gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
683274 Posts in 27763 Topics by 4096 Members - Latest Member: MrSunshine August 02, 2025, 04:16:53 PM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchCalendarLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.       « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: I have proof!!!  (Read 8543 times)
Ganz Allein
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 203


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 15, 2010, 09:39:15 PM »

If this is from 1970, this is a good example of how Brian's voice in '70 HAD deteriorated since '66, even though it's not immediately obvious from listening to his vocals on record at the time (and which a lot of people have questioned, suggesting that his voice was pretty much untouched until '74).  He still had a lot of his range and the youthful tone to his voice, but it had gotten harder to control and required a lot more effort to sing.  It's also worth a reminder that your ability to sing can vary drastically from day to day, and if your health is poor it can create all kinds of issues with inflammation, sinus infections, etc., that can mess with your voice as well.  Some of that was probably in play...and drug use, particularly cocaine and pot smoking, can mess with your voice pretty badly too.

I think another factor in the late '60s decline of Brian's voice is that he probably wasn't singing regularly any more. After he stopped touring with the BBs he was still recording a lot of vocal parts, but after '67 he started to relinquish more and more parts to the other guys.


After '74 the basic tone of Brian's voice changed drastically and it was nearly impossible to cover up (though they managed it on MIU), but a lot of other other issues were already in play...they just didn't prevent getting a good vocal take on record, necessarily.

By the time of the Jim Pewter interview (summer? fall?) 1974, Brian's speaking voice is already noticeably lower.  Pitch-wise it's not too far from the way it would sound by '76, although it doesn't have any of the gravelly quality that it took on by that time.  It's surprising to me that those who've heard the '74 California Feeling report that it sounds about 75% like the old Brian. Then again his falsetto sounds pretty good on the late '74 Rollin' Up to Heaven.  Apparently whatever he did to sabotage his voice in '75 took it quickly to the point of no return.
Logged
Jason
Guest
« Reply #26 on: April 15, 2010, 09:54:48 PM »

Really ?  I figured they did that because they can't spell in the first place.

O snap i kno! dood she's like totes dum ud think she never gradu8ed nizzle!
Logged
adamghost
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2116



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 16, 2010, 01:50:36 PM »

If this is from 1970, this is a good example of how Brian's voice in '70 HAD deteriorated since '66, even though it's not immediately obvious from listening to his vocals on record at the time (and which a lot of people have questioned, suggesting that his voice was pretty much untouched until '74).  He still had a lot of his range and the youthful tone to his voice, but it had gotten harder to control and required a lot more effort to sing.  It's also worth a reminder that your ability to sing can vary drastically from day to day, and if your health is poor it can create all kinds of issues with inflammation, sinus infections, etc., that can mess with your voice as well.  Some of that was probably in play...and drug use, particularly cocaine and pot smoking, can mess with your voice pretty badly too.

I think another factor in the late '60s decline of Brian's voice is that he probably wasn't singing regularly any more. After he stopped touring with the BBs he was still recording a lot of vocal parts, but after '67 he started to relinquish more and more parts to the other guys.


After '74 the basic tone of Brian's voice changed drastically and it was nearly impossible to cover up (though they managed it on MIU), but a lot of other other issues were already in play...they just didn't prevent getting a good vocal take on record, necessarily.

By the time of the Jim Pewter interview (summer? fall?) 1974, Brian's speaking voice is already noticeably lower.  Pitch-wise it's not too far from the way it would sound by '76, although it doesn't have any of the gravelly quality that it took on by that time.  It's surprising to me that those who've heard the '74 California Feeling report that it sounds about 75% like the old Brian. Then again his falsetto sounds pretty good on the late '74 Rollin' Up to Heaven.  Apparently whatever he did to sabotage his voice in '75 took it quickly to the point of no return.

REALLY good point about not singing regularly anymore.  You're right, that was probably the overriding factor with everything else just contributing.

I'm one of the ones that heard "California Feeling" and yeah, he's pretty good on there for awhile, but you can tell there's some stuff he just can't get.  He also seemed (to my ears) to lose focus towards the end of the song, so it may be that there was a force of effort required to get the notes out.  I've also heard one other song from a little later in '74 that is almost exactly 50-50 old-new Brian.  The final change seems to have come on pretty rapidly.
Logged
TdHabib
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1150



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 16, 2010, 02:22:08 PM »

I've never quite understood how people can say "Rollin' Up to Heaven" is vintage Brian; he sounds good on it, the pitch is good and clear but he's nasal and straining. IMO he had already declined. Once again, his '76 voice is gruffer and not even close pitch-wsie, but he was getting older already and the falsetto was already leaving him by '72, in 1972 he did some good stuff but none of his great falsettos like "Awake" the year before. I'd say '71 was the last time he sounded unquestionably great and vintage Brian.
Logged

I like the Beatles a bit more than the Boys of Beach, I think Brian's band is the tops---really amazing. And finally, I'm liberal. That's it.
BJL
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Online Online

Posts: 363


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 16, 2010, 06:38:10 PM »

In terms of losing the falsetto, even in the late 60s it wasn't what it had been. 
For example, Add Some Music; listening to the vocal only mix especially, you can really hear how nasal and weak his falsetto has become, especially compared to something like Hushabye, where his falsetto is practically a force of nature, 6 years earlier. 
Logged
♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇
Pissing off drunks since 1978
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11874


🍦🍦 Pet Demon for Sale - $5 or best offer ☮☮


View Profile WWW
« Reply #30 on: April 16, 2010, 10:20:51 PM »

Agreed. The coke  (thus, more smoking) brought it on, but after Murry died, from my understanding, that's when he REALLY started hitting the powder hard. Also...was he shooting up heroin, or was he smoking it? If it was the latter, that would explain a whole hell of a lot. For those who are familiar with Stone Temple Pilots...right after Purple is when Weiland started smoking heroin. That, his heavy coke usage, and a brief flirtation with crack (!) led to his own much changed voice by the next album...
Logged

Need your song mixed/mastered? Contact me at fear2stop@yahoo.com. Serious inquiries only, please!
Amazing Larry
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 552


There's a new daddy in town...


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: April 16, 2010, 11:57:54 PM »

Agreed. The coke  (thus, more smoking) brought it on, but after Murry died, from my understanding, that's when he REALLY started hitting the powder hard. Also...was he shooting up heroin, or was he smoking it? If it was the latter, that would explain a whole hell of a lot. For those who are familiar with Stone Temple Pilots...right after Purple is when Weiland started smoking heroin. That, his heavy coke usage, and a brief flirtation with crack (!) led to his own much changed voice by the next album...
Brief flirtation with crack? When?
Logged

A discipline daddy.
Andrew G. Doe
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17767


The triumph of The Hickey Script !


View Profile WWW
« Reply #32 on: April 17, 2010, 01:31:42 AM »

Agreed. The coke  (thus, more smoking) brought it on, but after Murry died, from my understanding, that's when he REALLY started hitting the powder hard. Also...was he shooting up heroin, or was he smoking it? If it was the latter, that would explain a whole hell of a lot. For those who are familiar with Stone Temple Pilots...right after Purple is when Weiland started smoking heroin. That, his heavy coke usage, and a brief flirtation with crack (!) led to his own much changed voice by the next album...
Brief flirtation with crack? When?

Late seventies. Reportedly, the final straw for Marilyn was when she came home one day and found Brian in the hallway, trying to get Carnie, who was nine, ten or so at the time, to snort some horse with him. I've never seen this denied by any of the principals.
Logged

The four sweetest words in my vocabulary: "This poster is ignored".
♩♬🐸 Billy C ♯♫♩🐇
Pissing off drunks since 1978
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11874


🍦🍦 Pet Demon for Sale - $5 or best offer ☮☮


View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: April 17, 2010, 07:42:12 AM »

LOL I was referring to Scott Weiland's drug use, and comparing it to Brian's (as both went through a REAL noticeable vocal change in a short time span). He did crack for about a month in 1995.

But back to Brian...so he *was* snorting heroin. That will certainly screw up someone's voice. But if he wasn't doing it in 1974 or 1975, then that wasn't to blame.
Logged

Need your song mixed/mastered? Contact me at fear2stop@yahoo.com. Serious inquiries only, please!
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5992



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2010, 08:38:34 PM »

The thing about Brian's voice that's confusing(at least to me) is the fact that when he lost his voice, it wasn't just hoarse. The whole tone of his voice changed...even his speaking voice. Listen to him in 1970, then listen to him five or six years later. It doesn't even sound like the same person. It's a 100% change in his voice. NOTHING of his younger voice was left. Even when he tried to do falsetto, it sounded like a different person. He did a decent job at first(Sherry She Needs Me for example), but even then it didn't sound like Brian singing.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2010, 10:34:21 AM »

"Don't You Just Know It" has signs of a 15 Big Ones sounding Brian?

That's news to me - I think he sounds great there, and sounds just like every other late 60s/early 70s Brian vocal, to me.
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
runnersdialzero
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5143


I WILL NEVER GO TO SCHOOL


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: April 19, 2010, 10:38:38 AM »

Agreed. The coke  (thus, more smoking) brought it on, but after Murry died, from my understanding, that's when he REALLY started hitting the powder hard. Also...was he shooting up heroin, or was he smoking it? If it was the latter, that would explain a whole hell of a lot. For those who are familiar with Stone Temple Pilots...right after Purple is when Weiland started smoking heroin. That, his heavy coke usage, and a brief flirtation with crack (!) led to his own much changed voice by the next album...

The sad thing is, Weiland sounded a thousand times better after that, to me. I'm thinking of the Tiny Music album - I couldn't get into much else after that, but I enjoy his style on that album about a thousand times more than their first two albums. He tended to sound like a typical asshole rawker sh*t head of the era on those, although the songwriting was noice enough.

Brian, on the other hand, didn't benefit from it Sad
Logged

Tell me it's okay.
Tell me you still love me.
People make mistakes.
People make mistakes.
adamghost
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2116



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: April 20, 2010, 02:26:29 PM »

"Don't You Just Know It" has signs of a 15 Big Ones sounding Brian?

That's news to me - I think he sounds great there, and sounds just like every other late 60s/early 70s Brian vocal, to me.

There's a difference between sounding like his later voice (which I don't think anybody said), and there being ample evidence that his voice had deteriorated by that point (which I think we all said).
Logged
Jason
Guest
« Reply #38 on: April 20, 2010, 06:45:38 PM »

Brian was certainly using cocaine as early as 1968 if not the bare end of 1967. The heroin came in around 1974-75 or so, although it became much worse by 1977. Look at the Largo footage. If that concert ever gets an official release, virtually every shot of Brian will be edited out for one good reason - he's rubbing his nose every ten seconds it seems. Apparently Brian and Dennis' absence during the middle part of the show was for the two of them to share moonrocks* with each other.

*Moonrocks are the smoked equivalent of speedballs aka cocaine and heroin in one hit.
Logged
Amazing Larry
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 552


There's a new daddy in town...


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: April 21, 2010, 07:33:08 PM »

Brian was certainly using cocaine as early as 1968 if not the bare end of 1967.
Why do you say that?
I always thought it started in 1971, but that's just me.
Logged

A discipline daddy.
Jason
Guest
« Reply #40 on: April 21, 2010, 07:34:52 PM »

Peter Carlin mentioned it in his book, and I believe Danny Hutton mentioned it at one point - he would know too, he apparently was the one who gave it to Brian!
Logged
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5992



View Profile
« Reply #41 on: April 21, 2010, 08:40:00 PM »

I think it states in Brian's "autobiography" that the cocaine started around the 20/20 period. I don't know how much faith I would put into that though.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5992



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: April 21, 2010, 08:42:43 PM »

Peter Carlin mentioned it in his book, and I believe Danny Hutton mentioned it at one point - he would know too, he apparently was the one who gave it to Brian!
Have you by chance read Chuck Negron's autobiography? It talks a lot about Danny HUtton, and how messed up he got. To put it in a polite way....I don't think Danny Hutton would know his nose if it were on his own face.  Grin It's literally a miracle that the man remembers his own name.
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
Jason
Guest
« Reply #43 on: April 21, 2010, 10:43:16 PM »

It certainly adds fuel to the Lovester's stance on the "hangers-on" during the Smile period.
Logged
Alex
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2666



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: April 22, 2010, 10:25:20 AM »

It certainly adds fuel to the Lovester's stance on the "hangers-on" during the Smile period.

I've always liked the hangers-on...the Vosse Posse!
Logged

"I thought Brian was a perfect gentleman, apart from buttering his head and trying to put it between two slices of bread"  -Tom Petty, after eating with Brian.
Wirestone
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6063



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: April 22, 2010, 10:39:10 AM »

Hutton stayed around far after the Smile sessions, though, right?
Logged
grillo
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 725



View Profile
« Reply #46 on: April 22, 2010, 12:19:47 PM »

Hutton stayed around far after the Smile sessions, though, right?
Sure. Isn't Redwood Hutton's group? That's at least a year later. Plus I thought he was involved in the Iggy Pop Shortenin' Bread scene in '70 or so.
Logged

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
― Richard Buckminster Fuller
Jason
Guest
« Reply #47 on: April 22, 2010, 07:36:27 PM »

Technically Danny Hutton was around through thick and thin in Brian's life.
Logged
Jay
Smiley Smile Associate
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5992



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: April 22, 2010, 08:57:27 PM »

Look at the Largo footage. If that concert ever gets an official release, virtually every shot of Brian will be edited out for one good reason - he's rubbing his nose every ten seconds it seems. Apparently Brian and Dennis' absence during the middle part of the show was for the two of them to share moonrocks* with each other.*Moonrocks are the smoked equivalent of speedballs aka cocaine and heroin in one hit.
Where did you hear/read about that?
Logged

A son of anarchy surrounded by the hierarchy.
Jason
Guest
« Reply #49 on: April 22, 2010, 09:09:21 PM »

Watch the Largo footage! It's obvious as hell. They both came back onstage after All This Is That and it's quite obvious that the two of them are f***ed up out of their minds on the sh*t.
Logged
gfx
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.313 seconds with 20 queries.
Helios Multi design by Bloc
gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!