't see as likely at all, then I'm not opposed. I'd prefer it to be a bonus track, but if it makes the album, meh. Didn't some Wilson kid take a song about some Rhonda lady and put it on two albums in a row because he felt he drastically improved upon the original?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on April 23, 2012, 01:12:23 PM
Does the remake of "She Believes in Love Again" retain Carl's lead vocal??




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 01:12:53 PM
Good point RDZ, have to admit that "she believes in love again" is a guilty pleasure for me. Still I wouldn't want it on the new album if it keep new material off it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 23, 2012, 01:13:00 PM
I could see there being multiple versions of the album. "Deluxe" editions, iTunes bonus tracks, etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 01:20:34 PM
I've never heard Bruce's song. But an album of Brian/mike?  :D :D :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 23, 2012, 01:21:24 PM
"The label picks the songs" and this new She Believes in Love Again are more proof that forces have always been at work to hold these guys down.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 01:21:41 PM
Bruce's just talking, I wouldn't put too much stock in it.  They dropped DIA off the album even though it's great, so obviously they're only going to let new songs on there.

And all this talk about people watching, who cares?  Just do what you normally do.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 23, 2012, 01:24:13 PM
Did everyone miss "Johnston says that Brian Wilson composed "a little suite" for the set as well."

OMG YES.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 23, 2012, 01:25:02 PM
Did everyone miss "Johnston says that Brian Wilson composed "a little suite" for the set as well."

OMG YES.
"Old news".  :) Amazing nonetheless.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 01:25:33 PM
Did everyone miss "Johnston says that Brian Wilson composed "a little suite" for the set as well."

OMG YES.

That got me really excited


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 23, 2012, 01:43:08 PM
Did everyone miss "Johnston says that Brian Wilson composed "a little suite" for the set as well."

OMG YES.

That got me really excited

Me too - all along I was hoping for a Brian/Mike-centered album, and it appears as if that's just what we're going to get, with Al and Bruce limited to a song apiece.  They really do seem to be doing it right this time around - who would have thought? 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 23, 2012, 01:45:26 PM
I'd like to see a "Rio Grande" styled suite from Brian, just to show at 50 years, he can still do it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 23, 2012, 01:49:49 PM
"The label picks the songs" and this new She Believes in Love Again are more proof that forces have always been at work to hold these guys down.

I would hope that the label would be realistic and realize the best sales are probably going to be from an accessible, limited-schlock, critically-acclaimed album.

This needs to be something that casual fans, long-term fans, hipsters, etc all enjoy, and that an 18-34 year old isn't going to totally cringe at.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 23, 2012, 01:51:02 PM
"The label picks the songs" and this new She Believes in Love Again are more proof that forces have always been at work to hold these guys down.

I would hope that the label would be realistic and realize the best sales are probably going to be from an accessible, limited-schlock, critically-acclaimed album.

 :lol

I'll have to remember that one the next time I'm at the dentist.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 01:57:34 PM
I think of the Bruce news this way.

Brian has been working on this album for most of the past year. He's arranging, he's (co) producing, he's singing. He's busy.

Mike came in somewhat later, but he's clearly working on lyrics and maybe contributing songs as well. He'll have some serious leads, too.

Al is singing lead (presumably) on several tracks and has a half-dozen tracks in his back pocket that he can push for inclusion.

Dave has guitar work to contribute.

So, harmony vocals aside, what does Bruce have to do? He's not really essential as a lead voice, and his keyboard skills aren't needed either. I just figure that when he got into the studio with the band, he took on this new version of his old tune as a side project. It was something to occupy his time.

And that being said, if he could come up with a real full-on harmony version of the song, with a little more Beach Boys of a sound and a little less 80s schmaltz, it could be really nice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 23, 2012, 02:02:09 PM
As long as the remix and/or reworking and/or re-recording of "She Believes In Love Again" bumps something else off the tracklist, which I don't see as likely at all, then I'm not opposed. I'd prefer it to be a bonus track, but if it makes the album, meh. Didn't some Wilson kid take a song about some Rhonda lady and put it on two albums in a row because he felt he drastically improved upon the original?


Well, Brian wanted to make a single version of "Rhonda". Now guess who told Brian it would be a good idea to include the no. 1 sngle on the new album as well. It was someone calling himself Johnston. But it was a different thing back then and his suggestion I share. But not now, not "She believes in love again" on a new Beach Boys album. Bruce must've written other stuff in the last twenty years that he can bring in. Even if it's just another old doo wop song he played around with like "One summer night"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 23, 2012, 02:02:45 PM
Interestingly, before we've heard anything about the new album and it's songs, say at the beginning of the reunion talk I'd have said that Mike and Bruce will go the nostalgia, oldie, re-record way. Don't get me wrong, I think Bruce seems like a nice guy but I'm not surprised that he wants to go that route. I'm much more surprised Mike doesn't.

I gotta say though, in Bruce's defense, rerecording "She Believes in Love Again" is probably more of an artistic decision, seeing as though its not like its a big hit. He probably just thought he could get it "right" this time. And he has the right to do that, if the rest of the band thinks that's ok too. Would one assume that in the nearly 20 years since Summer in Paradise and now he would have a new song to offer? Sure. But if he wants to rerecord a song from their 1985 album, then that's his prerogative. We have to remember, that this is the same guy whose album, Goin' Public consisted of quite a bit of redone material. And his track on Keepin' the Summer Alive was a song from like 1971 or 1972. So it seems to be pretty obvious the guy either doesn't compose enough material that stands up to his own standards or he just doesn't really compose much at all.

On the other hand, if they were rerecording "Help Me Rhonda", "Fun, Fun, Fun" and "Surfer Girl", then it would be obviously just be them trying to appeal to a nostalgic, oldies audience. Which I don't think "She Believes in Love Again" will do.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Eric Aniversario on April 23, 2012, 02:20:34 PM
So the label picks the songs?  I say just include them all!  Release 50 songs!  I'll pay for a 4-cd boxed set of new material!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 23, 2012, 02:29:02 PM
So the label picks the songs?  I say just include them all!  Release 50 songs!  I'll pay for a 4-cd boxed set of new material!
That's not how you make money.  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: J.G. Dev on April 23, 2012, 02:37:32 PM
"Everyone had fake judo fights over the years, but no one got hurt. It was pretty easy."

There's your album title...."Fake Judo Fighting"





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 23, 2012, 02:51:06 PM
My perfect album title would be "Don't f*** With The Formula"

William Hill offered me odds of 1000/1


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on April 23, 2012, 03:06:33 PM
My perfect album title would be "Don't f*ck With The Formula"

William Hill offered me odds of 1000/1

That would be pretty incredible, on many levels.  Especially if the album eschewed the formula.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on April 23, 2012, 03:25:58 PM
The new album is going to be called - "Joemama Thomas-arama: A New Take on TM with Mike & Friends".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 23, 2012, 03:26:44 PM
Interestingly, before we've heard anything about the new album and it's songs, say at the beginning of the reunion talk I'd have said that Mike and Bruce will go the nostalgia, oldie, re-record way. Don't get me wrong, I think Bruce seems like a nice guy but I'm not surprised that he wants to go that route. I'm much more surprised Mike doesn't.

I gotta say though, in Bruce's defense, rerecording "She Believes in Love Again" is probably more of an artistic decision, seeing as though its not like its a big hit. He probably just thought he could get it "right" this time. And he has the right to do that, if the rest of the band thinks that's ok too. Would one assume that in the nearly 20 years since Summer in Paradise and now he would have a new song to offer? Sure. But if he wants to rerecord a song from their 1985 album, then that's his prerogative. We have to remember, that this is the same guy whose album, Goin' Public consisted of quite a bit of redone material. And his track on Keepin' the Summer Alive was a song from like 1971 or 1972. So it seems to be pretty obvious the guy either doesn't compose enough material that stands up to his own standards or he just doesn't really compose much at all.

On the other hand, if they were rerecording "Help Me Rhonda", "Fun, Fun, Fun" and "Surfer Girl", then it would be obviously just be them trying to appeal to a nostalgic, oldies audience. Which I don't think "She Believes in Love Again" will do.

I have no problem with a new version of SBILA. Nevertheless, it's strange that Probyn was not aware of the song in the interview he gave. In  it, he mentioned in detail Bruce working out a banjo part with a musician, I think.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 03:50:08 PM
Bruce is a musician, he probably has a few different songs he's working on, I wouldn't sweat it too much.  We'll know what we know when we know :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 04:07:01 PM
I imagine the suite is gonna be the nice creative push ala cwtl mad in tlos


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 23, 2012, 04:11:57 PM
So, so far Mike thinks it sounds like '65 era, Al thinks it sounds like Pet Sounds, and Bruce thinks it sounds like Sunflower. This "sounds like" business is quite the useful exercise...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 04:16:48 PM
Interestingly, before we've heard anything about the new album and it's songs, say at the beginning of the reunion talk I'd have said that Mike and Bruce will go the nostalgia, oldie, re-record way. Don't get me wrong, I think Bruce seems like a nice guy but I'm not surprised that he wants to go that route. I'm much more surprised Mike doesn't.

I gotta say though, in Bruce's defense, rerecording "She Believes in Love Again" is probably more of an artistic decision, seeing as though its not like its a big hit. He probably just thought he could get it "right" this time. And he has the right to do that, if the rest of the band thinks that's ok too. Would one assume that in the nearly 20 years since Summer in Paradise and now he would have a new song to offer? Sure. But if he wants to rerecord a song from their 1985 album, then that's his prerogative. We have to remember, that this is the same guy whose album, Goin' Public consisted of quite a bit of redone material. And his track on Keepin' the Summer Alive was a song from like 1971 or 1972. So it seems to be pretty obvious the guy either doesn't compose enough material that stands up to his own standards or he just doesn't really compose much at all.

On the other hand, if they were rerecording "Help Me Rhonda", "Fun, Fun, Fun" and "Surfer Girl", then it would be obviously just be them trying to appeal to a nostalgic, oldies audience. Which I don't think "She Believes in Love Again" will do.

I have no problem with a new version of SBILA. Nevertheless, it's strange that Probyn was not aware of the song in the interview he gave. In  it, he mentioned in detail Bruce working out a banjo part with a musician, I think.

He didn't say banjo, I think. Just a musician. And if Bruce was just cutting a backing track, especially one for a substantially different version of the song, I'm not sure it would be that recognizable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 05:49:39 PM
So, so far Mike thinks it sounds like '65 era, Al thinks it sounds like Pet Sounds, and Bruce thinks it sounds like Sunflower. This "sounds like" business is quite the useful exercise...

Yes, exactly. I mentioned this somewhere in another thread. Even when people can accurately guage or rate music, this is way too subjective to mean anything. The "sounds like" business is indeed nearly useless.

If one of them came out and said "it sounds kind of like Judas Priest", then that would be helpful a bit. But comparing their stuff to their other old albums, it's not very helpful.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 07:32:54 PM
It's kind of like in my local city's entertainment section... they list bands that are playing, and then they list what 'genre' they are.... which is of course completely useless.  So it'll say things like

Sat. March 5th
I wanna Burrito
(Folk/Indy/Rock/Spatial)

Sun. Marth 6th
Here come the Benjamins
(Folk/Etheral/Rock/Garage)

Mon. March 7th
Once again it's On
(Rock/Country/Jazzersize/Cloudy)

Like WTF is that?  If I ever had a band it would say

Tues. March 8th
Ron
(ROCK)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 08:06:17 PM
Comparing (rock) to (folk/indie/rock/spatial), I think we have different opinions on which is more useless


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 23, 2012, 09:08:54 PM
Yes, one is pretentious bullshit, the other is simple.  LOL  You must be in the "It sounds like Sunflower, but kind of like Pet Sounds, but more like 1965" camp.  BTW are you a chick?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 09:16:01 PM
New album details here --

http://stlouis.metromix.com/entertainment/3047305

Confirmed titles now include:

Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Sunrise over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (!)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 09:21:16 PM
Yes, one is pretentious bullsh*t, the other is simple.  LOL  You must be in the "It sounds like Sunflower, but kind of like Pet Sounds, but more like 1965" camp.  BTW are you a chick?

Lol could i ask you to answer if I said yes I am a girl, and no I am not. And I don't think it's pretentious to think seeing four descriptions will give me a better idea than seeing the single broadest description ha.  But if more than one descriptor is too much for you, I can understand why it'd be pretentious


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 23, 2012, 09:23:34 PM
New album details here --

http://stlouis.metromix.com/entertainment/3047305

Confirmed titles now include:

Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Sunrise over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (!)
Spring Vacation brings images of Mike Love try to sing away like its 1963.  :thud


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 09:30:52 PM
New album details here --

http://stlouis.metromix.com/entertainment/3047305

Confirmed titles now include:

Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Sunrise over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (!)
Spring Vacation brings images of Mike Love try to sing away like its 1963.  :thud

I tell you, if this reunion sends out any more mixed signals ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 09:38:31 PM
 ;D spring vacation sounds poised to join the ranks of amusement parks USA.  So it sounds like shelter and Bill were finished songs that brian brought with him.  I wonder if it's all him lyrically or if one oF his band helped.  I'm super excited for the suite.  It's great that they're letting brian do his thing!
So we got:

Waves of love
That's why god made the radio
She believes in love
Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Daybreak over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (counts as 1 or 3?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on April 23, 2012, 10:04:53 PM
If Bruces didn't joke with "She Believes In Love Again" and we know Al provides "Waves Of Love", this shows once again that Brian is and was the Beach Boys, or the real driving force behind the group.

Just give us a new BB album with brand new songs and show us that 70 year or almost 70 year old people don't live in the past and are still able to come up with something new.

Edit: I already want a new Brian Wilson written Solo album. Melinda?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on April 23, 2012, 10:27:19 PM
I`m very pleased that they have chosen to record Mike`s Daybreak. This is imo the best song that he has ever written (on his own obviously) and if they were going to include any oldies then this would be the best choice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 23, 2012, 11:36:49 PM
I`m very pleased that they have chosen to record Mike`s Daybreak. This is imo the best song that he has ever written (on his own obviously) and if they were going to include any oldies then this would be the best choice.
Indeed, I can see "Daybreak" working very well as a Beach Boys song. Good choice by Mike.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 23, 2012, 11:58:16 PM
New album details here --

http://stlouis.metromix.com/entertainment/3047305

Confirmed titles now include:

Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Sunrise over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (!)

Another priceless Brian quote for the ages:
"I think it's even better, to tell you the truth, because the guys have been practicing for years," says Brian Wilson
That guy cracks me up. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 24, 2012, 03:59:27 AM
I like "Daybreak". Hopefully (certainly) the production will be better than on "Mike Love not war". The song really is nice


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 24, 2012, 04:25:37 AM
My only concern with Spring Vacation is that its title rhymes with "excitation" and "vibration". :lol

Other than that: BRING IT ON!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 24, 2012, 04:31:14 AM
I like "Daybreak". Hopefully (certainly) the production will be better than on "Mike Love not war". The song really is nice

It's a lovely chilled song that will fit nicely. I actually think the sound of the harmonies is spot on, doesn't sound as processed as recent Brian/BB material.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 24, 2012, 05:11:53 AM
My only concern with Spring Vacation is that its title rhymes with "excitation" and "vibration". :lol

Other than that: BRING IT ON!

Maybe it will be "Spring Vacation", but in the vein of "Surfs Up", i.e, goofy title but mind blowing song. A statement. #

Or else it could be about one of those Spring Break - Show Your Beaver contests which I've heard about but never googled.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 24, 2012, 05:49:12 AM
My only concern with Spring Vacation is that its title rhymes with "excitation" and "vibration". :lol

Other than that: BRING IT ON!

We're takin' a spring vacation.
Playin' oldies like 'Good Vibrations'
We're sendin' out those excitations.
Spring, spring, spring, spring vacation!

Sorry, i just had to do that.  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 24, 2012, 06:05:54 AM
My only concern with Spring Vacation is that its title rhymes with "excitation" and "vibration". :lol

Other than that: BRING IT ON!

We're takin' a spring vacation.
Playin' oldies like 'Good Vibrations'
We're sendin' out those excitations.
Spring, spring, spring, spring vacation!

Sorry, i just had to do that.  :lol



Don't be sorry. Unfortunately in Beach Boy-world this is a strong chance it will be something like that


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on April 24, 2012, 06:06:28 AM
I`m very pleased that they have chosen to record Mike`s Daybreak. This is imo the best song that he has ever written (on his own obviously) and if they were going to include any oldies then this would be the best choice.


Umh.. in my opinion Anything For You, I Don't Wanna Know and Glow Crescent Glow are superior but let's see what the BB magic can do!!





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 06:22:11 AM
That being said, it is Brian who wanted to record a follow-up to TLOS called "Pleasure Island." I always have to remind myself of that when I start feeling crabby about Mike's lyrical concepts ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: astroray on April 24, 2012, 06:26:25 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/news/story/2012-04-23/beach-boys-album/54494556/1


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 24, 2012, 06:37:42 AM
That being said, it is Brian who wanted to record a follow-up to TLOS called "Pleasure Island." I always have to remind myself of that when I start feeling crabby about Mike's lyrical concepts ...

Yeah, I'm hoping everyone working together can act as a filter.  If Brian was left to his own devices the lyrics wouldn't be any good either except for maybe a song or two.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on April 24, 2012, 06:43:18 AM
"Spring Vacation"?


Oh dear....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wrightfan on April 24, 2012, 07:36:34 AM
That's Why God Made the Radio is going to premiere on Mike and Mike in the Morning tomorrow on ESPN Radio.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 24, 2012, 07:36:47 AM
;D spring vacation sounds poised to join the ranks of amusement parks USA.  So it sounds like shelter and Bill were finished songs that brian brought with him.  I wonder if it's all him lyrically or if one oF his band helped.  I'm super excited for the suite.  It's great that they're letting brian do his thing!
So we got:

Waves of love
That's why god made the radio
She believes in love
Shelter
The Private Life of Bill and Sue
Beaches in Mind
Spring Vacation (barf)
Daybreak over the Ocean (ML tune)
A seven-minute BW suite (counts as 1 or 3?)


Don't forget Al's "Islands In the Sun".

A few other songs I hope are in contention:

"Still A Mystery"
"Dancin' The Night Away"
"Cool Head, Warm Heart"

I also wonder if "Don't Fight the Sea" has a chance of making the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 24, 2012, 07:41:52 AM
That's Why God Made the Radio is going to premiere on Mike and Mike in the Morning tomorrow on ESPN Radio.

Yeah, I’ll wait the extra few hours to buy the track for 99 cents on Amazon rather than listen to sports talk radio. The ten minutes of sportscasters I subjected myself to when attempting to hear the BB’s at the Dodgers game online a couple weeks ago was more than I needed for the next decade. I didn’t know it was possible for sports programming to get even more hyped, bloated, and annoying than it was ten or twenty years ago. 

I’m hoping perhaps Amazon will even have the download available late tomorrow (Wednesday) night as soon as 9pm-ish, at least here on the west coast.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 24, 2012, 07:43:11 AM
Why exactly is the song premiering on a sports talk show?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on April 24, 2012, 07:47:10 AM
Yeah, I’ll wait the extra few hours to buy the track for 99 cents on Amazon rather than listen to sports talk radio.

This.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on April 24, 2012, 07:52:32 AM
I`m very pleased that they have chosen to record Mike`s Daybreak. This is imo the best song that he has ever written (on his own obviously) and if they were going to include any oldies then this would be the best choice.


Umh.. in my opinion Anything For You, I Don't Wanna Know and Glow Crescent Glow are superior but let's see what the BB magic can do!!





Maybe it depends on whether we`re talking about the original version of Daybreak or the (first) remake.

I Don`t Wanna Know and Glow Crescent Glow are both excellent as well anyway and if the BBs were to record the latter then I wouldn`t complain.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 24, 2012, 08:00:56 AM
Why exactly is the song premiering on a sports talk show?

Kevin Love probably hooked them up.

Seriously, they're on a ton of stations and simulcast on ESPN2.  Who knows if the label did some kind of deal with Disney or Mike and Mike are just big fans or what.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nicko1234 on April 24, 2012, 08:08:37 AM


Don't forget Al's "Islands In the Sun".
 

Is this the song from the 1990s that AGD described as being in the Kokomo-style?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on April 24, 2012, 08:45:52 AM
I`m very pleased that they have chosen to record Mike`s Daybreak. This is imo the best song that he has ever written (on his own obviously) and if they were going to include any oldies then this would be the best choice.


Umh.. in my opinion Anything For You, I Don't Wanna Know and Glow Crescent Glow are superior but let's see what the BB magic can do!!





Maybe it depends on whether we`re talking about the original version of Daybreak or the (first) remake.

I Don`t Wanna Know and Glow Crescent Glow are both excellent as well anyway and if the BBs were to record the latter then I wouldn`t complain.

The mid-2000s version of Too Cruel with Christian Love on vocals could've been a hit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 24, 2012, 08:46:39 AM


Don't forget Al's "Islands In the Sun".
 
[/quote

Is this the song from the 1990s that AGD described as being in the Kokomo-style?


Actually, Al described it that wasy in the new ESQ.  Yes, dates from teh 90's





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: gsmile on April 24, 2012, 09:21:55 AM
"Spring Vacation"?


Oh dear....

Could "Spring Vacation" be a left-over Pleasure Island song?  I seem to recall Brian outlining the "plot-line" for that album as a bunch of teens who go to an island for spring break and discover the magic of rock n' roll.  Or something like that.  TWGMTR would certainly fall into that category...maybe the new Beach Boys album has been built from the ashes of Pleasure Island?  Heck, it's a thought.  :hat

Edit:  I see the Pleasure Island connection has already been brought up earlier.   :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 24, 2012, 10:33:45 AM
Quote from: Wirestone link=topic=12286.msg264772#msg264772 date=13352737 :hat31
That being said, it is Brian who wanted to record a follow-up to TLOS called "Pleasure Island." I always have to remind myself of that when I start feeling crabby about Mike's lyrical concepts ...
it could be a cool song about a huge orgy on an island with naked ladies and the like  :hat so it MAY not  be that bad of a concept..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 24, 2012, 10:46:10 AM
Quote from: Wirestone link=topic=12286.msg264772#msg264772 date=13352737 :hat31
That being said, it is Brian who wanted to record a follow-up to TLOS called "Pleasure Island." I always have to remind myself of that when I start feeling crabby about Mike's lyrical concepts ...
it could be a cool song about a huge orgy on an island with naked ladies and the like  :hat so it MAY not  be that bad of a concept..
Or it could be a rock opera about Pinocchio. Brian says that Surfer Girl was based on "When You Wish Upon A Star", so maybe the man has a Pinocchio obsession.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 12:39:18 PM
We'll have to see.  BTW the article doesn't absolutely say that will be on the album, it says it's one of the titles in contention.  I.E., a name Mike could think up on the spot for a reporter on that particular day. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 12:52:17 PM
We'll have to see.  BTW the article doesn't absolutely say that will be on the album, it says it's one of the titles in contention.  I.E., a name Mike could think up on the spot for a reporter on that particular day. 
Maybe they should name the new album "Capitol Picks". Since it sounds like they are choosing the tunes for inclusion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 24, 2012, 01:08:47 PM
We'll have to see.  BTW the article doesn't absolutely say that will be on the album, it says it's one of the titles in contention.  I.E., a name Mike could think up on the spot for a reporter on that particular day. 
Maybe they should name the new album "Capitol Picks". Since it sounds like they are choosing the tunes for inclusion.

That's already come out. About 30-40 times.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 01:11:27 PM
We'll have to see.  BTW the article doesn't absolutely say that will be on the album, it says it's one of the titles in contention.  I.E., a name Mike could think up on the spot for a reporter on that particular day.  
Maybe they should name the new album "Capitol Picks". Since it sounds like they are choosing the tunes for inclusion.

That's already come out. About 30-40 times.
And here I thought I was being so original. Leave it to you to bust a man's bubble. What would I do without you. ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 24, 2012, 01:13:33 PM
We'll have to see.  BTW the article doesn't absolutely say that will be on the album, it says it's one of the titles in contention.  I.E., a name Mike could think up on the spot for a reporter on that particular day. 
Maybe they should name the new album "Capitol Picks". Since it sounds like they are choosing the tunes for inclusion.

That's already come out. About 30-40 times.
And here I thought I was being so original. Leave it to you to bust a man's bubble. What would I do without you. ;)

D'awww, I'm just playin'. ^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 24, 2012, 01:38:09 PM
The new album seems to be titled IT'S ALL BRAND NEW. (edit: maybe this is a mistake - but the way the article puts it in italics....)

http://somethingelsereviews.com/2012/04/24/something-else-sneak-peek-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-2012/


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 24, 2012, 01:42:04 PM
The new album seems to be titled IT'S ALL BRAND NEW. (edit: maybe this is a mistake - but the way the article puts it in italics....)

http://somethingelsereviews.com/2012/04/24/something-else-sneak-peek-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-2012/



I kinda like that title. But then there shouldn't be no "She believes in love again"'s


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 24, 2012, 01:50:35 PM
The new album seems to be titled IT'S ALL BRAND NEW. (edit: maybe this is a mistake - but the way the article puts it in italics....)

http://somethingelsereviews.com/2012/04/24/something-else-sneak-peek-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-2012/



I kinda like that title. But then there shouldn't be no "She believes in love again"'s
The orthodox brethren will agree.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 24, 2012, 01:51:21 PM
Dear God I hope that's not the title - perhaps the reporter read Bruce's comments and incorrectly extrapolated from there?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Eireannach on April 24, 2012, 01:52:25 PM
That title is everywhere on google from the last day.  It's probably legit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 24, 2012, 01:54:48 PM
Dear God I hope that's not the title - perhaps the reporter read Bruce's comments and incorrectly extrapolated from there?

It worked pretty well for Nintendo

(http://i.imgur.com/uh5BC.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on April 24, 2012, 01:57:09 PM
That title is everywhere on google from the last day.  It's probably legit.
Yes, it's their baby and they named it. Now let's bite our tongues and say how much the baby takes after its fathers and that we can't wait to hold it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 24, 2012, 02:00:03 PM
I kind of like it, it's better than Beach Boys 50 or whatever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 02:03:44 PM
That title is everywhere on google from the last day.  It's probably legit.
Yes, it's their baby and they named it. Now let's bite our tongues and say how much the baby takes after its fathers and that we can't wait to hold it.

Woah, woah, woah.

That is not the title. It's just not.

Bruce was quoted in Billboard talking about the contents of the album, and some sloppy web aggregators put two and two together and got 15. The Billboard article itself says that they haven't decided on a title yet.

http://www.billboard.com/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story

"Johnston says the album's first single, "That's Why God Made the Radio," was in contention to be the title track but was deemed too long, so alternatives are being considered."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 24, 2012, 02:05:21 PM
It won't be called "It's All Brand New"

Which is a shame, as that would be a really cool name for a new Beach Boys album of original songs


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 24, 2012, 02:22:08 PM
Yeah, I just realized the mistake and was about to come on here and point it out, looks like you guys beat me to it.  The author of that particular article saw the Billboard article titled "The Beach Boys album:'It's All Brand New'" and assumed that was the name, when, as Wirestone pointed out, that was just Bruce's quote.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 24, 2012, 02:22:24 PM
Maybe The Beach Boys will tell us what the album is titled tonight when they play 'That's Why God Made The Radio". Y'know, something like "This is a brand new song from our new album '50' that's coming out on June 5th. It's dedicated to everybody who loves the radio as much as we do, and it's called TWGMTR."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 24, 2012, 02:34:11 PM
I think 50 would be a terrible album title


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 02:36:56 PM
Ocean Way!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 24, 2012, 02:41:02 PM
What about "It's  A Bit Crap"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on April 24, 2012, 02:41:50 PM
What's funny is that Ocean Way studios is on the corner of Sunset Boulevard and Beachwood Drive.  Too many references to work with there...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 02:43:51 PM
What about "It's  A Bit Crap"

Good too! (And possibly the most accurate ... although I'm trying to stay positive)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: D409 on April 24, 2012, 02:55:04 PM
Apologies if this has been posted already :
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-beach-boys-new-album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 24, 2012, 03:10:41 PM
Apologies if this has been posted already :
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-beach-boys-new-album



Mike Love: It was kind of cool, because we did our track, and then I came in and did the lead vocal and Brian said, “How can a 70-year-old guy sound that good?” [Brian laughs…] Which was kind of nice. I said, “Well, it’s ’cause I’ve been practicing it for 40 years.” [Laughs] It was a lot of fun to do that, and it made a lot of sense thematically to do “Do It Again” as the first song that we recorded together after all these years.



Yap, we know it.



Al Jardine: We sat down and listened to the track.  We basically were reintroducing ourselves to the recording process at that time at Capitol. It was pretty cool. The track was very solid, so it was easy to sing to. We had pre-recorded it that day. I came in and sang on the track, and basically reinvented it… I helped arrange some of the parts. I thought it sounded even better than the original. It’s always good to have the principles around. It’s not an easy task to remake something. You have to make it better than the original… Otherwise, why do it? We all helped each other out in making it sound as good as we could. The best way to record is when everybody’s around one microphone.



Wtf ?!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 03:28:35 PM
The new album seems to be titled IT'S ALL BRAND NEW. (edit: maybe this is a mistake - but the way the article puts it in italics....)

http://somethingelsereviews.com/2012/04/24/something-else-sneak-peek-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-2012/

Two things:

1 - I don't see ANY mention of "It's All Brand New" in your link.

2 - the article plainly states "the Beach Boys improbable forthcoming reunion album — as yet untitled"

Jesus people, next time, try actually reading the article properly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 24, 2012, 03:29:31 PM
Andrew - I swear, that article was revised after I posted it! Where it now says as yet untitled was where it said It's All Brand New.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 24, 2012, 03:33:29 PM
Well then, evidently someone didn't jump to the same conclusion you did. Maybe they got a word in their ear from BRI/Capitol/BriMel/Old Father Time.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 24, 2012, 03:34:30 PM
The new album seems to be titled IT'S ALL BRAND NEW. (edit: maybe this is a mistake - but the way the article puts it in italics....)

http://somethingelsereviews.com/2012/04/24/something-else-sneak-peek-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-2012/

Two things:

1 - I don't see ANY mention of "It's All Brand New" in your link.

2 - the article plainly states "the Beach Boys improbable forthcoming reunion album — as yet untitled"

Jesus people, next time, try actually reading the article properly.

Andrew, its been edited.  ;D

Beat me to it, nevermind  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 03:36:56 PM
Dear God I hope that's not the title - perhaps the reporter read Bruce's comments and incorrectly extrapolated from there?

The issue is, it's not a reporter.  It's just some normal guy who found the video on youtube!  All his news is what's in the video. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 03:42:26 PM
If Al reinvented "Do It Again", he's really bad at re-inventing things without breaking copyrights... 'cuz I'm pretty sure he'd lose in court on that one, lol.  Sounds almost exactly like the original. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 24, 2012, 03:45:23 PM
I think the title is New Release.

 :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 24, 2012, 03:48:25 PM
Ocean Way!

I suggested that one two months ago!

They'd have to find a cross walk for the boys to cross, and Brian w/ no shoes on!

 :3d


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 03:48:43 PM
Apologies if this has been posted already :
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-beach-boys-new-album

Al Jardine: We sat down and listened to the track.  We basically were reintroducing ourselves to the recording process at that time at Capitol. It was pretty cool. The track was very solid, so it was easy to sing to. We had pre-recorded it that day. I came in and sang on the track, and basically reinvented it… I helped arrange some of the parts. I thought it sounded even better than the original. It’s always good to have the principles around. It’s not an easy task to remake something. You have to make it better than the original… Otherwise, why do it? We all helped each other out in making it sound as good as we could. The best way to record is when everybody’s around one microphone.


Wtf ?!

Oh Al, you little prick. Maybe this will get you kicked off this tour sooner rather than later. Sheesh.

When it happens, he'll say it's so he can record California Dreamin' again, this time with Axl Rose and Tony Bennett.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 24, 2012, 05:01:37 PM
I dunno. I'm not trying to be an Al apologist, but my total guess is that Al didn't intend that to be an egotistical comment. In the same article, Brian also gushes about how the new version is better than the original. I don' t think Al is saying he "reinvented" the song that he single-handedly made the song way better. I think he means it much more in a way suggesting it's new and different. Al sometimes has a very slightly weird way with language that way in interviews. It's hard to explain. He's a well-spoken guy, but occasionally uses words in odd ways.

I am finding this new wave of Beach Boys fandom quite interesting. It's great, and occasionally really frightening. BB fans are understandably not always trusting of release dates or promises of high quality product. I just think it's weird how fans are so excited about this reunion yet are so quick to just tear every person involved to shreds. I've criticized too, but not with the venom I'm reading in some of these comments. Jardine is too full of himself apparently, Marks makes up release dates, Brian doesn't want to be there, Bruce is stuck in 1985, but some sort of weird "new" version of 1985, Foskett is taking the band over, no, wait, that dude from Survivor is taking the band over, and so on. Some of these things are kind of true.

Maybe the dysfunction of the BB's does spill over into fans sometimes.  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 24, 2012, 05:16:22 PM
Bruce is stuck in 1985, but some sort of weird "new" version of 1985

Probably the one from Back to the Future II.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 24, 2012, 05:18:07 PM
Bruce is stuck in 1985, but some sort of weird "new" version of 1985

Probably the one from Back to the Future II.
I think I saw Bruce perform at Biff's casino. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 24, 2012, 05:18:20 PM
I'm not sure what Al said that was so wrong other than "pre-recorded", a "word" which makes no fucking sense what so ever. If Brian had said, "I re-invented it," we'd have no problem with it or, at worst, we'd laugh it off as a Brianism. And naw, I don't think Al meant it as anything egotistical, it just came out kind of funny.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 24, 2012, 05:20:58 PM
Bruce is stuck in 1985, but some sort of weird "new" version of 1985

Probably the one from Back to the Future II.

I was also going to make a reference to the TV show "Fringe", which is partly set in 1985. But who knows how many folks here watch it?  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 05:21:43 PM
What makes Al's comment better, is when you realize he said it really quietly and calmly like he always does.  Just imagine it.  Good stuff. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 05:23:13 PM
I think it's just that all of the relationships are a little different.

The main point: Carl isn't there. He was both Al and Brian's closest ally in the band.

Brian is now closest to Mike and his backing band (which just happens to be the group's).

Al has been a free agent for the last 14 years or so, and he's developed into his own man, an elven self-promotion machine.

Mike has come to terms with the group's artier material and has done some great catalog shows. He's taken full control of the touring band, but now is willing to yield it (to some extent) to Brian.

Dave has been added, and he's close to Mike and Al.

Bruce, as ever, gets along with everyone.

The point is, the balance of power and the web of relationships is different. This is a fundamentally different group than has ever toured or recorded before. I don't quite know how to feel about it.

But I guess we'll all find out!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 05:31:12 PM
Considering this is the first show, the new album is over a month away and single hasn't yet been released, hold off feeling anything until you have something to have a feeling about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 24, 2012, 05:39:35 PM
I think it's just that all of the relationships are a little different.

The main point: Carl isn't there. He was both Al and Brian's closest ally in the band.

Brian is now closest to Mike and his backing band (which just happens to be the group's).

Al has been a free agent for the last 14 years or so, and he's developed into his own man, an elven self-promotion machine.

Mike has come to terms with the group's artier material and has done some great catalog shows. He's taken full control of the touring band, but now is willing to yield it (to some extent) to Brian.

Dave has been added, and he's close to Mike and Al.

Bruce, as ever, gets along with everyone.

The point is, the balance of power and the web of relationships is different. This is a fundamentally different group than has ever toured or recorded before. I don't quite know how to feel about it.

But I guess we'll all find out!

You make some very interesting points. It is hard to describe exactly, but I think I know what you're talking about. The sort of balance of power shifts from year to year and project to project. I think they are all united by the novelty of the anniversary concept, and probably the lucrative nature of the tour.

I think they are acheiving something closer to a fair and organic balance of power. Maybe. Big maybe. But Mike, Brian, and Al are all on equal footing legally/organizationally, Bruce seem to go with the flow, and David is very humbly and coolly adding his thing to the reunion as well. I think they are arriving at some democracy without doing it simply for the sake of giving each person exactly equal say in everything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 24, 2012, 07:48:44 PM
Andrew - I swear, that article was revised after I posted it! Where it now says as yet untitled was where it said It's All Brand New.
I saw it too. The article previously stated the album title was 'It's All Brand New' at least a couple of times. I didn't think the writer was correct though. Why would they have a scoop like that?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 24, 2012, 07:53:13 PM
I saw it too. The article previously stated the album title was 'It's All Brand New' at least a couple of times. I didn't think the writer was correct though. Why would they have a scoop like that?

"It's All Brand New" is a terrible title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 07:55:52 PM
Like in the 70's, "New Album" would work just fine for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 24, 2012, 08:12:14 PM
Like in the 70's, "New Album" would work just fine for me.

I don't think that was ever going to be a final title. It'd be totally ridiculous, if it were, as would It's All Brand New be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 08:22:01 PM
Like in the 70's, "New Album" would work just fine for me.

I don't think that was ever going to be a final title. It'd be totally ridiculous, if it were, as would It's All Brand New be.
I don't care if it was or not. Even if it was just a placeholder, it is simple and says exactly what it is. After 16 years since the last one, those two words have great meaning to anyone who cares.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 24, 2012, 09:22:13 PM
i think the inclusion of Brian's suit is the best news i've heard so far.  I'm just imagining when he wanted to get mt. vernon on holland lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 09:35:19 PM
Even better, will be if "The private life of bill and jane" or whatever it's called.....    is part of the suite.  I.E. he uses two or three songs to tell a story about something, like Mt. Vernon!   Think Eleanor Rigby on steroids. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 24, 2012, 09:45:01 PM
i don't think that's the case actually, i think shelter and bill/sue stand on their own.  Or I'd think that would have been said by Mike or Bruce when they mentioned the title.  I wonder if the suite is gonna be like side 2 of smile, or like rio grande??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 24, 2012, 09:57:23 PM
Even better, will be if "The private life of bill and jane" or whatever it's called.....    is part of the suite.  I.E. he uses two or three songs to tell a story about something, like Mt. Vernon!   Think Eleanor Rigby on steroids. 

It's a cool idea, but it's not the case. In one of the most recent articles about the new record it was made clear that this, "Shelter" and the BW suite are all different songs.

This might be a dumb question, but is it safe to assume that the record is done now that the band has embarked on their tour?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 10:04:13 PM
Basically i'm going to enjoy it whatever it is.  I loved the Disney Album, I loved the Gershwin Album, I loved TLOS, I loevd the Christmas album, I loved BWPS...

I think i'm safe here no matter what he does, lol. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SonoraDick on April 24, 2012, 11:57:00 PM
Just got home from the Tucson show... glanced through some earlier posts & I don't see any mention of this. When Mike introduced "That's Why God Made The Radio" tonight, he clearly added from our new album "OF THE SAME NAME".
So, maybe there's the answer to the new album title question.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on April 25, 2012, 12:02:34 AM
 :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 25, 2012, 01:27:12 AM
Of all the titles thrown out recently, both as potentials by the band, guesses by fans, etc. etc. etc. That's Why God Made The Radio is the least offensive, albeit still not very impressive and a bit too over the top as far as cheese/nostalgia goes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 02:45:51 AM
Didn't they drop it as title since it is too long? Well, we'll see...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 07:01:21 AM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 07:36:08 AM
So we got the tracklist, although not in order.

I will say I'm disappointed that we didn't get "Dancing the Night Away", although maybe it is there, just re-titled. I doubt it though. I wonder if there are any Carl vocals on the album, if they don't have this or "Waves of Love" on there. And I'm  nearly positive that there is probably no Dennis.

I kinda think it's cool that the only song that appears to be somewhat "old" is "Daybreak Over The Ocean" and while that has never been a favorite of mine, its not bad and I'm sure they probably made a good version of it.

Some of the titles are interesting. "Think About The Days" and "Isn't It Time" could either be nice melancholy things, or they might super nostalgic schlock. Or maybe neither. "Beaches In Mind", "Summer's Gone" and "Spring Vacation" kinda seem too obviously "Beach Boys"-ish, but once again who knows. I guess there is no point speculating, haha.

All the rest, well...here's hoping.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 25, 2012, 07:43:34 AM
That might very well be the order. After all, I can see them starting off with the title track and ending with a track called Summer's Gone. I know they've suggested that the suite ends the album, but there may be a sort of bonus thing going on at the end.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on April 25, 2012, 08:14:37 AM
So we got the tracklist, although not in order.

I will say I'm disappointed that we didn't get "Dancing the Night Away", although maybe it is there, just re-titled. I doubt it though. I wonder if there are any Carl vocals on the album, if they don't have this or "Waves of Love" on there. And I'm  nearly positive that there is probably no Dennis.


I would guess that if Carl was featured on any tracks, that fact would be touted in the press release.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on April 25, 2012, 08:21:36 AM
Aw, I was really coming around to the idea of a new "She Believe in Love Again". Then again the press release clearly says "The album’s other new songs include..." so maybe...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 25, 2012, 08:23:14 AM
Aw, I was really coming around to the idea of a new "She Believe in Love Again". Then again the press release clearly says "The album’s other new songs include..." so maybe...

11 songs total, so we have all the titles.  I would guess we get some bonus tracks from various retailers though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 08:37:23 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 08:38:44 AM
LOOKS like all of Johnston and Jardine's titles got dropped (i.e., Waves of Love, Islands in the Sun, She Believes in Love Again).  Then again, we do not know the final writing credits for the remaining tunes.  Presume some of these end up as bonus cuts...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 08:40:28 AM
"Strange world" - a new IJWMFTT or It's not easy being me ? Sounds like it title-wise


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 25, 2012, 08:43:28 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay

If Mike said that (can't quite remember), then that's probably what it means, yes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 08:50:01 AM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"


Yes! I was right! "Summer's Gone" is the closing track.

But where did this info come from?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 08:51:29 AM
Capitol put out the official press release today.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 08:53:25 AM
If they were going to name the album after a song, there are a few tracks on there that would have made a better title.  But, in the end, who really cares I suppose.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 08:56:11 AM
I wonder if "Isn't It Time" is a prequel to "It's About Time"?  ;)

I'm nervous about a few of the other track titles, though. A few of them sound a bit "SIP"-esque. But I suppose even "SIP" would've been somewhat listenable if Brian had had a hand in some of the songs.

I also wonder if the cover artwork for the "TWGMTR" single will be the album cover?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 25, 2012, 08:59:58 AM
If they were going to name the album after a song, there are a few tracks on there that would have made a better title.  But, in the end, who really cares I suppose.

The Beach Boys have a tradition of naming the album after a major single from it - Surfin' Safari, Surfin' USA, Surfer Girl, Wild Honey, Friends.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 09:03:57 AM
I also wonder if the cover artwork for the "TWGMTR" single will be the album cover?
No way. But maybe a variation of it, or a similar motif/theme, inlcuding the "radio", obviously.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 09:07:56 AM
So assuming the "My Life Suite" accounts for three tracks, that would bring the total tracklisting to thirteen, like a lot of the classic records.

Didn't I read somewhere that they recorded fifteen tracks total for the record? Looks like the ones on the cutting room floor are "Waves of Love", "Islands in the Sun", "She Believes In Love Again" and an as-yet unmentioned song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on April 25, 2012, 09:36:19 AM
I, for one, am not sorry that "Don't Fight The Sea" didn't make the cut (as far as we can tell) - better to leave that one to Jardine's album (same with "Waves of Love", really). I'm quite pleased that "Do It Again" is not on here nor any other re-records of released songs. Unless, of course, additional tracks will be included apart from the "new" ones. I think it's important to present an album like this without the crutch on relying on previous hits.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 25, 2012, 09:50:50 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay

Nobody ever said 'a three song suite'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on April 25, 2012, 09:54:09 AM
Yeah, I'm happily surprised they were tasteful enough to avoid the remakes and cutting room floor scraps and reconstructions and leave that stuff where it should be -- bonus tracks. Bring on the suite!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on April 25, 2012, 09:56:47 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay

Nobody ever said 'a three song suite'.

The word "suite" itself infers a number of elements (ie different songs) that make up a whole doesn't it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 09:57:19 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay

Nobody ever said 'a three song suite'.
But isn't it supposed to be like 7 minutes long, or something? Could mean three consecutive tracks which share an overall theme / narrative, or something. A mini-suite.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 25, 2012, 10:06:11 AM
Wasnt mike saying that the album ends with a three song suite?  Does this mean my life is 3 songs or whay

Nobody ever said 'a three song suite'.

No, but they described a track where "one song flows into another and that flows into another like that, until it’s over, until there’s no more album." This description alone sounds like "a three song suite" but it could be more than three, I suppose.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 25, 2012, 10:09:45 AM
Suite: a set of musical pieces considered as one composition.  Could be two pieces, or three, or 10.  I was only saying that nobody ever mentioned three.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 25, 2012, 10:11:27 AM
Suite: a set of musical pieces considered as one composition.  Could be two pieces, or three, or 10.  I was only saying that nobody ever mentioned three.

No, nobody mentioned three but the quote above suggests that it's three, but it's possible that he was just speaking rather informally about the track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 10:15:17 AM
I'm pretty glad they aren't using "Waves of Love" or "She Believes In Love Again". I think they would be far more useful as bonus tracks, seeing as how they are already out there in one form or another. But they would be interesting to hear as bonuses. Just not as part of a cohesive album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 10:16:45 AM
Hum. I really thought mike said 3 song at one point.oh well


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 25, 2012, 10:20:47 AM
Suite: a set of musical pieces considered as one composition.  Could be two pieces, or three, or 10.  I was only saying that nobody ever mentioned three.

It was mentioned that the "suite" is 7 minutes long at one point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 25, 2012, 10:27:34 AM
Suite: a set of musical pieces considered as one composition.  Could be two pieces, or three, or 10.  I was only saying that nobody ever mentioned three.

It was mentioned that the "suite" is 7 minutes long at one point.

Yep.  I'm excited to hear it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 25, 2012, 10:56:49 AM
Wasn't the original, Landy inspired suite on BW88 called The Life Suite?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 25, 2012, 11:11:17 AM
Wasn't the original, Landy inspired suite on BW88 called The Life Suite?
I pray to the god who made the radio it isn't that....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on April 25, 2012, 11:20:22 AM
why not? I think Landy/Morgan are a bit underrated as lyrical collaborators.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt H on April 25, 2012, 11:21:17 AM
Wasn't the original, Landy inspired suite on BW88 called The Life Suite?
I pray to the god who made the radio it isn't that....

I think that was one title, and then the title "Child, Adult, Parent" or something like that was thrown around in the WIBN book.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 11:22:29 AM
I think it was called like "Life's Suite". I also think it may have been called "Adult, Child, and Parent" or something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 11:23:27 AM
Wasn't the original, Landy inspired suite on BW88 called The Life Suite?

Yep. It will be fascinating to see if the new suite has links to 80s-era stuff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 11:35:44 AM
I think it was called like "Life's Suite". I also think it may have been called "Adult, Child, and Parent" or something.


But didn't it become "Rio Grande" ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 11:40:36 AM
I think it was called like "Life's Suite". I also think it may have been called "Adult, Child, and Parent" or something.


But didn't it become "Rio Grande" ?

I think RG was composed separately, at Lenny Waronker's suggestion to do something like H&V.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 25, 2012, 11:58:27 AM
I think it was called like "Life's Suite". I also think it may have been called "Adult, Child, and Parent" or something.


But didn't it become "Rio Grande" ?

I think RG was composed separately, at Lenny Waronker's suggestion to do something like H&V.

Something like H&V and not like Life Suite!

No I'm joking. Any song suite from Brian is most welcome at chez Newcombe


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 12:01:24 PM
I'm pretty glad they aren't using "Waves of Love" or "She Believes In Love Again". I think they would be far more useful as bonus tracks, seeing as how they are already out there in one form or another. But they would be interesting to hear as bonuses. Just not as part of a cohesive album.

Worst case scenario, the bonus tracks could be used to replace some lesser songs on the record in everyone's personalized iTunes playlists.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 01:12:57 PM
just went into my local record shop and was advised they will have the new album in the Friday before June 5, whatever date that is.  This means I can listen to all the down on my drive to the Hollywood Bowl on June 2.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 25, 2012, 03:08:16 PM
I think it was called like "Life's Suite". I also think it may have been called "Adult, Child, and Parent" or something.


But didn't it become "Rio Grande" ?

I think RG was composed separately, at Lenny Waronker's suggestion to do something like H&V.

Something like H&V and not like Life Suite!

No I'm joking. Any song suite from Brian is most welcome at chez Newcombe

Same here, I originally didn't like Rio Grande, but after 3 plays I loved it. Brian is the suite-king, anything he touches turns to amazing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 25, 2012, 03:21:52 PM
just went into my local record shop and was advised they will have the new album in the Friday before June 5, whatever date that is.  This means I can listen to all the down on my drive to the Hollywood Bowl on June 2.
Just because a store has it in the building does not mean they are allowed to sell it before the street date. There could be punitive action taken by the record company if they became aware of that activity, and most stores aren't willing to risk it. Good for you though, if you have found one that is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 25, 2012, 03:27:21 PM
(http://imageupload.org/thumb/thumb_221594.png) (http://imageupload.org/en/file/221594/twgmtr.png.html)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 25, 2012, 03:42:08 PM
(http://imageupload.org/thumb/thumb_221594.png) (http://imageupload.org/en/file/221594/twgmtr.png.html)

Is that really the album cover? Awesome! Where did you find it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 25, 2012, 03:43:55 PM
Nah, just a dream :)

Same place I found the album for download, BitTorrent.

The "life suite" is amazing, it even gives kudos to Dennis by having 5 whole minutes of audio p*rn with Mike!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 03:44:54 PM
"Just" a made-up mock cover reminiscent of Pet Sounds.  ;)

Actual album cover art wouldn't use that photo of the Boys (a photo which has already been released, anyway).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 03:45:56 PM
(http://imageupload.org/thumb/thumb_221594.png) (http://imageupload.org/en/file/221594/twgmtr.png.html)

I really hope the guys don't appear on the album cover.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 25, 2012, 03:47:12 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: JohnMill on April 25, 2012, 03:47:44 PM
"Just" a made-up mock cover reminiscent of Pet Sounds.  ;)

Actual album cover art wouldn't use that photo of the Boys (a photo which has already been released, anyway).

Is the album title officially "That's Why God Made The Radio"?  I read something from Bruce two days ago where he said that title was too long.  He also mentioned he wrote a song for the record but said it may have gotten rejected as the decision wasn't up to him as the record label decided what to include?  WTF?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on April 25, 2012, 03:50:41 PM
"Just" a made-up mock cover reminiscent of Pet Sounds.  ;)

Actual album cover art wouldn't use that photo of the Boys (a photo which has already been released, anyway).

Is the album title officially "That's Why God Made The Radio"?  I read something from Bruce two days ago where he said that title was too long.  He also mentioned he wrote a song for the record but said it may have gotten rejected as the decision wasn't up to him as the record label decided what to include?  WTF?

Since the single on iTunes has the album it's from listed as "That's Why God Made the Radio - single" I imagine they did that to differentiate it from the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 03:51:01 PM
"Just" a made-up mock cover reminiscent of Pet Sounds.  ;)

Actual album cover art wouldn't use that photo of the Boys (a photo which has already been released, anyway).

Is the album title officially "That's Why God Made The Radio"?  I read something from Bruce two days ago where he said that title was too long.  He also mentioned he wrote a song for the record but said it may have gotten rejected as the decision wasn't up to him as the record label decided what to include?  WTF?

Looks like Bruce was wrong and they went with TWGMTT title.

He didn't write a song for the record, either. He recorded a new version of "She Believes in Love Again."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 03:54:21 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR

Daybreak was recorded by Mike in 1978.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 25, 2012, 03:56:19 PM
just went into my local record shop and was advised they will have the new album in the Friday before June 5, whatever date that is.  This means I can listen to all the down on my drive to the Hollywood Bowl on June 2.

Hey Southbay,

Could you kindly tell me (PM) the name of said store?  Thank you kindly!

 :ohyeah


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 04:05:26 PM
Has anyone heard Brian's life suite from landy?i hope this is new


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 04:10:06 PM
Has anyone heard Brian's life suite from landy?i hope this is new

I never thought it actually existed. The name was out there, but I had always thought it was a Landy fabrication for BW's autobiography after Rio Grande turned out so well.

So who knows?

I was suspecting it was based on his abandoned "Little Prince" suite that he claimed to have written for the Royal Festival Hall ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 25, 2012, 05:28:26 PM
I can't possibly read everything so I apologize if anybody else has already said this: I'm seeing a couple places say that the title of the album is going to be "Celebration". 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 05:31:15 PM
The press release said twgmtr.  I'd much prefer celebration


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 25, 2012, 05:47:46 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR

Don't know about that - a good half of those titles reek of nostalgia in the same way "That's Why God Made The Radio" does. We'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 05:55:41 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR

Don't know about that - a good half of those titles reek of nostalgia in the same way "That's Why God Made The Radio" does. We'll see.

I think he meant mysterious in the sense that no one had heard them yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on April 25, 2012, 06:01:16 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR

Don't know about that - a good half of those titles reek of nostalgia in the same way "That's Why God Made The Radio" does. We'll see.

Runners, I think we are gonna have to resign ourselves to the fact that many of the lyrics to these songs will be filled with Mike Love cheese. However, hopefully unlike "That's Why God Made The Radio", the music will just be written by Brian, and not by committee, so we'll be able to enjoy the chord progressions, vocals, and harmonies. And one other thing, I was thinking about the possible cheesiness of some of these songs, and I realized it is probably what Brian himself wants. He's a cheesy guy. He wanted to do an album called Pleasure Island. And I'd rather have Mike Love writing nostalgic stuff than Scott Bennett trying to write confessional lyrics "in Brian's voice".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 25, 2012, 06:08:47 PM
I, for one, thought the lyrics for TWGMTR weren't that bad.  I actually enjoyed the references to spirituality in it, I think they're very Brian-esque.  In terms of nostalgia, I wouldn't say it "reeked" of it either.  I really think this is the best Beach Boys song in decades and was floored when I first heard it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 25, 2012, 06:10:54 PM
NPR is saying it's "The Best New Beach Boys Song In 40 Years".  So that's their opinion of it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on April 25, 2012, 06:23:20 PM
And I'd rather have Mike Love writing nostalgic stuff than Scott Bennett trying to write confessional lyrics "in Brian's voice".
With all due respect to Scott, amen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on April 25, 2012, 06:39:45 PM
Anyone know if one of these tracks is the one Mike was writing with David?

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on April 25, 2012, 07:01:09 PM
Well, going by that one track this album will be horrible IMO.  Not that I was expecting much else really.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 25, 2012, 07:19:34 PM
Well, going by that one track this album will be horrible IMO.  Not that I was expecting much else really.

Eh. Things are different in the year 2012 than they were in the 60s. As odd as it may sound, from my own listening habits, disliking the first single is usually a good sign for the rest of the album anymore. Either way, I don't think we're in for 11 more "That's Why God Made The Radio"s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 07:28:53 PM
brian hasn't written songs like TWGMTR in a long time, i'm much more interested in his songs.  I mean, once we learned who was wrote this song, i think we all knew it would be a beach boys by numbers song.  i expect more from the album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 07:44:57 PM
Well, going by that one track this album will be horrible IMO.  Not that I was expecting much else really.

(http://www.mememaker.net/static/images/memes/222654.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 25, 2012, 07:52:49 PM
The Beach Boys That's Why God Made The Radio

"That's Why God Made The Radio"
"Think About The Days"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life Of Bill And Sue"
"Daybreak Over The Ocean"
"Shelter"
"Beaches In Mind"
"Strange World"
"My Life Suite"
"Summer's Gone"

Great to see all songs are mysterious save for TWGMTR

Daybreak was recorded by Mike in 1978.

Yeah, that too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 25, 2012, 08:09:57 PM
I wonder how long it will be until the 30 second samples are up on Amazon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 25, 2012, 10:46:48 PM
Runners, I think we are gonna have to resign ourselves to the fact that many of the lyrics to these songs will be filled with Mike Love cheese. However, hopefully unlike "That's Why God Made The Radio", the music will just be written by Brian, and not by committee, so we'll be able to enjoy the chord progressions, vocals, and harmonies. And one other thing, I was thinking about the possible cheesiness of some of these songs, and I realized it is probably what Brian himself wants. He's a cheesy guy. He wanted to do an album called Pleasure Island. And I'd rather have Mike Love writing nostalgic stuff than Scott Bennett trying to write confessional lyrics "in Brian's voice".

I'd rather have actually heard the stuff before making dumbass comments based entirely on a list of titles and a considerable dislike of Mike. Just sayin'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 25, 2012, 10:50:13 PM
Runners, I think we are gonna have to resign ourselves to the fact that many of the lyrics to these songs will be filled with Mike Love cheese. However, hopefully unlike "That's Why God Made The Radio", the music will just be written by Brian, and not by committee, so we'll be able to enjoy the chord progressions, vocals, and harmonies. And one other thing, I was thinking about the possible cheesiness of some of these songs, and I realized it is probably what Brian himself wants. He's a cheesy guy. He wanted to do an album called Pleasure Island. And I'd rather have Mike Love writing nostalgic stuff than Scott Bennett trying to write confessional lyrics "in Brian's voice".

I'd rather have actually heard the stuff before making dumbass comments based entirely on a list of titles and a considerable dislike of Mike. Just sayin'.

Damn! C'mon, Andrew. I defend Mike left and right here, and stated that the titles sounded similar in the nostalgia department to "That's Why God..." but followed it up with "We'll see" because yes, we will indeed see. I have no idea, maybe "Summer's Gone" is about a couple gettin' freaky with teh peanut butter I DON'T KNOW MAN ;(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on April 25, 2012, 10:52:38 PM
NPR is saying it's "The Best New Beach Boys Song In 40 Years".  So that's their opinion of it.  

Nah.  It ain't better than "Good Timin'", "Sail On, Sailor", "Goin' On", "Keepin' The Summer Alive", "It's OK", etc.  It is better than "Male Ego" I suppose.  :-)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 25, 2012, 11:02:33 PM
Yeah, like I said that was NPR saying it.  Not me, lol.  Good Timin' is much better, and that's just an EASY example, 40 years would mean nothing better has came out since 1972?  Getthahellouttaheah!  Still I really like it, though.  It has that thick sound they're good at. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 26, 2012, 04:16:16 AM
NPR is saying it's "The Best New Beach Boys Song In 40 Years".  So that's their opinion of it.  

Nah.  It ain't better than "Good Timin'", "Sail On, Sailor", "Goin' On", "Keepin' The Summer Alive", "It's OK", etc.  It is better than "Male Ego" I suppose.  :-)

it is waay better than good timin, it's ok and definitely keepin the summer alive


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on April 26, 2012, 07:51:25 AM
NPR is saying it's "The Best New Beach Boys Song In 40 Years".  So that's their opinion of it. 

Nah.  It ain't better than "Good Timin'", "Sail On, Sailor", "Goin' On", "Keepin' The Summer Alive", "It's OK", etc.  It is better than "Male Ego" I suppose.  :-)

it is waay better than good timin, it's ok and definitely keepin the summer alive

I would say that it is in the discussion with being among the best material since '72


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 08:14:36 AM
I've seen a lot of online reviews say things like "I don't want to like this song, but I can't help it" or "O.K., it's a little cheesy... but I love it!" and lots of people referring to it like it's a guilty pleasure.  Which I think is actually pretty good, I'll bet the boys are pleased by the reaction. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 26, 2012, 09:27:13 AM
I've seen a lot of online reviews say things like "I don't want to like this song, but I can't help it" or "O.K., it's a little cheesy... but I love it!" and lots of people referring to it like it's a guilty pleasure.  Which I think is actually pretty good, I'll bet the boys are pleased by the reaction. 

Yes, and then they come on here..........



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 26, 2012, 10:44:11 AM
Anyone know if one of these tracks is the one Mike was writing with David?

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I was wondering this too, I guess we will find out soon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on April 26, 2012, 01:41:36 PM
Either way, I don't think we're in for 11 more "That's Why God Made The Radio"s.

I say at most 10 more "That's Why God Made The Radio"s.

(Mathematical joke. ;D)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 01:44:28 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfPFtbJAEm8


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 26, 2012, 01:46:46 PM
Well, going by that one track this album will be horrible IMO.  Not that I was expecting much else really.

Don't buy the album then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 26, 2012, 03:46:18 PM
I think the album will be a miracle to most BB fans. This is more like it. Classic BB sound. None of that SIP nonsense. TWGMTR has everything I love about the Beach Boys. It's kind of a nostalgic fun classic sounding song, but melancholy at the same time. Catchy and poppy, but haunting. For me, the aura of it kind of harkens back to Today! or In My Room. Which isn't a bad thing at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on April 26, 2012, 04:44:02 PM
So surprised to click on Amazon and look at my cart and see the actual album and real title shown. I think this just happened. First impression, I like the colors, design questionable(I understand the waves). I don't like the title very much, but was prepared.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 05:08:24 PM
The cover is growing on me.  The logo doesn't look so out of place after a while.... hmmm... this one might be a sleeper. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 26, 2012, 06:04:53 PM
This has all exceeded my expectations.  It's all being done so tastefully, I really can't believe it.  I'm sorry, but for a song as a whole, it's better than, and this is just me, a lot of Brian's solo material. Just for those voices alone.  Nothing sounds like the Beach Boys.  In my opinion, it also exceeds Good Timin' and anything after it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 26, 2012, 06:12:58 PM
This has all exceeded my expectations.  It's all being done so tastefully, I really can't believe it.  I'm sorry, but for a song as a whole, it's better than, and this is just me, a lot of Brian's solo material. Just for those voices alone.  Nothing sounds like the Beach Boys.  In my opinion, it also exceeds Good Timin' and anything after it. 

Ditto x 1000


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Custom Machine on April 26, 2012, 11:42:36 PM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 11:44:32 PM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on April 26, 2012, 11:51:04 PM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.

Agreed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mr_oleary on April 27, 2012, 12:21:09 AM
NPR is saying it's "The Best New Beach Boys Song In 40 Years".  So that's their opinion of it.  

Nah.  It ain't better than "Good Timin'", "Sail On, Sailor", "Goin' On", "Keepin' The Summer Alive", "It's OK", etc.  It is better than "Male Ego" I suppose.  :-)

I'd add Good Time, The Night was so Young, and I'll Bet He's Nice


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 27, 2012, 12:39:22 AM
The entirety of the album known as Love You....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on April 27, 2012, 03:37:06 AM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.

Culture clash


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 27, 2012, 04:26:41 AM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.
No, we don't all love the album cover. It reminds me of the budget Good Vibrations album from the early 70's with the colored circles along the bottom half of the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on April 27, 2012, 06:20:00 AM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.

Culture clash

Yes, I think it's definitely a culture clash. I'm 34 and freakin' love it. They've absolutely hit it out of the park on the cover art and the TWGMTR single. I don't love TWGMTR as the title of the album, but it could've been worse like the "The Beach Boys 50" or "Celebration". Maybe I'm just rationalizing, but I like it in that it's a subdued title as if this is just the next Beach Boys album, as opposed to being some gimmicky reunion album. Not sure if I'm articulating my thought clearly...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 06:31:05 AM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.

Culture clash

Yes, I think it's definitely a culture clash. I'm 34 and freakin' love it. They've absolutely hit it out of the park on the cover art and the TWGMTR single. I don't love TWGMTR as the title of the album, but it could've been worse like the "The Beach Boys 50" or "Celebration". Maybe I'm just rationalizing, but I like it in that it's a subdued title as if this is just the next Beach Boys album, as opposed to being some gimmicky reunion album. Not sure if I'm articulating my thought clearly...

I unabashedly adore it. Best thing about the reunion thus far.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 27, 2012, 07:04:35 AM
It's probably one of the better album covers the band has out on an album.  Technically they haven't had a good cover since like love you. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 27, 2012, 07:36:10 AM
The cover shown on Amazon today has (hopefully) gotta be a placeholder.  It looks like something you'd see on a cheap budget label release.



There's a whole thread about this. We love the cover.  It's awesome.

Culture clash

Yes, I think it's definitely a culture clash. I'm 34 and freakin' love it. They've absolutely hit it out of the park on the cover art and the TWGMTR single. I don't love TWGMTR as the title of the album, but it could've been worse like the "The Beach Boys 50" or "Celebration". Maybe I'm just rationalizing, but I like it in that it's a subdued title as if this is just the next Beach Boys album, as opposed to being some gimmicky reunion album. Not sure if I'm articulating my thought clearly...

Agreed, it looks very indie (outside of the massive Beach Boys logo) and vintage in some ways, which is seen as "cool" by a lot of people in 2012.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 27, 2012, 10:25:47 AM
The single cover looks cool. The album cover....well..... At least the logo should be thrown out. It doesn't fit....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 27, 2012, 01:18:41 PM
funny how different tastes are.  I think the single cover is god awful with zero artistic sense.  It's cliche beyond belief and the first thing anyone would think of.  But i love the album cover


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on April 27, 2012, 01:24:20 PM
funny how different tastes are.  I think the single cover is god awful with zero artistic sense.  It's cliche beyond belief and the first thing anyone would think of.  But i love the album cover

I have to ask, what exactly did you expect the artwork of a single titled 'That's Why God Made The Radio' to feature? A penguin duct-taped to a refridgerator?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 27, 2012, 01:40:16 PM
funny how different tastes are.  I think the single cover is god awful with zero artistic sense.  It's cliche beyond belief and the first thing anyone would think of.  But i love the album cover

I have to ask, what exactly did you expect the artwork of a single titled 'That's Why God Made The Radio' to feature? A penguin duct-taped to a refridgerator?

it was a dolphin in my mind.  but really, i expected more than a dutch angle of an old radio.  I would have liked if they had a theme between the single and the album art, maybe it wouldn't have waves, but what if it had circles like radio waves in a similar style to the album.  It'd be cool if they went together as they should, i've seen other bands do that.  and i'm not saying they should have done that, they're the professionals.  It just looked like very little effort was put into it. 

but y'know, that's fine, i'd rather them put the effort in the album stuff.  I don't like the single art, but it's just a single, so whatever. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 04:33:29 PM
The album has already made the top 100 sellers on Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/best-sellers-music-albums/zgbs/music/ref=pd_dp_ts_m_1#5


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 27, 2012, 04:41:38 PM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 04:44:41 PM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.

The price will come down. It's just a placeholder. I'd expect it will be either $9.99 or $11.99 by the middle of next month.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 27, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
This has all exceeded my expectations.  It's all being done so tastefully, I really can't believe it.  I'm sorry, but for a song as a whole, it's better than, and this is just me, a lot of Brian's solo material. Just for those voices alone.  Nothing sounds like the Beach Boys.  In my opinion, it also exceeds Good Timin' and anything after it. 

Ditto x 1000

Same here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on April 27, 2012, 08:22:17 PM
As much as I like TWGMTR and Brian's lead vocal, the background vocals do not sound like classic Beach Boys. Good Timin' on the other hand is one of the few late era Beach Boys songs that really captures that classic vocal sound. 1984's Chasin' The Sky is the last song to sound that way. By the next year something changed and it never returned. Not that they sounded bad or anything, but not how they sounded before.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on April 27, 2012, 08:57:00 PM
As much as I like TWGMTR and Brian's lead vocal, the background vocals do not sound like classic Beach Boys. Good Timin' on the other hand is one of the few late era Beach Boys songs that really captures that classic vocal sound. 1984's Chasin' The Sky is the last song to sound that way. By the next year something changed and it never returned. Not that they sounded bad or anything, but not how they sounded before.

I think Good Timin' sounds thin. Its vocal sound is as sparse as the rest of the LA Album. Brian shot his high voice, Carl has to cover, Bruce covers the middle... It sounds too thin for me. Tune's great, though.

One thing about the vocal sound of TWGMTR is that it lacks a strong vocal bass line. It's stuffed in the mid-range, while the singing is up-front, almost in New Jersey fashion. This in-your-face delivery, unlike most of the BBs vocal production (there are exceptions like "Wendy"), may end up helping its radioplay impact methinks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 28, 2012, 02:26:43 AM
A: Any news on a UK Vinyl release - nothing showing up on amazon yet...

B: Look at the release date (UK) - Looks like a TSS again!
 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_sc_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1335605150&sr=8-3-spell (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=sr_1_sc_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1335605150&sr=8-3-spell)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on April 28, 2012, 05:47:04 AM
Nice #65 on amazon.com Can't find it yet on german amazon though


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 28, 2012, 05:52:21 AM
Nice #65 on amazon.com Can't find it yet on german amazon though
... and still even no date for the single CD.   ::) I'm on the verge of cancelling my pre-order since I already have the song and I still don't know if the CD bonus track(s) would be worth it. I mean, they could at least upload the cover art and set an imaginary date.  :-\

Maybe I'll find the German release date somewhere on the internetz....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on April 28, 2012, 10:45:38 AM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.

You must be new.  This happens 100% of the time a CD is added to Amazon.com.
The price will come down.  Even at $17, it's still ranked #54 on Amazon.  Good job, guys.

And I really like the album cover.  Very tasteful.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 28, 2012, 02:16:00 PM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.

You must be new.  This happens 100% of the time a CD is added to Amazon.com.
The price will come down.  Even at $17, it's still ranked #54 on Amazon.  Good job, guys.

And I really like the album cover.  Very tasteful.

yes i am new, i am new to the world, internet, amazon.com, music world, beach boys fandom  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on April 28, 2012, 07:08:18 PM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.

You must be new.  This happens 100% of the time a CD is added to Amazon.com.
The price will come down.  Even at $17, it's still ranked #54 on Amazon.  Good job, guys.

And I really like the album cover.  Very tasteful.

yes i am new, i am new to the world, internet, amazon.com, music world, beach boys fandom  ::)

I bought the single on ITunes, and the CD an Amazon.  I'll buy everything they put out because it's the Freakin' Beach Boys, man!

 :hat


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 29, 2012, 01:10:55 AM
i still don't get why it's 18 dollars.  that's like barnes and noble priced!!  i gotta order my vinyl soon, the cd will be bought in store for sure.

You must be new.  This happens 100% of the time a CD is added to Amazon.com.
The price will come down.  Even at $17, it's still ranked #54 on Amazon.  Good job, guys.

And I really like the album cover.  Very tasteful.

yes i am new, i am new to the world, internet, amazon.com, music world, beach boys fandom  ::)

So... exactly where was the cave ?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 29, 2012, 02:35:58 AM
From amazon.com:

Track Listings

1. Think About The Days
2. That's Why God Made The Radio
3. Isn't It Time
4. Spring Vacation
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue
6. Shelter
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean
8. Beaches In Mind
9. Strange World
10. From There To Back Again
11. Pacific Coast Highway
12. Summer's Gone


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on April 29, 2012, 03:46:08 AM

Thanks!

Can't wait to listen to this album!  Been waiting too long!!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on April 29, 2012, 04:26:57 AM
Some of those titles sound fantastic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 29, 2012, 04:58:36 AM
so are those last three songs the suite or WHAT


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 29, 2012, 05:01:37 AM
I'm psyched for "Strange World", and I'm not even expecting an Iron Maiden cover.  ;D No really, if this doesn't scream "Brian Wilson", what does?

"From There and Back Again" - The Hobbit reference?  :3d


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 29, 2012, 05:03:18 AM
I'm psyched for "Strange World", and I'm not even expecting an Iron Maiden cover.  ;D No really, if this doesn't scream "Brian Wilson", what does?

"From There and Back Again" - The Hobbit reference?  :3d

lol i was trying to think from where i knew that title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 29, 2012, 05:04:08 AM
now i wonder if the "my life suite" made the cut.  I'm gonna be bummed if not


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on April 29, 2012, 05:15:32 AM


I still think  there were better titles for the album name that TWGMTR




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on April 29, 2012, 05:21:02 AM
now i wonder if the "my life suite" made the cut.  I'm gonna be bummed if not

I'm guessing "From There To Back Again" and "Pacific Coast Highway" are part of it.  Good idea to rename it because "My Life Suite" isn't a good title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on April 29, 2012, 05:22:25 AM
now i wonder if the "my life suite" made the cut.  I'm gonna be bummed if not

I'm guessing "From There To Back Again" and "Pacific Coast Highway" are part of it.  Good idea to rename it because "My Life Suite" isn't a good title.

well this how i assumed it was gonna be originally, but then that press release said "my life suite" and i thought that's what the album would say.  but i guess those two weren't mentioned, so it's cool.  I think Summer's Gone will be included, 2 songs isn't much of a suite


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 29, 2012, 05:23:43 AM
I still think  there were better titles for the album name that TWGMTR
Works as an overall statement about classic rock/popularmusic that was played on the radion in the golden days of the medium, a tradition where the BBs music originated and a heritage which the new album tracks (spearheaded by the title track) carry on. It fits.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on April 29, 2012, 05:42:24 AM
I think the title is catchy and not cliche:

The Beach Boys: That's why God made the radio


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on April 29, 2012, 05:54:45 AM
"From There To Back Again"

maybe this is just Life Suite under a different title?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on April 29, 2012, 05:57:42 AM
"From There To Back Again"

maybe this is just Life Suite under a different title?


Yeah, maybe the three parts of the suite appear as one track in the tracklisting. That's not unusual.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 29, 2012, 07:48:09 AM
If its not... I'm gonna destroy Capitol.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on April 29, 2012, 08:17:46 AM
I know things may have changed, but both Brian and Mike have said that the suite is going to close the album.  I'm thinking that the last two or three song titles on the tracklist will be the suite.  Won't be long now until we find out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on April 29, 2012, 08:48:31 AM
Two songs isn't much of a suite. Hopefully tracks 9-11 or 10-12 comprise the suite, or "From There To Back Again" is the suite.

The plot thickens...  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on April 29, 2012, 09:21:43 AM
Counting myself as both one of the world's biggest Beatles fans and a shameless BrianistaTM :hat, the thought of the band's final (?) lp culminating in a Brian Wilson-penned suite sounded like sheer brilliance, and serves as absolutley my most looked-forward-to aspect of the album.  Even though "My Life Suite" always did sound like a working title, I've grown so accustomed to seeing the phrase in print and spun fancifully around in my mind over these past few weeks that it has somehow endeared itself to me, and I couldn't help but feel a bit uneasy at it not appearing on Amazon's tracklisting.

I'm with the rest of you supposing that we're just witnessing a title change, but make no mistake, there is a group of untold millions who will rise up in righteous indignation and march on the tower, pitchforks and torches in tow, should our beloved little suite not feature on the album (so don't say we didn't warn you).

Hey, by the way, just who was it that decided it was a good idea to yield the artistic decision of which numbers would make the cut to the label anyway?  After all, economics aside, it should be an artistic decision, yes?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on April 29, 2012, 09:48:51 AM
Hey, by the way, just who was it that decided it was a good idea to yield the artistic decision of which numbers would make the cut to the label anyway?  After all, economics aside, it should be an artistic decision, yes?
When one wants the financial muscle of a major label, that's the trade-off. The band could easily have done an entirely self-financed, self-released album and taken complete control.

As for that last sentence, considering some of the artistic decisions the Beach Boys have made in the past, I think the answer to that in this case is a definite no.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on April 29, 2012, 11:12:08 AM
That's certainly all well and true, Luther - especially maybe the latter ;) - and yes, there was most assuredly a trade-off to be made in order for the band to receive a higher measure of label support, but boy oh boy, anyone other than those intimately involved in the production of the music deciding (not suggesting, based on market trends, public opinion polls, casting lots, etc., but having the final say) on what makes the album just really sticks in my craw, and it can have a marked effect on the final product.  The most cited example, I imagine, would be Capitol's dealing with the early Beatles output.  Personally speaking, even after years of trying to get used to it, I still prefer The Beatles / G. Martin's vision of their work vs. just about any of the choices that Capitol made (although I do prefer having "IWTHYH" on Meet The Beatles).

Even with a decidedly up and down history of commercial success, the Beach Boys are not, of course, unknown, hungry artists without a leg to stand on, and I would think they were in a better bargaining position than that when they signed this deal.  Still, the plain truth is that, as a fan, I'm not in the know here, and it's entirely possible that the group feels that they will be somehow better served this way, and if that is their feeling, then I'll support it and defend it, even if I don't understand the motivations behind it.

All that said, this is still just a very long-winded way of saying I want my Brian Wilson suite!

Oh, that and, I like the idea behind the album cover, and was quite pleasantly surprised with the colourful ocean waves / teardrops / boobies and/or buttcheecks, but the big, ungainly band logo doesn't jibe well and needs to be rethought for a better fit.  Oops!  Looky there, here I am -  uninvolved with the production of the work, dictating my input.  :D  Oh well, I'm right on this one!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on April 29, 2012, 11:57:11 AM
Spring Vacation:

"We're on a Spring Vacation,
Feelin' good vibrations,
Gonna take our tour
All over the nation!

Find some excitation
At the Lifeguard Station
Havin fun, fun, fun
No, you're not mistaken, it's

Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Hey nowwwww....

When some loud braggart
Tries to put us down,
We go out of town
On a fun spring trip

When it gets too hot,
We go down by the sea
And we find a nice beach
Where the kids are hip"

The Private Life of Bill and Sue:

"Bill and Sue
Don't know what to do
They've got a weekend alone

They'll go down by the shore
Grab their swimsuits and boards
And they'll get into the zone..

The Surf Zone! Ba ba baaaaa..."

"From Here to back Again"

"Well I was a cork on the ocean
But now I'm a surfboard, ya know
Surfin' around all over the place
From Californ-i-a to Mexico...

You know we're

Here and back again
Find some summer friends
The summer never ends
The fun that never ends

Here and back again
Let's do it again
Swimmin' with our friends
The summer never ends...."

"Shelter"

"Weeeeeeeelllllllllllllll....

When I was hot (When he was hot)
On the beach (On his beach)
With the sun beating down (The sun beats down)
It was hot and sweltering
I looked for some shelter
And look what I found...

Shelter shelter shelter shelter shelter
Lookin for some lookin for some shelter
Lookin at tomorrow for a surf board I can borrow
Demonstratin' with the students even though it isn't prudent
Sheeeeeeelllltterrrrrrrr!"

As you can see, all of the lyrics that have leaked so far follow the basic rhyme scheme of "Be True To Your School." They also pay respect to their early 70's work with callbacks to songs from "Surf's Up." This is looking good, guys!

/Sunday idiocy


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on April 29, 2012, 12:42:04 PM
I think the last 3 tracks comprise the suite - "Summer's Gone" is an evocative title that seems to somewhat morbidly suggest the end of one's life, and along with the other two titles, I can easily see how a suite could be woven through them.  No way Capitol cuts something like that, they know that people want to hear what Brian has to offer. 

Assuming we're right about this, it'll be the last Beach Boys album with a true Brian Wilson closing trifecta in 40 years.  That's definitely what I'll be looking most forward to hearing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 29, 2012, 12:45:55 PM
Hallmark album was called Songs From Here & Back. Just sayin...  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 29, 2012, 12:48:32 PM
Spring Vacation:

"We're on a Spring Vacation,
Feelin' good vibrations,
Gonna take our tour
All over the nation!

Find some excitation
At the Lifeguard Station
Havin fun, fun, fun
No, you're not mistaken, it's

Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Hey nowwwww....

When some loud braggart
Tries to put us down,
We go out of town
On a fun spring trip

When it gets too hot,
We go down by the sea
And we find a nice beach
Where the kids are hip"

The Private Life of Bill and Sue:

"Bill and Sue
Don't know what to do
They've got a weekend alone

They'll go down by the shore
Grab their swimsuits and boards
And they'll get into the zone..

The Surf Zone! Ba ba baaaaa..."

"From Here to back Again"

"Well I was a cork on the ocean
But now I'm a surfboard, ya know
Surfin' around all over the place
From Californ-i-a to Mexico...

You know we're

Here and back again
Find some summer friends
The summer never ends
The fun that never ends

Here and back again
Let's do it again
Swimmin' with our friends
The summer never ends...."

"Shelter"

"Weeeeeeeelllllllllllllll....

When I was hot (When he was hot)
On the beach (On his beach)
With the sun beating down (The sun beats down)
It was hot and sweltering
I looked for some shelter
And look what I found...

Shelter shelter shelter shelter shelter
Lookin for some lookin for some shelter
Lookin at tomorrow for a surf board I can borrow
Demonstratin' with the students even though it isn't prudent
Sheeeeeeelllltterrrrrrrr!"

As you can see, all of the lyrics that have leaked so far follow the basic rhyme scheme of "Be True To Your School." They also pay respect to their early 70's work with callbacks to songs from "Surf's Up." This is looking good, guys!

/Sunday idiocy

lol...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on April 29, 2012, 12:55:43 PM
"That's why God made the radio"
in the garden of eden God stuck his finger down
and made the radio so we won't go to hell
that's why God made the radio,it is our Jesus Christ
it's going to raise us from the dead and then we'll go surfin all night
adam told eve listen here to me don't you let me catch round the apple tree
if you do,woman, you'll send us to hell
that's why God made the radio,so we can go surfin
save the whales,the tree's and vote for ROMNEY
God wanted us to surf so he waved his hand
and turned the radio into a groovy surf board
that's why God made the radio,so we can hear the Devils rock n roll
We started this band after selling our souls..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on April 29, 2012, 01:32:52 PM
"That's why God made the radio"
in the garden of eden God stuck his finger down
and made the radio so we won't go to hell
that's why God made the radio,it is our Jesus Christ
it's going to raise us from the dead and then we'll go surfin all night
adam told eve listen here to me don't you let me catch round the apple tree
if you do,woman, you'll send us to hell
that's why God made the radio,so we can go surfin
save the whales,the tree's and vote for ROMNEY
God wanted us to surf so he waved his hand
and turned the radio into a groovy surf board
that's why God made the radio,so we can hear the Devils rock n roll
We started this band after selling our souls..


Love it. This is another option:

"That's why Al Gore made the internet
You'll see horrible things that you'll try to forget
When we play a show, login to see the set
On smileysmile dot net..."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 29, 2012, 04:11:23 PM
Well, now we've heard either "Beaches...." or "Days..." 

If you were looking for JT, you found him :D the song is good though!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on April 29, 2012, 04:33:11 PM
The most cited example, I imagine, would be Capitol's dealing with the early Beatles output.  Personally speaking, even after years of trying to get used to it, I still prefer The Beatles / G. Martin's vision of their work vs. just about any of the choices that Capitol made (although I do prefer having "IWTHYH" on Meet The Beatles).

All that said, this is still just a very long-winded way of saying I want my Brian Wilson suite!

Without Capitol rejiggering Rubber Soul into a more cohesive musical whole, we wouldn't have had Pet Sounds. Which is Brian Wilson's finest "suite".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on April 29, 2012, 05:56:25 PM
I think the last 3 tracks comprise the suite - "Summer's Gone" is an evocative title that seems to somewhat morbidly suggest the end of one's life,

I can't help but think it will go something like "Summer's gone, but our summer love goes on."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on April 29, 2012, 07:15:26 PM
I think the last 3 tracks comprise the suite - "Summer's Gone" is an evocative title that seems to somewhat morbidly suggest the end of one's life, and along with the other two titles, I can easily see how a suite could be woven through them.  No way Capitol cuts something like that, they know that people want to hear what Brian has to offer. 

Assuming we're right about this, it'll be the last Beach Boys album with a true Brian Wilson closing trifecta in 40 years.  That's definitely what I'll be looking most forward to hearing.

I disagree, I think that "Summer's Gone" would not be part of the suite as this title has been mentioned  before but not in any way referenced to being in a suite.  I still feel IMHO that the 3 parts of the suite are likely combined to form one title ( Brian writing fragments?   ;)  )  and a title like "Here and Back Again" sure has a Life Cycle like feel to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on April 29, 2012, 11:31:14 PM
"That's why God made the radio"
in the garden of eden God stuck his finger down
and made the radio so we won't go to hell
that's why God made the radio,it is our Jesus Christ
it's going to raise us from the dead and then we'll go surfin all night
adam told eve listen here to me don't you let me catch round the apple tree
if you do,woman, you'll send us to hell
that's why God made the radio,so we can go surfin
save the whales,the tree's and vote for ROMNEY
God wanted us to surf so he waved his hand
and turned the radio into a groovy surf board
that's why God made the radio,so we can hear the Devils rock n roll
We started this band after selling our souls..


Love it. This is another option:

"That's why Al Gore made the internet
You'll see horrible things that you'll try to forget
When we play a show, login to see the set
On smileysmile dot net..."


Wait wait, now it's my turn to make up some fake ridiculous Mike-style lyrics!
How about

"We like to get around
get up, we'll hit up
every hot spot in town"



Oh wait...






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 29, 2012, 11:52:51 PM
I think the last 3 tracks comprise the suite - "Summer's Gone" is an evocative title that seems to somewhat morbidly suggest the end of one's life, and along with the other two titles, I can easily see how a suite could be woven through them.  No way Capitol cuts something like that, they know that people want to hear what Brian has to offer. 

Assuming we're right about this, it'll be the last Beach Boys album with a true Brian Wilson closing trifecta in 40 years.  That's definitely what I'll be looking most forward to hearing.

I disagree, I think that "Summer's Gone" would not be part of the suite as this title has been mentioned  before but not in any way referenced to being in a suite.  I still feel IMHO that the 3 parts of the suite are likely combined to form one title ( Brian writing fragments?   ;)  )  and a title like "Here and Back Again" sure has a Life Cycle like feel to it.

I would have to disagree with your disagreement.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bcdam on April 30, 2012, 01:59:11 AM
Don't know if it got posted yet, but in this CBS report, there's a snippet of a new song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K7h7IICAs0

Sounds a little "Summer in Paradise"-y, but I'll reserve my judgement until I hear more than 5 seconds of it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on April 30, 2012, 02:06:53 AM
Don't know if it got posted yet, but in this CBS report, there's a snippet of a new song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K7h7IICAs0

Sounds a little "Summer in Paradise"-y, but I'll reserve my judgement until I hear more than 5 seconds of it.

There's a thread about that:

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.0.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.0.html)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on April 30, 2012, 05:25:14 AM
I think the last 3 tracks comprise the suite - "Summer's Gone" is an evocative title that seems to somewhat morbidly suggest the end of one's life, and along with the other two titles, I can easily see how a suite could be woven through them.  No way Capitol cuts something like that, they know that people want to hear what Brian has to offer.  

Assuming we're right about this, it'll be the last Beach Boys album with a true Brian Wilson closing trifecta in 40 years.  That's definitely what I'll be looking most forward to hearing.

I disagree, I think that "Summer's Gone" would not be part of the suite as this title has been mentioned  before but not in any way referenced to being in a suite.  I still feel IMHO that the 3 parts of the suite are likely combined to form one title ( Brian writing fragments?   ;)  )  and a title like "Here and Back Again" sure has a Life Cycle like feel to it.

I would have to disagree with your disagreement.

Darn..

nothing worse than having our resident expert disagree with your disagreement...
it certainly stacks the odds against me... but I'll leave it at that, I don't want to get all Phil about it.  :-X


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 30, 2012, 06:15:22 PM
Life Suite:
The suite makes this a must buy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 30, 2012, 11:06:19 PM
Think about it... final track on the last ever Beach Boys album is called "Summer's Gone". Poignant, yet somehow inevitable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on April 30, 2012, 11:11:53 PM
... on the last ever Beach Boys album ...

Is that a certainty or a likelihood? And if the former, what's the evidence? Pretty please? :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 30, 2012, 11:17:43 PM
Because I say so.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocky Raccoon on May 01, 2012, 12:27:58 AM
Some updated info on the album plus the QVC appearance and a magazine release featuring the re-recorded "Do It Again."
http://www.jambands.com/news/2012/04/30/the-beach-boys-confirm-that-s-why-god-made-the-radio-release-date-and-info


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 01, 2012, 04:41:47 AM
Did Phil Cohen comment on the whole affair already?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 01, 2012, 07:26:26 AM
Complete track listing up on amazon. All the same titles we've already heard about. (not sure if this had been reported yet, but I haven't read it).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: myonlysunshine on May 01, 2012, 09:58:02 AM
I really hope that by "mellow," Brian doesn't mean the new album is full of Joe Thomas adult contemporary schlock like Imagination.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 01, 2012, 10:22:16 AM
From "Spring Vacation":

All day long, from the A.M. to PM
Ft. Lauderdale girls, how we're dyin' to see 'em...

Does that rhyme?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 01, 2012, 11:09:26 AM
Complete track listing up on amazon. All the same titles we've already heard about. (not sure if this had been reported yet, but I haven't read it).

Nope, my life suite has gone!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 01, 2012, 12:19:28 PM
Complete track listing up on amazon. All the same titles we've already heard about. (not sure if this had been reported yet, but I haven't read it).

Nope, my life suite has gone!

Theres two previously unmentionef songs there, probably the suite


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 01, 2012, 08:17:11 PM
A QVC only exclusive disc with greatest hits?  That's a pretty smart idea I think though I can't imagine anyone who wants them doesn't have the hits yet (I've been proven wrong on that with almost every re-packaging).  I wonder if it will ship before it's released in stores?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 01, 2012, 11:16:16 PM
Complete track listing up on amazon. All the same titles we've already heard about. (not sure if this had been reported yet, but I haven't read it).

Nope, my life suite has gone!

Theres two previously unmentionef songs there, probably the suite
That is most correct, please see here: http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=TOCP-71311


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 01, 2012, 11:20:10 PM
Anyone know how long before an album is released that 30 second samples are put up on Amazon?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 02, 2012, 12:28:09 AM
I really hope that by "mellow," Brian doesn't mean the new album is full of Joe Thomas adult contemporary schlock like Imagination.

Even worse: he'll say that Joe Thomas is a much better producer than he himself ever was.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Tord on May 02, 2012, 08:01:06 AM

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)

http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/ (http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 08:06:34 AM
Ah, an under-40 minute album. And a This Whole World length opening track!

Excellent.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 02, 2012, 08:12:32 AM
BBs new album looks like a keeper.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 02, 2012, 08:50:43 AM

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)

http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/ (http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/)

Hmm, I wonder what these track lengths tell us about the 'suite' at the end of the record?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on May 02, 2012, 09:38:22 AM

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)

http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/ (http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/)

I hope that "Pacific Coast Highway" is a surf instrumental, and if it isn't that I hope it's a hot rod song! :)
"Beaches In Mind" would also be a good title for a surf instrumental but it is unlikely either is.

What I also hope for is a silly song like "I'm Bugged At My Old Man", "Vega-Tables", or "Saturday Morning In The City"! ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 02, 2012, 09:46:33 AM
Will #5 reveal another Bill Clinton affair?  :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 02, 2012, 10:56:23 AM
Pacific Coast Highway totally sounds like an Al song from the title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 02, 2012, 11:07:24 AM
Pacific Coast Highway totally sounds like an Al song from the title.

Oh I dunno. It brings "Souther Californis" from TLOS to my mind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 02, 2012, 11:19:29 AM
the suite was supposedly 7 minutes long.  the last three songs are 9 minutes.  im gonna be pretty bummed if it's not on there guys. not gonna lie...surely capitol wouldn't do that to brian again would they?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 02, 2012, 11:26:09 AM
the suite was supposedly 7 minutes long.  the last three songs are 9 minutes.  im gonna be pretty bummed if it's not on there guys. not gonna lie...surely capitol wouldn't do that to brian again would they?

You mean releasing a super-obese 5 CD 2 LP 2 single two books poster $ 125.00 with a suite from Brian and then murdering another suite half a year later?

...well, it sounds totally logical, come to think.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 02, 2012, 11:44:13 AM
Why do people think Capitol would choose the tracklist ? Only because Bruce said that they are not looking for hit singles like in the 60s and therefor just listen to the stuff and say "Sounds good" ? The decision is up to Brian (and maybe the executive producers ). Of course they could say they won't release the album but they won't decide upon tracklisting, etc. In the end the Beach Boys have more or less carte blanche and that's what Bruce tried to express.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 02, 2012, 11:53:20 AM

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)

http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/ (http://www.recordshopx.com/artist/beach_boys/thats_why_god_made_the_radio/)


I hope "Think About The Days" it's an a cappella introduction to  the album.!





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 02, 2012, 11:54:51 AM
Why do people think Capitol would choose the tracklist ? Only because Bruce said that they are not looking for hit singles like in the 60s and therefor just listen to the stuff and say "Sounds good" ? The decision is up to Brian (and maybe the executive producers ). Of course they could say they won't release the album but they won't decide upon tracklisting, etc. In the end the Beach Boys have more or less carte blanche and that's what Bruce tried to express.

Well this is what Bruce has told us, there's a 7 minute suite by brian to end the album, the label is picking the tracks, the album isn't called TWGMTR because it's too long. ._.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 02, 2012, 11:56:06 AM
Why do people think Capitol would choose the tracklist ? Only because Bruce said that they are not looking for hit singles like in the 60s and therefor just listen to the stuff and say "Sounds good" ? The decision is up to Brian (and maybe the executive producers ). Of course they could say they won't release the album but they won't decide upon tracklisting, etc. In the end the Beach Boys have more or less carte blanche and that's what Bruce tried to express.

Well this is what Bruce has told us, there's a 7 minute suite by brian to end the album, the label is picking the tracks, the album isn't called TWGMTR because it's too long. ._.



I'd love to see that quote, because I can't remember it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 12:09:04 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 02, 2012, 12:12:33 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.

That would be pretty lame if true. I would take "Waves of Love" over "Spring Vacation" in a heartbeat based on the twenty or so seconds I've heard of the latter.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sound of Free on May 02, 2012, 12:29:31 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
So if they have 12 songs with what they wanted, why would there have been a problem of adding a 13th track to give Al a song on the album? (And for that matter, a 14th track, for Dave?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 02, 2012, 12:32:39 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
So if they have 12 songs with what they wanted, why would there have been a problem of adding a 13th track to give Al a song on the album? (And for that matter, a 14th track, for Dave?)
There's not point in that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 02, 2012, 12:34:31 PM
Why do people think Capitol would choose the tracklist ? Only because Bruce said that they are not looking for hit singles like in the 60s and therefor just listen to the stuff and say "Sounds good" ? The decision is up to Brian (and maybe the executive producers ). Of course they could say they won't release the album but they won't decide upon tracklisting, etc. In the end the Beach Boys have more or less carte blanche and that's what Bruce tried to express.

Well this is what Bruce has told us, there's a 7 minute suite by brian to end the album, the label is picking the tracks, the album isn't called TWGMTR because it's too long. ._.



I'd love to see that quote, because I can't remember it.

well i'll do my best, these were different articles i think.
http://www.billboard.com/#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story
that's the one where he says the label picks the songs.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/news/story/2012-04-23/beach-boys-album/54494556/1
this is where he says "i'm just going to guess, seven minutes long"

so i suppose those songs could still be it.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 12:35:47 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.

That would be pretty lame if true. I would take "Waves of Love" over "Spring Vacation" in a heartbeat based on the twenty or so seconds I've heard of the latter.

Yeah, but you're not Capitol. For the record-buying public, an album of BW songs, produced by BW, whatever the quality, is worth more than any number of Al tunes. The cult of genius does strange things.

I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
So if they have 12 songs with what they wanted, why would there have been a problem of adding a 13th track to give Al a song on the album? (And for that matter, a 14th track, for Dave?)

As I said, a BW-composed album is simply worth more than one written by the other members of the group. On tour, BW's participation doesn't mean much as long as he can make his way through a handful of songs. On record, it's the difference between major label and pressing up some copies through Amazon (Al, anyone?). The label may also want to placate BW and Melinda to keep them in the fold. Who knows?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 02, 2012, 12:38:15 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
I don't think so. Capitol does not have that kind of power; I believe Brother would have retained creative control in this case. As for Al's tunes, who says they won't be used as bonus/exclusive tracks, or even as new material to round out another collection? Also, there might be a follow up album; that's where Capitol may have the option or say so.  Those extra tunes would give them a little head start on that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 02, 2012, 12:48:45 PM
Why do people think Capitol would choose the tracklist ? Only because Bruce said that they are not looking for hit singles like in the 60s and therefor just listen to the stuff and say "Sounds good" ? The decision is up to Brian (and maybe the executive producers ). Of course they could say they won't release the album but they won't decide upon tracklisting, etc. In the end the Beach Boys have more or less carte blanche and that's what Bruce tried to express.

Well this is what Bruce has told us, there's a 7 minute suite by brian to end the album, the label is picking the tracks, the album isn't called TWGMTR because it's too long. ._.



I'd love to see that quote, because I can't remember it.

well i'll do my best, these were different articles i think.
http://www.billboard.com/#/news/beach-boys-album-it-s-all-brand-new-1006844362.story
that's the one where he says the label picks the songs.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/news/story/2012-04-23/beach-boys-album/54494556/1
this is where he says "i'm just going to guess, seven minutes long"

so i suppose those songs could still be it.  


Thanks for the links. You're right, he says that the label picks the songs, although he's just talking about his at that point, to be exact, so it very well could mean that the contract only says that tehre have to be so and so many BW tunes. I stand at my statement that the Beach Boys - and to be precise Brian - have carte blanche in tracklisting, etc. That is stuff the producer decides. Capitol may have options but those are probably quite small.

Anyhow, my point of view and of course in the end it doesn't matter


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 12:55:30 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
I don't think so. Capitol does not have that kind of power; I believe Brother would have retained creative control in this case. As for Al's tunes, who says they won't be used as bonus/exclusive tracks, or even as new material to round out another collection? Also, there might be a follow up album; that's where Capitol may have the option or say so.  Those extra tunes would give them a little head start on that.

Contractually, they may indeed have that kind of power. We just don't know for sure.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 02, 2012, 12:56:20 PM
Thanks for the links. You're right, he says that the label picks the songs, although he's just talking about his at that point, to be exact, so it very well could mean that the contract only says that tehre have to be so and so many BW tunes.

Well, if we're being exact, then he exactly says, "The label picks the songs."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 02, 2012, 12:57:55 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
I don't think so. Capitol does not have that kind of power; I believe Brother would have retained creative control in this case. As for Al's tunes, who says they won't be used as bonus/exclusive tracks, or even as new material to round out another collection? Also, there might be a follow up album; that's where Capitol may have the option or say so.  Those extra tunes would give them a little head start on that.

Contractually, they may indeed have that kind of power. We just don't know for sure.

Yeah, wasn't Brian under that kind of contractually obligation before? My only source in this is the A&E Biography.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 02, 2012, 12:58:40 PM
I think Capitol may have insisted that the album consist entirely of songs co-written by Brian (and perhaps one -- Daybreak -- solely written by Mike). That would explain the absence of any of Al's things.
I don't think so. Capitol does not have that kind of power; I believe Brother would have retained creative control in this case. As for Al's tunes, who says they won't be used as bonus/exclusive tracks, or even as new material to round out another collection? Also, there might be a follow up album; that's where Capitol may have the option or say so.  Those extra tunes would give them a little head start on that.

Contractually, they may indeed have that kind of power. We just don't know for sure.
You're right, we don't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 02, 2012, 01:01:16 PM
Thanks for the links. You're right, he says that the label picks the songs, although he's just talking about his at that point, to be exact, so it very well could mean that the contract only says that tehre have to be so and so many BW tunes.

Well, if we're being exact, then he exactly says, "The label picks the songs."
Which label? The one that delivers the album or the one that distributes it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 02, 2012, 01:05:47 PM
Thanks for the links. You're right, he says that the label picks the songs, although he's just talking about his at that point, to be exact, so it very well could mean that the contract only says that tehre have to be so and so many BW tunes.

Well, if we're being exact, then he exactly says, "The label picks the songs."


Like "the label picks the songs that are not written by Brian" ? This could go on and on and we probably would never come to a conclusion. My point: Capitol got the Beach Boys to make an album produced by Brian Wilson. So they won't ask his decisions. That's maybe why Joe Thomas was brought in, because he makes clear that Brian won't deliver GIOMH part 2 and Capitol had to go with it. And I don't know how much Brother Records (of which Bruce isn't a member) has to do with it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 02, 2012, 01:09:13 PM
Like "the label picks the songs that are not written by Brian" ? This could go on and on and we probably would never come to a conclusion.

The only reason we can't reach a conclusion is because you keep adding things to the quote that Bruce never said.

GUY: Whoa, whoa, whoa, Moses. Like, "thou shalt not kill...someone you really love?" I mean, we can't be sure so I'm just going to keep killing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 02, 2012, 02:47:01 PM
It would still surprise me for Capitol to select the songs though.  Leaving off the suite (i imagine it's those last three) would seem like a baaad idea. unless the music was horrible.  WHICH IS DOUBTFUL.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 02, 2012, 03:01:07 PM
Piece on the new album on the BigO website (italics are mine):

DON'T BLAME GOD
The Beach Boys' "That's Why God Made The Radio" 50th anniversary reunion album (Capitol) celebrates the 50th Anniversary of the band with a new album and reunion tour. The band's surviving original members wrote and recorded the album very quickly and it is being produced by Brian Wilson and executive produced by Mike Love. Release date is June 5. The songs are:

01. Think About The Days
02. That's Why God Made The Radio
03. Isn't It Time
04. Spring Vacation
05. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue
06. Shelter
07. Daybreak Over The Ocean
08. Beaches In Mind
09. Strange World
10. From There To Back Again
11. Pacific Coast Highway
12. Summer's Gone

The original Beach Boys are Mike Love, 71; Brian Wilson, Bruce Johnston (both turn 70 in June) and Al Jardine are all 69.
[/b]

Someone ought to point out the errors in that last line, Phil.  Thought I'd mention it before Jon did…!   ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Tord on May 02, 2012, 05:18:09 PM
“It’s very relaxed to me,” Johnston hints. “What I like about it is the label wasn’t running in the door every five minutes [looking for hits]. They just come over once in awhile and heard all the voices. Brian’s got this cute little pocket suite in it. And nobody’s worried about ‘Strings aren’t cool = it’s 2012.’ Paul Martin did these great string arrangements. It’s relaxed and there’s interesting things going on. Nobody’s trying to put on whatever they were all about from the mid ’60s. Nobody’s trying to win an Olympic gold medal. Al sang a duet with me, and it was a pleasure. It’s not like an album where you’re gonna go, ‘This is gonna be pretty big!’ You’re gonna go, ‘Hey, this is pretty nice. These guys, after all these years, can and want to sing together.’”

Brian Wilson, who guards his words in a separate interview, opens up here. “It’s very mellow-sounding. A lot of harmonies. Most of it’s just harmony. I wrote a song called ‘Shelter,’ which is all about how your house is shelter from the sunlight and shelter from the dark night. It’s a great tune, it really is.”

That’s Why God Made The Radio’s title track has been issued as the first single, and its unabashedly retro feel is charismatic. The band’s rich harmonies cascade over a bass pattern that’s surprisingly high in the mix, with everything swaying in 12/8 time. Despite the arrangement’s density, it never feels cluttered and — like most Beach Boys single edits — ends too soon.

He continues, “Most of the stuff I wrote in 1998 with my collaborator Joe Thomas. [Until now], the guys had never heard it before. They love it. They think it’s great stuff. The guys haven’t changed very much in 50 years, you know? They still sound just as good or even better than 50 years ago!”

http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/ (http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 02, 2012, 05:26:09 PM
I'm really interested to hear Brian's contributions to this record.

Really, everything said in this interview is cause to be really optimistic about this album. But then I remember those twenty seconds of "Spring Vacation"...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 02, 2012, 05:29:50 PM
Yeah, some nice stuff. Though I will say my heart sort of dropped when I read that Bruce it wouldn't be very "big".  Whatever that means. I don't know. I tend to think that this IS big, I guess.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 02, 2012, 05:39:24 PM
Yeah, some nice stuff. Though I will say my heart sort of dropped when I read that Bruce it wouldn't be very "big".  Whatever that means. I don't know. I tend to think that this IS big, I guess.

I think what Bruce meant is that there was no pressure to load the record with a bunch of "Kokomo"-style hit singles this time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on May 02, 2012, 06:01:38 PM
He continues, “Most of the stuff I wrote in 1998 with my collaborator Joe Thomas. [Until now], the guys had never heard it before. They love it. They think it’s great stuff. The guys haven’t changed very much in 50 years, you know? They still sound just as good or even better than 50 years ago!”

http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/ (http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/)

Very interesting. As I understand it, BW seems to be saying here that most of the material for this album was written in 1998 with Joe Thomas, presumably during or after the Imagination sessions. Would certainly explain why he went back to see JT last year and did some mysterious recording at that time.

Makes one wonder what else Brian's got stashed away that the fans and public have no knowledge of.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 06:16:56 PM
He continues, “Most of the stuff I wrote in 1998 with my collaborator Joe Thomas. [Until now], the guys had never heard it before. They love it. They think it’s great stuff. The guys haven’t changed very much in 50 years, you know? They still sound just as good or even better than 50 years ago!”

http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/ (http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/)

Very interesting. As I understand it, BW seems to be saying here that most of the material for this album was written in 1998 with Joe Thomas, presumably during or after the Imagination sessions. Would certainly explain why he went back to see JT last year and did some mysterious recording at that time.

Makes one wonder what else Brian's got stashed away that the fans and public have no knowledge of.

Indeed. Joe said at the time they had enough material for a follow up album -- but I had always dismissed this. Why? Well, Joe had given titles for some other songs they recorded -- "Melinda, Honey," "Proud Mary," "It's Happening Again" (a remake of You're Still a Mystery) and another Paley remake or two. When Brian only recorded "How Could We Still Be Dancin'" for GIOMH, it struck me that the rest of the material must have either been retreads, or just no good.

Instead, it seems like some of the opposition was probably political. Of course, there have been hints elsewhere on the board that some of Brian and Scott's TLOS unreleased work was being considered for the album too, so I wouldn't be surprised if the material draws on a number of different eras.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 02, 2012, 06:34:43 PM
so do we know of any other songs written in 98?  all the slightly american music tracks are paley sessions right?  So it's not those?  that said, i'd love it if "in my moondreams" was part of the suite  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 02, 2012, 06:40:45 PM
My opinion; Discus:

I think the boys are going out of their way, at every turn, to downplay every single thing they do, and the reason I think they're doing it is because Brian is anxious about the weight of all this.

So, the tour is no big deal, it's just a celebration.  Brian doesn't have to sing much.  The album won't be big.  Etc.  Etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 02, 2012, 06:51:47 PM
My opinion Javelin;

I think your right Ron! ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 02, 2012, 07:00:29 PM
so do we know of any other songs written in 98?  all the slightly american music tracks are paley sessions right?  So it's not those?  that said, i'd love it if "in my moondreams" was part of the suite  ;D

Those all pre-date "Imagination" by several years. Songs from the Paley sessions (which include SAM and a lot of other things) were written roughly from 92 to 95,  and a lot of recording on them was done in 94. Yes, some of the songs predated that time, as is the case often with Brian. Some were mainly by Andy (like IMM).

Brian and Joe started working together in late 1995 on the Stars and Stripes project, and then they started writing together in 96 or 97. They collaborated through 1999 or so.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 02, 2012, 08:52:16 PM
My opinion Javelin;

I think your right Ron! ;D


You misspelled Javelinn.  DUH


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 02, 2012, 11:07:37 PM
I wonder which song Brian co-wrote with Mark Lindsay...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt H on May 03, 2012, 05:08:03 AM
He continues, “Most of the stuff I wrote in 1998 with my collaborator Joe Thomas. [Until now], the guys had never heard it before. They love it. They think it’s great stuff. The guys haven’t changed very much in 50 years, you know? They still sound just as good or even better than 50 years ago!”

http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/ (http://illinoisentertainer.com/2012/05/cover-story-the-beach-boys/)

Very interesting. As I understand it, BW seems to be saying here that most of the material for this album was written in 1998 with Joe Thomas, presumably during or after the Imagination sessions. Would certainly explain why he went back to see JT last year and did some mysterious recording at that time.

Makes one wonder what else Brian's got stashed away that the fans and public have no knowledge of.

Indeed. Joe said at the time they had enough material for a follow up album -- but I had always dismissed this. Why? Well, Joe had given titles for some other songs they recorded -- "Melinda, Honey," "Proud Mary," "It's Happening Again" (a remake of You're Still a Mystery) and another Paley remake or two. When Brian only recorded "How Could We Still Be Dancin'" for GIOMH, it struck me that the rest of the material must have either been retreads, or just no good.

Instead, it seems like some of the opposition was probably political. Of course, there have been hints elsewhere on the board that some of Brian and Scott's TLOS unreleased work was being considered for the album too, so I wouldn't be surprised if the material draws on a number of different eras.


I believe "Melinda, Honey" is a re-write of "My Maryanne," as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 03, 2012, 05:16:19 AM
Think about it... final track on the last ever Beach Boys album is called "Summer's Gone". Poignant, yet somehow inevitable.

Not sure whether to laugh or cry at that observation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 03, 2012, 05:24:33 AM
Spring Vacation:

"We're on a Spring Vacation,
Feelin' good vibrations,
Gonna take our tour
All over the nation!

Find some excitation
At the Lifeguard Station
Havin fun, fun, fun
No, you're not mistaken, it's

Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Hey nowwwww....

When some loud braggart
Tries to put us down,
We go out of town
On a fun spring trip

When it gets too hot,
We go down by the sea
And we find a nice beach
Where the kids are hip"

The Private Life of Bill and Sue:

"Bill and Sue
Don't know what to do
They've got a weekend alone

They'll go down by the shore
Grab their swimsuits and boards
And they'll get into the zone..

The Surf Zone! Ba ba baaaaa..."

"From Here to back Again"

"Well I was a cork on the ocean
But now I'm a surfboard, ya know
Surfin' around all over the place
From Californ-i-a to Mexico...

You know we're

Here and back again
Find some summer friends
The summer never ends
The fun that never ends

Here and back again
Let's do it again
Swimmin' with our friends
The summer never ends...."

"Shelter"

"Weeeeeeeelllllllllllllll....

When I was hot (When he was hot)
On the beach (On his beach)
With the sun beating down (The sun beats down)
It was hot and sweltering
I looked for some shelter
And look what I found...

Shelter shelter shelter shelter shelter
Lookin for some lookin for some shelter
Lookin at tomorrow for a surf board I can borrow
Demonstratin' with the students even though it isn't prudent
Sheeeeeeelllltterrrrrrrr!"




Truly, truly, truly, truly dreadful. Though I'm not complaining. I'd rather have this rubbish than nothing at all. And for me it is more about the music anyway.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 06:09:22 AM
something strange happened today, i was getting dressed and i started singing to myself "spring vacaation, gooood vibratiooon, we're still togeeether, suuuummer weaaaather".  and then my face..

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/006/482/template.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 03, 2012, 06:24:52 AM
something strange happened today, i was getting dressed and i started singing to myself "spring vacaation, gooood vibratiooon, we're still togeeether, suuuummer weaaaather".  and then my face..

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/006/482/template.jpg)

Why?

It's so much more intelligible and human than:

"I read the news today oh boy
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 03, 2012, 06:27:42 AM
Mike Love is an American poet laureate for keeping the summer alive all these years.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 03, 2012, 06:38:15 AM
Mike Love is an American poet laureate for keeping the summer alive all these years.

I agree. Something that has no words to it does not exist. The Lovester is the Robert Frost, the Walt Whitman, the Henry David Thoreau of contemporary American popular music culture - a national treasure.

Don't diss the man.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 06:58:44 AM
something strange happened today, i was getting dressed and i started singing to myself "spring vacaation, gooood vibratiooon, we're still togeeether, suuuummer weaaaather".  and then my face..

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/006/482/template.jpg)

Why?

It's so much more intelligible and human than:

"I read the news today oh boy
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all"


i meant this more as "even though i said it was bad, the song is borrowing deep into my brain"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 03, 2012, 07:13:17 AM
something strange happened today, i was getting dressed and i started singing to myself "spring vacaation, gooood vibratiooon, we're still togeeether, suuuummer weaaaather".  and then my face..

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/006/482/template.jpg)

Why?

It's so much more intelligible and human than:

"I read the news today oh boy
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all"


i meant this more as "even though i said it was bad, the song is borrowing deep into my brain"

Ah, I see... tks for claryfing!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 08:18:25 AM
Interesting comment from an Uncut writer he has a review copy

#nowplaying The Beach Boys, "That's Why God Made The Radio", the album. Better than "Stars And Stripes Volume One", I'm saying.

Doesn't sound too promising  :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 03, 2012, 08:42:15 AM
Interesting comment from an Uncut writer he has a review copy

#nowplaying The Beach Boys, "That's Why God Made The Radio", the album. Better than "Stars And Stripes Volume One", I'm saying.

Doesn't sound too promising  :-\

How would that guy get his hands on a copy of the album over a month in advance?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 08:57:53 AM
The reviewers are already hearing it, a friend of mine is listening to it right now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 09:06:39 AM
Apparently, the word is:

Think Jimmy Buffett.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 03, 2012, 09:09:25 AM
A somewhat more positive voice: http://twitter.com/#!/michaelroffman


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on May 03, 2012, 09:15:18 AM
Very encouraging snippets of a review.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 03, 2012, 09:27:53 AM
Interesting comment from an Uncut writer he has a review copy

#nowplaying The Beach Boys, "That's Why God Made The Radio", the album. Better than "Stars And Stripes Volume One", I'm saying.

Doesn't sound too promising  :-\

How would that guy get his hands on a copy of the album over a month in advance?

Same way some folk laid ears on the Smile box a good two months before release: review streams.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 09:33:32 AM
A somewhat more positive voice: http://twitter.com/#!/michaelroffman

wow, very positive


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 03, 2012, 09:35:04 AM
Interesting comment from an Uncut writer he has a review copy

#nowplaying The Beach Boys, "That's Why God Made The Radio", the album. Better than "Stars And Stripes Volume One", I'm saying.

Doesn't sound too promising  :-\

How would that guy get his hands on a copy of the album over a month in advance?

Same way some folk laid ears on the Smile box a good two months before release: review streams.

Then it's off to the Hoffman boards for 15 minutes of fame until the album comes out. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 09:52:09 AM
a lot of fun singles to be had off #thebeachboys new LP. "shelter", "isn't it time", and "from there to back again". classics. hands dow

Holy sh*t I'm so excited


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 03, 2012, 10:19:05 AM
Spring Vacation:

"We're on a Spring Vacation,
Feelin' good vibrations,
Gonna take our tour
All over the nation!

Find some excitation
At the Lifeguard Station
Havin fun, fun, fun
No, you're not mistaken, it's

Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Spring vacation
Hey nowwwww....

When some loud braggart
Tries to put us down,
We go out of town
On a fun spring trip

When it gets too hot,
We go down by the sea
And we find a nice beach
Where the kids are hip"

The Private Life of Bill and Sue:

"Bill and Sue
Don't know what to do
They've got a weekend alone

They'll go down by the shore
Grab their swimsuits and boards
And they'll get into the zone..

The Surf Zone! Ba ba baaaaa..."

"From Here to back Again"

"Well I was a cork on the ocean
But now I'm a surfboard, ya know
Surfin' around all over the place
From Californ-i-a to Mexico...

You know we're

Here and back again
Find some summer friends
The summer never ends
The fun that never ends

Here and back again
Let's do it again
Swimmin' with our friends
The summer never ends...."

"Shelter"

"Weeeeeeeelllllllllllllll....

When I was hot (When he was hot)
On the beach (On his beach)
With the sun beating down (The sun beats down)
It was hot and sweltering
I looked for some shelter
And look what I found...

Shelter shelter shelter shelter shelter
Lookin for some lookin for some shelter
Lookin at tomorrow for a surf board I can borrow
Demonstratin' with the students even though it isn't prudent
Sheeeeeeelllltterrrrrrrr!"




Truly, truly, truly, truly dreadful. Though I'm not complaining. I'd rather have this rubbish than nothing at all. And for me it is more about the music anyway.


Brother John, those lyrics are pretty bad. I guess you're right though, it is about the music...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 03, 2012, 10:21:28 AM
Ah you ruined my expectations. I was hoping these songs were going to be instant classics, but now having read the new lyrics I haz a sad.   :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 03, 2012, 10:25:22 AM
I wonder how that "Shelter shelter shelter shelter shelter..." chorus sounds...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 03, 2012, 10:30:08 AM
Done!  >:D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on May 03, 2012, 10:40:04 AM
I doubt very much those are the lyrics.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 03, 2012, 10:44:13 AM
a lot of fun singles to be had off #thebeachboys new LP. "shelter", "isn't it time", and "from there to back again". classics. hands dow

Holy sh*t I'm so excited
It looks like "Isn't It Time" is an a capella intro in the style of "Our Prayer," and "Shelter" seems to be one of the best trcks on the record. "Spring Vacation" seems to be the weakest, which is good news!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 10:57:54 AM
Haha, some of you think those posted joke lyrics were the real ones?! That is hilarious.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 03, 2012, 10:59:53 AM
Looks good.  Nice to see an enthusiastic review for the album.  Also great to see that our expectations are panning out: "Spring Vacation" as we all thought was the clunker of the batch and "Shelter" among others seems to be promising...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 03, 2012, 11:01:23 AM
'There's sort of a suite - the lyrics are def in harmony. It opens with something similar to "Our Prayer" though, which is great'

 :thud

I really, really want to hear this now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 03, 2012, 11:04:57 AM
'There's sort of a suite - the lyrics are def in harmony. It opens with something similar to "Our Prayer" though, which is great'

 :thud

I really, really want to hear this now.
Hell yes! This is something to look forward to... the career-capping Beach Boys album we always wanted. Now that "Spring Vacation" is apparently the weakest track, I all of a sudden love what I've heard of it...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 11:13:47 AM
Mike Love is an American poet laureate for keeping the summer alive all these years.

That's the criteria for poet laureate now? Uh oh!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 11:17:38 AM
Hearing "Shelter" being called 'flawless' is so exciting..

Brian is back to his best  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 03, 2012, 11:17:54 AM
Mike Love is an American poet laureate for keeping the summer alive all these years.

That's the criteria for poet laureate now? Uh oh!

 ;D  Actually if that were the criteria he'd be doing more good for people and making them feel better through verse than, I'd assume, some of the recent poet laureates who have been named as such.

Keeping the summer alive in people's minds is a noble pursuit, I'm all for it! No irony there at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 03, 2012, 11:27:14 AM
Mike Love is an American poet laureate for keeping the summer alive all these years.

That's the criteria for poet laureate now? Uh oh!
The man is a legend for writing wrinkles. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 03, 2012, 11:39:19 AM
Guys, "Spring Vacation" lyrics leaked... you're not going to like:

brian wilson: puttin' suntan lotion on my wrinkly folds
lookin' for some cute surfer girls i can hold

mike love: she might a rhonda - she might a wendy
hop on to my little honda and hold tight

al jardine: the laguna's three arch bay oceanside road gets kinda bendy [acoustic guitar flourishes]

group: it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new elation
yes, it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new sensation


brian wilson: i don't catch a wave i just catch some rays
dance, dance on the shore, yeah i'm ready for more

mike love: she might be a barbara - she might be sixteen (sweet lil', sweet lil')
take her to my yacht in the harbor and

al jardine: majestic redwoods proud guide the way while we listen to jan & dean

[bridge]
brian wilson: love, love will save us all
god marks his presence each spring
with flowers
wooooaah, with flowers, yeah with flowers (mike: their hearts were full of...)

group: it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new elation
yes, it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new sensation

it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new elation
yes, it's spring (SPRING)
it's spring vacation
and it's bringing you a new sensation


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 11:42:27 AM
Amusing


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 11:43:39 AM
...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 03, 2012, 11:43:57 AM
Amusing

Ya think ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 11:44:41 AM

Ahem...well...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 03, 2012, 11:55:35 AM
Hearing "Shelter" being called 'flawless' is so exciting..

Wow, it sure is, Shady!  I just got a woodie thinking about it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 03, 2012, 11:57:18 AM
'There's sort of a suite - the lyrics are def in harmony. It opens with something similar to "Our Prayer" though, which is great'

 :thud

I really, really want to hear this now.


HA!  I called this a few pages/days ago!!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 12:03:51 PM
Hearing "Shelter" being called 'flawless' is so exciting..

Wow, it sure is, Shady!  I just got a woodie thinking about it!

Can you still get them at your age, Mikie?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 03, 2012, 12:07:04 PM
Satire works best when it's the truth, and reading through some of these spoof lyrics I don't know whether to laugh or be sad that they wouldn't necessarily be out of place if they were actual Beach Boys lyrics... ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 12:09:51 PM
Satire works best when it's the truth, and reading through some of these spoof lyrics I don't know whether to laugh or be sad that they wouldn't necessarily be out of place if they were actual Beach Boys lyrics... ;D

Someone on this board (I forget who now) parodied the Spring Vacation lyrics before that small portion of them was released. The parody called the Good Vibrations reference. And, yeah, it is kind of sad that the parody was actually realized in the real song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 12:11:01 PM
There's a much more detailed review on The Record Room board (there's a plug for ya!). As well as info about a new Mike interview. If you come by, look around the main board and post, if you can.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 03, 2012, 12:11:50 PM
Can you still get them at your age, Mikie?

Depends on the woman.   ;D

Some of your cheerleader-type posts do get me wound up though, Shady.   Reminds me of my high school days.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 03, 2012, 12:12:39 PM
Satire works best when it's the truth, and reading through some of these spoof lyrics I don't know whether to laugh or be sad that they wouldn't necessarily be out of place if they were actual Beach Boys lyrics... ;D

Someone on this board (I forget who now) parodied the Spring Vacation lyrics before that small portion of them was released. The parody called the Good Vibrations reference. And, yeah, it is kind of sad that the parody was actually realized in the real song.

That's the thing which happens when a public figure, celebrity, politician, whatever starts looking, sounding, and acting more like the parody(s) of them by comedians, impressionists, cartoonists, etc - was the parody that close to reality or was that person or entity really that ridiculous and no one noticed it?

That said, there are some brilliant lyric parodies posted here.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 12:19:12 PM
mc roffman guy is the president of consequenceofsound.com.  not a slouch website!  not as big as pitchfork, but one of the bigger ones for sure.  that's so awesome he's diggin it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 03, 2012, 12:22:43 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 12:23:10 PM
Can you still get them at your age, Mikie?

Depends on the woman.   ;D

Some of your cheerleader-type posts do get me wound up though, Shady.   Reminds me of my high school days.....

Just avoid them...

Because if you do keep taking shots eventually we'll both probably get banned


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 03, 2012, 12:27:20 PM
Just avoid them...Because if you do keep taking shots eventually we'll both probably get banned.

I can't avoid them!  I trip and stumble over them to get to the informative ones!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 03, 2012, 12:28:22 PM
Satire works best when it's the truth, and reading through some of these spoof lyrics I don't know whether to laugh or be sad that they wouldn't necessarily be out of place if they were actual Beach Boys lyrics... ;D

Someone on this board (I forget who now) parodied the Spring Vacation lyrics before that small portion of them was released. The parody called the Good Vibrations reference. And, yeah, it is kind of sad that the parody was actually realized in the real song.

That's the thing which happens when a public figure, celebrity, politician, whatever starts looking, sounding, and acting more like the parody(s) of them by comedians, impressionists, cartoonists, etc - was the parody that close to reality or was that person or entity really that ridiculous and no one noticed it?



It's interesting -- I've noticed with several artists (musicians, filmmakers, comedians, writers) that they want to have a unique individual style so they gradually refine their work more and more to the point where they simply take the elements from their earlier work that they thought was the most unique and then just focus on that. Sometimes it has positive results but sometimes the artist will lose their spark and become somewhat repetitive and derivative.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 12:31:20 PM
Just avoid them...Because if you do keep taking shots eventually we'll both probably get banned.

I can't avoid them!  I trip and stumble over them to get to the informative ones!

How dramatic, it's like you just can't scroll down..

That's how I ignore your sneering contributions


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 12:51:51 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 03, 2012, 01:01:42 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 03, 2012, 01:24:15 PM
So incredibly excited for this album, now.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 01:25:25 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 03, 2012, 01:29:37 PM
Where's Jonas the Admin.?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 03, 2012, 01:32:11 PM
Someone should tweet that guy and ask him which songs exactly are part of the suite.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 03, 2012, 01:45:18 PM
nm


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 01:49:21 PM
Someone should tweet that guy and ask him which songs exactly are part of the suite.

One song is the suite. The title has just been changed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 03, 2012, 01:52:17 PM
Someone should tweet that guy and ask him which songs exactly are part of the suite.

One song is the suite. The title has just been changed.

Hmm, pretty short suite...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 01:57:19 PM
the track reviews by that guy are f*cking awesome.  sounds like my kinda album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 02:17:13 PM
So Spring Vacation is quasi-Doobie brothers? I can deal with that!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 03, 2012, 02:18:30 PM
Do we have a list yet of who is confirmed as writing what?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 03, 2012, 02:19:37 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Thank you. Summ-a-Briz's comments were very encouraging, weren't they?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 02:43:50 PM
Anyone think some of the tracks will leak sometime soon?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 02:45:11 PM
i will partake in NO leak nor 30 second clips for this one. 

interesting that the review on the website didn't care for Shelter but the consequence of sound guy was nuts over it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 03, 2012, 02:58:06 PM
Didn't you already listen to the single, and then the 10 seconds of whatever that other song was?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 03:07:22 PM
Didn't you already listen to the single, and then the 10 seconds of whatever that other song was?

Yeah, just getting a little anxious over here. That's all  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 03:09:53 PM
Didn't you already listen to the single, and then the 10 seconds of whatever that other song was?

single doesn't count, and i only listened to the spring vacation one because everyone said it was bad.  so no loss there.  BUT NOTHING ELSE. i hope.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 03, 2012, 03:10:13 PM
Anyone think some of the tracks will leak sometime soon?

I hope not, not sure I can resist


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 03, 2012, 03:22:35 PM
well, the comments on the Record Room board sound pretty promising must say


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 03, 2012, 03:23:05 PM
Give me.

Give me.

Give me now.

The preview sounds better than I could have hoped for.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 03, 2012, 04:10:46 PM
Satire works best when it's the truth, and reading through some of these spoof lyrics I don't know whether to laugh or be sad that they wouldn't necessarily be out of place if they were actual Beach Boys lyrics... ;D

Someone on this board (I forget who now) parodied the Spring Vacation lyrics before that small portion of them was released. The parody called the Good Vibrations reference. And, yeah, it is kind of sad that the parody was actually realized in the real song.
That was me. I am not psychic, I just know Mike Love's mind better than he does himself...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 03, 2012, 04:53:52 PM
Who has the 30 second previews? I'm not seeing them on Amazon!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 05:06:39 PM
Who has the 30 second previews? I'm not seeing them on Amazon!

I don't think anybody does except those full versions supplied to certain people.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 03, 2012, 05:09:39 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Thank you. Summ-a-Briz's comments were very encouraging, weren't they?

When I click on this link I don't see anything about the new album. Can someone help a friend out?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 03, 2012, 05:12:09 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Thank you. Summ-a-Briz's comments were very encouraging, weren't they?

When I click on this link I don't see anything about the new album. Can someone help a friend out?
Explore and learn


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 03, 2012, 05:17:36 PM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 03, 2012, 05:18:03 PM
Yeah, you know.  If you haven't already, head over to Ian and Jon's Record Room site, and read the review in the Mike Love interview thread, which is in the Rockin' Beach Boys Room, which is in the Rubber Room.  But do explore the other areas, as well.  Lots of good stuff.  The review has got me really excited to hear this album.  The suite is there.  It sounds like the album will have some BB cheese, but it sounds like the beginning and the end could be really good.  Thanks for the invite, Ian.  I should visit more often.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 03, 2012, 05:27:58 PM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.
Referring to My Bloody valentine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 05:40:17 PM
Wow, those reviews combined with the twitter guy have got me beyond excited! SMILE INSTRUMENTS! LUSH HARMONIES! TIMPANI!

Everything sounded incredible, except for the steel drums. Damn those steel drums.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 03, 2012, 05:50:47 PM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.

There are no clips on any Amazon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 03, 2012, 06:09:43 PM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.

There are no clips on any Amazon.
Please see above


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 06:25:55 PM
The thread is in the beach boys sub forum under that link. But the thread about the interview with mike


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 03, 2012, 06:32:57 PM
Right, no clips ON AMAZON.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 03, 2012, 06:34:08 PM
The Record Room!!   With your host Ian Wagner??

Man, is that board still going?  I useta read that one years ago!  Does Jon Hunt still post there? And Jeff Mason? And Becky? And Andy Rooney? And Jason Penick from Oakland?  Those people know their shtuff!  I'll have to mosey on over there and see whatsup!

Yeah, all those folks are still there! Jon Hunt co-runs the board. I'm married to Becky now. Come on back and see what's up.

Can you post a link? I think I found the right site, but the search function keeps bringing up a thread about The Monkees when I try to search.

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Thank you. Summ-a-Briz's comments were very encouraging, weren't they?

Thank you.

When I click on this link I don't see anything about the new album. Can someone help a friend out?
Explore and learn


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 06:44:41 PM
http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 03, 2012, 06:59:40 PM
Yeah, you know.  If you haven't already, head over to Ian and Jon's Record Room site, and read the review in the Mike Love interview thread, which is in the Rockin' Beach Boys Room, which is in the Rubber Room.  But do explore the other areas, as well.  Lots of good stuff.  The review has got me really excited to hear this album.  The suite is there.  It sounds like the album will have some BB cheese, but it sounds like the beginning and the end could be really good.  Thanks for the invite, Ian.  I should visit more often.

Cheers and please do!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 03, 2012, 07:37:05 PM
OK, that thread has me ridiculously excited now.

We are getting a new Beach Boys record in 2012.  There's apparently going to be parts I'm not going to be crazy about, but there's going to be some stuff I'm going to love, which is more than I can say about basically any Beach Boys record since.....? 

One of the songs sounds Pet Sounds-ish?!?  Wow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 03, 2012, 07:39:12 PM
One of the songs sounds Pet Sounds-ish?!?  Wow.

And that's not coming from Al!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: OGoldin on May 03, 2012, 07:44:26 PM
And these are first impressions we are reading.  My first impression of TWGMTR was mild disappointment, but the more I hear it, the more amazing stuff there is to hear.  A lot of Brian's music is that way.  (I'm still waiting for MIU, though.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 03, 2012, 07:59:45 PM
Spring Vacation does sound to be as awful as we all feared.  But I won't dwell on that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 03, 2012, 08:07:52 PM
i'm super pumped for the last three tunes


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 03, 2012, 11:30:59 PM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.

Talking about an entirely different album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 04, 2012, 12:06:18 AM
I thought I read on that board that somebody was listening to clips on Amazon. Perhaps a different Amazon site than the US? How does one get there? I've tried, and so far can't.
Referring to My Bloody valentine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 05:08:54 AM
here's another tweet

Matthew Horton ‏ @matthewjh
Listening to the new Beach Boys album again. There's a lot that's worthwhile here.

that same guy from uncut
John Mulvey ‏ @JohnRMulvey
@matthewjh "Good vibration" line is rich too. Start and end of LP are OKish I think, Autotune notwithstanding. No worse than recent Bri LPs.

the uncut guy has been dismissive of them in all his tweets pretty much, sounds like some of the posters here  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Coachhill on May 04, 2012, 05:41:56 AM
at 73 pages, there is a lot to read about the new album. Can anyone verify if the presale album on Amazon comes with a LP or not, the price seems to say there is something extra.  ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on May 04, 2012, 06:37:55 AM
If it's as good as Brian's solo stuff then it'll be the "best Beach Boys Album since Love You".

Nobody should be expecting another Pet Sounds/Smile.  I'm glad it's definitely not going to be a trainwreck.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 04, 2012, 06:45:15 AM
at 73 pages, there is a lot to read about the new album. Can anyone verify if the presale album on Amazon comes with a LP or not, the price seems to say there is something extra.  ??? ??? ???

I think that would be the first instance ever where you buy a CD and it comes with a free LP, as opposed to the other way round.

So, no. Maybe a DVD or something. It is coming out on vinyl separately, though.


Wonder if the LP will come with a download code.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paul J B on May 04, 2012, 07:32:19 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 04, 2012, 07:41:56 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

Huh. Well, that was unexpected.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 09:23:22 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

so a big reviewer saying it might be the best since sunflower is a downer?  and that track by track review says it has some great moments?  all downers eh.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 09:26:42 AM
guy from paste magazine isn't a fan


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 04, 2012, 09:34:33 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 09:36:02 AM
I think going into it the perception of magazine reviewers is against it being a good album.  it'll take a lot to get over that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 09:43:13 AM
Going into it, my perception is against it being a good album too! But it sounds better than that, thankfully.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 04, 2012, 09:45:33 AM
Aye, doesn't one of these reviewers say he likes it more than S&Sv1? What kind of a statement is that?  It's like saying, "You're the best hog I've had since the last one, darling."

Meaningless.  But at least the reviewer gets to collect his paycheck. I mean pay packet. Cheque… wages… … whatever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 09:49:01 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/audio/2012/may/04/music-podcast-rolling-stones?CMP=twt_gu

Guardian doing a podcast, i think the middle is just about the beach boys.  One of them said they got an email in the middle of the night from another guardian reviewer who said some of the tracks are as good as anything they've done (then they joke he was probably a little drunk, so it had hyperbole lol)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 04, 2012, 10:23:43 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 04, 2012, 10:42:15 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.

Yes, so do I.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paul J B on May 04, 2012, 11:02:28 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

so a big reviewer saying it might be the best since sunflower is a downer?  and that track by track review says it has some great moments?  all downers eh.

A big reviewer? Is he tall or fat? I could not give a rip about a big reviewer's opinion. I'm referring to what sounds like it has steel drums and horrible lyrics in places. That is the key for me. Some decent stuff with some crap sounds a lot like the bad years to me. It does not have to be a gem, but if I'm going to have to hit the skip button on several tracks I"M NOT GOING TO BE EXCITED about it. I've been doing that since 15 Big Ones. I thought the cheese was past everyone involved and was hoping none would be here this time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 11:11:39 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

so a big reviewer saying it might be the best since sunflower is a downer?  and that track by track review says it has some great moments?  all downers eh.

A big reviewer? Is he tall or fat? I could not give a rip about a big reviewer's opinion. I'm referring to what sounds like it has steel drums and horrible lyrics in places. That is the key for me. Some decent stuff with some crap sounds a lot like the bad years to me. It does not have to be a gem, but if I'm going to have to hit the skip button on several tracks I"M NOT GOING TO BE EXCITED about it. I've been doing that since 15 Big Ones. I thought the cheese was past everyone involved and was hoping none would be here this time.

the steel drum song is written by mike love.  I think you should expect that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 04, 2012, 11:11:57 AM
Honestly I don't know why bands/artists/labels insist on sending out "advance copies" of albums. If they want the fans to decide themselves on the relative worth, enjoyment, and quality of any album or project, they would be better off setting *one* firm release date and have it be the only date the copies are shipped. They bellyache when someone leaks a copy, they watermark things and log tracking information on advance copies...releasing an advance single for broadcast is totally different, and a good promotions tool. But full albums? One release date for everyone, then everyone can form their own opinions of the work.

I base this on more than one album I've bought in the past and enjoyed very much after reading a negative "advance" review that almost made up my mind not to buy it before hearing it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 04, 2012, 11:18:40 AM
I don't need no stinkin' Twitter.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 04, 2012, 11:33:05 AM
Honestly I don't know why bands/artists/labels insist on sending out "advance copies" of albums. If they want the fans to decide themselves on the relative worth, enjoyment, and quality of any album or project, they would be better off setting *one* firm release date and have it be the only date the copies are shipped. They bellyache when someone leaks a copy, they watermark things and log tracking information on advance copies...releasing an advance single for broadcast is totally different, and a good promotions tool. But full albums? One release date for everyone, then everyone can form their own opinions of the work.

I base this on more than one album I've bought in the past and enjoyed very much after reading a negative "advance" review that almost made up my mind not to buy it before hearing it.

To be fair, no-one actually leaked the Smile box... they just said they'd heard it.  Capitol had that baby screwed down tighter than the Cohen of Silence.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 04, 2012, 11:36:25 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.

Yes, so do I.


If you really believed that, what would be the point of reading your excellent book on The Beach Boys' music?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 04, 2012, 11:37:08 AM
Perhaps there will be one of those advanced-streaming things, like what there was for BWPS.

Perhaps. Perhaps. Perhaps. (Sorry to get all Julie London on you there.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 04, 2012, 11:42:50 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.

Yes, so do I.


If you really believed that, what would be the point of reading your excellent book on The Beach Boys' music?

Not everyone is me (and that's a gooooooooooooooooood thing).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 11:47:44 AM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

so a big reviewer saying it might be the best since sunflower is a downer?  and that track by track review says it has some great moments?  all downers eh.

A big reviewer? Is he tall or fat? I could not give a rip about a big reviewer's opinion. I'm referring to what sounds like it has steel drums and horrible lyrics in places. That is the key for me. Some decent stuff with some crap sounds a lot like the bad years to me. It does not have to be a gem, but if I'm going to have to hit the skip button on several tracks I"M NOT GOING TO BE EXCITED about it. I've been doing that since 15 Big Ones. I thought the cheese was past everyone involved and was hoping none would be here this time.

Given song titles "Spring Vacation" and "Beaches in Mind," I would advise against you purchasing the album to begin with.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 11:54:46 AM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.

Yes, so do I.


If you really believed that, what would be the point of reading your excellent book on The Beach Boys' music?
There is a distinction, to me anyway, between music criticism that simply qualitatively assesses work and music analysis that  reveals depths of production, engineering, arrangement, and performance that can help us to better understand and enjoy the music.

By the same token, I don't know that I have ever read something that made me dislike an album I already enjoy. I have, however, read pieces that helped me appreciate certain aspects of an album more.

Even in the case of "Summer In Paradise," which I have never enjoyed, Mike Love's liner notes, which were recently posted in the "Has Mike ever commented about SIP" thread, made me understand where he and Melcher were coming from with that album. It helped me to appreciate the spirit behind the record that unfortuntely did not, in my opinion, transfer well to the actual recording.

Of course, when reading about an album that is yet to be released, reviews can colour one's assessment of said album. "Gone Troppo" is regarded by critics as George Harrison's nadir, but when I finally gave the record a fair shake after years of writing it off due to bad press, I realized that I enjoyed the record a lot more than I would have ever expected.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 04, 2012, 12:03:54 PM
May I be the first to say that I don't give a flying f*ck about what a series of more or less jaded reviewers in possession of advance copies are writing in that laughable 'medium' Twitter? Let them merrily blabber away, I will make up my own mind when I have the thing in my possession.

And after all, even the reception of Pet Sounds was lukewarm at best. Love You got panned in some quarters.

Listen to The Don at this point.

I agree with The Don. :-D  I like to form my own opinions using my ears and based on my questionable taste(s) in music.

Yes, so do I.


If you really believed that, what would be the point of reading your excellent book on The Beach Boys' music?

Not everyone is me (and that's a gooooooooooooooooood thing).


I agree!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 12:08:47 PM
some writer for the pittsburg post isn't a fan either.  SOUNDS LIKE WE'LL HAVE MIXED FEELINGS ON THE BOARD, i for one will know i'll dig it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 04, 2012, 12:09:37 PM
Honestly I don't know why bands/artists/labels insist on sending out "advance copies" of albums.

Because people that get free things want to make sure they keep on getting free things. Therefore, they will do what they have to do to make sure the free things keep on coming. That's how I remember the record business working when I was in it. I doubt things have changed too much in that regard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 04, 2012, 12:10:23 PM
Of course, when reading about an album that is yet to be released, reviews can colour one's assessment of said album. "Gone Troppo" is regarded by critics as George Harrison's nadir, but when I finally gave the record a fair shake after years of writing it off due to bad press, I realized that I enjoyed the record a lot more than I would have ever expected.

B00ts, you raise a very good point.  I happened to get into George's Gone Troppo just a couple of months ago, and it is one FINE album in every way.  Quite marvelous, in fact.  The "critics" totally missed the boat on that one.

eff Twitter, eff Paste Magazine, they sukk

I am looking forward to a damm fine album from the Freakin' Beach Boys!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 04, 2012, 12:11:41 PM
I like the double connotation in the title "Beaches In Mind".  Maybe the person (writer) is just thinking about beaches. But when I first saw it, I thought to myself, "B*tches In Mind".  

I guess the double entendre was the intention, right?  Am I stating the obvious?  Or maybe I'm just weird.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 04, 2012, 12:18:35 PM
I like the double connotation in the title "Beaches In Mind".  Maybe the person (writer) is just thinking about beaches. But when I first saw it, I thought to myself, "B*tches In Mind".  

I guess the double entendre was the intention, right?  Am I stating the obvious?  Or maybe I'm just weird.
"Beaches in mind"
I got those beaches on my mind,they have nice tans
beaches on my mind they walk on the sand
those beaches are on the beaches all day long..
those fine sexy beaches are on my mind
I want to make love to those beaches
all night long.
i'm going surfing with the beaches (ooooohhhhhh)
those hot fine beaches (oooooohhhhhhh)
then we go to the beach..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 04, 2012, 12:18:52 PM
Because people that get free things want to make sure they keep on getting free things. Therefore, they will do what they have to do to make sure the free things keep on coming. That's how I remember the record business working when I was in it. I doubt things have changed too much in that regard.

That's the impression I've always gotten.  Good reviews no matter what, accenting the positive.  Not just with music either - also electronics (i.e. TV's and stereo/AV equipment) So they'll continue to get free samples to evaluate. Even if it's not very good, the reader comes away thinking it's an above average to excellent product.

By jove, I think you've got it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 12:45:10 PM
Of course, when reading about an album that is yet to be released, reviews can colour one's assessment of said album. "Gone Troppo" is regarded by critics as George Harrison's nadir, but when I finally gave the record a fair shake after years of writing it off due to bad press, I realized that I enjoyed the record a lot more than I would have ever expected.

B00ts, you raise a very good point.  I happened to get into George's Gone Troppo just a couple of months ago, and it is one FINE album in every way.  Quite marvelous, in fact.  The "critics" totally missed the boat on that one.

eff Twitter, eff Paste Magazine, they sukk

I am looking forward to a damm fine album from the Freakin' Beach Boys!


Hell yes! It seems like a lot of political/non-musical factors affect album ratings, such as (in the case of Gone Troppo) Harrison's complete unwillingness to support the album by doing promotional tours/interviews/etc. Warners decided to not put any effort into promoting it, either. Hype has so much to do with perception.

And yes, f*** the critics, except the ones who give my stuff a good write-up - they are the one exception.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 12:47:13 PM
Because people that get free things want to make sure they keep on getting free things. Therefore, they will do what they have to do to make sure the free things keep on coming. That's how I remember the record business working when I was in it. I doubt things have changed too much in that regard.

That's the impression I've always gotten.  Good reviews no matter what, accenting the positive.  Not just with music either - also electronics (i.e. TV's and stereo/AV equipment) So they'll continue to get free samples to evaluate. Even if it's not very good, the reader comes away thinking it's an above average to excellent product.

By jove, I think you've got it!
So you're telling me that it isn't a coincidence that Rolling Stone - which at one point actually put effort into their reviews, such as Kurt Loder's excellent write-up of Pink Floyd's "The Final Cut" - now gives 3 1/2 stars to nearly every album they review?

I remember when I used to buy print copies of RS and I'd see an ad for the reviewed album on the facing page. They don't even try to hide it. Brazen corporate gladhanding.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 04, 2012, 01:00:13 PM
It snot a coincidence.

Kurt Loder Crap.   Didn't he useta be an MTV DJ?  Or he did the news highlights or something?  What's he doing reviewing music for the Rolling Stone rag?

Rolling Stone ain't what it use to be. (Understatement).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 04, 2012, 01:06:33 PM
I haven't read Rolling Stone since 1996. Got tired of all the ads and fluff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 01:10:50 PM
It snot a coincidence.

Kurt Loder Crap.   Didn't he useta be an MTV DJ?  Or he did the news highlights or something?  What's he doing reviewing music for the Rolling Stone rag?

Rolling Stone ain't what it use to be. (Understatement).

Loder was a journalist first, and an excellent one. MTV then hired him away.

Of course, when reading about an album that is yet to be released, reviews can colour one's assessment of said album. "Gone Troppo" is regarded by critics as George Harrison's nadir, but when I finally gave the record a fair shake after years of writing it off due to bad press, I realized that I enjoyed the record a lot more than I would have ever expected.

This was my experience with M.I.U., which a certain generation of older BB/BW fan once held in white-hot contempt. When I finally heard it, I was stunned: This pleasant, unassuming little record was what got everyone so angry?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 04, 2012, 01:14:38 PM
I'm getting less and less excited about this. At least most people are impressed by the tour.

so a big reviewer saying it might be the best since sunflower is a downer?  and that track by track review says it has some great moments?  all downers eh.

A big reviewer? Is he tall or fat? I could not give a rip about a big reviewer's opinion. I'm referring to what sounds like it has steel drums and horrible lyrics in places. That is the key for me. Some decent stuff with some crap sounds a lot like the bad years to me. It does not have to be a gem, but if I'm going to have to hit the skip button on several tracks I"M NOT GOING TO BE EXCITED about it. I've been doing that since 15 Big Ones. I thought the cheese was past everyone involved and was hoping none would be here this time.

Those steel drums are keeping Al Jardine in the group.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 04, 2012, 01:15:26 PM
Yeah, I finally just MIU, and had the same feeling. It's not fantastic, it is indeed pleasant, and was surprisingly un-horrible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 04, 2012, 01:27:57 PM
Wirestone, you're in the journalism business, aren't you?  What do you think of Krabklaw's analysis?  I've thought that for years about music reviewers.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 01:41:22 PM
It snot a coincidence.

Kurt Loder Crap.   Didn't he useta be an MTV DJ?  Or he did the news highlights or something?  What's he doing reviewing music for the Rolling Stone rag?

Rolling Stone ain't what it use to be. (Understatement).

Loder was a journalist first, and an excellent one. MTV then hired him away.

Of course, when reading about an album that is yet to be released, reviews can colour one's assessment of said album. "Gone Troppo" is regarded by critics as George Harrison's nadir, but when I finally gave the record a fair shake after years of writing it off due to bad press, I realized that I enjoyed the record a lot more than I would have ever expected.

This was my experience with M.I.U., which a certain generation of older BB/BW fan once held in white-hot contempt. When I finally heard it, I was stunned: This pleasant, unassuming little record was what got everyone so angry?
M.I.U. is a great example of this. Like you, I was scared away from it first, but it lies solidly in the middle third of the catalog in terms of quality. The album is a bit dull, but it doesn't veer off the rails into straight-up embarassing territory too often compared to "Still Cruisin'" and "Summer In Paradise." In my estimation, it also beats out BB'85 and "Keepin' the Summer Alive."

Another thing that affects reviews is precedent. I would imagine that hearing M.I.U.  would be a lot more shocking at the time of its release than it is nowadays;  the worst album the group had put out up to that point was 15 Big Ones, which still had plenty of Brian involvement.

In keeping with this line of thought, anyone who knows Kurt Loder as an MTV guy should read his review of Pink Floyd's "The Final Cut." It is an excellent piece of music journalism from a time when the pages of Rolling Stone were suitable for more than lining a birdcage.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 01:52:45 PM
Based on what I've read over at The Record Room, this album sounds promising. Like, REAL promising. I think a lot of us are going to be very, very pleasantly surprised. A lots of those reviews have been very positive so far too!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 02:41:03 PM
Wirestone, you're in the journalism business, aren't you?  What do you think of Krabklaw's analysis?  I've thought that for years about music reviewers.

I have a few thoughts on the subject.

1.) Music reviews, with very few exceptions, are not journalism.

-- Secondary point: Most music reviewers have little knowledge of music. They have knowledge of trends, personalities and lyrical analysis. But they don't actually know anything about music. This is one of the reasons why so many excellent books have been written about Dylan's work (he's a masterful lyricist), but so few good ones about the Beatles' output (Revolution in the Head being the most important). It's also telling that the true musical analysis of rock music tends to come in book form, and not in shorter articles.

2.) Most big print publications, including Rolling Stone, probably are not influenced by advertising in the way most reviews are written. These older mags tend to be pretty strict about dividing advertising from editorial operations. But that doesn't mean that review sections are immune to popular trends, and I'm sure that if Jan Wenner wants to tweak some stars being assigned to one album or another, no one would object. You can also control who is assigned to review what, I suppose.

3.) I think a lot of places reviewing things online do fall into the "give us something for free" trap. But they also have less to lose if they want to start being super-critical.

-- Secondary point: I think the pressure to be "cool" and in step with the latest trends is far more corrupting than the desire to get free stuff. Case in point: What happened to British music criticism after punk hit.

4.) If you think music reviews are bad and / or corrupt, you should try the world of video game reviews! Those are insanely, unbelievably horrible.

5.) I've always found it best to locate a few critics I like, and whose viewpoints I understand. I don't like all the records Christgau likes, for instance, but I appreciate his viewpoint and love his writing. So I don't mind if he badmouths something -- I read his work for the enjoyment of it. The same with someone like Ebert. And then, because I have the tastes of someone older and duller than myself, I'm pretty sure that if something is featured on NPR or similar outlets, I'll probably like it. But that's just how I handle it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 03:22:02 PM
Wirestone, you're in the journalism business, aren't you?  What do you think of Krabklaw's analysis?  I've thought that for years about music reviewers.

I have a few thoughts on the subject.

1.) Music reviews, with very few exceptions, are not journalism.

-- Secondary point: Most music reviewers have little knowledge of music. They have knowledge of trends, personalities and lyrical analysis. But they don't actually know anything about music. This is one of the reasons why so many excellent books have been written about Dylan's work (he's a masterful lyricist), but so few good ones about the Beatles' output (Revolution in the Head being the most important). It's also telling that the true musical analysis of rock music tends to come in book form, and not in shorter articles.

2.) Most big print publications, including Rolling Stone, probably are not influenced by advertising in the way most reviews are written. These older mags tend to be pretty strict about dividing advertising from editorial operations. But that doesn't mean that review sections are immune to popular trends, and I'm sure that if Jan Wenner wants to tweak some stars being assigned to one album or another, no one would object. You can also control who is assigned to review what, I suppose.

3.) I think a lot of places reviewing things online do fall into the "give us something for free" trap. But they also have less to lose if they want to start being super-critical.

-- Secondary point: I think the pressure to be "cool" and in step with the latest trends is far more corrupting than the desire to get free stuff. Case in point: What happened to British music criticism after punk hit.

4.) If you think music reviews are bad and / or corrupt, you should try the world of video game reviews! Those are insanely, unbelievably horrible.

5.) I've always found it best to locate a few critics I like, and whose viewpoints I understand. I don't like all the records Christgau likes, for instance, but I appreciate his viewpoint and love his writing. So I don't mind if he badmouths something -- I read his work for the enjoyment of it. The same with someone like Ebert. And then, because I have the tastes of someone older and duller than myself, I'm pretty sure that if something is featured on NPR or similar outlets, I'll probably like it. But that's just how I handle it.

Excellent post, Wirestone. The part about Rolling Stone separating advertisements and reviews is very surprising to me, as I had always assumed the opposite. Then again, I don't really know what I'm talking about; I am just stabbing in the dark based on anecdotal experiences. It is nice to know that Wenner still has integrity in this area.

One thing I have noticed about contemporary music reviews (I am mainly talking about the indie world here) is that if an artist is unknown, and a blog decides to review the artist's work, there is a very good chance that it will result in a positive review. If the blogger doesn't like the artist's work, he or she will just not bother with it. Of course, this doesn't apply to larger acts with established/well-promoted names, where a negative review can draw plenty of page views... Nor does it necessarily apply to print media. Moreover, this is another opinion formed from anecdotal evidence, so I could well be wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 04:02:15 PM
From MY personal experience, I've always felt the reviews at Pitchfork were fair, well written, and gave really nice insight into both the music, the story behind the album, and the lyrics. Of course, many people probably disagree with me. It should be noted that Pitchfork LOVES Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys, giving Brian's solo efforts, Smiley Smile, and Love You all positive reviews. They gave the Smile Sessions a perfect ten, and three or four Beach Boys songs are in their top twenty for greatest songs of the 60s, with GOK at number one  ;D

Yeah I love that website.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 04:17:13 PM
Excellent post, Wirestone. The part about Rolling Stone separating advertisements and reviews is very surprising to me, as I had always assumed the opposite. Then again, I don't really know what I'm talking about; I am just stabbing in the dark based on anecdotal experiences. It is nice to know that Wenner still has integrity in this area.

I should point out I don't have firsthand experience with RS or anything. I just know that the newspaper biz takes the separation of ad and news content very seriously, and I'd  be very surprised if mainstream magazines didn't either. Basically, you would have a lot of RS staff quit if they were being ordered to give certain reviews to certain things.

That being said, as I suggested, there are many ways that the owner of the mag could massage reviews if he wanted. You could only assign certain kinds of albums to certain reviewers. You could change the star score. It's not a hard thing to do. And for that matter, they may assign the reviews first, then share the reviews to the sales staff, who could sell ads to companies whose records were well-reviewed.

One thing I have noticed about contemporary music reviews (I am mainly talking about the indie world here) is that if an artist is unknown, and a blog decides to review the artist's work, there is a very good chance that it will result in a positive review. If the blogger doesn't like the artist's work, he or she will just not bother with it. Of course, this doesn't apply to larger acts with established/well-promoted names, where a negative review can draw plenty of page views... Nor does it necessarily apply to print media. Moreover, this is another opinion formed from anecdotal evidence, so I could well be wrong.

This is truer than you know. Across the board. And it applies to reviews of nearly everything. Audiences generally do not like negative reviews of new acts, new movies, new games, new anythings. And publications big and small (online and off) don't like devoting space to negativity. Writers tend not to enjoy trashing up-and-coming acts, either. So if you have a bad response to somebody new, it's easier to not write it and not print it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 04, 2012, 04:19:41 PM
Yeah, I finally just MIU, and had the same feeling. It's not fantastic, it is indeed pleasant, and was surprisingly un-horrible.

At the time it was a "them and us situation" (Mike Love dixit). That sh*t leaked into the fanbase, including the most respected and influential among them. Therefore liking MIU, in the mind of many, meant siding against the Wilsons. Sad but true.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 04:24:31 PM
From MY personal experience, I've always felt the reviews at Pitchfork were fair, well written, and gave really nice insight into both the music, the story behind the album, and the lyrics. Of course, many people probably disagree with me. It should be noted that Pitchfork LOVES Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys, giving Brian's solo efforts, Smiley Smile, and Love You all positive reviews. They gave the Smile Sessions a perfect ten, and three or four Beach Boys songs are in their top twenty for greatest songs of the 60s, with GOK at number one  ;D

Yeah I love that website.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/pitchfork-gives-music-68,2278/


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 04:29:34 PM
From MY personal experience, I've always felt the reviews at Pitchfork were fair, well written, and gave really nice insight into both the music, the story behind the album, and the lyrics. Of course, many people probably disagree with me. It should be noted that Pitchfork LOVES Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys, giving Brian's solo efforts, Smiley Smile, and Love You all positive reviews. They gave the Smile Sessions a perfect ten, and three or four Beach Boys songs are in their top twenty for greatest songs of the 60s, with GOK at number one  ;D

Yeah I love that website.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/pitchfork-gives-music-68,2278/

 :lol Yeah, so many people just rip on that website.  Oh well, I still think it's great. Do you have any personal opinion of Pitchfork Wirestone?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 04, 2012, 04:30:49 PM
i like pitchfork too.  People just don't get their rating scale is lower than everyone else's.  I remember like 10 years ago when the website was that ugly brown color, and they had a rating scale.  5.0 is their average, i've remembered that. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 04:33:31 PM
Yeah, I finally just MIU, and had the same feeling. It's not fantastic, it is indeed pleasant, and was surprisingly un-horrible.

At the time it was a "them and us situation" (Mike Love dixit). That sh*t leaked into the fanbase, including the most respected and influential among them. Therefore liking MIU, in the mind of many, meant siding against the Wilsons. Sad but true.
Good point, Lenny. Politics have a huge role to play, and the simplistic "Mike bad, Wilsons good" mentality seems like it was really coming to the fore in the late 1970s.

I wonder what the fan reaction would have been in the 80s-90s if Mike Love had written and produced an album that was magnificent, at the level of SMiLe and Pet Sounds? I'll bet many people would never even give it a chance. In 2012, I think people are much more open-minded about Dr. Love.

This is not to imply that Mike has the capability to single-handedly deliver that type of art. M.I.U. is nowhere near that rarefied level of quality, but it is far from their worst work. I just wonder what the f*** the group was thinking, putting "Hey Little Tomboy" on the album... and making it the second song! Truly bizarre, and it is of a piece with many other baffling decisions made by the Beach Boys over the years. This "wildcard" factor is responsible for 'sore thumb' tunes all over the group's discography, but it also has resulted in lots of sterling work.

It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 04:34:26 PM
From MY personal experience, I've always felt the reviews at Pitchfork were fair, well written, and gave really nice insight into both the music, the story behind the album, and the lyrics. Of course, many people probably disagree with me. It should be noted that Pitchfork LOVES Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys, giving Brian's solo efforts, Smiley Smile, and Love You all positive reviews. They gave the Smile Sessions a perfect ten, and three or four Beach Boys songs are in their top twenty for greatest songs of the 60s, with GOK at number one  ;D

Yeah I love that website.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/pitchfork-gives-music-68,2278/

 :lol Yeah, so many people just rip on that website.  Oh well, I still think it's great. Do you have any personal opinion of Pitchfork Wirestone?

I just think the article is funny. It's a fantastic piece on music criticism, period.

But I generally do like Pitchfork -- they gave TLOS a respectful listen, and their take on the Beatles and Queen remasters are excellent historical appraisals.

I'm a little less sold on their current-day coverage, simply because I've been out of the "indie" stream for awhile and am unfamiliar with a sizable number of the bands. It's too much work!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 04:36:10 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 04:42:38 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.

I think this record will be ten times better than MIU. Seriously. I'm very confident in that, especially after hearing TWGMTR


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 04, 2012, 04:50:07 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.

I think this record will be ten times better than MIU. Seriously. I'm very confident in that, especially after hearing TWGMTR

I think it'll have better leads, more lush harmonies and probably a few more very good songs. And as ironical as it may be -in 2012 with the technology that's available and with two of the guys no longer with us- this will probably sound as a more cohesive group album than its predecessors since possibly Holland.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 04, 2012, 05:22:07 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.

I think this record will be ten times better than MIU. Seriously. I'm very confident in that, especially after hearing TWGMTR

I think it'll have better leads, more lush harmonies and probably a few more very good songs. And as ironical as it may be -in 2012 with the technology that's available and with two of the guys no longer with us- this will probably sound as a more cohesive group album than its predecessors since possibly Holland.
I like the way you, Zach95, and Wirestone think. Perhaps this album will be better than M.I.U. I will not be surprised if the overall production and songwriting surpass their late '70s work.

Incidentally, the production and engineering on TWGMTR is fantastic. The rhythm section is insanely well-recorded and mixed, with rich, buttery bass guitar and well-defined but still Wilsonesque drums.

Some on this board have said that the single has a "Joe Thomas/Imagination sound,' but that record sounded dated in 1998, swamped with nylon-string guitars a faint digital hiss audible at the beginning of the first track and many others. In contrast, TWGMTR sounds current in the best possible way. Here's hoping the rest of the album follows suit.

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 05:30:08 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.

I think this record will be ten times better than MIU. Seriously. I'm very confident in that, especially after hearing TWGMTR

I think it'll have better leads, more lush harmonies and probably a few more very good songs. And as ironical as it may be -in 2012 with the technology that's available and with two of the guys no longer with us- this will probably sound as a more cohesive group album than its predecessors since possibly Holland.
I like the way you, Zach95, and Wirestone think. Perhaps this album will be better than M.I.U. I will not be surprised if the overall production and songwriting surpass their late '70s work.

Incidentally, the production and engineering on TWGMTR is fantastic. The rhythm section is insanely well-recorded and mixed, with rich, buttery bass guitar and well-defined but still Wilsonesque drums.

Some on this board have said that the single has a "Joe Thomas/Imagination sound,' but that record sounded dated in 1998, swamped with nylon-string guitars a faint digital hiss audible at the beginning of the first track and many others. In contrast, TWGMTR sounds current in the best possible way. Here's hoping the rest of the album follows suit.

 

Is there any chance we can get a like button on this board? I know others have mentioned it in passing, but I'm serious! I would totally use it, i.e. right now. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 04, 2012, 07:29:48 PM
Isn't it better just to comment?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 04, 2012, 07:32:18 PM
It seems like we may have a new album from the boys that is around the same overall level of quality as M.I.U., but with more direct Brian involvement.  If that is the case, it is a nice enough denouement for the Beach Boys' recording career.

I'd hope for better production quality and slightly better hooks, let's put it that way.

I think this record will be ten times better than MIU. Seriously. I'm very confident in that, especially after hearing TWGMTR

I think it'll have better leads, more lush harmonies and probably a few more very good songs. And as ironical as it may be -in 2012 with the technology that's available and with two of the guys no longer with us- this will probably sound as a more cohesive group album than its predecessors since possibly Holland.
I like the way you, Zach95, and Wirestone think. Perhaps this album will be better than M.I.U. I will not be surprised if the overall production and songwriting surpass their late '70s work.

Incidentally, the production and engineering on TWGMTR is fantastic. The rhythm section is insanely well-recorded and mixed, with rich, buttery bass guitar and well-defined but still Wilsonesque drums.

Some on this board have said that the single has a "Joe Thomas/Imagination sound,' but that record sounded dated in 1998, swamped with nylon-string guitars a faint digital hiss audible at the beginning of the first track and many others. In contrast, TWGMTR sounds current in the best possible way. Here's hoping the rest of the album follows suit.

 

Of course we don't know the extent of Joe's involvement here. It's true that he's been mentioned as execuive producer, but the amount of work he's putting into this we don't know for sure. To be honest, I think there's still a mild lack of trust from us fans in Brian's current producing skills; and I think that making Thomas responsible for the sound of the new music has a little to do with that... the idea flies over Brian's output since who knows when ("perhaps he's not producing" we whisper into our minds). Threads have been saturated with posts on this. I'm willing to argue that Brian is in fact producing a large part if not all his stuff, and has been doing it all the time. But that is not my point now. My point is this:

When he recorded Imagination he had no band. He was in whatever state of mind he was at the time and so he had his one collaborator fill in his blanks --to an extent that's what all his collaborators have done in the past. So Thomas, perhaps not too sensitive and knowledgeable on Brian's music, brings in his stuff, his sounds, his instruments and his musicians and fills all the gaps that Brian leaves uncovered. The  situation today is different: Brian's had a band he toured with and recorded with extensively for the past decade; they can read his mind and do as it pleases him without asking. And he has the Beach Boys with him; they'll go to war for Brian if they have to. So, in the end, the blank filling that Thomas played in 1998 is being played -much more adequately and to Brian's taste- by his current bandmates and supporting group. So there's no danger of Imagination's weakest production featured appearing in this new album.

BTW, I wish somebody could enlighten us on the ups and downs of Brian's relationship with Joe. How did it fall appart and how did it get a second round.
 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 07:37:02 PM
BTW, I wish somebody could enlighten us on the ups and downs of Brian's relationship with Joe. How did it fall appart and how did it get a second round.

I have an old post from the late, great Coach Bob Hanes on this subject. I'll look it up when I get home. Suffice to say that things came to a head when Joe (who was afraid of flying) refused to go to Japan with the band in 1999. Brian quickly decided he liked things better without Joe (who was trying to be music director and clashing with Darian) and seems to have decided to fire him. Things got a little messy after that.

As for coming back together, no one knows. It seems like he answered some pressing needs -- material for a Beach Boys reunion record (since several songs for this project come from 98) and someone to film and produce the accompanying reunion special (Joe has specialized in live concert production over the past decade). He also worked with the band before, too, so perhaps they had a role in bringing him back.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 04, 2012, 07:55:33 PM
Isn't it better just to comment?

Not just to say something like I agree!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 04, 2012, 08:01:14 PM
Isn't it better just to comment?

Not just to say something like I agree!

I dunno, I think making an effort to even type just that shows much more active participation in a human conversation than clicking a button. The shorthand of modern communication (which amounts to non-communication) is a real drag. But that's just my opinion, never mind. At least you didn't type +1!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 04, 2012, 10:17:05 PM
BTW, I wish somebody could enlighten us on the ups and downs of Brian's relationship with Joe. How did it fall appart and how did it get a second round.

I have an old post from the late, great Coach Bob Hanes on this subject. I'll look it up when I get home. Suffice to say that things came to a head when Joe (who was afraid of flying) refused to go to Japan with the band in 1999. Brian quickly decided he liked things better without Joe (who was trying to be music director and clashing with Darian) and seems to have decided to fire him. Things got a little messy after that.

As for coming back together, no one knows. It seems like he answered some pressing needs -- material for a Beach Boys reunion record (since several songs for this project come from 98) and someone to film and produce the accompanying reunion special (Joe has specialized in live concert production over the past decade). He also worked with the band before, too, so perhaps they had a role in bringing him back.

You neglected to mention the most obvious pressing need. $


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 04, 2012, 10:19:57 PM
BTW, I wish somebody could enlighten us on the ups and downs of Brian's relationship with Joe. How did it fall appart and how did it get a second round.

I have an old post from the late, great Coach Bob Hanes on this subject. I'll look it up when I get home. Suffice to say that things came to a head when Joe (who was afraid of flying) refused to go to Japan with the band in 1999. Brian quickly decided he liked things better without Joe (who was trying to be music director and clashing with Darian) and seems to have decided to fire him. Things got a little messy after that.

As for coming back together, no one knows. It seems like he answered some pressing needs -- material for a Beach Boys reunion record (since several songs for this project come from 98) and someone to film and produce the accompanying reunion special (Joe has specialized in live concert production over the past decade). He also worked with the band before, too, so perhaps they had a role in bringing him back.

You neglected to mention the most obvious pressing need. $

Really? For the album? Tour? Special? Hard to imagine the band would be cash-strapped.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 05, 2012, 05:07:26 AM
Isn't it better just to comment?

Not just to say something like I agree!

I dunno, I think making an effort to even type just that shows much more active participation in a human conversation than clicking a button. The shorthand of modern communication (which amounts to non-communication) is a real drag. But that's just my opinion, never mind. At least you didn't type +1!

(http://i46.tinypic.com/25tjcxf.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 05, 2012, 08:13:00 AM
Isn't it better just to comment?

Not just to say something like I agree!

I dunno, I think making an effort to even type just that shows much more active participation in a human conversation than clicking a button. The shorthand of modern communication (which amounts to non-communication) is a real drag. But that's just my opinion, never mind. At least you didn't type +1!

(http://i46.tinypic.com/25tjcxf.jpg)


HAHA!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 05, 2012, 10:03:29 AM
That is to say, I agree.

This board is the antithesis of that sort of facebookery


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 05, 2012, 10:53:15 AM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 05, 2012, 11:12:32 AM
where does Sir. AGD say that?

i saw that he said from there and back will make our jaws drop


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 05, 2012, 11:22:34 AM
That is to say, I agree.

This board is the antithesis of that sort of facebookery

Oh please. Not everyone uses Facebook for asinine purposes.  Sheesh.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 05, 2012, 11:23:29 AM
where does Sir. AGD say that?

i saw that he said from there and back will make our jaws drop

In that same thread.  In response to the twitter review that called each of those three tunes "Instant BB claassics" , AGD posted a word word response..."Disagree". In a later post he states that, indeed, FTTBA will make our jaws drop. I want to know what his thoughts indeed are about Shelter and Isn't it Time.  It is certainly possible I am misunderstanding his post...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 05, 2012, 11:26:28 AM
oh great and powerful AGD, please tease us with your heralded knowledge


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 05, 2012, 11:31:20 AM
Maybe AGD doesn't post it here because of the powers that read this board. They might not like that so I guess we should just wait and hear it when it's released (or read those other boards)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 05, 2012, 11:45:12 AM
I personally think its elitist and plain stupid to taunt an entire group of fanatics with an OPINION of an album no one else has heard.  Just my two cents. It's not like AGD's opinion changes anything about the album, except our distorted perceptions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 05, 2012, 11:51:55 AM
AGD is the great teaser, but i want my perception distorted ._.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 05, 2012, 11:54:14 AM
I ALWAYS appreciate AGD's insight and information. I guess I just don't like it when people say, "I have a secret! But I really can't tell you what it is".  That's all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 05, 2012, 12:17:58 PM
I personally think its elitist and plain stupid to taunt an entire group of fanatics with an OPINION of an album no one else has heard.  Just my two cents. It's not like AGD's opinion changes anything about the album, except our distorted perceptions.

But this is how the guy thrives and feeds his bloated self-importance. It seems to work, too, because many venerate the guy for simply knowing Beach Boys minutiae and being petty and condescending about it. It reminds me somewhat of a sado-masochistic relationship.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 05, 2012, 12:27:46 PM
I ALWAYS appreciate AGD's insight and information. I guess I just don't like it when people say, "I have a secret! But I really can't tell you what it is".  That's all.
When you tell secrets, you soon have no secrets to tell. All I can say is, when Andrew does respond, read it very carefully. Usually, subtle hints are everywhere.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 05, 2012, 12:35:57 PM
I personally think its elitist and plain stupid to taunt an entire group of fanatics with an OPINION of an album no one else has heard.  Just my two cents. It's not like AGD's opinion changes anything about the album, except our distorted perceptions.

But this is how the guy thrives and feeds his bloated self-importance. It seems to work, too, because many venerate the guy for simply knowing Beach Boys minutiae and being petty and condescending about it. It reminds me somewhat of a sado-masochistic relationship.

Stop being a jerk.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 05, 2012, 12:52:46 PM
I personally think its elitist and plain stupid to taunt an entire group of fanatics with an OPINION of an album no one else has heard.  Just my two cents. It's not like AGD's opinion changes anything about the album, except our distorted perceptions.

But this is how the guy thrives and feeds his bloated self-importance. It seems to work, too, because many venerate the guy for simply knowing Beach Boys minutiae and being petty and condescending about it. It reminds me somewhat of a sado-masochistic relationship.

I couldn't disagree more -- AGD doesn't suffer fools (as I've found out myself when I've been foolish in the past) but the hint-dropping isn't about self-importance but rather about actually giving out information. *Obviously* he's not going to tell anyone confidential information that can't be shared, because not only would he stop getting that information but it would also be an unethical way to behave. But just the odd "that's not what I've heard" or "yes, that would be interesting, wouldn't it?" can, in the right context and with a bit of thought from the reader, tell us a huge amount.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 05, 2012, 12:59:05 PM
Quote
*Obviously* he's not going to tell anyone confidential information that can't be shared, because not only would he stop getting that information but it would also be an unethical way to behave.

Maybe.  :angel:


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 05, 2012, 12:59:33 PM
Do you think I'm in the know now, too? Because I might not be.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 05, 2012, 01:14:09 PM
Do you think I'm in the know now, too? Because I might not be.  ::)

Difference is I've known AGD online for about 15 years, off and on, and in that time I've *very* rarely known him to make a statement of fact or a prediction about the band that hasn't turned out to be true. I've also seen him stood at the back of the stage watching gigs while I've just been in the audience, and seen him thanked in several Beach Boys related CD releases. That tends to suggest to me that he *does* have contacts inside the organisation, and *does* have information we don't have. Which makes it worthwhile trying to figure out what some of his more gnomic statements actually mean.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 05, 2012, 01:20:37 PM
Leave AGD alone, he has no reason to tell anyone anything.
So, forget it guys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 05, 2012, 02:09:04 PM
Do you think I'm in the know now, too? Because I might not be.  ::)

Difference is I've known AGD online for about 15 years, off and on, and in that time I've *very* rarely known him to make a statement of fact or a prediction about the band that hasn't turned out to be true. I've also seen him stood at the back of the stage watching gigs while I've just been in the audience, and seen him thanked in several Beach Boys related CD releases. That tends to suggest to me that he *does* have contacts inside the organisation, and *does* have information we don't have. Which makes it worthwhile trying to figure out what some of his more gnomic statements actually mean.

Exactly. The man has better connections than anyone else here, with the exceptions of folks like Mark or Alan, neither of whom post much anymore. He is plugged in, but he does not tell tales out of school.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 05, 2012, 02:40:08 PM
Not sure why this has veered off in the direction of doubting the guy’s connections. People sometimes have a funny way of misconstruing something and running with it. I certainly don’t doubt that he has connections, and i don’t see how anyone could doubt that. But who cares? It’s how he behaves, his attitude, and his pettiness that, i think, make him miserable. It was a comment on his general disposition and the sort of pompous role he seems to play in the fan community, not a veiled attempt to coax him into divulging information. On the contrary, it would be cool if he didn’t say anything at all. That is all. Let’s talk about something else, please. I only commented on it because it had already been brought up by someone. How about them surf boyz?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 05, 2012, 02:54:58 PM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?

1 - because no-one offered me an exclusive here.  ;D  This I'll say: the last great classic BB song (or two) will shortly be arriving. Think "elegiac".

2 - neither know nor give  flying one.  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 05, 2012, 03:21:21 PM
i hope the album is solid as a whole.  glad we're getting a couple classics though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 05, 2012, 03:21:43 PM
Not sure why this has veered off in the direction of doubting the guy’s connections. People sometimes have a funny way of misconstruing something and running with it. I certainly don’t doubt that he has connections, and i don’t see how anyone could doubt that. But who cares? It’s how he behaves, his attitude, and his pettiness that, i think, make him miserable. It was a comment on his general disposition and the sort of pompous role he seems to play in the fan community, not a veiled attempt to coax him into divulging information. On the contrary, it would be cool if he didn’t say anything at all. That is all. Let’s talk about something else, please. I only commented on it because it had already been brought up by someone. How about them surf boyz?

My dear sir, I may be many things, including much of what you say, but miserable I'm not. Especially not right now. Oh no.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 05, 2012, 03:55:21 PM
Not sure why this has veered off in the direction of doubting the guy’s connections. People sometimes have a funny way of misconstruing something and running with it. I certainly don’t doubt that he has connections, and i don’t see how anyone could doubt that. But who cares? It’s how he behaves, his attitude, and his pettiness that, i think, make him miserable. It was a comment on his general disposition and the sort of pompous role he seems to play in the fan community, not a veiled attempt to coax him into divulging information. On the contrary, it would be cool if he didn’t say anything at all. That is all. Let’s talk about something else, please. I only commented on it because it had already been brought up by someone. How about them surf boyz?

My dear sir, I may be many things, including much of what you say, but miserable I'm not. Especially not right now. Oh no.  ;D

Through my beer goggles, I just read......

My dear sir, I may be many things, including much of what you say, but English I'm not. Especially not right now. Oh no

For some reason I suddenly thought you were Spanish. Why? I don't know.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on May 05, 2012, 04:58:08 PM
Not sure why this has veered off in the direction of doubting the guy’s connections. People sometimes have a funny way of misconstruing something and running with it. I certainly don’t doubt that he has connections, and i don’t see how anyone could doubt that. But who cares? It’s how he behaves, his attitude, and his pettiness that, i think, make him miserable. It was a comment on his general disposition and the sort of pompous role he seems to play in the fan community, not a veiled attempt to coax him into divulging information. On the contrary, it would be cool if he didn’t say anything at all. That is all. Let’s talk about something else, please. I only commented on it because it had already been brought up by someone. How about them surf boyz?

My dear sir, I may be many things, including much of what you say, but miserable I'm not. Especially not right now. Oh no.  ;D
And would your un-miserableness be related to your having heard a certain new album by a California band?
(I feel like one of the panel on the old "What's My Line" tv game show.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 05, 2012, 06:40:42 PM
Is the answer a mineral?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 05, 2012, 07:51:20 PM
See, there is a BIG difference, for me, between getting excited because of certain information and being taunted by certain information.  This particular information has me EXTREMELY excited. I thank you AGD, didn't mean to spark off something of this nature.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on May 05, 2012, 10:47:12 PM
I say he's sitting on a copy at home and digging it. God bless him!! :-X


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 12:01:14 AM
Is the answer a mineral?

The answer is an emotion: mellow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 06, 2012, 01:44:14 AM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?

1 - because no-one offered me an exclusive here.  ;D  This I'll say: the last great classic BB song (or two) will shortly be arriving. Think "elegiac".

2 - neither know nor give  flying one.  ;)

Um... but is there any chance that the upcoming one WON'T be the very last BBs album?  ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 03:27:02 AM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?

1 - because no-one offered me an exclusive here.  ;D  This I'll say: the last great classic BB song (or two) will shortly be arriving. Think "elegiac".

2 - neither know nor give  flying one.  ;)

Um... but is there any chance that the upcoming one WON'T be the very last BBs album?  ???

Everything is possible, not everything is probable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 06, 2012, 03:50:02 AM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?

1 - because no-one offered me an exclusive here.  ;D  This I'll say: the last great classic BB song (or two) will shortly be arriving. Think "elegiac".

2 - neither know nor give  flying one.  ;)

Um... but is there any chance that the upcoming one WON'T be the very last BBs album?  ???

Everything is possible, not everything is probable.

OK, cheers, point firmly taken  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 06, 2012, 05:17:41 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 06, 2012, 05:20:43 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

*drools*

*realizes that, contrary to prior firm statements, he's interested in twitter stuff re: BBs album all of a sudden*

*bows head in shame*


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Cabinessenceking on May 06, 2012, 05:32:36 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

Would be better if it were best since 1977... LA Light is fine I guess, so looking forward to it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 06, 2012, 08:00:32 AM
1. Andrew...why are you sharing your (albeit unfortunately limited) thoughts on the album with the Hoffman crowd and not us? Aren't we really your favorites?  So, you DON"T think Shelter and Isn't it Time are classics? Are they "semi" or "almost" classics, then???

2. Per Amazon, vinyl release pushed to July 3 ?!?

1 - because no-one offered me an exclusive here.  ;D  This I'll say: the last great classic BB song (or two) will shortly be arriving. Think "elegiac".

2 - neither know nor give  flying one.  ;)

Um... but is there any chance that the upcoming one WON'T be the very last BBs album?  ???

Everything is possible, not everything is probable.

Who is the fairest one of all?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 08:12:15 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

 :o

We are in for something special


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: myonlysunshine on May 06, 2012, 08:33:32 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 06, 2012, 08:35:51 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"

Interesting point.  Yeah, it would have.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 06, 2012, 08:37:59 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"

Interesting point.  Yeah, it would have.


Big time!!





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on May 06, 2012, 08:39:00 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"

Might sound a bit too similar to "Songs from Here & Back" but I agree.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 06, 2012, 08:39:16 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"

I don't. From There To Back Again reminds me of The Hobbit. TWGMTW is unique and catchy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: myonlysunshine on May 06, 2012, 08:46:36 AM
It would be an especially fitting title considering it's the Beach Boys 50th.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 06, 2012, 09:11:09 AM
i'm not a fan of titles that draw attention to stuff like this.  I'd prefer it to be another album in the beach boys discography than the 50th anniversary one.  I actually preferred "Summer's Gone", since it sounds like that sentiment fits the album tone.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on May 06, 2012, 09:32:13 AM
Is the answer a mineral?

The answer is an emotion: mellow.

There is an emotion called "mellow"???

OK, I looked it up in the dictionary. There are several translations. Please define "mellow". ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 06, 2012, 09:35:52 AM
Is the answer a mineral?

The answer is an emotion: mellow.

There is an emotion called "mellow"???

OK, I looked it up in the dictionary. There are several translations. Please define "mellow". ::)

"Chill" and "Groovey" or "Cooooool" come to my mind as synonyms.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wilson Love on May 06, 2012, 09:38:59 AM
Is the answer a mineral?

The answer is an emotion: mellow.
What was the question?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 06, 2012, 09:40:50 AM
IIRC, to be or not to be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 11:18:03 AM
Does anybody else think that "From There to Back Again" would have made a better album title than the overly long "That's Why God Made the Radio?"

Interesting point.  Yeah, it would have.

yep.  So would Isn't it Time or even Strange World.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 06, 2012, 11:27:19 AM
There's some nice comments about the album from Andrew on The Record Room.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on May 06, 2012, 12:44:53 PM
AGD says it's the best Beach Boys album since Holland.  It doesn't seem fair that I will have to wait one month to be able to give it a listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 06, 2012, 01:17:55 PM
AGD says it's the best Beach Boys album since Holland.  It doesn't seem fair that I will have to wait one month to be able to give it a listen.
There will probably be 30 second previews soon on Amazon to whet our whistles...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 06, 2012, 01:19:33 PM
It should be noted that Andrew considers Love You to be a Brian album. So that factors into his verdict.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 01:32:47 PM
OK, after reading AGD's comments on the RR board (in the ML interview thread), along with the scant other reviews to date, I am now officially REALLY READY to hear this album.  Somebady just wake me up on June 5. No , wait, that won't work.  I have to go to the Hollywood Bowl on June 2... 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 06, 2012, 01:38:15 PM
Interesting that Andrew said he hopes this is their last album, but apparently Brian is planning the follow-up (a "rock 'n roll" record). More Beach Boys is always a good thing, but I'm not sure I'd want them to mess it up if the potential next album is less than stellar.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 06, 2012, 01:55:50 PM
Just think- according to what was written, Spring Vacation is one of the GOOD tracks.  It says things don't go downhill until you get Private Life. And I really don't like Buffet at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 06, 2012, 01:58:04 PM
There's some nice comments about the album from Andrew on The Record Room.
Link?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 06, 2012, 02:08:56 PM
http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Don't forget to register, respond and discuss there too, folks. There is room for two places to visit!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on May 06, 2012, 02:18:48 PM
http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom

Don't forget to register, respond and discuss there too, folks. There is room for two places to visit!
It's really a great board to discuss and discover other bands and styles ... and not just as "if you like Brian Wilson you'll like this." Obviously I love the Beach Boys as much as any band (more or less), but there is a lot of great music in this world. And someone at TRR knows about it, wants to talk with you about it, and if you've never heard it, to help give you an introduction.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 02:25:22 PM
Quote
Beaches in MInd - I like this one. Three chord dumb rock. It kinda sounds like "Let My Love Open the Door" reverse engineered to pay back the debt of "Hungry Heart" not being given to Joey Ramone. Vocals sound good. some kinda jews harp twangy thing getting on my nerves a tiny bit.


LOVE THAT SONG. EMPTY GLASS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE ALBUMS!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 02:28:42 PM
The "jews harp twangy thing" is a vocoder !

Er... allegedly.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 02:41:43 PM
Oh Doe... So Subtle  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Too Much Sugar on May 06, 2012, 03:45:42 PM
AGD says it's the best Beach Boys album since Holland.  It doesn't seem fair that I will have to wait one month to be able to give it a listen.

That is definitely encouraging, though I'd also be curious how it ranks with Brian's recent stuff (TLOS, Gershwin, etc.). 

Less than a month to go... 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 06, 2012, 03:47:12 PM
Quote
Beaches in MInd - I like this one. Three chord dumb rock. It kinda sounds like "Let My Love Open the Door" reverse engineered to pay back the debt of "Hungry Heart" not being given to Joey Ramone. Vocals sound good. some kinda jews harp twangy thing getting on my nerves a tiny bit.


LOVE THAT SONG. EMPTY GLASS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE ALBUMS!

Dude, register and reply on that board!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 06, 2012, 03:49:32 PM
For once in my life I think I'm gonna steer clear of the 30 second samples when they pop up.

I want the entire album to be fresh the first time I hear it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 06, 2012, 04:08:46 PM
For once in my life I think I'm gonna steer clear of the 30 second samples when they pop up.

I want the entire album to be fresh the first time I hear it.

I wish I had the strength to do that...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 06, 2012, 04:19:29 PM
For once in my life I think I'm gonna steer clear of the 30 second samples when they pop up.

I want the entire album to be fresh the first time I hear it.

I wish I had the strength to do that...

It's gonna be tough man. lol. Pray for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 06, 2012, 04:27:14 PM
You know, that means you can't watch them on QVC either....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 06, 2012, 04:32:02 PM
i'm gonna hold off too.  i'm never gonna get this opportunity again


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 04:57:27 PM
Just think- according to what was written, Spring Vacation is one of the GOOD tracks.  It says things don't go downhill until you get Private Life. And I really don't like Buffet at all.

Hmm, that's not how I read Andrew's write up.  Seems included Bill and Sue in the 'down"/middle portion of the albumand Spring Vacation was not specifically mentioned.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 05:01:00 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 05:02:48 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

We already know that's "Spring Vacation"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wrightfan on May 06, 2012, 05:04:02 PM
It really blows my mind that "That's why god Made the Radio" is apparently not even close to being the best song  :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 05:05:26 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

Spring Vacation.  How do we know that?

We already know that's "Summer Vacation"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 05:15:46 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

Spring Vacation.  How do we know that?

We already know that's "Summer Vacation"

An extended video featured the next lines "Spring Vacation, Good Vibration"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 05:18:04 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

Spring Vacation.  How do we know that?

We already know that's "Summer Vacation"

An extended video featured the next lines "Spring Vacation, Good Vibration"

Thanks!

I think that song sounds pretty good


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 06, 2012, 05:21:32 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 05:22:32 PM
I think that people are being rough on the song, the "We like to get around" part sounds very chill (backing track wise)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 06, 2012, 05:23:33 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

Spring Vacation.  How do we know that?

We already know that's "Summer Vacation"

An extended video featured the next lines "Spring Vacation, Good Vibration"

Thanks!

I think that song sounds pretty good

What? Wasn't your reaction to it:

Quote
OH............GOD.....................NO
?

Again, see thread I pasted above.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 05:23:55 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

Spring Vacation.  How do we know that?

We already know that's "Summer Vacation"

An extended video featured the next lines "Spring Vacation, Good Vibration"

Ah, did not see that extended video then, just the first one.   Thanks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 06, 2012, 05:28:05 PM
Word on the street is that all the cool kids are loving themselves some Spring Vacation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 05:32:01 PM
I REALLY wanna hear "FHTBA" And "Strange World"

Both amazing titles, and an acapella intro? Will this be the 2nd beach boys album EVER to do that?! (SMiLE!)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 06, 2012, 05:39:09 PM
I REALLY wanna hear "FHTBA" And "Strange World"

Both amazing titles, and an acapella intro? Will this be the 2nd beach boys album EVER to do that?! (SMiLE!)

Well according to AGD, all three of the final songs FHTBA, PCH and Summer's Gone are exceptional, along with the album's first 4 tracks (which,I guess  does include Spring vacation). He also gave Beaches in Mind a positive review on the bloo. Everybody else has indeed raved about Strange World.  Daybreak and Shelter (strangely) appear to be the weak links


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 05:45:05 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation" , it might have been the German dubbing that made me miss it..

And so what, it's grown on me me bit..



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 06, 2012, 05:50:54 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation"


Yes. Twice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 06, 2012, 05:53:14 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation" , it might have been the German dubbing that made me miss it..

And so what, it's grown on me me bit..



Oh no Mr. Mathers, once you form an initial opinion you have to stick with it....no changing your mind....ever.

LMAO. I love that people have nothing better to do on here than bitch at other posters for something as trivial as a song title.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 06, 2012, 05:58:21 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation" , it might have been the German dubbing that made me miss it..

And so what, it's grown on me me bit..



Oh no Mr. Mathers, once you form an initial opinion you have to stick with it....no changing your mind....ever.

LMAO. I love that people have nothing better to do on here than bitch at other posters for something as trivial as a song title.

Erm, that's not what I'm complaining about. There was a thread that very actively discussed the song and Slim was a very active participant on that thread (which is why I posted the thread above). It defies all logic that he didn't know what this song was. The only conclusion possible is that he simply doesn't read the threads he posts on, and you can't blame me for being annoyed by that, particularly when the threads he has posted on have answered the questions he is asking here, by discussing the matter in great detail.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 06:03:34 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation" , it might have been the German dubbing that made me miss it..

And so what, it's grown on me me bit..



Oh no Mr. Mathers, once you form an initial opinion you have to stick with it....no changing your mind....ever.

LMAO. I love that people have nothing better to do on here than bitch at other posters for something as trivial as a song title.

Erm, that's not what I'm complaining about. There was an thread that very actively discussed the song and Slim was a very active participant on that thread (which is why I posted the thread above). It defies all logic that he didn't know what this song was. The only conclusion possible is that he simply doesn't read the threads he posts on, and you can't blame me for being annoyed by that, particularly when the threads he has posted on have answered the questions he is asking here, by discussing the matter in great detail.

"very active", I posted a few times..

And yeah, I didn't read that thread very thoroughly, I was probably living life or something


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 06, 2012, 06:08:58 PM
To anyone who's heard the album, what are the lyrics "we like to get around, every hot spot in town" from..

I'm curious if that's one of the weaker songs on the album

You still don't know??? I mean, even AFTER you watched the video to the song that was specifically re-pasted for you since you were calling the song "relaxed" and "chilled out" and couldn't understand what people were upset about?

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12854.200.html)

Jesus, chill out..

I missed them say "spring vacation" , it might have been the German dubbing that made me miss it..

And so what, it's grown on me me bit..



Oh no Mr. Mathers, once you form an initial opinion you have to stick with it....no changing your mind....ever.

LMAO. I love that people have nothing better to do on here than bitch at other posters for something as trivial as a song title.

Exactly, luckily it's just a few posters on here who demand perfection..

Apart from them it's a great place


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 06, 2012, 06:15:06 PM
I don't demand perfection. I'm just surpised is all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 06, 2012, 06:50:33 PM
hai guyz im a lil bummed out bcuz the beech boiz have dis nu chill song kalled spring vacation but lyke i thot that the beech boiz were all about SUMMER?!? y iznt dis song kalled summer vacation????!1


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 06, 2012, 06:53:20 PM
hai guyz im a lil bummed out bcuz the beech boiz have dis nu chill song kalled spring vacation but lyke i thot that the beech boiz were all about SUMMER?!? y iznt dis song kalled summer vacation????!1

Spring vacation is where the college students go on vacation to party, sort of a "prequel" to summer, so I'd say the title fits perfectly with what The Beach Boys are all about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 06, 2012, 06:59:11 PM
hai guyz im a lil bummed out bcuz the beech boiz have dis nu chill song kalled spring vacation but lyke i thot that the beech boiz were all about SUMMER?!? y iznt dis song kalled summer vacation????!1

Spring vacation is where the college students go on vacation to party, sort of a "prequel" to summer, so I'd say the title fits perfectly with what The Beach Boys are all about.

o rite kewl thanx dat make sense
now wut about that krazy fat burn out geniouz who staid in bed for lyke 5 yrs??? iz he gunna b on dis nu album?? iz he still a beech boi?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 06, 2012, 07:06:15 PM
hai guyz im a lil bummed out bcuz the beech boiz have dis nu chill song kalled spring vacation but lyke i thot that the beech boiz were all about SUMMER?!? y iznt dis song kalled summer vacation????!1

Spring vacation is where the college students go on vacation to party, sort of a "prequel" to summer, so I'd say the title fits perfectly with what The Beach Boys are all about.

o rite kewl thanx dat make sense
now wut about that krazy fat burn out geniouz who staid in bed for lyke 5 yrs??? iz he gunna b on dis nu album?? iz he still a beech boi?

He actually passed away in bed in the late-60s and was replaced with a Disney animatronic robot. It's getting on in age though, so during live performance it may sound sort of computer-like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thetojo on May 06, 2012, 08:09:28 PM
It really blows my mind that "That's why god Made the Radio" is apparently not even close to being the best song  :o

Why? That song was clearly over-hyped! One listen and I was disappointed. Glad to hear other songs might be better. My feeling is that there were too many songwriters on that one - and yet it sounds unfinished (lyrically).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 06, 2012, 08:48:39 PM
It really blows my mind that "That's why god Made the Radio" is apparently not even close to being the best song  :o

Why? That song was clearly over-hyped! One listen and I was disappointed. Glad to hear other songs might be better. My feeling is that there were too many songwriters on that one - and yet it sounds unfinished (lyrically).

i'd be amazed if you can get everything out of a song from one listen. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 06, 2012, 08:53:03 PM
It really blows my mind that "That's why god Made the Radio" is apparently not even close to being the best song  :o

Why? That song was clearly over-hyped! One listen and I was disappointed. Glad to hear other songs might be better. My feeling is that there were too many songwriters on that one - and yet it sounds unfinished (lyrically).

i'd be amazed if you can get everything out of a song from one listen. 

You can if you're listening to Linkin Park.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 06, 2012, 08:58:07 PM
hai guyz im a lil bummed out bcuz the beech boiz have dis nu chill song kalled spring vacation but lyke i thot that the beech boiz were all about SUMMER?!? y iznt dis song kalled summer vacation????!1

Spring vacation is where the college students go on vacation to party, sort of a "prequel" to summer, so I'd say the title fits perfectly with what The Beach Boys are all about.

o rite kewl thanx dat make sense
now wut about that krazy fat burn out geniouz who staid in bed for lyke 5 yrs??? iz he gunna b on dis nu album?? iz he still a beech boi?

He actually passed away in bed in the late-60s and was replaced with a Disney animatronic robot. It's getting on in age though, so during live performance it may sound sort of computer-like.

 :o CONTROVERSIAL!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 06, 2012, 09:15:06 PM
Don't tell anybody but once the tour is over there is talk of moving him to a permanent location at Disneyland called Summerland as part of the Country Brian Jamboree.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 06, 2012, 09:53:53 PM
so when people say "jimmy buffett", do they mean like "margaritaville"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 06, 2012, 10:01:11 PM
so when people say "jimmy buffett", do they mean like "margaritaville"?

Maybe they mean like "South American"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 10:30:16 PM
Just think- according to what was written, Spring Vacation is one of the GOOD tracks.  It says things don't go downhill until you get Private Life. And I really don't like Buffet at all.

Hmm, that's not how I read Andrew's write up.  Seems included Bill and Sue in the 'down"/middle portion of the albumand Spring Vacation was not specifically mentioned.

Read again - I said that the first and last four tracks were at least good. "SV" is track #4. That means it's included in the first four.

Also, two caveats to bear in mind:

1 - it's all my personal opinion. Some folk will surely hate it. Truth.

2 - best since Holland does not in any way whatsoever equate to better than Holland.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 10:36:56 PM
so when people say "jimmy buffett", do they mean like "margaritaville"?

Vaguely tropical vibe, steel drums and nylon guitars kinda thing. Lumping all three together might not have been such a fine idea.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 06, 2012, 10:41:42 PM
Like so? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gd87JmkAkE


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 06, 2012, 10:47:25 PM
So here's assuming "Daybreak Over The Ocean" will sound pretty much like it did in Mike's last unreleased collection. I actually found it pretty inoffensive, and it's definitely one the best songs he wrote that was still unreleased by the time they started this project. I'm intrigued to hear the "bring back my baby" parts as done by The Beach Boys. So overall, I gotta say, that if Mike had to get a spot for a "solo"-ish song on the album, I'm glad it is this one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 06, 2012, 10:53:32 PM
Daybreak over the ocean, seagulls over the sea


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 06, 2012, 11:02:49 PM
Have there been any descriptions of "Pacific Coast Highway"? I find it interesting that it's such a short track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 06, 2012, 11:23:28 PM
Have there been any descriptions of "Pacific Coast Highway"? I find it interesting that it's such a short track.

Poignant.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on May 06, 2012, 11:52:19 PM
Where can I find AGD's write up specifically? I saw the link to the board but I wouldn't know where to start to look for it. And do I have to register to see it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Kirk on May 07, 2012, 04:37:58 AM
Here's the link I found by Googling. Comments start toward the bottom of this 12th page of the thread, starting at 05-04-2012, 10:32 PM, and go on for the rest of its 15 pages: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/archive/index.php/t-284574-p-12.html

No registration necessary.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 07, 2012, 04:42:50 AM
Where can I find AGD's write up specifically? I saw the link to the board but I wouldn't know where to start to look for it. And do I have to register to see it?

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/4


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 07, 2012, 07:11:24 AM
Trying to avoid the spoilers, but I can't help but ask:

AGD, does Brian shoot into falsetto at any point on the record?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paul J B on May 07, 2012, 07:18:24 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

Would be better if it were best since 1977... LA Light is fine I guess, so looking forward to it!

Or another way of looking at it according to that guy is of their last 3 or 4 efforts this is the best. Since everything after L.A. was pretty bad to awful what exactly does that mean? Again I could argue not exactly a reason to get excited.
In any case having been cautiously optimistic, to cautiously pessimistic about the record, I'm now somewhere in between. If there are indeed a fair amount of decent songs I guess that is cause for celebration....all things considered.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 07, 2012, 07:33:37 AM
I don't demand perfection. I'm just surpised is all.

I actually read: surpissed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 07, 2012, 08:08:32 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

Would be better if it were best since 1977... LA Light is fine I guess, so looking forward to it!

Or another way of looking at it according to that guy is of their last 3 or 4 efforts this is the best. Since everything after L.A. was pretty bad to awful what exactly does that mean? Again I could argue not exactly a reason to get excited.
In any case having been cautiously optimistic, to cautiously pessimistic about the record, I'm now somewhere in between. If there are indeed a fair amount of decent songs I guess that is cause for celebration....all things considered.

My mind keeps coming back to this. As a long-in-the-tooth devoted fan and a professional journalist with a cynical, suspicious mind, every instinct is telling me that to back away from this album and write it off before spending good money on it would be the sensible way forward.

But I'm smiling to my deep, dark, rotten core that this is even happening.

If this album was a suite made out of Ding Dang, Belles of Paris and Hey Little Tomboy, produced by Melinda, Murry and Landy using mics smuggled into the bathroom to record each BB singing in the shower… well, I'd still be chuffing ecstatic.

That AGD, Mr Chips and others are suggesting it ain't half-bad… well, I feel like the cat that got the cream and shagged the bride on his way to the bank to shove my third-in-a-row winning lottery ticket up the manager's ass.  I'm a happy boy.  Be happy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 07, 2012, 08:47:29 AM
the fact that AGD said some people will hate it makes me wanna temper the enthusiasm a bit. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 07, 2012, 08:53:55 AM
the fact that AGD said some people will hate it makes me wanna temper the enthusiasm a bit. 

Most likely because some people will be hung up on the middle portion of the album where the Boys "get their yuks out".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 09:16:56 AM
bbc guy:

Tim Chipping ‏ @timchipping
I can't quite believe it, but they've really pulled it off. Best Beach Boys album since 1979. You will weep.

Would be better if it were best since 1977... LA Light is fine I guess, so looking forward to it!
Or another way of looking at it according to that guy is of their last 3 or 4 efforts this is the best. Since everything after L.A. was pretty bad to awful what exactly does that mean? Again I could argue not exactly a reason to get excited.
In any case having been cautiously optimistic, to cautiously pessimistic about the record, I'm now somewhere in between. If there are indeed a fair amount of decent songs I guess that is cause for celebration....all things considered.

Now you're talkin'.  The glass is half full, not half empty (at least that's how I'm looking at it).  If we get a handful of really nice songs, I'll be pretty happy, and we've already got one good one (IMO of course).  I've even got my 15 year old daughter liking That's Why God Made The Radio.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 09:23:51 AM
the fact that AGD said some people will hate it makes me wanna temper the enthusiasm a bit.  

You should know that even the most die hard Beach Boys fans will disagree about what's good and what's not.  Some people will hate it.  Who cares?  Lots of people hate Smiley Smile or Love You.  I'm hearing lots of folks say that they don't like TWGMTR at all.  Whatever.  I like it a lot, and that's all that matters to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 07, 2012, 09:31:54 AM
From what we've read, I'm pretty sure this will be better than Summer In Paradise, and that is all I am asking for.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 07, 2012, 09:34:59 AM
From what we've read, I'm pretty sure this will be better than Summer In Paradise, and that is all I am asking for.

And yet, a dollar says there will be people who say it isn't. There will be people, no matter how good it is and no matter what a remarkable achievement it is/isn't who will automatically claim it is the worst album ever made by humans. You can bet, as they say, your bippy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 07, 2012, 09:36:40 AM
Even if it's 8 winners and 4 losers out of 12, and 3 or 4 songs are of the same quality as TWGMTR, I think we are talking about a great album. Of course the album's pacing problems that have been described (all of the duds are clumped together in the middle)is not a serious problem nowadays, and can be rectified to one's taste by re-sequencing things more to your liking and burning your own CD (with Do It Again 2012 included, natch).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 09:37:39 AM
From what we've read, I'm pretty sure this will be better than Summer In Paradise, and that is all I am asking for.

And yet, a dollar says there will be people who say it isn't. There will be people, no matter how good it is and no matter what a remarkable achievement it is/isn't who will automatically claim it is the worst album ever made by humans. You can bet, as they say, your bippy.

C'mon, man.  You can bet at least a $20.  You'll win that bet.  And I'm glad you decided to drop by, Old Rake.   :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 07, 2012, 09:46:08 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 07, 2012, 09:46:20 AM
I don't demand perfection. I'm just surpised is all.

I actually read: surpissed.

 :lol

I'm not saying it was that, but I do like your interpretation of my spelling error. Which now means that I can't edit it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 10:02:31 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.

It's very surprising that Beach Boys fans especially need to be reminded that some will like it and some will not.  As the 'rate these Beach Boys songs' poll here from a couple months ago proved, Beach Boys fans on this site can not agree at all on what's a great song and what's a clunker.

I have read the opinions of two people who have heard the album...just curious.  Obviously, one can not judge an album/song based on another's ears/tastes/perceptions.  As a rule I don't pay any mind to reviewers in the media.  I am one who will definitely not listen to any samples on Amazon.  I held out for the Smile tracks from TSS, too.  For me, I like to hear the whole album the first time from start to finish, without interruption.  That's just me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 07, 2012, 10:15:37 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.

It's very surprising that Beach Boys fans especially need to be reminded that some will like it and some will not.  As the 'rate these Beach Boys songs' poll here from a couple months ago proved, Beach Boys fans on this site can not agree at all on what's a great song and what's a clunker.

I have read the opinions of two people who have heard the album...just curious.  Obviously, one can not judge an album/song based on another's ears/tastes/perceptions.  As a rule I don't pay any mind to reviewers in the media.  I am one who will definitely not listen to any samples on Amazon.  I held out for the Smile tracks from TSS, too.  For me, I like to hear the whole album the first time from start to finish, without interruption.  That's just me.

Definitely, agreed. I usually stay away from reviews until I have the option/choice of hearing it on my own. Music is such a personal thing, and I will mostly read reviews after the product is officially available or if it's already on the market - if I'm interested in what that reviewer has to say, and that's rare. Not saying there isn't a place and demand for sneak peeks and opinions and "advance leaks" all of that, but I'm thinking of whoever was posting the Smile box set reviews/commentary before the box came out and it only served to boost their profile on a forum and keep people guessing - when the box came out, all of the commentary was swept into the bin and listeners heard it (and judged it) for themselves.

Again, that's just me too! But it's not unreasonable to assume people might have vastly different reactions and opinions to hearing the same thing - that's human nature and the nature of voicing opinion. I'd rather wait and let the process play out instead of seeing folks tweeting opinions for weeks before the album drops. That way you have the option to agree or disagree based on the actual music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 07, 2012, 10:19:51 AM
Word on the street is that all the cool kids are loving themselves some Spring Vacation.

Should someone call the plumbers?  ;D

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4DkH44Sbpwg/S2-lBLT813I/AAAAAAAAABg/V6uluAlNR9U/s320/three_stooges3_2.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 10:24:53 AM
Word on the street is that all the cool kids are loving themselves some Spring Vacation.

Should someone call the plumbers?  ;D

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4DkH44Sbpwg/S2-lBLT813I/AAAAAAAAABg/V6uluAlNR9U/s320/three_stooges3_2.jpg)

nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 07, 2012, 10:30:30 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.


Some of us enjoy reading the opinions of others who are smart and have good taste.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 07, 2012, 10:33:43 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.

It's very surprising that Beach Boys fans especially need to be reminded that some will like it and some will not.  As the 'rate these Beach Boys songs' poll here from a couple months ago proved, Beach Boys fans on this site can not agree at all on what's a great song and what's a clunker.

I have read the opinions of two people who have heard the album...just curious.  Obviously, one can not judge an album/song based on another's ears/tastes/perceptions.  As a rule I don't pay any mind to reviewers in the media.  I am one who will definitely not listen to any samples on Amazon.  I held out for the Smile tracks from TSS, too.  For me, I like to hear the whole album the first time from start to finish, without interruption.  That's just me.

Definitely, agreed. I usually stay away from reviews until I have the option/choice of hearing it on my own. Music is such a personal thing, and I will mostly read reviews after the product is officially available or if it's already on the market - if I'm interested in what that reviewer has to say, and that's rare. Not saying there isn't a place and demand for sneak peeks and opinions and "advance leaks" all of that, but I'm thinking of whoever was posting the Smile box set reviews/commentary before the box came out and it only served to boost their profile on a forum and keep people guessing - when the box came out, all of the commentary was swept into the bin and listeners heard it (and judged it) for themselves.

Again, that's just me too! But it's not unreasonable to assume people might have vastly different reactions and opinions to hearing the same thing - that's human nature and the nature of voicing opinion. I'd rather wait and let the process play out instead of seeing folks tweeting opinions for weeks before the album drops. That way you have the option to agree or disagree based on the actual music.


Option?? Why would reading someone else's opinion on art affect your own feelings, no matter if you read them ten years before you experience the art, ten years after, or during? I mean, if I had to worry about that, I'd have a pretty weak foundation of critical faculty.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 07, 2012, 11:15:00 AM
Right, so you've never read a good critic who made you think about things a different way or drew connections you didn't consciously make?

 If so, I'd say your feelings were affected by a critic without damaging your critical faculty.

That said, christ -- how many good critics are there? I can't come up with many. It seems to be a pretty depressing field in general.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 07, 2012, 11:19:10 AM
Is there any band who will release a new album which will please everyone? Is it just numbers of Beach Boys fans who need to be reminded some will like it and some will not, and is there really a different standard of expectation and judgement of this band?

I said earlier - these advance reviews are just fine if people are that curious, but it may be a better choice to just wait for the actual product in this case, or even those little song previews on Amazon to be posted. You're reading someone else's opinion and getting a mental picture of the music which you do not have the choice to hear with your own ears and semi-open mind...in some cases one person's "Jimmy Buffet" could be another person's Jobim, or they could both suck equally...but it's not too far off and not that much of a life-changing event to wait another few weeks for full songs in high quality.

It's very surprising that Beach Boys fans especially need to be reminded that some will like it and some will not.  As the 'rate these Beach Boys songs' poll here from a couple months ago proved, Beach Boys fans on this site can not agree at all on what's a great song and what's a clunker.

I have read the opinions of two people who have heard the album...just curious.  Obviously, one can not judge an album/song based on another's ears/tastes/perceptions.  As a rule I don't pay any mind to reviewers in the media.  I am one who will definitely not listen to any samples on Amazon.  I held out for the Smile tracks from TSS, too.  For me, I like to hear the whole album the first time from start to finish, without interruption.  That's just me.

Definitely, agreed. I usually stay away from reviews until I have the option/choice of hearing it on my own. Music is such a personal thing, and I will mostly read reviews after the product is officially available or if it's already on the market - if I'm interested in what that reviewer has to say, and that's rare. Not saying there isn't a place and demand for sneak peeks and opinions and "advance leaks" all of that, but I'm thinking of whoever was posting the Smile box set reviews/commentary before the box came out and it only served to boost their profile on a forum and keep people guessing - when the box came out, all of the commentary was swept into the bin and listeners heard it (and judged it) for themselves.

Again, that's just me too! But it's not unreasonable to assume people might have vastly different reactions and opinions to hearing the same thing - that's human nature and the nature of voicing opinion. I'd rather wait and let the process play out instead of seeing folks tweeting opinions for weeks before the album drops. That way you have the option to agree or disagree based on the actual music.


Option?? Why would reading someone else's opinion on art affect your own feelings, no matter if you read them ten years before you experience the art, ten years after, or during? I mean, if I had to worry about that, I'd have a pretty weak foundation of critical faculty.

A real critic, not the ones who write in magazines or the bloggers who ape the style of the one's who write in magazines, should be able to reveal things that you didn't necessarily know were there and this can help you enjoy it more. That being said, what gets called "criticism" (i.e. music reviews in magazines) is not actually criticism, as far as I'm concerned, just PR for the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 07, 2012, 11:37:34 AM
Yeah, yeah, ya'll are right. The best critical writing can illuminate the strengths and flaws of a given work. I was really saying that no review has caused me to like or dislike anything. Nothing has been ruined for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 07, 2012, 11:39:31 AM
I was really saying that no review has caused me to like or dislike anything.

As it should be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 07, 2012, 12:42:42 PM
Aye, there's the rub - I wasn't saying critical writing wasn't anything beyond someone's choice to read it or not read it. I was saying in general, I personally do not pay attention as much to advance reviews of an album. Everyone of course has the right to read them or ignore them, every writer can choose to publish it or not, every blogger or internet journalist can choose to send out Tweets with commentary on the albums, that's not the issue. The issue was stating why I don't pay attention to them or let them sway opinions.

A biggie for me is the fact that advance reviews are asking fans to put a lot of faith in the reviewer who is holding and judging that advance copy, where the other potentially hundreds of thousands of fans can only read what they see published by that writer or critic. Can the fans agree or disagree with *anything* that reviewer or writer may say if they don't have access to the same product in order to form an opinion? If we are curious about an album by "Artist X", do we listen to Rolling Stone over Entertainment Weekly, do we listen to Jim DeRogatis over another regional or local critic who publishes in the weekly city paper or 'zine? No matter what the choice, if the album is yet to be released, we're at the mercy of those opinions, positive or negative, and it's not a level playing field until everyone can put the music on and hear it firsthand.

That is the problem I have with advance reviews or advance copies in general, especially albums: They exist by design to promote the album, and the collateral damage of the practice is finding a reviewer who might think the album sucks and proceeds to go around bashing it before anyone can hear it on their own. I got a few hints of that happening during this thread, judging by what a few posters have said after reading Twitter posts and whatnot. Is the benefit of the advance publicity worth someone critiquing on Twitter setting up people to think when they buy the album, they'll not like it?

I enjoy and appreciate rock journalism when it is done well, I love reading what rock critics past and present have to say on any number of topics and have a collection of their books and collected writings/reviews to use for reference. But I'm more accepting of that because I can easily buy any album they are writing about and I can also read some of those without feeling like some of the reviews are not much more than (as rockandroll said) an advertisement or advance PR for the upcoming album release.

But again, I'm definitely not suggesting anything beyond what I do and feel personally about this stuff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 07, 2012, 12:52:44 PM
Yeah, the Twitter reviews and such are garbage in my opinion and if anyone is taking them seriously and letting their advance opinion be swayed by them, that is lame. But the thoughts of Andrew and Summ-A-Briz, the latter of which is an old Smile Shop regular under a new name, are of the knowledgable and trustworthy sort, and I appreciate them and find I will likely agree with them in the main. I find myself more willing to give the album a fair-minded chance because of those thoughts (tho they won't determine whether I will like the album ultimately).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 07, 2012, 01:39:25 PM
For my part, I am valuing highly the perspectives shared by Andrew and that other guy on the Record Room, and I'm suspending judgement until I get a chance to hear it for myself. Granted, when I hear the words Jimmy Buffett used by both sources, that, for me, is a 99% sure thing REASON TO BE SCARED. But hey, even if that part of it turns out to be as bad as it sounds, I'm sure the album will have plenty of shade and light to digest.

Wow, there's less than a month to go now... won't be long.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on May 07, 2012, 02:34:28 PM
I just saw Jimmy Buffet in concert two weeks ago. I'm not scared at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 07, 2012, 03:51:20 PM
I agree with guitarfool that reviews cloud opinions. How many times have you heard someone say "I've never listened to Summer in Paradise. I know it sucks!" ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 07, 2012, 03:53:59 PM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 07, 2012, 03:59:53 PM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!

That would sound like one groovy album!

"What Love Can Do" came close to Pet Sounds quality, IMO.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 07, 2012, 04:04:57 PM
I think it's possible, I mean, if TWGMTR is any indication, their voices sound great, and the songs really don't get much worse from what I understand, so who knows :D

(Spoiler, only god!)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ptijerm on May 07, 2012, 05:17:47 PM
I've got some questions about the forthcoming vinyl release of the That's Why God Made the Radio album.

Does anyone know if this will be pressed on 180 gram vinyl - similar to the Smile Sessions LP?  Also - will it be released as just a single LP or as 2-LP set (with any bonus cuts, etc.)?

FYI - Amazon Canada has the LP listed for only $16.99.   This is the cheapest I've seen the vinyl edition of the album for pre-order.  Here's the direct link to the Amazon listing - http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B007U1FEQW/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&m=A3DWYIK6Y9EEQB.

(P.S. Long time lurker/fan of this board...first time poster  :-[  Apologies if I've posted this in the wrong thread...)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 07, 2012, 05:38:06 PM
Question for those in the know that have heard the advance copy already: is any information given in that copy/stream/download about songrwiting credits? If so: care to post?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 07, 2012, 06:41:32 PM
I agree with guitarfool that reviews cloud opinions. How many times have you heard someone say "I've never listened to Summer in Paradise. I know it sucks!" ?

Those folks are idiots. Don't blame the reviewers.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on May 07, 2012, 08:08:45 PM
I've got some questions about the forthcoming vinyl release of the That's Why God Made the Radio album.

Does anyone know if this will be pressed on 180 gram vinyl - similar to the Smile Sessions LP?  Also - will it be released as just a single LP or as 2-LP set (with any bonus cuts, etc.)?

FYI - Amazon Canada has the LP listed for only $16.99.   This is the cheapest I've seen the vinyl edition of the album for pre-order.  Here's the direct link to the Amazon listing - http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B007U1FEQW/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&m=A3DWYIK6Y9EEQB.

(P.S. Long time lurker/fan of this board...first time poster  :-[  Apologies if I've posted this in the wrong thread...)

What's interesting about this: Amazon ( USA) has the Vinyl scheduled for July 3rd, but Amazon Canada still has it for June 5th.
Perhaps it's being released on time in Canada? 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on May 08, 2012, 04:30:21 AM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!


I think the issue for most people on here won't be whether a few of the songs themselves are good enough, but whether the production/autotune partially ruins them or completely ruins them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 08, 2012, 06:36:46 AM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!
I think the issue for most people on here won't be whether a few of the songs themselves are good enough, but whether the production/autotune partially ruins them or completely ruins them.

Well, yeah, there are going to be those that don't like it for any number of reasons.  Songwriting, lyrics, digital sheen, too much pitch correction, not enough pitch correction, too '60s, not '60s enough.  What else is new?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Moon Dawg on May 08, 2012, 05:58:49 PM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!


 1/4 Imagination
 1/4 That Lucky Old Sun
 1/4 Pet Sounds
 1/4 The Many Moods of Murry Wilson  ;D

  Oops! Maybe not.

 Hello, I'm Moon Dawg and I used to post frequently on Shut Down Vol. 2. Still do on occasion. Beyond stoked for the new LP!  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on May 08, 2012, 06:03:42 PM
I'm betting this album will be...

1/3rd Imagination
1/3rd Lucky Old Sun
and
1/3rd Pet Sounds

Hang me if you want, but i'd like to see Brian do ONE MORE PET SOUNDS QUALITY SONG!
I think the issue for most people on here won't be whether a few of the songs themselves are good enough, but whether the production/autotune partially ruins them or completely ruins them.

Well, yeah, there are going to be those that don't like it for any number of reasons.  Songwriting, lyrics, digital sheen, too much pitch correction, not enough pitch correction, too '60s, not '60s enough.  What else is new?
Indeed. "Hi, I'm a Beach Boys fan. Now let me tell you everything wrong with the Beach Boys (and why I'm a better one than any one of them)."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 08, 2012, 06:06:59 PM

 1/4 Imagination
 1/4 That Lucky Old Sun
 1/4 Pet Sounds
 1/4 The Many Moods of Murry Wilson  ;D

  Oops! Maybe not.

 Hello, I'm Moon Dawg and I used to post frequently on Shut Down Vol. 2. Still do on occasion. Beyond stoked for the new LP!  

Whoa - blast from the past. Welcome!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Moon Dawg on May 08, 2012, 06:44:59 PM
 Thanks! It's good to be here during this incredible time. Very nice to see some of the Shut Down Vol 2 posters such as yourself and Mikie active on this board!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on May 08, 2012, 09:14:30 PM
Thanks! It's good to be here during this incredible time. Very nice to see some of the Shut Down Vol 2 posters such as yourself and Mikie active on this board!

A lot of us here from the cabin/shut down/wheeler page.  I miss a lot of folks I used to enjoy messaging with in those places.  A great time for all to come together. :) :) :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 09, 2012, 12:47:24 AM
Thanks! It's good to be here during this incredible time. Very nice to see some of the Shut Down Vol 2 posters such as yourself and Mikie active on this board!

A lot of us here from the cabin/shut down/wheeler page.  I miss a lot of folks I used to enjoy messaging with in those places.  A great time for all to come together. :) :) :)

Ah... the old days. When the web still was called the Super Information Highway.

Altavista and AskJeeves were the grampa's and granma's of Google.

And the Commodore 64, and Pong still were living memories...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 01:10:56 AM
To cut through the thickening haze of nostalgia... the lyrics can be very reflective, and decidedly, uh, nostalgic. Thus:

"Don't you understand the words are singin' in the wind
I wish that we could get from there to back again"

"Sometimes I realise my days are gettin' on
Sometimes I realise it's time to move along"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 09, 2012, 01:23:37 AM
To cut through the thickening haze of nostalgia... the lyrics can be very reflective, and decidedly, uh, nostalgic. Thus:

"Don't you understand the words are singin' in the wind
I wish that we could get from there to back again"

"Sometimes I realise my days are gettin' on
Sometimes I realise it's time to move along"



Do we know who wrote these?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 01:59:17 AM
Not me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 09, 2012, 02:45:23 AM
"Nostalgic" as in "haven't I heard something rather like that before?" ?   ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 03:15:58 AM
Philistine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 09, 2012, 03:22:32 AM
No, Phil's time's long past – been quiet for a while now…   ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 09, 2012, 03:28:13 AM
Not me.



Thanks for the clarification.  Before that I was under the impression that you had provided lyrics for the new album.



 ::)





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 03:29:45 AM
Not me.



Thanks for the clarification.  Before that I was under the impression that you had provided lyrics for the new album.



 ::)


A common misapprehension.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 09, 2012, 03:38:51 AM
Not me.



Thanks for the clarification.  Before that I was under the impression that you had provided lyrics for the new album.



 ::)


A common misapprehension.

Cor! Blimey! For years I thought that Doe is a nickname for Tony 'Tones' Asher...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 09, 2012, 04:12:29 AM
Aan Gyke Darks, surely…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 09, 2012, 07:14:10 AM
The new album is currently sitting at #17 on the amazon top 100 chart..

Impressive stuff


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 09, 2012, 07:39:04 AM
The new album is currently sitting at #17 on the amazon top 100 chart..

Impressive stuff

It had been dropping and was in the 60's.  Looks like the Fallon appearance was a boost


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 09, 2012, 08:47:45 AM
If this album is a smash, what are the realistic chances they actually do a follow-up? I know Brian still wants to do his 'rock n' roll' album, and although there's no better time than now to make that a reality, there seem to be indications that "TWGMTR" is the perfect swan song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 09, 2012, 08:56:47 AM
If this album is a smash, what are the realistic chances they actually do a follow-up? I know Brian still wants to do his 'rock n' roll' album, and although there's no better time than now to make that a reality, there seem to be indications that "TWGMTR" is the perfect swan song.

I am in two minds about this. On the one hand, the 'swan song' idea may be apt. On the other... I wrote earlier that I am quite partial to the more hoarse, soulful voice Mike's equipped with nowadays; there is an ace band, the best that ever backed the boys IMHO (Cowsill, Bragg, Sahanaja, all others bar Stamos); and there may be quite some unfinished songs that deserve to see the light of day (I am thinking the cover of 'Proud Mary', with those rising and falling choruses, from the Paley days).

Who knows? I wouldn't pass up an invitation to come to Pleasure Island, no siree...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 09, 2012, 09:25:05 AM
If the new the album is a success, then I see no reason not to continue in the studio if they are all up for it. That Rock n Roll album (if it ever comes to fruition) is a much better vehicle for The Beach Boys, than as a Brian Wilson solo effort.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 09, 2012, 09:32:55 AM
another tweet for the curious

Mike Mineo ‏ @ObscureSound
new Beach Boys album has its highs and lows... but the highs - like "Shelter" and "Isn't It Time" - are really brilliant.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 09, 2012, 09:37:58 AM
So, Shelter is both weak & brilliant depending on the reviewer? I guess the average makes it a fair-to-midlin song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 09, 2012, 10:04:09 AM
Oh man, we need previews ASAP


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 09, 2012, 10:10:36 AM
So, Shelter is both weak & brilliant depending on the reviewer? I guess the average makes it a fair-to-midlin song.

i don't think so since it seems to be singled out by everyone in some way.  A middling song probably wouldn't get a mention.  it just seems to be polarizing!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 09, 2012, 10:46:23 AM
There is usually always something to like in a Brian Wilson tune, so I'm hoping it falls on the side of brilliance or thereabouts.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 09, 2012, 11:26:20 AM
if AGD doesn't like a song and someone else who is probably significantly less cynical does, I'm going to go with the latter's opinion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on May 09, 2012, 11:31:19 AM
Dunno if I'll want to listen to the inevitable 30 second samples or not....  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on May 09, 2012, 11:39:26 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #18 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

    #15 in Music > Rock
    #18 in Music > Pop



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 09, 2012, 12:17:30 PM
I wrote earlier that I am quite partial to the more hoarse, soulful voice Mike's equipped with nowadays; there is an ace band, the best that ever backed the boys IMHO (Cowsill, Bragg, Sahanaja, all others bar Stamos); and there may be quite some unfinished songs that deserve to see the light of day (I am thinking the cover of 'Proud Mary', with those rising and falling choruses, from the Paley days).

Who knows? I wouldn't pass up an invitation to come to Pleasure Island, no siree...

Put "Waves of Love", "Still A Mystery", "Dancin' the Night Away", and "Proud Mary" on the next record and I'd be happy as a clam.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 09, 2012, 12:49:00 PM
If this album is a smash, what are the realistic chances they actually do a follow-up? I know Brian still wants to do his 'rock n' roll' album, and although there's no better time than now to make that a reality, there seem to be indications that "TWGMTR" is the perfect swan song.

I don't think anyone knows. Brian has suggested he's interested in another album, and I think Al might have mentioned that too. It really depends on the record label, I would think, and if Brian has the support in place to record another album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 09, 2012, 01:42:34 PM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 09, 2012, 01:51:54 PM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

I would think that members who have heard it (ahem) would have been pretty clear if more of the album was recycled. Doesn't sound like it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: donald on May 09, 2012, 02:40:33 PM
I sttill want to hear California Feeling completed and released as a full BB song.  There is that great track with Carl and Bruce to build on.  I wanted to hear this LIVE along with DFTS.   There are some really great loose ends sitting around even to this day.

Not to complain.  Just wishing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 02:45:46 PM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 09, 2012, 02:46:31 PM
I sttill want to hear California Feeling completed and released as a full BB song.  There is that great track with Carl and Bruce to build on.  I wanted to hear this LIVE along with DFTS.   There are some really great loose ends sitting around even to this day.

Not to complain.  Just wishing.

i think al's version is definitive.  I don't need another version after that one


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 09, 2012, 04:03:29 PM
I sttill want to hear California Feeling completed and released as a full BB song.  There is that great track with Carl and Bruce to build on.  I wanted to hear this LIVE along with DFTS.   There are some really great loose ends sitting around even to this day.

Not to complain.  Just wishing.

i think al's version is definitive.  I don't need another version after that one

   agreed


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 09, 2012, 04:27:27 PM
I sttill want to hear California Feeling completed and released as a full BB song.  There is that great track with Carl and Bruce to build on.  I wanted to hear this LIVE along with DFTS.   There are some really great loose ends sitting around even to this day.

Not to complain.  Just wishing.

i think al's version is definitive.  I don't need another version after that one

Yup leave it at Al's version. I actually don't care for the song that much, it's always kind of bored me but it fits in rather nicely on Al's album and he sings it well.
   agreed


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 09, 2012, 05:01:28 PM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

As for Cali Feeling mentioned in the posts above, I agree, Al's version is by far the best to date. I can never get over the line "pick a grapefruit from a grapefruit tree" though. Must be one of the clunkiest in the BBs repertoire.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 09, 2012, 07:11:04 PM
 I actually like American Spring's version the best.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 09, 2012, 07:41:32 PM
If this album is a smash, what are the realistic chances they actually do a follow-up? I know Brian still wants to do his 'rock n' roll' album, and although there's no better time than now to make that a reality, there seem to be indications that "TWGMTR" is the perfect swan song.

If the album does well, I think they will definately make a follow up album.  Brian digs hits, and if he has a hit he won't be able to resist doing another one.  If Brian's down to do it, the others will do it definately. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 09, 2012, 10:28:09 PM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 09, 2012, 10:32:45 PM
As for Cali Feeling mentioned in the posts above, I agree, Al's version is by far the best to date. I can never get over the line "pick a grapefruit from a grapefruit tree" though. Must be one of the clunkiest in the BBs repertoire.

what the hell, I hate Al's version. the normal 70s with Carl singing is the best, followed by Brian's version on Classics Selected by Brian Wilson


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 09, 2012, 10:37:43 PM
As for Cali Feeling mentioned in the posts above, I agree, Al's version is by far the best to date. I can never get over the line "pick a grapefruit from a grapefruit tree" though. Must be one of the clunkiest in the BBs repertoire.

what the hell, I hate Al's version. the normal 70s with Carl singing is the best, followed by Brian's version on Classics Selected by Brian Wilson

carl's doing that vocal thing where he sounds like he has a cold, and i've never liked that, it sounds better lower in the throat.  Al's voice and arrangement make the melody pop better than the original and definitely better than brian's. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 10, 2012, 02:10:35 AM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.

That's quite an achievement for these guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Brian's had some of the melodies in his portfolio for a while, that' the nature of the guy, but for there to be nothing from PCM (previously circulating material) is gosh-darn cool.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 10, 2012, 02:37:23 AM
What's wrong with the Classics version of California Feelin'?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 10, 2012, 07:07:51 AM
What's wrong with the Classics version of California Feelin'?

Ditto. I quite like the "call and answer" arrangement he gave it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 10, 2012, 07:57:08 AM
What's wrong with the Classics version of California Feelin'?

Nothing.  I just don't think we need any more versions, particularly taking up space on a new album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 10, 2012, 08:05:02 AM
In terms of Beach Boys songs, it is one with the most unrealised potential - They never seemed to care about what could have been, produced right, one of their iconic tunes. I bet you if they'd released it on, IDK, 15 Big Ones or MIU they'd still be playing it today. But if even Brian didn't care about it, I guess motivation was low. A missed opportunity.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 10, 2012, 10:03:16 AM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.

That's quite an achievement for these guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Brian's had some of the melodies in his portfolio for a while, that' the nature of the guy, but for there to be nothing from PCM (previously circulating material) is gosh-darn cool.

OK, hold that thought - I'm 97.423% that "Daybreak" uses at least part of the Mike Love Not War recording: some of the bvs are identical, especially the ones that sound a lot like Christian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 10, 2012, 10:20:34 AM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.

That's quite an achievement for these guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Brian's had some of the melodies in his portfolio for a while, that' the nature of the guy, but for there to be nothing from PCM (previously circulating material) is gosh-darn cool.

OK, hold that thought - I'm 97.423% that "Daybreak" uses at least part of the Mike Love Not War recording: some of the bvs are identical, especially the ones that sound a lot like Christian.

I kinda figured they'd build on that anyway. The harmony sound on that was incredible, sounded just like the BB's.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 10, 2012, 11:11:33 AM
I'm in the camp that would rather see new material than reworks of unreleased songs, or even marginally released songs.  I don't understand why anybody would want to hear a (by most accounts) mediocre song reworked or rewritten because it has 'potential'.  Just write something new (which it appears they have! I win). 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 10, 2012, 11:44:38 AM
I'm in the camp that would rather see new material than reworks of unreleased songs, or even marginally released songs.  I don't understand why anybody would want to hear a (by most accounts) mediocre song reworked or rewritten because it has 'potential'.  Just write something new (which it appears they have! I win). 

Yeah, same. I'd like to hear new songs. That one from Mike's solo album is not very good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 10, 2012, 12:05:06 PM
Where can i listen to Mike Love solo version of Daybreak ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 10, 2012, 12:07:04 PM
Where can i listen to Mike Love solo version of Daybreak ?

Same here, googled it and everything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dutchie on May 10, 2012, 12:11:05 PM
You cant because its not "offiially "released yet  ::) ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 10, 2012, 12:14:17 PM
Of all the reviews i've found via google tho, lots of people are sayin' good stuff about it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 10, 2012, 12:54:11 PM
New album is 100% amazing. Seriously, a reviewer friend of mine sung some harmonies from "FHTBA" (the first part) and holy shoot... Definitely some amazing sh*t!




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Stegibo on May 10, 2012, 01:04:57 PM
When will the 30 seconds samples appear on amazon? :/


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 10, 2012, 01:08:12 PM
New album is 100% amazing. Seriously, a reviewer friend of mine sung some harmonies from "FHTBA" (the first part) and holy shoot... Definitely some amazing sh*t!

Can't agree with you there - I'd rate it at about 71% amazing.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 10, 2012, 01:08:51 PM
New album is 100% amazing. Seriously, a reviewer friend of mine sung some harmonies from "FHTBA" (the first part) and holy shoot...



Would you hum a little for us ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 10, 2012, 01:18:18 PM
I'm in the camp that would rather see new material than reworks of unreleased songs, or even marginally released songs.  I don't understand why anybody would want to hear a (by most accounts) mediocre song reworked or rewritten because it has 'potential'.  Just write something new (which it appears they have! I win). 

Yeah, same. I'd like to hear new songs. That one from Mike's solo album is not very good.

I dunno. It's nothing earth-shattering, but it sounds very classically Beach Boys. If it fits with the flow of the album, I'm cool with it. Mike is sitting on so much unreleased stuff it's not funny ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 10, 2012, 01:23:31 PM
I'm in the camp that would rather see new material than reworks of unreleased songs, or even marginally released songs.  I don't understand why anybody would want to hear a (by most accounts) mediocre song reworked or rewritten because it has 'potential'.  Just write something new (which it appears they have! I win). 

I'd rather the album contain at least a few good songs that I'm already familiar with either from bootlegs or unreleased recordings than have to worry about them padding out the record with some newly-written, over-nostalgic tripe just to meet the quota of a 12-13 track album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 10, 2012, 01:25:33 PM
New album is 100% amazing. Seriously, a reviewer friend of mine sung some harmonies from "FHTBA" (the first part) and holy shoot... Definitely some amazing sh*t!

Can't agree with you there - I'd rate it at about 71% amazing.  ;D

Haha, agreed, it was a hyperbole, he said it's very good though, maybe like 75-80%



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 10, 2012, 01:26:28 PM
I'm in the camp that would rather see new material than reworks of unreleased songs, or even marginally released songs.  I don't understand why anybody would want to hear a (by most accounts) mediocre song reworked or rewritten because it has 'potential'.  Just write something new (which it appears they have! I win). 

I'd rather the album contain at least a few good songs that I'm already familiar with either from bootlegs or unreleased recordings than have to worry about them padding out the record with some newly-written, over-nostalgic tripe just to meet the quota of a 12-13 track album.

Sounds like a grand total of one track (Daybreak) has circulated. If AGD isn't familiar with any of the others, that's about as definitive as it gets. And I agree with you, but it sounds like the decision has been made.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on May 10, 2012, 01:51:40 PM
I'd rather the album contain at least a few good songs that I'm already familiar with either from bootlegs or unreleased recordings than have to worry about them padding out the record with some newly-written, over-nostalgic tripe just to meet the quota of a 12-13 track album.

I can see how the band would feel a bit of the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" here. Most fans have seemed to criticize them for continually mining old compositions and recordings for "new" albums. What's worse, they often pick seemingly weak material (e.g. "When Girls Get Together").

At this point, I'm all for new material we haven't heard. I love tracks like "You're Still a Mystery", but at this point even a track like that is an approximately 17-year-old recording. Stick that stuff on a "rarities" archival collection at this point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on May 10, 2012, 01:53:27 PM

Sounds like a grand total of one track (Daybreak) has circulated. If AGD isn't familiar with any of the others, that's about as definitive as it gets. And I agree with you, but it sounds like the decision has been made.

We have indications that while we haven't *heard* much on this album before, at least some of it comes from the 1998 Joe Thomas era. If it's new to me and it's good, then I don't care when it was written. But it brings up an interesting question. Would anyone have a problem if, say, half the album (or more) was written in 1998 and maybe even some of the backing tracks came from that era?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 10, 2012, 01:54:22 PM
Yeah Hey Jude! Some others have mentioned that we have no idea what the 'vault' releases are going to be to coincide with this anniversary, they may have all kinds of unreleased stuff planned to come out, so they can't include it on the new album since it'll be on the boxset or re-releases or whatever they have planned.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 10, 2012, 02:06:04 PM

Sounds like a grand total of one track (Daybreak) has circulated. If AGD isn't familiar with any of the others, that's about as definitive as it gets. And I agree with you, but it sounds like the decision has been made.

We have indications that while we haven't *heard* much on this album before, at least some of it comes from the 1998 Joe Thomas era. If it's new to me and it's good, then I don't care when it was written. But it brings up an interesting question. Would anyone have a problem if, say, half the album (or more) was written in 1998 and maybe even some of the backing tracks came from that era?

I would have no problem if it was revealed that Brian wrote three-quarters of it under a tree in San Diego in 1978.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 10, 2012, 02:11:55 PM

Sounds like a grand total of one track (Daybreak) has circulated. If AGD isn't familiar with any of the others, that's about as definitive as it gets. And I agree with you, but it sounds like the decision has been made.

We have indications that while we haven't *heard* much on this album before, at least some of it comes from the 1998 Joe Thomas era. If it's new to me and it's good, then I don't care when it was written. But it brings up an interesting question. Would anyone have a problem if, say, half the album (or more) was written in 1998 and maybe even some of the backing tracks came from that era?

I would have no problem if it was revealed that Brian wrote three-quarters of it under a tree in San Diego in 1978.  ;D


I was just informed that, in fact, The Private Life Of Bill And Sue was originally entitled Under A Tree In San Diego.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 10, 2012, 02:13:49 PM
Would anyone have a problem if, say, half the album (or more) was written in 1998 and maybe even some of the backing tracks came from that era?

To the first question, no. I expect that's actually the case.

To the second question, I doubt that happened. Brian was recording tracks throughout last year.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 10, 2012, 03:03:26 PM

Sounds like a grand total of one track (Daybreak) has circulated. If AGD isn't familiar with any of the others, that's about as definitive as it gets. And I agree with you, but it sounds like the decision has been made.

We have indications that while we haven't *heard* much on this album before, at least some of it comes from the 1998 Joe Thomas era. If it's new to me and it's good, then I don't care when it was written. But it brings up an interesting question. Would anyone have a problem if, say, half the album (or more) was written in 1998 and maybe even some of the backing tracks came from that era?

I would have no problem if it was revealed that Brian wrote three-quarters of it under a tree in San Diego in 1978.  ;D


I was just informed that, in fact, The Private Life Of Bill And Sue was originally entitled Under A Tree In San Diego.

Aw man, why didn't he kept that title ! (i'm from SD)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 10, 2012, 03:39:25 PM

I was just informed that, in fact, The Private Life Of Bill And Sue was originally entitled Under A Tree In San Diego.

Yup- it was originally planned to be a track on the unreleased album 'Remember The San Diego Zoo'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on May 10, 2012, 04:37:41 PM
A whole different question: Does anyone know if the LP mastering will be the same in the US as in Europe? SMiLE 2004 EU didn't sound that well, while TSS sounded great. Do I have to get a US pressing?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: catman on May 10, 2012, 11:12:36 PM
Whatever happened to Frankie Avalon,the original version to Everything I Need and It's Over? Any of these would be really awesome to see...but I dont have my hopes up...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 10, 2012, 11:23:30 PM
Whatever happened to Frankie Avalon,the original version to Everything I Need and It's Over? Any of these would be really awesome to see...but I dont have my hopes up...

Well, Frankie Avalon is a rough demo from the Paley sessions. There are at least a couple of dozen other such songs. It doesn't look like any of them are on the new record.

Everything I Need was released on the Wilsons record in 1997. Jeff Foskett released a version with Brian that restored some of the original arrangement. Given that two versions are out, I'm not sure why anyone would want to release the song again.

And I'm not familiar with a Beach Boys song called "It's Over." There's one called "It's Over Now," which was released on the 1993 boxed set. Again, given that the song has been released, I'm not sure why it would be on the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: catman on May 10, 2012, 11:52:45 PM
Whatever happened to Frankie Avalon,the original version to Everything I Need and It's Over? Any of these would be really awesome to see...but I dont have my hopes up...

Well, Frankie Avalon is a rough demo from the Paley sessions. There are at least a couple of dozen other such songs. It doesn't look like any of them are on the new record.

Everything I Need was released on the Wilsons record in 1997. Jeff Foskett released a version with Brian that restored some of the original arrangement. Given that two versions are out, I'm not sure why anyone would want to release the song again.

And I'm not familiar with a Beach Boys song called "It's Over." There's one called "It's Over Now," which was released on the 1993 boxed set. Again, given that the song has been released, I'm not sure why it would be on the new album.

Thanks man. Been out of the bw loop for a little while. Was not awre of the 97 version of EIN. Neat version. Something about the rough version of the other demo i like...this one is great. found it on youtube. Really refined. Great stuff.

Yes, "Its over now" is what i meant. Wow what a song...i get your point on all of these. I guess I just felt like these songs never got there debut as beach boys material. IOV from 93 box is the carl wilson version correct? Call me crazy but I like the song better being banged out on piano like on the demos...

sorry...this thread isn't for my opinion on such matters...back to topic
Can someone summarize where things are at now with this album? Whats the release date?...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 11, 2012, 12:03:34 AM
Whatever happened to Frankie Avalon,the original version to Everything I Need and It's Over? Any of these would be really awesome to see...but I dont have my hopes up...

Well, Frankie Avalon is a rough demo from the Paley sessions. There are at least a couple of dozen other such songs. It doesn't look like any of them are on the new record.

Everything I Need was released on the Wilsons record in 1997. Jeff Foskett released a version with Brian that restored some of the original arrangement. Given that two versions are out, I'm not sure why anyone would want to release the song again.

And I'm not familiar with a Beach Boys song called "It's Over." There's one called "It's Over Now," which was released on the 1993 boxed set. Again, given that the song has been released, I'm not sure why it would be on the new album.

Thanks man. Been out of the bw loop for a little while. Was not awre of the 97 version of EIN. Neat version. Something about the rough version of the other demo i like...this one is great. found it on youtube. Really refined. Great stuff.

Yes, "Its over now" is what i meant. Wow what a song...i get your point on all of these. I guess I just felt like these songs never got there debut as beach boys material. IOV from 93 box is the carl wilson version correct? Call me crazy but I like the song better being banged out on piano like on the demos...

sorry...this thread isn't for my opinion on such matters...back to topic
Can someone summarize where things are at now with this album? Whats the release date?...

No problem! (97 version of EiN here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lsx7YrCqU0. Foskett version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPXleBlUjSM).

Album comes out June 5. All new Brian Wilson songs (seemingly) except for a Mike Love tune originally written in 1978. About 38 minutes long. (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=ntt_mus_ep_dpi_1) Has a closing suite that people who have heard advance copies are raving about.
 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt H on May 11, 2012, 07:24:22 AM
Looks like a bonus track in Japan:

Copy/paste from translated HMV Japan page:

Songs

1
Think About The Days

2
The God made the radio - God it does to make, the radio

3
Isn't It Time

4
Spring Vacation

5
The Private Life Of Bill And Sue

6
Shelter

7
Daybreak Over The Ocean

8
Beaches In Mind

9
Strange World

10
From There To Back Again

11
Pacific Coast Highway

12
Summer's Gone

13
Revival (2012 [vuajiyon]) of love (bonus track/truck)

http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hmv.co.jp%2Fen%2Fproduct%2Fdetail%2F5045005&lp=ja_en&btnTrUrl=Translate


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 11, 2012, 07:38:15 AM
Revival of Love? Could this be another Mike penned song?  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 11, 2012, 07:38:41 AM
Looks like a bonus track in Japan:

Copy/paste from translated HMV Japan page:

Songs

1
Think About The Days

2
The God made the radio - God it does to make, the radio

3
Isn't It Time

4
Spring Vacation

5
The Private Life Of Bill And Sue

6
Shelter

7
Daybreak Over The Ocean

8
Beaches In Mind

9
Strange World

10
From There To Back Again

11
Pacific Coast Highway

12
Summer's Gone

13
Revival (2012 [vuajiyon]) of love (bonus track/truck)

http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hmv.co.jp%2Fen%2Fproduct%2Fdetail%2F5045005&lp=ja_en&btnTrUrl=Translate

Meh. Sounds like a remake of Summer of Love with Mike's dreadful lyrics. I hate it already.











 ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 11, 2012, 08:19:18 AM
Revival of Love? Could this be another Mike penned song?  :lol
Can it be Waves of Love?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 11, 2012, 08:27:07 AM
Doea "(2012 [vuajiyon]) " mean '2012 version?'


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 11, 2012, 08:30:25 AM
that's Do It Again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on May 11, 2012, 08:30:51 AM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.

That's quite an achievement for these guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Brian's had some of the melodies in his portfolio for a while, that' the nature of the guy, but for there to be nothing from PCM (previously circulating material) is gosh-darn cool.

OK, hold that thought - I'm 97.423% that "Daybreak" uses at least part of the Mike Love Not War recording: some of the bvs are identical, especially the ones that sound a lot like Christian.

I kinda figured they'd build on that anyway. The harmony sound on that was incredible, sounded just like the BB's.

I really do like Daybreak from 'Unleash The Love/Mike Love Not War' - Very mellow distant relative of 'Kokomo' with Acoustic Guitars and Steel Drums.
Superb 12 second accapella intro 'Bring Back , My Baby' , nice chorus 'As Daybreaks Over The Ocean , Moonlight Still On The Sea , Where The Waves Gentle Motion , Bring My Babe My Baby Back To Me'

Would be interesting to see how much work they have actually done to the original 2003 recording.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on May 11, 2012, 08:41:43 AM
that's Do It Again.
Yeah it's Do It Again, did some rough translating and got "Do again". Glad to see it's surfaced somewhere else other than the Zinepak, even if it's Japan exclusive. Also on amazon.jp


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 11, 2012, 11:38:34 AM
Question for those who have heard the new cd.... are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka:save the day/fairytale, Christine/Living doll..etc?

Couldn't say, as I have heard no such CD.  ::)

Pedantry man, pedantry.

Question for those who've heard the advance review stream: are all the songs 100% original (brand new) expect "daybreak" or have any of the songs/sections of songs evolved from demos that we have heard before Aka: Save The Day/Fairytale, Christine/Living Doll..etc?


;D

My impression is, nothing recycled from previously circulating material.

That's quite an achievement for these guys. I wouldn't be surprised if Brian's had some of the melodies in his portfolio for a while, that' the nature of the guy, but for there to be nothing from PCM (previously circulating material) is gosh-darn cool.

OK, hold that thought - I'm 97.423% that "Daybreak" uses at least part of the Mike Love Not War recording: some of the bvs are identical, especially the ones that sound a lot like Christian.

I kinda figured they'd build on that anyway. The harmony sound on that was incredible, sounded just like the BB's.

I really do like Daybreak from 'Unleash The Love/Mike Love Not War' - Very mellow distant relative of 'Kokomo' with Acoustic Guitars and Steel Drums.
Superb 12 second accapella intro 'Bring Back , My Baby' , nice chorus 'As Daybreaks Over The Ocean , Moonlight Still On The Sea , Where The Waves Gentle Motion , Bring My Babe My Baby Back To Me'

Would be interesting to see how much work they have actually done to the original 2003 recording.  

Was just discussing Daybreak with a couple of posters via email. I think if the end of the album is supposed to be where the heavy stuff is at then it makes sense to have something light before that. I hope AGD's right when he says Christian's vocals are still in there, hopefully there's a cool bridge been added to it aswell.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 11, 2012, 01:43:47 PM
good discussion of the  new album's lead and bgv's over at the Record Room board today, last page of the Mike Love interview thread.  Who sings what, etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 11, 2012, 03:05:04 PM
And it's here :
http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/5


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 11, 2012, 03:07:12 PM
It would seem Andrew is only allowed to talk about the album in any kind of depth over there. Is he getting compensated somehow?  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 11, 2012, 03:47:16 PM
Did I just see a compassion between "FHTBA" and "Surfs Up"?!?

HOLY FU*KING SHOOT.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 11, 2012, 04:33:06 PM
It would seem Andrew is only allowed to talk about the album in any kind of depth over there. Is he getting compensated somehow?  :lol

It may be a case of asking the right questions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 11, 2012, 11:28:00 PM
http://www.hmv.co.jp/en/product/detail/5045005

I just learnt that "Revival of love" = "Do it again (2012)"....  ;/

True or false????


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 12, 2012, 06:54:06 AM
Yes.

Revival = Again

Love = Do It



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 12, 2012, 06:55:45 AM
Yes.

Revival = Again

Love = Do It




 ;D ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 12, 2012, 10:42:32 AM
Love revival... Oh my... Insert bonus track of your own choice...

Endless love
Love will keep us together
All you need is love
Love is all around
Prisoner of love
A world without love
Power of love
Silly love songs

:D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 12, 2012, 10:51:17 AM
Can You Feel Mike Love Tonight?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 12, 2012, 10:53:21 AM
Can You Feel Mike Love Tonight?

If it's all the same to you, I'd really rather not.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 12, 2012, 12:55:00 PM
Have writing credits been posted for Pacific Coast Highway yet?

Just came across a John Phillips song with the same title. Maybe AGD can confirm if they're the same lyrics?

Rollin' along Pacific Coast Highway -
Bummin' along to my radio.
Saw a blond hitchin' my way;
Rolled up and said "How far do you wanna go?"
She'd been hummin', thumbin', hitchin' and wishin'
For a good day on Pacific Coast Highway.
Looked in at me; and when I could see her,
She seemed to be somebody I ought to know.
Opened the door; sat down beside me.
Then with a roar, we started to roll.
She'd been hummin', thumbin', hitchin' and wishin'
For a good day on Pacific Coast Highway.
Looked like a swan, but brown as Chuck Berry -
A summer's dawn, yeah, light as a fairy.
We got to town; she said her name was Mary.
She'd been hit, she'd been whipped,
She'd been hummin', she's been bummin' all her life.
(On the highway - On and on)
(On the highway - On and on)

Probably a coincidence…  apologies if this has been mentioned before.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 12, 2012, 01:18:59 PM
Not. Even. Close.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 12, 2012, 01:30:54 PM
Looked like a swan, but brown as Chuck Berry -

Let us take a moment and thank God that these lyrics won't be on this upcoming album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 12, 2012, 03:20:47 PM
Have writing credits been posted for Pacific Coast Highway yet?

Just came across a John Phillips song with the same title. Maybe AGD can confirm if they're the same lyrics?

Rollin' along Pacific Coast Highway -
Bummin' along to my radio.
Saw a blond hitchin' my way;
Rolled up and said "How far do you wanna go?"
She'd been hummin', thumbin', hitchin' and wishin'
For a good day on Pacific Coast Highway.
Looked in at me; and when I could see her,
She seemed to be somebody I ought to know.
Opened the door; sat down beside me.
Then with a roar, we started to roll.
She'd been hummin', thumbin', hitchin' and wishin'
For a good day on Pacific Coast Highway.
Looked like a swan, but brown as Chuck Berry -
A summer's dawn, yeah, light as a fairy.
We got to town; she said her name was Mary.
She'd been hit, she'd been whipped,
She'd been hummin', she's been bummin' all her life.
(On the highway - On and on)
(On the highway - On and on)

Probably a coincidence…  apologies if this has been mentioned before.

There is also a Burt Bacharach song by the same name, although there are no lyrics for it to my knowledge.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjU4kpWJC1c


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 12, 2012, 03:28:10 PM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 12, 2012, 03:35:30 PM
I put my foot down a couple years ago and refused to buy any of the greatest hits albums that only have a dozen or so songs, because I just couldn't think of a good reason to buy any of them when I already have everyone of those songs multiple times. 


I also have to put my foot down about ordering from QVC.  I just can't do it.


I may actually be afraid though that I'll get hooked like all those people on Hoarders I see that order so much stuff from QVC that they can no longer open their front door. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 13, 2012, 11:10:23 AM
so if we buy from QVC and we have a pre-order on amazon we just submit to buying the album in 2 venues?  sounds good to me


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 13, 2012, 12:17:13 PM
Did I just see a compassion between "FHTBA" and "Surfs Up"?!?

HOLY FU*KING SHOOT.

summ-a-briz just said it's comparable to midnight's another day, just with the beach boys.  That's about what i was hoping for!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 13, 2012, 12:32:05 PM
Did I just see a compassion between "FHTBA" and "Surfs Up"?!?

HOLY FU*KING SHOOT.

summ-a-briz just said it's comparable to midnight's another day, just with the beach boys.  That's about what i was hoping for!

I think that's more likely, and it's good cause that's what i've been wishin' for! can't wait to hear this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 13, 2012, 01:07:12 PM
How about these lyrics of this Courtney Love song? Is this the same as The Beach Boys' Pacific Coast Highway?

I knew a boy, he came from the sea
He was the only boy who ever knew the truth about me

I’m overwhelmed and undersexed
Oh baby what did you expect?
I’m over rod and so disgraced
And too ashamed to show my face

And they’re coming to take me away
What I want I will never have
I’m on the Pacific Coast Highway
With your gun in my hands


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 13, 2012, 01:11:32 PM
How about these lyrics of this Courtney Love song? Is this the same as The Beach Boys' Pacific Coast Highway?

I knew a boy, he came from the sea
He was the only boy who ever knew the truth about me

I’m overwhelmed and undersexed
Oh baby what did you expect?
I’m over rod and so disgraced
And too ashamed to show my face

And they’re coming to take me away
What I want I will never have
I’m on the Pacific Coast Highway
With your gun in my hands


Oh, totally.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 13, 2012, 01:18:46 PM
How about these lyrics of this Courtney Love song? Is this the same as The Beach Boys' Pacific Coast Highway?

I knew a boy, he came from the sea
He was the only boy who ever knew the truth about me

I’m overwhelmed and undersexed
Oh baby what did you expect?
I’m over rod and so disgraced
And too ashamed to show my face

And they’re coming to take me away
What I want I will never have
I’m on the Pacific Coast Highway
With your gun in my hands

Yup, that's it, them's the lyrics.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 13, 2012, 08:33:55 PM
Apparently, "From Here To Back Again" is as good as "Midnights Another Day"
With beach boys vocals...

Wow. Wasn't expecting that :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 13, 2012, 08:53:30 PM
For years, people have said that Brian's solo records would be improved with the Beach Boys' voices. Against all expectations, it seems like the Beach Boys album we're getting is essentially a BW solo project (with a couple of ML lyrics and one ML-composed song), featuring the group's vocals.

In a way, this is amazing. It's something Carl wouldn't allow back in the mid-90s. But it's heartening to see that the group has basically allowed BW free reign in the studio. It doesn't guarantee a good album, but it makes it more likely than a hodgepodge of tracks written by everyone in the group.

That being said, if they want to do a followup, working more collaboratively would be a great way to go. I'd love to hear BW collabs with Al again, or even Dave! That would take some serious effort and time, though. It's good that for this project, when they had a tight schedule, that they basically took a BW solo project and put their voices on it. Some of the best BB albums are like that!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 13, 2012, 09:21:33 PM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

I just think, like most of the rest of the album is just Scott Bennett writing "confessional" lyrics for Brian and just trying to write something like "'Til I Die."  This was something Brian apparently wrote as an up-tempo thing, and Scott apparently decided they should slow it down and make it a slower thing. It just seems to be indicative of what we don't want to happen with Brian (i.e. people messing with his creations to better suit what their image of him should be. The rest of the music on the album, besides "Southern California" seems good, but honestly, the only good lyrics seem to come from "Good Kind of Love" (written by just Brian) and "Live Let Live" (written by Brian and Van Dyke), whereas the rest just seem like it trying to be a thing about Brian's "story", which I don't think Brian honestly wants.

So what I'm saying, is I hope the new Beach Boys album is good, and I hope "From There To Back Again" is as good as everybody says. I just hope the album is what Brian and the boys really want, and not what they think others want.

For years, people have said that Brian's solo records would be improved with the Beach Boys' voices. Against all expectations, it seems like the Beach Boys album we're getting is essentially a BW solo project (with a couple of ML lyrics and one ML-composed song), featuring the group's vocals.

In a way, this is amazing. It's something Carl wouldn't allow back in the mid-90s. But it's heartening to see that the group has basically allowed BW free reign in the studio. It doesn't guarantee a good album, but it makes it more likely than a hodgepodge of tracks written by everyone in the group.

That being said, if they want to do a followup, working more collaboratively would be a great way to go. I'd love to hear BW collabs with Al again, or even Dave! That would take some serious effort and time, though. It's good that for this project, when they had a tight schedule, that they basically took a BW solo project and put their voices on it. Some of the best BB albums are like that!

I sure hope they do indeed do a followup, and it would be cool if Brian worked with Al on some material, or even if they ended up putting out that thing that Mike wanted to work on with Dave. I think its great that this album seems to be Brian-centric, which is probably what most of us wanted, but I wouldn't mind something that had more creative from the other guys too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 13, 2012, 09:27:24 PM
For years, people have said that Brian's solo records would be improved with the Beach Boys' voices. Against all expectations, it seems like the Beach Boys album we're getting is essentially a BW solo project (with a couple of ML lyrics and one ML-composed song), featuring the group's vocals.

In a way, this is amazing. It's something Carl wouldn't allow back in the mid-90s. But it's heartening to see that the group has basically allowed BW free reign in the studio.

...To be fair, the other boys have said the record label got to choose which songs would make the album.  Capitol may well have consciously decided to make it Brian-centric...  or rather, Brian-and-Mike-centric, since presumably Mike is doing lyrics for some of these new Brian numbers.  If they're taking the angle of "the team that brought you Good Vibrations, writing together again for the first time in decades", fair enough...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 13, 2012, 09:36:00 PM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

Because the album and that song in particular are very well done. And the song affects a lot of folks on a very deep level -- including Brian.

...To be fair, the other boys have said the record label got to choose which songs would make the album.

I think this should be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. Over at the Record Room, a poster who interviewed Mike, Bruce and Brian has said the other guys actually know very little about the album or its creation, besides adding their voices.

I suspect that all of the Brian Wilson-written songs available were used, and I suspect that was part of the deal made between Brian's team and Mike to make this whole situation happen. Brian gets to run the record, and Mike gets to run the tour. Everyone's happy.




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 13, 2012, 09:57:49 PM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

I also don't get it. I can't even listen to MAD, i find it insipid and unbearably corny. I think it's an ugly melody and chord progression, and leaves a lot to be desired. The whole arrangement bores me, and the backing vocals sound so cheap. Though i do like the short section with glockenspiel and sleigh bells, i think that's pretty. But not enough to listen to the whole song.  :(

I wonder if the people who are drawing comparisons to MAD are referring more to a general tone rather than anything concretely musical?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 13, 2012, 10:09:45 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 13, 2012, 10:16:28 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)
I sometimes wonder why the beautiful and poignant "Southern California" off the same album doesn't receive as much praise as the aforementioned "MAD".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 13, 2012, 10:32:10 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)

Do you think MAD is better than Melt Away?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 13, 2012, 10:35:52 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)
I sometimes wonder why the beautiful and poignant "Southern California" off the same album doesn't receive as much praise as the aforementioned "MAD".

"Southern California" is too much of a "Love and Mercy" rewrite for me.

MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)

Do you think MAD is better than Melt Away?

I've always found Melt Away insipid and unbearably corny. I think it's an ugly melody and chord progression, and leaves a lot to be desired. The whole arrangement bores me, and the backing vocals sound so cheap. Though i do like the tag section, i think that's pretty. But not enough to listen to the whole song.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 13, 2012, 10:55:07 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)

Do you think MAD is better than Melt Away?

ooooo that's a tough one.  You've picked the one tune from the other solos I really like  ;D. *chomps crow* but, i think MAD is more genuine if that makes sense.  Well I guess it won't since we're on opposite ends of the song.  I prefer the melody and structure of MAD, and there's a lot of production aspects that hold Melt Away back for me.  If the Brian of today rearranged it (and re-recorded vocals), I may have a different answer, but I doubt it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 13, 2012, 11:03:26 PM
MAD is the best brian tune since the 70s easy.  It's the one song on TLOS that you can tell Brian pushed him on.  That song and live let die are by far the highlights.  calling it "insipid" and "corny", is laughable to me, especially with all the music that's come out that IS like that (see every other brian wilson solo album. especially imagination *groan*)

Do you think MAD is better than Melt Away?

ooooo that's a tough one.  You've picked the one tune from the other solos I really like  ;D. *chomps crow* but, i think MAD is more genuine if that makes sense.  Well I guess it won't since we're on opposite ends of the song.  I prefer the melody and structure of MAD, and there's a lot of production aspects that hold Melt Away back for me.  If the Brian of today rearranged it (and re-recorded vocals), I may have a different answer, but I doubt it. 

So how do you feel about the version of Melt Away on IJWMFTT? See, that one does nothing for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 13, 2012, 11:13:04 PM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

I also don't get it. I can't even listen to MAD, i find it insipid and unbearably corny. I think it's an ugly melody and chord progression, and leaves a lot to be desired. The whole arrangement bores me, and the backing vocals sound so cheap. Though i do like the short section with glockenspiel and sleigh bells, i think that's pretty. But not enough to listen to the whole song.  :(

I wonder if the people who are drawing comparisons to MAD are referring more to a general tone rather than anything concretely musical?

I quite like MAD musically; lyrically though it wore off early - too many, far too many metaphors... I mean, are you a flag without a wind that took a dive but couldn't swim (a swimming flag?) but with a diamond for a soul? Hmm...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 01:38:00 AM
I'm also in the camp that thinks Midnight's Another Day is extremely overrated. the version of Live Let Live on the Arctic Tale soundtrack is probably Brian's best recent song. the TLOS version just plods slowly though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 14, 2012, 01:42:38 AM
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llgnxwrmNM1qfxadao1_1280.png)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 14, 2012, 01:44:11 AM
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llgnxwrmNM1qfxadao1_1280.png)

Goodbye Beach Boys, Hello Rent Boys


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 14, 2012, 03:12:44 AM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

I also don't get it. I can't even listen to MAD, i find it insipid and unbearably corny. I think it's an ugly melody and chord progression, and leaves a lot to be desired. The whole arrangement bores me, and the backing vocals sound so cheap. Though i do like the short section with glockenspiel and sleigh bells, i think that's pretty. But not enough to listen to the whole song.  :(

I wonder if the people who are drawing comparisons to MAD are referring more to a general tone rather than anything concretely musical?

I quite like MAD musically; lyrically though it wore off early - too many, far too many metaphors... I mean, are you a flag without a wind that took a dive but couldn't swim (a swimming flag?) but with a diamond for a soul? Hmm...


Yeah the lyrics are pretty terrible but this is true of so many of my favourite BB/BW tunes that I can easily excuse them.

The melody though and the way it soars on the chorus is uplifting in the way that only a BW classic can be. I don't care for much of TLOS, but this song in particular (and Message Man) proved to me that he still had a lot of the skills in tact.

I'm really excited to see the best song from this upcoming album compared to MAD, but with BB vocals, and that AGD is claiming the album to be the best since Holland. I don't believe for a minute that I'll agree, but it has certainly raised my expectations!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 03:49:30 AM
Song writing wise, MAD is the best BW song since "Melt Away" and with no doubt is the most effort he's put into a song in a LONG time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 03:51:45 AM
"Less desolation, more resignation. And a poppy tag. :-)"

Oh Andrew... He's watching you all complain about MAD ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 14, 2012, 03:58:13 AM
I guess I just don't get it, but I don't understand all the love for "Midnight's Another Day" or TLOS as a whole. Especially "Midnight's..."

Because the album and that song in particular are very well done. And the song affects a lot of folks on a very deep level -- including Brian.

...To be fair, the other boys have said the record label got to choose which songs would make the album.

I think this should be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. Over at the Record Room, a poster who interviewed Mike, Bruce and Brian has said the other guys actually know very little about the album or its creation, besides adding their voices.

I suspect that all of the Brian Wilson-written songs available were used, and I suspect that was part of the deal made between Brian's team and Mike to make this whole situation happen. Brian gets to run the record, and Mike gets to run the tour. Everyone's happy.





I find it odd that the guys would go around letting people see they don't know much about the songs. Not even Mike has plugged Daybreak so far. Dontcha think they know they have just finished a great one? My guess is that they will hype this album like crazy in due time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 14, 2012, 06:19:17 AM
Yeah, I think most of you guys nailed it. It's really the lyrics that bother me. To me, its a second-rate "'Til I Die" lyrically. Scott's lyrics on TLOS generally just suck. Musically, maybe I should re-listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 06:54:14 AM
I think think the lyrics on TLOS are far and away the best of Brian's solo career.  There's some dud's on it, but nothing on it was distractingly bad (well maybe mexican girl) like on a lot of Brian's music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 07:14:21 AM
Mr. Carlin chimed in

Peter Ames Carlin ‏ @peteramescarlin
Still thinking about that new Beach Boys album. It's really a fascinating work, in a lot of ways. Unexpected. To me. More soon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 14, 2012, 07:17:02 AM
I think think the lyrics on TLOS are far and away the best of Brian's solo career.  There's some dud's on it, but nothing on it was distractingly bad (well maybe mexican girl) like on a lot of Brian's music.

I know it's not the right thread, but (imo) too many people dislike Mexican Girl. I love everything about that track!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 07:23:26 AM
"Less desolation, more resignation. And a poppy tag. :-)"

Oh Andrew... He's watching you all complain about MAD ;)

Not complaining - to these ears "MAD" is one of the best things Brian's done since "Sail On, Sailor", but it's very dark and desolate. "From There To Back Again" is more reflective, mellow, wistful and resigned. And yes, it is up there with "MAD". Well, I think so, anyway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 07:27:11 AM
Chance to hear a couple of previews:

http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1 (http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1)

In the 13-5-2012 box click on "11.00 - 12.00" and they're after about 5.30


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 14, 2012, 07:33:42 AM
Holy sh*t!

From There To Back Again Think About The Days kicks ass.

I think I like Spring Vacation. This is a pleasant surprise. Terrible lyrics in places, mind.

Are there any more?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 07:34:10 AM
heard 2 seconds and decided to wait. GAAAH.   thanks though Sir AGD.  so everyone else start talking about it so i can read lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 07:39:16 AM
Holy sh*t!

From There To Back Again kicks ass.

I think I like Spring Vacation. This is a pleasant surprise. Terrible lyrics in places, mind.

Are there any more?

Eloquently stated, sir. Er... except the first one is "Think About The Days".

And yes, there are 10 more. On the album.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 14, 2012, 07:39:53 AM
Holy sh*t!

From There To Back Again kicks ass.

I think I like Spring Vacation. This is a pleasant surprise. Terrible lyrics in places, mind.

Are there any more?

Eloquently stated, sir.


Well, I wouldn't want to give TOO much away  ;)

And whoops..... Of course, now we are quoting all these posts I can't go back and correct my stupid error. Chalk it up to excitement....



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 14, 2012, 07:44:16 AM
Chance to hear a couple of previews:

http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1 (http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1)

In the 13-5-2012 box click on "11.00 - 12.00" and they're after about 5.30

Fantastic. Thanks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 14, 2012, 07:48:59 AM
Thanks a lot for sharing this link AGD!

My thoughts:
Think About The Days is a nice little intro to the album, nothing earth shattering and certainly no Our Prayer or even Meant For You. But still: nice and inoffensive. I think it might be better in the flow of the album than on it's own.

The music to Spring Vacation is alright and it's nice to think of Mike and Brian getting together again to write some songs, but the lyrics are absolutely disgusting.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 07:49:27 AM
Thanks for the link.

"Think About The Days" is wonderful and lovely. "Spring Vacation" has charming (albeit heavily autotuned) moments (Halelu-who-ooooo-yah) but seems pretty ho-hum.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 07:53:16 AM
Thanks a lot for sharing this link AGD!

My thoughts:
Think About The Days is a nice little intro to the album, nothing earth shattering and certainly no Our Prayer or even Meant For You. But still: nice and inoffensive. I think it might be better in the flow of the album than on it's own.

As a prelude to "From There To Back Again/Pacific Coast Highway/Summer's Gone", it's fit and proper.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 14, 2012, 07:54:23 AM
It sounds like something Bruce would write, doesn't it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 07:58:12 AM
Ah... 22 days before it's released, the backlash starts here.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on May 14, 2012, 07:59:06 AM
"Think About The Days" - absolutely beautiful (did I hear some of the melody before? Can't remember the song and why, but the fairytale EP comes to mind).
"Spring Vacation", better than expected after knowing some of the lyrics. A 2000's production like you would hear it on the radio, like it better than TWGMTR.
What's the name of the guitar song? Sweet vocal by Mike.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 14, 2012, 08:00:05 AM
As a prelude to "From There To Back Again/Pacific Coast Highway/Summer's Gone", it's fit and proper.
Great!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: CarlTheVoice on May 14, 2012, 08:06:36 AM
Think About The Days is amazing! Proper Beach Boys sound there! It's a shame it isn't longer! Spring Vacation? The lyrics are a bit lazy in places but generally good! I can't wait to hear more now. Considering they have been around for 50 years, are all around 70, haven't worked together for decades and are missing two founding members, I am impressed!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 14, 2012, 08:09:03 AM
Ah... 22 days before it's released, the backlash starts here.  ;D

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 08:09:18 AM
Think About The Days is amazing! Proper Beach Boys sound there! It's a shame it isn't longer! Spring Vacation? The lyrics are a bit lazy in places but generally good! I can't wait to hear more now. Considering they have been around for 50 years, are all around 70, haven't worked together for decades and are missing two founding members, I am impressed!

Yes, if Spring Vacation is the worst we have to fear then I am pretty excited.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 14, 2012, 08:11:01 AM
Ah... 22 days before it's released, the backlash starts here.  ;D
Not from me, these samples are great. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 14, 2012, 08:12:26 AM
What songs are featured in this preview? I don't want to spoil the album too much for myself.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 08:14:56 AM
What songs are featured in this preview? I don't want to spoil the album too much for myself.

Think About The Days (track #1)
Spring Vacation (#4)

I like "SV" in a kinda guilty pleasures way.




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 14, 2012, 08:17:09 AM
Think About The Days (track #1)
Spring Vacation (#4)

I like "SV" in a kinda guilty pleasures way.
Thanks, Andrew. I saw someone mistakenly refer to "From There To Back Again" being part of the preview.

I actually dig "Spring Vacation". Brian's vocals sound great here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaspy on May 14, 2012, 08:21:04 AM
What, the third song isn't even by the BB's?
Darm, I liked that one best. ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 08:35:23 AM
What, the third song isn't even by the BB's?
Darm, I liked that one best. ;D

The songs are played back to back.  Think About the Days and Spring Vacation.  There is a Norah Jones song first, then the 2 BB's songs back to back. 

Love Think about the Days for what it is intended to be, part of the whole.  As for SV, I am with you guys.  Better than expected.  Great vocals by Brian, brought a little smile to my face.  Can't wait for the rest... 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 14, 2012, 08:43:21 AM
Well, the theme for this Reunion album is reunion itself. And seems to be done in a pretty classy way.

TATD... Beautiful. Brian is actually singing falsetto in a new BB song. I'm speechless.

SV... I like that one very much. Can't forget the bashing this one got when a snippet leaked. Shame on you, people! I think the lyrics, in their expected simplicity, are sincere as hell. This guys mean what they're singing. And it shows.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 08:44:52 AM
"Spring Vacation" I cannot even bring myself to like guiltily.

I like almost everything else I've heard so far, though!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 08:48:10 AM
"Spring Vacation" I cannot even bring myself to like guiltily.

I like almost everything else I've heard so far, though!

OK, I give up.  Where are these?  All I heard were SV and TATD...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on May 14, 2012, 08:55:51 AM
Apart from the 90s boyband lyrics to SV, these two tunes are way better than i expected.

:)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 14, 2012, 09:00:39 AM
brian singing were back together. mike: the past is behind us; this is beautiful : every artist has a right to a manifesto, even it's heavy with references to their corpus. our whoel lives are full of those references. . . . .

hey, what's it to you!!??

I am in heaven with this. listen to Dave rip a solo of spring vacation!!

wow

got to go to work. . . .


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 09:01:45 AM
"Spring Vacation" I cannot even bring myself to like guiltily.

I like almost everything else I've heard so far, though!

OK, I give up.  Where are these?  All I heard were SV and TATD...

Hmm, rather than answer my question, Mr. Old Rake edited out his comments about all of the other tunes on the album. If you heard an advance stream, just tell us what think about it ala AGD.  We just want the info, my friend...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 09:02:22 AM
I love what I'm hearing so far. Just beautifully assembled Sunshine Pop. Sorry to those who don't dig it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 14, 2012, 09:05:05 AM
To me (and I've only heard the new single) The Boys should definitely stay together for a second album.  I'd be happy if they quit the tours and just focused on studio work.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 09:06:10 AM
brian singing were back together. mike: the past is behind us; this is beautiful : every artist has a right to a manifesto, even it's heavy with references to their corpus. our whoel lives are full of those references. . . . .

hey, what's it to you!!??

I am in heaven with this. listen to Dave rip a solo of spring vacation!!

wow

got to go to work. . . .

As the man says:

"As for the past, it’s all behind us
Happier now, look where life finds us
Singing our songs is enough reason
Harmony boys is what we believe in
Some said it wouldn’t last
All we can say is we’re still having a blast"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 09:15:21 AM
I love both tunes. Spring Vacation is much better than what I imagined. Glad it was autobiographical and not about the girls in sunny Florida or Mexico. I can't get over how good Mike & Brian sound. The studio is a wonderful thing. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 09:29:52 AM
"Spring Vacation" I cannot even bring myself to like guiltily.

I like almost everything else I've heard so far, though!

OK, I give up.  Where are these?  All I heard were SV and TATD...

Hmm, rather than answer my question, Mr. Old Rake edited out his comments about all of the other tunes on the album. If you heard an advance stream, just tell us what think about it ala AGD.  We just want the info, my friend...

It's just the two songs previewed; nothing else.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 14, 2012, 09:30:46 AM
Think About The Days does sound very Bruce, doesn't it, with a little McCartney around the edges? Not my kind of thing, but I can see it working in the context of an album.
Spring Vacation, though... I don't want to judge it too harshly on a very lossy stream, but it sounded exactly like I thought the song would sound from the video clip that went round a little while ago. All that splashy hi-hat or cymbal work (couldn't tell for sure on a dodgy stream through computer speakers and the general production sound made it sound like the theme for an unsuccessful mid-90s US sitcom...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 09:33:55 AM
"Spring Vacation" I cannot even bring myself to like guiltily.

I like almost everything else I've heard so far, though!

OK, I give up.  Where are these?  All I heard were SV and TATD...

Hmm, rather than answer my question, Mr. Old Rake edited out his comments about all of the other tunes on the album. If you heard an advance stream, just tell us what think about it ala AGD.  We just want the info, my friend...

It's just the two songs previewed; nothing else.

I know that, which is why I wondered why he had comments about every other song on the album....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 09:35:30 AM
Think About The Days does sound very Bruce, doesn't it, with a little McCartney around the edges? Not my kind of thing, but I can see it working in the context of an album.
Spring Vacation, though... I don't want to judge it too harshly on a very lossy stream, but it sounded exactly like I thought the song would sound from the video clip that went round a little while ago. All that splashy hi-hat or cymbal work (couldn't tell for sure on a dodgy stream through computer speakers and the general production sound made it sound like the theme for an unsuccessful mid-90s US sitcom...

Ok, so that is 2 out of the 3 songs so far you don't like?  SV and THWGMTR, right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 09:38:18 AM
Think About The Days does sound very Bruce, doesn't it, with a little McCartney around the edges? Not my kind of thing, but I can see it working in the context of an album.
Spring Vacation, though... I don't want to judge it too harshly on a very lossy stream, but it sounded exactly like I thought the song would sound from the video clip that went round a little while ago. All that splashy hi-hat or cymbal work (couldn't tell for sure on a dodgy stream through computer speakers and the general production sound made it sound like the theme for an unsuccessful mid-90s US sitcom...

Ok, so that is 2 out of the 3 songs so far you don't like?  SV and THWGMTR, right?

well 3, cause he doesn't like TATD on its own either.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 09:47:30 AM
you are correct sir.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 09:55:16 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dancing Bear on May 14, 2012, 09:57:51 AM
"Think About the Days", while not having a strong tune, is gorgeous. It reminds me of those Judee Sill baroque wordless tunes.

"Spring Vacation" doesn't rock my world, but it's definetly listenable and pleasant. It makes a lot of difference that the chorus has that kind of attack. Kinda like "Yes I believe it!" in "He Come Down". I say it's a good song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 14, 2012, 09:59:30 AM
Yeah, I'm not impressed with anything I've heard so far. I'm glad other people are, though, and certainly don't want to spoil it for anyone else.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 14, 2012, 10:02:56 AM
Spring Vacation is better than I thought it was gonna be.
Still sounds like it came out of the mid 90s though!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 10:05:48 AM
Both better than I expected, esp. "Think About the Days" which I find just beautiful.  I do hope "Spring Vacation" is the only song where Mike plugs in "good vibrations" or other old song titles...obvious and lazy songwriting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 14, 2012, 10:08:33 AM
Well, the theme for this Reunion album is reunion itself. And seems to be done in a pretty classy way.

TATD... Beautiful. Brian is actually singing falsetto in a new BB song. I'm speechless.

SV... I like that one very much. Can't forget the bashing this one got when a snippet leaked. Shame on you, people! I think the lyrics, in their expected simplicity, are sincere as hell. This guys mean what they're singing. And it shows.

lol...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 10:13:08 AM
Extra slick production, vocally and instrumentally, but we expected that.

Otherwise, better than I dared hope. Vacation is charming fluff and much hookier than the clip.

TATD reminds me very much of Brian and Joe's 97 take on Joy to the World. Not a bad thing!

I can also say, despite the doubts I raised earlier, this sure sounds like a JT co-production.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 14, 2012, 10:17:49 AM
Yeah man, that production .. dear lord

but anyway, these are the full songs, aren't they ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 14, 2012, 10:19:45 AM
No. Spring Vacation actually has a Hey Jude style fade with 7 keychanges and is 13 minutes long.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 10:20:10 AM
Yeah man, that production .. dear lord

but anyway, these are the full songs, aren't they ?

digging your avatar ziggy


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 14, 2012, 10:21:29 AM
Ok so it's the full songs.

Yeah man, that production .. dear lord

but anyway, these are the full songs, aren't they ?

digging your avatar ziggy

Haha yeah thanks, love Alex Ross work.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 10:22:32 AM
Both songs sound incredible..

"Spring vacation" is a real guilty pleasure, classic Mike..

Brian's vocals are great


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 10:23:37 AM
Thanks for the link !!

Is that David singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days or Al (hope you know what I mean)?



EDIT:

Dig that stuff !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Quzi on May 14, 2012, 10:24:22 AM
TADT's beauty speaks for itself methinks. Even though Spring Vacation's lyrics are a tad trite and the production not very Beach Boys like, I can kinda dig it, it has a nice bouncy 'Bruce will try to start a clap when played live' vibe to it. It's Summer in Paradise done right I'd say. I can do with one of these 'let's reference old hits!' tracks, but please God, let this be the only one!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 14, 2012, 10:25:39 AM
Spring Vacation reminds me of Do you have any regrets.

Am I right or wrong?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 14, 2012, 10:29:06 AM
I don't hear it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 10:30:51 AM
Thanks for the link !!

Is that David singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days or Al (hope you know what I mean)?

Nope - nor is it Mike, Bruce or Jeff.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 10:32:32 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 14, 2012, 10:35:44 AM
Spring Vacation reminds me of Do you have any regrets.

Am I right or wrong?
I don't hear it.
I do.

(I just had to. :))


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 10:36:03 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 10:37:14 AM
Thanks for the link !!

Is that David singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days or Al (hope you know what I mean)?

Nope - nor is it Mike, Bruce or Jeff.  :)


I'm just listening with headphones. The words I meant are do-do-do-do (if that makes any sense). Sounds now like Al to me. Is it really Brian ? I mean the very first voice


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on May 14, 2012, 10:37:24 AM
"Think About the Days" -- a total jaw-dropper -- WOW!




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 10:40:27 AM
Thanks for the link !!

Is that David singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days or Al (hope you know what I mean)?

Nope - nor is it Mike, Bruce or Jeff.  :)


I'm just listening with headphones. The words I meant are do-do-do-do (if that makes any sense). Sounds now like Al to me. Is it really Brian ? I mean the very first voice

Murry.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 10:41:03 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 10:42:16 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it

I believe you're mistaken.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 10:45:07 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it

If you really can't hear at least Bruce on there (hint: falsetto), may I respectfully suggest an audiologists appointment asap ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on May 14, 2012, 10:46:16 AM
First song is really lovely. Spring Vacation...um.

Oh, I definitely hear Bruce on that first song. No one does that high "Love Surround Me" vocal like him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 14, 2012, 10:46:32 AM
Spring Vacation is horrendous.

Horrendous production

Horrendous autotune

Horrendous lyrics

Horrendous guitar solo


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 14, 2012, 10:48:30 AM
Spring Vacation is horrendous.

Horrendous production

Horrendous autotune

Horrendous lyrics

Horrendous guitar solo


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 10:50:40 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it

If you really can't hear at least Bruce on there (hint: falsetto), may I respectfully suggest an audiologists appointment asap ?
I think he misread your response  in "Reply 2225"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on May 14, 2012, 10:54:51 AM
Holy cow, though. I only listened once and that Spring Vacation song won't leave my mind, even though I don't particularly like it. Weird. Catchy little number, I'll give them that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 14, 2012, 10:57:09 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it

I only listened to it twice, through poor-quality laptop speakers, but Al definitely sings lead and Bruce is all over it. I think I remember Mike being quite audible, too. In fact my first thought was "this sounds a *lot* more like the Beach Boys than That's Why God Made The Radio did".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 10:58:06 AM
The lack of Beach Boys harmonies in "Think about the days" is slightly disappointing

i was under the impression it was a purely harmony song?? (i'm not listening to the clips)

It is but I mean I'm disappointed , Mike, Al, Bruce and David aren't on it

If you really can't hear at least Bruce on there (hint: falsetto), may I respectfully suggest an audiologists appointment asap ?
I think he misread your response  in "Reply 2225"

What's to mis-read in the sentence I replied to: "singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days" ? Unless English isn't his first language, no excuse.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 14, 2012, 10:59:20 AM
If there's still time - ditch Spring Vacation from the record.

Think About The Days is nice. Must be a Bruce. I think I hear Brian on some of the falsetto as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 14, 2012, 11:00:29 AM
Spring Vacation is horrendous.

Horrendous production

Horrendous autotune

Horrendous lyrics

Horrendous guitar solo

I wanted to like it, I really did. I don't mind a bit of pitch correction, but this is just horrid. This must have been purposeful, as when pitch correction is used like this, it is stylistic, rather than correctional.

Maybe they're trying to appeal to the kids.

Oh well, Judging by the first track, they're trying to keep the fans happy as well.

I'll definitely be flicking past Spring Vacation though. I found it physically painful.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 14, 2012, 11:01:30 AM
Thanks for the link !!

Is that David singing the "lead" di-dims on Think About The Days or Al (hope you know what I mean)?

Nope - nor is it Mike, Bruce or Jeff.  :)


I'm just listening with headphones. The words I meant are do-do-do-do (if that makes any sense). Sounds now like Al to me. Is it really Brian ? I mean the very first voice

Murry.

 :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on May 14, 2012, 11:02:59 AM
BLOODY WOW , I've now played these 2 songs about 10 times and if SV is the ( supposed ) weakest song the album then what are we in for ?? Great stuff , SV is really catchy.
My only gripe , why couldn't they have been performed in German  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:05:14 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: atroxi on May 14, 2012, 11:06:49 AM
Anyone got any popcorn?   :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on May 14, 2012, 11:06:59 AM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer". Given that Joe Thomas reportedly contributed the heavily "Loves Lies Bleeding"-derived coda to "Sunshine" (on IMAGINATION), I am to assume that Mr. Thomas wrote some of the music to "Spring Vacation"?

This song is about as insipid as I imagined it would be, but "Think About The Days" is completely left-field; perhaps the most mournful track the Beach Boys ever released.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:08:29 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming shitstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:10:01 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.

Cheers, Andrew!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:10:41 AM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 14, 2012, 11:12:50 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.

Reading those credits made me really sad, for some reason.
Maybe 'cause it's (possibly) the last Beach Boys album and Joe Thomas' name is all over it.
Doesn't mean it won't be great (I like a lot of Imagination), but...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paul J B on May 14, 2012, 11:13:04 AM
TATD is a great opening for the first BB album in decades. I loved it. I don't want to hear it again though until the album is released. Spring Vacation really seems like it could have been a not so great track on Imagination. But I think TWGMTR is pretty good and that opening number is really sad and really cool. I'm back to a "glass half full" approach to the record now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on May 14, 2012, 11:13:38 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.


John Bon Jovi ????? Christ we are Living On A prayer  :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:16:49 AM
Can we keep the full info over there for a bit, rather than reposting it here? Just a small request!
It is great that the first critical reactions to the album were shared before the songwriting credits.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 14, 2012, 11:17:03 AM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".
Good one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on May 14, 2012, 11:17:37 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.

Reading those credits made me really sad, for some reason.
Maybe 'cause it's (possibly) the last Beach Boys album and Joe Thomas' name is all over it.
Doesn't mean it won't be great (I like a lot of Imagination), but...

Hey don't worry , Mike will in about 30 years claim that he co-wrote them  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:23:53 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.


John Bon Jovi ????? Christ we are Living On A prayer  :o

Stay your fears - you'd never know to listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 11:27:15 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.

well don't feel the need to edit yourself.  If you have heard bits and bobs that's more than the rest of us, so share your thoughts, they are welcomed here...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 14, 2012, 11:27:40 AM
 I hope this won't be their last album, because there definitely needs to be one more with songs written by the band members with Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 11:32:51 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.

well don't feel the need to edit yourself.  If you have heard bits and bobs that's more than the rest of us, so share your thoughts, they are welcomed here...

I *can* tell you that any worry about Bon Jovi's involvement in "Summer's Gone" can be allayed. Because it's remarkable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:34:02 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.

Let us know what you think on the RR, contardo!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:36:52 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.

well don't feel the need to edit yourself.  If you have heard bits and bobs that's more than the rest of us, so share your thoughts, they are welcomed here...

I *can* tell you that any worry about Bon Jovi's involvement in "Summer's Gone" can be allayed. Because it's remarkable.

As are the two preceding tracks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on May 14, 2012, 11:37:07 AM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".

It's really only a few notes, but that section of the song immediately reminded me of a similar phrase in the Elton John track. Since the "Sunshine" coda was quite similar to Elton John's "Love Lies Bleeding", I wondered if Mr. Thomas has an affinity for Mr. John's compositions.

Obviously, it's impossible to write a completely new melody that doesn't have something in common with what came before and I have no problem with the melodies of either "Spring Vacation" or "Sunshine".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:38:13 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 14, 2012, 11:39:35 AM
So no songs by either David, Alan, or Bruce made it to the record... very disappointed about this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 11:41:01 AM

I haven't heard a stream. I've heard bits and bobs of the songs via a telephone conversation with a friend. That's it. Not enough to judge, really, and so I edited my comments. I can say, though, that lots of what I heard was better than "Spring Vacation." Just in case folks are worried.

Let us know what you think on the RR, contardo!

I WILL DAMMIT


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 11:41:44 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

Well, and with no "Sunshine." THANK THE LORD.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 14, 2012, 11:42:23 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

I'm not the biggest "Imagination" fan, but I'm staying positive. I really like two of the three tracks I've heard so far. And I can forgive them the modern sound on Spring Vacation. They are, first and foremost, a pop act.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on May 14, 2012, 11:42:46 AM
One thing I would like to have heard on "Spring Vacation" is just one voice singing a lead line, instead of multiple voices each and every line. Hopefully, there are some "naked" vocals on other songs on the album. As much as I love hearing the BBs sing harmony, I really like hearing their individual voices shine through too (even if their age is starting to show a bit).



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 11:44:26 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

Well, and with no "Sunshine." THANK THE LORD.

Amen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 11:45:43 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.


Yeah, I believe in a recent interview Brian said that many of the songs were from '98. Wasn't Brian goin' to do another Beach Boys album after Imagination but then Carl died. I'm not sure about that. If that's the case, maybe this was written in '98 with the boys in mind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 11:46:02 AM
Songwriting credits for the album over on The Record Room. If you dig, register and thank Summ-A-Briz.

Here:

http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977 (http://s3.excoboard.com/therecordroom/54492/907180/6#7552977)

Warning - incoming sh*tstorm expected in roughly three minutes.  ;D

And yes, register  - cool music board, way beyond the BB.

Reading those credits made me really sad, for some reason.
Maybe 'cause it's (possibly) the last Beach Boys album and Joe Thomas' name is all over it.
Doesn't mean it won't be great (I like a lot of Imagination), but...

Yes, I'm pretty surprised to see Thomas' name on every single song except "Daybreak."  I' figured we'd get at least a couple of Wilson-Bennett songs.  And poor Al seems to be getting shut out at every instance (no song on the album or in the show, not included in the Fallon interview, etc).  Maybe someday we'll hear the whole backstory.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 14, 2012, 11:48:15 AM
I don't think we should talk about "poor Al", the man hardly writes any tunes. Just look at his first solo record and what's on it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 14, 2012, 11:49:18 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

So is this just an unfinished album with new overdubs?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 11:50:33 AM
I don't think we should talk about "poor Al", the man hardly writes any tunes. Just look at his first solo record and what's on it!

A valid point.  I'm more referring to his comments in interviews about some of his songs he hoped would be on the album or in the show, and none have come to pass.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 14, 2012, 11:51:12 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

After hearing three songs and after seeing the writing credits, it appears that way. And, didn't I read in a recent interview with Brian that he wrote some of these songs with Joe Thomas around the time of Imagination? If Brian didn't re-record four BB tracks for Imagination - Sherry She Needs Me, Keep An Eye On Summer, Let Him Run Wild, and My Solution -  maybe a couple of these "new" songs would've appeared on that album.

I like what I'm hearing though, and Imagination is my favorite BW solo album anyway...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 11:52:09 AM
I don't think we should talk about "poor Al", the man hardly writes any tunes. Just look at his first solo record and what's on it!

A valid point.  I'm more referring to his comments in interviews about some of his songs he hoped would be on the album or in the show, and none have come to pass.


I guess we'll get "Lookin' at tomorrow" at some show sooner or later. And "California saga" probably as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:52:32 AM
This seems to be Wilson and Thomas' follow-up to Imagination, with Beach Boys vocals. Interesting.

So is this just an unfinished album with new overdubs?



No.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mark H on May 14, 2012, 12:00:38 PM
SV sounds a lot better than the previous snippet made us believe.  Love the chorus, listened to it a few times now :)

Definitely a Imagination vibe there but tbh I'm just happy to be getting a new album from the band together, so if it takes J Thomas' involvement then so be it.

Can't wait to give it a spin all the way through.

Many thanks for the link AGD :)





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 12:04:08 PM
I wonder if QVC will give us some better quality snippets to hear when they sell the new CD on Wednesday evening?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 12:07:36 PM
I LOVE THINK ABOUT THE DAYS.
IT'S SMILE LIKE, NOT KIDDING.

And, SV is not nearly as bad as I worried.

Amazing feeling, a Good beach boys album in my lifetime!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 12:07:49 PM
I don't think we should talk about "poor Al", the man hardly writes any tunes. Just look at his first solo record and what's on it!

A valid point.  I'm more referring to his comments in interviews about some of his songs he hoped would be on the album or in the show, and none have come to pass.


I guess we'll get "Lookin' at tomorrow" at some show sooner or later. And "California saga" probably as well.

I hope so.  I'd much prefer to hear "California Saga" than "Then I Kissed Her."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: send me a picture and i'll tell you on May 14, 2012, 12:15:26 PM
TATD sounds like Stairway to Heaven.

SV sounds like Smart Girls.

TWGMTR sounds like Goin On.


 :old


And they're all great!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 14, 2012, 12:21:42 PM
Brian's vocals sounded great on Imagination and from "Think About The Days" and "Spring Vacation", he sounds great on this new album, so if anything, I'm all for Joe producing Brian's vocals, if it is indeed his work. The autotune gets to be a bit much, but whatever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 14, 2012, 12:25:43 PM
Brian's vocals sounded great on Imagination and from "Think About The Days" and "Spring Vacation", he sounds great on this new album, so if anything, I'm all for Joe producing Brian's vocals, if it is indeed his work. The autotune gets to be a bit much, but whatever.

There is a slathering ton of the damn stuff, isn't there?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Exapno Mapcase on May 14, 2012, 12:29:30 PM
Maybe Bon Jovi supplied the tight leather pants then left the room...  I trust Andrew on this (and on many other things except his questionable taste in football teams).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 14, 2012, 12:33:51 PM
I don't think we should talk about "poor Al", the man hardly writes any tunes. Just look at his first solo record and what's on it!

A valid point.  I'm more referring to his comments in interviews about some of his songs he hoped would be on the album or in the show, and none have come to pass.
Ok, I understand your point as well  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sound of Free on May 14, 2012, 12:39:20 PM
I know his full name is Michael Edward Love, but why is Mike all of a sudden using the E?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 12:41:48 PM
The whole band probably recorded a number of things -- Al certainly had a few tunes, and Bruce was working on his BB85 remake. But I suspect very strongly that the deal the entire time was exactly this. A BW-written and (co) produced album.

Mike gets some credits because he's the other power player in this. Everybody else is just happy to be along for the ride (does anyone think that Al would storm out if the song he already released on his solo album isn't on the group's album? ... I didn't think so).

I'm delighted. Not necessarily because Joe is credited on nearly everything, but because it means that most of this album was written and tracks as a BW project, with Joe and Jeff along for the ride. That gives it a lot more potential artistic coherence than a slapped-together bunch of tracks from each of the guys.

There is an argument to be made for a more Sunflower-y type of album, and I would enjoy hearing that. But it would take serious time to make, and the guys would have to be around each other a lot. It seems one of the reasons this project worked so smoothly is that most of the tracks were ready, Brian had the parts, and they just banged it out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 12:43:20 PM
Ok, everyone stop bitching about production...


BRIAN IS SINGING FALSETTO AGAIN. HOLY sh*t.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 14, 2012, 12:48:25 PM
just called QVC about ordering the album; they have no item # yet but will tomorrow; QVC orders start when the show starts at 4pm LA time on wednesday.  They were thus not sure yet if the album will ship right away or at a later date, so I think we do not know if buying the album at QVC gets us the album sooner or if the motivation will have to be to get whatever the bonus is.

In an ideal dream, a new BB album has songs written, recorded and sung by all the BB al a Sunflower, Friends, etc. If this is more their singing over Brian songs, with some BB musical accompanyment, such as Dave's playing, then I will not have gotten all I want, but I wil judge the record by whether it's any good, first and, second, if I can hear all the contribution sof each BB, as we can, for sure , on TWG.

But also I will hope it's a hit, achieves critical acclaim, and also have the BB own stamp of pride and satisfaction.  If is "works," I would expect a follow up soon with more of my ideal dream actualized.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 14, 2012, 12:50:23 PM
Spring Vacation makes me so happy.   ;D :'(

SHOULD HAVE BEEN THEE SINGEL


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: myonlysunshine on May 14, 2012, 12:54:24 PM
Songwriting=good. Production=bad. :( I really like both tracks, especially Think About the Days, but I'm left wondering how good these songs could sound with better production.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 14, 2012, 12:57:36 PM
Personally, other than one or two tracks I've never been very keen on Al or Bruce's songwriting anyway, so I'm happy enough that it's a Brian album with the others only contributing vocals (and some lyrics and one song from Mike) -- that part of it seems right, to me.
I do find the fact that Joe Thomas' name is all over the thing slightly more worrying, but a good half the songs on Imagination were decent to good, so that could still be OK. The credits for Peterik and Bon Jovi are frankly scary, though.

Either way, the tour we're getting is great, so I'm happy no matter what the album's like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 12:57:56 PM
Can anybody tell me what they're singing in the chorus just before "ain't life funny"? Something about money? I've listened to it multiple times, and I just can't figure it out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 01:00:59 PM
"Easy money"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 14, 2012, 01:03:51 PM

arghh

(gnashes teeth)

June 5th is 22 freakin' days away!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 14, 2012, 01:05:00 PM
Brian's vocals sounded great on Imagination and from "Think About The Days" and "Spring Vacation", he sounds great on this new album, so if anything, I'm all for Joe producing Brian's vocals, if it is indeed his work. The autotune gets to be a bit much, but whatever.

There is a slathering ton of the damn stuff, isn't there?

Yeah, while I can't say I've listened to the radio enough to hear what's going on lately, but this seems like they are using it quite a bit more than anything I've heard. I know many of the better bands out there today use it, but I don't think they use it like The Beach Boys are, where some parts sound nearly Daft Punk-esque.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 14, 2012, 01:07:14 PM
BRIAN IS SINGING FALSETTO AGAIN. HOLY sh*t.

May I ask where you hear that? I listened to both songs at work, but not at a very high volume, and not with my full attention, for obvious reasons.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 14, 2012, 01:08:48 PM
You can hear it (albeit heavily autotuned) on Think About The Days


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 01:12:11 PM
In an ideal dream, a new BB album has songs written, recorded and sung by all the BB al a Sunflower, Friends, etc. If this is more their singing over Brian songs, with some BB musical accompanyment, such as Dave's playing, then I will not have gotten all I want.

You mean like Pet Sounds? Where Brian wrote all the songs while the guys were on the road, tracked nearly all of it without them, and then just did some vocal sessions to finish it?

I agree, the group album is a nice idea, but a lot of the group's classic LPs are nearly all written by Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 01:13:49 PM
"Easy money"
Thank you. That's a pretty funny line actually. Reminds me of 'Life's Been Good'.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 01:16:50 PM
In an ideal dream, a new BB album has songs written, recorded and sung by all the BB al a Sunflower, Friends, etc. If this is more their singing over Brian songs, with some BB musical accompanyment, such as Dave's playing, then I will not have gotten all I want.

You mean like Pet Sounds? Where Brian wrote all the songs while the guys were on the road, tracked nearly all of it without them, and then just did some vocal sessions to finish it?

I agree, the group album is a nice idea, but a lot of the group's classic LPs are nearly all written by Brian.

can you imagine how this board would kill him for such a concept today?  At least Joe Thomas isn't a jingle writer, I guess...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 01:17:16 PM
Mike gets some credits because he's the other power player in this. Everybody else is just happy to be along for the ride (does anyone think that Al would storm out if the song he already released on his solo album isn't on the group's album? ... I didn't think so).

I'm delighted. Not necessarily because Joe is credited on nearly everything, but because it means that most of this album was written and tracks as a BW project, with Joe and Jeff along for the ride. That gives it a lot more potential artistic coherence than a slapped-together bunch of tracks from each of the guys.

Personally, I am delighted too that Brian's camp appears to have artistic control/final say, based on the quality of the past several BW albums, and based on what we've heard so far.  

My main point about Al is that he must be a little disappointed not to have a song - or songwriting royalties - on the Beach Boys' big comeback album.  Even though (IIRC) he is an equal member of BRI, and he was part of the recording and performing group for well over 30 years, his name is tellingly on the 2nd line of credits on the concert marketing, and so far none of his songs have made it in the setlist.  I surmise he may not have much say in the choices being made.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 01:20:01 PM
I surmise he may not have much say in the choices being made.  

He is part of a group of people who made the choice to give Brian's camp the reins. So that means this album is in good company.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 14, 2012, 01:24:27 PM
just called QVC about ordering the album; they have no item # yet but will tomorrow; QVC orders start when the show starts at 4pm LA time on wednesday.  They were thus not sure yet if the album will ship right away or at a later date, so I think we do not know if buying the album at QVC gets us the album sooner or if the motivation will have to be to get whatever the bonus is.

Okay, but for those who absolutely must have a "Beach Boys" fix, and have it NOW, QVC does have this one ready to go on their website.   :angel:


http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.H144553.desc.Copa-Judaica-Beach-Boys-Menorah


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 01:25:07 PM


My main point about Al is that he must be a little disappointed not to have a song - or songwriting royalties - on the Beach Boys' big comeback album.  

I agree that Al has deserved some more attention in concert for he was really trying to get the band back together as soon as 2006. But maybe his songs were not good enough/not fitting the feeling of the record (apart from the possibility that the contract asks for so and so percent Brian Wilson-tunes).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 01:25:50 PM
Spring Vacation
(Wilson / Love / Van Halen / Peterik / Bon Jovi / Cobain)

Mike:

Driving around
Living the dream
I'm cruising the town
Digging the scene

I'm not gonna stress
I'm not gonna worry
Doing our best,
No need to hurry.

Looking ahead
With anticipation
Making each day
A new celebration

Bruce:

Seems like it could
Go on forever
Long as we can
All stay together

Mike and Brian?:

We used to get around
Get up and hit up
All the hot spots in town

Brian:

Spring vacation
Good vibration
Summer weather
We're back together

Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah

Mike:

As for the past,
It's all behind us
Happier now,
Look where life finds us

Singing our songs
Is enough reason
Harmony boys
It's what we believe in

Mike and Brian?

Some said it wouldn't last
All we can say is
We're still having a blast

Brian:

(Chorus)

Mike:

Every night a special occasion
???? Don't take much persuasion

(Solo)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 01:26:31 PM
I love Al Jardine as much as anybody (trust me), but this is simple--you want an Al Jardine album or a Brian Wilson album?  Seems to me even the Beach Boys had a pretty easy time making THAT decsion. And by the way, doubt there was any record label interested in a Beach Boys album NOT written and produced by Brian Wilson (see, SIP).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 01:37:47 PM
I surmise he may not have much say in the choices being made.  

He is part of a group of people who made the choice to give Brian's camp the reins. So that means this album is in good company.

Good point; he must have known when he signed up what the power structure was and agreed to it.  And don't get me wrong, I'm happy to have BW songs rather than Al songs, and Capitol is, too.  I'm sure he's able to mitigate any disappointment he may have for not getting more credit with his checks from the tour.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 01:38:55 PM
I also think Al is the one who (along with Brian) has speculated most openly about a follow-up album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 01:46:04 PM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 14, 2012, 01:46:44 PM
I think a song contribution from David was a long shot. Welcomed, but a long shot.

Due to Al being an original member, having a history of some quality BB songs, and having recently been recording on his own, I expected a song from him, even just for an extra Al Jardine lead vocal. However, it would've been bizarre if they included a track (bonus or otherwise) from A Postcard From California.

I am very surprised that Bruce was not represented. He has written two standards (whether we like one of them or not), Bruce has been the "good soldier" and continued along as The Beach Boys (with Mike) all these years, and was usually good for a song per album. Bruce always considered himself a songwriter first, and he must have several good ones stockpiled. A remake of "She Believes In Love Again" was not the way to go.

I don't think this new album is going to clock in at much over thirty minutes, if that. As a selfish fan, I was hoping for a song or two more. Maybe next album Al, Bruce, and Dave will be represented songwriting-wise. :-D

I believe Joe Thomas could've integrated the others' songs into a cohesive album. When it was first announced that Joe would be contributing, there was quite a bit of head scratching. Who would've thought his contribution would be so great? From what I've heard and seen so far, I don't view him as "along for the ride". I think he was driving the bus!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 01:47:36 PM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.


It reminds me of
"fun is in
it's no sin
it's that time again"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 01:49:56 PM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.

I think it shows a refreshing amount of self-knowledge and reflexivity. That verse is actually what sold me on the song as a whole. Reminds me of a Warren Zevon lyric.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 01:51:30 PM
 From what I've heard and seen so far, I don't view him as "along for the ride". I think he was driving the bus!

I think there is a lot more to know regarding this album that we will find out sooner or later.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 14, 2012, 01:53:09 PM
It does seem like, if they wanted to, they could pretty easily put together another album with material that is already written. If Brian doesn't have any "new" material, he could always dip into the Paley stockpile and pull out "You're Still a Mystery" and "Dancing the Night Away" I'm sure, or possibly some things from around the BWPS thru TLOS era. And Mike still has material that would be decent on a Beach Boys album, such as "Cool Head, Warm Heart" or maybe "Too Cruel". And I'm assuming they already recorded "Waves of Love" from Al, and possibly "Islands in the Sun". And Ronald Reagan redid "She Believes in Love Again", which I suppose would be interesting enough if they decided to release it. And of course, maybe even some Dave stuff.

I personally think it'd be great if they resumed as a fully-functioning recording entity, with Brian committing his material to The Beach Boys instead of a solo career, especially because it'll probably gain him a larger audience. Whether that happens, well I kinda doubt it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 01:54:47 PM
It does seem like, if they wanted to, they could pretty easily put together another album with material that is already written. If Brian doesn't have any "new" material, he could always dip into the Paley stockpile and pull out "You're Still a Mystery" and "Dancing the Night Away" I'm sure, or possibly some things from around the BWPS thru TLOS era. And Mike still has material that would be decent on a Beach Boys album, such as "Cool Head, Warm Heart" or maybe "Too Cruel". And I'm assuming they already recorded "Waves of Love" from Al, and possibly "Islands in the Sun". And Ronald Reagan redid "She Believes in Love Again", which I suppose would be interesting enough if they decided to release it. And of course, maybe even some Dave stuff.

I personally think it'd be great if they resumed as a fully-functioning recording entity, with Brian committing his material to The Beach Boys instead of a solo career, especially because it'll probably gain him a larger audience. Whether that happens, well I kinda doubt it.



I believe some vocal were recorded for a David-song during the sessions for this album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 02:01:10 PM
I don't think this new album is going to clock in at much over thirty minutes, if that. As a selfish fan, I was hoping for a song or two more. Maybe next album Al, Bruce, and Dave will be represented songwriting-wise. :-D

Here are the track timings. It looks to be 36 minutes or so.

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)

  From what I've heard and seen so far, I don't view him as "along for the ride". I think he was driving the bus!

I think there is a lot more to know regarding this album that we will find out sooner or later.

This is doubtless true. When I said "along for the ride," I simply meant that this was originally described as a Brian-Joe-Jeff project. They were recording throughout last year. Brian's new compositions seem to include Shelter, Bill and Sue and Think About the Days. And some extra work on the old demo of TWGMTR. But yeah, it seems like Joe was a real linchpin to all of this. But it's not just as a co-writer or producer -- he's intimately involved in the staging too, I think.

"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.

I think it shows a refreshing amount of self-knowledge and reflexivity. That verse is actually what sold me on the song as a whole. Reminds me of a Warren Zevon lyric.

It strikes me as the most Brian-like moment of the lyric, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 02:04:29 PM
Poems everybody! The laddie reckons himself a poet!

(http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk242/redhook4/Decorated%20images/PinkFloydSchoolMaster.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 14, 2012, 02:05:07 PM

Here are the track timings. It looks to be 36 minutes or so.

1. Think About The Days (1:27)
2. That’s Why God Made The Radio (3:19)
3. Isn’t It Time (3:45)
4. Spring Vacation (3:07)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue (4:17)
6. Shelter (3:02)
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)
8. Beaches In Mind (2:38)
9. Strange World (3:03)
10. From There To Back Again (3:23)
11. Pacific Coast Highway (1:52)
12. Summer’s Gone (4:40)



Thanks for the times, Wirestone. I am PLEASANTLY surprised! :police:


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: send me a picture and i'll tell you on May 14, 2012, 02:12:48 PM
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean (4:20)    :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 02:13:39 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 14, 2012, 02:15:04 PM


LALALALALALALALA I'm not listening until the album is out LALALALALALALA


 :ahh





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 02:15:40 PM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.

Yet somehow they made it work


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 02:16:02 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 14, 2012, 02:17:27 PM
I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for


I don't see no reason to think otherwise. Should I ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 14, 2012, 02:19:10 PM


LALALALALALALALA I'm not listening until the album is out LALALALALALALA


 :ahh





Same here.  I've heard enough samples.  I'm not listening to any more songs until the CD is spinning in my stereo....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 14, 2012, 02:19:53 PM
This thread is blowing up today.  Did the Monolith appear?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 14, 2012, 02:21:07 PM
This thread is blowing up today.  Did the Monolith appear?



Two full songs!!

Here's where to find them if anybody missed AGD's original post:

Chance to hear a couple of previews:

http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1

In the 13-5-2012 box click on "11.00 - 12.00" and they're after about 5.30


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 02:21:15 PM
I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

He says he did- isn't that good enough for you? Should he have filmed himself?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 02:23:55 PM
This thread is blowing up today.  Did the Monolith appear?



Smile came out a few months ago


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 02:24:35 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?

yup, and went to email.  still getting a "you do not have permission" when i try to post


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 02:26:48 PM
Spring Vacation is so great


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 02:26:58 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?

yup, and went to email.  still getting a "you do not have permission" when i try to post

Ooh, sorry, I'll fix that!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 02:27:25 PM
This thread is blowing up today.  Did the Monolith appear?



Songwriting credits revealed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 02:27:47 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?

yup, and went to email.  still getting a "you do not have permission" when i try to post

Ooh, sorry, I'll fix that!

cool thanks


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 02:28:13 PM


LALALALALALALALA I'm not listening until the album is out LALALALALALALA


 :ahh





Same here.  I've heard enough samples.  I'm not listening to any more songs until the CD is spinning in my stereo....

yup.  I can wait.  somehow, i'm ok with this lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 02:29:55 PM
Yeah, anyone who has registered to the RR in the last few days, I've verified your accounts, sorry to be so sloppy about that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 02:30:18 PM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.

I think those lines kind of say it all, actually, and I rather like the honesty... (and it doesn't hurt that Brian sounds great signing them)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 14, 2012, 02:31:09 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?

yup, and went to email.  still getting a "you do not have permission" when i try to post

I tried to sign up last week, but never heard back from them. I thought maybe I had bad breath.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 02:32:24 PM
well i tried posting on the record room but it said i didn't have permission.  I'll just say i'm not surprised at all by the songwriting credits.  I just hope Brian did indeed have a hand in writing the tunes he's credited for

Did you register?

yup, and went to email.  still getting a "you do not have permission" when i try to post

I tried to sign up last week, but never heard back from them. I thought maybe it was bad breath.

You're verified now, sorry about that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 02:36:32 PM
bon jovi is such a lol wtf moment


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 02:41:15 PM
bon jovi is such a lol wtf moment

Be  thankful. It could have read "12. Summer’s Gone
(B. Wilson, J. Stamos, J. Thomas)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on May 14, 2012, 02:44:18 PM
If only I knew how to rip songs on my mac... I don't know if it's possible.

I actually dig Spring Vacation. It could have been worse. Think About the Days sounds like a nice intro, imo. Sounds very Imagination, but I like that album so I don't mind. I can't wait to hear the rest.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 14, 2012, 03:01:02 PM
"Think About The Days" seems to be an adequate album opener, yes.

"Spring Vacation", I think, is pretty bad. The tune itself might be okay-ish, despite the dumb lyrics and general boringness of the melody, but the production sinks it. Sounds like a generic production of some soulless 90s summer dance group: flat, sterile, witlessly overproduced. Their voices sound unnatural. I will never get that kind of production decision.. the Boys still got fine enough voices, you could do all kinds of authentic and exciting stuff with them. "Spring Vacation" is utterly unexciting. Best case scenario: it grows to become a guilty pleasure song like "Kokomo" or "Smart Girls". (Actually, "Kokomo" is a far better song.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 03:02:24 PM
I thought Spring Vacation was an alright song but I was just listening to it in my iTunes and then the Surf's Up demo came up right after that (alphabetial order, man, it's a killer).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 03:14:22 PM
My ratings so far (The ratings may see high but  I wasn't expecting Pet Sounds or Sunflower, the bar was very low)

Think About The Days - 9

Spring Vacation - 7

That's Why God Made the Radio - 8


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 03:19:28 PM
"Think About The Days" seems to be an adequate album opener, yes.

"Spring Vacation", I think, is pretty bad. The tune itself might be okay-ish, despite the dumb lyrics and general boringness of the melody, but the production sinks it. Sounds like a generic production of some soulless 90s summer dance group: flat, sterile, witlessly overproduced. Their voices sound unnatural. I will never get that kind of production decision.. the Boys still got fine enough voices, you could do all kinds of authentic and exciting stuff with them. "Spring Vacation" is utterly unexciting. Best case scenario: it grows to become a guilty pleasure song like "Kokomo" or "Smart Girls". (Actually, "Kokomo" is a far better song.)

Smart Girls?  Really, Smart Girls?!?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 14, 2012, 03:21:52 PM
My ratings so far (The ratings may see high but  I wasn't expecting Pet Sounds or Sunflower, the bar was very low)

Think About The Days - 9

Spring Vacation - 7

That's Why God Made the Radio - 8
Out of 10? What would be a 10..?


Quote from: southbay
Smart Girls?  Really, Smart Girls?!?
"Guilty pleasure", that' what I said.  ;) Or maybe exchange that for anything on "Summer in Paradise". Yeah, "Spring Vacation" could easily have been on "Summer in Paradise".

I'm still stoked (and optimistic) about the album, just for the record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 03:29:56 PM
"Think About The Days" seems to be an adequate album opener, yes.

"Spring Vacation", I think, is pretty bad. The tune itself might be okay-ish, despite the dumb lyrics and general boringness of the melody, but the production sinks it. Sounds like a generic production of some soulless 90s summer dance group: flat, sterile, witlessly overproduced. Their voices sound unnatural. I will never get that kind of production decision.. the Boys still got fine enough voices, you could do all kinds of authentic and exciting stuff with them. "Spring Vacation" is utterly unexciting. Best case scenario: it grows to become a guilty pleasure song like "Kokomo" or "Smart Girls". (Actually, "Kokomo" is a far better song.)
After playing it a number of times, the background vocals sound more natural than they do on TWGMTR. The chorus is very catchy. I've been singing it all afternoon. Love how Brian is into the organ lately. It's 3 for 3 for me. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 14, 2012, 03:30:04 PM
Think about the days is great. That will be a beautiful intro to the album.

My god that autotuned hallelujah from Brian is hilarious. Christ I hope they're more sparing with it on the other tracks. SV is pretty bad but has a certain charm lacking in some of the weaker tracks from tlos (eg. Mexican girl). Please let it be one of the worse tracks though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on May 14, 2012, 03:32:24 PM
Think About the Days is pretty dang incredible.

Spring Vacation is fun... not as bad as I thought it's going to be.  The auto-tune doesn't bother me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 14, 2012, 03:35:55 PM
Spring Vacation felt like a record I could play by the pool this summer with my friends and it would just fit right in. I felt that right away, especially during that solo.

So, to me, that makes the song great. I dig it, no where near as bad as I projected it would be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 14, 2012, 03:38:55 PM
Think about the days is great. That will be a beautiful intro to the album.

My god that autotuned hallelujah from Brian is hilarious. Christ I hope they're more sparing with it on the other tracks. SV is pretty bad but has a certain charm lacking in some of the weaker tracks from tlos (eg. Mexican girl). Please let it be one of the worse tracks though.
I've enjoyed "Mexican Girl" since the 1st time I heard it - it's silly, but openly so. It's real catchy and has good overall production: it's clear and features a natural lead vocal by Brian and good, clear and full-frontal back-up vocals in the mix. I think it's a better song than "Spring Break", maybe not by a mile, but even so.

P.S. I must say I generally dug the production and sound on TLOS, and I was a bit disappointed when it became clear that the new BBs album wouldn't sound like TLOS.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 14, 2012, 03:47:41 PM
I couldn't put my finger on what TATD reminded me of but it just clicked - Cry from Imagination!

So are the songs with a Joe Thomas co-write, ones that were written shortly after Imagination, and not newly written ones? TATD certainly doesn't sound like a new Brian song to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chris Brown on May 14, 2012, 03:48:29 PM
I knew something had to be up when the page count on the thread jumped so much since yesterday...

Anyways, "Think About the Days" really knocked me out.  Amazing harmonies, the whole thing just sets the mood perfectly.  Even without lyrics, the melancholy feeling was fantastic.

"Spring Vacation" was pretty abysmal, but then again I wasn't expecting much.  As great as the vocals are (Brian and Mike both sound fantastic), it's just another retread of the lazy songwriting that has plagued the band's studio output over the last 30 years.  

All in all though, the three tracks we've heard have got me itching to get that CD in my hands even more than I was before.  All the Joe Thomas writing credits in the world can't scare me at this point!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 03:49:45 PM
I have to admit I am a bit disappointed that we aren't getting songs written by a post BWPS/TLS Brian Wilson.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 14, 2012, 03:50:19 PM
Think about the days is great. That will be a beautiful intro to the album.

My god that autotuned hallelujah from Brian is hilarious. Christ I hope they're more sparing with it on the other tracks. SV is pretty bad but has a certain charm lacking in some of the weaker tracks from tlos (eg. Mexican girl). Please let it be one of the worse tracks though.
I've enjoyed "Mexican Girl" since the 1st time I heard it - it's silly, but openly so. It's real catchy and has good overall production: it's clear and features a natural lead vocal by Brian and good, clear and full-frontal back-up vocals in the mix. I think it's a better song than "Spring Break", maybe not by a mile, but even so.

P.S. I must say I generally dug the production and sound on TLOS, and I was a bit disappointed when it became clear that the new BBs album wouldn't sound like TLOS.



I also liked the overall production of TLOS and loved about half the songs. Some, such as Mexican Girl, I just found melodically a bit flat.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Cabinessenceking on May 14, 2012, 03:51:58 PM
My view.

Think About the Days - 8 (a very pleasant short wordless hymn. I expect it will be one of the better tracks after hearing it followed by the horrific 'Spring Vacation')

Spring Vacation - 3
(dreadful, pointless, bad production, bad lyrics with disgusting references to old classics - just worse than 'Brian's Back' because unlike that song this one isn't catchy, it isn't deep, there is no redeeming vocal part by Carl. I almost vomited when I heard this because I was expecting another TWGMTR.  My bad I guess. Also the title reminds me of a very bad shark film which shares the title. It starts promising then dies horribly.)

That's Why God Made The Radio - 8
(this is a very good song. It is not cheesy enough to call it a cheese slice and although the production is NOT very Brian Wilson nor PS or Sunflower in any regards it is well done.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 03:53:32 PM
Think about the days is great. That will be a beautiful intro to the album.

My god that autotuned hallelujah from Brian is hilarious. Christ I hope they're more sparing with it on the other tracks. SV is pretty bad but has a certain charm lacking in some of the weaker tracks from tlos (eg. Mexican girl). Please let it be one of the worse tracks though.
I've enjoyed "Mexican Girl" since the 1st time I heard it - it's silly, but openly so. It's real catchy and has good overall production: it's clear and features a natural lead vocal by Brian and good, clear and full-frontal back-up vocals in the mix. I think it's a better song than "Spring Break", maybe not by a mile, but even so.

P.S. I must say I generally dug the production and sound on TLOS, and I was a bit disappointed when it became clear that the new BBs album wouldn't sound like TLOS.



I also liked the overall production of TLOS and loved about half the songs. Some, such as Mexican Girl, I just found melodically a bit flat.
Love the ending of Mexican Girl, very Pet Sounds (the track).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 14, 2012, 03:58:02 PM
My view.

Think About the Days - 6 (a very pleasant short wordless hymn. I expect it will be one of the better tracks after hearing it followed by the horrific 'Spring Vacation'

Spring Vacation - 3
(dreadful, pointless, bad production, bad lyrics with disgusting references to old classics - just worse than 'Brian's Back' because unlike that song this one isn't catchy, it isn't deep, there is no redeeming vocal part by Carl. I almost vomited when I heard this because I was expecting another TWGMTR. Also the title reminds me of a very bad shark film which shares the title. My bad I guess.)  :'(

That's Why God Made The Radio - 8
(this is a very good song. It is not cheesy enough to call it a cheese slice and although the production is NOT very Brian Wilson nor PS or Sunflower in any regards it is well done.)
I don't get you on Spring Vacation. We spend the last 6 months or more discussing the reunion, yet the main players of that reunion can't sing about it? Maybe because I am older that kind of song is more appealing to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 04:00:18 PM
So are the songs with a Joe Thomas co-write, ones that were written shortly after Imagination, and not newly written ones? TATD certainly doesn't sound like a new Brian song to me.

I believe that it is, actually. Do some reading over at the Record Room -- there's an interview with Brian there. Joe and Brian were writing and recording throughout last year.

I have to admit I am a bit disappointed that we aren't getting songs written by a post BWPS/TLS Brian Wilson.

We are. We're getting at least three, and possibly more.

People are very quick to jump to conclusions. Yes, some of the material comes from Brian's work with Joe back in 98. But not all. There are newly written songs.

What's more, there's no reason to think that many of these songs aren't newly completed or revised. Ask yourself why they didn't appear on anything Brian has done over the last 14 years -- could it have been because they were just fragments or bits of demos?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 14, 2012, 04:01:30 PM
I have to admit I am a bit disappointed that we aren't getting songs written by a post BWPS/TLS Brian Wilson.

I think "Shelter" and "The Private Life of Bill and Sue" are more recent.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 04:02:41 PM

What's more, there's no reason to think that many of these songs aren't newly completed or revised. Ask yourself why they didn't appear on anything Brian has done over the last 14 years -- could it have been because they were just fragments or bits of demos?

It could likely have been because of Joe Thomas's exile from the BW scene and the fact that the songs could not have been used until this point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 14, 2012, 04:03:05 PM
Thanks Aegir and Wirestone. That's good to know.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pets0unds on May 14, 2012, 04:10:17 PM
Chorus to Summer Vacation sounds like the verse of Elton John - Tiny Dancer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 04:12:02 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 04:12:50 PM

What's more, there's no reason to think that many of these songs aren't newly completed or revised. Ask yourself why they didn't appear on anything Brian has done over the last 14 years -- could it have been because they were just fragments or bits of demos?

It could likely have been because of Joe Thomas's exile from the BW scene and the fact that the songs could not have been used until this point.

I'm not sure it works that way, actually. Gettin' in Over My Head featured "How Could We Still Be Dancin," which was a post-Imagination co-write by Brian and Joe. And the version of the title track on that record is a Joe Thomas co-production featuring his studio musicians.

In other words, BriMel seems to have had access to both Joe and Brian's unreleased compositions and unreleased studio work. Doesn't sound -- to me -- like a situation in which Joe was holding anything hostage.

I suspect a likelier scenario is that the group was looking for someone to coordinate the reunion tour and associated products, and that Joe (whose main expertise these days is staging concerts for TV) came up as a good candidate to direct the special / DVD. And then that led to new studio work between Joe and Brian, and then a new BBs album. Just my guess.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on May 14, 2012, 04:25:33 PM
Think About the Days is pretty dang incredible.

Spring Vacation is fun... not as bad as I thought it's going to be.  The auto-tune doesn't bother me.

Agree! I enjoyed "Spring Vacation", ignored the lyrics.  If that's the worst, we are in for a pretty good album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 04:31:41 PM
Think About the Days is pretty dang incredible.

Spring Vacation is fun... not as bad as I thought it's going to be.  The auto-tune doesn't bother me.

Agree! I enjoyed "Spring Vacation", ignored the lyrics.  If that's the worst, we are in for a pretty good album.

Same mindset here, we have 2 really really good tracks and one okay track, majority rules.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 04:47:07 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 04:49:55 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.

Thank you. There is no way you're going to get an album produced by a 23-year-old Brian Wilson. We already have one of those anyway. You're going to get an album with a co-writer and a co-producer, and with autotune and slick production. And you know what? It's all right.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 14, 2012, 04:52:48 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.

Something like the sound of Brian's last few solo albums was what I was expecting, and would have been much better than what we've got, as far as I can tell from those lossy streams. For that matter, much of Al's solo album is much better-sounding than this, production-wise.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 04:53:17 PM
yeah i don't know what people are expecting, Brian's music has always been slick for the time ._.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doc smiley on May 14, 2012, 04:59:17 PM
to expect Brian to record a lp of material in a finished polished manner is just not realistic. Brian creates demos/song sketches, and that is all he's mainly done for 30 + years. Brian needs someone to finish/polish his music , be it Joe Thomas, or Scott and Darian or whoever Brian is close to at that time. Closest thing to a Brian finished production was Love You back in 1977, and even that included a ton of extra work by Carl before it saw the light of day.

I like what I've heard here so far... SV is pretty light weight, but at least it feels radio friendly.

cheers

Doc Smiley
(imho)
 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 14, 2012, 05:02:18 PM
Eh. We're not on a Misfits forum or something, but there's the expected liberal amount of slick and then there's over-the-top slick, which some of this stuff flirts with if not does outright. Can't believe good ol' B-Pain makes an appearance on this record :(

I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 14, 2012, 05:11:49 PM
I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.
Exactly.

And I agree with Hickey that Al's Postcard sounds way better production-wise than the 3 tracks I've heard off TWGMTR.

But yeah, that's just how it is and what we're gonna get. And I'm still positive that we're gonna get a good album. It's just that to a fan of the timeless and well-aged stuff the Beach Boys did in the 60s and 70s and to a music lover in general this mainstreamed production style (that tries to cover as many target groups as possible while taking absolutely no risks creatively) is a huge disappointment when applied to his/her favourite band.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 14, 2012, 05:12:07 PM
Eh. We're not on a Misfits forum or something, but there's the expected liberal amount of slick and then there's over-the-top slick, which some of this stuff flirts with if not does outright. Can't believe good ol' B-Pain makes an appearance on this record :(

I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.


Right, and according to the people who have ACTUALLY HEARD IT, this happy middle ground is probably right here on this album...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dumbangel76 on May 14, 2012, 05:53:50 PM
I like what I hear so far! I will wait to pass judgement till I hear the whole album! I cannot wait!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 05:54:43 PM
i think people should listen to more modern music before they say these songs have modern "slickness"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 14, 2012, 05:56:47 PM
So: anyone can figure out David's voice in these two songs?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 14, 2012, 06:01:05 PM
i think people should listen to more modern music before they say these songs have modern "slickness"

I mean, we could have gotten something like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpFMuBHxGWs

^art.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 06:04:20 PM
i think people should listen to more modern music before they say these songs have modern "slickness"

I mean, we could have gotten something like this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpFMuBHxGWs

^art.

seriously.  I put my nice headphones on and listen to Cee Lo Green's last album and i'm appalled at how un-pleasant the headphones made it.  I put TWGMTR on and it sounds better than normal headphones, that tells me the mastering is ok


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on May 14, 2012, 06:10:42 PM
Someone already said this, but SV could have easily fit onto Summer in Paradise. Good thing I love all things Beach Boys and love Summer in Paradise! Yeah, that's right. I love SIP. You gotta problem wit dat??  :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 14, 2012, 06:15:27 PM
Someone already said this, but SV could have easily fit onto Summer in Paradise. Good thing I love all things Beach Boys and love Summer in Paradise! Yeah, that's right. I love SIP. You gotta problem wit dat??  :p

Yes. I do. Parking lot after school at 3. Be there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 06:16:49 PM
Someone already said this, but SV could have easily fit onto Summer in Paradise. Good thing I love all things Beach Boys and love Summer in Paradise! Yeah, that's right. I love SIP. You gotta problem wit dat??  :p

i can already imagine how many review blurbs will be "beach boys new album hits all aspects of their career, the highs and the lows"  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 14, 2012, 06:19:27 PM
This is slightly off topic but I was just watching this video and It really made me feel even more happy about this new album and having the beach boys back on tour..

Their music means so much to people young and old. Best band of all time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVmhw7X7kzs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVmhw7X7kzs)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 06:39:18 PM
I like Spring Vacation.

So yeah.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 14, 2012, 07:01:29 PM
Agayn, why so much hyperbole? That Lucky Old Sun didn't sound too bad (albeit not without a few faults), and the Gershwin album was a bit better, at that. Middle ground. There aren't only two production styles and sounds, it's not a matter of the songs sounding exactly like "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" versus "Tik Tok" by Kesha.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 07:10:51 PM
We have a 12-track album. So far we've heard three tracks, all of which sound somewhat different. We have the ambient-sounding opener, the heavily tuned (and somewhat silly) SV, and the more natural (at least instrumentally) TWGMTR. They are all different enough that I'm not comfortable even judging what the final album will sound like. Will it be more Imagination-y? More TLOS-y? Who knows!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on May 14, 2012, 07:13:19 PM
I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.
Exactly.

And I agree with Hickey that Al's Postcard sounds way better production-wise than the 3 tracks I've heard off TWGMTR.

But yeah, that's just how it is and what we're gonna get. And I'm still positive that we're gonna get a good album. It's just that to a fan of the timeless and well-aged stuff the Beach Boys did in the 60s and 70s and to a music lover in general this mainstreamed production style (that tries to cover as many target groups as possible while taking absolutely no risks creatively) is a huge disappointment when applied to his/her favourite band.

I'd have loved them to get Jason Brewer of The Explorers Club to help produce and maybe even write.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 14, 2012, 07:20:34 PM
I couldn't have wished for a more amazing opener then "Think..."

Honestly, love the brass at the end!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 07:24:23 PM
I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.
Exactly.

And I agree with Hickey that Al's Postcard sounds way better production-wise than the 3 tracks I've heard off TWGMTR.

But yeah, that's just how it is and what we're gonna get. And I'm still positive that we're gonna get a good album. It's just that to a fan of the timeless and well-aged stuff the Beach Boys did in the 60s and 70s and to a music lover in general this mainstreamed production style (that tries to cover as many target groups as possible while taking absolutely no risks creatively) is a huge disappointment when applied to his/her favourite band.

I'd have loved them to get Jason Brewer of The Explorers Club to help produce and maybe even write.

Barf.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 14, 2012, 07:25:34 PM
Agayn, why so much hyperbole? That Lucky Old Sun didn't sound too bad (albeit not without a few faults), and the Gershwin album was a bit better, at that. Middle ground. There aren't only two production styles and sounds, it's not a matter of the songs sounding exactly like "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" versus "Tik Tok" by Kesha.

I only posted the Kesha link to be humorous.  Again, as I stated in the other thread, I am right with you in the middle ground.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 14, 2012, 07:44:06 PM
Agayn, why so much hyperbole? That Lucky Old Sun didn't sound too bad (albeit not without a few faults), and the Gershwin album was a bit better, at that. Middle ground. There aren't only two production styles and sounds, it's not a matter of the songs sounding exactly like "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" versus "Tik Tok" by Kesha.

I only posted the Kesha link to be humorous.  Again, as I stated in the other thread, I am right with you in the middle ground.

I hate myself.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 14, 2012, 07:50:06 PM
Agayn, why so much hyperbole? That Lucky Old Sun didn't sound too bad (albeit not without a few faults), and the Gershwin album was a bit better, at that. Middle ground. There aren't only two production styles and sounds, it's not a matter of the songs sounding exactly like "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" versus "Tik Tok" by Kesha.

I only posted the Kesha link to be humorous.  Again, as I stated in the other thread, I am right with you in the middle ground.

I hate myself.

Confused.  ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 07:53:22 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.

So, you're saying there was no other option available to them, either lo-fi or this? Or you're just trying to make me out to be totally unreasonable? I do listen to "modern" music, and it doesn't need to be produced like this. The voices sound completely processed to my ears and I find that disappointing. You don't have to agree with me, but the fact that I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm a bitter person.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 07:56:26 PM
i don't understand why people still complain about them being processed, we've heard the single, not to mention 25 years of processed brian


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 07:58:44 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.

Thank you. There is no way you're going to get an album produced by a 23-year-old Brian Wilson. We already have one of those anyway. You're going to get an album with a co-writer and a co-producer, and with autotune and slick production. And you know what? It's all right.

I wasn't expecting that, but again, it's either that or slick autotune? No other options? Am I missing a logical leap here?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 08:03:05 PM
i think people should listen to more modern music before they say these songs have modern "slickness"

I do, and it doesn't have to sound like this. I think the Smile skit came true, except in this case the Beach Boys fell in the synthesizer. They're singing to me through this film of bits and bytes, and they can't get out!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 08:09:48 PM
Agayn, why so much hyperbole? That Lucky Old Sun didn't sound too bad (albeit not without a few faults), and the Gershwin album was a bit better, at that. Middle ground. There aren't only two production styles and sounds, it's not a matter of the songs sounding exactly like "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" versus "Tik Tok" by Kesha.

I get what you're saying, completely. Apparently it's easier to criticize the criticizers as old fashioned rather than admit that different production decisions could have been made regarding this album, with it still sounding like a 2012 product.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 08:14:24 PM
People just want to have something to complain about. Because this wouldn't be a fan board if people here didn't hate Brian and the rest of the band with the white-hot hatred that only true fans can feel.

Some 14 years ago, everyone freaked out about the pitch correction on "Imagination."

When BWPS came out, people complained about the synthesized keyboard sound and that Brian was doubled too many times and tuned.

When TLOS came out, people said it was too slick. They preferred the demos. There were too many lyrics from Scott.

When the Gershwin album came out, people vociferously criticized the autotune on "The Like in I Love You."

Several posters complained about ITKOD sounding "like Imagination." Too slick.

And on every single one of these releases, and more, posters have complained about it "not sounding like Brian," that the songs were written by other people, etc., etc., etc.

So pardon me for not taking any of this particularly seriously. It's going to be a slick record, and the participation of Joe Thomas made that a likelihood from the beginning. And even if it did sound like TLOS, a lot of the same people would be bitching for the same reasons.

In principle, yes, "a middle ground" is great. But the last decade of BW releases has proved there is no such thing. He will be excoriated for whatever he does, whoever he collaborates with, whatever he releases. It all falls short for someone somewhere. We can all imagine better productions, better people for him to collaborate with, better lyrics, better mixing, better mastering.

So, yeah. The album is made, and this is what it sounds like, for better or worse.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mammy blue on May 14, 2012, 08:19:41 PM
People just want to have something to complain about.

Some 14 years ago, everyone freaked out about the pitch correction on "Imagination."

When BWPS came out, people complained about the synthesized keyboard sound and that Brian was doubled too many times and tuned.

When TLOS came out, people said it was too slick. They preferred the demos. There were too many lyrics from Scott.

When the Gershwin album came out, people vociferously criticized the autotune on "The Like in I Love You."

Several posters complained about ITKOD sounding "like Imagination." Too slick.

And on every single one of these releases, and more, posters have complained about it "not sounding like Brian," that the songs were written by other people, etc., etc., etc.

So pardon me for not taking any of this particularly seriously. It's going to be a slick record, and the participation of Joe Thomas made that a likelihood from the beginning. And even if it did sound like TLOS, a lot of the same people would be bitching for the same reasons.

In principle, yes, "a middle ground" is great. But the last decade of BW releases has proved there is no such thing. He will be excoriated for whatever he does, whoever he collaborates with, whatever he releases. It all falls short for someone somewhere.

So, yeah. The album is made, and this is what it sounds like, for better or worse.

But, you're painting me with a broad brush here. I had no major problems with any of the post-Imagination albums you cite. Actually, the last decade proved that there was a middle ground. Everything after Imagination mostly sounded fine to my ears. Listen to the vocals on BWPS, TLOS and Gershwin, then this. Flat out, I wish the Wondermint crew / Mark Linnett had their hands on this instead. One man's opinion. I'm glad people are enjoying the tracks and I don't want to overwhelm the thread anymore with negativity, so Ill stop here. If I haven't gotten my point across by now, I never will.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 08:35:31 PM
Flat out, I wish the Wondermint crew / Mark Linnett had their hands on this instead.

You might be surprised.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 14, 2012, 08:43:37 PM
People just want to have something to complain about.

Do you mean like this?


Gotta get this off my chest. The reunion really seems a bit crap now, doesn't it?

Car songs.

Surfin' songs.

Surfboards in promo pics.

"Beaches in Mind."

Not a single Pet Sounds song in the mini-set -- no WIBN, no GOK.

"Kokomo."

That hideous single cover.

Wal-Mart.

Jim Peterik writing the lead-off single.

Underwhelming, poorly mixed live appearances.

Utterly disengaged Brian.

I remember saying that I would expect the worst and hope for the best from this reunion. My expectations have been richly fulfilled.

All of you hepping yourselves up over this should calm down. It's not going to be the worst ever, but it seems like it will be richly embarrassing for anyone expecting anything with a smidgen of artistic integrity. Brian was on a winning streak with TLOS and BWRG. He's now singing songs from by Peterik and being produced by Joe Thomas.

How are you all blind to this? I have been trying so hard to think this will be good. But I've given up trying to defend the indefensible. These guys are cashing in, pure and simple. The album is likely going to have a couple of nice new BW things, some recycled stuff, and oodles of dross. No one is interested in pushing themselves -- only using Brian's band as a giant security blanket as they go through the motions of a coast-to-coast cash grab.

Depressing beyond belief.

EDIT: I would love to be proved wrong. I would so love to be proved wrong. But every step of this process has only increased my doubts, rather than assuaging them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 14, 2012, 08:46:20 PM
Jim looks extremely drunk in your avatar. Like, I just picture him sitting there saying, "uhhh yeah man. f*ckin' beers and chicks, man. uhhhdrrrrr i'm goin' for the jesus look abnd i'm important and... ejr what was i sayin'. quick, one of y'ouns hit me with a toolbox."

"uhhh yeah man. f*ckin' beers and chicks, man. uhhhdrrrrr i'm goin' for the jesus look abnd i'm important and... ejr what was i sayin'. quick, one of y'ouns hit me with a toolbox." - James Douglas Morrison


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 08:58:41 PM
People just want to have something to complain about.
Do you mean like this?

Yes! I know the sins of which I speak, sadly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 14, 2012, 09:00:48 PM
I don't understand all the hyperbole. It's not ultra slick production and autotune versus Brian's muddiest mono mix of the 60s - there is a happy middle ground to be found.
Exactly.

And I agree with Hickey that Al's Postcard sounds way better production-wise than the 3 tracks I've heard off TWGMTR.

But yeah, that's just how it is and what we're gonna get. And I'm still positive that we're gonna get a good album. It's just that to a fan of the timeless and well-aged stuff the Beach Boys did in the 60s and 70s and to a music lover in general this mainstreamed production style (that tries to cover as many target groups as possible while taking absolutely no risks creatively) is a huge disappointment when applied to his/her favourite band.

I'd have loved them to get Jason Brewer of The Explorers Club to help produce and maybe even write.

Barf.


That cracked me up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Moon Dawg on May 14, 2012, 09:04:09 PM
  Bruce wasn't kidding when he said this isn't a "pot luck" album where everybody brings his songs to the table. Based on the credits, it is very much a Brian Wilson-Joe Thomas composed LP, with some Mike Love input. One might lament that this won't be a "group album" along the lines of SUNFLOWER or SURF'S UP, but then again PET SOUNDS and THE BEACH BOYS LOVE YOU didn't exactly feature many tunes from the rest of the band, did they? After 50 years, Brian is still the guy who makes it happen, although the full, still to come details on the making of this album will likely be more complicated that that simple, eternal truth. 



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Doo Dah on May 14, 2012, 09:16:54 PM
Regarding Spring Vacation, in the words of Yacht Rock - 'keep the smooth'

First track sounds great. A 2012 update of One for the Boys, with a nice melancholy touch.

I think that everything we've heard and/or suspected is in play here; Joe Thomas as the all seeing presence turning up the smooth, Brian doing what only he can do in vocal arranging, and a delicate equilibrium between Brian's emotional quirks and commercial concerns. Much like 'magination, I'll take it. It's gonna be good, but it's never gonna be quirky good, because the money 'sez so.' And I hate to say it, but the same musical tug a war would be at play if Brian ever does his long mentioned 'rock and roll Spector' record with the 'Boys. I'd rather he just cut it with his band, and have Scottie play the role of Svengali as opposed to Thomas.

Still can't understand why they used that flat vocal session for the promo video for SV - with proper studio sweetening, it's a pleasant thing. Not the kind of thing you'd win over indie music converts but to a fan who's already loyal to the catalog, they'll enjoy it for what it is, imo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 14, 2012, 09:25:42 PM

"Spring Vacation", I think, is pretty bad. The tune itself might be okay-ish, despite the dumb lyrics and general boringness of the melody, but the production sinks it. Sounds like a generic production of some soulless 90s summer dance group: flat, sterile, witlessly overproduced. Their voices sound unnatural. I will never get that kind of production decision.. the Boys still got fine enough voices, you could do all kinds of authentic and exciting stuff with them. "Spring Vacation" is utterly unexciting. Best case scenario: it grows to become a guilty pleasure song like "Kokomo" or "Smart Girls". (Actually, "Kokomo" is a far better song.)

"Spring Vacation" has a nice melody, but I agree that it is marred with bad lyrics and Autotuned vocals. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 09:26:45 PM
it's odd to me that auto-tune can sway people so much, i guess i'll see when i hear it.  but i don't recall anyone who has heard the album complaining about autotune. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 14, 2012, 09:28:12 PM
People just want to have something to complain about. Because this wouldn't be a fan board if people here didn't hate Brian and the rest of the band with the white-hot hatred that only true fans can feel.

Some 14 years ago, everyone freaked out about the pitch correction on "Imagination."

When BWPS came out, people complained about the synthesized keyboard sound and that Brian was doubled too many times and tuned.

When TLOS came out, people said it was too slick. They preferred the demos. There were too many lyrics from Scott.

When the Gershwin album came out, people vociferously criticized the autotune on "The Like in I Love You."

Several posters complained about ITKOD sounding "like Imagination." Too slick.

And on every single one of these releases, and more, posters have complained about it "not sounding like Brian," that the songs were written by other people, etc., etc., etc.

So pardon me for not taking any of this particularly seriously. It's going to be a slick record, and the participation of Joe Thomas made that a likelihood from the beginning. And even if it did sound like TLOS, a lot of the same people would be bitching for the same reasons.

In principle, yes, "a middle ground" is great. But the last decade of BW releases has proved there is no such thing. He will be excoriated for whatever he does, whoever he collaborates with, whatever he releases. It all falls short for someone somewhere. We can all imagine better productions, better people for him to collaborate with, better lyrics, better mixing, better mastering.

So, yeah. The album is made, and this is what it sounds like, for better or worse.

I agree that you can't please everyone and I don't care for those that are just looking for reasons to complain.  That being said, there's nothing wrong with being objective.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 14, 2012, 09:29:54 PM
it's odd to me that auto-tune can sway people so much, i guess i'll see when i hear it.  but i don't recall anyone who has heard the album complaining about autotune. 

Liberal use of pitch correction just over-cooks the vocals, making them sound robotic.  It is used quite commonly as an effect these days, but I'm waiting for it to go out of style.  :-)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 09:35:56 PM
FWIW, I think the processing on the Spring Vacation vocals is entirely intentional, and done with an eye toward making the song a single. Lots of AC songs, even from people who can sing, feature major vocal processing these days. The other two songs released, while still clearly processed, sound somewhat more natural.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 14, 2012, 09:44:27 PM
it's odd to me that auto-tune can sway people so much, i guess i'll see when i hear it.  but i don't recall anyone who has heard the album complaining about autotune. 

Liberal use of pitch correction just over-cooks the vocals, making them sound robotic.  It is used quite commonly as an effect these days, but I'm waiting for it to go out of style.  :-)

i know what it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5CHyy4sazs


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 14, 2012, 09:51:12 PM
BTW - iTunes has the new album available for pre-order.  Doesn't appear to have any exclusive bonus tracks on it.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/preorder/thats-why-god-made-the-radio/id527213734


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 14, 2012, 09:52:51 PM
Here's my feeling on auto-tune, processing etc. I think, to some extent, I prefer to hear the 70-year-old voices -- at least the ones that require it -- with the rough edges rounded off a bit. I know a lot of people didn't like the Ramone-produced remake of GOK for that very reason, but I did. For me, it simply sounded like a better, more listenable version of BW. In that regard, auto-tune is simply this generation's version of double tracking, punching-in, comp-ing, etc. The key difference being that those were mostly organic processes, whereas this can be a noticeably artificial one -- particularly if done to an excess or with the parameters set to "stun." Would I prefer the use of some of those more organic methods? Absolutely. But, my guess would be that time, money and interest often makes that less likely these days, and in the end, the results might even be less satisfying...all things considered.

And that's what's really going to be the deal-breaker for me with the album. That is, will I get the feeling that the human element is still coming through, or will it sound like an excessive, generic wash of blandness? Of course, other, possibly even more important factors come into play here: Will I get a sense that I'm hearing the individual BBs voices in the mix vs. that generic wash again (the former being *really* important to me)? Will the backing tracks convey a feeling of "real" instruments vs. the artificial type? And obviously, the songs themselves.

I guess the questions will be answered soon enough. I will say this much however: I do believe that it's going to tip in the direction of artificiality, more so than what we've heard this past decade from the various BW, AJ productions, BUT, that doesn't mean that it still can't all hang together and be satisfying if one or more of those aforementioned good factors outweigh the bad.

Just go lightly on the nylon string guitars, JT...  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 14, 2012, 09:58:51 PM
So far, the _tracks_ of all the songs sound pretty good. Not a lot of processing there, and a lot of BW touches (at least in TWGMTR). The voices are a different story.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 14, 2012, 10:14:50 PM
The first song is OK, but I really don't like the production on these tracks at all. It's just way too slick... like we're hearing from cartoon versions of the Beach Boys rather than the real people. I'll certainly buy the album and give it a fair listen, but this sounds to me like it will date the same way Beach Boys 85 did.

Well, really, what was expected?  The guys singing around a campfire recorded on an 8-track? Some people really set themselves up for disapointment, I guess.

So, you're saying there was no other option available to them, either lo-fi or this? Or you're just trying to make me out to be totally unreasonable? I do listen to "modern" music, and it doesn't need to be produced like this. The voices sound completely processed to my ears and I find that disappointing. You don't have to agree with me, but the fact that I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm a bitter person.
Your thoughts are appreciated and I can definitely understand where you're coming from. We have to take the good with the bad, as with any album. I'll jump in with my thoughts, why not...

"That's Why God Made the Radio" is slick and radio-friendly but very well-produced. The tightness of the rhythm section, for example, is second to none. Listen to that bass guitar! It is not a cloying-sounding single to my ears, like some of Imagination. It is mixed in an atypical way compared to the group's catalogue, but the instrumentation is pure Brian Wilson.

"Think About the Days" sounds very good overall. I love the instrumentation and the beautiful, yet slightly twisted sound of the melody. A loping descending chord pattern. Probably the perfect intro to a 2012 Beach Boys album.

I have to agree with you about the overall production of "Spring Vacation." I wish they had at least turned down the wet level of the pitch correction on that track for starters. The instrumentation is more contemporary than on the other two tracks.  It seems like they went all-in on the 2012 Top 40 sound for this song. I'm glad they didn't go too far in this direction with "That's Why God Made The Radio."

Unlike some of the group's lesser work, "Spring Vacation" is not lacking in the melody department, so I am sure I will listen to it sometimes, although not as much as the other two songs. The fact that it has a good melody and some Brian Wilson quirk puts it over most of Summer In Paradise in my view.

Like you, I am a fan of BWPS, TLOS, and BWRG, and I have very few complaints about the production on those albums or ITKOD. From what I've heard of this record, there are two excellent tracks and one mediocre track, so I am not too worried about the quality of the remaining tracks.

We are getting a slickly produced album no matter what, and it is not going to sound like That Lucky Old Sun... which brings with it advantages and disadvantages. Let's hope for more timeless production decisions than bad/instantly-dated ones.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 14, 2012, 11:06:41 PM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.

Sorry if this has been posted already, but here is the track listing for the QVC bonus CD; there is some overlap with the ZinePak CD.  (Don't know if "Do It Again" is the 2012 version, but I'm guessing it is).  And the website says the ship date is June 5; the earliest delivery date given to my address in Texas is June 6.  So apparently no early delivery of the new album.

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD (http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD)

50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

    "Catch a Wave"
    "Surfin' Safari"
    "409"
    "God Only Knows"
    "California Girls"
    "Heroes and Villains"
    "Surfer Girl"
    "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
    "Little Honda"
    "Dance, Dance, Dance"
    "Do It Again"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anazgnos on May 14, 2012, 11:10:45 PM
People just want to have something to complain about. Because this wouldn't be a fan board if people here didn't hate Brian and the rest of the band with the white-hot hatred that only true fans can feel.

Some 14 years ago, everyone freaked out about the pitch correction on "Imagination."

When BWPS came out, people complained about the synthesized keyboard sound and that Brian was doubled too many times and tuned.

When TLOS came out, people said it was too slick. They preferred the demos. There were too many lyrics from Scott.

When the Gershwin album came out, people vociferously criticized the autotune on "The Like in I Love You."

Several posters complained about ITKOD sounding "like Imagination." Too slick.

And on every single one of these releases, and more, posters have complained about it "not sounding like Brian," that the songs were written by other people, etc., etc., etc.

I don't get it...your list is a catalog of perfectly legitimate complaints.   It's not as though everyone subsequently recanted and now agrees that every single one of those releases is flawless.   The fact that criticisms invariably arise does not mean that those criticisms are all uniform, or all invalid...the things you listed are actually true of those albums.  And if those things are true, it seems like this would be the place to talk about them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 14, 2012, 11:29:08 PM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.

Sorry if this has been posted already, but here is the track listing for the QVC bonus CD; there is some overlap with the ZinePak CD.  (Don't know if "Do It Again" is the 2012 version, but I'm guessing it is).  And the website says the ship date is June 5; the earliest delivery date given to my address in Texas is June 6.  So apparently no early delivery of the new album.

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD (http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD)

50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

    "Catch a Wave"
    "Surfin' Safari"
    "409"
    "God Only Knows"
    "California Girls"
    "Heroes and Villains"
    "Surfer Girl"
    "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
    "Little Honda"
    "Dance, Dance, Dance"
    "Do It Again"



Thanks for the info. Without complaining too much, not much of an incentive for domestic customers to purchase if one already grabbed the Zine -- assuming that DIA is indeed the 2012 version. I'm wondering if the band struck deals with any of the other major retailers for any type of bonus (track or otherwise) versions?


Still looking forward to the TV performance though. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 14, 2012, 11:32:19 PM
for some reason "spring" reminds me of Jan and dean...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 14, 2012, 11:38:00 PM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.

Sorry if this has been posted already, but here is the track listing for the QVC bonus CD; there is some overlap with the ZinePak CD.  (Don't know if "Do It Again" is the 2012 version, but I'm guessing it is).  And the website says the ship date is June 5; the earliest delivery date given to my address in Texas is June 6.  So apparently no early delivery of the new album.

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD (http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD)

50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

    "Catch a Wave"
    "Surfin' Safari"
    "409"
    "God Only Knows"
    "California Girls"
    "Heroes and Villains"
    "Surfer Girl"
    "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
    "Little Honda"
    "Dance, Dance, Dance"
    "Do It Again"


Somewhat bizarre selection there.  :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on May 15, 2012, 12:05:41 AM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.

Sorry if this has been posted already, but here is the track listing for the QVC bonus CD; there is some overlap with the ZinePak CD.  (Don't know if "Do It Again" is the 2012 version, but I'm guessing it is).  And the website says the ship date is June 5; the earliest delivery date given to my address in Texas is June 6.  So apparently no early delivery of the new album.

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD (http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD)

50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

    "Catch a Wave"
    "Surfin' Safari"
    "409"
    "God Only Knows"
    "California Girls"
    "Heroes and Villains"
    "Surfer Girl"
    "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
    "Little Honda"
    "Dance, Dance, Dance"
    "Do It Again"


Somewhat bizarre selection there.  :-\

My thoughts exactly.  It includes none of their number one singles, and very few of their biggest "signature" songs , like "Sufin' USA", "Barbara Ann", or "Fun, Fun, Fun".  Strange indeed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 15, 2012, 12:07:39 AM
Not their "greatest" hits, but the ones being played at the current shows.... I think that might explain that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on May 15, 2012, 12:14:38 AM
The audio player's not working for me anymore... Is it down for anyone else? I only got to listen once.  :(

EDIT: Nevermind, worked in Firefox!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 15, 2012, 12:52:57 AM
When the album was announced I was hoping for a cross between TLOS and Imagination with M.I.U.-like quality of songwriting. After listening to these three new ones, however, I have a feeling we're in for a cross between Imagination and Summer in Paradise instead. Really enjoyed "Think About the Days", mind you, but "Spring Vacation" strikes me as incredibly bland even in a post-Light Album context. "TWGMTR" I think is pleasant but nothing to write home about really. Still looking forward to hearing the "deeper" Brian cuts on the album. Too bad they didn't include at least one song by David Marks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 15, 2012, 01:16:26 AM
I don't get it...your list is a catalog of perfectly legitimate complaints.

His point isn't about the complaints, but the complaining, if you get my drift.  The issues may well be reasonable matters of taste, but that doesn't mean the over-the-top freak-outs about them are justified!

Think about it.  With a little bit of perspective, doesn't ranting about synth harpsichords when you've just been handed a completed version of "Smile" after nearly forty years seem a little bit silly?

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 15, 2012, 01:19:16 AM
don't go to a message board if you don't want to read people complaining.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on May 15, 2012, 01:30:24 AM
http://www.examiner.com/article/that-s-why-god-made-the-radio (http://www.examiner.com/article/that-s-why-god-made-the-radio)

Don´t know if this has been up already but.. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 01:32:32 AM
Be honest.

When you think of the guys working on the new album, who do you picture behind the knobs?

Is it...






















(http://www.selfhelpdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Dave-Thomas-Wendys.jpg)

This guy?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 15, 2012, 01:35:05 AM
No, it's this guy:

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Joe-Thomas_March-2010.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 01:36:35 AM
http://www.examiner.com/article/that-s-why-god-made-the-radio (http://www.examiner.com/article/that-s-why-god-made-the-radio)

Don´t know if this has been up already but.. :)

I'm puzzled as to why Jeff's voice is a "welcome presence", but Christian Love (who has Beach Boys blood in him) and Adrian Baker are thought of as strange. Well, I can see why someone would find Adrian Baker's voice strange, but why is it "strange" for them to be on this album?

Also, am I the only one who's pretty sure I hear Christian on "Spring Vacation", too?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 15, 2012, 01:37:52 AM
Adrian Baker's voice isn't "strange," it's "terrible." If a cat was a person and also dying he is what it would sound like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 15, 2012, 01:38:29 AM
I think the review was just saying that because they're only on that one track it's weird.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 15, 2012, 01:38:42 AM
This is slightly off topic but I was just watching this video and It really made me feel even more happy about this new album and having the beach boys back on tour..

Their music means so much to people young and old. Best band of all time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVmhw7X7kzs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVmhw7X7kzs)
This is great...  :)

"I know, Brian's with them."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 15, 2012, 01:40:18 AM
Adrian Baker's voice isn't "strange," it's "terrible." If a cat was a person and also dying he is what it would sound like.

Only if the cat was also attempting, and failing, to do an American accent when it came from Essex.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 15, 2012, 02:15:10 AM
People just want to have something to complain about. Because this wouldn't be a fan board if people here didn't hate Brian and the rest of the band with the white-hot hatred that only true fans can feel.

Some 14 years ago, everyone freaked out about the pitch correction on "Imagination."

When BWPS came out, people complained about the synthesized keyboard sound and that Brian was doubled too many times and tuned.

When TLOS came out, people said it was too slick. They preferred the demos. There were too many lyrics from Scott.

When the Gershwin album came out, people vociferously criticized the autotune on "The Like in I Love You."

Several posters complained about ITKOD sounding "like Imagination." Too slick.

And on every single one of these releases, and more, posters have complained about it "not sounding like Brian," that the songs were written by other people, etc., etc., etc.

I don't get it...your list is a catalog of perfectly legitimate complaints.   It's not as though everyone subsequently recanted and now agrees that every single one of those releases is flawless.   The fact that criticisms invariably arise does not mean that those criticisms are all uniform, or all invalid...the things you listed are actually true of those albums.  And if those things are true, it seems like this would be the place to talk about them.

Hear hear! Please let's not have a culture of 'like it or shut up' on this board, especially when spear-headed by Wirestone of recent uber-negative thread frame (sorry Wirestone - I enjoy many of your posts but you're being a little hypocritical here, don't you think?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 02:21:04 AM
I think the review was just saying that because they're only on that one track it's weird.

Ah, gotcher. I guess that is kind of strange.

Also, I must have missed the part where you folks talked about Jon Bon Jovi having a writing credit on the album? I can't imagine how that went down or came about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on May 15, 2012, 03:43:49 AM
"Easy money
Ain't life funny
Hey what's it to you,
Hallelujah"

this is actually one of the most amazingly terrible lyrics in the history of music.

As someone who criticised the lyrics to TWGMTR and SV, I actually like the above lines. It's great pop music lyrics. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 15, 2012, 03:51:50 AM
I like them but I also think they're really dumb, if that makes any sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on May 15, 2012, 03:53:16 AM
I like them but I also think they're really dumb, if that makes any sense.

That's pretty much the entire history of post-war pop music! A wop bop a loo bop a lop bam boom.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jaco on May 15, 2012, 04:15:03 AM
I've only heard 3 songs of the new album, and now I'm seeing a pattern, something like the 'Joe Thomas production method', it borrows sounds and styles from various popular artists:

during the recording of one song on Stars And Stripes, he asked the Boys to sing like Sade (!)

the random nylon guitar strings on various tunes of Imagination: like Sting, f.e. Fragile (also on Everything I need)

on Happy Days Are Here Again: the keyboard sounds like Supertramp

That's Why God Made The Radio - that one guitar note before the bridge: like Toto - Hold The Line

the opening track of the new album, Think About The Days: sounds like Enya

Spring Vacation: guitar sounds like f.e. Robert Cray Band


- just an observation -


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 15, 2012, 04:47:45 AM
Every night a special occasion
???? Don't take much persuasion

For the first couple of listens I didn't care, but now I'm really wondering what's going on. Did they block out the 2nd line of the bridge for the promo version? I'm interested in hearing what other people think.

Btw, I think both of the songs sound GREAT. I don't mind some controlled autotune on a pop record. At least you don't hear it glitching all over the place.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 15, 2012, 05:12:08 AM
Anyone else curious about the so-called "eclectic" mix of greatest hits on the QVC bonus disc?  I'm wondering if it will be the same disc as the Zinepak.

Sorry if this has been posted already, but here is the track listing for the QVC bonus CD; there is some overlap with the ZinePak CD.  (Don't know if "Do It Again" is the 2012 version, but I'm guessing it is).  And the website says the ship date is June 5; the earliest delivery date given to my address in Texas is June 6.  So apparently no early delivery of the new album.

http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD (http://www.qvc.com/qic/qvcapp.aspx/view.2/app.detail/params.item.F09766.desc.Shp65-The-Beach-Boys-Thats-Why-God-Made-the-Radio-CD)

50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

    "Catch a Wave"
    "Surfin' Safari"
    "409"
    "God Only Knows"
    "California Girls"
    "Heroes and Villains"
    "Surfer Girl"
    "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
    "Little Honda"
    "Dance, Dance, Dance"
    "Do It Again"


Somewhat bizarre selection there.  :-\

They said it was going to be "eclectic."  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Phoenix on May 15, 2012, 06:32:37 AM
Adrian Baker's voice isn't "strange," it's "terrible." If a cat was a person and also dying he is what it would sound like.

A little harsh but you're right.  He isn't in the same league as anyone else who's every filled the flsetto role for the Boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 06:32:59 AM
http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE

clips up


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 06:33:38 AM
I don't get it...your list is a catalog of perfectly legitimate complaints.

His point isn't about the complaints, but the complaining, if you get my drift.  The issues may well be reasonable matters of taste, but that doesn't mean the over-the-top freak-outs about them are justified!

Think about it.  With a little bit of perspective, doesn't ranting about synth harpsichords when you've just been handed a completed version of "Smile" after nearly forty years seem a little bit silly?

This is precisely right. Jonathan makes my point better than I did. Of course you get complaining on a message board. But when you get a situation where every album is blasted -- and then many folks recant in a couple of years (which, regardless of what Anazgnos says, happens a lot) -- it gets a little exhausting. Isn't it easier to be more measured in the first place?

Goodness knows I'm not above criticism in this regard. I've been on BW/BB message boards for 15 years, and I've no doubt been guilty of every single thing that I criticize in others. I had a major reunion-based freakout here just a month or so ago. We all get passionate, and that's one of the reasons I spend time here -- people here care. And that is ultimately far more important to me than if I agree with you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 06:37:31 AM
http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE

clips up

Wow!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 06:41:14 AM
sigh. i'm not gonna listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 15, 2012, 06:44:47 AM
http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE

clips up

Thanks!

It sounds like a truly solid album!! (Spring Vacation sounds great!). I hope the mixing is a bit better for the CD as I can barely make out the lyrics in half the songs :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 15, 2012, 06:48:50 AM
Oh man. Think I'm gonna stick to my guns and not check out the 30-second samples.

I don't mind listening to one or two full songs, but I don't wanna hear the SOUND of any of the other songs yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 15, 2012, 06:58:57 AM
I'm waiting until I can hear the whole thing, too.  I made it with TSS, and I can make it with this release.  In three weeks I'll turn on my sound system, put the disc in my CD player, sit down on my couch, and listen to the whole thing in one sitting.  Start to finish...no interruptions.  I'm really looking forward to that.

Actually, my local indie CD/record store sold me the two-disc TSS on the Saturday before the official release date, so maybe I'll get lucky again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 15, 2012, 07:05:57 AM
I still don't like the overall production style, on almost all of the 30s snippets they sound as if they're singing out of a tin can and being autotuned on top of that (especially Brian). I didn't hear one natural-sounding vocal on all of the snippets. (Al still sounds the best.)
But apart from that... they seem to be good songs. And many a-Brian  to be heard.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 15, 2012, 07:08:37 AM
I still don't like the overall production style, on almost all of the 30s snippets they sound as if they're singing out of a tin can and being autotuned on top of that (especially Brian). I didn't hear one natural-sounding vocal on all of the snippets. (Al still sounds the best.)
But apart from that... they seem to be good songs. And many a-Brian  to be heard.  :)

I'm so sad to say this, but I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get past the pitch correction. To me it's like fingers scraping down a blackboard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 15, 2012, 07:10:39 AM
True, they could've scaled the autotune back a little bit. But I don't think it's any worse than BW's vocals on Imagination. And to me, that's the best he's ever sounded in his solo career. Then again, I like that sort of thing.  :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 07:10:47 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 07:12:39 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?

Your mileage will vary. I personally think it (thankfully) leans to the latter, but all of it is audibly processed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paul J B on May 15, 2012, 07:17:49 AM
I just listened to the samples at amazon, (they are always very short, unlike itunes) so it does not spoil it IMO. From the short samples I would say it's a winner. Indeed the tracks echo different era's in the BB's history. Al's voice and the music on one clip in particular did sound like it was '65. Griping is fine with me, I do more than my share, however I'm done with it as far as this album is concerned.

Brian, Mike, Alan, Bruce and David are alive and have created some brand new tracks that sound great in 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sometimes miracles are right in front of our faces........................


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amanda Hart on May 15, 2012, 07:19:45 AM
I wasn't going to listen to the clips, but I wanted to look on Amazon to see if the vinyl release was also coming with a digital download (nothing to indicate it will, and it says the vinyl won't be available until July 3 :( ) and I couldn't not listen with them right in my face like that.

I say up front my expectations were not high, I knew it would be slick and probably on the bland side. Listening to those 30 second clips, my expectations have been slightly exceeded. Think About The Days and Isn't It Time sound really promising, as do some of the songs toward the end of the album. Even in the short clips, the parts where you can hear the Boys singing together is wonderful. Even if the songs themselves are nothing to write home about in the end and the production isn't great, it is still really exciting to get to hear them all together.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 07:35:05 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?

Your mileage will vary. I personally think it (thankfully) leans to the latter, but all of it is audibly processed.

well that's good.  That's the only other clip i've heard, glad to hear that autotune isn't all over the place.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 07:39:23 AM
i listened to the TWGMTR clip since i've heard the song, these clips are like super low quality.  glad everyone still likes them


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 15, 2012, 07:41:19 AM
Isn't it time... Love it. The slower songs in the end sound haunting, although it's hard to have a clear idea from these clips. No spoiler, really.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 15, 2012, 07:46:10 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?

Your mileage will vary. I personally think it (thankfully) leans to the latter, but all of it is audibly processed.

well that's good.  That's the only other clip i've heard, glad to hear that autotune isn't all over the place.

It sounded very autotuned to me, sorry. Every single vocal. Some people can accept with that, I can't. After hearing those clips, I probably won't be buying this album. My loss.

But I can live with that, this band have given me so much. I'll just give Love You another spin instead.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 07:47:57 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?

Your mileage will vary. I personally think it (thankfully) leans to the latter, but all of it is audibly processed.

well that's good.  That's the only other clip i've heard, glad to hear that autotune isn't all over the place.

It sounded very autotuned to me, sorry. Every single vocal. Some people can accept with that, I can't. After hearing those clips, I probably won't be buying this album. My loss.

But I can live with that, this band have given me so much. I'll just give Love You another spin instead.

 ._.

i don't think i could have a comment for this line of thinking, whatever


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 15, 2012, 07:49:52 AM
does every song (autotune wise) sound like Spring Vacation (autuned a lot) or TWGMTR (fine autotune)?

Your mileage will vary. I personally think it (thankfully) leans to the latter, but all of it is audibly processed.

well that's good.  That's the only other clip i've heard, glad to hear that autotune isn't all over the place.

It sounded very autotuned to me, sorry. Every single vocal. Some people can accept with that, I can't. After hearing those clips, I probably won't be buying this album. My loss.

But I can live with that, this band have given me so much. I'll just give Love You another spin instead.

 ._.

i don't think i could have a comment for this line of thinking, whatever

Oh well, each to their own. I'm genuinely happy you like it :) You don't need to feel threatened because I don't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 15, 2012, 07:51:06 AM
But I can live with that, this band have given me so much. I'll just give Love You another spin instead.
That, or M.I.U.  :3d

I'll buy the LP, just because it's the Beach Boys. I'm still positive that it's going to be a good album: the songs ain't bad, some sounding to be real good songs under all that ACR production and processing. Maybe I'll get used to it. Maybe it doesn't sound as bad as the low-fi amazon snippets on the actual album. Que sera, sera.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on May 15, 2012, 07:52:50 AM
Say, where are the credits written? Seems I missed those.

Doesn't seem too bad an album, does it? Well, to make me enjoy TWGMTR more I think I'll listen to the Summer In Paradise album right before the new one. It's time to make it once all the way through SIP after all! :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on May 15, 2012, 07:58:05 AM
Oh well, each to their own. I'm genuinely happy you like it :) You don't need to feel threatened because I don't.

No, but we do need to read about it over and over right?

How long after the sound clips were posted did the first complaints come in?

I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 15, 2012, 08:00:15 AM
I still don't like the overall production style, on almost all of the 30s snippets they sound as if they're singing out of a tin can and being autotuned on top of that (especially Brian). I didn't hear one natural-sounding vocal on all of the snippets. (Al still sounds the best.)
But apart from that... they seem to be good songs. And many a-Brian  to be heard.  :)

I'm so sad to say this, but I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get past the pitch correction. To me it's like fingers scraping down a blackboard.

I know what you mean - it's like the current trend of overt autotune has given these guys the green light to go mental with it. Brian I can accept may benefit from a bit of judicious pitch correcting but does Al really need the same treatment (track 10)? Autotune is being used here stylistically rather than as a subtle enhancement to the odd bum note and for a band famed for their beautiful harmonies this strikes me as a gross misjudgement, plus it will date the album faster than if they'd all decided to black up for the cover shoot. This reminds me of when someone discovers the filters in Photoshop and just goes ballistic with them resulting in a smeary, digital, soulless mess.

Anyway, rant over. The use of autotune is unforgiveable, but hopefully some of that BW songwriting magic will still manage to shine through. Difficult to tell from the samples.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 08:01:26 AM
Oh well, each to their own. I'm genuinely happy you like it :) You don't need to feel threatened because I don't.

threatened definitely isn't the word lol, i'll leave it alone though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 15, 2012, 08:06:28 AM
Oh well, each to their own. I'm genuinely happy you like it :) You don't need to feel threatened because I don't.

No, but we do need to read about it over and over right?

How long after the sound clips were posted did the first complaints come in?

I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.

Oh f*ck off.

Where was there any hate in my posts? I expressed sadness, that for reasons of personal taste I won't enjoy it. I said they've given me so much already. I said I'm happy that others like it.

You're the one with the problem pal. Go and have a group wank with the other self satisfied, smarmy war mongers on this board. I've had it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 15, 2012, 08:09:53 AM
Lots of these sound really cool - Isn't It Time, Summer's Gone, Pacific Coast Highway, Shelter, and Strange World sounds aight....

The Private Life Of Bill & Sue.... bah. Everything about that sounded cool - lyrics about tabloid culture, weird Brian-esque title. Not this tropical assery. The California pop sound was not built on tropical cliches, you fools!

Daybreak.... hmph. I guess Mike insisted on one of his songs?

Maybe what they meant when they said 'It sounds like Pet Sounds!' is 'Brian takes most of the leads'?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 08:11:01 AM
good lord Iron-Horse, calm down.  I don't see anything in that guys post directed at your personally.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 15, 2012, 08:12:09 AM
I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.

Obviously we hate The Beach Boys, we post here!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: BiNNS on May 15, 2012, 08:12:29 AM
Well, having heard only TWGMTR and SV i can safely say that I am pumped for this album! June 5th can't come soon enough.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 08:13:31 AM
I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.

Obviously we hate The Beach Boys, we post here!

yah hate was the wrong word, pouting though! that would do it  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on May 15, 2012, 08:17:53 AM
Sounds really solid all around to me (with the first 2 tracks being great and reportedly the last 3 being great as well).  Could be their best album since Surf's Up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 15, 2012, 08:19:47 AM
Any news on a UK vinyl version - Amazon doesn't have it  :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 15, 2012, 08:51:55 AM
wow, sounds like a quality album with some tremendous Brian vocals

"Isn't it time" stood out the most


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 15, 2012, 08:53:59 AM
These clips sound promising. Sounds like they're really having fun.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on May 15, 2012, 09:30:12 AM
The use of autotune is going to sound worse on low quality clips like Amazon has (I was surprised how much more natural TWGMTR sounded on YouTube when I chose the highest quality setting). All the same, I think it's best to compare these recordings to what is currently accepted out there in Top 40 land instead of comparing them to the sound of past Beach Boys/Brian Wilson recordings. Compared to the overkill use of autotune on many, many recordings today, these tracks display a lighter touch.

I like what I'm hearing for the most part and am surprised by how melancholy this album seems to be. I smiled when hearing the line "It's a strange world after all" given that Brian just did an album of Disney covers!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 09:38:10 AM
I expressed sadness, that for reasons of personal taste I won't enjoy it. I said they've given me so much already. I said I'm happy that others like it.

Iron Horse, perhaps this is the kind of album that will grow on you over time?  The single That's Why God has grown on me a LOT to where I now think it's incredible in every way!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 09:44:36 AM

ARGHHH!

Hey, I know all these albums are just sitting in a warehouse somewhere.  What's say we rustle up a posse and go raid the warehouse?  WHO'S WITH ME ON THIS?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 09:46:06 AM
Well, they're following in the same tradition of having song titles that could easily be confused with another:  "Isn't It Time" vs "It's About Time" , "All I Want To Do" vs "All I Wanna Do"...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Les P on May 15, 2012, 10:06:28 AM
All the same, I think it's best to compare these recordings to what is currently accepted out there in Top 40 land instead of comparing them to the sound of past Beach Boys/Brian Wilson recordings. Compared to the overkill use of autotune on many, many recordings today, these tracks display a lighter touch.

Maybe the autotune usage is just an attempt to stay current with the contemporary market.  One rarely would have heard a non-reverbed pop hit from L.A. in 1965 (think how Capitol slathered reverb on "I Feel Fine" and other Beatles songs, for instance).  Likewise, maybe for any album seeking Top 40 status in 2012, autotune is just assumed to be an effect intentionally used to make it fit in with everything else on the radio.  That is not a comment on whether it's good or bad, as I'd prefer it's use to be limited.

Quote
I like what I'm hearing for the most part and am surprised by how melancholy this album seems to be. I smiled when hearing the line "It's a strange world after all" given that Brian just did an album of Disney covers!

Same reaction here!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on May 15, 2012, 10:08:38 AM
The two that stuck out for me were Beaches in Mind and Strange World. It's a strange world indeed that we basically have the first Brian Wilson led Beach Boys album since 1977. Actually, not strange, but AWESOME!!!!!!! The quality of the clips is very low - I have no doubt that this will be a very good to great album. I'm very surprised at the lack of Mike Love co-writes, and I guess I'm kinda disappointed that there's not a single Wilson-Love credit that doesn't also have Joe Thomas. But that's a minor complaint. I think the fact that we have a Brian Wilson Beach Boys record is way more than we could have ever hoped and expected especially considering how long it's been since they were last a real band (1996 for stars and stripes IIRC). To be honest, I love Brian Wilson but I'm not a Brianista. I kind of resented his solo career, particularly the 2004 smile. But if that's what it took to get this album and tour, both of which are a very tasteful, elegant, and incredibly joyful capstone to their career, then it's ok with me. Plus, I really have developed an incredible amount of respect and admiration for Brian's band (now the Beach Boys' band?) after seeing them in concert this past weekend (as well as scott totten and john cowsill). They really are incredible musicians and vocalists and are obviously huge beach boys fans themselves.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 15, 2012, 10:15:10 AM
Only the two last clips sounds promising ..
the rest seems like a bunch of Kokomo-like with full of Autotune (for most of the part)

Isn't it sad ? it's their first album in i don't know how many years, celebrating 50 years of career, 50 years of a band that is well known for harmonies and vocals performance, and that special album ends up being an extreme use of Autotune.. such a shame
i just wished That Lucky Old Sun was recorded with The Beach Boys and that it was the last album (well if God Made The Radio is the last one..
if not, then let's hope they come up with something more solid and natural)

Oh well, these were just clips yet it shows a lot of the production and the songs atmosphere..
maybe i'll dig them after listening to the album, i'm sure i'll be likin' the two last or three songs (poor Al, massive Autotune on his great voice),
but the rest sounds like guilty pleasures at best.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Feldspar on May 15, 2012, 10:16:01 AM
the songwriting sounds amazingly strong. Its nothing like summer in paradise and honestly sounds much better than most of the BW solo albums (and I love those). I am excited! My only complaint is having to wait.... ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 15, 2012, 10:24:00 AM
Shelter has a very catchy chorus tho (thanks Jeff).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 15, 2012, 10:24:43 AM
The two that stuck out for me were Beaches in Mind and Strange World. It's a strange world indeed that we basically have the first Brian Wilson led Beach Boys album since 1977. Actually, not strange, but AWESOME!!!!!!! The quality of the clips is very low - I have no doubt that this will be a very good to great album. I'm very surprised at the lack of Mike Love co-writes, and I guess I'm kinda disappointed that there's not a single Wilson-Love credit that doesn't also have Joe Thomas. But that's a minor complaint. I think the fact that we have a Brian Wilson Beach Boys record is way more than we could have ever hoped and expected especially considering how long it's been since they were last a real band (1996 for stars and stripes IIRC). To be honest, I love Brian Wilson but I'm not a Brianista. I kind of resented his solo career, particularly the 2004 smile. But if that's what it took to get this album and tour, both of which are a very tasteful, elegant, and incredibly joyful capstone to their career, then it's ok with me. Plus, I really have developed an incredible amount of respect and admiration for Brian's band (now the Beach Boys' band?) after seeing them in concert this past weekend (as well as scott totten and john cowsill). They really are incredible musicians and vocalists and are obviously huge beach boys fans themselves.


Tim, you are as eloquent as you are right, sir. I agree completely.

byw: the QVC listing for the album is up, but it ships on June 5, so ordering from QVC will not get us the album sooner than Amazon.  I still do not see the special offer part of the qvc listing; perhaps tomorrow when they are on TY they will indicate what makes this package special;  I teach tomorrow, so I hope someone will be recording and posting the BB appearance/performance.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 10:27:44 AM
actually if it ships on june 5 then that's slower than amazon.com.  I'm sure amazon has the option for day of delivery. might as well just go to best buy though.  No shipping and albums are only 9.99 week of release there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 10:29:21 AM
Did anyone notice the lyrics on Shelter? The verse sounds like a tribute to Busy Doin' Nothing!

... Staying at home
Summertime (?)
Make a few calls
Make a little love
Thank god for shelter


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Michael Edwards Love on May 15, 2012, 10:31:57 AM
actually if it ships on june 5 then that's slower than amazon.com.  I'm sure amazon has the option for day of delivery. might as well just go to best buy though.  No shipping and albums are only 9.99 week of release there.

Special offer is a fairly predictable Greatest Hits comp:

The Beach Boys That's Why God Made the Radio CD & Bonus CD

That's Why God Made The Radio

"Think About the Days"
"That's Why God Made the Radio"
"Isn't It Time"
"Spring Vacation"
"Private Life of Bill And Sue"
"Shelter"
"Daybreak Over the Ocean"
"Beaches in Mind"
"Strange World"
"From There to Back Again"
"Pacific Coast Highway"
"Summer's Gone"


50 Years Of Hits (Bonus CD)

"Catch a Wave"
"Surfin' Safari"
"409"
"God Only Knows"
"California Girls"
"Heroes and Villains"
"Surfer Girl"
"Wouldn't It Be Nice"
"Little Honda"
"Dance, Dance, Dance"
"Do It Again"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 15, 2012, 10:32:40 AM
Did anyone notice the lyrics on Shelter? The verse sounds like a tribute to Busy Doin' Nothing!

... Staying at home
Summertime (?)
Make a few calls
Make a little love
Thank god for shelter

I'll give you shelter from the storm
And a house to keep to you warm
I'll give you shelter through the night
And a chance to make things right
Ya... maybe..... nice observation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on May 15, 2012, 10:51:39 AM
I wish it wasn't sounding so much like a Brian album with the boys voices and lyrics added when the reunion came up. I do hope they do another album after that's a full collaboration from the start.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 15, 2012, 10:58:38 AM
good lord Iron-Horse, calm down.  I don't see anything in that guys post directed at your personally.

Well he quoted me before typing his bullsh*t, so yes, it was directed at me you idiot.

And this is directed at you

I'm fed up of these condecnding, belittling remarks being thrown around every time someone posts an opinion. You are a prime offender. You want to end a remark aimed at me with a dimissive "whatever", like some dimwitted 14 year old, then I'm going to take that as aggressive. If people throw the word "hate", or "hater" at me, then they're going to get some hate thrown back at them.

Pretty soon, all those of us who are fighting a losing battle at being respectful to one another are going to get fed up and leave. Then you idiots can have the place to yourselves, and you're welcome to it.

And don't you dare tell me to calm down you patronising twat.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 11:04:52 AM
good lord Iron-Horse, calm down.  I don't see anything in that guys post directed at your personally.

Well he quoted me before typing his bullsh*t, so yes, it was directed at me you idiot.

And this is directed at you

I'm fed up of these condecnding, belittling remarks being thrown around every time someone posts an opinion. You are a prime offender. You want to end a remark aimed at me with a dimissive "whatever", like some dimwitted 14 year old, then I'm going to take that as aggressive. If people throw the word "hate", or "hater" at me, then they're going to get some hate thrown back at them.

Pretty soon, all those of us who are fighting a losing battle at being respectful to one another are going to get fed up and leave. Then you idiots can have the place to yourselves, and you're welcome to it.

And don't you dare tell me to calm down you patronising twat.





YEAH!!! YEAH!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:10:25 AM
good lord Iron-Horse, calm down.  I don't see anything in that guys post directed at your personally.

Well he quoted me before typing his bullsh*t, so yes, it was directed at me you idiot.

And this is directed at you

I'm fed up of these condecnding, belittling remarks being thrown around every time someone posts an opinion. You are a prime offender. You want to end a remark aimed at me with a dimissive "whatever", like some dimwitted 14 year old, then I'm going to take that as aggressive. If people throw the word "hate", or "hater" at me, then they're going to get some hate thrown back at them.

Pretty soon, all those of us who are fighting a losing battle at being respectful to one another are going to get fed up and leave. Then you idiots can have the place to yourselves, and you're welcome to it.

And don't you dare tell me to calm down you patronising twat

Dude, i think you should calm down.  My "whatever" was me deciding not respond because i thought your comment was ungrateful of what you're getting.  You said I was "threatened" by you, i chose not to respond to that.  You start calling someone names because he didn't get some of the "hate" he was seeing, and i even said later that "hate" was the wrong word.  Saying "whatever" isn't aggressive, that means i'm not gonna try and make a big deal out of it.  But now here you are calling me a patronizing twat and others an "idiot".  

You talk about some "battle" and that the board is losing cause of "hate", well these last few posts by you have been some of the most spiteful i've read on the board.  So maybe you should think about what you're saying.

You're not being respectful at all, you're calling people names when nobody else has called you one.  The reason why I was dismissive of what you said was because it seemed ungrateful.  The Beach Boys are releasing an album in less than a month, and i highly doubt they're doing it for themselves, they're doing it for their fans.  For you to say "i hear autotune, i'm not gonna buy it" is really harsh, and i don't appreciate reading someone being dismissive about something they did for us.  They don't owe you anything.  If you're going to pout about it, then don't tell us about it.  

if i said something to somebody else that offended them, then i'll apologize to them (and check what i post from now on, since i'm being accused of being hateful)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 11:15:12 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 15, 2012, 11:15:50 AM
"I don't love it," as the English A&R guys used to say. It's orthodox MOR and sterile sounding as all get out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 15, 2012, 11:20:21 AM
THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS GUYS!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:21:26 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 15, 2012, 11:22:26 AM
I don't know for sure what they are doing to Brian's vocals; autotune, reverb, echo? Whatever it is, I hope they keep on doing it. I thought he did great on the Gershwin album, but he sounds even better here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 11:24:41 AM
I wish it wasn't sounding so much like a Brian album with the boys voices and lyrics added when the reunion came up. I do hope they do another album after that's a full collaboration from the start.

But that's what some of the best Beach Boys albums are! The other guys hardly collaborated at all on Pet Sounds or Smile. Brian made the tracks and they came in to sing on them. (Not saying this album will be PS or Smile, but still.)

I don't know for sure what they are doing to Brian's vocals; autotune, reverb, echo? Whatever it is, I hope they keep on doing it. I thought he did great on the Gershwin album, but he sounds even better here.

Well, the Gershwin album was him working hard in the studio -- with some pitch correction on notes here and there (or many notes, like in TLILY). This seems to be tuning, reverb, everything in the book thrown at his voice. (Also some doubling with Jeff.)

But you're right ... he does sound pretty good!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Exapno Mapcase on May 15, 2012, 11:25:34 AM
God I hate Daybreak etc etc.  Hated it on the solo album. Hate it now.  There were better tracks he could've used.

Still... My overriding feeiling is this should've happened years ago, but thank God they got together before it was too late. For all their brilliance, so much of their career has been a tragic waste.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 11:25:56 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 11:30:35 AM

The new album is win/win for me!

I've related this story before.  Brian's album Imagination is what actually turned me into a Brian and later a Beach Boys fan.  Honestly, before Imagination, I really didn't know Brian Wilson from Mr. Wilson on Dennis the Menace...... On this board, I talked about Imagination so much that someone finally asked me if I was Joe Thomas.  (I'm not.)  LOL !

So wayway, the Joe Thomas involvement is welcome by me!

Trying.
To.
Resist.
Playing.
Samples.

ARGHH

where's that posse?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 15, 2012, 11:31:02 AM
As much I like their later work and all, the best Beach Boys (with maybe Sunflower as an exceptrion) were the ALL BRIAN albums up through Wild Honey. His Music, his production, their voices; seems to work just about every time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 11:31:21 AM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:32:58 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think, i know i've seen you call people names, myself included, it seems you have your own perspective on it and i have mine.  I don't care if you call it an "internet phenomenon", that's what i do in real life too.  I said i didn't have time to get into an opinion that dismisses something made for them because they didn't like part of it, and i stand by that.  I'm not saying his opinion is worth less than mine, because it absolutely is not, i think i got into an argument with fishmonk over that. but if someone is gonna dismiss my favorite band, then i'm gonna say something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:35:09 AM
As much I like their later work and all, the best Beach Boys (with maybe Sunflower as an exceptrion) were the ALL BRIAN albums up through Wild Honey. His Music, his production, their voices; seems to work just about every time.

I may be in the minority, but i think i'd take Surf's Up over wild honey  ;D

that said, brian + beach boys makes everything better. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 11:38:56 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 15, 2012, 11:42:54 AM
I'm kind of really stoked for this now. I just wish they were the iTunes minute & a half samples instead of the 30 second ones. Definitely missing Carl vocals,  but hearing Brian, Al & Mike singing together on the same track.  ;D That's dope.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 11:48:36 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys. 

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:50:09 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

it's true, i'd prefer not to offend people when i don't mean to, ya got me.  He can decide how he wants to take what i said, but i think i have more say in what i actually meant, don't you think?  You can say what you want about me, but ugh, it just seems arrogant.  I still appreciate you pointing us to that board you plug, and i think we can agree neither of us really care that much about continuing this discussion.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 15, 2012, 11:50:16 AM

The new album is win/win for me!

I've related this story before.  Brian's album Imagination is what actually turned me into a Brian and later a Beach Boys fan.  Honestly, before Imagination, I really didn't know Brian Wilson from Mr. Wilson on Dennis the Menace...... On this board, I talked about Imagination so much that someone finally asked me if I was Joe Thomas.  (I'm not.)  LOL !

So wayway, the Joe Thomas involvement is welcome by me!

Trying.
To.
Resist.
Playing.
Samples.

ARGHH

where's that posse?



Right here witcha!   :smokin

I know myself too well. I'll end up playing the samples until the sound is worn out to me! I did that with Surf's Up '67. Recorded my own version of the arrangement and everything before I even heard the full track, lol.

Granted, these are new songs and I don't think ~30 seconds would spoil it entirely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 15, 2012, 11:51:38 AM
I know you have all been waiting. Here is my verdict:

1. Think About The Days - 9/10 (could have been written by Benny Andersson)
2. That's Why God Made The Radio - 5/10 (too pedestrian)
3. Isn't It Time - 4/10 (bland)
4. Spring Vacation - 6/10 (great verses, lousy chorus)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue - 8/10 (I am a sucker for this song)
6. Shelter - 7/10 (shows some promise, the chorus is similar to Darlin')
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean - 8/10 (I liked this one on the Mike Love, Not War album)
8. Beaches In Mind - 3/10 (I've got 3/10 in mind)
9. Strange World - 3/10 (Not my cup of milk)
10. From There To Back Again - 6/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics)
11. Pacific Coast Highway - 7/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again)
12. Summer's Gone - 8/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again again)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 11:51:45 AM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 11:51:50 AM
God I hate Daybreak etc etc.  Hated it on the solo album. Hate it now.  There were better tracks he could've used.

Still... My overriding feeiling is this should've happened years ago, but thank God they got together before it was too late. For all their brilliance, so much of their career has been a tragic waste.

I think the timing of this is pretty good actually!  There's a lot of love for the group, and i think they're all more welcoming to this than say 10 years ago.  i'd rather this happen now, as far separated from the 80s as possible.  Their legacy is pretty well repaired


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 15, 2012, 11:54:47 AM
The samples sound pretty good but just leave me wanting more, only 20 days to go! Regarding the autotune, if it's done tastefully then I don't mind and it's kinda hard to tell from the samples on amazon just how prevalent it is. The thing is that, as other posters have pointed out, Brian has been using tricks on vocals for nearly 50 years e.g. double tracking on virtually everything from Surfin' U.S.A. onwards and speeding the tape up to make the vocals sound younger on Surfin' and Caroline, No. Let's also not forget that the main vocalists of the band are all 69+ and may need a little polish in the studio to smooth off the rough edges.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 15, 2012, 11:55:17 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?


Yes, please.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 11:56:50 AM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys. 

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 11:58:00 AM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  


Hadn't seen it. Sorry.
I agree though about Baker. But as of yet we don't know how much he will be recognizable. On the amazon-clip you can hear him but not (yet) sticking out.
A Matt Jardine appearance would be nice. But I won't complain. I just wondered about Baker's vocal track(s) being used. His voice is very, very annoying and doesn't fit in very well with the Beach Boys' blend imo. Never has.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: BJL on May 15, 2012, 12:00:42 PM
I think its worth noting that there may be less Joe Thomas involvement in the songwriting than it looks like, since Joe Thomas seems to be mainly a lyrics writer, I would imagine that the songs with a Thomas, Wilson, and Love credit were first written with Joe Thomas lyrics, then stripped down to just tracks and got new lyrics from Mike Love.  In that kind of situation the old writing credits would generally all stay, but the song would still be substantially brian music and mike words.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 12:01:06 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?



I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  


Hadn't seen it. Sorry.
I agree though about Baker. But as of yet we don't know how much he will be recognizable. On the amazon-clip you can hear him but not (yet) sticking out.
A Matt Jardine appearance would be nice. But I won't complain. I just wondered about Baker's vocal track(s) being used. His voice is very, very annoying and doesn't fit in very well with the Beach Boys' blend imo. Never has.

Oh I wasn't saying you should have seen it.  Just agreeing with you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 12:02:46 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Semantics, mate


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 15, 2012, 12:03:59 PM
I know you have all been waiting. Here is my verdict:

1. Think About The Days - 9/10 (could have been written by Benny Andersson)
2. That's Why God Made The Radio - 5/10 (too pedestrian)
3. Isn't It Time - 4/10 (bland)
4. Spring Vacation - 6/10 (great verses, lousy chorus)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue - 8/10 (I am a sucker for this song)
6. Shelter - 7/10 (shows some promise, the chorus is similar to Darlin')
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean - 8/10 (I liked this one on the Mike Love, Not War album)
8. Beaches In Mind - 3/10 (I've got 3/10 in mind)
9. Strange World - 3/10 (Not my cup of milk)
10. From There To Back Again - 6/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics)
11. Pacific Coast Highway - 7/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again)
12. Summer's Gone - 8/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again again)
What do you know that the rest of us don't? Are you rating based on the clips at Amazon?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 12:06:35 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys. 

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Can you take whatever you want to call this that is distracting from the actual thread outside?

Did you read the part of the conversation that involved Iron Horse-Apples and Runaways? Address that. That was the fight.
I provided a place to find out some of the cool info discussed on this thread. Don't tell me to take anything anywhere. I've been on point in this thread since I joined in.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 15, 2012, 12:07:16 PM
I know you have all been waiting. Here is my verdict:

1. Think About The Days - 9/10 (could have been written by Benny Andersson)
2. That's Why God Made The Radio - 5/10 (too pedestrian)
3. Isn't It Time - 4/10 (bland)
4. Spring Vacation - 6/10 (great verses, lousy chorus)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue - 8/10 (I am a sucker for this song)
6. Shelter - 7/10 (shows some promise, the chorus is similar to Darlin')
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean - 8/10 (I liked this one on the Mike Love, Not War album)
8. Beaches In Mind - 3/10 (I've got 3/10 in mind)
9. Strange World - 3/10 (Not my cup of milk)
10. From There To Back Again - 6/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics)
11. Pacific Coast Highway - 7/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again)
12. Summer's Gone - 8/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again again)
What do you know that the rest of us don't? Are you rating based on the clips at Amazon?
Yes. Plus I've heard the full version of Think About the Days God Made Spring Vacation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 12:09:07 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys. 

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Can you take whatever you want to call this that is distracting from the actual thread outside?

Did you read the part of the conversation that involved Iron Horse-Apples and Runaways? Address that. That was the fight.
I provided a place to find out some of the cool info discussed on this thread. Don't tell me to take anything anywhere. I've been on point in this thread since I joined in.

Hey, Billy, a little help over here?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 12:09:23 PM
Yes. Plus I've heard the full version of Think About the Days God Made Spring Vacation.

is that an extended remix?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 15, 2012, 12:09:29 PM
I know you have all been waiting. Here is my verdict:

1. Think About The Days - 9/10 (could have been written by Benny Andersson)
2. That's Why God Made The Radio - 5/10 (too pedestrian)
3. Isn't It Time - 4/10 (bland)
4. Spring Vacation - 6/10 (great verses, lousy chorus)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue - 8/10 (I am a sucker for this song)
6. Shelter - 7/10 (shows some promise, the chorus is similar to Darlin')
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean - 8/10 (I liked this one on the Mike Love, Not War album)
8. Beaches In Mind - 3/10 (I've got 3/10 in mind)
9. Strange World - 3/10 (Not my cup of milk)
10. From There To Back Again - 6/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics)
11. Pacific Coast Highway - 7/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again)
12. Summer's Gone - 8/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again again)
What do you know that the rest of us don't? Are you rating based on the clips at Amazon?
Yes. Plus I've heard the full version of Think About the Days God Made Spring Vacation.

Oh. Thought you'd heard the whole thing, seems a little strange to give ratings to songs you haven't properly heard yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 15, 2012, 12:11:43 PM
I know you have all been waiting. Here is my verdict:

1. Think About The Days - 9/10 (could have been written by Benny Andersson)
2. That's Why God Made The Radio - 5/10 (too pedestrian)
3. Isn't It Time - 4/10 (bland)
4. Spring Vacation - 6/10 (great verses, lousy chorus)
5. The Private Life Of Bill And Sue - 8/10 (I am a sucker for this song)
6. Shelter - 7/10 (shows some promise, the chorus is similar to Darlin')
7. Daybreak Over The Ocean - 8/10 (I liked this one on the Mike Love, Not War album)
8. Beaches In Mind - 3/10 (I've got 3/10 in mind)
9. Strange World - 3/10 (Not my cup of milk)
10. From There To Back Again - 6/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics)
11. Pacific Coast Highway - 7/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again)
12. Summer's Gone - 8/10 (introspective looking back type of lyrics again again)
What do you know that the rest of us don't? Are you rating based on the clips at Amazon?
Yes. Plus I've heard the full version of Think About the Days God Made Spring Vacation.

Oh. Thought you'd heard the whole thing, seems a little strange to give ratings to songs you haven't properly heard yet.
You can rate what you've heard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 12:12:01 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys. 

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Can you take whatever you want to call this that is distracting from the actual thread outside?

Did you read the part of the conversation that involved Iron Horse-Apples and Runaways? Address that. That was the fight.
I provided a place to find out some of the cool info discussed on this thread. Don't tell me to take anything anywhere. I've been on point in this thread since I joined in.

Hey, Billy, a little help over here?

Billy's a great guy. I'm sure he can see where the problem was.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 15, 2012, 12:14:11 PM
Yes. Plus I've heard the full version of Think About the Days God Made Spring Vacation.

is that an extended remix?  ;D
Yes, it is remixed by John Stamos, Murry Wilson, Eugene Landy and Melinda Wilson.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 12:16:51 PM

I may be in the minority, but i think i'd take Surf's Up over wild honey  ;D

that said, Brian + beach boys makes everything better. 

Y'know, that's a really interesting comparison, because in a sense Wild Honey and Surf's Up are like an alpha/omega of the post-Pet Sounds work.  Hey, were those albums even done by the same band?   :lol

Just shows how awesome The Boys were AFTER Pet Sounds.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 12:16:59 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Can you take whatever you want to call this that is distracting from the actual thread outside?

Did you read the part of the conversation that involved Iron Horse-Apples and Runaways? Address that. That was the fight.
I provided a place to find out some of the cool info discussed on this thread. Don't tell me to take anything anywhere. I've been on point in this thread since I joined in.

Hey, Billy, a little help over here?

Billy's a great guy. I'm sure he can see where the problem was.

This thread is for discussing the album, that's all I'm Im asking.  Lets discuss the album , not the language or intentions of other posters.  Do that in pm's.  And yes, I appreciated your posts directing us to the record room. Great stuff over there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 12:19:29 PM
 And yes, I appreciated your posts directing us to the record room. Great stuff over there.

Cool. Thank you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 12:24:44 PM
Why is it every time I take a day or week off from reading this board that something BIG happens? And what is it with all of you folks who read and post here every blooming day? How in the name of God do you do it? How do you have time to, you know, live your lives and stuff? I will never understand.

Anyway, rant over. I just now listened to these clips and wanted to respond before becoming infected by the backlash and negativity that is inevitably contained in the pages I haven’t read yet (I’m on page 87).

BEAUTIFUL stuff.

Think About The Days: I am shocked, actually, I never expected anything this sensitive, delicate and toned just right. If you think about it, 1985 was the last time that ALL surviving members of the group came together and offered up an original artistic statement of some kind. That’s 26 years ago. This intro to me feels perfectly pitched to open things up after such a long gap. It may not be as compositionally eloquent as “Our Prayer” perhaps (but then, what is?), but I imagine it’s just as effective in its context.

Spring Vacation: LOVE it. It feels like a commercial, with leprechauns splashing around or something, far removed from whatever it advertises, just the echo of a form of something real, but in its wake comes rejuvenation. A real result. Like an “ahhh” after a drink of water. I have no problems with the lyrics. Since their first album on, the Beach Boys have been a billboard for a land that’s “merely” a theme park. The latter-day sum-sum-summer clichés are just a natural extension of that for me, and they work, in the context of these Men/Boys valiantly struggling to reconcile the real with the ideal. Some of my brightest days have been spent at theme parks after all. I love Brian’s swoopy “hallelujah” – some brilliant, goofy phrasing there. I do have to say, though, I HATE the guitar solo. That kind of guitar wankery – that and cheesy sax – those are two things I cannot stomach. But I can forgive. I embrace the positivity. I feel the Love.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 15, 2012, 12:33:42 PM
What is this "life" thing you speak of ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 15, 2012, 12:38:49 PM
I just listened to the amazon clips a couple times and was trying to figure out why the production sounds the way it does at first I didn't like the way they are sounding and then it hit me,it seems (IMO) that they are going for an up to date "alternative" college age sound,Aka:Bare naked ladies,High LLamas,Xtc  etc.. which is a good thing that they are aiming it at people who are in their 20's because that's the age group that will carry on their legacy ,especially in the art world...Smart move on their part...I can picture a lot of these songs being played at the local college radio station,it just has that sound that college aged studets like..alternative/modern/artsy but at the same time we know it's the beach boys...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 15, 2012, 12:41:41 PM
"The Private Life of Bill and Sue" really does it for me for some reason. Judging from that short snippet, the lyrics seem to be incredibly bland and the overall sound is akin to "South American", one of the most un-Brian songs ever released on a BW album. Still, I'm really looking forward to this. Very catchy! (...and at least they don't sing "From California to Kokomo"...)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 12:49:52 PM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".
Good one.
Seconded, that was a hilarious response Andrew. Incidentally I think "The Star Spangled Banner" nicks much more from John Lennon's "Two Minutes Silence" than it ever did from "4:33."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 12:52:30 PM
I have a question for Sir AGD,

I know you've been championing from there and back again, does al sound as robotic on the album? or is it just the amazon.com quality.  That has me scratching my head a bit


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 12:58:33 PM
To me, the vocals on this record sound more naturalistic than the 85 album, where every single vocal part sounds like it was shoved through a Fairlight. I can hear the processing on the new tunes, but it isn't egregious to my ears.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 15, 2012, 01:00:34 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

You really can't pick out Adrian's voice by the way so I wouldn't worry too much. The harmonies on Mike's version of Daybreak are really nice.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 01:01:21 PM
yeah i only clicked on a couple, the only one that i was taken aback by was "from there and back", i was expecting a more "naked" vocal track i suppose.  I'm sure the quality is making it worse.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: CarlTheVoice on May 15, 2012, 01:04:32 PM
It may be quite easy to forget the main thing here. The Beach Boys are back together making music, enjoying it and giving us some original songs to add to the hundreds of others we have the pleasure of listening to.  

Ok, so songs may not be to everyone's tastes but come on, a lot of us would have never had thought we would be writing about these songs!

My personal faves (so far) are Think About the Days, From There To Back Again, Pacific Coast Highway (lovely harmonies and chords - would have been perfect for Carl!) and Summer's Gone (very Pet Sounds but a fitting end.....).

I'm a very happy young BB fan today.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 01:05:43 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

You really can't pick out Adrian's voice by the way so I wouldn't worry too much. The harmonies on Mike's version of Daybreak are really nice.  :)

Fair enough, thanks.  The idea of it still hurts my ears a little, though


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 01:11:10 PM
 And yes, I appreciated your posts directing us to the record room. Great stuff over there.

Cool. Thank you.

Looks very interesting!  I am going to sign up fir it tonight!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 15, 2012, 01:11:30 PM
Why is it every time I take a day or week off from reading this board that something BIG happens? And what is it with all of you folks who read and post here every blooming day? How in the name of God do you do it? How do you have time to, you know, live your lives and stuff? I will never understand.

Anyway, rant over. I just now listened to these clips and wanted to respond before becoming infected by the backlash and negativity that is inevitably contained in the pages I haven’t read yet (I’m on page 87).

BEAUTIFUL stuff.

Think About The Days: I am shocked, actually, I never expected anything this sensitive, delicate and toned just right. If you think about it, 1985 was the last time that ALL surviving members of the group came together and offered up an original artistic statement of some kind. That’s 26 years ago. This intro to me feels perfectly pitched to open things up after such a long gap. It may not be as compositionally eloquent as “Our Prayer” perhaps (but then, what is?), but I imagine it’s just as effective in its context.

Spring Vacation: LOVE it. It feels like a commercial, with leprechauns splashing around or something, far removed from whatever it advertises, just the echo of a form of something real, but in its wake comes rejuvenation. A real result. Like an “ahhh” after a drink of water. I have no problems with the lyrics. Since their first album on, the Beach Boys have been a billboard for a land that’s “merely” a theme park. The latter-day sum-sum-summer clichés are just a natural extension of that for me, and they work, in the context of these Men/Boys valiantly struggling to reconcile the real with the ideal. Some of my brightest days have been spent at theme parks after all. I love Brian’s swoopy “hallelujah” – some brilliant, goofy phrasing there. I do have to say, though, I HATE the guitar solo. That kind of guitar wankery – that and cheesy sax – those are two things I cannot stomach. But I can forgive. I embrace the positivity. I feel the Love.


Love it, Catbirdman! You should be writing the sleeve notes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 15, 2012, 01:12:17 PM
Based on these samples, perhaps an award for Most Inappropriate Use of Autotune As Effect should be given to From There To Back Again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 15, 2012, 01:17:04 PM
I have a question for Sir AGD,

I know you've been championing from there and back again, does al sound as robotic on the album? or is it just the amazon.com quality.  That has me scratching my head a bit

Yes, noticed it straight away. And ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 15, 2012, 01:17:09 PM
Lads, the amazon samples is up thread is concurrent with this one; ought they be merged?  I will not paste my post here as well, but I did write there about the samples, qv.

Ought we only now post here to unify the thread?

I have all the songs in my head; this is a grand and absolute success.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 15, 2012, 01:20:22 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 01:30:19 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=




Excellent ! I hate it !



And remember this is the kind of stuff that we'd (or some of us) expected Mike to come up with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx3kYj0AsDA&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx3kYj0AsDA&feature=related)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 01:30:30 PM
I do find the fact that Joe Thomas' name is all over the thing slightly more worrying, but a good half the songs on Imagination were decent to good, so that could still be OK. The credits for Peterik and Bon Jovi are frankly scary, though.

I don't fully understand my own reaction at the developments thus far: looking at past prejudices, I SHOULDN'T like the production. I SHOULD be trembling over the names in the credits. I SHOULD be reeling from the lyrics in "Spring Vacation." But I’m really, really not.

“Imagination” was far from a personal favorite, but I just have this feeling that in this context – getting the old gang back together, owning the 50 fractured years for better or worse, owning the myth and the identity – the aesthetic will be right. Based on what I’ve heard/read, I expect nothing like the nadir of “Sunshine,” a few exceptional songs and moments, and an overall bed of achy/celebratory goo. A bit slick maybe, but RIGHT for the Beach Boys. At least that’s my gut feeling – hopefully I won’t be disappointed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 01:31:07 PM
I have a question for Sir AGD,

I know you've been championing from there and back again, does al sound as robotic on the album? or is it just the amazon.com quality.  That has me scratching my head a bit

Yes, noticed it straight away. And ?

nothing else, if everyone is still saying it's great, then i'll wait and hear the whole thing


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 15, 2012, 01:31:52 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=

Dear god...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 01:34:59 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=




Excellent ! I hate it !





And remember this is the kind of stuff that we'd (or some of us) expected Mike to come up with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx3kYj0AsDA&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx3kYj0AsDA&feature=related)
[/

Yep, that's the voice I never  want to hear again. That is the one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 15, 2012, 01:35:55 PM
Dear god, that was freaking terrible! Listening to Baker's 'falsetto' is the aural equivalent of being slapped square in the balls.

I had to put my post above the quote as the quote function seems to have gone all whackadoodle.

I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 01:38:19 PM
I wonder why they didn't take Adrian Baker's vocals off "Daybreak over the ocean" and record new ones. Or did they do that only letting Baker's voice stay in ?

I said the same thing in the Amazon clip thread.  So far my only real complaint on the album.  Like that C. Love is on there, but that would have been a great place to also add M. Jardine.   Adrian Baker  is just going to stick out like a really sore and infected thumb on this thing  

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=



Dear god, that was freaking terrible! Listening to Baker's 'falsetto' is the aural equivalent of being slapped square in the balls.

Matt Jardine set us free in 1993. Literally set us free.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 01:39:25 PM
something funky with the quote box going on here


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: anders wyller on May 15, 2012, 01:40:24 PM
According to amazon.jp the bonus track on the japanese edition is Revival of Love (2012 Version) - do I read japanese? No. Google translate usually does.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 15, 2012, 01:43:41 PM
According to amazon.jp the bonus track on the japanese edition is Revival of Love (2012 Version) - do I read japanese? No. Google translate usually does.
It's most likely Do It Again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 01:48:05 PM
i think it was translated by people here and it was "do it again"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 15, 2012, 01:49:35 PM
But man, saying you don't appreciate reading someone else's opinions, calling them ungrateful and telling him not to share them is not respectful in any manner. I do not understand why folks think because they may not use profanity, that their passive-aggressive insults are any less offensive.

i'm not being passive aggressive at all.  I said he was being ungrateful, nothing passive aggressive about that.  Also nothing passive aggressive about not wanting to hear pouting.  I'm being straight forward about this without having to call someone names.  He's free to post whatever he likes, my initial response to him wasn't some long rant, i let it go.  I personally think name-calling is really low, so I try not to do that because I don't know any of you guys.  

There is no difference in offense between calling someone a "name" and telling them their opinion is unwelcome. The type of person who would not agree is someone who wants to be able to say anything they want to others, and not get called on it. That is an Internet phenomenon. Language matters less than intention.

That's fine if that's what you think

In fact, my point was proved by the effect upon IHA of what you said. HE gets to decide the impact of your words, not you. You just want to say otherwise because you want people to like you. I don't, therefore I'm truthful about what I say.

hey, can you guys all take your fight outside?

I'm not fighting, mate. Thanks.

Can you take whatever you want to call this that is distracting from the actual thread outside?

Did you read the part of the conversation that involved Iron Horse-Apples and Runaways? Address that. That was the fight.
I provided a place to find out some of the cool info discussed on this thread. Don't tell me to take anything anywhere. I've been on point in this thread since I joined in.

Hey, Billy, a little help over here?

Billy's a great guy. I'm sure he can see where the problem was.

This thread is for discussing the album, that's all I'm Im asking.  Lets discuss the album , not the language or intentions of other posters.  Do that in pm's.  

100% agreed. At this point, I could give two shits about who started it, just that it gets finished and doesn't end up on the board anymore.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SBonilla on May 15, 2012, 01:53:32 PM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".
Good one.
Seconded, that was a hilarious response Andrew. Incidentally I think "The Star Spangled Banner" nicks much more from John Lennon's "Two Minutes Silence" than it ever did from "4:33."
You haven't heard the 4 track demo, then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 15, 2012, 01:55:52 PM
Quote
With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=

Good fuckin' gravy, that's horrible. I'd rather swallow a gallon of gasoline, get set on fire, and have my ashes snorted by Keith Richards than ever be subjected to that again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 01:58:35 PM

100% agreed. At this point, I could give two sh*ts about who started it, just that it gets finished and doesn't end up on the board anymore.

That's good with me, man. I just hope Iron Horse-Apples isn't dissuaded from giving his opinion. I, for one, welcome his insights.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 15, 2012, 02:05:16 PM
Quote
With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=

Good f*ckin' gravy, that's horrible. I'd rather swallow a gallon of gasoline, get set on fire, and have my ashes snorted by Keith Richards than ever be subjected to that again.

Ugh, what a dire period for the band. Not only is Adrian's voice terrible, but he's also pretty ugly and has a dumb receding hairline. and Tim Bonhomme (the keyboard player) is smoking a cigar! what the hell?

and Mike looks like an asshole with that goatee.


all of that being said, I didn't think his voice stood out to well on Mike's solo recordings. The vocals are probably my favorite part of that album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 02:06:43 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Feldspar on May 15, 2012, 02:08:33 PM
I disagree with people who say that "Spring Vacation" is very SIP... I actually think it has way more of an "Its OK" from 15 Big Ones vibe. And I LIKE that song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on May 15, 2012, 02:11:42 PM
"Spring Vacation" seems to borrow a bit of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer".

Ex-CUSE me ? It resembles "TD", even passingly, about as much as "The Star Spangled Banner" sounds like "4.33".
Good one.
Seconded, that was a hilarious response Andrew. Incidentally I think "The Star Spangled Banner" nicks much more from John Lennon's "Two Minutes Silence" than it ever did from "4:33."

I hope you'll forgive me for pointing out that another poster, who apparently did not read my post, noted the similarity to "Tiny Dancer"! Not trying to ruin anyone's enjoyment of the song; just something I noticed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 02:16:22 PM
Wow. Those samples blew me away.  I will say, the vocal processing is very apparent on some of these Amazon clips, but I'm fairly certain the actual product will sound entirely different.  Go listen to the TLOS clips on Amazon.  They certainly sound nothing like the actual record.  In any case, Summer's Gone had on me the same effect as another recent poster. It made me close my eyes and just...listen.  It's beautiful.  In fact, a LOT of this is beautiful.  I really enjoyed Daybreak as well.

I'm beyond excited for this album.  I hope many of us hear enjoy it, this may be the last time we get this folks.

(Just thought I'd mention, the only song that the processing really bothers me is Beaches in Mind, other than that, it really doesn't bother me)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 02:28:37 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period

That was broadcasted as the Beach Boys' show of the AVO-sessions. I taped it when it aired one time on TV. Have it on VHS, so sorry that I can't upload it. But really, you don't wanna see that ! You don't !! Don't, don't, don't !!! I still can't believe on what a horrible musical level they were. All the negative stuff and hate about the Mike & Bruce show comes from this era. It's unbelievable how good they became after Baker was gone (it started when he was still there). Totten really did/does a great job. I only wonder why Mike and Bruce got along with that trainwreck of a "band" that you've just seen on youtube.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 02:32:52 PM
What is that bass player's name?  I was watching a Mike/Bruce gig the other night from 2007 and that bass player was still there...probably the most blandest, unexciting performer to ever join them.  I cringed as he sang "Cottonfields"...no emotion...no conviction...it was shameful.  He seemed to be the last of the players left over from the fuller group found in this video.  So glad I never saw that version of The Beach Boys.  No doubt this band probably left a permanent bad taste in everyone's mouth...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 02:39:11 PM
What is that bass player's name?  I was watching a Mike/Bruce gig the other night from 2007 and that bass player was still there...probably the most blandest, unexciting performer to ever join them.  I cringed as he sang "Cottonfields"...no emotion...no conviction...it was shameful.  He seemed to be the last of the players left over from the fuller group found in this video.  So glad I never saw that version of The Beach Boys.  No doubt this band probably left a permanent bad taste in everyone's mouth...

Yeah, seeing that I was quite young during this time period, I'm real grateful I didn't have to witness this.  The band has come such a long way, in a very short amount of time they have improved their public image that had been tattered with SIP, the lawsuits, the infighting, and Carl's death.  Since 1998 Brian has lead a successful and critically acclaimed solo career, he released a definitive Smile, we've seen some brilliant Mike and Bruce tours, the groundbreaking Smile Sessions were released, Al released a very solid solo album, and now the Boys are back together, performing an amazing tour and releasing what seems to be a promising album.  Wow. Just wow.  It's hard to realize this, you really have to let it sink in. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 02:41:50 PM
What is that bass player's name?


The bass player is Chris Farmer. I believe he joined during the last periode with Carl. Iirc he can be seen as part of the band on the concert footage of the Nashville Sounds DVD's intro.


EDIT:


Quote
Yeah, seeing that I was quite young during this time period, I'm real grateful I didn't have to witness this.  The band has come such a long way, in a very short amount of time they have improved their public image that had been tattered with SIP, the lawsuits, the infighting, and Carl's death.  Since 1998 Brian has lead a successful and critically acclaimed solo career, he released a definitive Smile, we've seen some brilliant Mike and Bruce tours, the groundbreaking Smile Sessions were released, Al released a very solid solo album, and now the Boys are back together, performing an amazing tour and releasing what seems to be a promising album.  Wow. Just wow.  It's hard to realize this, you really have to let it sink in.


I think Brian's tours and their critical success really were the start to concentrate again on the greatness and quality that the Beach Boys' name deserves. I don't know what would've been had Brian not made his touring carreer


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 15, 2012, 02:43:10 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period

That was broadcasted as the Beach Boys' show of the AVO-sessions. I taped it when it aired one time on TV. Have it on VHS, so sorry that I can't upload it. But really, you don't wanna see that ! You don't !! Don't, don't, don't !!! I still can't believe on what a horrible musical level they were. All the negative stuff and hate about the Mike & Bruce show comes from this era. It's unbelievable how good they became after Baker was gone (it started when he was still there). Totten really did/does a great job. I only wonder why Mike and Bruce got along with that trainwreck of a "band" that you've just seen on youtube.

Presumably because they had some loyalty to them -- the only poor musicians in that band were Baker and Kowalski, both of whom they'd been working with off and on for decades. Swapping in Randell Kirsch for Baker and moving Cowsill to drums from keyboards was all the band really needed to become very good.

And Justin -- Chris Farmer was usually rather good, He did a *great* Sail On Sailor. You probably saw him on a bad night.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 15, 2012, 02:44:18 PM
What is that bass player's name?  I was watching a Mike/Bruce gig the other night from 2007 and that bass player was still there...probably the most blandest, unexciting performer to ever join them.  I cringed as he sang "Cottonfields"...no emotion...no conviction...it was shameful.  He seemed to be the last of the players left over from the fuller group found in this video.  So glad I never saw that version of The Beach Boys.  No doubt this band probably left a permanent bad taste in everyone's mouth...

Chris Farmer.  Replaced the great Ed Carter.  What was with that parrot?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 15, 2012, 02:49:33 PM
Swapping in Randell Kirsch for Baker and moving Cowsill to drums from keyboards was all the band really needed to become very good.




No, it took much more than that. Their whole approach at playing these songs is different now. There's respect for the songs that was missing too often during that time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 02:51:56 PM
The bass player is Chris Farmer. I believe he joined during the last periode with Carl. Iirc he can be seen as part of the band on the concert footage of the Nashville Sounds DVD's intro.

Chris Farmer.  Replaced the great Ed Carter.  What was with that parrot?

Thanks guys, I suppose anyone would've been tough to follow Ed Carter.  

And Justin -- Chris Farmer was usually rather good, He did a *great* Sail On Sailor. You probably saw him on a bad night.

Sweet Moses...he did "Sail On Sailor"??  Wow...would I love to see that.   I was watching a 2007 performance from Branson, Misouri (well circulated).  Although it was pro-shot, the sound wasn't really great at all so I can't really comment on his bass playing but his lead vocals on "Cottonfields" (among others I can't recall which ones) were just so pedestrian--it was a tough watch.  It was the first time I recognized what people may have hated about the Mike/Bruce road show.  I'd be happy to revise my opinion on the dude but going by what I saw in that one performance...he can only go up in my book!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 15, 2012, 02:54:05 PM
Swapping in Randell Kirsch for Baker and moving Cowsill to drums from keyboards was all the band really needed to become very good.




No, it took much more than that. Their whole approach at playing these songs is different now. There's respect for the songs that was missing too often during that time.

And that respect started once Baker was swapped for Kirsch. Even in 2004, when that was the only line-up change and Chris Farmer was still musical director, they sounded infinitely better than they had a year or two earlier. And once they replaced Kowalski with Cowsill, they sounded better still. Scott Totten has done a wonderful job since taking over as the musical director, but the problem was essentially a personnel one, Having a drummer who couldn't keep time and a falsetto vocalist who couldn't sing was dragging the rest of them down.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 15, 2012, 02:54:53 PM
Yes, Mike and Bruce at that point sounded like the cover band you'd see at your local bar. It is a shame about Kowalski because he was quite good in the 70s, and I love his work with Nick Drake. Was there a falling out with Adrian Baker?

It is weird to compare Darian/Wondermints to Adrian Baker. They are all very influenced by Brian and The Beach Boys, but the Wondermints also made original music that wasn't simply pastiche. Everything I have heard from Baker has been pastiche and medlies, which are fine, and they have their place... but I never saw a unique artistic direction there.

Edit: Back on topic - does anyone else hear the water dripping as a percussive effect in "Summer's Gone?" Very nice, reminds me of "Cool Cool Water."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 02:56:27 PM
I think Brian's tours and their critical success really were the start to concentrate again on the greatness and quality that the Beach Boys' name deserves. I don't know what would've been had Brian not made his touring carreer

Yes. They really stepped up their game, especially after Brian toured Pet Sounds and Smile. The one-two punch of that era -- roughly 2000-2004 was pretty profound in Beach Boys land. And Mike and Bruce just didn't react for awhile.

But then they did -- and they managed to revamp the band and setlists at about the time that Brian started to tour less and feature less-ambitious setlists, so they ended up looking a lot better than they might have even a year or two before.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 15, 2012, 03:06:13 PM
[
Sweet Moses...he did "Sail On Sailor"??  Wow...would I love to see that.   I was watching a 2007 performance from Branson, Misouri (well circulated).  Although it was pro-shot, the sound wasn't really great at all so I can't really comment on his bass playing but his lead vocals on "Cottonfields" (among others I can't recall which ones) were just so pedestrian--it was a tough watch.  It was the first time I recognized what people may have hated about the Mike/Bruce road show.  I'd be happy to revise my opinion on the dude but going by what I saw in that one performance...he can only go up in my book!

Get hold of the MP3s of one of the 2004 UK shows (Glasgow and Newcastle are circulating very widely). He did Sail On Sailor on those (though he didn't sound as good on it in 2004 as he did in 2001), and also sang stuff like You Still Believe In Me, You're So Good To Me and the low Carl part on All This Is That.

He may not have been as good on the 2007 performance (and that would have been just before he left the band, and probably after Kowalski did, so he may have been unhappy with his job at that point) but in the shows in the early 2000s he and Cowsill (and later Kirsch) were the only reason the band was worth watching (Totten had a far less prominent role in the show then, just playing rhythm guitar and singing backgrounds -- I only realised how exceptionally good he is in 2008).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 03:15:55 PM
Thanks for the tip. I suppose the timing of that 2007 gig I was watching had a lot to do with it because I have the 2004 Glasgow gig and never noticed any issues with the songs in that recording.  In fact, I didn't know it was him in those 2004 recordings.  I'm unfamiliar with all the players pre-2008.  He does sound better on those.   The Branson gig may have been one where he and a few other phoned it in because the entire first row was flooded with children. Halfway through the show it looked like the Beach Boys were playing at a middle school.  The whole spectacle was actually quite disturbing to watch right after seeing them at the Beacon the week before.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 03:30:12 PM
gotta give mike credit for powering through some of that crap then.

That's good with me, man. I just hope Iron Horse-Apples isn't dissuaded from giving his opinion. I, for one, welcome his insights.

nobody else wants that either, which is why i apologized to iron horse if I came off that way. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 15, 2012, 03:31:46 PM
Thanks for the tip. I suppose the timing of that 2007 gig I was watching had a lot to do with it because I have the 2004 Glasgow gig and never noticed any issues with the songs in that recording.  In fact, I didn't know it was him in those 2004 recordings.  I'm unfamiliar with all the players pre-2008.  He does sound better on those.   The Branson gig may have been one where he and a few other phoned it in because the entire first row was flooded with children. Halfway through the show it looked like the Beach Boys were playing at a middle school.  The whole spectacle was actually quite disturbing to watch right after seeing them at the Beacon the week before.

Yeah, I could see that making a difference.
The line-up for the 2004 shows was Mike, Bruce, Chris Farmer (bass and musical director), Randell Kirsch (lead guitar, falsetto vocals), Scott Totten (rhythm guitar, backing vocals), Tim Bonhomme (keyboards, backing vocals), John Cowsill (keyboards, vocals) and Mike Kowalski (drums) -- that's the same line-up that had toured since 2001 (when Cowsill and Totten replaced Phil Bardowell and Mike Meros), except that Kirsch had recently replaced Adrian Baker. Since then, Kowalski left, Cowsill moved to drums, and then Farmer left, Christian Love came in on rhythm guitar, Kirsch switched to bass and Scott Totten to lead guitar and musical director.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 04:21:22 PM
Thanks for the rundown...my first Mike/Bruce show in 2008 was probably just when that group had just shifted players around for the last time (and for the better).  I'm glad they finally got their stuff together!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 15, 2012, 04:29:52 PM
actually, I much prefer the current lineup.. with Brian Wilson, Al Jardine, and David Marks in the band.

Since then, Kowalski left, Cowsill moved to drums, and then Farmer left, Christian Love came in on rhythm guitar, Kirsch switched to bass and Scott Totten to lead guitar and musical director.

pretty sure Chris Farmer and Christian Love had some overlap.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 15, 2012, 05:45:43 PM
I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.

Obviously we hate The Beach Boys, we post here!

Of course we do.  Because fandom is about obsession rather than love.  Love keeps no record of wrongs; fandom keeps an umpteen-page autotune thread.

Seriously.  Found out a funny thing over in Doctor Who fandom, when comparing fan polls with the general-audience appreciation surveys:  when asked to score episodes on a 1-to-10 scale, fans consistently scored them lower than the general audience.  Fans are more nitpicky, more intensely critical.  Just because we care more deeply doesn't mean we're actually more positive about the things we care about.

So yeah, you're more likely to find hate for the Beach Boys on a Beach Boys board than anywhere else in the world!

Which is a damn shame, because I'd love to have a place where I could be enthusiastic without someone declaring vociferously how much what I like sucks.  (This doesn't mean I'd want to ban any sign of unhappiness; I just prefer the critical stuff to be more measured rather than full-on wailing and gnashing...)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dumbangel76 on May 15, 2012, 06:21:47 PM
I disagree with people who say that "Spring Vacation" is very SIP... I actually think it has way more of an "Its OK" from 15 Big Ones vibe. And I LIKE that song.



Well said! I am digging Spring Vacation!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 15, 2012, 06:25:32 PM
If there was ever a time to use the "Love You" synths on a new Beach Boys album it was "Stange World"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 15, 2012, 06:27:08 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period

 All the negative stuff and hate about the Mike & Bruce show comes from this era.

Not really. There was plenty of hate in the late 90s already. I remember it well. It could be thrown at you any time. It took like 10 for Mike and Bruce to earn a reputation. They had to work their asses off.

Back to the new album... No Blondie or Ricky. Meh.
 ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 06:27:19 PM
I feel so strange to be enjoying this while surrounded by Beach Boys hate.

Obviously we hate The Beach Boys, we post here!

Of course we do.  Because fandom is about obsession rather than love.  Love keeps no record of wrongs; fandom keeps an umpteen-page autotune thread.

Seriously.  Found out a funny thing over in Doctor Who fandom, when comparing fan polls with the general-audience appreciation surveys:  when asked to score episodes on a 1-to-10 scale, fans consistently scored them lower than the general audience.  Fans are more nitpicky, more intensely critical.  Just because we care more deeply doesn't mean we're actually more positive about the things we care about.

So yeah, you're more likely to find hate for the Beach Boys on a Beach Boys board than anywhere else in the world!

Which is a damn shame, because I'd love to have a place where I could be enthusiastic without someone declaring vociferously how much what I like sucks.  (This doesn't mean I'd want to ban any sign of unhappiness; I just prefer the critical stuff to be more measured rather than full-on wailing and gnashing...)

Cheers,
Jon Blum

What is important and extraordinarily difficult is to identify your own opinion as separate and uninfluenced by that of others.  It's very hard to do this, and no matter what anyone says, it can be very easy to be swayed one way or another about the quality of a work of art based on other people's opinions.  The trick is avoiding this, and holding true to one's own initial personal convictions


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 15, 2012, 06:28:59 PM

100% agreed. At this point, I could give two sh*ts about who started it, just that it gets finished and doesn't end up on the board anymore.

That's good with me, man. I just hope Iron Horse-Apples isn't dissuaded from giving his opinion. I, for one, welcome his insights.

I think the new album will be part of IHA records shelf in the future. He just has to grow with it. And eventually, even for completist reasons, he'll end up owning it. My 2 cents.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 15, 2012, 06:30:22 PM
Question, are Mike's vocals on "daybreak" newly recorderd are they from the solo album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 15, 2012, 06:30:47 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period

 All the negative stuff and hate about the Mike & Bruce show comes from this era.

Not really. There was plenty of hate in the late 90s already. I remember it well. It could be thrown at you any time. It took like 10 for Mike and Bruce to earn a reputation. They had to work their asses off.

Back to the new album... No Blondie or Ricky. Meh.
 ;D
Weren't the early Mike and Bruce shows in 1998 really bad?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 15, 2012, 06:34:15 PM

100% agreed. At this point, I could give two sh*ts about who started it, just that it gets finished and doesn't end up on the board anymore.

That's good with me, man. I just hope Iron Horse-Apples isn't dissuaded from giving his opinion. I, for one, welcome his insights.

I think the new album will be part of IHA records shelf in the future. He just has to grow with it. And eventually, even for completist reasons, he'll end up owning it. My 2 cents.

Yeah, most likely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 15, 2012, 06:55:26 PM
yet at the same time, i want to see more videos of the band from this period

 All the negative stuff and hate about the Mike & Bruce show comes from this era.

Not really. There was plenty of hate in the late 90s already. I remember it well. It could be thrown at you any time. It took like 10 for Mike and Bruce to earn a reputation. They had to work their asses off.

Back to the new album... No Blondie or Ricky. Meh.
 ;D
Weren't the early Mike and Bruce shows in 1998 really bad?

It didn't really matter. People hated them period.

Back on topic, I'd like to submit that Mike sounds phenomenal in all these new songs. Myself I expected a brand new rocker a la Morning Beat sung by Mike. Oh well... perhaps on the next album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 07:00:10 PM

With the Adrian Baker talk, this might be a good opportunity to remember how far we've come: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNV-eve42M0&feature=

Saw this and "Good Vibrations" last night, and I'd seen "Don't Worry Baby" some time ago. Does he normally sing like this? Was he drunk?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 15, 2012, 07:20:30 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 15, 2012, 07:27:24 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

Oh, yes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 07:27:46 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

Probably different clips? They generally are. Can anyone confirm?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 07:29:36 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

Probably different clips? They generally are. Can anyone confirm?

Yeah, thirty second clip for TAD but the rest are 1:30. They are different.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 07:30:36 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

"Isn't It Time" is still a favorite for me...

Mike gets some nice moments.

Exaggerated use of autotuning in the "isn't it time" refrain... I'm sure will come under a lot of fire... but sounds great to me

Right at the very end of the clip the track is starting to do some very interesting things with the vocals and the clangs


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 07:32:55 PM
at 0:24 in "From There To Back Again" - the riff there - reminds me strongly of The Night Was So Young


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 15, 2012, 07:33:26 PM
I can't listen, those clips are too long


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 07:34:13 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

"Isn't It Time" is still a favorite for me...

Mike gets some nice moments.

Exaggerated use of autotuning in the "isn't it time" refrain... I'm sure will come under a lot of fire... but sounds great to me

Right at the very end of the clip the track is starting to do some very interesting things with the vocals and the clangs

Who is singing that?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 07:41:04 PM
Clips are up on iTunes now too!

Probably different clips? They generally are. Can anyone confirm?

Yeah, thirty second clip for TAD but the rest are 1:30. They are different.

1:30! Damn, don't know if I want to hear THAT much of these songs quite yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 07:43:26 PM
I would say Beaches in Mind is the weakest track, Spring Vacation behind it. Really impressed with Daybreak and Isn't it Time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 15, 2012, 07:44:24 PM
"Summer's Gone"

just caught a snippet of a lyric -

"...for those who still have more to say."

what an amazing line, painful

then an oboe

wow


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 15, 2012, 07:47:49 PM
Okay, the iTunes samples sound ENTIRELY different than the Amazon samples, as I predicted the auto-tuning is NO WHERE NEAR as bad as it sounded on those Amazon samples.  Iron Horse, please give this a chance.  This sounds so much different...I swear by it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 15, 2012, 07:57:04 PM
"Isn't it Time" sounds like a new classic up-tempo Beach Boys song. I like the vocal interplay.

"The Private Life and Bill and Sue" and "Shelter" to me, sound like Brian solo tunes. Maybe they are better on the album, but meh, I don't know yet. I like the "Darlin'" like melody on "Shelter".

"Daybreak Over the Ocean" I think is quite lovely actually. I think Mike is way under utilized on the album.

"Strange World" sounds kinda disappointing. I was hoping for more. Very TLOS. But I don't care for that album. But maybe after hearing the album I'll like it more.

"From There to Back Again" sounds very pretty. I'm really excited. Al sounds great. Brian sounds good.

"Pacific Coast Highway", Brian sounds really nice on. Kinda like "Southern California" but with better vocals by Brian.

"Summer's Gone" sounds absolutely beautiful. Brian sounds absolutely awesome. "Caroline No" type vibe. Probably going to the be the best song on the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 08:00:45 PM
......mustn't...be...swayed....by.....the.....longer.....clips.....must...stick.....to.....my....guns....and....hold...out....for...the.....actual.....CD...................


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 15, 2012, 08:04:43 PM
I would say Beaches in Mind is the weakest track, Spring Vacation behind it. Really impressed with Daybreak and Isn't it Time.
Out of the twelve, Spring Vacation is catchiest. My favorite, so far in the early going.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 08:09:04 PM
The lengthy clips are deeply impressive.

For those who want the TLOS sound, it's on more tracks than you might have thought.

The tuning is nowhere near as bad as you might have thought.

Brian sings astonishingly well on the closing suite of songs.

I may be enjoying this more than Love You. True thing. Right now, I'm thinking best since Sunflower. Really.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 08:10:42 PM
(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff302/gingerslam/gifs/not-listening-dumb-and-dumber-o.gif)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 15, 2012, 08:12:53 PM
......mustn't...be...swayed....by.....the.....longer.....clips.....must...stick.....to.....my....guns....and....hold...out....for...the.....actual.....CD...................

I'm with you Justin, I'm just going to listen to the 30 second clips.  1.5minutes is pretty long, I'm afraid it'll spoil it for me. 

Hey it's only 3 weeks. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 15, 2012, 08:15:00 PM
Yeah, Ron, 3 weeks...gotta stay strong!  In the meantime, I think I just might have to stop visiting this thread lol. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 15, 2012, 08:16:56 PM
For all of you waiting, I'm gonna go right out and say, amazing job guys,
you're about to hear the best, most Pet-Sounds/SMiLE worthy tracks that are possible, and
While they may take some getting used to... Doesn't all good music?!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 15, 2012, 08:19:48 PM
Yes!  Some albums sound great at first, then wear out.  The truly great ones hardly ever sound great on first listen, they grow on you and never get old. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 15, 2012, 08:30:44 PM
The one song that really stuck out for me so far is "From There to Back Again".  Nice melody.  I will admit that a bunch of these songs kinda sound the same--same mid-tempo beat.  Auto-tune is a bit distracting.  That all being said, this album doesn't sound half-bad.  :-)  Hope it does well. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 15, 2012, 08:32:58 PM
And by using my amazing songwriter abilities, I'd say we're hearing the beginning half of "FTTBA"...

Who knows what happens next! (Besides PCH hahaha)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on May 15, 2012, 08:48:40 PM
With reference to 1998 through about 2005, it's a miracle they survived, as the Mike and Bruce shows sucked. People walking out. Complaining at the concessions stand about "that singer" doing Don't Worry Baby. I just about wrote them off. BWPS got me through at the end of that time period though. Never give up, but it was pretty bad for a long time. I was amazed Bruce didn't bail.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 15, 2012, 08:51:19 PM
And by using my amazing songwriter abilities, I'd say we're hearing the beginning half of "FTTBA"...

Who knows what happens next! (Besides PCH hahaha)

Using the context clues from the song title, I'll bet in the second half of the song they go back again. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 08:54:02 PM
Editing this because it was too long, but the biggest points of it I wanted to keep were...

"Shelter" - I've finally figured out the main reason I dislike Jeff's voice. Aside from the hoarseness/bloatedness, the constant cracking, the modification of Brian's written parts and sitting way too high in the mix, one of the biggest attractions for the Beach Boys for me was that their voices, despite being grown men, have almost always had this child-like quality to it. Even when Brian fried his voice with coke and cigarettes, he still had that quality to it. Even at 70 years old, the guys still have that quality to their voices. It's diminished a bit, some members more than others, but it's still very much there. It's playful, it has this energy to it that I can't really describe. It's just not there in Jeff's voice. At all. It's the opposite. Jeff's voice makes me want to do taxes and wash dishes. And there are times when it seems as though he's aware of it and tries to put a "silly" face on it, but it makes things even worse. I hate to bash the guy, it's just that all the things I just named combine and then clash with the other guys' voices, it creates some kind of dissonance (maybe not technically, but you know what I mean). This is the best I can describe this.

I promise this'll be the biggest negativity toward these songs that you'll see here, but I'm not a fan at all of him outright getting a lead vocal during the chorus of this one. He's not a Beach Boy and it shows. It's not even a difficult falsetto part! Al or Bruce easily could have nailed it. The song itself feels similar to the former track in terms of being a bit too adult contemporary, but there are some positives - that little vocal bit by Brian ("Make a little love" or whatever). The chorus, even if sung by someone else, doesn't do much. That big, dramatic minor chord that hits once it comes in is a bit goofy and the chorus just feels a tad too adult contemporary to me. Again, obviously I'll withhold final judgement until hearing the song in full.

"From There To Back Again" - This one, at its heart, sounds pretty impressive. The production again hurts it, and I'll again say that autotune has no place on an album by a vocal group who made their name in the 1960s. It just doesn't, it can only hurt things, and it does. That's not being irrational in the least and I'm not sure why people say it is. The vocal glitch on "clouds" is a complete joke, I really hate to say - how did everyone okay that? Using a bit of manual pitch correction instead of lazily applying an autotune filter over the entire vocal is all it takes. It's slightly more time consuming and you have to be a bit more attentive, but the results are a hundred times better. Don't be lazy.

Again, the song sound like it could be pretty good. Al, behind the obnoxious filter, is putting forth a really good vocal, and the arrangement is pretty nice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 09:00:47 PM
Have to say, I don't really hear any "Imagination" style arrangements. This sounds far, far better. Lots of little touches of BW humor.

Frankly, I'm beginning to wonder if Joe Thomas actually had much to do with the production of this. A large number of the songs simply sound like they were worked out with Brian's band, along with strings n stuff from Paul. The vocals are much more produced, yes, but the tracks are so far above the Imagination level it's not even funny.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 09:04:20 PM
Have to say, I hear almost no signs of "Imagination" style arrangements. This sounds far, far better. Lots of little touches of BW humor.

Frankly, I'm beginning to wonder if Joe Thomas actually had anything to do with the production of this. A large number of the songs simply sound like they were worked out with Brian's band, along with strings n stuff from Paul. The vocals are much more produced, yes, but the tracks are so far above the Imagination level they're not even close.

To me, it's only especially apparent on a couple songs. "The Private Life" feels somewhat similar, especially that guitar part that comes in halfway through the clip, but has a playfulness to it that's lacking on that album. "Strange World" very much feels like an Imagination track, but is indeed a bit more playful - the bicycle bell made me smile. Still, the Lion King-esque timpani, the Spanish percussion, the adult contemporary-esque string hits, etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 15, 2012, 09:05:16 PM
I noticed on "Beaches in Mind" that they actually say "fun fun fun".

Ick. Mike. Wow. Even though he always does it, I still can't believe it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 09:11:14 PM
I noticed on "Beaches in Mind" that they actually say "fun fun fun".

Ick. Mike. Wow. Even though he always does it, I still can't believe it.

The references to older hits is amusing and so cheesy, but I've come to expect it from the Lovester and it's kind of become... hrm, a trademark of his? I think it's more tastefully done on these songs than on Summer In Paradise, but that's me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 09:12:43 PM
Have to say, I hear almost no signs of "Imagination" style arrangements. This sounds far, far better. Lots of little touches of BW humor.

Frankly, I'm beginning to wonder if Joe Thomas actually had anything to do with the production of this. A large number of the songs simply sound like they were worked out with Brian's band, along with strings n stuff from Paul. The vocals are much more produced, yes, but the tracks are so far above the Imagination level they're not even close.

To me, it's only especially apparent on a couple songs. "The Private Life" feels somewhat similar, especially that guitar part that comes in halfway through the clip, but has a playfulness to it that's lacking on that album. "Strange World" very much feels like an Imagination track, but is indeed a bit more playful - the bicycle bell made me smile. Still, the Lion King-esque timpani, the Spanish percussion, the adult contemporary-esque string hits, etc.

I can see that. I'd be really interested to know if there are different backing band combinations on this. Because all the backing tracks do not sound the same. A number of them sound a lot like Brian's group (including arrangement-wise), some sound more AC, and a couple (Isn't It Time, for example) don't sound like any backing group I've heard before. Much more spare and BB85-like in some ways.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 15, 2012, 09:33:59 PM
I noticed on "Beaches in Mind" that they actually say "fun fun fun".

Ick. Mike. Wow. Even though he always does it, I still can't believe it.

The references to older hits is amusing and so cheesy, but I've come to expect it from the Lovester and it's kind of become... hrm, a trademark of his? I think it's more tastefully done on these songs than on Summer In Paradise, but that's me.

I just think it's funny because he kinda has come across lately as "hey, I'm really trying to write good lyrics this time!"

Yeah. b.s. Mike.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 09:42:21 PM
I noticed on "Beaches in Mind" that they actually say "fun fun fun".

Ick. Mike. Wow. Even though he always does it, I still can't believe it.

The references to older hits is amusing and so cheesy, but I've come to expect it from the Lovester and it's kind of become... hrm, a trademark of his? I think it's more tastefully done on these songs than on Summer In Paradise, but that's me.

I just think it's funny because he kinda has come across lately as "hey, I'm really trying to write good lyrics this time!"

Yeah. b.s. Mike.

Well, there's no "Summer of Love," at least!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 15, 2012, 09:42:55 PM
The tuning is nowhere near as bad as you might have thought.

If you can make a statement like that then i can state the opposite. That is simply not true. Not only is it as bad, it's worse, even more noticeable on the higher quality, longer iTunes samples.

As runnersdialzero said recently, i can't believe B-Pain made it onto the record. But it's not just Brian, AL JARDINE for heaven's sake, the guy who can still sing like he did in 1965, he is slathered in it. The amount of Autotune used all throughout these songs is enough that people who don't ordinarily hear it, will clearly hear it. And that's because it sometimes borders on Autotune as effect, and in some parts it's just blatantly effect. Can you imagine, of all groups/artists in the world, THE BEACH BOYS put out a new album and AUTOTUNE is audible all over it? And that's just in 1:30 samples. Slick production is one thing, but overuse of Autotune?

Well, either it was Brian's idea (or someone else's and he approved) or someone is ghost producing because the use of Autotune is a producer's call. So either way, Brian likes/wants Autotune. And yeah, let's hear it one more time, guyz: Autotune is JUST LIKE double tracking like they did in the 60s! Yeah, totally!  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 15, 2012, 09:58:45 PM
Man, I really dig "Isn't it Time", it should be a single definitely.

It's probably the most rockin' cut on the whole album, and I love the vibe. The guys sound like they are having fun. The vocals sound great. I love the percussion. Doesn't really sound like anything they've done before. Great song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 15, 2012, 09:59:52 PM
For all of you waiting, I'm gonna go right out and say, amazing job guys,
you're about to hear the best, most Pet-Sounds/SMiLE worthy tracks that are possible

That are possible in 2012, recorded digitally with really slick production, heavy, noticeable use of Autotune, written and arranged by a 70 year old who's been to hell and back, with help from a former wrestler turned MOR music producer? Yeah, i guess so.

On another note, i really like Isn't It Time. That is a GREAT backing track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 15, 2012, 10:01:25 PM
Monicker, you really do know how to spread some joy and light.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 10:03:44 PM
Editing this because it was too long, but the biggest points of it I wanted to keep were...

"Shelter" - I've finally figured out the main reason I dislike Jeff's voice. Aside from the hoarseness/bloatedness, the constant cracking, the modification of Brian's written parts and sitting way too high in the mix, one of the biggest attractions for the Beach Boys was that their voices, despite being grown men, have almost always had this child-like quality to it. Even when Brian fried his voice with coke and cigarettes, he still had that quality to it. Even at 70 years old, the guys still have that quality to their voices. It's diminished a bit, some members more than others, but it's still very much there. It's playful, it has this energy to it that I can't really describe. It's just not there in Jeff's voice. At all. It's the opposite. Jeff's voice makes me want to do taxes and wash dishes. And there are times when it seems as though he's aware of it and tries to put a "silly" face on it, but it makes things even worse. It clashes with the other guys, it creates some kind of dissonance. This is the best I can describe this.

For me what doesn't make his voice not always work in the band is that he doesn't always sing like he's in a blend.  If even he's singing just a part, it sounds like he sings it as a lead, when he should relax and let it blend in.  So it creates the dissonance, if that makes any sense. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 15, 2012, 10:04:08 PM
Jeff's voice makes me want to do taxes and wash dishes.

This is the greatest thing i've read in a long time. That is a brilliant way to put it. I always thought to myself that his falsetto (i will give him due for his mid range, which i think is pretty good) sounds like a grandma singing out of her range, trying to do a whacky imitation of The Beach Boys. But, yes, taxes and dishes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 15, 2012, 10:09:37 PM
i gave FTAB a 5 second listen because i gave the amazon.com clip the same.  I'm comforted that it doesn't sound like autotune anymore, and just a vocal effect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 15, 2012, 10:10:00 PM
The tuning is nowhere near as bad as you might have thought.

If you can make a statement like that then i can state the opposite. That is simply not true. Not only is it as bad, it's worse, even more noticeable on the higher quality, longer iTunes samples.

As runnersdialzero said recently, i can't believe B-Pain made it onto the record. But it's not just Brian, AL JARDINE for heaven's sake, the guy who can still sing like he did in 1965, he is slathered in it. The amount of Autotune used all throughout these songs is enough that people who don't ordinarily hear it, will clearly hear it. And that's because it sometimes borders on Autotune as effect, and in some parts it's just blatantly effect. Can you imagine, of all groups/artists in the world, THE BEACH BOYS put out a new album and AUTOTUNE is audible all over it? And that's just in 1:30 samples. Slick production is one thing, but overuse of Autotune?

Well, either it was Brian's idea (or someone else's and he approved) or someone is ghost producing because the use of Autotune is a producer's call. So either way, Brian likes/wants Autotune. And yeah, let's hear it one more time, guyz: Autotune is JUST LIKE double tracking like they did in the 60s! Yeah, totally!  
Yeah, it is pretty gross-sounding. It will instantly date this record to this era. This is really being used as an effect rather than a pitch correction tool, and it sounds arbitrary especially when applied to Al in a downtempo, introspective number. I'd always rather hear an Al Jardine vocal than an Al Jardine plus synthesizer vocal.

The analogy of pitch correction to double-tracking is apt, but double-tracking can yield myriad sounds, depending on the singer, microphones, room, etc. Autotune is much more homogenized; anyone with a DAW and pitch correction software can get that basic sound. Although the timbre varies somewhat from algorithm to algorithm, it is still very much 'that sound.'

I can also sympathize with Runnerdialzero about the Foskett leads. I am not a Foskett-hater, but I think he summed up the discrepancy between Jeff's voice and the other voices we have on record. It certainly stands out when it is centre-stage.

I'm glad that I can hear plenty of Al and Bruce vocals on the tracks I have listened to thus far. I like the production on "Isn't it Time" a lot and it doesn't sound like anything from Imagination. "Spring Vacation" is much closer to that Joe Thomas 1998 sound.

I am wondering if Darian, Scott, et. al. and Matt Jardine are on the record at all. I hope so. I love Darian's voice, and Matt Jardine and Christian Love would be great additions to the vocal blend.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Feldspar on May 15, 2012, 10:16:21 PM
the itunes clips are AWESOME. Just listened with noise canceling headphones. This is really going to be a great album! I'm an autotune hater as much as the next guy, but the use of it here, while noticeable, really doesn't bother me. Surprisingly impressed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on May 15, 2012, 10:23:48 PM
All of their records are pretty dated to their respective eras, though. 15 Big Ones is more authentically 70s sounding than Born to Run, for me, meaning that I hear shag carpet, plaid pants and wood paneling in that music, whereas in Born to Run I hear epic poetry. I can pretty much say the same of all their records. Even MIU captures that late 70s disco exhaustion that the non-punk world got. I think the Beach Boys tend to take prevailing trends and magnify them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 15, 2012, 10:30:49 PM
YIKES

I left for 3 hours and there are 8 more pages.

I am still going to AVOID all the clips.  I want the Full Monty experience!   :hat

Love reading all the pro and con comments.  "alot" of interesting opinions on both sides.

Get it?  "alot"

-- David

Just got signed up for the Record Room too!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Awesoman on May 15, 2012, 10:51:49 PM

"Shelter" - I've finally figured out the main reason I dislike Jeff's voice. Aside from the hoarseness/bloatedness, the constant cracking, the modification of Brian's written parts and sitting way too high in the mix, one of the biggest attractions for the Beach Boys was that their voices, despite being grown men, have almost always had this child-like quality to it. Even when Brian fried his voice with coke and cigarettes, he still had that quality to it. Even at 70 years old, the guys still have that quality to their voices. It's diminished a bit, some members more than others, but it's still very much there. It's playful, it has this energy to it that I can't really describe. It's just not there in Jeff's voice. At all. It's the opposite. Jeff's voice makes me want to do taxes and wash dishes. And there are times when it seems as though he's aware of it and tries to put a "silly" face on it, but it makes things even worse. I hate to bash the guy, it's just that all the things I just named combine and then clash with the other guys' voices, it creates some kind of dissonance (maybe not technically, but you know what I mean). This is the best I can describe this.


I've never really been on the "Hate Foskett" bandwagon, but I will admit his vocals on these songs are a little clunky.  A few listens to his solo albums will prove this guy has a good voice; but he's not really providing it on this record.  The absence of Carl in the vocal blend is definitely felt on every track. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 15, 2012, 11:18:47 PM
Monicker, you really do know how to spread some joy and light.

I second that. They're all about 70, maybe they can't sing in tune any more? If this is what it takes, then fair enough. It is what it is. Monicker, you do have much more sensitive ears than anyone else on the board (you were very upset about Smile Sessions and yes, I did hear what you heard, but I didn't let it bother me) and most people here either haven't noticed pitch correction or don't mind it. As Wirestone says, let's not spoil the party. The release of this record will be a special event for everyone here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 15, 2012, 11:19:51 PM
Jeff's voice makes me want to do taxes and wash dishes.

This is the greatest thing i've read in a long time. That is a brilliant way to put it. I always thought to myself that his falsetto (i will give him due for his mid range, which i think is pretty good) sounds like a grandma singing out of her range, trying to do a whacky imitation of The Beach Boys. But, yes, taxes and dishes.

Very well put. It is the timbre of Jeff's voice which is displeasing to the ear.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 15, 2012, 11:29:26 PM
Pitch correction was used on Brian's 1988 solo debut. Can you really tell? You can't, and it's because they manually adjusted his pitch when it needed to be done instead of lazily throwing a filter over the entire vocal. We've heard Brian live without pitch correction, we've heard the other guys recently without pitch correct, and they can still sing just fine while having the occasional iffy moment, but they've had those since the 60s. Harmonies aren't meant to have a creepy synthetic pitch-perfect quality. That's why some folks have a problem with it, especially someone like Al, whose voice has held up the best over these 50 years. His vocals do not deserve to be compromised like they have on "From There To Back Again". No one is being irrational or attempting to sour anything for anyone, we're just upset because the folks in charge of this are trying their damnedest to fix what isn't broken and it's unnecessarily compromising the quality of the final product.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 15, 2012, 11:34:07 PM
Judging from the longer clips at iTunes, to me this isn't anywhere near as good as the stuff of theirs I enjoy best (Love You, Holland, early hits, etc.) but honestly I didn't expect it any other way. Not a big issue at all.

"The Private Life of Bill and Sue" reminds me of both Imagination and the M.I.U. Album. Not a great piece of art but kind of pleasant and, as I said before, VERY catchy. So far, this might be my favorite. "Isn't It Time" is a bit too retro for me in terms of the lyrics. The music itself is (again) pleasant enough. "Pacific Coast Highway" reminds me of "MAD" but the B-Pain thing really is distracting. Overall, very promising. "Beaches in Mind" sounds completely forgettable to these ears, as does "Spring Vacation", which I think is laughably bad. "Shelter" is pretty good I guess. Not a big fan of Foskett's vocals, however, and the B-Pain thing is way too prominent too. "From There to Back Again" could be one of the album's definite high points. Bit underwhelmed by "Summer's Gone". Never been a fan of "Daybreak Over the Ocean". Could be their best since Still Cruisin' or maybe even BB85; as a whole, probably better than KTSA but not too close to the individual high points of the Light Album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 16, 2012, 12:03:18 AM
we're just upset because the folks in charge of this are trying their damnedest to fix what isn't broken and it's unnecessarily compromising the quality of the final product.

Fair enough.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on May 16, 2012, 12:07:36 AM
To me, it almost sounds like an album they should have put out long ago. By that, I mean 90s or early 2000s. It fits in the Beach Boys' evolution of sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: roll plymouth rock on May 16, 2012, 12:12:29 AM
spring vacation, good vibration, summer weather, we're back together....easy money, ain't life funny, hey what's it to ya? hallelujah


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 16, 2012, 01:37:49 AM
I apologise for yesterday. Whilst I feel vindicated in defending my right to have a subjective opinion without being called a "hater", there is no excuse for name calling in return.

Please guys, be aware though. There is a knock on effect when you try to belittile people whose opinion you don't share.

My two favourite albums are Smiley Smile and Love You. There are a lot of people on here who can't stand these albums. Whilst I find that bewildering, I would defend their right to have their opinion to the death.

I find the clips physically painful to listen to. I hate the pitch correction. Whilst I will listen to the album tracks on Youtube when they become available, I will not be spending money on an album I will never play. I would rather spend that money on a nice day out with my daughter!

The Beach Boys are entertainers. They don't owe me anything, and I don't owe them anything. There is no rule saying that to be a Beach Boys fan you have to blindly love everything they do. (And I'm not for one moment saying that's what any of you are doing, that is addressed to me and the genuine sadness and disapointment I feel)

They enjoy a privileged lifestyle because of us fans.

Do they deserve this? Absolutely

Have they earned this? Undoubtedly

Are they above criticism?...........I don't think I need answer that

This ain't the blooboard guys.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 16, 2012, 01:42:35 AM
Monicker, you really do know how to spread some joy and light.

I second that. They're all about 70, maybe they can't sing in tune any more? If this is what it takes, then fair enough. It is what it is. Monicker, you do have much more sensitive ears than anyone else on the board (you were very upset about Smile Sessions and yes, I did hear what you heard, but I didn't let it bother me) and most people here either haven't noticed pitch correction or don't mind it. As Wirestone says, let's not spoil the party. The release of this record will be a special event for everyone here.

I wanted to counter the claim that the Autotune, as heard on the iTunes clips, was nowhere near as bad as one might have thought, because i noticed it even more on the higher quality. But, yeah, i don’t need to say anymore. And i don’t mean that in a snarky way at all. Honestly, these issues can’t at all be compared to the Smile Sessions box or argued in the same way because, ultimately, these are creative decisions that someone is making on the new record, so how much can the naysayers really say? It comes down to tastes. That, however, wasn’t the case at all with TSS. And for the record, my ears aren’t the greatest--in the videos posted in the Autotune thread, there were a lot of instances where i couldn’t hear it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 16, 2012, 04:07:17 AM
Wow Isn't It Time is great! It's the closest thing here to a classic sounding BB record. It kind of feels like MIU/LA Light/KTSA era to me and I don't mean that as a slur - it's like one of the better tracks from that era, which is no mean feat in 98 or 2012 or whenever this was actually written.

Shame about the autotune though, but don't want to dwell too much on that. It is as it is. I can imagine Bruce bringing that idea to the party, for some weird reason.

Based on these Itunes clips I'd say I like about 2/3rds of the album which has way exceeded my expectations. Summer's Gone sounds gorgeous. I remember a quote from Carnie Wilson or one of his daughters where she eluded to some incredible Caroline No like track that Brian had kept in the can. I always wondered about that. I know it's a long shot but maybe this last one is what she was referring to.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 16, 2012, 05:54:58 AM
Monicker, you really do know how to spread some joy and light.

I second that. They're all about 70, maybe they can't sing in tune any more? If this is what it takes, then fair enough. It is what it is. Monicker, you do have much more sensitive ears than anyone else on the board (you were very upset about Smile Sessions and yes, I did hear what you heard, but I didn't let it bother me) and most people here either haven't noticed pitch correction or don't mind it. As Wirestone says, let's not spoil the party. The release of this record will be a special event for everyone here.

I wanted to counter the claim that the Autotune, as heard on the iTunes clips, was nowhere near as bad as one might have thought, because i noticed it even more on the higher quality. But, yeah, i don’t need to say anymore. And i don’t mean that in a snarky way at all. Honestly, these issues can’t at all be compared to the Smile Sessions box or argued in the same way because, ultimately, these are creative decisions that someone is making on the new record, so how much can the naysayers really say? It comes down to tastes. That, however, wasn’t the case at all with TSS. And for the record, my ears aren’t the greatest--in the videos posted in the Autotune thread, there were a lot of instances where i couldn’t hear it. 

part of me thinks that what one person calls autotune could possibly just be a vocal effect.  Definitely on from there to back again.  We all know al doesn't need the tuning, so i think it's a vocal effect.  for whatever reason, brian was diggin it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 16, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
Monicker, you really do know how to spread some joy and light.

I second that. They're all about 70, maybe they can't sing in tune any more? If this is what it takes, then fair enough. It is what it is. Monicker, you do have much more sensitive ears than anyone else on the board (you were very upset about Smile Sessions and yes, I did hear what you heard, but I didn't let it bother me) and most people here either haven't noticed pitch correction or don't mind it. As Wirestone says, let's not spoil the party. The release of this record will be a special event for everyone here.

I wanted to counter the claim that the Autotune, as heard on the iTunes clips, was nowhere near as bad as one might have thought, because i noticed it even more on the higher quality. But, yeah, i don’t need to say anymore. And i don’t mean that in a snarky way at all. Honestly, these issues can’t at all be compared to the Smile Sessions box or argued in the same way because, ultimately, these are creative decisions that someone is making on the new record, so how much can the naysayers really say? It comes down to tastes. That, however, wasn’t the case at all with TSS. And for the record, my ears aren’t the greatest--in the videos posted in the Autotune thread, there were a lot of instances where i couldn’t hear it.  

part of me thinks that what one person calls autotune could possibly just be a vocal effect.  Definitely on from there to back again.  We all know al doesn't need the tuning, so i think it's a vocal effect.  for whatever reason, brian was diggin it

I totally agree. It may not be Antares Autotune, but it is pitch correction / quantizer of some make, and the way it has been used is as a vocal effect.

Most, if not all of the major studio software now ships with pitch correction as standard. I use it sometimes, to correct the odd bum note on an otherwise perfect take. You can replace bum notes by dropping in, but by the time you've set this up, you're standing in a slightly different position / distance in relation to the mic, and the replaced note is now incongruous sounding. So pitch correction is the preferable remedy.

You can use it, and you wouldn't know it was there, is what I'm trying to say. When you know it's there, it's a a stylistic choice, it's a vocal effect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 16, 2012, 08:29:42 AM
has anyone run an old beach boy vocals through autotune software?  I'm curious what would happen


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on May 16, 2012, 08:32:47 AM
has anyone run an old beach boy vocals through autotune software?  I'm curious what would happen

The vocals would sound perfect...and terrible.

Someone on here autotuned some Freddie Mercury vocals (from "Love of My Life" I believe) and it just destroyed the natural beauty of what Mercury had achieved.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 16, 2012, 08:49:09 AM
sorry lads, I love it all. I fear some of your critics would die and go to heaven and complain about something. I am now going to stop talking and listen to the music only; rhetorical discourse and competitive wit is no way to appreciate songs.  I'll check back with you when the record is out; I am grateful for this forum, but I am gaining nothing from the snarkiness.

best till then

the professor


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 16, 2012, 08:53:36 AM
sorry lads, I love it all. I fear some of your critics would die and go to heaven and complain about something. I am now going to stop talking and listen to the music only; rhetorical discourse and competitive wit is no way to appreciate songs.  I'll check back with you when the record is out; I am grateful for this forum, but I am gaining nothing from the snarkiness.

best till then

the professor

i think the majority of the posts here are positive for the new stuff


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 16, 2012, 09:00:20 AM
I apologise for yesterday. Whilst I feel vindicated in defending my right to have a subjective opinion without being called a "hater", there is no excuse for name calling in return.

Please guys, be aware though. There is a knock on effect when you try to belittile people whose opinion you don't share.

My two favourite albums are Smiley Smile and Love You. There are a lot of people on here who can't stand these albums. Whilst I find that bewildering, I would defend their right to have their opinion to the death.

I find the clips physically painful to listen to. I hate the pitch correction. Whilst I will listen to the album tracks on Youtube when they become available, I will not be spending money on an album I will never play. I would rather spend that money on a nice day out with my daughter!

The Beach Boys are entertainers. They don't owe me anything, and I don't owe them anything. There is no rule saying that to be a Beach Boys fan you have to blindly love everything they do. (And I'm not for one moment saying that's what any of you are doing, that is addressed to me and the genuine sadness and disapointment I feel)

They enjoy a privileged lifestyle because of us fans.

Do they deserve this? Absolutely

Have they earned this? Undoubtedly

Are they above criticism?...........I don't think I need answer that

This ain't the blooboard guys.

Well-said. I love the group, as do most people who post here, but I agree with you 100% about not owing them anything (although I will most likely purchase the album on day one). There is a certain amount of expectation for us as listeners. For me, "Isn't it Time" is the closest to a classic Beach Boys sound - no audible pitch correction, a very neat backing track, and a really cool trade-off vocal between Michael, Alan, and Brian.

I agree that the pitch correction on Al's voice in "From Here to Back Again" is not as bad on the iTunes samples. I can hear  Joe Thomas-style production on "Strange World" and "Spring Vacation" more than any other tracks. I can remember from the Peter Carlin book where he wanted Brian's band to play "Caroline No" as a 'sexy, sade-type thing' and that's what I hear in some of these backing tracks. Brian's production style over the past few years seems to be most apparent on "That's Why God Made The Radio" and "Think About the Days."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 16, 2012, 09:02:49 AM
I fear some of your critics would die and go to heaven and complain about something. I am now going to stop talking and listen to the music only;

Seeing as I hate religion more than I hate pitch correction, you're spot on there Yaffle!

But lets look at what you just said. So heaven is supposed to be a perfect place, but us critics would find something to complain about if we were there because our complaining is psychological. Therefore our complaints have no basis and our opinions are invalid. Neat trick there Prof!

So how would you feel if I said something like this?

"Oh, you lot who like this album would like a dog turd if it had the Beach Boys logo on it"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 16, 2012, 10:19:43 AM
I can hear  Joe Thomas-style production on "Strange World" and "Spring Vacation" more than any other tracks. I can remember from the Peter Carlin book where he wanted Brian's band to play "Caroline No" as a 'sexy, sade-type thing' and that's what I hear in some of these backing tracks. Brian's production style over the past few years seems to be most apparent on "That's Why God Made The Radio" and "Think About the Days."

Sade!  That's what I was thinking of when I heard these snippets. Had to review a Sade album for a mag about 26 years ago. When I put side two on it sounded the same as side one. Ah well…


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on May 16, 2012, 10:38:12 AM
So, someday when the new album gets reissued a few years down the road, would it be possible to have someone like Mark Linett produce a version without any Autotune-type effects? I so badly want to hear these guys singing in their natural voices, without special effects.






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 16, 2012, 10:52:58 AM
Just listened to the samples on itunes, to me The Private Life Of Bill And Sue sounds like the only real clunker with the rest of the tracks ranging from average to very good, of course it's hard to make a proper judgement without hearing the complete album.

I also think people need to live and let live regarding the new tracks, some people will gush over them, some people will hate them, some people will be indifferent to them. We are all different people with different views on life, music and everything else but are tied together through our love of the Beach Boys. I myself love the title track and am excited about the rest of the album, but I respect that it really doesn't do it for many other fans as is their right, you can't force yourself to like something that doesn't sound right to you.  Case in point, I've listened to the Wild Honey album dozens and dozens of times since I got into the Boys and still don't like it and would be a bit pissed off if someone told me I was being negative for not liking it as has happened here in regards to the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 16, 2012, 10:54:40 AM
So, someday when the new album gets reissued a few years down the road, would it be possible to have someone like Mark Linett produce a version without any Autotune-type effects? I so badly want to hear these guys singing in their natural voices, without special effects.






Wouldn't help, we would then complain that the vocals were flat and/or out of tune!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doinnothin on May 16, 2012, 11:05:28 AM
Honestly, I'm all for The Beach Boys using auto-tune/pitch-correction if they want it. Hate it or love it, it's a studio tool now, and one of the things I've always loved about Brian was his ability to use all the tools in the studio. I don't begrudge him using echo chambers, double tracking, or synths, so, for me, it seems like a weird thing to draw a line on.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 16, 2012, 11:14:10 AM
So, someday when the new album gets reissued a few years down the road, would it be possible to have someone like Mark Linett produce a version without any Autotune-type effects? I so badly want to hear these guys singing in their natural voices, without special effects.






Wouldn't help, we would then complain that the vocals were flat and/or out of tune!

There's a middle ground, as some have been saying all along.

And this isn't directed at you Paulos, I just don't want to start another post, but it may help people who are having trouble accepting any criticism of this album to know this:

I feel incredibly sad I don't like it. I really, really wanted to. To me this was a lot more exciting than TSS. I'm not going to pretend to like it though, just to fit in. And I'm not going to keep quiet either. And believe it or not, I'm getting secondary enjoyment from seeing how much others like it.

Do people really want a message board where everyone thinks the same?  :police:

It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though. [




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 16, 2012, 11:14:40 AM
I think Shelter could have been a great song with Carl's voice singing the chorus.  Without Carl, it is what it is.  That is the one spot on these previews where his missing voice really stuck out to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 16, 2012, 11:19:43 AM
So, someday when the new album gets reissued a few years down the road, would it be possible to have someone like Mark Linett produce a version without any Autotune-type effects? I so badly want to hear these guys singing in their natural voices, without special effects.






Wouldn't help, we would then complain that the vocals were flat and/or out of tune!

There's a middle ground, as some have been saying all along.

And this isn't directed at you Paulos, I just don't want to start another post, but it may help people who are having trouble accepting any criticism of this album to know this:

I feel incredibly sad I don't like it. I really, really wanted to. To me this was a lot more exciting than TSS. I'm not going to pretend to like it though, just to fit in. And I'm not going to keep quiet either. And believe it or not, I'm getting secondary enjoyment from seeing how much others like it.

Do people really want a message board where everyone thinks the same?  :police:

It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though. [




I know! Since i think this is going to be their best album evur, It's heartening to know I will get no criticism for that belief. 

Shelter, is going to be better than Heroes & Villians I think. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 16, 2012, 11:21:56 AM
So, someday when the new album gets reissued a few years down the road, would it be possible to have someone like Mark Linett produce a version without any Autotune-type effects? I so badly want to hear these guys singing in their natural voices, without special effects.






Wouldn't help, we would then complain that the vocals were flat and/or out of tune!

There's a middle ground, as some have been saying all along.

And this isn't directed at you Paulos, I just don't want to start another post, but it may help people who are having trouble accepting any criticism of this album to know this:

I feel incredibly sad I don't like it. I really, really wanted to. To me this was a lot more exciting than TSS. I'm not going to pretend to like it though, just to fit in. And I'm not going to keep quiet either. And believe it or not, I'm getting secondary enjoyment from seeing how much others like it.

Do people really want a message board where everyone thinks the same?  :police:

It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though. [




That's cool IHA, in the post I made before the one referenced I'm agreeing with you on the same principle.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 11:31:58 AM
It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though.

Sure. But you have to know that saying, and I quote: "I find the clips physically painful to listen to" and "I will not be spending money on an album I will never play" is going to elicit a strong counter-reaction.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 16, 2012, 11:38:09 AM
I find the album to be a mixed bag from the clips I have listened to, but "Isn't It Time" may be my favorite so far. It is a new-sounding Beach Boys track with a great melody that trades off between singers. It picks up right where they left off in the 1970s. This is probably my favorite Mike moment that I've heard so far, and I love the way Al sounds on it.

I agree about "Shelter." Carl is sorely missed. I like Jeff in the blend, but when he stands out like this, he sounds like a dessicated clone of the traditional Beach Boys falsetto sound. Darian's falsetto is excellent, I wonder why they didn't use him? Perhaps his conflicts with JT... Then again, Jeff is Switzerland. Everybody in the band has a history with him, and I assume they all like him.

P.S. Does anyone know who is doing the falsetto in "Isn't It Time?" I love that part. Maybe it's Jeff; if so, good on him. I really enjoy that vocal tag.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 11:46:37 AM
I'm really enjoying "Strange World," which isn't one of the tracks people are seizing on. But there's something about it that really gets me.

I will also say, I'm generally happy with how BW-composed the album sounds ... with a couple of exceptions. Spring Vacation, for all its tacky charms, also doesn't sound especially Wilsonian, except for the bridge. Ditto for what we've heard of Beaches in Mind so far (although the vocoder effect is neat). That is the one thing that irritated me about Imagination, and it sounds like it will irritate me on these tracks -- there were a couple of songs that simply didn't sound, compositionally, like something Brian would write.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 16, 2012, 11:50:05 AM
It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though.

Sure. But you have to know that saying, and I quote: "I find the clips physically painful to listen to" and "I will not be spending money on an album I will never play" is going to elicit a strong counter-reaction.

Both true. So I'm supposed to keep quiet for fear of provoking anyone? I'm all for people disagreeing with me, but not dismissing me and telling me my opinion is worthless. That makes me dig my heels in.

I really want to let this go now, and I keep trying to. By saying "I find the clips physically painful to listen to", I'm trying to get across to people why I don't like it, so the attacks stop. I can't win

I tell you what. You've won. I'm too tired to carry on. The group has beaten the hater down. How dare he think otherwise to them. And knowing as you do why I'm probably feeling so down and defensive at the moment, your comment has finished me off.

So excuse the melodrama, I'm sure you'll all have a good laugh.

Goodbye to all those I consider friends on here.

Take care

Stephen

Come on Wirestone. I really want to let this go. You either accept I have a


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 11:56:24 AM
IHA, you can't have it both ways. You really can't. If you say something strong in one direction -- and I support your right to say it, and think that it's absolutely fine that you say whatever you like -- you can't then deny others the ability to disagree with you. You're disagreeing with them!

No one is trying to silence you, and I've found your posts interesting and engaging. But freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism. Indeed, the two things go together. There are many other people who don't like the clips either, and that's giving the board some life and excitement. The back and forth is what it's all about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 16, 2012, 12:10:07 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*** if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do! All I'm asking is that people RESPECT EACH OTHERS OPINIONS . Is that too much to ask?!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 12:13:08 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do!

Exactly.

Is that too much to ask?!

I'd hope not.

...

Also, did I mention how much I liked "Strange World"? And the bicycle bell? Awesome!

Also, part two: The lyrics in the bridge of Spring Vacation are still weirdly muffled on the iTunes clop. What's up with that?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 16, 2012, 12:22:53 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do! All I'm asking is that people RESPECT EACH OTHERS OPINIONS . Is that too much to ask?!
I can not be a part of a forum where there is a lack of respect. And I don't respect you other guys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on May 16, 2012, 12:26:42 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do! All I'm asking is that people RESPECT EACH OTHERS OPINIONS . Is that too much to ask?!
I can not be a part of a forum where there is a lack of respect. And I don't respect you other guys.

I'm not sure if you are trying to be ironic or not here, either way I respect your right to express yourself.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 16, 2012, 12:39:16 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do! All I'm asking is that people RESPECT EACH OTHERS OPINIONS . Is that too much to ask?!
I can not be a part of a forum where there is a lack of respect. And I don't respect you other guys.

Seriously?! In that case, feel free to leave.

edit

I think that was a joke. Whoops


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 16, 2012, 12:51:25 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do!

Exactly.

Is that too much to ask?!

I'd hope not.

...

Also, did I mention how much I liked "Strange World"? And the bicycle bell? Awesome!

Also, part two: The lyrics in the bridge of Spring Vacation are still weirdly muffled on the iTunes clop. What's up with that?

Love Strange World as well. Regarding the Isn't it Time clip, is that just Brian, Al and Mike we are hearing on the lead? Is that someone else (Jeff or AL?) mixing in WITH Brian on that?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2012, 12:55:22 PM
It would be nice to have a slightly more tolerant board though.

Sure. But you have to know that saying, and I quote: "I find the clips physically painful to listen to" and "I will not be spending money on an album I will never play" is going to elicit a strong counter-reaction.

Both true. So I'm supposed to keep quiet for fear of provoking anyone? I'm all for people disagreeing with me, but not dismissing me and telling me my opinion is worthless. That makes me dig my heels in.

I really want to let this go now, and I keep trying to. By saying "I find the clips physically painful to listen to", I'm trying to get across to people why I don't like it, so the attacks stop. I can't win

I tell you what. You've won. I'm too tired to carry on. The group has beaten the hater down. How dare he think otherwise to them. And knowing as you do why I'm probably feeling so down and defensive at the moment, your comment has finished me off.

So excuse the melodrama, I'm sure you'll all have a good laugh.

Goodbye to all those I consider friends on here.

Take care

Stephen

Come on Wirestone. I really want to let this go. You either accept I have a

Stephen, even though I don't agree with your assessment, neither do I have your ears. So, what do I know? Come back, I enjoy your posts, as well. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 16, 2012, 01:05:13 PM
Who gives a flying oatmeal f*ck if someone disagrees with someone? We're Beach Boys fans...disagreeing is what we do!

Exactly.

Is that too much to ask?!

I'd hope not.

...

Also, did I mention how much I liked "Strange World"? And the bicycle bell? Awesome!

Also, part two: The lyrics in the bridge of Spring Vacation are still weirdly muffled on the iTunes clop. What's up with that?

Love Strange World as well. Regarding the Isn't it Time clip, is that just Brian, Al and Mike we are hearing on the lead? Is that someone else (Jeff or AL?) mixing in WITH Brian on that?

I'm actually thinking there's a fair amount of Bruce on the high parts in Isn't It Time, possibly with Jeff propping him up. It's amazing how high Bruce can still sing, he's doing a lot of the high parts (that aren't Jeff) in Think About The Days and he's been doing the falsetto part at the end of Fun Fun Fun on this tour.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 16, 2012, 01:51:57 PM
It became clear to me tonight. After a bottle of wine. And after listeing to Shelter. It dawned on me. I feel one thing when listening to the new album in all its imperfection - pure love. I've never loved The Beach Boys this much, it feels they are doing is this album for us, not for themselves. They wanted us to have one last gift, one final lingering memory of things that were. After aeons of hardships they got together and put their differences aside to give us something to make us happier than we were before.

It is not a perfect album, but then again we are not perfect. No-one is perfect. Life is not perfect. This album evokes thoughts of things that could have been, but never came to pass.

I will be forever thankful for that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 16, 2012, 02:08:51 PM
Dang, Mr. Frog...that would mean Brian's not gonna do another new one with them after that.

This album will be a nice place to leave off, if it comes to that. But hey: summer may be gone, but it always comes back next year. (Maybe with all real instruments, noisemakers, and purer vocals!) I wouldn't diss that, for sure.

That said, it seems to me that this album will likely hold a few new classics--if we indeed can allow ourselves the notion that anything that comes from "the present" can also be "classic".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 16, 2012, 02:14:00 PM
I want to say one last thing about Autotune, or rather the perception of it. I think i’ve realized why i personally don’t like it as an effect, why i’m bothered by it, and why it may seem that i draw the line there. I was thinking about this and trying to pinpoint my disdain for it, and my first thought, of course, was how unnatural it sounds. But then that’s appeal to nature. And i like synths, electronic music, and other things that would likely be considered “unnatural.” So it can’t be that. Then it hit me: i think it all comes down to association. That distinct sound is immediately associated with certain types of music, certain songs and artists, all of which i do not enjoy. The effect is so inextricably tied to certain music that when i hear this effect i instantly think of Cher, Lil Wayne, R. Kelly, and a slew of contemporary R&B and Hip Hop artists who i really don’t care for. But even when i hear it outside of this arena, i’m just reminded of all that music anyway. And it creates a knee jerk reaction, kind of like hearing a soprano sax solo or an over the top guitar shredding solo, two sonic trademarks that are associated with certain types of music and artists. It’s also not unlike the vocoder, which is such a distinct and homogenized sound that was overused and became a cliche. In a song like From There To Back Again, the Autotune effect sounds so superfluous, so out of place, so uncalled for. At that point i just can’t help feel that it’s being abused. When i heard it on Spring Vacation i thought for sure it would be the only spot on the record where it’s used as a gimmick. Why start using it on other tracks and homogenize the sound? To (futilely) attempt to make the Beach Boys seem current?

A much simpler way to put it is that i think it’s a really ugly sounding effect. Which i guess begs the question: do i think it’s ugly because i associate it with things that i don’t like? But when Cher’s Believe first came out i thought it was really ugly sounding, and that was my first ever exposure to it. Maybe it’s just that it was unappealing from the start, and for over a decade now we’ve been bombarded with it, which is only going to make the experience even more unappealing. 

There’s a Ween (who i like a lot) recording that purposely abuses it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L947gWoM9M and, sure, when i hear it i laugh, it’s funny to me, but i also can’t get into the song, and i prefer that it didn’t have it at all. They’ve spent over 20 years making much better use of exaggerated vocal effects anyway. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 02:25:14 PM
Excellent post, Monicker. I think that's a real contributor to why so many folks have problems with autotune, when you get down to it. As you say, it's not so much that it's a technical effect -- there have been lots of those on BW/BB albums for years. It's the association with what's considered disposable music of the moment. And we've all devoted a lot of time and effort to a band that we believe transcends popular trends, so it's discouraging to see such trends worm their way into a BB record. (That's likely one reason why so many people hated the disco track on the LA album, too, for instance.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 16, 2012, 02:50:12 PM
i would hope that people don't like it just because of the association.  I'm not a huge fan, at it's mostly because i find it be sort of "cold", whereas i think of the best beach boy vocals as warm.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Music Machine on May 16, 2012, 03:06:53 PM
My thoughts on the iTunes samples:

Think About the Days - It reminds me of the Friends album and Friends era outtakes.

That's Why God Made the Radio - The best early Beach Boys pastiche since It's Ok and sounds like a cross between Sail on Sailor and Goin' On.

Isn't it Time and Spring Vacation - What stuff from BB '85 or SIP would sound like with better slightly better production.

The Private Life of Bill and Sue - Has an 00's Brian Wilson solo album feel to it.

Shelter - Early 70's Beach Boys pastiche.

Daybreak Over the Ocean - I would have preferred a group version of Cool Head Warm Heart but this'll do, nice harmonies. You can sing Getcha Back and Sumahama along to this.

Beaches in Mind - Reminds me of the title track from Keepin' the Summer Alive.

Strange World - Sounds like a rewrite of You're Still a Mystery. I like the little Smile reference near the end of the sample.

From There to Back Again - A sublime ballad like the ones on Carl and the Passions, I love it. Also it's got the exact same guitar part and tone as The Night Was So Young.

Pacific Coast Highway - Sounds like the better solo Brian stuff.

Summer's Gone - Very reminiscent of Caroline No.

All in all it sounds like a solid 4 out 5 album to me and will get a lot of replay over the summer but it's kind of like the Beach Boys became their own Rutles.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 16, 2012, 03:20:02 PM
Basically, the production reminds of High School Musical or something, and Brian sounds responsible for maybe a quarter or a third of the arrangements (if you include the vocals). Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective. Overall, it's a decent album, but the freaks aren't going to like. Nostalgic old people will probably get a kick out of it, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 03:35:39 PM
So, I'm seriously digging Shelter, Strange World, and It Isn't Time more and more.  Strange World is really, REALLY interesting. I'm going to love this album, and I think a lot of critics will too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 16, 2012, 03:59:36 PM
I think this is the perfect last album, perfectly describes the boys,

A few duds, a few catchy "jinglish" songs, and a few that are the pinnacle of art. This has it all folks, and some AMAZING harmonies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Domino on May 16, 2012, 04:12:22 PM
It seems like Brian wrote The Private Life of Bill and Sue in 2009. This is a translation from a 2009 swedish interview:

Is it easier for you to write music today?
- No, it's really not. I wrote the album That Lucky Old Sun, but nowadays it's a little harder for me.

Why?
- I don't know... I'm not sure I can do it anymore.

Not sure you can?
- Maybe if I really wanted. I have tried my best. By the way, I wrote a song last week called The Private Life of Bill and Sue. It goes like this: "The private life of Bill and Sue. It does not matter what They do." I havn't finished the lyrics yet, but the melody is done.

Brian Wilson begins to sing:
- "The private life ..." I can't do it by heart, but I have it on tape.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 16, 2012, 05:29:52 PM
. Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective.

And you base this statement based on...??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 05:37:18 PM
It seems like Brian wrote The Private Life of Bill and Sue in 2009. This is a translation from a 2009 swedish interview:

Is it easier for you to write music today?
- No, it's really not. I wrote the album That Lucky Old Sun, but nowadays it's a little harder for me.

Why?
- I don't know... I'm not sure I can do it anymore.

Not sure you can?
- Maybe if I really wanted. I have tried my best. By the way, I wrote a song last week called The Private Life of Bill and Sue. It goes like this: "The private life of Bill and Sue. It does not matter what They do." I havn't finished the lyrics yet, but the melody is done.

Brian Wilson begins to sing:
- "The private life ..." I can't do it by heart, but I have it on tape.

Good catch! So yes, smack in the middle of his "five year dry spell," as he put it in the June '11 CBC interview, Brian just managed to write a song one week. I bet you anything that Brian manages to write songs during his periods of "writer's block." It's probably just not as frequent or fulfilling as the periods when he's inspired every day.

. Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective.

And you base this statement based on...??

Thank you for the note of skepticism there. From the sound of the record so far, I'd say Brian was much more directly involved in terms of arrangement and production than he was for "Imagination." The songwriting is harder to tell, but all but a couple of the songs sound like his creations to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 16, 2012, 05:40:50 PM
. Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective.

And you base this statement based on...??
Dada, tell us about a 1/4 of the arrangements too? Is this an inference from what you heard, or do you know for sure?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 05:48:44 PM
It seems like Brian wrote The Private Life of Bill and Sue in 2009. This is a translation from a 2009 swedish interview:

Is it easier for you to write music today?
- No, it's really not. I wrote the album That Lucky Old Sun, but nowadays it's a little harder for me.

Why?
- I don't know... I'm not sure I can do it anymore.

Not sure you can?
- Maybe if I really wanted. I have tried my best. By the way, I wrote a song last week called The Private Life of Bill and Sue. It goes like this: "The private life of Bill and Sue. It does not matter what They do." I havn't finished the lyrics yet, but the melody is done.

Brian Wilson begins to sing:
- "The private life ..." I can't do it by heart, but I have it on tape.

Wow. Great stuff. Glad to hear this, makes me appreciate Sue a little more, I'm excited to hear it entirely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 05:49:32 PM
. Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective.

And you base this statement based on...??
Dada, tell us about a 1/4 of the arrangements too? Is this an inference from what you heard, or do you know for sure?

I would seriously doubt anyone except but Brian, Joe and the session musicians know the facts here. And if Joe did that much of it, they certainly wouldn't tell anyone.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 16, 2012, 06:02:08 PM
. Songwriting wise, it's hard to say, but probably only a couple songs are completely written by Brian from a chord and melody perspective.

And you base this statement based on...??
Dada, tell us about a 1/4 of the arrangements too? Is this an inference from what you heard, or do you know for sure?

I would seriously doubt anyone except but Brian, Joe and the session musicians know the facts here. And if Joe did that much of it, they certainly wouldn't tell anyone.

Right. Harsh criticism is fine. But enough with the bold statements based on very limited data (or lack of thereof).

Just one thing regardings Brian's alledged writer's block. It's likely that he's less productive than he was 40 years ago. Or that it takes longer for him to finish a song. But, based on the interviews he gives, it's like he calls "writer's block" whichever period that goes by without him writing a new song. If the interview falls into one of those periods (that may last probably a couple days or a week sometimes) he'll clam to be suffering from a writer's block.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 16, 2012, 06:19:01 PM
Maybe I had very low expectations, but after finally listening to the iTunes previews... this is pretty damn good. I like it more than the BW solo stuff/anything Beach Boys related since at least 1977. Think About the Days, Summer's Gone, Pacific Coast Highway, Strange World, Shelter all sound great so far.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 16, 2012, 06:34:16 PM
WHY NO LOVE FOR THE BEST? FROM THERE TO BACK AGAIN?

I love the lyrics

"Don't you understand the words are singing in the wind? I wish we the could get from here to back again!"

The title and the "Da-Da-Daaa" after the lines "Pacific Coast Getaway" are AMAZING. AND THAT FLUTE MAKES ME CRY.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 16, 2012, 06:54:00 PM
Maybe I had very low expectations, but after finally listening to the iTunes previews... this is pretty damn good. I like it more than the BW solo stuff/anything Beach Boys related since at least 1977. Think About the Days, Summer's Gone, Pacific Coast Highway, Strange World, Shelter all sound great so far.

Yeah man!  Good time to be a fan.  Can't wait for the album, it's going to be excellent.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 16, 2012, 06:55:33 PM
WHY NO LOVE FOR THE BEST? FROM THERE TO BACK AGAIN?

I love the lyrics

"Don't you understand the words are singing in the wind? I wish we the could get from here to back again!"

The title and the "Da-Da-Daaa" after the lines "Pacific Coast Getaway" are AMAZING. AND THAT FLUTE MAKES ME CRY.

I think the cool part of FTTBA is that it has sections -- and the clips we've heard so far has mainly been Al's introductory piece. So it's harder to judge, perhaps, then the rest of the songs. But it does seem very pretty.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 16, 2012, 07:04:27 PM
Why did Joe Thomas had to enter into Brian Wilson's life... why.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 16, 2012, 07:21:06 PM
I just listened to the tracks on iTunes. As someone that has used pitch correction software for over 10 years (both Autotune and Melodyne), I have to say that I don't hear any egregious pitch correction on ANY of these songs.

What I do hear is a fair amount of the Eventide harmonizer effect that is commonplace on almost all major label recordings. This is a stereo effect where the left side is pitched down a few cents, say 12, and the right side is pitched up a few cents, say 12. This is then blended with the dry vocal to provide a thickening, chorusy-type effect. It's been used on Mike Love's vocals in the live setting for probably at least 20 years.

I like what I've heard of the album so far. Seems to easily be their best since the L.A. album, and probably surpasses it. That's a rather monumental achievement in my estimation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 07:53:22 PM
I just listened to the tracks on iTunes. As someone that has used pitch correction software for over 10 years (both Autotune and Melodyne), I have to say that I don't hear any egregious pitch correction on ANY of these songs.

What I do hear is a fair amount of the Eventide harmonizer effect that is commonplace on almost all major label recordings. This is a stereo effect where the left side is pitched down a few cents, say 12, and the right side is pitched up a few cents, say 12. This is then blended with the dry vocal to provide a thickening, chorusy-type effect. It's been used on Mike Love's vocals in the live setting for probably at least 20 years.

I like what I've heard of the album so far. Seems to easily be their best since the L.A. album, and probably surpasses it. That's a rather monumental achievement in my estimation.

You know, something like this is refreshing.  Thanks for the info Matt, I, and I assume many others, appreciate it.  Many people here claim to be experts, many probably are, and many other simply make broad generalized statements like "this is slathered in autotune!" without really knowing what it is/does. 

So what's worse, an Eventide harmonizer effect or Antares Autotune? The fact is, it simply doesn't matter. Some people might be grateful or relieved to hear that auto-tune hasn't been applied to these vocals.  Others might dismiss the idea. Whatever the case, it just doesn't freakin matter.  I guess if the vocals upset you so much that you refuse to purchase the album or whatever, fine.  But that the Boys are releasing a brand new album, full of what seem to be promising new brilliant tracks, then I could care less what program has been used to enhance their vocals.  Auto-tune has become such a dirty word that people associate with modern pop acts that the mere thought of it on a Beach Boys album turns them off.  What if everyone started saying, "Oh, this has Eventide harmonizer effects on it, I won't listen to this".  People would think they were mad.  But for some reason, "Oh I hate this because of the auto-tune" is a justified argument.  Get what I mean?

I guess I'm sort of rambling here, but I'm trying to make a point and I'm having a hard time formulating words for how I feel.  I don't know.  This is going to be a friggin great album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 16, 2012, 08:36:29 PM
I just listened to the tracks on iTunes. As someone that has used pitch correction software for over 10 years (both Autotune and Melodyne), I have to say that I don't hear any egregious pitch correction on ANY of these songs.

What I do hear is a fair amount of the Eventide harmonizer effect that is commonplace on almost all major label recordings. This is a stereo effect where the left side is pitched down a few cents, say 12, and the right side is pitched up a few cents, say 12. This is then blended with the dry vocal to provide a thickening, chorusy-type effect. It's been used on Mike Love's vocals in the live setting for probably at least 20 years.

I like what I've heard of the album so far. Seems to easily be their best since the L.A. album, and probably surpasses it. That's a rather monumental achievement in my estimation.

You know, something like this is refreshing.  Thanks for the info Matt, I, and I assume many others, appreciate it.  Many people here claim to be experts, many probably are, and many other simply make broad generalized statements like "this is slathered in autotune!" without really knowing what it is/does. 

So what's worse, an Eventide harmonizer effect or Antares Autotune? The fact is, it simply doesn't matter. Some people might be grateful or relieved to hear that auto-tune hasn't been applied to these vocals.  Others might dismiss the idea. Whatever the case, it just doesn't freakin matter.  I guess if the vocals upset you so much that you refuse to purchase the album or whatever, fine.  But that the Boys are releasing a brand new album, full of what seem to be promising new brilliant tracks, then I could care less what program has been used to enhance their vocals.  Auto-tune has become such a dirty word that people associate with modern pop acts that the mere thought of it on a Beach Boys album turns them off.  What if everyone started saying, "Oh, this has Eventide harmonizer effects on it, I won't listen to this".  People would think they were mad.  But for some reason, "Oh I hate this because of the auto-tune" is a justified argument.  Get what I mean?

I guess I'm sort of rambling here, but I'm trying to make a point and I'm having a hard time formulating words for how I feel.  I don't know.  This is going to be a friggin great album.

No man, it's a sound. Who cares what the name of the software is?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on May 16, 2012, 08:42:05 PM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 08:50:01 PM
I just listened to the tracks on iTunes. As someone that has used pitch correction software for over 10 years (both Autotune and Melodyne), I have to say that I don't hear any egregious pitch correction on ANY of these songs.

What I do hear is a fair amount of the Eventide harmonizer effect that is commonplace on almost all major label recordings. This is a stereo effect where the left side is pitched down a few cents, say 12, and the right side is pitched up a few cents, say 12. This is then blended with the dry vocal to provide a thickening, chorusy-type effect. It's been used on Mike Love's vocals in the live setting for probably at least 20 years.

I like what I've heard of the album so far. Seems to easily be their best since the L.A. album, and probably surpasses it. That's a rather monumental achievement in my estimation.

You know, something like this is refreshing.  Thanks for the info Matt, I, and I assume many others, appreciate it.  Many people here claim to be experts, many probably are, and many other simply make broad generalized statements like "this is slathered in autotune!" without really knowing what it is/does. 

So what's worse, an Eventide harmonizer effect or Antares Autotune? The fact is, it simply doesn't matter. Some people might be grateful or relieved to hear that auto-tune hasn't been applied to these vocals.  Others might dismiss the idea. Whatever the case, it just doesn't freakin matter.  I guess if the vocals upset you so much that you refuse to purchase the album or whatever, fine.  But that the Boys are releasing a brand new album, full of what seem to be promising new brilliant tracks, then I could care less what program has been used to enhance their vocals.  Auto-tune has become such a dirty word that people associate with modern pop acts that the mere thought of it on a Beach Boys album turns them off.  What if everyone started saying, "Oh, this has Eventide harmonizer effects on it, I won't listen to this".  People would think they were mad.  But for some reason, "Oh I hate this because of the auto-tune" is a justified argument.  Get what I mean?

I guess I'm sort of rambling here, but I'm trying to make a point and I'm having a hard time formulating words for how I feel.  I don't know.  This is going to be a friggin great album.

No man, it's a sound. Who cares what the name of the software is?

I guarantee numerous people here would be thrilled to hear Autotune is not being used and that would placate them.   


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 08:52:36 PM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.

So, if they "aren't up to snuff" should we have been satisfied with poor vocal performances?

I personally think they ARE up to snuff, and that the vocal enhancement may have been unnecessary.  I don't mind however. If the performances really were that bad you rather have listened to poor performances?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bcdam on May 16, 2012, 08:55:05 PM
I just listened to the tracks on iTunes. As someone that has used pitch correction software for over 10 years (both Autotune and Melodyne), I have to say that I don't hear any egregious pitch correction on ANY of these songs.

What I do hear is a fair amount of the Eventide harmonizer effect that is commonplace on almost all major label recordings. This is a stereo effect where the left side is pitched down a few cents, say 12, and the right side is pitched up a few cents, say 12. This is then blended with the dry vocal to provide a thickening, chorusy-type effect. It's been used on Mike Love's vocals in the live setting for probably at least 20 years.

I like what I've heard of the album so far. Seems to easily be their best since the L.A. album, and probably surpasses it. That's a rather monumental achievement in my estimation.

that Melodyne effect is being used on the high parts of a track like "Isn't It Time" ("isn't it tiiime"), where it's slightly distracting (if you're hoping for more "real" or "raw" sounding vocals). But you don't hear fairly egregious autotune on a track like "Spring Vacation" ("hal-lel-u-jah")? Again, it's a matter of taste and if it doesn't bother you, it doesn't bother you - but it's there...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on May 16, 2012, 08:59:16 PM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.

So, if they "aren't up to snuff" should we have been satisfied with poor vocal performances?

I personally think they ARE up to snuff, and that the vocal enhancement may have been unnecessary.  I don't mind however. If the performances really were that bad you rather have listened to poor performances?

Did you see the QVC performance tonight? Those were live songs, and they all sounded pretty good. They would obviously sound better in the studio, without the aid of any things like Autotune.

Plus, just because vocals aren't perfectly polished, doesn't mean they aren't good. Raw can sound good. Could you imagine Bob Dylan's albums if they had that slick studio quality? OK, Dylan isn't the BB--fair enough. How about Pacific Ocean Blue? How about Love You? I personally would rather hear "rougher" vocals than Autotune'd ones. They are more natural, and therefore more emotive.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 16, 2012, 09:03:55 PM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.

So, if they "aren't up to snuff" should we have been satisfied with poor vocal performances?

I personally think they ARE up to snuff, and that the vocal enhancement may have been unnecessary.  I don't mind however. If the performances really were that bad you rather have listened to poor performances?

Did you see the QVC performance tonight? Those were live songs, and they all sounded pretty good. They would obviously sound better in the studio, without the aid of any things like Autotune.

Plus, just because vocals aren't perfectly polished, doesn't mean they aren't good. Raw can sound good. Could you imagine Bob Dylan's albums if they had that slick studio quality? OK, Dylan isn't the BB--fair enough. How about Pacific Ocean Blue? How about Love You? I personally would rather hear "rougher" vocals than Autotune'd ones. They are more natural, and therefore more emotive.

No no I agree with you!  I guess I read your post differently than you intended.  I was just saying that I rather have enhanced vocals than poor vocals with bum notes and all.  The Love You argument is tough to make though.  The bum notes and singing in that album add to its charm, but if that was the Beach Boys product released in 2012, I gotta say I would be pretty upset.  Love You is Love You because of its history and charm and uniqueness, but if it was released on June 5 of this year it would have, well, very little of that.  Maybe I feel this way because I wasn't alive when it was released. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on May 16, 2012, 09:08:43 PM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.

So, if they "aren't up to snuff" should we have been satisfied with poor vocal performances?

I personally think they ARE up to snuff, and that the vocal enhancement may have been unnecessary.  I don't mind however. If the performances really were that bad you rather have listened to poor performances?

Did you see the QVC performance tonight? Those were live songs, and they all sounded pretty good. They would obviously sound better in the studio, without the aid of any things like Autotune.

Plus, just because vocals aren't perfectly polished, doesn't mean they aren't good. Raw can sound good. Could you imagine Bob Dylan's albums if they had that slick studio quality? OK, Dylan isn't the BB--fair enough. How about Pacific Ocean Blue? How about Love You? I personally would rather hear "rougher" vocals than Autotune'd ones. They are more natural, and therefore more emotive.

No no I agree with you!  I guess I read your post differently than you intended.  I was just saying that I rather have enhanced vocals than poor vocals with bum notes and all.  The Love You argument is tough to make though.  The bum notes and singing in that album add to its charm, but if that was the Beach Boys product released in 2012, I gotta say I would be pretty upset.  Love You is Love You because of its history and charm and uniqueness, but if it was released on June 5 of this year it would have, well, very little of that.  Maybe I feel this way because I wasn't alive when it was released. 

Fair enough. Perhaps the "raw" vocals wouldn't work on songs like TWGMTR, but we'll never know I suppose. As far as "Love You," yeah, I agree--it'd be an odd release for 2012.

P.S. I wasn't born when it was released, either  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 16, 2012, 10:22:53 PM
Sorry, but people are not hearing autotune on these songs. They're massively stacked and slick vocals recorded and mixed 2012-style.

This isn't the Pet Sounds reissue, or Brian making an authentic reproduction of Smile. It's the Beach Boys making an album in 2012.

They always make their studio albums contemporary to the times. It's still way more retro than anything else out there now. Be grateful for that, and just try to enjoy an album with some great tunes and harmonies, please.

edit: that "hallelujah" line does sound punched; the notes in the melody line there as written are large jumps, done quickly, so they're prone to that, but really? This is not something the average person listening to the song is going to notice. I feel like we're dealing with the age-old axiom of "a little knowledge is dangerous".

You're now so into the process that goes into making records that you assume that's how everyone else also listens to music. They don't. The sooner you get past "the process", the sooner you'll be able to get back to the real business of simply connecting with people emotionally via music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alex on May 16, 2012, 11:05:35 PM
NOOO MOOOOOGGGGSSSS (or gruff vocals)!!!!!!!! :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :( :( :( :( :( :( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on May 16, 2012, 11:30:07 PM
Why did Joe Thomas had to enter into Brian Wilson's life... why.

"Why did Joe Thomas had to" ... haha


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on May 16, 2012, 11:47:08 PM
Yes, people who speak our language better than we do theirs, but still imperfectly, are hilarious


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 12:48:12 AM
I don't think a lot of people--myself among them--dislike things like Autotune because they are associated with vapid pop acts, but because they seem to be used typically as band-aids. Adding an echo, or some delay, or reverb, whatever, is usually done to add a certain dimension to a sound, not to cover up the fact that the sound was bad in the first place. That's my beef with Autotune, and I imagine the beef of many others. If they are honestly using pitch correction for artistic reasons, just like they'd use distortion on a guitar or reverb on vox, more power to them. But if they are doing it because they don't think the Boys' voices are up to snuff any more, then that's pretty lame. In my opinion.

So, if they "aren't up to snuff" should we have been satisfied with poor vocal performances?

I personally think they ARE up to snuff, and that the vocal enhancement may have been unnecessary.  I don't mind however. If the performances really were that bad you rather have listened to poor performances?

Did you see the QVC performance tonight? Those were live songs, and they all sounded pretty good. They would obviously sound better in the studio, without the aid of any things like Autotune.

Plus, just because vocals aren't perfectly polished, doesn't mean they aren't good. Raw can sound good. Could you imagine Bob Dylan's albums if they had that slick studio quality? OK, Dylan isn't the BB--fair enough. How about Pacific Ocean Blue? How about Love You? I personally would rather hear "rougher" vocals than Autotune'd ones. They are more natural, and therefore more emotive.

No no I agree with you!  I guess I read your post differently than you intended.  I was just saying that I rather have enhanced vocals than poor vocals with bum notes and all.  The Love You argument is tough to make though.  The bum notes and singing in that album add to its charm, but if that was the Beach Boys product released in 2012, I gotta say I would be pretty upset.  Love You is Love You because of its history and charm and uniqueness, but if it was released on June 5 of this year it would have, well, very little of that.  Maybe I feel this way because I wasn't alive when it was released. 

If Love You was released in 2012 it would receive a fantastic critical reception. I think it is genuinely an album that fits with a lot of contemporary music (not mainstream pop, proper music - some people on this board seem to get confused at that). Love You is a fantastic, interesting, melodic album that I think would be more appreciated now than in 1977.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 02:13:23 AM
Sorry, but people are not hearing autotune on these songs. They're massively stacked and slick vocals recorded and mixed 2012-style.


You can't listen to "From There To Back Again" and tell me there's no autotune.

Whatever the case, it just doesn't freakin matter.  I guess if the vocals upset you so much that you refuse to purchase the album or whatever, fine.  But that the Boys are releasing a brand new album, full of what seem to be promising new brilliant tracks, then I could care less what program has been used to enhance their vocals.  Auto-tune has become such a dirty word that people associate with modern pop acts that the mere thought of it on a Beach Boys album turns them off.  What if everyone started saying, "Oh, this has Eventide harmonizer effects on it, I won't listen to this".  People would think they were mad.  But for some reason, "Oh I hate this because of the auto-tune" is a justified argument.  Get what I mean?

I guess I'm sort of rambling here, but I'm trying to make a point and I'm having a hard time formulating words for how I feel.  I don't know.  This is going to be a friggin great album.

Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 02:35:00 AM
Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.
Remind me again who said it was your birthright to expect the same production style from 1966 in 2012.

I also demand the same gas prices that existed in 1966. Help me out with that, please.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on May 17, 2012, 03:45:00 AM
People just want to have something to complain about.
Do you mean like this?

Yes! I know the sins of which I speak, sadly.

You are forgiven. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 03:50:55 AM
Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.
Remind me again who said it was your birthright to expect the same production style from 1966 in 2012.

I also demand the same gas prices that existed in 1966. Help me out with that, please.

I would you to point to a single CREDIBLE 2012 production that sounds like this Beach Boys record. Yes you can say Katy Perry blah blah blah, Beach Boys are a pop act blah blah. The Beach Boys have never been anything like that kind of music.

The more comparable contemporary 'pop' acts are stuff like (not saying it in anywhere the same league) the Shins, Mumford and Sons, Fleet Foxes, Flaming Lips. You could even say stuff like Coldplay is closer to the BBs than actual 'pop' music that exists now. There may be is (and probably is) some minor pitch correction, but it doesn't sound like the new BB recordings.

And the major surviving contemporaries of  the Beach Boys don't have autotune slathered on their new albums - Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, Bob Dylan have all had recent good albums, without noticeable autotune.

So its simply ignorant to say this is the 2012 sound - and also your 'price of gas' comparison is just plain stupid. Welcome to the board.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 04:07:25 AM
Oh really?

Explain to me how SIP or KTSA or the LA albums sound like Katy Perry...

Of course they don't. But they were made with complete nods to what was contemporary.

You want the Beach Boys to sound like they did in 1966. I might also want that. But what the band does isn't my choice, or yours.

At their genesis, they started life as a modern band, not a retro one. Why do you think you have a right to expect them to now behave otherwise?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 04:11:56 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

Comparing The Shins, Mumford and Sons, Fleet Foxes, Flaming Lips to Brian Wilson is laughable.

8x derivative indie rock to the original? Great argument you have there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 04:23:36 AM
Oh really?

Explain to me how SIP or KTSA or the LA albums sound like Katy Perry...

Of course they don't. But they were made with complete nods to what was contemporary.

You want the Beach Boys to sound like they did in 1966. I might also want that. But what the band does isn't my choice, or yours.

At their genesis, they started life as a modern band, not a retro one. Why do you think you have a right to expect them to now behave otherwise?

I don't think you quite understand my point - the sound that the Beach Boys are now making is not contemporary, it is not nodding to the contemporary.

I don't want them to sound like 1966. I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: absinthe_boy on May 17, 2012, 04:31:56 AM
Record production has been steadily declining, in my humble opinion, since the early 1990's.

Of course we can all cite examples of good and bad production values from every decade....but the stuff coming out in the last 10 years honestly hurts my ears....hurts my head if I listen to it. I believe the autotune/vocal processing and the lack of dynamic range are mostly to blame.

I will pass comment on TWGMTR when I get to hear it properly. But I would say that any form of pitch correction has no place on a record put out by a group known for vocal harmony.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RickD on May 17, 2012, 04:40:29 AM
and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

Have another listen to Modern Times.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 04:45:25 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 17, 2012, 05:06:36 AM
and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

Have another listen to Modern Times.
and Love and Theft!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 05:07:19 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.

Here's one - MIU.

Anyway it's not the point. You're fixated that people should like the sound of this album because the 'Beach Boys have always tried to stay current'. That is not my worry about the album - my worry is that it sounds sterile and robotic, and it doesn't need to. Because other acts, both veterans and new acts, don't all have this sound on their records.

Oh and by the way I'd say every song on Modern Times is better than Spring Vacation. I'd say the same of So Beautiful or So What, and the same of 'Shine'. Okay McCartney is a mixed bag.


But regardless of this stupid debate, I am looking forward to TWGMTR - a lot of the songs sound like they will fantastic. But excess autotune and the other MOR style production bothers me - that's just my view.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 05:09:48 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.

Just to add, you've picked one of the best songs from BB85 to reference. Most of the rest of that album is completely spoilt by the then-contemporary production. And SIP is sh*t - have you not heard that?

So yes, it is justified to complain about the BBs trying to keep up with trends. I would have complained in 1985 had I been born.

And how is Good Timin' keeping up with the sound of 1979?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 17, 2012, 05:13:17 AM
I haven't listened to the iTunes samples yet.

Are the other songs autotuned significantly more than Summer Vacation?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 05:15:57 AM
I haven't listened to the iTunes samples yet.

Are the other songs autotuned significantly more than Summer Vacation?

No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on May 17, 2012, 05:24:46 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

*lol*


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jimmie_R on May 17, 2012, 05:25:55 AM
I´m so happy I can listen to an album without giving a f*** whether the songs are autotuned or not


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 17, 2012, 05:44:47 AM

You can't listen to "From There To Back Again" and tell me there's no autotune.


i'm not sure that's actually autotune, or just some other vocal effect.  it's obviously not being used to correct pitch. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 05:46:00 AM
Quote from: littlepad
How is Good Timin' keeping up with the sound of 1979?

Answer:
Quote from: littlepad
I would have complained in 1985 had I been born.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 17, 2012, 05:55:46 AM
I haven't listened to the iTunes samples yet.

Are the other songs autotuned significantly more than Summer Vacation?

No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.

I hear u. Oh well, Spring Vacation didn't bother me too much.

The only thing that was kind of a shock was hearing the uncompressed iTunes sample. I love that radio compression!

(Yes I managed to check out that sample without checking out the others. It wasn't easy.)

*edit - just realized I keep calling Spring Vacation Summer Vacation haha


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 05:56:11 AM
Quote from: littlepad
How is Good Timin' keeping up with the sound of 1979?

Answer:
Quote from: littlepad
I would have complained in 1985 had I been born.


Oh dear, hoisted by my own petard.

What exactly is your point?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Matt Allison on May 17, 2012, 06:02:41 AM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 17, 2012, 06:20:33 AM
Ultimately, the only thing that will matter, in the end, is if the album is any good. I was a stalwart defender of Imagination back in the 90s, because I figured that if master pop musician Brian Wilson wanted to make an AC pop record, so be it. If ultimate 60s pop act the Beach Boys want to make a shiny pop record in 2012, okay. The record's quality will not be determined by vocal effects, one way or another. It will be the solidity of the songs, the commitment of the vocalists, the twists and turns of the harmony, and the originality of the arrangements.

This isn't to say aesthetic concerns over vocal effects aren't relevant. They certainly are. But ultimately I think attempts to draw distinctions between digital pitch correction (which has been on practically every Beach Boys and Brian Wilson release since 1985) and other kinds of analogue vocal effects are arbitrary, an attempt to erect some sort of purity fence around an musical act that we treasure, an attempt to believe -- however strong the evidence to the contrary -- that the BBs are different and better in some fundamental way that goes beyond simply making great records.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 17, 2012, 06:27:14 AM
Ultimately, the only thing that will matter, in the end, is if the album is any good. I was a stalwart defender of Imagination back in the 90s, because I figured that if master pop musician Brian Wilson wanted to make an AC pop record, so be it. If ultimate 60s pop act the Beach Boys want to make a shiny pop record in 2012, okay. The record's quality will not be determined by vocal effects, one way or another. It will be the solidity of the songs, the commitment of the vocalists, the twists and turns of the harmony, and the originality of the arrangements.

This isn't to say aesthetic concerns over vocal effects aren't relevant. They certainly are. But ultimately I think the attempts to draw distinctions between digital pitch correction (which has been on practically every Beach Boys and Brian Wilson release since 1985) and other kinds of analogue vocal effects strikes me as arbitrary, an attempt to erect some sort of purity fence around an musical act that we treasure, an attempt to believe, however strong the evidence to the contrary, that the BBs are different and better in some fundamental way that goes beyond simply making great records.

Good points wirestone. However, I'm not sure that Brian does want to make AC pop records.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 17, 2012, 06:32:51 AM

Good points wirestone. However, I'm not sure that Brian does want to make AC pop records.

i don't think he wanted to for Imagination either.  But i think he had some control on this album and liked how the vocal effect sounded and went with it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 17, 2012, 06:37:35 AM
Ultimately, the only thing that will matter, in the end, is if the album is any good. I was a stalwart defender of Imagination back in the 90s, because I figured that if master pop musician Brian Wilson wanted to make an AC pop record, so be it. If ultimate 60s pop act the Beach Boys want to make a shiny pop record in 2012, okay. The record's quality will not be determined by vocal effects, one way or another. It will be the solidity of the songs, the commitment of the vocalists, the twists and turns of the harmony, and the originality of the arrangements.

This isn't to say aesthetic concerns over vocal effects aren't relevant. They certainly are. But ultimately I think the attempts to draw distinctions between digital pitch correction (which has been on practically every Beach Boys and Brian Wilson release since 1985) and other kinds of analogue vocal effects strikes me as arbitrary, an attempt to erect some sort of purity fence around an musical act that we treasure, an attempt to believe, however strong the evidence to the contrary, that the BBs are different and better in some fundamental way that goes beyond simply making great records.

Good points wirestone. However, I'm not sure that Brian does want to make AC pop records.

Well, he hasn't made many. At least for Imagination, he was very interested in having a hit. Almost above all, according to those around him, he wanted to be on the charts again. AC was presented to him as the means to that end, and he embraced it, at least for awhile. It was then handy of him to bad mouth Joe when the record wasn't a big hit and he had found a new group of enablers.

I am not a big fan of letting Brian off the hook for what are ultimately his creative decisions, good or bad. He's a big boy. He has for too long allowed others to take the heat when things don't work out and basked in kudos when they did. Fans do this too -- if it's something we like, Brian must be responsible. If it's something we hate, he was being manipulated by evil outside forces.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 17, 2012, 06:40:12 AM
well he can't take the brunt for the quality of songs on imagination heh. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 17, 2012, 06:41:13 AM
I recently came across an interview with Brian from 2005 (someone may have posted it here) where he says that he prefers recording now as opposed to the 60's due to pitch correction being available. I'd say it's pretty likely that he wanted the record to sound this way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 17, 2012, 07:07:30 AM
I´m so happy I can listen to an album without giving a f*ck whether the songs are autotuned or not

I second that emotion. :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 17, 2012, 07:12:57 AM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Um.... Except that neither reverb nor echo sound even remotely similar to autotune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 17, 2012, 07:14:33 AM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Um.... Except that neither reverb nor echo sound even remotely similar to autotune.

neither is what some people are calling autotune (i think that's his point)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 17, 2012, 07:15:46 AM
Ultimately, the only thing that will matter, in the end, is if the album is any good. I was a stalwart defender of Imagination back in the 90s, because I figured that if master pop musician Brian Wilson wanted to make an AC pop record, so be it. If ultimate 60s pop act the Beach Boys want to make a shiny pop record in 2012, okay. The record's quality will not be determined by vocal effects, one way or another. It will be the solidity of the songs, the commitment of the vocalists, the twists and turns of the harmony, and the originality of the arrangements.

This isn't to say aesthetic concerns over vocal effects aren't relevant. They certainly are. But ultimately I think the attempts to draw distinctions between digital pitch correction (which has been on practically every Beach Boys and Brian Wilson release since 1985) and other kinds of analogue vocal effects strikes me as arbitrary, an attempt to erect some sort of purity fence around an musical act that we treasure, an attempt to believe, however strong the evidence to the contrary, that the BBs are different and better in some fundamental way that goes beyond simply making great records.
If, as you say, this has been happening since 1985, then what really is the issue? 27 years worth of releases and we are still bitching about it? This is the way Brian makes records, now. If you want new product, then the ears just need to adjust to these recording techniques.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 17, 2012, 07:18:25 AM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Um.... Except that neither reverb nor echo sound even remotely similar to autotune.

neither is what some people are calling autotune (i think that's his point)

True. There is a cry of "AUTOTUNE" around here that reminds me of chicken little. But you can't deny the presence of autotune on the new album. It's there. Not anything necessarily wrong about that. It's well known that John Lennon hated his voice and favored putting what he called "ketchup" on his vocals.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 17, 2012, 07:41:44 AM
Ultimately, the only thing that will matter, in the end, is if the album is any good. I was a stalwart defender of Imagination back in the 90s, because I figured that if master pop musician Brian Wilson wanted to make an AC pop record, so be it. If ultimate 60s pop act the Beach Boys want to make a shiny pop record in 2012, okay. The record's quality will not be determined by vocal effects, one way or another. It will be the solidity of the songs, the commitment of the vocalists, the twists and turns of the harmony, and the originality of the arrangements.

This isn't to say aesthetic concerns over vocal effects aren't relevant. They certainly are. But ultimately I think the attempts to draw distinctions between digital pitch correction (which has been on practically every Beach Boys and Brian Wilson release since 1985) and other kinds of analogue vocal effects strikes me as arbitrary, an attempt to erect some sort of purity fence around an musical act that we treasure, an attempt to believe, however strong the evidence to the contrary, that the BBs are different and better in some fundamental way that goes beyond simply making great records.

Good points wirestone. However, I'm not sure that Brian does want to make AC pop records.

Imagination = AC
Christmas = AC
Gershwin = AC
Disney = AC


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 17, 2012, 08:25:34 AM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Um.... Except that neither reverb nor echo sound even remotely similar to autotune.

neither is what some people are calling autotune (i think that's his point)

True. There is a cry of "AUTOTUNE" around here that reminds me of chicken little. But you can't deny the presence of autotune on the new album. It's there. Not anything necessarily wrong about that. It's well known that John Lennon hated his voice and favored putting what he called "ketchup" on his vocals.

Oh theres def autotune. Which is perfectly fine. But some people were saying that al's vocal on fttba is autotuned, when that obviously isnt pitch correcting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 17, 2012, 08:34:11 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album. 

Dylan? You're kidding, right? A fair amount of Dylan's greatest work has been recorded over the last 15 years.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 17, 2012, 08:46:21 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album. 

Dylan? You're kidding, right? A fair amount of Dylan's greatest work has been recorded over the last 15 years.

I definitely agree there... Even Paul's last couple original albums have been his best since the early Wings stuff imo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 17, 2012, 09:13:37 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.  

Dylan? You're kidding, right? A fair amount of Dylan's greatest work has been recorded over the last 15 years.

I definitely agree there... Even Paul's last couple original albums have been his best since the early Wings stuff imo.

Well, that covers album he just released was pretty bad, but his other recent albums have been good, I agree. He's still got it.
Oh yeah- Beach Boys board- The Beach Boys still got it too!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 17, 2012, 09:15:19 AM
Isn't It Time sounds really cool, it's definitely the one I'm looking the most forward to listening to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 09:38:32 AM
Isn't It Time sounds really cool, it's definitely the one I'm looking the most forward to listening to.
Yes, this is my favorite as well. "Isn't It Time" is my favorite of all the tracks so far. It is simple, but it has a certain charm that is in short supply these days, and can only be provided by The Beach Boys.

I am comforted to know that there is no autotune on any of the vocals. It must just be double-tracking, or perhaps they recorded their vocals through a cellphone and that is causing notes to snap in new and different ways.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 17, 2012, 09:48:06 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

You're not gonna make friends outta me with a statement like that, pal.  You should do some research before laying down such ridiculously sloppy comments.  Both Paul Simon and Bob Dylan have put out some of their strongest works in their recent albums.  Paul Simon's latest "So Beautiful or So What" is impressive, and it contains all the elements that would make the common Brian Wilson fan smile:  complex arrangements, unconventional melodies and wonderful vocals.  Don't knock other artists just becuase you don't get what they're doing. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 10:05:30 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

Comparing The Shins, Mumford and Sons, Fleet Foxes, Flaming Lips to Brian Wilson is laughable.

8x derivative indie rock to the original? Great argument you have there.
Summer In Paradise does sound quite a bit like Katy Perry, as I have noted elsewhere on this board.
Incidentally, Eventide Harmonizer was used on Cher's "Believe" along with Antares or similar.

Paul McCartney released Chaos and Creation in the Back Yard in 2005, Memory Almost Full in 2007, and Electric Arguments in 2009. Three of my favorite McCartney records, and I have his whole catalogue. Yes, the mastering on MAF sucks, but the songs are excellent.

Bob Dylan's "Love and Theft," "Modern Times" and "Time Out of Mind" are, again, three of his best works, and Paul Simon has done some of his best work in the past decade as well.

Joni Mitchell has been coasting, I will grant you that... and personally I am not into any of the indie bands you mentioned, aside from the Flaming Lips. Actually have never heard the others, so I can't say one way or another if they are good.

Welcome to the board, Matt.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on May 17, 2012, 10:11:57 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.

Here's three. Pet Sounds, Wild Honey, Friends.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 10:18:17 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.

Here's three. Pet Sounds, Wild Honey, Friends.
Don't forget one of their best albums, Sunflower.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 17, 2012, 10:33:29 AM
I just don't want them to ruin what sound like beautiful songs with BAD application of modern technology, that sounds nothing like contemporary records (except for utter crap mainstream pop).

Oh ok, so were you complaining when they made 'Getcha Back'? or 'Good Timin'?

Other than the 'Love You' album, please proffer me ONE album where this band did not *completely* try to stay current with whatever was going on sonically in pop music.

Here's three. Pet Sounds, Wild Honey, Friends.

Also Smiley Smile. Can't get much more out of step than that. And 15 Big Ones doesn't sound like any other record from that time.

So in other words, every post-1966 Beach Boys record where Brian was in charge.

(Although for that matter I've never heard anything else, ever, that sounds quite like the sound the band got on some tracks from Surf's Up through Holland where they were combining analogue synth sounds with acoustic folk instruments like the banjo.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 17, 2012, 10:40:41 AM
And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album. 

Dylan? You're kidding, right? A fair amount of Dylan's greatest work has been recorded over the last 15 years.

Dear lord, Not Dark Yet has to be one of my all time fav Bob Dylan songs ever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 17, 2012, 10:42:20 AM
(Although for that matter I've never heard anything else, ever, that sounds quite like the sound the band got on some tracks from Surf's Up through Holland where they were combining analogue synth sounds with acoustic folk instruments like the banjo.)

Have you ever checked out The High Llamas?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 17, 2012, 10:44:21 AM
well, they're just ripping off the Beach Boys.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 17, 2012, 10:54:07 AM
well, they're just ripping off the Beach Boys.

If you mean that the High Llamas music has been hugely influenced and inspired by the Beach Boys, then I agree with you. But the term "ripping off" implies something negative which I don't think they deserve. I, for one, am happy and thankful for the many musicians and bands out there who have taken The Beach Boys music to heart, and have incorporated into their own art.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 17, 2012, 10:55:36 AM
I actually think this kind of historical talk rather misstates what was going on. Smiley Smile, Wild Honey and Friends were all very much part of the late-60s moment in which the big psych-rock bands started emphasizing more acoustic, less-produced approaches to their music. See the White Album and John Wesley Harding for examples. This is how BW's former posse saw it, too.

And Brian was still self-consciously writing singles. Sometimes they were hits -- Darlin and Do It Again -- sometimes they weren't -- Breakaway and Friends. But Brian wanted to have hits, and was reportedly hugely discouraged when something like Breakaway didn't do well. What's more, after Sunflower (during which he had re-emerged, albeit as a more collaborate force) flopped, he really retreated over the next few albums.

This isn't to say that BW didn't make some purposefully less-commercial music after the implosion of Smile. He did. But that was in keeping with the trends of the time. And he seems to never have stopped wanting to have hit singles, and he certainly kept trying to write and produce them. Brian derived a great deal of self-worth from the knowledge that other people liked what he did.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 11:02:03 AM
I actually think this kind of historical talk rather misstates what was going on. Smiley Smile, Wild Honey and Friends were all very much part of the late-60s moment in which the big psych-rock band started emphasizing more acoustic, less-produced approaches to their music. See the White Album and John Wesley Harding for examples. This is how BW's former posse saw it, too.

And Brian was still self-consciously writing singles. Sometimes they were hits -- Darlin and Do It Again -- sometimes they weren't -- Breakaway and Friends. But Brian wanted to have hits, and was reportedly hugely discouraged when something like Breakaway didn't do well. What's more, after Sunflower (during which he had re-emerged, albeit as a more collaborate force) flopped, he really retreated over the next few albums.

This isn't to say that BW didn't make some purposefully less-commercial music after the implosion of Smile. He did. But that was in keeping with the trends of the time. And he seems to never have stopped wanting to have hit singles, and he certainly kept trying to write and produce them. Brian derived a great deal of self-worth from the knowledge that other people liked what he did.
I will never understand why "Break Away" was not a bigger hit, aside from the obvious reason of Capitol having no interest in promoting the single. It has to be one of the best Beach Boys singles ever, and I would love to hear a new live rendition of the song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 17, 2012, 11:05:40 AM
(Although for that matter I've never heard anything else, ever, that sounds quite like the sound the band got on some tracks from Surf's Up through Holland where they were combining analogue synth sounds with acoustic folk instruments like the banjo.)

Have you ever checked out The High Llamas?

I have, and I see what you mean, but theirs is a much more clinical sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 17, 2012, 11:11:41 AM
(Although for that matter I've never heard anything else, ever, that sounds quite like the sound the band got on some tracks from Surf's Up through Holland where they were combining analogue synth sounds with acoustic folk instruments like the banjo.)

Have you ever checked out The High Llamas?

I have, and I see what you mean, but theirs is a much more clinical sound.

This is true. They definitely have a European slant that's a part of their brew.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 17, 2012, 11:23:31 AM
The lyrics to Break Away are pretty amazing as well and could refer to Murry, or to Brian:

"When I laid down on my bed
I heard voices in my head"

Wow.  Nail on the head, "Reggie Dunbar."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 11:37:02 AM
Back to the new record... Does the chorus of "Spring Vacation" remind anyone else of the chorus from "He Come Down?" 'Spring Vacation...' and 'I believe it...' sort of similar, at least in phrasing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 17, 2012, 12:05:00 PM
Thanks for the tip. I suppose the timing of that 2007 gig I was watching had a lot to do with it because I have the 2004 Glasgow gig and never noticed any issues with the songs in that recording.  In fact, I didn't know it was him in those 2004 recordings.  I'm unfamiliar with all the players pre-2008.  He does sound better on those.   The Branson gig may have been one where he and a few other phoned it in because the entire first row was flooded with children. Halfway through the show it looked like the Beach Boys were playing at a middle school.  The whole spectacle was actually quite disturbing to watch right after seeing them at the Beacon the week before.

Yeah, I could see that making a difference.
The line-up for the 2004 shows was Mike, Bruce, Chris Farmer (bass and musical director), Randell Kirsch (lead guitar, falsetto vocals), Scott Totten (rhythm guitar, backing vocals), Tim Bonhomme (keyboards, backing vocals), John Cowsill (keyboards, vocals) and Mike Kowalski (drums) -- that's the same line-up that had toured since 2001 (when Cowsill and Totten replaced Phil Bardowell and Mike Meros), except that Kirsch had recently replaced Adrian Baker. Since then, Kowalski left, Cowsill moved to drums, and then Farmer left, Christian Love came in on rhythm guitar, Kirsch switched to bass and Scott Totten to lead guitar and musical director.



Here's an example of that band (there's also a part 2):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8ikpC2CcXE&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8ikpC2CcXE&feature=related)



New album is at #18 on amazon


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 17, 2012, 01:20:44 PM
Breakaway is epic!


Title: Alternate TWGMTR
Post by: bsten on May 17, 2012, 01:45:53 PM




http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1




I went to the Dutch site and listened to the two full songs, great!! But what really hit me was the Norah Jones song, "Chasing pirates". Now that would make a great BB song! Can you imagine Mike on lead and the rest of the guys on bv? I certainly can!!  :)   Also compare the production of that song and the new BB (auto-)tunes...

Funny, but there's been no mention of the ALTERNATE version of TWGMTR on the same site.
Go to 6-5, 10:00-11:00 (see playlist).

Tried recording it but there's something wrong with my sound card... :(

/B





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 17, 2012, 01:57:31 PM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)

I don't think that's an alternate version, though? What are you hearing differently?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 03:45:17 PM
Remind me again who said it was your birthright to expect the same production style from 1966 in 2012.

Why do people keep making this assumption that if it doesn’t have all the hallmarks of a 2012 record production style, then the only alternative is 1966, and that that's what we're expecting? What?

You want the Beach Boys to sound like they did in 1966.

Stop.

Why do you think you have a right to expect them to now behave otherwise?

And what is this that you keep going on about RIGHTS?

And btw, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, and Bob Dylan haven't recorded a song in many decades that can even hold a candle to the worst one on this album.

Missed the point.

Comparing The Shins, Mumford and Sons, Fleet Foxes, Flaming Lips to Brian Wilson is laughable.

Missed the point.

8x derivative indie rock to the original? Great argument you have there.

And missed the point yet again.

I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Assuming that others are ignorant doesn’t make your arguments valid or you more knowledgeable.

 




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 03:47:06 PM
Fans do this too -- if it's something we like, Brian must be responsible. If it's something we hate, he was being manipulated by evil outside forces.


As i said in an earlier post, one way or the other, Brian Wilson is responsible for the decision to use these vocal effects on the new album. He produced it. I "blame" him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 03:49:37 PM
No I wouldn't say more. But From Here To Back Again and Pacific Coast Highway are probably of the same level, and they're quite slow ballads so sticks out more.
I think I get you guys now; "any vocal that isn't single-tracked and only has reverb or echo on it... is horribly "autotuned" "

Um.... Except that neither reverb nor echo sound even remotely similar to autotune.

neither is what some people are calling autotune (i think that's his point)

True. There is a cry of "AUTOTUNE" around here that reminds me of chicken little. But you can't deny the presence of autotune on the new album. It's there. Not anything necessarily wrong about that. It's well known that John Lennon hated his voice and favored putting what he called "ketchup" on his vocals.

Oh theres def autotune. Which is perfectly fine. But some people were saying that al's vocal on fttba is autotuned, when that obviously isnt pitch correcting.

Man, come on, people have been perfectly clear about making a distinction between Autotune as pitch correction and Autotune as effect. Al can sing better than anyone, he doesn't need pitch correction. That stuff is there AS AN EFFECT. But, pitch correction or effect, it's still THAT SOUND. And that's what people are referring to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 03:52:22 PM
Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.
Remind me again who said it was your birthright to expect the same production style from 1966 in 2012.

I also demand the same gas prices that existed in 1966. Help me out with that, please.

Again - why the hyperbole? A few times now, I've stated that it's not Brian's muddiest 1965 mono mix versus a Ke$ha production. No one has said, "Why doesn't it sound like 1966?" I'm wondering why they're using something that compromises all the vocals of a vocal group instead of applying a bit of tasteful pitch correction on an as-needed basis to fix the couple slightly bum notes. It's bad enough they're lazily applying a pitch correction filter over the entire vocal instead of fixing up a couple notes, but they're doing a poor job at it, as well.

Listen to Al's vocal on "From There To Back Again" when he sings "clouds" and a couple other words and, with a straight face, tell me it's acceptable that they unnecessarily f*cked with his vocal like that. Nothing but autotune (or similar pitch correction software, if you want to split hairs like some folks are doing) produces an effect like that. What if they start using this stuff on new stereo mixes? If they can't give respect to the Beach Boys and their legacy on a new recording by using something that compromises their music, then why should they have respect enough to not apply it on new stereo mixes? Or new mixes of unreleased material?

The year music is produced should not fall victim to all the shortcomings of that era. In '85, the self-titled Beach Boys album sounded pretty cutting edge for an aging pop band, but I'll be damned if it isn't hideously dated now. It's not negative mental association with other acts who use these tools - those big, booming 80s synth drums are just as ill-fitting for the Beach Boys as autotune. Just because you record and produce something in 2012 doesn't mean you are, by law, required to use a cheap tool like autotune over the entire vocal, which will inevitably be considered dated sooner or later too.

Sorry to bring this up again, but I don't like being accused of hyperbole myself when someone like this is the one who's using it - not me.


Title: Re: Alternate TWGMTR
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 03:58:58 PM




http://avro.nl/audioplayer/?p=schiffersfm&d=2012/05/13&h=1




I went to the Dutch site and listened to the two full songs, great!! But what really hit me was the Norah Jones song, "Chasing pirates". Now that would make a great BB song! Can you imagine Mike on lead and the rest of the guys on bv? I certainly can!!  :)   Also compare the production of that song and the new BB (auto-)tunes...

Funny, but there's been no mention of the ALTERNATE version of TWGMTR on the same site.
Go to 6-5, 10:00-11:00 (see playlist).

Tried recording it but there's something wrong with my sound card... :(

/B





Great, the cavernous Joe Thomas 1987 drum hit leading into the fade sounds even worse now, and Jeff's "GAWD!!" is louder in the mix now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 03:59:02 PM
Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.
Remind me again who said it was your birthright to expect the same production style from 1966 in 2012.

I also demand the same gas prices that existed in 1966. Help me out with that, please.

Again - why the hyperbole? A few times now, I've stated that it's not Brian's muddiest 1965 mono mix versus a Ke$ha production. No one has said, "Why doesn't it sound like 1966?" I'm wondering why they're using something that compromises all the vocals of a vocal group instead of applying a bit of tasteful pitch correction on an as-needed basis to fix the couple slightly bum notes. It's bad enough they're lazily applying a pitch correction filter over the entire vocal instead of fixing up a couple notes, but they're doing a poor job at it, as well.

(snip snip snip snip snip)

Sorry to bring this up again, but I don't like being accused of hyperbole myself when someone like this is the one who's using it - not me.
Great posts, Runners and Monicker. You hit the nail on the etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 04:00:26 PM
Quote
Agayn, I'm puzzled as to how people can't grasp that it does "freakin' matter" to some folks for reasons I stated a couple pages ago.

I think you have failed to read any of my post except the first line.  So it matters to you whether the vocal effect is Antares Autotune or Eventide harmonizer effects? THAT was my point.  Whatever vocal enhancement was used, it simply doesn't matter unless you're obsessed with the name "autotune".  The effect is there, no matter what it's called. Read my entire post next time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 04:05:32 PM

I think you have failed to read any of my post except the first line.  So it matters to you whether the vocal effect is Antares Autotune or Eventide harmonizer effects? THAT was my point.  Whatever vocal enhancement was used, it simply doesn't matter unless you're obsessed with the name "autotune".  The effect is there, no matter what it's called. Read my entire post next time.

What? Any form of modern pitch correction software needlessly applied to the entire vocal almost always has detectable results which generally cheapen the sound quality of the vocal. "Autotune" is used by many as a catch-all phrase for this kind of manipulation just as it's acceptable to say "Hand me a Kleenex" instead of "Hand me a tissue" to most people. I don't care if it's specifically Antares Autotune or some other modern software which does the exact same thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 04:09:04 PM

I think you have failed to read any of my post except the first line.  So it matters to you whether the vocal effect is Antares Autotune or Eventide harmonizer effects? THAT was my point.  Whatever vocal enhancement was used, it simply doesn't matter unless you're obsessed with the name "autotune".  The effect is there, no matter what it's called. Read my entire post next time.

What? Any form of modern, manual pitch correction needlessly applied to the entire vocal almost always has detectable results which generally cheapen the sound quality of the vocal. "Autotune" is used by many as a catch-all phrase for this kind of manipulation just as it's acceptable to say "Hand me a Kleenex" instead of "Hand me a tissue" to most people. I don't care if it's specifically Antares Autotune or some other modern software which does the exact same thing.

Yeah! I get that! That's exactly what I was saying! You needlessly argued with me about something I wasn't trying to argue!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 04:13:28 PM

I think you have failed to read any of my post except the first line.  So it matters to you whether the vocal effect is Antares Autotune or Eventide harmonizer effects? THAT was my point.  Whatever vocal enhancement was used, it simply doesn't matter unless you're obsessed with the name "autotune".  The effect is there, no matter what it's called. Read my entire post next time.

What? Any form of modern, manual pitch correction needlessly applied to the entire vocal almost always has detectable results which generally cheapen the sound quality of the vocal. "Autotune" is used by many as a catch-all phrase for this kind of manipulation just as it's acceptable to say "Hand me a Kleenex" instead of "Hand me a tissue" to most people. I don't care if it's specifically Antares Autotune or some other modern software which does the exact same thing.

Yeah! I get that! That's exactly what I was saying! You needlessly argued with me about something I wasn't trying to argue!

I get what you mean now but still can't really read into that in the original post. Still, my bad :'( sorry about that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 04:19:28 PM

I think you have failed to read any of my post except the first line.  So it matters to you whether the vocal effect is Antares Autotune or Eventide harmonizer effects? THAT was my point.  Whatever vocal enhancement was used, it simply doesn't matter unless you're obsessed with the name "autotune".  The effect is there, no matter what it's called. Read my entire post next time.

What? Any form of modern, manual pitch correction needlessly applied to the entire vocal almost always has detectable results which generally cheapen the sound quality of the vocal. "Autotune" is used by many as a catch-all phrase for this kind of manipulation just as it's acceptable to say "Hand me a Kleenex" instead of "Hand me a tissue" to most people. I don't care if it's specifically Antares Autotune or some other modern software which does the exact same thing.

Yeah! I get that! That's exactly what I was saying! You needlessly argued with me about something I wasn't trying to argue!

I get what you mean now but still can't really read into that in the original post. Still, my bad :'( sorry about that.

No problem, my friend.  Like I said in that post, I was really rambling and struggling to express the point I was trying to make.  That was on me. 

In any event, I haven't heard much discussion about the section at the end of the clip for FTTBA, the part where the piano kicks in and does this beautiful little run and stops, then kicks in again.  It's absolutely stunning. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 17, 2012, 04:20:38 PM
If the vocal effects are a purely artistic preference, so be it. Some will not like them, others will, others won't care either way.

If they are radio-oriented (i.e. conceived to compete and win the race for radio airplay and currentness), some will like them etc. But in this case, if the album and some of its songs become hits, they (Brian, actually, as producer) will be proved right.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 04:26:06 PM
Does anyone think, regardless of vocal effects, that the Boys sound fantastic?

I'm just wondering, because a friend of mine who is a huge fan listened to the samples and said Brian "sounded like an angel".  He also said Al sounded really great.  Then, he asked if pitch correction is being used.  I told him most likely yes, but that didn't seem to bother him (it doesn't particularly bother me either). 

Anyway, I'm just wondering what the consensus is in terms of if they sound good, or if the effects harm their vocal performances.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 17, 2012, 04:59:56 PM
People used to consider multi-tracking as a sin on the order we consider autotune today: "But...they couldn't/didn't play it live like that! That's cheating!" Same with editing and double-tracking/flanging on vocals. ("What, 17 edited takes for Johnny Angel/C'mon Let's Go?")

Which most sensible people realized was bullmerda--I mean, how many people complain about stuntment and effects in movies? Nobody says "But Harrison Ford didn't jump off that exploding cliff like that on the soundstage!" As George Martin once said, multitracking in the studio was more akin to making a film than a live album.

As with any technology, it's how it's used, and to what end in supporting the art/music presented. Sometimes it's used well, sometimes it ain't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on May 17, 2012, 05:01:18 PM
Does anyone think, regardless of vocal effects, that the Boys sound fantastic?

Yes, but will it be "commercial" ?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 17, 2012, 05:04:38 PM
As Monicker said, in most cases it is used for effect. They are going for a certain sound. To how many of you is this a deal breaker for buying the new CD? I've found with Brian's solo releases, that it sounds a lot worse when streaming the songs from online sources, but not nearly as bad when listening to the actual CDs. Personally, on CD, it is no worse to my ears than reverb or echo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 05:16:59 PM
I really don't think it's being used for effect here, though. The only folks who use it for effect are, yes, folks like T-Pain, Ke$ha etc. when the effect is cranked to 11 and purposefully manipulated for effect. While it's not especially pleasing to the ear (my ear, anyway), I can respect that more than I can for how it's being employed here. Not saying the entire production is a bust at all, I'm just still wondering who OKed this being used overall, especially with stuff like the glitch on Al's voice in "From There To Back Again", Brian's underwater-robot voice on a couple of the songs, that sort of shtuff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 17, 2012, 05:21:36 PM
Are we being to quick to the draw here with only hearing this from previews? As we have been finding out lately, what they put there isn't always what wind up on the CD.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 05:25:07 PM
Are we being to quick to the draw here with only hearing this from previews? As we have been finding out lately, what they put there isn't always what wind up on the CD.

We'll see. By all accounts, the CDs that are around sound like this, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 17, 2012, 05:26:04 PM
I'm just still wondering who OKed this being used overall, especially with stuff like the glitch on Al's voice in "From There To Back Again"

Damn. Spring Vacation sounds pretty clean. Sorry to hear they left a glitch in FTTBA.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 17, 2012, 05:27:19 PM
It may just be in the sample, they probably haven't even finalized the mixes yet, it will most likely be fixed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 05:29:22 PM
It may just be in the sample, they probably haven't even finalized the mixes yet, it will most likely be fixed.

That's extremely rare, though. Anytime clips are posted and someone says, "Well, they're just clips, I'm sure they fixed it," the album usually shows up and not surprisingly, the clips were taken directly from the final retail CD. Clips of rough mixes used to promote an album would be considered a bad move by most unless explicitly labelled as such (which does happen every great once in a while), so it makes sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 17, 2012, 05:32:58 PM
Well, it may just be a compression fragment from the servers lossy compression method :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 17, 2012, 05:37:37 PM
Does anyone think, regardless of vocal effects, that the Boys sound fantastic?

I'm just wondering, because a friend of mine who is a huge fan listened to the samples and said Brian "sounded like an angel".  He also said Al sounded really great.  Then, he asked if pitch correction is being used.  I told him most likely yes, but that didn't seem to bother him (it doesn't particularly bother me either). 

Anyway, I'm just wondering what the consensus is in terms of if they sound good, or if the effects harm their vocal performances.

They do sound fantastic!!! Six months ago we couldn't even dream something like this would occur. We are blessed as fans. And so are the BBs for keeping their voices, their spirits and making it happen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 07:10:30 PM
People used to consider multi-tracking as a sin on the order we consider autotune today: "But...they couldn't/didn't play it live like that! That's cheating!" Same with editing and double-tracking/flanging on vocals. ("What, 17 edited takes for Johnny Angel/C'mon Let's Go?")

Which most sensible people realized was bullmerda--I mean, how many people complain about stuntment and effects in movies? Nobody says "But Harrison Ford didn't jump off that exploding cliff like that on the soundstage!" As George Martin once said, multitracking in the studio was more akin to making a film than a live album.

As with any technology, it's how it's used, and to what end in supporting the art/music presented. Sometimes it's used well, sometimes it ain't.


AHHHHHHHHH. I can't let this go without being addressed because it's the sort of missing the point that elevates it to an art.

The argument isn't that pitch correction software is cheating or that’s it’s misleading or deceiving or indicative of a lack of ability. It’ about THE SOUND that is produced when it’s transparent (meaning: you can hear it when you’re not supposed to be hearing it) or when it is flat out used as an effect. Je-sus. Multi-tracking arguably doesn’t have its own distinct, characteristic SOUND. This isn’t about Ludditism. Nor is this about wanting to be fucking retro. How hard is it to grasp this concept?

The only argument you have in what you said is with the people who once said that they didn’t like the sound of double tracking. Not that they didn’t like the concept of it, but rather the SOUND that it produces. That’s it. The rest is a straw argument. And obviously no one here can speak for the people who might have, 60 years ago complained about the sound of double tracking.

No, people don’t complain about Harrison Ford not doing his own stunts (dumb analogy, but i will entertain it anyway) but a lot of people do laugh when it is very clear that the guy who just jumped off the cliff looks nothing like Harrison Ford except that they have the same clothing and hat. This falls into the category of Autotune being transparent. The stunt double who jumped off the cliff is supposed to look like Harrison Ford, the audience is supposed to be fooled into thinking it's really him. The Autotune (or similar software) that corrects the pitch of off notes is supposed to sound like a seamless vocal performance, the listener is supposed to think it's on key singing.

I don't know anything about this, but i imagine there are parody/satirical comedy type movies where they make it really obvious that it's a stunt double, as a gag. You can see where this is going...that would be comparable to Autotune used in the way that Cher or T-Pain use it. No one's hiding it, it's supposed to call attention to itself. I guess this is where runnersdialzero and i disagree, but i think that in From There To Back Again, as well as Spring Vacation, it's being used as an effect. Granted, it's not as extreme as how you hear it in popular radio songs today. But being "turned up to 11" is not the only way that it can be used as an effect. With any effect there are milder/subtler ways to use it and extreme ways to use it.

On other parts of the samples from iTunes, rather than it sounding like an effect, it sounds like transparent pitch correcting.

Lastly, the Beach Boys, Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Joe Thomas, Melinda, etc. have every right to use pitch correction software as they see fit. And we have the right to not like it. And talking about it is not going to change their mind, yes, we got that. Nobody owes anybody anything. 

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 17, 2012, 07:27:35 PM
Multi-tracking arguably doesn’t have its own distinct, characteristic SOUND.

Mmm. Gonna have to disagree with you there. Multiple versions of a single person's voice singing at the same time? That's a pretty characteristic sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 07:28:12 PM
if the album and some of its songs become hits, they (Brian, actually, as producer) will be proved right.

I have never understood this logic. If an audience likes something then the producer was "right"? What if in a parallel universe in 1966 Brian Wilson had decided to use a different chorus of the different arrangements that he recorded for Good Vibrations, and the single failed to chart? Would that have proven Brian Wilson "wrong" as a producer? Or what if he had ended up using different sections for Good Vibrations from all those outtakes that exist, but the single had still shot up to #1? A totally different arrangement and sequence, and, what, is he still right? More right, less right? What about your favorite non-charting song of all time, did the producer of that song not make the "right" decision because the public never validated it with chart success? If TWGMTR tanks, what, Brian will have been proved wrong? This all rests entirely on the fate of how the public will receive a song at any given point and time in history? And also, what are you saying, that if some of the songs on TWGMTR become hits it would be because of the vocal effects? How can anyone know exactly what aspect or combination of aspects contributed to a single resonating with an audience enough to make it a hit?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 07:34:45 PM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 07:35:12 PM
Multi-tracking arguably doesn’t have its own distinct, characteristic SOUND.

Mmm. Gonna have to disagree with you there. Multiple versions of a single person's voice singing at the same time? That's a pretty characteristic sound.

I was referring to, say, a band in one room playing all together, as opposed to one or a few people recording all the instruments by multi-tracking. That is  because the original poster wrote: "But...they couldn't/didn't play it live like that! That's cheating!"
Uh, it's a given that one person multi-tracking their voice is going to have a distinct sound.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 17, 2012, 07:38:08 PM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.

Come on Zach, you really think anyone here is enraged? I don't think there's any need to belittle people's opinions, observations, and tastes by distorting things like that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 17, 2012, 07:43:05 PM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.

Come on Zach, you really think anyone here is enraged? I don't think there's any need to belittle people's opinions, observations, and tastes by distorting things like that.

K, you know what I meant.  Serious discussion.  Stop distorting MY comments and reading into something that isn't there.  There has been extended, (and sometimes angry) discussion about this pitch correction thing.  I'm just wondering if other boards have had the same discussion.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 17, 2012, 07:48:17 PM
This might easily end up being one of my favorite Beach Boys albums ever


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 17, 2012, 07:59:01 PM
Multi-tracking arguably doesn’t have its own distinct, characteristic SOUND.

Mmm. Gonna have to disagree with you there. Multiple versions of a single person's voice singing at the same time? That's a pretty characteristic sound.

I was referring to, say, a band in one room playing all together, as opposed to one or a few people recording all the instruments by multi-tracking. That is  because the original poster wrote: "But...they couldn't/didn't play it live like that! That's cheating!"
Uh, it's a given that one person multi-tracking their voice is going to have a distinct sound.
Love your posts, Monicker. It is also worth mentioning that for many of us who have been listening to The Boys for all these years throughout their vast catalogue, we are used to the timbre of their voices. Speaking for myself, I had never before heard Al's wonderful voice through pitch correction, so it is jarring to me every time I play the clip.

Many of us also don't listen to genres of music where pitch correction is typically used, so it is doubly jarring to hear in these clips.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 17, 2012, 08:11:06 PM
Ok as much as I don't wanna ruin the song for myself....
What Excactly is wrong with Al's "FTTBA" vocal besides the subtle autotune and double track (which btw, is what sounds robotic to you all, you NEVER AUTOTUNE AN ADT VOCAL.)? Some type of fragment or something?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 17, 2012, 08:48:15 PM
Ok as much as I don't wanna ruin the song for myself....
What Excactly is wrong with Al's "FTTBA" vocal besides the subtle autotune and double track (which btw, is what sounds robotic to you all, you NEVER AUTOTUNE AN ADT VOCAL.)? Some type of fragment or something?

No clue, lol.

I know I'm gonna like it no matter what. I like pretty much everything these guys do as a band. And honestly I have faith in Joe Thomas' vocal production. Though perhaps he should stay away from the board at live gigs (and it seems like he is now.. ), no one's gotten later-era Brian to sound as good as he did on Imagination. It's hard to deny that the vocals sound pretty beastly on Spring Vacation. If that and TWGMTR are any indication, I'm sure it'll all be ear candy.

Still haven't listened to the samples yet. Gonna be a long 2 1/2 weeks!

(plays Spring Vacation for the 25th time today...)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 17, 2012, 09:40:45 PM
AHHHHHHHHH. I can't let this go without being addressed because it's the sort of missing the point that elevates it to an art.

The argument isn't that pitch correction software is cheating or that’s it’s misleading or deceiving or indicative of a lack of ability. It’ about THE SOUND that is produced

But that's a different silly argument.

The theremin is a hugely cliched sound -- used in a really crass way in countless junky '50s sci-fi movies.  What the hell does Brian think he's doing, using a bit of it on "I Just Wasn't Made For These Times"?

It's all context.  And if you freak out at the first hint of hearing a recognizable sound just cause it was trendy in a different context, you won't be able to keep it in perspective in terms of how it works in this song...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 17, 2012, 10:58:28 PM
I guess this is where runnersdialzero and i disagree, but i think that in From There To Back Again, as well as Spring Vacation, it's being used as an effect.

Nooow I see what you're saying ^_^ Still not sure if I agree, though, as it's hard to say. One would hope it's going for effect with something so vile sounding in spots of "From There To Back Again", but it's hard to say, especially given their use of it on Brian's voice on the first several tour dates when those songs were likely never written with something like autotune in mind.

And yes, it's about the overall sound produced and how it compromises the entire vocal - not a silly argument in the least, to me. I've said several times that manual pitch correction is fine when used very sparingly and on the notes that really need it, and I think a few others have agreed with that, too. The sound produced with autotune is what makes the whole thing unpleasant (imo). Just as the previously mentioned 80s synth drums were ill-fitting for the Beach Boys, so is autotune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 18, 2012, 12:47:00 AM
AHHHHHHHHH. I can't let this go without being addressed because it's the sort of missing the point that elevates it to an art.

The argument isn't that pitch correction software is cheating or that’s it’s misleading or deceiving or indicative of a lack of ability. It’ about THE SOUND that is produced

But that's a different silly argument.

The theremin is a hugely cliched sound -- used in a really crass way in countless junky '50s sci-fi movies.  What the hell does Brian think he's doing, using a bit of it on "I Just Wasn't Made For These Times"?

It's all context.  And if you freak out at the first hint of hearing a recognizable sound just cause it was trendy in a different context, you won't be able to keep it in perspective in terms of how it works in this song...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

But, but...some of my favorite music of all time comes from one of those “junky ’50s sci-fi movies” and it features not one but two theremins: Bernard Herrman’s score to The Day The Earth Stood Still. Come on, this is better than, at least, The Beatles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYbHpXca7U0

Hey, a lot of those ‘50s sci-fi movies had good music that made use of the theremin. Les Baxter wrote great stuff using the theremin. I bet Brian dug the sh*t out of some Lex Baxter records. He knew where it was at.

I haven’t once heard the Autotune effect put to good use. Of course that could change one day but it’s not going to be with TWGMTR (imo imo imo imo imo imo imo).

I have no idea what i’m arguing anymore. I’m actually not arguing anything. I’m actually a robot. I'm hungry.

Maybe they should have put the FTTBA vocals through a ring modulator?

Or done something like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8xgsJYyfOA


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 18, 2012, 05:47:53 AM
Anyone else try downloading the torrent leak?

It's bogus, btw.  :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 18, 2012, 06:22:42 AM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.

At one point on the Hoffman board it started heating up, just as it is here, until the mods got sick of the bickering and the same old tired arguments back and forth, and they started deleting posts and pretty much clamped down on the subject because the argument is just so silly, really.  It all boils down to this:

The production decisions have been made by the production team.  The recording is finished.  The songs have been chosen.  The songs have been mixed and likely mastered.  We will hear what the production team wants us to hear.  If you don't like the songs, you don't like the songs.  If you don't like the sound of pitch correction, you don't like the sound of pitch correction.  If you end up paying $12.00 for the disc, and you can't listen to it for whatever reason, then you're out $12.00.  Maybe you can sell the thing and get some of your money back. 

But why argue over something that we have absolutely no control over.  The Beach Boys are releasing a new album very soon.  As with every other album ever made by any artist in any era, you may like it and you may not.  You pays your money and you takes your choice.         

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 06:28:11 AM

Nooow I see what you're saying ^_^ Still not sure if I agree, though, as it's hard to say. One would hope it's going for effect with something so vile sounding in spots of "From There To Back Again", but it's hard to say, especially given their use of it on Brian's voice on the first several tour dates when those songs were likely never written with something like autotune in mind.


i think you can listen to the clip of Spring Vacation and compare the chorus effect to Mike's auto tuned verses to know.  The chorus could be autotuned and all the voices together make it sound more prominent.  FTTBA definitely just sounds like an effect, Al is not capable of a vocal that would need the amount of "autotune" needed to make that sound heh. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 18, 2012, 07:49:06 AM
I will take a break from my dumb, silly offerings and make note that there are now 90-second samples up on iTunes, for those that need to hear an extra minute per song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: adamghost on May 18, 2012, 10:45:31 AM
My two cents...

I'm against autotune on general principle, but that's personal taste.  Speaking more broadly, to paraphrase George Martin about multitracking, modern day digital recording is more like movie making than it ever was because by and large the recording is made in the edit and not the performance.  The further you get away from four guys in a room making a sound, the more it's going to sound like it's been made in a box, and whereas in the old days you had to capture some semblance of a live performance at some stage of the process, nowadays it would have to be a difficult and conscious choice for sound engineers that are no longer used to recording that way.

Which is fine, you get a different kind of output, but it's not necessarily a bad output.  But what happens every time there's a new technology, inevitably a few people go overboard with it, have some success, and then everyone copies them.  A few years later everybody wakes up from it like a hangover from a binge and realizes they made a lot of aesthetically displeasing choices that, once removed from the styles of the time, don't really hold up.  Exhibit A would be this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Iq8JmmfxY&ob=av2e

Nowadays it would not seem like a good idea to build a whole record around an immense plastic sounding electronic snare drum, but in 1987, everyone was doing it...all an outgrowth of a very clever and compelling sonic experiment by Phil Collins about five years earlier on "Against All Odds" coupled with advances in sampling technology.  Obviously, it's more complicated than that, but that's the basic gist.  Anyhoo...

So, with autotune...putting my own Luddite objections aside (though they're not entirely Luddite...I run a small studio and I never use autotune but I will edit the beejeesus out of a vocal, which digital recording makes possible.  Basically same outcome but a much more natural sound to my ears)  I would compare it to CGI in film.  The first time we all saw CGI it was like...wow!  Check that out!  Then people started grasping the possibilities and went wild with it, and in the process perhaps shortcutting more creative ways to achieve the same production goals.  Meanwhile, people who watched a lot of movies started to be able to pick out when it was being used, and it took us out of the moviegoing experience.  After awhile, overuse of CGI started to imply a certain lack of finesse and maybe seemed a bit cheesy. For some.  For others, who didn't really notice, it was fine.

I guess my personal Ludditism is that, in music at least, as technology has advanced and record-making has becoming more and more automated, I feel it's made people lazy and less creative. The music sounds more homogenized and fewer people experiment (outside the realms of what's in the box, that is) or really develop their craft.  You could argue that Brian never would have made PET SOUNDS in '66 if samplers had been around.  Why bother to get all those guys in a room when you can just program it all?  But it would not sound anywhere NEAR the same, and you wouldn't have had the back and forth of the years of expertise of the Wrecking Crew to work with.  That's kind of what I'm talking about.

Just my .02.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 18, 2012, 10:56:30 AM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)

I don't think that's an alternate version, though? What are you hearing differently?

Try and listen to the two versions side by side.
It starts right off with a more prominent keyboard, there's more echo - overall it sounds more "far away"...
It's apparently a Dutch promo, but strangely enough I hear no extra tambourines... :D

Is there a promo of the whole album, with different versions??? Or is the Dutch (or European) version of the album different?

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 18, 2012, 11:01:16 AM
Excellent, nicely-thought-out post, adamghost.

It's also nice to read a reply that offers an alternate opinion without calling someone else's arguments as dumb, etc.

Guess I'm Dumb!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 18, 2012, 11:31:24 AM
yeah, you nailed it, adamghost. That should be stapled to people's foreheads before they start talking about voice processing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 18, 2012, 11:38:41 AM
Adam Lambert has a new record out -- whatever you think of the man, he can clearly sing.

Samples here: Autotune slathered over nearly every track.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/trespassing/id517333358

Not saying it's right or wrong ... but it might be instructive for folks here to hear the samples. This is mainstream pop in 2012, with someone who can sing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 18, 2012, 11:39:48 AM

Nowadays it would not seem like a good idea to build a whole record around an immense plastic sounding electronic snare drum, but in 1987, everyone was doing it...all an outgrowth of a very clever and compelling sonic experiment by Phil Collins about five years earlier on "Against All Odds" coupled with advances in sampling technology.  Obviously, it's more complicated than that, but that's the basic gist.  Anyhoo...

Against All Odds was 1984, Collins had used that sound long before that. He didn't even originate it, it can be heard first on David Bowie's Speed Of Life from the Low album released in 1976.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 18, 2012, 11:40:46 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gated_reverb


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 11:45:23 AM
I'm curious how much of these songs were written/recorded in 1998.  Doesn't brian not like re-recording things?  Brian's quote was that TWGMTR was partly written in 98, i imagine most of the songs were like that. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 18, 2012, 11:46:18 AM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)


Great, thanks!! And even better - you don't need ITunes!! :)

Go here:

http://www.podcast.de/episode/106928600/120513%2BAVRO%2BSchiffers.fm%2Buur%2B2

Select the show you want, look for Download, then right-click and Save as...
Use your favorite audio editing program and edit out the songs... :)

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: adamghost on May 18, 2012, 11:52:12 AM

Nowadays it would not seem like a good idea to build a whole record around an immense plastic sounding electronic snare drum, but in 1987, everyone was doing it...all an outgrowth of a very clever and compelling sonic experiment by Phil Collins about five years earlier on "Against All Odds" coupled with advances in sampling technology.  Obviously, it's more complicated than that, but that's the basic gist.  Anyhoo...

Against All Odds was 1984, Collins had used that sound long before that. He didn't even originate it, it can be heard first on David Bowie's Speed Of Life from the Low album released in 1976.

Yes, hence the "it's more complicated than that" disclaimer.  I wasn't trying to do a detailed aural deconstruction of the history of gated reverb or of the advancement of digital technology.  "Against All Odds" was the first time I'd ever personally heard it...because it was the first time that sound was heard in a mass-media context (although "In The Air Tonight" had a bit of the same thing going on..but not the same effect as it wasn't the featured instrument on the record).  As a radio listener at the time, it was a very dramatic change in how hit records sounded.  The point isn't that Collins was the first to use gated reverb, it's that after that record, EVERYBODY started using it, and placing it front and center a la "Odds".  The snare sound took up a much more prominent place in the mixes, crowding out much of the other sonic information.  Then people sampled that sound, and boom...'twas everywhere for a few years.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 18, 2012, 12:06:01 PM
If some of the basic tracks are from '98, that might explain how the album got put together so quickly.

I don't mind, really. I can't see how the 90s and the 10s are all that different in style in regards to this type of music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 18, 2012, 12:16:22 PM
I'm curious how much of these songs were written/recorded in 1998.  Doesn't brian not like re-recording things?  Brian's quote was that TWGMTR was partly written in 98, i imagine most of the songs were like that.  

Private Life and Bill and Sue seems to have originated in 2009. According to BW interviews, Shelter likewise seems of recent vintage, as does Think About the Days. TWGMTR comes from '98-'99, although Brian and Joe finished it last year. Given the writing credits, it's a good bet that It's About Time comes from that period, too. Hard to know definitively about the rest of them.

Brian has said two different things -- he's said most of it came from 98, but he's also said it comes from fragments and melodies that he had been playing around since then. So I would guess that a full album of stuff from 98 wasn't ready -- no doubt they had some completed songs, but they likely had some unfinished demos and fragments, too. Brian added a handful of new tunes, worked with Joe to finish up the demos and fragments, and when they combined that with the old stuff, they had an album. Again, just my guess.

If some of the basic tracks are from '98, that might explain how the album got put together so quickly.

I don't mind, really. I can't see how the 90s and the 10s are all that different in style in regards to this type of music.

I've talked about this quite a bit. The album didn't really come together all that quickly. Brian was working with Joe throughout last year, which is more than enough time to record tracks. And the Beach Boys had some four months in the studio to record vocals, so I doubt they were that pressed for time. (That's not to say that tracks from 98 couldn't have been used, of course, just that the album was well underway before the BBs reunion was announced or the guys recorded anything on it.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 12:18:34 PM
Adam Lambert has a new record out -- whatever you think of the man, he can clearly sing.

Samples here: Autotune slathered over nearly every track.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/trespassing/id517333358

Not saying it's right or wrong ... but it might be instructive for folks here to hear the samples. This is mainstream pop in 2012, with someone who can sing.

yeah i recently got the latest Fun. album, they're the guys who sing that "WE AARE YOOOUNG SO LET'S SET THE WORLD ON FIIIRE" song, really good pop writer/singer.  His voice is fantastic, but on this album he decided to use autotune as a stylistic choice on SOME songs to pretty good result.  autotune in the b-pain way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 18, 2012, 01:03:18 PM
Has anybody ever compiled a chart of how long each BB album took to record? That'd be at least marginally interesting, for comparison purposes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 18, 2012, 01:34:08 PM
Has anybody ever compiled a chart of how long each BB album took to record? That'd be at least marginally interesting, for comparison purposes.

http://www.esquarterly.com/bellagio/gigs.html

Includes sessions along with shows.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 18, 2012, 01:36:02 PM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)


Great, thanks!! And even better - you don't need ITunes!! :)

Go here:

http://www.podcast.de/episode/106928600/120513%2BAVRO%2BSchiffers.fm%2Buur%2B2

Select the show you want, look for Download, then right-click and Save as...
Use your favorite audio editing program and edit out the songs... :)

/B


I just compared the Itunes sample of Spring vacation with the "Dutch" version,
and the "Dutch" version is (just like TWGMTR) slightly different - the lead vocal is "further back" - it has a,
what should I say, softer approach, more enjoyable to listen to...

Is there another version of the album out there or is it the radio station using effects???

/ B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 18, 2012, 04:14:00 PM
I haven't listened to the samples- I'm trying to hold out.  But my God I am so excited for this album.  I've only been a nut for the Beach Boys for 7 or 8 years, so to be able to take in a brand new Beach Boys album is unbelievable to me.  Pointless post I know, but just wanted to share!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 04:52:32 PM
Tim Chipping ‏@timchipping
Obsessing over the last 3 songs on the new Beach Boys album again. Unbelievably great. An actual miracle.

BBC writer heheheheh. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RubberSoul13 on May 18, 2012, 06:35:26 PM
OK- does anyone know if this is a mistake or anything?

On Amazon, it says the vinyl doesn't release until July 3rd, where as we all know the CD and download are avaliale June 5th.

http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1)

Is this true?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 18, 2012, 07:04:43 PM
OK- does anyone know if this is a mistake or anything?

On Amazon, it says the vinyl doesn't release until July 3rd, where as we all know the CD and download are avaliale June 5th.

http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1)

Is this true?

I believe it is sadly, some kind of problem with getting the vinyls done or something.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 18, 2012, 08:12:12 PM
We may be getting to the point in this old world where there's only a few factories actually pressing the vinyl anymore.  Maybe they have to wait in line?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 18, 2012, 08:17:10 PM
New article in Spring Magazine coming out soon, not much info, but some nice re-assurance :D

Quote
"After eight examples of such unintentional self-parody, however, something unexpected happens. Partway through “From There to Back Again,” The Beach Boys throw off the pretense that they’re still adolescents and acknowledge they’re old men “thinking about when life was still in front of you,” as Al sings. “We had a lot to live; we gave it all,” Brian adds wistfully.
With this sudden honesty in the lyrics, the music changes too, busting out of its lockstep arrangements and forced cheerfulness into an ever-shifting tide of melancholy and resilience, represented by wordless choral vertigo, mood-turning piano chords, rhythmic decelerations and accelerations and happy-go-lucky whistling. It’s a tour de force that wouldn’t have been out of place on the Smile sessions, a reminder that Brian and his bandmates can still make ambitious music if they choose to.
One band member reveals that the 3:23 “From There to Back Again” and the 1:47 “Pacific Coast Highway” were at one point part of a seven-minute suite called “My Life,” but apparently ambition still has its limits in The Beach Boys camp. That’s too bad, because “Pacific Coast Highway” and “Summer’s Gone” are also terrific songs, suffused with the sadness that has marked many of Brian’s greatest creations. (If you’re a downloader, you should download these three songs and the gorgeous, wordless album opener, “Think About the Days.” Skip the rest.)
"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LetHimRun on May 18, 2012, 08:20:46 PM
OK- does anyone know if this is a mistake or anything?

On Amazon, it says the vinyl doesn't release until July 3rd, where as we all know the CD and download are avaliale June 5th.

http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1)

Is this true?

I ordered the vinyl off Amazon a little over a week ago and at the time, the release date was June 23rd. July 3rd would suck, but as long as I get it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 08:47:22 PM
New article in Spring Magazine coming out soon, not much info, but some nice re-assurance :D

i never understood the term "self-parody".  Well i get what they're trying to say, but if someone is doing the same thing they've always done, then what are they parodying?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RubberSoul13 on May 18, 2012, 08:51:54 PM
OK- does anyone know if this is a mistake or anything?

On Amazon, it says the vinyl doesn't release until July 3rd, where as we all know the CD and download are avaliale June 5th.

http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337391225&sr=8-1)

Is this true?

Darn, I was hoping to try and have the guys sign it in June...oh well, back to the drawing board! I won't worry about pre-ordering this, I'll get at my local record store when it is released.

I believe it is sadly, some kind of problem with getting the vinyls done or something.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 18, 2012, 09:03:08 PM
I have a problem with that review; essentially it's saying that the only songs that are any good are what he determines are the sad ones. 

The beauty of Brian's music isn't it's sadness, it's the hope in even the sad songs.  For every "Warmth of the Sun" where a girl leaves him, there's a line "My loves like the warmth of the sun; it won't ever die"  For every "Caroline, No" there's a "You Still Believe in Me". 

Telling listeners to skip everything but the sad songs is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 09:05:12 PM
well i've never heard of Spring magazine, so no loss.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 18, 2012, 09:05:50 PM
So, are people calling records "vinyls" now? Is this a thing? And if so, is it too late to stop them?

As for the record -- I'm afraid we're going to see a lot of lazy "Mike Love cashes in on his ill cousin" stuff. A lot of rote dismissals of half to three-quarters of the album. And it's going to be occasionally nasty. None of this has anything to do with how bad or good the record is. But having stuff like "Spring Vacation" or "Beaches in Mind" on there -- however good the actual songs are -- is baiting a certain class of reviewer. Sad to say.

There can be good songs and bad songs about beaches and surfing. The subject matter alone shouldn't determine the response. But oh, I bet it will. For some folks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 18, 2012, 09:24:42 PM
Re: the Spin essay:
I too anticipate that reviewers will want to exercise their artsy cool by fetishizing the Brianesque melancholy at the expense of the greater totality of what the BB are. I am insulted by the "skip the rest," especially since each new listen to the 90-second clips reveals some new aspect of beauty. It's not self-parody, intentional or not; rather, it's a certain idiom that they created and are now contemplating--and celebrating.  I am hearing moment of Brian Eno, Frippertronics, and other bits of musical invention and influence throughout the songs.  I hear Bruce everywhere, by the way, and all the boys, save Dave's voice, though I hear his guitar.

Shelter is growing on me (that's where I hear Eno); I'll take Jeff's voice, which I wish were Bruce's part)  as a "guest vocalist" or a "homage a Carl."

 The praise of the last three songs in the Spin essay is, however, in itself, lyrical and acute, so I exhort the author to revise his essay before publication (if he's listening) to show an appreciation for the full range of tone and emotion on the album.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 09:36:20 PM
well said prof.  A lot of critical reviewers like to disregard the early stuff, so music that resembles that they disregard it too. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: grillo on May 18, 2012, 10:41:27 PM
So, are people calling records "vinyls" now? Is this a thing? And if so, is it too late to stop them?


Yeah, it's something I noticed on this board, and at first I thought it was from non-english speakers, but now I think maybe it's from folks who somehow grew up without records. I also hear it at the re-sale shop I work at, but from 50and60-somethings. Very confusing...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 18, 2012, 10:47:32 PM
speaking of records, i just bought original pressings of sunflower and surf's up and am very happy inside  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 18, 2012, 11:08:20 PM
The inevitable leak is most likely days away..

To anybody wanting to hold out till release day, best of luck

 ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 18, 2012, 11:14:34 PM
The inevitable leak is most likely days away..

The Cohen of Silence kept saying that about TSS... right up to the day it was released, with no leak.  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 18, 2012, 11:27:47 PM
So, are people calling records "vinyls" now? Is this a thing? And if so, is it too late to stop them?


Yeah, it's something I noticed on this board, and at first I thought it was from non-english speakers, but now I think maybe it's from folks who somehow grew up without records. I also hear it at the re-sale shop I work at, but from 50and60-somethings. Very confusing...
Here are two vinyls: http://www.cdvinyl.de/cdpic/00CV/others/lp-rest_28.jpg


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 18, 2012, 11:32:04 PM
New article in Spring Magazine coming out soon, not much info, but some nice re-assurance :D

Quote
"After eight examples of such unintentional self-parody, however, something unexpected happens. Partway through “From There to Back Again,” The Beach Boys throw off the pretense that they’re still adolescents and acknowledge they’re old men “thinking about when life was still in front of you,” as Al sings. “We had a lot to live; we gave it all,” Brian adds wistfully.
With this sudden honesty in the lyrics, the music changes too, busting out of its lockstep arrangements and forced cheerfulness into an ever-shifting tide of melancholy and resilience, represented by wordless choral vertigo, mood-turning piano chords, rhythmic decelerations and accelerations and happy-go-lucky whistling. It’s a tour de force that wouldn’t have been out of place on the Smile sessions, a reminder that Brian and his bandmates can still make ambitious music if they choose to.
One band member reveals that the 3:23 “From There to Back Again” and the 1:47 “Pacific Coast Highway” were at one point part of a seven-minute suite called “My Life,” but apparently ambition still has its limits in The Beach Boys camp. That’s too bad, because “Pacific Coast Highway” and “Summer’s Gone” are also terrific songs, suffused with the sadness that has marked many of Brian’s greatest creations. (If you’re a downloader, you should download these three songs and the gorgeous, wordless album opener, “Think About the Days.” Skip the rest.)
"
They've buried the lede here... Apparently "My Life" was the seven-minute suite, and it has been pared down to these two songs. I had assumed that the group had just changed the track breaks, and that "Pacific Coast Highway" and "Summer's Gone" were part of the suite,

He says that it is according to a member of the band... perhaps these other tracks might turn up on the new Greatest Hits compilation that is supposed to have new songs? I hope this was Brian's decision.

My favorite track so far is "Isn't it Time," but the last few sound amazing from these descriptions. I have also grown to love "Spring Vacation" in spite of the lyrics and production. The melody redeems the song fully for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 18, 2012, 11:48:29 PM
Just listened to the samples again; in "Summer's Gone," at the start of Brian's phrase 'The nights grow cold,' you can hear a double-tracked voice (each track hard panned) singing along on the word "The" and then clipped. It is very bassy and high volume, and it sounds like Mike. Perhaps he recorded a lead for the song and they left that small bit in by accident. The water drips in the background are slick too.

It sounds like there are a good amount of Mike Love bass vocals throughout the album. "Isn't it Time" has some cool wordless scatting that is almost definitely Mike. It is buried in the mix though, you have to strain to hear it. It sounds like the harmony mix is less bass-heavy than we are used to, except for "Daybreak Over the Ocean," which really gets close to the classic Beach Boys blend, even though there may be no Beach Boys on the track aside from Mike.

Possible Joe Thomas influence on the arrangement of "Strange World," with the descending figure from the bridge of "Lay Down Burden" from Imagination.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 19, 2012, 12:17:39 AM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.

At one point on the Hoffman board it started heating up, just as it is here, until the mods got sick of the bickering and the same old tired arguments back and forth, and they started deleting posts and pretty much clamped down on the subject because the argument is just so silly, really.  It all boils down to this:

The production decisions have been made by the production team.  The recording is finished.  The songs have been chosen.  The songs have been mixed and likely mastered.  We will hear what the production team wants us to hear.  If you don't like the songs, you don't like the songs.  If you don't like the sound of pitch correction, you don't like the sound of pitch correction.  If you end up paying $12.00 for the disc, and you can't listen to it for whatever reason, then you're out $12.00.  Maybe you can sell the thing and get some of your money back. 

But why argue over something that we have absolutely no control over.  The Beach Boys are releasing a new album very soon.  As with every other album ever made by any artist in any era, you may like it and you may not.  You pays your money and you takes your choice.         

A healthy life philosophy, because no one ever changed anything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 19, 2012, 12:28:05 AM
The inevitable leak is most likely days away..

To anybody wanting to hold out till release day, best of luck

 ;D

It seems like things have tightened up considerably over the last couple of years as far as leaks go. Anyway, between the iTunes and Amazon samples, and the Dutch radio cuts we already have about 25 minutes of a 36 minute album to listen to. We have a pretty clear picture of what this album is. I don't think there's going to be many surprises come June 5th.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 19, 2012, 12:31:24 AM
I think The Smile Sessions is the only thing I've seen leak several days after it was released. Incredible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 19, 2012, 12:36:23 AM
I don't think there's going to be many surprises come June 5th.

We'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 19, 2012, 02:10:12 AM
I think The Smile Sessions is the only thing I've seen leak several days after it was released. Incredible.

But they didn't, aside from the official previews: descriptions of the box were leaked, but not the actual tracks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 19, 2012, 02:11:51 AM
New article in Spring Magazine coming out soon, not much info, but some nice re-assurance :D

Quote
"After eight examples of such unintentional self-parody, however, something unexpected happens. Partway through “From There to Back Again,” The Beach Boys throw off the pretense that they’re still adolescents and acknowledge they’re old men “thinking about when life was still in front of you,” as Al sings. “We had a lot to live; we gave it all,” Brian adds wistfully.
With this sudden honesty in the lyrics, the music changes too, busting out of its lockstep arrangements and forced cheerfulness into an ever-shifting tide of melancholy and resilience, represented by wordless choral vertigo, mood-turning piano chords, rhythmic decelerations and accelerations and happy-go-lucky whistling. It’s a tour de force that wouldn’t have been out of place on the Smile sessions, a reminder that Brian and his bandmates can still make ambitious music if they choose to.
One band member reveals that the 3:23 “From There to Back Again” and the 1:47 “Pacific Coast Highway” were at one point part of a seven-minute suite called “My Life,” but apparently ambition still has its limits in The Beach Boys camp. That’s too bad, because “Pacific Coast Highway” and “Summer’s Gone” are also terrific songs, suffused with the sadness that has marked many of Brian’s greatest creations. (If you’re a downloader, you should download these three songs and the gorgeous, wordless album opener, “Think About the Days.” Skip the rest.)
"

Really ?  I'd argue that point, and strongly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jay on May 19, 2012, 02:45:42 AM
I think The Smile Sessions is the only thing I've seen leak several days after it was released. Incredible.

But they didn't, aside from the official previews: descriptions of the box were leaked, but not the actual tracks.
I probably shouldn't say this, but I had a download of the entire disc 1 of TSS a couple days before I got the physical set, and I pre ordered it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on May 19, 2012, 02:48:58 AM
Sweet, we'll be looking to you to supply the goods, then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 19, 2012, 03:24:25 AM
So, are people calling records "vinyls" now? Is this a thing? And if so, is it too late to stop them?

As for the record -- I'm afraid we're going to see a lot of lazy "Mike Love cashes in on his ill cousin" stuff. A lot of rote dismissals of half to three-quarters of the album. And it's going to be occasionally nasty. None of this has anything to do with how bad or good the record is. But having stuff like "Spring Vacation" or "Beaches in Mind" on there -- however good the actual songs are -- is baiting a certain class of reviewer. Sad to say.

There can be good songs and bad songs about beaches and surfing. The subject matter alone shouldn't determine the response. But oh, I bet it will. For some folks.

I think people need to brace themselves for bad reviews. From the samples, I think I'll probably agree with the reviewer that the intro, and last 3 are the real keepers, and that about another 3rd of the album will be a guilty pleasure and the remaining 3rd I can live without - and I consider myself a pretty blinkered fan. All I'm saying is there's a lot here to put off listeners and critics alike, and that doesn't necessarily mean that the fault lies with the critic because they are blinded by superficial, unimportant things such as subject matter and style.

I do think the autotune is a huge misjudgment and will be anathema to many. My kids were playing Justin Bieber this morning and I thought - that's where autotune truly belongs - to make young people sound even younger, or maybe the way Kanye West uses it - I think  it works well on those type of glamorous, excessive, high-gloss productions, where the artist and protagonists are young. But definitely not a Beach Boys' album! I think they can get away with a lot of dubious production gimmicks, but within that vocal blend and harmonies lies the identity of the band. If you mess with the voices, what are you left with? I guess they have a history of making poor judgements in an attempt to sound current and commercial, and this is part of who they are, love it or hate it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 19, 2012, 03:45:40 AM
Blinkered fans will review this album worse than most critics. Indeed, from your post, it seems one already has -- based on 90 second samples.

I predict a mixed critical reaction -- probably somewhere in the 70s on Metacritic. Some very high praise, some scathing pans, and a bunch in the middle.

And I would be surprised if even a single reviewer mentions autotune. A single reviewer. People here have a very strange view of music sometimes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 19, 2012, 03:48:27 AM
The inevitable leak is most likely days away..

To anybody wanting to hold out till release day, best of luck

 ;D

Haha. Well, if the whole album leaks, I'll download it. (But of course, I will buy the album on release day to support.)

Still haven't heard any of the samples. I'm considering allowing myself one iTunes sample per week til release day.

I figure I was able to quit smoking cigarettes, and I've lost 20 lbs so far (only eating salad, eggs, fruit & chicken.. 40 lbs to go! eek)

Which one would you suggest I check out if I could hear one out of the remaining 9?





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 19, 2012, 03:51:25 AM
This is not to say people can't disagree on the quality of the album. They certainly can! But it will be interesting to see how critical relations track with fan reactions. Here's one quick example: Getting' in Over My Head got decent mainstream reviews. Not much different from TLOS.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 19, 2012, 04:06:48 AM
Blinkered fans will review this album worse than most critics. Indeed, from your post, it seems one already has -- based on 90 second samples.

I predict a mixed critical reaction -- probably somewhere in the 70s on Metacritic. Some very high praise, some scathing pans, and a bunch in the middle.


90 second samples allow me to hear enough of a song to make a judgement on whether I'll like it or not. I may change my mind, but for the most part that doesn't happen.

Anyway, I'm saying I like 2 thirds of the album! But just because I like it doesn't make it a great, or classic album, and I just think it's worth making that distinction here.

And I would be surprised if even a single reviewer mentions autotune. A single reviewer. People here have a very strange view of music sometimes.

I don't understand why expressing my disappointment at the use of autotune on this album equates to "a very strange view of music". Maybe you could consider any view other than your own "very strange"?

I'll be seriosuly surprised if no reviewer picks up on the autotune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 19, 2012, 05:42:00 AM
but every brian album has autotune.  this is just the first time he's used it as a vocal effect.  not that i expect reviewers to see that.

This is not to say people can't disagree on the quality of the album. They certainly can! But it will be interesting to see how critical relations track with fan reactions. Here's one quick example: Getting' in Over My Head got decent mainstream reviews. Not much different from TLOS.

i'm preeeeetty sure TLOS got quite a bit better reviews.  their metacritic scores are 55 vs 70


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 19, 2012, 06:29:11 AM
Just out of curiosity, can the enraged pitch correction discussion that's evident on this board be found anywhere else? Or are we the only ones who talk about it.

At one point on the Hoffman board it started heating up, just as it is here, until the mods got sick of the bickering and the same old tired arguments back and forth, and they started deleting posts and pretty much clamped down on the subject because the argument is just so silly, really.  It all boils down to this:

The production decisions have been made by the production team.  The recording is finished.  The songs have been chosen.  The songs have been mixed and likely mastered.  We will hear what the production team wants us to hear.  If you don't like the songs, you don't like the songs.  If you don't like the sound of pitch correction, you don't like the sound of pitch correction.  If you end up paying $12.00 for the disc, and you can't listen to it for whatever reason, then you're out $12.00.  Maybe you can sell the thing and get some of your money back. 

But why argue over something that we have absolutely no control over.  The Beach Boys are releasing a new album very soon.  As with every other album ever made by any artist in any era, you may like it and you may not.  You pays your money and you takes your choice.         

A healthy life philosophy, because no one ever changed anything.
Not on a record this late in the game. Some of you guys piss and moan just to hear/see yourselves piss and moan. In this case it is too late and they will do what they will do. If you really think you can change this, have them add Carl & Dennis to the vocals while you're at it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 19, 2012, 07:08:42 AM
but every brian album has autotune.  this is just the first time he's used it as a vocal effect.  not that i expect reviewers to see that.

This is not to say people can't disagree on the quality of the album. They certainly can! But it will be interesting to see how critical relations track with fan reactions. Here's one quick example: Getting' in Over My Head got decent mainstream reviews. Not much different from TLOS.

i'm preeeeetty sure TLOS got quite a bit better reviews.  their metacritic scores are 55 vs 70

That's more than I recalled. Still kinda middlish for each, though. Anyway, how many people here would honestly give GIOMH a 55?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 19, 2012, 08:43:18 AM
new issue of uncut is out and has a review of the new album.

i'm in america so i can't read it though.

wait, not till tuesday. FALSE ALARM ABORT ABORT


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 19, 2012, 09:58:35 AM
To support any chart placing for our boys I just ordered the album on amazon.com although I would have it a few days sooner if I'd ordered on amazon.de


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 19, 2012, 10:03:08 AM
new issue of uncut is out and has a review of the new album.

i'm in america so i can't read it though.

wait, not till tuesday. FALSE ALARM ABORT ABORT

Looking at their website closely, looks like it is a concert review, not new album review.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 19, 2012, 10:31:43 AM
New article in Spring Magazine coming out soon, not much info, but some nice re-assurance :D

Quote
"After eight examples of such unintentional self-parody, however, something unexpected happens. Partway through “From There to Back Again,” The Beach Boys throw off the pretense that they’re still adolescents and acknowledge they’re old men “thinking about when life was still in front of you,” as Al sings. “We had a lot to live; we gave it all,” Brian adds wistfully.
With this sudden honesty in the lyrics, the music changes too, busting out of its lockstep arrangements and forced cheerfulness into an ever-shifting tide of melancholy and resilience, represented by wordless choral vertigo, mood-turning piano chords, rhythmic decelerations and accelerations and happy-go-lucky whistling. It’s a tour de force that wouldn’t have been out of place on the Smile sessions, a reminder that Brian and his bandmates can still make ambitious music if they choose to.
One band member reveals that the 3:23 “From There to Back Again” and the 1:47 “Pacific Coast Highway” were at one point part of a seven-minute suite called “My Life,” but apparently ambition still has its limits in The Beach Boys camp. That’s too bad, because “Pacific Coast Highway” and “Summer’s Gone” are also terrific songs, suffused with the sadness that has marked many of Brian’s greatest creations. (If you’re a downloader, you should download these three songs and the gorgeous, wordless album opener, “Think About the Days.” Skip the rest.)
"

Really ?  I'd argue that point, and strongly.

Yes, Andrew is right.  There can be no "summer's gone" without , "daybreak" and "beaches in mind." I would be bold enough to aver that the album, as sequenced, is already a journey, a suite, a narrative, a progression that is more coherently linked than Smile, PS or St. Pepper (I won't debate this, but like Dennis, I am making a perhaps exaggerated point).  The BB starts with a sacred text, like "my prayer," to introduce the gravity of what's to come.  The playful, "fun" songs do not exist outside of the narrative context heading to the wistful melancholy of the final songs.  I would like to know if parts of the suite were omitted (as some of the "I-fear Brian was dissed by commercialism" members are worrying, or if the suite is not simply separately sequenced tracks that are not in "suite" form per se.  Does any one know?).

My other scholarly duties and the absence of the complete album prevent me from writing a longer essay in this forum, but I'll likely compose an Amazon review along these lines.

my point for today: the songs on the album get more mature in theme and lyric and musicality; we are experiencing the "ages of man," a classical and medieval trope, through the BB vision of themselves.

the album tells us "we're back to together" and "the past is all behind us." Then it asks a question: "isn't it time," and it answers it, somewhat tragically with the final suite:

"sunlight's fading and there's not much left to say" ; "I'm better off alone"

"old friends have gone; they's gone their separate ways"; "our dreams hold on for those who still have more to say"

In short, for our colleague from Spin: old age means nothing without youth. Are the BBs Cicero, as in his de senectute?  Well, pretty close. They are our modern philosophers about youth, age , and wisdom.  So "skip the rest" is very poor scholarly advice.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 19, 2012, 10:38:26 AM
To support any chart placing for our boys I just ordered the album on amazon.com although I would have it a few days sooner if I'd ordered on amazon.de

You're a good man, I applaud your dedication my friend  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 19, 2012, 10:40:09 AM
new issue of uncut is out and has a review of the new album.

i'm in america so i can't read it though.

wait, not till tuesday. FALSE ALARM ABORT ABORT

Looking at their website closely, looks like it is a concert review, not new album review.

i was going off a tweet by the guy who first tweeted about the album when he got a copy a few weeks ago, you might be right but this would be the issue with the review wouldn't it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on May 19, 2012, 10:42:27 AM
To support any chart placing for our boys I just ordered the album on amazon.com although I would have it a few days sooner if I'd ordered on amazon.de

You should order also, the vinyl from Amazon Canada, as it's being released on June 5th, unlike all other countries that don't release until July 3rd.
http://www.amazon.ca/Thats-Why-Made-Radio-Version/dp/B007U1FEQW/ref=sr_1_12?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1337449302&sr=1-12


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 19, 2012, 10:42:51 AM
To support any chart placing for our boys I just ordered the album on amazon.com although I would have it a few days sooner if I'd ordered on amazon.de

You're a good man, I applaud your dedication my friend  ;D

Very true!  That said, we don't want to punt the chart position over there either....  Ha ha ha :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 19, 2012, 11:05:17 AM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)


Great, thanks!! And even better - you don't need ITunes!! :)

Go here:

http://www.podcast.de/episode/106928600/120513%2BAVRO%2BSchiffers.fm%2Buur%2B2

Select the show you want, look for Download, then right-click and Save as...
Use your favorite audio editing program and edit out the songs... :)

/B


I just compared the Itunes sample of Spring vacation with the "Dutch" version,
and the "Dutch" version is (just like TWGMTR) slightly different - the lead vocal is "further back" - it has a,
what should I say, softer approach, more enjoyable to listen to...

Is there another version of the album out there or is it the radio station using effects???

/ B




Funny, no-one's interested in talking about alternate versions of the new songs - and they're out there to download...........
 ??? ::) :o :smokin 8) ;D :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 19, 2012, 11:17:47 AM
new issue of uncut is out and has a review of the new album.

i'm in america so i can't read it though.

wait, not till tuesday. FALSE ALARM ABORT ABORT

Looking at their website closely, looks like it is a concert review, not new album review.

i was going off a tweet by the guy who first tweeted about the album when he got a copy a few weeks ago, you might be right but this would be the issue with the review wouldn't it?

yep, and it could be an album review as well.  The magazine cover is a bit vague, but the actual website appears to indicate a live review.  We'll see, I guess.

Also, looks like the negative review this was cited on the board from "Spring" magazine has now morphed into a review from SPIN.  I don't think anyone has seen or linked e review from SPIN, uness I missed it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 19, 2012, 02:09:35 PM
You can download the shows as podcasts  ;)


Great, thanks!! And even better - you don't need ITunes!! :)

Go here:

http://www.podcast.de/episode/106928600/120513%2BAVRO%2BSchiffers.fm%2Buur%2B2

Select the show you want, look for Download, then right-click and Save as...
Use your favorite audio editing program and edit out the songs... :)

/B


I just compared the Itunes sample of Spring vacation with the "Dutch" version,
and the "Dutch" version is (just like TWGMTR) slightly different - the lead vocal is "further back" - it has a,
what should I say, softer approach, more enjoyable to listen to...

Is there another version of the album out there or is it the radio station using effects???

/ B




Funny, no-one's interested in talking about alternate versions of the new songs - and they're out there to download...........
 ??? ::) :o :smokin 8) ;D :o

I'm not smart enough to figure out how to acquire them to talk about them despite the instructions...  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 19, 2012, 04:00:15 PM

I'm not smart enough to figure out how to acquire them to talk about them despite the instructions...  :)

Well, Perhaps I can Make you happy in other ways...   :o
Cheers
/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 19, 2012, 05:01:05 PM
Yes, Andrew is right.  There can be no "summer's gone" without , "daybreak" and "beaches in mind." I would be bold enough to aver that the album, as sequenced, is already a journey, a suite, a narrative, a progression that is more coherently linked than Smile, PS or St. Pepper (I won't debate this, but like Dennis, I am making a perhaps exaggerated point).  The BB starts with a sacred text, like "my prayer," to introduce the gravity of what's to come.  The playful, "fun" songs do not exist outside of the narrative context heading to the wistful melancholy of the final songs.  I would like to know if parts of the suite were omitted (as some of the "I-fear Brian was dissed by commercialism" members are worrying, or if the suite is not simply separately sequenced tracks that are not in "suite" form per se.  Does any one know?).

My other scholarly duties and the absence of the complete album prevent me from writing a longer essay in this forum, but I'll likely compose an Amazon review along these lines.

my point for today: the songs on the album get more mature in theme and lyric and musicality; we are experiencing the "ages of man," a classical and medieval trope, through the BB vision of themselves.

the album tells us "we're back to together" and "the past is all behind us." Then it asks a question: "isn't it time," and it answers it, somewhat tragically with the final suite:

"sunlight's fading and there's not much left to say" ; "I'm better off alone"

"old friends have gone; they's gone their separate ways"; "our dreams hold on for those who still have more to say"

In short, for our colleague from Spin: old age means nothing without youth. Are the BBs Cicero, as in his de senectute?  Well, pretty close. They are our modern philosophers about youth, age , and wisdom.  So "skip the rest" is very poor scholarly advice.
I like the lyrical analysis here. I noticed that almost every song on the album has references to the past, and I am digging the thematic continuity.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 19, 2012, 05:23:22 PM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 19, 2012, 05:32:26 PM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.

Bill and Sue... How can anybody not experience that unmistakable joie de vivre associated with BBs music when Brian sings the "from California to Mexico" part? His ageless sound bursting into the full-voiced imagery and musical colors that exist only in the mind of this distant man? When I hear a strong new Brian vocal like that I fall for his music and all that it represents all over again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 19, 2012, 05:40:41 PM
Yes, brothers, that's it. Let's embrace the thematic whole of  this album. The beach boys obviously being very retrospective and contemplative in a sometimes ironical and sometimes tragically melancholic way. Anyone who thinks the phrase easy money is not ironically contextualized is misreading the album. What they have done and what they are doing does not look easy, emotionally, physically.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 19, 2012, 05:43:08 PM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.

Bill and Sue... How can anybody not experience that unmistakable joie de vivre associated with BBs music when Brian sings the "from California to Mexico" part? His ageless sound bursting into the full-voiced imagery and musical colors that exist only in the mind of this distant man? When I hear a strong new Brian vocal like that I fall for his music and all that it represents all over again.

I think that particular line ("from California to Mexico") is Jeff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 19, 2012, 05:46:08 PM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.

Bill and Sue... How can anybody not experience that unmistakable joie de vivre associated with BBs music when Brian sings the "from California to Mexico" part? His ageless sound bursting into the full-voiced imagery and musical colors that exist only in the mind of this distant man? When I hear a strong new Brian vocal like that I fall for his music and all that it represents all over again.
I feel the same way about the bridge to "Shelter," the 'make a little love' part. It is quintessential Brian, and I feel like he hasn't been that loose in his songwriting (for want of a better word) for a long, long time. I love the way he sings it.

Some critics dismissed "The Private Life..." as a tropical throwaway, missing the point entirely. The instrumentation used on that track is perfect for the composition. It is not shoehorned in there arbitrarily, swamped with small lizards and tiny umbrellas, like "Island Fever." It fits the song perfectly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 19, 2012, 05:51:55 PM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.

Bill and Sue... How can anybody not experience that unmistakable joie de vivre associated with BBs music when Brian sings the "from California to Mexico" part? His ageless sound bursting into the full-voiced imagery and musical colors that exist only in the mind of this distant man? When I hear a strong new Brian vocal like that I fall for his music and all that it represents all over again.

I think that particular line ("from California to Mexico") is Jeff.

Hm. You could be onto something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 20, 2012, 05:38:34 AM
I figure I was able to quit smoking cigarettes, and I've lost 20 lbs so far (only eating salad, eggs, fruit & chicken.. 40 lbs to go! eek)

Which one would you suggest I check out if I could hear one out of the remaining 9?

I'd opt for the eggs. The eggs should definitely come before the chicken.

I think …


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 20, 2012, 05:44:28 AM
I figure I was able to quit smoking cigarettes, and I've lost 20 lbs so far (only eating salad, eggs, fruit & chicken.. 40 lbs to go! eek)

Which one would you suggest I check out if I could hear one out of the remaining 9?

I'd opt for the eggs. The eggs should definitely come before the chicken.

I think …

Good call.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 20, 2012, 07:46:24 AM
Something I was thinking about - and (kind of) expanding on the thematic thing mentioned earlier. You can pick apart any album and find tracks you don't like as much as others. So, while we all haven't heard the full album yet, maybe try to take this viewpoint before judging it. This could be an album to grow on you as a whole. So, while, say,what I've heard of the lyrics to "Bill and Sue" might be a bit off putting as a single track, maybe it can be easier to dig as a part of the album, but only if the listener decides to think that way.

Good point.  We've reached a situation where the lyrics to Bill and Sue are put down, but we consider the greatest album of all time to have lyrics like "Out In the Barnyard, The Chickens do their Number! Out In the Barnyard, The Cook Is Chopping Lumber!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 20, 2012, 08:17:11 AM
Some critics dismissed "The Private Life..." as a tropical throwaway, missing the point entirely. The instrumentation used on that track is perfect for the composition. It is not shoehorned in there arbitrarily, swamped with small lizards and tiny umbrellas, like "Island Fever." It fits the song perfectly.
I like tPLoBaS.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on May 20, 2012, 08:50:09 AM
The more I listen to Think About the Days, the more I'm reminded of 10CC's I'm Not In Love. A few folk liked that song…

Edit: and the track often billed by bootleggers as "unreleased unknown backing vox" or similar but actually Breakaway backing vox.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 20, 2012, 10:01:45 AM
From There to Back Again is growing and growing.

It was orignally written during the Mount Vernon and Fairway sessions and called Fom There to Bach Again, there was nothing but Bach on the radio back then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rocksong.flac on May 20, 2012, 07:58:54 PM
runnersdialzero should be a mod, imo.  :afro


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on May 20, 2012, 10:39:11 PM
runnersdialzero should be a mod, imo.  :afro

That's an interesting second post.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jay on May 21, 2012, 12:00:16 AM
Is it June 5th yet?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 21, 2012, 12:06:12 AM
I've been away for a few days, what are we all bitching about now?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 21, 2012, 01:08:54 AM
runnersdialzero should be a mod, imo.  :afro

That's an interesting second post.

this was the first post actually.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 21, 2012, 03:15:57 AM
From There to Back Again is growing and growing.

It was orignally written during the Mount Vernon and Fairway sessions and called Fom There to Bach Again, there was nothing but Bach on the radio back then.

From what I heard on ITunes it's the only "real" BB-sounding song on the record (?) - it's good to hear Al on lead and the boys in the back! Also a good melody!  :)

Unfortunately some of the songs, like Shelter, sound too "contemporary"...
But again, that's based on 1-minute snippets...

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 21, 2012, 04:01:27 AM
From There to Back Again is growing and growing.

It was orignally written during the Mount Vernon and Fairway sessions and called Fom There to Bach Again, there was nothing but Bach on the radio back then.

From what I heard on ITunes it's the only "real" BB-sounding song on the record (?) - it's good to hear Al on lead and the boys in the back! Also a good melody!  :)

Unfortunately some of the songs, like Shelter, sound too "contemporary"...
But again, that's based on 1-minute snippets...

/B

Yeah it's rather beautiful that one. I'm really excited about hearing the 3 final tracks in full - the samples sound great.  I also think the start of the album is great, kicking off with the intro, then Radio and Isn't It Time. I still can't get over how great Isn't It Time is. Even the production on this one is ok - love the hand-claps. And Mike coming in on the bridge (but what's with that weirdly double tracked "Past"?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ESQ Editor on May 21, 2012, 04:56:44 AM
http://www.examiner.com/article/that-s-why-god-made-the-radio


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 21, 2012, 06:29:06 AM


Unfortunately some of the songs, like Shelter, sound too "contemporary"...
But again, that's based on 1-minute snippets...

/B

I disagree - Shelter was the one song (based on the samples) that sounds like classic Beach Boys.
In fact, I don't think any of this album sounds contemporary. I mean, not that I listen to much current music, but do you hear anything like what's on this album on Top 40 radio? Even indie bands don't sound like this. Personally, I think it's a good thing....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ohthosegirls on May 21, 2012, 06:48:46 AM
These samples really do sound terrific. Now I can talk it up to my more casual fan friends who almost guaranteed it would be terrible!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 21, 2012, 07:15:29 AM
These samples really do sound terrific. Now I can talk it up to my more casual fan friends who almost guaranteed it would be terrible!

Who goes into things with such a shitty attitude? Sheesh.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ohthosegirls on May 21, 2012, 08:22:10 AM
I think mostly it was just the one friend. But I know, right?!?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 21, 2012, 08:30:37 AM
thought for the day: listen to who sings what throughout the album,as each part manifests the character and history of the singer. example: Bruce sings something like "long as we all stay together." Jeff, an outsider, sings "I'll give you shelter from the storm," which can be read symbolically as his care for Brian. Mike's assertion of summer fun continues to make him allegorical of that season and emotion,while Brian responds with "being alone" and "summer's gone."  Can you analyze the Al parts this way too?  Give it a shot  The BB have put the songs and the men in dialogue with one another dynamically; that's why the album works as a whole, generating complex beauty and meaning.

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 21, 2012, 09:33:56 AM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 21, 2012, 10:43:53 AM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 21, 2012, 12:21:16 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 21, 2012, 12:22:46 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.
Could mean he wanted another "Student Demonstration Time" on the album.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 21, 2012, 03:28:20 PM
And that's how he wants to make them sound today? man..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rocksong.flac on May 21, 2012, 03:31:38 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*** u and f*** joe too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 21, 2012, 03:36:29 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.


+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.


Um, excuse me? This is your third post here, and you're already on your way to getting banned.  You don't get to say stuff like that to other people on this board.

Secondly, (and I'm not quite sure why I'm even responding to this, frankly) where is that quote from? You can't really just quote something and not cite the source.

@ any moderators, um, I'm pretty sure this is not allowed and/or tolerated, right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 21, 2012, 03:39:15 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.
Joe Thomas +1000 >:D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 21, 2012, 03:40:00 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

Um, excuse me? This is your third post here, and you're already on your way to getting banned.  You don't get to say stuff like that to other people on this board.

Secondly, (and I'm not quite sure why I'm even responding to this, frankly) where is that quote from? You can't really just quote something and not cite the source.

@ any moderators, um, I'm pretty sure this is not allowed and/or tolerated, right?

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.

Too bad your quote did not come out properly, Zach. But I'm with ya.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 21, 2012, 03:42:05 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.
Joe Thomas +1000 >:D

O'Hagan's account should be taken with a grain of salt. Brian did not care for him at all.

And he had a strong bias against the lead singer of the band he was supposed to produce.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 21, 2012, 03:43:51 PM
Ha. So on one account we have Joe Thomas as a huge fan of some of the critically acclaimed later period albums, and another account in which he knows nothing about the "genius" side of Brian. I guess the answer lies somewhere in the middle.

Now, I hate to voice this, but it's a thought that keeps popping up in my head. Do you think Joe Thomas actually had a hand in writing all the songs he has credits on?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 21, 2012, 03:44:41 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.
Joe Thomas +1000 >:D

O'Hagan's account should be taken with a grain of salt. Brian did not care for him at all.

And he had a strong bias against the lead singer of the band he was supposed to produce.
Brian wasn't interested in working with a knock-off artist like O'Hagan, and was creeped out by him personally.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 21, 2012, 03:52:57 PM
The direct source. Joe knew more than people give him credit for:

'When asked to compare his style of producing Brian to that of Andy Paley, Joe Thomas responds, “I think that Andy more comes from that historical perspective than I do. I mean he knows a lot more about the way Brian recorded stuff back in the ‘60s. I know they use a lot of the same musicians like Carol Kaye and Hal Blaine. When I listen to the stuff that Andy has done with Brian in the past, I think there’s more of that group mentality. I’ve got my guys that I really like. And the fact is that right now, I also don’t like to record with a lot of people in the room at the same time. My reasoning is that I just can’t keep track of what’s going on. I think it’s a different way of recording that Brian likes this time around. Brian thinks very conceptually and he’s definitely thematic. I think he’s on one tangent and I think the course that’ll probably happen is that he’ll go through a Joe Thomas phase and maybe we’ll do one more album or two more albums together and... God bless him. I’m just proud to be part of this phase.”

'When told about Brian’s interest in doing a rock and roll record next time around, Thomas replied, “Oh yeah, we came up with about 3 or 4 real rockin’ things. He likes that really crunchy guitar and the big heavy moog bass. So we’ve got a couple of things down. We’ve got 2 or 3 gems there that are really uptempo and slammin’. We recorded like 20 songs for Imagination, and I think he feels kind of guilty that some of the songs didn’t make it. There’s so much stuff that we recorded, and I really have to convince people that the reason some of the songs didn’t get on the album weren’t because they weren’t as good as the songs on the album. They just weren’t conceptual, they weren’t as thematic. So we’ve got a good kick start. There’s eight songs recorded and I’d say four of those songs would fit easily on a new Brian Wilson album. It’s funny too, when we did Imagination, Brian was thinking with the Beach Boys in mind. Even though it was a solo record, that could have easily been a Beach Boys record.” Asked what his favorite Beach Boys album is, Thomas gladly offers, “Surf’s Up was a gem. I gotta tell ya’, as much as everybody—and I’m one them—loves Pet Sounds, my favorite Beach Boys’ album of all time is Surf’s Up. I just was blown away by it, I couldn’t believe it. Sunflower is another one of my favorites.”

http://www.mwe3.com/archive/pastfeature/featurebrianwilson1998.htm


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 21, 2012, 04:13:28 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

Um, excuse me? This is your third post here, and you're already on your way to getting banned.  You don't get to say stuff like that to other people on this board.

Secondly, (and I'm not quite sure why I'm even responding to this, frankly) where is that quote from? You can't really just quote something and not cite the source.

@ any moderators, um, I'm pretty sure this is not allowed and/or tolerated, right?

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.

Too bad your quote did not come out properly, Zach. But I'm with ya.

Fixed, thanks Lenny.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rocksong.flac on May 21, 2012, 07:40:03 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.
Joe Thomas +1000 >:D

O'Hagan's account should be taken with a grain of salt. Brian did not care for him at all.

And he had a strong bias against the lead singer of the band he was supposed to produce.
Brian wasn't interested in working with a knock-off artist like O'Hagan, and was creeped out by him personally.


Bruce Johnston: "Brian was a little intimidated by Sean, in the same way that Gershwin may have been intimidated by Oscar Levant."

Oh, and in regards to having a 'strong bias' against the lead singer, maybe this had something to do with it: "Mike Love was less than hospitable. "He called me a f****t straight away, because I'm from England. 'You're all f*ggots,' he said. I was stunned. "


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 21, 2012, 07:47:58 PM
Here's a question:

How much does Joe Thomas know about Brian and The Beach Boys' history, and their catalog of music? I'm geniunely interested.


A great deal. His favorite album of theirs is Surf's Up, followed IIRC, by Sunflower.

+1 for Joe in my book.


"It was during this period that Brian was being coerced away from Andy Paley (by wife Melinda, according to observers), toward Joe Thomas, a former WBA wrestler, co-founder of the Adult Contemporary stronghold, River North Records, and producer of, as O'Hagan puts it, "real right-wing country artists." Wilson's lack of interest in the O'Hagan project manifested itself at dinner that night.

"I could already tell it was never going to happen," says O'Hagan. "The whole thing was absurd. As far as I can see, Joe Thomas hasn't got a clue about Brian Wilson or his legacy. It's all just 'Little Deuce Coupe' to him. He wanted Brian to make a big Eighties ballad record, all cavernous snares. He kept referring to Brian's potential as an Adult Contemporary crossover artist. I sad, 'Don't you realize Brian Wilson is essentially a 20th-century avant-garde pop genius?' And he went, 'Avant-garde? Not the Brian Wilson I know' "


f*ck u and f*ck joe too.
Joe Thomas +1000 >:D

O'Hagan's account should be taken with a grain of salt. Brian did not care for him at all.

And he had a strong bias against the lead singer of the band he was supposed to produce.
Brian wasn't interested in working with a knock-off artist like O'Hagan, and was creeped out by him personally.


Bruce Johnston: "Brian was a little intimidated by Sean, in the same way that Gershwin may have been intimidated by Oscar Levant."

Oh, and in regards to having a 'strong bias' against the lead singer, maybe this had something to do with it: "Mike Love was less than hospitable. "He called me a blueboarder straight away, because I'm from England. 'You're all blueboarders,' he said. I was stunned. "
Sean is no angel, here is this board's thread on this topic
http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,9255.0.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 21, 2012, 08:07:19 PM
That blurb from Joe that Wirestone posted makes me really like the guy.  He even says that Brian might only feel like working with him for a little while... he says that the other producer is better than he is.  He says that he keeps things simple because it's all he's capable of doing.  He seems like he really knows his place, IMHO. 


Also, since when does everything have to be perfect?  If Brian wants his next door neighbor to produce his album because they're good friends and they get along well, what's the problem?  Sure, he's capable of better, but maybe he doesn't feel like being a genius this time around. 



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 21, 2012, 08:26:43 PM
I hear that's what Einstein said after he published his theory on hot wings and beer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 21, 2012, 08:37:40 PM
I really feel down when i think of what happened to The Beach Boys late 80's and during the 90's and 00's

i won't say name coz' then people will just say that i'm a h8terrr boii, but spending all of this time reaching out for more money when, i'm sure you already have plenty, by doing silly hits such as Kokomo or Wipe Out and filing a lawsuit against your cousin while keeping him out of the band (at least out of the most songwritting part), while you could just do it all again and focusing on art and music, and the talent Brian Wilson still has..
i mean, can you picture Love And Mercy done and recorded along with the rest of The Beach Boys ? their voices harmonizing on the background of that great ballad and Carl Wilson doing beautiful lead on it.. i don't know how people feel about Your Imagination around here, but i like some parts of it (the song that has the same title would have been an great single for the band, and Lay Down Burden is wonderful) and i heard Brian did it with the Beach Boys in mind.

And that album with High Llamas, man that would have been the top of the top.. and what about That Lucky Old Sun ? another very good record that would been great with The Beach Boys and made us all forgot about Still Cruisin', Summer In Paradise and all those useless dumb songs that failed and that we wished never happened..

Well, now they're finally back together, but it is different.. i guess the album is gonna be nice, sounds like, even tho i rather have another producer on it, but oh well.. i somehow hope it's the last one, but i somehow hope not and that Brian will come back and offer them something as cool as That Lucky Old Sun.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 21, 2012, 08:55:33 PM
Well, now they're finally back together, but it is different.. i guess the album is gonna be nice, sounds like, even tho i rather have another producer on it, but oh well.. i somehow hope it's the last one, but i somehow hope not and that Brian will come back and offer them something as cool as That Lucky Old Sun.

I get the feeling that Brian would have never been able to make an album like That Lucky Old Sun with The Beach Boys, which is a damn shame. The last time Brian had any real control over an entire Beach Boys album was 15 Big Ones and before that it was probably Friends --> two albums in 44 years. And this is the 50th anniversary. Something interesting to consider.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 21, 2012, 10:17:02 PM
'When told about Brian’s interest in doing a rock and roll record next time around, Thomas replied, “Oh yeah, we came up with about 3 or 4 real rockin’ things. He likes that really crunchy guitar and the big heavy moog bass. So we’ve got a couple of things down. We’ve got 2 or 3 gems there that are really uptempo and slammin’.

The rock and roll album! man, Brian's never gonna get to do this rock and roll album he's been wanting to do for so long.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 21, 2012, 10:33:14 PM
'When told about Brian’s interest in doing a rock and roll record next time around, Thomas replied, “Oh yeah, we came up with about 3 or 4 real rockin’ things. He likes that really crunchy guitar and the big heavy moog bass. So we’ve got a couple of things down. We’ve got 2 or 3 gems there that are really uptempo and slammin’.

The rock and roll album! man, Brian's never gonna get to do this rock and roll album he's been wanting to do for so long.
The fact that Thomas mentioned the Moog bass circa 1999 is very interesting because it shows that Brian never lost his love for that sound. It also shows that Joe Thomas gets Brian more than many of us give him credit for.

I guess Brian doesn't have a lot of control over what actually comes out. It makes sense because, wife and managers and Beach Boys aside, it is not as easy to get funding for a major-label project nowadays, and paying all the people who are necessary for a Brian Wilson record - meaning the large band - must add to the burden.

It would be great if Brian would release more demos and rough tracks via the internet. Just bang out songs in his bedroom and pop 'em up online.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 22, 2012, 01:50:56 AM
As is my wont, I'll start this off with disclaimers (not that I need to, as I've learned... but why break the habit of a lifetime?). My apologies in advance for:
1. Being intoxicated (and if spelling/grammar/syntax doesn't betray this fact, well, that's because I'm anal about this sort of thing)
2. I haven't read this board since sometime yesterday (um, make that 2 days ago seeing as how it's now the wee hours of today, scratch that, tomorrow), and even that was just for a hot second

With that out of the way, I will say: I have skimmed this page, whereupon I am posting this here post, and I see talk of Sean O'Hagan vs./avec Mr. Joe Thomas... and naturally I feel moved to pontificate:

My opinion (and my asshole agrees) is this:
1. Sean is (or was, back in 1995) a tiny cog, with two pence in his pocket, a nobody, a Bloo-boarder, but young and not without talent, and all hail, because he has made me cry (what with his goats and bubbly synths), back when I too was younger, and being young and scruffy-bearded (as I picture him, stereo-lab-typing as I lazily do, all hipsters everywhere), he had his finger on a Pulse, and as such, he was a Midas of the mid-90s, with the promise of channeling Brian's inner soul-trip to Hawaii in his RV... which Brian had long since ditched.
2. Joe is (back then, and still is today, equally) a TNT, must-see TV, Aaron Spelling yesteryear heavyweight with balls and cred like you wouldn't want to f*ck with, and have a seat, end of. He, I imagine, was and is well-hung, hanging with the Solid Gold dancers, and could have produced Carl Wilson's solo albums in place of Steely Dan. He NEVER knew the Pulse, in ANY generation, but no matter: he bought/worked (both!) his way to the table, and make no mistake: HE IS NOT WITHOUT TALENT either. So there.
3. Joe wins. And what's more painful for me to say is this: Joe is... [ouch] ...better... [my guts are aching and my eyes are red] ...for the Beach Boys. Sean held open a window for Brian perhaps (had Brian taken to him, which he clearly did NOT), but for the Beach Boys at large, um, no. In my (moon)dreams.
4. I don't have to like it.

Yeah. So, anyway - the point of my whole post was this:
Holy crap!  I was just surfing the "Internet" looking for (stuff that absolutely nobody cares about but me), and (for reasons that nobody cares about), I googled "Brian Wilson Pacific Coast Highway" and came up with this:

http://oldielyrics.com/lyrics/beach_boys/pacific_coast_highway.html

How/Why the does the Internet know of these lyrics?

Interesting in any case. And I quite like them. Very much in fact. Kind of like a take on "California Slide," but artlessly literary and self-aware. I DIG these lyrics, if I dare say. Without disclaimers even.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Christian on May 22, 2012, 02:10:09 AM
Holy crap!  I was just surfing the "Internet" looking for (stuff that absolutely nobody cares about but me), and (for reasons that nobody cares about), I googled "Brian Wilson Pacific Coast Highway" and came up with this:

http://oldielyrics.com/lyrics/beach_boys/pacific_coast_highway.html

How/Why the does the Internet know of these lyrics?

Different song! These lyrics belong to The Mamas & Papas´ "Pacific Coast Highway", released on their "People Like Us" album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on May 22, 2012, 02:10:31 AM

Holy crap!  I was just surfing the "Internet" looking for (stuff that absolutely nobody cares about but me), and (for reasons that nobody cares about), I googled "Brian Wilson Pacific Coast Highway" and came up with this:

http://oldielyrics.com/lyrics/beach_boys/pacific_coast_highway.html

How/Why the does the Internet know of these lyrics?

Interesting in any case. And I quite like them. Very much in fact. Kind of like a take on "California Slide," but artlessly literary and self-aware. I DIG these lyrics, if I dare say. Without disclaimers even.

1 - none of the lyrics heard in the amazon/iTunes snippets can be seen in the lyrics in that link and
2 - the writer is "John Phillips".

These are pretty big hints.



Edit: Christian's been faster than me :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on May 22, 2012, 06:36:11 AM
The direct source. Joe knew more than people give him credit for:

'When asked to compare his style of producing Brian to that of Andy Paley, Joe Thomas responds, “I think that Andy more comes from that historical perspective than I do. I mean he knows a lot more about the way Brian recorded stuff back in the ‘60s. I know they use a lot of the same musicians like Carol Kaye and Hal Blaine. When I listen to the stuff that Andy has done with Brian in the past, I think there’s more of that group mentality. I’ve got my guys that I really like. And the fact is that right now, I also don’t like to record with a lot of people in the room at the same time. My reasoning is that I just can’t keep track of what’s going on. I think it’s a different way of recording that Brian likes this time around. Brian thinks very conceptually and he’s definitely thematic. I think he’s on one tangent and I think the course that’ll probably happen is that he’ll go through a Joe Thomas phase and maybe we’ll do one more album or two more albums together and... God bless him. I’m just proud to be part of this phase.”

'When told about Brian’s interest in doing a rock and roll record next time around, Thomas replied, “Oh yeah, we came up with about 3 or 4 real rockin’ things. He likes that really crunchy guitar and the big heavy moog bass. So we’ve got a couple of things down. We’ve got 2 or 3 gems there that are really uptempo and slammin’. We recorded like 20 songs for Imagination, and I think he feels kind of guilty that some of the songs didn’t make it. There’s so much stuff that we recorded, and I really have to convince people that the reason some of the songs didn’t get on the album weren’t because they weren’t as good as the songs on the album. They just weren’t conceptual, they weren’t as thematic. So we’ve got a good kick start. There’s eight songs recorded and I’d say four of those songs would fit easily on a new Brian Wilson album. It’s funny too, when we did Imagination, Brian was thinking with the Beach Boys in mind. Even though it was a solo record, that could have easily been a Beach Boys record.” Asked what his favorite Beach Boys album is, Thomas gladly offers, “Surf’s Up was a gem. I gotta tell ya’, as much as everybody—and I’m one them—loves Pet Sounds, my favorite Beach Boys’ album of all time is Surf’s Up. I just was blown away by it, I couldn’t believe it. Sunflower is another one of my favorites.”

http://www.mwe3.com/archive/pastfeature/featurebrianwilson1998.htm


I still love the Paley stuff, more than anything official. I'd kill for a really nice quality version of the songs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Catbirdman on May 22, 2012, 06:50:07 AM
1 - none of the lyrics heard in the amazon/iTunes snippets can be seen in the lyrics in that link and
2 - the writer is "John Phillips".

These are pretty big hints.

Yes, huge hints, and I even own that album! What can I say, I was drunk. Speaking of the man, I love his solo album - that Wolf King of L.A. thing, as I suppose it's known.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 07:02:57 AM
I hear that's what Einstein said after he published his theory on hot wings and beer.

His theory of relativity still covers it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 22, 2012, 10:44:22 AM
Promoted right, "Shelter" could be a huge hit..

What a chorus


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 22, 2012, 10:53:23 AM
This may be fairly obvious, but who sings the chorus lead on 'Shelter'?

It sounds like Jeff, but I'm really not used to the voices of the older Beach Boys.

^Indeed, that sounds like a killer chorus. I really can't wait to hear this album - just another week or so!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 11:00:52 AM
'tis Jefferz.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 11:13:06 AM
Here's the thing ... there is a great Beach Boys album in the can (more or less) with the Paley material.  Brian has done nothing that can touch 'It's Not Easy Being Me' since at least Love You, possibly since 'Til I Die'.  Those original tracks, "Still A Mystery", "Gettin in Over My Head", "I'm Broke", etc ... they are all gold.  Throw some extra BB vocals on here and there, leave Carl's vocals in wherever they can.  This record would restore respect for the Beach Boys and give 'em their best record since '77 and one more true classic to go out with a bang.

It seems the group's management and Brian's people are not and have not been interested in actually supporting a true Brian Wilson production since Love You.  There's even that funny little 'apology' in the liner notes.  Then he gave 'em the brilliant Adult Child but we got M.I.U. instead. I know we really want to believe, but TWGMTR (the new album) is most certainly not an actual Brian Wilson production.  I'm sure he threw in some ideas here and there (maybe any of the quirky elements), but this is a Joe Thomas deal.  I mean, they are releasing 'Daybreak' on a record that says 'Produced by Brian Wilson'.  It's sort of like they realized a long time ago that the label needs to say he produced it, but it's much safer bring in somebody like Joe Thomas to actually produce it.  The new record is fine, but it really does seem like a cross between Still Cruisin' and BW '88.  With a generous amount of auto-tune frosting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 22, 2012, 11:16:06 AM
I think a lot of the verses from the paley sessions uses would need to be redone and get a bigger production. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 11:20:36 AM
I think a lot of the verses from the paley sessions uses would need to be redone and get a bigger production. 

a lot of people would say the same thing about Love You and Adult Child.  What happens is you end up with the M.I.U. version of 'Hey Little Tomboy' instead of the original ... the sanitized version.  What this world needs is some real f*in Brian Wilson / Beach Boys music.  I know I need it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on May 22, 2012, 11:37:22 AM
When was the last time Brian legitimately called the shots on the production of an album the way he did on Love You, do we know? The 2004 SMiLE doesn't count, cause that was just a copy of production he'd done 40 years earlier. From what I've seen on the TLOS dvd, sure, he's in the booth, but you get the sense that the band plays a really large role in determining how each song sounds, and then Brian sort of gives feedback. I'd love to be wrong, so please tell me if I am.

In some ways (and I'll tread lightly here), I feel like the last three BW releases have felt more like someone imitating the sound of Pet Sounds and SMiLE rather than pushing forward into new territory. ITKOD was basically "The Pet Sound Boys Play 'When You Wish Upon a Star' and Other Disney Favorites". Don't get me wrong, I love the last three albums, but I hate to think that Brian truly thinks bass harmonica and vibraphone are the most appropriate instruments for every song ever written. Say what you will about Love You, but it was a legitimately new sound for them.

On the one hand, I'd be fascinated to learn where his creative mind would take him production-wise if he had a room full of musicians who wouldn't play a note until he told them how he wanted it to sound. On the other, it's a huge gamble on the part of those around him, because you never know when he's going to bring you something so bizarre that it's unmarketable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 22, 2012, 11:42:25 AM
This may be fairly obvious, but who sings the chorus lead on 'Shelter'?

It sounds like Jeff, but I'm really not used to the voices of the older Beach Boys.

^Indeed, that sounds like a killer chorus. I really can't wait to hear this album - just another week or so!

Foskett.  It is diiffuclt (no, impossible) to listen to that chorus and not hear Carl's voice singing it in your head


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 22, 2012, 11:51:51 AM
This may be fairly obvious, but who sings the chorus lead on 'Shelter'?

It sounds like Jeff, but I'm really not used to the voices of the older Beach Boys.

^Indeed, that sounds like a killer chorus. I really can't wait to hear this album - just another week or so!

Foskett.  It is diiffuclt (no, impossible) to listen to that chorus and not hear Carl's voice singing it in your head

I did the same thing! How missed he is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 12:03:25 PM
When was the last time Brian legitimately called the shots on the production of an album the way he did on Love You, do we know? The 2004 SMiLE doesn't count, cause that was just a copy of production he'd done 40 years earlier. From what I've seen on the TLOS dvd, sure, he's in the booth, but you get the sense that the band plays a really large role in determining how each song sounds, and then Brian sort of gives feedback. I'd love to be wrong, so please tell me if I am.

In some ways (and I'll tread lightly here), I feel like the last three BW releases have felt more like someone imitating the sound of Pet Sounds and SMiLE rather than pushing forward into new territory. ITKOD was basically "The Pet Sound Boys Play 'When You Wish Upon a Star' and Other Disney Favorites". Don't get me wrong, I love the last three albums, but I hate to think that Brian truly thinks bass harmonica and vibraphone are the most appropriate instruments for every song ever written. Say what you will about Love You, but it was a legitimately new sound for them.

On the one hand, I'd be fascinated to learn where his creative mind would take him production-wise if he had a room full of musicians who wouldn't play a note until he told them how he wanted it to sound. On the other, it's a huge gamble on the part of those around him, because you never know when he's going to bring you something so bizarre that it's unmarketable.
Adult Child was the last full album.  And they still haven't put that one out.

I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.  Everything released since Love You seems to have had quite a bit of professional 'help' in getting a finished product.  Andy Paley seemed to let BW loose and let him be however he wanted to be.  And whatever Paley did contribute, even if it was apeing Brian, sounds closer to Brian than anyone else's attempts.  It just sounds like natural music, unlike what has come since.  But those songs are so raw and honest ... too much for Brian's people I guess.  The ironic thing is if you put out this raw stuff, it would become critically acclaimed and probably sell more than TWGMTR or any of his solo albums (except SMiLE).

Here's the deal: Brian Wilson is strange. And his music is strange. And the best Beach Boys stuff is strange. Strange, weird Beach Boys is marketable. The people calling the shots are not hip and don't seem to understand this. The group needs some musical controversy but they are playing it safe.  "they continue to blow it ...", etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 12:15:36 PM
Bull.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on May 22, 2012, 12:23:05 PM
Right, gotcha. I think for the buying public who arrived at the Beach Boys because of the hits, they will just never be ready for Brian's music to be weird. When your initial impression of someone is all of the music from 63-65 or so, it's a difficult leap to then try to listen to something even as challenging as Smiley Smile. In the context of a 50th anniversary tour, I don't think this would be the logical time to release something strange. That'd just lead to the same situation they had with the Brian's Back period, where the hype was "Hey, you liked that recent greatest hits collection?! Well, Brian's writing a bunch more stuff that sounds JUST LIKE THAT!" and then everyone sits perplexedly around their turntables listening to a bunch of oldies and strange synths and "Just Once in My Life" and they're just not prepared psychologically for it. Personally, I wasn't a huge Beach Boys fan UNTIL I bought Love You, Surf's Up, and the 2004 SMiLE. So my frame of mind was to expect the unusual from Brian. If I'd started with Fun Fun Fun, maybe it'd be different, I don't know.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Smilin Ed H on May 22, 2012, 12:45:49 PM
"That blurb from Joe that Wirestone posted makes me really like the guy"

Unfortunately, the resulting album was only a third decent and that had to do with the songs rather than the production and instrumentisation.  In the BB world, nothing is black and white.  Thomas and O'Hagan obvioulsy love the music. I've seen a quote along the lines of Was being keen on 'collecting' the great artists of the 60s as some kind of pet project.  The work with the Stones was great; with Dylan, beyond awful; with Brian, it was sometimes inspired; sometimes so-so.

My objection to Thomas is the horrible synthetic AOR veneer of his approach - although i thought some of the choice of songs (by whoever...) was poor considering what was lying around.

I'm not going to buy the sudden deification of Thomas simply because he's worked on the new album or because he likes Surf's Up, admirable though that undoubtedly is (in my book).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 22, 2012, 01:01:12 PM

Unfortunately, the resulting album was only a third decent and that had to do with the songs rather than the production and instrumentisation.  In the BB world, nothing is black and white.  Thomas and O'Hagan obvioulsy love the music. I've seen a quote along the lines of Was being keen on 'collecting' the great artists of the 60s as some kind of pet project.  The work with the Stones was great;


I think "Bridges to Babylon" was terrible except for one or two tracks.


I agree about Thomas, but I have hopes that his AOR approach won't be that hard on the new album (a little bit probably won't be that bad). Brian's albums after Imagination and people like Darian and Scott B. hopefully will have enough influence


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 22, 2012, 01:06:56 PM
Quote
I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.

Amen. That's also why I hate Paul Mertens! He's so predictable in that classically trained way. Brian's arrangements were never so conventional.  When I hear a woodwind or string arrangement from Mertens, I just cringe inside. Go arrange a new CATS! production already and get off my BW record!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 22, 2012, 01:08:50 PM
http://youtu.be/g0zrvCWJZQ0

Seriously, this is incredible (plus many other songs from that album) ! such a missed opportunity to make a super solid record with The Beach Boys for the first time since Love You.. well, it's still out there, but under the Brian Wilson name, which is great, but i just feel bad for the BB career.. i guess TWGMTR will be better than their last releases, but still..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 22, 2012, 01:10:56 PM
If you analyze the album in the context of Mike's and Brian's discussion on C Rose about exuberance and melancholy, you will be less likely to de-contextualize individual songs and concepts in the album (I have written about this in previous posts).  For those you you who accuse me of committing the fallacy of imitative form, I will contend again that the authorial agent that brought these song together in this order and in their current artistic manifestations (be it JT, BW, MJ, the other BB, Capital records, etc.) has crafted a meaningful whole in which the nostalgia and corn play an historical role, poignantly ironized and re-imaginaged with every new track as the album unfolds.

Other notes: the verses of Shelter recall Brian Eno, and, in fact, the whole album has an ambient "Before and after science" feel to it. Some Fripertronics in Spring Vacation too.

"As long as there is an ocean" in daybreak recalls "if everybody had an ocean," as Mike is now confronting Time "sub specie aeternitatis," as the whole album is doing. As one of you noted, Brian's "strange world after all" is an ironical recapitulation (and tasteful refutation?) complete with Pet-Sounds bike bells, of the Disney album.

I could go on all day, but this does not pay the rent.

I am so thankful for this forum and for all your comments, critical and laudatory; it all makes us learn and ponder.  I was just invited to the Santa Barbara show Monday by my cousin, so I will see them 3 x in one week  (Hollywood bowl, then Irvine).

Furthermore: I thin kit likely they will do another album with all this success and all this material out there; do they only have a one-album contract with Cap.?



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 22, 2012, 01:32:24 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff. Eventually we'll get the archival stuff anyway. If it's old but unheard of, it's good also. Besides, every time a new release has included a previiously heard song, the reaction among the fanbase tends to be "meh". It was that way with GIOMH and a few others


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 22, 2012, 01:35:34 PM
Quote
Seriously, this is incredible (plus many other songs from that album) ! such a missed opportunity to make a super solid record with The Beach Boys for the first time since Love You.. well, it's still out there, but under the Brian Wilson name, which is great, but i just feel bad for the BB career.. i guess TWGMTR will be better than their last releases, but still..

Agreed. A typical interview with someone from BW's band: "We know what Brian wants, so he doesn't have to offer as much input. We decide that he wants Pet Sounds style arrangements, and then with the help of Brian's managers and wife we force him to solicit opinions on our brilliant arrangements that are just expression of his unexpressed desires. Sometimes, he says something insane, like 'hit the tom 4 four times before going back into the verse', and we all think it's crazy! But then, somehow, it works and leads brilliantly into Paul Mertens' tear-jerking Smile-ish string arrangement. That's the genius of Brian. I'll decide that he really wants this specific chord progression, and then he just walks up and throws a B diminished chord in there. And I'm like, Brain - you crazy! You so crazy!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 22, 2012, 01:41:53 PM
It really shows he DEFINITELY still has it and that his great band knows how to make him sound the best and create some real solid instrumental stuff..

I mean that album is just amazing and i could really hear some Al Jardine on some songs or Mike Love doing the narrative.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 22, 2012, 01:45:16 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff. Eventually we'll get the archival stuff anyway. If it's old but unheard of, it's good also. Besides, every time a new release has included a previiously heard song, the reaction among the fanbase tends to be "meh". It was that way with GIOMH and a few others
Many of those Paley Sessions are messed up. They all need speed and pitch correction of some kind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 01:55:33 PM
The notion that "we all" know what a BW production sounds like -- and that this "obvious" knowledge proves his noninvolvement in his recent records' sound or production ignores history and the records themselves.

Love You and Adult Child were abberations in BW's creative trajectory -- the work of a man forced to create one-man band productions as therapy. Little in BW's work before or after this time suggests that he prefers to work in this manner, and much of it suggests instead that he wants to make pop records for the widest audience possible using the same musicians and a stable of trusted collaborators.

Which, amazingly, is what he has managed to do over the last dozen years.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 01:56:45 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff. Eventually we'll get the archival stuff anyway. If it's old but unheard of, it's good also. Besides, every time a new release has included a previiously heard song, the reaction among the fanbase tends to be "meh". It was that way with GIOMH and a few others
Many of those Paley Sessions are messed up. They all need speed and pitch correction of some kind.

Oh dear.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 22, 2012, 02:06:58 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 22, 2012, 02:09:06 PM

It seems the group's management and Brian's people are not and have not been interested in actually supporting a true Brian Wilson production since Love You.  

That is true. And, warranted or unwarranted, Brian somewhat is to blame (for lack of a better word) . I think, to the group and the record companies, Brian burned too many bridges, disappointed people, didn't deliver what others wanted or expected.

After Pet Sounds and "Good Vibrations", the Beach Boys were on the top of the music world, and Brian did Smiley Smile. After the Endless Summer/Spirit Of America explosion, the Beach Boys were arguably the most popular band in the world, and Brian produced 15 Big Ones and Love You. To a lesser degree, by the time "Getcha Back" came out, the Beach Boys were gaining some momentum again, and Brian was supposedly involved in the 1985 album and learning the new technology blah blah blah, and his contributions on the 1985 album were less than expected. In each case, with each of the above releases, the Beach Boys took a big nosedive.

There is a trend here. Momentum is built, Brian - for whatever reason - records the wrong album at the wrong time. Or, usually due to substances -  prescribed or otherwise - isn't in shape to come through. Whether it is Mike Love or Melinda or the record company or whoever, they do not want history to repeat itself. Thus, we get the Brian-assisted productions. How much "assistance" Brian was given is the big question. However, it appears this regime at Capitol Records is covering all the bases.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 02:14:17 PM
The notion that "we all" know what a BW production sounds like -- and that this "obvious" knowledge proves his noninvolvement in his recent records' sound or production ignores history and the records themselves.

Love You and Adult Child were abberations in BW's creative trajectory -- the work of a man forced to create one-man band productions as therapy. Little in BW's work before or after this time suggests that he prefers to work in this manner, and much of it suggests instead that he wants to make pop records for the widest audience possible using the same musicians and a stable of trusted collaborators.

Which, amazingly, is what he has managed to do over the last dozen years.


I disagree with this assessment. I would hardly call "Still I Dream of It" or "It's Over Now" abberations. Love You and Adult Child are pure BW productions, through and through. The same vibe found on "Amusement Parks USA", "In the Back of my Mind", "I Went to Sleep", "Funky Pretty". Absent from much of 20/20, half of Surf's Up, "I Can Hear Music". It's a certain strangenes. I can even hear it in 'Male Ego', even though the label says Steve Levine produced it. I'd venture to say BW had a bigger hand in that than the rest of the '85 LP. Let's just say I'm sensitive to Brian Wilson's magic touch, and I've not heard it in a new release in many years, and I don't believe he's lost it either. There is a whimsical, child-like beauty his production style.

But perhaps you're right -- maybe all Beach Boys fans here don't know what a Brian Wilson production sounds like. And maybe that's the problem.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 02:17:05 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff.

The quality is terrible, especially considering it's next to impossible to find lossless sources for a lot of this stuff nowadays - God knows how much tampering or transcoding has been done to the MP3s. It'd be nice to have this stuff at the correct speed and in good quality. By this logic, you may as well have said to hell with The Smile Sessions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 02:18:44 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 02:24:00 PM

It seems the group's management and Brian's people are not and have not been interested in actually supporting a true Brian Wilson production since Love You.  

That is true. And, warranted or unwarranted, Brian somewhat is to blame (for lack of a better word) . I think, to the group and the record companies, Brian burned too many bridges, disappointed people, didn't deliver what others wanted or expected.

After Pet Sounds and "Good Vibrations", the Beach Boys were on the top of the music world, and Brian did Smiley Smile. After the Endless Summer/Spirit Of America explosion, the Beach Boys were arguably the most popular band in the world, and Brian produced 15 Big Ones and Love You. To a lesser degree, by the time "Getcha Back" came out, the Beach Boys were gaining some momentum again, and Brian was supposedly involved in the 1985 album and learning the new technology blah blah blah, and his contributions on the 1985 album were less than expected. In each case, with each of the above releases, the Beach Boys took a big nosedive.

There is a trend here. Momentum is built, Brian - for whatever reason - records the wrong album at the wrong time. Or, usually due to substances -  prescribed or otherwise - isn't in shape to come through. Whether it is Mike Love or Melinda or the record company or whoever, they do not want history to repeat itself. Thus, we get the Brian-assisted productions. How much "assistance" Brian was given is the big question. However, it appears this regime at Capitol Records is covering all the bases.

Probably so. I suppose they're focused on the immediate at the expense of the group's legacy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 02:26:19 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.

Brian's vocal tracks tell another story.  Just listen to the heartfelt singing there ... something was very different about these sessions.  The vibes are spooky ... something totally absent from the recent releases.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 02:40:44 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.

Brian's vocal tracks tell another story.  Just listen to the heartfelt singing there ... something was very different about these sessions.  The vibes are spooky ... something totally absent from the recent releases.

As opposed to Brian's soaring vocals on Imagination? His stellar, quirky work on TLOS? Or his remarkable tone and phrasing on the Gershwin and Disney records?

To any nonideological observer, all four of those records have vocals that far outstrip the Paley sessions. So it must follow that BW dictated every note on those records.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Myk Luhv on May 22, 2012, 02:46:13 PM
I think I'm probably the only person who doesn't find much memorable about the Paley sessions. Granted, it's been a while since I've heard them but I wasn't impressed when I did the first time...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 22, 2012, 02:55:04 PM

It seems the group's management and Brian's people are not and have not been interested in actually supporting a true Brian Wilson production since Love You.  

That is true. And, warranted or unwarranted, Brian somewhat is to blame (for lack of a better word) . I think, to the group and the record companies, Brian burned too many bridges, disappointed people, didn't deliver what others wanted or expected.

After Pet Sounds and "Good Vibrations", the Beach Boys were on the top of the music world, and Brian did Smiley Smile. After the Endless Summer/Spirit Of America explosion, the Beach Boys were arguably the most popular band in the world, and Brian produced 15 Big Ones and Love You. To a lesser degree, by the time "Getcha Back" came out, the Beach Boys were gaining some momentum again, and Brian was supposedly involved in the 1985 album and learning the new technology blah blah blah, and his contributions on the 1985 album were less than expected. In each case, with each of the above releases, the Beach Boys took a big nosedive.

There is a trend here. Momentum is built, Brian - for whatever reason - records the wrong album at the wrong time. Or, usually due to substances -  prescribed or otherwise - isn't in shape to come through. Whether it is Mike Love or Melinda or the record company or whoever, they do not want history to repeat itself. Thus, we get the Brian-assisted productions. How much "assistance" Brian was given is the big question. However, it appears this regime at Capitol Records is covering all the bases.

Great post


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 22, 2012, 03:00:49 PM
I'd be fascinated to learn where his creative mind would take him production-wise if he had a room full of musicians who wouldn't play a note until he told them how he wanted it to sound.

Me too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 03:00:58 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.

Brian's vocal tracks tell another story.  Just listen to the heartfelt singing there ... something was very different about these sessions.  The vibes are spooky ... something totally absent from the recent releases.

As opposed to Brian's soaring vocals on Imagination? His stellar, quirky work on TLOS? Or his remarkable tone and phrasing on the Gershwin and Disney records?

To any nonideological observer, all four of those records have vocals that far outstrip the Paley sessions. So it must follow that BW dictated every note on those records.

Personally, I don't find Imagination to have many redeeming qualities, aside from some nice songwriting here and there. Brian sounds 'good', but totally not into it (sleepwalking through it).

TLOS doesn't sound quirky to me at all.  But I don't want to start $hit-talking these records ... they are fine for what they are, but they're not in the realm of the real stuff in my opinion.  The Paley material is though.

The point I'm getting at here is this: If BW somehow presented the group's and his management with another Friends or Love You today, it would be rejected, twisted and perverted into some kind of digitally-perfected adult contemporary mess. It's like the only two choices are 'fun in the sun' or 'serious'/AC Pet Sounds.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 03:03:27 PM
I'd be fascinated to learn where his creative mind would take him production-wise if he had a room full of musicians who wouldn't play a note until he told them how he wanted it to sound.

Me too.

"We've just been doing what he likes to do – the kind of records he's always liked; I don't try to change anything in any way – his vision of what he wants. When he says 'Do this' in the studio, I do it. I don't question it." -- Andy Paley.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 22, 2012, 03:10:04 PM
Quote
The point I'm getting at here is this: If BW somehow presented the group's and his management with another Friends or Love You today, it would be rejected, twisted and perverted into some kind of digitally-perfected adult contemporary mess. It's like the only two choices are 'fun in the sun' or 'serious'/AC Pet Sounds.
The Lucky Old Sun demos are a case in point. A real BW album would be those songs as they appear there, maybe with a few more overdubs if presented as a finished release. Left to his own devices, Brian is going to produce piano/keyboard heavy songs. There wouldn't be the Wondermints and a professional arranger all over it. They do what they think is right, and Brian goes along with it because he's convinced that's what people want. His suggestions fall under that umbrella. IMO, anyway.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 22, 2012, 03:12:52 PM
Quote
I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.
Amen. That's also why I hate Paul Mertens! He's so predictable in that classically trained way. Brian's arrangements were never so conventional.  When I hear a woodwind or string arrangement from Mertens, I just cringe inside. Go arrange a new CATS! production already and get off my BW record!

Amen to the amen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 22, 2012, 03:27:38 PM
I'd be fascinated to learn where his creative mind would take him production-wise if he had a room full of musicians who wouldn't play a note until he told them how he wanted it to sound.

Me too.

"We've just been doing what he likes to do – the kind of records he's always liked; I don't try to change anything in any way – his vision of what he wants. When he says 'Do this' in the studio, I do it. I don't question it." -- Andy Paley.

Yeah, in my fantasy world, if i were given the opportunity to produce a BW album--which for various reasons, i wouldn't accept the offer, but if i did--my approach would be as hands off as possible, to the point where it might even be argued that it’s not even really producing. I would try to encourage his ideas more than anything, and constantly ask him for his opinion on how he thinks certain things should sound. If he wanted something that i thought sounded awful, it would be hard to swallow but i would, although if he asked my opinion i would probably let him know that i wasn’t into the idea. Maybe someone who doesn’t know anything about record production should produce him? 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 22, 2012, 03:49:02 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 22, 2012, 03:55:49 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...

Seems to me we are forgetting that Brian hasn't been able to truly see an album's production through, from start to finish, since Pet Sounds. I think Brian simply isn't able to complete the task without a lot of help and encouragement from outside.. whether those sources are Joe Thomas, Mertens, Wonderminds, whoever.

The Brian that produced Pet Sounds just does not exist anymore. The assumption that he does is very frustrating.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 04:12:03 PM
"That blurb from Joe that Wirestone posted makes me really like the guy"

Unfortunately, the resulting album was only a third decent and that had to do with the songs rather than the production and instrumentisation.  In the BB world, nothing is black and white.  Thomas and O'Hagan obvioulsy love the music. I've seen a quote along the lines of Was being keen on 'collecting' the great artists of the 60s as some kind of pet project.  The work with the Stones was great; with Dylan, beyond awful; with Brian, it was sometimes inspired; sometimes so-so.

My objection to Thomas is the horrible synthetic AOR veneer of his approach - although i thought some of the choice of songs (by whoever...) was poor considering what was lying around.

I'm not going to buy the sudden deification of Thomas simply because he's worked on the new album or because he likes Surf's Up, admirable though that undoubtedly is (in my book).

It's quite possible that he can be somewhere between saint and sinner, like the rest of us.  No need to deify him, but I'm not going to get too upset that he's involved with making music with one of my heroes. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 22, 2012, 04:13:28 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefer Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.

Brian's vocal tracks tell another story.  Just listen to the heartfelt singing there ... something was very different about these sessions.  The vibes are spooky ... something totally absent from the recent releases.

As opposed to Brian's soaring vocals on Imagination? His stellar, quirky work on TLOS? Or his remarkable tone and phrasing on the Gershwin and Disney records?

To any nonideological observer, all four of those records have vocals that far outstrip the Paley sessions. So it must follow that BW dictated every note on those records.

Personally, I don't find Imagination to have many redeeming qualities, aside from some nice songwriting here and there. Brian sounds 'good', but totally not into it (sleepwalking through it).

To me, when Brain sings "I miss the way that I used to call the shots around here!" he is most certainly NOT sleep walking.  Imagination is a glorious album.

However, I appreciate DonnyL's comments on the poignant "weirdness" of some of Brian's music ("I Went to Sleep" or "Happy Days").

Would be cool to have an archival release of the Paley stuff.  As a fan I have actually heard very little of it.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 04:13:39 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff. Eventually we'll get the archival stuff anyway. If it's old but unheard of, it's good also. Besides, every time a new release has included a previiously heard song, the reaction among the fanbase tends to be "meh". It was that way with GIOMH and a few others

I agree!  I'm *THRILLED* that they're writing and recording new music, to hell with having new recordings of stuff that we already have.  Brian just did that with his last two albums, lol.  "Brian Wilson Reimagines The Paley Sessions that he originally Imagined in the first place".  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 04:15:33 PM
The notion that "we all" know what a BW production sounds like -- and that this "obvious" knowledge proves his noninvolvement in his recent records' sound or production ignores history and the records themselves.

I agree, it's the arrogance of fanatics, I mean fans, creeping in again.  They have noooo clueeee who did what, even if somebody tells them if could be b.s. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 04:17:11 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period .

...because it's unreleased.  If TLOS was unreleased, you'd be saying IT'S the best album he ever did.


"It's got SPOKEN WORD links between the tracks!!!! They say one of the songs is about his smog phobia!!! There's rumours, that he and Van Dyke wrote an environmental song for it!!!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:18:34 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...

I think he does.  Or if he doesn't, I think it would be more interesting to see what he comes up with left to his own devices where he calls the shots.  If he fails, let it be a fantastic, bold failure.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 22, 2012, 04:20:16 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...

Seems to me we are forgetting that Brian hasn't been able to truly see an album's production through, from start to finish, since Pet Sounds. I think Brian simply isn't able to complete the task without a lot of help and encouragement from outside.. whether those sources are Joe Thomas, Mertens, Wonderminds, whoever.

The Brian that produced Pet Sounds just does not exist anymore. The assumption that he does is very frustrating.
Hell, the Brian who made "love you" is long gone.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
Hard for me to understand the reason why so many people want an official release of a bunch of songs they already have and can listen when they want. Paley sessions are ok, as are many unreleased songs from the past that have leaked, but I prefer new stuff. Eventually we'll get the archival stuff anyway. If it's old but unheard of, it's good also. Besides, every time a new release has included a previiously heard song, the reaction among the fanbase tends to be "meh". It was that way with GIOMH and a few others

I agree!  I'm *THRILLED* that they're writing and recording new music, to hell with having new recordings of stuff that we already have.  Brian just did that with his last two albums, lol.  "Brian Wilson Reimagines The Paley Sessions that he originally Imagined in the first place".  

I'm cool with the new record, but I doubt many of the songs are really any more recent than the Paley material in any case.  And I'm not certain how much BW we're getting vs. how much Jon Bon Jovi we're getting.  I'll wait for the vinyl before I make any concrete decisions on it myself.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 04:23:44 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period .

...because it's unreleased.  If TLOS was unreleased, you'd be saying IT'S the best album he ever did.

Because the world will not just shut the f*** up when it comes to stating Sweet Insanity and the 1977 Christmas album are the best albums ever in the history of everything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:28:58 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...

Seems to me we are forgetting that Brian hasn't been able to truly see an album's production through, from start to finish, since Pet Sounds. I think Brian simply isn't able to complete the task without a lot of help and encouragement from outside.. whether those sources are Joe Thomas, Mertens, Wonderminds, whoever.

The Brian that produced Pet Sounds just does not exist anymore. The assumption that he does is very frustrating.

While I'm not expecting another 'Pet Sounds', I think a distinction between 'not able to' and 'not allowed to' needs to be made. He really is capable of creating a record himself. Whether he has the interest to pursue it to completion is one question. The other is whether he is encouraged or 'allowed' to. I would much rather listen to BW's own creation, for better or worse, warts and all, than a souped-up Joe Thomas production.  The issue is not whether or not the Joe Thomas record sounds good.  It's whether or not we're getting an authentic product or a sound-alike.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:31:32 PM
The notion that "we all" know what a BW production sounds like -- and that this "obvious" knowledge proves his noninvolvement in his recent records' sound or production ignores history and the records themselves.

I agree, it's the arrogance of fanatics, I mean fans, creeping in again.  They have noooo clueeee who did what, even if somebody tells them if could be b.s.  

The proof is in the pudding. I don't care what some dude on a forum (hearsay in any case) tells me. The Paley stuff sounds like everything I would expect a real honest-to-God '90s BW record to sound like.  Nothing else since the '70s does. That is all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 04:32:18 PM
O.K.... well you go about not enjoying any of Brian's music since Love You, personally I'm going to enjoy all of Brian's music including Love You. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:38:50 PM
We are making a big assumption here - that Brian still has the production chops to come up with something brilliant.

Since Brian was Landyfied for about ten years (1982-1992?), he hasn't geniused around very often. If you consider Love You/ Adult Child to be his last top-flight production work, well, that's been about 36 years now. I mean, we are beyond the "Brian still has it but doesn't wish/care to share it" train of thought, aren't we? Maybe that last sentence belongs in the Is Brian Still A Genius thread...

Seems to me we are forgetting that Brian hasn't been able to truly see an album's production through, from start to finish, since Pet Sounds. I think Brian simply isn't able to complete the task without a lot of help and encouragement from outside.. whether those sources are Joe Thomas, Mertens, Wonderminds, whoever.

The Brian that produced Pet Sounds just does not exist anymore. The assumption that he does is very frustrating.
Hell, the Brian who made "love you" is long gone.

see, I don't think he is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 04:38:54 PM
Quote
I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.

Amen. That's also why I hate Paul Mertens! He's so predictable in that classically trained way. Brian's arrangements were never so conventional.  When I hear a woodwind or string arrangement from Mertens, I just cringe inside. Go arrange a new CATS! production already and get off my BW record!

I'm sorry, but seriously?  You're dissing a guy because he plays his instruments exceptionally well? And for that reason you rather he not be on a Brian Wilson solo effort?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:42:29 PM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period .

...because it's unreleased.  If TLOS was unreleased, you'd be saying IT'S the best album he ever did.

Because the world will not just shut the f*ck up when it comes to stating Sweet Insanity and the 1977 Christmas album are the best albums ever in the history of everything.

I know.  I mean, this thing about people trying to be cool or weird, or whatever ... it just isn't true.  I'm not some elitist.  I like M.I.U., I like Light Album, KTSA.  But I like Adult Child more.  And I like the Paley stuff more.  And I don't like most of what's come but in the last 30 years.  Not because I'm biased against it, but because it doesn't sound good to me.  Although I like some of the tracks on Still Cruisin and BW 88.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 04:44:28 PM
O.K.... well you go about not enjoying any of Brian's music since Love You, personally I'm going to enjoy all of Brian's music including Love You. 

I love a lot of Brian's music since Love You.  Particularly tracks like "Some of Your Love" and "Male Ego".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 22, 2012, 04:52:03 PM
He really is capable of creating a record himself. Whether he has the interest to pursue it to completion is one question. The other is whether he is encouraged or 'allowed' to. I would much rather listen to BW's own creation, for better or worse, warts and all, than a souped-up Joe Thomas production. 

Gettin' In Over My Head and What I Really Want For Christmas, from what I read, were mostly BW productions. I also read somewhere that the record company chose the songs. That being said, I think Brian was encouraged and allowed to produce those records. Honestly, I don't think they were that special. And, I'd bet the person or persons driving this new album at Capitol Records were not going to let those albums happen again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 04:55:38 PM
I don't want TLOS sung by the Beach Boys.  I don't want spoken word by Mike Love, just because it's somehow super hip (when it really isn't) and quirky.  That's not who the Beach Boys are.  This is a new BEACH BOYS record.  This isn't a Brian Wilson solo effort, and people need to grasp that.  The Beach Boys legacy will not be tarnished by this record, and I don't see how it could without being absolutely horrendous.  Clearly, that's not what we're getting here. Brian has put out some brilliant solo material.  We have that. Now let's here the first real Beach Boys record in two decades.

I find it pretty funny at all the "We want quirky, weird Brian stuff" as well.  Like, here Brian has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments.  They rather have Brian pounding away at some tack piano singing unaltered raw vocals, which, by the way, he would NEVER do!  Brian's music NOW is TLOS.  I firmly believe that.  That's what he enjoys.  Do you hear what he listens to these days? Fifties stuff! He loves Gershwin! You think he would go out on his own and make some quirky weird Love You Volume II? No way! He's just not like that anymore.

I'm also a little disturbed by all the "Oh Brian doesn't get to do what he wants" conversation.  The man gets what he wants.  Stop treating him like some child who gets manipulated by his band and wife.  That's just not the case.  If anything, Brian manipulates other people.  We've seen that over the years very clearly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 22, 2012, 04:57:21 PM
I am just stoked they have released this new album early and some of you have all heard it!! I am equally as happy that you have all had fly on the wall experiences for his last couple of solo albums with regards to the writing and production of said albums. But what really, really excites me is that you know what Brian thinks and feels and your also fully aware of what he wants to create!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 05:00:06 PM
He really is capable of creating a record himself. Whether he has the interest to pursue it to completion is one question. The other is whether he is encouraged or 'allowed' to. I would much rather listen to BW's own creation, for better or worse, warts and all, than a souped-up Joe Thomas production. 

Gettin' In Over My Head and What I Really Want For Christmas, from what I read, were mostly BW productions. I also read somewhere that the record company chose the songs. That being said, I think Brian was encouraged and allowed to produce those records. Honestly, I don't think they were that special. And, I'd bet the person or persons driving this new album at Capitol Records were not going to let those albums happen again.

I'm not so sure I believe that, no offense. In any case, those records aren't really 'produced' as much as simply 'recorded'. Everything was pretty by the numbers, and the 'production' seems to have been in the hands of the whole team.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 22, 2012, 05:06:52 PM
I don't want TLOS sung by the Beach Boys.  I don't want spoken word by Mike Love, just because it's somehow super hip (when it really isn't) and quirky.  That's not who the Beach Boys are.  This is a new BEACH BOYS record.  This isn't a Brian Wilson solo effort, and people need to grasp that.  The Beach Boys legacy will not be tarnished by this record, and I don't see how it could without being absolutely horrendous.  Clearly, that's not what we're getting here. Brian has put out some brilliant solo material.  We have that. Now let's here the first real Beach Boys record in two decades.

I find it pretty funny at all the "We want quirky, weird Brian stuff" as well.  Like, here Brian has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments.  They rather have Brian pounding away at some tack piano singing unaltered raw vocals, which, by the way, he would NEVER do!  Brian's music NOW is TLOS.  I firmly believe that.  That's what he enjoys.  Do you hear what he listens to these days? Fifties stuff! He loves Gershwin! You think he would go out on his own and make some quirky weird Love You Volume II? No way! He's just not like that anymore.

I'm also a little disturbed by all the "Oh Brian doesn't get to do what he wants" conversation.  The man gets what he wants.  Stop treating him like some child who gets manipulated by his band and wife.  That's just not the case.  If anything, Brian manipulates other people.  We've seen that over the years very clearly.

That's kind of twisting around what was posted, don't you think ?

No one is 'treating Brian' like anything. Some people are expressing their opinions about his music on a forum. We all love & respect him.

No one is implying he doesn't 'get to do what he wants' either. I'm sure he's quite content with the current situation and his current role. And I'm sure he likes the music he's making.

My opinion is if he were left to his own devices, and encouraged to make music however he wants, I would guess that it would come out something like the Paley sessions, that's all.  There are elements surrounding Brian and the group that would not 'allow' that to happen.

Some people think of the Beach Boys as high art. And the stuff they've been putting out for the past few decades is not representative of WHAT THEY ARE STILL CAPABLE OF in my opinion. It's just a shame, that's all. I think they've got one more great record in them. But I also don't believe it will ever be realized.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 05:09:42 PM
I don't want TLOS sung by the Beach Boys.  I don't want spoken word by Mike Love, just because it's somehow super hip (when it really isn't) and quirky.  That's not who the Beach Boys are.  This is a new BEACH BOYS record.  This isn't a Brian Wilson solo effort, and people need to grasp that.  The Beach Boys legacy will not be tarnished by this record, and I don't see how it could without being absolutely horrendous.  Clearly, that's not what we're getting here. Brian has put out some brilliant solo material.  We have that. Now let's here the first real Beach Boys record in two decades.

I find it pretty funny at all the "We want quirky, weird Brian stuff" as well.  Like, here Brian has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments.  They rather have Brian pounding away at some tack piano singing unaltered raw vocals, which, by the way, he would NEVER do!  Brian's music NOW is TLOS.  I firmly believe that.  That's what he enjoys.  Do you hear what he listens to these days? Fifties stuff! He loves Gershwin! You think he would go out on his own and make some quirky weird Love You Volume II? No way! He's just not like that anymore.

I'm also a little disturbed by all the "Oh Brian doesn't get to do what he wants" conversation.  The man gets what he wants.  Stop treating him like some child who gets manipulated by his band and wife.  That's just not the case.  If anything, Brian manipulates other people.  We've seen that over the years very clearly.

That's kind of twisting around what was posted, don't you think ?

No one is 'treating Brian' like anything. Some people are expressing their opinions about his music on a forum. We all love & respect him.

No one is implying he doesn't 'get to do what he wants' either. I'm sure he's quite content with the current situation and his current role. And I'm sure he likes the music he's making.

My opinion is if he were left to his own devices, and encouraged to make music however he wants, I would guess that it would come out something like the Paley sessions, that's all.  There are elements surrounding Brian and the group that would not 'allow' that to happen.

Some people think of the Beach Boys as high art. And the stuff they've been putting out for the past few decades is not representative of WHAT THEY ARE STILL CAPABLE OF in my opinion. It's just a shame, that's all. I think they've got one more great record in them. But I also don't believe it will ever be realized.

I mean, fair enough.  To each his own, I guess.  I just don't think there's another Pet Sounds or Smile or Sunflower or even Surf's Up left in five senior citizens.  I DO think that there's potential for a solid, beautiful, and lovely record to cap their careers on a positive note.  I also think we'll be getting that record on June 5.

EDIT: Oh, and an aside, not everything posted in my original post was directed at you DonnyL.  Just wanted you to know that.  The original comment that really made me post the whole thing had to do with Paul Mertens and his God-forbid perfectionism.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 05:16:14 PM

And the stuff they've been putting out for the past few decades is not representative of WHAT THEY ARE STILL CAPABLE OF in my opinion.

How can you be so sure of that, though?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GoofyJeff on May 22, 2012, 05:18:36 PM
I cannot get "Isn't It Time" and "Shelter" out of my head, based on the merged Amazon/iTunes samples.  And "Spring Vacation" from that Dutch radio show is pretty damn catchy too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 22, 2012, 05:43:59 PM
I cannot get "Isn't It Time" and "Shelter" out of my head, based on the merged Amazon/iTunes samples.

Agree, seems to be very catchy tunes! this plus the final three songs sounds dope bro dawg.

Tho i havn't heard the Itunes clips.. since i don't own/use that and it takes quite a lot of space for my small computer, anyone willing to help a dawg/bro and upload the clips ? )':


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 05:51:03 PM
No record label was interested in or willing to release the Paley sessions. This is according to Paley.

The Beach Boys rejected the material too.

Whatever hand BW had in those sessions, that reaction surely persuaded him that he needed to have a differrnt sound if he wanted his music released by a major label.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 06:02:24 PM
I'm also a little disturbed by all the "Oh Brian doesn't get to do what he wants" conversation.  The man gets what he wants.  Stop treating him like some child who gets manipulated by his band and wife.  That's just not the case.  If anything, Brian manipulates other people.  We've seen that over the years very clearly.

I understand this is a popular train of thought nowadays, but I believe it is also utterly and entirely flat out false. Look at that Charlie Rose interview. When he is asked what he thinks his own best quality is, Brian says, "Singer." Then the band start saying things like, "Oh, come on Brian" and on and on. And Brian says something like, "Okay, then, producer." And there are many examples of this: Oh, you don't like the answer I gave? Okay, how about this one. I used to think my own best quality was this, but since you scoffed, I will change and say it's that. Now if you use the kind of Smile logic that some people make here occasionally you will have someone who could say, "Yeah, but it was Brian who made that CHOICE to change his mind. No one forced him to." And the fact is that demands a real genuine and wilful ignorance about the kind of personality that  responds in that sort of way. And once you see Brian so quickly cave in like that you have start wondering, how often does he simply respond to things by making educated guesses as to what he thinks people want him to say, rather than what he actually wants to say. When the band laughs at the mention of Smile, Brian immediately says, "It's not my favourite album, actually." And that's fine. It may very well not be. But it was an interesting thing to say at that particular moment.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 22, 2012, 06:18:41 PM
I wouldn't base anything on an interview. Brian is awkward and uncomfortable doing them. We all know Brian is a humble guy and doesn't toot is own horn very often. I haven't seen the Rose interview yet, but I am sure the others wanted it known that Brian is or can be a great as a writer, producer, arranger. Mike is always mentioning his arranging ability on Why Do Fools Fall In Love. He mentioned on Jimmy Fallon and even at the Atlantic City show this past Saturday.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 06:21:05 PM
I wouldn't base anything on an interview. Brian is awkward and uncomfortable doing them. We all know Brian is a humble guy and doesn't toot is own horn very often. I haven't seen the Rose interview yet, but I am sure the others wanted it known that Brian is or can be a great as a writer, producer, arranger. Mike is always mentioning his arranging ability on Why Do Fools Fall In Love. He mentioned on Jimmy Fallon and even at the Atlantic City show this past Saturday.

I'm sure they were. I'm merely using this as an example to explain what seems to be a very inherent personality trait in Brian. He can be very, very easily swayed to quickly abandon a position that he may have once been extremely confident about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HeyJude on May 22, 2012, 06:26:21 PM
Quote
I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.

Amen. That's also why I hate Paul Mertens! He's so predictable in that classically trained way. Brian's arrangements were never so conventional.  When I hear a woodwind or string arrangement from Mertens, I just cringe inside. Go arrange a new CATS! production already and get off my BW record!

I'm sorry, but seriously?  You're dissing a guy because he plays his instruments exceptionally well? And for that reason you rather he not be on a Brian Wilson solo effort?


I can't speak for the original poster, but I don't think it's about technical ability. It's about how that style impacts Brians or the BB's music. I do think there has been too much woodwind stuff on Brian's solo stuff. I don't blame Mertens, as presumably Brian wants that stuff on it. Some tasteful bits are fine, and Mertens is a great player and arranger. But I always sense that having a sax or woodwind player in your crew sometimes makes you stick that on more material than you otherwise would. I've had more issues with the Mertens material in live shows, because there are some things that I don't think a sax is needed on. I don't think, for instance, that sax usually works as a sort of rhythm instrument. Solos are one thing, and riffs and whatnot. But I don't like it when the sax is doubling the bass line or playing throughout the song.

No sax needed on, for instance, "This Whole World."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 06:28:05 PM
I find it pretty funny at all the "We want quirky, weird Brian stuff" as well.  Like, here Brian has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments.  They rather have Brian pounding away at some tack piano singing unaltered raw vocals, which, by the way, he would NEVER do!

Hyperbole imo

Quote
I'm also a little disturbed by all the "Oh Brian doesn't get to do what he wants" conversation.  The man gets what he wants.  Stop treating him like some child who gets manipulated by his band and wife.  That's just not the case.  If anything, Brian manipulates other people.  We've seen that over the years very clearly.

Fact is, we really don't know how it is either way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 06:35:20 PM
Quote
I think we all know what Brian Wilson productions sound like and they are generally weird and unpredictable, and a little disconcerting at times.

Amen. That's also why I hate Paul Mertens! He's so predictable in that classically trained way. Brian's arrangements were never so conventional.  When I hear a woodwind or string arrangement from Mertens, I just cringe inside. Go arrange a new CATS! production already and get off my BW record!

I'm sorry, but seriously?  You're dissing a guy because he plays his instruments exceptionally well? And for that reason you rather he not be on a Brian Wilson solo effort?


I can't speak for the original poster, but I don't think it's about technical ability. It's about how that style impacts Brians or the BB's music. I do think there has been too much woodwind stuff on Brian's solo stuff. I don't blame Mertens, as presumably Brian wants that stuff on it. Some tasteful bits are fine, and Mertens is a great player and arranger. But I always sense that having a sax or woodwind player in your crew sometimes makes you stick that on more material than you otherwise would. I've had more issues with the Mertens material in live shows, because there are some things that I don't think a sax is needed on. I don't think, for instance, that sax usually works as a sort of rhythm instrument. Solos are one thing, and riffs and whatnot. But I don't like it when the sax is doubling the bass line or playing throughout the song.

No sax needed on, for instance, "This Whole World."

Yeah, to be fair to Dada, his criticism about Mertens was that he was predictable not that he played his instrument well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 06:37:50 PM
By the by, I stand by my initial statement here which is different from DonnyL's point of view, that an album like Lucky Old Sun could have never been released as a Beach Boys record. Whatever the extent that Brian's role was in the album (and I think it was more than crucial), it is clearly not what has been accepted as "acceptable Beach Boys music" for decades now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 22, 2012, 06:50:14 PM
I'm merely using this as an example to explain what seems to be a very inherent personality trait in Brian. He can be very, very easily swayed to quickly abandon a position that he may have once been extremely confident about.

Good points, rockandroll. I've noticed that trait in Brian also. It endears you to him. You almost want to advocate for him. But, I wonder how long he's been like that, where he could be easily swayed, specifically when it has to do with his music.

For a large part of his career, he recorded whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, even if it was at odds with the album project at hand or the direction of the band. I often wonder what the band thought when they recorded Smiley Smile, maybe even Friends (the direction, too mellow for 1968?), "Sail Plane Song", "My Solution", "A Day In The Life Of A Tree", "Mount Vernon And Fairway", "Love Is A Woman", some of the Adult Child songs, "Shortenin' Bread", "I'm So Lonely", etc.

Don't misunderstand me, I love all of those songs, love 'em - now. But, at the time they were recorded, do you really think the band liked them? I wonder if they thought, "What the hell...". Did they voice their opinion? Did Brian care? That's what he had at the time and that's what got recorded.

Brian might be different now, he might shelf what he likes in favor of the good of the group. But, when specifically do you think he changed?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 07:00:29 PM
He's still like that. He insisted on recording I Loves You Porgy without changing the gender in the song, even though his band and record label pleaded with him to change it.

And he recorded plenty of peculiar things with Scott and Andy -- there's just less of a demand now to release every odd thing he does.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 22, 2012, 07:01:50 PM
I cannot get "Isn't It Time" and "Shelter" out of my head, based on the merged Amazon/iTunes samples.

Agree, seems to be very catchy tunes! this plus the final three songs sounds dope bro dawg.

Tho i havn't heard the Itunes clips.. since i don't own/use that and it takes quite a lot of space for my small computer, anyone willing to help a dawg/bro and upload the clips ? )':


:( :( :( :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 07:06:50 PM
He insisted on recording I Loves You Porgy without changing the gender in the song, even though his band and record label pleaded with him to change it.

This makes me sad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 22, 2012, 07:12:26 PM
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 07:13:11 PM
I'm merely using this as an example to explain what seems to be a very inherent personality trait in Brian. He can be very, very easily swayed to quickly abandon a position that he may have once been extremely confident about.

Good points, rockandroll. I've noticed that trait in Brian also. It endears you to him. You almost want to advocate for him. But, I wonder how long he's been like that, where he could be easily swayed, specifically when it has to do with his music.

For a large part of his career, he recorded whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, even if it was at odds with the album project at hand or the direction of the band. I often wonder what the band thought when they recorded Smiley Smile, maybe even Friends (the direction, too mellow for 1968?), "Sail Plane Song", "My Solution", "A Day In The Life Of A Tree", "Mount Vernon And Fairway", "Love Is A Woman", some of the Adult Child songs, "Shortenin' Bread", "I'm So Lonely", etc.

Don't misunderstand me, I love all of those songs, love 'em - now. But, at the time they were recorded, do you really think the band liked them? I wonder if they thought, "What the hell...". Did they voice their opinion? Did Brian care? That's what he had at the time and that's what got recorded.

Brian might be different now, he might shelf what he likes in favor of the good of the group. But, when specifically do you think he changed?

Well, I do think that part of his personality has always been there. I think he got particulary cocky around the Pet Sounds/Smile era mostly because there were a lot of people around him telling him he was great and serious artist. In many ways, it is kind of good for us that it went to his head, because it spurred him on to make more and more compelling choices with his music. In other ways, it is unfortunate that he might have needed that reaction in order to spur him on. I think this is a reason why there was kind of a split between Brian and some of the other members of the group at this point because, well, they were family and friends. They didn't just know Brian as "Brian-the-brilliant-musician". They also knew him as "Brian-the-kid-I-grew-up-with."

My thoughts are really that Brian wasn't entirely recording whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted after the collapse of Smile. I think he was made to feel that Smile was inappropriate - something he certainly didn't seem to feel when recording the music, as evidenced by Sessions - and so he switched to something he considered more appropriate. People often ask, "Well, if that's the case, then why Smiley Smile? Is that more appropriate than Smile?" My answer to that is yes, if the objections to Smile was that it was pretentious in its production and its content and taking too much time to complete (which is kind of like the joke at the beginning of Annie Hall, but I digress...). If those were crucial objections, then Smiley Smile is a compromise - yes, it was still really weird but it was also an album that could be made simply and quickly and importantly, with more participation from the other members of the band.

I do think that Friends was in many ways a return for Brian (I realize I'm side-stepping what is a real favourite, Wild Honey, to make this point). I think it was just as much a Brian album as Pet Sounds. But I think after that album, there was the sense that Brian simply couldn't cut it anymore and very often his ideas were put aside and I do think that this would have had a crucial effect on a guy with the kind of personality I've been describing. The album that he seemed to be recorded post-Friends was almost entirely abandoned, he met with resistance with things like Til I Die, and Mt. Vernon and Fairway. I think the reaction to all this would be something along the lines of, "Well, you don't like this, you don't like that, and on and on, I might as well just not contribute anything."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 07:16:58 PM
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?

What manipulative tactics did he use to get his way?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 22, 2012, 07:27:30 PM
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?

What manipulative tactics did he use to get his way?

He threatened to stop making everyone a lot of money.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 07:29:10 PM
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?

What manipulative tactics did he use to get his way?

Maybe not manipulative, but the point is, he got his way. For whatever reason.

I find it pretty funny at all the "We want quirky, weird Brian stuff" as well.  Like, here Brian has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments.  They rather have Brian pounding away at some tack piano singing unaltered raw vocals, which, by the way, he would NEVER do!

Hyperbole imo


On my part? On on those who wish for the odd, quirky stuff?

If you indeed meant on my part, someone here in this thread did actually say they would want a raw unabridged album of Brian singing with his keyboard.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 07:32:23 PM
Maybe not manipulative, but the point is, he got his way. For whatever reason.

Erm, you're the one who stated Brian was manipulative, so that is kind of the point, not Wirestone's distortion of what my point was, which was certainly not "Brian never gets his way at any time ever."


On my part? On on those who wish for the odd, quirky stuff?

If you indeed meant on my part, someone here in this thread did actually say they would want a raw unabridged album of Brian singing with his keyboard.

What would be wrong with that? Have you heard any of the Lennon anthology albums? The demos are pretty interesting.

And yes, on your part.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 07:41:00 PM
Maybe not manipulative, but the point is, he got his way. For whatever reason.

Erm, you're the one who stated Brian was manipulative, so that is kind of the point, not Wirestone's distortion of what my point was, which was certainly not "Brian never gets his way at any time ever."


On my part? On on those who wish for the odd, quirky stuff?

If you indeed meant on my part, someone here in this thread did actually say they would want a raw unabridged album of Brian singing with his keyboard.

What would be wrong with that? Have you heard any of the Lennon anthology albums? The demos are pretty interesting.

And yes, on your part.

My original point was that, if anything, (as compared to his band/wife/whoever else manipulating Brian) he can be the manipulator.  I never said every time he gets his way he is manipulative.

Secondly, you want the last Beach Boys album to be Brian Wilson demos comparable to Lennon's anthology albums? I was commenting on the last Beach Boys album, and why it should not be something quirky and odd.  I have listened to those anthology albums, they're great, but not as official fifty year anniversary releases.

Lastly, how in the world was that hyperbole on my part? That's like the third time runners' has accused me of that.  People literally said that! Go look at the older posts! People want some quirky weird final album to conclude the BB career, and I just think that's ridiculous.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 07:52:21 PM
My original point was that, if anything, (as compared to his band/wife/whoever else manipulating Brian) he can be the manipulator.  I never said every time he gets his way he is manipulative.

OK, then, name one time.

Quote
Secondly, you want the last Beach Boys album to be Brian Wilson demos comparable to Lennon's anthology albums? I was commenting on the last Beach Boys album, and why it should not be something quirky and odd.  I have listened to those anthology albums, they're great, but not as official fifty year anniversary releases.

Lastly, how in the world was that hyperbole on my part? That's like the third runners' has accused me of that.  People literally said that! Go look at the older posts! People want some quirky weird final album to conclude the BB career, and I just think that's ridiculous.

Part of what makes it hyperbole is how you have very much reduced people's arguments. You've suggested that people have criticized Paul Mertens because he plays exceptionally well. False. You have reduced DonnyL's argument to him wanting The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary album to be Brian sitting at a tack piano with unadorned vocals. False. You keep attributing points of view that are not only manifestly false but also extraordary exaggerations of what they are really saying. Hence you claim that Brian "has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments." You're doing two things here: 1. exaggerating the counter-argument to make it appear ridiculous (shameful), and 2. exaggerating your own side - "the greatest backing band anyone could hope for...accomodating every need."

Do I want this Beach Boys album to be an album of Brian's demos? No. Would I like it if it were an album where Brian had fairly free creative control? Yes. And that is precisely Donny's argument.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 07:56:23 PM
Just for laughs:

DonnyL:

Quote
No one is implying he doesn't 'get to do what he wants'

Wirestone, 10 minutes later:

Quote
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 08:02:54 PM
My original point was that, if anything, (as compared to his band/wife/whoever else manipulating Brian) he can be the manipulator.  I never said every time he gets his way he is manipulative.

OK, then, name one time.

Quote
Secondly, you want the last Beach Boys album to be Brian Wilson demos comparable to Lennon's anthology albums? I was commenting on the last Beach Boys album, and why it should not be something quirky and odd.  I have listened to those anthology albums, they're great, but not as official fifty year anniversary releases.

Lastly, how in the world was that hyperbole on my part? That's like the third runners' has accused me of that.  People literally said that! Go look at the older posts! People want some quirky weird final album to conclude the BB career, and I just think that's ridiculous.

Part of what makes it hyperbole is how you have very much reduced people's arguments. You've suggested that people have criticized Paul Mertens because he plays exceptionally well. False. You have reduced DonnyL's argument to him wanting The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary album to be Brian sitting at a tack piano with unadorned lyrics. False. You keep attributing points of view that are not only manifestly false but also extraordary exaggerations of what they are really saying. Hence you claim that Brian "has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments." You're doing two things here: 1. exaggerating the counter-argument to make it appear ridiculous (shameful), and 2. exaggerating your own side - "the greatest backing band anyone could hope for...accomodating every need."

Look, I don't know any more about Brian's personal involvement with his records or anybody else than anyone on this board.  There have just been examples here that I've read in the past about Brian being manipulative, stating in public interviews that he didn't come up with the Gershwin album when other sources said he did, stuff like that.  That's why I said that the manipulative comment.  People keep stating that Brian gets pushed around like they know that he gets pushed around.  I don't think that's the case. I've encountered times on this board where people have cited that wasn't the case.  Thus, my comment. Happy?

As for the hyperbole and what not, please stop twisting my words.  In the case of Paul Mertens, the original poster said he was predictable in that classically trained way.  He was referring to the arrangements, which I misinterpreted as referring to his instrumental skills.  Excuse me. Additionally, I NEVER said DonnyL wanted Brian sitting at a tack piano or whatever.  Take a look at my edit of my original post.  I even detailed that not all of what I commented on referred to DonnyL's statements.  So you accused me of something I had already attempted to protect myself against.  Finally, are you going to say that Brian's backing band isn't superb? You're really going to criticize me for calling them the "greatest backing band in the world"? Really? Oh, and they DON'T respect Brian immensely? They DON'T accommodate him? Oh, oops, I guess I shouldn't have said "his every need".  I'll watch myself next time  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 22, 2012, 08:07:03 PM
My original point was that, if anything, (as compared to his band/wife/whoever else manipulating Brian) he can be the manipulator.  I never said every time he gets his way he is manipulative.

OK, then, name one time.

Quote
Secondly, you want the last Beach Boys album to be Brian Wilson demos comparable to Lennon's anthology albums? I was commenting on the last Beach Boys album, and why it should not be something quirky and odd.  I have listened to those anthology albums, they're great, but not as official fifty year anniversary releases.

Lastly, how in the world was that hyperbole on my part? That's like the third runners' has accused me of that.  People literally said that! Go look at the older posts! People want some quirky weird final album to conclude the BB career, and I just think that's ridiculous.

Part of what makes it hyperbole is how you have very much reduced people's arguments. You've suggested that people have criticized Paul Mertens because he plays exceptionally well. False. You have reduced DonnyL's argument to him wanting The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary album to be Brian sitting at a tack piano with unadorned lyrics. False. You keep attributing points of view that are not only manifestly false but also extraordary exaggerations of what they are really saying. Hence you claim that Brian "has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments." You're doing two things here: 1. exaggerating the counter-argument to make it appear ridiculous (shameful), and 2. exaggerating your own side - "the greatest backing band anyone could hope for...accomodating every need."

Look, I don't know any more about Brian's personal involvement with his records or anybody else than anyone on this board.  There have just been examples here that I've read in the past about Brian being manipulative, stating in public interviews that he didn't come up with the Gershwin album when other sources said he did, stuff like that.  That's why I said that the manipulative comment.  People keep stating that Brian gets pushed around like they know that he gets pushed around.  I don't think that's the case. I've encountered times on this board where people have cited that wasn't the case.  Thus, my comment. Happy?

As for the hyperbole and what not, please stop twisting my words.  In the case of Paul Mertens, the original poster said he was predictable in that classically trained way.  He was referring to the arrangements, which I misinterpreted as referring to his instrumental skills.  Excuse me. Additionally, I NEVER said DonnyL wanted Brian sitting at a tack piano or whatever.  Take a look at my edit of my original post.  I even detailed that not all of what I commented on referred to DonnyL's statements.  So you accused me of something I had already attempted to protect myself against.  Finally, are you going to say that Brian's backing band isn't superb? You're really going to criticize me for calling them the "greatest backing band in the world"? Really? Oh, and they DON'T respect Brian immensely? They DON'T accommodate him? Oh, oops, I guess I shouldn't have said "his every need".  I'll watch myself next time  ::)

I don't think you're capable of speaking reasonably or honestly at this point. Good talking to you.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 22, 2012, 08:10:02 PM
My original point was that, if anything, (as compared to his band/wife/whoever else manipulating Brian) he can be the manipulator.  I never said every time he gets his way he is manipulative.

OK, then, name one time.

Quote
Secondly, you want the last Beach Boys album to be Brian Wilson demos comparable to Lennon's anthology albums? I was commenting on the last Beach Boys album, and why it should not be something quirky and odd.  I have listened to those anthology albums, they're great, but not as official fifty year anniversary releases.

Lastly, how in the world was that hyperbole on my part? That's like the third runners' has accused me of that.  People literally said that! Go look at the older posts! People want some quirky weird final album to conclude the BB career, and I just think that's ridiculous.

Part of what makes it hyperbole is how you have very much reduced people's arguments. You've suggested that people have criticized Paul Mertens because he plays exceptionally well. False. You have reduced DonnyL's argument to him wanting The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary album to be Brian sitting at a tack piano with unadorned lyrics. False. You keep attributing points of view that are not only manifestly false but also extraordary exaggerations of what they are really saying. Hence you claim that Brian "has the greatest backing band anyone could hope for, who accommodate his every need and have incredible respect for him, and people want to throw that away because they're too good at their instruments." You're doing two things here: 1. exaggerating the counter-argument to make it appear ridiculous (shameful), and 2. exaggerating your own side - "the greatest backing band anyone could hope for...accomodating every need."

Look, I don't know any more about Brian's personal involvement with his records or anybody else than anyone on this board.  There have just been examples here that I've read in the past about Brian being manipulative, stating in public interviews that he didn't come up with the Gershwin album when other sources said he did, stuff like that.  That's why I said that the manipulative comment.  People keep stating that Brian gets pushed around like they know that he gets pushed around.  I don't think that's the case. I've encountered times on this board where people have cited that wasn't the case.  Thus, my comment. Happy?

As for the hyperbole and what not, please stop twisting my words.  In the case of Paul Mertens, the original poster said he was predictable in that classically trained way.  He was referring to the arrangements, which I misinterpreted as referring to his instrumental skills.  Excuse me. Additionally, I NEVER said DonnyL wanted Brian sitting at a tack piano or whatever.  Take a look at my edit of my original post.  I even detailed that not all of what I commented on referred to DonnyL's statements.  So you accused me of something I had already attempted to protect myself against.  Finally, are you going to say that Brian's backing band isn't superb? You're really going to criticize me for calling them the "greatest backing band in the world"? Really? Oh, and they DON'T respect Brian immensely? They DON'T accommodate him? Oh, oops, I guess I shouldn't have said "his every need".  I'll watch myself next time  ::)

I don't think you're capable of speaking reasonably or honestly at this point. Good talking to you.

I'm really unsure of how anything of what I said was so absurd.  You accused me of things, I responded.  I took particular offense to your accusation that I attacked DonnyL, when I even edited my original post to make sure that was not what was perceived. Good talking to you my friend, no hard feelings.  

Oh, and that honesty thing? Yeah, I kind of was honest when I said I misinterpreted Dada's comment.  I know it seems hard to believe that I admitted my mistake. I really was being honest though!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 22, 2012, 08:26:48 PM
He's still like that. He insisted on recording I Loves You Porgy without changing the gender in the song, even though his band and record label pleaded with him to change it.

Do you ever read something that simultaneously excites and annoys you? This right here. Good for Brian. Really obnoxious of his band an the record label. That's really great that Brian got his way with that. I'm really happy to hear that.


Title: new album
Post by: jimmy1949 on May 22, 2012, 08:55:50 PM
Rolling Stone gives it three Stars!!"A sugary,brand-claiming nostalgia fest. but with Wilson's return,its also an ambitious statement..." a pretty positive review. cites key album tracks at rollingstone.com! :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 22, 2012, 08:59:49 PM
So yeah, I'm partially in the DonnyL camp, and I agree that nothing that Brian has done in a while really strikes me as being really him. Probably the his '88 solo debut was the last time I felt that musically he was in charge. Yes, I know there was like a bunch of people that hand their hand in that, but to me, it sounds like a progression of Love You. I personally thought, song-wise, that the Paley sessions were kinda crappy. I think "Dancin' the Night Away" as an instrumental track sounds fabulous and I love Carl's part, but it's never been finished, apparently. I also like "You're Still a Mystery", but I think I like it a lot more than I would more just because for years it seemed like it was going to be the "last original Beach Boys song". And "Chain Reaction of Love" was pretty neat. But besides that there really isn't much that excites me from that collection of songs. "It's Not Easy Being Me" bugs me for the same reason "Midnight's Another Day" bugs me. It's Brian singing "confessional" lyrics that he himself probably had no emotional involvement in. And the rest just seems so throwaway, like "Marketplace" and whatnot. And this comes from a guy who thinks "I Went to Sleep" is one of the best thing's Brian's ever done.

However, on the other hand, I gotta say that I'm in the camp that believes that for the most part Brian is doing what he wants to do. He is still pleased about That Lucky Old Sun according to the Charlie Rose interview, and I'd say he's probably pretty happy about the new Beach Boys album. I think TLOS is musically pretty good, but I think the Scott Bennett lyrics are really icky in places, especially on things like "Midnight's Another Day" (as I mentioned earlier) and lyrics like "at 25 I turned out the light...". Yuck.

So honestly, I think That's Why God Made the Radio will be an improvement over TLOS. I'd rather hear nostalgic Mike Love goofiness on things like "Isn't It Time", "Summer Vacation", and "Beaches in Mind" rather than Scott Bennett trying to re-tell us the "Brian Wilson story".

Honestly, to me, the problem with Brian's solo career hasn't so much been the production of the tracks, as much as his vocals and the lyrics. The absolutely horrible lyrics, coupled with Brian doing his worst "Bill Murray from Caddyshack" vocals on GIOMH is what really makes that album suck. And as much as people say he sounded great on TLOS, I just don't hear it. I think he still sounds gruff and just a bit "off", and Scott Bennett's lyrics are just plain distracting. It's not a coincidence that the best lyrics on the album come from "Good Kind of Love" (which was written by Brian only) and "Live Let Live" (which had lyrics by Van Dyke). The vocal that really convinced me that he still had it though, was "Listen to Me", the Buddy Holly cover. He sounds absolutely beautiful on it, even better than the BWRG album. And I think he's sounding possibly even better on "Summer's Gone". So I'm excited. And the lyrics, on the new album, while not great, aren't quite as distracting.

And as far as him "producing" these days, let's be honest. He probably does have the final say in the studio, and therefore is the producer, but he's probably cool with something slicker these days, and isn't looking to blow people's minds like he did in the '60s. Let's face it, the dude apparently doesn't really write that much music anymore, and likely is okay with his band picking up some of the slack. Do I wish he would do a self produced album with him playing all the instruments and having just The Beach Boys doing the vocals? Sure. But we have the facts that this is probably not what Brian wants anymore, ya know?


Title: Re: Rolling Stone Reviews New Album
Post by: Runaways on May 22, 2012, 09:04:42 PM
Gives it three Stars!!"A sugary,brand-claiming nostalgia fest. but with Wilson's return,its also an ambitious statement..." a pretty positive review. cites key album tracks at rollingstone.com! :)

what?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jimmy1949 on May 22, 2012, 09:06:10 PM
you heard me dude. 8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 22, 2012, 09:12:56 PM
all i see is the track review


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 22, 2012, 09:13:35 PM
Its a subscribers only review.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 22, 2012, 10:12:58 PM
But he got his way! Isn't that what folks are insisting never happens anytime ever?

Nobody knows what happens, they just flop it this way or that to fit whatever they're trying to say.  So if a song is sh*t, it's not because Brian screwed up, it's because Melinda's evil.  Or the record company hates him.  Or the band members produced it instead of Brian.  If the album isn't as good as Pet Sounds, it's because Brian's friend Joe produced it.  Or because Mike Love can't write.  If the album doesn't sell well, it's Capitol Record's fault, because they didn't do promo right and always mess it up.  If Brian doesn't sound good enough, it's because Joe used Autotune.  If Brian sounds too good, it's because Joe used Autotune. 

Blah Blah Blah

I think the truth is (and this is my version of the truth, just like everybody else has their version, so feel free to trash it)... the truth is, Brian's an incredibly brilliant man, sometimes, but sometimes he just doesn't give a sh*t, so sometimes he does good, sometimes he doesn't.  Kind of like the rest of the population, save Mother Theresa, Danny Thomas, and a few other noteable sainthood-worthy people. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The_Holy_Bee on May 22, 2012, 10:23:08 PM
Dammit, wrong thread. Apologies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bcdam on May 22, 2012, 10:26:37 PM

Honestly, to me, the problem with Brian's solo career hasn't so much been the production of the tracks, as much as his vocals and the lyrics. The absolutely horrible lyrics, coupled with Brian doing his worst "Bill Murray from Caddyshack" vocals on GIOMH is what really makes that album suck. And as much as people say he sounded great on TLOS, I just don't hear it. I think he still sounds gruff and just a bit "off", and Scott Bennett's lyrics are just plain distracting. It's not a coincidence that the best lyrics on the album come from "Good Kind of Love" (which was written by Brian only) and "Live Let Live" (which had lyrics by Van Dyke). The vocal that really convinced me that he still had it though, was "Listen to Me", the Buddy Holly cover. He sounds absolutely beautiful on it, even better than the BWRG album. And I think he's sounding possibly even better on "Summer's Gone". So I'm excited. And the lyrics, on the new album, while not great, aren't quite as distracting.


He does sound amazing on "Listen To Me". Perhaps one day he'll put out a cover album all of those 50s and 60s songs that he talks about in every interview...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 23, 2012, 03:28:00 AM
Its a subscribers only review.

Could someone copy and paste it here?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 23, 2012, 03:35:48 AM
Its a subscribers only review.

Could someone copy and paste it here?

Hm. I see a hissing Jann S. Wenner, phoning his lawyers. He once was a hippie, I hear. Not so any more. He turned into what he once utterly despised.

Which happens very often, by the way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: matt-zeus on May 23, 2012, 04:59:33 AM
I'm generally liking what I hear so far, even the songs I thought were duffers at first are growing on me. That could be just a symptom of being starved of new Beach Boys product for most of my life though...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 23, 2012, 05:36:20 AM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period .

...because it's unreleased.  If TLOS was unreleased, you'd be saying IT'S the best album he ever did.

quote]
......or maybe I just prefer the Paley sessions, personal taste n'all that. I love TLOS it's a damned fine album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 23, 2012, 05:39:27 AM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.
To me it's not a question of assessing how much Brians involved, just how good or rather how much I like the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 23, 2012, 05:46:31 AM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period .

...because it's unreleased.  If TLOS was unreleased, you'd be saying IT'S the best album he ever did.

quote]
......or maybe I just prefer the Paley sessions, personal taste n'all that. I love TLOS it's a damned fine album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 23, 2012, 06:36:48 AM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 06:55:28 AM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

good stuff, my one problem is when you imply that the sophistication of pet sounds/smile was something brian did "totally accidently".  Isn't it established that Brian was going for sophistication?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 23, 2012, 06:57:15 AM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

Great review Jon. Things like this, from a fan like yourself, is what really excites me about this album. I know that the final three songs on the album are a great "career capper" supposedly, but I hope they keep going on. If only from the iTunes clips, this does not sound like a band who sound tired and ready to hang it up. They seem to have a new lease on life, and I think they should ride this wave as far as it takes them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: urbanite on May 23, 2012, 07:01:21 AM
Here's a fairly positive review from a Seattle newspaper.

http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/blogcritics/article/Music-Review-The-Beach-Boys-That-s-Why-God-3578675.php


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 23, 2012, 07:03:20 AM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

good stuff, my one problem is when you imply that the sophistication of pet sounds/smile was something brian did "totally accidently".  Isn't it established that Brian was going for sophistication?

No no -- I said it *happened* accidentally. I even say as much re: brian shooting for hip, but the accident was that those albums arrived (or, in the case of Smile, didn't arrive!) in a world that totally welcomed sophisto chamber pop. Right time, right place, kind of.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 07:25:40 AM
Here's a fairly positive review from a Seattle newspaper.

http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/blogcritics/article/Music-Review-The-Beach-Boys-That-s-Why-God-3578675.php

That sure is a lot of simple sentences.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 23, 2012, 07:48:30 AM
Its a subscribers only review.

Could someone copy and paste it here?

Hm. I see a hissing Jann S. Wenner, phoning his lawyers. He once was a hippie, I hear. Not so any more. He turned into what he once utterly despised.

Which happens very often, by the way.

Of course it does: Image sells more than reality, and once that image makes enough money, that person can transition back to reality and have enough money in the bank to cover it or simply not care. When those youngsters in the record business back in the 60's labeled the "kids", the idealists, and the hippies in some cases took over the record companies into the 70's and 80's, look what happened across the board.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 23, 2012, 08:12:07 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 23, 2012, 08:28:08 AM
Yeah, but Craig, Brian Wilson, even during the hitmakin' years was always way more about the Four Freshmen and Rosemary Clooney -- the epitome of pure corn, though of course awesome! -- than Chuck Berry. His roots have always been in music other people would consider corny/cheesy. The point is that he was able to transform his influences into great songs. But the corn was there -- always. It came out in his songs, too!

And yeah -- there's no point in comparing this record to stuff from the 60s, even though in terms of quality the last few songs are on a par with, say, a Pet Sounds or a Til I Die.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 23, 2012, 08:28:41 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.

Brilliant


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 23, 2012, 08:30:01 AM
Just heard the itunes clips,sounds more promising than i first thought.. kinda like it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 08:39:28 AM
so i wonder if a "review embargo" has officially come off in the past couple days.  We've had a couple reviews come out today


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 23, 2012, 08:52:52 AM
Here's a fairly positive review from a Seattle newspaper.

http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/blogcritics/article/Music-Review-The-Beach-Boys-That-s-Why-God-3578675.php

That sure is a lot of simple sentences.

Their Pet Sounds review would have probably been something like : "God Only Knows, a song on which Carl Wilson sings about the fact that, it's only God who knows."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 23, 2012, 08:53:17 AM
I got a funny feeling most of the reviews will be pretty negative


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 23, 2012, 08:55:21 AM
I gotta a funny feeling most of the reviews will be pretty negative

I think you're probably wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 23, 2012, 09:01:46 AM
Is there not a website that compiles reviews (similar to what rottentomatoes.com does for movies)?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 09:03:46 AM
Is there not a website that compiles reviews (similar to what rottentomatoes.com does for movies)?

metacritic, but on a muuch smaller scale and only the big review sites get on it.  A rottentomatoes for music would be sweet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 23, 2012, 09:53:54 AM
The Paley tracks to my mind would have been the best BW solo album he's done, period . I'd prefer an official archive release as is though rather than further recording and a release as a new BB's album.

The difficult truth is that Brian had less involvement with many Paley sessions tracks -- as songwriter and producer -- than he did with his solo work before or after that time. People simply prefee Paley's impression of BW than BW's actual creations.
To me it's not a question of assessing how much Brians involved, just how good or rather how much I like the album.

See, this is where my opinion differs.  I want to hear what Brian is up to and where he's at.  There's a historical importance there.  I'm not sure we're hearing real Beach Boys music, as nice as it might be.

And for the record, I'm not down on the new album. I just hope they do another one, for the ages.

Additionally, my opinion here is nothing new -- I just this article I wrote in 1999 from my old website online!:

http://troun.tripod.com/essentialrarities.html



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike's Beard on May 23, 2012, 10:11:12 AM
Its a subscribers only review.

Could someone copy and paste it here?

Hm. I see a hissing Jann S. Wenner, phoning his lawyers. He once was a hippie, I hear. Not so any more. He turned into what he once utterly despised.

Which happens very often, by the way.

I think that happened to all the hippies.......  apart from the ones that O'D or are now living on the street shouting crazy things at the people walking by.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 23, 2012, 01:19:29 PM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

Great review Jon. Things like this, from a fan like yourself, is what really excites me about this album. I know that the final three songs on the album are a great "career capper" supposedly, but I hope they keep going on. If only from the iTunes clips, this does not sound like a band who sound tired and ready to hang it up. They seem to have a new lease on life, and I think they should ride this wave as far as it takes them.



What a generously intelligent, driven, and uncompromisingly penetrating review; so wonderful, Jon. You are doing your part to reveal the complex truths the BB deliver. You are right that "hip" is historically contingent and thus irrelevant to our engagement at any given moment of audience reception. I love all your insights. Deep thanks brother.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 23, 2012, 01:38:30 PM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

I don't like the implication that one who doesn't like the production is merely hung up on hipness. That's a really narrow view.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 23, 2012, 01:50:55 PM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

I don't like the implication that one who doesn't like the production is merely hung up on hipness. That's a really narrow view.

It's a view. Not necessarily a narrow one. Slick production has been a feature of Beach Boys albums since 1985, and Brian Wilson albums since 1988. To get hung up on it now -- while somehow simultaneously singing the praises of the aurally freeze-dried BW88 -- is the peculiar thing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 23, 2012, 02:08:40 PM
There are different forms of slick, tho. BW88 bugs the sh*t out of me, TLOS is fine and tasteful enough overall (although not without some faults). From what I've heard thus far, the new album falls somewhere in between those.

Honestly, though, and I'm gonna get shot for this - there really haven't been any Beach Boys albums without fault in the production or mixing department to me *, minor as it may be in some cases. I can generally learn to live with most of them and eventually become less aware of them when listening. On some albums, it's way too distracting and it's not really easy to get over. Thus far, it seems as though this album may have that in a spot or two, but I doubt it'll be like BW88 where the entire album just sounds too hilarious and over the top to just enjoy for what it is.

(*!!!! I just realized, I don't have any issues at all with Smiley Smile sans the mix on "Heroes And Villains", but that was from an entirely different session. Further evidence that scrapping Smile was an act of retaining sanity, breaking all the music he'd written in the year prior down to their most basic and manageable elements and realizing the songs were still great.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 05:12:45 PM
6/10 http://www.shout4music.com/albums-eps/the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-

oddly no mention of the last songs


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 23, 2012, 06:20:54 PM
6/10 http://www.shout4music.com/albums-eps/the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-

oddly no mention of the last songs

Especially considering it's somewhat dismissive in saying the album is basically nothing but "straightforward set of nice surf-rock numbers, resplendent with close harmonies and lots of lyrics about cars and the ocean".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 06:28:55 PM
yeah i think we can expect reviews to be either accepting of the music or wanting it to be some big innovation


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 23, 2012, 06:47:58 PM
6/10 http://www.shout4music.com/albums-eps/the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-

oddly no mention of the last songs

Especially considering it's somewhat dismissive in saying the album is basically nothing but "straightforward set of nice surf-rock numbers, resplendent with close harmonies and lots of lyrics about cars and the ocean".

Even the album artwork is wrong. The reviewer seemed sort of clueless.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 23, 2012, 07:00:37 PM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

I don't like the implication that one who doesn't like the production is merely hung up on hipness. That's a really narrow view.

It's a view. Not necessarily a narrow one. Slick production has been a feature of Beach Boys albums since 1985, and Brian Wilson albums since 1988. To get hung up on it now -- while somehow simultaneously singing the praises of the aurally freeze-dried BW88 -- is the peculiar thing.

You've strayed far from the point and are adding things to, it seems, help some argument you have, though what that is, i'm not sure. The reviewer in said review suggested that one who doesn't like the production is just preoccupied with it not being hip. And that is a narrow view because it completely dismisses other, legitimate reasons that people may and will have for simply not liking a certain kind of aesthetic/production value. It's this same binary thinking that keeps coming up.

EDIT: How about this? How about everyone on this board who has expressed not liking the production style of the new album, whose reason for not liking it is that it's not hip, step up and raise their hand?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 23, 2012, 07:23:15 PM
It is a reviewer's prerogative to be somewhat hyperbolic, and to speak to the particular audience that reads reviews on that type of website. The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.
I'm not a fan of the sound of the record per se, and not because I think it isn't hip. But I still like reviews that take a stab at leaving no room for denial. That is a Paul Williams hallmark.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 23, 2012, 07:36:06 PM
I'm not sure we're hearing real Beach Boys music, as nice as it might be.

Oh reality / It's not for me / And it makes me laugh.

I don't get the obsession with (air-quotes) "authenticity" here.  Especially when not being "real" is used as a reason to rule out large chunks of what the guy's really done.  And I find it very easy to believe that the stuff Brian is doing everywhere from TLOS to Gershwin to Disney is at least as real an expression of what he likes to do as the unpolished output of a (romanticized) drug-addled obese depressive is...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 23, 2012, 07:58:46 PM
The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.

Yeah, all you stupid losers! He should never have asked your opinion.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 23, 2012, 08:10:56 PM
I'm not sure we're hearing real Beach Boys music, as nice as it might be.

Oh reality / It's not for me / And it makes me laugh.

I don't get the obsession with (air-quotes) "authenticity" here.  Especially when not being "real" is used as a reason to rule out large chunks of what the guy's really done.  And I find it very easy to believe that the stuff Brian is doing everywhere from TLOS to Gershwin to Disney is at least as real an expression of what he likes to do as the unpolished output of a (romanticized) drug-addled obese depressive is...

Thank you, Jon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 23, 2012, 09:08:55 PM
The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.

Yeah, all you stupid losers! He should never have asked your opinion.  ::)

Roll em till you're blind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 09:18:51 PM
Here's the review I did of "That's Why God Made The Radio" for a Minneapolis arts rag I write for called L'Etoile.

http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/

Lemme know what y'all think, whether or not you agree and all that.

good stuff, my one problem is when you imply that the sophistication of pet sounds/smile was something brian did "totally accidently".  Isn't it established that Brian was going for sophistication?

No no -- I said it *happened* accidentally. I even say as much re: brian shooting for hip, but the accident was that those albums arrived (or, in the case of Smile, didn't arrive!) in a world that totally welcomed sophisto chamber pop. Right time, right place, kind of.

Ok i think i understand what you're saying now.  But i still think there's some contradiction when you say brian was consciously trying to write hip music, then end the paragraph saying it was hip totally accidentally.  I know you're saying Brian (unhip) was trying to write hip, and what he came up with just happened to be hip/popular, but i think brian was more dialed in than you think.  For me, I think it makes more sense to say Brian was trying to do new things and it became super hip in parts of the world.  Because I think brian knew exactly what he was doing then.  still a sweet review, it pumps me up for the album man.  

though i must say, i almost enjoy your review on the RR about wanting more cheese more  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 23, 2012, 09:25:23 PM
The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.

Yeah, all you stupid losers! He should never have asked your opinion.  ::)

just let the child play.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 23, 2012, 09:59:42 PM
I'm not sure we're hearing real Beach Boys music, as nice as it might be.

Oh reality / It's not for me / And it makes me laugh.

I don't get the obsession with (air-quotes) "authenticity" here.  Especially when not being "real" is used as a reason to rule out large chunks of what the guy's really done.  And I find it very easy to believe that the stuff Brian is doing everywhere from TLOS to Gershwin to Disney is at least as real an expression of what he likes to do as the unpolished output of a (romanticized) drug-addled obese depressive is...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

Without authenticity, we may as well accept a fine tribute album that sounds great as performed by a group of Beach Boys sound-alikes (and no, I am not implying this is what the new album is).

If you don't value authenticity in a Brian Wilson or Beach Boys album, I'm not sure what to tell you.

Personally, I would never view BW as a 'drug-addled obese depressive'.  What a load of $hit.  You're really misinterpreting my point.  I'm not talking about the 'cocaine sessions' or whatever, I'm talking about a genuine BW production.  Which I believe he is fully capable of but is either not surrounded by people supporting that or is completely uninterested or unwilling to do it.  Not sure what's really going on but the music speaks for itself and the passage of time will bring more clarity I'm sure.

And I think some people may be confusing 'music Brian likes' with an actual BW production.  I'm not talking about what he likes; I'm talking about what he's legitmately in charge of vs. what he's just going along with.  Having the final veto power to reject or approve something is like saying Brian mixed the album because he approved it.  Or he painted the cover image.  come on now !

I seriously don't know how anyone here can think Brian actually produced this new album.  If he did, why does it sound so much like a Joe Thomas production?  I mean, speaking of reality, what's going on here ?

I'm not down on the new album.  I just refuse to accept it for anything other than what it is.  I will buy it like the rest of you, and I will enjoy it I'm sure.  And I'm really looking forward to hearing the suite at the end, etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 24, 2012, 12:50:18 AM
Without authenticity, we may as well accept a fine tribute album that sounds great as performed by a group of Beach Boys sound-alikes

If it sounds good, moves me, and hits my this-is-art button, I don't care if it's got "THIS IS A FAKE" scrawled on the flipside of the disc in felt-tip.

I'd go see a symphony orchestra play Mozart even if by definition that makes them a tribute band.  And if it turned out Mozart dashed the piece off just to get some pushy patron off his back without putting his own personal heart and soul into it, I'd still appreciate it if it sounded right.  That's authenticity.

Quote
Personally, I would never view BW as a 'drug-addled obese depressive'.  What a load of $hit.  You're really misinterpreting my point.

No, I'm making my point.  Which is that treating "Love You"-era Brian as the real Brian, and the one who does that wonderfully quirky take on "Heigh Ho" on the Disney album as a soulless shell, you're creating an artificially narrow definition of the "real" Brian.  One which focuses on the way he worked during the periods of time when he was most fried, but not with the overwhelming share of what he's done in his life.

Or to put it another way:  Brian "going along with people" is real Brian.  He's not just Stalin-in-the-studio, he's a guy who collaborates -- as Wirestone pointed out in the other thread, he does that whether that's with the Wrecking Crew, his own band, or the boys.  The DIY stuff is only a small part of who he is and how he works.

Regards,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: atroxi on May 24, 2012, 05:30:07 AM
Physical copies of the CD are out there now, at least if you're Tim Chipping.

http://lockerz.com/s/211434885 (http://lockerz.com/s/211434885)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 05:38:19 AM
sigh, i was really hoping for paper cases.  still looks nice


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 24, 2012, 05:39:57 AM
sigh, i was really hoping for paper cases.  still looks nice

Yeah, as was I, especially since TLOS and the Gershwin album were paper.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 24, 2012, 05:55:41 AM
I totally agree Jon.

I've never understood this obsessivness regarding whether Brian is in control or not, whether he is cracking the whip in the studio, if what we listen to is a genuine authentic Brian Wilson production. As far as we know and are able to tell, he hasn't been in control since Smile. Every album, single, or recording has in some way been a shared effort - and you could argue that even the pre 67 stuff is as much shared by the personality of the co-writer and studio musicians (the same with Phil Spector). Even he fabled Love You was a co job. He was forced into writing and recording those songs by Dr Landy, so how anyone can say that is the "real" Brian is baffling. This kind of double guessing is not needed. Appreciate Brian for what he is and not what he isn't.

Today Brian needs help in writing songs, writiing lyrics, recording, arranging, producing etc. He can't do it on his own. And neither should we expect him to do so. He has done enough already. He'd done enough by the time he was 25 years old. I have no doubt that today left to his own devices, he would come up with jack sh*t. This kind of wet dream of Brian being left alone in a studio of full of keyboards creating masterpieces is a crock of sh*t. Of course he would play the keyboard, possibily write some of the most amazing melodies imaginable. But would he finish them without some help, or some kind of goal or reason to complete them. No he wouldn't. He is no longer 22 or 23 when the world was his for the taking. Unfortunately the world has passed him by. And i think in many ways that suits him fine. He cracked under the pressure of trying to keep up. It became easier for him to live without that pressure - and maybe that brought about it's own problems (coke, staying in bed, Danny Hutton etc) but that is a different issue.

The fact of the matter is that Brian has written and produced some of the most amazing, soulful, honest, beautiful music ever done by anyone, and in my opinion continues to do so. He has given us so much. So much that for some of us, his life and his work is as much ours as it is his. But he hasn't been alone in doing this. Gary Usher, Tony Asher, Van Dyke Parks, Tandyn Almer, Mike Love, Andy Paley, Dr Landy, Joe Thomas and many others have all been needed by Brian to help him realise his dreams. His work has been dependent on their support. Without them, the friends, associates, relations, managers etc, we wouldn't be here talking about whether the real Brian is still out there. Without them the real Brian would still be in bed, or worse.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 06:14:07 AM
sigh, i was really hoping for paper cases.  still looks nice

Yeah, as was I, especially since TLOS and the Gershwin album were paper.
I have TLOS as a jewel case - it's an import.
That guy appears to be from Europe, so there's still a chance it could be in a digipack.
I prefer the jewel case, honestly....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 06:29:31 AM
sigh, i was really hoping for paper cases.  still looks nice

Yeah, as was I, especially since TLOS and the Gershwin album were paper.
I have TLOS as a jewel case - it's an import.
That guy appears to be from Europe, so there's still a chance it could be in a digipack.
I prefer the jewel case, honestly....

he's a BBC writer.  He tweeted about the last songs being a miracle. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 24, 2012, 07:41:45 AM
 
Quote
The reviewer in said review suggested that one who doesn't like the production is just preoccupied with it not being hip.

You could not have more thoroughly missed the point I was trying to make. Hint: that's not even close. I'm glad it got your panties up in a bundle, but go back and read again with your hackles *down* this time and see if you get it.

Again: not. even. close.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 24, 2012, 07:45:55 AM
It is a reviewer's prerogative to be somewhat hyperbolic, and to speak to the particular audience that reads reviews on that type of website. The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.
I'm not a fan of the sound of the record per se, and not because I think it isn't hip. But I still like reviews that take a stab at leaving no room for denial. That is a Paul Williams hallmark.

Werd.

I'm not a fan of the sound of the record for LOTS of reasons -- totally stated 'em in the article, too. The bits about hipness in there were jibes at people, and you and I both know a ton of 'em, who only like the Beach Boys *because* they're hip. I was just saying you aren't going to be finding any of that here -- the hip sort of "Pet Sounds redux" music or whatever, this record has none of that, and don't we all agree with that? The point of the article was simply that if you are able to overlook the godawful production touches, you're gonna find good songs.

I dunno how dude above so thoroughly missed the point I was making, esp. considering so many other people got it. I guess if you go into a review with your fists up and ready to fight, you're gonna find something to fight about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 08:07:08 AM
my vinyl has now been delayed to august 14  :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 08:42:47 AM

The point of the article was simply that if you are able to overlook the godawful production touches, you're gonna find good songs.


i think it's funny for a band more famously known for its production prowess, pretty much since 1976 we've been having to do just that


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 24, 2012, 08:44:57 AM
Quote
The reviewer in said review suggested that one who doesn't like the production is just preoccupied with it not being hip.

You could not have more thoroughly missed the point I was trying to make. Hint: that's not even close. I'm glad it got your panties up in a bundle, but go back and read again with your hackles *down* this time and see if you get it.

Again: not. even. close.

Your review (of the band as a whole and this album) reads very well.  If I were a better writer, that is what I would have said.  Thanks for sharing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 24, 2012, 08:56:29 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.


Yeah, but Craig, Brian Wilson, even during the hitmakin' years was always way more about the Four Freshmen and Rosemary Clooney -- the epitome of pure corn, though of course awesome! -- than Chuck Berry. His roots have always been in music other people would consider corny/cheesy. The point is that he was able to transform his influences into great songs. But the corn was there -- always. It came out in his songs, too!

And yeah -- there's no point in comparing this record to stuff from the 60s, even though in terms of quality the last few songs are on a par with, say, a Pet Sounds or a Til I Die.

I see the points, but I also don't hear that cornball element near as much as the review would suggest in the final products, especially from the "Golden Age" which I'd list as 1963-67. Freshmen, Clooney, Gershwin...check. However, and I mean this seriously, do we as people who listen to a lot of music hear any of that in the truly great singles the man was making? I Get Around? When I Grow Up? California Girls? Wouldn't It Be Nice?

I could list more but I'd be tempted to say if you played those classic BB singles for people in a blind test next to a stack of Clooney or Freshmen records, the similarities would be threadbare at best. It reminds me of reading various City Paper type publications and 'zines in the early 90's where the music writers would hear a rock band doing a vocal harmony or a jazzy chord change and immediately trot out the "Brian Wilson" comparison tag.

Again, if we take the larger overview of the band's history, specifically the stage act which more fans have spent money on than any new record releases since the 70's, the cornball element is huge and yes, it should be celebrated and enjoyed because it is part of the band's fun identity, no problems from me on that point.

But to paint the recorded legacy of Brian Wilson with that broad of a brush, I think it does paint over what was a young man making among the best and most forward-thinking recordings of his time and among his peer group, and those recordings influenced and continue to influence those in his field. If the cornball element were that strong *at that time*, Brian's records would be in the same bin as Winchester Cathedral or They're Coming To Take Me Away - novelties that sounded interesting but were ultimately forgettable and disposable.

It's just a difference of opinion, not saying either is right or wrong. Reviews and articles should inspire debate and discussion, and this one did just that! It was hard to get past the word or the theme of "cornball" for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 24, 2012, 09:19:23 AM
Quote
Today Brian needs help in writing songs, writiing lyrics, recording, arranging, producing etc. He can't do it on his own. And neither should we expect him to do so. He has done enough already. He'd done enough by the time he was 25 years old. I have no doubt that today left to his own devices, he would come up with jack sh*t. This kind of wet dream of Brian being left alone in a studio of full of keyboards creating masterpieces is a crock of sh*t. Of course he would play the keyboard, possibily write some of the most amazing melodies imaginable.

Of course not! I'm of the type that I'd rather hear horrible or sloppy Brian verses most of the Disney album -  Brian has earned that from me, whereas Foskett and Mertens have earned nothing. Their music doesn't resonate with me. I mean, listen to the guitar on "Beaches In Mind"... is that serious? Or a joke? If it was meant to be ironically cheesy, I could maybe accept it, but I suspect the guitarist was actually earnest. It's like something from a Disney Channel commercial, but on a Brian Wilson "production".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 24, 2012, 09:28:17 AM
Also, I find interesting that almost everyone here can slag off everything the BBs did in the 1980s, and yet so many people give anything made now a pass. "You should just be grateful you're getting anything," they say. Please. These guys are making some real money off of this reunion. There's no reason not to expect a product that's good. They aren't doing it for charity. We all hated Joe Thomas, but now we're being told to accept whatever cheesy, digital crap he throws on a song. "If Brian wants to use autotune for artistic reasons, we shouldn't dare criticize it!" OK.

"Peace and money! Ain't life funny?" Those are Mike's lyrics from "Spring Vacation". Shows what this reunion is about for some. There are some good new songs and fun moments here, but there's an undercurrent of something odious going on, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 24, 2012, 09:33:38 AM
Quote
Today Brian needs help in writing songs, writiing lyrics, recording, arranging, producing etc. He can't do it on his own. And neither should we expect him to do so. He has done enough already. He'd done enough by the time he was 25 years old. I have no doubt that today left to his own devices, he would come up with jack sh*t. This kind of wet dream of Brian being left alone in a studio of full of keyboards creating masterpieces is a crock of sh*t. Of course he would play the keyboard, possibily write some of the most amazing melodies imaginable.

Of course not! I'm of the type that I'd rather hear horrible or sloppy Brian verses most of the Disney album -  Brian has earned that from me, whereas Foskett and Mertens have earned nothing. Their music doesn't resonate with me. I mean, listen to the guitar on "Beaches In Mind"... is that serious? Or a joke? If it was meant to be ironically cheesy, I could maybe accept it, but I suspect the guitarist was actually earnest. It's like something from a Disney Channel commercial, but on a Brian Wilson "production".
So, are you saying that Brian had no input into the sound of his music? That if he did not like the guitar work of which you speak that he could not have had the guitarist re-do the section to his satisfaction? I also want to say that Brian has not earned the right to be horrible or sloppy. If a musician goes into a studio to make a record, I expect him or her to give it their best shot to make as good a record as they are capable of making. If you expect people to pay money to buy your music, then you need to put your best foot forward and give it your best effort.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 24, 2012, 09:34:09 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.


Yeah, but Craig, Brian Wilson, even during the hitmakin' years was always way more about the Four Freshmen and Rosemary Clooney -- the epitome of pure corn, though of course awesome! -- than Chuck Berry. His roots have always been in music other people would consider corny/cheesy. The point is that he was able to transform his influences into great songs. But the corn was there -- always. It came out in his songs, too!

And yeah -- there's no point in comparing this record to stuff from the 60s, even though in terms of quality the last few songs are on a par with, say, a Pet Sounds or a Til I Die.

I see the points, but I also don't hear that cornball element near as much as the review would suggest in the final products, especially from the "Golden Age" which I'd list as 1963-67. Freshmen, Clooney, Gershwin...check. However, and I mean this seriously, do we as people who listen to a lot of music hear any of that in the truly great singles the man was making? I Get Around? When I Grow Up? California Girls? Wouldn't It Be Nice?

I could list more but I'd be tempted to say if you played those classic BB singles for people in a blind test next to a stack of Clooney or Freshmen records, the similarities would be threadbare at best. It reminds me of reading various City Paper type publications and 'zines in the early 90's where the music writers would hear a rock band doing a vocal harmony or a jazzy chord change and immediately trot out the "Brian Wilson" comparison tag.

Again, if we take the larger overview of the band's history, specifically the stage act which more fans have spent money on than any new record releases since the 70's, the cornball element is huge and yes, it should be celebrated and enjoyed because it is part of the band's fun identity, no problems from me on that point.

But to paint the recorded legacy of Brian Wilson with that broad of a brush, I think it does paint over what was a young man making among the best and most forward-thinking recordings of his time and among his peer group, and those recordings influenced and continue to influence those in his field. If the cornball element were that strong *at that time*, Brian's records would be in the same bin as Winchester Cathedral or They're Coming To Take Me Away - novelties that sounded interesting but were ultimately forgettable and disposable.

It's just a difference of opinion, not saying either is right or wrong. Reviews and articles should inspire debate and discussion, and this one did just that! It was hard to get past the word or the theme of "cornball" for me.

I don't hear it in the hot hit singles, no, but I surely hear it in some of the ballads. Listen to "Your Summer Dream" or "Ballad of Ole Betsy" and stuff like that, you don't hear that? Those aren't a little corny? I mean, they're gorgeous, sure, but also: a little corny. I could list like a million others, too, even some of the rock tunes. And no, it wouldn't have been "novelty songs." That's not true at all, I don't think. that's not the only "corny" music out there.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 24, 2012, 09:35:24 AM
Quote
"Peace and money! Ain't life funny?"

Actually: "Easy Money / Ain't Life Funny."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 09:36:18 AM
Also, I find interesting that almost everyone here can slag off everything the BBs did in the 1980s, and yet so many people give anything made now a pass. "You should just be grateful you're getting anything," they say. Please. These guys are making some real money off of this reunion. There's no reason not to expect a product that's good. They aren't doing it for charity. We all hated Joe Thomas, but now we're being told to accept whatever cheesy, digital crap he throws on a song. "If Brian wants to use autotune for artistic reasons, we shouldn't dare criticize it!" OK.

"Peace and money! Ain't life funny?" Those are Mike's lyrics from "Spring Vacation". Shows what this reunion is about for some. There are some good new songs and fun moments here, but there's an undercurrent of something odious going on, too.

i think people aren't hating on joe thomas because the production doesn't sound as bad as imagination, which is why people hated him in the first place.

nobody said we shouldn't criticize brian for using autotune for artistic reasons.  Some people were thinking that all the autotune was being used to tune the voices, which they didn't think was necessary cause the guys can still sing fine. but obviously it's being used for a vocal effect on certain tracks.  So nobody says you can't criticize, people just wanted the right thing to be criticized.

but the big reason people aren't slagging them as much as the 80s is because the songwriting seems to be better.  good songs cures everything.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: monicker on May 24, 2012, 09:37:55 AM
You could not have more thoroughly missed the point I was trying to make. Hint: that's not even close. I'm glad it got your panties up in a bundle, but go back and read again with your hackles *down* this time and see if you get it.

Again: not. even. close.

I'm the one who's angry? Nice straw man there, it's looking good, but you may want to add sunglasses to it. Go back and read my posts and please tell me where you detect my raised hackles, and that i went in with my fists up, ready to fight. It seems you're very eager to disqualify anything i have to say.

And, yeah, i so thoroughly, so completely missed the point. I was not even close, yeah. Dude.

The point of the article was simply that if you are able to overlook the godawful production touches, you're gonna find good songs.

Quote
Eh. My final word is this: if you’re able to overlook the production – if you’re able to disconnect the part of your brain that decides whether something is hip or not hip and makes it matter at all – you’re probably going to love That’s Why God Made The Radio.

Yeah, okay, that's so off. You even went as far as to connect the two ideas with a (misused) hyphen.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 24, 2012, 09:42:14 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.


Yeah, but Craig, Brian Wilson, even during the hitmakin' years was always way more about the Four Freshmen and Rosemary Clooney -- the epitome of pure corn, though of course awesome! -- than Chuck Berry. His roots have always been in music other people would consider corny/cheesy. The point is that he was able to transform his influences into great songs. But the corn was there -- always. It came out in his songs, too!

And yeah -- there's no point in comparing this record to stuff from the 60s, even though in terms of quality the last few songs are on a par with, say, a Pet Sounds or a Til I Die.

I see the points, but I also don't hear that cornball element near as much as the review would suggest in the final products, especially from the "Golden Age" which I'd list as 1963-67. Freshmen, Clooney, Gershwin...check. However, and I mean this seriously, do we as people who listen to a lot of music hear any of that in the truly great singles the man was making? I Get Around? When I Grow Up? California Girls? Wouldn't It Be Nice?

I could list more but I'd be tempted to say if you played those classic BB singles for people in a blind test next to a stack of Clooney or Freshmen records, the similarities would be threadbare at best. It reminds me of reading various City Paper type publications and 'zines in the early 90's where the music writers would hear a rock band doing a vocal harmony or a jazzy chord change and immediately trot out the "Brian Wilson" comparison tag.

Again, if we take the larger overview of the band's history, specifically the stage act which more fans have spent money on than any new record releases since the 70's, the cornball element is huge and yes, it should be celebrated and enjoyed because it is part of the band's fun identity, no problems from me on that point.

But to paint the recorded legacy of Brian Wilson with that broad of a brush, I think it does paint over what was a young man making among the best and most forward-thinking recordings of his time and among his peer group, and those recordings influenced and continue to influence those in his field. If the cornball element were that strong *at that time*, Brian's records would be in the same bin as Winchester Cathedral or They're Coming To Take Me Away - novelties that sounded interesting but were ultimately forgettable and disposable.

It's just a difference of opinion, not saying either is right or wrong. Reviews and articles should inspire debate and discussion, and this one did just that! It was hard to get past the word or the theme of "cornball" for me.

I don't hear it in the hot hit singles, no, but I surely hear it in some of the ballads. Listen to "Your Summer Dream" or "Ballad of Ole Betsy" and stuff like that, you don't hear that? Those aren't a little corny? I mean, they're gorgeous, sure, but also: a little corny. I could list like a million others, too, even some of the rock tunes. And no, it wouldn't have been "novelty songs." That's not true at all, I don't think. that's not the only "corny" music out there.
Jon, maybe by today's standards they are corny, but in 1963 it was not that corny to sing about your car like it was a long lost love. Some people felt that way about their car. People, whole families only had one car. It was cherished and taken well care of. I come from that time and I know of what I speak. Overall, a very nice review of the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 24, 2012, 09:42:27 AM
Physical copies of the CD are out there now, at least if you're Tim Chipping.

http://lockerz.com/s/211434885 (http://lockerz.com/s/211434885)

Not out in the Netherlands yet, official release here is listed as June 4. Maybe they'll have it like 4 days earlier at the max.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 24, 2012, 09:48:52 AM
Quote
i think people aren't hating on joe thomas because the production doesn't sound as bad as imagination, which is why people hated him in the first place.

Sometimes, anyway. "Shelter", for example, sounds like vintage Imagination, as does "Private Life of Bill & Sue". Add a little more reverb to "Strange World" and you again have classic Joe Thomas. And so on.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 24, 2012, 09:52:20 AM
Quote
i think people aren't hating on joe thomas because the production doesn't sound as bad as imagination, which is why people hated him in the first place.

Sometimes, anyway. "Shelter", for example, sounds like vintage Imagination, as does "Private Life of Bill & Sue". Add a little more reverb to "Strange World" and you again have classic Joe Thomas. And so on.
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 24, 2012, 10:10:20 AM
I'm not down on the new album.  I just refuse to accept it for anything other than what it is.  I will buy it like the rest of you, and I will enjoy it I'm sure.  And I'm really looking forward to hearing the suite at the end, etc.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news but I don't think there is a suite at the end anymore - though there are, perhaps, a few songs in a row, not connected to each other sonically, that have some kind of thematic connection.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 10:13:18 AM
According to those who have heard the album, the last three songs flow together without gaps. And the lyrics of those three songs have thematic elements in common. It's still a suite.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 24, 2012, 10:19:29 AM
According to those who have heard the album, the last three songs flow together without gaps. And the lyrics of those three songs have thematic elements in common. It's still a suite.

Oh really? That's good to hear. I thought this thread suggested otherwise a few days ago.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 24, 2012, 10:20:43 AM
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?

no, digital reverb and digital echo are the digital versions of reverb and echo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 10:28:10 AM
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?

no, digital reverb and digital echo are the digital versions of reverb and echo.

Because only audio effects developed by the mid-60s (or their approximations) are legitimate, of course.

Autotune, in contemporary pop records, is indeed much like reverb in the 60s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 24, 2012, 10:40:39 AM
It looks like it easier to blame anyone but Brian for making a supposed bad record.

I just don't get it. Maybe the album does sound horribly cheesy and dated even by late 90's standards. Maybe Brian is completely happy with the sound. To suggest that Brian is there in name only and that he has had no input into this record nd how it was produced shows a complete lack of respect to Brian and those who support him. It's quite easy to see (judging by the history of the band of the last 50 years, that it is not an easy thing to make a Beach Boys or Brian Wilson record. It's exceedingly hard work and possibly infinitely frustrating for all involved. But maybe all the work and worry and heartache is worth it just to get something. A result. A song that still contains beauftiful melodies, complex harmony structure and those "only Brian can do" moving bass lines in the chords. Those things are still there. I can hear them in these clips of this new album. Brian is there in spades. His magic and unique way with a song is plain to see and hear. And if it had to be that the only way they could satisfy everyones needs and expectations was to get Joe Thomas in to co produce and Mertens to arrange the strings and things (because there no one else in the band can do it including Brian) and so on and on, then so be it. If some folk still want to lust after what is simply not possible then it is their problem and not Brians.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 24, 2012, 10:47:06 AM
One particular statement or theme in this review (http://www.letoilemagazine.com/2012/05/23/we-will-rock-you-the-square-sounds-of-the-beach-boys/), how Brian Wilson has always been a colossal cornball, doesn't hold up when you put his music and his productions from 1963-67 into that equation. At that time, he was one of the few producers who had the ears of most in the pop music business, had more clout than I'd bet 98% of people his age and background in the business at that time, and that point continues to be driven home every time another of his peers says in an interview how influential his records at that time were on other artists and producers making pop music. The driving force behind that clout and respect was mostly the way his records sounded and the way they were received by the public and the record biz types alike.

Cornball sells in very large quantities but it doesn't garner the same level of respect and the same aura as innovation.

It's not about hip, it's not about pop-culture iconoclastic imagery, it's about putting out songs that people heard on the radio and on record and considered to be at the forefront of pop recording at that time. Brian *was* competitive at that time and has admitted it, he *was* trying to outdo Spector and the Beatles and others, and he was making records that were cutting-edge for pop or teen music of that era. I'd suggest there was a different kind of drive behind those records and that music, a different kind of mindset that went into creating them which did not go into nearly everything the man released from the 70's onward with a few but very significant exceptions, and even those exceptions had a foot in the past rather than a start-from-scratch mentality. There was that competitive edge in that process which the man himself admits he discarded soon after the Smile era, and making that kind of music no longer appealed to him as much as making records which pleased him.

The statement about cornball would ring more true if the years from, say, 1963-67 were taken out of the equation.

I also think comparing anything from this album to something from the 60's classic era is a mistake, as shown by Brian's reaction when Al attempted to link it somehow to Pet Sounds during the PBS interview. The mindset going into this latest album was not 1965, even though some of the resulting sounds may have come out sounding like 1965.

The new album may be cornball, but to apply that overall to Brian's music from the 60's didn't feel right - not completely wrong, but not right.


Yeah, but Craig, Brian Wilson, even during the hitmakin' years was always way more about the Four Freshmen and Rosemary Clooney -- the epitome of pure corn, though of course awesome! -- than Chuck Berry. His roots have always been in music other people would consider corny/cheesy. The point is that he was able to transform his influences into great songs. But the corn was there -- always. It came out in his songs, too!

And yeah -- there's no point in comparing this record to stuff from the 60s, even though in terms of quality the last few songs are on a par with, say, a Pet Sounds or a Til I Die.

I see the points, but I also don't hear that cornball element near as much as the review would suggest in the final products, especially from the "Golden Age" which I'd list as 1963-67. Freshmen, Clooney, Gershwin...check. However, and I mean this seriously, do we as people who listen to a lot of music hear any of that in the truly great singles the man was making? I Get Around? When I Grow Up? California Girls? Wouldn't It Be Nice?

I could list more but I'd be tempted to say if you played those classic BB singles for people in a blind test next to a stack of Clooney or Freshmen records, the similarities would be threadbare at best. It reminds me of reading various City Paper type publications and 'zines in the early 90's where the music writers would hear a rock band doing a vocal harmony or a jazzy chord change and immediately trot out the "Brian Wilson" comparison tag.

Again, if we take the larger overview of the band's history, specifically the stage act which more fans have spent money on than any new record releases since the 70's, the cornball element is huge and yes, it should be celebrated and enjoyed because it is part of the band's fun identity, no problems from me on that point.

But to paint the recorded legacy of Brian Wilson with that broad of a brush, I think it does paint over what was a young man making among the best and most forward-thinking recordings of his time and among his peer group, and those recordings influenced and continue to influence those in his field. If the cornball element were that strong *at that time*, Brian's records would be in the same bin as Winchester Cathedral or They're Coming To Take Me Away - novelties that sounded interesting but were ultimately forgettable and disposable.

It's just a difference of opinion, not saying either is right or wrong. Reviews and articles should inspire debate and discussion, and this one did just that! It was hard to get past the word or the theme of "cornball" for me.

I don't hear it in the hot hit singles, no, but I surely hear it in some of the ballads. Listen to "Your Summer Dream" or "Ballad of Ole Betsy" and stuff like that, you don't hear that? Those aren't a little corny? I mean, they're gorgeous, sure, but also: a little corny. I could list like a million others, too, even some of the rock tunes. And no, it wouldn't have been "novelty songs." That's not true at all, I don't think. that's not the only "corny" music out there.

I do think there is an inherent risk if not danger in doing ballads: Ballads by their design are often considered corny, right or wrong. When the hair metal dudes in the 80's pulled out the Ovations, strummed an earnest G-C-Em-D chord progression, and got all the fans waving the Bics in the air, no matter how serious or heartfelt the song was, a lot of people's reaction was "F*ckin' hell, sellout...". And it was corny. But it did work for that scene.

Paul McCartney - this man has straddled so many stylistic lines in the past 20 years, from being the all-out rockabilly guy playing the Cavern again with various members of prog-rock bands, to being the arena rock touring workhorse, to being the new Paul with a hot new young band that knows and respects his music new and old, to being the "cutting edge" Paul who worked with various electronica-fueled DJ's, remixers, and hip producers on everything from trance to soundscapes worthy of a Radiohead production (hint, hint)...YET, where did he go on his latest album? He became Paul the sappy (corny?) balladeer delivering love songs to those love-drunk or lovelorn masses of fans that might still swoon over Yesterday and My Love on vinyl.

Did he embrace the sappy, corny balladeer image after running from it for a few decades? Did he do it with a wink and a nod? Or was it just the album he wanted to make?

Would we be able to label Paul "the sappy balladeer" on a future release and have it stick? Likewise, is Brian's music corny?

I think with Brian and the Beach Boys in general, there is a double-edged sword when they're labeled a certain way. They're called hip, you play a record like "Ballad Of Ole Betsy" for someone who you've told about their being hip, and the reaction may be "What?" Or it may be "Damn, that's great!". Then get someone who had their girlfriend dancing on their shoulders at an outdoor BB concert to "Fun Fun Fun" and play them an album cut like "You Still Believe In Me", and they might say "What?" or "Damn, that's great!"

The room is big enough for both, and both can and should be celebrated and enjoyed. However, I do think any "new" Beach Boys album has not in 30+ years nor will it match anything close to what was happening in, say, 1965, and I'm looking at Brian, thinking that this man realizes this and is comfortable with this.

I do feel that, like Paul, he has woven enough styles in and out of his music through the years from bad to truly magnificent and describing this in too broad of a term like corny works for some of his music but may also discredit when he was truly cutting-edge, and considered far from corny or sappy or whatever other adjectives we could use. This may again revert back to the image versus the music thing which will always rage...

This brings up a lot of issues which many of us in a certain age group never experienced. The Beach Boys were *huge* stars in 1964...48 freakin' years ago. Round it off to 50....now go back to when we were 16-17, whatever age when music became one of the most important things in our lives and existence...

Could you imagine getting this excited over an artist from 50 years ago coming out with a new album? In my time that was Duke Ellington, Benny Goodman, Glenn Miller...the big band era from the 30's and 40's. Most of them were not making new albums, and most of them were dead and gone. Now the Beach Boys, McCartney, Stones, etc are that generation time-wise to the teenage audiences today. Talk about cultural shift...Jagger just nailed a hosting gig on SNL, and compare that to the image of the tuxedo-ed older jazz musicians who would come on Ed Sullivan or Hollywood Palace alongside the "kids" playing rock....

That element is as culturally significant to a new Beach Boys album as almost anything I can think of. The fact that a record like Pet Sounds is to teenagers as old as Chick Webb or Bing Crosby was to me, yet is still considered "hip" and worth owning and enjoying is huge. Huge! I love it. :) In that way, the fact a new album is even being discussed across several generations makes it less corny by nature. Even though many of the new grooves on this album may be corny.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 24, 2012, 10:51:11 AM
Craig -- I see exactly what you are saying, but I also believe Jon is accurate as well.  I suspect that the classics of 63-67 have multiple dimensions -- Brian not writing for himself, Brian reacting to what he hears on the radio as opposed to what he loves, maybe Carl and Mike have more influence than we give them credit for (Carl after all was the Chuck Berry nut of the band, and Mike's words spoke most often in these days).  I think there's room to say that Brian had a period where he cared to be "hip" and had the ability to be hip, but that he accomplished this by denying his own voice in his music in some ways.  I think back on the review of the Smile Sessions which said that Smile sounded like a square white boy on acid, and it really does.  If you think about it, that oddness in his music didn't take flower until after acid entered his world; maybe that had an impact too.

I think Jon's more worried about those fans who only came to the Beach Boys because of Pet Sounds and Smile and have no room to consider an album like, say, MIU as something worth listening to.  I think he's saying that it is going to sound more like the latter than the former (and actually, probably more like Imagination if it's going to be "caribbean" and all).  If you are a fan who only likes them because of the "artistic" side of the music, the commerical sheen will be off-putting.  I get that.  You have to be willing to let your love for music that is looked down upon, the Perry Como instead of the Sinatra, to get into the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 24, 2012, 10:54:01 AM
I think Jon's more worried about those fans who only came to the Beach Boys because of Pet Sounds and Smile and have no room to consider an album like, say, MIU as something worth listening to.  I think he's saying that it is going to sound more like the latter than the former (and actually, probably more like Imagination if it's going to be "caribbean" and all).  If you are a fan who only likes them because of the "artistic" side of the music, the commerical sheen will be off-putting.  I get that.  You have to be willing to let your love for music that is looked down upon, the Perry Como instead of the Sinatra, to get into the album.

Exactly.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 24, 2012, 11:06:33 AM
The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.

Yeah, all you stupid losers! He should never have asked your opinion.  ::)

just let the child play.

If you are not going to bother properly capitalizing sentences, you can probably leave the period at the end off, as well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 24, 2012, 11:13:01 AM
It feels like the responses are less about what I actually wrote and more about trying to address things that are already accepted knowledge. Of course this band out of any others has the artistic versus the commercial issue raging constantly no matter what they do or release. I do think listeners and fans usually find what they like or respond to and that gut reaction or connection is more of an issue than any explanations or backstories attached to the music, no matter how good or bad it may be.

To my McCartney reference: Did we go around telling people who liked Sgt. Pepper and the White Album similar things when his latest album of love ballads and songs came out? Maybe we did and I missed it, but I don't think trying to ease a listener into something is as good as just letting the music play, and if someone likes it or connects with it after hearing it, what difference does it make where it came from? Or how the artist has a corny versus hip side, or a rocker versus balladeer side, or a jazzer versus country side, or whatever else. The music really shouldn't have an asterisk next to it, no matter who the artist is.

All this may just play out where McCartney's Ram is now being deluxe re-released akin to The Smile Sessions, and we'll have the ability to see the experimental post-Beatles garage-rocker McCartney in contrast to his other musical incarnations of recent years. Do we place the asterisk on the Ram box set and say "This is the same guy that did Sgt Pepper" or "This is the same guy who did the album of sappy love songs a year ago"?  :)

Artists from the 60's still making music today exist in a much larger (and more inclusive) stylistic tent than even Perry Como, Sinatra, et al. Stylistically the tent is probably as big as it will ever be even for the next few generations of music fans, so the music becomes the ultimate basis for someone's opinion of it.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 24, 2012, 11:31:19 AM
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?

no, digital reverb and digital echo are the digital versions of reverb and echo.

Because only audio effects developed by the mid-60s (or their approximations) are legitimate, of course.

Autotune, in contemporary pop records, is indeed much like reverb in the 60s.

I mean, I could see something like double-tracking being compared, but reverb and echo are still widely used (really rare to find a pop hit without one or the other, or both), so the initial analogy doesn't make sense.

Audible pitch correction sounds worse than singing off-key in my (and many others') opinion.  The thing is they are double-tracking, using reverb and echo (and God knows what else) ... AND overusing pitch correction.  No one is talking about which effects are 'legitimate' ... anything goes in music and production.  But people are entitled to express their opinion when they feel something sounds bad.

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 11:41:48 AM
The only mistake he made was asking for anyone's opinions here.

Yeah, all you stupid losers! He should never have asked your opinion.  ::)

just let the child play.

If you are not going to bother properly capitalizing sentences, you can probably leave the period at the end off, as well.

you're slipping man.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 24, 2012, 11:57:07 AM
Just so this doesn't get lost in the posts, I want to re-emphasize one part of a previous post:

Consider what we are discussing in the context of age and era. Just a few quick ones to consider:

When Brian and the BB's had a #1 with I Get Around, when Beatlemania was in full swing, music that was 50 years old was music of the 1910's...World War One era. Wax cylinder Edison "talking machine" kind of stuff...can anyone name one of the more popular musical artists or songs from, say, 1916? Of course not.

When we were liking Appetite For Destruction or another of the benchmark 80's popular albums, Sgt. Pepper was 20 years old...yet didn't feel all that old. 50 years, though: 1930's big band, swing era, early Delta blues like Robert Johnson before the CD box set made him a rock star, rural Carter Family country...etc. It was a niche audience among record collectors, musicians, and whatnot who were actively into that stuff... but among people aged 13-19? Pretty much a rarity if not totally unheard of among that peer group.

Now in 2012 a new album and tour from a 50 year old group comprised of 70 year old men playing 50 year old songs is getting attention and positive feedback from audiences spanning at least three generations. The music is alive, the band is alive, and fans are coming to the shows and will buy (in lesser numbers) the new album.

Put into the context of my teenage years, and Brian's teenage years, this is mindblowing to consider. Add Beatles, Stones, VU, Doors, etc into the mix and it's still 50 year old music that remains vibrant across three generations of fans - numbering in the millions.

I think the longevity rules the day with a lot of this. Lesser music, lesser artists do not age that well and have not in the past, for specific reasons. If we're actively discussing a forthcoming album by a group of men in their 70's who are performing concerts featuring 50 year old music, that in itself makes an incredible story to tell. The fact that some of the new music is compelling, and some not-so...decorations on the icing on the multi-layered cake.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 24, 2012, 12:22:58 PM

I think Jon's more worried about those fans who only came to the Beach Boys because of Pet Sounds and Smile and have no room to consider an album like, say, MIU as something worth listening to.  


Jeff Manson is right. M.I.U. is a superior listening experience to Pet Sounds and Smile.

1) It doesn't make me all emotional inside like Pet Sounds (unless you count hunger as an emotion...all that talk of croissants in Belles of Paris gets me going

2) It has simple boy/girl/tomboy/Hawaiian/France vacation lyrics that I can comprehend, not that artsy fartsy Van Dyke Parks crap.

Some of us are red-blooded Americans who like football and women. We like songs that make us feel good and that we can tap our foot to all the way through. Try doing that with "Do You Like Worms". I sprained my ankle one time trying to keep up with it.

If Jon Hunt says the album is good he's probably right. He tells me to jump, I say "how high?" He tells me to tape dynamite to my chest and run into a Ke$ha concert, I'm gonna do that too. He's my Randall Flagg, except he's gonna win and Mother Abigail and her pack of loons are going to self-destruct before they make it to Boulder. Hallelujah! Holy sh*t!





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 24, 2012, 12:29:38 PM
what the hell did i just read.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 24, 2012, 12:31:54 PM

If you are not going to bother properly capitalizing sentences, you can probably leave the period at the end off, as well.


You are one unserviceable son-of-a-bitch.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 12:38:00 PM
I can't say I'm terribly concerned with the opinion on this album of folks who see little merit in this band (or Brian Wilson solo project, as they like to think of them) aside from Pet Sounds, which was kind of a fluke and Brian was just ripping off the Beatles anyway and then he went insane and stayed in bed for 30 years while Mike Love (aka Satan) released "Kokomo".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 24, 2012, 12:40:15 PM
I can't say I'm terribly concerned with the opinion on this album of folks who see little merit in this band (or Brian Wilson solo project, as they like to think of them) aside from Pet Sounds, which was kind of a fluke and Brian was just ripping off the Beatles anyway and then he went insane and stayed in bed for 30 years while Mike Love (aka Satan) released "Kokomo".

This is the most awesome summary of none of the reviews thus far posted!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 12:41:41 PM
I can't say I'm terribly concerned with the opinion on this album of folks who see little merit in this band (or Brian Wilson solo project, as they like to think of them) aside from Pet Sounds, which was kind of a fluke and Brian was just ripping off the Beatles anyway and then he went insane and stayed in bed for 30 years while Mike Love (aka Satan) released "Kokomo".

This is the most awesome summary of none of the reviews thus far posted!

'twasn't a review summary :( you don't understand me AT ALL!!!! :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 24, 2012, 12:59:30 PM
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?

no, digital reverb and digital echo are the digital versions of reverb and echo.

Because only audio effects developed by the mid-60s (or their approximations) are legitimate, of course.

Autotune, in contemporary pop records, is indeed much like reverb in the 60s.

I mean, I could see something like double-tracking being compared, but reverb and echo are still widely used (really rare to find a pop hit without one or the other, or both), so the initial analogy doesn't make sense.

Audible pitch correction sounds worse than singing off-key in my (and many others') opinion.  The thing is they are double-tracking, using reverb and echo (and God knows what else) ... AND overusing pitch correction.  No one is talking about which effects are 'legitimate' ... anything goes in music and production.  But people are entitled to express their opinion when they feel something sounds bad.

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Yeah i guess the problem again lies with expectations, both ours as listeners and of the band themselves. Thing is, if there is one thing the whole world can agree upon is that the Beach Boys are kings of harmony. Maybe even Gods. Their super tight fearless vocal blend is their weapon of mass destruction. It was damn near close to perfect in the days of 4 track recording, then it became a wonder to behold with the advent of multi tracking turning their 4 or 5 parts into a massive mulitlayered wall of vocal splendour.

Problem is now, they can't get anywhere close to that without a little help. There are 2 options -1) spend hour after hour trying to get a good part down, then repeat many times for the different layers, or 2) get a bit of technological help. Problem with option 1 is that they are now 70 year men whose voices (maybe with the exception of Al and Bruce) are completely shot, and the stamina required to stand up to vocal mike for hour after hour is somewhat lacking. As much as they would probably want to sing in perfect harmony on their own, they simply cannot anymore. Nothing to be ashamed of.

However that doesn't stop us as listeners expecting the same old perfection. So they need a bit of help. They use pitch correction, they use auto tune, and maybe just maybe a lot of this effect has to be applied to get suitable results. It does sound a bit weird and we all now know that they haven't got the vocal chops they once did, but it gives us a listenable record without killing anyone. A win win situation if ever there was one, ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 01:01:52 PM

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Trufax ^_^ People will look back at autotune and laugh or cringe, just as they do with the booming synth drums of the 80s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 01:11:16 PM
Using autotune as an effect; is this the digital version of reverb and echo in world of today's music making?

no, digital reverb and digital echo are the digital versions of reverb and echo.

Because only audio effects developed by the mid-60s (or their approximations) are legitimate, of course.

Autotune, in contemporary pop records, is indeed much like reverb in the 60s.

I mean, I could see something like double-tracking being compared, but reverb and echo are still widely used (really rare to find a pop hit without one or the other, or both), so the initial analogy doesn't make sense.

Audible pitch correction sounds worse than singing off-key in my (and many others') opinion.  The thing is they are double-tracking, using reverb and echo (and God knows what else) ... AND overusing pitch correction.  No one is talking about which effects are 'legitimate' ... anything goes in music and production.  But people are entitled to express their opinion when they feel something sounds bad.

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Yeah i guess the problem again lies with expectations, both ours as listeners and of the band themselves. Thing is, if there is one thing the whole world can agree upon is that the Beach Boys are kings of harmony. Maybe even Gods. Their super tight fearless vocal blend is their weapon of mass destruction. It was damn near close to perfect in the days of 4 track recording, then it became a wonder to behold with the advent of multi tracking turning their 4 or 5 parts into a massive mulitlayered wall of vocal splendour.

Problem is now, they can't get anywhere close to that without a little help. There are 2 options -1) spend hour after hour trying to get a good part down, then repeat many times for the different layers, or 2) get a bit of technological help. Problem with option 1 is that they are now 70 year men whose voices (maybe with the exception of Al and Bruce) are completely shot, and the stamina required to stand up to vocal mike for hour after hour is somewhat lacking. As much as they would probably want to sing in perfect harmony on their own, they simply cannot anymore. Nothing to be ashamed of.

However that doesn't stop us as listeners expecting the same old perfection. So they need a bit of help. They use pitch correction, they use auto tune, and maybe just maybe a lot of this effect has to be applied to get suitable results. It does sound a bit weird and we all now know that they haven't got the vocal chops they once did, but it gives us a listenable record without killing anyone. A win win situation if ever there was one, ;D

When I saw them live, I heard the huge, "wall of sound" vocals that the Beach Boys are known for. That was because they had help, and it wasn't autotune/pitch correction.
They could have had Darian, Scott et. all help fill out the harmonies on the record.
We'd all be bitching still probably, but it might have sounded more natural.
Of course, would you rather have voices on the record that aren't the BBs, or would you rather have the vocals pitch corrected and autotuned within an inch of their life?
Valid discussion I think - but it's moot - the album is already made and we got the latter.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 24, 2012, 01:12:42 PM

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Trufax ^_^ People will look back at autotune and laugh or cringe, just as they do with the booming synth drums of the 80s.

Or as people do with backwards guitar solos, or slapback echo, or rythmn king drum machines, or phasing.........


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 24, 2012, 03:22:20 PM

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Trufax ^_^ People will look back at autotune and laugh or cringe, just as they do with the booming synth drums of the 80s.

Or as people do with backwards guitar solos, or slapback echo, or rythmn king drum machines, or phasing.........

The fact of the matter is the standards for record production that were developed in the '60s hold up better over time because they are generally natural and tasteful due to the limitations of the technology.

Necessity is the mother of invention, and when you are required to get creative, the results are ... more creative-sounding. and more exciting to listen to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 24, 2012, 03:23:56 PM
Valid discussion I think - but it's moot - the album is already made and we got the latter.

for the record, I've been talking about a future record ... the next one, not this one.

If Brian and the group came up with a ragged album that was a cross between Love You, Friends, and Summer Days (i.e. the Paley Sessions), would Capitol reject it? They'd have an automatic press angle ('Beach Boys baffle listeners with critically acclaimed 50th Anniversary follow up') and more sales from people who actually buy new music (i.e., younger people).

I'm just saying I BELIEVE I BELIEVE I BELIEVE Brian and the Beach Boys have one more GREAT album -- on par with their best stuff -- in them. And TWGMTR is not it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 24, 2012, 03:32:08 PM
It feels like the responses are less about what I actually wrote and more about trying to address things that are already accepted knowledge. Of course this band out of any others has the artistic versus the commercial issue raging constantly no matter what they do or release. I do think listeners and fans usually find what they like or respond to and that gut reaction or connection is more of an issue than any explanations or backstories attached to the music, no matter how good or bad it may be.

To my McCartney reference: Did we go around telling people who liked Sgt. Pepper and the White Album similar things when his latest album of love ballads and songs came out? Maybe we did and I missed it, but I don't think trying to ease a listener into something is as good as just letting the music play, and if someone likes it or connects with it after hearing it, what difference does it make where it came from? Or how the artist has a corny versus hip side, or a rocker versus balladeer side, or a jazzer versus country side, or whatever else. The music really shouldn't have an asterisk next to it, no matter who the artist is.

All this may just play out where McCartney's Ram is now being deluxe re-released akin to The Smile Sessions, and we'll have the ability to see the experimental post-Beatles garage-rocker McCartney in contrast to his other musical incarnations of recent years. Do we place the asterisk on the Ram box set and say "This is the same guy that did Sgt Pepper" or "This is the same guy who did the album of sappy love songs a year ago"?  :)

Artists from the 60's still making music today exist in a much larger (and more inclusive) stylistic tent than even Perry Como, Sinatra, et al. Stylistically the tent is probably as big as it will ever be even for the next few generations of music fans, so the music becomes the ultimate basis for someone's opinion of it.



Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?  And that those fans think that Sgt. Pepper is overrated and slag on all of McCartney's work on it?  And that even in 1968 there were nervous voices about much of McCartney's work on the White Album, to the point of his own bandmates questioning McCartney's taste?  You better believe there has been second-guessing the coolness factor of some Beatles music and most of McCartney's solo career as a purveyor of lightweight uncool music.  You are actually more making our case by using him as an example.  When I'm 64 is about as "hip" as an old-time pop song pre-rock era, if you want to get into "hipness", and stuff like Obla-di-Obla-da was getting slagged at the time of release (heck, George even slipped in a derogatory comment on the same fricking album!).

So to return to your point, in 1978 I guarantee you that fans were making apologies for how wussy London Town sounded to them and were trying to ease their friends into listening to it. It's not wussy or bad, not to an open-minded listener anyway (I really like it), but to a fan of rock in the purist sense, songs like I'm Carrying were cringeworthy.  People have been apologizing for new McCartney albums for years because of how uncool they are.  Jon could have been reviewing London Town or Pipes of Peace for all we know, so much of his points can apply towards McCartney.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 24, 2012, 04:12:04 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 04:23:47 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 24, 2012, 04:27:32 PM
I think that article answers all the uncertainties I've been having about exactly how this all came about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 04:29:12 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.

Fascinating. It's pretty clear that the full suite was never the same thing as this album, though. Wouldn't it be crazy if Brian actually finishes it and releases it as a solo album, though?

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on May 24, 2012, 04:31:32 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Interesting article, thanks.  That answers alot of the questions we have been wondering about...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 24, 2012, 04:38:10 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.

i'm confused.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 24, 2012, 04:44:46 PM
And "Summer's Gone" was supposed to be the career-ender. Wow. My mind is definitely in a different place now, concerning Brian's role in the album. This really truly is Brian dominating an album his way for the first time since Love You. I'm excited for it. And I really get the vibe now that this isn't even close to the end for The Beach Boys. I get the vibe that Brian feels right being part of this band again, and that in his heart, he wants to write for his, Mike, Al, and Bruce's voices.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 04:45:13 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.

i'm confused.

Whole suite = incomplete.

1st half of suite = incomplete, not on album.
2nd half of suite = Strange World, From There To Back Again, Pacific Coast Highway, Summer's Gone (on the new album) + I'd Go Anywhere (meant to go after Strange World, before FTTBA, but incomplete, therefore not on the album)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 04:47:36 PM
"Hey guys. I know you're working on new material, but let's release a very unfinished work in fragmented form because the Beach Boys can't release an album after the beginning of summer. That's absurd. Fun in the sun, guys. Fun. In. The. Sun."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 24, 2012, 04:49:31 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.

i'm confused.

I think there was supposed to be basically an album length suite, but it wasn't finished. So then they figured they'd do the "Strange World", "I'd Go Anywhere", "From There to Back Again", "Pacific Coast Highway", and "Summer's Gone" thing, but then apparently "I'd Go Anywhere" wasn't finished, so they took that out and released the rest.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 04:50:13 PM
"Hey guys. I know you're working on new material, but let's release an unfinished work because the Beach Boys can't release an album after the beginning of summer. That's absurd. Fun in the sun, guys. Fun. In. The. Sun."

I don't get that impression at all. I think the suite was probably intended to be a BW solo project, and as the group was integrated into the work, the decision was made to use part of it for the end of the record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 24, 2012, 04:51:33 PM
"Hey guys. I know you're working on new material, but let's release a very unfinished work in fragmented form because the Beach Boys can't release an album after the beginning of summer. That's absurd. Fun in the sun, guys. Fun. In. The. Sun."

Eh, maybe.It's still a pretty solid album. I think it's more of the fact they want to release it while the tour is in full swing, as opposed to winding down. Striking while the iron is hot. There'll be another album after this  Ibet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 04:52:37 PM
"Hey guys. I know you're working on new material, but let's release a very unfinished work in fragmented form because the Beach Boys can't release an album after the beginning of summer. That's absurd. Fun in the sun, guys. Fun. In. The. Sun."

Eh, maybe.It's still a pretty solid album. I think it's more of the fact they want to release it while the tour is in full swing, as opposed to winding down. Striking while the iron is hot. There'll be another album after this  Ibet.

Then hold the suite shtuff off until the next album when it's, y'know, finished.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 04:54:50 PM
Also, I wonder if Capitol decided that a full album suite from The Beach Boys wouldn't give them enough sales.

(and yeah, I know they released SMiLE last year, but that was being sold to a different market. The SMiLE Sessions isn't and wasn't being sold in Wal Mart. This is).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 04:56:41 PM
Also, I wonder if Capitol decided that a full album suite from The Beach Boys wouldn't give them enough sales.

(and yeah, I know they released SMiLE last year, but that was being sold to a different market. The SMiLE Sessions isn't and wasn't being sold in Wal Mart. This is).

i'm not gonna blame capitol if the songs were incomplete.  Would you rather capitol have forced brian to finish it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 04:57:36 PM
No, not at all. I don't care either way, honestly, it was just a thought.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 04:58:55 PM
It doesn't even have to take up the entire album, it just feels goofy to very prematurely release something incomplete and fragmented that are meant to be part of a bigger whole on an album, later finishing it and re-releasing some of the same songs in their correct context. These guys have a vast unreleased catalog as well as five songwriters, which isn't even including Joe Thomas, etc. Just doesn't make much sense to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 24, 2012, 05:02:41 PM
Pretty interesting article here

http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/ (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/)

Thanks for posting that. For all of you wondering about the suite, your answer is there. The first half of the intended full suite is incomplete. Most of the second half is on the new album, sans a track called "I'd Go Anywhere", which is incomplete too.

i'm confused.

Whole suite = incomplete.

1st half of suite = incomplete, not on album.
2nd half of suite = Strange World, From There To Back Again, Pacific Coast Highway, Summer's Gone (on the new album) + I'd Go Anywhere (meant to go after Strange World, before FTTBA, but incomplete, therefore not on the album)

i'm a bit less confused (but still), thanks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 05:03:22 PM
The article never said they were re-releasing the part of the suite that will be on this album.
I'd assume this part of the suite is considered 'done', and whatever is being worked on that gets completed will be a part of another album.
I guess by necessity, that would make them two different suites!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 05:08:59 PM
The article never said they were re-releasing the part of the suite that will be on this album.

We we get to put it together ourselves. grrr8 ^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 24, 2012, 05:12:51 PM
but i thought this was the last album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 24, 2012, 05:13:28 PM
Wow! Thanks, Slim Shady for posting that article. Very informative and positive.

A lot of fun, fun, fun and good vibrations coming from the Beach Boys (sorry, lost my head again). But, seriously...first, good friend Al Jardine goes on Charlie Rose and says that he would like to continue touring after the reunion tour, and now Cousin Brian leaves the door open for another Beach Boys' recording.

AND THE NEW ALBUM ISN'T EVEN OUT YET!  AS Bob Dylan (Happy Birthday, Bob!) says, "It's all good..."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 24, 2012, 05:15:54 PM
It doesn't even have to take up the entire album, it just feels goofy to very prematurely release something incomplete and fragmented that are meant to be part of a bigger whole on an album, later finishing it and re-releasing some of the same songs in their correct context. These guys have a vast unreleased catalog as well as five songwriters, which isn't even including Joe Thomas, etc. Just doesn't make much sense to me.

See but I think Brian and the band decided on this. I don't think these songs were like ripped from the suite against Brian's will, and are now being released. Apparently the stuff that's on the record works, and so it goes. I'd surmise that if the remaining material is any good, it will see release, either under the banner of The Beach Boys or Brian Wilson, solo artist. So I'm not too worried about this. Keep in mind we are also getting some new material on the greatest hits set. Maybe those songs are being held onto for that. Plus there's the upcoming box set, so maybe there will be stuff from these recent sessions on that too. And on top of that, I'm also feeling pretty confident from what I've read that the group is going to release another album with all new, unreleased songs after That's Why God Made the Radio, so I figure the guys will give us the best work they have.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 05:21:44 PM
It doesn't even have to take up the entire album, it just feels goofy to very prematurely release something incomplete and fragmented that are meant to be part of a bigger whole on an album, later finishing it and re-releasing some of the same songs in their correct context. These guys have a vast unreleased catalog as well as five songwriters, which isn't even including Joe Thomas, etc. Just doesn't make much sense to me.

See but I think Brian and the band decided on this. I don't think these songs were like ripped from the suite against Brian's will, and are now being released. Apparently the stuff that's on the record works, and so it goes. I'd surmise that if the remaining material is any good, it will see release, either under the banner of The Beach Boys or Brian Wilson, solo artist. So I'm not too worried about this. Keep in mind we are also getting some new material on the greatest hits set. Maybe those songs are being held onto for that. Plus there's the upcoming box set, so maybe there will be stuff from these recent sessions on that too. And on top of that, I'm also feeling pretty confident from what I've read that the group is going to release another album with all new, unreleased songs after That's Why God Made the Radio, so I figure the guys will give us the best work they have.

I doubt they were ripped from the suite, but still. I'm sure it was a matter of them just asking Brian if they could use parts of it (as to ensure a summer release date) and him agreeing, but that doesn't mean it was necessarily a good decision. One would hope these guys learned their lesson from the cherry-picking of the late 60s, but naw.

I'm not torn up about it, honestly, it just seems like a very strange move. Like, finish your work, and then release it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 24, 2012, 05:49:04 PM
As much as i'd love a new album long suite, I think 5 songs, all INCREDIBLE songs, is enough :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 05:52:36 PM
It sounds as though Brian had prepared a lot of material for a Beach Boys album, though. The title track, Shelter, Bill and Sue, his collabs with Mike -- and none of that was intended for the suite. I suspect they just picked the best, finished songs from a larger batch.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 24, 2012, 06:02:21 PM
So, 'Spring Vacation' was originally called "Lay Down Your Burden", and was the song that Carl was originally supposed to sing. Interesting...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 06:04:39 PM
So, 'Spring Vacation' was originally called "Lay Down Your Burden", and was the song that Carl was originally supposed to sing. Interesting...

The whole article has a ton of interesting info related to the new album, as well as a few spots that were kind of touching, including the part you just mentioned. Really great read.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 24, 2012, 06:13:51 PM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 06:17:44 PM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\

No, he said the song came from Joe Thomas. Not the title. A slight distinction, I grant you, but a distinction nonetheless.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 24, 2012, 06:21:21 PM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\

Mike: who wrote this song? (Soul Searchin')
Brian: Andy Paley

Seems like on certain occasions Brian will credit / blame someone else for the totality of the job.

We get fragmented information and insist on bulding our own complete portrayals of reality based on it. Let us not hurry into building theories. We might have to change them when the next article appears.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 06:23:28 PM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\

No, he said the song came from Joe Thomas. Not the title. A slight distinction, I grant you, but a distinction nonetheless.

Wait, what? I thought it was the opposite - Joe Thomas came up with the title, not the song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 06:26:59 PM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\

No, he said the song came from Joe Thomas. Not the title. A slight distinction, I grant you, but a distinction nonetheless.

Wait, what? I thought it was the opposite - Joe Thomas came up with the title, not the song.

Wilson had dreamed up the title at dinner one night in Chicago in the late '90s after attending a White Sox game with Thomas, Survivor rocker Jim Peterik and recording engineer Larry Millas. After the meal, the foursome raced over to Peterik's home studio and, with Wilson pounding out a little boogie-woogie rhythm on the piano, they laid down a rough demo.

Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/#ixzz1vqB8WEQt
- vcstar.com


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 06:29:29 PM
Hrm, it indeed conflicts with Brian saying a few days ago that Joe Thomas came up with the title first.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 24, 2012, 06:38:18 PM
Back cover looks very nice :D

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51V5x7XosHL._AA300_.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 06:38:52 PM
i kinda put more into what Joe says on this than Brian.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 24, 2012, 06:39:49 PM
BTW: the suite is almost 13 minutes, more then enough :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 24, 2012, 06:39:52 PM
Plus, those quotes come from a Brian "email interview", and I doubt Bri has ever responded to an email.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 24, 2012, 06:43:12 PM
The world we know as The Beach Boys can drive a person crazy!!!!

I thought - and, please, correct me if I'm wrong - that there was a previous thread, what a couple of months ago (the Mafia thread), which indicated that the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" was composed (maybe copyrighted?) by Thomas, Peterik, and  Millas - no Brian Wilson on the credit. Wasn't there also speculation as to how Brian was to be credited on the new recording, which he eventually was. On top of that, a week ago Brian credits Thomas, which, has been stated, can't be taken as total fact.

Now, Joe Thomas states that Brian was in on the song from the very beginning. Maybe old Joe learned a valuable lesson from his previous dealings with Brian. :police:


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 24, 2012, 06:43:55 PM
Plus, those quotes come from a Brian "email interview", and I doubt Bri has ever responded to an email.

Speaking of, I wonder if in '97 Brian sent "Spring Vacation" to Carl via e-mail. Interesting thought.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 06:46:47 PM
The world we know as The Beach Boys can drive a person crazy!!!!

I thought - and, please, correct me if I'm wrong - that there was a previous thread, what a couple of months ago (the Mafia thread), which indicated that the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" was composed (maybe copyrighted?) by Thomas, Peterik, and  Millas - no Brian Wilson on the credit. Wasn't there also speculation as to how Brian was to be credited on the new recording, which he eventually was. On top of that, a week ago Brian credits Thomas, which, has been stated, can't be taken as total fact.

Now, Joe Thomas states that Brian was in on the song from the very beginning. Maybe old Joe learned a valuable lesson from his previous dealings with Brian. :police:

I don't think it was ever copyrighted. I checked the BMI databases. The song was mentioned on some threads in another forum as having been written by Peterik and Thomas (or Peterik, Thomas and Millas) for the Beach Boys. It was speculated on this board by myself and others that perhaps Brian had come up with the title and the rest of the guys then wrote the song (this has happened a few other times in recent years). But then we actually heard the tune, and it also seems clear that however it originated, Brian clearly had a major role in how the chorus turned out.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 24, 2012, 06:48:04 PM
What would be so crazy about the fact that Brian uses internet -at least for mails- ?!

I read the rest of the interview, thought it ended when i saw the picture gallery, teehee!
but yeah, quite awesome stuff dawg! interesting that Brian finally decided it won't be the final BB album, maybe tthat explains why it took so long to reveal the album title..

So maybe his "rock'n'roll album" will end up being a BB album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 06:49:28 PM
The world we know as The Beach Boys can drive a person crazy!!!!

I thought - and, please, correct me if I'm wrong - that there was a previous thread, what a couple of months ago (the Mafia thread), which indicated that the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" was composed (maybe copyrighted?) by Thomas, Peterik, and  Millas - no Brian Wilson on the credit. Wasn't there also speculation as to how Brian was to be credited on the new recording, which he eventually was. On top of that, a week ago Brian credits Thomas, which, has been stated, can't be taken as total fact.

Now, Joe Thomas states that Brian was in on the song from the very beginning. Maybe old Joe learned a valuable lesson from his previous dealings with Brian. :police:

I don't think it was ever copyrighted. I checked the BMI databases. The song was mentioned on some threads in another forum as having been written by Peterik and Thomas (or Peterik, Thomas and Millas) for the Beach Boys. It was speculated on this board by myself and others that perhaps Brian had come up with the title and the rest of the guys then wrote the song (this has happened a few other times in recent years). But then we actually heard the tune, and it also seems clear that however it originated, Brian clearly had a major role in how the chorus turned out.

this is what i'm going with.  similar to "summer's gone"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 24, 2012, 06:56:55 PM
The world we know as The Beach Boys can drive a person crazy!!!!

I thought - and, please, correct me if I'm wrong - that there was a previous thread, what a couple of months ago (the Mafia thread), which indicated that the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" was composed (maybe copyrighted?) by Thomas, Peterik, and  Millas - no Brian Wilson on the credit. Wasn't there also speculation as to how Brian was to be credited on the new recording, which he eventually was. On top of that, a week ago Brian credits Thomas, which, has been stated, can't be taken as total fact.

Now, Joe Thomas states that Brian was in on the song from the very beginning. Maybe old Joe learned a valuable lesson from his previous dealings with Brian. :police:

I don't think it was ever copyrighted. I checked the BMI databases. The song was mentioned on some threads in another forum as having been written by Peterik and Thomas (or Peterik, Thomas and Millas) for the Beach Boys. It was speculated on this board by myself and others that perhaps Brian had come up with the title and the rest of the guys then wrote the song (this has happened a few other times in recent years). But then we actually heard the tune, and it also seems clear that however it originated, Brian clearly had a major role in how the chorus turned out.

this is what i'm going with.  similar to "summer's gone"

I might, too.

But, you have to admit, we really didn't see Brian's name linked with the song early on (I know, I know, you can't believe everything you read), and, Brian did appear pretty convincing with his direct "Joe Thomas" response (I know, I know, you ABSOLUTELY can't believe everything Brian says).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 07:00:26 PM
Well, Summer's Gone is interesting, isn't it? Brian has a verse, and a concept -- the last song on the last Beach Boys album -- and it's almost as if he forces Bon Jovi to finish it for him.  :-D

Overall, though, I have to say the article goes beyond my expectations in many ways. Brian wasn't just working on this album for most of 2011. He was tinkering with it for the last two or three years. And he wasn't just using old songs -- he was reworking fragments into new compositions. He hoped to make a last Beach Boys album, and worked to get Mike on board.

It's amazing, really. While Brian might not have the endurance he did several decades ago, he really seems to have been a force behind this album, both in conception and execution. Amazing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 24, 2012, 07:01:20 PM
The world we know as The Beach Boys can drive a person crazy!!!!

I thought - and, please, correct me if I'm wrong - that there was a previous thread, what a couple of months ago (the Mafia thread), which indicated that the song "That's Why God Made The Radio" was composed (maybe copyrighted?) by Thomas, Peterik, and  Millas - no Brian Wilson on the credit. Wasn't there also speculation as to how Brian was to be credited on the new recording, which he eventually was. On top of that, a week ago Brian credits Thomas, which, has been stated, can't be taken as total fact.

Now, Joe Thomas states that Brian was in on the song from the very beginning. Maybe old Joe learned a valuable lesson from his previous dealings with Brian. :police:

I don't think it was ever copyrighted. I checked the BMI databases. The song was mentioned on some threads in another forum as having been written by Peterik and Thomas (or Peterik, Thomas and Millas) for the Beach Boys. It was speculated on this board by myself and others that perhaps Brian had come up with the title and the rest of the guys then wrote the song (this has happened a few other times in recent years). But then we actually heard the tune, and it also seems clear that however it originated, Brian clearly had a major role in how the chorus turned out.

this is what i'm going with.  similar to "summer's gone"

I might, too.

But, you have to admit, we really didn't see Brian's name linked with the song early on (I know, I know, you can't believe everything you read), and, Brian did appear pretty convincing with his direct "Joe Thomas" response (I know, I know, you ABSOLUTELY can't believe everything Brian says).

He also said in a separate interview (at the Record Room) that he and Joe started it in 1998 and finished it up "four or five months ago."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 24, 2012, 07:05:52 PM
it's also very nice to hear Joe say Brian  had a great time recording with the group again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 07:08:55 PM
Plus, those quotes come from a Brian "email interview", and I doubt Bri has ever responded to an email.

Speaking of, I wonder if in '97 Brian sent "Spring Vacation" to Carl via e-mail. Interesting thought.

He did. It was a MIDI file and it took a long time to send. Carl had his speakers up super loud listening to an old Beach Boys CD. Between you and I, seltaeb, Crl shat himself mightily once the thing started playing.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 24, 2012, 07:18:40 PM
Plus, those quotes come from a Brian "email interview", and I doubt Bri has ever responded to an email.

Speaking of, I wonder if in '97 Brian sent "Spring Vacation" to Carl via e-mail. Interesting thought.

He did. It was a MIDI file and it took a long time to send. Carl had his speakers up super loud listening to an old Beach Boys CD. Between you and I, seltaeb, Crl shat himself mightily once the thing started playing.

Woooord doood.

Serious tho, mp3's were invented in '95. It's not completely far-fetched, is it? Maybe it is, lol.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 24, 2012, 07:30:08 PM
Plus, those quotes come from a Brian "email interview", and I doubt Bri has ever responded to an email.

Speaking of, I wonder if in '97 Brian sent "Spring Vacation" to Carl via e-mail. Interesting thought.

He did. It was a MIDI file and it took a long time to send. Carl had his speakers up super loud listening to an old Beach Boys CD. Between you and I, seltaeb, Crl shat himself mightily once the thing started playing.

Woooord doood.

Serious tho, mp3's were invented in '95. It's not completely far-fetched, is it? Maybe it is, lol.

It was invented in '95 but only became common later. I just wanted to make jokes about MIDI, really.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 24, 2012, 09:04:44 PM
Oh really? That's good to hear. I thought this thread suggested otherwise a few days ago.

This thread suggested lots of things, many of which have turned out not to be the case.

Remember when everyone was convinced that "That's Why God Made The Radio" was a post-Imagination-solo-album leftover, a second-rate knock-off written by Joe Thomas and his cronies with only a token Brian credit?  Well, turns out Brian started it, and it was written by Wilson, Thomas, Peterik, and Millas all in the same room together (http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/24/the-beach-boys-are-making-radio-waves/) -- with Brian at the piano.  And that Brian had it earmarked for the Beach Boys from the moment he wrote it, and only shelved it after Carl died.

Nobody knows nothin'.

That article also contains a great quote from Thomas about a potential next album:  "All I know is the choice will be 100 percent Brian's."  Guess he didn't get the memo about Brian being everyone's puppet...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 24, 2012, 09:12:49 PM
Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?

"...You know.  Morons."
      -- Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles"

You're at least two reappraisals of Macca's hipness behind, I'd say.  I think the last of the cognoscenti gave up on the Paul-can't-rock bit somewhere between Glastonbury and "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight"...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 24, 2012, 09:16:04 PM
it just feels goofy to very prematurely release something incomplete and fragmented that are meant to be part of a bigger whole on an album, later finishing it and re-releasing some of the same songs in their correct context.

Think of it as an homage to "Smiley Smile".

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 24, 2012, 09:27:11 PM
Think of it as an homage to "Smiley Smile".

...In fact, the more I think about it, the more perfect that seems.  After solo tours, a finished Smile, acclaimed solo projects like TLOS and Gershwin, a tremendous 50th-anniversary tour, and a new career-capping album, what's left for Brian to give us as an encore?

A new fragmentary unfinished maybe-masterpiece for all us die-hards to speculate over.

Merry Christmas, everybody,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Quzi on May 25, 2012, 12:03:39 AM
It's quite sad that these stellar suite songs have been divorced from their original context. I honestly think they would've likely only sounded better in the company of an album which is thematically linked. If the powers that be really wanted to have an album out to capitalise (capitolise?  :lol) on this wave of 50th Anniversary hype they would have been better off using what songs they aren't part of the suite like TWGMTR, Shelter etc. and worked on finding something else out of their still adequately sized unreleased catalogue/some rock n' roll tunes to pad it out a bit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 25, 2012, 12:07:13 AM
Very interesting interview, if Joe Thomas's version of events is to be believed.

Just listening to the iTunes samples again, and I don't hear much Bruce. Maybe he's on the bits that aren't on the previews.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 25, 2012, 03:44:42 AM
So, I think my guesses that some stuff was specifically written for the Beach Boys in the 90s weren't that far off.

Great article btw. Sounds like a very creative feeling. That's cool.

And now we know who's to blame for the shorts  :lol

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/574589_t607.JPG)
Ojai photographer Guy Webster spent six hours in February with The Beach Boys at a beach house in Malibu's Latigo Canyon. Pictured are Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks. "We rented the house for the day and had the white piano delivered," Webster said. "They brought tons of clothes, so I helped art direct. Bruce was wearing shorts and I told him, 'Look, you've got good legs ... leave the shorts on. That's very Beach Boy. Let the other guys wear long pants."



(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/436626_t607.JPG)
Ojai photographer Guy Webster, who's known The Beach Boys since the early 1960s, took this shot in February at a beach house in Malibu's Latigo Canyon. "We all ate together, talked, hung out. Even Brian was up for it," Webster said. "Everything was great. I couldn't believe it, because these are guys who really haven't hung out together for many years. We joked around a lot. Everybody was smiling and happy." Pictured are Bruce Johnston (from left), Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine and David Marks.



(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/367360_t607.JPG)
Original Beach Boys members Brian Wilson (from left), David Marks, Mike Love and Al Jardine perform May 8 at the Beacon Theater in New York. "We give each other little looks and glances on stage," Jardine says. "It's a little transfer of energy that keeps us going. … You need a mess of help to stand alone, to quote one of our songs."


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/90032_t607.JPG)
The 1962 Beach Boys lineup featured Dennis Wilson (from left), David Marks, Carl Wilson, Mike Love and Brian Wilson. Fifty years later, Marks, Love and Brian Wilson are back on tour together. Not pictured is Al Jardine, who had left the group briefly to go back to school. Jardine returned in '63 around the same time Marks left.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/40281_t607.JPG)
The Beach Boys (Al Jardine, from left, David Marks, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and Bruce Johnston) are photographed by longtime pal Guy Webster of Ojai. "They trust me," says Webster, whose iconic shots of the band from 1966-67 are featured prominently in 2011's "SMiLE" boxed set. "I've been taking photos of them for 40 years, you know?"


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/10786_t607.JPG)
The cover for The Beach Boys new album was designed by Los Angeles-based art director Lawrence Azerrad, best known for his work with Wilco. He spent three months on the project, came up with about 15 different design concepts, and created more than 80 covers before the band picked this jewel-toned wave design.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 25, 2012, 03:58:03 AM

And as some folks here suspected, That's Why God Made the Radio originated as a BW saying. Of course.

It depends on who you believe. A few nights ago on Charlie Rose it was Brian who said it originated from Joe Thomas.  :-\

No, he said the song came from Joe Thomas. Not the title. A slight distinction, I grant you, but a distinction nonetheless.

Wait, what? I thought it was the opposite - Joe Thomas came up with the title, not the song.


That's right. Mike and Rose talked about the title and Brian said it came from Joe. Not the song, but the title


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 25, 2012, 04:13:54 AM
Just read in that vcstar.com article that Mike's a vegetarian. Got to love that man! ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 25, 2012, 04:34:07 AM
Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?

"...You know.  Morons."
      -- Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles"

You're at least two reappraisals of Macca's hipness behind, I'd say.  I think the last of the cognoscenti gave up on the Paul-can't-rock bit somewhere between Glastonbury and "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight"...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

Context, please, context.  The point was that Craig was saying that no one would question McCartney as cornball, or apologize for a current release by the one who did Sgt. Pepper.  First off, the latter is not as sacred as he seems to think.  Second off, apologies happened a lot for his work.  What the current opinion is doesn't matter to my argument -- though I don't think McCartney is as rehabilitated as you do.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 25, 2012, 08:40:43 AM

This idea that, "well, that's just the effect of the day" is a cop-out.  The Beach Boys have always been forward-thinking and innovative with their recordings.  Auto-tune is already totally out of date as an effect.

Trufax ^_^ People will look back at autotune and laugh or cringe, just as they do with the booming synth drums of the 80s.

Or as people do with backwards guitar solos, or slapback echo, or rythmn king drum machines, or phasing.........

The fact of the matter is the standards for record production that were developed in the '60s hold up better over time because they are generally natural and tasteful due to the limitations of the technology.

Necessity is the mother of invention, and when you are required to get creative, the results are ... more creative-sounding. and more exciting to listen to.

Keep in mind there were those folks criticizing Frank Sinatra when he started releasing albums on Reprise after leaving Capitol because of Bill Putnam's audio "gimmicks" like reverb and compression/limiting. Now we consider most anything that came from Putnam and UA back in the 60's not only legendary but also essential when recording certain sounds and styles, or recording in general. "Peg O' My Heart" was considered almost a novelty but got the reputation for being the first hit record to use that kind of reverb...which anyone can dial in and replicate today with a 50 dollar device. Ubiquitous.

Add to the list guitar effects...and there are multiple offenders here. The wah-wah pedal, the Digitech Whammy pitch-shifter pedal, onward to the modern trend of "boutique" pedal builders trying to make a better Tube Screamer than the original Tube Screamers and charging 300+ for the results...it comes down to the creativity of the person using it to create music.

These things like AutoTune are tools, and could even be considered gimmicks as they tagged Putnam's now-legendary creations when they were still considered new. It's not as much a case of critiquing their use but should be a case of critiquing how they're used. Ultimately the tool does nothing on its own - and if the song sucks and isn't compelling to begin with, it will most likely suck after being processed through whatever tools are used.

That Cher song that put AutoTune and its overuse on the map: yes it was a gimmick and a catchy as hell sonic hook on that vocal, but it was also a good song and a good production. So it became a hit and people liked it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 25, 2012, 09:04:30 AM
Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?

"...You know.  Morons."
      -- Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles"

You're at least two reappraisals of Macca's hipness behind, I'd say.  I think the last of the cognoscenti gave up on the Paul-can't-rock bit somewhere between Glastonbury and "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight"...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

Context, please, context.  The point was that Craig was saying that no one would question McCartney as cornball, or apologize for a current release by the one who did Sgt. Pepper.  First off, the latter is not as sacred as he seems to think.  Second off, apologies happened a lot for his work.  What the current opinion is doesn't matter to my argument -- though I don't think McCartney is as rehabilitated as you do.

Time out. First, that was not my point. Please reread my posts and replies, they're pretty clear on their intent and the opinions being expressed.

Second, please refrain from making a point for me publicly and to another poster using something I never said or even suggested, especially if and when that wasn't my point to begin with.

If I need to clarify something I wrote or make a specific point, I'll do it myself, and if there is a misunderstanding of those words please ask and I'll try to clarify.

But I don't need or care to see someone else *assuming or claiming to assume* what I was saying then stating it as fact, especially when they missed the point(s) and misrepresented what was written three or four pages ago. The original posts and sentiments are still there to be read for the sake of accuracy.

Thank you.  :)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 25, 2012, 09:14:49 AM
I simply cannot wait for this album.  A week and a half to go....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on May 25, 2012, 09:35:00 AM

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


Looks like times are still pretty hard in the Beach Boys camp. We got Mike and Dave sharing the same shirt here. Anybody got a little small change for these poor guys?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 25, 2012, 09:36:28 AM
lolololol, nice catch. I'm gonna guess the reason behind this is they likely have stylists. Or maybe Mike and David just enjoy swapping clothes. ^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 25, 2012, 09:38:03 AM
There was a thread before this which had a picture of Brian in that shirt too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 25, 2012, 09:44:37 AM
Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?

"...You know.  Morons."
      -- Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles"

You're at least two reappraisals of Macca's hipness behind, I'd say.  I think the last of the cognoscenti gave up on the Paul-can't-rock bit somewhere between Glastonbury and "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight"...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

Context, please, context.  The point was that Craig was saying that no one would question McCartney as cornball, or apologize for a current release by the one who did Sgt. Pepper.  First off, the latter is not as sacred as he seems to think.  Second off, apologies happened a lot for his work.  What the current opinion is doesn't matter to my argument -- though I don't think McCartney is as rehabilitated as you do.

Time out. First, that was not my point. Please reread my posts and replies, they're pretty clear on their intent and the opinions being expressed.

Second, please refrain from making a point for me publicly and to another poster using something I never said or even suggested, especially if and when that wasn't my point to begin with.

If I need to clarify something I wrote or make a specific point, I'll do it myself, and if there is a misunderstanding of those words please ask and I'll try to clarify.

But I don't need or care to see someone else *assuming or claiming to assume* what I was saying then stating it as fact, especially when they missed the point(s) and misrepresented what was written three or four pages ago. The original posts and sentiments are still there to be read for the sake of accuracy.

Thank you.  :)



Obviously they aren't as clear as you think that they are, because that is exactly how I was taking your words.  It sounded to me like all the world like you were using McCartney as an example of how people should not criticize Brian Wilson as being uphip, because no one ever criticized Paul for that or worried about that since he made Sgt. Pepper or the White Album.  If that wasn't your point, I don't understand what you were trying to say at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 25, 2012, 09:56:19 AM

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


Looks like times are still pretty hard in the Beach Boys camp. We got Mike and Dave sharing the same shirt here. Anybody got a little small change for these poor guys?  ;D
They so Po' they have to share shirts,,look what downloading their music illegally has done to them..They are Ghetto now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 25, 2012, 10:05:20 AM
I think Bruce wears A LOT of Mike's shirt too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 25, 2012, 10:14:27 AM
Craig, you are aware that McCartney is usually the least cool of the Beatles to like, and there's a whole slew of fans who think McCartney is now and always was pap?

"...You know.  Morons."
      -- Gene Wilder, "Blazing Saddles"

You're at least two reappraisals of Macca's hipness behind, I'd say.  I think the last of the cognoscenti gave up on the Paul-can't-rock bit somewhere between Glastonbury and "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight"...

Cheers,
Jon Blum

Context, please, context.  The point was that Craig was saying that no one would question McCartney as cornball, or apologize for a current release by the one who did Sgt. Pepper.  First off, the latter is not as sacred as he seems to think.  Second off, apologies happened a lot for his work.  What the current opinion is doesn't matter to my argument -- though I don't think McCartney is as rehabilitated as you do.

Time out. First, that was not my point. Please reread my posts and replies, they're pretty clear on their intent and the opinions being expressed.

Second, please refrain from making a point for me publicly and to another poster using something I never said or even suggested, especially if and when that wasn't my point to begin with.

If I need to clarify something I wrote or make a specific point, I'll do it myself, and if there is a misunderstanding of those words please ask and I'll try to clarify.

But I don't need or care to see someone else *assuming or claiming to assume* what I was saying then stating it as fact, especially when they missed the point(s) and misrepresented what was written three or four pages ago. The original posts and sentiments are still there to be read for the sake of accuracy.

Thank you.  :)



Obviously they aren't as clear as you think that they are, because that is exactly how I was taking your words.  It sounded to me like all the world like you were using McCartney as an example of how people should not criticize Brian Wilson as being uphip, because no one ever criticized Paul for that or worried about that since he made Sgt. Pepper or the White Album.  If that wasn't your point, I don't understand what you were trying to say at all.


Two words to sum it up: No asterisks. That's it. If I'm being too obtuse on that point, I'm tempted to say reread my posts from a few pages ago before going around telling others what I said or what I meant. Because in the words of Cosmo Kramer, "You're waaaayyyy off." And you shouldn't put thoughts or words in other peoples' mouths anyway, let them clarify or restate or explain or whatever in their own words. Less misunderstandings and hard feelings, right?

Again, just don't put words in my mouth or assume things if you really don't know or are unable to understand something. I'd appreciate that. And if more clarification is needed, I'm happy to provide it.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on May 25, 2012, 10:39:45 AM
I'm replaying the iTunes samples over and over today. This album is SOOOO good. I seriously can't believe. Beaches in Mind and Strange World make me teary eyed (glad this board is anonymous - I'd never admit that to any human I know!!!). Almost every song is just too good (private life probably the weakest of the bunch... maybe shelter too....)

After reading that FANTASTIC article at vcstar.com, I keep thinking about how much of a gift this is to all us Beach Boys fans. And now, confirmed by the vcstar.com article, it's crystal clear that Brian was a DRIVING FORCE behind this project and is loving it. All you Brianista Mike Love-hating naysayers can go suck it!!  ;D I mean, the idea that for some time now he's been thinking about the LAST song on the LAST Beach Boy's record, "Summer's Gone", is just amazing and extremely touching. Being the wuss that I am, it kinda makes me teary eyed as well. 

I cannot wait for this album to come out. I CANNOT WAIT FOR THIS ALBUM TO COME OUT!!!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 25, 2012, 10:55:34 AM
So my question is this -- what are you talking about?  Jon's review had nothing to do with asterisks, so what is your point?  Jon was saying that music snobs who like the BB because of Pet Sounds can't be bothered more than likely with something that sounds like MIU or BB85.  A large part of the problem is that Brian is at heart a square and corny guy who makes square and corny music, and someone listening to the new album looking for Pet Sounds 2012 is going to hate it.  Where in there do you see asterisks?  Your point that Brian made "hip" music from 63-66 is noted, but at heart I am not sure he was making music for himself during those years, but rather music as competition.  No one is saying that the album is "lesser" than any other album (if anything the review makes me hopeful that I agree with Mr. Doe who says this is the best BB album not counting Love You since Holland).  We are just saying that some music fans don't just listen to the music and react to how they feel about it but add baggage in terms of their ideology, and the problem is particularly acute for Brian's music.  To prove that, play someone "Johnny Carson" and see what happens.  You say that we don't explain away McCartney's music like that and reference the most recent album.  To which I say, heck yes they did, look at London Town.  Help me understand what you are trying to say.  I am honestly trying to understand you, but if you brush me off with a two word reply to my request for clarification, you lead me to believe that you don't care whether I get what you are saying or not.  You say I am putting words in your mouth, but you aren't showing me from your words where I am doing this.  I am reacting to things like this:  

"Did we go around telling people who liked Sgt. Pepper and the White Album similar things when his latest album of love ballads and songs came out? Maybe we did and I missed it"

And I am saying people did go around and say that when albums like London Town came out.

"Did he embrace the sappy, corny balladeer image after running from it for a few decades? Did he do it with a wink and a nod? Or was it just the album he wanted to make?"

He's been seen as the sappy, corny balladeer for decades.  Why do you think that Silly Love Songs was written?  What about the reviews for Red Rose Speedway when it came out?  To me the latest album isn't a case of McCartney embracing something he ran from as much as just taking it to the logical conclusion.

"I think with Brian and the Beach Boys in general, there is a double-edged sword when they're labeled a certain way. They're called hip, you play a record like "Ballad Of Ole Betsy" for someone who you've told about their being hip, and the reaction may be "What?" Or it may be "Damn, that's great!". Then get someone who had their girlfriend dancing on their shoulders at an outdoor BB concert to "Fun Fun Fun" and play them an album cut like "You Still Believe In Me", and they might say "What?" or "Damn, that's great!""

I think everyone agrees with that -- but Jon was addressing a specific audience, with a specific mindset.  You are trying to generalize, I think.  And while that's fine, that doesn't remove the need for Jon's point.  There is a group of people who only like the artsy music that the BB put out, that think that an album like Keeping the Summer Alive is pretty worthless crap because of what it stands for.  Jon is saying that if you approach the music like that, you will hate the new album.  And you probably hate a lot of Brian's music because so much of it is corny.  After Pet Sounds, think about what he did -- Smiley Smile, "Busy Doin' Nothin", "I Went to Sleep", Love You, "Shortnin' Bread", the list goes on.  And let's face it -- with its references to exotica, tiki, Americana, Smile itself is full of "square" elements too.  The square elements may be seen as "hip" by someone in how they are crafted, but still the parts come from Brian's love of things like the Four Freshman.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on May 25, 2012, 11:03:41 AM
I think Bruce wears A LOT of Mike's shirt too.

Somehow I suspect none of the others wear Al's shirts. Although now the image of Brian barely able to move his arms because he's wearing a shirt 12 sizes too small for him has become the highlight of my afternoon...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Old Rake on May 25, 2012, 12:23:53 PM
Basically, I agree with everything Jeff Mason says so eloquently above.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 25, 2012, 12:29:42 PM
There was a thread before this which had a picture of Brian in that shirt too.


It was the thread for Beach Boys day in....forgot which town.
There's also a picture of Al with that shirt.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 25, 2012, 01:10:41 PM

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


Looks like times are still pretty hard in the Beach Boys camp. We got Mike and Dave sharing the same shirt here. Anybody got a little small change for these poor guys?  ;D

(http://o5.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/resize/600x450/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/d9d79694b1f06f680ed1644660467d19)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 25, 2012, 01:22:39 PM

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


Looks like times are still pretty hard in the Beach Boys camp. We got Mike and Dave sharing the same shirt here. Anybody got a little small change for these poor guys?  ;D

(http://o5.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/resize/600x450/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/d9d79694b1f06f680ed1644660467d19)



(http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Beach+Boys+50th+Anniversary+Concert+Tour+Tucson+jHfuRGLWOUDl.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 25, 2012, 01:28:14 PM
Another entry into the vast "The Beach Boys oddities" catalogue. Great.  ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 25, 2012, 01:28:34 PM
Let's start a poll and find out who people think wears the shirt better.

Make sure there is a "none of the above" option.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: PhilSpectre on May 25, 2012, 01:41:14 PM

(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/685930_t607.JPG)
Brian Wilson (from left), Mike Love (front) and David Marks perform May 8 at the Beacon Theatre in New York. "I love the way it sounds when all of the original guys sing," Wilson says.


(http://media.vcstar.com/media/img/photos/2012/05/23/505687_t607.JPG)
Bruce Johnston (from left), Al Jardine, Brian Wilson, Mike Love and David Marks pose for a photo on Feb. 8. "He needs us," Jardine says of Wilson, who hasn't performed with the band since 1996. "I feel he's really happy where is right now — with us. We give him strength, and he gives us strength when we're together."


Looks like times are still pretty hard in the Beach Boys camp. We got Mike and Dave sharing the same shirt here. Anybody got a little small change for these poor guys?  ;D

(http://o5.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/resize/600x450/http://hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/d9d79694b1f06f680ed1644660467d19)



(http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Beach+Boys+50th+Anniversary+Concert+Tour+Tucson+jHfuRGLWOUDl.jpg)

Now this just getting damn spooky. What is it with this particular model of red and green paisley patterned shirt? There must be some hidden message(s) the band are sending out to us through their current shirt atire. Is it a mark of their new found unity, harmony and group togetherness? And if so, why haven't we seen Bruce wearing one? Have we uncovered a subtle new inter-band conspiracy against Bruce?? I note that Al is sporting a short sleeved version of the shirt, while the others are all wearing long-sleeved. Is he sitting on the fence by not going the whole hog with the long sleeved model??

Or is this a modern equivalent of the stripy shirts they used to wear in the early '60s? We fans deserve to know!!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on May 25, 2012, 01:41:45 PM
Let's start a poll and find out who people think wears the shirt better.

Make sure there is a "none of the above" option.


Let's start a Shirts that hurt thread!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 25, 2012, 01:59:14 PM
Now this just getting damn spooky. What is it with this particular model of red and green paisley patterned shirt? There must be some hidden message(s) the band are sending out to us through their current shirt atire. Is it a mark of their new found unity, harmony and group togetherness? And if so, why haven't we seen Bruce wearing one? Have we uncovered a subtle new inter-band conspiracy against Bruce?? I note that Al is sporting a short sleeved version of the shirt, while the others are all wearing long-sleeved. Is he sitting on the fence by not going the whole hog with the long sleeved model??

Or is this a modern equivalent of the stripy shirts they used to wear in the early '60s? We fans deserve to know!!  ;D

Play the a cappella part of TWGMTR backwards....you'll get your answer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: endofposts on May 25, 2012, 03:16:15 PM
Paisley seems like a Brian Wilson thing.  I'm pretty sure he was wearing a paisley shirt at a book-signing in San Francisco in the early '90s (along with acid-washed jeans, which were the height of fashion back then).  He also wore a lot of those types of patterns during the "Smile" era. Perhaps their costume designer chose a paisley print  in honor of the "Smile" boxed set.  Though he/she could have chosen one more tasteful and less hideous.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on May 25, 2012, 03:18:10 PM
The shirts are most likely a BBs in-joke. It fits the guys' sense of humour to a tee (pun intended).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 25, 2012, 03:38:26 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 25, 2012, 03:50:52 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's
has the f--ing thing leaked yet?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 25, 2012, 04:15:11 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's
has the f--ing thing leaked yet?

From the sound of it, no.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 25, 2012, 04:33:27 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's

Yeah, I really think that, as somebody else said recently, he just sounds like an older Brian Wilson, instead of a Brian Wilson who ruined his voice and stopped singing properly. So basically he sounds like he should sound. Which is awesome.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 25, 2012, 05:19:16 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's
has the f--ing thing leaked yet?

Nope, trust me I've been checking..



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 25, 2012, 05:31:29 PM
I've gotta say, Brian's Vocal on "Summer's Gone", from the preview, may be his best since the 70's
has the f--ing thing leaked yet?

Nope, trust me I've been checking..


Same haha...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 25, 2012, 08:03:38 PM
What a fantastic article posted yesterday.  Very informative concernig the album we are getting, while leaving bits of information that leave me wanting more.

I've now visions of a project where "Wilson's plan was to title the new album Summer's Gone," (a title I was fond of upon first seeing the potential track listing for TWGMTR) "and end the record — the final Beach Boys record — with that ("Summer's Gone") track."  This apparently was the plan before "Wilson had a change of heart."  The article explains "Everybody was getting along so well and the creativeness started flowing again that he (Brian) shelved the idea of this being the last song on the last Beach Boys record," Thomas said. "He was having too good of a time."  I'm really happy to hear this, because I think it's something the 'Boys all deserve, and speaking selfishly, I hope to hear more quality Beach Boys LPs.

Still there's still this lingering notion of an eleven-song suite which explores the theme of Brian "looking at life as an older adult."

I mean, my goodness.  Goosebumps.

It's the kind of theme that my most beloved, John Lennon, was just really beginning to explore more deeply in his own work, before he was cheated out of years and we were robbed of the music.

I hope the band keep making music together for as long as they are happy to do so, but the idea of naming the final Beach Boys album Summer's Gone with the title track serving as the final bow is just such a wondrous thought (reminds me, naturally, of the Beatles' final album released under a moniker which evokes the theme of their studio work, finishing off with "The End").  The absolute icing would've been an album's-length suite of compositions.

I'd love to one day hear the six numbers that constitute the "first half," along with "I'd Go Anywhere."  Things change over time, of course - especially the artists own vision for his work (as I,myself, can attest) - but as long as we're not told that it was just a passing fancy, or "I scrapped it," then maybe (just maybe) Brian will see the whole suite through to completion, released under whichever banner is deemed appropriate, and then we'll have the opportunity to one day piece it all together ourselves.  When it's all said and done, there's a certain charm to that, too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 25, 2012, 09:21:47 PM
i think it's cool that if Brian ever finished the suite with the Boys, then "summer's gone" would still be the last beach boys song on the last beach boys album. :D

but i'm not gonna count on it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 25, 2012, 09:32:36 PM
I gotta say, I still find unlikely that they will do another album. Maybe it's just because I find it totally incredible that there is actually a new Beach Boys album in 2012, but I just don't know if I can see them doing another one on top of that.

As far as I'm concerned, them giving us SMiLE, That's Why God Made the Radio, a few new songs on the upcoming greatest hits album, and a box set is such a great, unexpected gift. So if they do indeed put out a second album, I'll be ecstatic.

However, it's pretty likely they did work on a few other things during the latest sessions. So you probably got "I'd Go Anywhere" from Brian, "Islands in the Sun" and "Waves of Love" from Al, and "She Believes in Love Again" from Bruce, and I'm sure Brian probably has a few other things he still might wanna use. And of course Mike has a backlog of songs he could use. So maybe it's more possible than I suspect.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 26, 2012, 05:37:01 AM
Don't know if this has already been said, but the back cover is on amazon

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B007U1FEJE/ref=dp_otherviews_z_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&img=1 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B007U1FEJE/ref=dp_otherviews_z_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&img=1)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 26, 2012, 06:28:53 AM
Don't know if this has already been said, but the back cover is on amazon

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B007U1FEJE/ref=dp_otherviews_z_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&img=1 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/B007U1FEJE/ref=dp_otherviews_z_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&img=1)
I like it.  :) Bruce is waving, of course.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 26, 2012, 06:37:45 AM
the back is kinda a mess, but whatever, it's just the back cover.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 26, 2012, 07:13:55 AM
I have a VERY strange feeling that we'll hear this later today...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 26, 2012, 07:28:00 AM
Quote
Or is this a modern equivalent of the stripy shirts they used to wear in the early '60s? We fans deserve to know!!  ;D

They're probably made by Gibson.

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 26, 2012, 08:14:57 AM
I'm actually even moer diggin' the back, the colored waves are all over the place, gives it a more 60's vibe than the front! pretty neat boi.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 26, 2012, 08:29:01 AM
MAYBE GUYS MAYBE

they'll release one more album and it'll be a DOUBLE ALBUM and the first album will me the mythical "rock n roll" album and and and and the second album will be the finished "Summer's Gone" suite :D :D :D :D :D :D

._.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GoofyJeff on May 26, 2012, 12:19:26 PM
I have a VERY strange feeling that we'll hear this later today...

I hope so... the wait is killing me, and of course I already have my copies (plural) preordered.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Emdeeh on May 26, 2012, 07:00:01 PM
Re the revolving shirts -- did any of you notice that the paisley shirt Al is wearing is short-sleeved and the one/s Brian, Mike, and Dave are wearing is/are long-sleeved?

The source of the shirts is mentioned in the tour program book: "Wardrobe by Robert Graham."

http://www.robertgraham.us/

Can't afford to buy any of those for my hubby, tho....




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 26, 2012, 07:31:51 PM
MAYBE GUYS MAYBE

they'll release one more album and it'll be a DOUBLE ALBUM and the first album will me the mythical "rock n roll" album and and and and the second album will be the finished "Summer's Gone" suite :D :D :D :D :D :D

._.

I'd probably die with a smile and a woody the moment the record hit my hands, having never heard a single note.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 26, 2012, 08:23:35 PM
After hearing all the parts, "Summer's Gone" is probably the only song i'd say is worthy of ending the Beach Boys Legacy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sie W on May 27, 2012, 12:14:02 AM
http://www.nme.com/news/the-beach-boys/63995

Bruce just wants a dollar....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 27, 2012, 12:25:03 AM
http://www.nme.com/news/the-beach-boys/63995

Bruce just wants a dollar....

lawl, big misinterpretation of what he was saying, not helped by the quote kind of being taken out of context.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 27, 2012, 01:22:18 AM
Jeez, i'm starting to REALLY like Daybreak Over The Ocean Fun In The Sun Surfin' Kokomo Forever, it is a very catchy tune actually, believe or not but i think it could be a good second single (MUCH BETTER than SV as someone mentioned ina  thread), yeah, i just said that, boom.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 27, 2012, 03:59:30 AM
After hearing all the parts, "Summer's Gone" is probably the only song i'd say is worthy of ending the Beach Boys Legacy.

Wait 'til you hear the full "FTTBA".  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on May 27, 2012, 04:41:34 AM
After hearing all the parts, "Summer's Gone" is probably the only song i'd say is worthy of ending the Beach Boys Legacy.

Wait 'til you hear the full "FTTBA".  ;D
Oooooo...AGD, can you elaborate on the key FTTBA things that will blow our minuscule minds?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 27, 2012, 05:28:31 AM
After hearing all the parts, "Summer's Gone" is probably the only song i'd say is worthy of ending the Beach Boys Legacy.

Wait 'til you hear the full "FTTBA".  ;D
Oooooo...AGD, can you elaborate on the key FTTBA things that will blow our minuscule minds?

Sure.

It's very good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on May 27, 2012, 05:35:06 AM
After hearing all the parts, "Summer's Gone" is probably the only song i'd say is worthy of ending the Beach Boys Legacy.

Wait 'til you hear the full "FTTBA".  ;D
Oooooo...AGD, can you elaborate on the key FTTBA things that will blow our minuscule minds?

Sure.

It's very good.
:lol Sold! 9 (or 5 perhaps) days to go!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 10:09:05 AM
So my question is this -- what are you talking about?  Jon's review had nothing to do with asterisks, so what is your point?  Jon was saying that music snobs who like the BB because of Pet Sounds can't be bothered more than likely with something that sounds like MIU or BB85.  A large part of the problem is that Brian is at heart a square and corny guy who makes square and corny music, and someone listening to the new album looking for Pet Sounds 2012 is going to hate it.  Where in there do you see asterisks?  Your point that Brian made "hip" music from 63-66 is noted, but at heart I am not sure he was making music for himself during those years, but rather music as competition.  No one is saying that the album is "lesser" than any other album (if anything the review makes me hopeful that I agree with Mr. Doe who says this is the best BB album not counting Love You since Holland).  We are just saying that some music fans don't just listen to the music and react to how they feel about it but add baggage in terms of their ideology, and the problem is particularly acute for Brian's music.  To prove that, play someone "Johnny Carson" and see what happens.  You say that we don't explain away McCartney's music like that and reference the most recent album.  To which I say, heck yes they did, look at London Town.  Help me understand what you are trying to say.  I am honestly trying to understand you, but if you brush me off with a two word reply to my request for clarification, you lead me to believe that you don't care whether I get what you are saying or not.  You say I am putting words in your mouth, but you aren't showing me from your words where I am doing this.  I am reacting to things like this:  

"Did we go around telling people who liked Sgt. Pepper and the White Album similar things when his latest album of love ballads and songs came out? Maybe we did and I missed it"

And I am saying people did go around and say that when albums like London Town came out.

"Did he embrace the sappy, corny balladeer image after running from it for a few decades? Did he do it with a wink and a nod? Or was it just the album he wanted to make?"

He's been seen as the sappy, corny balladeer for decades.  Why do you think that Silly Love Songs was written?  What about the reviews for Red Rose Speedway when it came out?  To me the latest album isn't a case of McCartney embracing something he ran from as much as just taking it to the logical conclusion.

"I think with Brian and the Beach Boys in general, there is a double-edged sword when they're labeled a certain way. They're called hip, you play a record like "Ballad Of Ole Betsy" for someone who you've told about their being hip, and the reaction may be "What?" Or it may be "Damn, that's great!". Then get someone who had their girlfriend dancing on their shoulders at an outdoor BB concert to "Fun Fun Fun" and play them an album cut like "You Still Believe In Me", and they might say "What?" or "Damn, that's great!""

I think everyone agrees with that -- but Jon was addressing a specific audience, with a specific mindset.  You are trying to generalize, I think.  And while that's fine, that doesn't remove the need for Jon's point.  There is a group of people who only like the artsy music that the BB put out, that think that an album like Keeping the Summer Alive is pretty worthless crap because of what it stands for.  Jon is saying that if you approach the music like that, you will hate the new album.  And you probably hate a lot of Brian's music because so much of it is corny.  After Pet Sounds, think about what he did -- Smiley Smile, "Busy Doin' Nothin", "I Went to Sleep", Love You, "Shortnin' Bread", the list goes on.  And let's face it -- with its references to exotica, tiki, Americana, Smile itself is full of "square" elements too.  The square elements may be seen as "hip" by someone in how they are crafted, but still the parts come from Brian's love of things like the Four Freshman.

Explain "we", did you and Jon Hunt collaborate on that review?

I find it interesting too that after how many years of avoiding this forum, you suddenly re-appear on page 120-something of this thread with guns blazin' over some commentary I made after reading Jon Hunt's review. Where were you for those other years when some really neat things were happening around the Beach Boys and some discussions here could have benefited from your input? It took my reaction to Jon's review to bring you back into the fold? I'm curious.

To the point of the asterisk: I was being conceptual, maybe too much. The two word answer is valid, sorry if you think it was dismissive.

An asterisk as we all know is often used as a disclaimer, as an addendum, as "fine print" after an offer or sale, as a way of adding on to the original point or the original content, especially if there is something that needs to be protected against or some additional meaning or backstory that should be mentioned in the wording but not necessarily as a main focus of the original wording.

In the case of baseball history, the asterisk is mentioned when some scandal or some problem of some kind is associated with the statistic or the history being recorded. Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds set hitting records, but because of the subsequent drug issues that surrounded them and those records specifically, many say there will always be an asterisk next to those records which they hold. In marketing they put the asterisk underneath the banner headline to ensure folks know before entering into the deal exactly what they will be getting - protecting buyer and seller.

What I'm saying is that the Beach Boys in 2012 need no asterisks of any kind next to an upcoming album. The fact that they are back together making solid new music in their 70's with some 50 years of making music already under their belts, is perhaps a bigger point and quite an accomplishment.

I personally don't care how they are perceived, I don't care to know how the hipsters will receive them, I wouldn't care to assume too much about anyone's potential reaction to this album if they're expecting something other than a new Beach Boys album as of 2012. I felt like the review was placing more emphasis than necessary on an asterisk next to the project and attempting to remove those possible, hypothetical responses from some fan looking for "Pet Sounds 2".

I like reviews which describe a personal connection to what that reviewer has just heard, positive or negative. I like much of what Jon has reviewed in the past, and on this particular one I just didn't feel there was that much need to preface the album for fans who are expecting something other than reality or hipsters who want a certain thing based on their likes or dislikes. It's irrelevant to hearing a song like the current TWGMTR single and connecting with it on some level. It either happens or it doesn't.

In 2012 The Beach Boys are what they are - there is so much water which has gone under that bridge over 5 decades of music and drama in this band, and likewise there is just too much back-catalog material out there and readily available where anyone who does not have at least some idea what this band is all about is either naive or a hopeless idealist who thinks everything Brian Wilson touches will be Pet Sounds Mach 3 or whatever.

For that I sarcastically also blame McCartney's question to Brian in that film from '76: "When are you going to give us another Pet Sounds?", Sir Paul leaned in and asked Brian at the party.

Never - That is the easy response because you can never do that again. See the Charlie Rose roundtable interview for Brian's reaction when Al Jardine raised that same topic relating pet Sounds to the new music and it looked like Brian bristled just a bit at the comment. As he should - PS was a personal album based on emotion, at least according to Brian.

The McCartney point: At what point are The Beach Boys considered at that place in their career where a review of their newest music does not have to remind anyone of anything beyond that music which has just been released? McCartney releases what he releases, and it is what it is: His fans will like it probably more than those who are not big into Paul but enjoy The Beatles, or whatever other scenario. McCartney doesn't need any kind of disclaimer along the lines of the cornball term being applied to Brian when he puts out music ranging from ballads to rockabilly to electronica. It's new music from Paul - damn the descriptions, damn the preconceived notions, it is what it is. Add any number of those artists from the 60's to that pool - is it necessary to place anything like an asterisk next to their name or remind potential listeners of their past work when discussing something new they are offering?

Listeners expecting "Pet Sounds 2" with anything Brian has done or will do since 1966 up to the present and beyond are, I hate to say it, lost in many ways in their own fantasy. "Orange Crate Art" was an enjoyable album, but was there not an inherent letdown associated with it no matter the quality when it was more of a "Brian sings songs written by Van Dyke Parks" reality rather than a "1966-67 redux" collaboration between words and music? Then there are the fans who expected "Smile 2" when they saw Wilson and Parks at that piano singing for Don Was, and unfortunately (or fortunately) those fans had no idea what was really happening. Brian's own solo releases over 10 years show just how many sounds and styles of music this man can and will record - everything in between pop and classical, basically. Is it all good? No - but after so many styles have appeared under his name on those albums, those folks expecting his work with the BB's to sound like 1966...I don't know what to say other than if that's what they really expect, they may be in for a rude awakening but at the same time, it is up to them to decide whether to listen or not.

Back to McCartney - people know who he is and what he does after 50+ years making music, and he is a stylistic chameleon, sometimes good and sometimes bad. Is someone worried when he releases a new album that the people who think of him a certain way will not go near it because of their expectations or perceptions from something he did in the past? Or is it simply "The Next New McCartney Album"? I'd vote for the latter.

I think after 50 years of making music, nothing needs to be explained. A new Beach Boys album comes with so much history and cache, I feel the tracks should stand on their own and whatever happened with previous albums or projects is worth noting in the right context, but perhaps not surrounding this album before it comes out. That's just my opinion and reaction. Those folks expecting anything but a new Beach Boys album in 2012 will most likely be disappointed, and if that is the case so be it. I wouldn't spend as much time worrying over what a hipster who may be cautiously pessimistic about the album will do or say when deciding to listen or not. Ultimately they will either like or dislike the album, and ultimately that affects no one but them.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Empire Of Love on May 27, 2012, 10:33:02 AM
Do you think the self-referential nature of this music, and the lyrics, contributes to the existence of this sort of review?  Also, Brian's music has a more distinct and unique sound than The Beatles, in my opion (even if this is due partly to the fact that so much of rock has aped The Beatles for so many years).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 11:06:32 AM
Do you think the self-referential nature of this music, and the lyrics, contributes to the existence of this sort of review?  Also, Brian's music has a more distinct and unique sound than The Beatles, in my opion (even if this is due partly to the fact that so much of rock has aped The Beatles for so many years).

I do think The Beach Boys - and Brian in particular - are judged differently and sometimes held to a higher standard than their peers like The Beatles, Stones, VU, or go down the list of 60's artists whose members are still releasing new music. It may be due to the fact that there are many fans who really connect with something in the music - and by connect I mean a truly deep connection brought out as emotion or as inspiration to make music of a similar type or feeling - on a different level than other artists, or so it would seem with numbers of BB's fans. Of course fans of other artists (Beatles, Elvis, Sinatra, etc) will say the same thing regarding the other artists, so maybe it's not that unique but it feels different in some way.

It's tough to explain because connecting to any artist from afar through their work can be such a unique, individual experience and everyone feels it a different way. Would you say a decent number of Beach Boys fans and fans of Brian's work within and for The Beach Boys in particular connect in a different way than fans of *...fill in the blank...*?

I think that BB-BW dedicated audience will be and will always be the primary source of record sales on anything "new" by this band and its members. BWPS (Smile), Kokomo, and Stamos singing on Full House may very well be the only widely successful non-greatest-hits "new" product to be widely known since the 1970's...is that accurate? If so, it says a lot about this scene, and the fact that most new albums of BB's tunes have not exactly won over new audiences since the 70's. The concerts are more of a universal "Greatest Hits" trip - the album will be what it is, and fans will support it. Ultimately, though, if it is less than stellar along the lines of BB '85 or any of the other miscues, it will not sell nor will it be remembered fondly. Standards are standards after all, no matter who it is.

Putting Brian back in the studio making new music with original members of The Beach Boys - naturally expectations will be as high as possible and anticipation levels will be off the chart. We each have that notion of "that sound" we hope it will be, and that is powerful stuff indeed. Yet, those fans who know and have followed this band for months, years, or decades: Will we be tempted to not buy the new album unless reminded of the past history of hits and misses, innovation versus schlock, heartfelt versus schmaltz, Dr. Landy and "Smart Girls", etc?

That different or even higher set of standards among BB and BW fans is a mixed blessing for the music, I'd say. And that distinct musical sound and nature of the lyrics we know and love because it all was so unique and so personal is a part of it, definitely. I don't know how much convincing needs to be done on people for them to decide to give this album a listen, or how much of the audience is already determined to buy it and like it either way, and after they buy it the album's success depends solely on whether those people outside the BB-BW fan realm determine on their own if it is good or bad. Or just "bleh". ;D 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 27, 2012, 11:30:39 AM
The reason for the reappearance was described well elsewhere by Jon, I think, but I can't remember if it was here or on the Record Room, so to summarize, it was an act of good faith, an attempt to see if anything can be salvaged among relationships once forged.  Jon posted about the discussion on the Record Room, so I got curious and came over to read.  First time I have been here in many months, and posted in many years.  I saw your discussion and I took up Jon's side because I agree with him, and thought it might be interesting to post.  Nothing more.  If you prefer we not post here, I will gladly make this the last post.

As for everything else, your opinion is totally valid, but you must remember that you are not the only potential audience for this album and that there are other types of fans people interact with.  Perhaps Jon actually KNOWS some of the "artsy Pet Sounds" fans, perhaps the web site which accepted his review is full of them.  Point is that right or wrong, there are going to be fans who add baggage to the album.  And another reason why the McCartney analogy doesn't work is that this is the first new Beach Boys album in 20 years, and the first Beach Boys album to have a genuine Brian Wilson production credit (as opposed to a credit given because of contractual reasons) since 1977.  McCartney puts out new albums every year or two, so people are used to what they get from him.  Think about this -- this is the first time since Love You that Brian Wilson has actively produced on a Beach Boys album.  You don't think that some hipsters aren't going to make expectations on that?  You don't think that some expectation leveling for some fans isn't needed?  If you personally can approach the album objectively then fine, but if the new album is closer in style to the post-Love You albums, then I think Jon is right to set expectations for fans who might otherwise attach more to the moment than the album can support.  Jon tells you exactly what type of music to expect and reviews it on that level, while still talking about his personal attachment to the music.  Works for me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 27, 2012, 11:33:45 AM
Everybody needs to get over what happened in the past and just enjoy the BBs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 12:12:10 PM
Everybody needs to get over what happened in the past and just enjoy the BBs.

Some people have wider interests than The Beach Boys. That is why the thing split apart, simple as that. The reason some people who used to be regulars are posting here for a bit, and the Beach Boys section of The Record Room is active at the moment, is that the folks there are momentarily interested in the band again in an active manner. Soon, everyone here will go back to doing what they do, and The Record Room will go back to discussing other things. Simple. It isn't important.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 27, 2012, 12:16:12 PM
Everybody needs to get over what happened in the past and just enjoy the BBs.

h8teerrzz gona h8 ma boiii!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 27, 2012, 12:23:25 PM
EDIT: Oh nevermind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 12:37:33 PM
The reason for the reappearance was described well elsewhere by Jon, I think, but I can't remember if it was here or on the Record Room, so to summarize, it was an act of good faith, an attempt to see if anything can be salvaged among relationships once forged.  Jon posted about the discussion on the Record Room, so I got curious and came over to read.  First time I have been here in many months, and posted in many years.  I saw your discussion and I took up Jon's side because I agree with him, and thought it might be interesting to post.  Nothing more.  If you prefer we not post here, I will gladly make this the last post.

As for everything else, your opinion is totally valid, but you must remember that you are not the only potential audience for this album and that there are other types of fans people interact with.  Perhaps Jon actually KNOWS some of the "artsy Pet Sounds" fans, perhaps the web site which accepted his review is full of them.  Point is that right or wrong, there are going to be fans who add baggage to the album.  And another reason why the McCartney analogy doesn't work is that this is the first new Beach Boys album in 20 years, and the first Beach Boys album to have a genuine Brian Wilson production credit (as opposed to a credit given because of contractual reasons) since 1977.  McCartney puts out new albums every year or two, so people are used to what they get from him.  Think about this -- this is the first time since Love You that Brian Wilson has actively produced on a Beach Boys album.  You don't think that some hipsters aren't going to make expectations on that?  You don't think that some expectation leveling for some fans isn't needed?  If you personally can approach the album objectively then fine, but if the new album is closer in style to the post-Love You albums, then I think Jon is right to set expectations for fans who might otherwise attach more to the moment than the album can support.  Jon tells you exactly what type of music to expect and reviews it on that level, while still talking about his personal attachment to the music.  Works for me.

First, it's not up to me or what I prefer to see anyone do on any board or forum, unless I'm running it. So have a blast, post wherever, it's all good! I just found it curious that after comments made in the past and staying away from this forum for years it was wanting to defend Jon's review against something I said that drew you back in. And it wasn't a warm welcome back, it was with what seemed to be a rush to come out swinging with various points because I disagreed with Jon on an aspect of that review he wrote. The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me.

Perhaps guitarfool2002 or Mumbly Joe 1978 or Random Poster (etc...) actually KNOWS some of those artsy Pet Sounds people as well and has recommended on request other Beach Boys albums to those artsy type folks in the past only to have them come back later and say "It's not what I expected". So what! It makes no difference - opinion is opinion, music either hits you now, hits you later, or doesn't hit you at all and you forget about it.

I think people who *assume* some fans need guidance or anything from anyone before listening to or being able to judge a piece of music are being a bit too high-minded, bordering on self-importance. It's that mindset which all but sank the world of jazz since the 70's, honestly, and an albatross which also hangs around the neck of more than one genre of so-called "serious" music and prevents some people from experiencing some truly incredible songs.  I can (and do) talk endlessly about things I like or music I really enjoy but if the music itself just doesn't connect with the new listener, that becomes the last word on the subject in that moment. Maybe years later they'll re-visit the same music and hear something different. I'd say listening with your own two ears is the first step, and probably the ultimate one to take. I don't think a sales pitch or a disclaimer is necessary as much as someone to just say "here's what I think, there is the album, check it out for yourself, I hope you enjoy it because I sure did...or didn't".

The McCartney point is valid, and made more valid if you put him in the group of his peers, and Brian's peers, who continue to release new music, no matter whose name is listed as producer. Does the fact that Mike Love is credited as Executive Producer mean anything good or bad to the quality of this particular BB's album? If not, should it? If not McCartney, plug in another aging 60's rocker, anyone will do if they're still releasing albums. If Bowie is ever going to release something new, I don't think I'll read a review of that mentioning his cover duet with Mick Jagger in the 80's. Or maybe I will... :-D

It feels like associating this new BB's music - which 98% of those who want to hear it have not been able to in full as of this afternoon - with some questionable or corny elements of previous albums or releases does more to try to lessen the negative impact of what may be perceived as lesser-quality music to some listeners than it would be to forget about hypothetical points or reactions entirely and focus on the grooves, especially the ones that work and hit just the right way or fall short, whatever the case. Again, that is my preference when reading reviews, and in this case as someone who has read some really high-quality, very enjoyable writings and reviews from Jon in the past.

Let me restate an earlier point, that a good review will inspire discussion and debate, and this one did. I would not have read and commented if it were a poorly done review, or if I didn't care what the reviewer had to say. Likewise if some feel any review is beyond reproach, and should not be questioned on specific points, they're missing the whole point of sharing opinions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 12:42:55 PM
The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me. 

Right there, you answered why someone such as Jeff Mason stays away from a board such as this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 27, 2012, 12:48:23 PM
Everybody needs to get over what happened in the past and just enjoy the BBs.

Some people have wider interests than The Beach Boys. That is why the thing split apart, simple as that. The reason some people who used to be regulars are posting here for a bit, and the Beach Boys section of The Record Room is active at the moment, is that the folks there are momentarily interested in the band again in an active manner. Soon, everyone here will go back to doing what they do, and The Record Room will go back to discussing other things. Simple. It isn't important.
I understand that along with the drama with Chuck, I just think the two boards and their members can post on both without drama. The record room is great for non-BB's conversation and this place is great for the BBs conversation with  the record room alums welcome to talk BBs once in while.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 12:57:40 PM
Everybody needs to get over what happened in the past and just enjoy the BBs.

Some people have wider interests than The Beach Boys. That is why the thing split apart, simple as that. The reason some people who used to be regulars are posting here for a bit, and the Beach Boys section of The Record Room is active at the moment, is that the folks there are momentarily interested in the band again in an active manner. Soon, everyone here will go back to doing what they do, and The Record Room will go back to discussing other things. Simple. It isn't important.
I understand that along with the drama with Chuck, I just think the two boards and their members can post on both without drama.

Unfortunately, trr thinks this board is filled with idiots. But that's partially because they all love TRR, it's pretty normal for people to identify with their own website.  I feel like I can switch back and forth between the two and still post my usual dopey shallow comments and not miss a beat.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 27, 2012, 01:06:10 PM
The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me. 

Right there, you answered why someone such as Jeff Mason stays away from a board such as this.

As if there aren't assholes all over the internet and they can be avoided if you're using messageboards etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 01:15:40 PM
The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me. 

Right there, you answered why someone such as Jeff Mason stays away from a board such as this.

I thought it was because of someone named Chuck.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 27, 2012, 01:25:15 PM
Still no leak, not a trace..

For those getting impatient  :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 27, 2012, 01:36:53 PM
The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me. 

Right there, you answered why someone such as Jeff Mason stays away from a board such as this.

I thought it was because of someone named Chuck.



Let's not get this started.  ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 01:48:17 PM
(http://gilagolf.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/charlie.jpg)
"what did i do?"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 27, 2012, 02:06:39 PM
(http://gilagolf.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/charlie.jpg)
"what did i do?"

Aww, nothing Runaways!  Now, :grouphug



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 27, 2012, 02:39:43 PM
The fact that you missed my points by a country mile or ten country miles but took what you misunderstood to be my truth and ran with it anyway in some rush to defend someone else's review was a bit surprising for me to see. But that's me. 

Right there, you answered why someone such as Jeff Mason stays away from a board such as this.

I thought it was because of someone named Chuck.



*Mods feel free to delete this if you feel it is TMI!


That is (kinda) the truth.

Let's just set this out for all to see. I apologize if I get anything wrong.

Jon and John ended The Smile Shop. I'm pretty sure they were gonna maybe bring it back in another form, but I suppose that never happened.

Chuck L. and others were sad to see The Smile Shop forum die, so he basically took it over and renamed it Smiley Smile (thus what we have today).

So naturally, John, Jon, Ian, blah blah blah, were upset cuz they felt Chuck co-opted The Smile Shop. But they still stuck around somewhat.

Then there was the Professor (apparently not the same Van Dyke Parksian "professor" who graces us today. And the professor did some things that would be considered inappropriate to a lady on the board. I will leave her name out. And Chuck apparently took dudes side or something, and then apparently the same chick said Chuck was being inappropriate to her. Was he? Well that's up to you to decide folks.

So that led the quote "final" blowout, and some really decent posters left for TRR. I honestly think those involved wanted any excuse to leave this place anyways, and this definitely gave them room to. But whatever, just my opinion.  But I recall Ian around here because I think he secretly loves the place, despite his protestations.

So along the way, some other decent folks would always have a hearty laugh over at TRR because they think we here at SS are stupid BB obsessed assholes. But whatever. There's still some good convo over there, so I occasionally post there now too. And let's be honest, if anybody is posting at either "the rocking beach boys room" or "smiley smile" and could tell you the name of track 7 on KTSA, chances are they are obsessed. Most of the people on both boards are generally nice people (even you Ian), and we should just all get along.

Any questions??


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 27, 2012, 02:44:22 PM
I'd like to hear more about the "lady" incident


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 27, 2012, 02:46:17 PM
what the hell is going on


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 27, 2012, 02:49:01 PM
Nothing important.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 02:59:21 PM
slim, i'd wager that is not something that needs to be discussed out here. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 27, 2012, 03:01:12 PM
As I said earlier, its all stuff that doesn't involve any of us, so let's get along.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 03:05:57 PM

That is (kinda) the truth.

Let's just set this out for all to see. I apologize if I get anything wrong.

Jon and John ended The Smile Shop. I'm pretty sure they were gonna maybe bring it back in another form, but I suppose that never happened.

Chuck L. and others were sad to see The Smile Shop forum die, so he basically took it over and renamed it Smiley Smile (thus what we have today).

So naturally, John, Jon, Ian, blah blah blah, were upset cuz they felt Chuck co-opted The Smile Shop. But they still stuck around somewhat.

Then there was the Professor (apparently not the same Van Dyke Parksian "professor" who graces us today. And the professor did some things that would be considered inappropriate to a lady on the board. I will leave her name out. And Chuck apparently took dudes side or something, and then apparently the same chick said Chuck was being inappropriate to her. Was he? Well that's up to you to decide folks.

So that led the quote "final" blowout, and some really decent posters left for TRR. I honestly think those involved wanted any excuse to leave this place anyways, and this definitely gave them room to. But whatever, just my opinion.  But I recall Ian around here because I think he secretly loves the place, despite his protestations.

So along the way, some other decent folks would always have a hearty laugh over at TRR because they think we here at SS are stupid BB obsessed assholes. But whatever. There's still some good convo over there, so I occasionally post there now too. And let's be honest, if anybody is posting at either "the rocking beach boys room" or "smiley smile" and could tell you the name of track 7 on KTSA, chances are they are obsessed. Most of the people on both boards are generally nice people (even you Ian), and we should just all get along.

Any questions??



A bit jumbled. The Professor incident (which I, of course, hastened) ended the original BB-centered Smile Shop. The site was closed then for reopening at a later date, with a non-BB centered focus, which it did. In the meantime, Chuck started this place, against the wishes of Jon and John. A lion's share of the major posters stayed away until the Jo(h)ns gave their blessing. Then Smiley and Smile Shop coexisted until the Chuck photoshop/PM reading incident, which hastened a large walkout from this board (hastened by me). Smile Shop ended after a big incident between the proprietors and a certain poster (guess who?). Then the Record Room was started.
But generally, you got it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 03:07:16 PM
 But I recall Ian around here because I think he secretly loves the place, despite his protestations.


How'd you guess?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 27, 2012, 03:08:09 PM
  But I recall Ian around here because I think he secretly loves the place, despite his protestations.


How'd you guess?

Ha.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 27, 2012, 03:10:25 PM
A bit jumbled. The Professor incident (which I, of course, hastened) ended the original BB-centered Smile Shop. The site was closed then for reopening at a later date, with a non-BB centered focus, which it did. In the meantime, Chuck started this place, against the wishes of Jon and John. A lion's share of the major posters stayed away until the Jo(h)ns gave their blessing. Then Smiley and Smile Shop coexisted until the Chuck photoshop/PM reading incident, which hastened a large walkout from this board (hastened by me). Smile Shop ended after a big incident between the proprietors and a certain poster (guess who?). Then the Record Room was started.
But generally, you got it.

I figured I messed it up somewhat. But yeah. There you go. And now I have 3 (?) posts in a row. Pathetic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 03:13:47 PM
ah now i see why the first thing spaceman ever said to me was "noob".  so much i don't know


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 03:25:33 PM
Whatever happened to the guy who used to post "What you talkin' bout Willis?" on one of the old-old Smile boards and had Gary Coleman as his avatar? This was even before there was a private message function and posting your email address was the option. I think he got banned - maybe someone has a list somewhere. My memory is hazy before 2002 because before that I only used work computers and they monitored online use... ;D

Speaking of Chucks, whatever happened to that photo of the Chuck Taylor sneakers with the Smile imagery on them that used to be on one of those older boards? That would be a neat pair of kicks to wear to the BBs concerts, with a paisley shirt of course.




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 27, 2012, 03:29:17 PM
Still no leak, not a trace..

For those getting impatient  :p

If you've listened to everything available through legitimate perfectly legal channels (samples. radio, youtube), then you have already heard about 83% of the album. I don't know how much suspense could be left after that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 03:34:11 PM
Still no leak, not a trace..

For those getting impatient  :p

If you've listened to everything available through legitimate perfectly legal channels (samples. radio, youtube), then you have already heard about 83% of the album. I don't know how much suspense could be left after that.

There is the part I don't understand - why bother with an "official" release date if so much of the music is available for preview, and hundreds of various music journalists from the Podunk Gazette up to Spin magazine have it...where is the suspense?

I still can't wait to go to the store and buy a new Beach Boys album featuring Brian in my lifetime...that will be as awesome as actually buying two "official" Smile releases over the counter. Things once thought impossible.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 03:41:35 PM
so much i don't know

But there is always someone out there who remembers, though...and there are usually two sides to every story, or two stories to every side, or every picture tells a story, etc... :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 27, 2012, 04:12:54 PM
Enough of the 83% BS... You haven't heard an album until you have liner notes at hand and can play it from A to B with no interruptions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 04:29:33 PM
Enough of the 83% BS... You haven't heard an album until you have liner notes at hand and can play it from A to B with no interruptions.

i actually don't like reading lyrics when i listen to an album the first time.  I think it distracts, same with music videos


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on May 27, 2012, 04:30:01 PM
Enough of the 83% BS... You haven't heard an album until you have liner notes at hand and can play it from A to B with no interruptions.

true speak.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 27, 2012, 05:08:09 PM
Enough of the 83% BS... You haven't heard an album until you have liner notes at hand and can play it from A to B with no interruptions.

It's not BS. You've heard 83% of the album. No one here has said "I've heard 83% of the album in clip form, thus I've heard the album," or anything ridiculous like that.

Liner notes, cover artwork etc. also imposes strongly upon your initial impression of the album too. Sometimes it's nicer to let your brain decide what color this song is or what that song makes you think of instead of an artist giving detailed imagery, lyrics, music videos, and sh*t like, "This song is about..." Those things have their place, don't get me wrong, but sometimes it's nice to enjoy those things after the songs have become your own.

No need to fault people for their listening preferences. If they want to listen to clips, cool. If they want to wait (what if you die while waiting? :O ), cool .


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 27, 2012, 05:11:47 PM
There's a very detailed thread in the Sandbox (use search function key word: exodus to find it) that will eliminate any further discussion regarding the "incident".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 27, 2012, 05:24:50 PM
meh, it got boring after spaceman was banned


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 27, 2012, 07:13:31 PM
Enough of the 83% BS... You haven't heard an album until you have liner notes at hand and can play it from A to B with no interruptions.

true speak.

Yeah man, liner notes is totally my fav song, best post SMiLE if you ask me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 27, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
Let me put it this way. There have been lots of times when I knew what I was getting for Christmas well beforehand, but I still eagerly awaited the day when I could wake up early, tear off the Santa Claus gift wrap and start enjoying my presents. That's pretty much  how I feel about the new Beach Boys album. I don't expect a lot of surprises and I feel like I pretty much know what to expect because of what's already out there on the internet. However, I still VERY much look forward to June 5, when I can bask in the glory of holding a new Beach Boys CD in my hands, and to be able to listen in superior sound quality with no rough edits. For those of you with the willpower to have resisted listening to all the preview clips, you will be delighted come Christmas morning.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 09:09:38 PM
meh, it got boring after spaceman was banned

Eh? I was never banned.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 27, 2012, 10:31:55 PM
meh, it got boring after spaceman was banned

Eh? I was never banned.

I'll definitely give every chance to say maybe you have forgotten over time as it was 6-7 years ago, but this statement isn't true.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 27, 2012, 11:56:07 PM
meh, it got boring after spaceman was banned

Eh? I was never banned.

I'll definitely give every chance to say maybe you have forgotten over time as it was 6-7 years ago, but this statement isn't true.

Maybe I was timed out for one or two days, but not banned. I mean, geez, I was a moderator on this board for a while even.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ReggieDunbarJr on May 28, 2012, 12:38:43 AM
Interesting thing in old interview!

Don't know if its been mentioned here before but in 2009, late august, Brian said that the week before he wrote a new song called
"The Private Life of Bill and Sue" !

http://www.bt.se/noje/brian-wilson-i-bt-intervjubr-(1491972).gm



//RDjr


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jeff Mason on May 28, 2012, 05:16:57 AM
meh, it got boring after spaceman was banned

Eh? I was never banned.

I'll definitely give every chance to say maybe you have forgotten over time as it was 6-7 years ago, but this statement isn't true.

Maybe I was timed out for one or two days, but not banned. I mean, geez, I was a moderator on this board for a while even.

Ian, if you go back onto what is left of the board meltdown on this board, Jon makes reference to you getting banned.  Might have only been for a day as a timeout, but that's what they are talking about.  Someone went back and read the accounts and is saying that the part after you were banned is boring.

And for everyone else, I think Ian means that "banning" is more permanent than a day or two.  Like how Sebastian got banned from the Record Room.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 06:12:06 AM
How do I say this without getting in trouble....

(http://www.foodsubs.com/Photos/leeks5.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 06:13:11 AM
EDIT : NVM


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 06:18:26 AM
EDIT: Can't keep these two posts and expect not to get in trouble haha


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 06:22:23 AM
I'll let you know if this is legit...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 28, 2012, 06:26:08 AM
I'll let you know if this is legit...
i don't think it can be looked at as 'legit' from any point of view..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Heartical Don on May 28, 2012, 06:28:11 AM
How do I say this without getting in trouble....

(http://www.foodsubs.com/Photos/leeks5.jpg)

You should get yourself a new amp. For instance, this one:

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-h1KjfPZGLc4/TbnpTeNc5HI/AAAAAAAAByM/gyoomlW1c_8/s1600/leak%2Bdelta%2B70blog3.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 06:48:29 AM
Well, no viruses, correct file sizes.


They're encrypted, and the password isn't opening them....

anyone else know about all this shi*? haha


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: atroxi on May 28, 2012, 07:00:44 AM
Well, no viruses, correct file sizes.


They're encrypted, and the password isn't opening them....

anyone else know about all this shi*? haha

It's a safe bet that 99.9% of passworded torrents are a fake at best, or a virus at worst.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 07:04:17 AM
Scanned with my $200 virus software.

idk, maybe someone else can figure it out :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 28, 2012, 07:04:52 AM
Well, no viruses, correct file sizes.


They're encrypted, and the password isn't opening them....

anyone else know about all this shi*? haha

It's a safe bet that 99.9% of passworded torrents are a fake at best, or a virus at worst.

aye, I believe it's all a scam to get you to fill in a survey so some bugger is 1% closer to getting his free iPad or whatever


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 28, 2012, 07:11:32 AM
took me a while to understand what was going on in this thread. mainly because i thought that veggie was a bokchoy


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 28, 2012, 07:14:34 AM
Doesn't really matter if it leaks now, we'll have it in a week, anyway. But I must say, I'm impressed with them keeping it from leaking until at least a week before the official release. That's rare.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 28, 2012, 07:25:32 AM
Doesn't really matter if it leaks now, we'll have it in a week, anyway. But I must say, I'm impressed with them keeping it from leaking until at least a week before the official release. That's rare.

well once people started getting physical albums last week, you knew it was all over


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 07:31:45 AM
Well considering this leak apparently isn't legit, it hasn't leaked...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on May 28, 2012, 07:36:53 AM
Well, no viruses, correct file sizes.


01. Think About the Days (01:27)............size: 7 MB
[...]
12. Summer's Gone (04:41).....................size: 8 MB

Dead giveaway. How could these be correct file sizes?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 28, 2012, 08:24:28 AM
Lol idk haha... shock I guess :P


More previews http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=8755059
 ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 28, 2012, 09:08:00 AM
Lol idk haha... shock I guess :P


More previews http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=8755059
 ::)

The only thing different I hear is in the last several seconds of the Pacific Coast clip- the violin part. Otherwise this has been heard elsewhere already.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: doinnothin on May 28, 2012, 10:39:35 AM
took me a while to understand what was going on in this thread. mainly because i thought that veggie was a bokchoy

sigged


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 28, 2012, 11:30:22 AM
Doesn't really matter if it leaks now, we'll have it in a week, anyway. But I must say, I'm impressed with them keeping it from leaking until at least a week before the official release. That's rare.

Prior to the Internet (when I was young, in the Stone Age... :D ), nothing leaked... ;)

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 28, 2012, 11:32:03 AM
Doesn't really matter if it leaks now, we'll have it in a week, anyway. But I must say, I'm impressed with them keeping it from leaking until at least a week before the official release. That's rare.

Prior to the Internet (when I was young, in the Stone Age... :D ), nothing leaked... ;)

/B

mmmh, not sure


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: I. Spaceman on May 28, 2012, 11:42:05 AM
There's a very detailed thread in the Sandbox (use search function key word: exodus to find it) that will eliminate any further discussion regarding the "incident".

I just read all those. Holy crap, what a nightmare.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on May 28, 2012, 12:42:30 PM
So far, apart from buying the single, I've managed to steer clear of you tube and amazon clips. Just found out I get next Tuesday off for the Queen's Jubilee. Nice I can spend the whole day listening to the album. God bless you maam!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 28, 2012, 12:59:22 PM
There's a very detailed thread in the Sandbox (use search function key word: exodus to find it) that will eliminate any further discussion regarding the "incident".

I just read all those. Holy crap, what a nightmare.

Yeah that's what I was referring to before when I said "banned", time out is better


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 28, 2012, 06:59:43 PM
So far, apart from buying the single, I've managed to steer clear of you tube and amazon clips. Just found out I get next Tuesday off for the Queen's Jubilee. Nice I can spend the whole day listening to the album. God bless you maam!

Me too.  Unfortunately I have to work during the Queen's Jubilee!  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 28, 2012, 07:01:34 PM
Tweet from huffington post cocktail blogger

Tony Sachs ‏@RetroManNYC
Heard the new Beach Boys album w/ Brian Wilson back in the fold. Aw, guys, you shouldn't have! No, seriously, you shouldn't have. #Ouch


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 28, 2012, 07:10:56 PM
Tweet from huffington post clocktail blogger

Tony Sachs ‏@RetroManNYC
Heard the new Beach Boys album w/ Brian Wilson back in the fold. Aw, guys, you shouldn't have! No, seriously, you shouldn't have. #Ouch

Wow, with cutting edge comedy like that, he's sure to know what would make for good music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 28, 2012, 07:57:10 PM
Tweet from huffington post clocktail blogger

Tony Sachs ‏@RetroManNYC
Heard the new Beach Boys album w/ Brian Wilson back in the fold. Aw, guys, you shouldn't have! No, seriously, you shouldn't have. #Ouch

Wow, with cutting edge comedy like that, he's sure to know what would make for good music.

Hope I don't offend anyone when I say the Huff Post is sort of a joke. No, not because this one guys doesn't like the new album.  Because, literally, it's a joke. Write your own stuff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on May 28, 2012, 08:58:37 PM
Does he write for Jay Leno?

Hey, I get that not everyone will like the album, but what a lame joke.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 28, 2012, 09:55:01 PM
took me a while to understand what was going on in this thread. mainly because i thought that veggie was a bokchoy

...My wife is still laughing from this!

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 29, 2012, 05:33:43 AM
Just listened to the samples on walmart.com and it's cool to hear Al's voice so prominent on the intro of "Daybreak over the ocean". Although I think it was the part that Christian sang before. But Al sounds so great on that and it all makes it sound so Beach Boy-y


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:24:17 AM
Jeez, everyone is like taking out their guns as soon someone is saying something bad or joking about the new Beach Boys! chill guys, chill.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 29, 2012, 08:13:11 AM
Nice how the melody on the Walmart sample of From There To Back Again starts just like I Wanna Pick You Up and Jeffrey Foskett didn't even veto it! ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on May 29, 2012, 08:33:00 AM
Tweet from huffington post clocktail blogger

Tony Sachs ‏@RetroManNYC
Heard the new Beach Boys album w/ Brian Wilson back in the fold. Aw, guys, you shouldn't have! No, seriously, you shouldn't have. #Ouch

Wow, with cutting edge comedy like that, he's sure to know what would make for good music.

Hope I don't offend anyone when I say the Huff Post is sort of a joke. No, not because this one guys doesn't like the new album.  Because, literally, it's a joke. Write your own stuff.

Well, I don't work for them so you're not offending me, but I will say a Pulitzer Prize is not a joke. Many in the writing game would kill to be that much of a joke.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on May 29, 2012, 08:43:18 AM
Getting back to the paisley shirt issue from a few pages ago, and if this hasn't already been mentioned, those wanting to have the look of those shirts without paying $200+ for the "official" Robert Graham paisley shirt can consider this:

(http://ak2.ostkcdn.com/images/products/L13075009.jpg)

Available here (though currently out of stock...):

http://www.overstock.com/Clothing-Shoes/English-Laundry-by-John-Lennon-Mens-Paisley-Woven-Shirt/5255724/product.html (http://www.overstock.com/Clothing-Shoes/English-Laundry-by-John-Lennon-Mens-Paisley-Woven-Shirt/5255724/product.html)

It's a nice shirt! I saw this 1966 photo of Lennon on a musicians' catalog sitting around my house:

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LzOdhh8wa04/Sb5lsdDCuRI/AAAAAAAAAmw/wziRGLI3DTg/s400/Epiphone_Casino_lennon_revolution_gibson_es_335_hollow_body_gibson_firebird_harrison_richards_humbuckers_Bigsby_epiphone_casino_lennon.jpg)

And it reminded me of what people had posted in this thread, and it turned out there is a "John Lennon" paisley shirt on the market which looks like what the Beach Boys have been wearing on the current tour.

From a distance I really can't see much difference between the 30 dollar Lennon shirt and the 225 dollar Graham shirt...they both look like paisley shirts.  :-D



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 29, 2012, 08:44:25 AM
I decided to give a 10 second listen on iTunes to some of the songs to make sure my expectatns werent too high. Oooof beaches in mind, that sounds pretty bad, same with strange world.  Strange world sounds like a 90s Disney song.  I chose the ones I sensed from reviews were poor and now with lowered expectations, I should enjoy the album more  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 29, 2012, 08:45:40 AM
Shirt is out of stock - but it's a nice one!

For those of you with thrift/second hand stores, hit them up. That's where I find my vtg 60s shirts/pants/sweaters etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on May 29, 2012, 08:53:13 AM
Jeez, everyone is like taking out their guns as soon someone is saying something bad or joking about the new Beach Boys! chill guys, chill.

I don't care what he said about the album really. It offended my sensibilities as a joke writer. And I think it's fair to say that I can't really respect a review that is solely a joke that was already old-fashioned before The Beach Boys released their first single.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 29, 2012, 09:04:25 AM
I just listened to the Walmart samples and I beginning to like Isn't It Time the best and Beaches In Mind the least. Starting to get excited for June 5th? Me too.  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: malpakoza on May 29, 2012, 11:30:06 AM
Heck heck out the Santa Barbara show thread for a full first live performance of isnt it time!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 29, 2012, 11:40:48 AM
Heck heck out the Santa Barbara show thread for a full first live performance of isnt it time!

Thanks for the heads up!

I listened to the first half of it and loved it! I'm gonna wait to listen to the entire thing when I get the CD.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 29, 2012, 02:53:24 PM
I just listened to the Walmart samples and I beginning to like Isn't It Time the best and Beaches In Mind the least. Starting to get excited for June 5th? Me too.  :-D


I think the acapella intro to Beaches In Mind is cool


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 29, 2012, 04:19:09 PM
I thought it was amusing that Mike was a little unsure on the release date for the album at last night's show.  Hopefully he'll be on top of it a bit more soon!  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 29, 2012, 04:30:48 PM
I thought it was amusing that Mike was a little unsure on the release date for the album at last night's show.  Hopefully he'll be on top of it a bit more soon!  :lol

I thought it was kind of relieving when I watched the video. Showed to me at least that he wasn't simply thinking of $$$ and selling albums.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on May 29, 2012, 04:32:08 PM
I thought it was amusing that Mike was a little unsure on the release date for the album at last night's show.  Hopefully he'll be on top of it a bit more soon!  :lol
The first Smile show I saw (Glasgow in early March '04), Brian introduced either Desert Drive, City Blues, or some GIOMH song as being off his new record. I forget the exact line, but he said something like "This is going to be on my new album, which is coming out ... actually I don't know when it will come out." Got quite a laugh.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 29, 2012, 04:47:43 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LzOdhh8wa04/Sb5lsdDCuRI/AAAAAAAAAmw/wziRGLI3DTg/s400/Epiphone_Casino_lennon_revolution_gibson_es_335_hollow_body_gibson_firebird_harrison_richards_humbuckers_Bigsby_epiphone_casino_lennon.jpg)

Has a man ever dressed in a more ridiculous manner?

The answer is no.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the captain on May 29, 2012, 04:58:03 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LzOdhh8wa04/Sb5lsdDCuRI/AAAAAAAAAmw/wziRGLI3DTg/s400/Epiphone_Casino_lennon_revolution_gibson_es_335_hollow_body_gibson_firebird_harrison_richards_humbuckers_Bigsby_epiphone_casino_lennon.jpg)

Has a man ever dressed in a more ridiculous manner?

The answer is no.
No?

(https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQv1Wp9TeSzXSlUuFTnBEzJLz_bwwyKbZQnc-7Xve521c942sRT)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 04:59:25 PM
(http://www.cokemachineglow.com/images/7852.jpg)

What's that ? a challenger ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 29, 2012, 05:00:21 PM
I had a tweet from the huffington cocktails blogger.  He said he greed with that review, the beach boys have always been corny, but the best beach boys has also been WEIRD.  new album: not weird.  i think he was referring to jon's/old rake's review


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 05:08:28 PM
Mh, good point i guess.. but then, you know, they're 70 years old guys..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 29, 2012, 05:16:45 PM
He wants wierd? Bill and Sue is pretty wierd.
Think About The Days and the last three tracks harken back to the "creative Brian period" every hipster adores.
Spring Vacation, Beaches In Mind have the good time beach sound covered.
Isn't It Time and Shelter highlight the classic 1965 pop sound from Today! and Summer Days.

Plenty of variety here!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 29, 2012, 05:26:49 PM
Brian writes a song about the concept of "Shelter" -- and that's not weird?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 29, 2012, 05:28:42 PM
(http://www.cokemachineglow.com/images/7852.jpg)

What's that ? a challenger ?
No?

(https://encrypted-tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQv1Wp9TeSzXSlUuFTnBEzJLz_bwwyKbZQnc-7Xve521c942sRT)

No.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 29, 2012, 05:30:23 PM
I had a tweet from the huffington clocktails blogger.  He said he greed with that review, the beach boys have always been corny, but the best beach boys has also been WEIRD.  new album: not weird.  i think he was referring to jon's/old rake's review

Obviously the guy has a very limited/shallow view of the band.  We don't need to get into the corny vs. not corny vs. hipster argument again, but some of the best of the band's material isn't weird at all! Love You and Smiley Smile are weird. Smile to a certain extent.  Today!, Pet Sounds, Surfer Girl, Sunflower, I wouldn't classify those albums as being weird.  I just...I guess I don't get it sometimes.  Why can't things be of quality without being "weird" or "corny" or "hipster" or whatever.  I guess it deals with the schematics of music criticism.  Heck, I've looked at a few colleges that offer music criticism as a class for a music minor! The point being, there's intelligent music criticism, and there's moronic music criticism, and it goes both ways whether it be praising an album or dismissing it.  Saying that, I've really liked both what Jon Hunt have said and guitarfool.  Both have very interesting and intelligent opinions regarding critique.  

I suppose it is inevitable for people to immediately classify an album as corny or hip or sophisticated or weird.  But, why can't an album be all of that? Or none of that? (i.e. Sunflower, At My Window = sort of corny, weird, but brilliant.  Cool Cool Water = hip, etc.) Oh whatever, as is the case with so many of my extended posts, this rant is now over.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 05:54:47 PM
Well i thought he meant weird as of being experimental, looking forward for new obscure different sounds and being adventurous, but i might be wrong..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 29, 2012, 06:09:35 PM
Well i thought he meant weird as of being experimental, looking forward for new obscure different sounds and being adventurous, but i might be wrong..

Right! But at 70, why in the world should the be adventurous? Why can't they be retrospective, and do it in fine format?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: GoodVibrations33 on May 29, 2012, 06:12:05 PM
Some freshly uploaded videos - seems they are part of a playlist: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:14:00 PM
Well i thought he meant weird as of being experimental, looking forward for new obscure different sounds and being adventurous, but i might be wrong..

Right! But at 70, why in the world should the be adventurous? Why can't they be retrospective, and do it in fine format?

True, and i said that like two posts again, but then i just remembered how good That Lucky Old Sun is and that if the band lets Brian take control again, he might do something as good and big as That Lucky Old Sun is, even tho it doesn't mean it's actually weird music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 29, 2012, 06:17:17 PM
Well i thought he meant weird as of being experimental, looking forward for new obscure different sounds and being adventurous, but i might be wrong..

Right! But at 70, why in the world should the be adventurous? Why can't they be retrospective, and do it in fine format?

True, and i said that like two posts again, but then i just remembered how good That Lucky Old Sun is and that if the band lets Brian take control again, he might do something as good and big as That Lucky Old Sun is, even tho it doesn't mean it's actually weird music.

Okay, but what I was commenting on dealt with delegating music as "weird" and putting it in categories.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:18:21 PM
Yeah yeah i get your point and i agree.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 29, 2012, 06:19:08 PM
Shelter = Lahaina Aloha

...Only better


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 29, 2012, 06:23:33 PM
Some freshly uploaded videos - seems they are part of a playlist: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos)

Hilarious. Nice quality clips too!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:27:13 PM
fleoi"uy'iopferz nvm


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 29, 2012, 06:27:35 PM
Some freshly uploaded videos - seems they are part of a playlist: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos)

Hilarious. Nice quality clips too!

heh these are cracking me up.  and i gotta say, the chorus to "shelter" knocks me OOUUUUUUUUT


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:33:24 PM
Yes i really love Shelter, but is that drum roll everywhere before the chorus comes in ? i remember hearin' an amazing clip where it was different, there's the silence and the drum came in a much much cooler way, like tcha boom tcha
that little drum roll kinda kills it for me :/


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:35:53 PM
Hey, at the end Brian presents Fleet Foxes but we don't see anything..
are these the videos for the prenium channel stuff?? mh


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 29, 2012, 06:39:15 PM
finally saw that reunion in harmony clip.  right OHN


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 29, 2012, 06:39:33 PM
Some freshly uploaded videos - seems they are part of a playlist: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/TheBeachBoysVEVO/videos)

Hilarious. Nice quality clips too!

heh these are cracking me up.  and i gotta say, the chorus to "shelter" knocks me OOUUUUUUUUT

During the one for TWGMTR Brian looks as if he's about to fall asleep, then he checks his watch :lol...clearly not too into the promo aspect!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 29, 2012, 06:42:13 PM
Yes i really love Shelter, but is that drum roll everywhere before the chorus comes in ? i remember hearin' an amazing clip where it was different, there's the silence and the drum came in a much much cooler way, like tcha boom tcha
that little drum roll kinda kills it for me :/

Probably a radio thing, remember LGIOK?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:43:44 PM
But, they are videos?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on May 29, 2012, 06:45:32 PM
I can't wait for this album. This really sounds like a solid effort from these guys!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 29, 2012, 06:45:53 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esz6bWPxRoA
Oh so this is from when they went to RS..
lol at trying to hide the vinyls cover (but not Pet Sounds tho) i can still see In Utero (and.. Jimi Hendrix?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 29, 2012, 06:49:46 PM
Yeah good stuff!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 29, 2012, 07:50:04 PM
I wonder what Mike thinks of a band calling themselves Death Cab For Cutie ^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 29, 2012, 07:51:30 PM
I wonder what Mike thinks of a band calling themselves Death Cab For Cutie ^_^

They're the offspring of Car Crazy Cutie...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Gohi on May 29, 2012, 07:59:27 PM
Brian writes a song about the concept of "Shelter" -- and that's not weird?
...no?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 29, 2012, 08:22:15 PM
Brian writes a song about the concept of "Shelter" -- and that's not weird?
...no?

I'm fine without the "weird".  I think that word has a slight negative connotation anyway. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 30, 2012, 12:22:22 AM
Brian writes a song about the concept of "Shelter" -- and that's not weird?

I'm with you.  The one I always point at is "Fun Fun Fun".  We all grew up with it... so it's part of our pop consciousness... but if you think about the sheer brilliance of writing a song called... oh... "Love Love Love" .... or "Happy Happy Happy".... or "Women Women Women".... or "Weed Weed Weed".... or "Money Money Money"....   or "Peace Peace Peace" or whatever else you want to write a song about.... Brian was really thinking outside of the box, EARLY.  


Another one was "Don't Worry Baby"... he wrote it for a girl group so he could fantasize they were singing it to him... then when they wouldn't, he just swapped the point of view around!  "When She Says...." and then sings what he'd have her sing to him.  completely brilliant, but long forgotten because we've all heard it since we were children. 

... and I know Brian didn't write all those lyrics, but still the concept likely originated with him, like "Saturday Morning in the City", and "That's why God Made the Radio", or "Rio Grande", or whatever else weird he's done. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 30, 2012, 12:29:14 AM
I thought it was amusing that Mike was a little unsure on the release date for the album at last night's show.  Hopefully he'll be on top of it a bit more soon!  :lol

I thought it was kind of relieving when I watched the video. Showed to me at least that he wasn't simply thinking of $$$ and selling albums.

Once they get something like this rolling, it's on cruise control.  Mike has people wake him up and tell him what he's doing that day....   He doesn't have to worry about the money, he has people taking care of that for him :) 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 30, 2012, 12:31:29 AM
(http://www.cokemachineglow.com/images/7852.jpg)

What's that ? a challenger ?

I cannot believe that Mike, who portrays himself as this macho asshole "I'll kick your ass" persona... .has such a flamboyant wardrobe not so many years ago.  I love it, believe me, I do, I wish he'd pull out that sh*t now... but it's just SO STRANGE that the two Mikes are the same. 

BTW, has anybody ever tried to get an 8X10 of a picture like that autographed by Mike, and saw his reaction to it?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: atroxi on May 30, 2012, 07:34:48 AM
5 track album sampler up @ The Guardian's website, for those who want to partake:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

...and by sampler, I mean five complete tracks.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 07:54:02 AM
ugh god no..WHY GUARDIAN WHYYYYYY


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on May 30, 2012, 07:58:19 AM
As predicted, From There to Back Again is full of - unpredictable - changes. Very, very good tune. Isn't It Time definitely is one of the highlights of the album for me. The other three songs are very good as well but less remarkable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 08:21:53 AM
I can't not listen to these, dammit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 08:26:42 AM
Wow...the full "From There To Back Again" blew my mind. I wasn't impressed with the Amazon sample when I heard it. The iTunes sample made me like it a little more, and I liked the beginning that was heard on the WalMart sample. Hearing the full thing, it's incredible. That's a masterpiece of epic proportions. Brian Wilson is still a  genius, he still has it. Wonderful.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 08:59:46 AM
5 track album sampler up @ The Guardian's website, for those who want to partake:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

...and by sampler, I mean five complete tracks.

"Isn't It Time" - awesome tune, horrendous production. Voices are way too thinly mixed, ugly instrumental tracks way too prominent.  :-\

"Spring Vacation" - similar case. I would have preferred a more natural-sounding production style, without the obvious autotuning and "tin-canning" of the voices. But I fear this could become the catchy tune of the summer 2012.  ;D

"Bill & Sue" - sounds like a true Brian original, but again, the soulless production destroys a lot here, I fear. A moore minimalistic approach would have been the way to go. Pretty much forgettable.

"Shelter" - *sigh*, same here. The voices are buried under too much sh*t. I can imagine this would be a decent enough tune if Brian would have been allowed to produce this the way he wants to. But the way it is it's streamlined, radio-friendly and unoffensive to the degree of me not really giving a f*ck. Maybe it'll grow on me, I don't know..

"From There To Back Again" - Why is the lead vocal processed like this? Sounds ugly. I don't get it.. the BBs voices are fine enough to record a good album without any overly obvious processing or pitch correction necessary. Just look at Brian's past few solo LPs: sure there's pitch correction here and there, but the albums still sound pretty awesome, and natural.


I think I will continue to enjoy TLOS and BWRG (etc.) much more than this.. as far as I am concerned, there's not much of a difference in how bad the new LP sounds production-wise compared to their 80's output. What I like about their 60's and 70's stuff is the naturalness and authenticity of the recordings, that's why Pet Sounds for instance still sounds so damn fresh today. I fear that TWGMTR will sound dated in less than a decade, just like their 80's output. It's a shame because there are some really good tunes buried in these ugly tin cans, I think.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:01:51 AM
How do you know this isn't how Brian wanted to produce the record? 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 09:04:18 AM
I can imagine this would be a decent enough tune if Brian would have been allowed to produce this the way he wants to.

The production on this record was Brian's decision. People will differ on its quality, but please let's not do the "Brian didn't want to do it this way" schtick. He made the call to involve Joe Thomas, and he knew what the finished product would likely sound like in that case.  What's more, the players are mostly Brian's band, so it's even less likely that Joe pulled anything underhanded production wise.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 30, 2012, 09:06:06 AM
5 track album sampler up @ The Guardian's website, for those who want to partake:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

...and by sampler, I mean five complete tracks.

 :-[

WHAT TO DO!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Quzi on May 30, 2012, 09:06:49 AM
I can't stop listening to From There to Back Again, somebody halp me plz.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:08:34 AM
5 track album sampler up @ The Guardian's website, for those who want to partake:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

...and by sampler, I mean five complete tracks.

 :-[

WHAT TO DO!

Stay strong mate!  Spring Vacation is the only one I've let myself listen to since it was on the radio. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 09:09:19 AM
How do you know this isn't how Brian wanted to produce the record?  
Agreed, i doubt brian and the boys are much in connection with the changing trends of snobbery from ultra pop |\/|usic fans (me included, god i hate the auto tune!).

I do disagree with Lowbacca about the production of Isn't It Time, though! That strikes me as a standout, with its moog baseline and odd percussion vibe it's probably  the only track that sounds like it has a genuine BW production on it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:14:00 AM
How do you know this isn't how Brian wanted to produce the record?  
Agreed, i doubt brian and the boys are much in connection with the changing trends of snobbery from ultra poDo I really wanna get banned?usic fans (me included, god i hate the auto tune!). [Edit: why won't it let me say the word pop?!]!

Theres two letters that can't be posted in succession on this board.  One ends pop,the other begins music


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 09:20:46 AM
@Runaways & Wirestone: Brian didn't produce this, somebody else did. You know that right?  ;) Whatever the reason for this, I don't like it. I wouldn't like it even if it was actually produced by Brian. Or anybody, for that matter.

Quote from: Wirestone
...but please let's not do the "Brian didn't want to do it this way" schtick.
Far from it. I guess it's much more possible that he didn't really care. What I meant was: in a scenario where Brian was truly interested in the project and given 100% control (which hasn't happenend for ages, obviously) we would have gotten something else entirely. That's all I'm saying.


Point is.. I don't like how TWGMTR sounds. And I'm kind of suprised I'm in the minority with this among BBs fanatics.

As soon as I have a copy I will play Keepin' The Summer Alive and That's Why God Made The Radio in a row, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's basically the same experience. KTSA might still sound more authentic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 09:28:00 AM
Isn't It Time : cool, i'm glad there's not the claps intro they did live in it
From There To Back Again : boom! that's my tish
Shelter : catchycatchycatchycatchy
Private Life Of Bill And Sure : feels something is missin', but it's nice
Spring Vacation : KILL IT WITH FIRE


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 30, 2012, 09:28:57 AM

"Breathe in..breathe out...just six more days...stay centered...stay calm...don't listen to the five complete songs on the guardian website....."

(Justin putting on "All I Wanna Do")

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/01/28/health/MEDITATE/MEDITATE-blog480.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 09:29:24 AM
@Runaways & Wirestone: Brian didn't produce this, somebody else did. You know that right?  ;) Whatever the reason for this, I don't like it. I wouldn't like it even if it was actually produced by Brian. Or anybody, for that matter.

Quote from: Wirestone
...but please let's not do the "Brian didn't want to do it this way" schtick.
Far from it. I guess it's much more possible that he didn't really care. What I meant was: in a scenario where Brian was truly interested in the project and given 100% control (which hasn't happenend for ages, obviously) we would have gotten something else entirely. That's all I'm saying.


Point is.. I don't like how TWGMTR sounds. And I'm kind of suprised I'm in the minority with this among BBs fanatics.

As soon as I have a copy I will play Keepin' The Summer Alive and That's Why God Made The Radio in a row, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's basically the same experience. KTSA might still sound more authentic.
Indeed, i don't think anyone is disputing that we all prefer a vintage production sound, but this is what we have! I've struggled with the production of Brian Wilson's first solo album, but after working at it was able to look past it and enjoy the songs which i guess is what the majority of people here are prepared to do!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:33:46 AM
I haven't really enjoyed the production on any beach boys album post 1975 (cept Dennis) and the production here, while not as organic as I'd like, seems like something Ill be able to overlook easily


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 09:37:39 AM
What I meant was: in a scenario where Brian was truly interested in the project and given 100% control (which hasn't happenend for ages, obviously) we would have gotten something else entirely. That's all I'm saying.

From all reports, he was truly interested, and was indeed the prime driver behind the project. Given that he specifically sought out Joe Thomas to make this record -- and several years ago, to boot -- this is clearly what he wanted to do. Make this record with these people for the Beach Boys.

(It also, incidentally, doesn't sound much like Imagination. It sounds like a more vocally processed TLOS or BWRG. Which makes sense, given that Brian's band plays on it, his arranger is doing the strings and horns, and he's producing the darn thing.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wylson on May 30, 2012, 09:42:54 AM
Sorry if this has been covered. Has anyone found the best way of ordering a vinyl copy in the UK?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 30, 2012, 09:43:22 AM
I feel like I'm the only one who likes the production , especially on Isn't it Time. -_-

Quote
(It also, incidentally, doesn't sound much like Imagination. It sounds like a more vocally processed TLOS or BWRG. Which makes sense, given that Brian's band plays on it, his arranger is doing the strings and horns, and he's producing the darn thing.)

You're right...it doesn't. Imagination sounded plastic in comparison.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 30, 2012, 09:45:09 AM
Wondeful ! Love the samples !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 09:46:06 AM
I feel like I'm the only one who likes the production , especially on Isn't it Time. -_-

Quote
(It also, incidentally, doesn't sound much like Imagination. It sounds like a more vocally processed TLOS or BWRG. Which makes sense, given that Brian's band plays on it, his arranger is doing the strings and horns, and he's producing the darn thing.)

You're right...it doesn't. Imagination sounded plastic in comparison.

Billy -- I'm waiting to hear the entire thing in CD-quality audio. I think I may have some quibbles with the arrangements in a song or two (the tropicalia does get a teensy bit grating), I may end up agreeing with you.

Also, in terms of Brian's interest and participation: http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:47:28 AM
Sorry if this has been covered. Has anyone found the best way of ordering a vinyl copy in the UK?

I don't think anyone has really looked past amazon.  US or canada


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 09:48:08 AM
Indeed, i don't think anyone is disputing that we all prefer a vintage production sound, but this is what we have!
I wasn't talking about "vintage" (if you mean "sounding like a classic BBs LP" by that), but just "natural", "organic". There a great sounding albums being released every week, by a great variety of artists, genres and generations.

Quote from: Wirestone
From all reports, he was truly interested, and was indeed the prime driver behind the project.
Yes, as far as I know he's really into the new songs. He has carried a few of them around for a number of years, after all. I just don't think he had any say in how the final product was mixed, how the final product really sounded. Maybe he didn't care and/or trusted Thomas to do the best thing in a commercial sense. And maybe this is the best decision in a commercial sense. Doesn't mean I have to like it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 30, 2012, 09:52:48 AM
I thought the handclapping patterns in the verses for Isn't It Time were rather interesting productionwise!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 30, 2012, 09:53:27 AM
"Private Life of Bill and Sue" reminds me of both "South American" and "Matchpoint of Our Love" - in a GOOD way, if that's possible. Incredibly catchy! This sounds like it could have been a genuine BW contribution to Summer in Paradise - again, in a good way. I'm eager to defend this song in the face of all the criticism it's going to attract.

"Shelter" is every bit as good as I imagined it to be after listening to the shorter snippets. VERY 80s-sounding, in a "Somewhere Near Japan" way. If only Carl was there to sing the chorus...

"Isn't It Time" sounds a bit weird to these ears (production-wise) and I agree with whoever said that some of this stuff sounds like High School Musical. Still a very good tune, fabulously catchy! The lyrics are rather nice as well. This may become a personal favorite.

"From There to Back Again" will have to grow on me, probably one of the standout songs.

"Spring Vacation", however, still sounds absolutely horrific to me. Reminds of the worst stuff on Summer in Paradise.

None of these songs remind me of Pet Sounds or Sunflower or their mid-sixties output. Still, I definitely like what I hear (except for "SV", that is)!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 30, 2012, 09:56:20 AM
My wife said 'Spring Vacation' sounds like either a TV sitcom theme song, or a song played during the closing credits on a PG family comedy. Sad part is, I think she meant it as a compliment.

:lol


Hell, I like it. Really, out of the five, it's 'Shelter' I'm the least Hooray Henry about.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 10:00:35 AM

Also, in terms of Brian's interest and participation: http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

Oh man that's a great interview.   I'm not gonna hold out that we're gonna hear a finished suite, but that'd be nice.  I'm gonna dream of the rock n roll/ summers gone double album  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 30, 2012, 10:04:14 AM
So how long until someone makes the "That's Why God Made the Radio is like a Smiley Smile version of Summer's Gone" argument?

Oh wait, we already covered that last week. Yes, that suite sounds really interesting. I'd love to hear the fragments in his Pro Tools timeline, as it's hard to get excited over Spring Vacation -- not very surprising to hear how quickly Mike Love came up with additional lyrics for that one!

JOE THOMAS: “Wow. Five minutes.”

It shows.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 10:07:50 AM


"From There to Back Again" will have to grow on me, probably one of the standout songs.


None of these songs remind me of Pet Sounds or Sunflower or their mid-sixties output. Still, I definitely like what I hear (except for "SV", that is)!

My first full hearing of FTTBA made me think of Pet Sounds. Honestly. It's so confessional, raw, emotionally deep, but not in a forced way. I know TLOS covered some of the same ground, but I don't really connect with Midnight's Another Day the way I do to I Just Wasn't Made For These Times. But From There To Back....makes me feel the same way inside that the majestic, heartfelt moments on Pet Sounds do.

It might just be me, but I want a full album of that type of material - be it Brian solo or the BBs. I do really like Shelter and Isn't It Time etc, and I know traditionally a Beach Boys album needs the "Mike Love" element of surfing, beaches, cars, and good times. But I would do terrible things for a full album of tracks like the last three on this album. People say Brian can't make a Pet Sounds II. I think he most certainly could. Whether he wants to or not, that's another thing. All IMO.

Anyway, back on topic, really looking forward to getting the CD on Friday and blasting it in the car.
We get a NEW Beach Boys album in 2012. With Brian Wilson. Still blows my mind, man.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 10:09:00 AM
I'm probably one of the only people here that finds it funny that this album may have Ben folds' tack piano on it


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 30, 2012, 10:09:12 AM
I'm really liking the 5 songs, especially FTTBA. Even the lightweight stuff is pretty enjoyable.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 10:12:29 AM
FTTBA is fascinating because, while it's melancholy on one hand, it's also sounds light and uplifting at the same time. Amazing.

And Brian wrote it last year. Take that, writer's block.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 30, 2012, 10:17:52 AM
Interesting...the interview makes it seem like the 'easy money' lyrics is Brian's.

edit


Actually, it makes it seem like quite a few of the lyrics are Brian's. Huh.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Gohi on May 30, 2012, 10:30:39 AM
I was not that excited about Shelter from the samples but I am enjoying it a lot.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jeffcdo on May 30, 2012, 10:33:39 AM
Definite stand out for me here is "From There To Back Again" - great lead vocal from Al, this track sounds like classic Sunflower/Holland Beach Boys tune to me.  "Bill & Sue" sounds like an Imagination b-side (first impression).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 10:42:00 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 10:45:05 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D
Already sounds much better.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 10:47:08 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

You made it sound like "Bad Day"! (I have no clue who that song is by, but you know the one).
Very cool.
 ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 10:47:40 AM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_LzOdhh8wa04/Sb5lsdDCuRI/AAAAAAAAAmw/wziRGLI3DTg/s400/Epiphone_Casino_lennon_revolution_gibson_es_335_hollow_body_gibson_firebird_harrison_richards_humbuckers_Bigsby_epiphone_casino_lennon.jpg)

Has a man ever dressed in a more ridiculous manner?

The answer is no.

Ah c'mon, Ryan(n), it's not such a poor choice.  After all, our beloved teh Kurt was known to rock the paisley now and again.  More than anything, it's the in-between length hairstyle that I find circumspect.  :)  OT, but I own a Casino - my goodness, what a wonderful instrument!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 10:48:54 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

Nice! Seriously.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rob Dean on May 30, 2012, 10:50:29 AM
Sorry if already posted somewhere else on the board ( not seen it )

Nice new Vid about the album from a French website

http://www.chartsinfrance.net/The-Beach-Boys/clip/Lyrics-To-A-Melody-vqpm0rm.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 10:50:46 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

You made it sound like "Bad Day"! (I have no clue who that song is by, but you know the one).
Very cool.
 ;D
The one by Daniel Powter? Yeah, I see what you mean.^^



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 10:53:35 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

Nice! Seriously.

cheers  ;D

you might enjoy this - a much better recorded (multitracked) video of me doing little deuce coupe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysKhdRsEsGs
(though i think the backing vox are an octave too low?)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 10:55:34 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

You made it sound like "Bad Day"! (I have no clue who that song is by, but you know the one).
Very cool.
 ;D
The one by Daniel Powter? Yeah, I see what you mean.^^



Yes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 30, 2012, 10:58:43 AM
FTTBA is my second favorite so far, behind the single. Maybe Summer's Gone will take that spot when I hear the whole thing. Shelter just jumped ahead of Isn't It Time for me. I'm disappointed that Isn't It Time has a repetitive final minute that ultimately causes the chorus to wear out it's welcome. I can't say that I actively dislike any of the tracks though. It strikes me that this album doesn't have the best sequencing, e.g. Shelter following Private Life, but we can change that for ourselves if we like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 11:00:32 AM
I've just done a little piano-and-vocal cover of 'Spring Vacation'..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8mO6vhN3Jc&feature=youtu.be   ;D

You made it sound like "Bad Day"! (I have no clue who that song is by, but you know the one).
Very cool.
 ;D
The one by Daniel Powter? Yeah, I see what you mean.^^



Yes!

maybe if they'd produced it that way it would have been a worldwide hit like 'bad day' was :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 11:03:40 AM
Well, the sequencing is very intentional ...

A capella (ish) opener, then the three or four single possibilities.

Then you have the mellow middle.

And then you finish off with the mini-suite.

Makes sense conceptually, but I think in reality that yeah, you probably do bog down with those tunes in the middle. Might have been better to move one of them earlier in the record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 30, 2012, 11:09:45 AM
I almost wouldn't feel embarrassed listening to From There to Back Again in public!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: STE on May 30, 2012, 11:14:46 AM

Sorry if it has been posted already but the Guardian is streaming 5 tracks of the album:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu (http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu)






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 11:17:17 AM
Well, That's Why God Made The Radio arrived at work quite a bit earlier that expected.  I have it in hand, and will be enjoying it straightaway.  Just a head's up to those with indie / mom and pop's in their area.  Maybe I'm not the only one.  Happy hunting!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 11:30:59 AM
Anyone else feeling that Al's pristine (compared to the state of the others') vocals are going to be a highlight on this thing?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 30, 2012, 11:37:41 AM
Anyone else feeling that Al's pristine (compared to the state of the others') vocals are going to be a highlight on this thing?

I think his vocals are what make FTTBA the stand-out track that it is. His vocal turn on Isn't It Time- the"E-ver-y-time I think of you" lines- really stand out. He gives the whole project the shot of youthfulness it required to sound like a real Beach Boys album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 11:40:37 AM
@Runaways & Wirestone: Brian didn't produce this, somebody else did. You know that right?  ;) Whatever the reason for this, I don't like it. I wouldn't like it even if it was actually produced by Brian. Or anybody, for that matter.

Quote from: Wirestone
...but please let's not do the "Brian didn't want to do it this way" schtick.
Far from it. I guess it's much more possible that he didn't really care. What I meant was: in a scenario where Brian was truly interested in the project and given 100% control (which hasn't happenend for ages, obviously) we would have gotten something else entirely. That's all I'm saying.


Point is.. I don't like how TWGMTR sounds. And I'm kind of suprised I'm in the minority with this among BBs fanatics.

As soon as I have a copy I will play Keepin' The Summer Alive and That's Why God Made The Radio in a row, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's basically the same experience. KTSA might still sound more authentic.

Just to chime in so you don't feel so alone ...

Sorry to say I agree for the most part.

The only thing I will add is the part about it sounding dated in 10 years. It sounds 'dated' in a bad way right outta the gate.

I miss Dennis & Carl. Looking forward to the box set.

Clearly Brian simply approved this album and maybe did some vocal arranging and gave suggestions here and there. This is a Joe Thomas prodution.

There is a difference between selecting a producer and actually producing something.

Keepin' the Summer Alive kills compared to this stuff. BB '85 and Still Cruisin sound better in fact. And those are two albums I no longer own.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 11:45:43 AM
I know there was some question as to which musicians laid down the tracks during these sessions.  I'm not sure if it's been sussed out already, but upon first glance I noted that along with complete lyrics, the liner notes give a detailed accounting of instrumentation for each track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 30, 2012, 11:47:29 AM
I know there was some question as to which musicians laid down the tracks during these sessions.  I'm not sure if it's been sussed out already, but upon first glanceI noted that the liner notes give a detailed accounting for each track.
Let us have 'em, then.  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 30, 2012, 11:52:17 AM
Isn't it great how some people know things they have absolutely no way of knowing? Looks like select members of the human species truly have evolved to the next level of consciousness.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 11:54:21 AM
I know there was some question as to which musicians laid down the tracks during these sessions.  I'm not sure if it's been sussed out already, but upon first glanceI noted that the liner notes give a detailed accounting for each track.
Let us have 'em, then.  :)

Ok, well, it's a long list and my scanner is broken, but I'm happy to help.  Just bear with me for a bit as I type it up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 11:54:53 AM

Clearly Brian simply approved this album and maybe did some vocal arranging and gave suggestions here and there. This is a Joe Thomas prodution.

There is a difference between selecting a producer and actually producing something.


I don't think it's clear at all. "some" vocal arranging?  Probyn stated in an interview that he didn't think Thomas was the producer and more of an overseer on the album.  Everything Thomas states in this interview seems to back that up, and I'm fairly certain Probyn is very honest on stuff like that.
http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

You may not want to believe that Brian had a big hand in this album, but it certainly seems so.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:04:45 PM
01. "Think About The Days"

Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston, Jeffrey Foskett - Vocals, Joe Thomas - Piano (I was hoping it was Brian), Probyn Gregory- French Horn, Scott Bennett - Vibes

02. "That's Why God Made The Radio"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David Marks, Tom Bukovich, Nick Walusko, Nick Rowe - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Chad Cromwell - Drums, Michael Rhodes - Bass, John Hobbs - Piano, Scott Bennett - Organ, Darian Sahanaja - Vibes


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 12:05:58 PM

Clearly Brian simply approved this album and maybe did some vocal arranging and gave suggestions here and there. This is a Joe Thomas prodution.

There is a difference between selecting a producer and actually producing something.


I don't think it's clear at all. "some" vocal arranging?  Probyn stated in an interview that he didn't think Thomas was the producer and more of an overseer on the album.  Everything Thomas states in this interview seems to back that up, and I'm fairly certain Probyn is very honest on stuff like that.
http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

You may not want to believe that Brian had a big hand in this album, but it certainly seems so.

I doubt it.

But, that's cool! I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all. He may very well have done all or most of the vocal arranging. Perhaps he completely produced the album and somehow his production style now sounds like Joe Thomas'. Regardless of who is responsible, it doesn't sound good to me. I'll probably buy it on vinyl when it comes out, play it once or twice and put it back on the shelf.

Hope all of my fellow fans have a great week and I'll see you guys in Berkely on Friday!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:12:10 PM
03. "Isn't It Time"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce, Foskett - Vocals, David - Guitar, Jim Peternik - Ukelele, Percussion, Larry Millas - Bass

04. "Spring Vacation"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David, Tom Bukovic, Nick Walusko, Jim Riley - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Chad Cromwell - Drums, Michael Rhodes - Bass, Scott Bennett - Clavinet, Organ, Jeff 'Skunk' Baxter - Electric Guitar


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thatjacob on May 30, 2012, 12:17:01 PM
I'm enjoying "Isn't It Time", but I agree that the chorus was a little overused.
FTTBA is the standout for me, but that's no surprise. It actually lived up to my expectations, though.

Sure, the production of this album is a downer, but that was something I knew going in. I don't even like the production of most of BW's solo albums. I know we'll never get another pet sounds, but I can only imagine how good some of this could've sounded if they had approached someone like Jonathan Wilson or someone that has worked with Neko Case, Fleet Foxes, etc -- Polished (and possibly even a little pitch correction in the case of Neko's latest album), but still organic enough.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 12:18:14 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 30, 2012, 12:21:12 PM
Listening to all BUT FTTBA, I want the suite to be complete.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:21:44 PM
05. "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Snaps, John Cowsill - Drums, Snaps, Brett Simons - Bass, John Hobbs - Piano, Nelson Bragg - Timpani, Percussion, Probyn Gregory - Banjo, Acoustic Guitar, Scott Bennett, Darian Sahanaja - Vibes, Tom Bukovich - Acoustic Guitar, Paul Mertens - Bari Saxophone, Skip Masters - Radio Voiceover, Jessica Bish, Joe Thomas - Snaps

06. "Shelter"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Probyn Gregory - Trombone, French Horn, John Hobbs - Tack Piano, Joe Thomas - Harpsichord, Tom Bukovich - Electric Guitar, Nelson Bragg - Percussion


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 12:22:22 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

Eh it's fine if he wants to stick to that.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 12:24:57 PM
05. "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Snaps, John Cowsill - Drums, Snaps, Brett Simons - Bass, John Hobbs - Piano, Nelson Bragg - Timpani, Percussion, Probyn Gregory - Banjo, Acoustic Guitar, Scott Bennett, Darian Sahanaja - Vibes, Tom Bukovich - Acoustic Guitar, Paul Mertens - Bari Saxophone, SkiDo I really wanna get banned?asters - Radio Voiceover, Jessica Bish, Joe Thomas - Snaps

06. "Shelter"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Probyn Gregory - Trombone, French Horn, John Hobbs - Tack Piano, Joe Thomas - Harpsichord, Tom Bukovich - Electric Guitar, Nelson Bragg - Percussion

Thanks for all of these.

David sure isn't doing much singing on the album, is he?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 30, 2012, 12:25:40 PM
I like the cleanness of the recordings.
I don't LOVE the production, but it's not bad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:27:54 PM
07. "Daybreak Over The Ocean"

Mike, Christian Love, Hayleigh Love, Adrian Baker - Vocals, Brian, Al, Bruce, Foskett - Additional Vocals, Scott Totten - Acoustic and Electric Guitar, Cliff Hugo - Bass, Curt Bisquera - Drums

08. "Beaches In Mind"

Brian, Mike Al, Bruce, Foskett - Vocals, David, Jim Riley, Jeff 'Skunk' Baxter - Guitar, John Cowsill - Drums, Brett Simons - Bass, Joe Thomas - Organ, Scott Bennett - Clavinet, Organ, Probyn Gregory - Acoustic Guitar


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 30, 2012, 12:32:03 PM
05. "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Snaps, John Cowsill - Drums, Snaps, Brett Simons - Bass, John Hobbs - Piano, Nelson Bragg - Timpani, Percussion, Probyn Gregory - Banjo, Acoustic Guitar, Scott Bennett, Darian Sahanaja - Vibes, Tom Bukovich - Acoustic Guitar, Paul Mertens - Bari Saxophone, Skip Masters - Radio Voiceover, Jessica Bish, Joe Thomas - Snaps

06. "Shelter"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce - Vocals, David - Guitar, Foskett - Vocals, Acoustic Guitar, Probyn Gregory - Trombone, French Horn, John Hobbs - Tack Piano, Joe Thomas - Harpsichord, Tom Bukovich - Electric Guitar, Nelson Bragg - Percussion
Interesting that there are apparently no backing vocals from David Marks on any of these tracks. I had thought that he contributed backing vocals to "That's Why God Made The Radio," but perhaps not.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 12:34:54 PM
Seems like brian stuck behind the mic and console


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 12:36:06 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:38:51 PM
09. "Strange World"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce, Foskett - Vocals, Chad Cromwell - Drums, John Hobbs - Tack Piano, Michael Rhodes - Bass, Nelson Bragg - Percussion, Gary Griffin - Accordian
Strings Arranged by Paul Mertens

10. "From There To Back Again"

Brian, Mike, Bruce, Foskett - Vocals, Al - Vocals, Whistle, Michael Rhodes - Bass, John Hobbs - Tack Piano, Tom Bukovich - Guitar, Paul Mertens - Flute, Peter Kent, Joel Deroulin, Sharon Jackson, Julie Rogers, John Wittenburg, Songa Lee - Violins, Vanessa Freebarin-Smith, Alisha Bauer - Cello
Strings Arranged by Paul Mertens


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 12:46:23 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.

Okay, then.

Also, Brian is not credited with producing the MIU album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 12:52:03 PM
11. "Pacific Coast Highway"

Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce, Foskett - Vocals, Joe Thomas - Piano, Paul Mertens - Flute, Probyn Gregory - French Horn, Nelson Bragg - Percussion, Peter Kent, Joel Deroulin, Sharon Jackson, Julie Rogers, John Wittenburg, Songa Lee - Violins, Vanessa Freebarin-Smith, Alisha Bauer - Cello
Strings Arranged by Paul Mertens

12. "Summer's Gone"

Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston, Jeffrey Foskett - Vocals, David Marks, Nick Walusko - Guitar, Eddie Bayers - Drums, Michael Rhodes, Brett Simons - Bass, Probyn Gregory - French Horn, Scott Bennett - Vibes, Tom Bukovich - Acoustic Guitar, Chris Bleth - Oboe, David ' Stoney' Stone - Acoustic Double Bass, Paul Mertens - Flute, Nelson Bragg - Percussion, Joe Thomas - Piano, Tack Piano
Strings Arranged by Paul Mertens


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 30, 2012, 12:53:14 PM
Quote
Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.

Okay, then.

Oh, c'mon. No need to be so so dismissive. It's Brian Wilson we're talking about here, not like there isn't decades upon decades worth of backstory, gossip, slanderous lies, blurry lines of collaboration with dozens of people, sadness, crazy productive spurts, abandonment and disinterest, etc. Fans going on about their grains of salt are par for the course! Surely you can understand why people would express these kinds of feelings and emotions!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 12:59:13 PM
The album will stand or fall on its merits, hopefully. And not on ultimately unknowable arguments BW participation.

Interesting to read the full credits, too. Lots of BW band folks, but also a Thomas crew in there too. Less Cowsill or Totten than I would have liked.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 01:03:53 PM

Thanks for all of these.

David sure isn't doing much singing on the album, is he?

Well, you're welcome.  I'm glad to be able to give back a bit to the site and the fans of the Boys who hang out here.  I put off diving in and listening in order to write up the list, so it's a bit weird, I suppose, in that other than rock records by acts with known, basic instrumentation, this is the first time I've gone in ahead of time with an idea of what to look for instrumentally.  Along those lines, "Summer's Gone" sure boasts some inspired choices, huh?

No David on vox at all, I guess. I'm a little surprised at this, but I guess someone felt the tunes were just better without.  The nice thing, though, is the number of numbers David is playing guitar on.

So now that the list is complete, any other surprises jump out at you guys?  Although I can't say I'm all that surprised, I am still a bit disappointed not to see any Beach Boy other than David play on the tracks (save for Al's 'whistle' on FHTBA - but I haven't heard it yet so they may not mean an actual whistle is being used, but rather Al is whistling).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 01:08:35 PM

Thanks for all of these.

David sure isn't doing much singing on the album, is he?

Well, you're welcome.  I'm glad to be able to give back a bit to the site and the fans of the Boys who hang out here.  I put off diving in and listening in order to write up the list, so it's a bit weird, I suppose, in that other than rock records by acts with known, basic instrumentation, this is the first time I've gone in ahead of time with an idea of what to look for instrumentally.  Along those lines, "Summer's Gone" sure boasts some inspired choices, huh?

No David on vox at all, I guess. I'm a little surprised at this, but I guess someone felt the tunes were just better without.  The nice thing, though, is the number of numbers David is playing guitar on.

So now that the list is complete, any other surprises jump out at you guys?  Although I can't say I'm all that surprised, I am still a bit disappointed not to see any Beach Boy other than David play on the tracks (save for Al's 'whistle' on FHTBA - but I haven't heard it yet so they may not mean an actual whistle is being used, but rather Al is whistling).

It sounds like a weirdly processed person whistling. A little strange.

I had hoped Brian might play on some things, but he didn't appear on the Gershwin or Disney albums either, so it's not the biggest surprise.

I'm surprised at how many guitarists are on a couple of songs early in the album. Three or four. I'm also curious to see those credits on Isn't It Time -- it sure seems like Peterik and Millas basically created the backing track on their own, and then Brian, Mike and Joe wrote the song on top of the riff. An interesting way to write a song for the BBs!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 30, 2012, 01:09:31 PM
Was David brought in rather late in the game? If vox were already laid down, maybe it wasn't reckoned to be a good thing wiping someone's else's finished vocal to get his on. Or rearranging the vocal charts to fit him in.

Best argument for this is to see what happens on the next BB album!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on May 30, 2012, 01:13:01 PM
I was wondering which song "Spring Vacation" reminds me and it hit me,it KIND OF reminds me of this song in certain parts (not the whole thing)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKksHmgqFi0


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 01:14:07 PM
Was David brought in rather late in the game? If vox were already laid down, maybe it wasn't reckoned to be a good thing wiping someone's else's finished vocal to get his on. Or rearranging the vocal charts to fit him in.

Best argument for this is to see what happens on the next BB album!

God, I really hope there is one. And let Joe stay home so we don't have to bicker about him anymore. Hell, let Brian record remakes of '50s rock and roll songs if he likes. And Shortnin' Bread, of course.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 30, 2012, 01:16:05 PM
This is the linkedin profile Jessica Bish, one of the people who "snaps" on Private Life of Bill and Sue. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jessica-bish/25/6a5/1b

Not a trained musician but works for Thomas.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 30, 2012, 01:26:20 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bubba Ho-Tep on May 30, 2012, 01:27:37 PM
I was wondering which song "Spring Vacation" reminds me

It reminds me of "He Came Down".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 01:29:32 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.

Well, the deal for the record was made in summer of 2010. So I wouldn't call it a rush, exactly. More that Brian and Joe preferred to work with studio guys and get some of those basic tracks ready before vocal recording began.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 01:34:07 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.
Also, Brian is not credited with producing the MIU album.

I know. He 'executive produced' it; i.e. did some basic tracks, arranging, approved the master, etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 01:35:09 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.


Let's talk about Carol Kaye.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 30, 2012, 01:37:45 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 30, 2012, 01:46:48 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?

...because it's a Beach Boys record? If Bruce can play the piano parts and Al can play the rhythm guitar why in the world would you not want them to play on the record?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 30, 2012, 01:47:51 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.

Well, the deal for the record was made in summer of 2010. So I wouldn't call it a rush, exactly. More that Brian and Joe preferred to work with studio guys and get some of those basic tracks ready before vocal recording began.

The deal for the record was made in summer of 2010, but when did they actually start recording the thing? They needed it out by this summer, and I'm sure if they had planned this perfectly, it would have been out by the time the tour started rather than halfway through.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 30, 2012, 01:47:57 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !
The album says "Produced by Brian Wilson". So, are you calling Brian a dirty, rotten liar? ;) (just to be sure, this is written with tongue planted firmly in cheek).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 30, 2012, 01:49:01 PM
Pet Sounds didn't have Beach Boys playing on it, and nobody's looking back saying "DAMN, AL SHOULD HAVE PLAYED ON THAT." I personally think this album is better than anything we could have ever expected and that like their earlier records, the VOICES are the most important contribution.  :hat


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 30, 2012, 01:49:21 PM
In a way, I'm glad they DIDN'T list the Beach Boys as contributing musicians, if they really didn't contribute anything and just to make it APPEAR like they did. Some of those later (post-Love You) Beach Boys' albums had all of the Beach Boys listed first as the musicians, then all of the other musicians listed below, but you had a feeling that the complete opposite was really true.

As a board who questions a lot of things - and I'm one of the chief offenders - this is actually refreshing, and, maybe....honest. :o


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 01:51:21 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !
The album says "Produced by Brian Wilson". So, are you calling Brian a dirty, rotten liar? ;) (just to be sure, this is written with tongue planted firmly in cheek).

I guess I am.  Brian should have been credited 'Executive in Charge of Production for Brother Entertainment' instead.

I think the bigger thing to think about is that Joe Thomas wasn't credited as even a co-producer. So what was his official role exactly?

The way I see it, they figured they'll sell more records with just Brian's name listed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on May 30, 2012, 01:54:26 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !
The album says "Produced by Brian Wilson". So, are you calling Brian a dirty, rotten liar? ;) (just to be sure, this is written with tongue planted firmly in cheek).

I guess I am.  Brian should have been credited 'Executive in Charge of Production for Brother Entertainment' instead.

I think the bigger thing to think about is that Joe Thomas wasn't credited as even a co-producer. So what was his official role exactly?

The way I see it, they figured they'll sell more records with just Brian's name listed.
I like that! That long title sounds important too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 01:59:32 PM
So what was his official role exactly?

It's all explained in Joe's interview, posted over in the Newsweek article thread. http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TonyW on May 30, 2012, 02:01:20 PM
Also, in terms of Brian's interest and participation: http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

So the genesis of the Beach Boys reunion started in Australia with Brian Wilson staring at his own feces rotating clockwise in the toilet bowl?

I LOVE THE BEACH BOYS WORLD!

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 02:01:47 PM
It's all explained in Joe's interview, posted over in the Newsweek article thread. http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

At least according to Joe, he did not produce the album.

yeh, i've read the interview.

what is Joe's credit on the album exactly?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 30, 2012, 02:04:37 PM
School yard bully in the house tonight....

"I am the one telling you how it is"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 30, 2012, 02:05:19 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.


Let's talk about Carol Kaye.

And Hal Blaine. Wasn't there a recent post proving that he was "incorrect" about his contributions on an album. And, recently, some of Glen Campbell's comments/contributions have been called into question.

I'm not taking sides. Not anybody's. I'm struggling with issues myself. But, I made this comment recently and will probably make it again and again. IT DEPENDS ON WHO YOU BELIEVE, OR DON'T BELIEVE. Joe Thomas has been pretty nice - and convincing - in his very descriptive comments about the new album. However, Brian Wilson has flat out, directly contradicted him (i. e. in the origin of "That's Why God Made The Radio" on Charlie Rose). So, who do you believe? Did Joe Thomas learn a valuable lesson from his previous tenure with Brian Wilson and his wife and managers and is just covering his ass? Or, is he telling the truth? I won't even begin to figure out Brian Wilson in 2012.

I'm just saying you can make the argument any way you want by using whatever "quotes" you want, or dismiss somebody else's argument the same way. Or, you can ignore everything you read and just use your gut...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 30, 2012, 02:08:57 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?

...because it's a Beach Boys record?


So is Pet Sounds, so what ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 30, 2012, 02:21:05 PM
Brian did spend all of last year telling anyone who would listen that he wasn't going to reunite with the boys. He's also said he burned the Smile tapes, that someone stole the Sweet Insanity masters, and that his music made a building burn down.

In recent years, I think Brian has consciously talked down his real and significant creative contributions to his albums. He is, I believe, so nervous about how they'll be received, and about competing in the modern marketplace, that he likes to say other people are responsible. This is of a piece with his day-to-day life, too, where Melinda gets to be the bad guy and Brian is behind the scenes at home, dodging responsibility. So he says lots of stuff about the origins of his records that's just dodging the subject or foisting it off on other people.

Anyhoo. I should be picking this up tomorrow. I'll report back.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mike Hunt on May 30, 2012, 02:31:04 PM
Hi guys, long time loiterer and first time poster.

Really didn't like these tracks at first due to the production and vox processing. Have to say they're now growing on me. I agree with DonnyL on the most part here. I don't think this has the indefinable magic of a true Brian Wilson production, but hey, is such a thing possible now?

It is what it is. I'm thankful to be getting it, and it's really growing on me, (there's the magic)

Cheers, Mike


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on May 30, 2012, 02:31:36 PM
(http://www.cokemachineglow.com/images/7852.jpg)

What's that ? a challenger ?

I cannot believe that Mike, who portrays himself as this macho asshole "I'll kick your ass" persona... .has such a flamboyant wardrobe not so many years ago.  I love it, believe me, I do, I wish he'd pull out that sh*t now... but it's just SO STRANGE that the two Mikes are the same. 

BTW, has anybody ever tried to get an 8X10 of a picture like that autographed by Mike, and saw his reaction to it?
Oh heavens yes. Twice! This particular 8x10 has a shot of Mike and me in a lobby of a hotel after a show in 1969. It IS a great pic. In 1972, I showed it to Mike after a show and he looked at it and said, "Where did you get that?!" Then he stormed away quickly. The pic had him in his white robes. The second time was at one of his pre-concert TM get-togethers in 1988. He was much more pleasant with my wife present and dozens of others. But instead he just in a roundabout way asked if he could have it. I had copies, so I gave it up. I often wonder if he shredded it in his dressing room.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 30, 2012, 02:42:52 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?

...because it's a Beach Boys record?


So is Pet Sounds, so what ?

I noticed you removed the part of my post asking why in the world you wouldn't want the Beach Boys to play on this if they can. By your response does that mean that because Pet Sounds didn't, this shouldn't either? Seems slightly backwards.

I never said it was a tragedy or anything that they don't, as I said in my original post, I was "slightly disappointed." It would have been cool for Al or Bruce or Brian to play on the album... that's all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 02:44:32 PM
In recent years, I think Brian has consciously talked down his real and significant creative contributions to his albums. He is, I believe, so nervous about how they'll be received, and about competing in the modern marketplace, that he likes to say other people are responsible. This is of a piece with his day-to-day life, too, where Melinda gets to be the bad guy and Brian is behind the scenes at home, dodging responsibility. So he says lots of stuff about the origins of his records that's just dodging the subject or foisting it off on other people.

Or maybe he's just not that involved.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on May 30, 2012, 02:56:04 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?

...because it's a Beach Boys record?


So is Pet Sounds, so what ?

I noticed you removed the part of my post asking why in the world you wouldn't want the Beach Boys to play on this if they can. By your response does that mean that because Pet Sounds didn't, this shouldn't either? Seems slightly backwards.



No. But my first post made it clear. If they just can't keep up with the session musicians, if they can't even play the instruments that are being called for then why should they play ? Don't get me wrong but I really can't see what could be so disappointing about that. David plays guitar on the new album because he's still got it and has a distinctive style while you probably never will hear someone say about a guitar part that that's "classic Jardine" (and I like Al as rhythm guitarist). Bruce was one of L.A.'s best piano players in the 60s according to some members of the Wrecking Crew (iirc) and yes, he's great. But still, no distinctive style that would add something unique to the music that couldn't be done by studio musicians


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mikie on May 30, 2012, 03:07:42 PM
'Scuse me for a second here. I just wanna welcome Mike Hunt to the board. I always liked Mike Hunt and his two Irish friends, Phil McCracken and Pat McGroin. And that other guy from Russia - what was his name again? Oh yeah, Oliver Clothesoff. Nice guys.

K, sorry to interrupt, just wanted to say Hi and welcome to Mike.  "Mike" is a good name by the way....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 30, 2012, 03:10:24 PM
A little bit disappointed in the lack of actual Beach Boys playing on the record, but it's pretty obvious there was a rush to get this record finished. Makes sense to let the professionals bang it out than to plan around different schedules and do a million takes with 70 year old musicians.


Or maybe it's because none of the Beach Boys can play the needed instruments ? David's guitar is all over there, you don't need Al because other players can probably even do better than him. And although Bruce is a fantastic piano player that job was also done by someone who at least made it sound as good as Bruce would. So why in the world would one want the Beach Boys (except David) to play the instruments on that record ?

...because it's a Beach Boys record?


So is Pet Sounds, so what ?

I noticed you removed the part of my post asking why in the world you wouldn't want the Beach Boys to play on this if they can. By your response does that mean that because Pet Sounds didn't, this shouldn't either? Seems slightly backwards.



No. But my first post made it clear. If they just can't keep up with the session musicians, if they can't even play the instruments that are being called for then why should they play ? Don't get me wrong but I really can't see what could be so disappointing about that. David plays guitar on the new album because he's still got it and has a distinctive style while you probably never will hear someone say about a guitar part that that's "classic Jardine" (and I like Al as rhythm guitarist). Bruce was one of L.A.'s best piano players in the 60s according to some members of the Wrecking Crew (iirc) and yes, he's great. But still, no distinctive style that would add something unique to the music that couldn't be done by studio musicians

I suppose we just disagree. If Al or Bruce can play a part just as well as a studio musician, I'd rather them play it than a non-Beach Boy. In the grand scheme, it obviously makes no difference.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 30, 2012, 03:31:52 PM
Anyone in LA know of a place who might have the new album early?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 30, 2012, 03:39:53 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !
The album says "Produced by Brian Wilson". So, are you calling Brian a dirty, rotten liar? ;) (just to be sure, this is written with tongue planted firmly in cheek).

I guess I am.  Brian should have been credited 'Executive in Charge of Production for Brother Entertainment' instead.

I think the bigger thing to think about is that Joe Thomas wasn't credited as even a co-producer. So what was his official role exactly?

The way I see it, they figured they'll sell more records with just Brian's name listed.
Donny, I enjoy your posts. I agree with many of your points and I find them to be a refreshing antidote to the groupthink that has pervaded the board as of late. I don't think you are giving Brian enough credit as the primary force behind this record, though.

The new album should probably be "Produced by Brian Wilson and Joe Thomas" or the other way around. Brian's name has cachet. That producer credit sells records. I don't think it is reasonable to say that Brian should be Executive Producer, which is largely an honorary title.

Brian steered the direction of the album in most respects, although Thomas' production and arrangements poke through, especially during moments like the garish panning wordless harmony in "Strange World" (which would sound beautiful center-stage) and the unfortunate use of pitch correction as an effect. There are also moments like the bass harmonica in "Beaches in Mind" that are awkwardly added to evoke Brian's 1960s output.

Overall, though, it seems like Joe Thomas has grown as a producer and engineer, and has made an effort to respect Brian's legacy more. This affects the sound of the album greatly. There are Imagination-style moments and arrangements (like the nylon-stringed guitar in "Strange World," but overall That's Why God Made the Radio is much more Brian Wilson-sounding than Imagination.

The reality is that Brian delegates a lot nowadays, and leaves people to pick up his slack. As has been discussed on this board, Brian employed people like Chuck Britz and the Wrecking Crew in his prime, and he has always been a chiefly collaborative writer. In 2012, he sets the direction of the project, chimes in on production and arrangement where appropriate, sometimes taking control and arranging himself when necessary, and writes the songs.

Of course, the songs are all co-writes. Wirestone had an excellent post about how Scott and Brians' collaboration for That Lucky Old Sun operated similarly to the songwriting process for That's Why God Made the Radio. In this case, Brian wrote tons of fragments of songs, and unearthed some songs from the late 1990s. The fragments were completed by Thomas, Peterik, Miles, and in one case Jon Bon Jovi.. I never thought I'd own and enjoy a song co-written by him, but he did a great job.

So, a lot of the songs were started by Brian and completed by others... but those songs, and Brian's production motif, set the tone for the record. Thomas acted as co-producer and fleshed things out. The other Beach Boys were largely tracked separately where needed, as on Pet Sounds. This is an album where the balance of power has shifted almost entirely back to Brian and his chosen collaborators (who I wish were Andy Paley, Van Dyke Parks and Scott Bennett, but they're not). It hasn't been this way since 1977, so "Produced by Brian Wilson" or "Produced by Brian Wilson and Joe Thomas" is entirely appropriate.

Hell, Rick Rubin sits on a couch for five minutes once a week and earns a fair bit of money as a producer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 04:27:28 PM
I have no problem with everyone enjoying the album and believing it is a BW production. I just don't think it is, that's all.

Because, of course, your beliefs trump repeated and regularly stated facts to the contrary.

As I've stated before, the production on the album sounds little like Imagination (which did have a Joe Thomas co-production and co-arranging credit) and much like TLOS or the Gershwin and Disney albums (which do not). Joe does say he oversaw the recording aspects of the new respect, which certainly explains some of the vocal processing or mixing decisions.

I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

This record sounds a lot like Imagination to me -- that's an opinion. And that's mine, just as the 'fact' that it doesn't sound like it is yours. Sorry, I'm not going to subscribe to the groupthink or buy the media PR.  Time will likely provide more details and perspective.

If anyone is attempting to present opinion as fact, it is you.  I've never implied my opinion is any more valid than anyone else's.

Good day, sir !
The album says "Produced by Brian Wilson". So, are you calling Brian a dirty, rotten liar? ;) (just to be sure, this is written with tongue planted firmly in cheek).

I guess I am.  Brian should have been credited 'Executive in Charge of Production for Brother Entertainment' instead.

I think the bigger thing to think about is that Joe Thomas wasn't credited as even a co-producer. So what was his official role exactly?

The way I see it, they figured they'll sell more records with just Brian's name listed.
Donny, I enjoy your posts. I agree with many of your points and I find them to be a refreshing antidote to the groupthink that has pervaded the board as of late. I don't think you are giving Brian enough credit as the primary force behind this record, though.

The new album should probably be "Produced by Brian Wilson and Joe Thomas" or the other way around. Brian's name has cachet. That producer credit sells records. I don't think it is reasonable to say that Brian should be Executive Producer, which is largely an honorary title.

Brian steered the direction of the album in most respects, although Thomas' production and arrangements poke through, especially during moments like the garish panning wordless harmony in "Strange World" (which would sound beautiful center-stage) and the unfortunate use of pitch correction as an effect. There are also moments like the bass harmonica in "Beaches in Mind" that are awkwardly added to evoke Brian's 1960s output.

Overall, though, it seems like Joe Thomas has grown as a producer and engineer, and has made an effort to respect Brian's legacy more. This affects the sound of the album greatly. There are Imagination-style moments and arrangements (like the nylon-stringed guitar in "Strange World," but overall That's Why God Made the Radio is much more Brian Wilson-sounding than Imagination.

The reality is that Brian delegates a lot nowadays, and leaves people to pick up his slack. As has been discussed on this board, Brian employed people like Chuck Britz and the Wrecking Crew in his prime, and he has always been a chiefly collaborative writer. In 2012, he sets the direction of the project, chimes in on production and arrangement where appropriate, sometimes taking control and arranging himself when necessary, and writes the songs.

Of course, the songs are all co-writes. Wirestone had an excellent post about how Scott and Brians' collaboration for That Lucky Old Sun operated similarly to the songwriting process for That's Why God Made the Radio. In this case, Brian wrote tons of fragments of songs, and unearthed some songs from the late 1990s. The fragments were completed by Thomas, Peterik, Miles, and in one case Jon Bon Jovi.. I never thought I'd own and enjoy a song co-written by him, but he did a great job.

So, a lot of the songs were started by Brian and completed by others... but those songs, and Brian's production motif, set the tone for the record. Thomas acted as co-producer and fleshed things out. The other Beach Boys were largely tracked separately where needed, as on Pet Sounds. This is an album where the balance of power has shifted almost entirely back to Brian and his chosen collaborators (who I wish were Andy Paley, Van Dyke Parks and Scott Bennett, but they're not). It hasn't been this way since 1977, so "Produced by Brian Wilson" or "Produced by Brian Wilson and Joe Thomas" is entirely appropriate.

Hell, Rick Rubin sits on a couch for five minutes once a week and earns a fair bit of money as a producer.

Yeh, I appreciate your perspective and agree with you to some degree.

And there is certainly gray area with regard to what a producer is.  But BW was always a very distinct producer.  And maybe he just isn't anymore. Maybe this is how he produces now. But I have a gut feeling that in the right environment, we would have a very different album.

yeh, i was joking about the 'exec' title (for the record, that was a jab at Mike Love's credit on Summer in Paradise).

I don't doubt he was involved. Probably more so than any of the other Beach Boys. I also don't doubt the creative seeds came from him.

But the way those drums sound ... those cymbal crashes, the way the drummers play ... just doesn't add up. If he were producing, I just can't see how he would let that stuff fly ... the panning of the fills. Just total MOR schlock. It's just so by-the-book; modern day engineering 'standards' abound. Nothing 'Beach Boys' about the sound really.

Some of the parts I've heard sound kind of interesting here and there (bass & flute on 'From Here to Back Again'). But as an overall package, I just can't really get behind it.

Well, you know I hate to be a downer, but it just seems like something that was put together to get a 50th Anniversary album, nothing more. And that's cool. But I'd hoped to get something at least on par with Keepin the Summer Alive.

And I feel like I should state my real opinion. I don't want to come off as negative and not supporting the only new Beach Boys album that's come out in my adult life. I've been on the fence about it and decided to come right out because I think some people might be thinking it too but afraid to confront their doubts.

Don't get me wrong.  The Beach Boys will never lose it; with me they're still number one.  But something seems really off about this product.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RickD on May 30, 2012, 04:28:30 PM
Also, in terms of Brian's interest and participation: http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

So the genesis of the Beach Boys reunion started in Australia with Brian Wilson staring at his own feces rotating clockwise in the toilet bowl?

I LOVE THE BEACH BOYS WORLD!

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;

possibly at the Orient Hotel!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 30, 2012, 04:45:42 PM
I caved, and decided to listen to Isn't It Time and Private Life.  Really loved Isn't It Time, around halfway through I found myself smiling at the fact I was listening to a new Beach Boys track during my lifetime.  Private Life really has an interesting concept behind it, I really dig the theme.  The song's mediocre, however, I'm not a huge fan of the instrumentation.  The radio bit at the end is clever, though!

It seems as though both tracks really had rockin' choruses.  I mean, the refrain on Isn't It Time is killer, and I think the band (or Brian for that matter) figured it out themselves and thus decided to repeat it a few times at the end.  Even the chorus to Private Life is real strong, I love the background vox and Brian's lead.  However, the bridges on both pieces seem a little weak.  The same goes for TWGMTR. Based on what we've heard regarding the origins of the record, with Brian playing demos and snippets of songs for Joe Thomas, I would go as far to say that the refrains to many of these songs (and the verses, to some degree, as well) were Brian's creation.  The middle eights on these songs seem less Brian-esque.  Just a guess, I'm wondering if anyone else feels this way.

In any event, I'm beyond stoked for the record.  I'm convinced this will be the best Beach Boys record since Love You, and based on what I've heard so far I doubt I'll be disappointed.  These songs seem really strong, so far.

EDIT: Scratch the possibility that Brian wrote the chorus to Private Life, it was noted in that Joe Thomas interview transcript that Joe wrote the chorus, not Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 30, 2012, 04:54:45 PM
For some reason, in my head, "Bill and Sue" keeps segueing into "Sub Rosa Subway" by Klaatu.

Are Klaatu really the Beach Boys?

















(No, they're not.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 30, 2012, 05:03:27 PM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 05:11:35 PM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.

Well there's slight overlap.  Spring Vacation was one of the dutch.  This is common for big releases nowadays, I'm surprised the whole album wasn't streaming from somewhere.  I've only heard 2 though hehe


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on May 30, 2012, 05:21:21 PM
You're right. Even so, much to be thankful for. Something to keep in mind, everyone.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 06:14:50 PM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.

What's out? The single, "Spring Vacation", the opening track - what else?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 06:19:14 PM
Are Klaatu really the Beach Boys?

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on May 30, 2012, 06:26:27 PM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.

What's out? The single, "Spring Vacation", the opening track - what else?

5 complete tracks can now be heard here (poor sound quality though):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

Private Life Of Bill & Sue, From There To back Again, Shelter, Isn't It Time, plus Spring Vacation (already heard, of course)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 06:34:33 PM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.

What's out? The single, "Spring Vacation", the opening track - what else?

5 complete tracks can now be heard here (poor sound quality though):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

Private Life Of Bill & Sue, From There To back Again, Shelter, Isn't It Time, plus Spring Vacation (already heard, of course)


Thanks! Somehow missed that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 30, 2012, 06:43:00 PM
I swear to christ i'm going to have a brain haemorrhage if I read another article in the media that puns 'Good Vibrations', 'Do It Again' 'Wouldn't It Be Nice' etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 30, 2012, 06:48:59 PM
Well, I’ve listened through the album twice now, and thought I might pass along some impressions.

Those who have heralded “Think About The Days,” “From There To Back Again,” “Pacific Coast Highway” and “Summer’s Gone” are right on the money.  These four tracks found me thoroughly swept up in their drama, and form the cornerstone of an enjoyable, by turns frustrating and startling journey.

“Strange World” (one of four offerings taken from a planned eleven-song suite) offers a charming glimpse into a world of oddities that would be made all the more queer “if you were not here with me.”

You already know of Al’s great performance on “From There To Back Again.”  It’s the last try at a dying love.  “Why don’t you run away and spend some time with me / why don’t we feel the way we used to anymore?”

“Pacific Coast Highway” is breathtaking in its dark beauty – “my life, I’m better off alone / my life, I’m better on my own.”  The resignation drips with each sorrowful note.  

As lovely as “Pacific Coast Highway” is, nothing tops the grand “Summer’s Gone.”  More than any other, this is the piece that strikes right to the heart, and demonstrates just what a talented artist can bring to the table.  When Brian sings about ‘another summer gone,’ one understands immediately, innately, that we’re not talking about the end of fun in the sun, the ocean and the beach.  Like the best of Brian’s work, the nature imagery is used here to greater effect as Brian solemnly mourns the encroaching end of an old man’s life - his very own. “It’s finally sinking in,” he sings, “one day begins, another ends.”  It won’t matter how many albums the group may produce from here on out, “Summer’s Gone” truly is the final song on the final Beach Boys record, just as Brian first envisioned.

There is more to the album than the suite numbers, to be sure.  I’ve been spinning the title track for weeks now, with its enchanting harmonies (although there are the BIIIG, dramatic floor tom and the lyric about ‘a whole new generation,’ both of which just grate on me).  “Bill and Sue,” in a not unconvincing manner, expounds the tale of reality show stars (!), seemingly lost at sea.  “Shelter” is a pleasant enough look at love, with a hook I know we’ve all heard before.
“Daybreak Over The Ocean” is a song that most of you will already have heard, but I have to say that it proves that the addition of those voices can complement an arrangement in such a manner that it lifts it from pleasant to, well, a thing of beauty.

It’s when we get to the tracks everyone was worried about that, frankly, you will probably find yourself proven right.  I have to say that as one of the two numbers I allowed myself to preview beforehand (the other being the album’s opener), “Spring Vacation” has had the time to grow on me and against all odds, it has taken full advantage of the opportunity.  If I could just get past the off-key caterwauling I glimpsed in that in-studio video sneak-peek.  I guess some things you just can’t unsee.

Sadly, “Isn’t It Time” holds very little appeal for me.  This is surprising as I quite enjoyed the live version posted the other day, and was looking forward to the album’s treatment.  But my God, “isn’t it time we danced the night away” just sounds sooo very… d-u-l-l.

“Beaches In Mind.” No.

In the end, it's more than I thought we’d ever get – more than we’d any right to expect.  It’s a fine album in places, with a few clunkers and its fair share of brilliance.  The numbers that originate from the suite constitute some of the strongest musical offerings from Brain in years, with mature lyrics appropriate to the theme of ‘looking at life as an older adult.’  Folks, I know the other six pieces of the suite is said to be unfinished at this time, but we need to hear the rest of this suite.  There’s been talk of another Beach Boys LP, with most (Wilson included) speculating on Brian’s long-desired Rock ‘n’ Roll album, but one member here offered a suggestion, probably more in jest than anything, that I think holds tremendous musical appeal and commercial potential – a double album.  Picture, if you will, The Beach Boys Rock ‘n’ Roll, backed with ‘My Life’s Suite’.  Food for thought.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 06:49:00 PM
Wouldn't It Be Nice if the Beach Boys could Do It Again and spread their Good Vibrations across the USA in their Little Deuce Coupe?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 30, 2012, 07:42:52 PM
Wouldn't It Be Nice if the Beach Boys could Do It Again and spread their Good Vibrations across the USA in their Little Deuce Coupe?

Hang on to your ego


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 07:45:31 PM
thanks for the review Generation42.  I have a feeling our "beaches in mind" reviews will be similar


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 08:01:51 PM
Who cares about Beaches In Mind ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 08:18:16 PM
Who cares about Beaches In Mind ?


People who listen to the new album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 08:22:37 PM
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOH SNAAAAP SON! MAN I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY NOW! OUTCH


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 30, 2012, 08:26:46 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.


Let's talk about Carol Kaye.

Carol Kaye may be dubious, but she's still less dubious than someone completely making stuff up based on "feelings".

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 08:30:18 PM
i think Ziggy is  :hat


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 08:30:46 PM
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOH SNAAAAP SON! MAN I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY NOW! OUTCH

okay.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 30, 2012, 08:35:32 PM
This is a forum for opinion, of course. And I respect them all. Even if I don't quite get the "oh no" trend that's been going for some time:

Oh no! They're recording a video clip. Maybe as bad as Summer of Love

Oh no! The artwork is out.

Oh no! No Blondie.

Oh no! Surfboards.

Oh no! Summer lyrics.

Etc.


Those 5 full songs moved me in a way I could not imagine. I'm so happy they pulled this off. So happy for Brian for his music. And so happy to hear those voices together. I find it hard to throw smart-ass remarks and punctilious asserts about these guys's work.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 08:38:34 PM
Not to stir the pot too much, but I just found a new BW interview which calls into question Joe Thomas' version of recent events:

Q: Whose idea was it to get back together after all this time?

BW: Well, Mike Love.

Q: How did it happen? Tell me the story.

BW: He called me and asked if I'd like to do a 50th anniversary tour with him and I said yeah.

haha! so far we have Al claiming it was his idea, Joe Thomas saying it was Brian's, and Brian claiming it was Mike's.  Of course, he may have been talking about just the tour, but still ... sort of like anything in Beach Boys-land.

http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/B/Beach_Boys/2012/05/30/19817736.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 08:40:19 PM
i think Ziggy is  :hat

Thanks! i think you're pimp too bro  :afro

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOH SNAAAAP SON! MAN I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY NOW! OUTCH

okay.

okay.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 30, 2012, 08:48:20 PM
Not to stir the pot too much, but I just found a new BW interview which calls into question Joe Thomas' version of recent events:

Q: Whose idea was it to get back together after all this time?

BW: Well, Mike Love.

Q: How did it happen? Tell me the story.

BW: He called me and asked if I'd like to do a 50th anniversary tour with him and I said yeah.

haha! so far we have Al claiming it was his idea, Joe Thomas saying it was Brian's, and Brian claiming it was Mike's.  Of course, he may have been talking about just the tour, but still ... sort of like anything in Beach Boys-land.

http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/B/Beach_Boys/2012/05/30/19817736.html

Here's a "Brianism" from that article:

Interviewer:Is it different writing for The Beach Boys instead of yourself?

Brian:No, not at all. I gotta go. I gotta get on an airplane.

 :lol Gotta love him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 30, 2012, 09:05:34 PM
Not to stir the pot too much, but I just found a new BW interview which calls into question Joe Thomas' version of recent events:

Q: Whose idea was it to get back together after all this time?

BW: Well, Mike Love.

Q: How did it happen? Tell me the story.

BW: He called me and asked if I'd like to do a 50th anniversary tour with him and I said yeah.

haha! so far we have Al claiming it was his idea, Joe Thomas saying it was Brian's, and Brian claiming it was Mike's.  Of course, he may have been talking about just the tour, but still ... sort of like anything in Beach Boys-land.

http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/B/Beach_Boys/2012/05/30/19817736.html

Pot stirred..
"Unfortunately, when the call came, it was an hour late, Love was MIA, and instead of an in-depth interview, I ended up getting four minutes with a harried Wilson, who had just cleared security at New York's JFK airport and was about to board a plane."



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 09:08:08 PM
haha yeah I saw that interview earlier and the moment i read the conditions of the interview, i quickly glanced it and knew it wasn't worth anything.

That huffington post cocktail blogger tweeted me back after i replied to him saying the best beach boys stuff is weird.  I admitted Love You was a lil too weird but still interesting.  He also just tweeted
Tony Sachs ‏@RetroManNYC
Not ready to say I like the new Beach Boys album, but the last few tracks really pack an emotional wallop. Gotta listen a few more times.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 30, 2012, 09:27:39 PM
couple of quick notes:

love that Dave's guitar is everywhere but wish he was credited with singing; were the videos on TWGMTR a sham, or did his track not make the mix. . . . .(??)

Love Bruce everywhere I hear him.

 I do wish the BB were playing more instruments here, but I'll take it, like PS, as a singing, harmonizing album.  The full BB sings only half the cuts on PS: 2 instrumentals, and Brian sings 2 songs alone, right (?)

Not worried about Joe Thomas.

Many albums, including Pet Sounds have great, good,and OK songs, so I can live with that hierarchy here.

Anywhere where I perceiving myself hearing "The Beach Boys" on this record, I am happy.

PLOBAS reminds me of O bla di o bla da for some reason, though it's tunefully superior. The themes, as it were, have not yet reached me intellectually. Did reality tv need a critique?

Shelter sounds like Brian Eno's "Here he comes."  really wish Bruce was singing the chorus.  Mike's part in second half of chorus is great.

Are these Guardian versions poor quality?

FTTBA is epic.

This is a great album.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 09:30:36 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 30, 2012, 09:38:40 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?


Because he was afraid that we might get them confused with ADITLOAT, LUGOTW and WIBNTLA.

Okay...he didn't really write WIBNTLA.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 30, 2012, 09:41:44 PM
I don't really want to get into this, but these 'facts' are merely anecdotes. I don't think BW produced this any more than he produced MIU Album.

Your feelings and your emotions apparently trump anecdotes from people who were there during the recording process.


Let's talk about Carol Kaye.

Carol Kaye may be dubious, but she's still less dubious than someone completely making stuff up based on "feelings".

Cheers,
Jon Blum

It seems we're speaking a different language.

Other than stating my (humble) opinion, I'm not involved in this in any way. What I'm getting at is we can't necessarily collect anecdotes and call them 'facts'.

Quite frankly, it seems fairly obvious to me that Joe Thomas' sonic signature is all over these tracks.  This is not some cryptic 'feeling' I have; there is audible evidence.  I find it surprising that others do not notice it.

And yet Joe Thomas is not credited as a producer.  Not sure what his credit is, if any.  So, I suppose most people here are content to accept 'good old Joe just helping a friend complete the new Beach Boys album'?

He co-wrote most of the songs. Some of the other co-writers are people associated with him that are not typically associated with BW or the Beach Boys.  It seems there is at least a little evidence that point to him being heavily involved with this record.  The music itself sounds as though he was more involved than Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys in my opinion.

Joe Thomas is a producer.  What is his role in this album if not production?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 09:59:09 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?

 :-*
& Runaways, do you hate me too?:(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 30, 2012, 10:05:26 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?

 :-*
& Runaways, do you hate me too?:(

 :grouphug


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 30, 2012, 10:07:25 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?

 :-*
& Runaways, do you hate me too?:(

"Too"? Does that imply that you think I hate you? :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 10:14:45 PM
Let's start a band just the 3 of us

 :thewilsons


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 30, 2012, 10:32:07 PM
Why didn't Brian just make it easy on us and call his songs "PLOBAS" and "FTTBA"?

 :-*
& Runaways, do you hate me too?:(
you are a cool dude ziggy :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 30, 2012, 10:38:38 PM
d'aaaaw why, thank you! so are you :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 30, 2012, 10:44:24 PM
d'aaaaw why, thank you! so are you :)
your welcome :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 31, 2012, 12:03:22 AM
This has got to be the funniest part of the reunion so far...

Joe Thomas: It was just like Mike told me “California Girls” was. Brian said, how about a title that’s like, “Spring Vacation, easy money.” And within five minutes, Mike had written “Spring vacation, good vibrations, summer weather, we’re back together.” It was like, “Wow. Five minutes.”

Yes... wow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 31, 2012, 12:24:28 AM
Well, I’ve listened through the album twice now, and thought I might pass along some impressions.



Hi, thanks for the review. Obviously you've got a promo. Now, I've asked this before on this thread, but no answer, so here goes again: is the promo different from the regular album? The two songs played on the Dutch Schiffer.fm show (TWGMTR and SV) sounded a lot different, a lot more enjoyable, with the lead not so prominent etc...

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 31, 2012, 12:35:19 AM
Someone updated the wikipedia article with all the session musicians that Generation42 mentioned:

Additional musicians

    Adrian Baker - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Alisha Bauer - Cello
    Jeff Baxter - Guitar
    Eddie Bayers - Drums
    Scott Bennett - Vibes, organ, clavinet
    Jessica Bish - Snaps
    Curt Bisquera - Drums
    Chris Bleth - Oboe
    Nelson Bragg - Timpani, percussion
    Tom Bukovac - Guitar
    John Cowsill - Drums, snaps
    Chad Cromwell - Drums
    Joel Deroulin - Violin
    Jeff Foskett - Vocals, acoustic guitar, snaps
    Vanessa Freebarin-Smith - Cello
    Probyn Gregory - French horn, banjo, acoustic guitar, trombone
    Gary Griffin - Accordion
    John Hobbs - Piano, tack piano
    Cliff Hugo - Bass
    Sharon Jackson - Violin
    Peter Kent - Violin
    Songa Lee - Violin
    Christian Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Hayleigh Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Skip Masters - Radio voiceover on "The Private Life of Bill and Sue"
    Paul Mertens - Saxophone, string arrangements, flute
    Larry Millas - Bass
    Jim Peterik - Ukulele, percussion
    Michael Rhodes - Bass
    Jim Riley - Guitar
    Julie Rogers - Violin
    Nick Rowe - Guitar
    Darian Sahanaja - Vibes
    Brett Simons - Bass
    David Stone - Acoustic double bass
    Joe Thomas - Piano, snaps, harpsichord, organ, tack piano
    Scott Totten - Guitar
    Nick Walusko - Guitar
    John Wittenberg - Violin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 12:46:00 AM
Not to stir the pot too much, but I just found a new BW interview which calls into question Joe Thomas' version of recent events:

Q: Whose idea was it to get back together after all this time?

BW: Well, Mike Love.

Q: How did it happen? Tell me the story.

BW: He called me and asked if I'd like to do a 50th anniversary tour with him and I said yeah.

haha! so far we have Al claiming it was his idea, Joe Thomas saying it was Brian's, and Brian claiming it was Mike's.  Of course, he may have been talking about just the tour, but still ... sort of like anything in Beach Boys-land.

http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Artists/B/Beach_Boys/2012/05/30/19817736.html

Whoa boy. These guys need to go on Stern so we can get the real story.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 31, 2012, 12:48:29 AM
Think about it: most of the album is out--5 tracks today, 2 on Dutch Radio, plus Do It Again (though not on the album), plus a bunch of scraps.

What's out? The single, "Spring Vacation", the opening track - what else?

5 complete tracks can now be heard here (poor sound quality though):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/30/album-stream-beach-boys-god-radio?CMP=twt_gu

Private Life Of Bill & Sue, From There To back Again, Shelter, Isn't It Time, plus Spring Vacation (already heard, of course)


Hey those are great songs, but funnily produced. Short review, off to work soon.

Isn't it time is as annoying as Enrique Iglesias - Do You Know? (The Ping Pong Song) or the hard banging drum on Bruce's She believes in love again on the 85 album. Otherwise a good song.

Spring vacation was played again this weekend on the Dutch Schiffer show, so perhaps it could go down well amongst the DJ's with it's bluesy sound. Despite the autotune...

Private life of Bill and Sue. Goes up and down, too soft verse and then comes a strong chorus, but which is great!! Good song.

Shelter - the chorus sounds like the beginning of Darlin' - sounds a bit like Don't worry baby. Just wondering why they stop before the chorus? ("hey guys, what was it again")

From there to back again. My favorite so far. It's got a little bit of Sunflower, Al's Postcard, Love you, KTSA, Today, Surf's up... Lovely song and lovely harmonies. However, it stops (just like Shelter) at times. Also, the last part wasn't necessary - makes the song non-memorable... Should have started over again from the beginning... Gonna do my own mix.

Too much Joe Thomas and Imagination-sound for me...

/B



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 01:10:01 AM
I just purchased the CD. And will be listening in minutes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 31, 2012, 01:40:43 AM
Someone updated the wikipedia article with all the session musicians that Generation42 mentioned:

Additional musicians

    Adrian Baker - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Alisha Bauer - Cello
    Jeff Baxter - Guitar
    Eddie Bayers - Drums
    Scott Bennett - Vibes, organ, clavinet
    Jessica Bish - Snaps
    Curt Bisquera - Drums
    Chris Bleth - Oboe
    Nelson Bragg - Timpani, percussion
    Tom Bukovac - Guitar
    John Cowsill - Drums, snaps
    Chad Cromwell - Drums
    Joel Deroulin - Violin
    Jeff Foskett - Vocals, acoustic guitar, snaps
    Vanessa Freebarin-Smith - Cello
    Probyn Gregory - French horn, banjo, acoustic guitar, trombone
    Gary Griffin - Accordion
    John Hobbs - Piano, tack piano
    Cliff Hugo - Bass
    Sharon Jackson - Violin
    Peter Kent - Violin
    Songa Lee - Violin
    Christian Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Hayleigh Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Skip Masters - Radio voiceover on "The Private Life of Bill and Sue"
    Paul Mertens - Saxophone, string arrangements, flute
    Larry Millas - Bass
    Jim Peterik - Ukulele, percussion
    Michael Rhodes - Bass
    Jim Riley - Guitar
    Julie Rogers - Violin
    Nick Rowe - Guitar
    Darian Sahanaja - Vibes
    Brett Simons - Bass
    David Stone - Acoustic double bass
    Joe Thomas - Piano, snaps, harpsichord, organ, tack piano
    Scott Totten - Guitar
    Nick Walusko - Guitar
    John Wittenberg - Violin



Looking at those credits, and "Daybreak" excluded, are we to believe that Jeff is the *only* other non-BBs voice in the entire album's harmonies? 'Cause that's not what I'm hearing at times. Unless Jeff can "throw" his voice six different ways...lol.

Or...are there additional vocal credits somewhere?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave Modny on May 31, 2012, 01:55:41 AM
From there to back again. My favorite so far. It's got a little bit of Sunflower, Al's Postcard, Love you, KTSA, Today, Surf's up... Lovely song and lovely harmonies. However, it stops (just like Shelter) at times. Also, the last part wasn't necessary - makes the song non-memorable... Should have started over again from the beginning... Gonna do my own mix.




It'll be interesting to see what kind of creative edits are put forth. I'm already "breakin' the law" and segueing Think About The Days straight into From There To Back Again. Like two old friends renewed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 02:46:39 AM
Not as impressive as a photo of the smile box, but ah well...

(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrcd.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 02:48:53 AM
Someone updated the wikipedia article with all the session musicians that Generation42 mentioned:

Additional musicians


Looking at those credits, and "Daybreak" excluded, are we to believe that Jeff is the *only* other non-BBs voice in the entire album's harmonies? 'Cause that's not what I'm hearing at times. Unless Jeff can "throw" his voice six different ways...lol.

Or...are there additional vocal credits somewhere?

Hard to say, although I can't say I've heard any identifiable voices on these songs sans Mike, Brian, Bruce, Al, and Jeff. Still not familiar with how David sounds or if he's anywhere on these songs. Still, I guess I haven't really been listening for voices other than those five folks, nor have I given it a good headphones listen (mainly because we've only gotten meh quality clips and streaming copies).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 02:49:38 AM
Not as impressive as a photo of the smile box, but ah well...

(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrcd.jpg)

Whoa, looks like you just took that right after purchasing it from the store. Am I correct?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 02:59:46 AM
Not as impressive as a photo of the smile box, but ah well...

(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrcd.jpg)

Whoa, looks like you just took that right after purchasing it from the store. Am I correct?

Correction - my dad took it right after purchasing it from the store :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 03:01:21 AM
ALL AH WANNA DO IS SCREAM... JEALOUSAAAY


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 03:02:32 AM
ALL AH WANNA DO IS SCREAM... JEALOUSAAAY

yes, but he doesn't get home for another 7 HOURS!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 03:05:23 AM
Wow. So the albums's out in a few stores. Wonder how long til a leak pops up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 03:07:30 AM
ALL AH WANNA DO IS SCREAM... JEALOUSAAAY

yes, but he doesn't get home for another 7 HOURS!!!

ARRRGGHHHHHGggehisG#)WEJgsigpd;


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 03:18:58 AM
Hmm I wonder if it's already in store in Germany somewhere. Gotta check out my city later today. And I gotta say, I'm still suprised they kept it from leaking at all. This reunion is in capable hands.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 03:36:19 AM
the worst part is my dad takes Wednesdays off - and they had it in yesterday!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 31, 2012, 03:50:19 AM
Wow. So the albums's out in a few stores. Wonder how long til a leak pops up.

Finally, someone says it :)

I'd give it till noon Tomorow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 04:00:29 AM
Wow. So the albums's out in a few stores. Wonder how long til a leak pops up.

Finally, someone says it :)

I'd give it till noon Tomorow.
Technically speaking it wouldn't be a leak at this point, since it's been (somewhat) officially released. Rips/copies of a CD somebody legally bought in a store ain't really a leak.  ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 04:02:06 AM
Very true.

I'm getting antsy now. Heard the full versions of Shelter & Isn't It Time.

Shelter is great. Feels like a record. Definitely no Imagination to be found. Nice, chunky drums.

Still holding out on "From There To Back Again" and everything else, but these little youtube clips / samplers they keep dropping is making it hard to avoid 'em.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 04:09:23 AM
The last 4 songs are magical Summers Gone is breathtaking,haunting and beautiful.
Brian Wilson well done.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: brother john on May 31, 2012, 04:52:16 AM

Quite frankly, it seems fairly obvious to me that Joe Thomas' sonic signature is all over these tracks.  This is not some cryptic 'feeling' I have; there is audible evidence.  I find it surprising that others do not notice it.

The music itself sounds as though he was more involved than Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys in my opinion.


DonnyL, I admire the degree to which you are determined to stick to your guns, maintaining your theory that in essence Joe Thomas is the organ grinder and Brian Wilson is the monkey.

But I would ask you to think about the following: This is the first Beach Boys album with all the band members involved for a very long time. It's a great shame that Carl and Dennis are not involved, but there it is. It may also be the last. This is very exciting and meaningful to a lot of long-term fans who may have been following BW & Co since their childhoods (like me). It is a cause for celebration that we will be getting Brian, Mike, Bruce and Al singing together, Brian involved to a meaningful degree in composition and arrangement, and an opportunity for those who want to to attend a Beach Boys concert. This is great news!

I don't see the point really in injecting cynicism and 'bad vibes' into a discussion that should be joyful and celebratory. The new album is what it is. I'd rather have an album with ageing, imperfect voices, with an old, tired, slightly befuddled Brian Wilson involved, than no beach Boys album at all. I consider it highly probable that many of the chord progressions, melodies and the majority of vocal arrangements are written by Brian Wilson. Surely that's a good thing!

I believe that, in your 'Brian is barely involved/Joe Thomas is too involved' comments, what you are standing up for is your right to be disappointed that the old Brian Wilson no longer exists, and that what remains cannot live up to our desire to be embraced by the beauty of his music in the way that we have been so often in the past. And I feel it too, but I will take comfort in the thought that something positive has happened in a life that has contained much tragedy (Brian's not mine...  ::)), and that Brian Wilson and his fans may take comfort in it too. 

Let's just enjoy what we have.






Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: desmondo on May 31, 2012, 04:56:11 AM
Having to the five tracks on the guardian website I have to admit I was wrong about this reunion

It ain't Pet Sounds or Smile but damn its pretty good in a great number of places - they should be proud


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: matt-zeus on May 31, 2012, 06:07:57 AM
If it is the last Beach Boys album, then far better that this album should be it than either 'Stars'n'stripes', 'Summer in Paradise', 'Still Cruisin' or 'BB85' (or even KTSA) depending on your definition of what was the last 'proper' Beach Boys album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 06:36:10 AM
I believe that, in your 'Brian is barely involved/Joe Thomas is too involved' comments, what you are standing up for is your right to be disappointed that the old Brian Wilson no longer exists, and that what remains cannot live up to our desire to be embraced by the beauty of his music in the way that we have been so often in the past. And I feel it too, but I will take comfort in the thought that something positive has happened in a life that has contained much tragedy (Brian's not mine...  ::)), and that Brian Wilson and his fans may take comfort in it too. 

Let's just enjoy what we have.

Or maybe he's just saying that it sounds more like a Joe Thomas record than a Brian Wilson one?

Liking something uncritically is much more of an insult to any serious attempt at art than disliking it critically. Personally, I think that Brian has earned enough of our respect that any new work from him should be treated as proper art, worthy of discussion and proper critical engagement, not just a mindless "Yay! Go team Brian!"

Certainly in my case I'm not 'disappointed that the old Brian Wilson no longer exists' -- I think That Lucky Old Sun is one of the best things he's ever done, and I see no evidence that he's deteriorated markedly since 2008. I am, however, disappointed by what I've heard of the new album, simply because it's not very good (though I reserve my right to change my mind on hearing the whole thing).

But whether it turns out to be another Pet Sounds or another Looking Back With Love, I'll show it the respect it's due by actually *engaging* with the work. *Thinking* about it, not just giving it a free pass. And I would hope others would too. Surely Brian and the rest of the band have earned enough respect that we don't have to say "Just enjoy what we have"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 31, 2012, 07:25:37 AM
Surely Brian and the rest of the band have earned enough respect that we don't have to say "Just enjoy what we have"?

but i think some of us really are enjoying it  ;D

I hated the single TWGMTR, but have really warmed to it upon repeated listenings.
I think being an apologist  for some of the short-comings of what the 'Boys do is part and parcel of being a fan.. like if some of my musician friends heard me listening to TLOS out of context they might think from the production style that i was listening to something vapid like 'Hairspray'. For me it's all about context, we know for many reasons that this album wont be Pet Sounds, but I will ignore what I don't like and enjoy what I do, because i really am happy to pour over, analyse, and ultimately enjoy any offering that Brian and the Boys present! I'm not saying I don't respect your ability to dislike the album though, I just happen to think it's good  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 08:14:31 AM
The album is out now on iTunes New Zealand. Sadly no iTunes LP (The Smile Sessions had a nice one) and not even a digital booklet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 31, 2012, 08:37:42 AM
The album is out now on iTunes New Zealand. Sadly no iTunes LP (The Smile Sessions had a nice one) and not even a digital booklet.

anyone can go on their itunes store to the main music page, scroll down and click on the circle flag in the bottom right corner.  You can then change your country and buy the album.

MIND YOU...it's 17.99.  

edit: nvm doens't work!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 31, 2012, 08:38:40 AM
I'll wait for it to popup on the torrents while I wait for my copy from Amazon.com to arrive.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bossaroo on May 31, 2012, 08:41:40 AM
Not as impressive as a photo of the smile box, but ah well...

(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrcd.jpg)

Whoa, looks like you just took that right after purchasing it from the store. Am I correct?

Correction - my dad took it right after purchasing it from the store :D

where was it purchased? what store/what city
thanks!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on May 31, 2012, 08:41:47 AM
It says I can only buy stuff in Holland with my Apple ID...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Beach Boy on May 31, 2012, 08:42:35 AM
Picked up a copy today, can't wait 'til my brother comes home, then I am going to tease him.  >:D   Strange feeling to buy a new and regular Beach Boys album at the store. And don't forget, the greatest pleasure lies in the anticipation.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 08:59:04 AM
The album is out now on iTunes New Zealand. Sadly no iTunes LP (The Smile Sessions had a nice one) and not even a digital booklet.

anyone can go on their itunes store to the main music page, scroll down and click on the circle flag in the bottom right corner.  You can then change your country and buy the album.

MIND YOU...it's 17.99. 

I tried and it switched me back to the US.  :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 31, 2012, 09:05:59 AM
awe. well i guess im wrong, my bad, i'll edit


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 09:08:26 AM
All good, I was gonna try anyway.  ;D

And the waiting game continues. No mom and pop stores around here as far as I know..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 09:13:00 AM
It says I can only buy stuff in Holland with my Apple ID...

It'll be on the Dutch store at 1am.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Generation42 on May 31, 2012, 09:15:27 AM
Well, I’ve listened through the album twice now, and thought I might pass along some impressions.



Hi, thanks for the review. Obviously you've got a promo. Now, I've asked this before on this thread, but no answer, so here goes again: is the promo different from the regular album? The two songs played on the Dutch Schiffer.fm show (TWGMTR and SV) sounded a lot different, a lot more enjoyable, with the lead not so prominent etc...

/B

You're welcome for the review, but as I said in an earlier post, it's not a promo copy (no, I would have made sure to note that).  I work at an indie record store and we just get things in early (usually not this early), so when they came in yesterday, I picked one up.  I made sure to point that out so that anyone so inclined could search out their mom-n-pop's beginning yesterday. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 09:18:16 AM
The album is out now on iTunes New Zealand. Sadly no iTunes LP (The Smile Sessions had a nice one) and not even a digital booklet.

anyone can go on their itunes store to the main music page, scroll down and click on the circle flag in the bottom right corner.  You can then change your country and buy the album.

MIND YOU...it's 17.99.  

edit: nvm doens't work!!

You can only purchase from the corresponding store for the country that your iTunes account is registered to.

The $17.99 price tag is because it's in New Zealand dollars, not US dollars. I believe it's going to be $11.99 on US iTunes.

It will be available on iTunes (local times):

Now: New Zealand
In a few hours if not already: Australia
Friday between 00:01am-01:00am: Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland (definitely), Scandinavia (I think)
Monday, 00:01am: UK
Tuesday, 00:01am: US, Canada, everywhere


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 09:26:25 AM
And now we wait..


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 31, 2012, 09:42:44 AM
Oops keep forgetting about this thread. Couldn't work out why there were no other mention of the Guardian tracks, then I find people in here posting photos of the actual album.

I have to say I am knocked out by From There To Back Again, and am now desperate to here the other two ending songs in full. Just had Isn't It Time in the car too which I am enjoying a lot.

So who's gonna leak this mutha ?.... (bearing in mind that we will all purchase it of course)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on May 31, 2012, 09:46:11 AM
My local indie shop sold me the two-disc TSS on the Saturday before release day.  I'm stopping there every day, starting today, just to check.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 10:00:51 AM
I forgot that it's going to be released in Germany tomorrow, so... I guess I'll just buy it anywhere tomorrow.  8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on May 31, 2012, 10:03:11 AM
Someone updated the wikipedia article with all the session musicians that Generation42 mentioned:

Additional musicians


Looking at those credits, and "Daybreak" excluded, are we to believe that Jeff is the *only* other non-BBs voice in the entire album's harmonies? 'Cause that's not what I'm hearing at times. Unless Jeff can "throw" his voice six different ways...lol.

Or...are there additional vocal credits somewhere?

Hard to say, although I can't say I've heard any identifiable voices on these songs sans Mike, Brian, Bruce, Al, and Jeff. Still not familiar with how David sounds or if he's anywhere on these songs. Still, I guess I haven't really been listening for voices other than those five folks, nor have I given it a good headphones listen (mainly because we've only gotten meh quality clips and streaming copies).

if David sang on the album, they wouldn't say that he didn't in the liner notes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 10:09:36 AM
Someone updated the wikipedia article with all the session musicians that Generation42 mentioned:

Additional musicians

    Adrian Baker - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Alisha Bauer - Cello
    Jeff Baxter - Guitar
    Eddie Bayers - Drums
    Scott Bennett - Vibes, organ, clavinet
    Jessica Bish - Snaps
    Curt Bisquera - Drums
    Chris Bleth - Oboe
    Nelson Bragg - Timpani, percussion
    Tom Bukovac - Guitar
    John Cowsill - Drums, snaps
    Chad Cromwell - Drums
    Joel Deroulin - Violin
    Jeff Foskett - Vocals, acoustic guitar, snaps
    Vanessa Freebarin-Smith - Cello
    Probyn Gregory - French horn, banjo, acoustic guitar, trombone
    Gary Griffin - Accordion
    John Hobbs - Piano, tack piano
    Cliff Hugo - Bass
    Sharon Jackson - Violin
    Peter Kent - Violin
    Songa Lee - Violin
    Christian Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Hayleigh Love - Vocals on "Daybreak Over the Ocean"
    Skip Masters - Radio voiceover on "The Private Life of Bill and Sue"
    Paul Mertens - Saxophone, string arrangements, flute
    Larry Millas - Bass
    Jim Peterik - Ukulele, percussion
    Michael Rhodes - Bass
    Jim Riley - Guitar
    Julie Rogers - Violin
    Nick Rowe - Guitar
    Darian Sahanaja - Vibes
    Brett Simons - Bass
    David Stone - Acoustic double bass
    Joe Thomas - Piano, snaps, harpsichord, organ, tack piano
    Scott Totten - Guitar
    Nick Walusko - Guitar
    John Wittenberg - Violin


I think Wikipedia is wrong on the lead vocals for "Isn't it Time" -- the chorus is Bruce (joined by Brian), then Al's part.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 10:17:05 AM

Quite frankly, it seems fairly obvious to me that Joe Thomas' sonic signature is all over these tracks.  This is not some cryptic 'feeling' I have; there is audible evidence.  I find it surprising that others do not notice it.

The music itself sounds as though he was more involved than Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys in my opinion.


DonnyL, I admire the degree to which you are determined to stick to your guns, maintaining your theory that in essence Joe Thomas is the organ grinder and Brian Wilson is the monkey.

But I would ask you to think about the following: This is the first Beach Boys album with all the band members involved for a very long time. It's a great shame that Carl and Dennis are not involved, but there it is. It may also be the last. This is very exciting and meaningful to a lot of long-term fans who may have been following BW & Co since their childhoods (like me). It is a cause for celebration that we will be getting Brian, Mike, Bruce and Al singing together, Brian involved to a meaningful degree in composition and arrangement, and an opportunity for those who want to to attend a Beach Boys concert. This is great news!

I don't see the point really in injecting cynicism and 'bad vibes' into a discussion that should be joyful and celebratory. The new album is what it is. I'd rather have an album with ageing, imperfect voices, with an old, tired, slightly befuddled Brian Wilson involved, than no beach Boys album at all. I consider it highly probable that many of the chord progressions, melodies and the majority of vocal arrangements are written by Brian Wilson. Surely that's a good thing!

I believe that, in your 'Brian is barely involved/Joe Thomas is too involved' comments, what you are standing up for is your right to be disappointed that the old Brian Wilson no longer exists, and that what remains cannot live up to our desire to be embraced by the beauty of his music in the way that we have been so often in the past. And I feel it too, but I will take comfort in the thought that something positive has happened in a life that has contained much tragedy (Brian's not mine...  ::)), and that Brian Wilson and his fans may take comfort in it too.  

Let's just enjoy what we have.


It seems you're assuming I'm not of these long-term fans.

I bought Summer in Paradise on the day it was released (age 13).  I was a die-hard already at that point.  Ditto Imagination. (I don't think I could stomach Stars & Stripes).

Cried when my mom came into my room and told be Carl had died.  "I feel like he was part of the family somehow," she said.

The last Beach Boys concert I attended was 1996. After Carl died, I vowed never to attend another.

Until now. I'll be in Berkeley tomorrow night for what's likely to be an emotional experience for me.

I take the Beach Boys very seriously.  I am musically obsessed with them.

I had all the records and all the unreleased stuff on cassette by age 14. I've been involved in Beach Boys fandom long before the internet, writing letters back & forth with Dometic Priore, etc., various other pen pals. It was through the kindness of my fellow fans and the communities that I was able to obtain a lot of material over the years.  I was a member of Friends of Dennis Wilson all through high school.  I put up with a lot of teasing as a Beach Boys fan in the dark Full House years.

I've seen countless bad decisions and missed opportunities over the years.  That's why this record hurts me as much as it makes me excited.

I'm not creating the bad vibes here, I'm pointing them out.  Sorry, I'm not getting on the 'we should be grateful to have anything at all' bandwagon because I expect more from the greatest band the world has ever known.

I'm sorry that I am experiencing a little heartbreak with the new album, but I feel I'm entitled to it.  Just as you are entitled to love it.

And for the record, I think Brian Wilson is still fully capable of producing brilliant music -- if I didn't feel this way, then I wouldn't have a problem with the new album at all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 31, 2012, 10:44:42 AM
I think basically it boils down to Crow T. Robot's immortal cry, "Hey you keep Christmas in your way, and let me keep it in mine, ok?"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 10:55:52 AM
Oops keep forgetting about this thread. Couldn't work out why there were no other mention of the Guardian tracks, then I find people in here posting photos of the actual album.

I wonder if there'll be a specific forum section for discussion of the new album soon (like there is for Smile Sessions)?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 31, 2012, 10:57:39 AM
Oops keep forgetting about this thread. Couldn't work out why there were no other mention of the Guardian tracks, then I find people in here posting photos of the actual album.

I wonder if there'll be a specific forum section for discussion of the new album soon (like there is for Smile Sessions)?

I dunno - I think the Smile Sessions was a one off as it was generating about 12 different threads every day months before it was released. But who's to say - I guess this is pretty big news too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 11:06:14 AM
Oops keep forgetting about this thread. Couldn't work out why there were no other mention of the Guardian tracks, then I find people in here posting photos of the actual album.

I wonder if there'll be a specific forum section for discussion of the new album soon (like there is for Smile Sessions)?

I dunno - I think the Smile Sessions was a one off as it was generating about 12 different threads every day months before it was released. But who's to say - I guess this is pretty big news too.
Nah it's just another BBs album, who cares... it's their 29th or something... if you've heard one of 'em you've heard 'em all.  :-\


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 31, 2012, 11:11:34 AM
Not as impressive as a photo of the smile box, but ah well...

(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrcd.jpg)

chhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

DROOL................................. SLOBBER.............................


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 31, 2012, 11:15:29 AM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 11:16:46 AM
The professor detect a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m37rkp8LVG1r9nrs0.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 31, 2012, 11:28:08 AM
the worst part is my dad takes Wednesdays off - and they had it in yesterday!

Mr. M, you have to tell us now, is your Dad an original Beach Boys fan?  Two gens of fandom in the family is cool!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 31, 2012, 11:36:00 AM
Oops keep forgetting about this thread. Couldn't work out why there were no other mention of the Guardian tracks, then I find people in here posting photos of the actual album.

I wonder if there'll be a specific forum section for discussion of the new album soon (like there is for Smile Sessions)?

I dunno - I think the Smile Sessions was a one off as it was generating about 12 different threads every day months before it was released. But who's to say - I guess this is pretty big news too.
Nah it's just another BBs album, who cares... it's their 29th or something... if you've heard one of 'em you've heard 'em all.  :-\

I think  you misunderstood me - I wasn't saying this isn't a big deal. Just that the sheer amount of traffic on this board during the run up to TSS release kind of necessitated a sub forum. I don't know how this compares though. Guess there's quite a few threads. Let the Mods decide!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 31, 2012, 11:39:05 AM
I think a thread designated to reviews would suffice


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 31, 2012, 11:48:29 AM
I had all the records and all the unreleased stuff on cassette by age 14.

Don't think you did. Actually, know you didn't.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 31, 2012, 11:58:32 AM
Oh, you know what he meant. The "commonly traded unreleased stuff" not the "super sekrit decoder ring, passed only between extra special super important people" material.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 12:01:02 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 


More like:


Or maybe he's just saying that it sounds more like a Joe Thomas record than a Brian Wilson one?

Liking something uncritically is much more of an insult to any serious attempt at art than disliking it critically. Personally, I think that Brian has earned enough of our respect that any new work from him should be treated as proper art, worthy of discussion and proper critical engagement, not just a mindless "Yay! Go team Brian!"



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 31, 2012, 12:04:25 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 


More like:


Or maybe he's just saying that it sounds more like a Joe Thomas record than a Brian Wilson one?

Liking something uncritically is much more of an insult to any serious attempt at art than disliking it critically. Personally, I think that Brian has earned enough of our respect that any new work from him should be treated as proper art, worthy of discussion and proper critical engagement, not just a mindless "Yay! Go team Brian!"


asserting the victory of art over criticism is not an uncritical act.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 12:06:46 PM
I had all the records and all the unreleased stuff on cassette by age 14.

Don't think you did. Actually, know you didn't.

alright man, you got me. you're right and I'm terribly wrong. let's change that to 'a lot of most of the common unreleased stuff that was available on boots at the time'.

perhaps you missed my basic point -- I was a pretty dedicated fan by age 14.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 12:14:42 PM
Or maybe he's just saying that it sounds more like a Joe Thomas record than a Brian Wilson one?

There's a lot of supposition in that statement, mainly the idea that any of us know what a 69 year old Brian Wilson producing David Marks, Al Jardine, Mike Love and Bruce Johnston in a modern studio in 2012 is 'supposed' to sound like.

I think a thread designated to reviews would suffice

I was thinking individual song discussion threads, but fair enough.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 12:16:18 PM
asserting the victory of art over criticism is not an uncritical act.

No, but *uncritically* asserting the victory of art over criticism is. Which was my point. Saying "Just enjoy it, don't worry about the production, the lyrics, who did what on the record or anything else", sometimes without even having heard it first, is as uncritical as it's possible to be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 31, 2012, 12:17:49 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 
Nobody wins when everyone argues. We all have different opinions, and there is nothing wrong with viewing the new record critically. There is really no need for groupthink here. We can have 3000 different opinions, not just the two that you listed.

I happen to love the new record, and I can't wait to get my hands on my own copy. The only song I haven't heard in full is "Strange World," and the only one I dislike is "Beaches in Mind," so I have a good idea that I will dig the sh*t out of this record.

Still, there is no reason to try to invalidate the opinions of others who don't like the album or find fault with it. Their dislike of, or disdain for the album does not need to affect our enjoyment of it. I too have plenty of criticisms I can level about the production, but that's life. Let's all discuss the record, and if some people don't like it, I for one find it interesting to read their critiques.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 31, 2012, 12:20:32 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 
Nobody wins when everyone argues. We all have different opinions, and there is nothing wrong with viewing the new record critically. There is really no need for groupthink here. We can have 3000 different opinions, not just the two that you listed.

I happen to love the new record, and I can't wait to get my hands on my own copy. The only song I haven't heard in full is "Strange World," and the only one I dislike is "Beaches in Mind," so I have a good idea that I will dig the sh*t out of this record.

Still, there is no reason to try to invalidate the opinions of others who don't like the album or find fault with it. Their dislike of, or disdain for the album does not need to affect our enjoyment of it. I too have plenty of criticisms I can level about the production, but that's life. Let's all discuss the record, and if some people don't like it, I for one find it interesting to read their critiques.

Right on, Boots!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 12:22:46 PM

There's a lot of supposition in that statement, mainly the idea that any of us know what a 69 year old Brian Wilson producing David Marks, Al Jardine, Mike Love and Bruce Johnston in a modern studio in 2012 is 'supposed' to sound like.


Eh, there's only a lot of supposition in the statement if you want to over-complicate a simple opinion.

I think we know pretty well what a Joe Thomas record sounds like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 12:25:00 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 

It doesn't have to be and shouldn't be that ^ way. There are no "sides", and it's not about winning and losing.

It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on May 31, 2012, 01:04:25 PM
Copy's going to arrive Friday or Saturday.

Still heavily into both "The Private Life of Bill and Sue" and "Shelter".

To these ears "From There to Back Again" sounds a bit like "Pet Sounds the Musical". Maybe it'll grow on me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 31, 2012, 01:12:15 PM
I don't get it, the album has been released, but nothing on the web yet ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on May 31, 2012, 01:13:02 PM
The professor detects a battle between two armies:

On one side is: the cynical, "I know a lot about music I I find fault with this production for these various arcane reasons"
or "I know a lot about the inner circle and the historical circumstances that led to this disappointing album" (plus the various Myrmidons wielding varieties of these doctrines).

On the other side is" the new BB album."

Guess who wins?

 

It doesn't have to be and shouldn't be that ^ way. There are no "sides", and it's not about winning and losing.

It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

.. and sage words from the Sherrif! Good to see you back here again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 31, 2012, 01:14:22 PM

Quite frankly, it seems fairly obvious to me that Joe Thomas' sonic signature is all over these tracks.  This is not some cryptic 'feeling' I have; there is audible evidence.  I find it surprising that others do not notice it.

The music itself sounds as though he was more involved than Brian Wilson or the Beach Boys in my opinion.


DonnyL, I admire the degree to which you are determined to stick to your guns, maintaining your theory that in essence Joe Thomas is the organ grinder and Brian Wilson is the monkey.

But I would ask you to think about the following: This is the first Beach Boys album with all the band members involved for a very long time. It's a great shame that Carl and Dennis are not involved, but there it is. It may also be the last. This is very exciting and meaningful to a lot of long-term fans who may have been following BW & Co since their childhoods (like me). It is a cause for celebration that we will be getting Brian, Mike, Bruce and Al singing together, Brian involved to a meaningful degree in composition and arrangement, and an opportunity for those who want to to attend a Beach Boys concert. This is great news!

I don't see the point really in injecting cynicism and 'bad vibes' into a discussion that should be joyful and celebratory. The new album is what it is. I'd rather have an album with ageing, imperfect voices, with an old, tired, slightly befuddled Brian Wilson involved, than no beach Boys album at all. I consider it highly probable that many of the chord progressions, melodies and the majority of vocal arrangements are written by Brian Wilson. Surely that's a good thing!

I believe that, in your 'Brian is barely involved/Joe Thomas is too involved' comments, what you are standing up for is your right to be disappointed that the old Brian Wilson no longer exists, and that what remains cannot live up to our desire to be embraced by the beauty of his music in the way that we have been so often in the past. And I feel it too, but I will take comfort in the thought that something positive has happened in a life that has contained much tragedy (Brian's not mine...  ::)), and that Brian Wilson and his fans may take comfort in it too.  

Let's just enjoy what we have.


It seems you're assuming I'm not of these long-term fans.

I bought Summer in Paradise on the day it was released (age 13).  I was a die-hard already at that point.  Ditto Imagination. (I don't think I could stomach Stars & Stripes).

Cried when my mom came into my room and told be Carl had died.  "I feel like he was part of the family somehow," she said.

The last Beach Boys concert I attended was 1996. After Carl died, I vowed never to attend another.

Until now. I'll be in Berkeley tomorrow night for what's likely to be an emotional experience for me.

I take the Beach Boys very seriously.  I am musically obsessed with them.

I had all the records and all the unreleased stuff on cassette by age 14. I've been involved in Beach Boys fandom long before the internet, writing letters back & forth with Dometic Priore, etc., various other pen pals. It was through the kindness of my fellow fans and the communities that I was able to obtain a lot of material over the years.  I was a member of Friends of Dennis Wilson all through high school.  I put up with a lot of teasing as a Beach Boys fan in the dark Full House years.

I've seen countless bad decisions and missed opportunities over the years.  That's why this record hurts me as much as it makes me excited.

I'm not creating the bad vibes here, I'm pointing them out.  Sorry, I'm not getting on the 'we should be grateful to have anything at all' bandwagon because I expect more from the greatest band the world has ever known.

I'm sorry that I am experiencing a little heartbreak with the new album, but I feel I'm entitled to it.  Just as you are entitled to love it.

And for the record, I think Brian Wilson is still fully capable of producing brilliant music -- if I didn't feel this way, then I wouldn't have a problem with the new album at all.

I gotta say I see where DonnyL is coming from. But here's the thing. Over time, it's become obvious that, perhaps, even though Brian still wants to work in the studio and do new material, he wants, or perhaps needs, somebody in the studio with him to basically "co-produce". And he goes with who he feels comfortable with. And apparently that person in this instance is Joe Thomas. Brian is apparently happy with the results. So, if you don't like, there is plenty of other Beach Boys material to listen to. I don't think that most of their new material is Pet Sounds-good, but you know what? A few of the songs, from what I've heard, sound absolutely beautiful, and the fact that even after all these years, there are a few more classic Beach Boys tunes is awesome.

It's not the 1960s or '70s anymore, and I doubt Brian is interested in doing things the same way he did back then, if he can get faster results these days with more help. He's not gonna sit there slugging out tunes like he did Love You style, if he has a group and also Joe Thomas around to facilitate that things get done in a fuller, slicker way. I'm not gonna say that I know what Brian thinks, because I have no idea, but I'd surmise that the guy likes things to be slick, as judging by, hmmm, nearly everything he's ever done!

I think you have to accept that Brian probably wants things this way, and even if it's not what you want, it probably IS what he wants.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 01:18:35 PM
I don't get it, the album has been released, but nothing on the web yet ?

Who says it isn't....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 31, 2012, 01:19:45 PM
Quote
I think you have to accept that Brian probably wants things this way, and even if it's not what you want, it probably IS what he wants.
So then what do we make of his cries to make a "real" rock n' roll album next for how many years he's been saying it, if that's how he likes productions?

As far as accepting anything, um... er? This is Brian Wilson we're talking about! Decades of speculating is part of the FUN! I love hearing what people think his motivations are... he's so fluid with his history and reality that you can quote his interviews like scripture to prove just about any point you want to make!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 31, 2012, 01:23:16 PM
I don't get it, the album has been released, but nothing on the web yet ?

Who says it isn't....

I haven't found it anywhere at all the usual places.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 31, 2012, 01:27:17 PM
I don't get it, the album has been released, but nothing on the web yet ?

Who says it isn't....

So.. are you just gonna troll us with your picture ? :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 01:30:03 PM
I don't get it, the album has been released, but nothing on the web yet ?

Who says it isn't....

So.. are you just gonna troll us with your picture ? :(

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 01:41:55 PM
I gotta say I see where DonnyL is coming from. But here's the thing. Over time, it's become obvious that, perhaps, even though Brian still wants to work in the studio and do new material, he wants, or perhaps needs, somebody in the studio with him to basically "co-produce". And he goes with who he feels comfortable with. And apparently that person in this instance is Joe Thomas. Brian is apparently happy with the results. So, if you don't like, there is plenty of other Beach Boys material to listen to. I don't think that most of their new material is Pet Sounds-good, but you know what? A few of the songs, from what I've heard, sound absolutely beautiful, and the fact that even after all these years, there are a few more classic Beach Boys tunes is awesome.

It's not the 1960s or '70s anymore, and I doubt Brian is interested in doing things the same way he did back then, if he can get faster results these days with more help. He's not gonna sit there slugging out tunes like he did Love You style, if he has a group and also Joe Thomas around to facilitate that things get done in a fuller, slicker way. I'm not gonna say that I know what Brian thinks, because I have no idea, but I'd surmise that the guy likes things to be slick, as judging by, hmmm, nearly everything he's ever done!

I think you have to accept that Brian probably wants things this way, and even if it's not what you want, it probably IS what he wants.


I appreciate your input but I'm not sure some of you understand what I'm getting at. Perhaps you're confusing my opinions with those of some of the Brianista types or something.

Honestly, I'm not talking about what Brian 'wants'. Brian might actually want to go home, watch TV and eat a steak instead of playing a show on most evenings. Would fans be okay with that? Brian might not want to produce an album at all.

Which is totally fine by me, actually.

I'm talking about what 'Produced by Brian Wilson' means on this album, and the way this album sounds. And the artistic merit of this (perhaps final) Beach Boys record.

I'm talking about the difference between selecting an outside producer vs. Brian actually producing.

Simply because Brian Wilson likes the result does not mean that he produced it.

You guys really think that BW did not have any songs hanging around that were not co-written by Joe Thomas? What's going on here?

The elephant in the room is that every person in this forum who seems to accept that BW was running this show cannot seem to identify or clarify exactly what Joe Thomas did on this album, and seem to be skirting that issue completely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 01:42:37 PM
No sign of it that I can see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mark H on May 31, 2012, 01:53:23 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

I gotta say I see where DonnyL is coming from. But here's the thing. Over time, it's become obvious that, perhaps, even though Brian still wants to work in the studio and do new material, he wants, or perhaps needs, somebody in the studio with him to basically "co-produce". And he goes with who he feels comfortable with. And apparently that person in this instance is Joe Thomas. Brian is apparently happy with the results. So, if you don't like, there is plenty of other Beach Boys material to listen to. I don't think that most of their new material is Pet Sounds-good, but you know what? A few of the songs, from what I've heard, sound absolutely beautiful, and the fact that even after all these years, there are a few more classic Beach Boys tunes is awesome.

It's not the 1960s or '70s anymore, and I doubt Brian is interested in doing things the same way he did back then

I started to write a similar post but gave up as I didn't want to add to the mix, however it's now easy for me to +1 or QFT! sweetdudejim's great post! :)

TWGMTR may not sound like your cup of tea but it's the new BB album full of B.Wilson tunes, and it's here!

A modern 'authentic/true' BW production is unfortunately a dream that likely won't come because, as sdjim describes so well, Brian seemingly has neither the need or drive to produce the way he used to in the 60's/70's.  That's more than understandable.

Maybe the Wilson/Paley stuff was the 'holy grail' or nearest we got to a 'true' BW sound, the sound being mostly done of his own volition/design

It just so happens Brian has /needs the help of others to create the finished product more now, which again is what you would expect.

I can't imagine anyone really thinks BW is calling all the shots.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 01:57:11 PM
I gotta say I see where DonnyL is coming from. But here's the thing. Over time, it's become obvious that, perhaps, even though Brian still wants to work in the studio and do new material, he wants, or perhaps needs, somebody in the studio with him to basically "co-produce". And he goes with who he feels comfortable with. And apparently that person in this instance is Joe Thomas. Brian is apparently happy with the results. So, if you don't like, there is plenty of other Beach Boys material to listen to. I don't think that most of their new material is Pet Sounds-good, but you know what? A few of the songs, from what I've heard, sound absolutely beautiful, and the fact that even after all these years, there are a few more classic Beach Boys tunes is awesome.

It's not the 1960s or '70s anymore, and I doubt Brian is interested in doing things the same way he did back then, if he can get faster results these days with more help. He's not gonna sit there slugging out tunes like he did Love You style, if he has a group and also Joe Thomas around to facilitate that things get done in a fuller, slicker way. I'm not gonna say that I know what Brian thinks, because I have no idea, but I'd surmise that the guy likes things to be slick, as judging by, hmmm, nearly everything he's ever done!

I think you have to accept that Brian probably wants things this way, and even if it's not what you want, it probably IS what he wants.


I appreciate your input but I'm not sure some of you understand what I'm getting at. Perhaps you're confusing my opinions with those of some of the Brianista types or something.

Honestly, I'm not talking about what Brian 'wants'. Brian might actually want to go home, watch TV and eat a steak instead of playing a show on most evenings. Would fans be okay with that? Brian might not want to produce an album at all.

Which is totally fine by me, actually.

I'm talking about what 'Produced by Brian Wilson' means on this album, and the way this album sounds. And the artistic merit of this (perhaps final) Beach Boys record.

I'm talking about the difference between selecting an outside producer vs. Brian actually producing.

Simply because Brian Wilson likes the result does not mean that he produced it.

You guys really think that BW did not have any songs hanging around that were not co-written by Joe Thomas? What's going on here?

The elephant in the room is that every person in this forum who seems to accept that BW was running this show cannot seem to identify or clarify exactly what Joe Thomas did on this album, and seem to be skirting that issue completely.


I don't think it's any elephant in the room at all.  In fact, I think you've created the elephant in the room if anything.  While I respect your opinions, I think you're calling into question the anecdotes, factual evidence, and opinions of nearly everyone regarding Brian Wilson's involvement barring Brian Wilson, whom we know has been prone to giving short ambiguous answers and has skewed factual evidence often.  Yes, "Produced by Brian Wilson" sells records.  But why is it so difficult to grasp that that is indeed the truth? If you don't like the album, fine, but Brian Wilson produced this record by all known accounts.

As for Thomas's involvement, what more is there to explain? He co-wrote the tracks with Brian, he recorded Brian in the late 90's and when they got together prior to the reunion, and he's had a hand in bringing this album together and making it happen.  No one's saying he had no involvement in creating the album. He's a co-writer.  He played on some of the tracks.  There's no doubt about those things.  But I think a major mistake everyone here has been making is confusing production with engineering.  Brian produced the album.  He wrote the songs, arranged the tracks, dealt with instrumentation and so on.  He may have also had considerable influence on the sound.  Now, whoever engineered the thing had much more influence on the sound.  Brian, presumably, does not know his way around ProTools.  He needs help with that. I believe that's where Thomas comes in, and though *I* have no real issue with the sound or production, I'm guessing that's where he exerted his influence on what you're hearing.

Think about George Martin, for instance. I think Brian, nowadays, works in a way very similar to how George used to (barring writing string arrangements).  Geoff Emerik influenced the Beatles' sound more than anyone else.  He was the engineer.  I think the same works in this case.  I'll stand by my guns until the day I die that Brian produced this album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 31, 2012, 02:00:24 PM
It also sounds like Joe Thomas booked the recording sessions and the musicians. But still, that doesn't mean he produced. To my ears, the production on the new album sounds in line with Brian's recent productions. (minus the vocal effects)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 02:09:13 PM
The elephant in the room is that every person in this forum who seems to accept that BW was running this show cannot seem to identify or clarify exactly what Joe Thomas did on this album, and seem to be skirting that issue completely.

What did Chuck Britz do? What did Larry Levine do? What did Steve Desper do? What did Carl Wilson do? What did Andy Paley do? What did Scott Bennett do?

They all helped Brian realize his vision. Sometimes they had a vision of their own that they added to his. Sometimes they mixed the records for him. Sometimes they pulled together the loose ends that Brian couldn't be bothered to. Steve's records for the Boys sound significantly different than their work before or after. But no one calls them records produced by Steve Desper. The ideas and directions for the albums came from Brian and the band. Now, not everyone likes Joe's sound or approach, but I don't see reason that his relationship with Brian is significantly different, at least this time around.

http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

Joe: "He arranges all the vocals and produces the record. I record it because I think he really likes the fact that technically… you gotta kind of keep up on all the techniques that are available to us right now and that’s kind of what my role is. He’s not going to tell me to use an SM-58 microphone instead of a U-67. He trusts me in that way."

That's Joe's account.

And just as I finished this, Zach95 put it better than I did.

"But I think a major mistake everyone here has been making is confusing production with engineering.  Brian produced the album.  He wrote the songs, arranged the tracks, dealt with instrumentation and so on.  He may have also had considerable influence on the sound.  Now, whoever engineered the thing had much more influence on the sound.  Brian, presumably, does not know his way around ProTools.  He needs help with that. I believe that's where Thomas comes in, and though *I* have no real issue with the sound or production, I'm guessing that's where he exerted his influence on what you're hearing.

"Think about George Martin, for instance. I think Brian, nowadays, works in a way very similar to how George used to (barring writing string arrangements).  Geoff Emerik influenced the Beatles' sound more than anyone else.  He was the engineer."


Ditto for Mark Linett, by the way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 02:11:05 PM
Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 31, 2012, 02:11:57 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 02:12:22 PM

I'm talking about what 'Produced by Brian Wilson' means on this album, and the way this album sounds. And the artistic merit of this (perhaps final) Beach Boys record.

I'm talking about the difference between selecting an outside producer vs. Brian actually producing.

Simply because Brian Wilson likes the result does not mean that he produced it.


I think that people might be talking at cross-purposes about what a 'producer' actually is.
Of the tracks I've heard, other than Spring Vacation, I'd be perfectly willing to believe that Brian arranged all the vocal parts, supervised the arrangement of the instrumental parts, decided on the players, and gave very detailed instruction down to the level of "On the third bar, bend the note slightly up when you hit the C for the second time". There are things on there that don't sound like Brian to my ears, and more importantly there are sounds that are missing that Brian usually likes to have on there (he's *always* gone for interesting buzzing/honking bass sounds, whether it be fuzz bass, bari sax, bass harmonica, Moog or organ pedals, and there's nothing like that on any of the tracks I've heard) but nothing so radically different from what Brian's done in the past that I won't believe that it's Brian's idea. So in that way, I'm more than willing to believe that Brian was more involved as a producer than on, say, Stars & Stripes (where Thomas handled the instruments and Brian only the vocals). And that stuff used to be the primary (though not only) role of a producer in the 60s.

But in stuff about the actual *sound* of the record -- how much reverb is used, what kind of processing is used on the vocals, how much compression is on the final track, what kind of drum sound is used, that kind of thing -- there are choices being made that don't sound like the kind of choices that have been made on any other record with a 'produced by Brian Wilson' credit, and which frankly show a lack of aesthetic judgement. The (lack of) taste shown in that department sounds to my ears like the same (lack of) taste used on Stars & Stripes and Imagination, just updated to today's technology.

So it seems to me that Brian may well have been fully and completely involved in the parts of production that he's used to, but let Thomas take control of what we might call 'engineering supervision', which is that part of production that's actually most of what producers have done for the last thirty years.

We all know that Brian relies heavily on collaborators, and has done for decades. The quality of his work varies *hugely* depending on who those collaborators are. Saying that isn't the same as saying Thomas is the organ grinder and Brian the monkey -- far from it. It *might* be that Brian contributes less than we'd hope to his collaborations, and the variation comes from the different levels of ability of the collaborators. But it *also* might be that Brian is inspired to rise to the level of his co-writers, and that working with Scott Bennett or Van Dyke Parks pushes him more than working with Joe Thomas or a bloke who used to be in a band with a bloke who used to be in Survivor. It might even be just that Scott (for example) has better judgement over which of Brian's ideas are worth pursuing further than Thomas does.

But either way, I've yet to hear anything from Joe Thomas to suggest that he's a good person for Brian to collaborate with in terms of the artistic result, even though he may be great in terms of being someone Brian wants to work with.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 31, 2012, 02:12:41 PM
Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

That's kind of the way it come off as to me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 02:15:25 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 02:17:41 PM

I'm talking about what 'Produced by Brian Wilson' means on this album, and the way this album sounds. And the artistic merit of this (perhaps final) Beach Boys record.

I'm talking about the difference between selecting an outside producer vs. Brian actually producing.

Simply because Brian Wilson likes the result does not mean that he produced it.


I think that people might be talking at cross-purposes about what a 'producer' actually is.
Of the tracks I've heard, other than Spring Vacation, I'd be perfectly willing to believe that Brian arranged all the vocal parts, supervised the arrangement of the instrumental parts, decided on the players, and gave very detailed instruction down to the level of "On the third bar, bend the note slightly up when you hit the C for the second time". There are things on there that don't sound like Brian to my ears, and more importantly there are sounds that are missing that Brian usually likes to have on there (he's *always* gone for interesting buzzing/honking bass sounds, whether it be fuzz bass, bari sax, bass harmonica, Moog or organ pedals, and there's nothing like that on any of the tracks I've heard) but nothing so radically different from what Brian's done in the past that I won't believe that it's Brian's idea. So in that way, I'm more than willing to believe that Brian was more involved as a producer than on, say, Stars & Stripes (where Thomas handled the instruments and Brian only the vocals). And that stuff used to be the primary (though not only) role of a producer in the 60s.

But in stuff about the actual *sound* of the record -- how much reverb is used, what kind of processing is used on the vocals, how much compression is on the final track, what kind of drum sound is used, that kind of thing -- there are choices being made that don't sound like the kind of choices that have been made on any other record with a 'produced by Brian Wilson' credit, and which frankly show a lack of aesthetic judgement. The (lack of) taste shown in that department sounds to my ears like the same (lack of) taste used on Stars & Stripes and Imagination, just updated to today's technology.

So it seems to me that Brian may well have been fully and completely involved in the parts of production that he's used to, but let Thomas take control of what we might call 'engineering supervision', which is that part of production that's actually most of what producers have done for the last thirty years.

We all know that Brian relies heavily on collaborators, and has done for decades. The quality of his work varies *hugely* depending on who those collaborators are. Saying that isn't the same as saying Thomas is the organ grinder and Brian the monkey -- far from it. It *might* be that Brian contributes less than we'd hope to his collaborations, and the variation comes from the different levels of ability of the collaborators. But it *also* might be that Brian is inspired to rise to the level of his co-writers, and that working with Scott Bennett or Van Dyke Parks pushes him more than working with Joe Thomas or a bloke who used to be in a band with a bloke who used to be in Survivor. It might even be just that Scott (for example) has better judgement over which of Brian's ideas are worth pursuing further than Thomas does.

But either way, I've yet to hear anything from Joe Thomas to suggest that he's a good person for Brian to collaborate with in terms of the artistic result, even though he may be great in terms of being someone Brian wants to work with.

See, the thing is, Brian is a producer from the sixties, and he's going to produce that way because that's what he's comfortable with. He's not going to delve into ProTools, like I said, when he knows nothing about it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 02:19:52 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


The man is 69.  He's not someone who's knowledgeable to the point of many others with modern day studio equipment, which includes complex computer programs like ProTools.  This is a record from 2012. Thus, that's why the engineer has so much more of an influence on the sound than "any other Beach Boys record".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 02:23:51 PM
So it seems to me that Brian may well have been fully and completely involved in the parts of production that he's used to, but let Thomas take control of what we might call 'engineering supervision', which is that part of production that's actually most of what producers have done for the last thirty years.

We all know that Brian relies heavily on collaborators, and has done for decades. The quality of his work varies *hugely* depending on who those collaborators are.

Regardless of our different feelings on the finished product, Andrew, I think this is precisely right.

And I'm not the biggest fan of Joe Thomas's overall sound or taste level. But I think it's possible to believe that Brian produced the record and was engaged by it, and that Joe also had a considerable say in how the final mix came out, and that the finished result will not be to everyone's taste. But none of these suppositions necessarily invalidates any of the others.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 02:26:12 PM
See, the thing is, Brian is a producer from the sixties, and he's going to produce that way because that's what he's comfortable with. He's not going to delve into ProTools, like I said, when he knows nothing about it. 

Absolutely. And if what I said sounded like I thought otherwise, I worded it badly. I was just trying to point out that the job description of 'record producer' has changed immeasurably over the course of Brian's career, and from the sounds of it what Brian is doing is 'record production' in the way that he, or George Martin, or Phil Spector were record producers, not in the way that today's producers are, and that this may be causing confusion. I think it's very obvious that Brian needs someone to work with him in the studio these days -- the only question is who that should be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 02:27:27 PM
7 songs in and it's just a really great album..

Best is yet to come too


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on May 31, 2012, 02:28:06 PM
Just wanted to let this out before I write a thorough review - I've just, erm, "heard" the album and the last three tracks HAVEN'T been overhyped.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 02:30:57 PM

Regardless of our different feelings on the finished product, Andrew, I think this is precisely right.

And I'm not the biggest fan of Joe Thomas's overall sound or taste level. But I think it's possible to believe that Brian produced the record and was engaged by it, and that Joe also had a considerable say in how the final mix came out, and that the finished result will not be to everyone's taste. But none of these suppositions necessarily invalidates any of the others.

Exactly.

And incidentally, I want to make clear that i don't actually *have* 'feelings on the finished product' yet (though I certainly see why you would think I did). I've only heard about half the tracks, and that mostly through fairly low-bitrate streams on bad laptop speakers (and I'm also suffering a temporary ear problem this week that means I'm deaf in one ear). What I've heard doesn't fill me with confidence, but I'm not going to dismiss the album based on that. In fact, I probably won't have a fixed opinion on the album for a year or so -- almost every Beach Boys album I truly love has had to grow on me, while those I've enjoyed from first listen don't hold up as well to my ears on repeated listening (though I've been able to tell if I *hate* an album on first listening...)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mark H on May 31, 2012, 02:33:19 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.
Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Yeh it's just me trying to explain myself/comment on DonnyL's post.

'Actual' in heavy commas etc, it's a BW production in process/album credit but not to DonnyL's (and others) ears.

Basically it's why I typed a post earlier but didn't post it until sweetdudejim posted so well.  I'm not that good at getting my point, even if it's just agreeing,  across!

Short answer for my source, I didn't mean what I wrote literally, sorry!

I'm loving the album btw :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 02:33:26 PM
When you combine engineering and songwriting with an artist you've previously 'produced' an album with, it certainly raises a lot of questions. Especially when the end product sounds like you produced it. I guess Brian really wanted those 'Eye of the Tiger' guitar breaks on the single, right?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 02:33:58 PM
See, the thing is, Brian is a producer from the sixties, and he's going to produce that way because that's what he's comfortable with. He's not going to delve into ProTools, like I said, when he knows nothing about it. 

Absolutely. And if what I said sounded like I thought otherwise, I worded it badly. I was just trying to point out that the job description of 'record producer' has changed immeasurably over the course of Brian's career, and from the sounds of it what Brian is doing is 'record production' in the way that he, or George Martin, or Phil Spector were record producers, not in the way that today's producers are, and that this may be causing confusion. I think it's very obvious that Brian needs someone to work with him in the studio these days -- the only question is who that should be.

Indeed. This was something I was thinking about the other night ... what does Brian think a producer does? And I realized that for him, sitting in the booth, listening to the musicians, calling takes and offering suggestions, moving things along -- that's production. It's not arranging, which he can suggest through demos or charts or singing a line (or just have Mertens handle), and it's not engineering. It's not a technical job.

But today, when we think about record producers, we think about people who are almost exclusively technical. Bands themselves handle most of the work that would be called "production" in the 60s.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 02:34:57 PM
See, the thing is, Brian is a producer from the sixties, and he's going to produce that way because that's what he's comfortable with. He's not going to delve into ProTools, like I said, when he knows nothing about it. 

Absolutely. And if what I said sounded like I thought otherwise, I worded it badly. I was just trying to point out that the job description of 'record producer' has changed immeasurably over the course of Brian's career, and from the sounds of it what Brian is doing is 'record production' in the way that he, or George Martin, or Phil Spector were record producers, not in the way that today's producers are, and that this may be causing confusion. I think it's very obvious that Brian needs someone to work with him in the studio these days -- the only question is who that should be.

Gotcha  ;D I agree with you completely, the producer's job has dramatically changed, for example Nigel Godrich fills the role as both Radiohead's "producer" and "audio engineer".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 31, 2012, 02:35:51 PM
Theres a sense of denial around these parts


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 02:37:38 PM
Theres a sense of denial around these parts

Among those who actually believe Brian produced this album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 02:39:58 PM
Theres a sense of denial around these parts

Among those who actually believe Brian produced this album?

I think he meant the other way. But he's cryptic!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 02:41:44 PM
If you don't break down and cry during Pacific Coast Highway/Summer's gone, you're a better man than me  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 31, 2012, 02:41:58 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on May 31, 2012, 02:42:05 PM
I am excited to leave work and pop this on the stereo. So very excited. ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 02:42:32 PM
Theres a sense of denial around these parts

Among those who actually believe Brian produced this album?

I think he meant the other way. But he's cryptic!

It's what I thought! But I wasn't sure...and immediately whipped out my guns  >:D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 31, 2012, 02:48:46 PM
Theres a sense of denial around these parts
Among those who actually believe Brian produced this album?

I think he meant the other way. But he's cryptic!

Or, perhaps, Coptic??  In de Nile?

 :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Bicyclerider on May 31, 2012, 02:49:08 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.

I don't know . . . I think the solo Christmas album, the Gershwin album, and the Disney album all sound very similar . . .  to what I've heard from the Beach Boys new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on May 31, 2012, 02:49:18 PM
Consider: when you heard of a new BB album, exactly how good did you imagine it would be ?

Point being, the finished product, irrespective of who did what, is easily 1000% better than such an album has any right to be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 31, 2012, 02:50:00 PM
I'm gonna wait to listen to the last 3 until tomorrow, when all I have to worry about is MUSIC.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 02:51:43 PM
Some thoughts.. possibly irrelevant  ;D

Does this look like the kinda guy who doesn't call the shots in a studio situation? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuptvX3xYlg

If Brian was the one who gave Thomas' ideas a yes or a no... he's the producer, and the credit is correct.

Although, as a producer, I would've wanted a co-production credit if I was Thomas. But who knows what kind of situation they worked out. He certainly made out like a bandit on the pub side.

Had the mix/recording sounded like this.. I think Brian's influence on the production would be a little more clear http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzBNmMmNpYo

There's a lot to be said for that "live" sound that make up Brian's early productions. But I'm sure if cleaner, quantized, pitch perfect options were available to Brian in the 60's... u know the rest.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 02:53:46 PM
Consider: when you heard of a new BB album, exactly how good did you imagine it would be ?

Point being, the finished product, irrespective of who did what, is easily 1000% better than such an album has any right to be.

I have to say I agree with you there. Got my hopes up a little too high somewhere back there that it might be as good as Keepin' the Summer Alive or BB '85. But it does seem like it'll be better than Summer in Paradise and Stars & Stripes. Still on the fence as to how it compares to Still Cruisin (I have a soft spot for "In My Car").


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 31, 2012, 02:55:59 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.

I don't know . . . I think the solo Christmas album, the Gershwin album, and the Disney album all sound very similar . . .  to what I've heard from the Beach Boys new album.

Yeah (i was thinking more of including the BB's albums) but even those solo albums have their own sound to them.

What i was getting at, was what things identify a Brian Wilson production? Think of every record that bears the legend "Produced By Brian Wilson". What makes those uniquely Brian Wilson productions?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 02:56:11 PM
Consider: when you heard of a new BB album, exactly how good did you imagine it would be ?

Point being, the finished product, irrespective of who did what, is easily 1000% better than such an album has any right to be.

So true


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mark H on May 31, 2012, 03:00:35 PM
Consider: when you heard of a new BB album, exactly how good did you imagine it would be ?

Point being, the finished product, irrespective of who did what, is easily 1000% better than such an album has any right to be.

Absolutely! :)

Echoing the 'miracle' thread elsewhere here the idea of TLOS, BWPS, TSS and now TWGMTR was unthinkable at one point.

So happy that we have a new great BB album AND a world tour with Brian, Al, Mike & Bruce, and David of course!

If TWGMTR is the last hurrah for the band (I hope we get more) then it's a fantastic last chapter.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 03:02:07 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.

They have, but there have been some features that have been constant in all of them. He tends to use the drums in interesting ways -- very rarely after about 1964 or so do you get him using a conventional drum kit playing standard patterns. In particular there's *far* less use of cymbal and hi-hat in drum parts on records Brian's produced than is normal.

He also has a fondness for two particular bass sounds. One is a trebly, hard sound, which he uses when he's got a prominent, melodic bass line on ballads (think much of Pet Sounds but also stuff like Everything I Need), while the other is a 'farting' sound, often played by an instrument other than a bass guitar but in the bass register (think the sax on the Honeys records, the bass harmonica on Friends or much of the Getting In Over My Head album, the moog on Love You).

Other things he does a lot might fall into the categories of songwriting or arrangement as much as production, but include things like having a tag which has completely new musical material, having multiple lead vocalists for songs, and having vocal arrangements that consist of very freely-moving lines at the top and bottom, with three-part block harmony moving in parallel in the middle.

These things have been in Brian's productions for pretty much all of his career. Some of them are evident on the songs from the new album that I've heard, others aren't.

However, there's *also* been a relatively consistent sonic ambience (for want of a better term) on most of Brian's solo recordings, but how much of that is him and how much is Mark Linnet is open to question, though the demos recorded with Andy Paley and Scott Bennett have something of the same quality. That sonic ambience isn't present on this album. Which is to be expected -- Brian's working with different people now.

Incidentally, according to Wikipedia, Thomas' official title is 'recording supervisor', which makes sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on May 31, 2012, 03:03:43 PM
Edit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: MaxL on May 31, 2012, 03:04:52 PM
Incidentally, according to Wikipedia, Thomas' official title is 'recording supervisor', which makes sense.

That's actually something I put on as a placeholder for when I can read what he actually does in the liner notes ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on May 31, 2012, 03:09:18 PM
Random (good?) point - appears to be less 'loudness' on the album version - making the single a radio based production!
Top = Album, Bottom = Single
(http://www.majhost.com/gallery/bionicool123/other/twgmtrc.jpg)
could also be that the album was a ripped CD, the single was not, but ah well...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 03:11:46 PM
That's a *staggering* difference in compression levels. Might sound a *lot* better then, which would be nice...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 31, 2012, 03:12:09 PM
I think we know pretty well what a Joe Thomas record sounds like.

Have you even bought a single Joe Thomas record that didn't have Brian Wilson on it?

Brian being influenced by whoever he's collaborating with in the studio doesn't mean his collaborators are in control.  "Smile" sounds way more like a Van Dyke Parks record than "All Summer Long" does -- doesn't stop it being a Brian Wilson record.  Hell, you could argue that Sunflower sounds like a "Stephen Desper record", there's a clear difference in its sound; that might be a better comparison to Thomas' technical role in recording...

Bottom line is, when I listen to the new stuff, I hear a hell of a lot of Brian Wilson, while you seem to be seizing on the bits that remind you of your least favorite (Wilson-and-)Thomas work and ignoring the rest.

Regards,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 03:13:22 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


Apologies for my earlier comments, I hadn't realized you were there in the studio to personally witness Brian being usurped and report this fact back to us with such authority.

Unless you're simply touting your personal bias and baseless assumption as some sort of verifiable fact, but who would be that arrogant?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 31, 2012, 03:13:35 PM
Glad the album isn't (totally) brickwalled like the single!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 31, 2012, 03:15:20 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.

They have, but there have been some features that have been constant in all of them. He tends to use the drums in interesting ways -- very rarely after about 1964 or so do you get him using a conventional drum kit playing standard patterns. In particular there's *far* less use of cymbal and hi-hat in drum parts on records Brian's produced than is normal.

He also has a fondness for two particular bass sounds. One is a trebly, hard sound, which he uses when he's got a prominent, melodic bass line on ballads (think much of Pet Sounds but also stuff like Everything I Need), while the other is a 'farting' sound, often played by an instrument other than a bass guitar but in the bass register (think the sax on the Honeys records, the bass harmonica on Friends or much of the Getting In Over My Head album, the moog on Love You).

Other things he does a lot might fall into the categories of songwriting or arrangement as much as production, but include things like having a tag which has completely new musical material, having multiple lead vocalists for songs, and having vocal arrangements that consist of very freely-moving lines at the top and bottom, with three-part block harmony moving in parallel in the middle.

These things have been in Brian's productions for pretty much all of his career. Some of them are evident on the songs from the new album that I've heard, others aren't.

However, there's *also* been a relatively consistent sonic ambience (for want of a better term) on most of Brian's solo recordings, but how much of that is him and how much is Mark Linnet is open to question, though the demos recorded with Andy Paley and Scott Bennett have something of the same quality. That sonic ambience isn't present on this album. Which is to be expected -- Brian's working with different people now.

Incidentally, according to Wikipedia, Thomas' official title is 'recording supervisor', which makes sense.

Yeah i totally agree.

And strangely i do hear most of these things on this new album. Granted the bass lines seem less fat, but listen to FTTBA and you hear that twangy trebly bass.

Other common Brianisms are the percussive use of piano or keyboard either in quarter notes, eighth notes or triplet. He very rarely has frilly keyboard parts. That has always been there. And again thats all over this new record - Isn't It Time for example.

The thing with all producers is that they all have these little tools and devices that they always return to. But aesthetically their records will change over the years. There is no surprise for me that this new Beach Boys album sounds the way it does. But i would argue forever that this is as much a Brian Wilson produced record as Love You was.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 31, 2012, 03:15:31 PM
It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

Regards,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 03:19:04 PM
How can you not LOVE "Beaches in Mind"

What a fun song, GO Mike!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 03:20:28 PM
The guy who leaked the album took this picture, the CD looks nice

(http://i2.lulzimg.com/1a738ac95a.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 31, 2012, 03:21:34 PM
What did Chuck Britz do? What did Larry Levine do? What did Steve Desper do? What did Carl Wilson do? What did Andy Paley do? What did Scott Bennett do?

They all helped Brian realize his vision. Sometimes they had a vision of their own that they added to his. Sometimes they mixed the records for him. Sometimes they pulled together the loose ends that Brian couldn't be bothered to. Steve's records for the Boys sound significantly different than their work before or after. But no one calls them records produced by Steve Desper. The ideas and directions for the albums came from Brian and the band. Now, not everyone likes Joe's sound or approach, but I don't see reason that his relationship with Brian is significantly different, at least this time around.

http://andrewromano.tumblr.com/joethomasbeachboys

Great post, Wirestone, and thanks for posting the Tumblr link.  INCREDIBLE interview!

Joe: "Let’s go back now three years maybe… a year after that. After he (Brian) said that, I didn’t hear from him for another year. He called me from Australia. It was kind of funny. He was talking about the fact he believed that the toilets flushed the opposite way than they did here above, in the northern hemisphere. And he wanted to know if I had any info on whether that was true or not. "

LOL!!!!

Brian is such a complete riot!!!!!

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 03:22:33 PM
It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

Regards,
Jon Blum

Spot on.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:23:15 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.


hallmarks of typical BW productions (minus the obvious vocal arrangement elements) --

* lack of cymbals (especially hi-hats)

* sparse and/or 'orchestral' drum patterns

* unusual use of percussion

* unique tags / fades

* fuzz / sax / bass harmonica / moog -type baritone sounds

* ethereal string / keyboard / other instrument (flutes w/ vibes) type 'pads'

* tape delay

* boogie-woogie-type piano rhythms

* surprising/unexpected twists and turns

* surprising/unexpected rumination on the same pattern(s)

* juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:27:02 PM

Have you even bought a single Joe Thomas record that didn't have Brian Wilson on it?


dear lord, no.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 31, 2012, 03:29:38 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.


hallmarks of typical BW productions (minus the obvious vocal arrangement elements) --

* lack of cymbals (especially hi-hats)

* sparse and/or 'orchestral' drum patterns

* unusual use of percussion

* unique tags / fades

* fuzz / sax / bass harmonica / moog -type baritone sounds

* ethereal string / keyboard / other instrument (flutes w/ vibes) type 'pads'

* tape delay

* boogie-woogie-type piano rhythms

* surprising/unexpected twists and turns

* surprising/unexpected rumination on the same pattern(s)

* juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant


But would you disagree if i said that most of the above are on the new album. Maybe some more than others, and maybe more so on certain songs. But yes they are there.

(where is the boogie woogie though? i hear no boogie woogie on it)



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:38:10 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


Apologies for my earlier comments, I hadn't realized you were there in the studio to personally witness Brian being usurped and report this fact back to us with such authority.

Unless you're simply touting your personal bias and baseless assumption as some sort of verifiable fact, but who would be that arrogant?

Perhaps I should re-word every post to make it 100% clear that I am offering an opinion.

"I must say this is the only time I've ever heard an end product that sounds so little like Brian Wilson and so much like one of his collaborators -- in terms of production -- that I am lead to believe Thomas took his engineering role too far into the realm of production, so much that I have formed the opinion that Joe Thomas is more responsible for the production than Brian Wilson is!"

Is that better ?

Does everyone here have Asperger's or are you guys just jerks ???


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:39:28 PM
It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

Regards,
Jon Blum

How about 'Therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show in my opinion" ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 03:42:41 PM
It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

Regards,
Jon Blum

If you take that second statement the way it was written, it would appear to be stated as a fact. But, hopefully, people can UNDERSTAND - meaning, it's understood - that's what he THINKS. Of course it's all the way it is written. How does this sound: "In my opinion, it clearly sounds like Brian wasn't running the show". It's the exact same point, obviously phrased differently.

Many threads/posts ago, somebody said that there should be a disclaimer, automatically showing up on each post, that clearly states: IN MY OPINION. Well, since that's not possible (or maybe it is), in my opinion, it would be helpful if we kept that little phrase in mind when reading somebody's posts. And then destroy them! >:D

EDIT: Wow, DonnyL, we must've been reading each other's minds. In my opinion, of course. We weren't really READING each other's minds....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 03:43:33 PM
Man, that really sounds like Carl on "Daybreak", it's like he's there


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 31, 2012, 03:45:25 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.

* surprising/unexpected twists and turns

* surprising/unexpected rumination on the same pattern(s)

* juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant

Awesome summary, almost a  " how to guide" for  BW's music and making classics. 8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:46:39 PM
Can anyone here tell me what a Brian Wilson production is supposed to sound like?

Cause when you listen to every album he's been associated with, they have all been different to the previous one.


hallmarks of typical BW productions (minus the obvious vocal arrangement elements) --

* lack of cymbals (especially hi-hats)

* sparse and/or 'orchestral' drum patterns

* unusual use of percussion

* unique tags / fades

* fuzz / sax / bass harmonica / moog -type baritone sounds

* ethereal string / keyboard / other instrument (flutes w/ vibes) type 'pads'

* tape delay

* boogie-woogie-type piano rhythms

* surprising/unexpected twists and turns

* surprising/unexpected rumination on the same pattern(s)

* juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant


But would you disagree if i said that most of the above are on the new album. Maybe some more than others, and maybe more so on certain songs. But yes they are there.

(where is the boogie woogie though? i hear no boogie woogie on it)



Personally, I don't really hear these elements much (a little here and there).

And I'd like to add one more -- the one that really seems to be missing: SOUND BLISS.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on May 31, 2012, 03:48:53 PM
Why does an album entitled "That's Why God Made The Radio" need to have a sticker on it telling the buyer that it includes "the new hit single That's Why God Made The Radio"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 31, 2012, 03:49:07 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


Apologies for my earlier comments, I hadn't realized you were there in the studio to personally witness Brian being usurped and report this fact back to us with such authority.

Unless you're simply touting your personal bias and baseless assumption as some sort of verifiable fact, but who would be that arrogant?

Perhaps I should re-word every post to make it 100% clear that I am offering an opinion.

"I must say this is the only time I've ever heard an end product that sounds so little like Brian Wilson and so much like one of his collaborators -- in terms of production -- that I am lead to believe Thomas took his engineering role too far into the realm of production, so much that I have formed the opinion that Joe Thomas is more responsible for the production than Brian Wilson is!"

Is that better ?

Does everyone here have Asperger's or are you guys just jerks ???

I don't know, I think people are defensively interpreting your posts as a threat against the new album. Perhaps it won't actually come out if you keep this up.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 03:49:54 PM
Why does an album entitled "That's Why God Made The Radio" need to have a sticker on it telling the buyer that it includes "the new hit single That's Why God Made The Radio"?

 :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 31, 2012, 03:50:35 PM
There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

If you take that second statement the way it was written, it would appear to be stated as a fact. But, hopefully, people can UNDERSTAND - meaning, it's understood - that's what he THINKS. Of course it's all the way it is written.[/quote]

Yup -- and I'd say it's the way it's written which is what's getting DonnyL so much grief.  If it didn't sound like he was saying "well, it's only my opinion, but if you don't think Brian's been obviously usurped you're clearly blind or deluding yourself", the opinion bit might seem more heartfelt...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andy B on May 31, 2012, 03:51:20 PM
Personally, I don't really hear these elements much (a little here and there).

And I'd like to add one more -- the one that really seems to be missing: SOUND BLISS.

Yeah it's true on some of the tracks, the BW elements are somewhat lacking, but listen to From There To Back Again. Total SOUND BLISS. All the way through. It's one giant bliss out track. Easily the most beautiful BW tune he's done in an absolute age.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:51:26 PM
It's about people - individuals - having an opinion and taking advantage of a message board to express it. What causes the hard feelings are people not respecting opinions they don't agree with, and trying to prove an opinion as being wrong.

There's personal opinions ("I don't like the style"), and then there's claims of fact ("therefore Brian clearly wasn't running the show").  I don't think anyone's failing to respect the first, it's the second that they're saying really doesn't stand up.

Regards,
Jon Blum

If you take that second statement the way it was written, it would appear to be stated as a fact. But, hopefully, people can UNDERSTAND - meaning, it's understood - that's what he THINKS. Of course it's all the way it is written. How does this sound: "In my opinion, it clearly sounds like Brian wasn't running the show". It's the exact same point, obviously phrased differently.

Many threads/posts ago, somebody said that there should be a disclaimer, automatically showing up on each post, that clearly states: IN MY OPINION. Well, since that's not possible (or maybe it is), in my opinion, it would be helpful if we kept that little phrase in mind when reading somebody's posts. And then destroy them! >:D

EDIT: Wow, DonnyL, we must've been reading each other's minds. In my opinion, of course. We weren't really READING each other's minds....

thanks for understanding !

But I don't see how you can say we were reading each others' minds.  First of all, mind reading is technically not possible.  Have you researched this at all and actually verified anything before you go around posting things like that?  I mean, there is some evidence to suggest astral projection is possible, but mind-reading is occult mumbo-jumbo at best.

HA !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:54:38 PM
First off thanks DonnyL for a great post about growing up loving the BB, I understand it's a shame that TWGMTR is not an actual BW production.

Care to share your source for this unequivocal statement ?

Just to clarify, are both of you indicating that Joe Thomas is credited as engineer on the album?

Yes, he is.

I must say this is the only time I've ever seen an engineer usurp the producer in such a way on a Beach Boys album.  Very clever.


Apologies for my earlier comments, I hadn't realized you were there in the studio to personally witness Brian being usurped and report this fact back to us with such authority.

Unless you're simply touting your personal bias and baseless assumption as some sort of verifiable fact, but who would be that arrogant?

Perhaps I should re-word every post to make it 100% clear that I am offering an opinion.

"I must say this is the only time I've ever heard an end product that sounds so little like Brian Wilson and so much like one of his collaborators -- in terms of production -- that I am lead to believe Thomas took his engineering role too far into the realm of production, so much that I have formed the opinion that Joe Thomas is more responsible for the production than Brian Wilson is!"

Is that better ?

Does everyone here have Asperger's or are you guys just jerks ???

I don't know, I think people are defensively interpreting your posts as a threat against the new album. Perhaps it won't actually come out if you keep this up.

Watch what you guys say. I have the power to replace the entire contents of TWGMTR with Andy Paley-produced variations of "Shortenin' Bread".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 31, 2012, 03:56:58 PM
The lack of traditional BW production hallmarks could mean one of two things, to me: 1. He wasn't always involved. 2. He convinced himself to go in a more modern direction in order to be contemporary. So, while BW might hate cymbals, he maybe realized that there are a lot of people that don't and that sleigh bells and loud shakers are not typical of modern rock/pop.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 03:58:53 PM
I'd say it's the way it's written which is what's getting DonnyL so much grief.  If it didn't sound like he was saying "well, it's only my opinion, but if you don't think Brian's been obviously usurped you're clearly blind or deluding yourself", the opinion bit might seem more heartfelt...

I doubt it. If I were stating my opinion about it clearly being 'such a great BW production and anyone who doesn't hear it doesn't know anything about the Beach Boys or sound', I'd probably get a resounding 'HURRAH!' from Team Smiley.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SMiLE Brian on May 31, 2012, 04:01:05 PM
While BW might hate cymbals, he maybe realized that there are a lot of people that don't and that sleigh bells and loud shakers are not typical of modern rock/pop.
The tragedy of modern music in a nutshell.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 31, 2012, 04:01:57 PM
* surprising/unexpected twists and turns

* surprising/unexpected rumination on the same pattern(s)

* juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant

Awesome summary, almost a  " how to guide" for  BW's music and making classics. 8)

...But apparently juxtaposing '50s 6/8 rock-and-roll with '80s power-ballad-style bridge chords, with staggering harmonies throughout, doesn't count as either "surprising/unexpected twists and turns" or "juxtaposition of the dumb and the brilliant".

No, instead those are reasons to make snippy comments about "Eye of the Tiger", a song with which it has pretty much zero resemblance (I'd point to something like "Lights" by Journey for that bridge way before anything from Survivor).  Only particular flavors of dumb need apply, it seems.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 31, 2012, 04:04:09 PM
Quote
The tragedy of modern music in a nutshell.
Agreed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 04:04:15 PM
Only particular flavors of dumb need apply, it seems.  :-)
No reason for such BS. We're better than that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 31, 2012, 04:09:37 PM
Also, one odd thing about Joe Thomas's interview... he seems to look at himself as BW's equal. He can throw out of 40% of Brian's ideas (Thomas's words), bring in some of his own (which the typically agreeable BW can reject), and then the two are ready to bang out a song. Then again, maybe Joe Thomas is BW's equal now. A scary thought.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on May 31, 2012, 04:12:49 PM
Also, one odd thing about Joe Thomas's interview... he seems to look at himself as BW's equal. He can throw out of 40% of Brian's ideas (Thomas's words)

Well I think he's just admitting that he knows Brian's strengths well enough to know when something isn't of top quality.  We do it every day on this board when we criticize Brian or Mike or whomever else's artistic choice in a song.  Joe isn't exempt from it any more than we are; the only difference is that he's established himself as a legitimate writing partner in Brian's eyes.  Brian trusts Joe and the decisions he makes.  No harm in that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on May 31, 2012, 04:17:57 PM
Quote
Brian trusts Joe and the decisions he makes.  No harm in that.

Yeah, maybe. I found that only time that Joe appeared to really see Brian as his superior when he was talking about the "My Life" suite. And coincidentally, it's those songs that seem the most authentic BW (even with Paul Mertens having a field day). The perfect example of the Joe Thomas effect on BW is "Everything I Need". With Joe on board it's a completely different song - better in some ways, worse in others. In the end, I'm not convinced it's better overall, and we lose some of BW's voice in attempt to be contemporary.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 04:19:38 PM
Brian trusts Joe and the decisions he makes.  No harm in that.

um ...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 04:19:56 PM
While BW might hate cymbals, he maybe realized that there are a lot of people that don't and that sleigh bells and loud shakers are not typical of modern rock/pop.
The tragedy of modern music in a nutshell.

indeed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 04:20:56 PM
have you heard the album DonnyL?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 04:21:15 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 04:23:56 PM
Does anyone know why the vinyl is taking a month longer to be released?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on May 31, 2012, 04:24:57 PM
Also, one odd thing about Joe Thomas's interview... he seems to look at himself as BW's equal. He can throw out of 40% of Brian's ideas (Thomas's words), bring in some of his own (which the typically agreeable BW can reject), and then the two are ready to bang out a song. Then again, maybe Joe Thomas is BW's equal now. A scary thought.

WOW
I did not get that at all.  Thomas is clearly, clearly in awe of Brian, and obviously loves collaborating with the world's greatest songwriter.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 04:28:52 PM
Also, one odd thing about Joe Thomas's interview... he seems to look at himself as BW's equal. He can throw out of 40% of Brian's ideas (Thomas's words), bring in some of his own (which the typically agreeable BW can reject), and then the two are ready to bang out a song. Then again, maybe Joe Thomas is BW's equal now. A scary thought.

WOW
I did not get that at all.  Thomas is clearly, clearly in awe of Brian, and obviously loves collaborating with the world's greatest songwriter.


This was my impression, too. The sorting through statement seemed to have more to do with Joe taping nearly everything Brian did, so he'd have a reference to all the things Brian threw out during recording/writing sessions. BW won't recall them all, but it gives Joe lots of things to send back to Brian. I mean, BW is entirely capable of writing a song at home and taping it, if he really wants to remember something.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 04:30:52 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?
He has dominated this thread for several pages. I have remained calm, it is a simple question. Has he heard the album to formulate his opinion?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mark H on May 31, 2012, 04:33:13 PM
hopefully, people can UNDERSTAND - meaning, it's understood - that's what he THINKS. Of course it's all the way it is written. How does this sound: "In my opinion, it clearly sounds like Brian wasn't running the show". It's the exact same point, obviously phrased differently.

This is it, spot on.  Let's stop questioning opinion or going over semantics or connotation etc.

Give the album another spin and discuss and listen :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on May 31, 2012, 04:35:17 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?
He has dominated this thread for several pages. I have remained calm, it is a simple question. Has he heard the album to formulate his opinion?


Let's just say I'm waiting for the vinyl to make my purchase.

I don't wish to 'dominate' this thread any longer, so I'll exit now. (The only reason for this perception of domination is that I have a strong opinion which is at odds with most people on the board.)

I'll see you guys in Berkely tomorrow !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 04:35:58 PM
Why can't people make it easier for all people by putting "imo" after each sentence? imo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 04:36:02 PM
Some observations: there's hardly any prominent Bruce vocals and not enough of Jardine's still awesome voice (methinks). Brian sounds good, but not as inspired or "into it" (or whatever) as on his recent solo output (just listen to "Baby Mine" or "I've Got a Crush On You" for comparison). Mike is okay mostly, and pretty cool on "Daybreak" (I gotta admit). Dave apparently didn't record any vocals at all for this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 04:41:39 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?
He has dominated this thread for several pages. I have remained calm, it is a simple question. Has he heard the album to formulate his opinion?


Let's just say I'm waiting for the vinyl to make my purchase.

I don't wish to 'dominate' this thread any longer, so I'll exit now. (The only reason for this perception of domination is that I have a strong opinion which is at odds with most people on the board.)

I'll see you guys in Berkely tomorrow !

You have a very strong opinion for something you have not heard in it's entirety as yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 04:52:50 PM
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 04:57:36 PM
I'd say it's the way it's written which is what's getting DonnyL so much grief.  If it didn't sound like he was saying "well, it's only my opinion, but if you don't think Brian's been obviously usurped you're clearly blind or deluding yourself", the opinion bit might seem more heartfelt...

I doubt it. If I were stating my opinion about it clearly being 'such a great BW production and anyone who doesn't hear it doesn't know anything about the Beach Boys or sound', I'd probably get a resounding 'HURRAH!' from Team Smiley.


You stated that Brian had been 'usurped' in the studio by his engineer, among other baseless assumptions, all presented as fact.

You have entirely zero evidence of any of this, or you would have offered it by now.

People have patiently taken the time to point out to you that 'I don't like the production' or 'it doesn't sound like what I expected of a Brian Wilson production' are opinions. Basically saying 'Brian didn't produce it' is nonsense until you can prove otherwise.

You respond to this being pointed out by throwing your toys out of the pram and whinging that people are 'jerks'. That along with your infantile 'Team Smiley' nonsense (an obvious and rather pathetic tactic to box your detractors in a corner while you continue to refuse to back up your claims) leads me to suggest you might need to grow up.

If I said 'Mike Love isn't doing the Mike Love vocals on this record, they must have hired someone', people would expect me to prove my point, and rightly so.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 04:57:47 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?
He has dominated this thread for several pages. I have remained calm, it is a simple question. Has he heard the album to formulate his opinion?


Let's just say I'm waiting for the vinyl to make my purchase.

I don't wish to 'dominate' this thread any longer, so I'll exit now. (The only reason for this perception of domination is that I have a strong opinion which is at odds with most people on the board.)

I'll see you guys in Berkely tomorrow !

You have a very strong opinion for something you have not heard in it's entirety as yet.
Maybe he has? He merely said he didn't make the purchase yet. I haven't, either.  ;)


Quote from: Slim Shady
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc
That would've been cool. But what (he thinks) sells is lyrics about fun in the summertime with girls, made up in 5 mins.  :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 31, 2012, 05:00:48 PM
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc

Was going to start a separate thread about the lyrics for this album, they really do seem godawful! I'm much more interested in harmony and melody anyway so it doesn't bother me that much, but jeez. I laughed when in the Joe Thomas interview he talks about how amazing it was that Mike Love wrote the lyric 'Spring Vacation, Good Vibrations/Summer weather, we're back together!' in 5 minutes - really?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on May 31, 2012, 05:02:32 PM
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc

I was thinking this same exact thing when I was listening for the first time. What's the most introspective lyric Mike has ever written?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 05:03:34 PM
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc

I was thinking this same exact thing when I was listening for the first time. What's the most introspective lyric Mike has ever written?

Warmth Of The Sun? Or Meant For You, maybe.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 31, 2012, 05:06:19 PM
Why don't we take some time on this thread to talk about the new album, and not Donny?
Why should everybody have to stamp any opinion with "this is my opinion?" Ridiculous. Live, let live. Man, this board is getting weird.

I will say that overall, I am enjoying the record and I only wish the suite at the end were longer and "Beaches in Mind" was replaced by something else. The fragments the end of "From Here to Back Again" are the single best Brian Wilson moment here, bar none.

Anyway, here are my thoughts for the first third of the album.

1) Think About the Days - Clearly influenced by "Our Prayer," but less in line with traditional non-SMiLe Beach Boys albums. This is the latest in a line of overtures since BWPS, including "That Lucky Old Sun" and "Rhapsody in Blue." A pretty melody, beautiful vocals. This also goes some way towards communicating to the listener that we can expect some beautiful 'artistic' BW songs later on. The title fits in with the album's theme of growing old and looking back (possibly with love).

2) That's Why God Made the Radio - A sterling single. Great care was clearly put into the arrangement, production and composition. My only real gripe is the bridge at the end, but what can you do... The album mix sounds different from the single mix. A prime example of Brian orchestrating with the Boys' voices.

3) Isn't it Time - Possibly my favorite track on the album outside of the suite. This should be heavily pushed for second single, and that's probably part of the reason that it's number 3 on the album and being played live by the Beach Boys now. I love the production motif, Al's vocal, Mike's vocal, Bruce's vocal... just perfect, classic Beach Boys. This could have been from the Sunflower era or the MIU era, but it explores a new sound for the Beach Boys all the same. The lyrics here are Mike's best job on the album. Brian's intro vocal is a bit rough compared to most of his recent material, but it smooths out. Love the breakdown.

4) Spring Vacation - This song was a huge disappointment to me when I first heard it, partly because the lyrics are inane and partly because I feared that the whole album would have this type of lyric. Fortunately, I was wrong on the second count. The lyrics by Brian and Mike mar an otherwise superb composition; the chords and the melodies they wrote are top-notch. It took me many listens to realize how Gosh Darn good this song is. Production and arrangement-wise, "Spring Vacation" is the most Joe Thomas-sounding song on the first side, but it is Thomas working within the idiom of a gospel arrangement, which he pulls off well. This will probably be the third single, hence the fourth track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:10:10 PM
"Beaches In Mind" is the worst of the bunch thus far imo, and even then has some redeeming qualities and isn't totally worthless. And hay, it only takes up two and a half minutes of the album. I only hope they can work Carl and Dennis in somewhere next time, but otherwise, pretty decent effort.

The "Just call" part of "From There To Back Again" is way too good. Probably my favorite song on the album.

Also, is that the sound of a storm I hear at the end of the record? Huge surprise, maybe even a bit grim, but a very, very nice touch. The picture this one paints is almost a bit much for me in being a reminder that these guys aren't gonna be around forever. So sad, but a really nice song - that matters above all, glad it made the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:12:11 PM
Some observations: there's hardly any prominent Bruce vocals and not enough of Jardine's still awesome voice (methinks). Brian sounds good, but not as inspired or "into it" (or whatever) as on his recent solo output (just listen to "Baby Mine" or "I've Got a Crush On You" for comparison). Mike is okay mostly, and pretty cool on "Daybreak" (I gotta admit). Dave apparently didn't record any vocals at all for this.

Bruce is prominent in the harmony. As much as the vocal sound became Carl-colored over the years, Bruce's voice has to do a lot with the current sound of the blend. He sings a few lead lines, plus some high falsettos. I think it's him doing the ooohs during the Bill and Sue chorus, for instance.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:13:31 PM
Glad to see I'm not the only one who had "Spring Vacation" grow on them, against all odds. It and "Isn't It Time" have been stuck in my head for days.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 31, 2012, 05:17:50 PM
Can anyone work out who sings the high part in the main melody of TPLOBAS?
I know Brian is singing the majority but is Foskett taking over at that point?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on May 31, 2012, 05:18:08 PM
I think it's him doing the ooohs during the Bill and Sue chorus, for instance.
You sure? Most of the obvious falsetto stuff sounds like Foskett, I'd say.

And anybody else think "Think About The Days" sounds like it could've been a vocal intro HOLLAND?  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 05:19:57 PM
Can anyone work out who sings the high part in the main melody of TPLOBAS?
I know Brian is singing the majority but is Foskett taking over at that point?

That's what it sounds like to me. Sounds like Foskett does a line solo, then the next line is a BW / JF hybrid.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:21:59 PM
You sure? Most of the obvious falsetto stuff sounds like Foskett, I'd say.


I feel like someone who took part in the recording said Bruce does quite a bit of falsetto and higher vocals on the album. Joe Thomas even said he generally sits right under Jeff in the blend.

Hate to say this, but there are a few really impressive, great-sounding falsetto or higher parts on this album. Given Jeff's history of grating my ears all to hell and Bruce's tendency to sound fantastic these days, I'm gonna guess Bruce did most or all of those goodery parts.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:23:36 PM
1- every time a new BW album has appeared fans had a great time arguing about just how much of it was produced by BW. This BB album is no exception.

2- unfamiliar and trendy production techniques are being used as exhibit A for proving that BW was overruled by Thomas.

3- lack of enough trademark BW production touches are exhibit B.

4- however, when BW's production touches appeared on previous albums, many of us stressed that actually it was the band members coming up with BW pastiche to cover up for him.

Bottomline: we know sh*t.





Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:26:45 PM
I think it's him doing the ooohs during the Bill and Sue chorus, for instance.
You sure? Most of the obvious falsetto stuff sounds like Foskett, I'd say.


I think so. There's this thin L.A. Album-type falsetto all over the album. Keep in mind that it's Bruce the one who sings the wailing falsetto tag to Fun Fun Fun in concerts today. The guy can sing pretty high. And Jeff, although he sings most of the prominent falsettos, is doing Carl's parts in this album a lot of the time.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on May 31, 2012, 05:27:18 PM
Hate to say this, but there are a few really impressive, great-sounding falsetto or higher parts on this album. Given Jeff's history of grating my ears all to hell and Bruce's tendency to sound fantastic these days, I'm gonna guess Bruce did most or all of those goodery parts.

Bloody wish he'd done the bridge in 'Isn't It Time'


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:28:33 PM

Bottomline: we know sh*t.

While this has certainly happened before, to say we know sh*t is a bit of an exaggeration.

On that note, I cannot picture Brian sitting behind a monitor, laughing maniacally as he ups the attack and sensitivity knobs on the autotune setting, nor can I picture him saying, "FUCK YEAH I SOUND LIKE A ROBOT. KEEP IT," in response to hearing a few particularly bad spots on this album. Not to accuse the guy of not caring about his songs, but I'm sure there have been instances of someone saying, "Brian, do you like what I did there?" and Brian saying, "Sure. When's dinner?"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:28:37 PM
Hate to say this, but there are a few really impressive, great-sounding falsetto or higher parts on this album. Given Jeff's history of grating my ears all to hell and Bruce's tendency to sound fantastic these days, I'm gonna guess Bruce did most or all of those goodery parts.

Bloody wish he'd done the bridge in 'Isn't It Time'

Enjoying the album so far, huh?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:29:29 PM
Hate to say this, but there are a few really impressive, great-sounding falsetto or higher parts on this album. Given Jeff's history of grating my ears all to hell and Bruce's tendency to sound fantastic these days, I'm gonna guess Bruce did most or all of those goodery parts.

Bloody wish he'd done the bridge in 'Isn't It Time'

Totally agreed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:30:33 PM

Bottomline: we know sh*t.

While this has certainly happened before, to say we know sh*t is a bit of an exaggeration.

On that note, I cannot picture Brian sitting behind a monitor, laughing maniacally as he ups the attack and sensitivity knobs on the autotune setting, nor can I picture him saying, "FUCK YEAH I SOUND LIKE A ROBOT. KEEP IT," in response to hearing a few particularly bad spots on this album. Not to accuse the guy of not caring about his songs, but I'm sure there have been instances of someone saying, "Brian, do you like what I did there?" and Brian saying, "Sure. When's dinner?"

We don't know, man. He fired Thomas once already.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 31, 2012, 05:32:19 PM
Damn, so. In less than a year we've gotten an official release of The Smile Sessions, a 75-date Beach Boys w/ Brian tour, and a brand new Brian Wilson helmed Beach Boys album.

WHY AM I STILL SO UNHAPPY WITH MY LIFE?!  :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:33:02 PM

Bottomline: we know sh*t.

While this has certainly happened before, to say we know sh*t is a bit of an exaggeration.

On that note, I cannot picture Brian sitting behind a monitor, laughing maniacally as he ups the attack and sensitivity knobs on the autotune setting, nor can I picture him saying, "FUCK YEAH I SOUND LIKE A ROBOT. KEEP IT," in response to hearing a few particularly bad spots on this album. Not to accuse the guy of not caring about his songs, but I'm sure there have been instances of someone saying, "Brian, do you like what I did there?" and Brian saying, "Sure. When's dinner?"

We don't know, man. He fired Thomas once already.

Was it Brian who actually opted to fire Joe before? Not questioning, I'm sincerely asking - I don't know.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:34:27 PM
Damn, so. In less than a year we've gotten an official release of The Smile Sessions, a 75-date Beach Boys w/ Brian tour, and a brand new Brian Wilson helmed Beach Boys album.

WHY AM I STILL SO UNHAPPY WITH MY LIFE?!  :'(

Cheer up man. I mean, can't die from cannabis, however you could kill yourself why high i guess. If you want to kill yourself with a drug it can't be weed, anyhow more importantly don't kill yourself man no point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 31, 2012, 05:36:28 PM
Damn, so. In less than a year we've gotten an official release of The Smile Sessions, a 75-date Beach Boys w/ Brian tour, and a brand new Brian Wilson helmed Beach Boys album.

WHY AM I STILL SO UNHAPPY WITH MY LIFE?!  :'(

Cheer up man. I mean, can't die from cannabis, however you could kill yourself why high i guess. If you want to kill yourself with a drug it can't be weed, anyhow more importantly don't kill yourself man no point.

Well, when you look at it that way!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 05:37:24 PM

Bottomline: we know sh*t.

While this has certainly happened before, to say we know sh*t is a bit of an exaggeration.

On that note, I cannot picture Brian sitting behind a monitor, laughing maniacally as he ups the attack and sensitivity knobs on the autotune setting, nor can I picture him saying, "FUCK YEAH I SOUND LIKE A ROBOT. KEEP IT," in response to hearing a few particularly bad spots on this album. Not to accuse the guy of not caring about his songs, but I'm sure there have been instances of someone saying, "Brian, do you like what I did there?" and Brian saying, "Sure. When's dinner?"

We don't know, man. He fired Thomas once already.

Was it Brian who actually opted to fire Joe before? Not questioning, I'm sincerely asking - I don't know.

On the recent Thomas thread Wirestone reposted Bob Hanes' account on the episode. It's enlightening about his leadership, I think.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 05:40:32 PM
So, of course Mike had to include "Fun, Fun, Fun" in the lyrics to Beaches In Mind.

Gotta say, the way they stacked the harmonies was unexpected, therefore making that line decent enough.

Summer's Gone is my current fav. Very early-60's-"Surfer Girl"-era sounding.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on May 31, 2012, 05:51:30 PM
So far, love the second half. First half sounds fresh, classic, but a little hackneyed (the lyrical callbacks in particular). All of it however, sounds like and represents many of  the various sounds, eras and moods of The Beach Boys - that in itself is an achievement. Looking forward to living with it a while.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 05:52:58 PM
The guy who leaked the album took this picture, the CD looks nice

(http://i2.lulzimg.com/1a738ac95a.jpg)

Why do people set their CDs down like this? CDs go in CDs players or CD cases, not thrown on top of a wooden table ;(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 06:03:10 PM
I wish Mike went in a more introspective direction with his lyrics..

The man's been through so much just like the rest of the BB's in the last 20 years, would've been interesting to hear his thoughts on life etc

Was going to start a separate thread about the lyrics for this album, they really do seem godawful! I'm much more interested in harmony and melody anyway so it doesn't bother me that much, but jeez. I laughed when in the Joe Thomas interview he talks about how amazing it was that Mike Love wrote the lyric 'Spring Vacation, Good Vibrations/Summer weather, we're back together!' in 5 minutes - really?

Maybe when they realized they were going to go with the melancholy, reflective albeit beautiful ending, they decided that they needed Mike's happy, Beach Boyish lyrics to balance things out. Just a thought...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 06:21:50 PM
Can anyone work out who sings the high part in the main melody of TPLOBAS?
I know Brian is singing the majority but is Foskett taking over at that point?

That's what it sounds like to me. Sounds like Foskett does a line solo, then the next line is a BW / JF hybrid.

Jeff and Brian trade lines in the chorus. Jeff sings the "x to y" bits and Brian sings the answer lines.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 06:26:27 PM
So brief thoughts after one listen to the album -- it's not very good. But "not very good" is still another way of saying "better than anything released under the Beach Boys' name since 1979". It's about on a level with something like MIU, I suppose -- perfectly competent, but without a single track that sounds like someone had something to say, as opposed to just wanting to put out some product. Some nice tunes, abysmal lyrics throughout, but decent enough I suppose.

Think About The Days sounds like something Bruce would write, but in a good way.
That's Why God Made The Radio sounds much better than the single mix, but is still an underwhelming song.
Isn't It Time is great -- could have come from the Paley sessions from its sound.
Spring Vacation -- sounds like the theme for a poor mid-90s American sitcom. I can't hear it without seeing images in my head of Greg Evigan or Joey Lawrence in an improbably large apartment with a wacky neighbour and an executive production credit for Linwood Boomer.
The Private Life Of Bill And Sue -- one of the best things on the album, but sounds *exactly* like a Boney M record (can't remember the name), apart from the first two seconds, which sound *exactly* like a track by Carolyn Edwards (an LA pop musician who's worked with some of Brian's band).
Shelter -- "but don't forget who's taking you home, and in whose arms you're gonna be...". Worryingly, all the best stuff so far is very, *very* derivative. But this *is* one of the better tracks.
Daybreak -- That's definitely four minutes and twenty seconds of music-like sound.
Beaches In Mind -- Utter, irredeemable sh*t. Along with Spring Vacation the worst thing on the album.
Strange World -- a really interesting track, seems to be equal parts Disney, Beethoven, Phil Spector and bad 80s AOR. Combining different types of bombast is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure it comes off.
From There To Back Again -- Nice. Sounds just like Paul Williams. That's a good thing, mostly.
Pacific Coast Highway -- Nice enough, but pointless to judge as a separate track rather than as a link between the two songs on either side of it.
Summer's Gone -- I don't get the fuss that some people have made about this one. It's pleasant enough, in a nursery rhyme way, but doesn't really do anything for me. That said, it took two months for me to really get why Midnight's Another Day was actually a good song after I dismissed it utterly on first listen. Maybe this will grow on me in the same way.

But the thing is, in a couple of months I could have totally changed my opinion. I have with many other Beach Boys albums. Right now, I think this is like A Postcard From California -- something I'll listen to a couple of dozen times in the first month or so, then never again -- but I could be wrong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 06:31:39 PM
Can anyone work out who sings the high part in the main melody of TPLOBAS?
I know Brian is singing the majority but is Foskett taking over at that point?

That's what it sounds like to me. Sounds like Foskett does a line solo, then the next line is a BW / JF hybrid.

Jeff and Brian trade lines in the chorus. Jeff sings the "x to y" bits and Brian sings the answer lines.

Nice, you're probably right. Just going off of what I remember from one listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 06:36:29 PM
Also, the musician credits are definitely not correct. There's a distinct bari sax line on the title track, but no credit for Mertens. Possibly a late overdub?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 06:39:27 PM
wow, AndrewHickey really expected Sunflower 2


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: AndrewHickey on May 31, 2012, 06:41:55 PM
wow, AndrewHickey really expected Sunflower 2

No, I didn't. I expected pretty much exactly what we got.
I *hoped* for better, because as recently as 2008 Brian was putting out music that is as good as anything the band ever released, but any expectation I had for anything other than bland competence went away once I heard the title track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on May 31, 2012, 06:59:49 PM
Don't know if this has been mentioned yet (I've tried reading through this entire thread as time has gone by, but my word, it's long). Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't "What Love Can Do" the most recent BW track before the stuff on this album? If so, I'm not sure if it's coincidence that there was some kind of pitch correction slathered all over his vocals on that song as well. Now, on the one hand, that was produced by Phil Ramone, IIRC, who I haven't known to use modern tools like that in most of the music of his that I've heard over the years. But it's definitely there. So couldn't it be that Brian requested its use there and continued to do so on the new stuff because he liked the outcome there? To my ears, it sounds no better or worse than it does on the new album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 07:07:38 PM
Now, on the one hand, that was produced by Phil Ramone, IIRC, who I haven't known to use modern tools like that in most of the music of his that I've heard over the years. But it's definitely there.

Just like Brian is said to have produced this material and yet the idear of autotune feels pretty foreign to this kind of material. Even at the height of his perfectionism in the 60s, I can't see Brian resorting to something like this, although I'm sure some people could give me some kind of valid points about why he would.

Regardless, I'm sure there are outside influences in stuff like this. It could be some folks from Capitol, it could be Joe Thomas, it could be Melinda (who is known to have wanted Brian to double his lead vocals when redoing them for a live DVD until it was explained to her why this was a terrible idea), etc. etc. etc.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 07:09:57 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't "What Love Can Do" the most recent BW track before the stuff on this album?

He's released three solo albums since then.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on May 31, 2012, 07:13:44 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't "What Love Can Do" the most recent BW track before the stuff on this album?

He's released three solo albums since then.

Oh, wow, the song's that old?! I thought it was maybe 18 months ago or something, recorded contemporaneously with Disney. My bad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on May 31, 2012, 07:20:22 PM
People like to point out how "Brian's production style" has to have all these certain things that have to be there for it to be an official Brian production. However, there's people like Quincy Jones, George Martin, Paul McCartney, Dr. Dre, etc. And guess what? A Quincy Jones production from the '80s sounds way different from one in the '90s. McCartney productions from the early '70s sound much different from '80s, which sound different from the '90s. Even say, Dr. Dre, who is from the hip-hop side of the things, he had an album in 1992 which sounded a lot different from the album he released in 1999. People change and so do their styles.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: BJL on May 31, 2012, 07:27:16 PM
Question: can anyone make out the lyrics of the backing vocals on the last verse of shelter - I didn't even notice them until my fourth or fifth listen, but they're really cool.  It's in the last two choruses.  It sounds like their saying "moonlight" to me, but it might just be nonsense syllables even. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 07:33:19 PM
On "The Private Life Of Bill And Sue", every time they sing "California to Mexico..." I expect the next line to be "everybody's goin' to Kokomo..." :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on May 31, 2012, 07:41:17 PM
People like to point out how "Brian's production style" has to have all these certain things that have to be there for it to be an official Brian production. However, there's people like Quincy Jones, George Martin, Paul McCartney, Dr. Dre, etc. And guess what? A Quincy Jones production from the '80s sounds way different from one in the '90s. McCartney productions from the early '70s sound much different from '80s, which sound different from the '90s. Even say, Dr. Dre, who is from the hip-hop side of the things, he had an album in 1992 which sounded a lot different from the album he released in 1999. People change and so do their styles.

Amen.

Another thing... the production sounds similar  on the BW christmas album, and TLOS, and Gershwin, and (especially) the Disney album...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 07:43:19 PM
Question: can anyone make out the lyrics of the backing vocals on the last verse of shelter - I didn't even notice them until my fourth or fifth listen, but they're really cool.  It's in the last two choruses.  It sounds like their saying "moonlight" to me, but it might just be nonsense syllables even. 

I noticed this as well. They are really cool.  They give that last chorus a really cool vibe, I was really into the song when I heard this.  But I have no idea what they're saying.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on May 31, 2012, 07:45:25 PM
Question: can anyone make out the lyrics of the backing vocals on the last verse of shelter - I didn't even notice them until my fourth or fifth listen, but they're really cool.  It's in the last two choruses.  It sounds like their saying "moonlight" to me, but it might just be nonsense syllables even. 

I noticed this as well. They are really cool.  They give that last chorus a really cool vibe, I was really into the song when I heard this.  But I have no idea what they're saying.

Isn't that Spanish (as per Joe Thomas)?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on May 31, 2012, 07:47:24 PM
2- unfamiliar and trendy production techniques are being used as exhibit A for proving that BW was overruled by Thomas.

2b - footnote: this is a definition of "trendy" which includes sounding like an album that's 30 years old this year.  ('80s power chords are retro now, folks!)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 07:49:08 PM
Question: can anyone make out the lyrics of the backing vocals on the last verse of shelter - I didn't even notice them until my fourth or fifth listen, but they're really cool.  It's in the last two choruses.  It sounds like their saying "moonlight" to me, but it might just be nonsense syllables even. 

I noticed this as well. They are really cool.  They give that last chorus a really cool vibe, I was really into the song when I heard this.  But I have no idea what they're saying.

Isn't that Spanish (as per Joe Thomas)?

That's on the bridge to Strange World, I believe.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 07:58:51 PM
People like to point out how "Brian's production style" has to have all these certain things that have to be there for it to be an official Brian production. However, there's people like Quincy Jones, George Martin, Paul McCartney, Dr. Dre, etc. And guess what? A Quincy Jones production from the '80s sounds way different from one in the '90s. McCartney productions from the early '70s sound much different from '80s, which sound different from the '90s. Even say, Dr. Dre, who is from the hip-hop side of the things, he had an album in 1992 which sounded a lot different from the album he released in 1999. People change and so do their styles.

Amen.

Another thing... the production sounds similar  on the BW christmas album, and TLOS, and Gershwin, and (especially) the Disney album...

100% agree I was going through saying Style wise.. Smile, Disney, TLOS ,Gershwin etc


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: 18thofMay on May 31, 2012, 08:00:28 PM
I love the album. But I loved Disney so did the kids, I also loved Gershwin so did my Dad, I also love TLOS so did my kids and wife.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 08:03:26 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't "What Love Can Do" the most recent BW track before the stuff on this album?

He's released three solo albums since then.

Oh, wow, the song's that old?! I thought it was maybe 18 months ago or something, recorded contemporaneously with Disney. My bad.

They've put it out on a couple of different compilations since then, so it's tough to track. But I believe the original CD (which also includes a remake of GOK) was issued in 2007. It was appreciated, too, because we hadn't had a studio album from BW for a couple of years at that point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 31, 2012, 08:06:57 PM
So, of course Mike had to include "Fun, Fun, Fun" in the lyrics to Beaches In Mind.

Jesus christ, what is WRONG with this guy??
didn't he wrote GREAT lyrics, such as All This Is That ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on May 31, 2012, 08:07:59 PM
Also, the musician credits are definitely not correct. There's a distinct bari sax line on the title track, but no credit for Mertens. Possibly a late overdub?
There is also clearly piano on "Isn't it Time."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 08:08:48 PM
I would like to cautiously, bravely float the idea that "Spring Vacation" could have been the best song on the album.... if it had better lyrics.  

Discuss.


Also, I would like to make the observation that ultimately, the blame for that lies with Brian.  Sure Mike wrote the shittiest lyrics that have ever shitted, but when you tell Mike Love "Hey, Write something about Spring Vacation" and then accept, sing, and PUBLISH what he hands you 5 minutes later.... I don't think it's really the Lovester that's the problem.  

That would be like telling your 5 year old to write something about spring vacation, and then complaining when it's not very good.  Brian (or whoever's in charge) should have rejected the lyrics and told him to write something better.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 08:11:01 PM
I love the album. But I loved Disney so did the kids, I also loved Gershwin so did my Dad, I also love TLOS so did my kids and wife.

I'm with you man.  Disney was great, Gershwin was great, TLOS was great, and this album, at first listen, has great spots and not so great spots, but I'm going to choose to enjoy it instead of pick it apart.  Those beautiful voices! 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 08:12:51 PM
People like to point out how "Brian's production style" has to have all these certain things that have to be there for it to be an official Brian production. However, there's people like Quincy Jones, George Martin, Paul McCartney, Dr. Dre, etc. And guess what? A Quincy Jones production from the '80s sounds way different from one in the '90s. McCartney productions from the early '70s sound much different from '80s, which sound different from the '90s. Even say, Dr. Dre, who is from the hip-hop side of the things, he had an album in 1992 which sounded a lot different from the album he released in 1999. People change and so do their styles.

I agree wholeheartedly.  Note too, that in the case of Dr. Dre, he's often been accused of having people do all the work and they just lie about it and say he did it.

Kind of like people are saying Brian does. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 08:16:06 PM
1- every time a new BW album has appeared fans had a great time arguing about just how much of it was produced by BW. This BB album is no exception.

2- unfamiliar and trendy production techniques are being used as exhibit A for proving that BW was overruled by Thomas.

3- lack of enough trademark BW production touches are exhibit B.

4- however, when BW's production touches appeared on previous albums, many of us stressed that actually it was the band members coming up with BW pastiche to cover up for him.

Bottomline: we know sh*t.





You sir win the 'voice of reason' prize for the evening.  Please return tommorow night. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 08:21:32 PM
I would like to cautiously, bravely float the idea that "Spring Vacation" could have been the best song on the album.... if it had better lyrics.  

Discuss.


Also, I would like to make the observation that ultimately, the blame for that lies with Brian.  Sure Mike wrote the sh*ttiest lyrics that have ever sh*tted, but when you tell Mike Love "Hey, Write something about Spring Vacation" and then accept, sing, and PUBLISH what he hands you 5 minutes later.... I don't think it's really the Lovester that's the problem.  

That would be like telling your 5 year old to write something about spring vacation, and then complaining when it's not very good.  Brian (or whoever's in charge) should have rejected the lyrics and told him to write something better.  

I agree with you, Ron. I think "Summer's Gone" is the best song, but upon the first few listens, I can't find a song that I enjoy more than "Spring Vacation".

Some of Mike's retro Beach Boys' lyrics are cringe-worthy, such as "fun fun fun" on "Beaches In Mind". But, for some reason, they don't bother me on "Spring vacation" They seem to work in the context of this song, not that Mike couldn't have written a hundred other words to put in that song. Also, we diehards have had to endure Mike doing this forever. Maybe the new or casual fan who hears these lyrics won't be as put off by them.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 31, 2012, 08:22:05 PM
Okay, well "Shelter" Is my current favorite (not listening to the last 4 songs yet)
And JUST TRY to tell me that isn't BW.
It is CLASSIC Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 08:26:06 PM
Also, the musician credits are definitely not correct. There's a distinct bari sax line on the title track, but no credit for Mertens. Possibly a late overdub?
There is also clearly piano on "Isn't it Time."

I thought so too, but on recurrent listens I couldn't tell. The handclaps and uke kind of blend together, so maybe that's the sound?

I kind of expected this from a production involving Joe -- the Imagination musician credits are pretty bad, too. One of the tunes doesn't even list a rhythm section!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 08:27:54 PM
"Why don't you run away and spend some time _________"

??? halp me ;(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on May 31, 2012, 08:28:01 PM
Okay, well "Shelter" Is my current favorite (not listening to the last 4 songs yet)
And JUST TRY to tell me that isn't BW.
It is CLASSIC Brian.

Only thing that really bothers me is the translation between the pre-chorus and chorus.. the way the drums comes in after the first chorus, with the roll, really kinda kills the vibe, out of place imo.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 08:28:51 PM
I would like to cautiously, bravely float the idea that "Spring Vacation" could have been the best song on the album.... if it had better lyrics.  

Discuss.


Also, I would like to make the observation that ultimately, the blame for that lies with Brian.  Sure Mike wrote the sh*ttiest lyrics that have ever sh*tted, but when you tell Mike Love "Hey, Write something about Spring Vacation" and then accept, sing, and PUBLISH what he hands you 5 minutes later.... I don't think it's really the Lovester that's the problem.  

That would be like telling your 5 year old to write something about spring vacation, and then complaining when it's not very good.  Brian (or whoever's in charge) should have rejected the lyrics and told him to write something better.  

I agree with you, Ron. I think "Summer's Gone" is the best song, but upon the first few listens, I can't find a song that I enjoy more than "Spring Vacation".

Some of Mike's retro Beach Boys' lyrics are cringe-worthy, such as "fun fun fun" on "Beaches In Mind". But, for some reason, they don't bother me on "Spring vacation" They seem to work in the context of this song, not that Mike couldn't have written a hundred other words to put in that song. Also, we diehards have had to endure Mike doing this forever. Maybe the new or casual fan who hears these lyrics won't be as put off by them.

Yeah I'm thinking it may resound with a casual fan, I don't know.

Just to clarify, I don't think I would have made the song about Spring Vacation AT ALL, maybe you could clean the lyrics up and save the subject matter, I don't know.  

What I DO know, though, is that the structure of the song, the chorus, the melody, the background harmonies, the bridge... the song is really, really good.  Very catchy, very original... even some of the little melody things they do while they're singing the verses are really clever and catchy in a Weezer/Bare Naked Ladies sort of way, if you know what I mean.  

That people are willing to look by lyrics that awful and STILL enjoy the song I think proves the point.  It could have been so great.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 31, 2012, 08:46:31 PM
Some of Mike's retro Beach Boys' lyrics are cringe-worthy, such as "fun fun fun" on "Beaches In Mind". But, for some reason, they don't bother me on "Spring vacation" They seem to work in the context of this song, not that Mike couldn't have written a hundred other words to put in that song. Also, we diehards have had to endure Mike doing this forever. Maybe the new or casual fan who hears these lyrics won't be as put off by them.

If Mike had written "Do It Again" in 2012 exactly as is, people would probably be calling him out on a few lines. "Let's get back together and surf again"? "With warmed up weather, let's get back together"? Slash the guy's wrists and he'd bleed cheese - almost always has and always will. I wouldn't have 'im any other way, for better or worse.

These are certainly far from the best lyrics he's written, a few lines are a bit goofy (as is the namechecking of older songs), but they serve the mood of the song well. I'd call them pretty tolerable and, again, they serve the song well overall.

I'll also point out that stuff like "The clouds are breaking, it's a beautiful day/For a wonderful Pacific Coast getaway," aren't really any better, to me. An extreme example, I realize, but I think it's relevant that the cheese flows on these songs with or without teh lovester's involvement. And again, the line looks iffy on its own, but in context works just fine.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on May 31, 2012, 08:51:32 PM
Mike looks...so serious in some of those youtube videos writing lyrics! What goes through the guy's head? "Oh, they'll love this. 'We'll find a place in the sun, where we can  have'...hmmm...oh! Perfect! 'Fun, fun, fun'! Yeah! That works. Here Brian!"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 08:57:45 PM
Has the reason for Mike Love's executive producer credit been established?

Is it because he brought the positivity to the table?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 09:02:06 PM
Has the reason for Mike Love's executive producer credit been established?


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Craig Feldspar on May 31, 2012, 09:02:11 PM
Alright, So i've heard the album and I like it, great job to everyone involved, its clearly their best album in a long long time. Anyways, as a David Marks fan, I was wondering if anyone can point out places where hes clearly audible. (guitar riffs etc). I am having trouble identifying his sound and where he is on the album...anyone know where our man DM is? (at least we know not on vocals :( )


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on May 31, 2012, 09:04:17 PM
Mike looks...so serious in some of those youtube videos writing lyrics! What goes through the guy's head? "Oh, they'll love this. 'We'll find a place in the sun, where we can  have'...hmmm...oh! Perfect! 'Fun, fun, fun'! Yeah! That works. Here Brian!"

Mike is shamelessly nostalgic..

In any given interview he drops 6 or 7 Beach Boys song titles and he's not even joking, when he rhymes 'sun' with 'fun' he sees nothing wrong with it, lucky for him it somehow works


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 31, 2012, 09:04:38 PM
"From There to Back Again" makes "Winds of Change" its bitch.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 09:07:06 PM
"From There to Back Again" makes "Winds of Change" its bitch.

LOL. So true tho.

Has the reason for Mike Love's executive producer credit been established?


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ;)

How so? As in, Mike funded studio time, etc? I would've thought Capitol Records would do that, but I guess that's what that credit usually means.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on May 31, 2012, 09:07:48 PM
Mike looks...so serious in some of those youtube videos writing lyrics! What goes through the guy's head? "Oh, they'll love this. 'We'll find a place in the sun, where we can  have'...hmmm...oh! Perfect! 'Fun, fun, fun'! Yeah! That works. Here Brian!"

Mike is shamelessly nostalgic..

In any given interview he drops 6 or 7 Beach Boys song titles and he's not even joking, when he rhymes 'sun' with 'fun' he sees nothing wrong with it, lucky for him it somehow works

Mike has an infinite amount more money than I, so really... who knows what about writing songs.  None of my songs are being ridiculed on message boards right now.  

BTW, somebody please post up the songs from the album that Mike has a song writing credit on.  We're slamming him, lets see if there's some praise to pass around too.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 09:13:19 PM
Alright, So i've heard the album and I like it, great job to everyone involved, its clearly their best album in a long long time. Anyways, as a David Marks fan, I was wondering if anyone can point out places where hes clearly audible. (guitar riffs etc). I am having trouble identifying his sound and where he is on the album...anyone know where our man DM is? (at least we know not on vocals :( )

I don't doubt he played at the sessions, but I don't hear anything distinctive.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 09:14:43 PM
Mike looks...so serious in some of those youtube videos writing lyrics! What goes through the guy's head? "Oh, they'll love this. 'We'll find a place in the sun, where we can  have'...hmmm...oh! Perfect! 'Fun, fun, fun'! Yeah! That works. Here Brian!"

Mike is shamelessly nostalgic..

In any given interview he drops 6 or 7 Beach Boys song titles and he's not even joking, when he rhymes 'sun' with 'fun' he sees nothing wrong with it, lucky for him it somehow works

Mike has an infinite amount more money than I, so really... who knows what about writing songs.  None of my songs are being ridiculed on message boards right now.  

BTW, somebody please post up the songs from the album that Mike has a song writing credit on.  We're slamming him, lets see if there's some praise to pass around too.  

Mike wrote the words to Isn't It Time, Spring Vacation and Beaches in Mind. And Daybreak, of course.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on May 31, 2012, 09:19:11 PM
Has the reason for Mike Love's executive producer credit been established?


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ;)

How so? As in, Mike funded studio time, etc? I would've thought Capitol Records would do that, but I guess that's what that credit usually means.  ;D

I think the title can vary from project to project, but in this case, I believe Mike's input as Executive Producer was not so much hands on (that was Brian and Joe), but maybe to oversee the project. I think he definitely had input into the direction of the album, the theme of the album, you know, what type of album this was going to be (as we know, every Beach Boys' album was a different type). I put the $$$$$$$$$$ in my post because Executive Producer is a credit, one which means more responsibility, which, of course, means more compensation!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on May 31, 2012, 09:24:36 PM
In a word, what some are calling cheese is only the necessary element of innocence that makes the experience sublime, to put it into Blakian terms.

Little lamb, who made thee? sounds like cheese too, but it exists in dynamic juxtaposition to the Tiger and the Chimney Sweep. 

I have the album on amazon order and hope to see it on my Rhapsody tuesday morning. Don't want to chase u-ground bootleg sites. . .just feels wrong.



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on May 31, 2012, 09:29:38 PM
That sorta cheese sounds innocent out of the lips of a 20something, but when pinky rings are involved it tends to be more of a dairy product.

Love the suite fragments, quite like "The Private Life of Bill and Sue" except for the cliche opening. The chorus is catchy despite part of my brain resisting for obscure reasons.

How often are people going to quote Brian's cry of "I'm better off alone ... I'm better on my own" in big thinkpieces, I wonder. What a moment! Didn't like "Summer's Gone" as much as I thought I would but it probably needs two dozen more listens.

I kinda wish the album opened with Brian Wilson piano chord structure tho, it doesn't sound like his type of piano work at all. Lovely vocal arrangement of course!

Hmm. Typing this  makes me realize I should just listen to it again. CLICK.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 31, 2012, 09:45:29 PM
The first three tracks are fantastic. However, the transition from "Think About the Days" to "TWGMTR" is pretty jarring.

"Isn't It Time" is instant classic Beach Boys. Do my ears deceive me, or is that a farty, "Love You"-sounding synth line I hear during the chorus? I really love how strongly each of the Boys' vocals come through at various times throughout this one, especially Brian's part at the very beginning and Mike's singing the chorus by himself later in the song. Al sparkles throughout the entire thing. And Jeff's "Let's raise our glass to kindness" line is just beautiful.

"Spring Vacation" is not nearly as bad as I feared it would be. Lyrics are really cheesy but the verse melody is incredibly catchy. This is probably the song hurt most by the album's production.

"The Private Life of Bill and Sue" is pleasant enough. I think people would probably really dislike this song if we were told that Mike had written it, though. Nonetheless, it's an interesting subject matter for Brian to tackle. I like the sax noodling and the little radio/TV chatter at the very end.

"Shelter" is really good, but the various parts of the song--the verse, pre-chorus and chorus--all seem kind of disjointed, like they all belong to different songs. Nevertheless, I'll echo others' sentiments in saying it's a real tragedy that Carl isn't alive today to belt out that absolutely gorgeous chorus. In a very strange way the song lies somewhere melodically in between "Thinkin' About You Baby" and "Lahaina Aloha".

I wish "Daybreak Over the Ocean" sounded more like the 1978 Mike Love solo version. It's pretty overproduced, but I do give them credit for retaining Christian Love's vocals, though, and I wish he had more of a presence on the entire record.

"Beaches in Mind" is forgettable but not really offensively bad. I get the feeling there were probably a few other songs in contention for the album that would've worked better here, but what are you gonna do. If the worst thing you can say about the weakest track on a 2012 Beach Boys album is that it's forgettable, then I won't complain.

I'm not sure what to make of "Strange World". I like the Spector-esque production but for the most part it feels pretty forgettable. It'll probably take a few more listens to reach a verdict on this. Definitely don't dislike it, though.

"From There to Back Again" is an absolute stunner. It's unbelievable how well Al's voice has held up over the years, and I don't think any of the other Boys would've sounded right singing lead on this one. There's a lot to digest about the song, but I think the simplest way to describe it right now is if "Winds of Change" grew a pair of balls and had been written by Brian Wilson.

"Pacific Coast Highway" is just great. Seeing as it's probably one of the various transitional pieces that link larger compositions in Brian's "My Life Suite", this leaves me *really* wanting to hear the rest of the suite on the next BB record.

"Summer's Gone" is not really at all what I expected it to be based on the early reviews and descriptions. Very somber and grim even for Brian. There are some great harmonies here (especially when Mike's voice comes through) and I'm really glad the raindrops/crashing waves at the end don't feel gimicky. I wonder what Bon Jovi's contributions to this song were...



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on May 31, 2012, 09:49:08 PM

"Summer's Gone" is not really at all what I expected it to be based on the early reviews and descriptions. Very somber and grim even for Brian. There are some great harmonies here (especially when Mike's voice comes through) and I'm really glad the raindrops/crashing waves at the end don't feel gimicky. I wonder what Bon Jovi's contributions to this song were...


Good review, I agree with most of this. I think it's been established that Jon Bon Jovi wrote the lyrics for the 2nd verse.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on May 31, 2012, 09:49:41 PM
we made a thread for members' reviews!

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,13192.0.html


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on May 31, 2012, 09:49:59 PM
I wonder what Bon Jovi's contributions to this song were...

Well, according to Joe, he basically wrote all of it.

Brian had the title, the concept, and had demoed a single verse. Bon Jovi then expanded it into a full-length song. The tune is only a sequence of verses, though, so it's not like JBJ actually contributed much musically.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on May 31, 2012, 09:52:24 PM
we made a thread for members' reviews!

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,13192.0.html

Thanks! I didn't notice that thread until after I posted my review in this one. Sorry!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on May 31, 2012, 11:17:30 PM

The last really good album the BB made was Holland.

Look:
There's no Carl Wilson!!
There's no Dennis Wilson!!

This album's as good as KTSA.

Now back to listening to Kayla Williams!!

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bcdam on June 01, 2012, 12:48:53 AM
This is going to sound crazy, but perhaps we should all just admit that there's no way that any of us could have a truly subjective reaction to this album until we get perspective on it. It's either not good enough based on our expectations or way better than we deserved...again, based on our expectations. It's the best album since Sunflower...or Holland...or LA...or KTSA...or it's worse than SIP.

Or we could argue about who produced what and how much auto-tune is used (if any. HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE BRIAN OF USING ANY!!!) until we get too tired to type.


That said...Spring Vacation has terrible lyrics.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thatjacob on June 01, 2012, 01:08:45 AM
I just found the last three songs of the album streaming online at a questionable site (hopefully amazon mp3 will have a sale or it'll be on spotify on the release date) but I have to say, those three tracks actually lived up to my expectations. I'm surprised.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on June 01, 2012, 01:13:33 AM
.....must be strong...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jpinmyroom on June 01, 2012, 02:14:56 AM
Isnt it time sounds like a love child of male ego and its gettin late. I LOVE IT!!! I feared the cheesy lyrics would ruin the album but having only listened to it all the way through a couple of times im already singing along to most of it.

Theres something to be said about that and the direct nature of the lyrics. They fit the songs very well.

I put this album on a par with LA album


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 01, 2012, 03:54:09 AM
Isnt it time sounds like a love child of male ego and its gettin late.

To this ear, more like "ME" & Crack At Your Love". Still ver' good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RadBooley on June 01, 2012, 04:43:52 AM
I just found the last three songs of the album streaming online at a questionable site (hopefully amazon mp3 will have a sale or it'll be on spotify on the release date) but I have to say, those three tracks actually lived up to my expectations. I'm surprised.
I agree wholeheartedly. The pop songs on the first half of the album aren't awful but From There to Back Again to the end is fantastic.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on June 01, 2012, 06:25:06 AM
Alexis Petridis' Guardian review.
Sorry if posted already. 3 stars out of 5, for a guy so dismissive of their recent output, who repels 8 out of the 12 tracks, it ain't bad.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/31/beach-boys-thats-why-review


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 06:36:55 AM
Alexis Petridis' Guardian review.
Sorry if posted already. 3 stars out of 5, for a guy so dismissive of their recent output, who repels 8 out of the 12 tracks, it ain't bad.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/may/31/beach-boys-thats-why-review

yeah there's a thread for it.  He's a bit to dismissive and a paragraph on spring vacation is a bit much, but it's an ok review.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on June 01, 2012, 06:48:14 AM
First listen from beginning to end. Overall sound reminds me of Still Cruisin', with bits of Imagination, That Lucky Old Sun, M.I.U. Album and Pet Sounds The Musical thrown into the mix. At this moment, out of the much-celebrated last three songs, "Pacific Ocean Highway" is the one I like best. "Daybreak Over the Ocean" reminds me a bit of XTC's "Hold Me My Daddy" (off their Oranges and Lemons album). "Beaches in Mind" is definitely on the Shania Twain side of rawk. "Think About the Days" is simply gorgeous - whose voices do we hear at 0:44? Reminds me of Dennis' "Baby Blue" in a way.

Overall, I think I'm going to like this, easily their best one since BB85 (though I'm a huge fan of about half of the new songs on Still Cruisin'!). A bit slick even by their own standards, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 07:13:29 AM
Got my (physical) copy today. Cruised around and listened to the first eight tracks. This is a GREAT driving album. Funnily enough, the weak spot for me was "Think About The Days". I think it's the placement, and the fact that it reminds me of Our Prayer, but Our Prayer is just so damn good that this pales in comparrison. Bill and Sue will take some getting used to, but parts of it are brilliant! The trio of TWGMTR/Isn't It Time/Spring Vacation is really cool - you feel really good listening to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 07:15:32 AM
BLAAAH YOU GUYS SUUCK


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 07:34:59 AM
Summer's Gone might just be the saddest song ever written.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:22:46 AM
Yeah, when I was listening to "Summers Gone" driving home last night about 10p.m., I couldn't help but think about how sad it's going to be to not have the Beach Boys with us one day.  Sounds like Brian and Jon Bon Jovi were thinking about it too. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on June 01, 2012, 08:37:29 AM
Summer's Gone might just be the saddest song ever written.

No, it's probably this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK6TXMsvgQg


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:43:12 AM
I gotta go with this one.  So sad you may slit your wrists.  DO NOT WATCH THIS VIDEO IF YOU'RE PRONE TO SLIT YOUR WRISTS.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tp5Rdb9ncfM



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on June 01, 2012, 08:43:25 AM
Yeah, when I was listening to "Summers Gone" driving home last night about 10p.m., I couldn't help but think about how sad it's going to be to not have the Beach Boys with us one day.  Sounds like Brian and Jon Bon Jovi were thinking about it too. 

At the end of "Pacific Coast Highway" I felt quite sad when they sang "good bye".

Overall, yeah, that middle of the record really sags. I might resequence on the old iPod going forward, but my oh my, those last three songs are stunners. So elegiac.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 08:49:25 AM
I can't help but think the line "Drivin' down Pacific Coast out on Highway One, the setting sun/Goodbye" is a metaphor for death.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 01, 2012, 09:00:00 AM
I can't help but think the line "Drivin' down Pacific Coast out on Highway One, the setting sun/Goodbye" is a euphemism for death.


I think you mean a metaphor.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 09:04:26 AM
I can't help but think the line "Drivin' down Pacific Coast out on Highway One, the setting sun/Goodbye" is a euphemism for death.


I think you mean a metaphor.

Oops. Fixed.  ;D

I screen grabbed this from one of the Youtube promos. Brian's reading lyrics from the control room. I wonder what they're from ("Strange World"?)

(http://i.imgur.com/vpseG.png)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on June 01, 2012, 09:40:47 AM
You guys suck for hating on Beaches in Mind. Seriously, you're all so prissy and particular. My lord, just enjoy it - it's a Brian Wilson fun in the sun song. This is something he does really, really well (with a little input from Mike), and he freakin delivered! I don't understand you people. And I say that with all due respect (Talladega Nights style  ;D).

Beaches in Minda and Strange World (another one that you all seem not like) are probably the best two tracks. Bill and Sue not so great. Everything else - awesome. Funny how TWGMTR is rarely mentioned as a favorite track. It reminds me of the Van Halen "tattoo" single. The fans hated it, and it's generally dismissed. But had it NOT been a single, I bet it would be one of the favorite tracks. Same thing with TWGMTR. Bet if it wasn't the single, we would all be talking about how brilliant that song is in addition to the last three songs. Hm.....

By the way, I started illegally downloading the album last night, but I stopped before it was complete. It just felt - wrong. (my views of the songs are based on the generous iTunes samples). CAN'T WAIT TILL TUESDAY!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 01, 2012, 09:45:22 AM
You guys suck for hating on Beaches in Mind. Seriously, you're all so prissy and particular. My lord, just enjoy it - it's a Brian Wilson fun in the sun song.

(http://www.meh.ro/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/meh.ro6523.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TimmyC on June 01, 2012, 09:50:06 AM
hahahaha - I have no idea what that image has to do with the caption, but it's making me laugh


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Yorick on June 01, 2012, 09:57:25 AM
I can't help but think the line "Drivin' down Pacific Coast out on Highway One, the setting sun/Goodbye" is a euphemism for death.


I think you mean a metaphor.

Oops. Fixed.  ;D

I screen grabbed this from one of the Youtube promos. Brian's reading lyrics from the control room. I wonder what they're from ("Strange World"?)

(http://i.imgur.com/vpseG.png)

I thought Joe Thomas mentioned something about Brian writing some Spanish lyrics for Private Life Of Bill and Sue, maybe its that one?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on June 01, 2012, 10:08:31 AM
One thing that annoys me, why do the BB have to include these "tropical" elements like in "Daybreak Over the Ocean"? Here's a big misunderstanding I think. When the group started out and sang about the fun-in-the-sun stuff it wasn't about taking a fucking vacation on a tropical island. On the contrary, what probably still makes their early stuff so incredibly appealing is the idea that they were living the life they sang about 365 days a year, not just when their bosses and wives would allow them to. Huge difference!

Oh, by the way, I think "Strange World" is pretty underrated around here. Very charming little song (and very Brian imho!).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 01, 2012, 10:10:09 AM
They (well, Mike Love) are just trying and hoping to recapture the commercial success of Kokomo with the whole tropical vibe..
how is that not, like, really obvious?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on June 01, 2012, 10:15:50 AM
Yes, of course, but then he didn't succeed one single time, so why not finally get rid of that stuff?

Anyway, the tune itself is rather nice i think...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 10:17:13 AM
I really like Daybreak. It's very (as Brian would put it) mellow. The lyrics are great - Mike should be writing more like that and less of the "good vibrations/summer weather" stuff. I also think that track contains his best vocal of the album (even though it was recorded much earlier than the other ones).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 10:18:08 AM
I went to best buy to see if they'd sell it to me early.  Their kiosk said they had it in stock, but on dice on selling it. Darn!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on June 01, 2012, 10:23:24 AM
"Spring Vacation" really makes me want to hear the original lyrics. It's not hard to imagine them sing "Lay down burden" instead of "Spring vacation".

Have to admit the song is quite catchy no matter how trite the lyrics...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Digory Kirke on June 01, 2012, 10:27:28 AM
Got it in Dublin!  New releases come out on Fridays here.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on June 01, 2012, 10:29:48 AM
when's someone gonna post the chords to 'From There To Back Again'?  ;D

is there a special place on the forum for that shizzle?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on June 01, 2012, 10:32:26 AM
I went to best buy to see if they'd sell it to me early.  Their kiosk said they had it in stock, but on dice on selling it. Darn!

I went to my local indie store after work yesterday.  The guy said that they had ordered several, but that it doesn't come out until Tuesday.  I asked if they would be getting them in earlier, and he just smiled and said, "Come back on the weekend."  I've got my fingers crossed for Saturday.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 11:29:59 AM
I think most stores get shipments in around Thursday or Friday for the Tuesday releases.

Indies will sometimes sell early. My hometown shop puts everything out Thursday afternoon for the following week. Very handy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on June 01, 2012, 11:37:13 AM
I think most stores get shipments in around Thursday or Friday for the Tuesday releases.

Indies will sometimes sell early. My hometown shop puts everything out Thursday afternoon for the following week. Very handy.

Thats exactly what mine does


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 01, 2012, 11:43:51 AM
I can't find the leak and it's makin' me sad


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 01, 2012, 11:46:52 AM
Yeah just thinking about Spring Vacation : wonder what the gospel version with Carl without shitty lyrics would have sounded like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on June 01, 2012, 12:25:24 PM
Well, of course the BBs aren't going to write about surf/sun exactly the way they did when they were 18 or whatever...they're friggin' 70! Unless you're that old dad from "Surfwise", it's not likely you're gonna be livin' the Cali life exactly as you were then. You're gonna do what you're able that this age. You're gonna write about what life you lived, what life passed you by, what went wrong, what can still go right, what might be fixable, what's left to look forward to. That's life, and life changes, like it or not.

There may be a little surface cheese that's grating (but mmmmm...grated cheeeeese...), but I hear a lot of true sentiments under the surface, as there nearly always has been with BB music.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 01, 2012, 12:29:18 PM
Well, of course the BBs aren't going to write about surf/sun exactly the way they did when they were 18 or whatever...they're friggin' 70! Unless you're that old dad from "Surfwise", it's not likely you're gonna be livin' the Cali life exactly as you were then. You're gonna do what you're able that this age. You're gonna write about what life you lived, what life passed you by, what went wrong, what can still go right, what might be fixable, what's left to look forward to. That's life, and life changes, like it or not.

There may be a little surface cheese that's grating (but mmmmm...grated cheeeeese...), but I hear a lot of true sentiments under the surface, as there nearly always has been with BB music.

I'm just so glad that now they're focusing on writing lyrics with bunch of references to older songs, quality man.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on June 01, 2012, 12:38:14 PM
It says "hit single" about TWGMTR on the CD case sticker. Is it a hit single?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mr. Cohen on June 01, 2012, 12:41:19 PM
Well, it's big in Japan.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: elnombre on June 01, 2012, 12:47:34 PM
It says "hit single" about TWGMTR on the CD case sticker. Is it a hit single?

A listed in the UK, charting in Japan, lots of US airplay, all over the web, doing great at the concerts....no, it's a miserable flop. They should change the sticker.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on June 01, 2012, 12:58:45 PM
One thing that annoys me, why do the BB have to include these "tropical" elements like in "Daybreak Over the Ocean"?

For the exact same reason Van Dyke Parks toys around with a steel drum band and calypso rhythms. Because they fucking want to.

BTW, I have no problem with the Spring Vacation lyrics. I believe every single word they sing on it. They mean that stuff. And we'd be damned if a new BB album did not include its fair share of feel-good songs. We'd probably be bitching about it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Lowbacca on June 01, 2012, 01:04:20 PM
It says "hit single" about TWGMTR on the CD case sticker. Is it a hit single?

A listed in the UK, charting in Japan, lots of US airplay, all over the web, doing great at the concerts....no, it's a miserable flop. They should change the sticker.
No need for sarcasm. I honestly didn't know how it charted. The single hasn't even been released in Gemany yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 01, 2012, 01:08:02 PM
"Waves of Love" sounds damn good nestled between "Shelter" and "Daybreak".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on June 01, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
"Waves of Love" sounds damn good nestled between "Shelter" and "Daybreak".

which version?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 01, 2012, 01:29:12 PM
this album is way too short.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on June 01, 2012, 02:52:37 PM
this album is way too short.

Assuming you found the leak?  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 03:00:28 PM
One thing that annoys me, why do the BB have to include these "tropical" elements like in "Daybreak Over the Ocean"? Here's a big misunderstanding I think. When the group started out and sang about the fun-in-the-sun stuff it wasn't about taking a f*cking vacation on a tropical island. On the contrary, what probably still makes their early stuff so incredibly appealing is the idea that they were living the life they sang about 365 days a year, not just when their bosses and wives would allow them to. Huge difference!

Oh, by the way, I think "Strange World" is pretty underrated around here. Very charming little song (and very Brian imho!).

I can agree with some of this.  The modern day (on this album) tropical vibe they have is slightly off mark.  I listened to "Spring Vacation" again this morning.  I've narrowed it down to specifically the title and chorus of the song.... the verse is fine, even the "Easy Money" part of the chorus is fine, but the whole "Spring Vacation/Good Vibrations" thing I just can't get with.  If they literally would change those two lines the song would be twice as good.  They don't take Spring Vacations.  They're all retired, there's nothing to vacate from.  The good vibrations thing as mentioned ad naseum is just so overdone, even I, the king of beach boys apologists can't get behind that sh*t.  

Even if it was called SUMMER VACATION it would make more sense.  It's just the whole 'lets act like we're 16' thing ruins it, spring vacation specifically calls to mind people getting out of school and going to the beach on spring vacation before they have to be back in school.  

"Summer Vacation/The Ocean's Waiting/Warmer Weather/We're Back Together"

"Easy Money/Ain't Life Funny/Hey What's It To Ya/Hallelujia"

Not bad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 03:03:16 PM
I really like Daybreak. It's very (as Brian would put it) mellow. The lyrics are great - Mike should be writing more like that and less of the "good vibrations/summer weather" stuff. I also think that track contains his best vocal of the album (even though it was recorded much earlier than the other ones).

I respectfully disagree, I much prefer his vocal on Isn't it Time... and I do agree the lyrics are pretty good, I think his performance and even the whole vibe of the song is kind of boring/dreary though.  They probably could have made it sound better with something as simple as a different instrument being used or something, it's just a very boring song in my opinion (daybreak over the ocean). 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on June 01, 2012, 03:08:44 PM
One thing that annoys me, why do the BB have to include these "tropical" elements like in "Daybreak Over the Ocean"? Here's a big misunderstanding I think. When the group started out and sang about the fun-in-the-sun stuff it wasn't about taking a f*cking vacation on a tropical island. On the contrary, what probably still makes their early stuff so incredibly appealing is the idea that they were living the life they sang about 365 days a year, not just when their bosses and wives would allow them to. Huge difference!

Oh, by the way, I think "Strange World" is pretty underrated around here. Very charming little song (and very Brian imho!).

I can agree with some of this.  The modern day (on this album) tropical vibe they have is slightly off mark.  I listened to "Spring Vacation" again this morning.  I've narrowed it down to specifically the title and chorus of the song.... the verse is fine, even the "Easy Money" part of the chorus is fine, but the whole "Spring Vacation/Good Vibrations" thing I just can't get with.  If they literally would change those two lines the song would be twice as good.  They don't take Spring Vacations.  They're all retired, there's nothing to vacate from.  The good vibrations thing as mentioned ad naseum is just so overdone, even I, the king of beach boys apologists can't get behind that sh*t.  

Even if it was called SUMMER VACATION it would make more sense.  It's just the whole 'lets act like we're 16' thing ruins it, spring vacation specifically calls to mind people getting out of school and going to the beach on spring vacation before they have to be back in school.  

"Summer Vacation/The Ocean's Waiting/Warmer Weather/We're Back Together"

"Easy Money/Ain't Life Funny/Hey What's It To Ya/Hallelujia"

Not bad.

Not bad at all! Sing it to yourself! It works great!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 01, 2012, 03:20:56 PM
this album is way too short.

TLOS, Gershwin, Disney, Imagination....are all between 35 and 39 minutes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sea Devil on June 01, 2012, 03:23:55 PM
What the gash is that whistling about in FTTBA?
It's either heavily auto tuned, or is a synth made to sound like whistling.. sounds cheap.
Absolutely adore the song though, best on the album by a mile!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 01, 2012, 03:26:59 PM
this album is way too short.

TLOS, Gershwin, Disney, Imagination....are all between 35 and 39 minutes.

Imagination always seemed way too long to me!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 03:33:40 PM
Part of me wants to say it's too short too, but like pointed out the trend is kind of to make albums short (again).   I think the current length is about what it would have been (or maybe longer?) in the 60's.  The 80 minute opuses of the 90's have left the building, almost everybody makes short albums now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on June 01, 2012, 04:24:17 PM
What the gash is that whistling about in FTTBA?
It's either heavily auto tuned, or is a synth made to sound like whistling.. sounds cheap.
Absolutely adore the song though, best on the album by a mile!

It's not a synth, it's Al Jardine


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 01, 2012, 05:28:54 PM
I'm diggin' it but still, for me the very last and amazing Beach Boys album will always be TLOS (even tho it isn't).... until Brian does better or something more ambitious with the actual Beach Boys, we'll see.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 05:46:47 PM
I'm diggin' it but still, for me the very last and amazing Beach Boys album will always be TLOS (even tho it isn't).... until Brian does better or something more ambitious with the actual Beach Boys, we'll see.

As said here, the likelihood that the Boys would have had anything to do with a project like TLOS is infinitesimal. Too strange. Too arty. Mike wouldn't have allowed the Parks parts. Not enough summery themes.

I choose to think of TLOS as Brian's best solo album. Because that's what it is. And if this new project has shown us anything, it's that Brian has come to think of the Boys and of his solo career as distinctly different things. Think about it -- as he was promoting the Gershwin record, and recording and promoting the Disney one he was meeting with Capitol on this separate project.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 05:49:53 PM
Good points.  Still, I'm naieve enough to think that it's entirely possible they may drag ol' Mikie along for one more really nice ride. 

BTW, here, just to throw the bait out.  Joe Thomas said "3 album deal".  As you're pointing out, Brian seems to be capable of juggling several things in the air at once, perhaps this album was to appease Mike and Brian has something more 'artsy' planned for the third album?  (second album possibly being a live album). 

I know.  Wishful thinking.  Still. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 05:53:00 PM
Good points.  Still, I'm naieve enough to think that it's entirely possible they may drag ol' Mikie along for one more really nice ride. 

BTW, here, just to throw the bait out.  Joe Thomas said "3 album deal".  As you're pointing out, Brian seems to be capable of juggling several things in the air at once, perhaps this album was to appease Mike and Brian has something more 'artsy' planned for the third album?  (second album possibly being a live album). 

I know.  Wishful thinking.  Still. 

I believe the three-album deal was this one, the hits compilation, and the new boxed set.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on June 01, 2012, 06:11:00 PM
this album is way too short.

TLOS, Gershwin, Disney, Imagination....are all between 35 and 39 minutes.

Every Beach Boys and BW solo album other than SMiLE and OCA has been shorter than 42 minutes, as far as I know. Brian still thinks in terms of LPs, which were only able to fit maybe 45 minutes at the absolute most in the 60s. Right down to how he sequences the albums, I've long held the opinion that he thinks in terms of a Side 1 and a Side 2. Consider how "California Role" has an actual ending instead of crossfading directly into the next track or narrative. Even SMiLE probably shouldn't have been as long as it was. I highly doubt Brian would have sequenced it to be a 3-sided album, and he probably wouldn't have done a double-LP. Hell, I'd say we count ourselves lucky it isn't the length of Wild Honey, which is less than 30 minutes!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 01, 2012, 06:23:40 PM
which version?

The CD version.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 06:24:02 PM
I can't help but think the line "Drivin' down Pacific Coast out on Highway One, the setting sun/Goodbye" is a euphemism for death.


I think you mean a metaphor.

I metaphor sex, but she told me no. :(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 06:29:09 PM
this album is way too short.

TLOS, Gershwin, Disney, Imagination....are all between 35 and 39 minutes.

Every Beach Boys and BW solo album other than SMiLE and OCA has been shorter than 42 minutes, as far as I know. Brian still thinks in terms of LPs, which were only able to fit maybe 45 minutes at the absolute most in the 60s. Right down to how he sequences the albums, I've long held the opinion that he thinks in terms of a Side 1 and a Side 2. Consider how "California Role" has an actual ending instead of crossfading directly into the next track or narrative. Even SMiLE probably shouldn't have been as long as it was. I highly doubt Brian would have sequenced it to be a 3-sided album, and he probably wouldn't have done a double-LP. Hell, I'd say we count ourselves lucky it isn't the length of Wild Honey, which is less than 30 minutes!

GIOMH is 53 minutes.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 07:45:55 PM
And to be honest, it suffers for it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 07:59:35 PM
And to be honest, it suffers for it. 

You didn't hear me saying it was the best 53 minutes of anyone's life. Well, maybe Stevie Kalinich's.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 01, 2012, 08:00:16 PM
Is the Daybreak version on the new album different from the 95 ML version? I happen to have a copy (hhhrrmm) of the 95 version, and from what I heard on Itunes, they sound the same...

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on June 01, 2012, 08:02:04 PM
TPLOBAS would make for a really great music video. Shame it will never happen


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:13:25 PM
And to be honest, it suffers for it. 

You didn't hear me saying it was the best 53 minutes of anyone's life. Well, maybe Stevie Kalinich's.

I know, just sayin'.  It is a bit long.  Especially when the songs are sub par, you wonder why they went through so much trouble when they had to have known they could drop 4 or 5 songs off the album and it'd probably improve it, lol. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:14:25 PM
TPLOBAS would make for a really great music video. Shame it will never happen

I don't really get into that song too much, but you're right, a video would help.  I can see Brian sitting at a table for some reason when he starts singing it, I don't know what that's all about. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 08:23:40 PM
Listening in the car with my wife and daughter...who started singing along with Isn't it Time after the first verse. There's one soon-to-be-five fan of that song.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jonathan Blum on June 01, 2012, 08:24:45 PM
One thing that annoys me, why do the BB have to include these "tropical" elements like in "Daybreak Over the Ocean"? Here's a big misunderstanding I think. When the group started out and sang about the fun-in-the-sun stuff it wasn't about taking a f*cking vacation on a tropical island.

When the group started out 50 years ago, pretty much nobody hopped down to a tropical island for a vacation -- the international jet age was only beginning.  Couple of decades later, even college students could get down to Jamaica et cetera...

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:25:36 PM
Listening in the car with my wife and daughter...who started singing along with Isn't it Time after the first verse. There's one soon-to-be-five fan of that song.

Hey, we'll take it!  Good for her.  It's definately catchy. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on June 01, 2012, 08:47:19 PM
this album is way too short.

TLOS, Gershwin, Disney, Imagination....are all between 35 and 39 minutes.

Every Beach Boys and BW solo album other than SMiLE and OCA has been shorter than 42 minutes, as far as I know. Brian still thinks in terms of LPs, which were only able to fit maybe 45 minutes at the absolute most in the 60s. Right down to how he sequences the albums, I've long held the opinion that he thinks in terms of a Side 1 and a Side 2. Consider how "California Role" has an actual ending instead of crossfading directly into the next track or narrative. Even SMiLE probably shouldn't have been as long as it was. I highly doubt Brian would have sequenced it to be a 3-sided album, and he probably wouldn't have done a double-LP. Hell, I'd say we count ourselves lucky it isn't the length of Wild Honey, which is less than 30 minutes!

GIOMH is 53 minutes.

Good God, you're right. I guess I've just never once listened to it beginning to end. Still, I think it just shows that he was slapping any old songs he had finished on there instead of carefully choosing, because it doesn't feel like any kind of a complete cohesive statement whatsoever.

What I Really Want for Christmas is technically longer as well, but the last three tracks are essentially bonus tracks not really recorded to be part of the album, so I don't think of them as being part of what he intended the album to be in terms of sequencing. Otherwise why not end the whole thing with Auld Lang Syne like on the BBs Christmas album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 08:54:31 PM
I'm pretty sure that yes the last three songs were considered bonus, remember he had already released those three songs for free on his website over the years as christmas presents to the fans. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sheriff John Stone on June 01, 2012, 08:58:02 PM
One of those last three songs, "Joy To The World", is my favorite song on the album. Who produced that? :police:


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 09:00:26 PM
One of those last three songs, "Joy To The World", is my favorite song on the album. Who produced that? :police:

BRIAN IN HIS BEDROOM was the story I always heard, lol. 

To these ears, it sounds like every vocal line on that song is on "Brian Wilson Harmony", I.E., in a key that doesn't exist, but yet somehow it all fits together like it does in Brian's head and sounds incredible.  It sounds like every friekin' line is off key, but yet it all sounds great.  I don't know how he does that.  The "Bum, Bum, Bum, Bum..." thing is ACHINGLY good.  I just hurt myself thinking about it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 09:05:29 PM
One of those last three songs, "Joy To The World", is my favorite song on the album. Who produced that? :police:

BRIAN IN HIS BEDROOM was the story I always heard, lol. 

To these ears, it sounds like every vocal line on that song is on "Brian Wilson Harmony", I.E., in a key that doesn't exist, but yet somehow it all fits together like it does in Brian's head and sounds incredible.  It sounds like every friekin' line is off key, but yet it all sounds great.  I don't know how he does that.  The "Bum, Bum, Bum, Bum..." thing is ACHINGLY good.  I just hurt myself thinking about it. 

I think that developed from learning piano on his own terms.  I don't think he ever limited himself to what piano chords should be.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 09:14:09 PM
One of those last three songs, "Joy To The World", is my favorite song on the album. Who produced that? :police:

Brian and Joe Thomas (uncredited on the album, but not the song's original appearance).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 09:23:17 PM
Wirestone: was "Silent Night" recorded in Brian's house?  It's much more stripped down and could have possibly been even done on a desktop computer, nothing fancy about it. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 09:24:15 PM
Listening in the car with my wife and daughter...who started singing along with Isn't it Time after the first verse. There's one soon-to-be-five fan of that song.

Hey, we'll take it!  Good for her.  It's definately catchy.  

Shelter is another song that she seems to be digging..came up with her own harmony part for the chorus that strangely fit. Huh...I'm beginning to wonder about her (in a good way).

Funny story...Little Mermaid is her favorite movie, and when she heard Brian's Disney album , specifically 'Kiss the Girl', she asked me if Sebastian the Crab took singing lessons. :lol

Oh, and she loves the '66 and '67 versions of 'Surf's Up', and the BWPS version, but HATES the one with Carl on lead. 'Put the REAL one on, Daddy! I don't like this'. :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 01, 2012, 09:28:53 PM
Official production / engineering credits for those who care.

Produced by Brian Wilson
Executive Producer: Mike Love
Recorded by Joe Thomas
Recording and mixing engineer: Frank Pappalardo
Additional engineering by Michael Czaszwicz, Wesley M. Seidman, Larry Millas and Tom Gordon
Recorded at Ocean Way Recording, Hollywood CA, Ben's Studio, Nashville TN, World Stage Studios, Burr Ridge IL, Love Shack Studio, Incline Valley NV, and Chicago Recording Company, Chicago IL
Mixed Behind the Carwash, St. Charles IL
Mastered by Bob Ludwig at Gateway Mastering, Portland ME

----------

"Daybreak Over the Ocean" has its own production credits on its page of the booklet:

Produced and Recorded by Paul Fauerso at Love Shack Studio, Incline Village NV
Keyboards, Percussion and vocals arranged by Paul Fauerso.

----------

A few notes on session players:

Darian S. appears on only two tracks, playing vibes each time.
Scotty B. appears and Probyn G. each appear on six tracks.
Nelson B appears on five tracks.
Jeff "Skunk" Baxter is on both "Spring Vacation" and "Beaches in Mind."

----------

Except for "Daybreak," the only vocalists credited on the album are BW, ML, AJ, BJ and Jeff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 09:31:43 PM
i still can't believe that part of the album was recorded at ben folds' studio. so weird.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 09:32:05 PM
Listening in the car with my wife and daughter...who started singing along with Isn't it Time after the first verse. There's one soon-to-be-five fan of that song.

Hey, we'll take it!  Good for her.  It's definately catchy.  

Shelter is another song that she seems to be digging..came up with her own harmony part for the chorus that strangely fit. Huh...I'm beginning to wonder about her (in a good way).

Funny story...Little Mermaid is her favorite movie, and when she heard Brian's Disney album , specifically 'Kiss the Girl', she asked me if Sebastian the Crab took singing lessons. :lol

Oh, and she loves the '66 and '67 versions of 'Surf's Up', and the BWPS version, but HATES the one with Carl on lead. 'Put the REAL one on, Daddy! I don't like this'. :lol

out of the mouths of babes oft times come gems....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on June 01, 2012, 09:38:01 PM
i still can't believe that part of the album was recorded at ben folds' studio. so weird.

I think it's kind of fitting. Ben's style of songwriting doesn't really seem to be terribly influenced by the Beach Boys, but his harmonies definitely do. Something like the acapella tag at the end of "Rock Star" is vintage BBs.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 09:46:13 PM
I'd imagine most people are influenced by the Beach Boys, even if just a little bit, and would jump at the chance to work with them. 

10 bucks = if you call 50 Cent he'd drop everything to come do a song with Brian. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 09:46:41 PM
i still can't believe that part of the album was recorded at ben folds' studio. so weird.

I think it's kind of fitting. Ben's style of songwriting doesn't really seem to be terribly influenced by the Beach Boys, but his harmonies definitely do. Something like the acapella tag at the end of "Rock Star" is vintage BBs.

eh, i can kidna hear it.  The harmonies in ben folds five days were pretty fun.  Heh, rock star.  i haven't heard that one in a while, that was right about when i started losing interest in him.  his songwriting quality took quite a dive around then.  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: phirnis on June 01, 2012, 10:02:26 PM
Only Ben Folds song I've ever heard is his cover version of "Bitches Ain't sh*t" (which is great, though!). ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 01, 2012, 10:08:50 PM
I'd imagine most people are influenced by the Beach Boys, even if just a little bit, and would jump at the chance to work with them. 

10 bucks = if you call 50 Cent he'd drop everything to come do a song with Brian. 

I can't imagine 50 Cent even knows who Brian Wilson is.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 10:24:31 PM
I'd imagine most people are influenced by the Beach Boys, even if just a little bit, and would jump at the chance to work with them. 

10 bucks = if you call 50 Cent he'd drop everything to come do a song with Brian. 

I can't imagine 50 Cent even knows who Brian Wilson is.

Wrong. Allegedly he is a fan....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 01, 2012, 10:25:44 PM
They don't take Spring Vacations.  They're all retired, there's nothing to vacate from.

I wouldn't call being in a touring group for hundreds of days out of the year "retired". That sh*t's intense even when you're young, I can't imagine doing it in your 70s even under the pampered circumstances that these guys probably tour under. So yeah, it's real work, so there's plenty to vacate from when you're able to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 01, 2012, 10:26:42 PM
I'd imagine most people are influenced by the Beach Boys, even if just a little bit, and would jump at the chance to work with them. 

10 bucks = if you call 50 Cent he'd drop everything to come do a song with Brian. 

I can't imagine 50 Cent even knows who Brian Wilson is.

Wrong. Allegedly he is a fan....

LIAR.

(Weird. Very weird.)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 10:33:30 PM
I'd imagine most people are influenced by the Beach Boys, even if just a little bit, and would jump at the chance to work with them.  

10 bucks = if you call 50 Cent he'd drop everything to come do a song with Brian.  

I can't imagine 50 Cent even knows who Brian Wilson is.

Wrong. Allegedly he is a fan....

LIAR.

(Weird. Very weird.)

If I can find the link to the interview, I 'll post it. He threw them in along with other artists as groups he likes, but the interviewer didn't follow up on it. I don't know if he was serious or not.

I will say, though, that the Beach Boys are surprisingly popular in certain sample-happy circles...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 01, 2012, 10:37:50 PM
50 Cent has really matured a lot over the years. 

To be honest though the Beach Boys are part of everybody's child hood, it doesn't matter if you're a black kid growing up in the city you still know who the Beach Boys are.  I've heard Dr. Dre and Eminem seperately mention them before too. 

Back to fitty, he's an intelligent cat.  He's had his idiot ways in the past, but right now when you talk about him, you're talking about a media mogul who's a big mover in the music industry.  He's got a really solid head on his sholders, so it's no surprise to me that he's able to look outside of his stereotype and see value in other types of music.  I"ve seen him talk about how much he admired country singers too, believe it or not. 

Basically if you're in the music industry and a big deal, 50 cent is a fan because he wants to learn from you. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 10:48:39 PM
Quote
I"ve seen him talk about how much he admired country singers too, believe it or not. 

Yup...specifically, George Jones and Johnny Cash.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 01, 2012, 11:12:29 PM
the beach boys are pretty popular in hip hop circles.  95% for pet sounds though. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amazing Larry on June 01, 2012, 11:40:41 PM
the beach boys are pretty popular in hip hop circles.  95% for pet sounds though. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlUq9X6ORAo
GOD NO.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 01, 2012, 11:51:29 PM
:lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on June 01, 2012, 11:59:18 PM
the beach boys are pretty popular in hip hop circles.  95% for pet sounds though. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlUq9X6ORAo
GOD NO.

This much better, especially the chorus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YzwlYhY0poc


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 02, 2012, 12:01:54 AM
I actually like that mashup...whomever did it did a bangup job, as rhythmically, it fits.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on June 02, 2012, 12:04:04 AM
I actually like that mashup...whomever did it did a bangup job, as rhythmically, it fits.
Here someone mashed up the alternate version of Dance, Dance, Dance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KFsp4xmJ2A

Also very good.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 02, 2012, 12:07:45 AM
Wow...that's pretty badass.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 02, 2012, 12:08:28 AM
Violent J's "Barnyard" is the greatest fucking thing ever. Teh lawlz come hard in Auld Lang Syne every time I listen to it. I hate you all.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 02, 2012, 12:10:43 AM
I actually like that mashup...whomever did it did a bangup job, as rhythmically, it fits.
Here someone mashed up the alternate version of Dance, Dance, Dance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KFsp4xmJ2A

Also very good.

This would be great if they'd opted to speed up "Party Hard" instead of slowing "Dance Dance Dance" down. Still good, though.

Worth it alone for the bloody Brian picture, though. Noice.  8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amazing Larry on June 02, 2012, 12:33:22 AM
Violent J's "Barnyard" is the greatest fucking thing ever. Teh lawlz come hard in Auld Lang Syne every time I listen to it. I hate you all.
It makes my skin crawl, and not in the good way.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 02, 2012, 12:36:38 AM
Skin crawls in a good way? :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: DonnyL on June 02, 2012, 01:26:51 AM
Recorded by Joe Thomas
Recording and mixing engineer: Frank Pappalardo

Sorry to rear my ugly head back into this thread, but ...

Several folks (including AGD) confirmed that Joe Thomas was credited as the engineer. In fact, there was a heated discussion that pointed out how people are confusing engineering with production. I understood Thomas to be primarily a producer (I cannot find any releases in which he was credited as soley an engineer), so I was confused by the supposed engineer credit. Since Pappalardo is listed as the actual engineer, Thomas is given the mysterious 'recorded by' credit.

What does this mean in this situation exactly?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Amazing Larry on June 02, 2012, 01:39:13 AM
Skin crawls in a good way? :)
The tag to Surf's Up. That's the only example I can give.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on June 02, 2012, 02:11:45 AM
Skin crawls in a good way? :)
The tag to Surf's Up. That's the only example I can give.
Do you mean goosebumps?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on June 02, 2012, 05:16:23 AM
Recorded by Joe Thomas
Recording and mixing engineer: Frank Pappalardo

Sorry to rear my ugly head back into this thread, but ...

Several folks (including AGD) confirmed that Joe Thomas was credited as the engineer. In fact, there was a heated discussion that pointed out how people are confusing engineering with production. I understood Thomas to be primarily a producer (I cannot find any releases in which he was credited as soley an engineer), so I was confused by the supposed engineer credit. Since Pappalardo is listed as the actual engineer, Thomas is given the mysterious 'recorded by' credit.

What does this mean in this situation exactly?
Not sure, seems a bit undefined. Did he just press the record button? It probably means co-producer.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 02, 2012, 05:19:42 AM
I think co-producer/overseer seems right.  Probyn said felt like an "overseer" on the album, not a producer, but i'm sure he had a lil input.  I dunno guys, i think Brian trusts him and liked having him there to bounce stuff off. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on June 02, 2012, 05:23:19 AM

Sorry to rear my ugly head back into this thread, but ...



 :lol  DonnyL, your head is BEAUTIFUL, man!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 02, 2012, 08:21:41 AM
Lookalikes? Brian and Ben Folds. Yes, they both use harmonies. And they're both highly creative, innovative and skilled musicians... :)
And they're both gonna be at the Bonnaroo festival (and perhaps other festivals as well?).

/B

http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg (http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LostArt on June 02, 2012, 08:26:36 AM
I went to best buy to see if they'd sell it to me early.  Their kiosk said they had it in stock, but on dice on selling it. Darn!

I went to my local indie store after work yesterday.  The guy said that they had ordered several, but that it doesn't come out until Tuesday.  I asked if they would be getting them in earlier, and he just smiled and said, "Come back on the weekend."  I've got my fingers crossed for Saturday.

Let me say this first.  It's really a shame that the independent CD/record stores are disappearing in America.  I understand why they are, but it's a shame.  

I stopped at my local independent shop again last night (Friday) after work.  First I checked the new releases section, and did not see TWGMTR.  I didn't bother going to the Beach Boys bin.  I approached the nice young gentleman behind the counter, and told him what I was looking for.  I told him that it isn't slated for release until next Tuesday, but was hoping that they had got them in stock and into their system.  He nodded, turned around and went to a stack of soon-to-be new releases, grabbed a CD, and handed it to me.  I took my wallet out of my pocket, gave the nice young gentleman some cash money, and walked out of the store with a copy of That's Why God Made The Radio.  I paid two dollars more than I would've paid on line or in a big box store, but to me, it's worth all 200 cents to get the thing four days early.  That, my younger friends, is how it used to be done, and how it should be done today.  Support your local retailers.  They've got kids to feed, you know.   :old


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Surfing Moose on June 02, 2012, 08:54:05 AM
Just picked it out my postbox, immediately loaded it on my iPod and now I'll listen to it while going for a walk with my dog  :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 02, 2012, 08:57:36 AM
Just picked it out my postbox, immediately loaded it on my iPod and now I'll listen to it while going for a walk with my dog  :)

I'm sure he'll start taking a massive poop as soon as Spring Vacation will start and then bark at you when Beaches In Mind comes in.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 02, 2012, 08:59:31 AM
Lookalikes? Brian and Ben Folds. Yes, they both use harmonies. And they're both highly creative, innovative and skilled musicians... :)
And they're both gonna be at the Bonnaroo festival (and perhaps other festivals as well?).

/B

http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg (http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg)

ben isn't even close


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Surfing Moose on June 02, 2012, 09:39:54 AM
Just picked it out my postbox, immediately loaded it on my iPod and now I'll listen to it while going for a walk with my dog  :)

I'm sure he'll start taking a massive poop as soon as Spring Vacation will start and then bark at you when Beaches In Mind comes in.

 ;D

Close, he pooped when "Isn't It Time" was running


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on June 02, 2012, 09:58:29 AM
Haha, nice one!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Fro on June 02, 2012, 10:17:10 AM
Lookalikes? Brian and Ben Folds. Yes, they both use harmonies. And they're both highly creative, innovative and skilled musicians... :)
And they're both gonna be at the Bonnaroo festival (and perhaps other festivals as well?).

/B

http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg (http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg)

ben isn't even close

Yeah, he's actually a fantastic live performer and instrumentalist unlike Brian.  And a great lyricist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBvU68ZkAvk


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on June 02, 2012, 10:33:08 AM
Enough Ben Folds talk, nobody cares


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on June 02, 2012, 10:54:35 AM
I love this new album and I've only heard slightly over half of it.

Way to go guys. 

VERY strong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 02, 2012, 12:23:18 PM
Lookalikes? Brian and Ben Folds. Yes, they both use harmonies. And they're both highly creative, innovative and skilled musicians... :)
And they're both gonna be at the Bonnaroo festival (and perhaps other festivals as well?).

/B

http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg (http://i36.fastpic.ru/big/2012/0602/00/76b39e02d474736f7036efcda47fc700.jpg)

ben isn't even close

Yeah, he's actually a fantastic live performer and instrumentalist unlike Brian.  And a great lyricist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBvU68ZkAvk

Ben Folds is grrrreat!!! Watch him play and sing a la Jerry Lee Lewis below. No time for transcendental meditation, instead we get audience participation... !  :) 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXDVQ03lirE&feature=related

Sorry for being off-topic, but while we're at it, you might as well watch this - great ending!! :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmLTlV5Cc9k

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 02, 2012, 12:26:29 PM
Enough Ben Folds talk, nobody cares



Depends on your musical ear...  :D


(B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 02, 2012, 01:17:33 PM
Ben folds five and his first solo were great, everythinh since is meh. And that way to normal album?? Oof. His lyrics gave been bad lately too


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 02, 2012, 01:43:18 PM


Ok, back to the Beach Boys and the new album in a moment...

I'd just like to mention Tony Banks and his new Six pieces album.
Tony Banks played keyboards with Genesis and he has written some great stuff,
like "A curious feeling" (the remastered version is here):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLmE3iOqAS0&feature=related

:)

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Mendota Heights on June 02, 2012, 01:48:47 PM
Here is an esoteric revelation: TWGMTR is great when you're drunk.

I just wanted to put that piece of information out there for people to consider.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on June 02, 2012, 02:58:34 PM
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.digitalspy.com/music/albumreviews/a384939/the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-album-review.html

has this review been noticed by us yet? pardon any duplication, but it's an excellent review of the album in digital spy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on June 02, 2012, 03:31:49 PM
I just got in from a particularly shite day. Poured a very large whiskey and listened to Isn't It Time. Know what, I fucking love that song. It's cheered me right up. So very Brian. Thanks to all the Beach Boys!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ArchStanton on June 02, 2012, 03:43:03 PM
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.digitalspy.com/music/albumreviews/a384939/the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-album-review.html

has this review been noticed by us yet? pardon any duplication, but it's an excellent review of the album in digital spy.

He seems to like the recent Joey Ramone album as much as I did as well, so all in all, I like his review ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 02, 2012, 04:53:28 PM
Let me say this first.  It's really a shame that the independent CD/record stores are disappearing in America.  I understand why they are, but it's a shame. 


I don't understand why. I know the reason why, but I don't understand it.

Quote
I stopped at my local independent shop again last night (Friday) after work.  First I checked the new releases section, and did not see TWGMTR.  I didn't bother going to the Beach Boys bin.  I approached the nice young gentleman behind the counter, and told him what I was looking for.  I told him that it isn't slated for release until next Tuesday, but was hoping that they had got them in stock and into their system.  He nodded, turned around and went to a stack of soon-to-be new releases, grabbed a CD, and handed it to me.  I took my wallet out of my pocket, gave the nice young gentleman some cash money, and walked out of the store with a copy of That's Why God Made The Radio.  I paid two dollars more than I would've paid on line or in a big box store, but to me, it's worth all 200 cents to get the thing four days early.  That, my younger friends, is how it used to be done, and how it should be done today.  Support your local retailers.  They've got kids to feed, you know.   :old

^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bgas on June 02, 2012, 06:24:45 PM
WOWZERS! 
Big bonus day. opened the mail to find: not ONLY the New ESQ( VERY NICE) but a copy of the CD that a great friend sent my way.
Now of course, since I've read the ESQ, I suppose I must listen to the CD !! 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Surfing Moose on June 03, 2012, 01:25:09 AM
Hmmm... The chorus of "Shelter" is very familiar. If you listen closely to "Thinkin Bout You Baby" sung by Shannon Marie, you will notice the relationship to "Shelter" is very obvious. Since ""Thinkin Bout You Baby" was later redone by Brian as the know very well known "Darlin". And yes "Darlin" aund "Shelter" are the same song.  ;


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 03, 2012, 04:48:54 AM
Hmmm... The chorus of "Shelter" is very familiar. If you listen closely to "Thinkin Bout You Baby" sung by Shannon Marie, you will notice the relationship to "Shelter" is very obvious. Since ""Thinkin Bout You Baby" was later redone by Brian as the know very well known "Darlin". And yes "Darlin" aund "Shelter" are the same song.  ;

it's been discussed a few times


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Surfing Moose on June 03, 2012, 07:02:11 AM
Oh, Sorry about that, I used the "search" button, but couldn't find a topic regarding this issue.
I'll search again... 8)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 03, 2012, 05:55:20 PM
"Your Amazon.com order of "That's Why God Made the Radio" has shipped!"

Pretty sure I'm going to wet myself (figuratively) when it arrives!!!!

 >:D

 :hat


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 03, 2012, 06:01:26 PM

It's either heavily auto tuned, or is a synth made to sound like whistling.. sounds cheap.
Absolutely adore the song though, best on the album by a mile!

Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder.......


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 03, 2012, 10:56:08 PM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 03, 2012, 11:03:07 PM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 04, 2012, 01:21:46 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 04, 2012, 01:30:08 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jay on June 04, 2012, 01:38:21 AM
Is the $9.99 price on Amazon just a pre-order price? Will it go up on the release date?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 04, 2012, 01:48:47 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

UK only? Can only find the single...
Searched through albums and playlists, can't find individual songs...

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 04, 2012, 02:10:12 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.

On the UK Spotify. Both versions - US and Japanese, w/bonus track. Which everyone would have twigged had they actually logged on to Spotify.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 04, 2012, 02:55:35 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.

On the UK Spotify. Both versions - US and Japanese, w/bonus track. Which everyone would have twigged had they actually logged on to Spotify.

Not all of us use Spotify. :) Clam down, Mr.Doe.

And yeah, upon looking (I forgot I even had it installed), it's not up in the US quite yet.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 04, 2012, 03:10:47 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.

On the UK Spotify. Both versions - US and Japanese, w/bonus track. Which everyone would have twigged had they actually logged on to Spotify.

Well, I logged on to Spotify , but it's not available in Sweden. Guess the Jap version sounds the same, but w/the additional DIA, or "Love revival" if you wish.... ;)

A little disappointed, I thought the other version was the p-r-o-m-o version... ;)

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: astroray on June 04, 2012, 06:49:08 AM
$7.99 at Target this week!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 04, 2012, 08:51:57 AM
By the way, the new Neil Young/Crazy Horse album "Americana" is also out Tuesday, the same day as the BB's That's Why God Made the Radio.  An embarrassment of riches!!



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on June 04, 2012, 09:50:02 AM
Picked up my copy today, sounds fantastic in the car


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on June 04, 2012, 10:04:48 AM
By the way, the new Neil Young/Crazy Horse album "Americana" is also out Tuesday, the same day as the BB's That's Why God Made the Radio.  An embarrassment of riches!!



Hot damn...gonna be a great next couple of days!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 04, 2012, 10:23:02 AM
$7.99 at Target this week!

Well I know where I'm going.  Suck it best buy!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 04, 2012, 10:27:10 AM
Yeah I am tempted to cancel my CD order with Amazon and just go through Target.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 04, 2012, 10:28:44 AM
Yeah I am tempted to cancel my CD order with Amazon and just go through Target.


 I imagine that's gonna ship soon, if it hasn't already


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 04, 2012, 10:34:38 AM
Right. I put in a request. I could save $5 going through Target.  :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: curth on June 04, 2012, 10:42:01 AM
Amazon just lowered their price to $7.99 . They have a pre order price guarantee so you should be able to get the reduced price from them.

http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007U1FEJE/ref=zg_bs_tab_pd_bsnr_1?pf_rd_p=1348016562&pf_rd_s=right-5&pf_rd_t=2101&pf_rd_i=list&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=10Z228BVVK4X6DMB5VHE


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 04, 2012, 10:43:59 AM
True but I would still be paying shipping and waiting for it to ship.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: curth on June 04, 2012, 11:49:49 AM
Well, yes you would. Just curious , why did you pre-order in the first place? I've got a copy for $11.00 last Friday at a local indie and couldn't be happier ,  with the cd , which is terrific, the price and getting it five days before the official release date.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 04, 2012, 11:56:03 AM
Well, yes you would. Just curious , why did you pre-order in the first place? I've got a copy for $11.00 last Friday at a local indie and couldn't be happier ,  with the cd , which is terrific, the price and getting it five days before the official release date.

Usually I love Amazon because I would get CD's on the same day as they were released and for cheap but I changed my mind on this for two reasons:

1) I forgot that Amazon now uses a new shipping service (OnTrac) that I have had nothing but bad experiences with.
2) Target has it cheaper and I can get it on release day.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Sam_BFC on June 04, 2012, 03:59:30 PM
OK so I bought the album this morning, but have had the shits all day and didn't want to listen while my guts were like this because I thought it might compromise my first listen.  Watched the Queen's jubilee concert instead, but roll on tomorrow, I hope I feel better then. :afro


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 04, 2012, 05:03:44 PM
Why.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HighOnLife on June 04, 2012, 05:37:15 PM
It's #2 on Amazon.

Impressive. Most impressive.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on June 04, 2012, 05:38:05 PM
Amazon's great. Just spoke with customer service and they credited my card for the two dollar change in price. $7.99 is a great price, especially when one is buying numerous copies.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on June 04, 2012, 07:01:31 PM
Well, yes you would. Just curious , why did you pre-order in the first place? I've got a copy for $11.00 last Friday at a local indie and couldn't be happier ,  with the cd , which is terrific, the price and getting it five days before the official release date.

Usually I love Amazon because I would get CD's on the same day as they were released and for cheap but I changed my mind on this for two reasons:

1) I forgot that Amazon now uses a new shipping service (OnTrac) that I have had nothing but bad experiences with.
2) Target has it cheaper and I can get it on release day.

Bought it from Amazon with the new Neil Young and "Yellow Submarine" blu-ray. 
All three come out tomorrow.. All three were shipped last night.  I'll get all three tomorrow.
Free shipping.  Prime member.
Awesome.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dumbangel76 on June 04, 2012, 08:08:24 PM
Album is now avaliable on Itunes!! Downloading now!!!  :-D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Summertime Blooz on June 04, 2012, 08:20:05 PM
Album is now avaliable on Itunes!! Downloading now!!!  :-D

Woah! A little early, iTunes. I didn't think they were allowed to do that. Cool! I'll be heading out to Target for my cheap copy tomorrrow.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 04, 2012, 09:11:54 PM
Really cool that the CD is 7.99, You'd think the record companies would get with the program and just make all CD's 7 or 8 bucks, maybe they'd sell some again!  If the album's only 8 bucks, it makes people more likely to pay that small sum to own the booklet and the shiny little circle. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on June 05, 2012, 04:37:42 AM
ANyone know if the vinyl is dropping in the UK? Went to my local indie and they said it was CD only....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Charles LePage @ ComicList on June 05, 2012, 04:57:39 AM
The CD should arrive from Amazon today.  In the meantime I've downloaded it to my Zune via the Zune Marketplace.    AND IT'S AWESOME!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: atroxi on June 05, 2012, 04:58:29 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.

On the UK Spotify. Both versions - US and Japanese, w/bonus track. Which everyone would have twigged had they actually logged on to Spotify.

Well, I logged on to Spotify , but it's not available in Sweden. Guess the Jap version sounds the same, but w/the additional DIA, or "Love revival" if you wish.... ;)

A little disappointed, I thought the other version was the p-r-o-m-o version... ;)

/B

This morning, Spotify gives me the "Not Currently Available In The United States" error on both versions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 05, 2012, 05:08:28 AM
The CD should arrive from Amazon today.  In the meantime I've downloaded it to my Zune via the Zune Marketplace.    AND IT'S AWESOME!

wooow rockin the zune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 05, 2012, 05:49:49 AM
Really cool that the CD is 7.99, You'd think the record companies would get with the program and just make all CD's 7 or 8 bucks, maybe they'd sell some again!  If the album's only 8 bucks, it makes people more likely to pay that small sum to own the booklet and the shiny little circle. 

Pfff. f*** logic, man. That makes too much sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on June 05, 2012, 07:13:53 AM
OK so I bought the album this morning, but have had the sh*ts all day and didn't want to listen while my guts were like this because I thought it might compromise my first listen.  Watched the Queen's jubilee concert instead, but roll on tomorrow, I hope I feel better then. :afro
That jubilee concert would give anyone the shits!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thatjacob on June 05, 2012, 09:51:31 AM
New album is now up on Spotify. Both versions.

Versions?

Versions. Both. That's "more than one".

Right-O, I know the definition of the word "version", oh snarky one ^_^ I'm asking, wat? There are multiple versions? I wasn't aware and can't find anything about it.

Edit: lawl, wait, is this in reference to the QVC version with the 2nd, separate disc? I'd forgotten it existed given it's about the 793the redundant hits collection that's been released in the last decade or so. My bad.

On the UK Spotify. Both versions - US and Japanese, w/bonus track. Which everyone would have twigged had they actually logged on to Spotify.

Well, I logged on to Spotify , but it's not available in Sweden. Guess the Jap version sounds the same, but w/the additional DIA, or "Love revival" if you wish.... ;)

A little disappointed, I thought the other version was the p-r-o-m-o version... ;)

/B

This morning, Spotify gives me the "Not Currently Available In The United States" error on both versions.

Just delayed. It's on spotify in the US now.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: eknirb on June 05, 2012, 10:05:24 AM
First post, listened to the entire thing.  Favorites: Think About The Days.....From There.....Isn't It Time....PCH...Summer's Gone, and Beach's In Mind

Longtime career in major market radio--but never had much to do with the BBs--they just weren't much on the CHR and AC radar for me.  

Good story tho- late 80s, Cruise is on fire after Top Gun, here's this movie about...being a bartender.  OK, whatever.  It could be a movie baout him being an elevator operator @ this point, and it would still be gold.  We know there's gonna be a big soundtrack, etc.  The label is working, I be-lieve....Fabulous Stuff from the FTBs...and I think we were also playing GA Satellites just for fun.  I told Justin Fontaine---Justin if you're out there I am STILL waiting for my RIAA plaque...I said Justin..there's another song on here you need to pay attention to.  "Oh, well, yeah, there's the Starship song."  I said no- there's an absolute slam dunk monster on this album...wake up."  

Some songs are easier to call than others.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jeffcdo on June 05, 2012, 10:11:25 AM
24bit version available at HDtracks...

https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=catalogdetail&valbum_code=HD5099946320056 (https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=catalogdetail&valbum_code=HD5099946320056)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: eknirb on June 05, 2012, 10:19:27 AM
PS---am I right, or not--the remake of DIA is ONLY going to be on the actual disc WM sells?  Not gonna go drive to WM to buy a CD for one song!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 05, 2012, 11:06:42 AM
piano cover of "from there to back again"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aW58qhcAKc


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on June 05, 2012, 11:17:29 AM
PS---am I right, or not--the remake of DIA is ONLY going to be on the actual disc WM sells?  Not gonna go drive to WM to buy a CD for one song!

As far as I'm aware it is only on the Walmart exclusive Zinepak and the Japanese version of TWGMTR.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on June 05, 2012, 11:41:28 AM
Has anyone noticed the similarities between 'Daybreak Over The Ocean' and 'Getcha Back'?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: cwalter on June 05, 2012, 01:59:58 PM
Was going to go to Best Buy to get the CD... But I'm hearing that Walmart has the same CD except that it has DIA on it???   That would be cool...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on June 05, 2012, 02:20:43 PM
So is the vinyl out today, too? Or is that coming out later?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 05, 2012, 02:21:20 PM
So is the vinyl out today, too? Or is that coming out later?

Last I heard it wasn't coming out until late July or early August.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 05, 2012, 02:50:01 PM
Has anyone noticed the similarities between 'Daybreak Over The Ocean' and 'Getcha Back'?

"Daybreak" was first written & recorded back in fall 1978.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: RCTID on June 05, 2012, 03:08:40 PM
since TWGMTR is now officially released... does this thread now act as the place for information on the NEXT Beach Boys album?  :p


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: HighOnLife on June 05, 2012, 04:14:11 PM
It was #1 on Amazon and #8 on iTunes earlier.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thatjacob on June 05, 2012, 08:20:02 PM
Heads up: the mp3 version of the album is down to $4.99 on amazon.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: over and over on June 05, 2012, 11:09:42 PM
I'm torn between Spring Vacation and Summer's Gone being my favorate. Isn't it time is great too.................what am I saying!?!?! Its the fu*king Beach Boys!!!!!!!!! They are all great!  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Funky Pity on June 06, 2012, 05:18:31 AM
Hello, everyone!
I'm a new member from Sweden. Great album! I bought it yesterday.
Been a fan since 1989 (yes... my very first CD was Still Crusin'). Saw them for the first time in Gotheburg july 1991.
I agree with many other fans, their best record since LA album - 8/10.
Best tracks: Strange World, From There To Back Again (Al for President!?) I honestly can't find a really bad track on this album.
The track I listen to the least is "Shelter". Probably because that's the track where I really miss Carl the most, (at the chorus) :-\

The official reviews of the album in Sweden is a solid 6 out of 10, the critics seems to be pleasantly surprised.

But why no lead vocals from Bruce? Is the re-recording of "She Believes In Love Again (from BB 1985) the only Johnston track considered for this album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on June 06, 2012, 09:41:48 AM
Finally listened to the album in full. There should be a law to prevent Joe Thomas be anywhere near Brian or any of the band. The songs aren't great and the production is worse. So disappointed.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on June 06, 2012, 10:02:18 AM
Finally listened to the album in full. There should be a law to prevent Joe Thomas be anywhere near Brian or any of the band. The songs aren't great and the production is worse. So disappointed.
I am not a fan of Thomas' production on Imagination, and there are some questionable decisions on this record too. However, I think that as a songwriting and production collaborator for Brian, Joe acquits himself pretty well on this album. Ditto his much-maligned songwriting partners who are apparently both mob bosses.

We would all love to have Van Dyke Parks, Andy Paley, Scott Bennett, et. Al. Involved with this album, but the reality is that The Beach Boys are all comfortable with Thomas as a mediator.

Sorry to hear that you are so disappointed about the record. Perhaps in time you will begin to enjoy some of the tracks. I know that "Shelter" was a huuuuuuge grower for me; the first time I heard it, I thought it was OK. Now, I think that along with the ending suite, it is some of Brian's best work ever.

And yes, "Beaches in Mind" is execrable. The one track on the album that I am reasonably sure I will never like.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: debonbon on June 06, 2012, 10:22:40 AM
I like the opener and the last three tracks are not bad, I don't think they are as good as others seem to think but thats ok. I really wasn't expecting much, especially with Joe involved but deep down I had hope. Oh well.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 06, 2012, 10:35:12 AM
Good thing you went into it expecting not to like it!  Just imagine what could have happened if you allowed yourself to consider it might be decent. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Wirestone on June 06, 2012, 11:06:28 AM
Now, now, Ron.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: b00ts on June 06, 2012, 11:13:56 AM
Good thing you went into it expecting not to like it!  Just imagine what could have happened if you allowed yourself to consider it might be decent. 
This is a good rule of thumb. We should all forget our opinions and expectations before listening to any new album. I do it by drinking dangerously huge amounts of alcohol, but ether works too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Landlocked on June 06, 2012, 11:25:34 AM
Heads up: the mp3 version of the album is down to $4.99 on amazon.

I felt like a real non-fan waiting this long after its release to finally buy it, but man, in this case, being a procrastinator really paid off. That's half the price the CD was when I reserved it on Amazon! Good thing I cancelled my order before it shipped.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on June 06, 2012, 02:49:05 PM
Heard the album for the first time today while the family was out. Loud volume.

By the time they got back I was blubbing.

Pacific Coast Highway is awesome. Makes MAD sound like a SiP outtake.

Summer's Gone has no right to exist. Brian Wilson's supposed to have peaked creatively some 46 years ago. But this track is up there. Really.

Part of me wants it to never end. Part of me really believes this is Wilson either saying "goodbye" to the band or "goodbye" to the fans.

Folks are still giving a toss about a few bucks' price difference.
just buy the thing and listen ... Priceless.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 06, 2012, 02:52:19 PM
Good thing you went into it expecting not to like it!  Just imagine what could have happened if you allowed yourself to consider it might be decent. 

 :lol

(this is why we love Ron)

 :old


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Nothgual on June 06, 2012, 07:05:05 PM
Got the album today.  I find this a very frustrating listen.  There are moments of greatness, but a majority of it sounds like a Beach Boys parody.  These moments  than make up for the tons of embarrassing fluff though.  Isn't it Time is great, Think About the Days is alright except for that ugly piano sound, Shelter's chorus is nice and of course the suite.

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on June 07, 2012, 02:16:14 AM
As said here, the likelihood that the Boys would have had anything to do with a project like TLOS is infinitesimal. Too strange. Too arty. Mike wouldn't have allowed the Parks parts.

How could you possibly know that? Listen to the last three songs on TWGMTR, especially the lyrics. If Mike wouldn't allow those, why should he not allow spoken parts? The villain Mike thing is sooooo retro! :wink

But I absolutely agree with you about TLOS being Brian's best solo album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on June 07, 2012, 03:44:32 AM
… have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.

So what's insightful Bruce doing for a living these days? Give him my best next time you see him – and if there's any way I can help, get him to drop me a line.

 ::)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 07, 2012, 04:39:13 AM
Got the album today.  I find this a very frustrating listen.  There are moments of greatness, but a majority of it sounds like a Beach Boys parody.  These moments  than make up for the tons of embarrassing fluff though.  Isn't it Time is great, Think About the Days is alright except for that ugly piano sound, Shelter's chorus is nice and of course the suite.

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.

i thought he said it was the of Brian.  I've also never thought the term "self parody" made any sense.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on June 07, 2012, 05:56:32 AM
Pacific Coast Highway

Noted: that first word "Sometimes…"

Knew I'd heard it delivered similarly before… and just realised: whether intentional or not, it's a ringer for the first word in Dennis's (unreleased) I've Got a Friend.

Anyone agree?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on June 07, 2012, 05:58:47 AM
The whole track sounds like a Dennis Wilson song to me (...and I mean that as a compliment).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on June 07, 2012, 09:03:48 AM
Got the album today.  I find this a very frustrating listen.  There are moments of greatness, but a majority of it sounds like a Beach Boys parody.  These moments  than make up for the tons of embarrassing fluff though.  Isn't it Time is great, Think About the Days is alright except for that ugly piano sound, Shelter's chorus is nice and of course the suite.

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.

i thought he said it was the of Brian.  I've also never thought the term "self parody" made any sense.

He said it was the last great Brian Wilson song, and he started saying it 30 years ago.  He may have changed his mind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: startBBtoday on June 07, 2012, 09:31:15 AM
The whole track sounds like a Dennis Wilson song to me (...and I mean that as a compliment).

Agreed, the dramatic piano is very Dennis on that track.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Justin on June 07, 2012, 10:12:23 AM
I suppose this thread can be unstickied now?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on June 07, 2012, 06:00:29 PM
The album has 5 stars on Amazon (out of 60 reviews) as of right now!

If some of you all haven't yet, you should put some reviews up!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: superunison on June 07, 2012, 08:16:05 PM
OK so I bought the album this morning, but have had the sh*ts all day and didn't want to listen while my guts were like this because I thought it might compromise my first listen.  Watched the Queen's jubilee concert instead, but roll on tomorrow, I hope I feel better then. :afro

Saw this the other day, logged on today to find it again to make sure it wasn't just something I dreamt.  Post of the year. Cool story bro.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 07, 2012, 08:23:48 PM

Part of me wants it to never end. Part of me really believes this is Wilson either saying "goodbye" to the band or "goodbye" to the fans.

I was thinking today, maybe it's about Denny and Carl? 

"My Life; I'm better off Alone.... My Life; I'm better on my Own"  is about the pain of losing someone you love, you'd be better off if you never got close to anybody. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: thatjacob on June 07, 2012, 11:47:44 PM
I finally caved and bought the mp3 download instead of relying on spotify. I'm with everyone else: I think this album will be better while driving.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 08, 2012, 05:42:23 AM
I finally caved and bought the mp3 download instead of relying on spotify. I'm with everyone else: I think this album will be better while driving.

It sounds pretty badass in the car.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on June 08, 2012, 12:31:15 PM
Yes it does!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on June 08, 2012, 01:12:37 PM
Yes it does!

Agreed re tracks 1-9.  My car doesn't really do tracks 10-12 justice, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 09, 2012, 12:49:52 AM
Yes it does!

Agreed re tracks 1-9.  My car doesn't really do tracks 10-12 justice, though.

Time to get a new car... :D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 09, 2012, 11:59:06 AM

How come there's so few songs either writtten by Al, Dennis, Carl or Bruce, or that has them singing on the tunes? It was my belief
we were gonna get an album with several songs having Carl and/or Dennis overdubbed (that's the word?), like on Don't fight the sea. Besides - isn't that really a Beach Boys song and why wasn't it included on the album?

/B


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 09, 2012, 12:02:52 PM
I'm guessing Al, Carl, Dennis, and Bruce haven't exactly been prolific songwriters the past few decades. I'm glad "Don't Fight The Sea" isn't on the album, it's already been released! Those opening cheesy sounds would've really grated.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Ron on June 09, 2012, 01:15:18 PM
Ultimately it's because Brian really IS calling the shots in the studio, and naturally likes his own songs better than he likes any anybody else wrote. 


Lemme also say, the rest of the band has a really hard time producing anything at all.  The other two producers appear to have passed away.  Mike likes producing things then they never come out.  Bruce likes producing 1 song every 10 years.  Al likes producing 1 album every 30 years.  Brian likes producing 1 album a year. 



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Steve Mayo on June 09, 2012, 01:51:54 PM
add me to the list of liking to listen to the new cd in a car while just driving around. wonderful........


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Acechaser on June 09, 2012, 02:54:20 PM
Given that Brian "saved" some 90's songs for the Beach Boys to sing on a new album, I am surprised that "Desert Drive" and "South American" were not among those saved.   I would love to hear both songs with full BB vocals.   


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 09, 2012, 03:07:20 PM
I'm guessing Al, Carl, Dennis, and Bruce haven't exactly been prolific songwriters the past few decades.

I'm pretty sure that Dennis and Carl haven't actually written a note since 1983 and 1998 respectively.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on June 09, 2012, 03:09:46 PM
I'm guessing Al, Carl, Dennis, and Bruce haven't exactly been prolific songwriters the past few decades.

I'm pretty sure that Dennis and Carl haven't actually written a note since 1983 and 1998 respectively.
Well, at least not in this dimension, they haven't. ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 09, 2012, 03:13:11 PM
It never hurts to restate the utterly obvious! Obviously I'm semi-jokingly pointing out  they aren't prolific due to being a combination of dead and/or lethargic. Dennis I'm told is especially lazy for a dead guy.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on June 09, 2012, 03:16:36 PM
It never hurts to restate the utterly obvious! Obviously I meant they aren't prolific due to being a combination of dead and/or lethargic. Dennis I'm told is especially lazy for a dead guy.
Obviously, you are utterly welcome. :)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 09, 2012, 03:18:49 PM
I remain obviously and odiously yours.

You know, taking this seriously -- would it fit having an old Carl or Dennis song on there? Which one, then? I'm tired of hearing about Jardine's Waves of Love and Don't Fight The Sea. I'd probably do the same thing as Brian and bolt for the car.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on June 09, 2012, 03:23:03 PM
I remain obviously and odiously yours.

You know, taking this seriously -- would it fit having an old Carl or Dennis song on there? Which one, then? I'm tired of talking about Jardine's Waves of Love and Don't Fight The Sea. I'd probably do the same thing as Brian and bolt for the car.
As Brian did with Soul Searchin', there has to be tons of stuff recorded by both guys that they could have used and recorded new backing tracks. I am assuming that it was kind of a statement that the five remaining guys could record this all on their own. Sort of put their own stamp on the album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 09, 2012, 03:26:48 PM
I think they are doing Carl and Dennis tribute stuff right -- leave it at those two numbers on the tour and subsequent inclusion on the DVD. Keep the outtakes for the upcoming boxed set without any 2012 tinkering. It's a lot more tasteful that way...

It's kind of amazing what they are managing to do right lately! I was expecting a lot more cringing and having to defend it viciously to friends, honestly...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: bsten on June 09, 2012, 11:52:16 PM
I'm guessing Al, Carl, Dennis, and Bruce haven't exactly been prolific songwriters the past few decades.

I'm pretty sure that Dennis and Carl haven't actually written a note since 1983 and 1998 respectively.

The can monsieurs, the can... What's in the can?   ;)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 11, 2012, 09:00:58 AM
I remain obviously and odiously yours.

You know, taking this seriously -- would it fit having an old Carl or Dennis song on there? Which one, then? I'm tired of hearing about Jardine's Waves of Love and Don't Fight The Sea. I'd probably do the same thing as Brian and bolt for the car.

10,000 Years Ago, a Mike/Dennis cowrite which was recorded during the same sessions that Daybreak was.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 12, 2012, 01:13:57 PM

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.


No ! Where can I hear it ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 12, 2012, 02:29:11 PM

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.


No ! Where can I hear it ?

He said that on the 2000 "Endless Harmony" doc. Has he said again recently?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: TV Forces on June 12, 2012, 08:04:47 PM

Now that my opinion of the album is off my chest, have you guys heard the very recent interview about the album where Bruce says that T'ill I Die was the "end of the (Beach Boys') career"?  I find that to be surprisingly insightful.


No ! Where can I hear it ?

He said that on the 2000 "Endless Harmony" doc. Has he said again recently?

Bruce never said in that documentary that "Til I Die" was the end of the Beach Boys career. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on June 12, 2012, 11:39:04 PM
He didn't say it was the end of their career, he said something along the lines of it being the last instance of Brian being 100%. Or, more dramatically and prior to clarification, I think he said it was the "last Brian Wilson song" or something similar at first. The amount of misquoting 'round here is scary sometimes :O


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 13, 2012, 04:36:57 AM
He didn't say it was the end of their career, he said something along the lines of it being the last instance of Brian being 100%. Or, more dramatically and prior to clarification, I think he said it was the "last Brian Wilson song" or something similar at first. The amount of misquoting 'round here is scary sometimes :O

yeah i had to correct that same quote earlier too.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 13, 2012, 02:04:59 PM
Help!
I've had "Daybreak Over the Ocean" stuck in my head all day. Should I jump off my balcony now, or is there hope?

I think Mike is using some crazy Maharishi technique to control me.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on June 13, 2012, 02:23:20 PM
Help!
I've had "Daybreak Over the Ocean" stuck in my head all day. Should I jump off my balcony now, or is there hope?

I think Mike is using some crazy Maharishi technique to control me.

With a post like that......






Don't jump!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on June 13, 2012, 02:28:05 PM
Help!
I've had "Daybreak Over the Ocean" stuck in my head all day. Should I jump off my balcony now, or is there hope?

I think Mike is using some crazy Maharishi technique to control me.

It's a catchy song dude, I've had it cropping up in my head ever since I first heard it, same with Spring Vacation!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 13, 2012, 02:41:47 PM
That and Beaches in mind are the only one's I don't really dig. The verses in Beaches sound like Smash mouth.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on June 13, 2012, 02:45:36 PM
Help!
I've had "Daybreak Over the Ocean" stuck in my head all day. Should I jump off my balcony now, or is there hope?

I think Mike is using some crazy Maharishi technique to control me.

If Mike is, no point in jumping, he'll just levitate you back to your seat for another listen


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 13, 2012, 02:59:02 PM
Touché.
I was actually hoping for more bass parts from Mike though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Alan Smith on June 13, 2012, 04:10:46 PM
Yeah, me too!

Or more audible backing vox - I hear bits and pieces in the mix, but way down


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 13, 2012, 04:43:40 PM
Yeah, I hear brilliant backing in Shelter.
Shame it's not as loud as Jeff.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 13, 2012, 05:19:31 PM
What's Brian singing in those syncopated background vocals at the end of "Shelter"?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 13, 2012, 08:50:33 PM
What's Brian singing in those syncopated background vocals at the end of "Shelter"?

i posted this in another thread.  I skipped a couple, but you get the gist i think.  Also i think he may say "moonlight" instead of "sunlight" sometimes

I hear:
(jeff: i'll give shelter through the night)
"sunlight"
"keep you warm"
"sunlight"
"from the storm"
(mike: do you ever still think of me)
"sunlight"
"yes i will"
(and the way that we used to be)
"you know i will"
(do you think that you'd ever stay)
"yes i will"
(take a page out of yesterday)
"you know i will"
(we'll find a way)
"keep you warm"

more or less.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on June 13, 2012, 09:37:33 PM
Help!
I've had "Daybreak Over the Ocean" stuck in my head all day. Should I jump off my balcony now, or is there hope?

I think Mike is using some crazy Maharishi technique to control me.

Me too; each song has aggressively visited me, day and night; I never know which will show up; no song is exempt.
newsflash from the professor:  this album is better than any of us think: it won't quit, and the moment when you want to dismiss something, you hear a bass harmonica, a new lick by Dave, an elegant, ethereal harmony by Bruce, a rumble by Mike. . . . .this thing is bigger than the both of us.

San O to the Jersey shore. . . . .I'll be at the latter next week.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: musicismylife101 on June 13, 2012, 09:47:06 PM
Conclusion: Album's full of hooks and earworms getting inside our head  :smokin


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 13, 2012, 10:53:30 PM
i posted this in another thread.  I skipped a couple, but you get the gist i think.  Also i think he may say "moonlight" instead of "sunlight" sometimes

Thanks!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 14, 2012, 03:25:14 AM
Also, Brian is getting to relatively high notes on Bill and Sue. Love that song just because of that.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 14, 2012, 02:05:51 PM
I was just flipping through Paul Williams' book (damn, why did we have to lose Paul Williams?!) and was amused to find a reference to the suite on page 189 from an interview with Anderle dated March 20th, 1997

CINDY: Well, Melinda tells me that Brian's working on an incredible song cycle right now.

DAVID: Really? He told me, we ended the phone conversation with him saying, "I've got to get back to the piano now." That's a good sign.

They discuss the Chicago house and Joe Thomas a few pages later.

Then I got an email asking for help on an LA tribute for the OTHER Paul Williams. What the?!!?  


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 14, 2012, 02:35:51 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on June 14, 2012, 02:50:19 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to anything else instead. >:D (cringes)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 14, 2012, 02:56:38 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to anything else instead. >:D (cringes)

I think the ghost of Gene Landy appeared to Brian on his TV while he was watching Bravo and sang this to him.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 14, 2012, 08:01:18 PM
i think beaches in mind is a million times more cringeworthy than bill and sue.  I find Bill and Sue a nice tune to listen to.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 14, 2012, 08:50:50 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

South American > Bill and Sue



Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 14, 2012, 09:07:23 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

South American > Bill and Sue



Yep. That was the point.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 14, 2012, 09:10:36 PM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

South American > Bill and Sue



Yep. That was the point.

I know.
I'm hungry and I'm doin' lunch with Cameron Diaz...now THAT'S some quirky Brian.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Loaf on June 15, 2012, 02:19:59 AM
I prefer the line "I'm hungry and i'm doing Cameron Diaz with lunch."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on June 15, 2012, 09:08:54 AM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

South American > Bill and Sue



Yep. That was the point.

I know.
I'm hungry and I'm doin' lunch with Cameron Diaz...now THAT'S some quirky Brian.

Although I believe that line was written by Jimmy Buffett and that Brian didn't know who Cameron Diaz was when he recorded the song!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 15, 2012, 11:28:50 AM
Every time Bill and Sue comes on, I just want to go listen to "South American."

South American > Bill and Sue



Yep. That was the point.

I know.
I'm hungry and I'm doin' lunch with Cameron Diaz...now THAT'S some quirky Brian.

Although I believe that line was written by Jimmy Buffett and that Brian didn't know who Cameron Diaz was when he recorded the song!

Yes, but it's all in Brian's delivery. I'm with EH, regardless of who wrote it, it has that Brian quirkiness to it.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Jim V. on June 15, 2012, 11:58:48 AM
Meh, it's not really quirky Brian if it's not Brian's lyrics. And Brian writing about Cameron Diaz doesn't seem likely.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on June 15, 2012, 12:23:01 PM
I prefer the line "I'm hungry and i'm doing Cameron Diaz with lunch."
I like "I'm hungry and I'm eating Cameron Diaz for lunch"


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 15, 2012, 02:01:06 PM
Finally got the new album ! And I like it very much ! Some people complain about "Beaches in mind" but (and remember I was terrified when that title first was mentioned !) it's a nice little funky rock. The weak side of it (and the album) is in the lyrics. Unfortunately the songs Mike and Brian wrote together - Isn't It Time and Beaches In Mind - partly feature terrible, cheesy (and not good cheesy but tasteless 90s cheesy) lyrics. I don't know what's going on in their (especially Mike's) minds when it comes to this stuff. Back in the old days Mike was capable of very good and at times great lyrics. But what is this ? The title track shows how nostalgia can be done tastefully. I really wished that Brian and Joe would've told Mike to go back and work more on the lyrics instead of goin' with some of this stuff.
Anyway, I'm really glad with the album. It's more or less what I wanted it to be; a good pop album with catchy pop songs. The autotune isn't that big a thing as some people try to make it to be. It's the Beach Boys in 2012 and it does sound new and yet like the Beach Boys

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen I have time I'll write a review but that might take a while.


I'm a little confused about the credits. I heard that not all instrumentalists are mentioned and that David doesn't get singing credits. But he isn't listed at all on some songs. What's that about ?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: SloopJohnB on June 16, 2012, 01:25:18 AM
TWGMTR - #80 in France


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on June 17, 2012, 07:43:43 AM
i think beaches in mind is a million times more cringeworthy than bill and sue.  I find Bill and Sue a nice tune to listen to.

Well, to me it's exactly the other way round.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 17, 2012, 09:42:55 AM
i think beaches in mind is a million times more cringeworthy than bill and sue.  I find Bill and Sue a nice tune to listen to.

Well, to me it's exactly the other way round.

You are both partially right.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on June 17, 2012, 09:48:14 AM
the moment those drums kick in on "beaches in mind" oof, immediate gag/flight response on first listen.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Exapno Mapcase on June 17, 2012, 09:56:27 AM
"i think beaches in mind is a million times more cringeworthy than bill and sue.  I find Bill and Sue a nice tune to listen to. "

Me too. And I much pefer it to the ghastly South American


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on June 17, 2012, 01:21:28 PM
I find Bill and Sue to be a particularly strong tune.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Shady on June 17, 2012, 04:23:03 PM
Oh man, you gotta love videos like this, father and daughter singing TWGMTR

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGtKMwBBSv4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGtKMwBBSv4)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on June 18, 2012, 08:16:25 AM
"i think beaches in mind is a million times more cringeworthy than bill and sue.  I find Bill and Sue a nice tune to listen to. "

Me too. And I much pefer it to the ghastly South American

Beaches In Mind is, so far, my least favourite track on the album. It's like the song was built around a strong riff but failed to live up to it; the "beach" thang doesn't move me here.

Bill & Sue is, again to my mind, one of the stronger tracks though the chorus drags it back to ground already trodden, long ago – the list of places etc – and is so different to the rest of the track as to distract from the charm of the verses. It sounds to these ears as though some elements of the song might have been trimmed, as the story doesn't seem to be full developed. Trim the chorus and give us the rest (assuming I'm right!)!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on June 18, 2012, 08:18:45 AM
Oh man, you gotta love videos like this, father and daughter singing TWGMTR

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGtKMwBBSv4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGtKMwBBSv4)

Wow - my 3-year-old's picking up on it also.

Have you any idea how great it is to have a new Beach Boys album for my own kids to grow up on!!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: pixletwin on June 18, 2012, 08:35:19 AM
I heard my 10 year old singing "Shelter" while he was playing yesterday.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 18, 2012, 09:02:19 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!




Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Danimalist on June 18, 2012, 11:12:47 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!




Finally got the disc for Father's Day yesterday (don't worry, I found a site streaming it since ten days prior to release). The instrumentation and arrangement on this one are actually COOL! Who woulda thunk?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on June 18, 2012, 12:11:57 PM
Yeah, that song is shaping up to be one of my favorites


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Eireannach on June 18, 2012, 03:48:52 PM
My 5-year-old was singing "That's Why God Was the Radio" over the weekend.   :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dumbangel76 on June 18, 2012, 06:32:00 PM
Both my son and my daughter 8 and 10 years old love the new album! There favorite song is Isn't it Time!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Letsgoawayforawhile on June 18, 2012, 06:39:15 PM
You guy's are makin' we want kids now.
Stop it!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Dave in KC on June 18, 2012, 10:07:22 PM
Having children is the most wonderful part of life. And if you raise them well, the rewards cannot be calculated. I know children aren't for everybody, but for for the general masses who purposely avoid that possibility, well, you're missing out on a major part of the meaning of life. This theme can be found in many Beach Boy songs. They all had children and know what I mean.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on June 19, 2012, 04:32:30 AM
A slight over-reaction, perhaps?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on June 19, 2012, 05:24:48 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!



Outstanding song and recording. I hear a lot of Love You influence on this one. The whole album is ridiculously catchy. I have not yet played any other music since the album was released. I've got to get to the new Neil Young/Crazy Horse album this week. Break the cycle!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 19, 2012, 12:17:49 PM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!



Outstanding song and recording. I hear a lot of Love You influence on this one.


I agree ! It just sounds more polished than a imaginative Love You version probably would've






Vote for the Beach Boys:
http://www.billboard.com/features/poll-billboard-com-s-2012-mid-year-music-1007363352.story#/features/poll-billboard-com-s-2012-mid-year-music-1007363352.story


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: cwalter on June 20, 2012, 09:46:30 PM
Woke up this morning with 'Beaches in Mind' playing in my head. So I shuffled down the hall to my office and put it on at once :)

"...man it's been too much time" :D

Lol. It's so cheezy/goofy that it's awesome if you ask me. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on June 21, 2012, 02:58:07 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!



Outstanding song and recording. I hear a lot of Love You influence on this one.


I agree ! It just sounds more polished than a imaginative Love You version probably would've

Isn't it rhythmically and in terms of percussion too complex to be on Love You? Personally, I like Isn't It Time more than any recording on Love You, but that's subjective of course.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on June 21, 2012, 07:02:04 AM
So what are the chances for a GRAMMY Award for best album?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 21, 2012, 07:11:09 AM
So what are the chances for a GRAMMY Award for best album?


Next to none I'd imagine. But I want The Smile Sessions to get one !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Outtasight! on June 21, 2012, 08:32:54 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!



Outstanding song and recording. I hear a lot of Love You influence on this one.


I agree ! It just sounds more polished than a imaginative Love You version probably would've

Isn't it rhythmically and in terms of percussion too complex to be on Love You? Personally, I like Isn't It Time more than any recording on Love You, but that's subjective of course.
Yeh, it is a more accomplished recording and a more complex arrangement than Love You but they seem to be related, probably the prominent bass and the ultra catchy repetitive melody. I can hear it this one done with farty synths and rough voices.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on June 21, 2012, 09:52:57 AM
Just curious, when looking back on this thread as it unfolded before the official release, if folks think the numerous advance reviews were accurate, semi-accurate, or missed the mark. Or, if some may have set up an image in your mind about the sounds of the album that may or may not be how you hear it now, or whether those opinions shaped the actual listening experience. Just out of curiosity.

I'm thinking of discussions about Jimmy Buffett, the sound of Brian's "Imagination" album, etc. that were mentioned in reviews. I was expecting to hear more of that stuff, but it really wasn't as prominent as others may have heard it. I guess it's all in what the individual hears and perceives.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on June 21, 2012, 03:29:41 PM
I'd say most reviews were pretty on-target.

That said, I'd say the album--despite whatever little flaws--has become way much more enjoyable than I thought it would be from any review.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: mabewa on June 21, 2012, 06:42:44 PM
I think that initial reviews tended to underrate the album--it's kind of a grower, and I think that reviewers who have spent more time with it have picked up on that. 

As for the things about kids singing along--my 2.5 year old daughter, who understands English but speaks mostly Japanese, does a lot of singing along with it, especially to the title track.  The album has its faults, but in terms of melodies and harmonies, it's great throughout, and I think that kids pick up on that. 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Micha on June 22, 2012, 04:32:18 AM
I am loving LOVING that bass-and-ukulele groove on Isn't It Time.  Love the falsetto vocals.  Boy, that is one outstanding song, brilliantly arranged.  Major ear worm!  Love it!

A fun song in every way!

Ukulele!  YAY!



Outstanding song and recording. I hear a lot of Love You influence on this one.


I agree ! It just sounds more polished than a imaginative Love You version probably would've

Isn't it rhythmically and in terms of percussion too complex to be on Love You? Personally, I like Isn't It Time more than any recording on Love You, but that's subjective of course.
Yeh, it is a more accomplished recording and a more complex arrangement than Love You but they seem to be related, probably the prominent bass and the ultra catchy repetitive melody. I can hear it this one done with farty synths and rough voices.

Isn't It Time reminds me way more of the so-called "Landlocked" tape than of Love You. One track of that tape however was included in Love You.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 22, 2012, 10:05:52 AM
On another note, why wasn't Mark Linett involved with this album ? He's done such good work before


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: guitarfool2002 on June 22, 2012, 10:42:54 AM
I'd say most reviews were pretty on-target.

That said, I'd say the album--despite whatever little flaws--has become way much more enjoyable than I thought it would be from any review.

The first part I disagree with, I think certain elements were amplified way too much among certain reviewers and it gave an impression of a sound or texture that I don't think is there on the album.

The second part, I agree 110%. It was far better than I had thought it would be, and I mean that expectation I had in my head for what the album would be and not what reviews suggested it was.

It is a very enjoyable album, and even though some disagree I think the sound quality of the individual instruments on the tracks is sparkling. The detail is really, really good to these ears, and the guitars especially sounded better and more separated than I had expected.

And I'm glad there were far less traces of "Jimmy Buffett" sounds or vibes on this album...because I really can't stand most of his sh*t. :-D His beer is decent on a really hot day, though.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 22, 2012, 11:53:45 AM
Everyone was saying that the last three songs were so much better than the rest of the album. I disagree, I think the album is consistently good. Sure, the last three are more "serious" but that doesn't make them better.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Zach95 on June 22, 2012, 01:48:00 PM
Just curious, when looking back on this thread as it unfolded before the official release, if folks think the numerous advance reviews were accurate, semi-accurate, or missed the mark. Or, if some may have set up an image in your mind about the sounds of the album that may or may not be how you hear it now, or whether those opinions shaped the actual listening experience. Just out of curiosity.

I'm thinking of discussions about Jimmy Buffett, the sound of Brian's "Imagination" album, etc. that were mentioned in reviews. I was expecting to hear more of that stuff, but it really wasn't as prominent as others may have heard it. I guess it's all in what the individual hears and perceives.

For me, the Rolling Stone review describing the album as "sugary" or whatever really ingrained that image in my mind.  I was afraid of a "sugary" album, though I was pleasantly and extraordinarily surprised.  The album is not sugary at all, it's thoughtful, nostalgic (in the most tasteful and delightful way), and introspective.  It's beautiful, fun, and all together more than I could have ever hoped. A fantastic album in lieu of the previous studio albums the band has given us, and incredible by its own independent merit.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 22, 2012, 02:13:31 PM
Everyone was saying that the last three songs were so much better than the rest of the album. I disagree, I think the album is consistently good. Sure, the last three are more "serious" but that doesn't make them better.

It would be interesing to take a poll about this subject - I would say the last three tracks are head and shoulders above the rest of the album. (Not that the rest of the album is poor by any means).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: changeng on June 22, 2012, 03:25:41 PM
Well, I'm glad you all love the record, but for me, it's halfway wonderful with some really avoidable tracks.

I found a great way to enjoy the good and leave the not-so-good.  Start it on track 9 - "Strange World" and let it play through, starting again on tracks 1 and 2 and then STOP THE CD.  Everything else (to me) is very forgettable and this way you have an artsy EP of what sounds like a more somber "TLOS", ending with "TWGMTR".  It has a real nice flow to it this way and you get to have the others as bonus tracks.  SCORE !


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 22, 2012, 05:31:24 PM
Everyone was saying that the last three songs were so much better than the rest of the album. I disagree, I think the album is consistently good. Sure, the last three are more "serious" but that doesn't make them better.


Oh yeah, I agree. People tend to think that the Beach Boys' music is only worthless if it is melancholy (no matter which year).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Denny's Drums on June 22, 2012, 05:47:37 PM
I have to admit I was not so much skeptical about the material on this new album but I wasn't expecting it to be as  amazing as it is. Tracks 9-12 really is beautiful work.  Not sure if they're going to release any more albums but this makes for a great swansong.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Aegir on June 23, 2012, 04:52:47 PM
Something I've noticed from listening to this album is that a lot of vocals on Brian's solo albums that I attributed to Taylor Mills are actually Jeff. haha.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Autotune on June 23, 2012, 06:19:44 PM
Something I've noticed from listening to this album is that a lot of vocals on Brian's solo albums that I attributed to Taylor Mills are actually Jeff. haha.

Yeah. But some of the girly vocals here are Bruce's also.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: keysarsoze001 on June 23, 2012, 06:25:46 PM
Something I've noticed from listening to this album is that a lot of vocals on Brian's solo albums that I attributed to Taylor Mills are actually Jeff. haha.

That cutie in the mini-skirt making bedroom eyes at the audience while vaguely handling a shekere in BW's solo shows? Also Jeff.  :P


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Paulos on June 24, 2012, 03:09:01 AM
Something I've noticed from listening to this album is that a lot of vocals on Brian's solo albums that I attributed to Taylor Mills are actually Jeff. haha.

That cutie in the mini-skirt making bedroom eyes at the audience while vaguely handling a shekere in BW's solo shows? Also Jeff.  :P

 :lol :lol


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: lance on June 24, 2012, 04:31:48 AM
I'm not a big fan of Beaches In Mind, otherwise it is a very good album.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jet without wings on June 24, 2012, 05:45:32 PM
Love the new album. Exceeded my expectations. Brians writing seems the real achievement in my opinion. He has given us so much over these last 10 years or so.  Thank you to he and Joe Thomas for writing such beautiful music. I hear many similarites with the Imagination album which I've always liked. There is not a bad song on the album though Beaches in Mind is probably my least favorite. On the other hand, I think Mikes Daybreak over the Ocean is one of the 2 or 3 best songs. I really like all the vocals on Isnt it Time. I'm seeing their show June 29 at Darien Lake NY. Cannot wait. Meet and Greet ticket. Hope i get a chance to ask a question to them

jet without wings


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LdC on June 24, 2012, 07:27:47 PM
Im listening to it yet again, as i truly love it. Unlike all of Brian's solo efforts (will be honest Im still looking for TLOS), there was always something I found annoying, and also moments of greatness. I  and i am still yet to hear the weak or annoying track(s) on this album. The songs I didnt think we are as good as the classics (TwGMTR &the suite), well are completely growing on me. Shelter for example sounds like the classic Beach boys late 70s stuff to me. there are moments that take me to every period of the Beach Boys.

A couple of other random comments. I love Mike's bass vocal on Isn't it time, and I love the line from Spring Vacation "Harmony boys,is what we believe in".It gets a smile every time hearing that. I love the harmonies in DOTO, especially the one near the end sounding lots like Carl "bring my baby back ..", also the ending. Simple but wonderful. Also, the clear & confident piano chords of Pacific Coast highway. Just wonderful. The best Brian in ,oh I don't know how long..

ps. I also hear the spirit of Dennis all over this album,especially in the opener and the theme of the suite seems like a follow up of Pacific ocean blue. Also reading Joe Thomas interview, and with the quality of the suite, I believe we have the genesis of a new "smile" lost album legend? Notice how he said another ,i think 6-8 in the vault from this suite, and would love to see them alltogether...hmmm,sound's familiar!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: southbay on June 25, 2012, 05:01:13 PM
Love the new album. Exceeded my expectations. Brians writing seems the real achievement in my opinion. He has given us so much over these last 10 years or so.  Thank you to he and Joe Thomas for writing such beautiful music. I hear many similarites with the Imagination album which I've always liked. There is not a bad song on the album though Beaches in Mind is probably my least favorite. On the other hand, I think Mikes Daybreak over the Ocean is one of the 2 or 3 best songs. I really like all the vocals on Isnt it Time. I'm seeing their show June 29 at Darien Lake NY. Cannot wait. Meet and Greet ticket. Hope i get a chance to ask a question to them

jet without wings

Have your question ready and get it in quick. Then smile...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: JanBerryFarm on June 26, 2012, 10:27:31 AM
Love the new album. Exceeded my expectations. Brians writing seems the real achievement in my opinion. He has given us so much over these last 10 years or so.  Thank you to he and Joe Thomas for writing such beautiful music. I hear many similarites with the Imagination album which I've always liked. There is not a bad song on the album though Beaches in Mind is probably my least favorite. On the other hand, I think Mikes Daybreak over the Ocean is one of the 2 or 3 best songs. I really like all the vocals on Isnt it Time. I'm seeing their show June 29 at Darien Lake NY. Cannot wait. Meet and Greet ticket. Hope i get a chance to ask a question to them

jet without wings

Have your question ready and get it in quick. Then smile...


That's right. You're $400 meet and greet ticket buys you about 8 to 10 seconds. (according to one VIP posters experience, here)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: drbeachboy on June 26, 2012, 11:38:37 AM
Love the new album. Exceeded my expectations. Brians writing seems the real achievement in my opinion. He has given us so much over these last 10 years or so.  Thank you to he and Joe Thomas for writing such beautiful music. I hear many similarites with the Imagination album which I've always liked. There is not a bad song on the album though Beaches in Mind is probably my least favorite. On the other hand, I think Mikes Daybreak over the Ocean is one of the 2 or 3 best songs. I really like all the vocals on Isnt it Time. I'm seeing their show June 29 at Darien Lake NY. Cannot wait. Meet and Greet ticket. Hope i get a chance to ask a question to them

jet without wings

Have your question ready and get it in quick. Then smile...


That's right. You're $400 meet and greet ticket buys you about 8 to 10 seconds. (according to one VIP posters experience, here)
That's just about right. I milked an extra 10-15 seconds talking to Mike while positioning to get my pic taken with them. Tara (our hostess) was none  too pleased, either.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: KokoNO on June 27, 2012, 01:28:09 AM
Anybody want to take a guess as to how many copies this album will end up selling worldwide?

For reference, I believe the releases from Lana Del Rey and One Direction are the only new records from 2012 to surpass one million units (although Mr. Bieber will rocket past that bar very soon).


Week 1: #3 - 86,000
Week 2: #16 - 42,000

Total: 128,000+

Source: Mediatraffic.de

Week 3 results should be known real soon. Personally, I think they'll end up topping 250,000 thanks to the tour/reunion giving the record a boost throughout the year.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: LdC on June 27, 2012, 01:53:25 AM
Love the new album. Exceeded my expectations. Brians writing seems the real achievement in my opinion. He has given us so much over these last 10 years or so.  Thank you to he and Joe Thomas for writing such beautiful music. I hear many similarites with the Imagination album which I've always liked. There is not a bad song on the album though Beaches in Mind is probably my least favorite. On the other hand, I think Mikes Daybreak over the Ocean is one of the 2 or 3 best songs. I really like all the vocals on Isnt it Time. I'm seeing their show June 29 at Darien Lake NY. Cannot wait. Meet and Greet ticket. Hope i get a chance to ask a question to them

jet without wings

Have your question ready and get it in quick. Then smile...


That's right. You're $400 meet and greet ticket buys you about 8 to 10 seconds. (according to one VIP posters experience, here)

Thats $1250 here in Australia with no soundcheck! (only $100 + per second for the privelege...) :'(


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: jet without wings on June 27, 2012, 01:50:51 PM
I plan to be ready. I'm sure they will move us through quickly. Will post photos, if they are good ones. Received my Live Nation arrival instructions. Stoked!

Jet without wings

 


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 27, 2012, 02:03:17 PM
Woke up this morning with 'Beaches in Mind' playing in my head. So I shuffled down the hall to my office and put it on at once :)

"...man it's been too much time" :D

Lol. It's so cheezy/goofy that it's awesome if you ask me. 

Once "Beaches in Mind" has crawled into your head, it's hard to get it out of there!......

...... there it is again!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: musicismylife101 on June 27, 2012, 02:46:57 PM
Woke up this morning with 'Beaches in Mind' playing in my head. So I shuffled down the hall to my office and put it on at once :)

"...man it's been too much time" :D

Lol. It's so cheezy/goofy that it's awesome if you ask me. 

Once "Beaches in Mind" has crawled into your head, it's hard to get it out of there!......

...... there it is again!

Again, earworms! Snippets of songs from the album have been playing through my mind at random times ever since I heard it. As for kids singing along to it in earlier posts my sister randomly sang "Radioooo!" when TWGMTR was playing and "Vibrations!" on Spring Vacation. Totally random but funny


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on June 27, 2012, 02:47:53 PM
Hey guys apparently the life suite exists and brian wants to release it.


THE WHOLE ALBUM EXISTS.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: joshferrell on June 27, 2012, 02:49:33 PM
Hey guys apparently the life suite exists and brian wants to release it.


THE WHOLE ALBUM EXISTS.
how about a mini EP that we can download,with the single version of "isn't it time" the suite and maybe another song or two,,,


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 27, 2012, 03:07:52 PM
Hey guys apparently the life suite exists and brian wants to release it.


THE WHOLE ALBUM EXISTS.

Hold up, where did that info come out? Billboard article? I didn't see anywhere that said the full suite was completely recorded.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 27, 2012, 03:44:00 PM
Hey guys apparently the life suite exists and brian wants to release it.


THE WHOLE ALBUM EXISTS.

No, it does not. Unless Joe Thomas has been lying to the press.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on June 27, 2012, 06:24:54 PM
" 80 hours worth of tape," much of it culled from material they were working on around the time of Wilson's 1998 "Imagination" album that "were always songs he had earmarked for the Beach Boys." Some are on "That's Why God Made the Radio," but others include demos with the late Carl Wilson's vocals and an unreleased Dennis Wilson composition, as well as songs that were part of a suite from which the new album's "Pacific Coast Highway" and "Summer's Gone" (co-written with Jon Bon Jovi) were drawn."


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on June 27, 2012, 06:28:17 PM
" 80 hours worth of tape," much of it culled from material they were working on around the time of Wilson's 1998 "Imagination" album that "were always songs he had earmarked for the Beach Boys." Some are on "That's Why God Made the Radio," but others include demos with the late Carl Wilson's vocals and an unreleased Dennis Wilson composition, as well as songs that were part of a suite from which the new album's "Pacific Coast Highway" and "Summer's Gone" (co-written with Jon Bon Jovi) were drawn."

I don't understand how that makes you think the whole suite is done. The rough sketches are there from Brian's sessions with Joe, but they need to be completely written, backing tracks recorded, Beach Boys vocals laid down, mixing, mastering.....


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: ontor pertawst on June 27, 2012, 06:30:47 PM
Right, because no one on this board would be interested in listening to those rough sketches. Might be fun to release a few as part of a "selected piano demos" set one day.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Roger Ryan on June 28, 2012, 06:23:57 AM
Reading earlier interviews with Joe Thomas, I got the impression that a lot of those "80 hours" is just piano doodling with a tape rolling. Thomas would then "audition" certain moments to present to Brian who would then choose which ones to try and develop into songs. The "Life Suite" may be mostly written, but it certainly isn't all recorded.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Heysaboda on June 28, 2012, 10:46:11 AM

STRANGE WORLD

What an incredible song!

First of all, has everyone noticed the bicycle bell?  Ahhhhh!

And, that moment when Brian is singing "Sunday morning / skies of blue / Yo te amo / Means I love you"
WOW! makes me think I've died and gone to heaven!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 29, 2012, 05:15:11 AM

STRANGE WORLD

What an incredible song!

First of all, has everyone noticed the bicycle bell?  Ahhhhh!

And, that moment when Brian is singing "Sunday morning / skies of blue / Yo te amo / Means I love you"
WOW! makes me think I've died and gone to heaven!




You've just mentioned the part of the song that I don't like. Those "Yo te amo" lyrics just don't fit imo. rest of the song is cool though



From facebook (did Brian write more with Jon Bon Jovi?):

The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary ReUnion Tour
Mike Love has dismissed reports suggesting his plans for Beach Boys shows without bandmates Al Jardine and Brian Wilson.

The singer has booked a South American show for his spin-off Beach Boys band, which features guitarist Bruce Johnston, and a second show planned for Texas has been cancelled after venue bosses realised it wouldn’t involve the original bandmates.

Mike has spoken out to clarify his plans, insisting dates he’s planning with his Beach Boys band do not reflect on the reunited act.

He insists he’s making plans for the Wilson-led Beach Boys beyond 28 September, when the reunion tour ends in London.

He tells Rolling Stone, “There’s only one 50th anniversary, obviously, but… there’s talk of us going and doing a return to the Grammys next year, and there’s talk about doing another album together.

“There’s nothing in stone, but there’s a lot of ideas being floated around. So, after this year, after completing the 50th anniversary reunion, we’ll entertain doing some more studio work and see what we can come up with and can do in the future.”

And Love reveals there’s still a treasure trove of original Beach Boys songs to be mined for a follow-up to this year’s comeback album That’s Why God Made the Radio (WE TOLD YOU!) – they include demos with the late Carl Wilson’s vocals and an unreleased Dennis Wilson composition, as well as songs Wilson wrote with Jon Bon Jovi.

Endless Summer indeed!




I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 29, 2012, 07:41:30 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on June 29, 2012, 07:42:41 AM
Or 10,000 Years/Carl's Song, which Mike has been known to have a go at.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on June 29, 2012, 09:10:06 AM
"Who ever said, love could die"

That song would fit perfectly


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 29, 2012, 09:53:24 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".


Well, Brian has no working past with "I've got a friend" as war as we know. But "Oh Lord" was worked on for the Beach Boys '85 album. On the otehr hand I don't know if Dennis wrote anything of OL or if it was a Brian solo


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on June 29, 2012, 05:44:24 PM
Does anybody find strange the lyric that appears in "There and Back Again":

"Why don't you fall/to the ground..."

This mystifies me...it's an odd request of someone with whom you are trying to make up...


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Rocker on June 29, 2012, 06:33:45 PM
Does anybody find strange the lyric that appears in "There and Back Again":

"Why don't you fall/to the ground..."

This mystifies me...it's an odd request of someone with whom you are trying to make up...


Well, maybe I'm too drunk right now, but I can't find that lyric. Are you sure that that is what they sing?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on June 29, 2012, 08:58:15 PM
Does anybody find strange the lyric that appears in "There and Back Again":

"Why don't you fall/to the ground..."

This mystifies me...it's an odd request of someone with whom you are trying to make up...


Well, maybe I'm too drunk right now, but I can't find that lyric. Are you sure that that is what they sing?

It goes, "Just Call, Just Call, Just Fall" it changes to have a sort of double meaning like getting older and waiting.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: onkster on June 29, 2012, 10:18:11 PM
It's at the end of this verse:
The clouds are breaking, it's a beautiful day
For a wonderful, Pacific coast getaway
The sun is shining, could we just find a way
If you just call, just fall, just fall
To the ground

Meaning what, she's an angel? Join him on earth?

Or do a face-plant upon seeing each other after years? I dunno. That could prove counterproductive.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 30, 2012, 03:40:27 AM
First one is "just call".


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on June 30, 2012, 03:42:26 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".

Small problem. No vocals. No one - lead, backing, demo, scratch. Nada.  Cracking track, mind.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Gertie J. on June 30, 2012, 06:05:21 AM
norbit


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Disney Boy (1985) on June 30, 2012, 06:11:34 AM
I hope we're just going to get to hear the original Carl and Dennis songs/demos and not have to make do with 're-imaginings' by the group. Or is everyone here just perfectly content with having a re-recorded version of California Feeling whilst the original languishes in the vaults, and thus wouldn't mind the same happening to other unreleased material?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: coco1997 on June 30, 2012, 08:56:34 AM
Small problem. No vocals. No one - lead, backing, demo, scratch. Nada.  Cracking track, mind.

I interpreted the quote to mean it could be re-recorded by the current roster when they were discussing what material was available for the next record.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on July 03, 2012, 12:02:17 PM
deleted


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on July 04, 2012, 08:02:02 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".

Small problem. No vocals. No one - lead, backing, demo, scratch. Nada.  Cracking track, mind.

Andrew, what's your opinion if they were to add current-day backing vocals to Dennis' track "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" for release on the next album?  That's the most outstanding unreleased non-Caribou DW track in the vaults, so I would think it's likely that they would release that over any other (unless they add all their own vocals to the currently vocal-less "I've Got A Friend") , and I'm thinking they would be inclined to bolster it with their vocals.   In your opinion, would that tread on the sanctity of the track, or would it be OK (provided, of course, it sounded good...and given the quality of vocal arrangements & performances on the new album, I'm inclined to think it would).


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on July 05, 2012, 08:30:09 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".

Small problem. No vocals. No one - lead, backing, demo, scratch. Nada.  Cracking track, mind.

Andrew, what's your opinion if they were to add current-day backing vocals to Dennis' track "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" for release on the next album?  That's the most outstanding unreleased non-Caribou DW track in the vaults, so I would think it's likely that they would release that over any other (unless they add all their own vocals to the currently vocal-less "I've Got A Friend") , and I'm thinking they would be inclined to bolster it with their vocals.   In your opinion, would that tread on the sanctity of the track, or would it be OK (provided, of course, it sounded good...and given the quality of vocal arrangements & performances on the new album, I'm inclined to think it would).

It would be a completely f***ing insane idea. Brian & Carl's existing bvs are stellar. "(WIBNT)LA" belongs - unimproved - on either a deluxe reissue of Surf's Up or a new archive release - not a new BB album. They did that, I'd rip them a righteous and entirely deserved new one.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on July 05, 2012, 10:15:21 AM
quite a drop to 45 on this morning Billboard charts for the album; is top 50 at week 4 still pretty good?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: c-man on July 05, 2012, 10:37:05 AM
I wonder if the Dennis song could be "Oh Lord" which Brian also tried for the '85 sessions.

It could also be "I've Got A Friend".

Small problem. No vocals. No one - lead, backing, demo, scratch. Nada.  Cracking track, mind.

Andrew, what's your opinion if they were to add current-day backing vocals to Dennis' track "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again" for release on the next album?  That's the most outstanding unreleased non-Caribou DW track in the vaults, so I would think it's likely that they would release that over any other (unless they add all their own vocals to the currently vocal-less "I've Got A Friend") , and I'm thinking they would be inclined to bolster it with their vocals.   In your opinion, would that tread on the sanctity of the track, or would it be OK (provided, of course, it sounded good...and given the quality of vocal arrangements & performances on the new album, I'm inclined to think it would).

It would be a completely f***ing insane idea. Brian & Carl's existing bvs are stellar. "(WIBNT)LA" belongs - unimproved - on either a deluxe reissue of Surf's Up or a new archive release - not a new BB album. They did that, I'd rip them a righteous and entirely deserved new one.

Well then, let's hope they don't!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: rab2591 on July 05, 2012, 12:37:48 PM
Anyone notice the similarities between the SMiLE cover artwork the cover artwork for TWGMTR?

(The waves on the Smile Shop banner)


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on July 05, 2012, 08:48:39 PM
http://www.buzzinemusic.com/reviews/music-review-the-beach-boys-thats-why-god-made-the-radio-07052012

has anyone posted this review yet? it's very positive and accurate in its critical assessments. No, the professor did not write it.. . . . . .


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on July 05, 2012, 11:37:37 PM
Anyone notice the similarities between the SMiLE cover artwork the cover artwork for TWGMTR?

(The waves on the Smile Shop banner)

Those 'waves' are a shop awning.  ;D


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: halblaineisgood on July 05, 2012, 11:48:22 PM
So...

still no vinyl yet on this one?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: The Shift on July 06, 2012, 01:48:29 AM
So...

still no vinyl yet on this one?

Coming August 6, UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thats-Why-Made-Radio-VINYL/dp/B007U1FEQW


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: hypehat on July 09, 2012, 12:31:20 PM
So...

still no vinyl yet on this one?

Coming August 6, UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thats-Why-Made-Radio-VINYL/dp/B007U1FEQW

Well spotted, you! The amount of times I've nearly caved and bought this on CD.... give me my vinyl, EMI!


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: buddhahat on July 12, 2012, 06:38:02 AM
So...

still no vinyl yet on this one?

Coming August 6, UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thats-Why-Made-Radio-VINYL/dp/B007U1FEQW

Well spotted, you! The amount of times I've nearly caved and bought this on CD.... give me my vinyl, EMI!

Yeah I'm hanging out for the vinyl also. Let's hope the date doesn't keep shifting like this.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: dellydel on July 31, 2012, 08:13:52 AM
Anyone know the current total sales for TWGMTR?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on August 02, 2012, 06:27:03 PM
today's Billboard charts: http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/the-beach-boys/4053

we are slipping in the charts--barely in the top 200. What is happening?


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 02, 2012, 06:35:05 PM
today's Billboard charts: http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/the-beach-boys/4053

we are slipping in the charts--barely in the top 200. What is happening?

People are buying less copies over time as is the natural order of things. ^_^_^_^_^


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: the professor on August 02, 2012, 06:43:48 PM
Thanks, brother; you are right; let's hope a new single helps the album surge again.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: runnersdialzero on August 02, 2012, 07:47:17 PM
Thanks, brother; you are right; let's hope a new single helps the album surge again.

I'm not your brother, nor are you Hulk Hogan.

No srsly, "Isn't It Time" is so frigging good and I hope it generates some interest.


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on August 14, 2012, 02:45:04 PM
Hey guys my vinyl arrived today


Title: Re: New album info (as it rolls out...)
Post by: Runaways on August 14, 2012, 02:47:52 PM
The album cover is pretty flimsy, the vinyl sleeve is that same material that the TSS vinyl was kept in.  Except it's pink.  The label is yellow.