The Smiley Smile Message Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
If you like this message board, please help with the hosting costs!
680994
Posts in
27625
Topics by
4067
Members - Latest Member:
Dae Lims
May 13, 2024, 08:34:32 AM
The Smiley Smile Message Board
|
Smiley Smile Stuff
|
General On Topic Discussions
|
Guess You Had To Be There
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
7
Author
Topic: Guess You Had To Be There (Read 33735 times)
The Cincinnati Kid
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 802
Guess You Had To Be There
«
on:
March 24, 2015, 01:43:01 PM »
I know it was already posted in the other thread, but the other songs have their own links for now, so this one might as well, too.
http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/music/a33878/brian-wilson-10-favorite-songs/
Logged
joshferrell
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1634
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #1 on:
March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM »
nevermind..... sorry for this post..
«
Last Edit: March 25, 2015, 10:36:03 AM by joshferrell
»
Logged
alf wiedersehen
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 2178
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #2 on:
March 24, 2015, 01:54:43 PM »
This song is dope.
Logged
joshferrell
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1634
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #3 on:
March 24, 2015, 01:56:54 PM »
wait a minute... How many people (other than I) noticed that this song ends with Beethoven's 5th symphony?
Logged
Rocker
Smiley Smile Associate
Online
Gender:
Posts: 10644
"Too dumb for New York City, too ugly for L.A."
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #4 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:02:45 PM »
Just a quick reaction because I have to go off:
Love it! Brian's really back this time as it seems. Way to go!
Logged
a diseased bunch of mo'fos if there ever was one… their beauty is so awesome that listening to them at their best is like being in some vast dream cathedral decorated with a thousand gleaming American pop culture icons.
- Lester Bangs on The Beach Boys
PRO SHOT BEACH BOYS CONCERTS - LIST
To sum it up, they blew it, they blew it consistently, they continue to blow it, it is tragic and this pathological problem caused The Beach Boys' greatest music to be so underrated by the general public.
- Jack Rieley
bgas
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6372
Oh for the good old days
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #5 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:07:11 PM »
Nice that you can sit and watch Guess, then stay to watch videos for The Right Time, Mini-Mansions, Brian+ Carnie+ Wendy from 1995( DIA), What Love Can Do, NPP trailer, Emile Haynie Falling apart, Runaway Dancer live, Emile Henie Falling Apart live....
Sail Away hit RS today:
http://tinyurl.com/nlej86r
Logged
Nothing I post is my opinion, it's all a message from God
Rocket
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 126
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #6 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:07:32 PM »
Wow, what a track! I don't think it'd be possible to be unhappy while listening to this song.
Brian is 5/5 so far for this album.
I loved That Lucky Old Sun, and I'm sure I'll love this as well.
Logged
timbnash68
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 50
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #7 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM »
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
Logged
Eric Aniversario
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1847
Keep the Summer Alive!
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #8 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:31:03 PM »
Quote from: timbnash68 on March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
I was also surprised at this assertion. I didn't hear auto tune. Really enjoyed this song.
Logged
job
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 431
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #9 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:32:05 PM »
Holy crap...Brian is now 6 for 6 on awesome tunes that have been released in their entirety!
Logged
seltaeb1012002
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1412
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #10 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:48:51 PM »
Damn. So good.
edit: Glad Brian finally decided to do his thing with this chord progression. One of my favorite chord progressions ever. There's something about it (with the right melodies) that is chill inducing.
«
Last Edit: March 24, 2015, 02:54:02 PM by seltaeb1012002
»
Logged
guitarfool2002
Global Moderator
Offline
Posts: 10021
"Barba non facit aliam historici"
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #11 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:50:29 PM »
Quote from: timbnash68 on March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
Well said.
Logged
"All of us have the privilege of making music that helps and heals - to make music that makes people happier, stronger, and kinder. Don't forget: Music is God's voice." - Brian Wilson
Micha
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3133
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #12 on:
March 24, 2015, 02:55:44 PM »
So far my favorite track off the NPP. Just over a week till it's out!
Logged
Ceterum censeo SMiLEBrianum OSDumque esse excludendos banno.
smilethebeachboysloveyou
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 628
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #13 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:05:31 PM »
Anyone else not able to load the video? Whenever I try to click on it, it says "This video is private."
Logged
pixletwin
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4930
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #14 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:28:23 PM »
I like this one too.
Oddly enough, it would sound good on The Flaming Lips Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots. Has a similar feel to those songs.
Logged
Please delete my account
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 872
Please delete my account
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #15 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:34:16 PM »
Quote from: smilethebeachboysloveyou on March 24, 2015, 03:05:31 PM
Anyone else not able to load the video? Whenever I try to click on it, it says "This video is private."
try clicking on a different part of the video (specifically the centre of the "video"). It won't play on the vimeo page, it only plays directly embedded into the Esquire article.
Logged
Please delete my account
HeyJude
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 10090
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #16 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:41:36 PM »
Quote from: timbnash68 on March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
So were you there while the song was being mixed? Definitive "this has autotune!" statements may be overboard, but so is "you're completely wrong!"
I for one am finding it odd that all of a sudden autotuneish-sounding stuff is being explained away by "it's multitracked!" Now, let me back up. I'm not saying I find it odd that listeners are making this assertion. I think, and this is JUST A THEORY, that double tracking (or more) a lead vocal could be used to sort of take the edge off that autotune sound.
Double tracking a lead vocal is obviously a very old method. I'm also willing to stipulate to the fact that double tracking can give an autotune-ish effect to a voice, and I will *also* stipulate to the fact that previous uses of autotune can cause listeners to start assuming or waiting to hear it on the next song/album from an artist, and power of suggestion can go a long way.
But, given how WIDESPREAD the use of autotune-type plug-ins are, and the fact that they HAVE been used by some of the same folks working this new album, as well as the fact that some stuff *does* at least *sound* similar to an autotune effect; these things all tell me it's not far fetched to think that perhaps it has been used here and there to some degree. That doesn't preclude the artists from having done a million takes in the studio, nor does it preclude them from singing it as perfectly as they possibly can. It's not uncommon for a perfectly fine singer and a perfectly fine performance to have autotune gobbed all over their voice.
The mixture of better autotune (again, we're using autotune as a generic term for digital pitch correction plug-ins), a lighter hand on the autotune, then double or tripling he voice, and the mixing it, could take the edge off something like the robo voice heard on parts of TWGMTR.
News flash: We're never going to find out how much, if any autotune has been used. Are there a bunch of examples of artists admitting they use autotune?
So I don't think we should assume anything. But the mere accusation or question of whether autotune has been used should not be meant with an indignant tone.
This new tune sounds fine. It's the most "autotune-ish" sounding thing I've heard off the new album so far. Seriously, at this stage not everyone who suggest autotune might have been used are attacking the album, or the artists. It's like when your favorite band or singer does something you don't like on the track. Like when Al sticks a spoken-word intro on something, or when Mike has to namecheck old BB songs when he writes new lyrics, or when Clapton has to use a bright-sounding Strat on some song that needs a Les Paul and a Marshall stack. It doesn't necessarily make me hate the song. It's just a slight momentary "ah man, I could have done without that".
I'm also open to new "non-autotune" theories. Here's one: Young singers, especially *very* young singers, are now growing up hearing a lot of autotune. Maybe it's not insane to wonder if maybe young singers are using inflections and styles that emulate a bit of that autotune sound, and/or emulate the sound that our brains associate with autotune, and then it all starts sounding the same.
«
Last Edit: March 24, 2015, 03:45:28 PM by HeyJude
»
Logged
THE BEACH BOYS OPINION PAGE IS ON FACEBOOK!!!
http://www.facebook.com/beachboysopinion
- Check out the original "BEACH BOYS OPINION PAGE" Blog -
http://beachboysopinion.blogspot.com/
CenturyDeprived
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 5749
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #17 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:51:47 PM »
Quote from: HeyJude on March 24, 2015, 03:41:36 PM
Quote from: timbnash68 on March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
So were you there while the song was being mixed? Definitive "this has autotune!" statements may be overboard, but so is "you're completely wrong!"
I for one am finding it odd that all of a sudden autotuneish-sounding stuff is being explained away by "it's multitracked!" Now, let me back up. I'm not saying I find it odd that listeners are making this assertion. I think, and this is JUST A THEORY, that double tracking (or more) a lead vocal could be used to sort of take the edge off that autotune sound.
Double tracking a lead vocal is obviously a very old method. I'm also willing to stipulate to the fact that double tracking can give an autotune-ish effect to a voice, and I will *also* stipulate to the fact that previous uses of autotune can cause listeners to start assuming or waiting to hear it on the next song/album from an artist, and power of suggestion can go a long way.
But, given how WIDESPREAD the use of autotune-type plug-ins are, and the fact that they HAVE been used by some of the same folks working this new album, as well as the fact that some stuff *does* at least *sound* similar to an autotune effect; these things all tell me it's not far fetched to think that perhaps it has been used here and there to some degree. That doesn't preclude the artists from having done a million takes in the studio, nor does it preclude them from singing it as perfectly as they possibly can. It's not uncommon for a perfectly fine singer and a perfectly fine performance to have autotune gobbed all over their voice.
The mixture of better autotune (again, we're using autotune as a generic term for digital pitch correction plug-ins), a lighter hand on the autotune, then double or tripling he voice, and the mixing it, could take the edge off something like the robo voice heard on parts of TWGMTR.
News flash: We're never going to find out how much, if any autotune has been used. Are there a bunch of examples of artists admitting they use autotune?
So I don't think we should assume anything. But the mere accusation or question of whether autotune has been used should not be meant with an indignant tone.
This new tune sounds fine. It's the most "autotune-ish" sounding thing I've heard off the new album so far. Seriously, at this stage not everyone who suggest autotune might have been used are attacking the album, or the artists. It's like when your favorite band or singer does something you don't like on the track. Like when Al sticks a spoken-word intro on something, or when Mike has to namecheck old BB songs when he writes new lyrics, or when Clapton has to use a bright-sounding Strat on some song that needs a Les Paul and a Marshall stack. It doesn't necessarily make me hate the song. It's just a slight momentary "ah man, I could have done without that".
I'm also open to new "non-autotune" theories. Here's one: Young singers, especially *very* young singers, are now growing up hearing a lot of autotune. Maybe it's not insane to wonder if maybe young singers are using inflections and styles that emulate a bit of that autotune sound, and/or emulate the sound that our brains associate with autotune, and then it all starts sounding the same.
This.
I haven't even heard the track (I'm abstaining from listening to more from NPP until its release)... but it's impossible to say that there's no autotune on it. If autotune is mixed and implemented properly, it *should* essentially be invisible and not sound robotic. It should be wholly undetectable. I know, because I've used it a touch myself here and there for bum notes, and the moment it becomes even slightly apparent, I make sure to ease back on it.
Bottom line: We know Joe Thomas has used it in the past, it's been blatantly overused on a number of BW tunes (unarguably) over the years, so to think it's out of the question that it would be used on NPP (or on this track) is a bit absurd. For there to be some mythic no-autotune rule that BW would somehow magically implement to his current work, I would think that this would be publicized and pointed out specifically by the artist and/or producer, as a selling point to alleviate concerns to the people who it bugs so much. Since that's not happening, don't automatically expect autotune isn't there, even if it's invisible. Not saying that means it's on every single thing ever these days, but don't be so sure it's not on Joe Thomas product, even if it's less apparent.
Logged
rab2591
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5903
"My God. It's full of stars."
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #18 on:
March 24, 2015, 03:58:43 PM »
Do we know, by any actual source, how much Thomas has had to do with the production/mix of this album?
Logged
Bill Tobelman's
SMiLE site
Quote from: mtaber on September 18, 2021, 07:39:15 AM
God must’ve smiled the day Brian Wilson was born!
"ragegasm" - /rāj • ga-zəm/ : a logical mental response produced when your favorite band becomes remotely associated with the bro-country genre.
Ever want to hear some Beach Boys songs mashed up together like The Beatles' 'LOVE' album? Check out my mix!
Awesoman
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1835
Disagreements? Work 'em out.
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #19 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:01:48 PM »
"Guess You Had To Be There" sounds quite good; "Sail Away" isn't impressing me as much but not bad.
Logged
And if you don't know where you're going
Any road will take you there
HeyJude
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 10090
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #20 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:02:35 PM »
Quote from: rab2591 on March 24, 2015, 03:58:43 PM
Do we know, by any actual source, how much Thomas has had to do with the production/mix of this album?
Nope. He's been in a studio pic or two. It appears at least some of the songs on the album were co-written with Thomas. It was also mentioned that Joe was not in attendance for at least some sessions.
And all of that may or may not have anything to do with how much autotune is used or other post-production decisions are made.
Logged
THE BEACH BOYS OPINION PAGE IS ON FACEBOOK!!!
http://www.facebook.com/beachboysopinion
- Check out the original "BEACH BOYS OPINION PAGE" Blog -
http://beachboysopinion.blogspot.com/
joshferrell
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1634
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #21 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:07:47 PM »
sorry maybe I'm wrong..it could be her Vibrato that sounds like "auto Tune" to my ears.. maybe she just has that vibrato that goes up and down real fast I don't know, because I don't listen to her other stuff so I wouldn't know how her voice sounds.
Logged
timbnash68
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 50
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #22 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:18:40 PM »
Quote from: HeyJude on March 24, 2015, 03:41:36 PM
Quote from: timbnash68 on March 24, 2015, 02:20:29 PM
Quote from: joshferrell on March 24, 2015, 01:52:06 PM
nice thanks..... now this song HAS autotune..at least on Kacey's voice it does..
Sorry, my friend, you are completely wrong. I work at a recording studio here in Nashville. Kacey, according to reliable sources, said that Brian worked on her vocal for several hours until she got it perfect, and then had her multitrack her voice at least 5 times to get that sound. Also, according to her, it was just her and Brian in the studio along with an engineer when she laid the track down. One might conclude that since Kacey doesn't normally multitrack her vocals and Brian was working with her alone, either the engineer in the room forced him to record it that way, or it was his own idea. We really should be better informed when we make definitive statements such as yours.
So were you there while the song was being mixed? Definitive "this has autotune!" statements may be overboard, but so is "you're completely wrong!"
I for one am finding it odd that all of a sudden autotuneish-sounding stuff is being explained away by "it's multitracked!" Now, let me back up. I'm not saying I find it odd that listeners are making this assertion. I think, and this is JUST A THEORY, that double tracking (or more) a lead vocal could be used to sort of take the edge off that autotune sound.
Double tracking a lead vocal is obviously a very old method. I'm also willing to stipulate to the fact that double tracking can give an autotune-ish effect to a voice, and I will *also* stipulate to the fact that previous uses of autotune can cause listeners to start assuming or waiting to hear it on the next song/album from an artist, and power of suggestion can go a long way.
But, given how WIDESPREAD the use of autotune-type plug-ins are, and the fact that they HAVE been used by some of the same folks working this new album, as well as the fact that some stuff *does* at least *sound* similar to an autotune effect; these things all tell me it's not far fetched to think that perhaps it has been used here and there to some degree. That doesn't preclude the artists from having done a million takes in the studio, nor does it preclude them from singing it as perfectly as they possibly can. It's not uncommon for a perfectly fine singer and a perfectly fine performance to have autotune gobbed all over their voice.
The mixture of better autotune (again, we're using autotune as a generic term for digital pitch correction plug-ins), a lighter hand on the autotune, then double or tripling he voice, and the mixing it, could take the edge off something like the robo voice heard on parts of TWGMTR.
News flash: We're never going to find out how much, if any autotune has been used. Are there a bunch of examples of artists admitting they use autotune?
So I don't think we should assume anything. But the mere accusation or question of whether autotune has been used should not be meant with an indignant tone.
This new tune sounds fine. It's the most "autotune-ish" sounding thing I've heard off the new album so far. Seriously, at this stage not everyone who suggest autotune might have been used are attacking the album, or the artists. It's like when your favorite band or singer does something you don't like on the track. Like when Al sticks a spoken-word intro on something, or when Mike has to namecheck old BB songs when he writes new lyrics, or when Clapton has to use a bright-sounding Strat on some song that needs a Les Paul and a Marshall stack. It doesn't necessarily make me hate the song. It's just a slight momentary "ah man, I could have done without that".
I'm also open to new "non-autotune" theories. Here's one: Young singers, especially *very* young singers, are now growing up hearing a lot of autotune. Maybe it's not insane to wonder if maybe young singers are using inflections and styles that emulate a bit of that autotune sound, and/or emulate the sound that our brains associate with autotune, and then it all starts sounding the same.
I was not at the mix of course. Down here in Nashville we pride ourselves in pristine non altered recordings. Kacey is a killer musician. If she was at the mixes i highly doubt if she would allow even Brian to auto tune her voice, especially if she spent hours recording it over and over again more than 5 times. i don't know about previous albums who what when , nor do i care. we will never know. I think that not saying anything at all is not equal to an accusation such as this thrown at a wonderful singer. The accusation is far more damaging than my response. I can think of many hurtful and libelous things someone could write about another person. If someone were called a thief for example saying the person is not does not carry equal weight. But i will agree with you that my choice of words should have been as follows. I would highly doubt that Kacey would have allowed Brian to not only make her sing the lead vocal perfectly five or more times and then stack all of the vocals together, and then auto tune them in the mix. My God at some point don't you think she, her managers or label would have said stop? And once again I cannot imagine Brian having anything to do with it either. Can we please now get back to what a great song and performance these wonderful musicians have given us? Please!
Logged
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 6047
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #23 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:23:41 PM »
So far, all of the songs that have shown up on iTunes have Joe Thomas co-writing credits.
Logged
Amy B.
Smiley Smile Associate
Offline
Posts: 1654
Re: Guess You Had To Be There
«
Reply #24 on:
March 24, 2015, 04:27:35 PM »
Reposting what I wrote in the other thread. This is where I meant to put it.
I'm not a recording expert, and I've never heard her voice on anything else, that I know of. I do know that there's something artificial I'm hearing...some sort of effect. I can't imagine that if she were to sing live, into a microphone, with no effects on her voice, she would sound like that. If she does, I guess I just don't like her voice. But I can overlook that because I love the song.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> BRIAN WILSON Q & A
=> Welcome to the Smiley Smile board
=> General On Topic Discussions
===> Ask The Honored Guests
===> Smiley Smile Reference Threads
=> Smile Sessions Box Set (2011)
=> The Beach Boys Media
=> Concert Reviews
=> Album, Book and Video Reviews And Discussions
===> 1960's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1970's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1980's Beach Boys Albums
===> 1990's Beach Boys Albums
===> 21st Century Beach Boys Albums
===> Brian Wilson Solo Albums
===> Other Solo Albums
===> Produced by or otherwise related to
===> Tribute Albums
===> DVDs and Videos
===> Book Reviews
===> 'Rank the Tracks'
===> Polls
-----------------------------
Non Smiley Smile Stuff
-----------------------------
=> General Music Discussion
=> General Entertainment Thread
=> Smiley Smilers Who Make Music
=> The Sandbox
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.176 seconds with 22 queries.
Helios Multi
design by
Bloc
Loading...