The Smiley Smile Message Board

Smiley Smile Stuff => General On Topic Discussions => Topic started by: Jaspy on March 30, 2012, 01:56:22 AM



Title: "That's Why God Made The Radio" Single!
Post by: Jaspy on March 30, 2012, 01:56:22 AM
No additional info yet but I wanted to let you know that I found a CD Maxi Single "That's Why God Made The Radio" available for preorder in a Online CD Store (http://www.cede.ch/de/music-cd/default.cfm).


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on March 30, 2012, 03:05:54 AM
I feel we're getting closer!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 30, 2012, 03:34:28 AM
Do you have a link to the website? This is exciting!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on March 30, 2012, 03:47:12 AM
Do you have a link to the website? This is exciting!

Well, it's just a Swiss CD shop and there are no additional infos.
Couldn't find it in UK/US Online Shops.

http://www.cede.ch/de/music-cd/default.cfm


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 30, 2012, 03:49:44 AM
Due December 31?


Title: Re:
Post by: SBonilla on March 30, 2012, 04:01:09 AM
Due December 31?
That looks like a default date.


Title: Re:
Post by: Jaspy on March 30, 2012, 04:05:04 AM
Due December 31?
That looks like a default date.

I think so.
It's brand-new, wasn't online yesterday.
Despite missing facts, I think it's interesting that there will be a new single and that it won't be "Do It Again".


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 30, 2012, 04:12:55 AM
I wonder if the new album will come out, followed by a new GHits package within weeks, both featuring this single so they cross-fertilise sales.  The biggest income earner for the BBs from the new album will be the interest it sparks in their back catalogue.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on March 30, 2012, 04:24:41 AM
Hopefully Do It Again is on it too as the b-side, that'd be a cd single worth buying! I reckon if they push this in a big way it could do well, we're not talking massive sales but it could go top 5 here in Britain with the right promotion.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on March 30, 2012, 04:42:43 AM
Man, can't wait for this..

Were getting really close to the new album/tour


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on March 30, 2012, 06:08:07 AM
New Beach Boys single with an all-new song.... in 2012...... AWESOME  :rock


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 30, 2012, 08:56:42 AM
New Beach Boys single with an all-new song.... in 2012...... AWESOME  :rock

Yes, it's pretty amazing. TSS, and now this...  :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on March 30, 2012, 11:44:36 AM
Haven't they learned not to include God in a title? 


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on March 30, 2012, 11:55:40 AM
Haven't they learned not to include God in a title? 

Which reminds me of this..

http://web.archive.org/web/20040210121805/http://www.geocities.com/surfbored_1974/petsoundsban.htm


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on March 30, 2012, 12:00:52 PM
how come everytime I think of this title THIS song pops into my head..lol..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdT8CwhmrOc


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on March 30, 2012, 12:03:03 PM
how come everytime I think of this title THIS song pops into my head..lol..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdT8CwhmrOc

 :lol :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on March 30, 2012, 01:26:20 PM
I always think of this:

http://youtu.be/IlUOsVIqvzI

*plays air guitar*


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on March 30, 2012, 07:52:03 PM
Hopefully Do It Again is on it too as the b-side, that'd be a cd single worth buying! I reckon if they push this in a big way it could do well, we're not talking massive sales but it could go top 5 here in Britain with the right promotion.

Anything's possible, sometimes acts that have been gone for years come back with a song that's SLIGHTLY gimmicky (which this song sounds like it's going to be!) and hit #1 again. 

For instance a few years ago, Randy Travis came out of nowhere and made a song called "Three Wooden Crosses" that was essentially a gospel song that burned up a lot of charts and was a huge hit for him.  Then he disappeared again. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on March 30, 2012, 10:19:02 PM
Haven't they learned not to include God in a title? 

Which reminds me of this..

http://web.archive.org/web/20040210121805/http://www.geocities.com/surfbored_1974/petsoundsban.htm

Perhaps they should change it to "That's Why Alexander Stepanovich Popov Made The Radio"...

Is it correct that this will be the first new (and officially released) Beach Boys song in 20 years? Wow.
With the whole reunion hype, the time couldn't be better.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on March 30, 2012, 10:24:26 PM
Going by the name alone, I hope that this is a return to the weird and quirky Brian Wilson productions of the early 1970's, ala "Take A Load Off Your Feet".  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Summertime Blooz on March 30, 2012, 10:40:14 PM
Based on the title, it could be a soulful ballad like 'In My Room'.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on March 31, 2012, 01:52:11 AM
Going by the name alone, I hope that this is a return to the weird and quirky Brian Wilson productions of the early 1970's, ala "Take A Load Off Your Feet".  ;D

I think it's news to Brian that he produced it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on March 31, 2012, 02:38:47 AM
Sounds like it will be in the vein of That Same Song


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on March 31, 2012, 03:07:51 AM
Sounds like it will be in the vein of That Same Song

Hm.

I don't hope it'll be in the vein of some of his more 'forced' BBs-like constructs, like 'Too Much Sugar' or 'Let's Get To Heaven In My Car'.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 09:55:25 AM
Seems That's Why God Made The Radio was written by Jim Peteri, Joe Thomas and Larry (Millas?).

Jim Peteri: "There's a song that I wrote with Larry and Joe Thomas called 'That's Why God Made the Radio', which you'll hear some day, it's really pretty neat. It was meant to be for the Beach Boys."

Also featured some guy called David Hungate.

Source: http://www.melodicrock.com/interviews/Mecca-JimPeterik.html

A sessions seemingly produced by Peteri includes backing vocals by one Joe Vana:

JV: "A week later, yes, a week later he (JP) had me singing backgrounds on “That's why God Made the Radio”....for the BEACH BOYS....WTF"

Source:

http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=52689&sid=b16991b139ddbdfdca219e9ca0fefc74

Be veeeery interesting to see the songwriting credits on this one when it comes to light. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on March 31, 2012, 10:07:27 AM
Didn't Mike say that Brian wrote it ? Maybe I misremember


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 10:09:26 AM
More, from the Joe Vana thread on Melodic Rock forum:

Question: Being an insider, what's the greatest Survivor and/or Jim Peterik track that has never been released to the public (not including FMS demos)?

Answer: Dude...I sang on alot of JP's stuff and demos for years there, but you know way too much about that stuff!!!!....I did a demo called "Save Me" which was a heavy tune...I will go through some of my old CD's of demo stuff....even though I hate doing that..I was so new to singing, and I did not have the control I do now, so the parts were a bit loose.....

My original lead vocal version to "Too Miss Somebody" from World Stage 1....I sang on the final tune with Dennis Deyoung as well, I am all over the backgrounds and I have some step outs at the end of the tune....some of my favorite moments in the studio working with Dennis...and to hear one of your idols praise your work is humbling beyond belief.....he is a misunderstood guy, really a gem....

Oh yea...."That's Why God Made The Radio".....my first thing I ever sang on....it was a demo for the Beach Boys and Brian Wilson....written by JP and Joe Thomas.....that song I will say was killer.....


Title: Re:
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 10:12:12 AM
Seems That's Why God Made The Radio was written by Jim Peteri, Joe Thomas and Larry (Millas?).

Jim Peteri: "There's a song that I wrote with Larry and Joe Thomas called 'That's Why God Made the Radio', which you'll hear some day, it's really pretty neat. It was meant to be for the Beach Boys."

Also featured some guy called David Hungate.

Source: http://www.melodicrock.com/interviews/Mecca-JimPeterik.html

A sessions seemingly produced by Peteri includes backing vocals by one Joe Vana:

JV: "A week later, yes, a week later he (JP) had me singing backgrounds on “That's why God Made the Radio”....for the BEACH BOYS....WTF"

Source:

http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=52689&sid=b16991b139ddbdfdca219e9ca0fefc74

Be veeeery interesting to see the songwriting credits on this one when it comes to light.  


Jim Peterik co-wrote "Dream Angel" on Imagination, and is credited in the BMI database as co-writing "Your Imagination," even though his name isn't in the CD booklet.

Interesting indeed ... I'll bet Brian added a bridge (that's what he did for several of the Andy Paley collaborations, apparently).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 10:15:30 AM
Although, it must be said, it is sad that the standout track on the last Beach Boys album did not originate with Brian.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 10:15:54 AM
Suddenly I have a real urge to obtain a copy of this demo!


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 31, 2012, 11:38:30 AM
I have a bad feeling about all this now....


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on March 31, 2012, 11:43:31 AM
I have a bad feeling about all this now....
Just because TWGMTR isn't a brand-new song and not written by Brian?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 11:46:51 AM
I have a bad feeling about all this now....
Just because TWGMTR isn't a brand-new song and not written by Brian?

Mm-hm. On consideration, I have rather a sinking feeling as well.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on March 31, 2012, 11:50:05 AM
I have a bad feeling about all this now....
Just because TWGMTR isn't a brand-new song and not written by Brian?

Mm-hm. On consideration, I have rather a sinking feeling as well.
I am feeling that this album is a Joe Thomas run affair just like 1998 with Imagination, and this song might be a well worn nostalgia song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on March 31, 2012, 12:17:37 PM
Let's not lose scope of the grand picture here...we are still getting a dozen songs with all living Beach Boys singing on each track.  Two years ago if we had gotten out of the blue this song released and found out that Brian didn't write most of it---I doubt we would all crap on it; we'd be freaking out that the guys came together to record a new song.   Just because we're right in the middle of all this reunion hoopla and it's been a few months of us following every little piece of news regarding this album and tour--doesn't mean we should be as jaded as we're becoming here.  So Brian didn't really write this song on his own?  Wish he did but oh well.  Dennis didn't write "Never Learn Not To Love" but look how that turned out.  Brian may not have written this song but I"m sure the arranging and voices will be, as he says, outtasite.


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on March 31, 2012, 12:34:14 PM
If it's a great Beach Boys song, it won't matter who wrote it.  Do you think any less of Sloop John B because it was not written by a member of the group?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on March 31, 2012, 12:35:23 PM
Let's not lose scope of the grand picture here...we are still getting a dozen songs with all living Beach Boys singing on each track.  Two years ago if we had gotten out of the blue this song released and found out that Brian didn't write most of it---I doubt we would all crap on it; we'd be freaking out that the guys came together to record a new song.   Just because we're right in the middle of all this reunion hoopla and it's been a few months of us following every little piece of news regarding this album and tour--doesn't mean we should be as jaded as we're becoming here.  So Brian didn't really write this song on his own?  Wish he did but oh well.  Dennis didn't write "Never Learn Not To Love" but look how that turned out.  Brian may not have written this song but I"m sure the arranging and voices will be, as he says, outtasite.
Amen.

Dennis didn't write "Never Learn Not To Love" but look how that turned out.
With a crazy madman and sect leader turned angry.  ;D


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 12:36:53 PM
Let's not lose scope of the grand picture here...we are still getting a dozen songs with all living Beach Boys singing on each track.  Two years ago if we had gotten out of the blue this song released and found out that Brian didn't write most of it---I doubt we would all crap on it; we'd be freaking out that the guys came together to record a new song.   Just because we're right in the middle of all this reunion hoopla and it's been a few months of us following every little piece of news regarding this album and tour--doesn't mean we should be as jaded as we're becoming here.  So Brian didn't really write this song on his own?  Wish he did but oh well.  Dennis didn't write "Never Learn Not To Love" but look how that turned out.  Brian may not have written this song but I"m sure the arranging and voices will be, as he says, outtasite.

You're saying Joe Thomas is akin to Chuckie Manson? Let me think about that a while... :lol

I know where you're coming from and you're right, of course you're right. But I, for one, feel a tad winded by the fact that the one new  track being bigged up seems, in fact, not to be a BW/BBs' original but a retread of a demo by others. The first single, potentially, chissakes... I know, I know, let's wait and see... Maybe someone will offer some more info in light of this coming to the board's attention.

( and aye, I think you've got to have been a fan for many years to take this as a negative...)


Title: Re: \
Post by: the captain on March 31, 2012, 01:23:46 PM
Other than being a disappointment from a "perfect ending to the story" kind of perspective, I don't think it's especially relevant who wrote the song or when. If everyone keeps saying what a good song and/or recording it is--and not just Mike or Brian, but people like Probyn--then it may be just that. It would be cool if the Brian-Mike songwriting partnership of old rose from the dust for a new classic (and it may have in some other song(s), who knows?), but it's not essential for a successful song or album. If it comes to it, I would much rather have them do good versions of other people's good songs than of their own terrible ones.


Title: Re:
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 01:27:06 PM
I, for one, feel a tad winded by the fact that the one new  track being bigged up seems, in fact, not to be a BW/BBs' original but a retread of a demo by others. The first single, potentially, chissakes...

Exactly my thoughts. I mean, there's no question that Brian will get a writing credit on the tune, and he may well end up adding a bridge or tag and re-arranging it. But still ... sheesh. I guess my hope was that this would be a really Brian-dominated project, at least on the production, arranging and songwriting side of things. But time will tell.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Melt Away on March 31, 2012, 01:48:53 PM
I knew Joe Thomas was going to ruin this album. I'm probably speaking a little too early but it just seems to be going in a bad direction..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on March 31, 2012, 01:49:17 PM
man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on March 31, 2012, 01:55:16 PM
Since there will apparently be other Wilson/Love originals on the album, if its a great song I don't care who wrote it. But Dream Angel sucked, and Your Imagination was simply ok


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on March 31, 2012, 02:42:33 PM
man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune.  

There's a certain fan on this board that suddenly cared less about Meant for You once he knew Mike was singing lead instead of Brian. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but that's tone-deaf idiocy in my book.

Let us enjoy the music for what it is once we hear it. If the song is outstanding, what's wrong with these guys picking it up and singing it? The only thing I did not like was that the song got mentioned in about 25 interviews and the name of the songwriters was never mentioned... Now that was misleading, considering that most people suppose Brian's writing all the songs.

Now: when did that demo for TWGMR originate?


Title: That's Why God Made The Radio Single!
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune. 

There's a certain fan on this board that suddenly cared less about Meant for You once he knew Mike was singing lead instead of Brian. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but that's tone-deaf idiocy in my book.

Let us enjoy the music for what it is once we hear it. If the song is outstanding, what's wrong with these guys picking it up and singing it? The only thing I did not like was that the song got mentioned in about 25 interviews and the name of the songwriters was never mentioned... Now that was misleading, considering that most people suppose Brian's writing all the songs.

Now: when did that demo for TWGMR originate?

People aren't fans of the BBs / BW because of their stunning interpretive abilities. It's generally at least partially because of the guys' ability as songwriters. You can't totally separate the band from the songs they wrote.

As for the interview mentions, my guess is that Brian is credited as one of the writers on the tune. I bet every tune on the album has one of the guys listed as a writer or co-writer, regardless of what they actually did. And I suspect the chances are good that Brian added something to it.

Finally, if the tune was written for the BWs by Joe and Jim, that would suggest a late-90s composition date (somewhere between Stars and Stripes and Imagination).


Title: Re: That's Why God Made The Radio Single!
Post by: Autotune on March 31, 2012, 03:07:18 PM
man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune. 

There's a certain fan on this board that suddenly cared less about Meant for You once he knew Mike was singing lead instead of Brian. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but that's tone-deaf idiocy in my book.

Let us enjoy the music for what it is once we hear it. If the song is outstanding, what's wrong with these guys picking it up and singing it? The only thing I did not like was that the song got mentioned in about 25 interviews and the name of the songwriters was never mentioned... Now that was misleading, considering that most people suppose Brian's writing all the songs.

Now: when did that demo for TWGMR originate?

People aren't fans of the BBs / BW because of their stunning interpretive abilities. It's generally at least partially because of the guys' ability as songwriters. You can't totally separate the band from the songs they wrote.

As for the interview mentions, my guess is that Brian is credited as one of the writers on the tune. I bet every tune on the album has one of the guys listed as a writer or co-writer, regardless of what they actually did. And I suspect the chances are good that Brian added something to it.

Finally, if the tune was written for the BWs by Joe and Jim, that would suggest a late-90s composition date (somewhere between Stars and Stripes and Imagination).

I concur that Brian probably added a bridge or something to the song.

My point was that this reunion time is so special and unexpected, that these complaints end up seeming a little too miserable.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 03:10:06 PM
The only thing I did not like was that the song got mentioned in about 25 interviews and the name of the songwriters was never mentioned... Now that was misleading, considering that most people suppose Brian's writing all the songs.

That's what's eating me.  AGD's always advising folk to credit sources, and pros like the BBs ought to give credit where credit's due too.


People aren't fans of the BBs / BW because of their stunning interpretive abilities. It's generally at least partially because of the guys' ability as songwriters. You can't totally separate the band from the songs they wrote.

Totally.  This isn't the Gershwin album, or the Disney album. It's the first proper BBs band album since 1985… or is it S&S Vol II?


As for the interview mentions, my guess is that Brian is credited as one of the writers on the tune. I bet every tune on the album has one of the guys listed as a writer or co-writer, regardless of what they actually did. And I suspect the chances are good that Brian added something to it.

This. I hope the credits on all the tracks are legitimate and accurate. I recall (very vaguely, unfortunately)  a thread many moons ago in which it was implied that there's occasionally some, shall we say, negotiation over stated provenance of songs. I sure as hell don't want to be misled.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alan Smith on March 31, 2012, 03:10:31 PM

Let us enjoy the music for what it is once we hear it. If the song is outstanding, what's wrong with these guys picking it up and singing it?

Hooray for Dr Lenny!  I can't believe what a drubbing this relatively unheard song is attracting (or can I?)  :lol

Be cool, and (cautiously) optimistic -  I'm sure the new record will comply to the quality levels our boys have presented over the last 50 years (varied).

Demos won't always tell you the full story - heard a demo of a mega classic rock hit yesterday, it was a woeful
approximation of the completed behemoth.


Title: Re: That's Why God Made the Radio single
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 03:19:01 PM
I hope the credits on all the tracks are legitimate and accurate. I recall (very vaguely, unfortunately)  a thread many moons ago in which it was implied that there's occasionally some, shall we say, negotiation over stated provenance of songs. I sure as hell don't want to be misled.

Brian on "That's Why God Made the Radio" (predicted interview response):

"Oh, my friend Joe came up with that idea, and I thought it was really cool. We sat down and worked it out -- we were done in literally 20 minutes! Twenty minutes and the song was done! It's one of my favorites. It's about how God, you know, made the radio that we all listen to. It's like that. Really good. And the guys sing it so good too."


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on March 31, 2012, 03:24:04 PM

Let us enjoy the music for what it is once we hear it. If the song is outstanding, what's wrong with these guys picking it up and singing it?

Hooray for Dr Lenny!  I can't believe what a drubbing this relatively unheard song is attracting (or can I?)  :lol

Be cool, and (cautiously) optimistic -  I'm sure the new record will comply to the quality levels our boys have presented over the last 50 years (varied).

Demos won't always tell you the full story - heard a demo of a mega classic rock hit yesterday, it was a woeful
approximation of the completed behemoth.

Not drubbing the song, Alholio71, Dr Lenny, it's just the feeling that we've been somewhat mislead about its status. And you could argue that that's not the case, as no-one had said anything much about it.

It's a bit like when I was a kid and my dad came home after what I'd always been told was eight years at war, only it turned out he'd spent those eight years in prison*.









* This never happened by the way.  It's just there for the sake of effect.


Title: Re: That's Why God Made the Radio single
Post by: Autotune on March 31, 2012, 03:41:30 PM
I hope the credits on all the tracks are legitimate and accurate. I recall (very vaguely, unfortunately)  a thread many moons ago in which it was implied that there's occasionally some, shall we say, negotiation over stated provenance of songs. I sure as hell don't want to be misled.

Brian on "That's Why God Made the Radio" (predicted interview response):

"Oh, my friend Joe came up with that idea, and I thought it was really cool. We sat down and worked it out -- we were done in literally 20 minutes! Twenty minutes and the song was done! It's one of my favorites. It's about how God, you know, made the radio that we all listen to. It's like that. Really good. And the guys sing it so good too."

I'll betcha that the real interview will go like this:

Q: who wrote that song?
A: Joe Thomas


Title: Re:
Post by: Alan Smith on March 31, 2012, 03:43:37 PM

Not drubbing the song, Alholio71, Dr Lenny, it's just the feeling that we've been somewhat mislead about its status. And you could argue that that's not the case, as no-one had said anything much about it.

It's a bit like when I was a kid and my dad came home after what I'd always been told was eight years at war, only it turned out he'd spent those eight years in prison*.









* This never happened by the way.  It's just there for the sake of effect.

Not aimed at you, Sir, as I understand your position on attribution, given your line of work.

Your personal harrowing experience tells us you're more than an expert on the impact of discovering the shortcomings of one's heros *.








*I acknowledge the jailbird dad thing never happened, but it was too well played to ignore  :lol


Title: Re: That's Why God Made the Radio single
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 03:47:22 PM
I hope the credits on all the tracks are legitimate and accurate. I recall (very vaguely, unfortunately)  a thread many moons ago in which it was implied that there's occasionally some, shall we say, negotiation over stated provenance of songs. I sure as hell don't want to be misled.

Brian on "That's Why God Made the Radio" (predicted interview response):

"Oh, my friend Joe came up with that idea, and I thought it was really cool. We sat down and worked it out -- we were done in literally 20 minutes! Twenty minutes and the song was done! It's one of my favorites. It's about how God, you know, made the radio that we all listen to. It's like that. Really good. And the guys sing it so good too."

I'll betcha that the real interview will go like this:

Q: who wrote that song?
A: Joe Thomas

Brian's not that honest.

Please refer to his exuberant denials of any Beach Boys reunion over the last year. He enjoys lying to press.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Real Barnyard on March 31, 2012, 04:59:03 PM
At this point we only know that Joe Thomas and others wrote a demo of TWGMTR. Maybe later Brian & Mike have added the bridge or completed the song.
I'm thinking of Kokomo being a Phillips/McKenzie 1984 song and then mutated to the completed 1988 tune we all know and love.
Saving distances with TWGMTR I hope...


Title: Re: That's Why God Made the Radio single
Post by: Autotune on March 31, 2012, 05:26:39 PM
I hope the credits on all the tracks are legitimate and accurate. I recall (very vaguely, unfortunately)  a thread many moons ago in which it was implied that there's occasionally some, shall we say, negotiation over stated provenance of songs. I sure as hell don't want to be misled.

Brian on "That's Why God Made the Radio" (predicted interview response):

"Oh, my friend Joe came up with that idea, and I thought it was really cool. We sat down and worked it out -- we were done in literally 20 minutes! Twenty minutes and the song was done! It's one of my favorites. It's about how God, you know, made the radio that we all listen to. It's like that. Really good. And the guys sing it so good too."

I'll betcha that the real interview will go like this:

Q: who wrote that song?
A: Joe Thomas

Brian's not that honest.

Please refer to his exuberant denials of any Beach Boys reunion over the last year. He enjoys lying to press.

Well, he's quick to quote his collaborators for the entire work, even if that credit is not due (he's done that with Andy Paley and Scotty).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Manchini on March 31, 2012, 05:45:33 PM
I can understand the disappointment, and I can also see how it's inconsequential if this song is a collaboration where BW is not the main creative element. Either way, a question: has his writer's block eased up at all? He's mentioned it a lot, the most recent I've heard being in an interview for the Gershwin album. Maybe he just doesn't have enough songs to work with. (They could, of course, reach back to old unreleased songs, but my curiosity remains.)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 05:51:06 PM
I can understand the disappointment, and I can also see how it's inconsequential if this song is a collaboration where BW is not the main creative element. Either way, a question: has his writer's block eased up at all? He's mentioned it a lot, the most recent I've heard being in an interview for the Gershwin album. Maybe he just doesn't have enough songs to work with. (They could, of course, reach back to old unreleased songs, but my curiosity remains.)

I think he started writing again last year, maybe a bit earlier. He started mentioning new song titles last year -- "Shelter" and "The Private Life of Bill and Sue" among them. I think this song's presence in the album simply comes from the band's (and Brian's, most likely) desire to have a hit.

It's also important to note that Brian always has sufficient songs on hand for an album -- he over-produces during his fertile periods. That is, he has several songs from the TLOS writing sessions in 2006 that have gone unreleased. He did some work with Stevie Kalinich pre-GIOMH. And in the 90s he did a bunch of things with both Tony Asher and Joe Thomas that went unreleased too.


Title: Re:
Post by: c-man on March 31, 2012, 08:55:33 PM

Also featured some guy called David Hungate.


David Hungate was a member of Toto.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on March 31, 2012, 08:55:55 PM
i'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all.  it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on March 31, 2012, 09:01:31 PM
i'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all.  it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  

We don't know how much the other guys were told about who wrote the song for/with Brian.  Maybe they just don't know.  It's likely they were presented with a bunch of new songs from Brian and Joe, and got straight to work on them, but were not given all the details. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on March 31, 2012, 09:15:58 PM
i'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all.  it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  

We don't know how much the other guys were told about who wrote the song for/with Brian.  Maybe they just don't know.  It's likely they were presented with a bunch of new songs from Brian and Joe, and got straight to work on them, but were not given all the details. 

sweet, so it seems the best song on the next beach boys album wasn't written by a beach boy, but the songwriting power house of Joe Thomas and the guy who wrote "eye of the tiger"


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on March 31, 2012, 09:21:01 PM
i'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all.  it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  

We don't know how much the other guys were told about who wrote the song for/with Brian.  Maybe they just don't know.  It's likely they were presented with a bunch of new songs from Brian and Joe, and got straight to work on them, but were not given all the details. 

sweet, so it seems the best song on the next beach boys album wasn't written by a beach boy, but the songwriting power house of Joe Thomas and the guy who wrote "eye of the tiger"

Well, what if it turns out Russ Titeleman and not Brian started, or even wrote most of, Guess I'm Dumb and/or Sherri She Needs Me (or Gary Usher with In My Room)?  Those are still stunning BW tracks.  And, those two guys got Brian a semi-hit in the late nineties (one I still hear occasionally piped into offices and retail stores), and it wasn't all bad.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 09:40:27 PM
If the song is good, and if it has identifiable contributions from Brian (a quirky bridge, cool harmonies, etc., etc.), I predict that all will be forgiven.

I'm also a huge Your Imagination fan, so I guess I should be happier about this.  :P


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on March 31, 2012, 10:19:03 PM
I'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all. it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  

We don't know how much the other guys were told about who wrote the song for/with Brian.  Maybe they just don't know.  It's likely they were presented with a bunch of new songs from Brian and Joe, and got straight to work on them, but were not given all the details. 

sweet, so it seems the best song on the next beach boys album wasn't written by a beach boy, but the songwriting power house of Joe Thomas and the guy who wrote "eye of the tiger"


All those Eye of the tiger, Survivor Scotti Brothers people, were totally mobbed up, very bad vibes, complete total  stereotype Mafia,,, the Italian kind. Hey we hate to see you're health suffer,  that's the most important, thing capiche? take care of your health, now about these papers, my fiend's, Johnny Musso, Mr Scotti
we'd like you to sign these papers.


SO long story short, if this is where Joe Thomas and his musicians originated, it's almost as bad as another Dennis And Charlie Manson kind of thing.
But you know pop stars, for example put out a record written by their pal Charlie Manson, and suffer no consequences except maybe some jokes
at their expense. If Joe Thomas is hooked up with that old Scotti Brothers eye of the tiger crowd, well, I just lost about 60% of my interest in the
whole thing. It begs another question as well., Those kind of people wouldn't be beyond, taking songs from demo tapes, roadies, students, passerby
people they lock in closets... very very very bad karma to be involved with those people., and call this a creative artistic endeavor, of all the just typically
sketchy people in the music biz, to voluntarily   sign up to work with that crowd, you gotta be on heavy melds or owe somebody a piece of your income
for services rendered in the past...

That may all sound kooky and dramatic, but I'm telling you   straight up, the origins of those people are the Mob, it's common knowledge, it's not even
debatable. One of them threatened me  right in the building on Sunset, talked about your health (my health) why don't you do this. God knows who
actually wrote that song. If that's it's provenance.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on March 31, 2012, 11:06:50 PM
Have to say, after thinking 'Oh-oh' for a second, I'm now even more optimistic about the potential of this song. Everybody says it's great. Brian doesn't write hits anymore, perhaps this song is just what the BB need now. It was written for them and seems to be fantastic. Exactly what the BB need now to kick off their tour and promote the new album.

And to be true, I guess I'm not the only one to wonder sometimes how many of his solo songs Brian did really write by himself or without a little or more than a little help of his friends since, let's say the mid 80's. God, even Brian's autobiography was ghost-written. But that's business, the music business, I think we shouldn't forget that. Brian the genius. People want Brian written and produced records, people get Brian written and produced records, even if in reality he just was a co-writer and co-producer. "Midnight's Another Day" was a left-over from the Landy-era, who knows who was involved in writing it, in re-writing it, how much Scott Bennett added etc.

Can't wait!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 11:13:06 PM
"Midnight's Another Day" was a left-over from the Landy-era.

I think you've got your songs confused. MAD was co-written by Brian and Scott in '06 -- they took turns working it out at the piano, according to Scott.

"California Role," on the other hand, is taken from a Landy-era song called "Wondering What You're Up to Now" that Scott totally reworked as a movie-business song. Brian didn't tell him the melody was old, though. AGD did.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on March 31, 2012, 11:21:11 PM
"Midnight's Another Day" was a left-over from the Landy-era.

I think you've got your songs confused. MAD was co-written by Brian and Scott in '06 -- they took turns working it out at the piano, according to Scott.

"California Role," on the other hand, is taken from a Landy-era song called "Wondering What You're Up to Now" that Scott totally reworked as a movie-business song. Brian didn't tell him the melody was old, though. AGD did.  ;D

Really? That's funny. :-D

Ok. I thought I read somewhere that MAD originally was a fast rock song they reworked to what it is now. MAD a new collaboration? I happily stay corrected!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on March 31, 2012, 11:25:52 PM
"Midnight's Another Day" was a left-over from the Landy-era.

I think you've got your songs confused. MAD was co-written by Brian and Scott in '06 -- they took turns working it out at the piano, according to Scott.

"California Role," on the other hand, is taken from a Landy-era song called "Wondering What You're Up to Now" that Scott totally reworked as a movie-business song. Brian didn't tell him the melody was old, though. AGD did.  ;D

Really? That's funny. :-D

Ok. I thought I read somewhere that MAD originally was a fast rock song they reworked to what it is now. MAD a new collaboration? I happily stay corrected!

I heard the fast song reworked thing too, but not that it was Landy era. But after stumbling across an interview of Scott by AGD, though, it seems a little more straightforward.

Andrew: "Midnight" is just staggeringly beautiful, probably the best new work Brian has done since the early 70s - what was your role in creating such a gem ?

Scott: We traded seats at the piano until we had a cool intro-outro, verse pre-chorus, chorus and bridge. We knew it was special and spiritual, and after Brian showed me his lyric ideas for "Oxygen", I knew it would be OK to write the introspective words that this song needed.

http://www.beachboysbritain.org.uk/index.php/past-interviews.html


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on March 31, 2012, 11:36:57 PM
If Brian OK'd it, that means he put his stamp on it, and therefore.. I'm cool with it. I admire that he's looking to have a contemporary sounding hit record this late in the game. Hit records have always been on his mind.. and being open to cutting other writers songs shows me that he's still competitive in that sense.

"Your Imagination" is a well-written, well-produced record. Featuring some of Brian's best harmony arrangements. (Ok, could've lived without the AC touches) And it was a minor hit...But, think about it. If that had been the lead single for a Beach Boys reunion at the time.. it would've been monsterous.

If "Your Imagination", and all the hype around "TWGMTR" is any indication, I say we give the guy a break, and give him props for putting ego aside and recognizing a great song for his band. If it has the official BW co-sign, we're most likely in for a big treat. (American Spring anyone?)

I can't wait to hear it (and the rest of the album)!


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on March 31, 2012, 11:59:06 PM
god must have spent a little more time on the radio


Title: Re: \
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 01, 2012, 12:07:33 AM
Other than being a disappointment from a "perfect ending to the story" kind of perspective....

And Summer In Paradise was?  :lol


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 01, 2012, 12:32:16 AM
Other than being a disappointment from a "perfect ending to the story" kind of perspective....

And Summer In Paradise was?  :lol

Excellent point. Tipping point, in fact. No more scab-scratching, let's be open-minded again.


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 12:44:22 AM
i'm not bummed that there's a song on the album not written by them, that's not unsurprising at all.  it's that this is the song that has been hyped up, and now it isn't written by them?

it's the song probyn singled out.  It's the song Mike singled out.  Can we assume that this is the song that that drummer guy tweeted about too?  And what about Bruce, he said he'd been playing a Brian song over and over, so hopefully that's another tune.  i mean, talk about the songs the band wrote!!  this is like hyping up "i can hear music" instead of the other great tunes on 20/20.  

We don't know how much the other guys were told about who wrote the song for/with Brian.  Maybe they just don't know.  It's likely they were presented with a bunch of new songs from Brian and Joe, and got straight to work on them, but were not given all the details. 

sweet, so it seems the best song on the next beach boys album wasn't written by a beach boy, but the songwriting power house of Joe Thomas and the guy who wrote "eye of the tiger"

That Eye of the Tiger guy you speak of, Joe Peterik, was of course backed by Tony Scotti,,,,notorious mobbed up record executive, who claims to
be the son of Lucky Luciano, why the Beach Boys would willingly be involved with people from this crowd, I don't get it.

Here is a link with a long article from the New York Observer, with plenty of Quotes directly from Tony Scotti the long tie mentor of

Joe Peternik who apparently wrote, or gets credit for writing, the forthcoming Beach Boys single "that's Why God Made The Radio"
here is a story on his mentor Tony Scotti, mobster record man, from his own lips in the New York Observer.

http://www.observer.com/2000/04/my-pal-anthony-scptti-tells-me-hes-really-lucky-luciano-jr/


Scotti goes on to present scary bodyguards, make threats, explain conspiracies between area 51 the aliens, and himself..
This is the man the mafia guy, who mentored the guy who wrote "that's why God Made the radio"

These people are apparently all involved with Joe Thomas,   these are the people the Beach Boys involved for their swan song 50Th anniversary
album and tour.. If you think it's a joke just read the article and then do some google searches on the mob and Scotti Brothers, Anthony Scotti.,
cross check that with Joe Thomas and Joe Peternik, it's not rocket science, it's fairly easy to start piecing it together.

Of all the talented people in the world, this is who the Beach Boys are getting in bed with

Why ? This is the very antithesis of    Good Vibrations that's for sure


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 01, 2012, 01:04:01 AM
Why ?

$


Title: Re: \
Post by: anazgnos on April 01, 2012, 01:09:10 AM
Why ?

$

Or perhaps

$

+

….._\____________________,,__
…./ `–│││││││││———————-_]
…/_==o ____________________
…..),—.(_(__) /
….// (\) ),——
…//___//
../`—-’ / …
./____ / … .


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 01, 2012, 01:16:59 AM
I want to point out that this TWGMTR-revelation was posted on March 31, so it doesn't count as April Fools joke! 8)


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Shift on April 01, 2012, 01:40:30 AM
Okay my enthusiasm is revived! Gangster links didn't do Old' Blue Eyes any harm, and it wouldn't be The Beach Boys if they didn't go out with a blast of  controversy!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 01, 2012, 02:13:20 AM
I wish this album was just an extended 30 minute version of "I'm Broke".


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 02:28:10 AM
I want to point out that this TWGMTR-revelation was posted on March 31, so it doesn't count as April Fools joke! 8)


It's not a joke on my part. I linked the article to Anthony Scotti, in his own words. It's common
knowledge Scotti Brothers records was mobbed up, and the primary songwriter of Eye of the Tiger
and That's why God Made The Radio, is a protoge or was mentored by these people, for many years.

This is not uncommon, yes Tony Bennett, Frank Sinatra, many people their whole careers were enmeshed
with the original mob, it's not like those Italian singers had a choice. Yes they did well, regardless of
perhaps because of their mob connections.

Certainly many stories circulated around Hollywood with MCA Universal, Capitol, Film Studios, Vegas, the
night clubs, on the sunset strip, and in New York City.

The Beach Boys, I would hope, are in a position of strength, where these mellow surfers, creative singers
and songwriters, don't have to rely on mob connected songwriters, managers, or producers to find songs
go on tour or get their album happening.

These are some bad, very bad people. I'm sorry the Beach Boys didn't learn their lesson after the Manson
Family debacle, and do business with more above board sorts. Plenty of good songs around, that come with
a cleaner provenance than the old time Scotti Brother crowd.

It won't prevent me from enjoying the album. But how very sad, that in this day and age, they fell in with such
a crowd. Who knows, maybe they have to do a certain number of Joe Thomas inspired songs, just like John Lennon
had to do some Morris Levy songs to stay in one piece.

It's just sickening,  it shows decisions are not being made purely on artistic grounds, they have some rough partners.
I'm sure there are plenty of would be writers with plenty of demo's to send in, like the old days, if they needed a song.
This may be a good song, or maybe it's part of paying their bill to these people.

OK 30 days to go.


Did they get Van Dyke Parks to write some words? nah, they went with fringes of the mafia instead, ah I see.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 02:32:18 AM
Since I am a real sleuth, I did my homework. This is the songwriting team behind That's Why God Made The Radio:

(http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/_News/_SLIDESHOWS/Entourage%20Jobs/Brian-Wilson-Eugene-Landy-Entourage-Jobs-CNBC.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 01, 2012, 02:49:03 AM
My wife has her soap operas, I have this board.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 01, 2012, 02:54:20 AM
People are reading too deep into nothing. The band has always worked with outside collaborators. Some sketchier than others, but sketchy folks nonetheless. I doubt these alleged mobsters were gonna break Brian's knuckles with a pair of pliers if the band didn't work with them.

I heard that in the mid-60s they worked with some pretentious goofy fool who took drugs with Brian. Now THAT is the kind of influence that is unneeded.

It's not like it's gonna be their first hit single written by somebody outside the band. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grj7sjQ0_p4


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 01, 2012, 03:46:12 AM
(http://images.pictureshunt.com/pics/s/scarface-10733.jpg)

"DON'T f*** WITH THE FORMULA!"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 01, 2012, 04:01:44 AM
At this point we only know that Joe Thomas and others wrote a demo of TWGMTR. Maybe later Brian & Mike have added the bridge or completed the song.
I'm thinking of Kokomo being a Phillips/McKenzie 1984 song and then mutated to the completed 1988 tune we all know and love.
Saving distances with TWGMTR I hope...


Exactly. If Brian wrote a bridge, maybe that's the best thing of the song and everybody will go "hooray, Brian's back". So calm down until we have the song to listen to. I's more or less the same as with "Soul searchin'" to which Brian only added a part. And that one is a great song.

The Beach Boys want and need a hit in this anniversary celebration. Imagine at the end of the year the reunion is over and you don't have nothing to show because the only single they released did bomb out. At the end it's not the tour but the succes of the album/single that counts IMO. I'd be very happy if Brian and Mike would come up with something that eventually becomes a big hit but if they don't have the material (yet) than they have to take another song that might do that
And I'm happy that it's a new song they'll release and not Do It Again


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 01, 2012, 04:06:00 AM
Mob links, now I have heard everything... ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 04:17:34 AM
People are reading too deep into nothing. The band has always worked with outside collaborators. Some sketchier than others, but sketchy folks nonetheless. I doubt these alleged mobsters were gonna break Brian's knuckles with a pair of pliers if the band didn't work with them.

I heard that in the mid-60s they worked with some pretentious goofy fool who took drugs with Brian. Now THAT is the kind of influence that is unneeded.

It's not like it's gonna be their first hit single written by somebody outside the band. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grj7sjQ0_p4


No Hypehat, it is not much ado about nothing. These people are a part of the mafia, and the Beach Boys are choosing to use
a song, (the single) or perhaps multiple songs, from these people.

This is significant. However, it is hardly unusual in the music business, this case is somewhat extreme in that, many qualified people
with no connection to the mob so far as I know were available for songwriting or production help. Van Dyke Parks, Russ Titleman, Phil Ramone
Rick Rubin, Jack Douglas, or whoever, just using those people as examples.

They could have gotten a song off of Neil Diamond, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Jackie Deshannon, Tom Petty, Jeff  Lynne,Jackson brown
Cat Stevens, Don Mclean, Van Dyke Parks, Leo Sayer, Van Morrison, Don Mclean, Adam Marsland, Jewell, Sheryl Crow, Lucinda Williams

Or a gazzillion other people, if they needed a song, but its significant they found an outside tune to be a hit, from some people with a deep
and long history with the mob people.

No one would really argue it was no big deal the Beach Boys used a Charlie Manson song on the b side of a single, That's grotesque

The Beach Boys, have a reputation going back to the sixties, where they don't outright steal songs, but they put their name on songs mostly
created by other people, and many people got offers to write with one beach boy or another, and usually not much credit dribbles down.
some not too much.

Richie Podolor told me he walked away from one of those types of offers, a guy named Stan made an offer to me like that in the eighties from their crowd,     
What Makes   "that's why God made the radio" different, is the people involved have historic ties to the mafia.

But you're right there is plenty to talk about besides that, but no reason to sweep it under the rug or minimize it, it is what it is, and it kind of
confirms my feelings, about this "who the hell is this Joe Thomas guy, now I know. Kind of the reincarnation of Don Kirshner or something. that
guy Anthony Scotti, if you read that link, he says he is the son of Lucky Luciano! and he is proud of it, he says his father (Luciano) saved the United
States, he also says there is no such thing as the mob. no foolin that's what the guy said.


This may tarnish the album somewhat, and call into question the judgement of some of these decision making people around the Beach
Boys, but still it is their fiftieth, and by God, they are doing a new album, that supposedly sounds like Beach Boys circa 1965, I'd say that
trumps even the mob,though I wonder how the PBS crowd will react to this mob connection with the Beach Boys



 


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 01, 2012, 04:21:25 AM
Why ?

$

Or perhaps

$

+

….._\____________________,,__
…./ `–│││││││││———————-_]
…/_==o ____________________
…..),—.(_(__) /
….// (\) ),——
…//___//
../`—-’ / …
./____ / … .
TWGMTR is an offer the BBs cannot refuse.... 8)


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 04:26:52 AM
I think that is part of Brian Wilson's talent, taking a 3/4 written song, and making it his own
adding a bridge or whatever.

Paul McCartney added the Woke up got out of bed, to a basically complete Lennon song,  that
was great already, and just raised it to another level.

I have a co writer once in awhile, who writes just the bridge or embellishes 15% of the song, and
makes it twice as good.

That's a talent to take a raw song, write a bridge or verse or whatever it might be, and elevate it.

George Harrison after five years out of the studio, used the very obscure Rudy Clark song "got my mind
set on you" with a new totally different arrangement, the song skyrocketed to number one, restoring Mr
Harrison to the "A" list overnight.

Harry Nilsson wrote a lot of hit songs, One is the loneliest number for Three Dog Night, but his breakout hit
as an artist was written by Pete Ham "Cant Live if living is without you....



Sometimes reaching out for one or two outside songs, is a good idea, and finding one you can add a part to
is a legitimate method.. Hell Wilson finished a hundred year old, half done Gershwin tune recently, did he not?


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 04:32:27 AM
Since I am a real sleuth, I did my homework. This is the songwriting team behind That's Why God Made The Radio:

(http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/_News/_SLIDESHOWS/Entourage%20Jobs/Brian-Wilson-Eugene-Landy-Entourage-Jobs-CNBC.jpg)


I wouldn't be surprised if Gene Landy, was friendly with some of those people. If I ever meet his son Evan again
I'll ask him,


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 04:39:41 AM
*ssshhh... the Beach Boys need a new hit... you know whom to contact here, Don?*

(http://www.abc.es/Media/201105/05/padrino--644x362.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 01, 2012, 04:40:16 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 05:05:34 AM
well now i'm gonna hate this song dang it.  i just want them to hype something else up please.  i wonder how old this tune is anyway.  at least 2009 i think


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 05:25:11 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.

Hope you aren't addressing me here, Paulos. I'm just poking fun at the whole matter...  :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 01, 2012, 06:06:18 AM
Soulful ol man sunshine is moslty a Rick Henn composition/production/arrangement. That doesn't seem to bother people on this board.



Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 01, 2012, 06:07:47 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.

Hope you aren't addressing me here, Paulos. I'm just poking fun at the whole matter...  :smokin

Not you Don, responding to Vintagemusic's rambling, no offence intended and your post was funny!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 01, 2012, 06:09:37 AM
Soulful ol man sunshine is moslty a Rick Henn composition/production/arrangement. That doesn't seem to bother people on this board.



That's it, I'm never listening to that song ever again as it isn't a genuine Brian production. Also, I heard that Rick Henn once ate out at a pizzeria that a mob guy had once been in.


Title: Re: \
Post by: the captain on April 01, 2012, 06:14:18 AM
Other than being a disappointment from a "perfect ending to the story" kind of perspective....

And Summer In Paradise was?  :lol
Haha, obviously not. And that's kind of my point. I understand that people are disappointed, but I think it is largely because everyone has been hoping that this would be the perfect ending after all these years of lawsuits, bad albums, multiple touring acts, etc. Finally, it seemed that what was too good to be true might indeed be true: everyone coming together and putting together something great. Storybook. And so when reality creeps in, it's unfortunate.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:12:23 AM
Soulful ol man sunshine is moslty a Rick Henn composition/production/arrangement. That doesn't seem to bother people on this board.



Spot on. And no one ever, IIRC, found 'Breakaway' so-so for the co-writing by one Reggie Dunbar.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:13:29 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.

Hope you aren't addressing me here, Paulos. I'm just poking fun at the whole matter...  :smokin

Not you Don, responding to Vintagemusic's rambling, no offence intended and your post was funny!

Really appreciated, and no need to say sorry. It was just that some posts were between Vintagemusic's piece and yours, I guess.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 01, 2012, 07:34:40 AM
People are reading too deep into nothing. The band has always worked with outside collaborators. Some sketchier than others, but sketchy folks nonetheless. I doubt these alleged mobsters were gonna break Brian's knuckles with a pair of pliers if the band didn't work with them.

I heard that in the mid-60s they worked with some pretentious goofy fool who took drugs with Brian. Now THAT is the kind of influence that is unneeded.

It's not like it's gonna be their first hit single written by somebody outside the band. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Grj7sjQ0_p4


No Hypehat, it is not much ado about nothing. These people are a part of the mafia, and the Beach Boys are choosing to use
a song, (the single) or perhaps multiple songs, from these people.

This is significant. However, it is hardly unusual in the music business, this case is somewhat extreme in that, many qualified people
with no connection to the mob so far as I know were available for songwriting or production help. Van Dyke Parks, Russ Titleman, Phil Ramone
Rick Rubin, Jack Douglas, or whoever, just using those people as examples.

They could have gotten a song off of Neil Diamond, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Jackie Deshannon, Tom Petty, Jeff  Lynne,Jackson brown
Cat Stevens, Don Mclean, Van Dyke Parks, Leo Sayer, Van Morrison, Don Mclean, Adam Marsland, Jewell, Sheryl Crow, Lucinda Williams

Or a gazzillion other people, if they needed a song, but its significant they found an outside tune to be a hit, from some people with a deep
and long history with the mob people.

No one would really argue it was no big deal the Beach Boys used a Charlie Manson song on the b side of a single, That's grotesque

The Beach Boys, have a reputation going back to the sixties, where they don't outright steal songs, but they put their name on songs mostly
created by other people, and many people got offers to write with one beach boy or another, and usually not much credit dribbles down.
some not too much.

Richie Podolor told me he walked away from one of those types of offers, a guy named Stan made an offer to me like that in the eighties from their crowd,     
What Makes   "that's why God made the radio" different, is the people involved have historic ties to the mafia.

But you're right there is plenty to talk about besides that, but no reason to sweep it under the rug or minimize it, it is what it is, and it kind of
confirms my feelings, about this "who the hell is this Joe Thomas guy, now I know. Kind of the reincarnation of Don Kirshner or something. that
guy Anthony Scotti, if you read that link, he says he is the son of Lucky Luciano! and he is proud of it, he says his father (Luciano) saved the United
States, he also says there is no such thing as the mob. no foolin that's what the guy said.


This may tarnish the album somewhat, and call into question the judgement of some of these decision making people around the Beach
Boys, but still it is their fiftieth, and by God, they are doing a new album, that supposedly sounds like Beach Boys circa 1965, I'd say that
trumps even the mob,though I wonder how the PBS crowd will react to this mob connection with the Beach Boys



 

The record business was one bunch of guys runinning the record and publishing companies and another bunch of guys running promotion and distribution. There was, of course, some cross pollination. So, what?

























Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 01, 2012, 07:35:27 AM
How has Phil Cohen hacked into so many people's accounts?  Seems like half of the board, even the anti-PhilCohen himself (perhaps especially him), has taken on the Eeyore-like pessimism of Phil Cohen.  "Doesn't look good for the album."  "I hate that God/Radio song now."  "We've been mislead."  "The Beach Boys are in bed with the Cosa Nostra - how is PBS going to react to that?"  

And all without hearing so much as one note.  Amazing.












Pretty funny, though.   :lol  


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 01, 2012, 07:42:48 AM
How has Phil Cohen hacked into so many people's accounts?  Seems like half of the board, even the anti-PhilCohen himself (perhaps especially him), has taken on the Eeyore-like pessimism of Phil Cohen.  "Doesn't look good for the album."  "I hate that God/Radio song now."  "We've been mislead."  "The Beach Boys are in bed with the Cosa Nostra - how is PBS going to react to that?"  

And all without hearing so much as one note.  Amazing.













Pretty funny, though.   :lol  

Good theory.

PC is dangerously infectious. Were he a Congressman, WW III would be a distinct possibiliity.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 01, 2012, 07:54:25 AM
I think I missed out on something


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 01, 2012, 08:15:40 AM
How has Phil Cohen hacked into so many people's accounts?  Seems like half of the board, even the anti-PhilCohen himself (perhaps especially him), has taken on the Eeyore-like pessimism of Phil Cohen.  "Doesn't look good for the album."  "I hate that God/Radio song now."  "We've been mislead."  "The Beach Boys are in bed with the Cosa Nostra - how is PBS going to react to that?" 

And all without hearing so much as one note.  Amazing.
















Pretty funny, though.   :lol 

Well it's mostly 2 or 3 people---posting over and over and over


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 01, 2012, 08:22:57 AM
Going to buy the album no matter what, this year is awesome with a new album and tour.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 01, 2012, 08:35:59 AM
AAAAAAAAAAAAPRIL  FOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!! 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 08:52:58 AM
I guess we should have realized when brian wasnt sure which song it was when mike mentioned it.  I just wish thry eould plug a song they wrote.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 01, 2012, 09:28:15 AM
Although, it must be said, it is sad that the standout track on the last Beach Boys album did not originate with Brian.

ITS NOT NECESSARILY THE LAST BEACH BOYS ALBUM.


That is all. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 01, 2012, 09:37:59 AM
How has Phil Cohen hacked into so many people's accounts?  Seems like half of the board, even the anti-PhilCohen himself (perhaps especially him), has taken on the Eeyore-like pessimism of Phil Cohen.  "Doesn't look good for the album."  "I hate that God/Radio song now."  "We've been mislead."  "The Beach Boys are in bed with the Cosa Nostra - how is PBS going to react to that?"  

And all without hearing so much as one note.  Amazing.












Pretty funny, though.   :lol  

I agree!  People are such pussies. 

From now on, I'm only going to listen to Brian Wilson songs if he's sitting in my living room and actually writes it while he's singing it.  That way I know there's no funny business going on.

It's like that Gosh Darn "God Only Knows', Brian didn't even write it!  HORRIBLE SONG I can't stand that sh*t. 

Or "I Can Hear Music".  Completely unlistenable tripe.  Not only did the Beach Boys not write it, another band actually recorded it.  And it was CHICKS.  The Beach Boys Stole That Song! 

Or what's that other one everybody always goes on about, "Love And Mercy" my ass!  Brian Wilson didn't even produce it!  That's not a Brian Wilson song, it's bullshit.  I refuse to listen. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 10:20:22 AM
How has Phil Cohen hacked into so many people's accounts?  Seems like half of the board, even the anti-PhilCohen himself (perhaps especially him), has taken on the Eeyore-like pessimism of Phil Cohen.  "Doesn't look good for the album."  "I hate that God/Radio song now."  "We've been mislead."  "The Beach Boys are in bed with the Cosa Nostra - how is PBS going to react to that?"  

And all without hearing so much as one note.  Amazing.












Pretty funny, though.   :lol  

I agree!  People are such pussies.  

From now on, I'm only going to listen to Brian Wilson songs if he's sitting in my living room and actually writes it while he's singing it.  That way I know there's no funny business going on.

It's like that Gosh Darn "God Only Knows', Brian didn't even write it!  HORRIBLE SONG I can't stand that sh*t.  

Or "I Can Hear Music".  Completely unlistenable tripe.  Not only did the Beach Boys not write it, another band actually recorded it.  And it was CHICKS.  The Beach Boys Stole That Song!  

Or what's that other one everybody always goes on about, "Love And Mercy" my ass!  Brian Wilson didn't even produce it!  That's not a Brian Wilson song, it's bullsh*t.  I refuse to listen.  

Oh shutout uuuup.  I don't think it's out of line for people to be annoyed that the song thats been hyped up wasn't even written by the band.  I don't listen to them because they play other people's songs well. And obviously it's totally fine that they're doing a song that someone wrote for them, but talk about the songs that y'all wrote at least


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wrightfan on April 01, 2012, 10:34:18 AM
I guess Brian wrote Sloop John B too  :lol

As long as it sounds good with those Beach Boys harmonies, it won't matter. Plus, we'll have a ton of Brian songs regardless.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 11:25:17 AM
I guess Brian wrote Sloop John B too  :lol

As long as it sounds good with those Beach Boys harmonies, it won't matter. Plus, we'll have a ton of Brian songs regardless.

sloop john b is definitely the song everyone talks about when they talk about pet sounds  ::)
not that sloop john b counts either, it's a traditional song arranged by brian.  This is a song written by joe thomas.  JOE THOMAS. 

and i know we'll have i'd say 4 brian songs?  talk about those!  i don't get why certain fans put beach boy versions of songs on the same level as songs written by the band


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 01, 2012, 11:53:06 AM
at least the song wasn't written by Joe Momma


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 12:03:08 PM
(http://blog.memorialcreek.argtulsa.com/files/2010/08/JM_Reverse_Logo.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 01, 2012, 12:10:46 PM
sloop john b is definitely the song everyone talks about when they talk about pet sounds  ::)


Why wouldn't it be?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 12:22:15 PM
sloop john b is definitely the song everyone talks about when they talk about pet sounds  ::)


Why wouldn't it be?

wouldn't it be nice and god only knows? perhaps? i mean just maybe those songs are discussed more.  I'd like to state again i have no problem with them doing a song written by someone else for them, but it being the song that we've been hearing a lot about is a bummer, especially when it's coming from a guy who somehow made brian wilson's music very very dull.


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on April 01, 2012, 12:52:03 PM
Although, it must be said, it is sad that the standout track on the last Beach Boys album did not originate with Brian.

Y'know, it could be that Brian thought of that title and maybe even a hook to go with it, then Joe Thomas took it to Jim Peterik and that Larry guy, and together they wrote the majority of the song around the title & the hook, and recorded a demo with that Joe Vana guys singing backgrounds.  Then it eventually came back to Brian, who added his production touch and vocal harmonies for The Beach Boys to sing.  Wouldn't be the first time something along those lines has happened.  I'm sure we'll hear more about the song's history when it's released.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 01, 2012, 01:10:14 PM
Y'know, it could be that Brian thought of that title and maybe even a hook to go with it, then Joe Thomas took it to Jim Peterik and that Larry guy, and together they wrote the majority of the song around the title & the hook, and recorded a demo with that Joe Vana guys singing backgrounds.  Then it eventually came back to Brian, who added his production touch and vocal harmonies for The Beach Boys to sing.  Wouldn't be the first time something along those lines has happened.  I'm sure we'll hear more about the song's history when it's released.

Anyone we know doing the recording notes for the CD booklet? ? ? ?

 ::)


Title: Re:
Post by: c-man on April 01, 2012, 01:15:11 PM
Y'know, it could be that Brian thought of that title and maybe even a hook to go with it, then Joe Thomas took it to Jim Peterik and that Larry guy, and together they wrote the majority of the song around the title & the hook, and recorded a demo with that Joe Vana guys singing backgrounds.  Then it eventually came back to Brian, who added his production touch and vocal harmonies for The Beach Boys to sing.  Wouldn't be the first time something along those lines has happened.  I'm sure we'll hear more about the song's history when it's released.

Anyone we know doing the recording notes for the CD booklet? ? ? ?

 ::)

Ha!  Wouldn't THAT be nice?  :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 01:38:03 PM
Although, it must be said, it is sad that the standout track on the last Beach Boys album did not originate with Brian.

Y'know, it could be that Brian thought of that title and maybe even a hook to go with it, then Joe Thomas took it to Jim Peterik and that Larry guy, and together they wrote the majority of the song around the title & the hook, and recorded a demo with that Joe Vana guys singing backgrounds.  Then it eventually came back to Brian, who added his production touch and vocal harmonies for The Beach Boys to sing.  Wouldn't be the first time something along those lines has happened.  I'm sure we'll hear more about the song's history when it's released.

Good point. Other songs where that's been the case (off the top of my head) include "No Wrong Notes in Heaven" by Scotty and BW and "Miracle" by Carnie and Wendy and BW (and a lot of other people).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 01:58:54 PM
one could hope but yeah.


Title: Re: \
Post by: adamghost on April 01, 2012, 02:20:05 PM
I've heard absolutely nothing from the album, but I have heard two or three people who have heard stuff single out this particular song for praise, from "cool" to "really good."

I do think concern over Joe Thomas' production style and influence is totally understandable and not out of line.  If you weren't into the IMAGINATION approach there's no particular reason to assume this one's going to be much different.  Not so sure about the mob thing though.  I do remember growing up on the east coast that they were still involved in a lot of the clubs out there well into the '80s (the Scotti Bothers heydey), but I haven't heard or seen much evidence of significant mafia influence in the industry since.  But then, I may not be in a position to see such things, being positioned fairly low on the ladder so to speak.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 02:37:05 PM
I do think concern over Joe Thomas' production style and influence is totally understandable and not out of line.  If you weren't into the IMAGINATION approach there's no particular reason to assume this one's going to be much different.

Joe's involvement is still unclear. He's involved in some way, but whether it's as a co-producer, executive producer, TV guy or what isn't confirmed one way or another. He's clearly worked on some of the songs being used on the album, and Brian did record with him in Illinois at one point last year, but beyond that everything is murky. Brian's band is also involved, so who knows.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM
I hear the new album may be titled "Songs For Pussies and Pizza Parlors"


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 01, 2012, 03:32:58 PM
I hear the new album may be titled "Songs For Pussies and Pizza Parlors"

I think they'd be able to sell a ton of copies based on that title alone.


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 04:21:50 PM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts,  now he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out


Title: Re: \
Post by: adamghost on April 01, 2012, 04:45:26 PM
Ironically, the mob probably gave its artists a fairer shake than a lot of labels did...the music industry attracts lots of unsavory types.  Read up on a guy named Stan Polley...that story will make your hair curl.  I actually prefer some of the sharks (not Polley though, Christ, someone should have put a bullet through his head) to some of the folks I've observed down at the bottom -- not talking Beach Boys specifically here, just a general observation.  The sharks are out to make money, whereas the hangers-on are trying to leech money and reflected glory.  You can chart the career of many successful bands by their ratio of the hanger-on types to actual competent people that got the work done.

Although come to think of it, I think Polley may have had mob ties too.  Kind of shoots a hole in my own argument.  Oh well.  It's amazing good music gets out there, some how, some way.  There are plenty of obstacles to it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on April 01, 2012, 04:53:05 PM
I hear the new album may be titled "Songs For Pussies and Pizza Parlors"

Actually, I heard it was going to be called "Goodbye Surfing, Hello To My Little Friend"


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 05:21:21 PM
Ironically, the mob probably gave its artists a fairer shake than a lot of labels did...the music industry attracts lots of unsavory types.  Read up on a guy named Stan Polley...that story will make your hair curl.  I actually prefer some of the sharks (not Polley though, Christ, someone should have put a bullet through his head) to some of the folks I've observed down at the bottom -- not talking Beach Boys specifically here, just a general observation.  The sharks are out to make money, whereas the hangers-on are trying to leech money and reflected glory.  You can chart the career of many successful bands by their ratio of the hanger-on types to actual competent people that got the work done.

Although come to think of it, I think Polley may have had mob ties too.  Kind of shoots a hole in my own argument.  Oh well.  It's amazing good music gets out there, some how, some way.  There are plenty of obstacles to it.


It's always been a crooked business. Yes certainly the mob probably helped some people have careers. I don't know of Polly, but
I have seen a gazillion suits, some are cool, some are not, and there are all kinds or were, of different types of mobs and what not.


Look at the state of the music business now, I sort of liked the old system, at least it functioned. Artists were groomed, they grew
Some people got signed and groomed who didn't deserve it, some didn't get signed who did deserve it. People got cheated, at least
we had a functioning music business, I don't even understand how it works now. There doesn't seem to be a center, where things
spring from. It's all very haphazard now. Something will emerge from this chaos,

The World needs a good hit single from the Beach Boys, regardless of who wrote the tune, I really believe it's a good thing for the world
, Karma, and hopefully a nudge that might point the music business back into the right direction. The world could use a few new rock stars
who have the talent and live up to the hype. I don't know if Jack White and Lady Ga Ga, are deserving of the mantle, of this generations
rock stars,

Sigh new Beach Boy album featuring Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce, Carl and David, in 2012, what the heck could be better than that, I just hope
they deliver the goods, and turn in a really fine album. On some level it will be good for the planet, music influences culture as much as
culture influences music. At least I think so.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Don_Zabu on April 01, 2012, 05:32:51 PM
I just hope there are more Brian/Mike songs on the album than not.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on April 01, 2012, 05:43:40 PM
Ahhh The Beach Boys story never gets dull!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 01, 2012, 05:59:26 PM
The musical term 'hit' has taken on a whole new context after reading the last few pages of this thread!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 01, 2012, 06:02:33 PM
Wow, quite the turn this thread has taken!  

I don't particularly care about the mob thing, and the fact that the song seemingly wasn't written by any of the Beach Boys isn't a big deal in and of itself.  I'm just hoping that Brian and Mike have come up with some equally good tracks.  The pre-album hype thus far as pointed to "That's Why God Made the Radio" being the best of the bunch, and it would obviously be disappointing if the best track on a Beach Boys album was something that none of them had a hand in writing.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 01, 2012, 06:47:34 PM
Brian has worked with Joe Thomas and Jim Peternik in the past, so I don't get why the "mob links" would be a problem now. Frank Sinatra was rumored to work with the mob back in the day and he is an american icon.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 01, 2012, 06:51:35 PM
I just hope there are more Brian/Mike songs on the album than not.

i wonder how many we'll get.  3 from them two?  then maybe 2 more brian with others


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 06:58:59 PM
I just hope there are more Brian/Mike songs on the album than not.

i wonder how many we'll get.  3 from them two?  then maybe 2 more brian with others

I bet it'll break down like this: 12 songs, 8-9 BW co-writes, 3-4 of those with Mike. One song from Al, one song from Dave, one song from Bruce.

Something like that.


Title: Re: \
Post by: vintagemusic on April 01, 2012, 08:12:39 PM
Brian has worked with Joe Thomas and Jim Peternik in the past, so I don't get why the "mob links" would be a problem now. Frank Sinatra was rumored to work with the mob back in the day and he is an American icon.


Because when the link to Scotti Brothers, and all those music biz mobsters, became apparent to me, is when I mentioned it.
And I spoke about it at some length.

I hope wirestone is right in his prediction, or hope, 8-9 Brian Wilson co-writes, 3-4 with Love. One From Jardine
One From Johnston, something along those lines.

If "That's why God made the radio" sounds great, that will go a long, long way towards squashing any of the
backround people involved. If the record sounds like an assembly line hack job, by Old Scotti Brothers type people
then I think people will say, why didn't they call Carol King or Rick Rubin or Jackie Deshannon, or people they could
trust if they needed an outside song..

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Carol Bayer Sager or someone help on She Says that She needs me. We have the
much earlier Beach Boy track, with the melody and basic idea cut years before Joe Thomas ever worked with Wilson
so why is Thomas credited as a co writer on that song, what did he do? add the word "the" or some trivial thing, Thomas
is listed as a writer on that song right? Except for some of the lyrics, the Beach Boy demo has 80% of that song locked.


If the song is a great single, and Capitol uses all their expertise and muscle to push it, and they can get it on radio, and keep
doing TV and going on tour, it could be a monster hit, if it's good. We shall see. the $64 dollar question, will be answered soon.


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 01, 2012, 08:42:15 PM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts,  now he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out

Wait...the guy's name is PAULOS...not 'Paco' or 'Taco'. I sincerely hope you didn't choose those two words for the reason it seems like to me...


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 01, 2012, 08:45:29 PM
Quote
We have the
much earlier Beach Boy track, with the melody and basic idea cut years before Joe Thomas ever worked with Wilson
so why is Thomas credited as a co writer on that song, what did he do? add the word "the" or some trivial thing, Thomas
is listed as a writer on that song right? Except for some of the lyrics, the Beach Boy demo has 80% of that song locked.

Thomas wrote the horrible instrumental solo section.


Title: Re:
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 08:57:24 PM
Quote
We have the
much earlier Beach Boy track, with the melody and basic idea cut years before Joe Thomas ever worked with Wilson
so why is Thomas credited as a co writer on that song, what did he do? add the word "the" or some trivial thing, Thomas
is listed as a writer on that song right? Except for some of the lyrics, the Beach Boy demo has 80% of that song locked.

Thomas wrote the horrible instrumental solo section.

Joe is not listed as a co-writer on the song. BMI (and the CD booklet) credit it to Wilson / Titelman / Bayer Sager

http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&keyID=4446603&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID

And the horn section in the song is arranged by Brian.

Q: And that clarinet section in the middle of "She Says That She Needs Me," I love that. Is that your arrangement?

A: Oh yeah, that was me. He (talking about the clarinet player/section leader, I think. Or Joe Thomas? Who knows?) took it down verbatim and did it right there.

http://www.peteramescarlin.com/node/194


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 01, 2012, 09:02:43 PM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 01, 2012, 10:28:32 PM
Was referring to the keyboard part, which sounds more like a Joe Thomas kinda trip.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 01, 2012, 10:35:02 PM
Was referring to the keyboard part, which sounds more like a Joe Thomas kinda trip.

Not denying there's cheese in there!


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 12:07:18 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.


Title: Re:
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 01:12:19 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts,  now he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out

Wait...the guy's name is PAULOS...not 'Paco' or 'Taco'. I sincerely hope you didn't choose those two words for the reason it seems like to me...

I think he might be trying to be insulting towards hispanic people, not realising I'm a white English guy! If he is then he should be banned for attempting to incite racial hatred. I loved the 'I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional' - all I said that was he was getting upset and boring everyone, how does that translate as calling someone delusional? Oh and as for the 'offensive little man' comment I am 6ft 1 so not really so little. Also, you are the most boring poster on any board ever, but I am grateful for your helping my insomnia.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 01:29:15 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

We need EarCandy to ease the tension around here.


Title: Re:
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 03:39:07 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

We need EarCandy to ease the tension around here.
Thats what me and hypehat want as well.


Title: Re:
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 03:46:49 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

We need EarCandy to ease the tension around here.
Thats what me and hypehat want as well.

I want EarCandy to photoshop me roundhouse kicking Vintagemusic into a woodchipper whilst Don Corleone looks on.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 02, 2012, 03:55:43 AM
No you won't, Vintage is under my protection. Any more of your threats and you'll be pushing up the daisies, wearing a concrete overcoat as you sleep with the fishes.

Capiche?


Title: Re:
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 03:56:15 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

We need EarCandy to ease the tension around here.
Thats what me and hypehat want as well.

I want EarCandy to photoshop me roundhouse kicking Vintagemusic into a woodchipper whilst Don Corleone looks on.

 :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 03:57:26 AM
No you won't, Vintage is under my protection. Any more of your threats and you'll be pushing up the daisies, wearing a concrete overcoat as you sleep with the fishes.

Capiche?

You Are The Son Of Phil Cohen And I Claim My $ 640,000,000 Right Now!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 02, 2012, 03:58:11 AM
Argghhh, it's the Don!


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 03:59:42 AM
I need a favor from the Don.... :hat


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 04:02:09 AM
No you won't, Vintage is under my protection. Any more of your threats and you'll be pushing up the daisies, wearing a concrete overcoat as you sleep with the fishes.

Capiche?

So i'll be thrown into a body of water encased in concrete and somehow at the same time also buried in a place where daisies grow, man I'm good but not that good!  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 04:05:21 AM
No you won't, Vintage is under my protection. Any more of your threats and you'll be pushing up the daisies, wearing a concrete overcoat as you sleep with the fishes.

Capiche?

You Are The Son Of Phil Cohen And I Claim My $ 640,000,000 Right Now!
Can I have a record deal from Heartical Don Records?


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 02, 2012, 04:26:07 AM
(http://www.wildsound-filmmaking-feedback-events.com/images/goodfellas_ray_liotta.jpg)

As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to write for The Beach Boys....


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 04:31:27 AM
(http://www.wildsound-filmmaking-feedback-events.com/images/goodfellas_ray_liotta.jpg)

As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to write for The Beach Boys....


Brilliant!  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 04:33:17 AM
No you won't, Vintage is under my protection. Any more of your threats and you'll be pushing up the daisies, wearing a concrete overcoat as you sleep with the fishes.

Capiche?

You Are The Son Of Phil Cohen And I Claim My $ 640,000,000 Right Now!
Can I have a record deal from Heartical Don Records?

 :lol I must admit that it makes for a terrific vinyl label name... must TM it!


Title: Re: \
Post by: J.G. Dev on April 02, 2012, 04:41:21 AM
I for one am not concerend in the least of our heroes getting involved w/ mobsters. The minute one of them tries any funny business, Bruce will pistol whip them back to Chicago faster than you can say Deirdre. And as if that wouldn't be enough, Brian just might bust out some of his karate moves that he pulled on Elvis, for good measure.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 02, 2012, 05:00:23 AM
The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

Wait...you're saying that if someone doesn't care or doesn't believe that The Beach Boys are tied in with the mob, then that person is inclined to ignore cries of help from a neighbor, calling them thoughtless A Holes instead of calling 911?  Funny stuff.    

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts,  now he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat

So, because I was making light of some posters who have now dismissed a song that, by all accounts of some folks who have heard it, is great...sounds like a hit, even today...cool... really good, without hearing a single note, I am cruel?  Cruel?  Really?  So if I'm cruel, then what's this?

"Paco speaks for everybody!"

"I don't like it Taco"

Unbelievable.  And not funny.  At all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

Bullsh*t.

Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

You haven't heard one note of the song yet!

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!

Now you're calling the new Beach Boys album 'mostly authentic' because there is a song written (or co-written) by someone other than a Beach Boy?  You might want to check the credits on every Beach Boys album ever released, because you'll find that a great majority included a song written or co-written by someone other than a Beach Boy.

Far Out

Quite.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 05:04:34 AM
I for one am not concerend in the least of our heroes getting involved w/ mobsters. The minute one of them tries any funny business, Bruce will pistol whip them back to Chicago faster than you can say Deirdre. And as if that wouldn't be enough, Brian just might bust out some of his karate moves that he pulled on Elvis, for good measure.
Great first post. :lol


Title: Re:
Post by: vintagemusic on April 02, 2012, 06:08:39 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts, NOW he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out

Wait...the guy's name is PAULOS...not 'Paco' or 'Taco'. I sincerely hope you didn't choose those two words for the reason it seems like to me...

I think he might be trying to be insulting towards hispanic people, not realising I'm a white English guy! If he is then he should be banned for attempting to incite racial hatred. I loved the 'I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional' - all I said that was he was getting upset and boring everyone, how does that translate as calling someone delusional? Oh and as for the 'offensive little man' comment I am 6ft 1 so not really so little. Also, you are the most boring poster on any board ever, but I am grateful for your helping my insomnia.




No in fact I lived in Mexico, married a Spanish girl,   have nothing against Latin American people. Just you, when I say you are a little man
I don't refer to your height or weight, but the puny value of your soul. You're a cyber bully who laid in wait to pounce and insult me with
a bunch of false remarks, you said you spoke for everyone else here, which is a huge ego trip on your part,  you said what I had to say
was uninteresting, and everyone agreed with you, you are small minded and worse still, a huge egomaniac, essentially telling me my views
or posts are worthless, an irritation, a waste of time, and you speak for all like some magnanimous host, trying to apologize to the membership
as you cuttingly demean me, while you act like you aren't doing that very thing. The reason I mispronounced your name isn't because I dislike
people of color or hispanics, it's because arrogant jerkoffs like you, I don't bother to remember your name, I try and forget you, and demean you
as you tried to do to me, for no reason whatsoever.. I've actually been in a room with the mobsters I spoke of, and some of the Beach Boys
whom I consider decent folks, and I was saddened, from personal experience I know some of those people mentored by the Scotti brothers
are the dregs of the earth, and I lamented the fact, and pointed it out to those who might be interested... I also dislike those barf bags for any
part they played in harming the career and life of my pal Leif Garrett from school, who was a nice kid before he got involved with the Scotti's

Maybe I am boring, and long winded, I thought I had some worthwhile interesting things to contribute here, but there are quite a few of you
younger, know nothing about music guys, who always attack with the knife and fork, like you can only get your sustenance at the expense of
putting someone like me down.  I misspoke your name because I was trying to tell you to shove it, drop dead, go back to pulling the wings off
butterflies, don't speak for the entire membership about me, and don't demean me in some cowardly English backhanded way, like you belong
to the upper crust and just insulted the janitor at your squash club, go watch a film about all the English royalty that wanted to side with Hitler
or go read Neville Chamberlains speech about the Sudetenland, go meet your boyfriend for tea, but don't tell me you weren't insulting me

Your attempt to censor anyone who doesn't fit your profile is a lot more common at places like Steve Hoffman, don't bring that poison attitude over
here. So you didn't like what I had to say. Didint think it had merit. I don't think countries in the developed world in the 21st century, should
have a billion dollar a year royal family like the British equivalent of a theme park or night time soap. I insulted you because you insulted me
it's just that simple, then you simper and say   you didn't do a thing.

Of all the people in the music business, all the hall of famers, A Lister's and super talents, I was surprised and caught off guard, that the Beach
Boys were working with people that were mentored by the mob. Maybe you should head a department here that checks credentials and bloodlines
for membership, and censors posts before they are allowed to be read by the general membership, Jesus you are an ass


I still hear the phonetics of the song title as something more akin to a country song, I am dying to hear it, the whole album in fact, Culturally
they had a big impact on my generation growing up in Los Angeles, Musically I admire them and have been influenced by them, like any other
pop musician, and To think they have an album, which reminds people of Beach Boys circa 1965 is just stunning, I am hoping for two great songs
as good as California Girls, or God Only Knows, I hope they really turn in a masterpiece as their swansong, I am really rooting for them.




Title: Re:
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 06:28:44 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts, NOW he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out

Wait...the guy's name is PAULOS...not 'Paco' or 'Taco'. I sincerely hope you didn't choose those two words for the reason it seems like to me...

I think he might be trying to be insulting towards hispanic people, not realising I'm a white English guy! If he is then he should be banned for attempting to incite racial hatred. I loved the 'I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional' - all I said that was he was getting upset and boring everyone, how does that translate as calling someone delusional? Oh and as for the 'offensive little man' comment I am 6ft 1 so not really so little. Also, you are the most boring poster on any board ever, but I am grateful for your helping my insomnia.




No in fact I lived in Mexico, married a Spanish girl,   have nothing against Latin American people. Just you, when I say you are a little man
I don't refer to your height or weight, but the puny value of your soul. You're a cyber bully who laid in wait to pounce and insult me with
a bunch of false remarks, you said you spoke for everyone else here, which is a huge ego trip on your part,  you said what I had to say
was uninteresting, and everyone agreed with you, you are small minded and worse still, a huge egomaniac, essentially telling me my views
or posts are worthless, an irritation, a waste of time, and you speak for all like some magnanimous host, trying to apologize to the membership
as you cuttingly demean me, while you act like you aren't doing that very thing. The reason I mispronounced your name isn't because I dislike
people of color or hispanics, it's because arrogant jerkoffs like you, I don't bother to remember your name, I try and forget you, and demean you
as you tried to do to me, for no reason whatsoever.. I've actually been in a room with the mobsters I spoke of, and some of the Beach Boys
whom I consider decent folks, and I was saddened, from personal experience I know some of those people mentored by the Scotti brothers
are the dregs of the earth, and I lamented the fact, and pointed it out to those who might be interested... I also dislike those barf bags for any
part they played in harming the career and life of my pal Leif Garrett from school, who was a nice kid before he got involved with the Scotti's

Maybe I am boring, and long winded, I thought I had some worthwhile interesting things to contribute here, but there are quite a few of you
younger, know nothing about music guys, who always attack with the knife and fork, like you can only get your sustenance at the expense of
putting someone like me down.  I misspoke your name because I was trying to tell you to shove it, drop dead, go back to pulling the wings off
butterflies, don't speak for the entire membership about me, and don't demean me in some cowardly English backhanded way, like you belong
to the upper crust and just insulted the janitor at your squash club, go watch a film about all the English royalty that wanted to side with Hitler
or go read Neville Chamberlains speech about the Sudetenland, go meet your boyfriend for tea, but don't tell me you weren't insulting me


Your attempt to censor anyone who doesn't fit your profile is a lot more common at places like Steve Hoffman, don't bring that poison attitude over
here. So you didn't like what I had to say. Didint think it had merit. I don't think countries in the developed world in the 21st century, should
have a billion dollar a year royal family like the British equivalent of a theme park or night time soap. I insulted you because you insulted me
it's just that simple, then you simper and say   you didn't do a thing.

Of all the people in the music business, all the hall of famers, A Lister's and super talents, I was surprised and caught off guard, that the Beach
Boys were working with people that were mentored by the mob. Maybe you should head a department here that checks credentials and bloodlines
for membership, and censors posts before they are allowed to be read by the general membership, Jesus you are an ass


I still hear the phonetics of the song title as something more akin to a country song, I am dying to hear it, the whole album in fact, Culturally
they had a big impact on my generation growing up in Los Angeles, Musically I admire them and have been influenced by them, like any other
pop musician, and To think they have an album, which reminds people of Beach Boys circa 1965 is just stunning, I am hoping for two great songs
as good as California Girls, or God Only Knows, I hope they really turn in a masterpiece as their swansong, I am really rooting for them.




So, in the part in bold you have wished death upon me, accused me of animal torure and made fatuous remarks about my sexuality. If we couple this along with the racist Paco/Taco comments and the Adolph remarks from a few weeks back this paints you in a very poor light, I feel sorry for you as you are clearly a delusional, morally questionable little oik.



Title: Re:
Post by: LostArt on April 02, 2012, 06:48:31 AM
clearly a delusional, morally questionable little oik.

Hmm, oik.  At 55 I'm still not too old to learn a new word.  Thanks.  For those who don't know:

"an obnoxious or unpleasant person; in weakened senses, a 'nit-wit', a 'clot'."


Title: Re:
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 06:51:09 AM
clearly a delusional, morally questionable little oik.

Hmm, oik.  At 55 I'm still not too old to learn a new word.  Thanks.  For those who don't know:

"an obnoxious or unpleasant person; in weakened senses, a 'nit-wit', a 'clot'."

Glad to be of service!


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 02, 2012, 07:27:30 AM
Boring bored reading this boring back n forth. I'd take Phil anyday over this bickering.

I love the word "oik" though.  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 07:48:32 AM
I cannot find anything on the internet to link the Scotti brothers to the mafia beside that one article where Tony claims he is Lucky's son.


Title: Re:
Post by: b00ts on April 02, 2012, 08:37:36 AM
You're the only person upset about this whole mob thing, here's an idea: get over it and stop boring everyone.


I could condense my remarks some. But whether I do or not, you're still going to endure the
rest of your life, as an offensive little man, who lays in wait on chatboards so you can pounce
on someone you perceive as weak. Or less than you.

The connections I pointed out, are quite interesting, maybe not to you, but then if you hear cries
of help from your neighbor's maybe you're inclined to say "thoughtless A Holes" instead of calling 911

I've spent my life in music, and I get sad when one of my heroic bands (the Beach Boys) step into business
with some hoods. But then Gene Landy might have been a hood of a different sort.

That must be a big weight on your shoulders to speak for the entire membership, "nobody cares"
a blanket "Paco speaks for everybody!"

and then the other guy who says "Phil Cohen is hacking into people's accounts, NOW he is a rude
cruel guy too, but at least he is funny!  cruel+ funny :police: :smokin :hat


Listen Eye of the Tiger was a hit, like an assembly line Journey type of music , no soul, just assembly line
that's bad enough, but when you throw in Scotti Brothers, and how it all ties in with "that's why God made the radio"
it's creepy

You know when I went into the Scotti brothers building on Sunset, I was just a kid, I was afraid they'd kill  us
and not let us out, they focused   attention on their mafia roots, they didn't hide it, they used it as a marketing
tool, while I was in the building, their A&R guy started talking about my health, these people are directly connected
to "That's why God Made the Radio". I felt it was an intersting story to discuss. That's all.

The Beach Boys are America's band, the same way people try and promote America's football team, or baseball team
that carries with it, a certain responsibility, to act a certain way. If you sing at Reagan's library, you shouldn't be involved
with mobsters., especially by choice.3

I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional, I just pointed
out a story, about the backround of the people who wrote "that's why god made the radio" and the songs connection
with the Beach Boys. Read the article from Anthony Scotti's own lips,

I'll try and condense my remarks here, and be brief, you try and watch how you attack me personally little man, with
your "I speak for everyone here" bulls^^t


Back to the song, I find the title reminds me of what I would typically hear  in a new Country type of song, and I have
trouble imagining, complex, lush layered Beach Boy harmonies over that title, but maybe it's great, I am anxious to
hear a lush beach boy vocal arrangement over what sounds to me like a country song title.

The Brian Wilson Christmas album sounded like authentic, vintage Brian Wilson production to me, therefore, I hope
this new album has at least some vintage BW production. Beach Boys 65 that's the description everyone keeps using
I tend to believe them. Why not? They would know.

Finally Adam, I don't know if the mob is still involved with record companies and clubs, I suspect they are, but who knows.
that guy Peternik (that's why god made the radio) could answer that question I presume. Or Joe Thomas maybe,

Bring on That's Why God Made The Radio, I am excited as hell about a new real, authentic (mostly) Beach Boy album!
Far Out

Wait...the guy's name is PAULOS...not 'Paco' or 'Taco'. I sincerely hope you didn't choose those two words for the reason it seems like to me...

I think he might be trying to be insulting towards hispanic people, not realising I'm a white English guy! If he is then he should be banned for attempting to incite racial hatred. I loved the 'I don't like it Taco, when a guy like you, tries to pick on me, inferring, my mind is sick or I am delusional' - all I said that was he was getting upset and boring everyone, how does that translate as calling someone delusional? Oh and as for the 'offensive little man' comment I am 6ft 1 so not really so little. Also, you are the most boring poster on any board ever, but I am grateful for your helping my insomnia.
Blah blahblah blah blah...
Vintagemusic, what makes you think that the rest of us want or need to read about how your feelings are hurt and how you are just dishing it right back? Most of us come on here as a leisure activity. We are thinking "hmm, I wonder what's up with The Beach Boys," not "I wonder if Vintagemusic is offended by relatively innocuous remarks."

Do you see a different thread title than the rest of us (perhaps "Vintagemusic overreaction thread?") If you need to communicate this to Paulos, why not PM him? Better yet, why not just take the criticism like a big boy? I mean, who really cares? It's a fucking messageboard.

Just because someone criticized your posts on a messageboard does not make them a) Hitler b) Neville Chamberlain c) Tony Soprano. It also does not mean that you need to criticize entire cultures and nations as a result. Life's too short.

As for the song, I am assuming that Brian has had some input, like others have stated upthread. To my best recollection, Brian is the producer of this new Beach Boys album, and Mike Love (and/or Joe Thomas) is executive producer. If Brian didn't have any input as a songwriter, he certainly had input as an arranger and producer. It will be interesting to hear the track.

However... I don't want to alarm anyone, but I hear that this Peterik guy who wrote "Eye of the Tiger" has some mob connections. Clearly this means that the mafia is funding the Beach Boys' new album and tour. We will see La Cosa Nostra banners and logos all over the place when we go to the reunion shows, and if we are not sufficiently enthusiastic at the shows, we may get our legs broken (after they ask us about our health). Are you all OK with this????


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 02, 2012, 09:09:09 AM
BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

That's funny! :-D

*ssshhh... the Beach Boys need a new hit... you know whom to contact here, Don?*


You know more than you tell, ... "DON"!!! ;D

man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune. 

There's a certain fan on this board that suddenly cared less about Meant for You once he knew Mike was singing lead instead of Brian. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but that's tone-deaf idiocy in my book.

I remember someone praising some BB tune for Brian's songwriting skills years ago (probably on the old SMiLE Shop board), and when someone else pointed out to him it wasn't Brian who wrote that particular song, the guy suddenly found that song he loved before not good anymore - even though not one bit changed in the recording. I can't understand that either.  BTW I don't like that title "TWGMTR" no matter who came up with it, but am curious what the track will be like, mafia or not.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 09:53:14 AM
BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it.

That's funny! :-D

*ssshhh... the Beach Boys need a new hit... you know whom to contact here, Don?*


You know more than you tell, ... "DON"!!! ;D

man that's a real bummer.  i suddenly care a lot less about the tune. 

There's a certain fan on this board that suddenly cared less about Meant for You once he knew Mike was singing lead instead of Brian. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but that's tone-deaf idiocy in my book.

I remember someone praising some BB tune for Brian's songwriting skills years ago (probably on the old SMiLE Shop board), and when someone else pointed out to him it wasn't Brian who wrote that particular song, the guy suddenly found that song he loved before not good anymore - even though not one bit changed in the recording. I can't understand that either.  BTW I don't like that title "TWGMTR" no matter who came up with it, but am curious what the track will be like, mafia or not.

Thanks for the flowers, Micha! And your third item is spot on.


Title: Re: \
Post by: coco1997 on April 02, 2012, 09:54:38 AM
Looks like vintagemusic is back with more of his stream of consciousness, run-on sentence, anger-filled ramblings. Here we go again.  ::)


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 02, 2012, 10:01:13 AM
Quote
So, in the part in bold you have wished death upon me, accused me of animal torure and made fatuous remarks about my sexuality. If we couple this along with the racist Paco/Taco comments and the Adolph remarks from a few weeks back this paints you in a very poor light,

I agree. When he thought you were hispanic he made the Paco/Taco comment, and now that he knows you're British he's making THESE comments? Uh-uh.

Vintage, consider this a final warning. You've done more than cross the line with your last few posts...you've set it on fire and then proceeded to sh*t all over that line. Hate speech will not be tolerated here. Period.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 10:17:37 AM
... I don't want to alarm anyone, but I hear that this Peterik guy who wrote "Eye of the Tiger" has some mob connections. Clearly this means that the mafia is funding the Beach Boys' new album and tour. We will see La Cosa Nostra banners and logos all over the place when we go to the reunion shows, and if we are not sufficiently enthusiastic at the shows, we may get our legs broken (after they ask us about our health). Are you all OK with this????

I'm glad the BBs aren't coming to Britain … getting shot at gigs is always a real downer.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 02, 2012, 10:37:45 AM
... I don't want to alarm anyone, but I hear that this Peterik guy who wrote "Eye of the Tiger" has some mob connections. Clearly this means that the mafia is funding the Beach Boys' new album and tour. We will see La Cosa Nostra banners and logos all over the place when we go to the reunion shows, and if we are not sufficiently enthusiastic at the shows, we may get our legs broken (after they ask us about our health). Are you all OK with this????

I'm glad the BBs aren't coming to Britain … getting shot at gigs is always a real downer.

Wouldn't even want to know what's in the cello and violin cases... and I'd hate to wake up in the Travel Inn near the RFH with a horse's head in my bed.

No, keep it clean with Al Jardine in the good old U.S.A., I say.


Title: Re:
Post by: SBonilla on April 02, 2012, 10:58:16 AM
Quote
So, in the part in bold you have wished death upon me, accused me of animal torure and made fatuous remarks about my sexuality. If we couple this along with the racist Paco/Taco comments and the Adolph remarks from a few weeks back this paints you in a very poor light,

I agree. When he thought you were hispanic he made the Paco/Taco comment, and now that he knows you're British he's making THESE comments? Uh-uh.

Vintage, consider this a final warning. You've done more than cross the line with your last few posts...you've set it on fire and then proceeded to sh*t all over that line. Hate speech will not be tolerated here. Period.
Thanks for that.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 02, 2012, 11:12:11 AM
What the hell is going on...

Is the song released?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 11:14:31 AM
What the hell is going on...

Is the song released?

No, the song has not yet been released, a thread derailment occurred but we are now back on track.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 11:20:35 AM
So wasnt it melinda that suggested joe thomas?  Maybe she had debts..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 02, 2012, 11:28:56 AM
What the hell is going on...

Is the song released?

No, the song has not yet been released, a thread derailment occurred but we are now back on track.

That's a hell of derailment

I saw over 170 replies and nearly fell of my chair


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 02, 2012, 11:36:52 AM
Brian wrote it? I like it a lot better now.

 :lol

BTW the title of the new album has been decided upon.

Return Of The Hit Men.

I like it
Number 1 with a bullet. I still like my "Songs For Pussies And Pizza Parlors", though. Less blatant, more esoteric. ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 02, 2012, 12:02:29 PM
It's funny how people always get so worked up and at each others' throats when a new release is on the horizon.

Never change, guys.


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 02, 2012, 12:08:27 PM
Is it safe to come back in yet?


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 02, 2012, 12:12:27 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jason on April 02, 2012, 12:40:11 PM
This is by far one of the stupidest fucking threads I've ever seen on this board, and DAMN, is there some competition. We're talking about a new single and we get into the fucking MOB? Seriously?

Most of you people don't deserve a Beach Boys reunion or new album.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 02, 2012, 12:50:21 PM
This is by far one of the stupidest f*cking threads I've ever seen on this board, and DAMN, is there some competition. We're talking about a new single and we get into the f*cking MOB? Seriously?

Most of you people don't deserve a Beach Boys reunion or new album.

Hey, I tried to tell him that no-one cared about any alledged mob connections but this had the unfortunate effect of kicking off a shitstorm or mentalness. I for one am really looking forward to new Beach Boys songs, regardless of who wrote them.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 12:55:07 PM
Hell, least we had fun with Mob jokes for a while during this crazy thread. ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 02, 2012, 01:03:32 PM
I have to say, I think the community -- also known, perhaps, as the "family" -- handled itself very well on this thread. Lots of silliness, but virtually no real meanness. I like it!


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 02, 2012, 01:20:33 PM
yous guys know too much,yeah,so we're going to have ta go for a ride...yeah..we's have ta have a little talk..yeah..this cd could have been a contender,but ya all had ta ruin it...yeah...get in da car....yeah..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 01:27:25 PM
I'm looking forward to songs written by the beach boys  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 02, 2012, 01:30:42 PM
I'm looking forward to songs written by the beach boys  ;D

Me too..

Those Beach Boys are pretty good


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 02, 2012, 01:42:34 PM
I'm looking forward to songs written by the beach boys  ;D
If it is a good song, I really don't care who wrote it. The Boys' have sung other peoples songs on most every album released. Why this is a big deal is beyond me. Other peoples songs released as singles; Do You Wanna Dance, Then I Kissed Her, Bluebirds Over The Mountain, I Can Hear Music, Cottonfields, Rock And Roll Music, Come Go With Me etc.. As great as the Today album is; the lead-off single was Do you Wanna Dance. They must all think highly of the tune to be speaking of it as much as they are, and like it enough to release it as the first single. Me, I'm holding off judgment until I actually hear it.


Title: Re:
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 02:04:43 PM
I'm looking forward to songs written by the beach boys  ;D
If it is a good song, I really don't care who wrote it. The Boys' have sung other peoples songs on most every album released. Why this is a big deal is beyond me. Other peoples songs released as singles; Do You Wanna Dance, Then I Kissed Her, Bluebirds Over The Mountain, I Can Hear Music, Cottonfields, Rock And Roll Music, Come Go With Me etc.. As great as the Today album is; the lead-off single was Do you Wanna Dance. They must all think highly of the tune to be speaking of it as much as they are, and like it enough to release it as the first single. Me, I'm holding off judgment until I actually hear it.

I hear what you're saying, I just don't think it should be the song that is being hyped up.  Rock n roll music is one of their worst recordings ever by the way.  And do you wanna dance is a good example, great recording, butshouldnt be used to hype a release


Title: Re:
Post by: vintagemusic on April 02, 2012, 02:35:19 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 02, 2012, 02:37:47 PM
Phew… it's time for me to meditate…


Title: Re:
Post by: Jason on April 02, 2012, 03:00:22 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you

You can't remove yourself from the board forever? No one's forcing you to come here.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 02, 2012, 03:09:56 PM
oh dear

paraphrasing Bob Dylan who came on after Mike Love's rant at the RNR Hall of Fame ceremony:

"at least he didn't mention me....."

 ;D


Title: Re:
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 02, 2012, 03:10:39 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you

For the love of God Billy, DO IT !  Get this idiot out of our collective hair.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 02, 2012, 03:17:22 PM
Man, you guys are a buncha meanies!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 02, 2012, 03:35:18 PM
Is it possible for someone to post a live action shot of "Lurch" from the '60s Addams family series , shaking his head slowly and moaning?
Just seems appropriate.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 03:45:35 PM
The Coup de grâce right now would be Phil Cohen calling vintagemusic out. We all give him crap, but least he isn't a hateful person to anybody online.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 02, 2012, 03:45:55 PM
(http://i41.tinypic.com/1zww1s.gif)

This thread keeps getting better and better.

I also like this one:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/andrewdw/1284797918859.gif)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 02, 2012, 03:49:51 PM
Montgomery Burns:

"Excellent!"


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 02, 2012, 04:00:53 PM
The Coup de grâce right now would be Phil Cohen calling vintagemusic out. We all give him crap, but least he isn't a hateful person to anybody online.
Vintagemusic is being persecuted.
He is just
Trying to write about the Beach Boys in a unique sort of
Quasi-Haiku style formatting.
What I don't understand is why the lot of you
Are
Being Hitlers and Neville Chamberlains (respectively). You are also
Probably all involved with the mafia and asking
People how
Their health is.

One time I went to a doctor
Who was
Clearly involved with organized
Crime (the MAFIA/La Cosa Nostra)
As he was asking
Me how my health was.
"Eye of the Tiger" was playing
In his office as well.

So if you all want to appease Hitler, or be Hitler, or be
Ruled over by a regent of some sort, and also be
Involved with the mafia, then that's
Up to you, but vintagemusic
And I will keep
Safe, away
From
Bad
Folx.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 02, 2012, 04:29:29 PM
 :lol :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: rogerlancelot on April 02, 2012, 04:32:59 PM
Hi, I really wanted to stay out of this thread since I haven't heard the song in question yet. I do have to inform everybody that there is no Mob or Mafia anymore. Seriously. I live in Las Vegas. I have many older friends here including one who did in fact used to work for the Mob. His job was to make sure things were being handled correctly here. My connection to him is through the Freemasons and he comes over to our house once in a while for dinner and cocktails. At one time this city was run by organized crime, hell organized crime created this city. But that is no more. Every casino is now owned by some sort of corporation. Our last mayor Oscar Goodman used to be a Mob lawyer and his wife Carolyn is the current mayor. There is a lot of fascination here about the past and there are currently TWO Mob museums here. But there is no Mob anymore. So if there isn't Mob here, why would it still exist any where else???

Sorry, carry on, just trying to set the record straight.

 :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 02, 2012, 04:35:36 PM
Holy Payola crap! Smile has a Mafia song on it. There! Are you happy now, Morris? You tainted the Beach Boys legacy with Gee. What do I do now?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 02, 2012, 04:36:10 PM
Good point. Other songs where that's been the case (off the top of my head) include "No Wrong Notes in Heaven" by Scotty and BW and "Miracle" by Carnie and Wendy and BW (and a lot of other people).

This is because "In Heaven There Is No Beer" was taken.

 ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 02, 2012, 04:45:30 PM
(http://i41.tinypic.com/1zww1s.gif)

This thread keeps getting better and better.

I also like this one:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/andrewdw/1284797918859.gif)
Beautiful! Thank you.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 02, 2012, 04:46:06 PM
Hi, I really wanted to stay out of this thread since I haven't heard the song in question yet. I do have to inform everybody that there is no Mob or Mafia anymore. Seriously. I live in Las Vegas. I have many older friends here including one who did in fact used to work for the Mob. His job was to make sure things were being handled correctly here. My connection to him is through the Freemasons and he comes over to our house once in a while for dinner and clocktails. At one time this city was run by organized crime, hell organized crime created this city. But that is no more. Every casino is now owned by some sort of corporation. Our last mayor Oscar Goodman used to be a Mob lawyer and his wife Carolyn is the current mayor. There is a lot of fascination here about the past and there are currently TWO Mob museums here. But there is no Mob anymore. So if there isn't Mob here, why would it still exist any where else???

Sorry, carry on, just trying to set the record straight.

 :smokin
w
No Mafia in LV? Maybe you would know. But  what about in Brighton Beach, Staten Island, LA, Chicago, Miami and other spots? Did all da bums go straight and get respectable jobs at ticket reseller companies?


Title: Re:
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 02, 2012, 04:48:57 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you
Go Now!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pS3ixmsQgCk


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 02, 2012, 04:52:05 PM
The Coup de grâce right now would be Phil Cohen calling vintagemusic out. We all give him crap, but least he isn't a hateful person to anybody online.
Vintagemusic is being persecuted.
He is just
Trying to write about the Beach Boys in a unique sort of
Quasi-Haiku style formatting.
What I don't understand is why the lot of you
Are
Being Hitlers and Neville Chamberlains (respectively). You are also
Probably all involved with the mafia and asking
People how
Their health is.

One time I went to a doctor
Who was
Clearly involved with organized
Crime (the MAFIA/La Cosa Nostra)
As he was asking
Me how my health was.
"Eye of the Tiger" was playing
In his office as well.

So if you all want to appease Hitler, or be Hitler, or be
Ruled over by a regent of some sort, and also be
Involved with the mafia, then that's
Up to you, but vintagemusic
And I will keep
Safe, away
From
Bad
Folx.
Funny stuff :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 02, 2012, 04:58:47 PM
Thread of the month.

Nah, make it thread of the year.


Title: Re: \
Post by: rogerlancelot on April 02, 2012, 05:10:35 PM
No Mob in Vegas anymore. I work at a casino downtown on the Fremont experience (the old part of Vegas before the Strip was built). I hear all kinds of fascinating stories about the past but those things just don't happen anymore. My first real job here was at the Golden Gate. The Golden Gate opened in 1904, was the very first hotel/casino here, had the first telephone in Nevada (the number was 1) and has the address 1 Fremont Street. Our break room was in the basement and I used to sit down there and wonder how many bodies were in the walls. If there is such a thing as ghosts or paranormal activities, they really happened down in that basement, very creepy. I brought a camera with me and took pictures down there one night (they're on my Facebook). Sorry for getting way off topic but I think this thread got derailed way before I piped in. I just think that all this fear of the Mob is silly but could have been a genuine concern decades ago.

Looking forward to the new song, the new album and seeing the Beach Boys May 27th!


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 02, 2012, 05:12:41 PM
Jesus H. Mob Affiliated Christ, what is going on here?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 02, 2012, 05:14:43 PM
Jesus H. Mob Affiliated Christ, what is going on here?

Apparently The Beach Boys were coerced into recording songs written by the mafia.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 02, 2012, 05:17:49 PM
......and we're angry about that?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 02, 2012, 05:26:03 PM
Not angry. Worried.

Us board members are going to need to start sleeping with one eye open.


Title: Re:
Post by: Justin on April 02, 2012, 05:28:26 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you

Wait a minute...you're still here?  I thought you left a while ago?

It's a shame that your shortest posts are the ones where you tell everyone you're leaving.

And no, I don't know what "button" to press to disable your account.  Send a private message to one of the moderators to close your account...or how about just stop posting?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 02, 2012, 07:30:05 PM
Mafia points aside...

I do think that what may bother some people is that there really has been a sense given that this was a new, great, Brian Wilson track. I know that when I saw the title it had been written almost like this: "Brian Wilson has been writing many songs for the album. There's one on it called That's Why God Made The Radio that's supposed to be great!" Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.

Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's. So I can see how that might deflate someone's spirits moreso than, say, Sloop John B. I don't imagine people come to the Pet Sounds album strictly on the belief that Sloop John B. is the standout Brian Wilson penned track to watch out for and then have to confront the fact that it wasn't written by him at all. It's whole different kind of scenario.

Does that mean we'll like the track any less than we would have had the track been credited to Brian? I don't think so -- at least I hope not. It's simply a case of an impression being left, which created a certain kind of anticipation, that has been deflated somewhat.

I know that I got excited a few years ago when people started talking about a new Brian Wilson track called "Midnight's Another Day" which sounded really great that I hadn't heard yet. It gets a certain kind of hope up. Put it this way, if you were told about a great new song by written Brian and a great new song written by Joe Thomas, which one would be more exciting?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 08:45:23 PM
Mafia points aside...

I do think that what may bother some people is that there really has been a sense given that this was a new, great, Brian Wilson track. I know that when I saw the title it had been written almost like this: "Brian Wilson has been writing many songs for the album. There's one on it called That's Why God Made The Radio that's supposed to be great!" Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.

Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's. So I can see how that might deflate someone's spirits moreso than, say, Sloop John B. I don't imagine people come to the Pet Sounds album strictly on the belief that Sloop John B. is the standout Brian Wilson penned track to watch out for and then have to confront the fact that it wasn't written by him at all. It's whole different kind of scenario.

Does that mean we'll like the track any less than we would have had the track been credited to Brian? I don't think so -- at least I hope not. It's simply a case of an impression being left, which created a certain kind of anticipation, that has been deflated somewhat.

I know that I got excited a few years ago when people started talking about a new Brian Wilson track called "Midnight's Another Day" which sounded really great that I hadn't heard yet. It gets a certain kind of hope up. Put it this way, if you were told about a great new song by written Brian and a great new song written by Joe Thomas, which one would be more exciting?

thanks for putting this into better words than i could think of lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 02, 2012, 08:49:10 PM
I just got "DFTS" and honestly if they can provide an album of songs that good/better ill be a a very happy fan.

I just want a good overall album with 2 or 3 amazing tracks, I don't care who writes them, if the beach boys are the first to do it and it's not a cover and it was produced by Brian, then who cares!?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 02, 2012, 09:03:04 PM
I just want a good overall album with 2 or 3 amazing tracks, I don't care who writes them, if the beach boys are the first to do it and it's not a cover and it was produced by Brian, then who cares!?

i'm sure it'll be a very nice and enjoyable version.  but i've never gotten my head around that line of thought.  You can perform a song, and make it yours, but it will always belong to the songwriter in my mind. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alex on April 02, 2012, 10:49:13 PM
My connection to him is through the Freemasons

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FNndI0BvPNA/TKNVSQOO8BI/AAAAAAAAB4A/BsJ0itGZ8wg/s1600/eye_pyramid.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 02, 2012, 11:00:12 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 02, 2012, 11:10:58 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?

The only one I've found: http://www.brianwilson.com/community/  ;)


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 02, 2012, 11:23:21 PM
Yes....I'm here. Big Daddy will protect the flock.


:lol


Hey Big Daddy, or as I prefer to call you, Hypocrite

PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM YOUR BOARD FOREVER

thank you

For the love of God Billy, DO IT !  Get this idiot out of our collective hair.

Well, he did ASK for it, and I DO aim to please, so...


(http://www.gsmdome.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/banned.jpg)

Now back to your regularly scheduled programing, already in progress...


Title: Re: \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 02, 2012, 11:42:38 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
When I first came here it was great! then Bill, Phil, Ghost and a few other wacked out freaks started dragging it down to their level. Well maybe not Bill, he just had a theory that he would not let go!! I was going to mention Fishmonk but he has been pretty cool and has some great theories(that don't involve drugs)...Remember that thread!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alex on April 02, 2012, 11:56:29 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
When I first came here it was great! then Bill, Phil, Ghost and a few other wacked out freaks started dragging it down to their level. Well maybe not Bill, he just had a theory that he would not let go!! I was going to mention Fishmonk but he has been pretty cool and has some great theories(that don't involve drugs)...Remember that thread!!

A few years ago, yeah...  This board was one of them. I can't speak for Phil Cohen, nobody/ghost, etc., but the anticipation for the new album and tour is killing me, and I just occasionally like to have a little stupid fun. Very stupid fun. As far as Bill Tobleman and his Zen theory is concerned, I remember reading his website way back in '05 during the infancy of my BB fandom,  when I first started digging (er...googling) for SMiLE related stuff.


Title: Re:
Post by: LostArt on April 03, 2012, 04:51:55 AM
I just don't think it should be the song that is being hyped up. 

So, you're saying that the people who have heard this song and think it's great shouldn't tell other people that the song is great?  I don't get it.



Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 03, 2012, 04:56:31 AM
Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's.

I got a different impression from reading the quotes.


Title: Re: \
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 03, 2012, 06:48:17 AM
Hi, I really wanted to stay out of this thread since I haven't heard the song in question yet. I do have to inform everybody that there is no Mob or Mafia anymore. Seriously. I live in Las Vegas. I have many older friends here including one who did in fact used to work for the Mob. His job was to make sure things were being handled correctly here. My connection to him is through the Freemasons and he comes over to our house once in a while for dinner and clocktails. At one time this city was run by organized crime, hell organized crime created this city. But that is no more. Every casino is now owned by some sort of corporation. Our last mayor Oscar Goodman used to be a Mob lawyer and his wife Carolyn is the current mayor. There is a lot of fascination here about the past and there are currently TWO Mob museums here. But there is no Mob anymore. So if there isn't Mob here, why would it still exist any where else???

Sorry, carry on, just trying to set the record straight.

 :smokin

Sorry to keep the off-topic thing going, this may be true for some areas but it isn't accurate for the Philadelphia area. Google the names George Anastasia and Dave Schratwieser, one is a beat reporter and the other is a TV reporter from Philly who do a regular series called "Mob Talk" where they report all the goings-on, power grabs, and inner squabbles.

These guys wouldn't have a gig reporting on "Mob Talk" if there were nothing to report... :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 07:45:29 AM
Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's.

I got a different impression from reading the quotes.

I don't know. The parts you highlighted still seemsto be giving the impression to me that Brian Wilson had something to do with writing "That's Why God Made the Radio" when according to the facts we have so far, he didn't. Now in all fairness, they don't say that directly but you certainly can't blame someone from walking away from that article with that impression.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 07:47:21 AM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?

You mean you want a message board that completely voids the human element? I'm sure in a few years there can be an entirely robotically run message board. You can't participate, you can only watch.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 03, 2012, 07:56:06 AM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?

You mean you want a message board that completely voids the human element? I'm sure in a few years there can be an entirely robotically run message board. You can't participate, you can only watch.

Yeah. And it's called Rolling Stone.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 03, 2012, 08:02:47 AM
Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's.

I got a different impression from reading the quotes.

I don't know. The parts you highlighted still seemsto be giving the impression to me that Brian Wilson had something to do with writing "That's Why God Made the Radio" when according to the facts we have so far, he didn't. Now in all fairness, they don't say that directly but you certainly can't blame someone from walking away from that article with that impression.

How do you know Brian didn't have something to do with the writing of the song?  The fact is...we won't know until we see the writing credits.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 08:06:32 AM
Here, for instance, is the press release that seemed to be all over the place post-Grammys:

Quote
"The guys are brilliantly performing their vocals," Wilson added. "I'm very proud of the guys."

The band that fell apart years ago over infighting and lawsuits is also marking its 50th anniversary with a new CD and tour that will include stops in Europe and Japan. They're also recording new songs written by Wilson and Joe Thomas.Fellow founding member Mike Love, who just a few years ago wasn't talking to Wilson, his cousin, said the new songs are "fantastic."

He added he is particularly blown away by one called "That's Why God Made the Radio."

"It's a thrill to get together and execute that kind of song," said Love.

And here's another one:

Quote
Brian Wilson is writing songs with Joe Thomas; they collaborated 14 years ago on "Imagination." Mike Love and Al Jardine hyped the new music, with Love singling out the new track "That's Why God Made the Radio" for its great harmonies and Jardine noting backstage, "I came in late to the sessions but the recordings are on par with 'Pet Sounds.'" Wilson simply said, "It's a thrill to get together," and said fans could look forward to seeing a lot of him on the road.

So I think the impression was given that this great, new, stand-out track was very much a Brian song and there was no indication that it was anyone else's.

I got a different impression from reading the quotes.

I don't know. The parts you highlighted still seemsto be giving the impression to me that Brian Wilson had something to do with writing "That's Why God Made the Radio" when according to the facts we have so far, he didn't. Now in all fairness, they don't say that directly but you certainly can't blame someone from walking away from that article with that impression.

How do you know Brian didn't have something to do with the writing of the song?  The fact is...we won't know until we see the writing credits.

How do I know the Pope didn't have something to do with the writing of the song? Yeah, I suppose we could throw in just about anything. But according to the writing credits that we have been given, Brian is nowhere to be found. Those are the facts. Since then there's been a lot of conjecture that Brian could have written a bridge but there is no evidence to support it. It's just people guessing. So if we want to actually deal with the facts that are available, then we can only conclude at this point that Brian had nothing to do with writing that song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 03, 2012, 08:17:19 AM
wouldn't it be funny if ALL songs by the Beach boys since  the very beginning were written by the Mob and the Wilson "family" were really in the maffia and Murry was a Mob boss..Dennis was planning on telling the world the truth before the "accident" and Landy was a CIA informant trying to get info from Brian,Carl ended up in the witness protection program and the East meets west song is a clue about the east side maffia (4 seasons)vs the west side maffia (BB)?  :p


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 03, 2012, 08:19:30 AM
 :lol

You laugh but it wouldn't be hard to convince the crazy Paul is Dead crowd that that's true.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 03, 2012, 08:53:19 AM
No Mob in Vegas anymore. I work at a casino downtown on the Fremont experience (the old part of Vegas before the Strip was built). I hear all kinds of fascinating stories about the past but those things just don't happen anymore.

Eric, Downtown Vegas has some great old hotels, The El Cortez being one.  I used to say at there whenever I went to Vegas, because of its  "old timey" vibe.  Owned by Jackie Gaughan.  Haven't been there in years and years and years tho'.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/95/ElCortez_famous_sign.jpg/250px-ElCortez_famous_sign.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 03, 2012, 08:53:58 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 03, 2012, 08:55:39 AM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
This just in.............
The name of the new album is going to be "Hums Of Hitler", featuring a newly penned Brian Wison-Mike Love anti-semitic ballad and a suite loosely based on the life of Heinrich Himmler.........more details soon


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 03, 2012, 08:57:41 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...
Can we make a documentary or movie about this thread?


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 03, 2012, 09:03:22 AM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
When I first came here it was great! then Bill, Phil, Ghost and a few other wacked out freaks started dragging it down to their level. Well maybe not Bill, he just had a theory that he would not let go!! I was going to mention Fishmonk but he has been pretty cool and has some great theories(that don't involve drugs)...Remember that thread!!

Demented flaming is long-running feature of BB sites, especially those involving Smile. Even the ol' Smile Shop board had its occasional (and sometimes rather worrying) freak-outs.  Music is a passionate subject, and it's always going to attract people who take it too far. But if you think this board is somehow going downhill, then you really need to look at other user generated content sites more often. It's a veritable oasis of civility here. The occasional flame should be an opportunity to remind us of the value of this one, and hopefully, to take care to keep posting responsibly. The knowledge base is too valuable to get scattered again. :old


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 03, 2012, 09:06:36 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...
Can we make a documentary or movie about this thread?

Can I play the part of Murry?

 ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 03, 2012, 09:14:46 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...
Can we make a documentary or movie about this thread?

Can I play the part of Murry?

 ;D

If you're so desperate to work on a fake mixing console, yes.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 09:18:22 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...

I don't think we should stop there… I think it's time we started to speculate on the lyrics.

See, I get this feeling that there'll be something about surf in there, possibly listening to a radio on the beach, with bikini-clad surfer girls oiling themselves up… while the singer sings about parking his woodie somewhere real discreet…

YUCK!  I hate this song already – it's so clichéd, predictable and, frankly, sleazy. I can't believe they've recorded this.  I'm gonna burn my BBs CDs tonight, includin' all the bootlegs what I don't own…


Title: Re:
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 03, 2012, 09:23:12 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

And the Hoffmen have a field day, I tells ya.

'Historic' doesn't half describe it...

I don't think we should stop there… I think it's time we started to speculate on the lyrics.

See, I get this feeling that there'll be something about surf in there, possibly listening to a radio on the beach, with bikini-clad surfer girls oiling themselves up… while the singer sings about parking his woodie somewhere real discreet…

YUCK!  I hate this song already – it's so clichéd, predictable and, frankly, sleazy. I can't believe they've recorded this.  I'm gonna burn my BBs CDs tonight, includin' all the bootlegs what I don't own…

Yeah, I can well see why you hate it. It is the BBs by numbers. And I especially detest that line about Christmas On Kokomo.


Title: Re: \
Post by: anazgnos on April 03, 2012, 10:00:03 AM
Regardless of Brian's contribution to the song, it's still reasonable to conclude that this is a very industry-driven, written-by-committee tune, so therefore it's a lot less exciting in terms of anticipating a new original Beach Boys song, whatever potential it still has as a performance or a production.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 03, 2012, 10:06:24 AM
Erm...... so, getting back to the actual song "That's Why God Made The Radio" .

Has anyone heard the old country song called "You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma" by David Frizzell (brother of Lefty)?  Real nice tune.  I wonder if it was an inspiration?


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 03, 2012, 10:22:48 AM
Also "That's why god made Mexico"…   seems to be a few songs that take that starting point…


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 03, 2012, 10:47:56 AM
I have actually 'written' this song in my head, strangely enough. I keep toying with the idea of actually figuring out what I'm hearing, but I'm not near a musical instrument atm..... but it sounds good to me - lyrics like Add Some Music with soft verses and a stomping chorus. Am I going mad?  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Fall Breaks on April 03, 2012, 11:01:37 AM
I have actually 'written' this song in my head, strangely enough. I keep toying with the idea of actually figuring out what I'm hearing, but I'm not near a musical instrument atm..... but it sounds good to me - lyrics like Add Some Music with soft verses and a stomping chorus. Am I going mad?  :lol
So what was the reason for God to make the radio, then?


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 03, 2012, 11:13:18 AM
I have actually 'written' this song in my head, strangely enough. I keep toying with the idea of actually figuring out what I'm hearing, but I'm not near a musical instrument atm..... but it sounds good to me - lyrics like Add Some Music with soft verses and a stomping chorus. Am I going mad?  :lol
So what was the reason for God to make the radio, then?

To allow Kokomo to reach #1 on the charts.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 03, 2012, 11:15:11 AM
 :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 03, 2012, 11:30:17 AM
I have actually 'written' this song in my head, strangely enough. I keep toying with the idea of actually figuring out what I'm hearing, but I'm not near a musical instrument atm..... but it sounds good to me - lyrics like Add Some Music with soft verses and a stomping chorus. Am I going mad?  :lol
Your going crazy, in 45 years they will release "The Hypehat Sessions" ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 03, 2012, 02:18:36 PM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

Speak for yourself.  :)

Given the co-writers involved, I'd guess it dates back to the Imagination period, or maybe slightly after, as with "GIOMH" (the recording thereof, of course).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 03, 2012, 02:51:39 PM
I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

The thread certainly did take an odd, odd turn.  Usually, when you start seeing posts referencing Neville Chamberlain (on a, um, a Beach Boys board), that means things are getting wacky........

SO, now we are back to speculating about. Not. A. Whole. Lot.

But that's ok!

Cos this whole Celebration thing is gonna knock our socks through the roof!

 :hat


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 03, 2012, 10:37:25 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
This just in.............
The name of the new album is going to be "Hums Of Hitler", featuring a newly penned Brian Wison-Mike Love anti-semitic ballad and a suite loosely based on the life of Heinrich Himmler.........more details soon

Man, I rarely feel like putting someone down, but this post was unfunny, unnecessary, annoying and plain boring. So there!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 03, 2012, 10:47:12 PM
Yeah, what the hell?  That was a complete Michael Richards moment there.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 03, 2012, 11:03:10 PM
Really, this board needs moderators!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 03, 2012, 11:09:24 PM
Really, this board needs moderators!
That, or Billy C.  >:D


Title: Re:
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 04, 2012, 12:25:05 AM
Also "That's why god made Mexico"…   seems to be a few songs that take that starting point…

God made a lot of things, didn't he?

The Universe Is Large. It's Probably The Largest Thing We Know

(Kurt Vonnegut)


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 04, 2012, 12:32:37 AM
Also "That's why god made Mexico"…   seems to be a few songs that take that starting point…

God made a lot of things, didn't he?

The Universe Is Large. It's Probably The Largest Thing We Know

(Kurt Vonnegut)

"Space," it says, "is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space, listen..."


Title: Re:
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 04, 2012, 12:48:22 AM
Also "That's why god made Mexico"…   seems to be a few songs that take that starting point…

God made a lot of things, didn't he?

The Universe Is Large. It's Probably The Largest Thing We Know

(Kurt Vonnegut)

 :lol

"Space," it says, "is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space, listen..."


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 04, 2012, 12:48:53 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

Speak for yourself.  :)

Given the co-writers involved, I'd guess it dates back to the Imagination period, or maybe slightly after, as with "GIOMH" (the recording thereof, of course).

AGD corrected me. I can now die in peace...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 04, 2012, 12:49:44 AM
God made boobies.  :bow


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 04, 2012, 01:06:41 AM
God made boobies.  :bow

His greatest achievement. Although...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 04, 2012, 01:20:10 AM
Meow.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 04, 2012, 04:04:08 AM
So, when could be the release date of the single? Sometime in late May ahead of the album?


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 04, 2012, 07:00:56 AM
By now this thread may be seen as historic.

I mean, there's this single that no one has heard. There was speculation on the basis fo some interview quotes. On who wrote it. On when it actually was written and composed. We got to 10 pages by now and there certainly will be more. There was, um, 'an incident'. A poster got banned. We did extensive research on the antics and whereabouts of the Mob, in Las Vegas and elsewhere. We are none the wiser.

Speak for yourself.  :)

Given the co-writers involved, I'd guess it dates back to the Imagination period, or maybe slightly after, as with "GIOMH" (the recording thereof, of course).

I like the points of reference so far - something along the lines of Imagination meets Add Some Music, with Sunflower-era production sensibilities, and you can colour me happy. I don't like much BB-stuff from that late-80s/early 90s era, but I looooves me some Imagination. I almost like the heavy tinsel production....


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 04, 2012, 09:32:13 AM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
This just in.............
The name of the new album is going to be "Hums Of Hitler", featuring a newly penned Brian Wison-Mike Love anti-semitic ballad and a suite loosely based on the life of Heinrich Himmler.........more details soon

Man, I rarely feel like putting someone down, but this post was unfunny, unnecessary, annoying and plain boring. So there!
It was a reference to Vintages' ramblings.
If you don't have a sense of humor, that's your problem.


Title: Re:
Post by: Jimmie_R on April 04, 2012, 01:02:11 PM
Paul Simon has a song called "That´s why god made the movies"... just saying!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 04, 2012, 01:43:38 PM
Looks like Heinrich Rudolph Hertz first demonstrated the existance of radio waves with Gugliemo Marconi developing it and Nikola Tesla getting the first patent for a radio transmitter.
I wonder if these guys are mentioned in the lyrics. ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: MarcellaHasDirtyFeet on April 04, 2012, 02:24:11 PM
Looks like Heinrich Rudolph Hertz first demonstrated the existance of radio waves with Gugliemo Marconi developing it and Nikola Tesla getting the first patent for a radio transmitter.
I wonder if these guys are mentioned in the lyrics. ;D

"Don't worry Mr. Tesla. We'll get your radio goin'." :P


Title: Re: \
Post by: bgas on April 04, 2012, 02:34:26 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
This just in.............
The name of the new album is going to be "Hums Of Hitler", featuring a newly penned Brian Wison-Mike Love anti-semitic ballad and a suite loosely based on the life of Heinrich Himmler.........more details soon

Man, I rarely feel like putting someone down, but this post was unfunny, unnecessary, annoying and plain boring. So there!
It was a reference to Vintages' ramblings.
If you don't have a sense of humor, that's your problem.

No, it simply wasn't funny


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 04, 2012, 02:42:25 PM
Does anybody remember the deleted and creepy nazi beach boys song thread that Ghost made?...


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: markalpan on April 04, 2012, 04:18:58 PM
Rolling Stone has a segment titled "Spring Music Preview." Here is what it has to say.

The Beach Boys - Album title to be determined. Release - June
"It's a sentimental thing for me," Brian Wilson says of the Beach Boys' first all-new studio LP in decades. "We've been together 50 years-that's a long time." Since reuniting last year, the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios - where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the sixties. Expect lots of big harmonies and familiar subjects on songs like the mellow rocker "Beaches in Mind" and the nostalgic ballad "That's Why God Made the Radio."
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65," adds Mike Love. "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: Lowbacca on April 04, 2012, 04:26:52 PM
Rolling Stone has a segment titled "Spring Music Preview." Here is what it has to say.

The Beach Boys - Album title to be determined. Release - June
"It's a sentimental thing for me," Brian Wilson says of the Beach Boys' first all-new studio LP in decades. "We've been together 50 years-that's a long time." Since reuniting last year, the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios - where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the sixties. Expect lots of big harmonies and familiar subjects on songs like the mellow rocker "Beaches in Mind" and the nostalgic ballad "That's Why God Made the Radio."
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65," adds Mike Love. "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."
Old news, but thanks anyway.  ;) And welcome to the board!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 04, 2012, 05:04:37 PM
Looks like Heinrich Rudolph Hertz first demonstrated the existance of radio waves with Gugliemo Marconi developing it and Nikola Tesla getting the first patent for a radio transmitter.
I wonder if these guys are mentioned in the lyrics. ;D

"Don't worry Mr. Tesla. We'll get your radio goin'." :P
...........magic transistor radio............


Title: Re: \
Post by: onkster on April 04, 2012, 06:51:58 PM
Nazi Beach Boys song? You mean "Never Learn Not to Love"? Chorus: "I'm your kind, I'm your kinda Nazi..."

Maybe this should be filed under Misheard Lyrics...


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 04, 2012, 07:06:42 PM
I wonder if nostalgic ballad means it's something like "do you remember" or "sprit of rock n roll"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 04, 2012, 09:37:34 PM
is there a Beach Boys messageboard anywhere on the internet that focuses just on information and not pages upon pages of bullshit?
This just in.............
The name of the new album is going to be "Hums Of Hitler", featuring a newly penned Brian Wison-Mike Love anti-semitic ballad and a suite loosely based on the life of Heinrich Himmler.........more details soon

Man, I rarely feel like putting someone down, but this post was unfunny, unnecessary, annoying and plain boring. So there!
It was a reference to Vintages' ramblings.
If you don't have a sense of humor, that's your problem.

No, it simply wasn't funny

I stopped reading ramblings a long time ago, so I didn't get the reference. But even if I had gotten it, I'd still agree with bgas. In fact I do have several senses of humor, but not the one about connecting random people with Hitler and Nazis. Making fun of the Nazis, that's ok.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 04, 2012, 10:09:34 PM
Does anybody remember the deleted and creepy nazi beach boys song thread that Ghost made?...
I remember one where he argued that the beach boys were gay.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lonely Summer on April 04, 2012, 10:40:26 PM
The Mob can put all the money they want behind this song, doesn't matter, the Beach Boys are NOT going to have a hit single in 2012. Radio does not play new music by bands of old guys. Sheesh, the reunited Beatles even had trouble getting their new recordings played on radio back in 95/96. If there's one band the world would stop for, it is the Fab Four. If this was 1989, yeah, no problem. Things were much different back then, much of pop culture was still in love with the 60's. Today, if people wanna hear oldies, they're talking 80's/90's, maybe as far back as 1975. I am hoping the BB's make a good album artistically. I have no illusions about them being able to compete with Adele, Taylor Swift, or the new crop of boy bands.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 04, 2012, 11:10:15 PM
I looooves me some Imagination. I almost like the heavy tinsel production....

Yeah, I'm the same way.  I know it's overdone.  I know it's all processed.  I don't care.  I love it. 


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 05, 2012, 12:28:23 AM
Rolling Stone has a segment titled "Spring Music Preview." Here is what it has to say.

The Beach Boys - Album title to be determined. Release - June
"It's a sentimental thing for me," Brian Wilson says of the Beach Boys' first all-new studio LP in decades. "We've been together 50 years-that's a long time." Since reuniting last year, the surviving members have recorded more than a dozen new tunes at L.A.'s Ocean Way studios - where they cut "Good Vibrations" and much of Pet Sounds in the sixties. Expect lots of big harmonies and familiar subjects on songs like the mellow rocker "Beaches in Mind" and the nostalgic ballad "That's Why God Made the Radio."
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65," adds Mike Love. "I'm trying to write lyrics that fit the music without making it sound like you're writing from a hospice."

Hi and welcome. Reading that, I think I would be absolutely delighted if those 'big harmonies' would scale just those special 'BBs Peaks' where the spine tingles and the goosebumps appear. You know: that blend. Although Denny and Carl aren't there, I am sure that with the current team they'll be able to get very, very close, and God will provide inspiration. The Big Guy knows when he's being channeled...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 05, 2012, 01:14:53 AM
Awsome post, Don.  :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 05, 2012, 01:18:56 AM
Awsome post, Don.  :)

Thanks, Jay, mucho appreciated!


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: puni puni on April 05, 2012, 01:43:31 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 05, 2012, 01:59:22 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.

You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: The Heartical Don on April 05, 2012, 02:12:10 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.

You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?

 :lol of course! There is no shame in oldsters lying in an empty pool, smoking dope, and harmonizing merrily away! Get hip, dude!


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 05, 2012, 02:12:18 AM
Well, maybe Smiley Smile reminds him too much of old age...wanting to be around vegetables, and indeed, to chow down on vegetables. Increasingly difficult with false teeth.  Hankering for a little pad in Hawaii...it's an advert for Saga waiting to happen. Been in this town so long that back in the city I've been taken for a lost and gone...it wasn't a teenage symphony to god, it's was a pensioner's!


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 05, 2012, 02:49:50 AM
Every great opportunity? Like, was the world clamouring for another Smiley Smile? Have the band been having sleepless nights over the fact they may not be able to reunite, smoke $5000 worth of hash and f*ck about with a Baldwin organ in Brian's house once more? Making another album like Smiley Smile would be akin to finding a £20 note on the street and drawing sunglasses on the Queen before making it into a paper plane and divebombing lollipop ladies with it. That is, nonsense. Like Smiley Smile.

And how is wanting to make records sound like the most artistically AND commercially rich period in the entire 50 years of the group a bad thing?


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 05, 2012, 02:56:02 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.

You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?

Heroes & Viagras
Vegetables
Falls Over, Breaks a Leg, and Back to Bed (The Would-he-keep-his-Pecker-up Symphony)
We're All Going Bald
Little Incontinence Pad
Good Valiums
Wash Me Tonight
Wind.
Gettin' Grey
Whistle Out


(I'm sure the usual wags can do better!)


Title: Re:
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 05, 2012, 03:59:03 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.

You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?

Heroes & Viagras
Vegetables
Falls Over, Breaks a Leg, and Back to Bed (The Would-he-keep-his-Pecker-up Symphony)
We're All Going Bald
Little Incontinence Pad
Good Valiums
Wash Me Tonight
Wind.
Gettin' Grey
Whistle Out


(I'm sure the usual wags can do better!)
Senior smiley is genius :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 05, 2012, 04:09:03 AM
Does anybody remember the deleted and creepy nazi beach boys song thread that Ghost made?...
I remember one where he argued that the beach boys were gay.  ;D
That was one were he thankfully got banned. 8)


Title: Re:
Post by: rab2591 on April 05, 2012, 05:59:12 AM
"Conceptually, the album is not going to be anything outlandish like Smiley Smile - it will be like the Beach Boys circa '65,"

Why?

I will never understand this mindset. It's akin to picking up a $20 bill on the street and burning it.
There has got to be some sort of supernatural reason why this band squanders every single incredible opportunity it's ever been given.

You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?

Heroes & Viagras
Vegetables
Falls Over, Breaks a Leg, and Back to Bed (The Would-he-keep-his-Pecker-up Symphony)
We're All Going Bald
Little Incontinence Pad
Good Valiums
Wash Me Tonight
Wind.
Gettin' Grey
Whistle Out


(I'm sure the usual wags can do better!)

:lol this post made my day!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 05, 2012, 09:05:39 AM
Every great opportunity? Like, was the world clamouring for another Smiley Smile? Have the band been having sleepless nights over the fact they may not be able to reunite, smoke $5000 worth of hash and f*ck about with a Baldwin organ in Brian's house once more? Making another album like Smiley Smile would be akin to finding a £20 note on the street and drawing sunglasses on the Queen before making it into a paper plane and divebombing lollipop ladies with it. That is, nonsense. Like Smiley Smile.

And how is wanting to make records sound like the most artistically AND commercially rich period in the entire 50 years of the group a bad thing?
Truth. :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 05, 2012, 11:24:42 AM
No news?

I've been away. I would read back over the last 5 pages, but quite frankly can't be bothered. Can anyone condense it, beginning with Paco, and ending in Baldwin, into a manageable soundbite for me?


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 05, 2012, 11:36:12 AM
No news?

I've been away. I would read back over the last 5 pages, but quite frankly can't be bothered. Can anyone condense it, beginning with Paco, and ending in Baldwin, into a manageable soundbite for me?
In need of a caterer?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 05, 2012, 11:42:41 AM
No news?

I've been away. I would read back over the last 5 pages, but quite frankly can't be bothered. Can anyone condense it, beginning with Paco, and ending in Baldwin, into a manageable soundbite for me?
In need of a caterer?

No, a carer maybe.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 05, 2012, 01:36:42 PM
No news?

I've been away. I would read back over the last 5 pages, but quite frankly can't be bothered. Can anyone condense it, beginning with Paco, and ending in Baldwin, into a manageable soundbite for me?

Actually, you just summed it all up pretty well yourself!

 :lol


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: puni puni on April 05, 2012, 10:25:07 PM
You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?
That's exactly the point... I don't expect them to. Not because they can't, but because they're either lazy or unwilling even though it's much easier than it sounds. Imagine if Mike Love said:
Quote
"Conceptually, the album is going to be a little like Smiley Smile. It will be like the Beach Boys circa '67,"
The hype train would turn on full blast. It's not like this band has ever gone back to that phase, so there's no telling what could come out of it. The mere premise of "let's ditch the surf and go back to psychedelia!" would automatically save the album from being forgotten in time, as the fate of Summer In Paradise. The entire project would instantly turn into a very interesting and lasting piece of music history, and could potentially fix The Beach Boys reputation if done perfectly.

This is not 1965. You don't need to write a verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge song to be successful. I don't care if they're 200-years-old, they can still write and record music. It's an unbelievable shame to spend time recording an album in 2012 only to do things you already achieved fifty years ago when you had nothing but three guitars and a drum set.

Really, all I'm asking for them to do with their last album ever is to make it relevant to the year it was recorded in. Who knows, maybe they might have fun recording a fine product and leaving behind no regrets?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 05, 2012, 10:31:41 PM
I really wish they would just tell Brian record whatever you want. I wonder if he has total artistic freedom and doesn't want to exercise it or if he had an inspiration to do something weird they'd say it wasn't the style they wanted.


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: Wirestone on April 05, 2012, 10:41:30 PM
Really, all I'm asking for them to do with their last album ever is to make it relevant to the year it was recorded in. Who knows, maybe they might have fun recording a fine product and leaving behind no regrets?

No. 1, we don't know it's their last album ever.

No. 2, what would make any Beach Boys album relevant to 2012? Songs about the GOP primary? Rapping? Grizzly Bear producing? I mean, the whole reason they're doing this is because it's the group's 50th anniversary. Some amount of retrospection comes with the territory, surely.

No. 3, it seems like they had a good time making the album, they seem to think it's quality work. We'll see soon enough.

I really wish they would just tell Brian record whatever you want. I wonder if he has total artistic freedom and doesn't want to exercise it or if he had an inspiration to do something weird they'd say it wasn't the style they wanted.

Brian does record whatever he wants. Whether or not any record label is willing to release it is another question. No one would release the Paley sessions. No one would release the rest of his sessions with Scotty B. post-TLOS. The material has been recorded. The demand has not been there since the 70s (Brian's solo work, with a couple of exceptions, does not sell. No Beach Boys album, again with a couple of exceptions, has sold well since the 1960s).

What does that mean? If Brian's music is to be released, it has to be tailored to a specific project with specific goals. It may suck, but he and his people have been unwilling to embrace indie labels or online distribution for his weirder, personal music. So we get mainstream pop.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 05, 2012, 10:48:26 PM
I really wish they would just tell Brian record whatever you want. I wonder if he has total artistic freedom and doesn't want to exercise it or if he had an inspiration to do something weird they'd say it wasn't the style they wanted.
This is just pure speculation, but I think the group's negative reaction to Brian's production on 15 Big Ones and Love You created a lack of confidence that still lasts to this day. I don't know if even Brian himself would take total artistic freedom had it been given to him.


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 05, 2012, 11:53:16 PM
You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?
That's exactly the point... I don't expect them to. Not because they can't, but because they're either lazy or unwilling even though it's much easier than it sounds. Imagine if Mike Love said:
Quote
"Conceptually, the album is going to be a little like Smiley Smile. It will be like the Beach Boys circa '67,"
The hype train would turn on full blast. It's not like this band has ever gone back to that phase, so there's no telling what could come out of it. The mere premise of "let's ditch the surf and go back to psychedelia!" would automatically save the album from being forgotten in time, as the fate of Summer In Paradise. The entire project would instantly turn into a very interesting and lasting piece of music history, and could potentially fix The Beach Boys reputation if done perfectly.

This is not 1965. You don't need to write a verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge song to be successful. I don't care if they're 200-years-old, they can still write and record music. It's an unbelievable shame to spend time recording an album in 2012 only to do things you already achieved fifty years ago when you had nothing but three guitars and a drum set.

Really, all I'm asking for them to do with their last album ever is to make it relevant to the year it was recorded in. Who knows, maybe they might have fun recording a fine product and leaving behind no regrets?

How high are you right now?


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 06, 2012, 12:12:22 AM
The album didn't really do a heck of a lot for their standing back in the day, and I can't see it being an exercise they'd wish to repeat, even now.  Remember, these were drug-addled, generally inferior versions of songs from an album that had already been ditched.  The BBs todays aren't retrospective-glory-obsessed fans, they're the actual, physical, real, touch-em-and-squeal blokes who went through that bad trip.


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: hypehat on April 06, 2012, 01:01:35 AM
You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?
That's exactly the point... I don't expect them to. Not because they can't, but because they're either lazy or unwilling even though it's much easier than it sounds. Imagine if Mike Love said:
Quote
"Conceptually, the album is going to be a little like Smiley Smile. It will be like the Beach Boys circa '67,"
The hype train would turn on full blast. It's not like this band has ever gone back to that phase, so there's no telling what could come out of it. The mere premise of "let's ditch the surf and go back to psychedelia!" would automatically save the album from being forgotten in time, as the fate of Summer In Paradise. The entire project would instantly turn into a very interesting and lasting piece of music history, and could potentially fix The Beach Boys reputation if done perfectly.

This is not 1967. You don't need to write a verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge song to be successful. I don't care if they're 200-years-old, they can still write and record music. It's an unbelievable shame to spend time recording an album in 2012 only to do things you already achieved fifty years ago when you had nothing but three guitars and a drum set.

Really, all I'm asking for them to do with their last album ever is to make it relevant to the year it was recorded in. Who knows, maybe they might have fun recording a fine product and leaving behind no regrets?


So they should make a record that is relevant to 2012, and also make a psychedelic album? Psychedelic music hasn't been in the popular eye since (at a stretch) the 80's in Britain (Spacemen 3, JAMC, Loop, and stuff), and certainly was never 'pop' outside of 1967 - 1970.

Also, the bolded section - read it again, spot the difference, and see if the meaning has changed a great deal or not.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 06, 2012, 01:24:12 AM
The thing is though, Smiley Smile, Friends, and Sunflower all sold poorly upon release, but they've done so much for the band in the long term.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 06, 2012, 01:33:50 AM
"Long term" probably isn't on their minds much these days…  I suspect they'd rather have their last bout of success in 2012…


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 06, 2012, 01:47:40 AM
The thing is though, Smiley Smile, Friends, and Sunflower all sold poorly upon release, but they've done so much for the band in the long term.


I won't deny that, but then Today! and Summer Days have also enjoyed that same distance too. Hell, most of The Beach Boy's music is getting understood nowadays.

I just get riled when people go 'Brian can still be psychedelic, maaaan', because he was the dorkiest guy in 60's LA and now he's a pensioner.... but he can still be hip, maaaan. Get real.


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 06, 2012, 02:09:44 AM
I looooves me some Imagination. I almost like the heavy tinsel production....

Yeah, I'm the same way.  I know it's overdone.  I know it's all processed.  I don't care.  I love it. 


It's almost like - to get this great song, that was the cost, and it's become inseparable from the experience.

Someone...understands!

:drunks


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: UK_Surf on April 06, 2012, 02:16:19 AM
You really expect them, at age 70, to record an album like Smiley Smile?
That's exactly the point... I don't expect them to. Not because they can't, but because they're either lazy or unwilling even though it's much easier than it sounds. Imagine if Mike Love said:
Quote
"Conceptually, the album is going to be a little like Smiley Smile. It will be like the Beach Boys circa '67,"
The hype train would turn on full blast. It's not like this band has ever gone back to that phase, so there's no telling what could come out of it. The mere premise of "let's ditch the surf and go back to psychedelia!" would automatically save the album from being forgotten in time, as the fate of Summer In Paradise. The entire project would instantly turn into a very interesting and lasting piece of music history, and could potentially fix The Beach Boys reputation if done perfectly.

This is not 1967. You don't need to write a verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge song to be successful. I don't care if they're 200-years-old, they can still write and record music. It's an unbelievable shame to spend time recording an album in 2012 only to do things you already achieved fifty years ago when you had nothing but three guitars and a drum set.

Really, all I'm asking for them to do with their last album ever is to make it relevant to the year it was recorded in. Who knows, maybe they might have fun recording a fine product and leaving behind no regrets?


So they should make a record that is relevant to 2012, and also make a psychedelic album? Psychedelic music hasn't been in the popular eye since (at a stretch) the 80's in Britain (Spacemen 3, JAMC, Loop, and stuff), and certainly was never 'pop' outside of 1967 - 1970.

Also, the bolded section - read it again, spot the difference, and see if the meaning has changed a great deal or not.  ;D

Au contraire...spiritualized were quite a big deal until early 2000s, there was that bizarre mid-90s phase when Kula Shaker inexplicably surfaced with patently psychedelic nonsense (catchy tunes tho), the Flaming Lips and Mercury Rev had that great run in the early 2000s, Smile, fer crimeny's sake, was rampant in 2004-5, and there are pschedelic lo-fi folk troupes and nu gaze groups all over the UK and North America. And that's not even counting electronic interpretations. Psychedelia refuses to die. That doesn't mean the BBs should do it, necessarily, but they played and are playing a big part in its ongoing success, so it would be great to hear one or two tracks on the new album tip the hat to that.

Bring Back the Baldwin!


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 06, 2012, 03:18:59 AM
You're right, of course! I knew that was a bit iffy when I posted it. It's still not 'pop' (as in, massive-selling records in the popular conscience, which is what Kappa is saying), though. The Flaming Lips get closest to selling tonnes of records, and they've even gone back to it with the 6 hour and 24 hour songs. Modern psych rules though - you listened to Wooden Shjips?

Smiley Smile isn't typical psychedelic music, too. The 13th Floor Elevators it ain't.... more akin to sunshine pop, but it's still too weird/underproduced. It is the sound of a great bunch of singers goofing around with a few instruments. It's brilliant! But hard to reproduce.


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 06, 2012, 03:40:38 AM
I hadn't heard of Wooden Shjips, but am just checking 'em out...I like what I hear. Big fan of Thrill Jockey bands, so no surprises there, thanks for the tip.

I'm a fan of Besnard Lakes and Black Mountain (heavier end of the psychedelia thing) tho. Check those fine canucks out...

The examples you cite just show how broad a church psychedelia is...Smiley is enormously influential in certain segments of new psychedelia, particularly the folk offshoots. It's still in the psych camp,  and I think all the more so because it's so uncompromising and unique.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 06, 2012, 06:59:00 AM
Hypehat already made the best point here. 60s psychedelic music stopped being relevant with the release of The Band's Music From Big Pink.

I've said this already but the best hope for this album is not to go for a "Today! sound" or a "Pet Sounds sound" or a "Sunflower sound" but to try and make an album that years from now people will call a "New album sound" (insert title for "New Album").


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 06, 2012, 09:13:43 AM
Let's face it. Whatever they do, there are people on here who are going to hate it, and criticise it, no matter what it sounds like.

Personally I feel lucky to be getting anything from the reunited Beach Boys.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 06, 2012, 09:27:01 AM
Let's face it. Whatever they do, there are people on here who are going to hate it, and criticise it, no matter what it sounds like.

I don't think that's true. Everybody has certain expectations and that's understandable.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 06, 2012, 09:31:29 AM
Let's face it. Whatever they do, there are people on here who are going to hate it, and criticise it, no matter what it sounds like.

I don't think that's true. Everybody has certain expectations and that's understandable.

It's happened with every BW release. There were people who hated BWPS on principle.

And yes, it is about expectation.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 06, 2012, 09:33:46 AM
It's happened with every BW release. There were people who hated BWPS on principle.

Well, not everyone, including fans, have to like every release. And if people don't like the idea of a project, I think that's fair enough. Form is as important as content.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 06, 2012, 09:41:05 AM
Absolutely. And as much as I respect peoples opinions, I find it a shame that most of the posts about this album seem to be negative. I'm excited as hell about it. I'm also being realistic in my expectations. We're not getting Pet Sounds here.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 06, 2012, 09:49:33 AM
Absolutely. And as much as I respect peoples opinions, I find it a shame that most of the posts about this album seem to be negative. I'm excited as hell about it. I'm also being realistic in my expectations. We're not getting Pet Sounds here.

Agreed. There are expectations that are much more understandable than others.

And like I said earlier, when we were conditioned to believe that this particular standout song was written by Brian, and then found out that it was written by other people and not him, it did  understandably take the wind out of someone's sails. Naturally, it would be exciting to find out there's a new great Beach Boys record but what if you were told that while this is a new great Beach Boys record, most of the work, including the vocals, was done by outsiders. But, you know, the music is still great! Well, that's not the case here but imagine such a hypothetical situation. It would be deflating.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 06, 2012, 10:44:02 AM
It's not real negativity, simply realistic anticipation.  Cautious optimism. The excitement of those with many years' experience of the way the BBs handle things.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Amanda Hart on April 06, 2012, 11:00:20 AM
I've said this already but the best hope for this album is not to go for a "Today! sound" or a "Pet Sounds sound" or a "Sunflower sound" but to try and make an album that years from now people will call a "New album sound" (insert title for "New Album").

This is my hope too. I hate when people say "Ooh, mellow? Hope it sounds just like Friends" "Mike said it's got a '65 vibe, another Today!" Why does the new album have to sound exactly like an album they did 30 or 40 years ago? Let's hear what they have to bring to the table now. Pressure to sound like songs or albums past holds them back creatively. For me the sub-par parts of any BB related solo project are when they are clearly trying to recreate the sound of their younger selves.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 06, 2012, 11:33:07 AM
My guess is it'll sound somewhat like MIU crossed with TLOS crossed with Summer in Paradise.


Title: Re: \
Post by: GoodToMyBaby on April 06, 2012, 12:35:10 PM
Damn that's an ugly baby.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on April 06, 2012, 01:02:17 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 06, 2012, 01:25:13 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 06, 2012, 01:41:42 PM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 06, 2012, 01:50:53 PM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?

Probably just the national anthem and hits. Probably won't hear anything new until the single is released.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 06, 2012, 02:32:16 PM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?

Slim?  I doubt the best place to unveil a new song is in front of a stadium of baseball fans waiting to see their favorite baseball team play the first game of the season.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 06, 2012, 02:36:47 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



And this is why
I love this board


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 06, 2012, 04:08:41 PM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?

Not a chance, it's god save the queen then 1 song, probably good vibes or something


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 06, 2012, 05:04:10 PM
I've said this already but the best hope for this album is not to go for a "Today! sound" or a "Pet Sounds sound" or a "Sunflower sound" but to try and make an album that years from now people will call a "New album sound" (insert title for "New Album").

This is my hope too. I hate when people say "Ooh, mellow? Hope it sounds just like Friends" "Mike said it's got a '65 vibe, another Today!" Why does the new album have to sound exactly like an album they did 30 or 40 years ago? Let's hear what they have to bring to the table now. Pressure to sound like songs or albums past holds them back creatively. For me the sub-par parts of any BB related solo project are when they are clearly trying to recreate the sound of their younger selves.

That's  fair, but Brian digs the same sounds, it would seem - BW's  band have often mentioned that they will use, idk, the bass harmonica during initial jams for songs and BW responds positively. It ends up sounding that way because Brian likes it. TLOS, for example.

And, Al's solo CD. I would not mind at all if the new BB's album sounds like that. It's a really nice sounding record.

Even the BB's biggest stylistic departures still have the same few basic elements - Block harmonies, or a layered production, or the pounding piano chords, or compositional madness. Love You, the disco HCTN, Smiley Adult/Child.... The beach boys have a sound which has, depending on the basic material, more or less had the same constants. And they probably have more or less the same sounds to bring to the table now.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chocolate Shake Man on April 06, 2012, 05:19:07 PM
I've said this already but the best hope for this album is not to go for a "Today! sound" or a "Pet Sounds sound" or a "Sunflower sound" but to try and make an album that years from now people will call a "New album sound" (insert title for "New Album").

This is my hope too. I hate when people say "Ooh, mellow? Hope it sounds just like Friends" "Mike said it's got a '65 vibe, another Today!" Why does the new album have to sound exactly like an album they did 30 or 40 years ago? Let's hear what they have to bring to the table now. Pressure to sound like songs or albums past holds them back creatively. For me the sub-par parts of any BB related solo project are when they are clearly trying to recreate the sound of their younger selves.

That's  fair, but Brian digs the same sounds, it would seem - BW's  band have often mentioned that they will use, idk, the bass harmonica during initial jams for songs and BW responds positively. It ends up sounding that way because Brian likes it. TLOS, for example.

And, Al's solo CD. I would not mind at all if the new BB's album sounds like that. It's a really nice sounding record.

Even the BB's biggest stylistic departures still have the same few basic elements - Block harmonies, or a layered production, or the pounding piano chords, or compositional madness. Love You, the disco HCTN, Smiley Adult/Child.... The beach boys have a sound which has, depending on the basic material, more or less had the same constants. And they probably have more or less the same sounds to bring to the table now.

Absolutely!

However (haha - I'm sure you knew that was coming) that even though you could probably play all their albums to the most casual listener and they'd most likely clue in at some point that it's The Beach Boys, there is nevertheless a good reason why we can say, "I'd like it to sound like Today!" or "I'd like it to sound like Pet Sounds!" or Smile, or Friends, or Holland, and so on. Like any of the greatest bands, many of the Beach Boys albums (the best ones) have a stamp of personal individuality. We can say something like "That Surf's Up sound" because they are so unique. What would be great is if they made an album that likewise carried its own individual sound.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 06, 2012, 05:28:29 PM
Yeah, that's true. I am fairly tired and have had a few pints, but whilst it varies from record to record - Surf's Up sounds completely different to CATP, say - they still sound like Beach Boys records.

Of course, they should go for whatever the songs seem to demand. I just, idk, don't want them to try so hard? Saying 'WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT LIKE IT'S 1967/1977/1961/whatever' is demeaning to the current record. That said, Mike going 'it sounds like 1965' makes a lot of sense, because Brian's production and arrangement nous seems to be about there, if the Gershwin record and TLOS are anything to go by. But striving for it is not right.

I'm rambling. Should sleep.  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 06, 2012, 06:35:09 PM
Who sings lead on TWGMR?  Hasn't more info leaked out yet?  AGD probably knows.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 06, 2012, 07:28:07 PM
Who sings lead on TWGMR?  Hasn't more info leaked out yet?  AGD probably knows.

It's a ballad according to Rolling Stone.  I'm expecting a heavy harmony song, like surfer girl and in my room; brian is the lead, but everyone is singing so prevalent on it.  MY GUESS.


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 06, 2012, 08:52:32 PM
I don't think Mike's comment was, "We're striving to sound exactly as we did in '65," but more, "The album's turning out to sound similar to a '65 Beach Boys album." If I had to liken Brian's most recent original effort, TLOS, to anything in Brian's past, it'd probably be Today! or Summer Days. Makes sense that Mike would liken it to stuff they were doing in '65.

Expecting a group of 70 year olds to push the envelope as they did much earlier in their career is absolutely silly. I think the goal here is to write and record good, timeless songs. To go out on a higher, more tasteful note than the very confused 90s albums, and to do so as a group.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on April 06, 2012, 10:00:04 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



And this is why
I love this board

Yawn. That was a few pages old.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mahalo on April 06, 2012, 11:53:28 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.

There will never ever be anything close Smiley Smile again....


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 07, 2012, 01:00:43 AM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



And this is why
I love this board

Yawn. That was a few pages old.

SurferGirl7 loves to belittle people
Because she is
an unpleasant person
And she does not like Boots's creativity
Because she is boring
And most probably
Jealous.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 07, 2012, 03:07:33 AM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?

Not a chance, it's god save the queen then 1 song, probably good vibes or something

Yes, the Beach Boys are going to be singing God Save the Queen at a baseball game in California.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 07, 2012, 04:54:26 AM
Anyway, what are the odds the boys sing a new song at the Dodger Stadium?

Not a chance, it's god save the queen then 1 song, probably good vibes or something

Yes, the Beach Boys are going to be singing God Save the Queen at a baseball game in California.


Ahahaaaahahahaaaa, could you imagine?! The ultimate 'Hello Cleveland!' moment :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: ESQ Editor on April 07, 2012, 11:14:03 AM
Several tracks discussed Brian, Mike and Al in the upcoming Spring 2012 edition of Endless Summer Quarterly.



Title: Re: \
Post by: Amanda Hart on April 07, 2012, 11:46:25 AM
Yeah, that's true. I am fairly tired and have had a few pints, but whilst it varies from record to record - Surf's Up sounds completely different to CATP, say - they still sound like Beach Boys records.

Of course, they should go for whatever the songs seem to demand. I just, idk, don't want them to try so hard? Saying 'WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT LIKE IT'S 1967/1977/1961/whatever' is demeaning to the current record. That said, Mike going 'it sounds like 1965' makes a lot of sense, because Brian's production and arrangement nous seems to be about there, if the Gershwin record and TLOS are anything to go by. But striving for it is not right.

I'm rambling. Should sleep.  :lol

Don't worry, not too rambley. I think those of us discussing this now are on the same page. Working in a way that's familiar and comfortable is okay and could potentially produce the best results. It's the striving for it - going out of their way to emulate parts of their past - that would be unfavorable, for me at least.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 12:37:56 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



And this is why
I love this board

Yawn. That was a few pages old.

SurferGirl7 loves to belittle people
Because she is
an unpleasant person
And she does not like Boots's creativity
Because she is boring
And most probably
Jealous.
Nah, she's right on the money. It was not only done a few pages before, but it was sides-splitting funny........the first time.
OTOH, i'd say Iron Horse Apples is drifting into Vintagemusic territory................


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 07, 2012, 12:59:01 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.



Title: Re: \
Post by: bgas on April 07, 2012, 01:07:07 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.



Thanxx for the accolades, I like you too!


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 07, 2012, 01:30:08 PM
At least something "outlandish" like Smiley Smile would at least be more interesting then the sun surf sand I'm sure we'll be stuck with hearing.
The MAFIA is involved with Jim Peterik (Eye of the Tiger and now this new song). We will be getting
Fewer Pet Sounds and more Mob Sounds - less "How Deep is The Ocean"
And more "Sleepin' With the Fishes,"

This is no joke. At the age of 34, I found myself in Jim Peterik's
RV in back of a Checkers/Rallys location in North Carolina,
He asked me "how my health was" and demanded
Protection money (supposedly for a Checkers
Champ burger I was eating, but I read
Between the lines).



And this is why
I love this board

Yawn. That was a few pages old.

SurferGirl7 loves to belittle people
Because she is
an unpleasant person
And she does not like Boots's creativity
Because she is boring
And most probably
Jealous.
Thank you, good sir. I tried to bring some humor back because the thread was flagging again, but I see from other posters that it was not appreciated. To them, I can only say... You're all lucky that I'm not mob connected.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 01:35:45 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.
By "Vintagemusic territory" , I mean over-reaction. And your post adressing SurferGirl was anything but "nice"  Otherwise, yeah, this should be a place. I caught the same treatment myself, a page or 2 back. And as off the wall as Vintagemusic could seem at times, I believe he was targeted as well. It doesn't justify his over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon unneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you, and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene and  restful holiday.


By "vintagemusic territory"  I meant over-reaction. And your post was anything but "nice". I caught the same treatment myself a page or 2 back. And as off-the-wall as Vintagemusic seemed at times, I believe he was  targeted as well. It doesn't justify hiss over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon uneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene  holiday.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 07, 2012, 01:40:34 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.
By "Vintagemusic territory" , I mean over-reaction. And your post adressing SurferGirl was anything but "nice"  Otherwise, yeah, this should be a place. I caught the same treatment myself, a page or 2 back. And as off the wall as Vintagemusic could seem at times, I believe he was targeted as well. It doesn't justify his over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon unneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you, and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene and  restful holiday.


I agree, Vintagemusic was hounded unnecessarily. He was harping on the mob connections which was a bit annoying, but he also was adding to the discussion. Unfortuntely, before any of us could rush to his defense, he showed himself to be a wackjob.

I hope my attempt at humor hasn't caused anyone too much wasted time - I just saw another lull in the thread and figured I'd fill it with my loose-brained nonsense. C'est la vie.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 01:42:59 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.
By "Vintagemusic territory" , I mean over-reaction. And your post adressing SurferGirl was anything but "nice"  Otherwise, yeah, this should be a place. I caught the same treatment myself, a page or 2 back. And as off the wall as Vintagemusic could seem at times, I believe he was targeted as well. It doesn't justify his over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon unneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you, and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene and  restful holiday.


I agree, Vintagemusic was hounded unnecessarily. He was harping on the mob connections which was a bit annoying, but he also was adding to the discussion. Unfortuntely, before any of us could rush to his defense, he showed himself to be a wackjob.

I hope my attempt at humor hasn't caused anyone too much wasted time - I just saw another lull in the thread and figured I'd fill it with my loose-brained nonsense. C'est la vie.
I appreciate all attempts at humor, so my initial comment was out of line in itself. My apologies.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 07, 2012, 01:45:11 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.
By "Vintagemusic territory" , I mean over-reaction. And your post adressing SurferGirl was anything but "nice"  Otherwise, yeah, this should be a place. I caught the same treatment myself, a page or 2 back. And as off the wall as Vintagemusic could seem at times, I believe he was targeted as well. It doesn't justify his over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon unneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you, and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene and  restful holiday.


I agree, Vintagemusic was hounded unnecessarily. He was harping on the mob connections which was a bit annoying, but he also was adding to the discussion. Unfortuntely, before any of us could rush to his defense, he showed himself to be a wackjob.

I hope my attempt at humor hasn't caused anyone too much wasted time - I just saw another lull in the thread and figured I'd fill it with my loose-brained nonsense. C'est la vie.
I still thought the mob jokes were funny. The RV part was really funny. :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 01:55:24 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.
By "Vintagemusic territory" , I mean over-reaction. And your post adressing SurferGirl was anything but "nice"  Otherwise, yeah, this should be a place. I caught the same treatment myself, a page or 2 back. And as off the wall as Vintagemusic could seem at times, I believe he was targeted as well. It doesn't justify his over-reactive and offensive posts, but the guy was sh*t upon unneccessarily, imo.
I don't have any axe to grind with you, and I hope you find the peace you are seeking. Have a serene and  restful holiday.


I agree, Vintagemusic was hounded unnecessarily. He was harping on the mob connections which was a bit annoying, but he also was adding to the discussion. Unfortuntely, before any of us could rush to his defense, he showed himself to be a wackjob.

I hope my attempt at humor hasn't caused anyone too much wasted time - I just saw another lull in the thread and figured I'd fill it with my loose-brained nonsense. C'est la vie.
I didn't realize it was you that posted the humorous reference to Hitler and Chamberlain  a few pages back. I laughed hard at that one. It's true that Vintagemusic revealed himself to be a vicious wack-job and your post lightened things up considerably. Hilarious.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on April 07, 2012, 02:24:51 PM
Sorry guys I am a little too busy to be dealing with flame wars. People do have lives you know. Iron horse, I'll let you save your ax to grind elsewhere.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 07, 2012, 03:08:04 PM
That's fine, you just pop up every now and again with your nasty comments. That is all you seem to contribute to this board.

I have no axe to grind.

You stay out of my way, and I'll happily stay out of yours.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 07, 2012, 03:38:19 PM
Gooood, gooood, gooood, good vibrationnnnssss ::)


Title: Re: New Album
Post by: Micha on April 07, 2012, 03:46:07 PM
Brian's solo work, with a couple of exceptions, does not sell. No Beach Boys album, again with a couple of exceptions, has sold well since the 1960s

You mean the exceptions don't count? :wink

How about this: No Beach Boys album has ever sold good, with a few exceptions, and most of the exceptions were released in the 1960s. ;D

I expect the new album to be better than GIOMH and worse than Pet Sounds. If we're lucky we'll get something nearly as good as TLOS. And I'd love the new album sound like "Today!"

But the best part of it all is that the old boys seem to get along fine at last.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 04:44:41 PM
Gooood, gooood, gooood, good vibrationnnnssss ::)
LOL!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 07, 2012, 04:48:08 PM
Sorry guys I am a little too busy to be dealing with flame wars. People do have lives you know. Iron horse, I'll let you save your ax to grind elsewhere.
Little surfer, little one,
made our thread come all undone.....

Just kidding with you.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 07, 2012, 05:29:42 PM
Not really. I was merely saying I liked his poem. That didn't warrant a dismissive, catty remark. To be honest my life's not great at the moment. I want to come on here as a little escape. I genuinely find it hurtful when someone throws a nasty remark my way. Civility doesn't cost much. If you don't like someone's post, or find it yawn inducing. Ignore it. It's not hard.

And saying I'm "drifting into VintageMusic terrotory" What's that about? A threat? An attempt to ostracise me? For what exactly?

There are some great people on this board. Some are knowledgeable. Some are funny. Some are so clever it hurts my head. It's the small minority of mean spirited, scornful  people on here that bring this board down.

Be nice, really, life's too short.



+1

This board is a relief to us all. I would hate to think any of us come here with bad intentions, and even though some people turn out to be bigoted skull of Dick Reisings (vintagemusic, for instance), we're all here for the same good reason.

That reason is Mike Love, and all who sail in him.

Surfergirl7, I like your posts and all, but if you claim you don't have the time to deal with 'flame wars', it's probably not a good idea to start needlessly insulting people for harmless jokes.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 07, 2012, 09:06:51 PM
Just listening to Daves interview. 'Radio' is to be released next week as a single. I'm sure he said Wednesday!


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 07, 2012, 09:12:12 PM
Just listening to Daves interview. 'Radio' is to be released next week as a single. I'm sure he said Wednesday!

No way? That's AWESOME news. First new Beach Boys track in 20 years .  I think.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SamMcK on April 07, 2012, 09:56:07 PM
Hey guys i've been away for a while did I miss anything? :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 07, 2012, 10:35:07 PM
THIS COMING WEEK? OH MAN THAT'S AMAZING!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 07, 2012, 10:57:11 PM
Release of TWGMTR a day after the Dodger Stadium gig, that makes sense!
Will they perform the song?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 07, 2012, 11:07:27 PM
Release of TWGMTR a day after the Dodger Stadium gig, that makes sense!
Will they perform the song?

I doubt they'll perform it live but I would not be surprised if they played it over the stadium speakers before the game or in between innings. Do we have any LA area fans that will be attending?



Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 07, 2012, 11:14:53 PM
Release of TWGMTR a day after the Dodger Stadium gig, that makes sense!
Will they perform the song?

I doubt they'll perform it live but I would not be surprised if they played it over the stadium speakers before the game or in between innings. Do we have any LA area fans that will be attending?



Someone's gotta record this show and put it on YouTube asap afterwards!


Title: Re: \
Post by: over and over on April 07, 2012, 11:15:56 PM
I wish I could go!!!!
This is great news!!!! I think I'm gonna.....gonna.....................................  :angel:


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 08, 2012, 04:52:49 AM
I haven't bought a single since Kokomo in '88



Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 08, 2012, 05:41:05 AM
Looks like this single will be the most silent BB release ever if it really comes out next week. Hard to believe actually.
No official announcements, no preorder options, no updated websites...


Title: Re: \
Post by: GuyOnTheBeach on April 08, 2012, 06:12:04 AM
Wednesday seems like a funny day for a Single to come out, I always thought it was Monday in the U.K and Tuesday in the U.S?, I think Dave probably means that an announcement will be made, or the single will be sent to radio stations or something.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 08, 2012, 07:21:25 AM
Looks like this single will be the most silent BB release ever if it really comes out next week. Hard to believe actually.
No official announcements, no preorder options, no updated websites...
Ya, I really doubt it will be released next week.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 08, 2012, 08:22:27 AM
Wow, I'm really excited now


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 08, 2012, 09:10:36 AM
O boy o boy.  Maybe we'll get announcements for album and preview of twgmtr


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 08, 2012, 10:11:20 AM
I don't think the vast majority of singles are even released physically anymore. So Dave could mean any number of things. And it's not like the band is going to be making a play for the charts, anyway. This is purely a promotional device, however it comes out.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 08, 2012, 10:20:23 AM
I'm way out of touch. So I can't buy this as a physical single?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 08, 2012, 10:23:24 AM
Nothing has been announced.  But I'd expect maybe a vinyl single


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 08, 2012, 10:25:52 AM
I wonder if they did a deal with iTunes to have a front page feature.


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 08, 2012, 01:42:26 PM
Better start saving up for an iTunes card, nobody here will probably share it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 08, 2012, 01:57:21 PM
Someone must have heard this song, is it any good, worthy of a 50th anniversary tour?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 08, 2012, 01:59:19 PM
I'm picking itunes and also available for radio airplay this week. Would make sense to get a bit of momentum before it probably gets played live at the reunion gigs later this month.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 08, 2012, 02:19:27 PM
I don't think the vast majority of singles are even released physically anymore. So Dave could mean any number of things. And it's not like the band is going to be making a play for the charts, anyway. This is purely a promotional device, however it comes out.

Probyn said it sounds like a hit. And with the current musical competition, I'd say there's a very good chance it does well on the charts. It's not like they have much competition. Too many shite artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.

And if it's not a hit, you can expect a Summer In Paradise II.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 08, 2012, 02:22:10 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 08, 2012, 02:26:39 PM
Better start saving up for an iTunes card, nobody here will probably share it.

Listen to her!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 08, 2012, 02:28:48 PM

Probyn said it sounds like a hit. And with the current musical competition, I'd say there's a very good chance it does well on the charts. It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.

And if it's not a hit, you can expect a Summer In Paradise II.

This post is detached from reality.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 08, 2012, 02:50:50 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.



Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 08, 2012, 02:57:19 PM

Probyn said it sounds like a hit. And with the current musical competition, I'd say there's a very good chance it does well on the charts. It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.

And if it's not a hit, you can expect a Summer In Paradise II.

This post is detached from reality.

The f*** is that supposed to mean? The single/album are either going to do well, or they're not.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 08, 2012, 02:57:31 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.


a) The hipster crowd is interested in specific albums, not the Beach Boys as a band in general or the band who recorded numerous surf & car hits. They won't care for a new Beach Boys single, they pretend to care for PET SOUNDS etc.
b) The hipster crowd didn't buy Brian's Disney LP, parents did that to give the CD to their kids. And okay, a few hardcore fans bought it, but Disney makes money with parents. Therefore, the Disney LP is not an indicator for how the Beach Boys reunion album might fare.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Real Barnyard on April 08, 2012, 03:03:35 PM
The Single on amazon.de:

http://www.amazon.de/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007Q0OJC2


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 08, 2012, 03:28:34 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.


a) The hipster crowd is interested in specific albums, not the Beach Boys as a band in general or the band who recorded numerous surf & car hits. They won't care for a new Beach Boys single, they pretend to care for PET SOUNDS etc.
b) The hipster crowd didn't buy Brian's Disney LP, parents did that to give the CD to their kids. And okay, a few hardcore fans bought it, but Disney makes money with parents. Therefore, the Disney LP is not an indicator for how the Beach Boys reunion album might fare.


Of course they're interested in "certain albums." Everybody who listens to music is only interested in "certain albums." If you think that the younger people of today just "pretend to care for Pet Sounds" then you don't know wtf you're talking about. I see and hear their early 70s work mentioned as much, if not more, than Pet Sounds. The period from Summer Days to Love You is what is mentioned the most though, yeah, and somewhere in that sandwich of releases is the one that the new album is apparently supposed to be similar to.

And notice I said "people" when mentioning the Disney album, not "hipsters." Because I'm assuming that you're just assuming that people bought it for their kids not realizing there's several generations who grew up with The Beach Boys and Disney movies. Haven't read a whole lot of reviews that start off with "I bought this for my kids and..."

What about the Gershwin album that made it to 26 on the Billboard top 200? Does that also not matter because "parents just bought it for their convalescing parents because hipsters don't listen to Gershwin?"

"Brian Wilson" and "The Beach Boys" are pretty much synonymous, so if TWO albums of cover songs can do that decent on the charts, I don't see why the first Beach Boys album/single in a couple decades isn't going to do substantially better.


Title: Re: \
Post by: coco1997 on April 08, 2012, 03:36:00 PM
The Single on amazon.de:

http://www.amazon.de/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007Q0OJC2

Is there a release date listed on there?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 08, 2012, 03:55:02 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.


a) The hipster crowd is interested in specific albums, not the Beach Boys as a band in general or the band who recorded numerous surf & car hits. They won't care for a new Beach Boys single, they pretend to care for PET SOUNDS etc.
b) The hipster crowd didn't buy Brian's Disney LP, parents did that to give the CD to their kids. And okay, a few hardcore fans bought it, but Disney makes money with parents. Therefore, the Disney LP is not an indicator for how the Beach Boys reunion album might fare.


Of course they're interested in "certain albums." Everybody who listens to music is only interested in "certain albums." If you think that the younger people of today just "pretend to care for Pet Sounds" then you don't know wtf you're talking about. I see and hear their early 70s work mentioned as much, if not more, than Pet Sounds. The period from Summer Days to Love You is what is mentioned the most though, yeah, and somewhere in that sandwich of releases is the one that the new album is apparently supposed to be similar to.

And notice I said "people" when mentioning the Disney album, not "hipsters." Because I'm assuming that you're just assuming that people bought it for their kids not realizing there's several generations who grew up with The Beach Boys and Disney movies. Haven't read a whole lot of reviews that start off with "I bought this for my kids and..."

What about the Gershwin album that made it to 26 on the Billboard top 200? Does that also not matter because "parents just bought it for their convalescing parents because hipsters don't listen to Gershwin?"

"Brian Wilson" and "The Beach Boys" are pretty much synonymous, so if TWO albums of cover songs can do that decent on the charts, I don't see why the first Beach Boys album/single in a couple decades isn't going to do substantially better.
Woah, cool down.

Besides, I didn't know you were talking about the "hipster" culture as young people in general. Which is a mistake, by the way. Hipster culture is a concrete but constricted phenomenon, and its "members" really don't care about the entire discography of the Beach Boys. Trust me. It's even debatable if they're really interested in the stuff they do seem to care about (PET SOUNDS, SMiLE etc.).

Regarding your lines on the Gershwin LP.. dude, I don't know what you're trying to say.


Bottom line: anyone here (including me, of course) would love to see a successful single release - obviously. It's just highly unlikely that a broad audience will notice/care. A broad enough audience to make it a hit, that is. And that's what this argument is all about.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alan Smith on April 08, 2012, 03:56:38 PM
I haven't bought a single since Kokomo in '88


 :) How's this for out of touch - bought the 'Still Cruisin' and '...Japan' 45s in person from a record shop last Sunday - and I paid with cash.

A physical release would be cool, but I'll take whatever comes along!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 08, 2012, 04:04:41 PM
The album will most likely do well. Top 20, at a minimum. That says more about who's buying albums these days, but still. The single is a promo. I doubt there is a radio format that would play a new song by the BB these days, and that's one of the most important factors for singles chart placement. So everyone cool off and let whatever happens happen.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 08, 2012, 04:17:29 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.


a) The hipster crowd is interested in specific albums, not the Beach Boys as a band in general or the band who recorded numerous surf & car hits. They won't care for a new Beach Boys single, they pretend to care for PET SOUNDS etc.
b) The hipster crowd didn't buy Brian's Disney LP, parents did that to give the CD to their kids. And okay, a few hardcore fans bought it, but Disney makes money with parents. Therefore, the Disney LP is not an indicator for how the Beach Boys reunion album might fare.


Of course they're interested in "certain albums." Everybody who listens to music is only interested in "certain albums." If you think that the younger people of today just "pretend to care for Pet Sounds" then you don't know wtf you're talking about. I see and hear their early 70s work mentioned as much, if not more, than Pet Sounds. The period from Summer Days to Love You is what is mentioned the most though, yeah, and somewhere in that sandwich of releases is the one that the new album is apparently supposed to be similar to.

And notice I said "people" when mentioning the Disney album, not "hipsters." Because I'm assuming that you're just assuming that people bought it for their kids not realizing there's several generations who grew up with The Beach Boys and Disney movies. Haven't read a whole lot of reviews that start off with "I bought this for my kids and..."

What about the Gershwin album that made it to 26 on the Billboard top 200? Does that also not matter because "parents just bought it for their convalescing parents because hipsters don't listen to Gershwin?"

"Brian Wilson" and "The Beach Boys" are pretty much synonymous, so if TWO albums of cover songs can do that decent on the charts, I don't see why the first Beach Boys album/single in a couple decades isn't going to do substantially better.
Woah, cool down.

Besides, I didn't know you were talking about the "hipster" culture as young people in general. Which is a mistake, by the way. Hipster culture is a concrete but constricted phenomenon, and its "members" really don't care about the entire discography of the Beach Boys. Trust me. It's even debatable if they're really interested in the stuff they do seem to care about (PET SOUNDS, SMiLE etc.).

Regarding your lines on the Gershwin LP.. dude, I don't know what you're trying to say.


Bottom line: anyone here (including me, of course) would love to see a successful single release - obviously. It's just highly unlikely that a broad audience will notice/care. A broad enough audience to make it a hit, that is. And that's what this argument is all about.

Either way, hipsters don't buy music.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 08, 2012, 06:15:28 PM
I think it is remarkable that nothing has leaked yet. We're dying to hear something, to be sure, but someone's doing his job. Just remember that we got to hear BW's last 2 albums about 2 weeks prior to their release date!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 08, 2012, 06:18:47 PM
I think it is remarkable that nothing has leaked yet. We're dying to hear something, to be sure, but someone's doing his job. Just remember that we got to hear BW's last 2 albums about 2 weeks prior to their release date!

Alternatively, it may have leaked, but no-one's saying anything.

Doubt it though, as everything about the C50 seems exceeding tight.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 08, 2012, 06:41:30 PM
Very!

Even Carrie Marks has been laying low here for a while.

I wonder if David even had the ok to say what he did about the release. Sure hope so.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 08, 2012, 06:42:44 PM
I think it is remarkable that nothing has leaked yet. We're dying to hear something, to be sure, but someone's doing his job. Just remember that we got to hear BW's last 2 albums about 2 weeks prior to their release date!

It's also not two weeks prior to the release of the BB album, either.


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 08, 2012, 07:04:31 PM
As for the hit/no hit question, I could see the album doing well certainly,but I highly doubt a succesful single. Keep in mind that bands like the Eagles and Fleetwood Mac had huge success with reunion tours and albums not long ago but got little or no airplay and saw their singles tank


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 08, 2012, 08:03:56 PM
It's not like they have much competition. Too many sh*te artists releasing crap in today's musical landscape.
irrelevant.

How is that irrelevant? The Beach Boys have become hip again amongst the "indie" or "hipster" crowd, which is a pretty large demographic. If Brian's Disney album can peak at 83 on the Billboard 200 album chart, there's obviously people still interested in the music. More people will be interested in this since it's "Brian Wilson and The Beach Boys" and not a bunch of cover songs from children's movies.

Unless this is some awful, embarrassing song, which it very well may be, (It sounds like a hit to me, even by modern 2012 standards.) there's a very good chance it will do well.


a) The hipster crowd is interested in specific albums, not the Beach Boys as a band in general or the band who recorded numerous surf & car hits. They won't care for a new Beach Boys single, they pretend to care for PET SOUNDS etc.
b) The hipster crowd didn't buy Brian's Disney LP, parents did that to give the CD to their kids. And okay, a few hardcore fans bought it, but Disney makes money with parents. Therefore, the Disney LP is not an indicator for how the Beach Boys reunion album might fare.


I agree with both of your points, mostly though I generally agree with your nasty, nauseating hatred of hipsters, LOL.  Me Too!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 08, 2012, 08:07:07 PM
I don't think the vast majority of singles are even released physically anymore. So Dave could mean any number of things. And it's not like the band is going to be making a play for the charts, anyway. This is purely a promotional device, however it comes out.

Yeah, since the main people that will be looking for this are already hardcore fans, instead of like a traditional 'single' release like we've known in the past, this is one of those new fangled 'alright today you can finally download it' single releases... the music industry has changed much over the years and a seasoned band doesn't really have a single 'launch' to promote albums. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 08, 2012, 08:14:04 PM
The single has like no chance to be a radio hit nationwide, I bet you Californians will hear it though


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 08, 2012, 08:16:19 PM
^^^I love hipsters because they piss people off for virtually no reason whatsoever.
_____

I can't wait to hear this single!

But dear GOD. Please keep Foskett's falsetto from shadowing over the rest of the vocals.
_____



Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 08, 2012, 08:18:12 PM
As for the hit/no hit question, I could see the album doing well certainly,but I highly doubt a succesful single. Keep in mind that bands like the Eagles and Fleetwood Mac had huge success with reunion tours and albums not long ago but got little or no airplay and saw their singles tank

I think this is possible, definately.  It's a bit different though because of the timelines...


What it *ALL* comes down to is this: Pop Culture has a lot to do with 'lightning in a bottle'.  You can't straight up compare the Beach Boys favorably or unfavorably to what the Eagles or Fleetwood Mac did; they're different bands, different managers, different marketing strategies, different times....  

You've got three possible outcomes, like you always do with stuff like this:

1. It all bombs.  Nobody goes to the shows, the album doesnt' sell well, nobody plays the single, etc.  I doubt this will happen.  Maybe 10% chance.

2. It all goes well.  Album sells decent; all the shows sell out or close to it; the song gets a little radio play, etc... and everybody makes money.  This will probably be what happens.  85% chance.

3. It goes through the fucking roof... for whatever reason, the song catches on and is a hit.  All the shows sell out and demand is large for another tour.  The album lingers around on the charts for months and months selling and selling and selling, the whole public consciousness of the band in the public's eye goes up, etc.  5% chance that happens.  


You just never know what's going to make a hit, etc.  there were no guarantees they were going to get famous and do well in 1961... but eventually they did, becoming one of the biggest acts of all time, making untold fortunes for untold numbers of people.  Meanwhile the music industry and the record buying public has been very unkind to thousands of musicians and artists who also had a lot of talent, and worked very hard, but never got famous.  

So maybe... just maybe, the pop culture gods will smile on them one more time, and they'll see success nobody could ever dream of... for whatever that strange reason was that it happened in the first place back in the 60's.  



But probably not.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lonely Summer on April 08, 2012, 11:39:41 PM
I haven't bought a single since Kokomo in '88


I could almost say the same thing. Almost. For me, buying a single means trotting down to the nearest record store, and picking up one of those shiny little black discs with big hole in the center.....not downloading a song to my computer. Here's hoping us oldsters get a chance to buy the former this time around.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 09, 2012, 12:40:00 AM
Last time I bought a single was when Tower Records was going out of business and everything was 70% off. 

We live in the internet age now though, and digital audio stores sell singles. They even design digital album covers for them. What you rarely see anymore is the b-side to a single.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 09, 2012, 02:48:58 AM
I may be wrong here, and feel free to disagree, but I would think that most Beach Boys fans prefer a physical format rather than a download, and if they don't release the single as vinyl and/or CD then they will be completely disregarding their main market.



Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 09, 2012, 02:58:43 AM
I may be wrong here, and feel free to disagree, but I would think that most Beach Boys fans prefer a physical format rather than a download, and if they don't release the single as vinyl and/or CD then they will be completely disregarding their main market.



I think Capitol knows that and will accommodate fans. I assume there will be a physical printing of a disc or a 7" but maybe not? If it's just a promotional single then they might send copies just to radio stations, though I think most stations are using a digital format.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 09, 2012, 03:33:45 AM
I may be wrong here, and feel free to disagree, but I would think that most Beach Boys fans prefer a physical format rather than a download, and if they don't release the single as vinyl and/or CD then they will be completely disregarding their main market.



I think Capitol knows that and will accommodate fans. I assume there will be a physical printing of a disc or a 7" but maybe not? If it's just a promotional single then they might send copies just to radio stations, though I think most stations are using a digital format.

You say that, but tehre are alot of promo CD's about - Noel Gallagher for instance


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 09, 2012, 04:19:50 AM
I may be wrong here, and feel free to disagree, but I would think that most Beach Boys fans prefer a physical format rather than a download, and if they don't release the single as vinyl and/or CD then they will be completely disregarding their main market.


It's listed as a CD release on German amazon.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 09, 2012, 12:46:50 PM
I may be wrong here, and feel free to disagree, but I would think that most Beach Boys fans prefer a physical format rather than a download, and if they don't release the single as vinyl and/or CD then they will be completely disregarding their main market.



I think Capitol knows that and will accommodate fans. I assume there will be a physical printing of a disc or a 7" but maybe not? If it's just a promotional single then they might send copies just to radio stations, though I think most stations are using a digital format.

You say that, but tehre are alot of promo CD's about - Noel Gallagher for instance

THey usually get out to the general public eventually. I once found a copy of a rare 2002 Wondergirls promo single but didn't buy it and I've regretted it ever since.


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 09, 2012, 04:30:42 PM
If TWGMR is as good as some of the comments would have us believe, they would be crazy if they didn't play the song over the PA system at Dodger Stadium and introduce it to the fans.   


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 09, 2012, 04:38:26 PM
If TWGMR is as good as some of the comments would have us believe, they would be crazy if they didn't play the song over the PA system at Dodger Stadium and introduce it to the fans.   

The people in the stadium bought tickets to see the Dodgers play--not The Beach Boys.  These are not "fans."  Any new song being played over the PA wil barely be noticed especially on such a high-energy day as Opening Day.  They would be crazy if they made the first public debut of the song over the PA at a baseball game.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 09, 2012, 05:56:37 PM
Yeah playing twgmtr on the pa during a baseball game would gain nothing


Title: Re: \
Post by: coco1997 on April 09, 2012, 08:13:49 PM
So are we still supposed to be getting this song on Wednesday?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 09, 2012, 09:08:02 PM
So are we still supposed to be getting this song on Wednesday?

We are?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 09, 2012, 09:45:15 PM
So are we still supposed to be getting this song on Wednesday?

We are?

According to someone who would know.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SamMcK on April 09, 2012, 11:25:05 PM
I'm almost certain it will get a vinyl release so i'll be looking out for that. 8)


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 10, 2012, 06:36:53 AM
As much as I want it,
I don't know how valid Davids claim is considering we haven't seen anything yet...


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 10, 2012, 06:49:38 AM
It's not uncommon - The single will probably just pop up on iTunes or something tomorrow, if it's to be, with the only fanfare being people noticing it - there's little point drumming up singles nowadays as they're not as important businesswise.

Only thing is, singles don't get released on a wednesday? Maybe he means the song will be put on youtube or soundcloud or something, with an actual release following.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on April 10, 2012, 07:47:46 AM
It's not uncommon - The single will probably just pop up on iTunes or something tomorrow, if it's to be, with the only fanfare being people noticing it - there's little point drumming up singles nowadays as they're not as important businesswise.

Only thing is, singles don't get released on a wednesday? Maybe he means the song will be put on youtube or soundcloud or something, with an actual release following.

That's what I took it to mean. I think he means the single will be released to radio stations, youtube and tv stations (for the promo video) then after a while we'll get the physical release. Only a few places have it available for pre-order so far so I don't think we'll be seeing a physical release tomorrow.


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 10, 2012, 09:28:36 AM
In my opinion, I don't think it matters when 'singles' are released, they can put out an mp3 online whenever they/Capitol wants.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 10, 2012, 07:02:58 PM
Still no word on when and where we'll hear this? It's already Wednesday in some parts of the world!


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 10, 2012, 07:24:08 PM
COME ON GUYS.

EVERYONE IN CALIFORNIA SAW YOU ON TV TODAY.

LETS GO.


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 10, 2012, 07:39:11 PM
I'll be updating iTunes all day tomorrow....I can't wait to hear this song and I hope it lives up to the hype!

It's amazing that Brian is still singing harmonies 50 years after he started his band!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 10, 2012, 08:44:57 PM
I can't wait any longer!!!

LEGGO!!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 10, 2012, 08:46:11 PM
tomorrow would be a real good day.  C'MON PLEEAASE


Title: Re: \
Post by: coco1997 on April 10, 2012, 08:58:35 PM
It would really suck if David was wrong about the release date being tomorrow.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 10, 2012, 08:59:29 PM
It would really suck if David was wrong about the release date being tomorrow.

i think he just said this week, but wednesday would be a good day :D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 10, 2012, 09:07:18 PM
Tomorrow is supposed to be a nice day. I'm going to wait to listen to it until I'm driving then turn the stereo up full blast.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: coco1997 on April 10, 2012, 09:38:26 PM
How long before an album is released does the first single usually hit the airwaves?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 10, 2012, 09:45:56 PM
How long before an album is released does the first single usually hit the airwaves?

Depends on the artist, record label, etc.

Stone Temple Pilots' comeback single was released March 23rdish 2010, and their album was released May 25th 2010.

I full expect and anticipate that we will find out why god made the radio TOMORROW.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 10, 2012, 09:52:23 PM
YEEESSSS.

The meaning of life in song... I can't wait...


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 10, 2012, 09:54:26 PM
YEEESSSS.

The meaning of life in song... I can't wait...

ITS THE

EYE OF THE TIGER

ITS THA THRILL OF THE FIGHT

ITS WHY

GOD MADE THE RADIO OH OHHHHH


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 10, 2012, 10:21:34 PM
Seems kind of odd for it to be randomly released on a Wednesday.  New music usually is put out on Tuesdays (at least in the States).  I'm guessing if it shows up at all today it will be on the official website. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 10, 2012, 10:26:32 PM
The only reason to 'release' it on a tuesday though is because in the USA that's when 'soundscan' started their week.  So you would release it on tuesday, so your first week would be a clean week on Soundscan. 

If you're only releasing it online, or better yet as a free download on a website (hint hint) it really doesn't matter what day you release it on. 

OR, if you don't think the song is going to chart very high, or don't CARE what it charts, the day it's released is also irrelevant. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lonely Summer on April 10, 2012, 10:54:08 PM
Sure hope there is a physical single. Took me years to find the Still Cruisin' 45 - just got it a couple months ago at Bop Street, only cost me $4. Probably never will find Somewhere Near Japan, or any later BB's "singles", but thankfully a few of Brian's solo singles have appeared on 45's.  I've got What I Really Want for Christmas, Your Imagination, Midnight's Another Day, Melt Away, Love and Mercy and Let's Go to Heaven in My Car on 45's.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 10, 2012, 11:15:54 PM
Probably never will find Somewhere Near Japan, or any later BB's "singles", but thankfully a few of Brian's solo singles have appeared on 45's. 

There's at least  one of them being auctioned, right now.   (http://www.ebay.com/itm/THE-BEACH-BOYS-SOMEWHERE-NEAR-JAPAN-P-S-7-45rpm-/160754609447?pt=AU_Records&hash=item256db8ad27#ht_1828wt_922[/url)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 10, 2012, 11:18:41 PM
Well, Lonely Summer, for a second there I thought you were a really, really unbelievably cool person who somehow had a record player in their car, then I realized that's the full name of the song, lol.

"Melt Away" on 45?  That's pretty cool. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: SamMcK on April 11, 2012, 01:38:25 AM
I have unbelievably high expectations for this song right now! :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 11, 2012, 02:40:13 AM
Nothing showing on itunes, amazon etc thus far, will keep checking.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 11, 2012, 02:56:52 AM
I'm going to make a guess that it's not going to be for sale right now but some music magazine's website will have a world premiere or whatever. Rolling Stone or Spin. Maybe a physical copy will be available through a music magazine? Who knows.  i don't.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 05:12:00 AM
where did the "wednesday release" come from?  i'm pretty sure i poster here said wednesday and everyone took off with it right?


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 11, 2012, 05:15:42 AM
David was interviewed on WFMU last week and he said it. Seeing as it's 1pm here in Blighty and probably no longer Wednesday in some parts of the states, I guess he was not fully in the loop? He also said, iirc, that the album was not quite finished but close, and I guess you wouldn't release a single if the entire project wasn't done and dusted.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 05:41:26 AM
David was interviewed on WFMU last week and he said it. Seeing as it's 1pm here in Blighty and probably no longer Wednesday in some parts of the states, I guess he was not fully in the loop? He also said, iirc, that the album was not quite finished but close, and I guess you wouldn't release a single if the entire project wasn't done and dusted.

wednesday just started here in the states. 7:40 am in texas!  only 5:40 in california


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 11, 2012, 05:49:44 AM
David was interviewed on WFMU last week and he said it. Seeing as it's 1pm here in Blighty and probably no longer Wednesday in some parts of the states, I guess he was not fully in the loop? He also said, iirc, that the album was not quite finished but close, and I guess you wouldn't release a single if the entire project wasn't done and dusted.

wednesday just started here in the states. 7:40 am in texas!  only 5:40 in california

Hoping it's being released to the general public and not just radio stations: I think iTunes usually releases stuff around 1:00EST (10:00AM PST).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 05:55:56 AM
i don't think he'd show up on itunes immediately or today.  like stack-o-tracks said, it would be give to music websites first.


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 11, 2012, 06:01:36 AM
i don't think he'd show up on itunes immediately or today.  like stack-o-tracks said, it would be give to music websites first.

Perhaps. Since Brian did that for ITKOD it makes sense.

Damn, I was hoping to put a copy on my iPod today :-\


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 06:08:50 AM
Idk guys.... We NEED this....


I may have to go cry.
Haaaaaa...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 11, 2012, 08:48:16 AM
Idk guys.... We NEED this....


I may have to go cry.
Haaaaaa...
Still waiting for the 7" single TWGMTR/How's Your Health


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 08:52:29 AM
Haha

Andrew, come on man!! Let us know if we're waiting in vein!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 08:53:21 AM
I think itd be a miracle if it came out today lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 08:58:51 AM
I think itd be a miracle if it came out today lol
:smash :smash :smash


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 11, 2012, 10:01:09 AM
They should've just rerecorded "Marketplace" and made that the single.

LOX AND CREAM CHEESE, MELTING ALL OVER


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 11, 2012, 10:10:34 AM
Haha

Andrew, come on man!! Let us know if we're waiting in vein!!

... or even vain.  ;D

I'm sure any wait will be worth it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 10:16:30 AM
Haha

Andrew, come on man!! Let us know if we're waiting in vein!!

... or even vain.  ;D

I'm sure any wait will be worth it.
iPhone.. Sorry bout that haha..

I agree, but every moment we wait, we waste another second we could be listening!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 11, 2012, 10:24:46 AM
I don't know if I should be embarassed or worried but I totally had a dream last night that I was watching the music video for the new single.  It's absolutely ridiculous but here's how it went:  the music video started with a a bunch of dudes who looked like the Beach Boys singing the song.  These fake Beach Boy look-a-like dudes (all in their mid-twenties) were inside what looked like the poolhouse section of a fancy beachside house: huge glass windows surroudning them where you can see outside the ocean hitting the beach, and palm trees swaying in the wind.  in the dream, I realized that this was the spot where we had gotten those Malibu shots of the band a few weeks ago (the one of them at the beach and the other one of Al inside the house at the piano)--so in a way it was all coming together!   

These Beach Boy lookalikes (each obviously a double for the actual BB) began singing the new single and as they walked towards the camera, it's revealed that they are walking towards a huge pool, then they each step into the pool--fully clothed all while still singing!  As the camera pans out and as each fake BB-double gets further and further into the pool it's then revealed that the real   Beach Boys are already standing on the other end of the pool awkwardly (and hiliariously) waiting for them--also fully dressed.  I'm realizing at this point that is some weird updated 2012 spoof of the "Sloop John B" promo!  And just like in that promo film, these two sets of BB begin fighing and horsing  around.  The older BB fight the younger dudes, like "hey, we're the real Beach Boys you guys get outta here!"  Yup, Mike was without a hat and Brian's hair was drenched.  That's where it ended.  For all I know, I could've woken up in a laughing fit.

The song?  I was so enthralled by the ridiculous display that I completely forgot to pay attention to the song.  It sounded so perfect that I had thought it was an older classic song they were playing over the video.  I had pressed repeat on the video and relistened and found that it was the most catchy, ridiculously addciting song I had listened to.  The harmonies and overall theme was a cross between "All Summer Long" and "Old Man Sunshine"...I was beyond shocked. 

Well this was fun.   I think I might go seek some kind of psychiatric evaluation now.  See ya guys around.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 11, 2012, 10:27:27 AM
Looks like were getting nothing today  :-\


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 10:31:45 AM
This is one of those things where I'm not gonna expect to hear anything until I hear something


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 11, 2012, 10:54:09 AM
David teased and said it would be out on Wednesday... Now they HAVE to put out today  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 11, 2012, 11:03:21 AM
David teased and said it would be out on Wednesday... Now they HAVE to put out today  :lol
there are thousands of weds coming up it could be any number of them..lol..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Roger Ryan on April 11, 2012, 12:14:33 PM
David teased and said it would be out on Wednesday... Now they HAVE to put out today  :lol
there are thousands of weds coming up it could be any number of them..lol..

A thousand Wednesdays from now will be here before you know it...in about 19 years.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rob Dean on April 11, 2012, 12:32:49 PM
David teased and said it would be out on Wednesday... Now they HAVE to put out today  :lol
there are thousands of weds coming up it could be any number of them..lol..

A thousand Wednesdays from now will be here before you know it...in about 19 years.



I personally think we will see it on You Tube first , and very soon ( I hope )
Then Capitol will garnish the reaction , and then gauge a release date ( ie in about 2-3 weeks about the same time as the first few gigs ) , this would mean that the product might just be sat in a warehouse getting ready for distribution or being pressed/produced as we speak


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 11, 2012, 12:46:08 PM
Andrew,

Have you heard the song, and if so, can you give us a hint or more?


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 11, 2012, 12:49:12 PM
David teased and said it would be out on Wednesday... Now they HAVE to put out today  :lol
there are thousands of weds coming up it could be any number of them..lol..

A thousand Wednesdays from now will be here before you know it...in about 19 years.



I personally think we will see it on You Tube first , and very soon ( I hope )
Then Capitol will garnish the reaction , and then gauge a release date ( ie in about 2-3 weeks about the same time as the first few gigs ) , this would mean that the product might just be sat in a warehouse getting ready for distribution or being pressed/produced as we speak

I’m sure anything is possible, but I would tend to doubt CD singles are pressed and ready to go already if we haven’t even seen any kind of press release or indication of the label offering the single for retailers to order.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the single is a download-only release. There isn’t much of a market for physical CD singles these days. We’ll probably see a CD single released in other territories where there is more of a market (Europe, Japan, as indicated by it popping up on a few non-US sites), but other than maybe promo CD singles, I wouldn’t be surprised if the single is download-only when it first comes out. Even if a CD single is issued, it’s less likely it would be available day-and-date with a download release.

The only thing that makes me think we’d be unlikely to get the single on YouTube before iTunes is that it’s so easy to download audio off YouTube, they would want to at least make it available to purchase at the same time so people will at least have the option to buy it immediately.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 11, 2012, 01:40:29 PM
Brian's probably rearranging the song in a different order each morning, and Capitol's screaming bloody murder they need the album A.S.A.P., and Mike's telling Brian it's taking too long, and the songwriter quit because Mike bought him a ham sandwich for lunch instead of Roast Beef, and all the cd cases say "album order to be determined"...


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 11, 2012, 02:32:26 PM
Brian's probably rearranging the song in a different order each morning, and Capitol's screaming bloody murder they need the album A.S.A.P., and Mike's telling Brian it's taking too long, and the songwriter quit because Mike bought him a ham sandwich for lunch instead of Roast Beef, and all the cd cases say "album order to be determined"...

:lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 11, 2012, 02:37:14 PM
Brian's probably rearranging the song in a different order each morning, and Capitol's screaming bloody murder they need the album A.S.A.P., and Mike's telling Brian it's taking too long, and the songwriter quit because Mike bought him a ham sandwich for lunch instead of Roast Beef, and all the cd cases say "album order to be determined"...
Or, the project is running smoothly according to the marketing plan and things will be rolled out, mostly on schedule.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 11, 2012, 02:42:13 PM
The Cohen of Silence has descended once more...  >:D


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 11, 2012, 02:55:48 PM
Where is it? :/


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 11, 2012, 02:58:58 PM
I want the freaking song!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 11, 2012, 03:01:21 PM
Maybe if all 11 of us fly out to L.A. and rattle our sabres in the lobby of the capitol records building, they'll see the huge groundswell of nearly a dozen people anticipating this song AND RELEASE IT ALREADY!!!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 11, 2012, 03:04:47 PM
Maybe if all 11 of us fly out to L.A. and rattle our sabres in the lobby of the capitol records building, they'll see the huge groundswell of nearly a dozen people anticipating this song AND RELEASE IT ALREADY!!!!

The public has spoken!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 11, 2012, 03:13:44 PM
I'm bummed out now


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 11, 2012, 03:17:47 PM
"The album is - I don't know when the album is gets to come out but there's going to be a single out next week."

"And is the whole album done? Or at least the -"

"Yeah the album's pretty much done. Um, the single is titled "That's Why God Made The Radio," it's gonna be out next Wednesday."

David Marks interview with Michael Shelley on April 7, 2012.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 11, 2012, 03:19:01 PM
It's only like 3pm in LA..

We still have hope


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 11, 2012, 04:31:45 PM
HOPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING!


Title: Re:
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 04:40:56 PM
HOPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING!


Title: Re: \
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 11, 2012, 04:40:59 PM
I'm thinking one of our more talented, musically inclined board members should write a song called "That's Why God Made The Radio",  make it sound extra Beach Boys-y and demo it - that way we'll have something to tide us over.  :lol  :lol  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 11, 2012, 04:41:29 PM
I'm thinking one of our more talented, musically inclined board members should write a song called "That's Why God Made The Radio",  make it sound extra Beach Boys-y and demo it - that way we'll have something to tide us over.  :lol  :lol  :lol

On my way....


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 11, 2012, 04:46:47 PM
I'm thinking one of our more talented, musically inclined board members should write a song called "That's Why God Made The Radio",  make it sound extra Beach Boys-y and demo it - that way we'll have something to tide us over.  :lol  :lol  :lol

On my way....
No, don't. Please.


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 11, 2012, 04:48:37 PM
I always think of the melody of "God please let us go on this way" just with "That's why god made the radio" lol, i'm not creative. :D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 11, 2012, 05:14:56 PM
Well this was a wash out


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 11, 2012, 05:20:10 PM
Well this was a wash out

Gotta agree. Dang, I was really pumped to hear this.

At least when Al spills the beans you know sh*t's gonna go down. What happened, Dave!?!?!?!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 11, 2012, 05:52:00 PM
Wait a minute.  Maybe Dave's not really in the band, he's just in a band with really good impersonators.  How long's it been since he saw the REAL beach boys?  He may not even know.  Poor Dave. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 11, 2012, 07:41:53 PM
Not all that surprised that the song didn't surface today.  I mean, we're all getting bent out of shape over a vague comment David Marks made.  All he said was it was getting released on "Wednesday".  Didn't explain how it was getting released (on the radio, iTunes, website, etc.).  I think we're reading far more into this than necessary.  I'm sure the thing will get released soon.  Get a grip, people.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 11, 2012, 07:53:17 PM
Not all that surprised that the song didn't surface today.  I mean, we're all getting bent out of shape over a vague comment David Marks made.  All he said was it was getting released on "Wednesday".  Didn't explain how it was getting released (on the radio, iTunes, website, etc.).  I think we're reading far more into this than necessary.  I'm sure the thing will get released soon.  Get a grip, people.

Vague comment?

"The album is - I don't know when the album is gets to come out but there's going to be a single out next week."

"And is the whole album done? Or at least the -"

"Yeah the album's pretty much done. Um, the single is titled "That's Why God Made The Radio," it's gonna be out next Wednesday."

David Marks interview with Michael Shelley on April 7, 2012.

VAGUE COMMENT?!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 11, 2012, 07:56:21 PM
Guys... I'm trying to think of alternate meanings of the word "Released" as in "It's going to be released".... and I can't think of any.  

So apparently plans changed or David was operating on old information.

Edit: Just noticed he said it's going "To Be Out"... I can't think of anything else that could mean either other than it would pop up somewhere, presumably to be heard, on Wednesday. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 11, 2012, 07:57:30 PM
Not all that surprised that the song didn't surface today.  I mean, we're all getting bent out of shape over a vague comment David Marks made.  All he said was it was getting released on "Wednesday".  Didn't explain how it was getting released (on the radio, iTunes, website, etc.).  I think we're reading far more into this than necessary.  I'm sure the thing will get released soon.  Get a grip, people.

Vague comment?

"The album is - I don't know when the album is gets to come out but there's going to be a single out next week."

"And is the whole album done? Or at least the -"

"Yeah the album's pretty much done. Um, the single is titled "That's Why God Made The Radio," it's gonna be out next Wednesday."

David Marks interview with Michael Shelley on April 7, 2012.

VAGUE COMMENT?!

Considering that he doesn't specify exactly *how* it was going to be released, nor has anyone else made any kind of announcement that the song was coming out today, I'd say there's not a lot to go by.  So that would make it vague.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jon Stebbins on April 11, 2012, 07:59:08 PM
Gosh...Dave must be the first musician that ever mentioned a release date in an interview that ended up being wrong. Wow.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 11, 2012, 08:06:45 PM
Maybe the interview wasn't supposed to be aired until this week and he actuallly means next Wednesday?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 11, 2012, 08:12:56 PM
Actually, since the interview came out over the weekend, wouldn't today be "this Wednesday" and next week is "next Wednesday"


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 11, 2012, 08:15:04 PM
Yeah but the week starts on Monday, so it's still next week.  :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 11, 2012, 08:30:47 PM
They purposely changed it to make David look bad as punishment for giving an interview and talking about something.


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 11, 2012, 09:25:14 PM
Quote
I'm thinking one of our more talented, musically inclined board members should write a song called "That's Why God Made The Radio",  make it sound extra Beach Boys-y and demo it - that way we'll have something to tide us over.

Whoops...I made one called 'Thats why The Radio Made God'...lemme redo it :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 12, 2012, 09:18:09 AM
Actually, since the interview came out over the weekend, wouldn't today be "this Wednesday" and next week is "next Wednesday"

I remember getting into a massive semantics argument with someone once when they said they were going bowling 'next Friday', this was on a Monday but they didn't mean the upcoming Friday but the one after that, the argument went on for ages with both us refusing to back down. I still think I was right...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 12, 2012, 09:38:27 AM
Let's give it till next Wednesday


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 12, 2012, 09:41:33 AM
Gosh...Dave must be the first musician that ever mentioned a release date in an interview that ended up being wrong. Wow.

Surprisingly, considering the fervor for new information on the album on this board and penchant for quickly piling on someone in the BB camp for doing or saying or singing something someone doesn’t like, I haven’t seen much frustration targeted specifically at Dave on this one so much as general frustration about simply wanting to hear the song. Which is as it should be, because as soon as I listened to that interview, I knew it was just a casual sort of series of statements.

While we don’t actually know for sure if the June 5th release date for the album will hold true, if that is in fact the date, then it would be interesting that the fans know the release date of the album before Dave does. I get the vibe he’s not too concerned with all of that clerical, administrative stuff like release dates and whatnot. Thus, I took the “Wednesday” statement as a possible indicator and nothing more. This is especially the case considering, as I mentioned in previous posts, there has been nearly no other indication of this single release. We have band members saying it’s the first single, and some European sites showing a CD single for pre-order. That’s about it. That indicates it’s coming sooner rather than later. But with no new press release from Capitol, no indication of Capitol taking orders from retailers, and not one second of the new single leaking or being legitimately previewed, I was very skeptical the song would all of a sudden be purchasable yesterday.

An argument could be made that all of these guys, and probably many artists, should maybe take into account the fans’ enthusiasm for wanting to hear their new stuff sooner rather than later, and hold off on saying things that sound at all definitive if everything is still up in the air.

My best guess at this point would be that Capitol will want to combine a press release for the single and album (e.g. “New Beach Boys album (insert title here) due June 5th, First Single “That’s Why God Made the Radio” due out April whatever), and they probably can’t do that until the album is 100% done in terms of tracklisting, sequencing, title, probably art, etc. It sounds like in the last week or two they’ve still been finalizing the album, so perhaps they just need another week or so to get that all worked out.

I would think a new single right before the start of the tour would be a nice extra bit of promotion, so hopefully they’ll let us hear this song very soon!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 12, 2012, 09:57:33 AM
Had Foskett made the Wednesday claim, we'd have a 100-page ranting thread.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 12, 2012, 10:23:10 AM
.............which would be completely stupid.  I just skip over the negative sh!t people write about him here.  People with no lives, no jobs, and nothing else to do but sit on their computers day and night here and rag on Foskett or other posters.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 12, 2012, 10:26:58 AM
I like Jeff Foskett, there I said it!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 12, 2012, 10:48:36 AM
I like Jeff Foskett, there I said it!

Ban this guy!

 ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 12, 2012, 12:09:24 PM
I like Jeff's band from the 80s with Randell Kirsch, The Pranks.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 12, 2012, 12:14:14 PM
I like Jeff's band from the 80s with Randell Kirsch, The Pranks.
Yap. They got a few cool tunes. Check out The Warner Demos Collection.



Title: Re: \
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 12, 2012, 12:16:45 PM
I've had The Pranks stuff before I even knew who Jeff was - "Dance Floor" is a gem - a faux Hard Day's Night era Beatles, complete with George styled 12 string!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 12, 2012, 12:55:23 PM
I use to see Jeff play with Papa Doo Run Run at the Santa Cruz Boardwalk way back when.  Always thought his version of "GTO" was pretty good too, along with the Beach Boys and Jan & Dean covers.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Tony S on April 12, 2012, 02:34:53 PM
I have all of Foskett's solo CD's. I think they're great, especially At My Window(which sounds like it could be the Boys), and Cool and Gone, which is a tremendous CD. My problem with him, isn't actually with him per se, it's with him performing with the Boys, in an almost totally taking over mode. Not his fault in my mind, but when he sings with them live like the other day at Dodger Stadium, he might as well be solo. Can't hear anyone but him, and it's not the Beach Boys, in my opinion. Too much Jeff Foskett......but I really enjoy his solo music.....good stuff for sure.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 12, 2012, 02:37:48 PM
That's Why God Made The Internet



Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 12, 2012, 02:39:14 PM
I mentioned this before, but that's entirely the fault of a) the sound guy and b) the Beach Boys. Throughout a combination of factors (and god knows there are many in a baseball stadium with fireworks, what seemed like half of california's armed forces, and jets flying overheard) the group were not singing as loud as they were expected to.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 12, 2012, 03:13:49 PM
I like Jeff Foskett, there I said it!

Quick! To the Castle!

(http://paulboylan.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/angry-mob-at-frankenstein-castle.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 12, 2012, 03:31:24 PM
Not all that surprised that the song didn't surface today.  I mean, we're all getting bent out of shape over a vague comment David Marks made.  All he said was it was getting released on "Wednesday".  Didn't explain how it was getting released (on the radio, iTunes, website, etc.).  I think we're reading far more into this than necessary.  I'm sure the thing will get released soon.  Get a grip, people.
Vague comment?
"The album is - I don't know when the album is gets to come out but there's going to be a single out next week."

"And is the whole album done? Or at least the -"

"Yeah the album's pretty much done. Um, the single is titled "That's Why God Made The Radio," it's gonna be out next Wednesday."
David Marks interview with Michael Shelley on April 7, 2012.
VAGUE COMMENT?!

Considering that he doesn't specify exactly *how* it was going to be released, nor has anyone else made any kind of announcement that the song was coming out today, I'd say there's not a lot to go by.  So that would make it vague.

I was thinking, maybe those jets that flew over Dodger Stadium would drop copies of the single on the assembled masses.....................

 :P


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 12, 2012, 03:33:20 PM
The Cohen of Silence has descended once more...  >:D

"sorry about that, Chief!"

 >:D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 12, 2012, 03:45:57 PM

In the absense of any real news, maybe people will be amused by this related website of Get Smart catch phrases:

http://www.wouldyoubelieve.com/phrases.html

"How about Gunga Din on a donkey?"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 13, 2012, 04:03:13 AM
Let's give it till next Wednesday

When you say next Wednesday do you mean the 18th April or 25th?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 13, 2012, 04:48:03 AM
Let's give it till next Wednesday

like we have a choice?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Cliff1000uk on April 13, 2012, 05:40:53 AM
I like Jeff Foskett, there I said it!

i like Jeff too.....sorry (http://i41.tinypic.com/vnczev.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 13, 2012, 10:03:47 AM
Actually, since the interview came out over the weekend, wouldn't today be "this Wednesday" and next week is "next Wednesday"

I remember getting into a massive semantics argument with someone once when they said they were going bowling 'next Friday', this was on a Monday but they didn't mean the upcoming Friday but the one after that, the argument went on for ages with both us refusing to back down. I still think I was right...

but................ did they ever go bowling??


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 13, 2012, 10:52:42 AM
Actually, since the interview came out over the weekend, wouldn't today be "this Wednesday" and next week is "next Wednesday"

I remember getting into a massive semantics argument with someone once when they said they were going bowling 'next Friday', this was on a Monday but they didn't mean the upcoming Friday but the one after that, the argument went on for ages with both us refusing to back down. I still think I was right...

but................ did they ever go bowling??


I can't remember, they didn't talk to me for awhile after the disagreement! It was someone I worked with and I have a tendency to upset work colleagues without really meaning to, for example once a workmate asked if I would like to for drinks with a bunch of other work people and I responded with 'no thanks, I've already made plans with my real friends'. That did not go down well.


Anyhoo, back on topic: TWGMR will definitely be out at some point this year. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 13, 2012, 12:22:21 PM
 :o :o :o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 13, 2012, 12:45:20 PM
:o :o :o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

Gawaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!   Rickrolled!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 13, 2012, 01:07:55 PM
:o :o :o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
You bastard!


Title: Re:
Post by: Jimmie_R on April 13, 2012, 01:27:41 PM
:o :o :o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0


Grr...


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 13, 2012, 01:47:02 PM
:o :o :o http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

Let's hope the new single sounds half that good!!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 16, 2012, 07:47:20 AM
Hey everyone!

An hour ago, Brian Wilson's Facebook status asked this question:

"Question for everyone: Do you have/use iTunes?"

I just checked iTunes and nothing new for the Beach Boys came up...but perhaps they're getting ready to release the single and it will be on iTunes?


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 16, 2012, 01:07:56 PM
2 Days.

Get Ready.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 16, 2012, 01:14:26 PM
The boys really show their age with that question


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 16, 2012, 01:17:29 PM
2 Days.

Get Ready.
to be surprised and disappointed when nothing happens.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 16, 2012, 01:21:52 PM
2 Days.

Get Ready.
to be surprised and disappointed when nothing happens.

Care to wager?
Jk haha


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 16, 2012, 01:27:21 PM
The boys really show their age with that question
I don't think they are the ones asking. The marketing folk who run the page want to know if the geezer fans are hip to it.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 16, 2012, 01:34:49 PM
The boys really show their age with that question
I don't think they are the ones asking. The marketing folk who run the page want to know if the geezer fans are hip to it.

Wouldn't Capitol/EMI have highly paid people who track exactly how much Beach Boy product is sold on iTunes?   


Title: Re:
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 16, 2012, 01:36:56 PM
The boys really show their age with that question
I don't think they are the ones asking. The marketing folk who run the page want to know if the geezer fans are hip to it.

Wouldn't Capitol/EMI have highly paid people who track exactly how much Beach Boy product is sold on iTunes?   

I doubt the record company pays anybody to have iTunes send them a list of how many copies of what songs were sold.

Though they DO pay people to lurk message boards, so you never know.


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 16, 2012, 01:41:49 PM
You don't think they're tracking sales? The best research they can come up with is to ask people on facebook and BW.com if they use iTunes? If that is true, maybe it's no wonder record labels are crashing


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 16, 2012, 01:49:53 PM
I didn't say they weren't tracking sales, but I doubt Capitol has "highly paid people who track exactly how much Beach Boy product is sold" because Apple/iTunes already keeps track of that stuff. It's a store, so of course they know exactly how many copies of what is sold. Requires no "tracking" on the part of anybody because a computer does it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 16, 2012, 01:58:14 PM
I think this may be partly meant as a teaser. Rather than simply saying “A new single will be on iTunes”, they are asking who uses iTunes. Sort of like asking “Who has room on their shelf for a new Beach Boys CD?” rather than stating a new CD is coming out.

While they may gather some sort of info from responses to this question from fans, I don’t think the responses will determine whether they put the song on iTunes. Most anything new now gets put on iTunes. Even if they determined BB fans are old and want a physical CD, the song would still also appear on iTunes.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 16, 2012, 02:15:41 PM
I don't have i-Tunes. I don't have one of those i-Lids or whatever they're called. I don't want, need or have a mobile phone.  I want a fysical phormat.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 16, 2012, 02:47:31 PM
You don't think they're tracking sales? The best research they can come up with is to ask people on facebook and BW.com if they use iTunes? If that is true, maybe it's no wonder record labels are crashing

They have a direct link to consumers, a few are answering more in depth. You don't think that's useful?  Of course they're tracking sales, but Facebook is a great resource too


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 16, 2012, 03:17:33 PM
You don't think they're tracking sales? The best research they can come up with is to ask people on facebook and BW.com if they use iTunes? If that is true, maybe it's no wonder record labels are crashing



They have a direct link to consumers, a few are answering more in depth. You don't think that's useful?  Of course they're tracking sales, but Facebook is a great resource too

Ok, I'm an idiot. Not the first or last time.  I just thought it was an odd question.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 16, 2012, 06:02:41 PM
The boys really show their age with that question

I don't have Itunes.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 16, 2012, 10:51:31 PM
I don't have i-Tunes. I don't have one of those i-Lids or whatever they're called. I don't want, need or have a mobile phone.  I want a fysical phormat.

I have it/one, but I refuse to buy music digitally. Everything on my iPod is on a CD somewhere in my house, and very likely on vinyl too.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 17, 2012, 12:04:28 AM
The boys really show their age with that question

I don't have Itunes.

I don't think it's so much that rather than the fact that iTunes is, at the very least, the biggest music retailer in the U.S.  So it does sort of date whoever asked the question. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: TonyW on April 17, 2012, 12:11:24 AM
Please correct me if I'm wrong but since iTunes started to exist there hasn't been any "new" Beach Boys product to know how it would sell.  ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on April 17, 2012, 12:16:26 AM
They're releasing the Grammy performance on iTunes.  That may be why they're asking.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 17, 2012, 01:40:50 AM
Amazon.de has the single listed.


Title: Re: \
Post by: MBE on April 17, 2012, 03:12:57 AM
I rarely buy anything but vinyl because I just think that anyone can make a CD or download.


Title: Re:
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 17, 2012, 03:47:36 AM
Amazon.de has the single listed.
Hmmmmm
LEGGO!


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 17, 2012, 04:38:43 AM
They're releasing the Grammy performance on iTunes.  That may be why they're asking.

The song itself? Or the video of the performance? The Grammy video was on itunes within a week after the performance.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 17, 2012, 12:14:32 PM
Soooo, Wednesday  :P


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 12:22:27 PM
And?

You can't wait, Shady?  Don't you have any patience? Are you on the edge of your seat with anticipation for the new single, just like you were chomping at the bit on a daily basis for SMiLE?  Don't you think a release date will be publicized before release?  I think it will be.  I wouldn't hold your breath from week to week for a new single like you've been doing since last Wednesday (based on Dave Marks' comments).

It'll come, Shady.  If not the single, the album for sure. Then you'll have something to talk about.  Until then.............take a deeeeeep breath, eh?  ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 17, 2012, 12:29:13 PM
Thanks for the friendly advice, Mikie  ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 17, 2012, 12:52:04 PM

 ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 01:02:15 PM
 ::)


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 17, 2012, 01:17:52 PM
Bugger me, a love-in! :kiss


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 17, 2012, 01:42:18 PM
I'm still thinking tomorrow, may just be hope...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 02:21:44 PM
Hope all you want to - it ain't gonna happen!   ;D


Title: Re:
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 02:27:13 PM
Bugger me, a love-in! :kiss

John, "bugger" is an English term, right?  Originally used to describe either anal intercourse by a man with a man or woman, or an animal?

Not to be confused with "booger", an American term. As in the word printed on the bumper sticker of my car that says, "Get too close to me and I'll flick a booger on your windshield!"


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 17, 2012, 02:36:58 PM
"Bugger me", aye, an English term, but used in the sense of "by crikey old chap" or "by jove" or "flippin' 'eck".

I've never heard of this "anal intercoarse" business.  Can you enlighten… no, perhaps best not.

Booger; wasn't that a kind of dance one might have done to the 79 version of HCTN, as in "let's booger on down, baby"?

Just to be on topic, I reckon they'll release this new single on a specific anniversary. Maybe time to sift through Bellagio 10452 and see what's coming up.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Fro on April 17, 2012, 02:49:00 PM
I would think they would release it before their Sirus XM show and the tour starts (as they'd want to sing the new single on tour to promote the album coming out), but whatever.


Title: Re:
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 02:50:10 PM
Booger; wasn't that a kind of dance one might have done to the 79 version of HCTN, as in "let's booger on down, baby"?

No, that's "boogie"!  As in, "Let's get down and boogie!"  

As for "Bugger":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugger



Title: Re:
Post by: Alan Smith on April 17, 2012, 03:33:27 PM

Just to be on topic, I reckon they'll release this new single on a specific anniversary. Maybe time to sift through Bellagio 10452 and see what's coming up.

I checked Bellagio last night - says the single came out last Wednesday :lol, notes release date for the album, airing date for Summer's Gone


Title: Re:
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 17, 2012, 03:38:44 PM

Just to be on topic, I reckon they'll release this new single on a specific anniversary. Maybe time to sift through Bellagio 10452 and see what's coming up.

I checked Bellagio last night - says the single came out last Wednesday :lol, notes release date for the album, airing date for Summer's Gone

Two out of three ain't bad.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 17, 2012, 04:16:46 PM
Damn, and I always thought AGD did extensive research for that site.

What does that blurb say under his avatar?  I'm starting to believe it!   :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 17, 2012, 04:30:04 PM
I'm calling it, tomorrow or thurs. They're gonna be on world radio, what better a time then then to support it?


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 17, 2012, 05:02:58 PM

Just to be on topic, I reckon they'll release this new single on a specific anniversary. Maybe time to sift through Bellagio 10452 and see what's coming up.

I checked Bellagio last night - says the single came out last Wednesday :lol, notes release date for the album, airing date for Summer's Gone

Two out of three ain't bad.  ;D
No, that's Meatloaf.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 17, 2012, 08:29:44 PM
Everyone pray that god makes the radio tomorrow!!

Comeonnnnnnnn let's go! Can't I dream? Haha


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 17, 2012, 09:37:04 PM
I'm calling it, tomorrow or thurs. They're gonna be on world radio, what better a time then then to support it?

It won't broadcast until May. Then again, the tour starts pretty damn soon.

Either way, I'm with you dude, I'm dyin to hear this!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Quzi on April 17, 2012, 10:05:22 PM
The sirius.fm broadcast is supposedly going to feature cuts off the new album - I'd say that it's highly probable that we will hear TWGMTR sometime tomorrow.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 17, 2012, 10:21:00 PM
The sirius.fm broadcast is supposedly going to feature cuts off the new album - I'd say that it's highly probable that we will hear TWGMTR sometime tomorrow.

Not sure.
The Sirius-concert will be recorded April 19, but broadcasted May 26.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 17, 2012, 10:33:17 PM
Those concerts are REALLY cool.  It's almost like a behind the music type thing, they talk to the bands and they explain songs, etc.  I think Brian did one a few years back for one of the albums, can't remember which one it was. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 17, 2012, 10:48:16 PM
They're releasing the Grammy performance on iTunes.  That may be why they're asking.

The Grammy performance apparently has already been out on iTunes since February.  I don't think it has anything to do with what they're asking. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 17, 2012, 11:07:06 PM
Damn, and I always thought AGD did extensive research for that site.

What does that blurb say under his avatar?  I'm starting to believe it!   :-D

I must have a sharp word with young Marks...  ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dutchie on April 18, 2012, 12:42:58 AM
OK its the 18th but still no single  :'(


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 18, 2012, 01:33:17 AM
OK its the 18th but still no single  :'(

Don't tell Phil… he'll put it down to an outbreak of bubonic plague…


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 18, 2012, 04:41:38 AM
It's 4:40 am in california, nope, not todayb :smash


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 18, 2012, 08:33:43 AM
Hey, it's Wednesday.   Is the new single out yet??


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 18, 2012, 08:43:30 AM
Hey, it's Wednesday.   Is the new single out yet??
I think I liked this thread better when it was all about cement shoes and people asking about other peoples' health.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 18, 2012, 08:47:55 AM
 ;D



Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 18, 2012, 08:49:58 AM
Hey, it's Wednesday.   Is the new single out yet??
I think I liked this thread better when it was all about cement shoes and people asking about other peoples' health.

Maybe it's time for another of your sonnets then.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 18, 2012, 09:58:22 AM
Hey, it's Wednesday.   Is the new single out yet??
I think I liked this thread better when it was all about cement shoes and people asking about other peoples' health.

Maybe it's time for another of your sonnets then.
Yes, please.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 18, 2012, 10:46:30 AM
Hey, it's Wednesday.   Is the new single out yet??
I think I liked this thread better when it was all about cement shoes and people asking about other peoples' health.

Maybe it's time for another of your sonnets then.

Gladly. File this one under "diminishing returns..."

I put in a call to Capitol Records to axe them about the single.
The lady who answered wanted all kinds of personal
information from me, like my name and
which artist and single I was calling about.

I said, "that's personal information. Next,
you are going to ask how my health is,
and tell me how it would be a shame
if anything happened to my health."

The lady laughed at me, and said
"Let me transfer you to Scott."

"Scott as in Scotti Bros??"

There was no reply, as I
was on hold.
I was nervous, excited and
A little bit hungry - I had
Cracked the code of the
New Beach Boys single.
The Scotti Bros. are
Holding it hostage.

Scott answered.
I begged him
Not to hurt me
and told him to
Go after my
Loved ones
Instead.

He said "quit wasting my time,"
I said "that's verbal assault,"
And we parted ways.

So, my takeaway from that conversation is that the single is not going to come out
Until the Beach Boys pony up the necessary protection money.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 18, 2012, 11:20:18 AM
I wonder what the beach boys contract with capitol is right now


Title: Re: \
Post by: anazgnos on April 18, 2012, 11:27:17 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/vP6RX.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 18, 2012, 12:16:23 PM
:lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 18, 2012, 12:56:15 PM
"When it's done" HAHA my favorite part!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 18, 2012, 01:34:29 PM

"AUSGEZEICHNET!"


Title: Re:
Post by: Heysaboda on April 18, 2012, 01:43:36 PM
"Bugger me", aye, an English term, but used in the sense of "by crikey old chap" or "by jove" or "flippin' 'eck".

Here in the States we say "by cracky", a mild oath, often used to express surprise or approval.

Used mainly by people 75 years and older!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 09:31:36 AM
(http://www.chartsinfrance.net/style/breves/2/photo_1334838984.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Shift on April 19, 2012, 09:39:47 AM
Jaco's mock-up was along the right lines then, eh?

(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2q9ddakvX1rqueqco4_400.png)

Such powers of premonition!    ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 09:41:13 AM
Well, the vintage radio motif was to be expected.  ;) But yeah, nice foresight.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on April 19, 2012, 09:46:28 AM
Ahah came here to post this when i found the picture, but had to wait to get my account activated.

Looks like it's gonna be quite summer/surf-esque! hope it won't be too ridiculous and that they'll let Brian do some stuff, like Midnight's Another Day, would love that yeah.



Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 09:53:38 AM
Ahah came here to post this when i found the picture, but had to wait to get my account activated.

Looks like it's gonna be quite summer/surf-esque! hope it won't be too ridiculous and that they'll let Brian do some stuff, like Midnight's Another Day, would love that yeah.


Allegedly they are trying to emulate the Beach Boys formula circa '65, at least that's what the Boys hinted at in interviews. But certainly everybody involved will make sure it comes across as somewhat mature, not ridiculous. The whole reunion's been pretty tasteful so far.

Welcome to the board, anyhow!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ziggy Stardust on April 19, 2012, 10:02:30 AM
One can only hope!

Thanks, yeah i'm pretty bad/shy when it comes to introduce myself.



Title: Re: \
Post by: meltedwhiskeyinmyhand on April 19, 2012, 10:11:49 AM
only on a beach boys message board would there be a 24 page thread about a tune that no one has heard


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 10:20:23 AM
only on a beach boys message board would there be a 24 page thread about a tune that no one has heard
WE RULE.

(http://www.drinkalot.com/pics/Whos_Awesome.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rob Dean on April 19, 2012, 10:24:29 AM
(http://www.chartsinfrance.net/style/breves/2/photo_1334838984.jpg)




Ah just like the vintage and rather desirable 'Roberts' Radio , is it a code that only Roberts or a derivative of that name i.e Rob / Bob etc will get the first chance to hear this damn song ? I hope  :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rob Dean on April 19, 2012, 10:26:56 AM
only on a beach boys message board would there be a 24 page thread about a tune that no one has heard
WE RULE.

(http://www.drinkalot.com/pics/Whos_Awesome.jpg)


Na, he's saying 'Piss Off They Are Both Mine'

Nice ass  ;D

"Two Girls For Every Boy"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 19, 2012, 10:37:42 AM
"Two Girls For Every Boy"
Nice. I didn't even see the Jan & Dean 'possibility' there. Good to know the young folk is keeping their spirit alive.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paul J B on April 19, 2012, 11:39:23 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/vP6RX.jpg)

As bad as that movie was, the guy playing Mike really was a good fit. I thought that was him for a minute before I figured out what I was looking at. Too funny!


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 19, 2012, 11:40:20 AM
Brian's actor on the other hand... ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 19, 2012, 11:41:47 AM
I also didn't understand why they got a short dude to play David Marks and a tall guy to play Al.  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 19, 2012, 03:28:57 PM
only on a beach boys message board would there be a 24 page thread about a tune that no one has heard

People have heard it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 19, 2012, 03:34:30 PM
Andrew, if you've heard the new single, do you think you'd be able to summarize your thoughts about it in a one word review?   :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 19, 2012, 03:45:13 PM
If I had, then yes, I probably could.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 19, 2012, 04:10:10 PM
 :o Would've put money down that you've already heard it...


Title: Re: \
Post by: bgas on April 19, 2012, 04:12:17 PM
He didn't specifically say that he hadn't heard it


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 19, 2012, 04:13:45 PM
Or did he..... ?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 19, 2012, 04:16:19 PM
He didn't specifically say that he hadn't heard it

 ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Sam_BFC on April 19, 2012, 04:55:39 PM
only on a beach boys message board would there be a 24 page thread about a tune that no one has heard

People have heard it.

Such as those who performed on it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: bgas on April 19, 2012, 05:14:15 PM
If I had, then yes, I probably could.

He didn't specifically say that he hadn't heard it

Or did he..... ?

Hmmm....  reading along as he wrote it, I interpret his remarks as:
AGD would probably be able to give a one word review if he had heard the single.
He doesn't affirm, or deny hearing the recording, only writing he could give a review based on that specification


Title: Re:
Post by: SurfRiderHawaii on April 19, 2012, 07:15:48 PM
If I had, then yes, I probably could.

People have heard it - Brian, Al, Mike, Dave, Bruce ........


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 19, 2012, 10:49:35 PM
Probyn's heard it despite not playing on it - that was in the interview which was censored - and he gave it a thumbs up (I think!).


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 08:30:52 AM
Apparently some people heard it last night....


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 20, 2012, 12:22:19 PM
I find it hard to believe no one recorded it...


Title: Re: \
Post by: The Real Barnyard on April 20, 2012, 12:27:48 PM
Single on April 30th???

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/that%27s-why-god-made-the-radio


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 20, 2012, 12:34:06 PM
Single on April 30th???

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/that%27s-why-god-made-the-radio

-waves-

I got that info from this board  :P


Title: Re: \
Post by: MaxL on April 20, 2012, 12:48:29 PM
Single on April 30th???

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/that%27s-why-god-made-the-radio

-waves-

I got that info from this board  :P

Ditto, my blog's the other one that appears.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 12:49:17 PM
I find it hard to believe no one recorded it...

That's kinda what I was getting it.  Nor has anyone even described it.  It's like the freaking Coca Cola formula...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 20, 2012, 02:25:48 PM
So, I've just looked this up, cos I was intrested, like. This is the first original Beach Boys single for 20 years. "Hot Fun In The Summertime". This new single has a lot to live up to.


Title: Re: \
Post by: TerryWogan on April 20, 2012, 02:47:03 PM
So, I've just looked this up, cos I was intrested, like. This is the first original Beach Boys single for 20 years. "Hot Fun In The Summertime". This new single has a lot to live up to.

I'm missing the joke aren't I? Cos that ain't an original song. Which I'm almost certain you're aware of. And were making some kind of joke. Which I'm too silly to get. You know what? I think this post might be somewhat redundant.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 20, 2012, 02:50:55 PM
Wait... Since then did we have sleeve art?


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 02:52:37 PM
So, I've just looked this up, cos I was intrested, like. This is the first original Beach Boys single for 20 years. "Hot Fun In The Summertime". This new single has a lot to live up to.

Looking at the Bellagio site, says Summer of Love was released as a single in 1995. Interestingly also says TWGMTR released as a single April 2012, but no catalog # listed.  I could have sworn that Under the Boardwalk and Summer in Paradise were both released as singles.  AGD?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 20, 2012, 02:54:48 PM
Wait... Since then did we have sleeve art?


Since when have we still had singles?


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 20, 2012, 03:16:00 PM
Wait... Since then did we have sleeve art?


Since when have we still had singles?

I mean for this song


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 03:17:07 PM
yesterday.  It's on Amazon, I believe.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 20, 2012, 03:47:21 PM
Wait... Since then did we have sleeve art?


Since when have we still had singles?

I mean for this song

I mean for any song. I'm ipod 101 but I didn't know they still made singles!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 20, 2012, 05:01:24 PM
Fact. If this song is played live next weekend (100% certain) its going to be on youtube within minutes.

Surely it will be heard before then.

edit
Duh. First gig Tuesday. That rolled around fast!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 20, 2012, 05:19:11 PM
I almost don't want my first introduction to this "epic" song to be some crappy I-phone recorded version on YouTube.  It'll be tough to ignore it until the single comes out though....


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 20, 2012, 05:21:31 PM
Dude, I just wanna hear it! :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 20, 2012, 05:28:58 PM
A lot of bands still do singles.  I know Oasis continued to, and noel gallagher did for his solo singles.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 20, 2012, 05:33:59 PM
Anyone going to the record day thing that Al's doing tomorrow at Long Beach?

If so, ask him when its out.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 20, 2012, 05:38:06 PM
I almost don't want my first introduction to this "epic" song to be some crappy I-phone recorded version on YouTube.  It'll be tough to ignore it until the single comes out though....

Yeah, it's tough.  Something about actually buying the CD though and playing it old-school without hearing the leaked versions. 


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 20, 2012, 06:12:38 PM
I almost don't want my first introduction to this "epic" song to be some crappy I-phone recorded version on YouTube.  It'll be tough to ignore it until the single comes out though....

Yeah, it's tough.  Something about actually buying the CD though and playing it old-school without hearing the leaked versions. 


Yeah, I REALLY want to wait and pop the cd in.  Don't think I'll have the will power


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 12:11:39 AM
I almost don't want my first introduction to this "epic" song to be some crappy I-phone recorded version on YouTube.  It'll be tough to ignore it until the single comes out though....

Yeah, it's tough.  Something about actually buying the CD though and playing it old-school without hearing the leaked versions. 

But it's come full circle really, cos' back in the day you'd have heard a new single on a crappy one speaker radio.


Title: Re:
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 12:15:21 AM
So, I've just looked this up, cos I was intrested, like. This is the first original Beach Boys single for 20 years. "Hot Fun In The Summertime". This new single has a lot to live up to.

Looking at the Bellagio site, says Summer of Love was released as a single in 1995. Interestingly also says TWGMTR released as a single April 2012, but no catalog # listed.  I could have sworn that Under the Boardwalk and Summer in Paradise were both released as singles.  AGD?

Nope - they weren't. There was an "SIP" promo, with a live version from London in 1993 (I'm on it - the only guy in my row singing along, word perfect: my then GF couldn't understand how I knew the words to a new song), but no "UTB" release, as far as I know. As for no catalog # for "Radio" - I don't know it !


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 02:31:08 AM
Apparently some people heard it last night....

Wait, what?!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 03:39:04 AM
The Sirius taping.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 03:42:59 AM
yeah I read the other threads and have been informed. sure hope it leaks.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 06:06:26 AM
i'm cool with hearing twgmtr on a crappy iphone video.  It's the rest of the album i'll hold out for


Title: Re: \Here it is!
Post by: dumbangel76 on April 21, 2012, 06:34:49 AM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165s


Title: Re: \Here it is!
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 06:41:27 AM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165s


Thank you !!
Very nice. I don't know if it ha hit potential but it sounds nice. Let's wait for the whole thing !!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 06:43:58 AM
Sounds nice. Can't wait for the whole tune. Boys are looking good.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 06:46:13 AM
Love it... but immediately I'm thinking "Midnight Cowboy" !


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 21, 2012, 06:49:32 AM
Sounds great, can't wait to hear it properly!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 06:50:25 AM
Love it... but immediately I'm thinking "Midnight Cowboy" !


Exactly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnFoaj8utio (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnFoaj8utio)

But thinking of it, the title lends itself pretty well to incorporate lots of musical puns. I hope it won't be that way though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 21, 2012, 06:50:48 AM
At 2:43, certain people round here are going have a conniption.


I like it! Strange choice for a single, but it's a pretty ballad from what I can hear. Sounds very JT, mind. Sigh.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 06:52:58 AM
Love it... but immediately I'm thinking "Midnight Cowboy" !
Me, too! That one chord change with the descending melody makes it hard not to think of it. But, hey, sounds good to me. And the band seems enthused about it. All systems go.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 06:54:03 AM
At 2:43, certain people round here are going have a conniption.
;D
He had to be on this, obviously..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Steve Mayo on April 21, 2012, 06:55:14 AM
phil... oh, phil.....yoohoo


Title: Re: \
Post by: Tony S on April 21, 2012, 06:55:32 AM
I like it! Thanks for Posting!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 07:02:11 AM
Listening again, there has to be a missing middle-eight somewhere.


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 07:02:35 AM
Thought it was a joke at first with the way that link takes you to the end of the video.

But damn, that song sounds pretty incredible.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 21, 2012, 07:03:19 AM
Hey, this video is online since April 11!!! Are we all sleeping or what?

Not my taste though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: STE on April 21, 2012, 07:04:45 AM


Thanks for the link to the new Foskett single!!

 >:D



Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 07:09:12 AM

Sounds very JT, mind. Sigh.


The intro sounds very much like "Don't worry baby"'s intro on S&S. But if that's all it has in common with that phase of the Beach Boys I'm happy.

Sounds better and better the more I listen to it. Can't get it out of my head now. Do you think Brian will take the whole lead ?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 07:12:19 AM
does sound very JT, and a lil repetitive, but it's still a good song.  Harmonies sound killer, and i may like the verses more than the chorus on this one!  i really like the "fallin in love" part


Title: Re: \
Post by: Seaside Woman on April 21, 2012, 07:12:57 AM


Thanks for the link to the new Foskett single!!

 >:D



Bang on!

I wasn't expecting much so I'm not too disappointed with this very unremarkable song.



Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 07:16:39 AM
I had more expectations for the wilson/love songs, but this sounds like a nice tune.  The verse stuff sounds like 1963 ballady beach boys, so for that i like it. 


Title: Re:
Post by: Eireannach on April 21, 2012, 07:17:50 AM
Sounds alright.  Thanks for posting it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 21, 2012, 07:20:45 AM
The vocal blend or harmonising remind me a bit of "All Summer Long" at times.


Title: Re: \
Post by: lee on April 21, 2012, 07:21:50 AM
Sounds good and really nice harmonies.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 07:25:23 AM
I don't know how much I LOVE it yet.

But that chorus, DAMN THOSE HARMONIES. Better then I expected there.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 07:26:53 AM
Sounds better and better the more I listen to it. Can't get it out of my head now. Do you think Brian will take the whole lead ?

I think that's very, very possible.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 07:31:20 AM
Jeff is at the end, perfectly mixed.

TAKE THAT HATERS!


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 21, 2012, 07:33:28 AM
Thanks for posting.  Sounds really, really good.  Harmonies are fantastic.  Those four bars do sound a little like Midnight Cowboy, but the changes right after that change it up.  I think it's fantastic...well...from what I can hear of it.  Great way to wake up on a bright, sunny Saturday morning in Wisconsin.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 07:34:55 AM
I know right!? THIS is why god made the radio haha.

I mean, an album of songs that are around this caliber?! Man...


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 21, 2012, 07:35:46 AM
Brian sounds great!


Title: Re:
Post by: Margarita on April 21, 2012, 07:38:09 AM
This is far better than I ever expected.  It's a new, original song yet it has all of the familiar hooks that people love about the Beach Boys.   It is undeniably a Brian Wilson production.  

One thing the song is missing, though: Carl's voice.  His contribution would have made it something truly amazing.

What's ironic: radio is no longer how hits are made.  Nowadays "hit" status--meaning how well the song reaches the masses and enters the public consciousness--is done through iTunes, Amazon, Pandora, usage in TV and movies, shares on Facebook, etc.


Title: Re: \
Post by: rogerlancelot on April 21, 2012, 07:40:35 AM
Oops, link already posted!


Title: Re: \Here it is!
Post by: LostArt on April 21, 2012, 07:44:35 AM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165s

I think it's great that this person...dumbangel76...swoops in...first post...and drops this into our laps.  Thank you, whoever you are.  And say hi to the guys for us.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 07:45:06 AM
I love it.  I really do, it's what I expected would follow up "TLOS"
And man, even my mom loves it :D She was never the fan, my dad always was!

This reunion just saved itself.


Title: Re:
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 07:45:43 AM
This is far better than I ever expected.  It's a new, original song yet it has all of the familiar hooks that people love about the Beach Boys.   It is undeniably a Brian Wilson production.  

One thing the song is missing, though: Carl's voice.  His contribution would have made it something truly amazing.

What's ironic: radio is no longer how hits are made.  Nowadays "hit" status--meaning how well the song reaches the masses and enters the public consciousness--is done through iTunes, Amazon, Pandora, usage in TV and movies, shares on Facebook, etc.
Would it be like digital killed the analog star?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wylson on April 21, 2012, 07:46:10 AM
It sounds.....









Fucking awesome. It sounds like the Beach Boys.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 07:47:07 AM
Oh man... The more I listen to the ending part, the *rest *rest BAM

I think, Pet Sounds? Is that you!?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 07:47:23 AM
Its kinda in the same vein of your summer dream or surfer moonyah?  Oddly that refrain was reminding me of a robbie williams tune of all things


Title: Re: \
Post by: Steve Mayo on April 21, 2012, 07:57:21 AM
i like it..can't wait to hear the whole cd.
and while one may wonder if this single will be a hit, the back catalog keeps on selling. the cd.. 20 good vibrations-the greatest hits vol 1 re-enters billboard's top 200 lp chart for the week of april 28th at #95.
i hope the group sells a ton of cd's this year.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Yorick on April 21, 2012, 08:01:00 AM
Its kinda in the same vein of your summer dream or surfer moonyah?  Oddly that refrain was reminding me of a robbie williams tune of all things

You mean Nancy Sinatra's You Only Live Twice, which Robbie incorporated in his tune Millenium.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 21, 2012, 08:03:11 AM
Hey, this video is online since April 11!!! Are we all sleeping or what?

Not my taste though.
I don't think "sleeping" is accurate. You won't find this video with a search since the title does not adequately describe what it is. Who's going to search for 'TWGMTR'?

I think it sounds great. I know Joe Thomas gets a bad rap from a lot of people here, but I always liked what he was able to get out of Brian's voice on Imagination. On this new single, his voice is evocative of his classic years. I really like the theme of the song too, when I think of what a huge impact radio has had on my life.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Fro on April 21, 2012, 08:07:55 AM
Its kinda in the same vein of your summer dream or surfer moonyah?  Oddly that refrain was reminding me of a robbie williams tune of all things

You mean Nancy Sinatra's You Only Live Twice, which Robbie incorporated in his tune Millenium.

Yep, it's the same chord structure as the YOLT theme or the Midnight cowboy theme, both composed by the great John Barry.

IIRC, that's just a simple A --> E minor --> A chord progression

Not really anything that dozens of people haven't used before in songs.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 08:09:35 AM
Its kinda in the same vein of your summer dream or surfer moonyah?  Oddly that refrain was reminding me of a robbie williams tune of all things

You mean Nancy Sinatra's You Only Live Twice, which Robbie incorporated in his tune Millenium.


Well, yeah.

Midnight cowboy theme:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT9rqL0dSlU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT9rqL0dSlU)


You only live twice:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD_dBXj1Wso (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD_dBXj1Wso)


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 08:10:26 AM
The chorus is C# -> B if I'm Correct.... Sounds great


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 21, 2012, 08:15:22 AM
Hey, this video is online since April 11!!! Are we all sleeping or what?
I don't think "sleeping" is accurate. You won't find this video with a search since the title does not adequately describe what it is. Who's going to search for 'TWGMTR'?

Yeah.  Wednesday, the 11th.  David Marks was right, in a way.


I think it sounds great. I know Joe Thomas gets a bad rap from a lot of people here, but I always liked what he was able to get out of Brian's voice on Imagination. On this new single, his voice is evocative of his classic years. I really like the theme of the song too, when I think of what a huge impact radio has had on my life.

Agreed.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 08:16:21 AM
Have we seen this yet?!

http://www.thebeachboys.com/#music


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 08:18:53 AM
Have we seen this yet?!

http://www.thebeachboys.com/#music
The Beach Boys have their own website?? Sweet!!  :)

No, really, what do you mean? Can't see anything new there..


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 21, 2012, 08:19:49 AM
It's been all re-done, like with all the albums?! I haven't seen it, that's really cool!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 08:24:06 AM
It's been all re-done, like with all the albums?! I haven't seen it, that's really cool!


Holland is missing


"Full website coming soon".


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wrightfan on April 21, 2012, 08:26:17 AM
1. From what I hear, I LOVE it. Very catchy. Brian's in really good voice.

2. The part where they showed the white piano photo shoot. Brian looks as happy as I've ever seen him.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 08:27:47 AM
It did what a promotional trailer should do: finally make me preorder the damn thing. Yay. Wonder what the bonus tracks on the CD will be... "Waves of Love"?  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 08:39:56 AM
Holland is missing.

Nope, look - there it is, between Belgium and Germany.  ;D


Title: Re:
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 21, 2012, 08:40:42 AM
This is far better than I ever expected.  It's a new, original song yet it has all of the familiar hooks that people love about the Beach Boys.   It is undeniably a Brian Wilson production.  

One thing the song is missing, though: Carl's voice.  His contribution would have made it something truly amazing.

What's ironic: radio is no longer how hits are made.  Nowadays "hit" status--meaning how well the song reaches the masses and enters the public consciousness--is done through iTunes, Amazon, Pandora, usage in TV and movies, shares on Facebook, etc.


Agreed. I thought this was the kind of sound they would now be going for, which I think is the right direction to take as older men! I think I will have to listen to it a few times to really get into it but I am optimistic about the album now. :) They have done themselves proud with this - it may not be like the old stuff we love, but they can still make good music! I can't say the same about most of the artists around now....

One thing stands out for me though, as Margarita states. You can really tell Carl isn't in the mix and that is such a shame. I know there is nothing we can do about it, but it's just not 100% Beach Boys for me unless he's in there. They have done a good job without him though, I have to say.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 09:00:25 AM
Oh man, they still have it, that sounds incredible


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 09:02:15 AM
Jeff is at the end, perfectly mixed.

TAKE THAT HATERS!

This!

Jeff sounds great


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 21, 2012, 09:11:31 AM
Love it more and more as I'm listening on repeat - the guys sound fantastic, tune is catchy, production is solid if not inoffensive.  And boy are those harmonies killer! 

Carl is indeed sorely missed, but that wonderful blend is still there, with Foskett tastefully rounding it out on top.  Makes me really psyched to hear everything else they've done, if this is any indication of the quality of the other tracks.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 21, 2012, 09:14:14 AM
Holland is missing.

Nope, look - there it is, between Belgium and Germany.  ;D

Hmmm, I can see the Netherlands but this Holland place you speak of seems to be in the western part of the Netherlands.... ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 21, 2012, 09:14:34 AM
Jeff is at the end, perfectly mixed.

TAKE THAT HATERS!

This!

Jeff sounds great

EVERYBODY sounds great. Solid lead by Brian, for sure. I like how at the end "Includes the new hit" meaning that Capitol already paid off Clear Channel to have this song chart well.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wilson Love on April 21, 2012, 09:30:17 AM
I Iike it. iIt does have a '1965 feel to it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 21, 2012, 09:34:22 AM
Has anyone heard the whole song or just the sections they play during the promotional video?


Title: Re: \
Post by: myonlysunshine on April 21, 2012, 09:35:03 AM
Sounds like TLOS mixed with Don't Worry Baby to me. And I like it. It also kind of reminds me of certain ballads on Summer Days (and Summer Nights!!).


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 09:38:11 AM
Has anyone heard the whole song or just the sections they play during the promotional video?

Just the video


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 21, 2012, 09:38:45 AM
Thanks for posting the Youtube link, I wonder how we missed it?  :lol

I like it.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 21, 2012, 09:45:21 AM
I love how the interview snippets with Brian

a) could have been taken from any Brian Wilson interview in the past few years - "a lot of love in the harmonies"; "Chuck Berry, Rosemary Clooney, The Four Freshmen...".   ^-^
b) showcase Brian's brilliant sense of the obvious: "For me it's like a reunion." - Say WHAT?  ;D


I would have loved a scene in the studio where Brian's standing in front of the Boys at their mics, and he's clapping and saying "I can't believe it! You sound better than the Wondermints!!"  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: urbanite on April 21, 2012, 09:50:58 AM
"For me it's like a reunion."  Whoever produced and edited that video should have taken that comment out.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 21, 2012, 09:55:35 AM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165ls

Thank you for finding this. You can be my next wife!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 21, 2012, 09:58:08 AM
The song is growing on me, the chorus has earworm potential.

The production, singing & harmonies are great, can't wait to hear more.

Preordered the single about 1 month ago, hope it'll top the charts around the world!


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 21, 2012, 10:01:46 AM
Sounds like the close cousin of Keep An Eye On Summer to these ears. Sounds like a wee acappella section towards the end which we'll all love to scrutinise the arse off! And I hear a fair bit of Brian early on.

Good job, Beach Boys!


Title: Re: \
Post by: SG7 on April 21, 2012, 10:02:02 AM
Not bad of a song. I'm impressed.


Title: Re: \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 21, 2012, 10:04:42 AM
Am I the only one who doesn't like it much?

It’s *deeply* unimpressive, at least at first listen. Not terrible, but there’s no ‘there’ there. And hugely derivative — it’s Keep An Eye On Your Summer Dream, Midnight Cowboy, Because You Only Live Twice. If this is the song everyone’s been raving about, then the rest of the album is going to be pretty poor.

That’s Jeff Foskett doubling Brian on the verses. It’s done subtly, but it still sounds odd to me, like a Frankenbrian. It works — it’s what they did on a couple of tracks on Smile, too — but it confuses my ears as they try to decode which of them is singing. Doubt that’ll be a problem for the average listener, though.

Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. This could have been put out as a Brian Wilson solo track and from the evidence we’ve got here no-one would know any different (actually I *strongly* suspect there’s a middle eight that’s been cut out for this video, I’d guess with a Mike Love lead). In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts. But I quite like Jeff Foskett’s voice, unlike many…

The production sounds like Brian rather than Joe Thomas, which can only be a good thing. No acoustic guitars with pickups, no horrible snare sound and ‘sonic power’. It’s the best *sounding* thing released under the Beach Boys’ name since at least 1979.

So, the glass is half-full. I just won’t know what it’s half-full *of* until the single’s actually out…


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 10:07:38 AM


I would have loved a scene in the studio where Brian's standing in front of the Boys at their mics, and he's clapping and saying "I can't believe it! You sound better than the Wondermints!!"  ;D



 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 10:14:31 AM
I've come to the conclusion that this video was on private until it was discovered...

I've searched youtube for "That's Why God Made The Radio" a bunch of times and never found anything


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 10:16:13 AM
Has anyone heard the whole song or just the sections they play during the promotional video?

Define "whole song".


Title: Re: \Here it is!
Post by: dumbangel76 on April 21, 2012, 10:18:14 AM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165s

I think it's great that this person...dumbangel76...swoops in...first post...and drops this into our laps.  Thank you, whoever you are.  And say hi to the guys for us.


Hey yall! I use to be on here back in the day had to create a new name! I am just like one of yall a guy who really, really loves the Beach Boys. They have saved me from a'many of nights I didn't think I would get out of so, I just wanted to share with yall! I really love it on another site someone mentioned it reminds them of Keep an Eye On Summer. I agree somewhat it is also a lovely song. Love seeing the guys together again. If the whole album is up to this level I will be a happy, happy guy!! Glad I could share this!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 10:22:04 AM
Brian, Bruce and Jeff steal the show..

Those vocals sound incredible


Title: Re:
Post by: dumbangel76 on April 21, 2012, 10:23:18 AM
Sounds like the close cousin of Keep An Eye On Summer to these ears. Sounds like a wee acappella section towards the end which we'll all love to scrutinise the arse off! And I hear a fair bit of Brian early on.

Good job, Beach Boys!


You beat me to the KAEOS reference! You are welcome and I think my wife would take exception to me marrying you!! Haha!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Les P on April 21, 2012, 10:25:39 AM
Very nice job, lovely harmonies.  Seems to be a quite respectable song and performance, and better than I expected (admittedly, my expectations are not high).  We know there will be a lot of retro moments on this album but here they seem tastefully done (e.g., reminiscent of "Keep an Eye on Summer" vs. direct quote from "Hawaii" on "Kona Coast").  I am having a hard time getting "Midnight Cowboy" out of my head however. 


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 21, 2012, 10:28:20 AM
Sounds like the close cousin of Keep An Eye On Summer to these ears. Sounds like a wee acappella section towards the end which we'll all love to scrutinise the arse off! And I hear a fair bit of Brian early on.

Good job, Beach Boys!


You beat me to the KAEOS reference! You are welcome and I think my wife would take exception to me marrying you!! Haha!


Hey who said I was interested in marriage? I've had several wives but stayed unhitched myself!

Tiger!!



;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 10:33:48 AM
It's good. Derivative, but it's cool to hear the blend. Jeff is mixed pretty well. but no way in hell is this gonna be a hit. if the rest of the album is this boring though I'll probably only listen to it about 100 times.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 21, 2012, 10:34:28 AM
Am I the only one who doesn't like it much?

Probably not.  I liked it on first listen, and I like it even more after repeated listens. 

If this is the song everyone’s been raving about, then the rest of the album is going to be pretty poor.

If the rest of the album sounds like this, I'll be ecstatic.

Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts.

Wow.  I mean, now I've heard everything.  Not only is Jeff too high in the mix, he's singing EVERY PART. 
Unbelieveable.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Les P on April 21, 2012, 10:36:29 AM
Did I miss something, or is there absolutely no reference to the composer(s)?  I have to believe if Brian had a hand in composition, that would have been mentioned.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wrightfan on April 21, 2012, 10:39:20 AM
Did I miss something, or is there absolutely no reference to the composer(s)?

I think this video was leaked ala the Do it Again video.

Especially since there's a date at the end and I don't believe the website has officially announced it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 10:39:50 AM
It's good. Derivative, but it's cool to hear the blend. Jeff is mixed pretty well. but no way in hell is this gonna be a hit. if the rest of the album is this boring though I'll probably only listen to it about 100 times.

I had a pretty mediocre opinion of this song ten minutes ago but now I'm on my third listen and it's growing on me a lot. I still don't think it'll be a hit though, there's nothing cool about this song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Amanda Hart on April 21, 2012, 10:41:26 AM
Am I the only one who doesn't like it much?

It’s *deeply* unimpressive, at least at first listen. Not terrible, but there’s no ‘there’ there. And hugely derivative — it’s Keep An Eye On Your Summer Dream, Midnight Cowboy, Because You Only Live Twice. If this is the song everyone’s been raving about, then the rest of the album is going to be pretty poor.

That’s Jeff Foskett doubling Brian on the verses. It’s done subtly, but it still sounds odd to me, like a Frankenbrian. It works — it’s what they did on a couple of tracks on Smile, too — but it confuses my ears as they try to decode which of them is singing. Doubt that’ll be a problem for the average listener, though.

Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. This could have been put out as a Brian Wilson solo track and from the evidence we’ve got here no-one would know any different (actually I *strongly* suspect there’s a middle eight that’s been cut out for this video, I’d guess with a Mike Love lead). In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts. But I quite like Jeff Foskett’s voice, unlike many…

The production sounds like Brian rather than Joe Thomas, which can only be a good thing. No acoustic guitars with pickups, no horrible snare sound and ‘sonic power’. It’s the best *sounding* thing released under the Beach Boys’ name since at least 1979.

So, the glass is half-full. I just won’t know what it’s half-full *of* until the single’s actually out…

I'm closer to your opinion, Andrew. It's not bad at all, and I'll try to reserve judgement until I can hear the whole song, but nothing except the harmonies are jumping out at me. I hear a little bit of Al and Bruce in the harmony, but it's mostly BW and Jeff, so it does make it sound more like a Brian solo track than what I would have expected for the first single off of the reunion album.

It's still exciting though. I'm thinking the album won't be anything revolutionary, but I'm really looking forward to buying it and listening to it in only 6 more weeks.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 10:42:59 AM
is that bruce at 2:35? i mean it clearly sounds like bruce, but like 1965 bruce


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 21, 2012, 10:51:16 AM
So, must have listened to the promo about 8 times now and love it, definitely has earworm moments, I just got back from getting a takeaway and found myself singing the chorus on the drive back! Strange how some folk on here are concerned with it not sounding 'cool' or it being derivative - you would almost think the Beach Boys have always been cool and have never been derivitive.


Title: Re: \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 21, 2012, 10:53:11 AM
Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts.

Wow.  I mean, now I've heard everything.  Not only is Jeff too high in the mix, he's singing EVERY PART. 
Unbelieveable.


I'm not one of those who've been arguing Jeff is too high in the mix -- unlike half the board I have absolutely no problem with him. It wasn't even a complaint when I said I couldn't pick out anyone else, just an observation. Listening to the video we have, as far as I can tell:
Two lines sung by Brian and Jeff in unison
Three  lines sung by Brian and Jeff in harmony, followed by a massed harmony where I can't make out who's singing because people are talking
A chorus with at least three Jeffs on it, plus Brian. I *think* listening through this time I can also hear Bruce, but I wouldn't stake my life on it, as the quality's not high enough to be sure. There are other voices there, but they're just block background harmonies, and I can't make out any individuals.
A second verse. There are backing vocals here, but I can't tell who because it's being spoken over.
Second chorus, sounds like it's similar to the first.
Solo, multitracked Jeff singing "that's why God made, that's why God made..."
Final chorus, with extra vocal lines. I count at least four Jeffs here.

In all of what we can hear, there's not one place where I can pick out Mike or Al's voices in the mix, and I wouldn't bet a large amount of money on the bit where I can hear Bruce (I don't know David's voice well enough to tell, but I don't think I can hear him). I hear a lot of Fosketts, and some Brian, and that's it.

Not a criticism of the song. Doesn't mean they're not on it. As I've said before, I *like* Foskett's voice. I'm sure when we hear the actual thing we'll be able to make out more details of the harmonies and pick everyone out. But right now, I just hear a lot of Jeff Fosketts. That's not me being anti-Jeff, it's just me saying what I'm actually hearing.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 21, 2012, 10:53:37 AM
I also think the people saying the middle eight is missing are correct, if you listen at about 2:09 it fades out and another section comes in.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 21, 2012, 10:55:06 AM
Has anyone heard the whole song or just the sections they play during the promotional video?

Define "whole song".

Entire song from beginning to end.



There is what sounds to be an edit at about 2:09 of the video.  One part fades out, and another fades in.

Oops, Paulos beat me to it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: BJL on April 21, 2012, 11:05:31 AM
The first line is pretty much note for note the first line of "Your Summer Dream" -  but I don't mind in the least, it sounds like a beautiful song and i'm suitably excited!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 21, 2012, 11:07:10 AM
I can hear Mike towards the end, after the interview segments stop, left channel.

Strange how some folk on here are concerned with it not sounding 'cool' or it being derivative - you would almost think the Beach Boys have always been cool and have never been derivitive.

I don't care if it's cool, I'm just saying there's no way this can be a hit. I don't care if it's a hit, I've long gotten over needing sales, or other people, to validate my taste in music. And I don't mean derivative like "not inventive", I mean, it sounds pretty similar to songs that have already been written by Brian. and yes, this happens fairly frequently in the Beach Boys catalog. Girls on the Beach extremely derivative of Surfer Girl, but you know what? I don't really like Girls on the Beach for that reason.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 21, 2012, 11:08:01 AM
I doubt very much there is a secret overdubbed army of Jeffs here.

What you're hearing is the harmony stack of the original guys, all processed and tuned, with Jeff as an extra member. I can hear Bruce, what seems to be Mike singing in a tenor range (!) in the stack, Brian and Jeff at the fade. Surprised Jardine isn't more prominent, but they are talking over most of it.

Anyway.

-- No clear JT influence on the track -- sounds like a BW / BW band created backing. Which is a good thing. JT's influence (he seems to be in the control room in the video, btw) seems to be in the vocal fine-tuning, which was definitely his forte on Imagination.

-- Yes, it's derivative. But that's not only no surprise, it's fine. My doubts (as expressed yesterday) aside, of course this was going to be a heavily nostalgic trip. The issue isn't whether it's derivative. The issue is whether it's tasteful and good. And it most certainly is.

-- A Brian lead on the reunion single! That definitely says something about the balance of power in the reunion politics, doesn't it?

-- A Brian writing credit should be no problem -- given the, ahem, clear YSD rip in the verses.

-- I'm feeling mildly positive about the entire enterprise again.


Title: Re:
Post by: Justin on April 21, 2012, 11:14:03 AM
I almost don't want my first introduction to this "epic" song to be some crappy I-phone recorded version on YouTube.  It'll be tough to ignore it until the single comes out though....

Yeah, it's tough.  Something about actually buying the CD though and playing it old-school without hearing the leaked versions. 


Yeah, I REALLY want to wait and pop the cd in.  Don't think I'll have the will power

Sorry guys...does hearing the song for the first time during an interview promo count as the real thing??  Guilty.   :-[



Regarding the song, it's very clear that the song is heavy on harmonies.  The outro sounds like a cascading waterfall of harmonies and voices...quite beautiful stuff.  Aside from pointing out the dense vocal work on this, I am afraid that the song is taking a while for it to warm up to me.  I can't agree that the chorus is really that catchy (melodically or lyrically).  My opinion might change once I can hear the track without any voices speaking on top of it but my first impression is:  great effort for the first song sung together in 20 years...will it save the world?  I don't think so.  

Regarding Jeff Foskett being "everywhere"...well, I'm not sure what people thought was going to happen.  He's the only one who can do the falsetto and high parts.  If Brian were still able to do those parts...then it'd be him everywhere on the harmonies.  No one would complain then, obviously.  But since Brian can't and Jeff has always been there to cover Brian...it's no surprise Jeff will be "everywhere" on the vocals.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 11:16:41 AM
Has anyone heard the whole song or just the sections they play during the promotional video?

Define "whole song".

Entire song from beginning to end.


Ah, right. Just checking. I'd bet the farm, the college fund, several vital organs and (should I still possess it) my mortal soul on there being a middle eight excised from said video.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Les P on April 21, 2012, 11:18:28 AM
-- I'm feeling mildly positive about the entire enterprise again.

Yep.  While I suspect Brian had minimal to no involvement in the composition of their big comeback single and have some disappointment about that, the excitement is hitting me:  we are getting a new (and decent-sounding) Beach Boys single in 2012!!  How cool is that??!!  


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 11:35:00 AM
After quite a rainy day over here, we now have a beautiful sunset. And TWGMTR sounds exactly like that. That kind of nice, melancholy sound. Red, purple and orange. Very good.

Anyway, do you think that they made an error in the video's beginning with using "Wouldn't it be nice" instead of "Help me Rhonda" ? That way they had all the no.1's.


Quote
JT's influence (he seems to be in the control room in the video, btw) seems to be in the vocal fine-tuning, which was definitely his forte on Imagination.


I made a screenshot but I don't think it's Joe Thomas there. Two guys I don't know, Bruce and Brian if my eyes aren't lying.

(http://s7.directupload.net/images/120421/ormr4xun.jpg)

Edit
and a second one:

(http://s7.directupload.net/images/120421/56fmiz3d.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 21, 2012, 11:36:59 AM
I doubt very much there is a secret overdubbed army of Jeffs here.

I'm certainly not arguing there is a *secret* overdubbed army of Jeffs, but unless there's some new studio gadget called a Foskettiser, which can turn the voices of Mike Love and Al Jardine into the voice of Jeff Foskett, he's certainly singing multiple, prominent parts on the track.

Not, again, that I am saying this as a complaint. I think the harmony sound on the track is far and away the best thing about it from what we can hear.


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 21, 2012, 11:38:31 AM
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 11:45:49 AM
I had to make a third screenshot. The guy that I thought was Bruce in the first shot (see above) could be Joe Thomas. But I'm not sure


(http://s7.directupload.net/images/120421/mumtysmf.jpg)



Quote
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?


It sounds like him imo


Title: Re:
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 11:46:42 AM
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?

has to be right?  the only reason i stutter is because it sounds like bruce from 1965.  his voice is amazingly young sounding still


Title: Re:
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 11:47:26 AM
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?

Sounds like it. I'm also pretty sure he's doing the lead on the last "That's Why God Made The Radio". Great to hear him on record again.


Title: Re:
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 21, 2012, 11:49:27 AM
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?

It sounds like him for a second, but then it gets much, much higher and less husky than I've heard him sing in decades...


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 21, 2012, 11:50:24 AM
Is that Bruce singing "We're falling in love" at the end of the song?

Sounds like it. I'm also pretty sure he's doing the lead on the last "That's Why God Made The Radio". Great to hear him on record again.

closing screen.  album avaliable june 5.  why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???


Title: Re:
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 11:51:38 AM
why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???


The mob will make sure.....  :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: DonnyL on April 21, 2012, 11:52:13 AM
Nice to see Karen Lamm in there ...


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 11:52:32 AM
I'm trying to figure out who's singing that "ohhh radio" right before Foskett's "God"

Bruce? Al perhaps?


Title: Re:
Post by: Les P on April 21, 2012, 11:53:02 AM
 why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???

Presumably because the promo video leaked early.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 21, 2012, 11:53:59 AM
why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???


The mob will make sure.....  :smokin

I was talkin' about the available now part...


Title: Re: \
Post by: send me a picture and i'll tell you on April 21, 2012, 11:58:24 AM
I clearly hear Mike singing the low part in the playout.


Title: Re:
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 12:04:00 PM
 why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???

Presumably because the promo video leaked early.
It is standard practice to put, "featuring the hit..." on album and CD stickers and  in general on ads for albums.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 12:04:17 PM
i think this is definitely a JT song initially.  The chord structure just seems like something Brian left behind a long time ago.  But i don't doubt that brian did some work on it once it came to him.  


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 21, 2012, 12:04:20 PM
Very cool tune! I can see why everybody in the Beach Boys camp has been raving about it. I'd like to point out one other "callback" to an earlier Beach Boys single - in part of the verse, Brian sings a melody that sounds like the lines "I look in the mirror/It couldn't be clearer" from "Goin' On." Anybody else hear it?

As far as the production - it does sound like a Brian Wilson production, rather than a Joe Thomas production. This is very heartening.


Title: Re: \Here it is!
Post by: Awesoman on April 21, 2012, 12:11:27 PM
So, While combing through the Youtube I came upon this teaser for "That's Why God Made The Radio"!! It's interviews with the song playing behind the Guys. Pretty good hooky song the chorus is playing around in my head!! Here ya go!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=6HGSZDsNYQg#t=165s

Listening to the song now.  It is hard to form an opinion of it since it is mostly played in the background.  Still it doesn't sound bad.  Maybe a little over-produced.  But looking at the Youtube link, this isn't coming from their official Youtube channel.  Also, at the end it says the single is available now, but I can't find it anywhere.  How did this guy get this video? 


Title: Re: \
Post by: MaxL on April 21, 2012, 12:12:16 PM
Watched the video about six times now and I have to say I'm in love with song, definitely an earworm (learned that word today in this thread and have been saying it to friends as if it were a regular part of my vocabulary). I can pick out all the Boys and Jeff on there but I'm having trouble hearing Mike on my admittedly poor laptop speakers, must listen with earphones later.

I don't want to overanalyse anything, just say I love the song and while I've been cautiously optimistic all along I think now I can upgrade to optimistic.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 12:16:56 PM
Very cool tune! I can see why everybody in the Beach Boys camp has been raving about it. I'd like to point out one other "callback" to an earlier Beach Boys single - in part of the verse, Brian sings a melody that sounds like the lines "I look in the mirror/It couldn't be clearer" from "Goin' On." Anybody else hear it?



When it's out we should count how many songs were pointed at in whichever way in TWGMTR


Title: Re: \
Post by: Sie W on April 21, 2012, 12:18:08 PM
Sounds like Al with Brian beetween 1:37 - 1:50, Al on the left channel.

Catchy tune, growing on me as I watch it again.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 12:18:16 PM

-- A Brian lead on the reunion single! That definitely says something about the balance of power in the reunion politics, doesn't it?

No. It says that the group and its collaborators are trying to be prudent about the staging, presentation and marketing of the record and tour. There may be politics, sure. But, I don't feel an inordinate amount of power tripping going on.

I think the roles of each member were hashed out and  fairly clearly defined a while back. That's why I think they are smiling these days.


Title: Re: \
Post by: guitarfool2002 on April 21, 2012, 12:18:59 PM
The vocal harmonies and unexpected chord changes on that chorus are drawing me in. That chorus, those elements, are what I think separates the originals from all the bands they influenced which try for similar sounds.

The falsetto, just to confirm: Jeff Foskett?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 12:22:26 PM
I love it, very catchy. I can hear all the boys. Got no problem with Jeff when mixed properly. Thumbs up here.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 21, 2012, 12:28:52 PM
why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???

Presumably because the promo video leaked early.
It is standard practice to put, "featuring the hit..." on album and CD stickers and  in general on ads for albums.

I know that.  I was talking about the "now available" part...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 12:30:16 PM
i think it's pretty obvious that this leaked and wasn't supposed to come out ill the single was available. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 12:34:27 PM
Yeah. I'm guessing the Youtube channel is owned by the video editor. Should've named it something else (though it did take us a while to find it.)


Title: Re:
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 12:36:21 PM
why does it say the "hit single TWGMTR available now"???

Presumably because the promo video leaked early.
It is standard practice to put, "featuring the hit..." on album and CD stickers and  in general on ads for albums.

I know that.  I was talking about the "now available" part...
Then, it's the commercial, or something close to it, that will run during the tour.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 21, 2012, 12:38:47 PM
Yeah. I'm guessing the Youtube channel is owned by the video editor. Should've named it something else (though it did take us a while to find it.)

Yeah, the title should have been changed (though I'm not complaining!).  Though you could tell they tried to obscure it by putting it in the "Science & Technology" category. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 21, 2012, 12:45:25 PM
The vocal harmonies and unexpected chord changes on that chorus are drawing me in. That chorus, those elements, are what I think separates the originals from all the bands they influenced which try for similar sounds.

The falsetto, just to confirm: Jeff Foskett?

I have to agree.  Those chord progressions are very BW to me, so if he didn't write most of it, the writers sure did a damn good impression of him. 

Overall, I have to say, this is very nice.  They sound inspired and influenced from their past, but they don't sound like a parody, either.  That's a balance they've had trouble with for a while, but they've seemed to find it.  Brian sounds great on the lead and the harmonies are lush. 

This would have fit in nicely on "Shut Down, Volume 2".  It's very tasteful. 


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 21, 2012, 12:48:12 PM
i think it's pretty obvious that this leaked and wasn't supposed to come out ill the single was available.  

Thanks.  I'll make sure my obvious meter has enough fluid in it  


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 12:50:50 PM
It's gone now. Removed by user. Luckily I have it committed to memory


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 12:51:25 PM
It's removed, did anybody rip the audio?


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 21, 2012, 12:53:23 PM
I only got to listen to it ONE time! For the love of God, please tell me someone has this saved.


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 12:53:31 PM
-removed-


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 12:55:41 PM
-removed-


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 21, 2012, 12:56:50 PM
Quick! D/L it http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?sp10qn132rrshqz  ;D

Thank you!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 12:57:24 PM
And mediafire crashes!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 01:02:12 PM
Quick! D/L it http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?sp10qn132rrshqz  ;D

Great!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 21, 2012, 01:08:12 PM
Was great to have a sneak peak. But why not just wait from now on until it gets official ?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 01:12:34 PM
More proof were being watched

 :tiptoe


Title: Re: \
Post by: SonoraDick on April 21, 2012, 01:16:08 PM
And mediafire crashes!


Don't know about the crash, but here's my copy... still plays for me.

http://www.mediafire.com/?o7elca47z68i3g6


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 01:17:04 PM
More proof were being watched

 :tiptoe

Been saying this for years, finally the message is getting through - Big Brother is indeed watching us, and closely. One more reason I'm glad I'm not Cohen. He's on their sh*t-list, for sure.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 01:18:45 PM
Thanks, I got it in the end, it all went a bit slow.

Lets all take a moment.......and compare this to "Hot Fun In The Summertime."


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 01:29:11 PM
Thanks, I got it in the end, it all went a bit slow.

Lets all take a moment.......and compare this to "Hot Fun In The Summertime."

Same tempo?

edit: I take that back. I remember Hot Fun being slower than it is. Definitely a 6/8 feel tho!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 01:30:39 PM
just youtubed "hot fun in the summertime".  man, you old guys sure had to endure a lot.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 21, 2012, 01:55:52 PM
Thanks, I got it in the end, it all went a bit slow.

Lets all take a moment.......and compare this to "Hot Fun In The Summertime."

Same tempo?

edit: I take that back. I remember Hot Fun being slower than it is. Definitely a 6/8 feel tho!

He means Hot Fun was crap


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 21, 2012, 02:17:56 PM
1. Best new BB product in 35 years. Period.

2. Mike nailed it when he described their new work as 1965-ish.

3. The derivarions are made by the ear of the listener, not the composer's intentions. In general.

4. There's a killer Bruce line in there.

5. Brian's lead kicks ass. As does Mike's vocal cutting through the 1000-voice stack.

6. This is a single (potential hit) to be proud of. It's be great that the BBs are presented to the record-buying public sounding like this. Nobody else can do this in the bussiness.


Title: Re:
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 02:28:19 PM
Thanks, I got it in the end, it all went a bit slow.

Lets all take a moment.......and compare this to "Hot Fun In The Summertime."

Same tempo?

edit: I take that back. I remember Hot Fun being slower than it is. Definitely a 6/8 feel tho!

He means Hot Fun was crap

He does


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 02:29:38 PM
i think the most important thing for this album is to sound natural.  Not like they're trying to ape the beach boys sound like they did in the 80s.  this is a good start i think


Title: Re: \
Post by: SamMcK on April 21, 2012, 02:35:55 PM
Sounds great! Would love to hear it properly when it comes out!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jimmie_R on April 21, 2012, 02:38:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be)


Title: Re:
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 21, 2012, 02:49:00 PM
Thanks, I got it in the end, it all went a bit slow.

Lets all take a moment.......and compare this to "Hot Fun In The Summertime."

Same tempo?

edit: I take that back. I remember Hot Fun being slower than it is. Definitely a 6/8 feel tho!

He means Hot Fun was crap

He does

Yeah I get it. Just bored I guess, and happened to put the 2 and 2 together.

Anyway.. can't wait to hear the full song!



Title: Re: \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 21, 2012, 02:51:32 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be)

Taken down by EMI. As I presume any other Youtube links posted here will be...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 21, 2012, 02:54:38 PM
Check your messages or further back


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 03:14:29 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be)

Taken down by EMI. As I presume any other Youtube links posted here will be...

i'm fairly certain youtube has programs that read the data of videos to remove them automatically.  that's why sometimes you find tv shows on youtube but the image is mirrored.  something similar would have to happen for it to stay up i think


Title: Re: \
Post by: Fro on April 21, 2012, 03:20:19 PM
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqa6rc_twgmtr-promo_music


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 03:23:39 PM
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqa6rc_twgmtr-promo_music

Doint The Clown never disappoints.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 03:25:25 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QExYWbG7oIw&feature=youtu.be)

Taken down by EMI. As I presume any other Youtube links posted here will be...

i'm fairly certain youtube has programs that read the data of videos to remove them automatically.  that's why sometimes you find tv shows on youtube but the image is mirrored.  something similar would have to happen for it to stay up i think
Mmm, I think that they thought they were being discreet by titling it with just TWGMTR.... The vid got some 'likes' and maybe even a comment or two, which alerted EMI that the cat was out of the bag. I also think that it was meant as a test for inhouse feedback and that it wasn't leaked.


Title: Re: \
Post by: SBonilla on April 21, 2012, 03:32:56 PM
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqa6rc_twgmtr-promo_music

Doint The Clown never disappoints.
"ERROR PLAYBACK #2002." He doesn't?


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 03:35:34 PM
"GAHHH-AHHHD!"


Title: Re: \
Post by: TonyW on April 21, 2012, 03:40:49 PM
The marketing EMI/Capitol (& Brother) are putting into this reunion is amazing. On the money and respectful.

There are no eaks, its all viral man ...  ;)

TWGMTR is a nice extension of the Beach Boys sound and what Brian was doing on TLOS. Nice.


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 21, 2012, 03:45:29 PM
Mike's voice is really hoarse, I hope it has recovered by now.  :/


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 03:47:06 PM
Bruce's little vocal bit right before it is indeed ridiculously good, though.

Also, not complaining, just asking in a neutral manner: Is it me, or is Brian's lead doubled by someone? And it's seemingly not Jeff?


Title: Re:
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 03:47:53 PM
Mike's voice is really hoarse, I hope it has recovered by now.  :/

He's sounded this way for years. Willingly singing out your nose for 200 some dates a year will do that to you :( it's a shame.


Title: Re: \
Post by: adamghost on April 21, 2012, 03:53:36 PM
I like it.  There was a moment towards the end where I swear I heard Carl in the blend.  I know I didn't.  But it was a nice thing to be wrong about.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 21, 2012, 03:55:23 PM
Bruce's little vocal bit right before it is indeed ridiculously good, though.

Also, not complaining, just asking in a neutral manner: Is it me, or is Brian's lead doubled by someone? And it's seemingly not Jeff?

I hear that too - perhaps Scott?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 03:58:28 PM
whoever they have doubling brian (if they are) blends really really well.  it just makes Brian sound younger.  I'm still amazed by Bruce's voice at the end there.  I would think when he was younger he'd hold "fallin in looooooooooooooooooooove" a lot longer.  but still amazing sounding. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 21, 2012, 04:03:12 PM
whoever they have doubling brian (if they are) blends really really well.  it just makes Brian sound younger.  I'm still amazed by Bruce's voice at the end there.  I would think when he was younger he'd hold "fallin in looooooooooooooooooooove" a lot longer.  but still amazing sounding. 

It took me a few listens to notice that, but yeah Bruce nailed that line like it was 1970 all over again.

We may never know what Brian's exact contributions were to the track (hope I'm wrong on that), but I think we can all at least agree that he clearly had his hand in that tag - the little bit of it we hear sounds like vintage BW.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 21, 2012, 04:11:23 PM
Some extra notes ...

Interesting how midrange it all is now. Falsetto is not all over the place.

As I said earlier, that Mike seems to be singing a midrange part at one point.

The song seems to be constructed so that nearly all of the guys get a line or emphasis somewhere during the tune. A callback to the Still Crusin' style of production where you basically got all four/five guys spotlighted on each song.

The song itself is a callback to the style of something like Soul Searchin' (another custom-written tune for the group), in that it sounds more 50s than 60s.

It would be really nice to hear that bridge!

From the sound of it, Brian seems clearly involved in the vocal arranging, the tag to the tune, and the verse is total rip of other songs he wrote. With the bridge still under wraps, that sounds like a Peterik/Thomas/Wilson credit to me!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alan Smith on April 21, 2012, 04:13:04 PM
A small victory.  A good song for the boys.

Lovin' the voices, and the arrangement is great - and we finally get to hear (a reasonable amount of) this great white whale of a song.

Please, Capitol, release it tommorrow.












Oh, and hearing Good Vibrations merge into Kokomo is kinda jolting :lol


Title: Re:
Post by: ♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇 on April 21, 2012, 04:17:59 PM
Quote
The song seems to be constructed so that nearly all of the guys get a line or emphasis somewhere during the tune. A callback to the Still Crusin' style of production where you basically got all four/five guys spotlighted on each song.

I'd prefer to think of Add Some Music rather than Still Cruisin' ^_^


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 04:19:00 PM
Bruce's little vocal bit right before it is indeed ridiculously good, though.

Also, not complaining, just asking in a neutral manner: Is it me, or is Brian's lead doubled by someone? And it's seemingly not Jeff?

I hear that too - perhaps Scott?

Scott's part of this? I wasn't aware, somehow. I was thinking it sounded like Scott, actually.

I keep listening to Bruce's part near the end. Damn, I love that d00d's voice.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 21, 2012, 04:45:10 PM
Bruce's little vocal bit right before it is indeed ridiculously good, though.

Also, not complaining, just asking in a neutral manner: Is it me, or is Brian's lead doubled by someone? And it's seemingly not Jeff?

I hear that too - perhaps Scott?

Scott's part of this? I wasn't aware, somehow. I was thinking it sounded like Scott, actually.

I keep listening to Bruce's part near the end. Damn, I love that d00d's voice.

Scott's definitely in the touring band. Not sure how much the band members (besides Foskett) are contributing vocally to the album. Will be interesting to see.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 04:58:11 PM
can't stop listening ._.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 21, 2012, 05:05:25 PM
can't stop listening ._.

Same here.  I liked it on first listen, but it does grow on you.  It really has that classic era sound down pat, from the music, production, and concept.  It's been a long, long time since I've heard a Beach Boys song nail it like that.  Definitely exceeded my expectations.  

Additionally, I also love the spoken word interludes throughout the song by the band members, reminiscent of TLOS.  Oh wait...  


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 21, 2012, 06:13:17 PM
I liked it at first listen too, but it didn't knock my socks off. After listening to it about a dozen times now, it's growing on me more and more with each listen. It's The Beach Boys, but not a Beach Boys type of song that comes to mind right away. I am excited that it is a song that fits them at this time in their career, and I hope the general population will feel that way, as well. As most have been saying here, they are making and taking all the right steps to make this reunion a soaring, howling success.


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 21, 2012, 06:23:25 PM
Am I the only one who doesn't like it much?

It’s *deeply* unimpressive, at least at first listen. Not terrible, but there’s no ‘there’ there. And hugely derivative — it’s Keep An Eye On Your Summer Dream, Midnight Cowboy, Because You Only Live Twice. If this is the song everyone’s been raving about, then the rest of the album is going to be pretty poor.

That’s Jeff Foskett doubling Brian on the verses. It’s done subtly, but it still sounds odd to me, like a Frankenbrian. It works — it’s what they did on a couple of tracks on Smile, too — but it confuses my ears as they try to decode which of them is singing. Doubt that’ll be a problem for the average listener, though.

Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. This could have been put out as a Brian Wilson solo track and from the evidence we’ve got here no-one would know any different (actually I *strongly* suspect there’s a middle eight that’s been cut out for this video, I’d guess with a Mike Love lead). In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts. But I quite like Jeff Foskett’s voice, unlike many…

The production sounds like Brian rather than Joe Thomas, which can only be a good thing. No acoustic guitars with pickups, no horrible snare sound and ‘sonic power’. It’s the best *sounding* thing released under the Beach Boys’ name since at least 1979.

So, the glass is half-full. I just won’t know what it’s half-full *of* until the single’s actually out…


Some people are never happy unless they're unhappy about something... This post reminds me of the classic Frasier sketch where he and Niles dissect a fabulous meal they've just had, but at the end agree that the most pleasurable part of it all was to be able to find fault with a tiny, tiny detail that was not up to their exacting standards.

What do you want, already? Enjoy what you have got, and don't mourn what you haven't ::)  :P ::).


Title: Re: \
Post by: STE on April 21, 2012, 06:31:28 PM

Well I pretty much agree with AndrewH.  At least by listening to this low-quality version.
But let's see.



Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 21, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Interesting how midrange it all is now. Falsetto is not all over the place.

Given that the Beach Boys are all in their sixties now (except Mike who seems to be in his eighties) its not altogether surprising that its midrange (and probably just as well too!)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Quzi on April 21, 2012, 07:33:30 PM
I'm glad to hear that all the praise TWGMTR received was rightly given, this sounds ridiculously tight! I find that the subject matter and sound is more of a throwback to early '64 than the '65 era Mike pinned down. Sure, it's safe and nostalgic, but if they felt they had to go down that route, they've done it tastefully and they've pleased this kid.

Now I'm just hoping that everyone who is hyping this as the highpoint of the album is wrong :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 21, 2012, 07:35:06 PM
Interesting how midrange it all is now. Falsetto is not all over the place.

Given that the Beach Boys are all in their sixties now (except Mike who seems to be in his eighties) its not altogether surprising that its midrange (and probably just as well too!)

Brian's music turned mid-range gradually as he quit singing falsetto. There's still high vocals in there, not only from Jeff but by Bruce and Brian.

I think Brian is double/triple/quadruple-stacked in the verses. But there's also a group unison with two or more guys singing the same line.

I think this has "classic" written all over it. It's majestic, beautiful.

Hey guys, could you imagine, a year ago, that we'd be listening to such a GREAT new recording from the Beach Boys?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 21, 2012, 07:47:47 PM
I'm so excited for the full song to drop

Sounds brilliant


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 21, 2012, 08:25:20 PM
Near perfection.  Sounds tight, tastefully produced, and respectable.  Loving every bit of it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 21, 2012, 09:26:05 PM

Now I'm just hoping that everyone who is hyping this as the highpoint of the album is wrong :lol

 :thumbsup

part of me thinks they were just hyping up the single.  Something these guys would do i think


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 21, 2012, 09:39:06 PM
Am I the only one who doesn't like it much?

It’s *deeply* unimpressive, at least at first listen. Not terrible, but there’s no ‘there’ there. And hugely derivative — it’s Keep An Eye On Your Summer Dream, Midnight Cowboy, Because You Only Live Twice. If this is the song everyone’s been raving about, then the rest of the album is going to be pretty poor.

That’s Jeff Foskett doubling Brian on the verses. It’s done subtly, but it still sounds odd to me, like a Frankenbrian. It works — it’s what they did on a couple of tracks on Smile, too — but it confuses my ears as they try to decode which of them is singing. Doubt that’ll be a problem for the average listener, though.

Harmonies are nice, but there’s a *LOT* of Foskett in there and very little of anyone else. This could have been put out as a Brian Wilson solo track and from the evidence we’ve got here no-one would know any different (actually I *strongly* suspect there’s a middle eight that’s been cut out for this video, I’d guess with a Mike Love lead). In fact, from this I can’t pick out a single Beach Boy on vocals other than Brian, just a Wall O’ Fosketts. But I quite like Jeff Foskett’s voice, unlike many…

The production sounds like Brian rather than Joe Thomas, which can only be a good thing. No acoustic guitars with pickups, no horrible snare sound and ‘sonic power’. It’s the best *sounding* thing released under the Beach Boys’ name since at least 1979.

So, the glass is half-full. I just won’t know what it’s half-full *of* until the single’s actually out…


Some people are never happy unless they're unhappy about something... This post reminds me of the classic Frasier sketch where he and Niles dissect a fabulous meal they've just had, but at the end agree that the most pleasurable part of it all was to be able to find fault with a tiny, tiny detail that was not up to their exacting standards.

What do you want, already? Enjoy what you have got, and don't mourn what you haven't ::)  :P ::).


He's actually pretty spot on and, erm, did you miss the part where he went on to name several redeeming qualities?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 21, 2012, 10:41:14 PM
Unless they filmed additional songs from the album, I'm sure the snippets of them singing "TWGMTR" in the studio would be the very same footage we can expect to see in that PBS special, "Summer's Gone" where they promised new songs from their new album. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: mammy blue on April 21, 2012, 11:03:18 PM
Based on the youtube clip, this is certainly better than any of us could have expected it to be. It's nothing we haven't heard before but the harmonies are very appealing and it's great to hear the voices together again, minus a couple important ones. I need to hear the song as a whole and assess it, but I think I prefer it to any of their singles post Goin' On. Of course I wish these guys all the best and I look forward to seeing them on friday.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 21, 2012, 11:22:14 PM
Woke up this morning and had to listen to it again. Good sign I guess.

I wonder if it's an all around new recording or if parts date back to the second half of the 1990's.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 21, 2012, 11:30:44 PM
Lyrics, as best I can decipher them:

Tunin' in the latest star
From the dashboard of my car
Cruisin' at seven
Push-button heaven
Capturin' memories from afar
In my car
In my car

chorus:
That's why God made the radio
So tune right in everywhere you go
He waved his hand
Gave us rock & roll
The soundtrack for fallin' in love
Fallin' in love
That's why God made the radio

Feel the music in the air
Find a song to take us there
It's paradise when I
Lift up my antennae
Recieving your signal
Like a prayer
Like a prayer

I'm not totally sure they sing "soundtrack" in the chorus, but I can't think of anything else that either fits or makes  sense... and how can you not adore this couplet ?

"It's paradise when I
Lift up my antennae"


Title: Re:
Post by: Jimmie_R on April 22, 2012, 01:25:00 AM
The video is now up on Al Jardines facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/aljardine


Title: Re:
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 22, 2012, 01:38:27 AM
The video is now up on Al Jardines facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/aljardine

I was going to mention that.  I saw that on Twitter.  Kind of funny how, as EMI is trying to clamp down on it, there's ol' Al linking it!  Which is good.  This deserves to be heard by as many people as possible; though I do expect this iteration to also be pulled soon, unfortunately... 


Title: Re: \
Post by: EgoHanger1966 on April 22, 2012, 01:44:45 AM
Lyrics, as best I can decipher them:

Tunin' in the latest star
From the dashboard of my car
Cruisin' at seven
Push-button heaven
Capturin' memories from afar
In my car
In my car

chorus:
That's why God made the radio
So tune right in everywhere you go
He waved his hand
Gave us rock & roll
The soundtrack for fallin' in love
Fallin' in love
That's why God made the radio

Feel the music in the air
Find a song to take us there
It's paradise when I
Lift up my antennae
Recieving your signal
Like a prayer
Like a prayer

I'm not totally sure they sing "soundtrack" in the chorus, but I can't think of anything else that either fits or makes  sense... and how can you not adore this couplet ?

"It's paradise when I
Lift up my antennae"


These lyrics SCREAM BW. :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wylson on April 22, 2012, 03:03:13 AM
Only slight hint of sadness is that Brian could totally have nailed the high parts with Joe's help! But Jeff sounds great.


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 22, 2012, 03:09:22 AM
I'm not sure 'nailed' is quite the right expression, though he would certainly have given them his own unique twist.

So do we know who wrote and produced this? It sounds like Beach boys by numbers and not the sort of thing that B Wilson would have written for himself.

I might add that while I'm not a Marks evangelist I'm glad to see he is very present in the video. I guess the Management figured that they're all so old and grizzled now that no-one will be able to differentiate between them so that it doesn't matter, as long as they are all smilingl.  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 22, 2012, 03:18:53 AM
Only slight hint of sadness is that Brian could totally have nailed the high parts with Joe's help! But Jeff sounds great.

I wanna believe I hear him layered in some of the falsetto stuff. There's a high frequency that Jeff doesn't possess present during some of the chorus falsetto parts.

If it's not him (hard to decipher all of the voices as of now) The fact that BW's featured so prominently otherwise kinda overrides that.

There's definitely a lot of Al on the 2nd verse.

I'd even say this record sounds so good, that it makes me accept Jeff as part of the current Beach Boys sound.  :o


Title: Re: \
Post by: Cam Mott on April 22, 2012, 04:00:48 AM
They are sentimental old men, nothing is more sentimental then we old men therefore I dig it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 05:18:41 AM


So do we know who wrote and produced this? It sounds like Beach boys by numbers and not the sort of thing that B Wilson would have written for himself.


i agree with this.  But i think it's his production, and it sounds great.  I expect more musically from the rest of the album


Title: Re: \
Post by: astroray on April 22, 2012, 08:41:28 AM
The cherry on top in the video is Karen Lamm in her T-Bird cruisin!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 22, 2012, 08:53:32 AM
Not sure if this has been asked yet, but is there any way to extract that audio from the interviews so we can kind of hear the song and song only? Or should I just be patient.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 22, 2012, 08:55:16 AM
So do we know who wrote and produced this? It sounds like Beach boys by numbers and not the sort of thing that B Wilson would have written for himself.

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12601.msg258552.html#msg258552]
Y'know rhere's no sign of Jeff in this video, unlike the DIA feature.


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 22, 2012, 09:00:23 AM
Not sure if this has been asked yet, but is there any way to extract that audio from the interviews so we can kind of hear the song and song only? Or should I just be patient.

I tried it, but it's more "interesting" than "enjoyable".  They really lowered the music during the talking parts. So with this one, wiping out the vocal means wiping out a bunch of other stuff in the song too. That said, you can hear some vocals not really audible in the promo.

Shoot me a PM if u want to hear what I've been listening to.


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 22, 2012, 09:09:42 AM
Some of this song also reminds me of Kiss Me Baby, can anyone else hear this?


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 22, 2012, 09:16:37 AM
Some of this song also reminds me of Kiss Me Baby, can anyone else hear this?

Aye, agreed. And, funnily enough, Hot Fun In The Summertime.

BBs by numbers? What-if? Seems to work!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Music Machine on April 22, 2012, 09:19:14 AM
It sounded like Goin' On and Sail On Sailor put through a '65 Beach Boys filter to me. I like it a lot. The best Beach Boys single since California Dreamin' from '86 imo.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 09:57:57 AM
Sounds a LOT like Mid 60's Beach Boys to me.  Certainly more so than we could ever expect.  I agree with the poster who likened it to "All Summer Long".  Very similar vibe to the harmonies; which means, basically, it's the boys singing in full voice sounding fantastic. 

Somewhere, Carl and Dennis are very proud, imho.


The lyrics highlighted above about the Attenae, sound very brian wilson to me.  "We do it holding hands, it's so cold I go 'burr' ". 


Anyways, I think this song is fantastic and I hope the entire album is full of similar greatness.  If Al doesn't get kicked out of the band, lol. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 10:00:39 AM
Another thing that passed through my mind:

You know, we've only heard 2 songs.  "DIA", and "TWGMTR".  Both are very good, in my opinion, better than I would have hoped for... and now, the rumours, the stuff swirling around is "Do It Again" may not be on the album.

So; as good as Do It Again sounds, they're considering NOT putting it on there, or as some extra track, or whatever.  That HAS to speak well for the quality of the other material on the album. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 22, 2012, 10:07:28 AM
I hope Do It Again doesn't end up on the new album because that's basically saying "hey sorry we couldn't come up with some new songs."

That's why I think it'll just be on the Walmart zinepack or whatever and maybe some other compilations and not the album.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 10:08:12 AM
Another thing that passed through my mind:

You know, we've only heard 2 songs.  "DIA", and "TWGMTR".  Both are very good, in my opinion, better than I would have hoped for... and now, the rumours, the stuff swirling around is "Do It Again" may not be on the album.

So; as good as Do It Again sounds, they're considering NOT putting it on there, or as some extra track, or whatever.  That HAS to speak well for the quality of the other material on the album. 

hope so man


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wylson on April 22, 2012, 11:27:25 AM
Further reflection on this. Jeff may be in the mix, and even perhaps one or two others, but this definitely sounds more like the Beach Boys than Brian's band, and it sounds better than them too. Huge testament to the Beach Boys after all these years.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mr. Cohen on April 22, 2012, 11:40:57 AM
Word on the street has it that Foskett is fuming about this promo. Supposedly, they even went as far as to erase his lead in favor of Brian's! This was going to be his time to be the star and get the recognition he so justly deserves, and then the Boys stole it from him. Those harmonies, that arrangement - that was all Foskett's brainchild! He even played all the instruments! I for one am solely disappointed that this "reunion" has gone so sour!


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 22, 2012, 11:58:56 AM
Word on the street has it that Foskett is fuming about this promo. Supposedly, they even went as far as to erase his lead in favor of Brian's! This was going to be his time to be the star and get the recognition he so justly deserves, and then the Boys stole it from him. Those harmonies, that arrangement - that was all Foskett's brainchild! He even played all the instruments! I for one am solely disappointed that this "reunion" has gone so sour!
he's so angry that he's planning on blowing up the earth..he should be ready to do it by this december around the 21st or so..


Title: Re: \
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 22, 2012, 12:05:29 PM
Jeff jokes need to stop. ::)


Title: Re:
Post by: b00ts on April 22, 2012, 12:15:58 PM
The video is now up on Al Jardines facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/aljardine
Gotta love Al. Capitol takes the track down from Youtube, so Al puts it on his Facebook page. He is using guerilla tactics at this point. What a maniac!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mr. Cohen on April 22, 2012, 12:21:53 PM
Quote
Gotta love Al. Capitol takes the track down from Youtube, so Al puts it on his Facebook page. He is using guerilla tactics at this point. What a maniac!

Um... that's not a Youtube video. That's an exclusive promo video endorsed by Capitol. They just don't want Youtubers posting unauthorized copies of it, which is why those other links got taken down. It's rather draconian, but hey - they're a big record label. Being draconian is their business model.

Quote
Jeff jokes need to stop.

How do you know I'm not Jeff Foskett? I have a right to joke about myself.


Title: Re:
Post by: SMiLE Brian on April 22, 2012, 12:24:11 PM
The video is now up on Al Jardines facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/aljardine
Gotta love Al. Capitol takes the track down from Youtube, so Al puts it on his Facebook page. He is using guerilla tactics at this point. What a maniac!
Al is a folk hero! ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Fro on April 22, 2012, 12:36:11 PM
I hope Do It Again doesn't end up on the new album because that's basically saying "hey sorry we couldn't come up with some new songs."

That's why I think it'll just be on the Walmart zinepack or whatever and maybe some other compilations and not the album.

Exactly.  I'm fine with them throwing it in as a bonus track on the album too, but whatever is on the proper album should be songs that haven't been on a Beach Boys record before.


Title: Re:
Post by: brother john on April 22, 2012, 12:53:40 PM
So do we know who wrote and produced this? It sounds like Beach boys by numbers and not the sort of thing that B Wilson would have written for himself.

http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12601.msg258552.html#msg258552]
Y'know rhere's no sign of Jeff in this video, unlike the DIA feature.

Great, thanks for this!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 22, 2012, 12:58:27 PM
I keep re-watching the video and falling more in love with the song..

Better than I could have ever expected!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 22, 2012, 01:25:09 PM
Quote
Gotta love Al. Capitol takes the track down from Youtube, so Al puts it on his Facebook page. He is using guerilla tactics at this point. What a maniac!

Um... that's not a Youtube video. That's an exclusive promo video endorsed by Capitol. They just don't want Youtubers posting unauthorized copies of it, which is why those other links got taken down. It's rather draconian, but hey - they're a big record label. Being draconian is their business model.


That's not an official posting either. It's just an alternative video hosting service, one that is harder to automatically censor. Capitol has not officially released the video yet.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 22, 2012, 01:28:44 PM
The cherry on top in the video is Karen Lamm in her T-Bird cruisin!



Dennis' T-Bird iirc


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 22, 2012, 02:06:24 PM
Is it me, or is Al always the first to break news, first to post videos like this (regardless of if they've been released), etc. etc. etc.? Is the guy clueless, or is he just looking out for us folks?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 22, 2012, 02:22:19 PM
Is it me, or is Al always the first to break news, first to post videos like this (regardless of if they've been released), etc. etc. etc.? Is the guy clueless, or is he just looking out for us folks?

Honestly I think he's clueless


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 22, 2012, 02:23:09 PM
Is it me, or is Al always the first to break news, first to post videos like this (regardless of if they've been released), etc. etc. etc.? Is the guy clueless, or is he just looking out for us folks?

He is out there doing interviews everyday promoting his solo album in the midst of the reunion stuff...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 22, 2012, 02:25:00 PM
first to post videos like this (regardless of if they've been released), etc. etc. etc.? Is the guy clueless, or is he just looking out for us folks?



I'm pretty sure that his facebook site isn't run by him personally


Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 22, 2012, 02:36:03 PM
bummer.
the video has been taken down and nowhere else to be found!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Custom Machine on April 22, 2012, 02:38:35 PM
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqa6rc_twgmtr-promo_music

Now taken down as well.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 22, 2012, 02:46:05 PM
It will pop up again (officially then) soon enough!


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 22, 2012, 02:47:35 PM
I seem to hear Jeff less and less as I listen to this video over and over again. I can certainly here david. I can detect his south bay accent very clearly. This is a major success. I can't stop listening, and the song keeps playing in my head. It has anthemic potential.  I can hear the Glee cast wanting to do it. I too can't wait to hear each new installment of this deeply spiritual reunion /


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 22, 2012, 02:49:17 PM
It will pop up again (officially then) soon enough!

Not my link - thanks to original poster:

http://www.mediafire.com/?o7elca47z68i3g6 (http://www.mediafire.com/?o7elca47z68i3g6)




Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 22, 2012, 03:35:34 PM
I've also got the video uploaded on my Tumblr. natureshowinstereo


Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 22, 2012, 04:08:08 PM
Thanks guys! Much appreciated!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 22, 2012, 04:14:58 PM
They can't stop us!


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 22, 2012, 04:27:08 PM
He is out there doing interviews everyday promoting his solo album in the midst of the reunion stuff...

I'm pretty sure that his facebook site isn't run by him personally

I understand all this, but he just has a history of doing this stuff. Like, wouldn't shock the hell out of me if he were behind the video being posted if not the one who copies the link and hit "enter" himself.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mahalo on April 22, 2012, 04:44:53 PM
You guys rule. Thanx Bro John. About to check it out.

...That's why God made SSMB.  
  :rock


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 07:33:52 PM
I thought the car was a '55 or '56 chevy, are we sure it's a t-bird?


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 22, 2012, 07:36:52 PM
I thought the car was a '55 or '56 chevy, are we sure it's a t-bird?

That was the one from Two-Lane Blacktop. A matte grey '55 Chevy.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 07:39:43 PM
O.K., thought I was going crazy.  I didn't catch the t-bird, I'll rewatch.

I'm big into cars.  The reason I wasn't on the board ranting and raving yesterday is beacuse I went to the world's largest car show here in Charlotte, got so sunburned I can barely walk, and I'm just not recoperatng, lol.

I've got a '69 Mustang, '62 Corvair, '66 Valiant, and a '64 Comet, my brothers have a '55 chevy, '64 Nova, '65 Chevy Truck, and a '71 Monte Carlo!  Love those things!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 22, 2012, 07:47:17 PM
Whos singing "thats why god made the radio" after the first chorus?  Before mike starts talking about how its an accolade


Title: Re: \
Post by: LetHimRun on April 22, 2012, 07:52:27 PM
O.K., thought I was going crazy.  I didn't catch the t-bird, I'll rewatch.

I'm big into cars.  The reason I wasn't on the board ranting and raving yesterday is beacuse I went to the world's largest car show here in Charlotte, got so sunburned I can barely walk, and I'm just not recoperatng, lol.

I've got a '69 Mustang, '62 Corvair, '66 Valiant, and a '64 Comet, my brothers have a '55 chevy, '64 Nova, '65 Chevy Truck, and a '71 Monte Carlo!  Love those things!

Oh, I like you a lot. I've got a '72 Chevelle and '51 Chevy Styleline.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 22, 2012, 07:53:31 PM
Very nice! 


Title: Re: \
Post by: LetHimRun on April 22, 2012, 08:05:01 PM
Very nice! 

My Dad has been to that show in Charlotte before, but it was years ago. We take our Chevelle down to the Turkey Rod Run at Daytona. We just had it down there last month for the spring show. Great times.


Title: Re: \
Post by: ivy on April 22, 2012, 09:59:07 PM
X)

Well, it exceeds my expectations. Brian sounds great on it. And I think it will appeal well to the casual BB fans most of all. Very happy!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 23, 2012, 10:15:15 AM
I know this has been gone over before, but do we think we're going to get a physical release (ooer). And if it's only download, will it be available in a lossless format?


Title: Re: \
Post by: send me a picture and i'll tell you on April 23, 2012, 10:48:13 AM
O.K., thought I was going crazy.  I didn't catch the t-bird, I'll rewatch.

I'm big into cars.  The reason I wasn't on the board ranting and raving yesterday is beacuse I went to the world's largest car show here in Charlotte, got so sunburned I can barely walk, and I'm just not recoperatng, lol.

I've got a '69 Mustang, '62 Corvair, '66 Valiant, and a '64 Comet, my brothers have a '55 chevy, '64 Nova, '65 Chevy Truck, and a '71 Monte Carlo!  Love those things!

Oh, I like you a lot. I've got a '72 Chevelle and '51 Chevy Styleline.

Can I talk about my '68 Delmont  88 hardtop with 65K miles on its 455?  

I regularly drive a sexy little '05 Civic coupe, because the Delmont might make the world forget about my big p##nis.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 10:51:16 AM
I know this has been gone over before, but do we think we're going to get a physical release (ooer). And if it's only download, will it be available in a lossless format?

No and no.


Title: Re:
Post by: Myk Luhv on April 23, 2012, 11:47:57 AM
I think it's very foolish to not release a lossless-encoded option to download if no physical release is going to happen.


Title: Re:
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 11:51:48 AM
I think it's very foolish to not release a lossless-encoded option to download if no physical release is going to happen.

Presumably you would get a lossless version when the song is included in the album release. Having a download-only option for the entire album would indeed be objectionable. While I always prefer physical releases of everything, I don’t mind paying $1.29 for an MP3 of the new single so I can hear it sooner, knowing I’ll get a lossless version on the CD in mere weeks afterward. 


Title: Re:
Post by: Myk Luhv on April 23, 2012, 11:58:56 AM
Yeah, that's of course true but I'm thinking: what if some non-album cuts are included, or an instrumental/a cappella take? Maybe nobody bothers to do that with singles any more beyond hip-hop but it'd be a shame to only have such things in lossy format.


Title: The New BB LP - Formats
Post by: petsite on April 23, 2012, 01:28:17 PM
The new BB LP will be released as a download, on CD and on Vinyl. SO get ready!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Beach Boy on April 23, 2012, 01:58:59 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 23, 2012, 02:02:13 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 02:04:01 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D

Exactly. But no recorded single. Not yet.

Street date on the single is April 30 in Europe, stuff releases a day later for the U.S. -- so May 1 for us.

That also lines up perfectly with the April 29 TV promo appearance.


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 23, 2012, 02:07:01 PM
In Germany records are released on Fridays, so I guess we should get it on April 27th. :)


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 23, 2012, 02:08:52 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D

Exactly. But no recorded single. Not yet.

Street date on the single is April 30 in Europe, stuff releases a day later for the U.S. -- so May 1 for us.

That also lines up perfectly with the April 29 TV promo appearance.

Anyone seen a pre-order for the single other than the European site Jaspy linked to many days ago?


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 23, 2012, 02:22:12 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D

Exactly. But no recorded single. Not yet.

Street date on the single is April 30 in Europe, stuff releases a day later for the U.S. -- so May 1 for us.

That also lines up perfectly with the April 29 TV promo appearance.

April 29 TV appearance--is that the CBS Sunday morning thing?


Title: Re:
Post by: Wirestone on April 23, 2012, 02:26:07 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D

Exactly. But no recorded single. Not yet.

Street date on the single is April 30 in Europe, stuff releases a day later for the U.S. -- so May 1 for us.

That also lines up perfectly with the April 29 TV promo appearance.

April 29 TV appearance--is that the CBS Sunday morning thing?

Yep. Seems like the perfect time to unveil the single, doesn't it?


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 23, 2012, 02:55:12 PM
Since many singles are released on tuesday do you guys think we are finally going to get the song tomorrow?

A live version, most probably.  ;D

Exactly. But no recorded single. Not yet.

Street date on the single is April 30 in Europe, stuff releases a day later for the U.S. -- so May 1 for us.

That also lines up perfectly with the April 29 TV promo appearance.

April 29 TV appearance--is that the CBS Sunday morning thing?

Yep. Seems like the perfect time to unveil the single, doesn't it?

Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mr. Cohen on April 23, 2012, 02:57:54 PM
They should've produced "Imagination" like "Everything I Need". That, to me, represents a decent middle ground between the more classic Brian Wilson and '90s slickness. "Imagination" goes to far into the '90s slickness territory. Brian Wilson at that time ideally should've had the production Randy Newman had  on "You've Got a Friend In Me",


Title: Re:
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 02:59:13 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...


Title: Re: \
Post by: orange22 on April 23, 2012, 03:00:38 PM
Wow, this is actually quite good! I'm really liking Mike in the clips too, he seems so proud of the band.

Just did a chord sheet if you want to play along at home. Apologies if something is off, some parts are a bit hard to hear. Also thanks to Andrew for the lyrics.

Intro
C  |  F/G


Verse 1
C       a-              b-7      E
Tunin' in the latest star

A            f#-                  d-7     G
From the dashboard of my car

a-            D
Cruisin' at seven

a-               D
Push-button heaven

d-7         F       C/E       Bb
Capturin' memories from afar

         F/G    G
In my car


Chorus
C                                 g-7
That's why God made the radio

    Eb           Eb7      Db                  DbM7
So tune right in everywhere you go

Db/F  F#M7       F#7
He     waved his hand

            B
Gave us rock & roll

      D                             F#/C#    B/C#
The soundtrack for fallin' in love

            F#/C#    B/C#
Fallin' in love

d-            C/E   F            F/G      G
That's why God  made the radio


Verse 2
C         a-               b-7      E
Feel the music in the air

A        f#-                 d-7      G
Find a song to take us there

a-              D
It's paradise when I

a-           D
Lift up my antennae

d-7                F         C/E
Recieving your signal

        Bb
Like a prayer

        F/G       G
Like a prayer


Outro Chorus
(acapella)
Db                            ab-7
That's why God made, that's why God made

Db     Ab/C  bb-             B
That's why God made the radio

(instruments, repeat to fade)
Db                               ab-7
That's why God made the radio

Db     Ab/C  bb-             d-7     gb-
That's why God made the radio


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 23, 2012, 03:01:30 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...

Doh! Obvious meter was turned off again


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 23, 2012, 03:02:11 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...

I think he meant the concert will be recorded, uploaded, and in our grubby little hands by the time they take their encore.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 23, 2012, 03:07:54 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...

I think he meant the concert will be recorded, uploaded, and in our grubby little hands by the time they take their encore.

Yeah, gotcha.  Sometimes the (painfully) obvious escapes me.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 03:09:52 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...

I think he meant the concert will be recorded, uploaded, and in our grubby little hands by the time they take their encore.

Pssh.  This is 2012...I want a live video stream of every concert on the tour!  :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 23, 2012, 03:22:20 PM
And if it's not in HD 3D, forget it!

I want to see Bruce's shorts as if they're gyrating a mere sniffing distance from my face......


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 03:24:33 PM
Everything seems to add up to that, yes.  Curious about Andrew's post concerning a possible "live" single, howver, presumably taken from the sirius recording, being released earlier.

I think Andrew alluded to the fact that the "live" single he meant would be the first ever live performance on the first night of the tour tomorrow...


We will be getting two very soon if we're lucky

Jazz fest and bonnaroo
I think he meant the concert will be recorded, uploaded, and in our grubby little hands by the time they take their encore.

Pssh.  This is 2012...I want a live video stream of every concert on the tour!  :smokin


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Well Slim, it might just be Bonnaroo that we get.  I posted this in the Tour dates thread regarding the New Orleans Jazz Festival:

According to their official Youtube page, they will be broadcasting live from the festival from May 4th to 6th ONLY.  I do not believe they will be officially broadcasting The Beach Boys' portion of the show.  On the page, the countdown for the webcast is listed as 12 days (from today)...and definitely does not imply they are webcasting the performances on the 27th at all.  See:  http://www.youtube.com/jazzfest

And also from their Facebook Page;

"Have you checked out our Jazz Fest YouTube Page? We've put up a few videos to get you ready for #jazzfest2012 and don't forget we will be webcasting on May 4 - 6!"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 03:33:50 PM
Well Slim, it might just be Bonnaroo that we get.  I posted this in the Tour dates thread regarding the New Orleans Jazz Festival:

According to their official Youtube page, they will be broadcasting live from the festival from May 4th to 6th ONLY.  I do not believe they will be officially broadcasting The Beach Boys' portion of the show.  On the page, the countdown for the webcast is listed as 12 days (from today)...and definitely does not imply they are webcasting the performances on the 27th at all.  See:  http://www.youtube.com/jazzfest

And also from their Facebook Page;

"Have you checked out our Jazz Fest YouTube Page? We've put up a few videos to get you ready for #jazzfest2012 and don't forget we will be webcasting on May 4 - 6!"


Damn, well bonnaroo will do I guess..

I was really excited to watch the jazz fest show though, that's a more mature festival with Springsteen. Petty headlining

Perfect festival for the beach boys


Title: Re: \
Post by: Justin on April 23, 2012, 03:46:59 PM
True but I am really curious to how well the hip Bonaroo crowd takes on the band.  On the official festival site, you can see just how many people have added each band onto their own personal festival itinerary.  Radiohead has the most with 15K people planning to watch them...the Beach Boys are not too far behind with 10K.  That's pretty cool for a younger crowd.


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 23, 2012, 05:51:11 PM
True but I am really curious to how well the hip Bonaroo crowd takes on the band.  On the official festival site, you can see just how many people have added each band onto their own personal festival itinerary.  Radiohead has the most with 15K people planning to watch them...the Beach Boys are not too far behind with 10K.  That's pretty cool for a younger crowd.

Yeah, if nothing else, maybe these "hip" shows will help if management tells the BB's they are playing to the hipsters and indie crowd, and maybe they whip out "Lookin' at Tomorrow" or "Vegetables" or something. :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 23, 2012, 07:39:27 PM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 08:35:27 PM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 23, 2012, 08:42:21 PM
Wow, this is actually quite good! I'm really liking Mike in the clips too, he seems so proud of the band.

Just did a chord sheet if you want to play along at home. Apologies if something is off, some parts are a bit hard to hear. Also thanks to Andrew for the lyrics.

Intro
C  |  F/G


Verse 1
C       a-              b-7      E
Tunin' in the latest star

A            f#-                  d-7     G
From the dashboard of my car

a-            D
Cruisin' at seven

a-               D
Push-button heaven

d-7         F       C/E       Bb
Capturin' memories from afar

         F/G    G
In my car


Chorus
C                                 g-7
That's why God made the radio

    Eb           Eb7      Db                  DbM7
So tune right in everywhere you go

Db/F  F#M7       F#7
He     waved his hand

            B
Gave us rock & roll

      D                             F#/C#    B/C#
The soundtrack for fallin' in love

            F#/C#    B/C#
Fallin' in love

d-            C/E   F            F/G      G
That's why God  made the radio


Verse 2
C         a-               b-7      E
Feel the music in the air

A        f#-                 d-7      G
Find a song to take us there

a-              D
It's paradise when I

a-           D
Lift up my antennae

d-7                F         C/E
Recieving your signal

        Bb
Like a prayer

        F/G       G
Like a prayer


Outro Chorus
(acapella)
Db                            ab-7
That's why God made, that's why God made

Db     Ab/C  bb-             B
That's why God made the radio

(instruments, repeat to fade)
Db                               ab-7
That's why God made the radio

Db     Ab/C  bb-             d-7     gb-
That's why God made the radio

What do a- and d- and bb- mean? Is it minor or something?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Pretty Funky on April 23, 2012, 09:39:05 PM

Just shoot me but is there a little of Robbie Williams 'Millennium' to anyone elses ears? ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ5uIkJDb6o


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 23, 2012, 09:45:32 PM

Just shoot me but is there a little of Robbie Williams 'Millennium' to anyone elses ears? ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ5uIkJDb6o

Nope, one of the first thins I heard.  Robbie is my guilty pleasure.  Somebody pointed out that millenm sampled an older tune that twgmtr sounds like. It's the refrain and that twangy guitar that sound almost Brit pop for a briiiief moment


Title: Re: \
Post by: Awesoman on April 23, 2012, 10:07:49 PM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 23, 2012, 10:24:17 PM
@FatherOfTheMan: I think you forgot "Kokomo"!

(Just had to bring the good old standard joke)


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 23, 2012, 10:41:37 PM

Just shoot me but is there a little of Robbie Williams 'Millennium' to anyone elses ears? ???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ5uIkJDb6o

I was thinking about this today, actually.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Beach Boy on April 23, 2012, 11:44:53 PM
Release date April 26, according to amazon.com.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 11:48:06 PM
Release date April 26, according to amazon.com.

 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 11:49:42 PM
I could actually cry listening to the preview, they sound so great  :(


http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1)


Title: Re: \
Post by: I. Spaceman on April 23, 2012, 11:54:50 PM
Why are people mentioning that Robbie Williams song? That would be like copping the Under Pressure riff and someone saying it reminded them of Ice Ice Baby.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Too Much Sugar on April 23, 2012, 11:58:20 PM
I could actually cry listening to the preview, they sound so great  :(


http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1)

I couldn't make out Al at all in the video, but he's loud and clear (at least in the beginning) of the preview. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 23, 2012, 11:59:44 PM
I could actually cry listening to the preview, they sound so great  :(


http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1)

I couldn't make out Al at all in the video, but he's loud and clear (at least in the beginning) of the preview. 

He sounds fantastic on "in my car"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 24, 2012, 12:31:00 AM
I could actually cry listening to the preview, they sound so great  :(


http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Thats-Why-God-Made-Radio/dp/B007WZ7JDC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1335250110&sr=8-1)

oh wow, that's pretty good.


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 24, 2012, 12:42:46 AM
Why are people mentioning that Robbie Williams song? That would be like copping the Under Pressure riff and someone saying it reminded them of Ice Ice Baby.

Ha ha!

I don't think it's a conscious steal either - just that Brian writes from a very similar place as John Barry. I really like that bit of this new song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 12:47:20 AM
Why are people mentioning that Robbie Williams song? That would be like copping the Under Pressure riff and someone saying it reminded them of Ice Ice Baby.

Ha ha!

I don't think it's a conscious steal either - just that Brian writes from a very similar place as John Barry. I really like that bit of this new song.

I think you'll find that Brian did not write the song.


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 24, 2012, 01:58:05 AM
Hmm... no sign of a physical release.

This ain't on amazon.uk

... and Transatlantic downloads aren't allowed…

Have I caught a dose of pessimism from you know who?


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 24, 2012, 03:37:24 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 24, 2012, 04:31:27 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.

I'm with ya man. Best BB new product since Love You.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 24, 2012, 04:36:30 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.

Track length is listed at 3:17.  That's almost a minute more than we've heard.  I'm not so sure we've heard the bridge...maybe part of it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 24, 2012, 05:05:48 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.

I'm with ya man. Best BB new product since Love You.

I'd say since "Goin' On"


Title: Re: \
Post by: phirnis on April 24, 2012, 05:18:55 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.

I'm with ya man. Best BB new product since Love You.

I'd say since "Goin' On"

I'd say probably their best since "Somewhere Near Japan". ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 24, 2012, 05:36:11 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.


Title: Re: \
Post by: STE on April 24, 2012, 06:07:58 AM


Definitely the best one since "Do It Again 2011"!






Title: Re: \
Post by: ohthosegirls on April 24, 2012, 06:12:16 AM
from BB facebook : “That’s Why God Made The Radio” makes its national radio premiere Wednesday 4-25 on ESPN Radio’s “Mike & Mike In the Morning” on ESPN Radio & ESPN2. (6AM-10AM ET/PT, check local stations).


Title: Re: \
Post by: ohthosegirls on April 24, 2012, 06:14:19 AM
Looks like Mr. Marks was just off by a few Wednesdays!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 06:18:28 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 24, 2012, 06:26:36 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 06:35:44 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.

Arrangement and production,  most definitely. The actual tune? We haven't seen any evidence that Brian had a ha d in it. Written by Thomas and Peterik.


Title: Re: \
Post by: JohnMill on April 24, 2012, 06:42:37 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.

Arrangement and production,  most definitely. The actual tune? We haven't seen any evidence that Brian had a ha d in it. Written by Thomas and Peterik.

So the myth that the song might be based off of a Brian Wilson scrap from the eighties is just that?


Title: Re: \
Post by: LostArt on April 24, 2012, 06:45:23 AM
We shall see who's names are included in the writer's credit in a couple of days.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 06:51:20 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.

Arrangement and production,  most definitely. The actual tune? We haven't seen any evidence that Brian had a ha d in it. Written by Thomas and Peterik.

So the myth that the song might be based off of a Brian Wilson scrap from the eighties is just that?

I've never heard that.

There was some speculation here a few weeks back that it might have originated with BW in some way, but it was only speculation. The account of the song's origin from Peterik doesn't mention anything like that.

I personally believe BW will have a credit on the tune, but possibly for political reasons.


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 06:52:36 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.

Arrangement and production,  most definitely. The actual tune? We haven't seen any evidence that Brian had a ha d in it. Written by Thomas and Peterik.
Who cares who wrote it. If it is a quality song with a great arrangement, and given the Beach Boy treatment, then I am fine with it. Brian doesn't have to write everything. Except for Sunflower, albums like Today & Pet Sounds had at least one track not written by Brian or one of the band members. You make it seem like it isn't worthy just because Brian didn't write it.


Title: Re:
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 06:55:55 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

Some of it is.

Arrangement and production,  most definitely. The actual tune? We haven't seen any evidence that Brian had a ha d in it. Written by Thomas and Peterik.
Who cares who wrote it. If it is a quality song with a great arrangement, and given the Beach Boy treatment, then I am fine with it. Brian doesn't have to write everything. Except for Sunflower, albums like Today & Pet Sounds had at least one track not written by Brian or one of the band members. You make it seem like it isn't worthy just because Brian didn't write it.

Not saying I care. At least not today. Simply trying to keep things accurate.


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 24, 2012, 07:02:21 AM
Well, you commented on RONDEMON's posting regarding chords and uncommon jazz voicings. Whether Brian wrote it or not, he would have added all that in the arrangement. He didn't need to write the song to do those things. And yes, accuracy is indeed a good thing. :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 24, 2012, 07:07:47 AM
Just listened again, I'm gonna state my honest opinion so don't kill me.

This is probably my favorite Beach Boys song since Love You.
Hands down. Fantastic. Not even for 71 year olds, in general, one of their best.

Hell of a statement to make before even hearing the full thing

Yeah seriously.  Gonna reserve judgement on this tune until I have a chance to hear the whole thing in its entirety. 

Meh, we've heard both verses, and the chorus, bridge, and fade. I should say this is LOOKING like it.

I'm with ya man. Best BB new product since Love You.

I'd say since "Goin' On"

Goin' on is a poorly-recorded great song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: TimmyC on April 24, 2012, 08:05:21 AM
I'm new to this Board, but have been obsessively reading it for the past couple of months. Just wanted to say for my inaugural post that, all criticisms aside, TWGMTR is amazing and has been absolutely worth the wait. Cannot wait for the new tour and for the meet and greet on May 12 in Uncasville!!!


Title: Re:
Post by: Aegir on April 24, 2012, 09:01:23 AM
Well, you commented on RONDEMON's posting regarding chords and uncommon jazz voicings. Whether Brian wrote or not, he would have added all that in the arrangement. He didn't need to write the song to do those things. And yes, accuracy is indeed a good thing. :)

Exactly, Brian didn't write Sloop John B either. but the Beach Boys version certainly don't sound like this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk7I_KWkswQ


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 24, 2012, 09:19:53 AM
Listening to the amazon sample, this song seems like a pretty seamless continuation of Brian's solo career as far as over all sound/production go. Me likey.  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: joshferrell on April 24, 2012, 10:36:46 AM
This is going to be the best song since TWGMTR (the promo video)


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 24, 2012, 10:52:14 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

You're kidding me. This is not written by Brian? I'm surprised as there are so many parts of it that sound uniquely BW - the little descending doo woppy piano runs, the chord changes. More power to those that aren't bothered - I find it pretty wearisome that they're seemingly churning out fake Brian songs and for the lead single too! Sure, it shouldn't matter if the end result is a good song, but I feel disappointed to hear this. Maybe I'm sick of the constant did he/didn't he debates that plague Brian's work these days but this kind of undermines any interest I had in this reunion.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 24, 2012, 11:06:13 AM
Any idea if there is going to be a physical release yet - and will it be up on the UK amazon for download too - I still have a voucher to redeem!


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on April 24, 2012, 11:14:42 AM
This sounds terrific. Those chords! Lots of those uncommon jazz voicings that BW typically uses on his best work.

The song isn't by Brian, though.

You're kidding me. This is not written by Brian? I'm surprised as there are so many parts of it that sound uniquely BW - the little descending doo woppy piano runs, the chord changes. More power to those that aren't bothered - I find it pretty wearisome that they're seemingly churning out fake Brian songs and for the lead single too! Sure, it shouldn't matter if the end result is a good song, but I feel disappointed to hear this. Maybe I'm sick of the constant did he/didn't he debates that plague Brian's work these days but this kind of undermines any interest I had in this reunion.

*Sigh* We've been over this before...we DON'T know for sure that Brian didn't write TWGMTR...all we know for sure is that Joe Thomas, Jim Peterik (formerly of Survivor) and some other guy all contributed to the writing of this song.  Brian may very well have had the initial inspiration (ala "Sail On Sailor") and if so, probably wrote something like the chorus hookline, after which it was handed off to others to finish and demo, after which it maybe came back to Brian to arrange the chordal structure and background harmonies in his inimmitable way.  I'm sure we'll find out soon enough.  In the meantime, I can say I think that's a very Brian-sounding title!


Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 24, 2012, 11:33:42 AM
I don't care if Grill Chingos (a man I just made up) wrote the song. Whoever did write it really did their Brian Wilson chord dictionary research.
Sounds great and those chords are heavenly and the key to why the BB's music has THAT quality to it that makes those harmonies so mindblowing.

Major 7s, Ab/Bb (and voicings like that).

So good. Can't wait to hear the whole song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 24, 2012, 11:45:31 AM
The song is beautiful. I hear all the BB singing, with Jeff doing, as some have said, Carl's parts, which is fine and tasteful. Dave is clear on the chorus; his "god" is pronounced like the first syllable in PDE "gadget," because he has retained, more than the others,his "South bay" (south west los angeles county" accent (an open front to mid un-rounded vowel: [ae] in phonetic transcription). I hear echos of the songs so far listed (kiss me baby, theme from midnight cowboy, your summer dream, etc) but also from the 50 hit Silhouettes (in the verses).  I don't care about the credits and am sure the BB influence is just as strong here as in Sloop and Sail on Sailor and other songs of mixed provenance.

The BB are together; they are playing tonight; they have an album, a Zine with DIA coming out, and a great single, which is bound to make the top 40, currently in part on youtube and 48 hours away from sale to all in its full glory.

I see cause for only joy; the song played in my head--and heart I am proud to say--all night last night. Say what you will about autotune and JT and the like, the proof is in the celestial result, in hearing the spheres rotate--that's all it's ever been about for me, and I hear them here.

best to all


Title: Re: \
Post by: Melt Away on April 24, 2012, 12:31:42 PM
I've really grown to love this song over the last few days. I wouldn't say it harps back to any other era of the BB's, this is a new 21st century updated sound. This is the first new record I've really been excited for since Chaos and Creation by McCartney. Waves of Love is good but it's seems a little outdated and while I love Don't Fight the Sea it's so 80's it's ridiculous. I'm hoping an album full of 21st century BB's and nothing else!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 12:35:23 PM
IT's got a little bit of "Good Timin' thrown in for good measure... if you listen to the amazon sample towards the end, Brian does with his 'crazy' voice "whooo oohhh ohhhh!!" instead of "You need good Timin!"  Kinda takes 30 years off of him for a minute there :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 24, 2012, 01:44:25 PM
ONE ADDED QUESTION:SO FAR ON THE AMAZON SAMPLE AND THE VIDEO i DO NOT YET HEAR MIKE SINGING BASS OR BARRITONE. WHERE IS THE BOTTOM AND WHO IS SINGING WHAT DENNIS AND MIKE WOULD NORMALLY SING TOGETHER? I HOPE WE CAN DO A FULL VOCAL ACCOUNTING LINE BY LINE ON THURSDAY. I CAN HEAR LOTS OF AL AND BRUCE TOGETHER AND AL AND BRIAN TOGETHER (2ND VERSE) AS IN SLOOP.


Title: Re:
Post by: aaktt on April 24, 2012, 01:57:19 PM
I don't remember being this excited about something in my whole life :D
After hearing this short fragment I'm perfectly sure it's gonna be great and can't wait to hear the full version.

I feel like I'm 13 or something. Incredible :D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 24, 2012, 02:05:34 PM
ONE ADDED QUESTION:SO FAR ON THE AMAZON SAMPLE AND THE VIDEO i DO NOT YET HEAR MIKE SINGING BASS OR BARRITONE. WHERE IS THE BOTTOM AND WHO IS SINGING WHAT DENNIS AND MIKE WOULD NORMALLY SING TOGETHER? I HOPE WE CAN DO A FULL VOCAL ACCOUNTING LINE BY LINE ON THURSDAY. I CAN HEAR LOTS OF AL AND BRUCE TOGETHER AND AL AND BRIAN TOGETHER (2ND VERSE) AS IN SLOOP.

Mike seems to be singing a midrange part.

I'm not hearing anyone lower, particularly. Maybe Dave?

Very odd.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 24, 2012, 02:10:42 PM
This is absolutely spectacular.  Just LISTEN to that! It sounds fantastic!  Better than I could have ever expected, hands down.


Title: Re: \
Post by: doc smiley on April 24, 2012, 02:26:08 PM
ONE ADDED QUESTION:SO FAR ON THE AMAZON SAMPLE AND THE VIDEO i DO NOT YET HEAR MIKE SINGING BASS OR BARRITONE. WHERE IS THE BOTTOM AND WHO IS SINGING WHAT DENNIS AND MIKE WOULD NORMALLY SING TOGETHER? I HOPE WE CAN DO A FULL VOCAL ACCOUNTING LINE BY LINE ON THURSDAY. I CAN HEAR LOTS OF AL AND BRUCE TOGETHER AND AL AND BRIAN TOGETHER (2ND VERSE) AS IN SLOOP.

I would assume that Dave is singing what would have been Dennis and Brian is singing Carl's part...
that would leave Jeffrey F. or Matt J.  singing on top.  If Mike is singing mid-range not bass, I would assume that another band member would be covering for him... however I think he is singing bass as well, but his voice isn't very strong anymore, so its well back in the mix.  (imho)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 24, 2012, 03:34:15 PM
Yeah, I think Mike probably sang bass (who else would?) and since his voice is so... understated... anymore, it's almost impossible to hear in the mix.  Once we get a nice clean sounding copy we'll probably be able to pick out more vocal lines!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 24, 2012, 04:13:24 PM
I don't think anyone is singing a bass vocal. The lowest voice is probably one of the three or four fosketts on the track.


Title: Re: \
Post by: NatureShowInStereo on April 24, 2012, 04:20:38 PM
I didn't know about that Amazon preview, though it's just the chorus basically. But the single will be out within 2 days? April 26th it says on Amazon?

And how crazy would it be if we had the album title and cover all along and just thought it was the single/art? They're being so tricky and clever with us, it's bittersweet.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 24, 2012, 05:34:11 PM
No idea who's singing at the start Of that amazon clip, "in my car" .  Then I hear Jeff and Brian together, then Bruce and Jeff together


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 24, 2012, 05:35:21 PM
No idea who's singing at the start Of that amazon clip, "in my car" .  Then I hear Jeff and Brian together, then Bruce and Jeff together

That's Al


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 24, 2012, 08:35:31 PM
I don't think anyone is singing a bass vocal. The lowest voice is probably one of the three or four fosketts on the track.

I don't hear a bass vocal either, but it's hard to tell with what we've got.  Even if it turns out that there isn't one, I doubt it's a matter of Mike's voice not being strong enough - good miking (pardon the pun) can take care of that - maybe Brian (or whoever) just didn't feel that a bass vocal fit the tune. 


Title: Re:
Post by: aaktt on April 25, 2012, 02:53:03 AM
IT's got a little bit of "Good Timin' thrown in for good measure... if you listen to the amazon sample towards the end, Brian does with his 'crazy' voice "whooo oohhh ohhhh!!" instead of "You need good Timin!"  Kinda takes 30 years off of him for a minute there :)
Yeah, I can hear it too. The chorus seems to be recorded in a similar way.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 25, 2012, 04:01:12 AM
I didn't know about that Amazon preview, though it's just the chorus basically. But the single will be out within 2 days? April 26th it says on Amazon?

And how crazy would it be if we had the album title and cover all along and just thought it was the single/art? They're being so tricky and clever with us, it's bittersweet.

No, they're keeping us in the dark and feeding us insufficient scraps. The Cohen of Silence has thus decreed.


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 25, 2012, 04:52:18 AM
I am singing this in my head (along with all the other songs it sounds like!) over and over again. That is a good thing! I can't wait until it's released.


Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 25, 2012, 05:27:24 AM
I'm a journalist and Capitol just sent out the stream of the single. It sounds great. Not a ton of surprises as that video is pretty thorough and the bridge is pretty short and leads right into the acapella section.

I obviously can't link it as it's password protected but here's a long press release I just received...



Hollywood, California – April 25, 2012 – The founding members of The Beach Boys, one of the world’s most legendary bands in popular music history, have reunited for a global 50th Anniversary celebration, including a new album release, a major international tour, and commemorative catalog releases.  Today, The Beach Boys announce details about their new studio album, That’s Why God Made The Radio, to be released June 5 by Capitol/EMI.

 Beach Boys Brian Wilson, Mike Love, Al Jardine, Bruce Johnston, and David Marks recently completed their recording sessions at Los Angeles’ Ocean Way Studios for That’s Why God Made The Radio, the band’s 29th studio album (including 2011’s The SMiLE Sessions), the first in decades to feature all of the band’s surviving original members.  Produced by Brian Wilson and executive produced by Mike Love, the album’s 11 new songs illustrate The Beach Boys’ unique and evocative West Coast story with the band’s timeless signature sound.

                                                     

The album’s lead single, “That’s Why God Made The Radio,” showcases The Beach Boys’ soaring harmonies in an upbeat, beaming ode to music’s radio champions around the world.  Beginning today, the song is available for download purchase from all major digital service providers, and it makes its national radio premiere today on “Mike & Mike In the Morning” on ESPN Radio and ESPN 2 (6 AM-10 AM ET/PT, check local stations).  A new lyrics video for the single has been launched today on VEVO and The Beach Boys’ YouTube channel, where a video about the making of the song is also available for streaming.

 

“Radio was my whole education,” says Brian Wilson.  “Chuck Berry, Rosemary Clooney, The Four Freshmen, Phil Spector, Little Richard... To hear ‘That’s Why God Made The Radio’ on the radio would be a thrill beyond belief, it really would.  It would be a thrill beyond belief.”

 

“I got a lot of my appreciation for all of the creativity in the world, in terms of music, through the radio,” says Mike Love.  “For all of us who grew up in the ‘50s, ‘60s, ‘70s and beyond, the radio has played such a huge, important part in our lives.  When we were kids, we’d sneak out of the house and go and sit in Brian’s car and listen to the local radio stations on his car radio.”

 

The album’s other new songs include “Think About The Days,” “Isn’t It Time,” “Spring Vacation,” “Private Life Of Bill And Sue,” “Shelter,” “Daybreak Over The Ocean,” “Beaches In Mind,” “Strange World,” “My Life Suite,” and “Summer’s Gone.”


 

The Beach Boys’ collaborative approach to writing and recording their new music is evidenced throughout the album, with all of the band members participating to create its glorious harmonies, lyrics, and arrangements.

 

“We’ve come full circle,” says Al Jardine.  “Sharing our memories and our present in the studio has been really remarkable.  I can especially feel it when we’re all singing around the mic together, because we all hear each other and we really lock in.”

 

“We have reunited as a band, but we never ‘un-reunited’ as friends,” says Bruce Johnston.  “To be back in the studio with these guys is like a prayer that’s been answered and I am thrilled to be sharing it with everybody.”

 

“This is more like a family reunion than anything,” says David Marks.  “When we’re together, we get along great.  The chemistry always works the same as the last time we were together, and the five of us become a single element.”

 

The Beach Boys’ 50th Anniversary tour, the band’s first major outing to include Brian Wilson in more than two decades, began this week in Tucson, with other North American stops including their first concert at the Hollywood Bowl since 1965, headlining performances at the New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Festival (“Jazz Fest”) and Bonnaroo Music and Arts Festival, and concerts in major cities including New York, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Washington, DC, Toronto, and Montreal.

 

The Beach Boys have also confirmed concerts throughout Europe with additional European territories to be announced shortly.  The Beach Boys will also perform shows in Japan, and concerts in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will be announced soon.  All confirmed tour dates can be found on TheBeachBoys.com.

 

Starting May 1, a custom 72-page Beach Boys ‘ZinePak magazine, bundled with an exclusive CD featuring 11 of the band’s classic hits and their 2012 version of “Do It Again,” will be available for purchase in the music department at Walmart stores nationwide.  For more information and to purchase the ‘ZinePak online, visit http://www.walmart.com/ip/20678933.

 

The Beach Boys are scheduled to head to QVC Wednesday, May 16 to unveil their much-anticipated new release with a special hour-long live performance at 7 PM ET / 4 PM PT. During The Beach Boys’ QSessions Live broadcast, fans will have the opportunity to order the new album, which has been specially packaged just for QVC shoppers with a greatest hits bonus CD, nearly a month before the new album’s release date. The QVC-exclusive album package with bonus CD will be available starting May 16 at QVC.com or (800) 345-1515, while supplies last.

 

The Beach Boys have confirmed several other national television appearances, including an interview on “CBS Sunday Morning” to air this Sunday, April 29, a multi-song performance and interview on NBC’s “Late Night With Jimmy Fallon” on May 7, a performance on NBC’s “Tonight Show With Jay Leno” on June 6, and more to be announced.

 

Special radio events have also been confirmed, including a SiriusXM “Artist Confidential” performance and Q&A special to air Saturday, May 26 at 12 PM ET within the satellite network’s “Beach Boys Endless Summer Weekend,” a four-day Memorial Day Weekend tribute airing on ‘60s on 6, channel 6.  Also during Memorial Day Weekend, Cumulus Radio Networks will premiere an exclusive, hour-long Beach Boys 50th Anniversary special on more than 150 Classic Hits/Oldies and AC stations across the U.S.

 

The Beach Boys and Capitol/EMI have also partnered for 50th Anniversary commemorative releases celebrating the band’s entire catalog, with a new hits collection and a career-spanning box set planned for later this year.

 



Title: Re: \
Post by: Roger Ryan on April 25, 2012, 05:38:48 AM
Sorry if I missed it, but have we determined which piece of John Barry music the chorus resembles?

It must be the same music that Ray Davies copped a bit of for the Kinks' song "A Face In The Crowd" (1974)...which I was just listening to a day or so back! Anyway, the descending chords have a sad elegance that give the song a nice, mature feel. It's a mainstream ballad without being obnoxiously so. If it resembles anything from the Beach Boys' own catalog, I'd say it recalls "Keep An Eye On Summer".

EDIT: O.K. - thanks to another thread, I realize the chorus is a lift from John Barry's theme score for the James Bond film "You Only Live Twice". No problem for me, that's a great piece of music to "borrow"!


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 25, 2012, 05:39:28 AM
The Beach Boys have also confirmed concerts throughout Europe with additional European territories to be announced shortly.  The Beach Boys will also perform shows in Japan, and concerts in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will be announced soon.  All confirmed tour dates can be found on TheBeachBoys.com.

Hell yeah!


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 25, 2012, 05:40:57 AM
Wow! Thanks for this! It's really informative, just what we needed!

Am I looking into the "additional EUR dates" bit too much, or could this be the UK? Please?!

If so, I am going to save all my wedding money and spend it on tickets! :D


Title: Re:
Post by: hypehat on April 25, 2012, 05:41:16 AM
The Beach Boys have also confirmed concerts throughout Europe with additional European territories to be announced shortly.  The Beach Boys will also perform shows in Japan, and concerts in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will be announced soon.  All confirmed tour dates can be found on TheBeachBoys.com.

Hell yeah!

*Giggles like a schoolgirl*


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 25, 2012, 05:47:44 AM
Holy crap! We're getting Life's Suite!


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 25, 2012, 05:57:58 AM
Thanks for the info RONDEMON!!

TWGMTR released today! :-D


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 25, 2012, 05:59:49 AM
Thanks for the info RONDEMON!!

TWGMTR released today! :-D

Hmm… maybe on one side of the Atlantic Channel…


Title: Re: \
Post by: Matt H on April 25, 2012, 06:03:45 AM
Interesting that the Track list does not include "Waves of Love," even though it was reported earlier, I wonder if Carl is on the album anywhere.


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on April 25, 2012, 06:05:48 AM
Hmmm...they played the Hollywood Bowl in '82...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 06:07:59 AM
That summers gone title has popped up again


Title: Re:
Post by: rab2591 on April 25, 2012, 06:11:21 AM
Thanks for the info RONDEMON!!

TWGMTR released today! :-D

Hmm… maybe on one side of the Atlantic Channel…

Good point.


Title: Re: \
Post by: c-man on April 25, 2012, 06:17:11 AM
Sorry if I missed it, but have we determined which piece of John Barry music the chorus resembles?

It must be the same music that Ray Davies copped a bit of for the Kinks' song "A Face In The Crowd" (1974)...which I was just listening to a day or so back! Anyway, the descending chords have a sad elegance that give the song a nice, mature feel. It's a mainstream ballad without being obnoxiously so. If it resembles anything from the Beach Boys' own catalog, I'd say it recalls "Keep An Eye On Summer".

EDIT: O.K. - thanks to another thread, I realize the chorus is a lift from John Barry's theme score for the James Bond film "You Only Live Twice". No problem for me, that's a great piece of music to "borrow"!

I wouldn't say it's a lift from "YOLT", since the descending riff in THAT song has more movement of notes melody-wise.  But to me, it instantly reminded me of something I couldn't quite place at first, but occurred to me awhile later...Danny Kirwan's instrumental "Sunny Side Of Heaven" from Fleetwood Mac's "Bare Trees" album.  Then, the first few notes of the verse remind me of "Your Summer Dream".


Title: Re: \
Post by: AndrewHickey on April 25, 2012, 06:18:33 AM
Wow! Thanks for this! It's really informative, just what we needed!

Am I looking into the "additional EUR dates" bit too much, or could this be the UK? Please?!

If so, I am going to save all my wedding money and spend it on tickets! :D

I doubt it, from everything we've heard. However, even so it still could be good news for some of us. If they do a show in Amsterdam, for example, that's actually both closer, and cheaper to get to, from Manchester, where I live, than London is. Popping over on a budget airline would be cheaper than getting a train or driving from say Glasgow or Birmingham to London (or vice versa). Even though I'm going to two shows in Italy already, I'll definitely consider any other European dates that are announced...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zargo on April 25, 2012, 06:20:07 AM
Quote from: RONDEMON
[b
The Beach Boys have also confirmed concerts throughout Europe with additional European territories to be announced shortly.  The Beach Boys will also perform shows in Japan, and concerts in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will be announced soon.  All confirmed tour dates can be found on TheBeachBoys.com.[/b]

Unreal!!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 25, 2012, 06:22:03 AM
Amazon is still showing a release date of tomorrow, 4/26, for the download single. Not sure why it says today. I don’t have access to iTunes at the moment, so I’m not sure if it’s already there.

The QVC thing is interesting. I’m wondering if the 5/16 date for availability of the album through QVC is just in referencing to being able to order it rather than it actually shipping to customers on 5/16.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jaspy on April 25, 2012, 06:22:30 AM
Man, the Beach Boys really go for it  :-D

Thanks, thanks, thanks!


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on April 25, 2012, 06:26:33 AM
Interesting that the Track list does not include "Waves of Love," even though it was reported earlier, I wonder if Carl is on the album anywhere.

It sounds like the Beach Boys worked on it. A few interviews seemed to suggest the song was going to be on the album, while other interviews were more non-committal in terms of what might make the tracklisting.

Perhaps we’ll still see “Waves of Love”, Bruce’s remake of “She Believes in Love Again”, and other items on a “Deluxe” edition or as retailer-exclusive bonus tracks. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 06:28:20 AM
Still no release or delivery date for the CD single on German amazon...  :-\


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 25, 2012, 06:32:20 AM
Andrew, I am really hoping that we are included in these new dates. For more to be announced and the UK still to miss out, well, then there would be an outcry! I will be looking for more information on this every day, so hopefully some announcements are close.



Title: Re: \
Post by: RONDEMON on April 25, 2012, 06:44:53 AM
You're welcome everybody : ) : ) : )

Oh, in reply to whoever posted about John Barry earlier in the thread - the chorus of "That's Why God...." resembles the main theme to "You Only Live Twice" and also Barry's "Midnight Cowboy" theme. The former, Robbie Williams sampled in his hit "Millenium."



Title: Re:
Post by: aaktt on April 25, 2012, 07:44:09 AM
Don't know if you guys realize, but the whole song's already on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGke6pnT1d0


Title: Re:
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 07:45:51 AM
Don't know if you guys realize, but the whole song's already on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGke6pnT1d0
Yap, we realize. Got a separate thread for that.  :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 07:56:04 AM
not on iTunes as of 8 am PDT


Title: Re: \
Post by: elnombre on April 25, 2012, 07:57:10 AM
It'll be on iTunes at midnight in your local region, except if you're in the GMT+1 time zone (Germany, Netherlands etc.) then it will be 1 a.m.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 08:25:06 AM
It'll be on iTunes at midnight in your local region, except if you're in the GMT+1 time zone (Germany, Netherlands etc.) then it will be 1 a.m.

ok, cool.  So that still means tomorrow, 4/26. Press release said "today", 4/25. 


Title: Re:
Post by: Bedroom Tapes on April 25, 2012, 11:54:03 AM
Thanks for the info RONDEMON!!

TWGMTR released today! :-D

Hmm… maybe on one side of the Atlantic Channel…

Good point.

Maybe it gets released 12 AM PST??  What time do places like iTunes usually start selling new music?


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 25, 2012, 12:02:41 PM
Those of you who said use headphones - good call - it's so different. The bass is great!


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 25, 2012, 12:06:00 PM
Those of you who said use headphones - good call - it's so different. The bass is great!

Definitely a huge difference. I just took out to my car for a listen. Sooo good.


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 25, 2012, 12:37:35 PM
Sorry if I missed it but is this definitely being released tomorrow in the UK? And only digitally?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 12:39:12 PM
What should I do ? I hope we can get the boys back high on the charts in the U.S. When I buy the single on amazon.com but am living in Germany, will it count as U.S.- sale ?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Custom Machine on April 25, 2012, 02:30:48 PM
It's now officially available on iTunes!


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on April 25, 2012, 02:34:46 PM
It's now officially available on iTunes!

And Bingo!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Summertime Blooz on April 25, 2012, 02:35:24 PM
It's now officially available on iTunes!
Yup! Sure to sell a million copies.


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 25, 2012, 02:35:32 PM
It's now officially available on iTunes!

Awesome. I just bought it. Curious to see which is better. My rip or the official rip.  


Title: Re:
Post by: Eireannach on April 25, 2012, 02:35:51 PM
Sweet!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 25, 2012, 02:39:19 PM
It's not on itunes UK/IRELAND


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 25, 2012, 02:50:19 PM
I'm digging the one side of beach songs, one side of ballads and a suite layout.

It's a lot like Today! :D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 02:51:46 PM
It's not on itunes UK/IRELAND
Not on German itunes, either. And still no date for the single CD.  :-\


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 25, 2012, 02:53:54 PM
It's on german amazon.


Title: Re:
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 02:55:40 PM
It's on german amazon.


Not available yet. 4 1/2  minutes to go.....


Title: Re:
Post by: Stegibo on April 25, 2012, 03:01:10 PM
Now available in german amazon! :p


Title: Re:
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 03:06:05 PM
Now available in german amazon! :p


And I've got it !


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 25, 2012, 03:07:05 PM
It was asked in the other TWGMTR thread whether there are song writing credits imbedded in the mp3 file.

Yes: Joe Thomas, Brian Wilson, Jim Peterik & Larry Millas


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 25, 2012, 03:09:34 PM
Am I the only one getting the CD instead of purchasing the itune?  :-\  Still no date for it. Hope I at least get one or two exclusive bonus tracks with it..


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 25, 2012, 03:14:24 PM
Am I the only one getting the CD instead of purchasing the itune?  :-\  Still no date for it. Hope I at least get one or two exclusive bonus tracks with it..


No. When the CD is released I'll order that one too. Will it count as U.S.-sale when I order via amazon.com instead of .de ? I'd like to contribute to getting them on the charts


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 25, 2012, 03:17:16 PM
Am I the only one getting the CD instead of purchasing the itune?  :-\  Still no date for it. Hope I at least get one or two exclusive bonus tracks with it..


No. When the CD is released I'll order that one too. Will it count as U.S.-sale when I order via amazon.com instead of .de ? I'd like to contribute to getting them on the charts

Yeah it will

I did the same with smile


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alan Smith on April 25, 2012, 03:23:53 PM
Quote from: RONDEMON
[b
The Beach Boys have also confirmed concerts throughout Europe with additional European territories to be announced shortly.  The Beach Boys will also perform shows in Japan, and concerts in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will be announced soon.  All confirmed tour dates can be found on TheBeachBoys.com.[/b]

Unreal!!!

Yeeeeeeeeeeah!!!!!!!! :-D
:-D :-D :o


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wrightfan on April 25, 2012, 03:31:21 PM
Amazing amazing amazing!

What a killer arrangement! Love how the middle eight goes right to the a capella section. The tag is something else too!


Title: Re: \
Post by: JohnMill on April 25, 2012, 03:32:36 PM
Amazing amazing amazing!

What a killer arrangement! Love how the middle eight goes right to the a capella section. The tag is something else too!

Bruce's vocals on the tag are out of this world!


Title: Re: \
Post by: elnombre on April 25, 2012, 05:23:32 PM
Am I the only one getting the CD instead of purchasing the itune?  :-\  Still no date for it. Hope I at least get one or two exclusive bonus tracks with it..

Join us in the 21st century, won't you?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 05:29:12 PM
I'm pretty sure anyone can change their iTunes store from the iTunes home page. Look for a flag. 

Anyway, I'm really getting into this song. Particularly from the bridge on.  When that tag starts, I hear some beach boys magic.  I don't really hear the connection to imagination either


Title: Re: \
Post by: dumbangel76 on April 25, 2012, 05:33:34 PM
Brilliant! Has everything I have loved about The Beach Boys since I have first heard them! I cannot wait for the album and three days later I will see them in the Woodlands! I know I will have a hard time with the tears!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 25, 2012, 05:37:09 PM
Brilliant! Has everything I have loved about The Beach Boys since I have first heard them! I cannot wait for the album and three days later I will see them in the Woodlands! I know I will have a hard time with the tears!

You won't be the only one there in tears lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 25, 2012, 06:20:46 PM
Just bought it on iTunes! Come on guys, lets make this a top 40 hit!


Title: Re: \
Post by: SamMcK on April 25, 2012, 06:33:55 PM
I can't believe how good this is! :o I wasn't so sure at first when listening on Youtube but listening to it in much better fidelity with headphones on at full volume really shows the power of those harmonies! I've only been a fan for about 2/3 years but I actually cried because it made me so happy listening to a new song by one of the greatest bands ever and sung by the master of music himself  Brian Wilson! I can't believe I just listened to a brand new song by these people whose music I love so much. ;D I actually played Surfin' just before to show the difference between 1961 and 2012! :lol  



Title: Re: \
Post by: dumbangel76 on April 25, 2012, 06:37:45 PM
Brilliant! Has everything I have loved about The Beach Boys since I have first heard them! I cannot wait for the album and three days later I will see them in the Woodlands! I know I will have a hard time with the tears!

You won't be the only one there in tears lol


Ha! I bet! I remember when I saw Brian on the Pet Sounds tour I didn't even realize the tears were coming and when he went into Surfer Girl I could not hold back! A local dj was sitting next to me and he had tears as well!


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 25, 2012, 09:39:06 PM
listening non-stop. I hear many more BB parts (as opposed to Jeff) the more I listen. I have discussed Dave's voice already; I hear it.  Don't underestimate Dave; listen for his accent.Al and Bruce are everywhere. Brian does get support from Jeff, but I hear him individualized enough.  Can we do a full, line by line vocal accounting?  I am awestruck and speechless.

How will we measure if this is a "hit."  Will we monitor its chart status?

thanks and congratulations to the BB


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 26, 2012, 02:41:48 AM
Seems like I accidentally started my own thread http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12801.0.html (http://smileysmile.net/board/index.php/topic,12801.0.html) on this topic (must have got over-excited...). Makes more sense to be here...

Anyway, a new single from the Beach Boys could have been atrocious, but it isn't! So thank god for that, and for the radio!  ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mike Lovechild on April 26, 2012, 02:48:02 AM
Check out the video I made for the single :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upv6R5miYaQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upv6R5miYaQ)


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 26, 2012, 02:54:36 AM
Good work!


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 26, 2012, 03:00:51 AM
Check out the video I made for the single :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upv6R5miYaQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upv6R5miYaQ)

Now, where that was OKAY, I think you need to work on it SOME. Take a lesson from me, for instance, next time you attempt to make a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JJi7tLW8DU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JJi7tLW8DU)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mike Lovechild on April 26, 2012, 03:16:38 AM
It's certainly not perfect, looking forward to checking out your video (too much Youtube in work makes it look like I'm not working!  :) )


Title: Re: \
Post by: mr_oleary on April 26, 2012, 03:39:59 AM
I can't get this song out of my head!!!  Why do I feel like Brian is playing a practical joke on me?  ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 26, 2012, 03:52:43 AM
This song demands radio play. Hope it gets a lot of attention


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 26, 2012, 04:22:30 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 26, 2012, 04:55:04 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol

technically the facebook page posted the video which tells you it's available for download.  they did so 18 hours ago


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 26, 2012, 04:58:14 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol

technically the facebook page posted the video which tells you it's available for download.  they did so 18 hours ago

It hardly does..

And it's not that hard to post the itunes link, make it easy as possible for people..

And the no promotion on itunes is inexcusable


Title: Re: \
Post by: Luke_Barshack on April 26, 2012, 05:55:43 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol

technically the facebook page posted the video which tells you it's available for download.  they did so 18 hours ago

It hardly does..

And it's not that hard to post the itunes link, make it easy as possible for people..

And the no promotion on itunes is inexcusable

Agreed. I was searching on my iPhone at work. It took me longer than I'd have like to find it on itunes. A poor show I feel. There should have been a huge splash - AT LEAST on the BB artist page.

Have been listening to it non-stop though. It has it's flaws but I think it's the perfect reunion record. Pretty much all of the boxes, for everyone, have been ticked.

Can't wait to listen to it in the car on the way home.

BBC 6 Music here in the UK gave it a mention and a bit of a lukewarm response to be honest. They also joked that they didn't have much hope the boys would even finish the tour due to the turbulent relationships of some band members. They said the single is "exactly what you'd expect". I do know what they mean, but I honestly don't think that's a bad thing.

I've been trying to request the station to spin it ever since but haven't heard anything yet.


Title: Re: \
Post by: The infamous Baldwin Organ on April 26, 2012, 06:17:27 AM
I bought it off iTunes this morning, and I love it...a perfect record for the reunion!

I will admit it took me a few listens to fully get into; I went back and played Don't Fight the Sea to help my ears adjust, and I think that helped. What I love about TWGMTR is that it's very Doo Wop, and that you can hear all of the individual voices in there. I must give props to whoever did the mix; the stereo balance is very nice IMO. I am really excited to hear the rest of the record; there still is that classic element to the Beach Boys, and I hope that they can make a record with some humor to it as well! Bring on the bass vocals and songs about root beer!  :)


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 26, 2012, 07:00:12 AM
This has to be Brian's finest lead vocal in the last 30 years. His voice is smooth, he holds all of his notes properly, instead of cutting off too soon and sounding breathy. The background vocals are really beautiful. I hardly recognize Mike's voice. Nothing nasal at all. Al and Bruce sound fantastic. The only thing missing really is Carl. There is something distinct in his singing that when you hear it, you instantly know it is The Beach Boys that you are listening to. My wife picked up on it right away, saying "That really sounds nice, but it doesn't quite sound like The Beach Boys". Maybe, they could have added Chris Love to the background vocals, as he sounds the most like Carl. Minor complaint though, as overall, Im just loving having a new Beach Boys record to listen to. Wonderful!!!


Title: Re: \
Post by: obscurereference on April 26, 2012, 07:45:07 AM
Wow, just bought just bought my very first NEW Beach Boys single (didn't think I'd ever get a chance to say that), and it also happens to be pretty good! Good time to be a fan...


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 08:29:33 AM
I can't get this song out of my head!!!  Why do I feel like Brian is playing a practical joke on me?  ::)

It makes you wonder if there's an art to it.  Exactly how do you write a catchy song?  It has to be pretty simple, it has to have just enough cheese to make it rememberable, and to hit that part in you that actually DOES like love songs, or nostalgia, etc.... but can't go over the line or it's just annoying.  This song seems to walk the line with that. 

I think one of the great things about some of the Beach Boys songs is how the lyrics are almost bad, but the voices are so unbelievably great that you can't possibly say the song isn't good.  I mean they just sound great on this, and the harmonies still have Brian's brilliance dripped on them. 

I've heard tons of people refeerred to as 'like the Beach Boys' over the years, but I have yet to hear anybody who does that vocal stack like that.  It's simple, you just add something on top, or strip this down, or go acapella but yet nobody else does it.  It must be harder than it looks, like this song is a little better than it looks. 

Interesting. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 26, 2012, 08:56:36 AM
My question is: Which bits did Brian write?

The descending doo wop piano runs behind the verses sound totally Brian. The way the chords shift unexpectedly for the 3rd and fourth bars ("from the dashboard of my car") seem typical of his writing style, remindng me of Keep an Eye on Summer and Warmth of the sun.

The "Cruisin at 7" part also sounds uniquely Brian. It reminds me very much of the "I look in the mirror" lines from Goin On.

But then if you were to construct a Beach Boys soundalike record and were well versed in the music, I guess you could kind of cut and paste from different songs and produce a convincing Brian style, if you were a skillful enough writer.

Any thoughts on Brian's involvement with this?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 09:02:49 AM
I could be incredibly naieve, but Brian talks about writers block from time to time... that leads me to believe he has a confidence issue.  So perhaps he has trouble coming up with ideas.

HOWEVER, if you were to walk up to Brian with a song written called "That's Why God Made The Radio", and tell him you want him to finish it up and make it a Beach Boys record... I would imagine he'd jump right in, change a few lines he didn't like, add some chords, drop a couple parts, and make a pretty different track out of what he started with. 

He doesn't strike me as not capable of production anymore like others have suggested, as a matter of fact I think he really still enjoys doing that.  When you have an entire room full of great musicians, it's really easy to bang out on a piano some different chords (If you're Brian) and play around with the song a little bit. 

So I would assume (there's that word) that Brian took a finished song, was told to rewrite part of it, changed a third or so of it and added more vocal lines.  From what I understand he comes up with harmonies on the fly, half the vocals you're hearing he probably added on top of what was on the original song. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 26, 2012, 09:03:23 AM
My question is: Which bits did Brian write?

The descending doo wop piano runs behind the verses sound totally Brian. The way the chords shift unexpectedly for the 3rd and fourth bars ("from the dashboard of my car") seem typical of his writing style, remindng me of Keep an Eye on Summer and Warmth of the sun.

The "Cruisin at 7" part also sounds uniquely Brian. It reminds me very much of the "I look in the mirror" lines from Goin On.

But then if you were to construct a Beach Boys soundalike record and were well versed in the music, I guess you could kind of cut and paste from different songs and produce a convincing Brian style, if you were a skillful enough writer.

Any thoughts on Brian's involvement with this?
It's anybody's guess, but lyrically I am thinking "it's paradise when I lift up my antenna" is a Brian line. Musically, I think he may have been the one to suggest the modulations/chord changes in the chorus, especially the last "That's Why God..." in each chorus, which has that ominous minor 7th feel. These are the parts that screamed Brian Wilson to me.

The part which seems anti-Brian or un-Brian is the bridge, which I am guessing was written by Thomas/Peterik.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 09:05:49 AM
Oh, and BTW, this is essentially what Brian has been doing for 3 or 4 years now.  Taking others songs (Gershwin; Disney) and basically reimagining them.  Some of the songs on his last two albums were very different than the originals, I imagine this song by EyeOfTheTigerGuy was given the same treatment by Brian, and possibly a few new lyrics.  I agree the antennae line sounds Brianish. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 26, 2012, 09:11:14 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol



53 minutes ago it was posted on facebook.


Quote
The Beach Boys
Download the new Beach Boys single - "That's Why God Made The Radio" now on iTunes. http://bit.ly/IQP0vd


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 26, 2012, 09:13:57 AM
What we need is the original Peterik demo…  Has it been booted?  Does Phil C know?  Where is he when you need him…


Title: Re: \
Post by: pixletwin on April 26, 2012, 09:14:44 AM
Ron I think you are bang on correct here.

I could be incredibly naieve, but Brian talks about writers block from time to time... that leads me to believe he has a confidence issue.  So perhaps he has trouble coming up with ideas.

HOWEVER, if you were to walk up to Brian with a song written called "That's Why God Made The Radio", and tell him you want him to finish it up and make it a Beach Boys record... I would imagine he'd jump right in, change a few lines he didn't like, add some chords, drop a couple parts, and make a pretty different track out of what he started with. 

He doesn't strike me as not capable of production anymore like others have suggested, as a matter of fact I think he really still enjoys doing that.  When you have an entire room full of great musicians, it's really easy to bang out on a piano some different chords (If you're Brian) and play around with the song a little bit. 

So I would assume (there's that word) that Brian took a finished song, was told to rewrite part of it, changed a third or so of it and added more vocal lines.  From what I understand he comes up with harmonies on the fly, half the vocals you're hearing he probably added on top of what was on the original song. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Amy B. on April 26, 2012, 09:23:25 AM

It's anybody's guess, but lyrically I am thinking "it's paradise when I lift up my antenna" is a Brian line. Musically, I think he may have been the one to suggest the modulations/chord changes in the chorus, especially the last "That's Why God..." in each chorus, which has that ominous minor 7th feel. These are the parts that screamed Brian Wilson to me.

The part which seems anti-Brian or un-Brian is the bridge, which I am guessing was written by Thomas/Peterik.
[/quote]

I agree that the bridge is the weakest part of the song and does not sound like Brian wrote it. Now watch--it'll come out that the bridge was Brian's contribution!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 26, 2012, 09:29:07 AM
I'm gonna be the first to say it

Brian can "lift my antenna" any day.


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 26, 2012, 09:35:28 AM
I agree that the bridge is the weakest part of the song and does not sound like Brian wrote it. Now watch--it'll come out that the bridge was Brian's contribution!

Yeah - the sole contribution! It wouldn't surprise me.

I could be incredibly naieve, but Brian talks about writers block from time to time... that leads me to believe he has a confidence issue.  So perhaps he has trouble coming up with ideas.

HOWEVER, if you were to walk up to Brian with a song written called "That's Why God Made The Radio", and tell him you want him to finish it up and make it a Beach Boys record... I would imagine he'd jump right in, change a few lines he didn't like, add some chords, drop a couple parts, and make a pretty different track out of what he started with.  

He doesn't strike me as not capable of production anymore like others have suggested, as a matter of fact I think he really still enjoys doing that.  When you have an entire room full of great musicians, it's really easy to bang out on a piano some different chords (If you're Brian) and play around with the song a little bit.  

So I would assume (there's that word) that Brian took a finished song, was told to rewrite part of it, changed a third or so of it and added more vocal lines.  From what I understand he comes up with harmonies on the fly, half the vocals you're hearing he probably added on top of what was on the original song.  

Yeah this sounds about right.

I can also understand the need to hire other writers to create a quintessentially Beach Boys record. I doubt Brian would have the right perspective to be able to do that, ironically enough. That said, a lot of the tracks from TLOS, with rewritten lyrics, could have made perfect Beach Boy material, just not necessarily recognisably BB to the average Joe, in the same way this is.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Shady on April 26, 2012, 10:38:48 AM
I see absolutely no mention of the fact the song is available for download on the beach boys facebook page, no promotion on the itunes front page, it just dropped out of nowhere..

Typical BS from Capitol



53 minutes ago it was posted on facebook.


Quote
The Beach Boys
Download the new Beach Boys single - "That's Why God Made The Radio" now on iTunes. http://bit.ly/IQP0vd

haha, now that wasn't so hard was it


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 26, 2012, 11:51:11 AM
First thing I did when I got in from work was download this and I am really pleased with it!

I understand the reasons why some people aren't happy/sure about this song as I can hear what they are talking about. However, the Beach Boys did not have to re-unite and could have just put out some old collections, but they spent a lot of time in the studio producing what they want to be their legacy. They wouldn't want to be remembered for an embarrassing record or thought of totally past it and I think this is a good choice of direction. It may not be a classic, but we have been so lucky to call so many BB songs classics. We can't be greedy anymore!

So, whatever you think of the song, just remember that the boys are happy with it, they want to do it and how many of you really thought we could possibly hear something this good 50 years on?

:) Thank God for the Beach Boys!  :love


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 26, 2012, 12:00:55 PM
I agree that the bridge is the weakest part of the song and does not sound like Brian wrote it. Now watch--it'll come out that the bridge was Brian's contribution!

Yeah - the sole contribution! It wouldn't surprise me.

I could be incredibly naieve, but Brian talks about writers block from time to time... that leads me to believe he has a confidence issue.  So perhaps he has trouble coming up with ideas.

HOWEVER, if you were to walk up to Brian with a song written called "That's Why God Made The Radio", and tell him you want him to finish it up and make it a Beach Boys record... I would imagine he'd jump right in, change a few lines he didn't like, add some chords, drop a couple parts, and make a pretty different track out of what he started with.  

He doesn't strike me as not capable of production anymore like others have suggested, as a matter of fact I think he really still enjoys doing that.  When you have an entire room full of great musicians, it's really easy to bang out on a piano some different chords (If you're Brian) and play around with the song a little bit.  

So I would assume (there's that word) that Brian took a finished song, was told to rewrite part of it, changed a third or so of it and added more vocal lines.  From what I understand he comes up with harmonies on the fly, half the vocals you're hearing he probably added on top of what was on the original song.  

Yeah this sounds about right.

I can also understand the need to hire other writers to create a quintessentially Beach Boys record. I doubt Brian would have the right perspective to be able to do that, ironically enough. That said, a lot of the tracks from TLOS, with rewritten lyrics, could have made perfect Beach Boy material, just not necessarily recognisably BB to the average Joe, in the same way this is.

I sincerely doubt that the bridge is Brian's contribution. I would imagine that Brian contributed the following:

Structurally:

- Getting straight to the verse at the top of the song, with a short intro
- Hitting the chorus directly ater the first verse without a bridge. This is a classic Brian technique; I know, because I've ripped it off countless times.
- The quick mini-bridges before the choruses ("like a prayer...")
- The quick bridge and break into the ending coda was probably Brian's idea.

I'd imagine that Brian shortened a few of the parts of the song and contributed to its slightly unusual song structure; while this is a common and quintessentially commercial song structure in 2012, it is emblematic of the work Brian did in the mid-60's.

Melodically and Chordally:

- Some of the aspects of the verse melody (floating above the root note)
- Most importantly, I would imagine the exact chord progression in the chorus of the original demo to be different. The modulations in the chorus ("tune right in everywhere you go," the spooky D Sharp Major 7 to C Sharp Major 7 or something similar)
- Really, the chordal and melodic aspects of the Chorus as it progresses are quintessential Brian, both in their commerciality and their uniqueness. I'd imagine the original tune had a more standard doo-wop progression.
- The extra, extremely powerful "That's Why God Made The Radio" at the end of the chorus. Reinforcing the point of the song beautifully in a very Brian manner.

Arrangement and Production:

As we enter this category, we are more susceptible to being duped. Some of Brian's other songwriting hallmarks are so uniquely his that when they are well-executed, there is little doubt as to the author. Still, the arrangement and production are extremely Brian-style, and I can't imagine how anyone could compare them to Imagination.

- Unlike Imagination, the choice of instrumentation is VERY mid-60s Brian, as it was on Brian Wilson Reimagines Gershwin.
- The beautiful, menacing sax or bass harmonica following the chord changes in the chorus - this was Brian's original version of the Moog and other synth bass we heard a lot in his solo and BBs work from 1976-1988
- The break and a capella tag at the end
- Harpsichord or Rocksichord or some sort of non-velocity sensitive Harpsichord-esque instrument throughout
- The bass hovering around away from the root note of the verse whilst still anchoring the song (BW hallmark)
- The beautiful, understated "Wouldn't It Be Nice" - style arpeggios in the break before the coda

There is a lot more, of course, and these are only my observations. Suffice it to say, though, that there is a lot of Brian in this tune. For the naysayers, think about Brian's motivations in every interview he has given for the past 15 years - he wants a hit. Sometimes he says he can't get hits anymore, but he is always fixated on it.

My guess is that Thomas/Peterik had the song lying around for a while, the record company and the group liked it and thought it had a good chance of being a hit, and Brian, motivated as ever, jumped in and helped make it a true Brian-produced Beach Boys record.

What is probably not written by Brian is the bridge towards the end. Very standard songwriting, and it sticks out like a sore thumb, as do the distorted guitars, which seem to scream "take us seriously!" Brian is typically able to use distorted guitars, synths, etc. to great effect in order to heighten the tension in a song, especially towards the end. This is a pale imitation of that technique, and the guitars are mixed too loud.

All food for thought, anyway!
-b00ts


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 26, 2012, 12:09:34 PM
The more I listen to this the more I want to cry......in a good way!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Chris Brown on April 26, 2012, 12:12:43 PM
Excellent post bOOts, agreed on all counts.  

As others have said, the bridge was a bit of a letdown - it's by far the most generic part of the song, almost sounds like it doesn't belong at all.  Still, that's a minor quibble on what is otherwise an outstanding track.  I haven't been able to stop listening since downloading it last night, it holds up really well on repeat listens.


Title: Re: \
Post by: CarlTheVoice on April 26, 2012, 12:16:08 PM
Excellent post bOOts, agreed on all counts.  

As others have said, the bridge was a bit of a letdown - it's by far the most generic part of the song, almost sounds like it doesn't belong at all.  Still, that's a minor quibble on what is otherwise an outstanding track.  I haven't been able to stop listening since downloading it last night, it holds up really well on repeat listens.


All BB songs last well on repeat! So many bands don't, I get sick and tired of them!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 26, 2012, 12:21:42 PM
I guess if Brian had more than a little to do with the writing of the song we would've read it in every article and would've been told in every video.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 26, 2012, 12:23:05 PM
I think Brian wrote all the parts that I like. And Peterik wrote all the parts I don't like.

Likewise, it's the BBs singing the vocals that sound good. And Jeff singing those that stink.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 12:55:06 PM
I really like Jeff's "falling in loOove!"


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 26, 2012, 01:05:02 PM
I just wrote to a big radio station here and told them about the new single and that it is out. Hope they'll play it


Title: Re: \
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on April 26, 2012, 01:07:17 PM
b00ts knows that the structure is the key.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Freddie French-Pounce on April 26, 2012, 01:16:33 PM
Excellent post bOOts, agreed on all counts.  

As others have said, the bridge was a bit of a letdown - it's by far the most generic part of the song, almost sounds like it doesn't belong at all.  Still, that's a minor quibble on what is otherwise an outstanding track.  I haven't been able to stop listening since downloading it last night, it holds up really well on repeat listens.

I Didn't mind it at first, but listening to it the first time with the rubbish lyric video actually devalued the song - as soon as I listened to it without anything else - It seemed that much better, and just gets better every time I hear it!

The first time I heard it, the bridge seemed further out of place than on later listens, and the near a capella section almost sounded cut on, Smile style if you know what I mean. Now, It flows perfectly!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 01:23:20 PM
Fabulous post, Boots. For those of us without some of precise musical knowledge, it's very useful.

Over on the Blue Board, someone with connections to Capitol said that Brian and Joe had picked the song back up and finished it for this record. So that suggests that your theory -- which is Brian basically editing, rewriting and fiddling with a tune -- has some real basis in fact.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Charles LePage @ ComicList on April 26, 2012, 01:35:33 PM
So this song is one of the "leftover" Wilson/Thomas songs from Imagination?

http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/1998-08-27/music/brian-wilson-reconstructed/4/

And Joe Thomas is willing to work with Brian after getting sued?  Fascinating.


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 26, 2012, 01:38:19 PM
I too am grateful for that detailed scholarly analysis of the song structure. As I listen I hear the exact beach boys voices more clearly all the time. Who can offer a detailed explanation of exactly who is singing exactly what exactly when? Last question how will we monitor is this song is going to be a hit? Thank you for everyone's fellowship and kind caring of our information our appreciation and our hope. Let me say 1 more time that I distinctly here davids voice in the response on the chorus. His south bay accent is very distinct.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 01:39:40 PM
why does David have a different accent from the Wilson brothers who grew up across the street from him?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 26, 2012, 01:44:07 PM
Because Dave didn't always live in Hawthorne, he moved there when he was 7.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Heysaboda on April 26, 2012, 01:45:39 PM

News flash:

IT'S GLORIOUS!


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 26, 2012, 01:52:48 PM
Where was dave living up until 7?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 26, 2012, 01:53:08 PM
So this song is one of the "leftover" Wilson/Thomas songs from Imagination?

http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/1998-08-27/music/brian-wilson-reconstructed/4/

And Joe Thomas is willing to work with Brian after getting sued?  Fascinating.

Well Brian is working with Mike after being sued by him more than once, Al sued Brian at least once and Mike sued Al for using The Beach Boys name so it doesn't seem to be an issue.

It's also nice to see the chairman of the board, hows do you like the new single Chuck?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Paulos on April 26, 2012, 01:54:23 PM
Where was dave living up until 7?

I can't remember and my copy of The Lost Beach Boy is in my parents attic and as such inaccessable - paging Mr Stebbins and Mr Doe for an answer!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andrew G. Doe on April 26, 2012, 02:15:56 PM
Erie, PA.

Jeez, don't you guys know anything ?  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 02:18:48 PM
Well then that certainly wouldn't explain his SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES ACCENT!


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on April 26, 2012, 02:22:46 PM
I looked on YouTube to find video of David Marks talking, to see what the professor was talking about, and he sounds like the average person from the West Coast, either Northern or Southern California.  I'm not sure what a South Bay accent sounds like.  There's a video where he takes Chuck Kelly on a walking tour of Hawthorne and tells stories about the Wilsons, like the time Dennis chopped a tree down after David fell out of it and broke his arm.


Title: Re: \
Post by: RCTID on April 26, 2012, 02:28:05 PM
i dig this song the more i listen to it.

love it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 26, 2012, 03:21:07 PM
Well then that certainly wouldn't explain his SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES ACCENT!

 The flats vowels of PA and los angeles are very similar. This would explain why dave has such a distinct pronunciation._ I am a professor, but I am not professor higgins. The bottom line is, do we hear dave in the place where I am hearing him, in the responses on the chorus. Plus, is that his great guitar work, and 8th note chuch-chuck, plus some melodic fills, passim?


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 26, 2012, 03:25:02 PM
I sincerely doubt that the bridge is Brian's contribution. I would imagine that Brian contributed the following:

Structurally:

- Getting straight to the verse at the top of the song, with a short intro
- Hitting the chorus directly ater the first verse without a bridge. This is a classic Brian technique; I know, because I've ripped it off countless times.
- The quick mini-bridges before the choruses ("like a prayer...")
- The quick bridge and break into the ending coda was probably Brian's idea.

I'd imagine that Brian shortened a few of the parts of the song and contributed to its slightly unusual song structure; while this is a common and quintessentially commercial song structure in 2012, it is emblematic of the work Brian did in the mid-60's.

Melodically and Chordally:

- Some of the aspects of the verse melody (floating above the root note)
- Most importantly, I would imagine the exact chord progression in the chorus of the original demo to be different. The modulations in the chorus ("tune right in everywhere you go," the spooky D Sharp Major 7 to C Sharp Major 7 or something similar)
- Really, the chordal and melodic aspects of the Chorus as it progresses are quintessential Brian, both in their commerciality and their uniqueness. I'd imagine the original tune had a more standard doo-wop progression.
- The extra, extremely powerful "That's Why God Made The Radio" at the end of the chorus. Reinforcing the point of the song beautifully in a very Brian manner.

Arrangement and Production:

As we enter this category, we are more susceptible to being duped. Some of Brian's other songwriting hallmarks are so uniquely his that when they are well-executed, there is little doubt as to the author. Still, the arrangement and production are extremely Brian-style, and I can't imagine how anyone could compare them to Imagination.

- Unlike Imagination, the choice of instrumentation is VERY mid-60s Brian, as it was on Brian Wilson Reimagines Gershwin.
- The beautiful, menacing sax or bass harmonica following the chord changes in the chorus - this was Brian's original version of the Moog and other synth bass we heard a lot in his solo and BBs work from 1976-1988
- The break and a capella tag at the end
- Harpsichord or Rocksichord or some sort of non-velocity sensitive Harpsichord-esque instrument throughout
- The bass hovering around away from the root note of the verse whilst still anchoring the song (BW hallmark)
- The beautiful, understated "Wouldn't It Be Nice" - style arpeggios in the break before the coda

There is a lot more, of course, and these are only my observations. Suffice it to say, though, that there is a lot of Brian in this tune. For the naysayers, think about Brian's motivations in every interview he has given for the past 15 years - he wants a hit. Sometimes he says he can't get hits anymore, but he is always fixated on it.

My guess is that Thomas/Peterik had the song lying around for a while, the record company and the group liked it and thought it had a good chance of being a hit, and Brian, motivated as ever, jumped in and helped make it a true Brian-produced Beach Boys record.

What is probably not written by Brian is the bridge towards the end. Very standard songwriting, and it sticks out like a sore thumb, as do the distorted guitars, which seem to scream "take us seriously!" Brian is typically able to use distorted guitars, synths, etc. to great effect in order to heighten the tension in a song, especially towards the end. This is a pale imitation of that technique, and the guitars are mixed too loud.

All food for thought, anyway!
-b00ts

Great post Boots!

Also check the solitary drum thump followed by glissando organ note at 2.34 - exactly the same technique is used in Nothing But Love and one of the musicians on that session described it as an inspired bit of production from Brian. I'll wager this is also a BW touch for heightening the drama as the other voices come in.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 26, 2012, 03:33:19 PM
I think Brian wrote all the parts that I like. And Peterik wrote all the parts I don't like.

Likewise, it's the BBs singing the vocals that sound good. And Jeff singing those that stink.

Hilarious! :-D

I just wrote to a big radio station here and told them about the new single and that it is out. Hope they'll play it


Which one, NDR?


Title: Re: \
Post by: hypehat on April 26, 2012, 04:08:42 PM
Any brave soul tried to tab this out yet? Would love to be able to play it  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 04:20:01 PM
Any brave soul tried to tab this out yet? Would love to be able to play it  ;D

2 or 3 days ago somebody posted the chords, that ought to do in a pinch.  I think it was before the middle 8 was heard though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 04:33:35 PM
Also check the solitary drum thump followed by glissando organ note at 2.34 - exactly the same technique is used in Nothing But Love and one of the musicians on that session described it as an inspired bit of production from Brian. I'll wager this is also a BW touch for heightening the drama as the other voices come in.

Actually, I don't think it was "Nothing But Love." The story I heard was about "Summertime," where at 2:56 point everything stops and the drum is thwacked hard three times before the tag starts. The rest of the band thought it was a strange suggestion, but it gives the song a lot of drama. It seems like that's a BW device to focus a listener's attention. And it works, by gum.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 04:38:46 PM
I think Brian wrote all the parts that I like. And Peterik wrote all the parts I don't like.

Likewise, it's the BBs singing the vocals that sound good. And Jeff singing those that stink.

Exactly!  LOL  That's the BEAUTY of it, we don't know what happened so we can just think whatever makes our little minds happy.  It's like a religion.  BTW in Heaven everybody has classic cars, none of this new crap. 

Anyways!  Somebody else mentioned that it's good there's cowriters, because we can blame them for the bridge, lol. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jonathan Blum on April 26, 2012, 06:18:38 PM
The thing I love about the song is how it starts off absolutely conventional and early-rock-era-ballad-sounding...  then gradually starts throwing in some unexpected touches...  then suddenly the harmonies are doing really unexpected things...  then it goes even further off the beaten path.  Of course, later it heads back towards more conventional stuff, even some touches of cliched '80s bombast...  but by the end it's finally back into full artistic voice.

In other words, it's basically the evolution of the Beach Boys themselves packed into three and a half minutes.  Cosy pop turning into art, pulling between the formula and the rewriting of the rulebook.

Only if they spliced a Moog break into the middle would it match more perfectly.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 26, 2012, 06:23:20 PM
and as odd and bombastic as that bridge is, there is a sublime pay off like no other when Mike starts the outro--his finest moment in the song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: ArchStanton on April 26, 2012, 06:51:44 PM
The thing I love about the song is how it starts off absolutely conventional and early-rock-era-ballad-sounding...  then gradually starts throwing in some unexpected touches...  then suddenly the harmonies are doing really unexpected things...  then it goes even further off the beaten path.  Of course, later it heads back towards more conventional stuff, even some touches of cliched '80s bombast...  but by the end it's finally back into full artistic voice.

In other words, it's basically the evolution of the Beach Boys themselves packed into three and a half minutes.  Cosy pop turning into art, pulling between the formula and the rewriting of the rulebook.

Only if they spliced a Moog break into the middle would it match more perfectly.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum

I agree with this 100%.  Great post.  I like the heavier guitar sound in the third verse (I believe) that comes out of nowhere.

Does it remind anyone else of Good Timing?  My apologies if that's been mentioned....


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 06:59:02 PM
The thing I love about the song is how it starts off absolutely conventional and early-rock-era-ballad-sounding...  then gradually starts throwing in some unexpected touches...  then suddenly the harmonies are doing really unexpected things...  then it goes even further off the beaten path.  Of course, later it heads back towards more conventional stuff, even some touches of cliched '80s bombast...  but by the end it's finally back into full artistic voice.

In other words, it's basically the evolution of the Beach Boys themselves packed into three and a half minutes.  Cosy pop turning into art, pulling between the formula and the rewriting of the rulebook.

Only if they spliced a Moog break into the middle would it match more perfectly.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum

This is a very smart post. You and Boots win thread prizes for the day!

Does it remind anyone else of Good Timing?  My apologies if that's been mentioned....

Yeah, the second half of the verse seems to lift the "couldn't quite make it / but still I can't shake it" lines from GT.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jim V. on April 26, 2012, 07:08:50 PM
The thing I love about the song is how it starts off absolutely conventional and early-rock-era-ballad-sounding...  then gradually starts throwing in some unexpected touches...  then suddenly the harmonies are doing really unexpected things...  then it goes even further off the beaten path.  Of course, later it heads back towards more conventional stuff, even some touches of cliched '80s bombast...  but by the end it's finally back into full artistic voice.

In other words, it's basically the evolution of the Beach Boys themselves packed into three and a half minutes.  Cosy pop turning into art, pulling between the formula and the rewriting of the rulebook.

Only if they spliced a Moog break into the middle would it match more perfectly.  :-)

Cheers,
Jon Blum

This is a very smart post. You and Boots win thread prizes for the day!

Does it remind anyone else of Good Timing?  My apologies if that's been mentioned....

Yeah, the second half of the verse seems to lift the "couldn't quite make it / but still I can't shake it" lines from GT.

Hate to be this guy, but you're referring to "Goin' On" Wirestone.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 26, 2012, 07:45:22 PM
I'm glad you guys enjoyed the post about what I imagine to be Brian's involvement in the single. Indulge me once more and I will offer my best guesses - by no means correct - on who is singing which parts of the song. Obviously there are block harmonies, etc. not mentioned here, and like other posters, I am not nearly as familiar with David's voice as I am with Brian's, Al's, Michael's, and Bruce's.

All of the Beach Boys get to shine on this single. The vocal arrangement was tailored perfectly for their individual strengths, and it brings to mind many classic Beach Boys songs. Giving Brian the lead was a good idea, and he sings it convincingly. Al in particular leaps out of the song frequently, while Bruce's vocals are most noticeable during the choruses and Mike and Davids' voices are most apparent in the coda.

----

First verse:


"Tunin in the latest star
From the dashboard of my car..." - Brian

"Cruisin at 7
Push button Heaven" - Brian lead, Bruce and Alan harmony

"Capturing memories from afar" - Bruce doubling lead in left channel

"In my car" - Alan in right channel

"Far...." bass vocal - Michael




First Chorus:


Chorus falsetto parts - Jeff (singing like Carl)

Chorus non-falsetto parts - Bruce is loud in the left channel, possibly Mike and David
                                        Also unison vocals at some points (perhaps three or more BB's singing the same part together)

Low "everywhere you go" - Mike and Dave

Low wordless bass vocal before last "That's Why God..." Mike and/or Dave

"He waved his hand, Gave us rock and roll, the soundtrack for falling in love" - Bruce singing falsetto into regular voice

"Woaahhh" - Brian, of course

last "That's why God made the radio" of the first chorus - Bruce in left channel, Brian in center right



Second Verse:


"Feel the music in the air" - Brian

"Find a song to take us there" - Brian with Al doubling in right channel

"It's Paradise when I lift up my antennae" - Brian with Al harmonizing in right channel and Left channel (two Als!)

"Receiving your signal like a prayer" - Brian with Al doubling in left channel (the second syllable of the word "signal" evinces  Al's trademark vibrato, which I love"

"Like a prayer" - Al



Second Chorus

"That's why God..." non-falsetto - Al, Mike and Brian

Falsetto tag - Jeff again (obviously)

"Everywhere you go" and "Waved his hand" sustained vocals - Al and Bruce?

The last "That's why God made..." - Bruce again, but fades into Brian for the end of the phrase (!?) NB: Just listened again, and it sounds like Bruce's left channel vocal simply fades out before the end of the phrase, a common tack when doubled vocals don't line up well at the end of a phrase



Bridge


Lead vocals - Brian

"To a whole new generation" - Al, Bruce, Mike, David, Jeff (I don't hear Brian in there but he probably is as well)

"That's why God Made, That's why God made..." - Mike in the left channel (His voice has changed but he sounds great). Multitracked voices come into the right channel, doubling the line towards the beginning of the next part

Lead "That's why God made the Radio" - Bruce and Alan



Coda

Bass "That's why God made..." vocal - Mike and Dave

Right channel harmonies - Al and Bruce

Center Right harmonies - Brian and David

"For fallin' in Love" in left channel - Bruce

Most falsetto and "Goooddddd...." Jeff

3:00 "That's why" in right channel -  Al, killing it as always



Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 08:07:53 PM
there's a voice or three that sounds like Jeff during Mike's part right after the bridge.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 26, 2012, 08:19:28 PM
I kind of really love Jeff after this song...I think he sounds so much like Carl. Please don't kill me.


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 26, 2012, 08:21:56 PM
If Carl sounded remotely like Jeff to me, I would probably not be able to listen to the Beach Boys.


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on April 26, 2012, 08:24:54 PM
The part at 2:22 is as Brian as I've ever heard, from that point on, the song becomes one of my favorites for a LONNNGG time.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 26, 2012, 08:43:00 PM
If Carl sounded remotely like Jeff to me, I would probably not be able to listen to the Beach Boys.

How about the "Go-o-d"s in the coda? You don't hear that at all?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Autotune on April 26, 2012, 08:51:12 PM


Bridge


Lead vocals - Brian

"To a whole new generation" - Al, Bruce, Mike, David, Jeff (I don't hear Brian in there but he probably is as well)

"That's why God Made, That's why God made..." - Mike in the left channel (His voice has changed but he sounds great). Another Mike comes into the right channel, doubling this vocal as the left channel harmonies come in

Lead "That's why God made the Radio" - Bruce and Alan



Great post, boots. May I suggest that the unison "That's why God made" after the bridge is Mike plus David and Alan. It sounds like more than just one singer (Mike is very distinguishable on "God"), and those three are shown singing (lip-synching in the video). Not being completely familiar with David's singing voice, I'd say it's Mike and one or two others.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 09:02:51 PM
Jeff.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 09:19:21 PM
The thing I love about the song is how it starts off absolutely conventional and early-rock-era-ballad-sounding...  then gradually starts throwing in some unexpected touches...  then suddenly the harmonies are doing really unexpected things...  then it goes even further off the beaten path.  Of course, later it heads back towards more conventional stuff, even some touches of cliched '80s bombast...  but by the end it's finally back into full artistic voice.

Yeah!  The first time I heard it, I kind of was following the harmonies, and then it consistantly goes into things you wouldn't expect.  Very cleverly done. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 26, 2012, 09:22:20 PM
If Carl sounded remotely like Jeff to me, I would probably not be able to listen to the Beach Boys.

How about the "Go-o-d"s in the coda? You don't hear that at all?

Worst part of the song, if only because it jumps out of the mix and isn't particularly pleasing to the ears (or my ears, at least). What Carl vocal would you compare this to?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 09:27:19 PM
If Carl sounded remotely like Jeff to me, I would probably not be able to listen to the Beach Boys.

How about the "Go-o-d"s in the coda? You don't hear that at all?

Worst part of the song, if only because it jumps out of the mix and isn't particularly pleasing to the ears (or my ears, at least). What Carl vocal would you compare this to?

It's cool. It's fine. It does sound like a soulful Carl.

Your attitude is making other people feel like they have to apologize for liking one of the singers on a BB recording. Stop it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 26, 2012, 09:29:09 PM
If Carl sounded remotely like Jeff to me, I would probably not be able to listen to the Beach Boys.

How about the "Go-o-d"s in the coda? You don't hear that at all?

Worst part of the song, if only because it jumps out of the mix and isn't particularly pleasing to the ears (or my ears, at least). What Carl vocal would you compare this to?

It's cool. It's fine. It does sound like a soulful Carl.

Your attitude is making other people feel like they have to apologize for liking one of the singers on a BB recording. Stop it.

Man ;( I'm not. It just strikes me as a very strange comparison, that's all. The "What Carl vocal would you compare this to?" wasn't rhetorical or sarcasm, I was actually wondering.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 26, 2012, 09:40:46 PM
I don't think Jeff sounds all too nice singing songs I've already heard Brian in his prime sing better, but being that this is a new song I have no problem with ANY of Jeff's lines, in fact most of the things I like about this song have to do with Jeff's lines. I'm sure 60s Brian or any era Carl could've done them better, but still.

however I will agree that runners that Jeff does not sound like Carl in the slightest on this track.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 26, 2012, 10:00:11 PM


Bridge


Lead vocals - Brian

"To a whole new generation" - Al, Bruce, Mike, David, Jeff (I don't hear Brian in there but he probably is as well)

"That's why God Made, That's why God made..." - Mike in the left channel (His voice has changed but he sounds great). Another Mike comes into the right channel, doubling this vocal as the left channel harmonies come in

Lead "That's why God made the Radio" - Bruce and Alan



Great post, boots. May I suggest that the unison "That's why God made" after the bridge is Mike plus David and Alan. It sounds like more than just one singer (Mike is very distinguishable on "God"), and those three are shown singing (lip-synching in the video). Not being completely familiar with David's singing voice, I'd say it's Mike and one or two others.

Good call, Dr. Lenny. I think you're right on the money, and the video confirms it. It's a cool arranging tactic to really bring through the vocal, and they use it all over this single.

As for the Foskett hate, I like Foskett even though I can hear what others hear in Foskett's voice - a strident quality that is distinct from the other Beach Boys. I understand why people don't like his voice, but I must say he blends beautifully and he knows his place in the harmony mix. When Jeff does strike out towards the end, he is doing a good impression of Carl that is a nice touch, and a tribute to Carl's part of the Beach Boys blend.

It's worth noting that Jeff is not the only one doing falsetto - Bruce is singing falsetto in the chorus (and he smoothly glides into head voice, showing that he has retained his chops over the years) and Brian gets up to a high head voice, if not falsetto.

Andrew G. Doe thinks that people resent Jeff because he has the Beach Boy fan's dream job, but I think it is much simpler - Jeff is an outsider who is in the vocal blend. There have been plenty of "outsiders" before on Beach Boys records, but even on this single, where all the Beach Boys are present vocally in spades, Jeff is all over the mix, and he is not an official Beach Boy. He is a utility hitter who is necessary for the blend at this point, as he was on BWPS and other projects, and he has the distinction of being a long-time member of the Beach Boys/Brian Wilson camp, but he is still considered an outsider by fans.

"Who is that singing all those beautiful harmonies and the part at the end that sounds like Carl?" "Oh, that's just Jeff, honey. Pay him no mind."

But without Jeff, this single would not be what it is. Jeff is a stalwart man and he has done a lot for us as fans, even for those of us who absolutely despise his vocals. Do you think BWPS would exist without Jeff? I don't.

I'm not hitting out at anyone who dislikes Jeff (runnersdialzero and many others). I am just saying that one day, you may grow to appreciate his contributions, musical and otherwise.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 10:12:50 PM
Jeff simply fills a role the band created.  If Jeff didn't exist, someone like Jeff would exist, and they probably wouldn't be as talented as Jeff is.  Not only vocally, but with all the extra curricular stuff he's willing to do, and his ability to get along with Brian at least and the rest of the band at best. 

I like what someone above said, since this song is new, It's much easier to swallow Jeff having a lot of part in it.

The song just sounds good, no matter who's singing or how they accomplished it.  To me, that's most important. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: 18thofMay on April 26, 2012, 10:17:46 PM
Well said Ron!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 26, 2012, 10:50:01 PM
I don't know what it is about the classic sound of The Beach Boys' voices. Could it just be I'm so used to hearing it that I won't accept anything else? It is merely a prejudice informed by habit which dominates me?
When I listen to I Can Hear Music there is something transcendental about Carl's voice, a quality of ineffable sweetness to which no other may ever hope to aspire. On The Trader when the harmonies rise like some vast and shimmering aurora borealis, crowing the unexplored horizon in radiant beauty. On the wilting, ephemeral goodbyes of the Heroes fadeout, or the will-o'-the-wisp backing vox on Steamboat which drifts over the twanging moog like the sound of lost souls crowding a murky and unholy swamp.

Those instances are just unparalleled, evocative of some other realm beyond the farthest twilight heavens. On the second chorus of I Just Wasn't Made For These Times, the harmonies seem to open, for one fleeting moment, a window to the brilliant fog of some far away nebula. Each voice twining like some eerie star through the dense haze in resplendent color.

When I listen to TWGMTR though...
I hear none of that. So sure the vocals may be quite fine, and well delivered. But they still pale in comparison to those truly spectral moments of otherworldly beauty which I'm so accustomed to.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 11:10:58 PM
Fishmonk, you're basically expecting something that's not even remotely possible anymore because one of the principals has passed away.  If you go into it with expectations like that, you can't possibly be pleased because Carl's no longer with us.  It's impossible.

So it's not that you have to lower your expectations, it's just you have to appreciate what's to appreciate. 

To me, there's something about them doing a pretty fine job, even in the face of old age, mental illness, lawsuits, changing times, the death of Carl and Dennis, etc.... I can appreciate that.  So it may not be as good as Carl would have done it, or a young Brian, or whatever.... but it's still pretty special.

Carl and Dennis would have been proud of them, they're doing the best they can. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: lance on April 26, 2012, 11:13:50 PM
Well then that certainly wouldn't explain his SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES ACCENT!
Right, because accents are irrevocably fixed by age 7.  :lol


Title: Re: \
Post by: lance on April 26, 2012, 11:14:16 PM
(not really, just playing along)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Ron on April 26, 2012, 11:16:36 PM
It could be as simple as his wife has an accent and he's around her so much now he does, or something.  Or not.  Accents change, I find myself often talking like whomever I'm around.  Or maybe David's dad had a really heavy accent and so he's always had one, or whatever. 


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 26, 2012, 11:17:40 PM
Fishmonk, the classic sound you speak of was produced by five guys in their 20s. The core of the group was three brothers.

Two of those five guys, and two of that core group of brothers, are dead.

The three remaining guys are nearly (or past) 70. Two extra guys have been added, but they're not relations and in their 60s too.

There is nothing to be regained. That sound was lost in the late 60s and cannot come back. Mortality and the passage of time is a bitch. But what can you do?

To me, it's enough that Brian Wilson is still arranging vocals and making records. To have Al and Mike on there, in whatever form, is a bonus.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Mikie on April 26, 2012, 11:24:40 PM
What "Los Angeles accent".  There's no Los Angeles accent.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 26, 2012, 11:28:31 PM
Fishmonk, the classic sound you speak of was produced by five guys in their 20s. The core of the group was three brothers.

Two of those five guys, and two of that core group of brothers, are dead.

The three remaining guys are nearly (or past) 70. Two extra guys have been added, but they're not relations and in their 60s too.

There is nothing to be regained. That sound was lost in the late 60s and cannot come back. Mortality and the passage of time is a bitch. But what can you do?

Nothing can be done, but do I have to like everything The Beach Boys do simply because it's The Beach Boys? It may be "good for what it is" but why do I have to care? What if I just don't like what it is? I don't think TWGMTR deserves any special praise. It's not really good in any objective way. If it wasn't by The Beach Boys I would never have bothered to listen to it.
I think you can talk yourself into liking it, and maybe in the context of all the reunion stuff it's wrapped up in you could say it was acceptable. But honestly, I don't care about it, it doesn't move me, it's a thousand miles away from when the band wrote and recorded touching music. In the absolute I simply don't like it, it doesn't appeal to me in any way shape or form.


Title: Re: \
Post by: lance on April 26, 2012, 11:57:27 PM
What "Los Angeles accent".  There's no Los Angeles accent.
Yes, there is. IBut you know, I've always thought Mike Love has a different accent than the Wilson brothers. More twangy.


Title: Re: \
Post by: ? on April 27, 2012, 12:02:57 AM
Fishmonk, the classic sound you speak of was produced by five guys in their 20s. The core of the group was three brothers.

Two of those five guys, and two of that core group of brothers, are dead.

The three remaining guys are nearly (or past) 70. Two extra guys have been added, but they're not relations and in their 60s too.

There is nothing to be regained. That sound was lost in the late 60s and cannot come back. Mortality and the passage of time is a bitch. But what can you do?

Nothing can be done, but do I have to like everything The Beach Boys do simply because it's The Beach Boys? It may be "good for what it is" but why do I have to care? What if I just don't like what it is? I don't think TWGMTR deserves any special praise. It's not really good in any objective way. If it wasn't by The Beach Boys I would never have bothered to listen to it.
I think you can talk yourself into liking it, and maybe in the context of all the reunion stuff it's wrapped up in you could say it was acceptable. But honestly, I don't care about it, it doesn't move me, it's a thousand miles away from when the band wrote and recorded touching music. In the absolute I simply don't like it, it doesn't appeal to me in any way shape or form.

That's pretty much how I feel.  It just isn't a good song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 27, 2012, 12:06:50 AM
Well then that certainly wouldn't explain his SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES ACCENT!
Right, because accents are irrevocably fixed by age 7.  :lol


I just don't understand how people are saying you can hear David in the song because of his distinct accent. Shouldn't Brian/Carl/Dennis have the same accent?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Eric Aniversario on April 27, 2012, 01:05:34 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on April 27, 2012, 01:11:23 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Niiiiiice. Not really a "rock" song, but if it's that high on Amazon, it should definitely make a splash on those Billboard charts.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zargo on April 27, 2012, 01:20:47 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)


Title: Re: \
Post by: brother john on April 27, 2012, 01:32:40 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)

Buy it from iTunes.


Title: Re: \
Post by: lance on April 27, 2012, 04:14:11 AM
Well then that certainly wouldn't explain his SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES ACCENT!
Right, because accents are irrevocably fixed by age 7.  :lol


I just don't understand how people are saying you can hear David in the song because of his distinct accent. Shouldn't Brian/Carl/Dennis have the same accent?
Well, Brian and Dennis definitely have an LA accent when they sing, Carl not so much, in my opinion. As far as David, personally, I can't pick him out at all. But I've only listened to the song twice. All I can hear is Brian Wilson and Foskett.


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 27, 2012, 04:22:04 AM
I agree. Jeff may be singing Carl's part, but he doesn't sound like him, at all. Overall, everyone sounds great on the track, especially for their age. Except for Jeff, pretty damn good for an average age of 68 Years old.


Title: Re: \
Post by: buddhahat on April 27, 2012, 04:28:24 AM
Also check the solitary drum thump followed by glissando organ note at 2.34 - exactly the same technique is used in Nothing But Love and one of the musicians on that session described it as an inspired bit of production from Brian. I'll wager this is also a BW touch for heightening the drama as the other voices come in.

Actually, I don't think it was "Nothing But Love." The story I heard was about "Summertime," where at 2:56 point everything stops and the drum is thwacked hard three times before the tag starts. The rest of the band thought it was a strange suggestion, but it gives the song a lot of drama. It seems like that's a BW device to focus a listener's attention. And it works, by gum.

I think you're right - the thwacks are from Summertime but I'm sure a keyboardist also spoke of their surprise at being instructed by brian to just hold one note in the bridge for Nothin But Love (1.25). Then they heard it and were amazed at how effective one note could be! I got the two confused.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Amy B. on April 27, 2012, 04:33:20 AM
Fishmonk, the classic sound you speak of was produced by five guys in their 20s. The core of the group was three brothers.

Two of those five guys, and two of that core group of brothers, are dead.

The three remaining guys are nearly (or past) 70. Two extra guys have been added, but they're not relations and in their 60s too.

There is nothing to be regained. That sound was lost in the late 60s and cannot come back. Mortality and the passage of time is a bitch. But what can you do?

Nothing can be done, but do I have to like everything The Beach Boys do simply because it's The Beach Boys? It may be "good for what it is" but why do I have to care? What if I just don't like what it is? I don't think TWGMTR deserves any special praise. It's not really good in any objective way. If it wasn't by The Beach Boys I would never have bothered to listen to it.
I think you can talk yourself into liking it, and maybe in the context of all the reunion stuff it's wrapped up in you could say it was acceptable. But honestly, I don't care about it, it doesn't move me, it's a thousand miles away from when the band wrote and recorded touching music. In the absolute I simply don't like it, it doesn't appeal to me in any way shape or form.

That's pretty much how I feel.  It just isn't a good song.

You guys are talking about two different things-- whether it's a good song and whether it has the classic BBs sound vocally. I don't think it's the best song they've ever done, but for me, the harmonies save it. And in my opinion, while it isn't a great song, it's not terrible either.  And maybe also the idea that all the living BBs are singing together makes it even more appealing to me.
As for vocal blend, they haven't had that since Brian lost his falsetto in the 70s. Love You sounds like it has different singers than Pet Sounds. The fact that Jeff sings falsetto means that he voice dominates, and maybe that's why the reaction is so strong. Maybe if he sang in the middle range, people wouldn't object so much.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Amy B. on April 27, 2012, 04:39:13 AM
What "Los Angeles accent".  There's no Los Angeles accent.

I'm from the eastern U.S., am not a linguist, and have never been to LA, but there's definitely a California accent, or there was in that generation. (A lot of old-time child stars--including Shirley Temple--had it, it seems to me.) The Wilson brothers all had it, and Mike. There's a way of pronouncing the vowels that is different than in the East or Midwest (or South, obviously). And there's a real emphasis on R's (surrrrrrfin'). Mike might exaggerate it when he sings, but it's there when he talks, too. But as for Dave, I still can't pick him out in the song, so I don't know about his singing accent.


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 27, 2012, 07:40:22 AM
so thrilled with b00ts listing; I hear it like that exactly except:

"For fallin' in Love" in left channel - Jeff

No, I would maintain this is, as had been noted much earlier, Bruce, in his finest signature moment, eh?

best to all; this is so wonderful.


Title: Re: \
Post by: UK_Surf on April 27, 2012, 08:03:11 AM
Lyrics are pretty naff, but there's some ok moments in there, some good vocals. Mostly harmless, to quote the great Adams...

But what a fantastic event. How could any song live up to it? My hope is that there's a hidden BW gem lurking in there somewhere.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 27, 2012, 10:28:27 AM


Which one, NDR?


NDR 2. They wrote back, thanked and said they would give it to the music section of the station. Hopefully it will be played. Won't you call and make a wish for that one ? We should do as much as we can to promote them


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 27, 2012, 10:30:05 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)


Where are you from ? I purchased mine from amazon.de and will order the CD single on amazon.com


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 27, 2012, 11:45:42 AM
What "Los Angeles accent".  There's no Los Angeles accent.

I'm from the eastern U.S., am not a linguist, and have never been to LA, but there's definitely a California accent, or there was in that generation. (A lot of old-time child stars--including Shirley Temple--had it, it seems to me.) The Wilson brothers all had it, and Mike. There's a way of pronouncing the vowels that is different than in the East or Midwest (or South, obviously). And there's a real emphasis on R's (surrrrrrfin'). Mike might exaggerate it when he sings, but it's there when he talks, too. But as for Dave, I still can't pick him out in the song, so I don't know about his singing accent.

so, either way, the conclusion here is that David probably does not have a different accent than the rest of the band.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Charles LePage @ ComicList on April 27, 2012, 12:01:00 PM
It's also nice to see the chairman of the board, hows do you like the new single Chuck?

I'm digging it A LOT.  Listening to it over and over again.   Only thing that throws me a bit off about it is not recognizing some of the voices in it, though that could be David Marks or a blend of voices.    I can't hear Mike Love in the song, but that's not the worst thing that could happen.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Andreas on April 27, 2012, 12:04:41 PM


Which one, NDR?


NDR 2. They wrote back, thanked and said they would give it to the music section of the station. Hopefully it will be played. Won't you call and make a wish for that one ? We should do as much as we can to promote them
Don't know if that's anything special, but I heard the song on German radio station hr1 yesterday! The moderator claimed it was written by Brian, though. :)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on April 27, 2012, 12:17:50 PM
well, there's this little thing called the composer credits are Brian is one of the four people listed, so it's not all that inaccurate to say Brian wrote it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dunderhead on April 27, 2012, 01:06:38 PM
Fishmonk, the classic sound you speak of was produced by five guys in their 20s. The core of the group was three brothers.

Two of those five guys, and two of that core group of brothers, are dead.

The three remaining guys are nearly (or past) 70. Two extra guys have been added, but they're not relations and in their 60s too.

There is nothing to be regained. That sound was lost in the late 60s and cannot come back. Mortality and the passage of time is a bitch. But what can you do?

Nothing can be done, but do I have to like everything The Beach Boys do simply because it's The Beach Boys? It may be "good for what it is" but why do I have to care? What if I just don't like what it is? I don't think TWGMTR deserves any special praise. It's not really good in any objective way. If it wasn't by The Beach Boys I would never have bothered to listen to it.
I think you can talk yourself into liking it, and maybe in the context of all the reunion stuff it's wrapped up in you could say it was acceptable. But honestly, I don't care about it, it doesn't move me, it's a thousand miles away from when the band wrote and recorded touching music. In the absolute I simply don't like it, it doesn't appeal to me in any way shape or form.

That's pretty much how I feel.  It just isn't a good song.

You guys are talking about two different things-- whether it's a good song and whether it has the classic BBs sound vocally. I don't think it's the best song they've ever done, but for me, the harmonies save it. And in my opinion, while it isn't a great song, it's not terrible either.  And maybe also the idea that all the living BBs are singing together makes it even more appealing to me.
As for vocal blend, they haven't had that since Brian lost his falsetto in the 70s. Love You sounds like it has different singers than Pet Sounds. The fact that Jeff sings falsetto means that he voice dominates, and maybe that's why the reaction is so strong. Maybe if he sang in the middle range, people wouldn't object so much.

"not terrible" isn't "good". That's what I just can't oblige. It doesn't deserve praise just for not sucking.


Title: Re: \
Post by: b00ts on April 27, 2012, 01:15:07 PM
so thrilled with b00ts listing; I hear it like that exactly except:

"For fallin' in Love" in left channel - Jeff

No, I would maintain this is, as had been noted much earlier, Bruce, in his finest signature moment, eh?

best to all; this is so wonderful.
Thanks, the professor. I edited the post to include this into and Dr. Lenny's. Bruce has retained a lot of his vocal chops and he sounds truly excellent on this song.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 27, 2012, 01:26:23 PM


Which one, NDR?


NDR 2. They wrote back, thanked and said they would give it to the music section of the station. Hopefully it will be played. Won't you call and make a wish for that one ? We should do as much as we can to promote them
Don't know if that's anything special, but I heard the song on German radio station hr1 yesterday! The moderator claimed it was written by Brian, though. :)


Now, that's something ! When was the last time a new single by the Beach Boys was played on the radio ? I think we fans should ry to get them play it as often as possible without us getting annoying.

I also wrote to Hit Radio Antenne


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 27, 2012, 02:05:14 PM
When can we determine if this is a hit? Are we monitoring billboard top 40 and is that the measure? Also, any word on whether it's Dave playing the guitar in this song? Sure as heck sounds like early BB guitar work.

Thanks to all


Title: Re: \
Post by: Runaways on April 27, 2012, 02:24:37 PM
it'll be insane if this makes the top 40, i don't think it'll make it though


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on April 27, 2012, 02:33:23 PM
Both the "sizzle reel" and lyric video have gotten over 76,000 plays on YouTube, and have only been up there for a week or two.  That's not bad.  It may not sell a lot of paid downloads or chart, so you have to use different yardsticks to figure out what's a success.


Title: Re: \
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 03:38:55 PM
Hey guys,

This is my first post, but I've been trolling the board for years. I wanted to put in my two cents about the single -

I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs.

Anyone else feel the same way?


Title: Re: \
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 03:44:15 PM
Both the "sizzle reel" and lyric video have gotten over 76,000 plays on YouTube, and have only been up there for a week or two.  That's not bad.  It may not sell a lot of paid downloads or chart, so you have to use different yardsticks to figure out what's a success.

I work in the online video industry, and they count commercial views and click throughs as the definition of success; so if you want to help the video's relative success out, click on the ad when it plays.


Title: Re: \
Post by: OGoldin on April 27, 2012, 03:50:38 PM
"I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs."

Let's not forget how intrigued Brian was by synthesizers for a while.  I think on this song he is purposefully playing around with new sonorities -- he is not looking for an organic blend -- the processed voices are like a new synthesizer, that allow him to come up with unnaturally creamy textures that -- like those of a synthesizer -- can be beautiful in their own way.

I'm warming up to the song.  The more I listen -- and the more carefully I listen, the deeper it gets.  I love how at the end you hear the layered harmonies punctuated by the singing of "God" "God" "God" -- reminds me of "Surf's Up."  The deep religiosity of the song is there, in those moments, more than in the lyrics.


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on April 27, 2012, 03:54:59 PM
Hey guys,

This is my first post, but I've been trolling the board for years. I wanted to put in my two cents about the single -

I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs.

Anyone else feel the same way?

Oh, yeah, I agree.  Autotuned  or pitch-corrected, and I don't think anyone can disagree with that like they can on the live recordings.  I also agree about how hard it is to tell the voices apart.  Someone said I needed my hearing checked if I couldn't hear Al, but it took headphones to hear him, and he doesn't sound that Al-like.  Al and Mike have very strong vocal personalities, and they're washed away with electronic processing.  Brian doesn't feature that much processing on his recent solo records (some, I'm sure, but not that heavy).  I'm not a fan of Joe Thomas.


Title: Re: \
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 04:02:22 PM
Hey guys,

This is my first post, but I've been trolling the board for years. I wanted to put in my two cents about the single -

I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs.

Anyone else feel the same way?

Oh, yeah, I agree.  Autotuned  or pitch-corrected, and I don't think anyone can disagree with that like they can on the live recordings.  I also agree about how hard it is to tell the voices apart.  Someone said I needed my hearing checked if I couldn't hear Al, but it took headphones to hear him, and he doesn't sound that Al-like.  Al and Mike have very strong vocal personalities, and they're washed away with electronic processing.  Brian doesn't feature that much processing on his recent solo records (some, I'm sure, but not that heavy).  I'm not a fan of Joe Thomas.

Yeah. Actually, there's a recording of them from the Tucson concert that was online for about 15 minutes yesterday and it sounded like they were being majorly pitch corrected live (which technology allows for now). I hope that I'm wrong. If I can make it through Brian's SNL performance in '77, I can make it through breathy and pitchy singing from a bunch of 70 year olds.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 04:02:45 PM
Hey guys,

This is my first post, but I've been trolling the board for years. I wanted to put in my two cents about the single -

I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs.

Anyone else feel the same way?

Oh, yeah, I agree.  Autotuned  or pitch-corrected, and I don't think anyone can disagree with that like they can on the live recordings.  I also agree about how hard it is to tell the voices apart.  Someone said I needed my hearing checked if I couldn't hear Al, but it took headphones to hear him, and he doesn't sound that Al-like.  Al and Mike have very strong vocal personalities, and they're washed away with electronic processing.  Brian doesn't feature that much processing on his recent solo records (some, I'm sure, but not that heavy).  I'm not a fan of Joe Thomas.

I have to say, I was able to hear Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce and Jeff distinctly the first time I heard the song. I suppose many people may not be familiar with how the main participants' voices have changed, or listened to as much of the recent work of the band (last 10-20 years) as I have.

Also, I'm beating this into the ground, but we have no confirmation that Joe Thomas had anything to do with the production of this song. Possible, but the only word on production duties for the album is that Brian did it.


Title: Re: \
Post by: endofposts on April 27, 2012, 04:06:33 PM
Hey guys,

This is my first post, but I've been trolling the board for years. I wanted to put in my two cents about the single -

I think as a song, it's pretty good, and the arrangement of the harmonies are nice - but my two biggest gripes are that the voices are auto-tuned to hell (especially Brian's - but I don't think anyone's brought that up on the boards yet) and I can barely tell the difference between the voices. For me, the joy of the Beach Boys weren't that they were pitch-perfect singers, but how much emotional resonance they were able to instill into their songs.

Anyone else feel the same way?

Oh, yeah, I agree.  Autotuned  or pitch-corrected, and I don't think anyone can disagree with that like they can on the live recordings.  I also agree about how hard it is to tell the voices apart.  Someone said I needed my hearing checked if I couldn't hear Al, but it took headphones to hear him, and he doesn't sound that Al-like.  Al and Mike have very strong vocal personalities, and they're washed away with electronic processing.  Brian doesn't feature that much processing on his recent solo records (some, I'm sure, but not that heavy).  I'm not a fan of Joe Thomas.

I have to say, I was able to hear Brian, Mike, Al, Bruce and Jeff distinctly the first time I heard the song. I suppose many people may not be familiar with how the main participants' voices have changed, or listened to as much of the recent work of the band (last 10-20 years) as I have.

Also, I'm beating this into the ground, but we have no confirmation that Joe Thomas had anything to do with the production of this song. Possible, but the only word on production duties for the album is that Brian did it.

I have a really hard time believing Brian produced it all by himself.  He has other producers on his solo records, so I'm not sure how he could avoid it wih this one.  Why bring Joe Thomas back in the first place?  I know there are people who think Brian and his advisers can do no wrong, but if he didn't produce it by himself, I don't see what the big deal is about acknowledging the work of others.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 04:14:20 PM
I have a really hard time believing Brian produced it all by himself.  He has other producers on his solo records, so I'm not sure how he could avoid it wih this one.

He hasn't had another producer on one of his solo records since Imagination, with the exception of a "co-producer" credit for Scott on TLOS. You can argue with the credits' accuracy, but none are listed for Roxy, PS Live, GIOMH, BWPS, WIRWFC, BWRG or ITKOD.

Why bring Joe Thomas back in the first place?  I know there are people who think Brian and his advisers can do no wrong, but if he didn't produce it by himself, I don't see what the big deal is about acknowledging the work of others.

That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? Seems like Joe is in TV production now and is actually more or less managing the band in the reunion. Probyn and Al have both suggested he's executive producing.

Anyway, I don't know one way or another. Certainly the single is much more processed that Brian's recent solo work, but it doesn't sound much like Imagination either. Joe could well end up with a co-producer credit. We just don't know yet.


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on April 27, 2012, 04:44:35 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens. I know where I've been told he is, I think I may hear a voice in there that's his, but he's being doubled and drowned out and I'm still not 100% certain. And yeah, I know what he sounds like nowadays. Strange, but I guess that's just my perception of the recording.


Title: Re: \
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 04:46:49 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens. I know where I've been told he is, I think I may hear a voice in there that's his, but he's being doubled and drowned out and I'm still not 100% certain. And yeah, I know what he sounds like nowadays. Strange, but I guess that's just my perception of the recording.

I think that's his heavily processed voice at about 2:28 saying "that's why god made, that's why god made" which is somewhat confirmed by the sizzle reel video.


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 27, 2012, 04:58:52 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens.

He pops out on the right channel on "God Made".

This is OOPS'd so you can hear him better

http://soundcloud.com/smile-a-d/mike


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 27, 2012, 05:05:36 PM
Isn't it Mike singing the repeating That's Why God Made in the chorus? He may be processed because he doesn't sound nasal, but it sounds like him otherwise.


Title: Re: \
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 05:09:29 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens.

He pops out on the right channel on "God Made".

This is OOPS'd so you can hear him better

http://soundcloud.com/smile-a-d/mike

wow! thanks for that. he sounds a million miles away.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zargo on April 27, 2012, 05:11:20 PM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)


Where are you from ? I purchased mine from amazon.de and will order the CD single on amazon.com

Down under!
BTW, my 9 month old son shares his first name with you (just in case that gives you a warm fuzzy feeling!)


Title: Re: \
Post by: seltaeb1012002 on April 27, 2012, 05:30:23 PM

wow! thanks for that. he sounds a million miles away.

Yup, no prob.

Yeah, he's buried there. Really nice vocal. Reminds me of his voice on Kiss Me Baby. Can't wait to hear his vocals on the new album.

Isn't it Mike singing the repeating That's Why God Made in the chorus? He may be processed because he doesn't sound nasal, but it sounds like him otherwise.

Yeah, on the tag definitely. I don't hear him audibly before that break after the bridge, but I'm sure he's buried in there somewhere.


Can anyone confirm who sings "God, radiooooo" at 3:03? I'm wondering if it's David Marks. But it sounds like it could be Al.


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on April 27, 2012, 05:31:15 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens.

He pops out on the right channel on "God Made".

This is OOPS'd so you can hear him better

http://soundcloud.com/smile-a-d/mike

wow! thanks for that. he sounds a million miles away.
He is being isolated here. Now, go buy the song and listen to it. You will hear this same part after the bridge and drum beat.


Title: Re:
Post by: bcdam on April 27, 2012, 05:53:22 PM
I still cannot really hear Mike in here after repeated listens.

He pops out on the right channel on "God Made".

This is OOPS'd so you can hear him better

http://soundcloud.com/smile-a-d/mike

wow! thanks for that. he sounds a million miles away.
He is being isolated here. Now, go buy the song and listen to it. You will hear this same part after the bridge and drum beat.

ahh, yes. already been bought. just surprised at how much pitch correction, reverb and echo they put on him! Still like the track though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 27, 2012, 11:01:01 PM
I haven't gone through this entire thread, so I hope this hasn't been answered several times already. Does anybody know if the single of TWGMTR  will be issued as a physical cd? I've read a lot about it being released as an mp3, but what about an actual physical disc?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Wirestone on April 27, 2012, 11:24:18 PM
I haven't gone through this entire thread, so I hope this hasn't been answered several times already. Does anybody know if the single of TWGMTR  will be issued as a physical cd? I've read a lot about it being released as an mp3, but what about an actual physical disc?

Overseas, yes. In the U.S., seems like no.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Jay on April 28, 2012, 12:07:07 AM
Well, that sucks.  >:(


Title: Re: \
Post by: Alan Smith on April 28, 2012, 12:21:49 AM
I'm sure if you asked an overseas comrade to sort you out, said overseas comrade would do so, dependent on said overseas comrade's region attaining said physical release


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 28, 2012, 12:22:35 AM
Small consolation Jay - the US gets the Beach Boys, playing in your town soon!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 28, 2012, 04:15:15 AM
While I'm not a big fan of the sound of Foskett's falsetto, it is done here in an absolutely not-annoying way. The result sounds very good.

I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 28, 2012, 04:20:56 AM
I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D
Count me in.

(http://cdn.urbangiraffe.com/images/blog/2011/09/jeff-foskett-900x600.jpg)


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on April 28, 2012, 05:53:47 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)


Where are you from ? I purchased mine from amazon.de and will order the CD single on amazon.com

Down under!
BTW, my 9 month old son shares his first name with you (just in case that gives you a warm fuzzy feeling!)



It does  ;D

Your son's name is Rocker ? That's my surname.... ;)


Title: Re: \
Post by: RCTID on April 28, 2012, 05:55:40 AM
While I'm not a big fan of the sound of Foskett's falsetto, it is done here in an absolutely not-annoying way. The result sounds very good.

I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D

Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::
Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 28, 2012, 06:01:29 AM
While I'm not a big fan of the sound of Foskett's falsetto, it is done here in an absolutely not-annoying way. The result sounds very good.

I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D

Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::
Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::
That's how we'll do it. I appoint you musical director of the operation. We should rendezvous before the show, in some pub, and rehearse.

Gotta show the guy some support, even if it's as late as the Berlin gig...  ;D


Title: Re: \
Post by: rab2591 on April 28, 2012, 07:05:18 PM
This song is incredible.

Such a great and unexpected hook in the chorus ("so tune right in everywhere you go,"). And that outro is classic.

It is such an awesome wall of sound. If the rest of the album sounds like this I think it will be a fantastic treat to us fans. We're lucky this is all happening right now!


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zargo on April 29, 2012, 02:49:03 AM
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
 #128 Paid in MP3 Songs
#7 in MP3 Downloads > MP3 Songs > Rock

Tried to purchase... not permitted outside of the US  ::)


Where are you from ? I purchased mine from amazon.de and will order the CD single on amazon.com

Down under!
BTW, my 9 month old son shares his first name with you (just in case that gives you a warm fuzzy feeling!)



It does  ;D

Your son's name is Rocker ? That's my surname.... ;)

Whoops, got confused with all the different quotes... I must redirect that remark to Mr Eric Aniversario. Rocker would be a brave first name. Better then "rapper", anyway!

Incidentally, I have a friend who had (one is still alive) two cats named Bri (Brian) and Vandy (Van Dykes). He thought it was very clever, and why not?  :-D


Title: Re: \
Post by: the professor on April 29, 2012, 09:57:55 AM
Any updates on the Billboard status? I simply don't see it there.  I remain confused about how this song is "doing." My impression is that the concerts and the song and the viewings on youtube and, in short, the entire experience of the BB music and reunion is exceeding all hopes and expectations.  I have been posting on radio stations and amazon and other places, as many of you have, as well, no doubt, to try to drum up support. Will there be some formal announcement that the song is a hit?  Will the album and the Leno/Fallon appearances dramatically popularize the song?

Too many questions. Is someone else trying to do a forensic accounting of the song's status?

Finally, have we determined if any BB, likely Dave, is playing music of TWGMTR? Do you hear the solos he is ripping in concert? He waited 49 years to do that--that's the crowning piece in all this.

Best to all. I feel that we are riding an ever-waxing wave--that something magical is happening with this music returning to consciousness in 2012 culture. Hopeful, yes, deluded, I hope not.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Zach95 on April 29, 2012, 05:25:07 PM
Any updates on the Billboard status? I simply don't see it there.  I remain confused about how this song is "doing." My impression is that the concerts and the song and the viewings on youtube and, in short, the entire experience of the BB music and reunion is exceeding all hopes and expectations.  I have been posting on radio stations and amazon and other places, as many of you have, as well, no doubt, to try to drum up support. Will there be some formal announcement that the song is a hit?  Will the album and the Leno/Fallon appearances dramatically popularize the song?

Too many questions. Is someone else trying to do a forensic accounting of the song's status?

Finally, have we determined if any BB, likely Dave, is playing music of TWGMTR? Do you hear the solos he is ripping in concert? He waited 49 years to do that--that's the crowning piece in all this.

Best to all. I feel that we are riding an ever-waxing wave--that something magical is happening with this music returning to consciousness in 2012 culture. Hopeful, yes, deluded, I hope not.

I was really wondering as well, though I'm as clueless as you are as to how the song is doing.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Micha on April 30, 2012, 12:17:24 AM
While I'm not a big fan of the sound of Foskett's falsetto, it is done here in an absolutely not-annoying way. The result sounds very good.

I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D

Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::
Jeff-rey Fos-kett! ::clap clap clapclapclap::
That's how we'll do it. I appoint you musical director of the operation. We should rendezvous before the show, in some pub, and rehearse.

Gotta show the guy some support, even if it's as late as the Berlin gig...  ;D

Anyone here who could recommend a pub?

It will be a tough thing to do, though, as we're probably not sitting together and have lots of general audience between us, but worth a try.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Sie W on April 30, 2012, 01:09:25 AM
I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D
Count me in.

(http://cdn.urbangiraffe.com/images/blog/2011/09/jeff-foskett-900x600.jpg)

I would love to know what is on Brian's auto-cue at this point!


Title: Re: \
Post by: STE on April 30, 2012, 01:34:12 AM

I think it says "Just ignore him"



Title: Re: \
Post by: bossaroo on April 30, 2012, 01:53:02 AM
this song really is fabulous. figuring out the chord progression has put me even more in awe of its greatness. it's all over the place key-wise... similar to "This Whole World".

damn. just... DAMN.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on April 30, 2012, 02:01:27 AM
I think I will try and start "Jeffrey-Foskett-Jeffrey-Foskett" chants during the Berlin concert just to annoy Foskett haters. :-D
Count me in.

(http://cdn.urbangiraffe.com/images/blog/2011/09/jeff-foskett-900x600.jpg)

I would love to know what is on Brian's auto-cue at this point!

It says "There's pie for dinner.".


Title: Re:
Post by: The Shift on April 30, 2012, 02:07:50 AM
I thought it said "and for Jeff's next trick he's gonna eat the guitar…"


Title: Re: \
Post by: FatherOfTheMan Sr101 on May 06, 2012, 06:53:36 PM
http://bit.ly/K4Sr51


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 06, 2012, 07:00:42 PM
http://bit.ly/K4Sr51

No b-side, it looks like? Shame.


Title: Re: \
Post by: harrisonjon on May 09, 2012, 04:44:36 AM
On the TV performance, the influence of "Midnight Cowboy" is so strong on the chorus that John Barry's estate might be interested. Sing "That's Why God Made" over this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6P96ukN5HU



Title: Re:
Post by: 37!ws on May 10, 2012, 09:00:57 AM
So...I've heard the song many times, but usually from YouTube clips and streaming on Pop Garden Radio...but finally I listened to the actual iTunes-purchased song last night, through my Bose headphones...

Song -- I thought I'd like it but not love it, but...I love it now!

The sound quality -- HORRIBLE. Really, it's brickwalled beyond belief. Every hit of the bass drum seriously rattled my head.....there's just no dynamic in the production...


Title: Re:
Post by: Eireannach on May 10, 2012, 09:05:47 AM
The sound quality -- HORRIBLE. Really, it's brickwalled beyond belief. Every hit of the bass drum seriously rattled my head.....there's just no dynamic in the production...
Thank you, compressed digital music (mp3s and otherwise).  I can't listen to mp3s unless I have no alternative.


Title: Re:
Post by: Iron Horse-Apples on May 10, 2012, 09:30:26 AM
The sound quality -- HORRIBLE. Really, it's brickwalled beyond belief. Every hit of the bass drum seriously rattled my head.....there's just no dynamic in the production...
Thank you, compressed digital music (mp3s and otherwise).  I can't listen to mp3s unless I have no alternative.

I'm holding out for the physical album, which hopefully hasn't been compressed to death.


Title: Re:
Post by: drbeachboy on May 10, 2012, 11:31:08 AM
The sound quality -- HORRIBLE. Really, it's brickwalled beyond belief. Every hit of the bass drum seriously rattled my head.....there's just no dynamic in the production...
Thank you, compressed digital music (mp3s and otherwise).  I can't listen to mp3s unless I have no alternative.
Considering that it has only been released on lossy digital (AAC, MP3), I am betting it ws mastered that way. I'm sure there won't be much difference when the CD is released.


Title: Re: \
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 10, 2012, 11:49:58 AM
Casualties of the Loudness war.... Who's got a waveform?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on May 10, 2012, 11:57:48 AM
Casualties of the Loudness war....


And some people really wanted Rick Rubin to produce it.....


Title: Video from Jimmy Fallon show
Post by: WaxOn on May 10, 2012, 01:41:26 PM
http://www.hulu.com/watch/ad/100571

You can also go to allmusic.com and flame the creep who's dissing The Beach Boys (...They went on Jimmy Fallon last night to croak through a few songs and pretend to play their instruments.) if yer in the mood.


Title: Re: \
Post by: HeyJude on May 10, 2012, 01:56:23 PM
http://bit.ly/K4Sr51

No b-side, it looks like? Shame.

That's just a promo CD made for radio presumably. Those are usually one-track affairs, unless they have some alternate edit or mix of the track to include as well. You know, if they wanted a version of "That's Why God Made the Radio" without all the swearing.  :-D

The European-style CD singles are where we would find non-album b-sides and the like, and it doesn't appear any commercial CD single has materialized yet. If one does, it's likely any non-album b-sides would be songs already featured in some other "exclusive" form like retailer-exclusive bonus tracks, or maybe a vocals-only mix or something like that. Just guesses, though.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Lowbacca on May 10, 2012, 02:33:38 PM
http://bit.ly/K4Sr51

No b-side, it looks like? Shame.

That's just a promo CD made for radio presumably. Those are usually one-track affairs, unless they have some alternate edit or mix of the track to include as well. You know, if they wanted a version of "That's Why God Made the Radio" without all the swearing.  :-D

The European-style CD singles are where we would find non-album b-sides and the like, and it doesn't appear any commercial CD single has materialized yet. If one does, it's likely any non-album b-sides would be songs already featured in some other "exclusive" form like retailer-exclusive bonus tracks, or maybe a vocals-only mix or something like that. Just guesses, though.
I cancelled my pre-order for the single CD a few days ago. Seemed to me like it would never get released: no track list, no release date, nothing. Not to go all Phil Cohen on y'all, but it seems strange since the digital release already took place.. or whaddayathink?


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 10, 2012, 03:01:51 PM
http://bit.ly/K4Sr51

No b-side, it looks like? Shame.

That's just a promo CD made for radio presumably. Those are usually one-track affairs, unless they have some alternate edit or mix of the track to include as well. You know, if they wanted a version of "That's Why God Made the Radio" without all the swearing.  :-D

The European-style CD singles are where we would find non-album b-sides and the like, and it doesn't appear any commercial CD single has materialized yet. If one does, it's likely any non-album b-sides would be songs already featured in some other "exclusive" form like retailer-exclusive bonus tracks, or maybe a vocals-only mix or something like that. Just guesses, though.
I cancelled my pre-order for the single CD a few days ago. Seemed to me like it would never get released: no track list, no release date, nothing. Not to go all Phil Cohen on y'all, but it seems strange since the digital release already took place.. or whaddayathink?

You'd have been aswell just leaving it mate, they don't take the money off you until it's shipped anyway. I would prefer it on 7" than CD though, I reckon they could do quite well with that.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Dr. Tim on May 10, 2012, 06:36:30 PM
Guess I'm dumb, but --

the only voice I distinctively make out through most of this is Brian, with Mike a bit toward the end.  IF I'd heard this without a caption on it, I'd have thought it was a Brian track with Brian's band singing the harmonies.  (Which it is, kinda, I know)

I won't judge the sound quality too harshly until the full-bandwidth version is released.  I know it's brickwall-mastered and auto-tuned a bit, but then most pop-related things are these days.  I deal.

That said -- s'all right.  I hear the Midnight Cowboy quote, but the key changes are cool.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 10, 2012, 06:41:09 PM
Guess I'm dumb, but --

the only voice I distinctively make out through most of this is Brian, with Mike a bit toward the end.  IF I'd heard this without a caption on it, I'd have thought it was a Brian track with Brian's band singing the harmonies.  (Which it is, kinda, I know)

I won't judge the sound quality too harshly until the full-bandwidth version is released.  I know it's brickwall-mastered and auto-tuned a bit, but then most pop-related things are these days.  I deal.

That said -- s'all right.  I hear the Midnight Cowboy quote, but the key changes are cool.

They're all in there. Bruce can be heard the most apart from Brian, he's on the "In my car" line and he also does the "Fallin' in love" part at the end. Al does the same part as Bruce going into the second chorus but the words are "Like a prayer". I think it was Jon Stebbins (might be wrong though) who managed to pick out David in the harmony blend but i'm not familiar enough with his voice to pick it out personally.


Title: Re:
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 10, 2012, 06:48:42 PM
The sound quality -- HORRIBLE. Really, it's brickwalled beyond belief. Every hit of the bass drum seriously rattled my head.....there's just no dynamic in the production...

No way, man. You're hearing sh*t. You wanted to hear it as compressed and modern. You're hysterical, you need to be put into a home. This song is so dynamic sounds and just like my homeboy Pac.


Title: TWGMTR cover
Post by: Magic City Surfer on May 10, 2012, 07:42:54 PM
Sometimes it helps me to break a song down and figure it out when I see how someone else covers it.

but, anyway, here's this guy's cover version for those that haven't seen it yet.

Does he post here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZmozByQMEw


Title: Re: TWGMTR cover
Post by: stack-o-tracks on May 10, 2012, 08:10:18 PM
Sometimes it helps me to break a song down and figure it out when I see how someone else covers it.

but, anyway, here's this guy's cover version for those that haven't seen it yet.

Does he post here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZmozByQMEw

Yeah he does!  I believe he even made a thread. Nice cover fo sho.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on May 11, 2012, 06:54:18 AM
Guess I'm dumb, but --

the only voice I distinctively make out through most of this is Brian, with Mike a bit toward the end.  IF I'd heard this without a caption on it, I'd have thought it was a Brian track with Brian's band singing the harmonies.  (Which it is, kinda, I know)

I won't judge the sound quality too harshly until the full-bandwidth version is released.  I know it's brickwall-mastered and auto-tuned a bit, but then most pop-related things are these days.  I deal.

That said -- s'all right.  I hear the Midnight Cowboy quote, but the key changes are cool.

They're all in there. Bruce can be heard the most apart from Brian, he's on the "In my car" line and he also does the "Fallin' in love" part at the end. Al does the same part as Bruce going into the second chorus but the words are "Like a prayer".


Right.
Bruce is all over the harmonies. He's doing really a great job on the song. I didn't think his voice was still that strong. Al is also used quite strongly in the harmonies. I don't have a clue what David sounds like but apart from him, you can hear each Beach Boy clearly even if you have to concentrate at some points


Title: Re:
Post by: 37!ws on May 11, 2012, 08:17:58 AM
Besides Brian, I can definitely hear Jeff in the mix, and in some places Darian's voice is pretty clear. If you listen really carefully, you can hear Mike on the lower parts.

[And I hope Mr. Barfy-Milk was being facetious...]


Title: Re:
Post by: Rocker on May 11, 2012, 08:25:40 AM
Besides Brian, I can definitely hear Jeff in the mix, and in some places Darian's voice is pretty clear. If you listen really carefully, you can hear Mike on the lower parts.



I don't think Darian or any other member of the background group is on there. Maybe I'm wrong but I can't make out any non-Beach Boy


Title: Re:
Post by: Autotune on May 11, 2012, 08:32:18 AM
Besides Brian, I can definitely hear Jeff in the mix, and in some places Darian's voice is pretty clear. If you listen really carefully, you can hear Mike on the lower parts.



I don't think Darian or any other member of the background group is on there. Maybe I'm wrong but I can't make out any non-Beach Boy


Yep. Just Jeff.

David's supposed to be singing the unison line after the bridge along with Mike and Al. That's what the video shows and that's what they do live. Can't single out his voice yet, though


Title: Re:
Post by: b00ts on May 11, 2012, 10:46:15 AM
Besides Brian, I can definitely hear Jeff in the mix, and in some places Darian's voice is pretty clear. If you listen really carefully, you can hear Mike on the lower parts.

[And I hope Mr. Barfy-Milk was being facetious...]

This is from another thread, but I figured I'd repost it here. It is my analysis of the vocals, with some help from Lenny and Wirestone.


First verse:


"Tunin in the latest star
From the dashboard of my car..." - Brian

"Cruisin at 7
Push button Heaven" - Brian lead, Bruce and Alan harmony

"Capturing memories from afar" - Bruce doubling lead in left channel

"In my car" - Alan in right channel

"Far...." bass vocal - Michael




First Chorus:


Chorus falsetto parts - Jeff (singing like Carl)

Chorus non-falsetto parts - Bruce is loud in the left channel, possibly Mike and David
                                        Also unison vocals at some points (perhaps three or more BB's singing the same part together)

Low "everywhere you go" - Mike and Dave

Low wordless bass vocal before last "That's Why God..." Mike and/or Dave

"He waved his hand, Gave us rock and roll, the soundtrack for falling in love" - Bruce singing falsetto into regular voice

"Woaahhh" - Brian, of course

last "That's why God made the radio" of the first chorus - Bruce in left channel, Brian in center right



Second Verse:


"Feel the music in the air" - Brian

"Find a song to take us there" - Brian with Al doubling in right channel

"It's Paradise when I lift up my antennae" - Brian with Al harmonizing in right channel and Left channel (two Als!)

"Receiving your signal like a prayer" - Brian with Al doubling in left channel (the second syllable of the word "signal" evinces  Al's trademark vibrato, which I love"

"Like a prayer" - Al



Second Chorus

"That's why God..." non-falsetto - Al, Mike and Brian

Falsetto tag - Jeff again (obviously)

"Everywhere you go" and "Waved his hand" sustained vocals - Al and Bruce?

The last "That's why God made..." - Bruce again, but fades into Brian for the end of the phrase (!?) NB: Just listened again, and it sounds like Bruce's left channel vocal simply fades out before the end of the phrase, a common tack when doubled vocals don't line up well at the end of a phrase



Bridge


Lead vocals - Brian

"To a whole new generation" - Al, Bruce, Mike, David, Jeff (I don't hear Brian in there but he probably is as well)

"That's why God Made, That's why God made..." - Mike in the left channel (His voice has changed but he sounds great). Multitracked voices come into the right channel, doubling the line towards the beginning of the next part

Lead "That's why God made the Radio" - Bruce and Alan



Coda

Bass "That's why God made..." vocal - Mike and Dave

Right channel harmonies - Al and Bruce

Center Right harmonies - Brian and David

"For fallin' in Love" in left channel - Bruce 

Most falsetto and "Goooddddd...." Jeff

3:00 "That's why" in right channel -  Al, killing it as always


Title: Re:
Post by: Rocker on May 11, 2012, 10:52:36 AM


"In my car" - Alan in right channel




That's Bruce. But Al does sing the "capturing mem'ries"


Title: Re:
Post by: Zach95 on May 11, 2012, 04:05:24 PM


"In my car" - Alan in right channel




That's Bruce. But Al does sing the "capturing mem'ries"

No. No that's DEFINITELY Al.


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on May 11, 2012, 04:19:59 PM


"In my car" - Alan in right channel




That's Bruce. But Al does sing the "capturing mem'ries"

No. No that's DEFINITELY Al.

That's Al.  Bruce may be in there as well, as the guys seem to tade off even within certain lines.  But yeah, that's Al


Title: Re: \
Post by: Aegir on May 11, 2012, 04:33:01 PM
Bruce sings that line live. not that that means anything really.


Title: Re: \
Post by: runnersdialzero on May 11, 2012, 04:43:46 PM
Al and Bruce are both singing "In my car" imo


Title: Re:
Post by: southbay on May 11, 2012, 05:00:57 PM
Bruce sings that line live. not that that means anything really.

On Fallon both Al and Bruce sang that line.  On the youtube clip from the Beacon, the camera is on neither of them, but you can clearly hear Al, Bruce not as much


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on May 12, 2012, 04:48:46 AM
They change around some parts for live performances. The studio "in my car" is Bruce. If you can't hear it, compare the two parts directly. And then listen to the other parts Bruce and Al have a lead on. Definitely Bruce


Title: Re: \
Post by: Craig Boyd on May 12, 2012, 05:09:33 AM
They change around some parts for live performances. The studio "in my car" is Bruce. If you can't hear it, compare the two parts directly. And then listen to the other parts Bruce and Al have a lead on. Definitely Bruce

I'm saying it's definitely Bruce. Al may be doubling his part but the upfront voice there is Brucey.


Title: Re: \
Post by: Rocker on May 12, 2012, 05:15:51 AM
They change around some parts for live performances. The studio "in my car" is Bruce. If you can't hear it, compare the two parts directly. And then listen to the other parts Bruce and Al have a lead on. Definitely Bruce

I'm saying it's definitely Bruce. Al may be doubling his part but the upfront voice there is Brucey.


Right. Al is very audible on "capturing mem'ries" and then the voice changes and Bruce takes over. Al is singing the "like a prayer" so it's very easy to compare both parts and see that it is Bruce on "in my car"