gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
682979 Posts in 27751 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine July 13, 2025, 01:28:14 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Singles seperate from albums  (Read 3610 times)
OneEar/OneEye
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 321


View Profile
« on: October 11, 2010, 12:26:25 PM »

I'm curious about the way the British record industry operated regarding singles and albums.   The standard apparently was that singles didn't appear on albums, but of course SOME did, while others did not.   Why was this?  Was the British record industry really less greedy than its USA counterpart?   Not generally wishing to make the consumer pay for the same songs they'd just bought on singles on the albums too?   I'm thinking specifically of the Beatles, but this would go for all British acts.  George Martin has said that Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields Forever had to be excluded from Peppers because it had been released as a single when one was needed, but why?  Eleanor Rigby/Yellow Submarine had appeared on revolver AND as a single.  Was It just because the beatles wanted it that way?    I think it was cool that they had that sort of system in the British market because I like stand alone singles, but I don't really understand the reasons for how it was. 
Logged
Rocker
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10806


"Too dumb for New York City, too ugly for L.A."


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2010, 01:36:03 PM »

I don't know, but Elvis' singles also didn't appear on his albums already in the 50s
Logged

a diseased bunch of mo'fos if there ever was one… their beauty is so awesome that listening to them at their best is like being in some vast dream cathedral decorated with a thousand gleaming American pop culture icons.

- Lester Bangs on The Beach Boys


PRO SHOT BEACH BOYS CONCERTS - LIST


To sum it up, they blew it, they blew it consistently, they continue to blow it, it is tragic and this pathological problem caused The Beach Boys' greatest music to be so underrated by the general public.

- Jack Rieley
OneEar/OneEye
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 321


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2010, 07:34:48 AM »

I don't know, but Elvis' singles also didn't appear on his albums already in the 50s

Was that in the UK or in the US? 
Logged
Rocker
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10806


"Too dumb for New York City, too ugly for L.A."


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2010, 07:25:09 PM »

I don't know, but Elvis' singles also didn't appear on his albums already in the 50s

Was that in the UK or in the US? 


US, but I probably the same in the UK because the albums didn't differ
Logged

a diseased bunch of mo'fos if there ever was one… their beauty is so awesome that listening to them at their best is like being in some vast dream cathedral decorated with a thousand gleaming American pop culture icons.

- Lester Bangs on The Beach Boys


PRO SHOT BEACH BOYS CONCERTS - LIST


To sum it up, they blew it, they blew it consistently, they continue to blow it, it is tragic and this pathological problem caused The Beach Boys' greatest music to be so underrated by the general public.

- Jack Rieley
gfx
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.121 seconds with 21 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!